Text

Readiness Review Program Module 18A - Hvac
	ML20078A612
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	02/12/1988
From:	; GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20078A351	List: ML20078A353; ML20078A355; ML20078A365; ML20078A367; ML20078A371; ML20078A377; ML20078A381; ML20078A385; ML20078A390; ML20078A396; ML20078A399; ML20078A405; ML20078A410; ML20078A412; ML20078A418; ML20078A428; ML20078A434; ML20078A437; ML20078A443; ML20078A447; ML20078A453; ML20078A456; ML20078A461; ML20078A468; ML20078A471; ML20078A476; ML20078A483; ML20078A488; ML20078A492; ML20078A495; ML20078A500; ML20078A507; ML20078A525; ML20078A535; ML20078A540; ML20078A544; ML20078A546; ML20078A550; ML20078A555; ML20078A559; ML20078A566; ML20078A572; ML20078A575; ML20078A579; ML20078A583; ML20078A588; ML20078A593; ML20078A599; ML20078A604; ML20078A609; ... further results
References
	PROC-880212, NUDOCS 9406020254
	Download: ML20078A612 (200)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:i O l VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM [ MODULE 18A - HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING I l l l 9406020254 940512 0269r/040-8 PDR ADOCK 05000424 P PDR

I PREFACE Georgia Power Company (GPC), in order to gain added assurance of the operational readiness of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), conducted a pilot Readiness Review Program for Unit 1. The VEGP pilot Readiness Review Program was a systematic, in-depth self-assessment of work processes and verification of compliance with regulatory commitments. To accomplish the VEGP pilot Readiness Review Program, the work processes and regulatory commitments were divided into manageable segments called modules. There are 22 modules. Each module is a predefined scope of VEGP activities. Each module provides a brief description of the method of complying with project licensing commitments pertaining to the module scope and is not intended to make further commitments or to revise in any way prior commitments. Activities common to several modules are defined in General Appendixes. There are seven appendixes. These appendixes, as appropriate, are referenced in the modules and are augmented in each module with module-scope-specific details as needed. The VEGP pilot Readiness Review Program was conducted on a schedule to provide added operational readiness assurance to GPC O management in support of the VEGP Unit 1 operating license. Conclusions reached regarding programmatic and technical adequacy through review of VEGP Unit 1 are indicative of Unit 2, since both units are being designed and constructed together under a single quality assurance program: with like management controls, procedures, specifications, and criteria. The Unit 2 Readiness Review Program extends the results of the Unit 1 review by assessing activities, hardware, and documents within the scope of selected modules and ascertaining compliance with licensing requirements. The VEGP Unit 2 Readiness Review Program is being conducted on a schedule to provide added operational readiness assurance to GPC management in support of the VEGP Unit 2 operating license. The VEGP Readiness Review Program is not intended to eliminate or to diminish any authorities or regulatory responsibilities now assigned to or exercised by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or GPC. Further, the Readiness Review Program is not intended to change the techniques of inspections or assurance of quality program activities. Rather, the VEGP Readiness Review Program is an added program initiated by GPC management to assess the VEGP and to provide additional feedback to management so that they may initiate any needed corrective actions in an (} orderly and timely manner. 0269r/040-0

The work processes and regulatory commitment compliance covered by each module scope will be assessed by, and the module prepared and reviewed by, individuals collectively familiar with the design, construction, and preoperational processes of nuclear power plants. It is the collective opinion of the Readiness Review Task Force, Readiness Review Board, and GPC management that, based on their experience, the methodology used in the module process will assess, on a programmatic basis, the adequacy of project commitment implementation. Readiness Review findings and resulting dispositions are reviewed by the Project Quality Assurance staff and are input into the normal project process for safety significance and potential reportability evaluations in accordance with regulatory requirements. O O iv 0269t/040-8

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

O This module documents a review conducted to ascertain whether the design and construction of safety-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems in Unit 2 of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant comply with licensing commitments and whether compliance is verifiable using existing project documentation. HVAC systems include duct, duct supports, equipment, dampers, and local and in-line instrumentation. The review program for Unit 2 used the results of the Unit 1 review program as a base, and focused on differences between the units. These differences included added or revised licensing commitments and program changes resulting from project development or corrective actions to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) findings, project findings, design changes, or hardware modifications. The review consisted of technical and programmatic evaluations of the design and construction processes and results. Project documents such as design criteria and procedures; design output such as specifications, drawings, and calculations; and construction results such as installed hardware and quality documentation were examined during the review. Discrepancies noted during review activities were issued to the O, Project as findingc. Following receipt and evaluation of the response, the findings were subject to categorization as follows to indicate their relative importance: l Level I - Violation of licensing commitments, project i procedures, or engineering requirements with l indication of safety concern. l Level II - Violation of licensing commitments or engineering requirements with no safety l concern. 1 Level III - Violation of project procedures with no safety concern. The Readiness Review Program evaluation of HVAC in VEGP Unit 2 consisted of three major activities: 1 Commitment Implementation Review i l Readiness Review has maintained the listing of commitments for design and construction developed during the Unit 1 l Readiness Review Program through review of Final Safety Analysis Report amendments and letters to the NRC. The ; Project Engineering and Construction organizations were O issued the listing of commitments applicable to this module l l l l l 0277r/040-8 y l

at the beginning of the review period; and the Project provided Readiness Review with updated implementation information which is presented in section 3. Unit 1 Finding Followup During the assessment of Unit 1, the Project committed to the performance of certain corrective actions. For Unit 2 Readiness Review provided Project Engineering and Construction with a list of Unit 1 findings and corresponding corrective actions. These two groups evaluated those applicable to Unit 2 activities and informed Readiness Review as to the action taken. The listing of Unit 1 findings and Unit 2 actions is presented in section 5. Assessment The Unit 2 assessment of HVAC systems consisted of an evaluation of commitment implementation, Unit 1 finding followup, and an assessment of design and construction activities to ascertain project compliance to commitments. During the assessment, Readiness Review verified, by selective sampling, the updated implementation and Unit 1 finding followup information provided by the Project. During the assessment of design and construction, Readiness Review chose and assessed a sample of design documents and installed equipment to determine acceptance to specified criteria and conformance to installation and procedural requirements. Twenty-nine hardware items such as ducts, supports and equipment, and approximately 300 documents were examined. Nine findings were issued during the assessment. Four were classified as Level II and five as Level III. Corrective action to one finding involved relocation of a

temperature sensing element, another required minor rework of a duct. Neither resulted in a safety concern. The remaining seven findings required correction or clarification of documents.

The findings were judged to be isolated instances of failure to I comply with engineering or licensing requirements, or with ! procedures, with no safety concern and do not indicate, either individually or collectively, programmatic concerns. Readiness Review

Conclusion:

l Based on the results of the review, and the implementation of l effective corrective actions to the identified findings as committed to by the Project, Readiness Review concludes that adequate programs exist to ensure: the quality of design and 0277r/040-8 vi

construction; objective evidence of tnat quality has been documented; and the licensing commitments within the scope of O this module have been implemented. i i

P f O l t i 1 I O

    -0277r/040-0                    vii

MODULE 18A HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope l 1.2 Module Organization 1.3 Status Section 2 Organization 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Design 2.3 Construction Section 3 Commitments 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Commitment and Implementation Matrices Section 4 Program Description

 'g             4.1     Design 4.2     Construction 4.3     Program Changes Section 5   Audits and Inspections 5.1     Introduction 5.2     Project Audits 5.3     Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspections 5.4     Reportable Deficiencies and Special Evaluations 5.5     Unit 1 Finding Followup Section 6   Prog *am Assessment 6.1     Introduction 6.2     Program Description 6.3     Summary and Conclusions 6.4     Assessment Activities and Results

6.5 Findings

Section 7 Assessment of Module Adequacy Project Quality Assurance Readiness Review Board i r N. l (_) Section 8 Assessment Plan and Checklists l 0269r/040-8

                 #  7                        ' ' -

w----

1 INTRODUCTION O 1.1 SCOPE This module is one in a series of modules that provides an evaluation of the design, construction, and preoperational e,esting of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 2. It is intended to describe the method of complying with the project commitments found in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and is not intended to make further commitments or revise in any way, prior commitments. If any differences exist between the commitment descriptions in this document and the FSAR, those differences are unintentional and the FSAR shall take precedence and shall define the project commitments. The scope of this module encompasses the design and construction activities associated with safety-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems for the VEGP Unit 2. The installation of American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code components (chilled water ; equipment and piping, duct containment penetrations, and instrument tubing) is performed by the piping contractor and those activities are assessed in Module 4. The design of chilled water equipment is assessed in this module. Chilled water piping design is included in Module 4.

Local and in-line HVAC instrumentation is included with the HVAC systems in this module. The HVAC Control Board in the control room is included with the other control room boards in the scope of Module 6. The checks, reviews, inspections, audits, and verifications performed to ensure the adequacy of design and construction functions are examined. The organizations responsible for performing design and construction activities are identified and the work activities that the organizations perform are , described. The project commitments for HVAC are identified, the method of implementation is listed, and the results of a review for compliance to the committed requirements are presented. The effective date of the module is July 15, 1987. Changes to the included programs, organizations, commitments, etc., occurring after this date are not necessarily addressed, t O 0261r/040-8 1-1

  %,   a        m _.      J. J .. u__A.2Am     m. A. -    -    - .

C.- , -2. l 9 9 i 0261r/040-8 1-2 e mfde' ' l- .- .-.. -. , .-

i l l 1.2 MODULE ORGANIZATION l This module is divided into the following sections:

1. Introduction.

l

2. Organization - A brief description of the project 1 organizations and their division of responsibilities as i applicable to this module. I

3. Commitments - Project licensing commitments pertaining to safety-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning as found in the Final Safety Analysis Report, responses to Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins, and correspondence to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This section also lists the documents that demonstrate implementation of these commitments.

4. Program Description - A brief description of the processes for design and construction applicable to the scope of this module.

5. Audits and Inspections - Listings of Quality Assurance (QA) audits and findings and NRC inspections and violations applicable to the scope of the module and conducted since the Unit 1 module. A description of i O- special investigations is provided. The Readiness Review findings and NRC violations from the Unit 1 i module activity are listed, the corrective actions are presented, and their applicability to Unit 2 is indicated.

I

6. Program Assessment - A description of the assessment l plan development, plan implementation, and results, j including corrective actions. '

7. Assessment of Module Adequacy - The evaluations and conclusions of this module by the Project, QA, and the Readiness Review Board.

8. Assessment Plan - The assessment plan and checklists utilized by the Readiness Review Team, I

i tT (_/ . l 0261r/040-3 1-3

? O O 9 0261r/040-8 1-4 l

l.3 STATUS As of the July 15, 1987, the design of safety-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning was essentially complete and construction was approximately 98-percent complete. L O . t I i I I o O i 0261r/040-8 1-5 I

2 ORGANIZATION O INTRODUCTION 2.1 Georgia Power Company (GPC), acting on its own behalf and as agent for the Oglethorpe Power Corporation, the Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, and the City of Dalton is responsible for the design, procurement, construction, and operation of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant. GPC administers the overall quality assurance program, provides procurement services, controls materials issue, performs quality control inspections, and provides construction services for calibration, tests, inspections, document control, and nonconformance control. Bechtel Western Power Company (BWPC) is contracted by GPC to provide architect / engineering services for plant equipment / systems contained within the Seismic Category I structures and is responsible for the overall design coordination of all plant equipment / systems. Pullman /Kenith-Fortson (P/K-F) is the contractor for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) and is responsible for fabrication of duct and supports and installation of the HVAC systems. Figure 2-1 shows the overall Project organizational structure. The following sections contain brief descriptions of the individual GPC, BWPC, and P/K-F groups that perform activities related to HVAC systems. 1 l l 0263r/027-8 2-1

