ML20080P421
| ML20080P421 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 07/18/1980 |
| From: | Chaust R, Evans L, Tuckman M DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080P419 | List:
|
| References | |
| CP-O-A-8100-01, CP-O-A-8100-1, NUDOCS 8402220539 | |
| Download: ML20080P421 (2) | |
Text
'
Fern SPD-1003-2
~
DUKE PO*w?.R COMPAhY (1)
ID No: CE/0/A/8300/01 PROCEDIT.E MAJOR CHANGE Change No:
1 PROCESS RECORD Permanent /L.;.i r M Tr (2)
STATION:
Catawba (3) PROCEDURE TITLE:
Chemistry Procedure for the Determination of pH (4)
SECTION'S) 0F PROCEDURE AFFEC ED:
2.7, 4.2.1.1, 4.2.2 (5) DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE:
(Attach additional pages, if necessary.)
Change Section 2.7 to read:
150 or 250 ml beakers In Section 4.2.1.1 change 50 ml. to 100 ml.
In Section 4.2.1.2 change 50 al. to 100 ml.
Ip Section 4.2.2 change 50 ml. to 100 ml.
(6) RtASON FOR CHANGE:
Procedure improvement r,-
(7)
PREPARED BY:. '/
/-.,.
w DATE:
4 (8)
SAFE *Y EVALUATION This change:
Yes No X
Represents a change to the station or procedures as described in the FSAR, or a test or experiment not described in the FSK Yes No Recuires a change to the station Technical Specifications?
Yes No Involves an unreviewed safety question?
If the answer to any of the above is "Yes", attach a detailed explanation.
As appropriate attach a completed " Nuclear Safety Evaluation Check List" form.
i J
By:
./
a Date:
ubl DATE:
7 " W '
.O (9) REVIEWED BT:
[
Cress-Disciplinary Review By:
/
(10) TEMPORARY APPROVAL (IF NECESSARY):
By:
(SRO) Date:
By:
Date:
H. b. T
'^
) b C[
(11) APPROVED BY:
DATE:
(12) MISCELLANEOUS:
Reviewed / Approved By:
Date:
Reviewed / Approved By:
Date:
(13) Page 1 of 8402220539 840215 PDR ADOCK 05000413 E
PDR 3,y 34 9/20/77
,r.
-_..,.,,.--~...,w-.
.+
w-.-----.-c.
,--w--w=-"e-w 1,t-+-t*
- =
- ----'"'-v-
- t*-e-*'-e*
T
Form SPD-1003-2 DUKE POWER COMPANY (1) ID No: M/f/
[88!.
PROCEDURE MAJOR CHANGE C_h m e No:
/
PROCESS RECORD (ermanegheeeeeeeee. ~.o-b4I~4(V84 (2)
STATION:
(3) PROCEDURE TITLE:
[ >
,0 s
.L% /Ji. w hkh odp uf e6 p O r t'
b (4)
SECTION(S) 0F PROCEDURE 'TECTED:
bA
-t##debi@
(5) DESCRIPTION OF CRANC~r:
(Attach additional pag
, if necessary.)
D Atv n,k fu-&
cP o b Su:)p 0l
./
(6) REASON FOR CHANGE:
L y l w i b p cl' o / n %
oI (7) PRE?ARED BY:
Eh,_ _
h DATE:
,-t9-ec (8)
SAFETY EVAf.UATION This change:
s Yes No epresents a change to the station or procedures as described 5 the FSAR, or a test or experiment not described in the FSA?
d Yes No A jquires, a change to the station Technical Specifications?
Yes No i M nvolves an unreviewed safety question?
If the answer to any of the above is "Yes", attach a detailed explanation.
As. appropriate attach a completed " Nuclear Safety Evaluation Check List" for=.
eu Date:
l ' M ^ hO By:
DATE:
[
M[" Y8 (9) REVIEWED BY:
Cross-Disciplinary Review By:
N/R:
L.
(10) TDIDORARY APPROVAL (IF NECESSARY):
By:
(SRO) Date:
By:
Date:
(11) APPROVED BY:
30 $
DATE:
l (12) MISCELLANEOUS:
Reviewed / Approved By:
Date:
Reviewed / Approved By:
Date:
(13) Page 1 of f
Rev 14 9/20/77