ML20081L646
| ML20081L646 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1983 |
| From: | Partlow J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20079F427 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-35 NUDOCS 8311160367 | |
| Download: ML20081L646 (3) | |
Text
Q*
/
og UNITED STATES
]-
,\\
g g
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
\\
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%, vqy November 9, 1983 Docket Nos. 50-400 and 50-401
)
?~
MEMORANDUM-FOR:
B. J. Yobngblood, Chi.ef',
Licensing Branch #1 Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
James G. Partlow, Acting Director Division of Quality Assurance, Safeguards, and Inspection Programs
SUBJECT:
HARRIS.DR FT SER.SECTION 17 Per the request of the LPM, we have reviewed the subject document. We find it acceptable except in the area of what items will be subject to the appli-
. cant's 10 CFR 50 Appendix B QA program during the operations phase.
There has beep progress made in thi,s area sirice the subject document was prepared.
~
' reflects the current status of this effort and should be used in the SER if the applicant does not satisfactorily rey-ise its response to our tequest for additional information in this area in time for the SER to reflect this fact.
If we receive an acceptable revision of the applicant's response to our request in time, enclosure 2 should be used in the SER, showing the acceptability of the QA program description for safety-related items as described in the FSAR for the operations pha:;e of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant.
Any qucstions regarding the items subject to QA should be addressed to Jack Spraul on ext. 24530. Any questions regarding the QA program itself should be addressed,
to John Gilray on ext. 29592.
...,\\% c4 James G. Partlow, Acting Director Divifion of Quality Assurance, Safeguards, and Inspection Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosures:
1.
Current Status 2.
Acceptability of QA Prograni cc w/ enclosures:
M Copy ~Hg3 gGen Sen! jo pgg J. Holonich B. Buckley l
b h0 h
)
ENCLOSbRE1 i
and deficiencies are effectively corrected and that the corrective action j.
precludes repe~titive occurrences.-
'i7 4' Conclusions
~~~
Based on its detailed review and evaluation of the QA program as described in FSAR Section 17.2, the staff concludes that (1) The organi-zations and persons performing QA functions appear to have the required independence and authority to effectively carry out the QA program without undue. influence from those directly responsible for cost and schedules.
(2) The QA program, with the'exceptfon of the confirmatory issue described in Section 17.5 of.this SER,. describes requirements, procedures,. and controls that, when properly implemented, comply with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and with the acceptance criteria in SRP 17.2 Ac'cordingly, the staff conclu' des that EP&L's description of the QA program, with the exception of the confirmatory issue noted below, is in compliance with applicable NRC regulations.
17.5_
Confirmatory Quality Assurance Issue Tne staff has evaluated the FSAR list of structures, systems, and components that are under the control of the QA program.
CP&L has committed to revise its response to the staff's request for additional information concerning the list such that the response will be acceptable to the staff.
This is a confirmatory issue which will be closed in a supplement to this SER after receipt of the formally revised response.
O 6
W 89e G,
17-10 i
x...
ENCLOSURE 2 d..
.anddeficienciesareeffictiv'elycorrect~edandthat.th,ecorrectiveaction precludes repetitive occurrences.
17.4 Conclusions
)
On the basis of its detailed review and evaluation of the QA program Se' scrip-tion contained in Section 17 of the FSAR -and the topical report referenced
- r. t therein,- the staff concludes that the QA program for operations meets the requirements of 10 CFR 50,. Appendix B, and is acceptable.
The. review included a review of the list of. items to which, the, QA program applies.
The list of items was reviewe5 by the" staff technical review branches to ensure
-that safety-related items within their scope of review are under the QA program controls.
Differences between the staff and the applicant regarding the list have been resolved to the _ staff's satisfaction.
The list has been expanded to include safety-related items reflected in NllREG-0737.
Therefore, the staff has no open items concerning the QA program for operations or to its application.
Based on its detailed revtew and evaluation of the QA program as described in FSAR Section 17.2, the staff' concludes that (1). The organizations and persons performing QA functions appear to have the required independence and authority to effectively carry out the QA program without undue influence from those directly responsible for cost and schedules.
(2) The QA program describes requirements, procedures, and controls that, when properly implemented, comply with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and with the acceptance criteria in SRP 17.2 Accordingly, the staff ' concludes that CP&L's description of the QA program is
~
.in compliance with applicable NRC regulations.
17-10 e
~
s y
- - - - -