0 . O O 0263r/027-8 2-2

2.2 DESIGN Project Engineering, under the direction of the project engineering manager, is responsible for design of safety-related heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC). This responsibility is divided between two Project organizations: Design Engineering (DE), and Installation Engineering (IE), with Bechtel Western Power Company having overall design responsibility. The organizational structure is shown on Figure 2-2. 2.2.1 DESIGN ENGINEERING DE is located at the jobsite with support staff in Norwalk, California. The design of safety-related HVAC is performed by the Mechanical Discipline with support from Civil-Structural, Controls, Plant Design, and Nuclear. In addition, technical support, as necessary, is supplied by the Environmental Qualification Group. The DE organizational structure is shown in Figure 2-3. The Mechanical Design Group is under the direction of the mechanical project engineer and the mechanical engineering group supervisor. 2.2.2 INSTALLATION ENGINEERING IE is located at the jobsite and is primarily responsible for resolution of field problems identified by Project Construction. They are specifically responsible for duct and duct support design and control and updating of the HVAC construction specification. They serve as the primary contact for the Construction Discipline for resolution of field interferences and problems, and coordinate with DE the solution to field identified problems. The IE organization structure is shown in Figure 2-4. HVAC IE reports through the project engineer, civil installation to the GPC Civil Discipline for project direction and to the mechanical project engineer and engineering group supervisor, site design engineering for technical direction. Other IE groups providing support to HVAC installation are organized in a similar fashion with the same reporting relationship to appropriate GPC discipline supervisors for project direction and to Design Engineering for technical direction. 2.2.3 ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES O In January 1987, Project Engineering, then comprised of Home Office Engineering (HOE) and Project Field Engineering (PFE) was 0263r/027-8 2-3

restructured to better support the construction effort. The major elements of this restructuring were: lh o Transfer of personnel from Norwalk (HOE) to the site. This onsite group, along with the few remaining personnel in Norwalk, became DE. o Relocation of PFE personnel from one central onsite location to individual groups located in proximity to each construction discipline. These groups became IE. o Designation of a single engineering group supervisor for each design discipline with overall responsibility for DE and IE work, o Design activities in direct support of construction work were assigned to the IE groups, o Design activities of a general or oversight nature were assigned to the DE group. o Control of Project Reference Manual. Design Manual, and responsibility for providing technical direction to the IE groups was assigned to DE. G 9 0263r/027-8 2-4

2.3 CONSTRUCTION Project Construction is responsible for installation, maintenance, and inspection of safety-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. This responsibility is divided between the Civil Discipline and Quality Control (QC). The overall Project Construction organization is shown on Figure 2-5. A brief description of the Project Construction groups that perform installation, inspection, and maintenance activities related to HVAC systems is presented in this section. 2.3.1 CIVIL DISCIPLINE Georgia Power Company (GPC) Civil Discipline manages and provides technical support to the HVAC contractor for the HVAC system installation. One contractor, Pullman /Kenith-Fortson (P/K-F), performs the work associated with HVAC systems. The P/K-F project manager reports to the civil discipline manager. Installation Engineering, as described in section 2.2.2, performs design activities to support resolution of field problems. The Construction Maintenance Organization is part of the Civil Discipline and is responsible for cleanliness, protection, and periodic maintenance of equipment during the () construction phase. P/K-F is responsible for fabrication, receipt, storage, handling, installation, and inspection of HVAC duct, duct supports, volume control dampers, and accessories not supplied by GPC. In addition, P/K-F is responsible for the requisition from GPC storage, installation, and inspection of tornado dampers, control dampers, fire dampers, HVAC equipment, and instrumentation. P/K-F is also responsible for the development and implementation of installation and QC procedures. P/K-F's work is performed under the P/K-F quality assurance (QA) program. P/K-F's QA/QC department develops and implements acceptance procedures and verifies that HVAC fabrication and inspection conform to approved specifications, drawings, codes and manufacturer's requirements. The P/K-F organization is shown in Figure 2-6. 2.3.2 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY QUALITY CONTROL GPC QC provides an overview of the P/K-F QA/QC program and is also responsible for tool calibration, receipt inspection of GPC procured items, and inspection of housekeeping and maintenance activities of the Construction Maintenance Organization. The GPC QC organization is shown in Figure 2-7. 0263r/027-8 2-5

The surveillance QC section verifies quality compliance of construction activities performed by P/K-F by reviewing a sample of completed work that has received inspection by P/K-F QC to ascertain compliance with design requirements and applicable procedures. The GPC QC staff monitors the P/K-F QA program. Areas of review include: o Review of P/K-F QA/QC staffing. o Review of qualification of P/K-F QC personnel, o Review of P/K-F QA audit plans and reports. o Review and approval of applicable P/K-F procedures. 2.3.3 CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES In August 1986, HVAC Construction Engineering, which had been a part of the GPC Civil Section was restructured to be under the direction of the P/K-F engineering manager. O 9 0263r/027-8 2-6

O O LEGEND PROJECT DIRECTION

                 ---- PROJECT COORDif4ATION                                                        VP AND
                 - * - F:JNCTtGN AL DIRECTION                                                     *ROJECT 0;maECTOR f

I i GENERAL MANAGER ASS 4STANT GENER AL MANAGER I OUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGEP NUCLE AR OPER ATIONS I I VOGTLE OUALITY ASSURANCE - - - - - a MANAGER I l . __ l t I 4 PROJECT

                                   , ,c , ,. ,,,,                     veCE PRESioENT                           PROJECT                       UNIT 2 PROJECT
                                     ,,,gg g                          CONST RUCTION                       LlCENSING MANAGER                STARTUP MANAGER                                              !

RE ADsNESS REVIEW PROJECT SUDGET ANO GENERAL MANAGER PROGRAM MANAGER SCHEDULE MANAGER PROJECT SUPPORT Figure 2-1 Project Organization

A

                        %s :

t I PROJECT ENGINEERING MANAGER LEGEND- 1 PROJECT DIRECTION ,

             -- FUNCTIONAL. TECHNICAL, ADealNISTR ATIVE DIRECTION                                                                                                                                                                                               '
             ---- PROMCT COORDINATION I

BECHTEL PROJECT ENGINEERING MANAGER ~~~~~~~~~~~7 I I t I i QUALI RANCE H E ENGINE E R I GPC SCHEDU E AGER t r i I I l i PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT TNGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER OMCT ENGINEER MECHANICAL, EER lAECHAN N. AL ELECTRICAL ' T LL ELECTRICAL DESmN CWR AND PLANT DESIGN BNSTALLATlON INSTALLATION CONTROLS & NUCLE AR DESIGN Figure 2-2 Project Engineering _ _ _ , ~ , . . .~. . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _.__ ._. . _ _ . - . _ - _ . . .. . _ . _ _ . , _ ~ . _ _ _ . . _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

(~ l (j~\

     \,                                                            ( '

lv i PROJE CT ENGINEERING MAN AGER I I I l PROJECT ENGINEER PROJECT ENGINEER MECH ANICAL, CON T ROLS E LECT RICA L AND NUCLEAR DESIGN ME CH ANICAL NUCLEAR CON TROLS SYSTEM ELECTRICAL PL ANT DESIGN CIVIL /STRUC/ ARCH ENGINEERING GROUP ENGINE ERING GROUP ENGtNE ERING GROUP ENGINEERING GROUP ENGINEE RING GROUP ENGINEE RING GROUP SUPE RV tSOR SUPE RVISOR St'PERVISOR SJE RVISOR SUPE RVISOR SUPE RVISOR

HVAC SYSTEMS Figure 2-3 Design Engineering

I t CIVIL DtSCIPLINE

-[

MANAGER LEGEND PROJECT DIRECTION

      ~---

TECHNICAL DIRECTION 1 l'

b CIVIL PROJECT ENGINEER E MINE E RIM GRN Civil INST AL L ATION O SUPE RVISOR SUPE RVISOR i i l l I I I I I I I I I i l I I I I i i i CONTRACTOR Civil HVAC . , SUPPOR T STRUCTURAL l l l

HVAC
CONSTRUCTION SPEC SUPPOR TS MAINTENANCE o OR.

j . PCR. l Figure 2-4 Installation Engineering i 1

O f i VCE PRES 8 DENT CONSTRUC f SON i MANAGER MANAGER REGULATORY LAaOR QUALITY ONTROL CONST UCTION i SYSTEM CIVal ELECT RIC AL MECHANICAL COMPLETION DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER , Figure 2-5 Construction Organization

 . . _ _ _ -, - . -          _ . _ . . - . ~ . - - . .    - . _ . - . .          . . - . _ _ _ - . -. _-. . - _ . _ . . - _ . . _ _ . _ _ .                         _ , _ . _ _ , . _ _ . . .       _ _ _ _ _ _

L O R R E T G N _ A O NFC AO Y 1 1 l I I l I M T . S C IL D P G A - R U ~ OE O l CO E . R A Q I

                                                           "^         1 E

C I il l l li F F q3 . O E - T A

                             -                                              -G                 .

R SI N O TN P R

                             -                                          I 4 OA I

O UR C - AT F - . E

P T R a oR n F C E E o E G KJ A t'c G s

                          /ON                                 uA                 t P

RA oN r PM oA aM o - r F Y - TOL R h I IL T t - AN i UO n OC e K

n N a O m T I l 5A l . cR

                                                              ' T u            .
                                                              *S                 P
                                                              *I                              .

oN - MI 6 - L E R D 1 N E A - v8 f L G 2 CP A4 CC P$ A N e G dim r u g i F a . aR a' E E 8G. NT aN O a R A A TO c' aM NAF t O NR I _ T 1 O C O C E R R OR e OO ~ DC TN CO R T CC T AlT R C l iN O S

                                                                 ~                            .  .

E J T E 8vOI Ci l V lI I l g l L MON RROa R C C R E P PCD P E P G S U O - S . N E - - G E - L - - l l l l i !

i MANAGER OF QUALITY CONTROL I DOCUMfMT CIVIL / MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL TEcipteCAL %JPPORT GUALITY CONTROL REVIEW ' OC SECTION INSPECTION SECTIA' STAFF-SUPE RVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOMS SUPERVISOR e DOCUMENT STOR AGE

HVAC SURVEILLANCE
P/K F P! A _AE
P/K-F PROGRAM
DOCUMENT REVIEW
TOOL CAle8R ATION REVIEW MONITORING
RECEIPT INSPECTION - STAFFING
CMO INSPECTION - OUALIFICATION

                                                                                                                            - AUDIT PLANS &

REPORTS Figure 2-7 Georgia Power Company Quality Control

3 COMMITMENTS

3.1 INTRODUCTION

This section contains, in matrix form, licensing and project commitments and the corresponding implementing documents. These are presented in two matrices, the commitment matrix and the implementation matrix. Commitments A commitment is an obligation to comply with the described requirements of an industry standard, Regulatory Guide, Branch Technical Position, or owner plan of specific action. For the purposes of Readiness Review, commitments are identified from the following sources: o Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), including responses to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) questions, o Responses to Inspection and Enfotcement Bulletins, o Correspondence to the NRC. These sources were reviewed and commitments were selected for inc.usion on the matrix using the following guidelines: o Specific design and or construction requirement. o Specific standards of acceptance, o Specific cited technical data used as a design basis and/or unique design methodology. o Specific codes, standards, or regulatory requirements. Descriptions, detailed data and/or parameters resulting from design activities, general codes, and regulations are not generally considered licensing commitments. These include: o Dimensions. o System operational concepts or operational descriptions. o Design calculation details such as strength parameters, flow rates, etc. o References to general standards such as 10 CFR 50, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). American Concrete Institute, etc. (specific requirements from such bodies, however, are commitments). 0262r/027-8 3-1

Implementation An implementing document is a working level document that' imposes the requirements of the commitment to a specific activity. Implementation of commitments is typically found in the following: o Design Criteria. o Material Specifications. o Construction Specifications. o Project Reference Manual. o Field Procedure Manual. o Startup Manual. o Drawings Additionally, the Project has a commitment to comply with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria, and industrial standards such as American National Standards Institute ANSI /ASME N45.2 and N45.2.ll. Although they may not have been identified as specific commitments in this module, Headiness Review considered the applicable requirements of these types of commitments in preparing and assessing the scope of work presented by this module. Commitment descriptions in this section are for identification and are not intended to make further commitments or to revise in any way prior commitments. Differences, if any, between the descriptions in this section and the commitments in the FSAR are unintentional and the commitments in the FSAR take precedence. 9 0262r/027-8 3-2

        .   -.                           = . -

3.2 COMMITMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION MATRICES During the Unit 1 Readiness Review Program, the task force performed a systematic review of licensing documents and identified the Project commitments. Once identified, these commitments were listed in a document called the commitment matrix. Readiness Review has maintained the matrix current for design and construction through review of Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Amendments and letters to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Additionally, during the Unit 1 Readiness Review, the task force identified project controls that implemented the commitment requirements (i.e., design criteria, specifications, construction procedures, etc.) and listed them on a document called the implementation matrix. For Unit 2, the commitment matrix and implementation matrix were transmitted to the appropriate project organizations for updating of the implementation matrix data to reflect the latest implementing documents. Upon completion, the updated matrix was returned to Readiness Review who verified the accuracy, on a sampling basis, as described in section 6. Changes in module commitments from those presented in the Unit 1 module are identified by a vertical row of X's in the left margin of the commitment matrix. The commitment and implementation matrices are presented following this section. Commitments are current through O%. Amendment 34 of the FSAR, O 0262r/027-3 3-3

s

PLANT WOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS NEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX i

=======us = s====2. === s===========

RSF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR HEMARES ! NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

  ==t====     ==e=======    ==================== ==================== =================*==              ==2 === '* ^^== '         =~2--      "'" ' *- "-

EXPLAMATION OF FIELOS REF. NO. - A reference nomber that corresponds to the appropriate llee entry . In the leptementottee estrlw COMMlTMENT $0gacE

                                          - The decoment coeteleleg the cemetteest IFSAR. Generic Letter. I.E.

