ML20108D898
| ML20108D898 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 11/01/1983 |
| From: | Gilinsky V NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Uhl W LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20105B503 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-250 NUDOCS 8412130477 | |
| Download: ML20108D898 (1) | |
Text
.-
i It cqq'e:
p UNITED STATES 4
y ' ~ w, I,%
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j 9, ',i-i' ' " n,E wAssincTon. O.c. 20sss
- j*-is.f4
)
,e g *,~.-
,,+
' CFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER November 1, 1983 Wilfred C Chl President Long Isla.d Lighting Company 250 Old Country Road Mineola, New York 11501
Dear Mr. Uhl,
Thank. you for writing me about your decision to drop the
" advisor" system for shif t operating personnel and to hire.
permanent experienced operators.
I had not yet heard about.
this from our staff.
Needless to say, I think this puts you on a sounder course.
S'
- erely,
.s VictorGilinsIy Commissioner I
.c I
i
.7 8412130477 840521 PDR FOIA i
BELAIR84-250 PDR s
y pu A/de _ ~ up f) ;&. -
3
+
1 Fedeial Ernergency Management Agency g
Washington, D.C. 20472 DEC 221983 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Edward L. Jordan Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response O'ffice of Inspection and Enforcement
'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission FROM:
a Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Programs
SUBJECT:
Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) Review of Long Island Lighting Company (LILCO) Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station On October 27, 1983, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) asked for an extension of 60 days (i.e., until February 1,1984) to complete a thorough, detailed RAC review of Revision 1 of the LILCO Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. Via your men.orandum of November 10, 1983, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) granted that extension but requested that FEMA include Revision 2 in the RAC review.
This had already been delivered to RAC members.
In addition, via a letter of December 8, 1983,"from Hunton and Williams, legal counsel for LILCO, FEMA received an amended list of effective pages of Revision 2.
Finally, on December 14, 1983, FEMA was notified by Hunton and Williams that Revision 3 of the plan would be received during the week of December 19, 1983.
l FEMA will make every effort to complete the review of the LILCO Tratisition Plan including Revisions 2 and 3 as close to February 1, 1984 as pcssible provided we receive the required material f rom LILCO no later than January 3,1984.
However, based on a preliminary examination of Revision 2 and preliminary
~
information on Revision 3, some additional time beyond the originally projected date of February 1,1984, will probably be needed to assure a comprehensive analysis of the plans by a full RAC review.
In order to give FEMA's analysir l
and finding to NRC as soon as possible, we will need prompt distribution of the collated LILCO Transii: ion Plan to all RAC members no'later than January 3,1984, l
It is Including Revision 3, with appropriate cross-references to NUREG-0654.
C4 our understanding that LILCO intends to provide FEMA and the RAC members with
[N comprehensive' plans that incorporate both Revisions 2 and 3.
Upon receipt of these plans and the cross-referencing mentioned below, a full, independent RAC review will begin.
d >"
In the interest of ef ficiency and ef fective utilization of RAC members and FEMA's resources, we request that the utility also prepare a matrix which identifies f
page changes affected by each revision of the plan with references to NUREG-0654.
This matrix should be updated with each revision that is submitted in order to provide all reviewers with a chronological record of changes that have been I
This matrix will facilitate quick reference to specific pages and affected.
g]
allow reviewers to more resdily assess the quality and effect of the changes M
that have b2en instituted as the plan and procedures hase evolved to their current The suggested format is provided in the Attachment 1.
status.
,s -
t*
In addition to the above matrix, FEMA also requests that a narrative description of the reason (s) for each change (i.e., actions, clarifications, etc. in response to FEMA comments, contentions, improvements, minor changes, etc.) be submitted with each revision of the plan and procedures.
This narrative description should also be indexed by NUREG-0654 element.
At present, we have a sub'stantial workload associated with operating nuclear reactors which will have to be postponed if FEMA attempts to meet the February 1, 1984, deadline.
The Regional Assistance Committee has ^other agency commitments in addition to the REP work for our Region and cannot devote 100% of their time to Shoreham.
As a result of this effort for Shoreham, FEMA /RAC may delay the completion of 44 CFR 350 reports for the operating nuclear reactors in the Region.
Attachment as Stated O
m 6^
l e
4 4
J
_ _... _ _ _. _ _. _ -. _ __ _. _ -. _, _ _., _. ~ -. _., _ _.... _ _ _. _.., _ _ _,
7 4
1 j
WE:2CWENE I l
6 Itevisicra e h aeul art e G pegg s MW aland i
O 1
2 3
a A.1.a A.I.b A_.1. _c A.I.d A.1.e l
A.2.a A.2.b
_ A.3 A.4 L
r
$e P.10 e
4 o
G e e
g 90 t
e e
O e
g G
S g
D O
e G
e 4
4 e
O O
e 9
0 e
O 4 6
g 9
g e
q eq 9 O e e I
e i
e 1
e
n-~n-wn.w-n---,,,,,,.n,
-. - - - - _ _.. -,,_---,--, _,~ ~. --- --..,.--- ---
~ ~ ~ - -