ML20083L917
| ML20083L917 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 12/20/1982 |
| From: | Mccracken C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Macdonald D OHIO, STATE OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20079G498 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-83-243, FOIA-83-A-18 NUDOCS 8301060232 | |
| Download: ML20083L917 (2) | |
Text
.q: 999jgyuyhitg*/a 4%ft %g' f[+ [
y :Q L.- &A 9" J y [ T.-
f
- _ g _.,.
x u,t ' yt l,f.:.
.- gy m, y..g,
.'\\
,; :- 3~
1,[
{^f.. ?.. [. -fd'Ahy[,.
~
g g
3, DISTRIBUTION
'S i
Centro file c
x f(L(j' C.MEB reading file I
w-
[0 $Y9 DEC 2 0 7s62
{
4 c
?
1 1 !
i l i
MEMORAMOUM FOR:
T. Shook, FRC j l, 1
THRU:
Victor Benaroya, Chief Chemical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering il FROM:
Conrad McCracken, Section Leader k
Cheetcal Engineering Branch Division of Engineering j
j
SUBJECT:
REVIEV Of GPUNC TOPICAL REPORT 008 (RETURN TO 4
SERVICE AFTER STEAM GENERATOR REPAIR)
Attached is the licensee's safety assessment, dated 12/7/8}, pertaining to restart subsequent to the OTSG repairs.
Please review the licensee's safety assessment and provide your TER's consistent with the following schedule.
t 1/7/83:
Requests for additional information to C. McCracken i
(preliminary staff review will be concurrent with contractors so that additional information requests from the staf f are also completed by 1/7/83).
f i
1/10-14/83:
Meeting (s)/telecon(s) with the licensee to receive additional information as needed.
1/28/83:
Oraf t TER's due.
2/11/83:
Staf f comments on draf t TER's to contractors (staf f initiate preparation of SER).
2/25/83:
Final TER's cue.
3/11/83:
Draft restart SER completed
.o
.r.
v
q.
II s
~~~~-+n.v a
i 2
The TER's should be based primarily on review of the attached topical report and the periodic analysis reports which have b+en provided by meno from the staff.
In instances where the review is based on data presented vert > ally or as handouts at meetings, be sure to include the date of the meeting and identify the infomation which was received verbally.
3 Conrad McCracken, Section Leader Chemical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
w/o enclosure w/encloswee POR 50-289 P. Wu R. Vollmer J. Rajan D. Eisenhut L. Frank W. Johnston T. shook, FRC T. Novak D. MacDonald, Ohio State G. Lainas R. 01111en, Pitt J. Kalght J. Weeks, BNL J. Stolz C. Dodd, ORK C. Cheng
- 9. Sellers S. Yeung
- 5. Kirslis R. Jacobs S. Paulickt T. Sellivan H. Conrad B. Liaw P. Grant
- _ _ - __ M LCM M _,'~
M](63% %i
_j
m c
(.-
GPU Nuclear Corporation
[W 1 Nuclear
- =9xsotteo e
Mico!etown.Pennsy.vania ? 7057 717 944-7621 TELEX 84-2386 Writer"s Direct Dial Numcer March 31, 1983 5211-83-098 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn: John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Sir:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1)
Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Steam Generator Repair (Topical Report 008, Rev. 2)
Attached for your information is Revision 2 to the subject topical report.
This revision provides updated information and responses to the questions in your letter dated February 7, 1983. This report and its conclusio.
addresses return of TMI-l to service after repair of the steam generators as reported in Licensee Event Report (LER) 6A-013.
Other plant equipeent which has been identified as damaged by sulfer (the Waste Gas System and PORV) will be addressed separately by a closecut report for LER 82-11 and 83-03.
Since the attached report contains proprietary information, it should be withheld from public disclosure per 10 CFR 2.790.
Sincerely, 9
if. Y cf kill Director, TMI-l HDH: CWS :vj f 0 -(
Attachments: 1) Topical Report 008, Rev. 2
- 2) Affidavit n ;;;;;;G7 000001 -
PDR ADOCK 05000289 p
PDR GPU Nuc! ear Corporation is a subscary et the General Putoc utihties Cerocrat:en
Babcock &Wilcox AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES H.
TAYLOR A.
My name is James H.
Taylor.
I am Manager of Licensing in the Nuclear Power Generation Division of Babcock & Wilcox, and-as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.
B.
I am f amiliar with the criteria applied by Babcock & Wilcox to de-te-mine whether certain i n 'o rma -i o n o# 3abcock & Wilcox is proprietary and I am f amiliar wi tn tne procecures estaciisnec witni Babcock & Wilcox, particularly the Nuclear Power Generation Division (NPGD), to ensure the proper application of these criteria.
C.
In determining whether a Babcock & Wilcox document is to be classi-fied as proprietary information, an initial determination is made by the unit manager who is responsible for originating the document as to whether it falls within the criteria set forth in paragraoh D hereof.
If the information f alls wi thin any one of these criteria, it is classified as proprietary by the originating unit manager.
This initial determination is reviewed by the cognizant section manager.
If the document is designated as' proprietary, it is re-viewed again by Licensing personnel and other management within NPGD as designated by the Manager of Licensing to assure tnat the regulatory requirements of 10 CFR Section 2.790 are met.
D.
The following information is provided to demonstrate that the pro-visions of 10 CFR Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations
^
l have been considered:
l (i)
The information has been held in confidence by the Babcock &
Wilcox Company.
Copies of tne document are clearly identified l
as proprietary.
In addition, whenever Babcock.& Wilcox l
transmits the information to a customer, customer's agent, potential customer or regulatory agency, the transmittal re-quests the recipient to hold the information as proprietary.