Bellette Response, etc l COMMITMENT SECTecu - leestifies the FSAR secties, letter number, or questlos eveher COMMITMENT SUBJECT - The sehject of the FSAR sectles er Generic Letter DOCUMENT / FEATURE . - The decoment elecessed in the FSAR section or the pleet festere descrlhed le the FSAR section

MODULE - The modele for ettch the cometteest le leptemented DESIGM/CONSTRUCitou - An X la pieced under the headlag for the ergeoisettom responsible for Implementotloa et the comaltetet FSAR AMENDMENT -

FSAR emendesat neeber for revised consiteemts le aero 80) is placed la this celese for changes made prior to Amendment 13 ' Intert of Unit i Reedleens Reeleell NOTE: Costituent changes free these presented in the Welt I modelo are Identitled by a verticel' row of I's le the left mergle.

                                                                                  ~
                                ;OI
                                                                                                                                                                                                               ~

Page No. 1

                                 '01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A
                                                                                   ======================================

REF.' COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARXS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                                    ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ====                                      ========n=========e=

1487.00 FSAR 1. 2. 6. 3 CONTAINMENT COOLING TO REDUCE POST 184 X 0 SYSTEM SIZING ACCIDENT CONTAINMENT PRESS. TO LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO $0% OF PEAR PRESS. WITHIN 24 HRS. G73.00 FSAR 1. 2. 6. 4 SAFETY FEATURES 10CFB100 IBA I O PENETRATION NOOM FILTRAITON SYSTEMS 1491.00 FSAR 1. 2. 12. 1. 2.L SINGLE FAILURE. IEEE 279-1971 18A X 0 REDUNDANCT AND INDEPENDENCE CRITERIA 2041.00 FSAR 1. 9. 7 CONTROL OF RG 1.7 . REV. 2, 18A X 0 NEF. 6.2.5.1.1 FOR COMBUSTIBLE GAS 11/78 CONFORMANCE. CONCENTRATIONS IN CONTAINMENT FOLLOWING A LOCA i 682.00 FSAR 1. 9. 26. 2 QUAL. GROUP CLASS. RG 1.26 REV. 3, 18A X 0 REF. TABLE 3.2.2-1 AND STANDARDS FOR 2/76 WATER. STEAM & RADWASTE CONTAINING COMPONENTS OF NPP 685.00 FSAR 1. 9. 29 SEISMIC DESIGN RG 1.29 REV 3, 9/78 18A X 0 REF. TABLE T3.2.2-1 CLASSIFICATION i X 1855.00 FSAR 1. 9. 31. 2 CONTROL OF FERRITE RG 1.31 IBA X 0 l X CONTENT IN STAINLESS I STEEL WELD METAL

.I i X 1548.00 FSAR 1. 9. 52 DESIGN, TEST & RG 1.52 REV. 2,- 18A X 0 COMPONENT SERVICING MAINT. CRITERIA FOR 3/78 AND MAINTENANCE POST-ACC. ESF PROVISIONS ATMOSPHERE CLEAN-UP- CONSISTENT WITH RG SYSTEM AIR 8.8 FILTRATION &

ADSORPTION UNITS I i l

4 Page No. 2 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 kEADINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE IBA

                                                                                      =_ =====   ==.==2==.====      _==========.====

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON F5AR REMARh5 NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                                  ======= ========== === ================ =====-============== =========== ==-== == === === === .=.= .=====.                          =.=-t==s====

X 1549.00 FSAR 1. 9. 52. 2 DESIGN. TEST & CONFORMS TO ANSI IBA X X 25 X MAINT. CRITERIA FOR N509-1976 OR 1980 X POST-ACC. ESF DEPENDING ON DATE OF X ATMOSPHERE CLEAN-UP P.O., OR CONFORMS TO X SYSTEM AIR ANSI N509-1980 WHEN FILTRATION & SPECIFICALLY CALLED ADSONPTION UNITS OUT IN SPEC I 1550.00 FSAR 1. 9. 52. 2 DESIGN, TEST & CONFOHMS TO ANSI 18A X X 25 X MAINT. CHITERIA FCH N510-1975 OR 1980 X POST-ACC. ESF DEPENDIhG ON DATE OF I ATMOSPHERE CLEAN-UP P.O., OR CONFORMS TO X SYSTEM AIR ANSI N510-1980 WHEN FILTRATION & SPECIFICALLY CALLED - ADSORPTION UNITS OUT IN SPEC 1551.00 4'S A R 1. 9. 53 APPLICATION OF RG 1.53 REV. O, 18A X 0 NFF. 7.1.2.6 & SINGLE FAILURE 6/73 15.0.8 CHITERION 707.00 FSAR 1. 9. 61 DAMPING VALUES FOR RG 1.61, 10/73 18A X 0 SEE FSAW 3.7.B.I SEISMIC DESIGN Of h0 CLEAR POWER PLANTS 1865.00 FSAR 1. 9. 78 ASSUMPTIONS FOR RG 1.78 IBA X 0 SEE 2.2.3 & 6.4 EVALUATING THE HABITABILITY OF A NPP CONTROL ROOM DURING A POSTULATED HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL RELEASE 172.00 FSAR I. 9. 89 QUALIFICATION FOR RG 1.89, HEV. O, 18A I O SEE FSAN 3.ll.B. CLASS IE EQUIPNENT 11/74 X 715.00 FSAR 1. 9. 92 COMBINING MODAL RG 1.92, HEV 1, 2/76 18A X 0 SEE FSAN 3.7.B. 4 HESPONSES & SPATIAL 3.7.N. 3.7.N.2.7 I COMPONENTS IN I SEISMIC HESPONSE X ANALYSIS 9 9 9

                          ~
                                                                                                                      'A                                                           'N   ,

Page No. 3 01/25/88 PLANT WOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE IdA

                                                                                                  ======================================

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                            ====2==    ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ============= ======

X 4973.00 FSAE 1. 9. 94. 2. 9 VISUAL WELDING WELDING VISUAL 18A X 20 X ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA INSPECTION X ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA I IN ACCORDANCE WITH X AWS DI.1-75 FOR INSPECTIONS PERFORMED PRIOR TO 12/02/85 AND NCIG-01 REY. 2 FOR INSPECTIONS PELFORMED AFTER 12/02/85. 2020.00 FSAR 1. 9. 95 PROTECTION OF NPP PG 1.95 REV. 1, 18A X 0 SEE 6.4.4.2 2.2.3 CONTROL ROOM 1/77 6.4.2 OPERATORS AGAINST AN ACCIDENTAL CHLORINE RELEASE 1931.00 FSAR 1. 9.100 SEISMIC RG 1.100 184 X 0 SEE FSAR 3.10.B.2 QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT FOR NUCLEAP POWER PLANTS 720.00 FSAR 1. 9.117 TORNADO DESIGN RG 1.117 REV 1 IBA X 0 SEE FS4R 3.5 CLASSIFICATION 4/78 182.00 FSAR I. 9.128 INSTALLATION DESIGN RG 1.128 REY. 1 18A X 0 SEE FSAR 8.1 AND H.3 AND INSTALLATION OF 10/78 LARGE LEAD STORAGE BATTERIES 1596.00 FSAR 1. 9.141. I CONTAINMENT ANSI N271-1976 18A X 0 REF. 6.2.4 ISOLATION PROVISIONS FOR FLU 7D SYSTEMS

Page No. 4 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIE'd PROGRAM COMMITMENT NATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                                                                             =========================::===========

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOUkCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                                                                               ======= ::======== ==================== ==== -======= ======                          =2==================            === === === ==== ====::====.. :=====

1595.00 FSAR 1. 9.141. 2 CONTAINMENT HG l.141 REV. O, 18A X 0 REF. 6.2.4 ISOLATION PROVISIONS 4/78 FOR FLUID SYSTEMS 1599.00 FSAR 1. 9.148. 2 FUNCTIONAL SPEC. FOR RG 1.148 REV. O, 18A I O REF. TABLE ACTIVE VALVE 3/81 3.9.B.3-10 , ASSEMBLIES IN SYSTEMS IMPORTANT TO SAFETY 1873.00 FSAR 2. 2. 3. 1. 4. 1 T0XIC GAS 2-MIN. RG 1.78 18A 3 16 THRESHOLD LIMIT IN CONTROL ROOM 785.00 FSAR 3. 1. I CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC IBA I O GENERAL DESIGN 2 CRITERIA. DESIGN BASES FOR PROTECTION AGAINST NATURAL PHENOMENA 790.00 FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 GDC, ENVIRONMENTAL 4 AND MISSILE DESIGN BASES 791.00 FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50 APP. A, GDC 18A 1 0 GDC. SHARING OF 5 STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS 808.00 FSAR 3. 1. 4 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50, APP. A, GDC 18A X 0 GDC, CONTAINMENT 41 ATMOSPHERE CLEANUP 809.00 e3AR 3. 1. 4 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50 APP. A, GDC 18A X 0 CRITERIA STATES ThAT GDC. INSPECTION OF 42 SYSTEMS S H A LI. B E CONTAINMENT DESIGNED FOR ATMOSPHERE CLEANUP PERIODIC INSPECTION. SYSTEM O O 9

k[ Page No. 5- i 01/25/88 PL ANT VOGTLE UNIT '2 RE ADINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMEh? MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                         ======================================

r REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR R6:: ARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                    =====,= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ====================

810.00 FSAR 3. 1. 4 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC IBA X 0 CRITERIA STATES THAT GDC. TESTING OF 43 SYSTEM SHALL BE j CONTAINMENT DESIGNED TO PERMIT ATMOSPRERE CLEANUP TESTING SYSTEM IT41.00 FSAR 3. 1. 4 CONTAINMENT RG 1.7 18A X 0 ATMOSPHERE CLEAN-UP 2025.00 FSAR 3. 1. 5 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 GDC. PIPING SYSTEMS 54 PENETRATING CONTAINMENT X 2027.00 FSAR 3. 1. 5 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 X GDC. PRIMARY 56 " X CONTAINMENT X ISOLATION X 318.00 FSAR 3. 1. 6 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR$0 APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 GDC. FUEL AND 61 REACTIVITY CONTROL 829.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2 VOGTLE ELECTRIC 10CFR50 18A X 0 REFER TO SPECIFIC GENERATING PLANT LISTINGS CLACSIFICATION SYSTEM 1753.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2 VEGP QUALITY GROUP RQ l.26 & RG 1.29 18A X 0 -L

CLASSIFICATIONS. 1754.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2 VEGP SEISMIC DESIGN RG 1.29 18A X 0 CLASSIFICATION i SYSTEM I 830.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 CLASSIFICATION OF NOTE (s): I&C WHICH 18A X 0 TABLE 3.2.2-1 NOTE STRUCTURES. CAN EFFECT THE (s) COMPONENTS AND OPERATION / ACTUATION SYSTEMS OF A SAFETY-RELATED' FUNCTION MUST BE ' QUALIFIED TO REQUIREMENTS OF PROJECT CLASS 11J. m'm'_-- w _., _ A_ a__ 'F1+ h -g +-' f*T-" '% 14 T'W"'T +'-'--uWe-ww

                                                                                               - -        euhnur-'Fr--_" e  a-L *      --w--4   4 __ __ __i                -1'- mi m - w-__ _       -  __

Page No. 6 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIE - MODULE 18A

                                                    ===================      =================a REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT                 COMMITMENT                DOCUMENT /              MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE        SECTION                  SUBJECT                   FEATURE                 ULE IGN ST AMEN
 ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ====_==_ _=_==-=====        -

857.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL CODES AND AISI, SPEC. FOR 184 X 0 STANDARDS FOR DESIGN OF T.3.2.2-1 COLD-FORMED STEEL STR. MEMBERS, 1968 LIGHT GAGE C-F STAINLESS STEEL, 1968 858.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL CODES AND AMCA (AIR MOVING AND 18A I O STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONING T.3.2.2-1 ASSOCIATION) 860.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL CODES AND ASHRAE (AMERICAN 18A X 0 STANDARDS FOR SOCIETY OF RE ATING. T.3.2.2-1 REFRIGERATION AND AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERS) 862.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL CODES AND ARI (AIR COND. & 18A X 0 STANDARDS FOR REFR. INST.) T.3.2.2-1 863.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL CODES AND ANSI N509 18A I I O STANDARDS FOR T.3.2.2-1 866.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-; PRINCIPAL CODE? AND SMACNA - SHEET METAL 18A X 0 STANDARDS FOR AND A/C CONTRACTORS 7.3.2.2-1 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 867.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL CODES AND NEMA MGl 1972 IBA X 0 TABLE 3.2.2-1 COL STANDARDS FOR TABLE (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL (g) 3.2.2-1 MFRS. ASSOCIATION) MOTORS / GENERATORS 880.00 FSAR 3. 2. 2- I PRINCIPAL CODES AND ASME III, CLASS 18A X X 0 TABLE 3. 2. 2 - 1 CO L . STANDARDS FOR 1.2.3 OR MC, NF, OR (g) 73.2.2-1 CS S . 9 9

  /"'r i    i V

Page No. 7 01/25/88 PLANT VOCTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIk - MODULE 18A

                                                                                                                       ======================================

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NiiMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

    ======= ========== ===== ==============                                                                        =u==================          ======== =========== === === === ==== ===== == = ==. ====

S24.00 FSAR 3. 5 MISSILE PROTECTION 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 4 4370.00 FSAR 3. 7.B. 1-1 DAMPING VALUES FOR PERCENT OF CRITICAL 18A X 0 FIXED BASE DAMPING PER MODE STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS 983.00 FSAN 3. 7.B. 2 CATEGORY l HG I.29 18A X 0 STRUCTURE, SYSTEM AND COMPONENT CLASSIFICATION 1010.00 FSAR 3. 7.B. 3. 1. 2 SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM MODAL RESPONSE IBA I O SEE 3.7.B.3.5 ANALYSIS OF CAT. I SPECTRUM ANALYSIS CABLE TRAYS & METHOD OR EQUIVALENT SUPPORTS AND HVAC STATIC LOAD METHOD DUCTS & SUPPORTS X 1012.00 FSAR 3. 7.B. 3. 1. 3 SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM MODAL RESPONSE 18A X 0 X ANALYSIS OF CAT. I SPECTHUM OR X SUBSYSTEMS AND EQUIVALENT STATIC X COMPONENTS LOAD METHOD X 1013.00 FSAN 3. T.B. 3. 5 SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM EQUIVALENT STATIC 18A X 30 USED FOR PLATFORMS. ANALYSIS. USE OF LOAD METHOD OF CABLE THAY & EQUIVALENT STATIC ANALYSIS SUPPORTS, CONDUIT & LOAD METHOD OF SUPPORTS. HVAC DUCT ANALYSIS & SUPPORTS. SIMPLE PIPING SYSTEMS X 1014.00 FSAR 3. 7.B. 3. 5 SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM SEISMIC ACCELENATION 18A X 30 X ANALYSIS. USE OF VALUES ... ARE PEAK X EQUIVALENT STATIC ACCELERATION VALUES X LOAD METHOD OF MULTIPLIED BY A X ANALYSIS FACTOR OF 1.5 UNLESS A LOWER FACTOR IS ( JUSTIFIED l

Page No. 8 PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ======================================

HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMAHKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATUNE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                             ======= ========== ==================== ==================== =======: =========== === === === ====                                                                                                                                                              .  ======== ==;= - ====

X 4688.00 FSAN 3. 7.B. 3. 6 SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM COMPONENT EANTHQUAKE 184 X 0 4 ANALYSES - THREE EFFECTS COMBINED BY X COMPONENTS OF SRSS METHOD (FOR X EARTHQUAKE MOTION. QUAL, BY ANALYSIS). X 1017.00 FSAN 3. 7.B. 3. 7 SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM BC-TOP-4A, SEC. 4.2 18A X 0 ANALYSIS, COMBINATION OF MCDAL RESPONSES 1018.00 FSAR 3. 7.B. 3. 7 SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM RG 1.92 18A X 0 ANALYSIS. COMBINATsON OF MODAL RESPONSES 1778.00 FSAH 3. 8. 2. 1 PIPE ATTACHED TO ASME III, CLASS 2 18A X 0 CONTAINMENT WALL PENETRATION SLEEVES X 5025.00 FSAR 3. 8. 4. 5 WELDING OF WELDING OF IBA X X 25 ADDED BY FSAW AMEND. X STHUCTURAL STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL, 25 X MISC. STEEL, HACEWAY X SUPPORTS, & HVAC X DUCT SUPPORTS IS PERFORMED IN ACCORD. WITH AWS Dl.1-1975 OR LATER 1202.00 FSAN 3.10.B. I SEISMIC QUAL. AND IEEE 344-1975 18A X 0 DOCUMENTATION FOR SAFETY RELATED EQUIP. AND SUPPORTS. 1263.00 FSAR 3.II.B. 2 QUALIFICATION TESTS IEEE 323-1974 18A X 0 AND ANALYSES. TYPE TESTING. O O 9

 -m                                                                                                                                      .

J u Page No. 9 03/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                                                     ===============u=============          =======

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

  ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== === ===;= =:: .=, ===

1306.00 FSAR 6. O ENGINEERED SAFETY 10CFR100 18A X 0 FEATURES 323.00 FSAR 6. 1. 1. 1. 1 SPECS. FOR ALL ASME 111 18A X 0 PRINCIPAL PRESSURE PRESSURE RETAINING RETAINING MATERIALS MATERIAL IN ESF INDICATED IN TABLE SYSTEM 6.1.1-1 324.00 FSAR 6. 1. 1. 1. 1 MATERIAL SPECS FOR ASME III, NC-2000, 184 X 0 ESF COMPONENTS IN CLASS 2 QUALITY GROUP B, CLASS 2 325.00 FSAR 6. 1. 1. 1. 1 MATERIAL SPECS. FOR ASME III, ND-2000, 18A X 0 ESF COMP. IN QUALITY CLASS 3 GROUP C, CLASS 3 328.00 FSAR 6. 1. 1. 1. 2 ESF CONSTRUCTION ASME II, SFA 5.1, 18A X 0 MATERIALS- WELD 5.2, 5.5, 5.17, 5.18 MAT *L FOR JOINING & 5.20 FERRITIC BASE MAT'LS 331.00 FSAR 6. 1. 1. 1. 2 ESF CONST. ASME III 18A X 0 ESF SYSTEMS HAT *LS-WELD MATERIAL QUALIFICATIOrt 333.00 FSAR 6. 1. 1. 1. 2 ESF CONST. MAT'L - LIMITED TO NO 184 I O COLD WORKED GREATER THAN AUSTENITIC S.S. 90,000 psi YIELD STRENGTH 1326.00 FSAR 6. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1.D CONTAINMENT COOLING ASME XI 18A X 0 SYSTEM, SAFETY DESIGN BASIS IN-SERVICE INSPECTION

                                   =     -

Page No. 10 01/25/88 PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATWlX - MODULE 18A

                                                        ====================== ==== -        ===e====

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR HEMAHh5 NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

      ======= ========== == == ============-= ========-=========== ==================== === === === ==== == ======.. .. ==    .

2397.00 FSAR 6. 2. 2. 1. 1. l.G CONTAINMENT COOLING DESIGNED AND 18A X 0 SEE FSAH TABLE SYSTEM SAFETY DESIGN FABRICATED TO CODES 3.2.2-1 FOH QUALITY BASES CONSISTENT WITH RG GHOUP CLASS 1.26 2398.00 FSAN 6. 2. 2. 1. 1. l.G CONTAINMENT COOLING HG 1.29 18A X 0 SEE FSAW TA3LE SYSTEM SAFETY DESIGN 3.2.2-1 FOR SEISMIC BASSS CATEGORY 2511.00 FSAN 6. 2. 2. 1. 1. 2 CONTAINMENT COOLING LIMIT AMBIENT 18A X 0 SYSTEM DESIGN BASES CONTAINMENT AIN TEMPERATURE TO 120 DEGHEES F WITH ANY 4 OF 8 COOLERS OPERATING 2039.00 FSAN 6. 2. 2. 1. 4 CONTAINMENT HEAT FANS ARE TESTED AND 18A X 0 HEMOVAL SYSTEMS HATED BY THE TESTING & MANUFACTURER IN INSPECTION ACCONDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE AlH MOVING AND CONDITIONING ASSOCIATION 1332.00 FSAN 6. 2. 4 CONTAINMENT TMI ACTION PLAN TASK 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM IIE.4.2 1333.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 1. 1.D CONTAINMENT 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM 54 SAFETY DESIGN BASIS 2044.00 FSAN 6. 2. 4. 1. 1.E CONTAINMENT 10CFH50, APP.A. GDC 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM, 56 PRIMAHY SAFETY DESIGN BASIS CONTAINMENT ISOLATION O O O

O

                                                                                                   )                                                              U Page No.                                 11 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A
                                                                              ======================================

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

 =======                             :s======== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ====================

2408.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 1. 1. F. 3 CONTAINMENT ASME III, CLASS 2 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM, SAFETY DESIGN BASIS 2048.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 1. 1.H CONTAINMENT DESIGNED TO REMAIN 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM, FUNCTIONAL FOLLOWING SAFETY DESIGN BASIS A SSE 2422.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 2. I SYSTEM GENERAL BTP CSB 6-4 18A X 0 TABLE 9.4.6-4 DESCRIPTION - CONTAINMENT PURGE SYSTEM 2488.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 2. 1 DESIGN BASIS FOR RG 1.141 18A X 0 CONTAINMENT ISOLATION 2516.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 2. 2 CONTAINMENT CLASSIFIED AS IBA X 0 PENETRATIONS - QUALITY GROUP B AND CONTAINMENT SEISMIC CATEGORY I ISOLATION SYSTEM 2053.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 3.C CONTAINMENT PREACCESS PURGE 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM, SUPPLY AND EXHAUST DESIGN EVALUATION VALVES IN 24-IN. LINES ARE DESIGNED TO SHUT IN LESS THAN 10 SEC. X 5117.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 3.C CONTAINMENT PREACCESS MINI PURGE 18A X 0 X ISOLATION SYSTEM, LINE ISOLATION X DESIGN EVALUATION VALVES SHUT IN LESS X THAN 5 SEC. I 2055.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 3.D CONTAINMENT 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM, 54 PIPING SYSTEMS DESIGN EVALUATION PENE1 RATING CONTAINMENT

Page No. 12 01/25/88 PLANT %OGTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW PROGHAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                            ======_==== ====================_=== =

HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH HEMAHhs NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                      ==s-  === =_=    ====2 ; == === ============= ==================== ==================== === === === ==== === == __- _;=                                       u===