Also, in order to strictly limit any potential or' actual customer's use of proprietary informatien, the following
Babcock &Wilcox AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES H. TAYLOR (Cont'd) provision is includ'ed in all procosals submitted by Sabcock
& Wilcox, and an applicable version of the proprietary provision is included in all of Babcock & Wilcox's contracts:
" Purchaser may retain Company's Proposal for use in g--a
.,s-s 3_
y;- :..-
for that purpose, make such copies thereof as may be necessary.
Any proprietary information concerning Company's or its Suppliers' products or manufacturing proces'es which is so designa ted by Company or i ts s
Suppliers and disclosed to Purchaser incident to the performance of such contract shall remain the property
.. of Company or its Suppliers and is disclosed in confi-dence, and Purchaser shall not publish or otherwise disclose it to others without the written approval of Company, and no rights, implied or otherwise, are granted to produce or have produced any products or to practice or cause to be practiced any manufacturing processes covered thereby.
Notwithstanding the above, Purchaser may provide the NRC or any other regulatory agency with any such pro-prietary information as the NRC or such other agency may require; provided, however, that Purchaser shall first give Company written notice of such proposed disclosure and Company shall have the right to amend such proprietary information so as to make i t non-pro-prietary.
In the event that Company cannot amend such proprietary information, Purchaser shall, prior to disclosing such information, use its best efforts to obtain a commi tmen t from NRC or such other agency to have such information withheld from public inspection.
(2)
1 Babcock &Wilcox AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES H. TAYLOR (Cont'd)
Company shall be given the right to participate in pursuit of such confidential treatment."
(ii) The following criteria are customarily applied by Babcock &
Wilcox in a rational decision process to determine whether the
' ' : - i t ' :.- :M:::t b2 ::::.at 1: - : - ' : : --
~:---'--
may be classified as proprietary if one or more of tne following criteria are met.
a.
Information reveals cost or price information, commercial strategies, production capabilities, or budget levels of Babcock & Wilcox, its cus tomers or suppliers.
b.
The information reveals data or material concerning Babcock s
& Wilcox research or development plans or programs of present or potential competitive acvantage to Babcock &
Wilcox.
c.
The use of the information by a competitor would decrease his expenditures, in time or resources, in designing, producing or marketing a similar product.
d.
The information consists of test data or other similar data concerni.ng a process, methed or component, the application or which results in a competitive advantage to Babcock &
- Wilcox, e.
The information reveals special aspects of a process, method, component or the like, the exclusive use of which resul ts in a competitive advantage to Babcock & Wilcox.
f.
The information contains ideas for which patent protection may be sought.
(3)
=l
BabcockI.Wilcox AFFI0AVIT OF JAMES H.
TAYLOR (Cont'd)
The document (s) listed on Exhibit "A",
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, has been evaluated in accordance wi th normal Babcock & Wilcox procedures with respect to classification and has been found to contain information which falls within one or more of the cri teria enumera ted above.
Exhibit "B",
which is attached hereto and made a cart hereof, s:ecificallv i d e n ti fi e s tne criteria applicaole to tne document (s) listed in Exnibit " A .
(iii) The document (s) listed in Exhibit "A",
which has been made avail-able to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission was made available in confidence with a request tha t the document (s) and the information contained therein be withheld from public disclosure.
(iv) The information is not available in the open literature and to the best of our knowledge is,not known by Combustion Engineering, EXXON, General Electric, Westi,nghouse or other current or potential domestic or foreign competi tors of B&W.
(v) Specific information with regard to whether public disclosure of the information is likely to cause harm to the competitive position of Babcock & Wilcox, taking into account the value of the information to Babcock & Wilcox; the amount of effort or money l
expended by Babcock & Wilcox developing the information; and the ease or difficulty with which the information could be properly duplicated by others is given in Exhibit "B".
E.
I have personally reviewed the document (s) listed on Exhibit "A" and have found that it is considered proprietary by Babcock & Wilcox l
because it contains information which f alls within one or more of
_ the criteria enumerated in Paragraph D, and it is information whici:
is custcmar,ily held in confidence and protected as proprietary in-formation by Babcock & Wilcox.
This report comprises information utilited by Babcock & Wilcox in its business which afford Babcock
& Wilcox an opportunity to obtain a competitive advantage over (4) 1
.J
~-
.n,,
~
Babcock &Wilcox those who may wish to know or use the information contained in the document (s).
JAMES'H. TAYLOR StateofVirginia)
)
SS.
Lynchburg City of Lynchburg)
James H. Taylor, being duly sworn, on his oath deposes and says that he is the person who subscribed his name to the foregoing statement, and that the matters and facts set forth in the statement are true.
t JAMESH.,7IYLOR
/
Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 771+v4 1983.
v A / Y Y ]s r U rxD Notary Public in and for the City of Lynchburg, State of Virginia My Comission Expires /CZML A9J973 (5)
$abcock&WilCcx Exh ib i t A
" Assessment of TiiI-l Plant Safety for Return to Service After Steam Generator Repair"- GPUN Topical Report ilo. 008, Rev. 2.
9 es 9
e
Babcock &Wilcox Exhibit B Descriotion of Material Acolicable Criteria
" Assessment of TMI-l Plant Safety for B, C, D & E Return to Service After Steam Generator Recair", GPUN Topical Recort No. 008, 09"
?
Portions as noted below:
Fig.1 - 4 Section III D & E Pages 25, 26, 27 & 28 Section V A 2 Pages 34 & 35 Section V C la Item 6, page 38 Section V C lb, ic, ld & le Pages 38 through 42 Section V C 2a, 2b & 2c Pages 42 & 43 Section V D 2 Pages 45, 46 & 47 Section VI C Pages 52 & 53 (to but not including VI D) 4 e
I
-c