2056.00 FSAH 6. 2. 4. 3.E CONTAINMENT 10CFH50, APP. A, GDC 18A X 0 I SOI. AT I ON SYSTEM, 55 & 56, PHIMARY DESIGN EVALUATION CONTAINMENT ISOLATION 2058.00 FSAN 6. 2. 4. 3.H CONTAINMENT DESIGNED IN 18A X 0 ISOLATION SYSTEM, ACCOHDANCE WITH DESIGN EVALUATION SEISMIC CATEGORY I kEQUlHEMENTS. 2059.00 FSAR 6. 2. 4. 4 CONTAINMENT ASME XI IBA X 0 SEE FSAR 6.2.6 ISOLATION SYSTEM, TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 2061.00 FSAH 6. 2. 5 COMBUSTIBLE GAS 10CFH50, APP.A. GDC IBA X 0 CONTROL IN 41 CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHEHE CLEANUP 2062.00 FSAR 6. 2. 5. 1. l.A COMBUSTIBLE GAS DESIGNED FOR ALL 18A X 0 IN SCOPE OF MODULE CONTHOL IN NORMAL & ACCIDENT 04 CONTAINMENT LOADS INCLUDING SSE ELEC. HYDHOGEN AND PHESSURE RECOMBINEHS THANSIENTS FROM A DESIGN BASIS LOCA 2064.00 FSAR 6. 2. 5. 1. 2.A POST LOCA DESIGNED AS SEISMIC 18A X 22 CHANGED BY FSAR CONTAINMENT HYDROGEN CATEGORY I EXCEPT AMENDMENT 22 PURGE SYSTEM FOR DUCTWOHK INSIDE CONTAINMENT UPSTHEAM OF CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE AND DUCTWORK AT THE FILTER INLET. 24 F3. 00 FSAN 6. 2. 5. 1. 2.D POST LOCA THE HEDUhDANT MOTOR 18A X 0 CONTAINMENT HYDHOGEN OPER. I S O I. A T I O N PUNGE SYSTEM VALVES LOCATED INSIDE THE CONTAINMENT ARE IN PAHALLEL AND POWERED FROM THE 480-V CLASS lE BUSES. O O O

O o ' Page No. 13 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PROGHAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A ']

                                                                                                               =====-===============-=====.=====.=====

HEF. COMMITMEN1 COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMAHkS NUMBEN SOUkCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

               ==u====   ========== =================_== ==================== ====================                                                                                                    2==  === === ==== ===- __     ====a_. __

l 5040.00 FSAR 6. 2. 5. 1. 3.D POST LOCA CAVITY DESIGNED TO 18A X 0 HYDROGEN PURCE AUTOMATICALLY START SYSTEM U l'O N RECEIPT OF A SAFETY lhJECTION SIGNAL 2065.00 FSAN 6. 2. 5. 1. 3.E POST LOCA CAVITY DESIGNED TO SEISMIC 18A X 0 PUNGE SYSTEM CATEGORY I REQUIREMENTS 2068.00 FSAR 6. 2. 5. 1. 4.E DESIGN PROVISIONS TO 10CFH50, APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 LIMIT PERSONNEL 19 EXPOSURE TO HADIATION 5057.00 FSAH 6. 2. 5. 1. 5.A CONTAINMENT HYDROGEN MAINTAIN IOCAL 18A X 0 SEE FSAR 6.2.5.2.5 MINING HYDROGEN CONCENTRATIONS AT LESS THAN 4 VOLUME PEHCENT 2070.00 FSAR 6. 2. 5. i. 5.B CONTAINMENT HYDROGEN ANY ACTIVE SYSTEMS 184 X 0 MIXING FOR MIXING CONTAINMENT AIR WILL MEET SAME REDUNDANCY. ENVIRONMENTAL. AND SEISMIC QUALITY knOU'REMENTS A IN FSAN 6.2.5.1.1. 2071.00 FSAR G. 2. 5. 2. 2 POST LOCA ISOLATION VALVES AND 18A X 22 SEE HEF. #5039 CONTAINMENT HYDHOGEN INTERCONNECTED PUHGE SYSTEM PIPING AHE SEISMIC CAT. I ALL OTHER I'ORTIONS OF SYSTEM ARE SEISMIC CAT. 2. L _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ .

Page No. 14 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PROGHAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                      ============================ = ======-

REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH NEMAHKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN

                                                  ====================   ::=========2:=:    ==== == ===    222  ====    ===c ::: 4 2 . :,. =-

_::=:2= ========== : ===2::::======-:==

5. 2. 2 CONTAINMENT H/2 EXHAUST FILTERS AND 18A X 22 ADDED BY FSAH X $039.00 FSAR 6. 2.

AMENDMENT 22 X PURGE SYSTEM EXHAUST DUCT TO I PLANT VENT ARE X DESIGNED AS SIESMIC s CAT. I

2. 3 POST LOCA CAVITY DESIGNED TO SEISMIC 18A X 0 2072.00 FSAR 6. 2. 5.

PURGE SYSTEM CAT. I 2447.00 FSAN 6. 2. 5. 2. 3 POST LOCA CAVITY EACH FAN IS POWERED 18A X 0 PUHGE SYSTEM FROM AN INDEPENDENT CLASS 1E POWER SUPPLY. I HABITABILITY SYSTEMS 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 20H5.00 FSAR 6. 4. DESIGN BASES 19 I HABITABILITY SYSTEMS CONTHOL HOOM 18A X 0 2086.00 FSAR 6. 4. DESIGN BASES ESSENTIAL HVAC IS DESIGNED TO FUNCTION DURING/AFTER SSE AND ALL AIR DUCTS AND THEIP SUPPORTS ABOVE CONTROL HOOM SUSPENDED CEILING (+ CEILING) ARE SEISMIC CAT. I I HABITARtLITY SYSTEMS RG 1.52 IBA X 0 2087.00 FSAR 6. 4. DES!GM BASES

4. HABITABILITY SYSTEMS RG 1.78 IBA X 0 2088.00 FSAR 6. 1 DESIGN BASES 2089.00 FSAR 6. 4. I HABITABILITY SYSTEMS HG 1.95 IBA X 0 DESIGN BASES I HABITABILITY SYSTEMS SEPARATE AND 18A X 0 2818.00 FSAH 6. 4.

CONTHOL ROOM TVAC INDEPENDENT lE POWER SYSTEM SOURCE FOR EACH TRAIN O O O

l , c'?" }

                                                                        =                                                    <..
   % -3            a%                                                                                                      f. h IMAGE EVALUATION                           ///// / j');f!/ /g, O
 ///       'f              hf'                             TEST TARGET (MT-3) y)                                                                                           R4,                 4
                                                                                  "      U" 1.0      :
                                                                                ". 3 2p2.2 u.

u , Arce i 2.0 j,l , ll4]M42 1 ll$ l.25 1.4 1.6

                                                                          --         l l
                                                                  -150mm                                             >

4 .. 4 ___ 6"

   &>sp                                                                                                                  ,,p dh~h>-

O Nzzzzz' b+<$ u 6q,p %qar 4

                                                                                                                               #kf y

l

                                                                             '                                       ~
                      ,s 1

o a h 'O w c%p 1' IMAGE EVALUATION 0 i.,

                                                                                                                ,t%
                 't "

TEST T ARGET (MT-3)

                                                                                                      /      , fM &%,
 \'                                k@                                                      /            f ;+ 4g      ?

y 4

6" - - - - - - - A., h,. 'fV g ) ) \ +; y .e ////p 4,,,,,s m;&, an . . . . ,,jl d . -ll r% n .i V h j - s. Page No. 15-01/25/"8 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 187 ====================================== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ==============4===== 2090.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. I HABITABILITY RG 1.52 18A X 0 SYSTEMS. VENTILATION SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN CRITERIA 2091.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.A HABITABILITY FILTER UNIT HOUSINGS 18A I O SYSTEMS, VENTILATION ARE SEISMIC CAT. I SYSTEM DESIGN 2092.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.A HABITABILITY RG 1.52 18A X 0 SYSTEMS. VENTILATION FILTER UNIT HOUSINGS 2093.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.B HABITABILITY SYSTEMS RG 1.52 184 X 0 VENTILATION MOISTURE SEPARATOR 2094.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.C HABITABILITY SYSTEMS ANSI N509 18A X 0 SEE 1.9.5.2.2 VENTILATION ELECTRIC HEATERS 2095.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.D HABITABILITY SYSTEMS MIL-F-51068 18A X 0 i VENTILATION HEPA FILTERS 2096.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.D HABITABILITY SYSTEMS MIN. ACCEPTANCE IBA X 0 VENTILATION HEPA CRITERIA FOR HEPA FILTERS FILTER IS REMOVAL OF 99.97% OF 0.3 MICRON THEHf4AL GENERATED, MONODISPERSED DIOCTYL PHTHALATE PARTICLES. 2097.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.E HABITABILITY MIN. AIR RESIDENSE 18A X 0 SYSTEMS, VENTILATION TIME IN THE CARBON CARBON ADSORBERS IS 0.5s, AT A ! NOMINAL FACE l VELOCITY OF 40 FT./ MIN. . _ . _ .- .. _ _ _ _ ._. . . _ . . . _ . . . . . - . . - _ . . _ . . . _ . , , . _ . . . _ _ _. - - _ ._ . . - . _ - , , . - -- .__ ..,. ~.. . . . . . - _ Page No. 16 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE 18A ====================================== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMARKS NUMBEH SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ===== ============== ==================== === === === ==== =====u =========;=== 2098.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.F II A B IT A B I LI TY DESIGNED TO SEISHIC IBA X 0 SYSTEM 3, VENTILATION CAT. I COOLING COIL 2099.00 FSAN 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.F II A B IT A B I LITY ASME SECT. 111, 18A X 0 SYSTEMS, VENTILATION CLASS 3 COOLING COIL 2100.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.G HABITABILITY SYSTEMS SEISMIC CAT. I IBA X 0 VENTILATION EMERGENCY FILTEH THAIN FANS 2101.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.G llABITABILITY SYSTEMS HG 1.52 18A X 0 VENTILATION EMERGENCY FILTER THAIN FANS 2102.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2 . 11 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS SEISMIC CAT. I 18A X 0 EMERG. CONTHOL HOOM HETURN FAN 2103.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.I HABITABILITY SYSTEMS SEISMIC CAT. I 18A X 0 VENTILATION DUCTWORK & DAMPERS 2104.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.I II AB TABI LITY SYSTEMS HG 1.52 18A X 0 VENTILATION DUCTWORK & DAMPERS 5042.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.J HABITABILITY SYSTEMS CONTROL HOOM DOORS IBA X 0 ARE EQUIPPED WITil SEL. CLOSING DEVICES X 5055.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.J IIABITABILITY SYSTEMS TWO SETS OF DOORS 18A X 30 X WsTH VESTIBULE ACT X AS AN AIH LOCK AT X CONTHOL N00M X EXTRANCES O O 9 O F O Page No. 17 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE IBA ====================================== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== =-================== ==================== ===a================ === === === ==== ==================== X 5112.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.J HABITABILITY SYSTEMS DOORS TO RECORD IBA X 30 X STORAGE AHEAS AHE X EQUIPPED WITH X SELF-CLOSING DEVICES X X 5113.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.J HABITABILITY SYSTEMS ACCESS TO RECORD 18A X 30 X STORAGE AREA THROUGH X AN AIRLOCK OR TWO X DOORS IN SERIES X 2105.00 FSAN 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.K HABITABILITY CAPABLE OF CLOSING 184 X 0 SYSTEMS, VENTILATION WITHIN 6 SECONDS OF ISOLATION DAMPERS RECEIVING ACTUATION SIGNAL 5043.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.L HABITABILITY SYSTEMS REDUNDANT CHLORINE 18A X 15 DETECTORS INSTALLED IN C0hrm0L ROOM VENTILATION CAPABLE OF DETECTING 1 PPM AND HIGHER 5044.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.M HABITABILITY SYSTEMS REDUNDANT RADIATION 18A X 0 DETECTORS INSTALLED IN CONTHOL ROOM VENTILATION 5045.00 FSAN 6. 4. 2. 2. 2.N HABITABILITY SYSTEMS REDUNDAP' SMOKE 18a X 0 DETECTORS INSTALLED IN CONTROL ROOM 2l06.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 3 WABITABILITY SYSTEMS ASHRAE HANDBOOK OF 18A X 0 VENTILATION LEAK FUNDAMENTALS TIGHTNESS 2107.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 3 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS HG 1.78 18A X 0 VENTILATION LEAK TIGHTNESS Page No. 18 01/25/H8 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE 10A ====================================== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMM.TMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======. === ====== ==================== ==================== =====a============== === === == ==== ===========;== ===== X 5092.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 3 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS CONVENTIONAL BLDGS, IBA X 25 X - VENTILATION FOR REACTOR X LEAK-TIGHTNESS CONTAINMENT X PUBLISHED BY ATOMICS X INT'L, CAT. NAA-SR-10100, 6-15-65 2109.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 4.A HABITABILITY THE PLENUM SYSTEM IS 18A X 25 SYSTEMS, INTERACTION DESIGNED AS SEISMIC WITH OTHER ZONES AND CAT. I PRESSURIZED EQUIPMENT X 5114.00 FSAR 6. 4, 2. 4.E HABITABILITY CONTHOL HOOM 18A X 30 X SYSTEMS, INTERACTION 000HWAYS WITH TWO X WITH OTHER 2ONES E"TS OF D00HS ACTING l X AS AN AIRLOCK X X 5115.00 FSAR 6. 4. 2. 4.E HABITABILITY D00HS TO RECOND 18A X 30 l X SYSTEMS, INTERACTION STORAGE AREAS AHE X FITH OTHER ZONES EQUIPPED WITH X SELF-CLOSING DEVICES X X 5116.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 4.E HABITABILITY ACCESS TO HECOND 18A X 30 X SYSTEMS, INTEHACTION STORAGE AHEA THROUGH X WITH OTHER ZONES AN AIRLOCK OR TWO X D00HS IN SERIES X 2110.00 FSAH 6. 4. 2. 4.F HABITABILITY HG 1.52 18A X 0 SYSTEMS, FILTERS FOR MAKEUP AIR SUPPLY DURING EMERGENCY CONDITIONS O O O ; f* Q . ! Page No. 19 01/25/88 PLANT WOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A I ====================================== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ==================== 2113.00 FSAR 6. 4. 4. 2 CONTROL ROOM RG 1.78 18A X 16 PROTECTION FROM T0XIC GAS 2114.00 FSAR 6. 4. 4. 2 CONTROL ROOM RG 1.95 18A X 16 PROTECTION FROM CHLORINE 2116.00 FSAR 6. 4. 4. 3 CONTROL ROOM AIR M9 1.4 18A X 0 PURIFICATION AND SHIELDING DESIGNS 2117.00 FSAR 6. 4. 4. 3 CONTROL ROOM RVAC DESIGNED TO 18A X 20 PRESSURIZE ROOM TO 1/8 IN. WG DURING EMERGENCY OPERATION MODE 2118.00 FSAR 6. 4. 4. 3 CHLORINE IN CONTROL RG 1.78 IBA X 0 ROOM BELOW ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATIONS 2119.00 FSAR 6. 4. 4. 3 CHLORINE IN CONTROL RG 1.95 18A X 0 ROOM BELOW ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATIONS 2120.00 FSAR 6. 4. 4. 3 HABITABILITT CONTROL ROOM 18A X 0 SYSTEMS, ESSENTIAL HVAC AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ISOLATION DAMPERS DESIGN BASES DESIGNED TO SEISMIC CAT. I 2121.00 FSAR 6. 4. 6 HABITABILITY DESIGNED AS SEISMIC 18A X 0 SYSTEMS, CAT. I INSTRUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 2153.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1-1 ESF FILTER SYSTEM, ESF FILTER SYSTEM IHA X 0 TABLE DESIGN PARAMETERS EFFICIENCIES e . - - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _. _ _ _ _ _ . _ - -_.m . _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Page No. 20 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE IHA = =================== ==== =========== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITHENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMAHKS NUMBEH SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================:- ====== ============= === == === ==== === = -- =. - - - == 1341.00 FSAH 6. 5. 1-3 ESF FILTER SYSTEM MATEHIAL SPECS FOR IHA X 0 TABLE MATEHIALS AIR CLEANUP UNITS 2122.00 FSAN G. 5. 1. l.A ESF FILTER SYSTEMS 10CFH50, APP. A. GDC IHA X 0 DESIGN BASIS IS CONTHOL ROOM HVAC X 2123.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 1.B ESF FILTER SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN 18A X 30 X DESIGN BASIS -1/4-IN. WG WITH X PIPING PENETHATION HESPECT TO ATMOS., X FILTER EXHAUST NEGATIVE WITH X SYSTEM HESPECT TO SUNHOUNDING AHEAS 2124.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 1.B ESF FILTER SYSTEMS 10CFR100 IBA X 0 DESIGN BASIS PIPING PENETRATION FILTER EXHAUST SYSTEM X 2125.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 1.C ESF FILTER SYSTEM DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN 18A X 30 X DESIGN BASIS A SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE X FHB POST-ACCIDENT PHESSURE IN THE FHB X EXHAUST SYSTEM FOLLOWING A FUEL X HANDLING ACCIDENT. 2126.00 FSAN 6. 5. 1. 1.C ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFH100 18A X 0 DESIGN BASIS FHB POST-ACCIDENT EXHAUST SYSTEM 2127.00 FSAN 6. 5. 1. 1.C ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC IHA X 0 DESIGN BASIS IS FHB POST-ACCIDENT EXHAUST SYSTEM 5046.00 FSAH 6. 5. 1. 1.D ENGINEEHED SAFET) SINGLE FAILUTE IN IHA X 30 FEATURES FILTER FILTRATION SYSTEM SYSTEMS O O 9 O O ~ Page No. 21 01/25/88 , PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COF1MITMENT MATRIX - MODULE IBA ====================================== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ==================== 2129.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 1.E ESF FILTER SYSTEM ESF FILTER SYSTEM 184 X 30 s DESIGN BASIS DESIGNED TO REMAIN INTACT AND FUNCTIONAL FOR SSE 2130.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 1.F ESF FILTER SYSTEM RG 1.52 18A X 30 DESIGN BASIS 2131.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 3.A ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR50, APP. A, GDC 18A X 0 CONTROL ROOM 19 BMERGENCY FILTERS & COMPONENTS l 2132.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 3.B ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFH100 IBA X 0 PIPING PENETRATION EXHAUST FILTERS 2133.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 3.B ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR50, APP. A, GDC 18A X 0 PIPING PENETRATION 19 EXHAUST FILTERS 2134.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 3.C ESF FILTER SYSTEM, 10CFR100 18A X 0 FRB POST-ACCIDENT EXHAUST SYSTEM 2135.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 3.C ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR50, AT P. A, GDC IBA X 0 FRB POST ACCIDENT 19 EXHAUST SYSTEM 5047.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 3.D ENGINEERED SAFETY TWO INDEPENDENT AND 18A X 30 FEATURES FILTER REDUNDANT FILTRATION SYSTEMS TRAINS FOR RVAC POWERED BY SEPARATE CLA35 IE ELECTRIC BUS. 2138.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 3.E ESF FILTER SYSTEM DESIGNED TO SEISMIC 18A X 30 CAT. I Page No. 22 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHlX - MODULE IBA ====================================== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH HEMARKS NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN = ====. ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ======= ======- =- 2139.00 FSAR G. 5. 1. 3.F ESF FILTER SYSTEV RG 1.52 IBA I 30 2140.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 4. 1 ESF FILTER SYSTEM, MIL-F-51068 18A X 0 MANUFACTURING AND TCSTING 2149.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 4. 1 ESF FILTEH SYSTEM, ANSI N509, PAHA. 5.4 18A X 0 SEE FSAN 1.9.52 TESTING OF MOISTURE SEPARATORS 2152.00 FSAR 6. 5. 1. 5 ESF FILTER SYSTEM HG 1.52 IBA X 0 INSTRUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 1342.00 FSAN 6. 5. 3. 1 FISSION PRODUCT CONTAINMENT MINI- IBA X 0 CONTHOL SYSTEMS PURGE ISOLATION PHIMARY CONTAINMENT VALVES DESIGNED TO CLOSE WITHIN 5 SEC. OF RECEIVING CLOSURE SIGNAL 4520.00 FSAR 7. 3. 4. 2.B CONTAINMENT PUHGE IEEE 279-1971 IBA X 0 SEE 7.2.3.2C FOR ISOLATION SYSTEM CONFORMANCE 4521.00 FSAR 7. 3. 5. 4.B FUEL HANDLING IEEE 279-1971 18A X 0 SEE 7.3.3.2C FOR BUILDING, CONFORMANCE VENTILATION ISOLATION 4515.00 FSAR 7. 3. G. 1. 2 CONTHOL HOOM NO SINGLE FAILURE 184 X 0 VENTILATION SYSTEM CAN PHEVENT THE DESIGN BASES ISOLATION OF THE CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION SYSTEM 4522.00 FSAR 7. 3. G. 2.B CONTHOL ROOM IEEE 279-1971 IBA X 0 /ENTILATION SYSTEM ANALYSIS O O 9 O O Page No. 23 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHlx - MODULE IBA ===_======= ===== =. .= == ======:== HEF. COMMITMENT CO"MITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMARKS NUMBEH SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATUNE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ===== ============== ==================== ==================== === === === === =4==== === 2= . _ = ;=- 4493.00 FSAN 7. 3. 12. 1. 2 CONTHOL BUILDING NO SINGLE FAILUNE 184 X 0 HVAC DESIGN BASES WITHIN SYSTEM NOH ANY SUPPOHTING SYSTEM SHALL PREVENT IT FROM PERFORMING ITS SAFETY FUNCTION. 4500.00 FSAR 7. 3. 13. 1. 2 AUX. BLDG, ESF HVAC NO SINGLE FAILURE 18A X 0 DESIGN BASES WITillN SYSTEM NOH ANY SUPPORTING SYSTEM SHALL PREVENT IF FROM PERFORMING ITS SAFETY FUNCTIONS 3440.00 FSAR 3. 2. 9. 1. 1. l.A ESSENTIAL CHILLED ESSENTIAL CHILLED 18A X 0 WATER SYSTEM - WATER SYSTEM SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DESIGNED TO HEMAIN FUNCTIONAL DURING/FOLLOWING AN SSE 3441.00 FSAR 9. 2. .D. 1. 1. l.B ESSENTIAL CHILLEDy DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN 18A X 0 WATEN SYSTEM ESF _, ,, S AFETY DESIGN B ASIS EDblPMENT/SWITCliGE AN HOOMS BELOW THE MAXIMUM DESIGN pHBIEN.T AIH, . TEMPERATUHE OF 104 . DEGREES F- UNDER ACCIDENT CONDITIONS 3553.00 FSAN 9. 2. 9. 1. 1. I.C ESSENTI A L

Cili LLED SINGLE FAILURE P'US L 18A X 0 WATEN-SAFETY DESIGN L . O . O '. P . WILL NOT '

BASES I MP A I R 'S YS'T'EM 412.00 FSAN 9. 2. 9. 1. 1. 2.A ESSENTIAL CHILLED ASHNAE COMFOHT IdA X 0 WATER SYSTEM DESIGN STANDAHD 55-74 Fage No. 24 Ol/25/8H PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE IBA ====================================== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==: ================ ==================== === === === ==== ===================. 3444.00 FSAR 9. 2. 9. 1. 3.A ESSENTIAL CHILLED CONDENSER WATER 18A X 0 WATER SYSTEM PUMP. CHILLER, SAFETY EVALUATION CHILLED WATER PUMP, AND PIPING DESIGNED TO SEISMIC CAT. 1 REQUIREMENTS 3447.00 FSAR 9. 4 ESSENTIAL HVAC REDUNDANT 18A X 0 SYSTEMS SAFETY-RELATED SEISMIC CAT. 1 TRAINS PROVIDEb 3489.00 FSAR S. 4. 1. 1. 1 CONTROL BUILDING FAILURE OF 18A X 14 IIVAC - S AFETY DESIGN NON-SAFETY, BASES NON-SEISMIC HVAC EOUIPMENT/DUCTWORK WILL NOT COMPROMISE ANY SAFETY RELATED SYST., STRS., OR COMPONENTS 3461.00 FSAR 9. 4. 1. 3.F CENTRAL ALARM DESIGNED TO LIMIT 112 18A X 0 IN CONFORMANCE WITH STATION BACKUP HVAC CONC. TO LESS THAN RC 1.128 SYSTEM 24 BY VOL ME IN SYSTEM OPERATION BATTERY ROOM. 3490.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 1. 1. 1 FHB NORMAL VENT FAILURE OF 18A X 14 SYSTEM NON-SAFETY, SAFETY DESIGN BASES NON-SEISMIC HVAC EQUIPMENT /DUCTWORK WILL NOT COMPROMISE ANY SAFETY RELATED SYS., STRUCTURES, OR COMPONENTS. 3972.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 1. 1.8 POST ACCIDENT DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN 18A X 30 OPERATION OF FHB A SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE VENT. SUBSYSTEM PRESSURE FOLLOWING AN ACCIDENT. O O O (N

p Page No. 25 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE lHA

==========-=====================u===== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === =2== ==================== 3973.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 1. 1.C POST ACCIDENT FHB POWERED SO FAILUNE 18A X 0 VENT. SUBSYSTEM. OF ONE CLASS lE POWER SUPPLY WILL NOT IMPAIR FUNCTION OF BOTH ESF TRAINS 3974.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 1. 3 POST ACCIDENT OR RG. 1.52 18A X 0 SEE FSAR 1.9.52 FOR EMERGENCY OPER. OF COMPLIANCE THE FHB VENT. SYSTEM, CODES AND STDS. - 3975.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 2. POST ACCIDENT OR 3-h HATED CURTAIN 18A X 0 2.C. 5 EMERGENCY OPER. OF TYPE FIRE DAMPERS THE FHB SYSTEM LOCATED IN FIRE FIRE DAMPERS BARRIERS. AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN FIRE RATING 3977.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 2. 3 POST ACCIDENT OR HEATING COIL 18A X 0 EMERGENCY OPER. OF MAINTAINS HELATIVE THE FHB SYSTEM - HUMIDITY OF AIR (SYSTEM OPER.) ENTERING THE CHARCOAL, BELOW 70% 3978.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 3.A POST ACCIDENT OR 10CFR100 18A X 0 FILTERS LIMIT EMER. OPER. OF THE RADIOLOGICAL FHB SYSTEM - SAFETY CONSEQUENCES OF FUEL EVALUATION HANDLING ACCIDENT TO LESS THAN 10CFH100 LIMITS 3980.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2, 2. 3.D POST ACCIDENT OR ESF FANS 18A X 0 EMERGENCY OPERATION DESIGNED /CONSTHUCTED OF THE FHB SYSTEM - TO SEIEMIC CAT I. SAFETY EVALUATION 3981.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 3.E POST ACCIDENT OR SUBSYSTEM 18A X 0 EMERGENCY OPEHATION DESIGNED / CONSTRUCTED OF THE FH3 SYSTEM - TO SEISMIC CAT. I SAFETY EVALUATION. Page No. 26 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A ========== =========================== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== =========== ======== 3982.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 4 POST ACCIDENT OR AMCA STD. 210 IBA X 0 A P r* L I E S TO TESTING EMERGENCY OPERATION OF FANS BY OF FHB VENT. SYSTEM MANUFACTUHEH - TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 3983.00 FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2. 4 POST ACCIDENT OR HEPA FILTER UNITS 18A X 0 EMERGENCY OPERATION TESTED INDIVIDUALLY OF FHB VENT. SYSTEM PRIOR TO - TESTS AND INSTALLATION TO INSPECTIONS. VERIFY AN EFFICIENCY OF 99.97% 3984.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 1. 1. 1 AUX. BLDG. NORMAL FAILURE OF 18A X 14 VENT. SYS. NON-SAFETY, NON-SEISMIC HVAC EQUIP./DUCTWORK WILL NOT COMPHOMISE ANY SAFETY RELATED SYS., l STRUCTURES, OR COMPONENTS. 3998.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 1. 1.B AUX. BLDG. EMER. EACH EQUIP. ROOM 18A X 0 VENT. SYS. - SAFETY COOLING UNIT FAN DESIGN BASES POWERED BY SAME SAFETY FEATURE BUS AS EQUIP. IN HOOM. { ! 3999.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 1. 1.D AUX. BLDG. EMERG. ANY SINGLE FAILURE IBA X 0 l VENT. SYS. - SAFETY CANNOT CAUSE LOSS OF DESIGN BASES ESF FUNCTION 4000.00 FSAH 9. 4. 3. 2. 1. 1.F AUX. BLDG. EMERG. DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN 18A X 0 VENT. SYS. - SAFETY NEG. PHESSURE TO DESIGN BASES PREVENT HADIOACTIVITY HELEASE O O O ] Page No. 27 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A =====================_================ REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMARKS NUMDER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN = ===== ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== =============2a===== 4001.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 1. 3 AUI. BLDG. EMERG. RG. I.52 18A X 0 SEE 1.9.52 FOR VENT. SYS. - CODES CONFORMANCE AND STDS. 4002.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 3.B AUK. BLDG. EMERG. EACH EQUIPMENT ROOM 18A X 0 ?ENT. SYSTEM - COOLED BY UNIT WHOSE SAFETY EVALUATION POWER AND CHILLED WATER ARE FROM SAME SAFETY FEATURES TRAIN AS EQUIPMENT IN ROOM. 4003.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3, 2. 3.C - AUX. BLDG. EMERGENCY SYSTEM IBA X 0 VENT. SYSTEM - DESIGNED / CONSTRUCTED SAFETY EVALUATION AS SEISMIC CAT. I 4004.00 FSAR 9.'4. 3. 2. 3.D AUX. BLDGs EMERG. NO SINGLE FAILURE 18A X 0 VENT. SYS. - SAFETY CAN CAUSE LOSS OF EVAL. ANY ESP FUNCTION 4005.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMERG. AMCA 210-1974 18A X 0 VENT. SYS. FAN TESTS 4006.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX BLDG. EMERG. RG 1.52 18A X 0 VENT SYS.. FILTER UNIT TESTS. 4007.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMERGENCY ARI 410-1972 IBA X 0 VENT. SYSTEM COIL TESTS 4008.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMERG. MIL-F-51068 18A X 0 VENT. SYS. - HEPA FILTER MANUFACTURING AND TESTING 4009.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMERG. RG 1.52 IBA X 0 VENT. SYS., HEPA FILTER TESTS L i f i ---.e,.g , m -ye,--.._a- g .- - y- - , , w-- 4 ~ ,._a,-.,,..e, -e,a,,+.,n._,<we w.,,,-,.., e wv,., --m~.,.- v.w-c n- , , , - , - - - , . ~ .-w ,-w- .-+,e--~e-,,rm ew , - - _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ - Page No. 28 01/25/H8 l' L A N T VOGTLE UNIT 2 ilEADINESS HEVIEW PROGHAM COMMITMENT MATHIX MODULE 18A ==============::= =:=== m ;_=_.=_: =_= HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH HEMARKS NUMBEH SOUNCE SECTION SilBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ====================. ========== ========= ========= === ==== = === ==- ~ ===- - 4010.00 FSAR 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMENG. NG 1.52 TABLE I 18A X 0 VENT. SYSTEM - ACTIVATED CAHBON ACCEPTANCE CHITERIA 4011.00 FS All 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMEH. HDT-M-16-lT, JUNE 18A X 0 VENT. SYS. - 1972 ACTIVATED CARBON ACCEPTANCE CHITEHIA 4013.00 FSAH 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMEHG. HG 1.52 18A X 0 TESTED TO VEHin VENT. SYS. - IODINE HEMOVAl. IMPHEGNATED EFFICIENCIES ACTIVATED CHARCOAL 4014.00 FSAH 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMEH. ANSI /ASME N509-1976 18A X 0 LAB TESTED TO S i!0W VENT. SYS. - PARAGHAPil 5.4 min. 99% EFP. MOISTUHE SEPARATORS HEMOVING MolSTUNE IN AIHSTilEAM X 4015.00 FSAH 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 AUX. BLDG. EMERG. SMACNA, 1975 & ANSI 18A X X 25 X VENT. SYSTEM - DUCT N510 SECT. 6, 1980 X LEAR TESTING X X 4390.00 FS Alt 9. 4. 3. 3. 1. I HADWASTE BLDG. VENT. FAILUHE OF 18A X 14 SYS. NON-SAFETY NONSEASHIC liVAC EQUIP./DUCTNORK WILL NOT COMPHOMISE ANY SAFETY HELATED SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, OR COMPONENTS. 4057.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 1. 1. 1.B CONTHOL BLnGt ESF ELEC. EQ t!! P . HOOM IHA X 0 VENT. SYSTEM - ELEC. I!VAC SifALL HEMAIN EQillPMENT HOOM FUNCTIONAL FOR SSE, It E S I G N BASES Tolf N A DO , LOCA, MAJON PIPE HUPTURE ON SINGLE FAILilHE OF ANY COMPONENT. O O 9 O O O Page No. 29 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATHlX - MODULE 18A =====================: =============== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH HEMAHKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ========:=========== 4058.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 1. 1. 1.C CONTHOL BLDG. ESF EACH THAIN OF SAFETY 184 X 0 VENT. SYSTEM - FEATUNES ELECTRICAL ELECT. EQUIP. HOOM EQUIPMENT HOOM HVAC IS POWERED BY A SEPAHATE INDEPENDENT CLASS lE POWER SYh7EM. 406I.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 1. 1. 2.B CONTHOL BLDG. ESF HEMalNS FUNCTIONAL 18A X 30 HVAC EQUIPMENT HOOM DUHING AN SSE, VENT SYSTEM. DESIGN BASIS TORNADO. OR LOCA ALONG WITH A SINGLE FAILURE OF ANY COMPONENT. 4062.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 1. 2. I CONTHOL BLDG. SAFETY HVAC SYSTEMS IBA X 0 FEATURE ELEC. DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN EQUIPMENT N00M HVAC SPACE TEMPERATURES SYSTEM. BETWEEN 65 DEGREES F. AND 100 DEGHEES F. 4063.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 1. 2. 1.B CONTHOL BLDO. SAFETY BATTERY HOOM EXH. 18A X 0 FEATURE ELEC. FAN MAINTAINS EQUIPMENT ROOM HVAC HYDHOGEN SYSTEM. CONCENTHATION BELOW 2%. 4065.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 1. 3 CONTHOL BLDG. ESF RG 1.52 18A X 0 SEE 1.9.52 FOR HVAC EQUIPMENT HOOM CONFORMANCE VENT. SYSTEM X 4F6G.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 2. I CONTROL BLDG. SAFETY BATTERY HOOM 18A X 30 X FEATURE ELEC. MAINTAINED AT X EQUIPMENT HOOM HVAC SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE X PHESSURE X Page No. 30 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS HEVIEW PROGHAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE IBA ========================= ============ HEF. COMMITMENT t'OMMITMENT COMM'TMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMAHKS NUMBER SOURCE SSCTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= =========~ =::=============== = ==================== ============ ======= === === === ==== ===========:s=====:. 4067.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 2. 2 ELEC. PENETRATION EACH TRAIN POWERED 18A X 0 HOOM FILTER EXHAUST BY SEPARATE CLASS IE SYSTEM POWEH SUPPLY 4068.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 3. 1 CONTHOL BLDG. SAFETY ROOMS MAINTAINED AT 10A X 0 FEATUNE ELEC. EQUIP. MAXIMUM 100 DEGREES ROOM HVAC SYSTEM. F 4069.00 FdAH 9. 4. 5. 3. I CONTHOL BLDG. SAFETY BATTERY HOOMS HAVE 18A X 0 FEATUNE ELEC. EQUIP. ELEC. HEHEAT COILS ROOM HVAC SYSTEM. TO MAINTAIN A HOOM DESIGN TEMP. OF 70 DEGREES TO 80 DEGHEES F. X 4070.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 3. 2 ELEC. PENETHATION UPON RECE!PT OF A 18A X 3 X HOOM FILTHATION AND CONTAINMENT X EXHAUST SYSTEM ISOLATION SIGNAL THE X ELEC. PENETHATION X HOOM EXHAUST FILTHATION UNITS ARE ACTIVATED 4071.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 4. l.A ESF ELEC. EQUIP. ESSENTIAL HVAC 18A X 0 ROOM HVAC SYSTEMS SYSTEMS F0H ESF SWITCHGEAN. ESF EQUIP. H00MS. AND BATTERY HOOMS DESIGNED TO SEISMIC CAT. I 4072.00 FSAli 9. 4. 5. 4. 1.B ESF ELEC. EQUIF SINGLE ACTIVE 18A X 0 HOOM HVAC SYSTEM FAILUHE IN ESSENTIAL HVAC SYSTEM OR SUPP0HTING SYSTEMS (INCL. OFFSITF POWER) DOES NOT IMPAIR SYSTEM'S ABILITY TO PEHFORM ITS SAFETY FUNCTION. O O 9 De (b U Page No. 31 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW PkOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHI? - MODULE 18A ============================-========= HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR HEMAHKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN =====2= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ==._==============2-4073.00 ISAH 9. 4. 5. 4. 1.C ESF ELEC. EQUIP. E ACli ELEC. EQUIPMENT 18A X 0 H00M HVAC SYSTEM ROOM COOLED BY A UNIT Wil0SE FAN IS POWERED FROM SAME i ESF BUS AS EQUIP. IN ROOM 4074.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 4. 1.D ESF ELEC. EQUIP. NG 1.128 18A X 0 VENT. SYSTEM HOOM liVAC SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO LIMIT BATTERY HOOM llYDHOGEN CONCENTHATION TO LESS Til A N 2% 4075.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 4. 2.B CONTHOL BLDG. ESF SIhqLE ACTIVE 18A X 30 HVAC EQUIPMENT ROOM FAllVHE IN flVAC VENT. SYSTEM E4JhPMENT ROOM LEVEL 3 VENT. SYSTEM DOES NOT IMPAIR ITS SAFETY FUNCTION CAPABILITY. 4076.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 5.A CONTROL BLDG. ESF AIR HANDLING UNIT 18A X 0 **4C SYSTEM, SYSTEM IIOUSINGS ARE SI:ISMIC s MPONENTS CAT. I 4077.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 5.B ' TROL BLDG. ESF MIN. AVG. EFFICIENCY IBA X 0 d.C SYSTEM OF PHEFILTEH, USING 6YSTEM COMPONENTS ATMOSPERIC DUST IS 20 TO 60 PERCENT WilEN TESTED BY ASHRAE STD. 52 4078.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 5.D CONTHOL BLDG. ESF FANS AHE SEISMIC 18A X 0 HVAC SYSTEM CAT. I l

SYSTEM COMPONENTS 4079.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 5.E CONTHOL BLDG. ESF DUCTWOHL AND DAMPERS IHA X 0 IIVAC SYSTEM ARE SEISMIC CAT. I SYSTEM COMPONENTS t

{ N' * *" i w aw+ 4e . y m > M e m 7- Page No. 32 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW PROCHAM COMMITMENT MATHlX - MODULE 18A =_ = ===_ _ ===_ _ __ == ___.=== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH HEMARKS NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SilBJECT FE ATilHE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ====.==e== ==================== ==================== ====.=x=========== = === .,- ==- ==== == -- .== -a= - ===. 4080.00 FSAN 9. 4. 5. 5.F CONTHOL BLDG. ESF BATTEHY N00M EXHAUST 18A X 0 HVAC SYSTEM FAN AHE SEIFMIC SYSTEM COMPONENTS CAT.1 4081.00 FSAN 9. 4. 5. 5.1 CONTROL BLDG. ESF MOISTUHE SEPAHATOR IBA X 0 HVAC SYSTEM WILL HEMOVE 99.7% OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS ALL FHEE WATER DROPLETS DOWN TO 2 MICHON DIAMETER WITHOUT VISIBLE , CAHHYOVER. 4082.00 FSAH 3. 4. 5. 5.1 CONTHOL BLDG. ESF HG. 1.52 18A A 0 HVAC SYSTEM COMPONENTS MOISTURE SEPAHATOR 4083.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 5.J CONTHOL BLDG. ESF MIL-F-51068 10A X 0 APPLIES TO HVAC MANUFnCTURING AND SYSTEM COMPONENTS, TESTING PH10H TO HEPA FILTERS INSTALLATION. 4084.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 5.J CONTHOL BLDG. ESF MIN. ACCEPTANCE IBA X 0 HVAC CHITEHIA IS HEMOVAL SYSTEM COMPONENTS OF 99.974 0F 0.3 HEPA FILTEHS MICHON THEHMALLY GRNERATED, MONODISPENSED DIOCTYL PHTHALATE PAHTICLES 40uJ.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 5.K CONTROL BLDG. ESF MIN alR HESIDENCE 18A X 0 HVAC, SYSTEM TIME IN THE CARB0F COMPONENTS, CAHBON IS 0.5S AT A NOMINAL ADSORBERS FACE VELOCITY OF 40 FT/ MIN. 4090.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 5.K CONTROL BLDG. ESF ACCEPTANCE CHITEHIA 18A X 0 HVAC 15 MIN. EFFICIENCY SYSTEM COMPONENTS, OF 99% HEMOVAL OF CAHBON ADSONBEHS ELEMENTAHY OHGANIC 10 DINES AT A CONTHOLIED H.H. OF 70%. O C O Page No. 33 01/25/88 PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS REVIEW PROGHAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE IBA ====================================== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH REMAHXS NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== =========== ======== === === === ==== ==============,3==a= 4085.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTROL BLDG. ESF AMCA STANDARDS 210 18A X 0 HVAC FAN TESTS 4086.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTROL BLDG. ESF RG. 1.52 IBA X 0 SEE FSAR 1.9.52 FOR HVAC CONFORMANCE FILTER UNITS TESTS 4087.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTHOL BLDG. ESF ARI STANDARD 410 18A X 0 HVAC COIL TESTS 4088.00 FSAN 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTROL BLDG. ESF M I L- F-51068 18A X 0 APPLIES TO HVAC MANUFACTURE AND HEPA FILTERS TESTING 4091.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTROL BLDG. ESF RG 1.52 18A X 0 CAPABLE OF HEMOVING HVAC, MOISTURE 99% OF ENTNAINED SEPARATOR TESTS MOISTUHE IN AN AIRSTREAM. 4093.00 FSAH 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTROL BLDG. ESF RG 1.52 18A X 0 HVAC. HEPA FILTER TESTS 4094.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTHOL BLDG. ESF RDT-M-16-IT 18A X 0 HVAC ACCEPT. CRITERIA FOR ACTIVATED CARBON 4095.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTHOL BLDG. ESF RG 1.52, POSITION C6 18A X 0 SEE 1.9.52 FOR HVAC - TEST ON AND TABLE 2 CONFORMANCE IMPHEGNATED ACTIVATED CHARCOAL TO VERIFT IODINE REMOVAL EFFICIENCT

X 4096.00 FSAR 9. 4. 5. 6 CONTROL BLDG. ESF SHACNA 1975 & ANSI 18A X X 25 X HVAC DUCTWONE LEAK N510 SECT. 6 1980 X TESTING X

X Page No. 34 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS REVIEW PH0GHAM COMMITMENT MATHIX MODULE 18A =========.=========. ===. . .,========= HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR HEMAHKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ======x==== ======== ==================== === === == ===-- =======:=~===-=== 4098.00 FSAR 9. 4. 6. 1 CONTAINMENT BLDG, CONTAINMENT HVAC IBA X 0 VENTILATION SYSTEM PENETRATIONS PENETRATING CONTAINMENT DESIGNED TO SEISMIC CAT. I 5048.00 FSAR 9. 4. 6. 1. 2.A CONTAINMENT BUILDING LIMIT TEMPEHATURE OF IBA X 0 VENTILATION SYSTEM CONCRETE STRUCTURES WITHIN CONTAINMENT TO 200 DEGHEE F. AND CONCRETE UNDER VESSEL COLUMN BASEPLATES TO 150 DEGREE F. 3864.00 FSAH 9. 4. 6. 1. 2.G CONTAINMENT BLDG. NON-SAFETY RELATED 18A X 14 SIMil.AH STATEMENT IN VENTILATION SYSTEM, HVAC DESIGNED TO 9.4.6.1.1 CHANGED BY DESIGN BASES MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL AMEND. 14 INTEGHITY FOLLOWING SSE. 3607.00 FSAH 9. 4. 6. 2. 2.A CONTAINMENT VENT. ASME CODE CASE N-294 184 X 0 APPLIES TO CLEANAHLE SYS. CONTAINMENT ALUMINUM BRONZE COOLERS ALLOY CASTING H-PLUGS IN CONTAINMENT COOLER 3556.00 FSAR 9. 4. 6. 2. 3.D SYSTEM OPERATION AIR OPERATED VALVES 18A X 0 CONTAINMENT HVAC AT CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS PENETHATIONS AHE DESIGNED TO FAIL CLOSED ON LOSS OF POWER 3608.00 FSAH 9. 4. 6. 2. 3.D CONTAINMENT LLDG. SEISMIC CLASS 1 AND 18A X 0 INCLUDING ISOLATION VENT. SYS. QUALITY Cl. ASS 2 VALVES AND CONTAINMENT APPHOPHIATE SEISMIC PENETRATIONS HESTHAINTS 9 9 9 O C O Page No. 35 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS HEVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATRIX - MODULE 18A =============;========= = =====-e=== === REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH HEMANKS NUMBEH SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================m =================== ==================== === === === ==== ========.:==_ r ;_a= 3Gil.00 FSAH 9. 4, 6. 3 CONTAINMENT BLDG. DUCTS, DAMPERS. AND lHA X 0 VENT. SYS. COMPONENTS SUPPORTED SAFETY EVALUATION BY SEISMIC CAT. I SUPPORTS 3612.00 FSAN 9. 4. 6. 3 CONTAINMENT BLDG. PENETRATIONS OF IBA X 0 VENT. SYS., SAFETY CONTAINMENT BOUNDARY EVALUATION ARE SEISMIC CAT. 1& SAFETY CLASS 2 3623.00 FSAR 9. 4. T. 1. l.A DIESEL GENEMATOR DESIGNED TO LIMIT 18A X 0 BLDG. VENT. SYS. MAX. TEMPERATURE IN SAFETY DESIGN BASES BLDG. TO 120 DEGREES F WITH DIESEL GEN. IN OPERATION. 3624.00 FSAN 9. 4. 7 1. 1.B DIESEL GENERATOR SINGLE ACIVE lHA X 0 BLDG. VENTILATION COMPONENT FAILUHE SYSTEM COINCIDEN7 WITH LOSS SAFETY DESIGN BASES OF OFFSITE POWER DOES NOT IMPAIN SAFETY FUNCTION 3625.00 FSAR 9. 4. 7. 1. 1.C DIESEL GENERATOR VENT. SYSTEM 18A X 0 BLDG. VENTILATION CONNECTED TO SAME SYSTEM CLASS lE BUS TRAIN SAFETY DESIGN BASES AS DIESEL GENERATON SET BEING VENTILATED. 4391.00 FSAH 9. 4. 7. 1. 1.E DIESEL GEN. BLDG. FAILUHE OF 18A X 14 VENT. SYS. NONSAFETY, SAFETY DESIGN BASIS NONSEISMIC HVAC EQUIP./DUCTWOHK WILL NOT COMPHOMISE ANY SAFETY HELATED SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, OR COMPONENTS, Page No. 36 01/25/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE IBA ====================================== HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITHENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / HOD DES CON FSAN HEMAHKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ===============_ === 3629.00 FSAR 9. 4. 7. 3.D DIESEL GENEHATOR ESF SUPPLY FANS 18A X 0 BLDG. VENTILATION DESIGNED /CONSTHUCTED SYSTEM AS SEISMIC CAT. I SAFETY EVALUATION. 3630.00 FSAR 9. 4. 7. 4 DIESEL GEN. BLDC. AMCA STD. 210, 1974 18A X 0 VENT. SYS. FAN TESTS X 5094.00 FSAR 9. 4. 7. 4 DIESEL GEN. BLDG. SMACNA. 1975 & ANSI 18A X X 25 X VENT. SYSTEM N510, SECT. 6 1980 X DUCTWORK LEAK X TESTING X 3631.00 FSAR 9. 4. 8. 1. 1.8 AUX. FEEDWATER SAFETY FUNCTION NOT 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC. IMPAIRED BY SINGLE SAFETY DESIGN BASES ACTIVE COMPONENT FAILURE COINCIDENT WITH LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER 3632.00 FSAR 9. 4. 8. 1. 1.C -AUX. FEEDWATER IIMIT BLDG. 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC TEMPERATURE TO 120 SAFETY DESIGN BASES DEGREES F MAX. 4392.00 FSAR 9. 4. 8. 1. 1.F AUX. FEEDWATER FAILURE OF 18A X 14 PUMPHO'JSE HVAC. NONSAFETY, SAFETY DESIGN BASIS NONSEISMIC HVAC EQUIP./DUCTWORK WILL NOT COMPROMISE ANY SAFETY HELATED SYSTEMS, STHUCTURES, OR COMPONENTS 3634.00 FSAH 9. 4. 8. 2. 3 AUX. FEEDWATER ESF FANS LIMIT 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC TEMPERATURE TO 120 SYSTEM OPER. DEGHEES F MAX. IN ELECTRICAL DHIVEN PUMP ROOM O O O O 1 O Page No. 37 Ol/25/HH PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESh HEVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE IBA ========2= ._====:=__u.. _=_:- __- === HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMAHKS NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ========== ==================== ==================== ===..a=.- _:==-- ==== === === -= ==== - _ a- ._ _s=, 3637.00 FSAR 9. 4. 8. 3.A AUX. FEEDWATER ALL POWElf SUPPLIES 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC AND CONTHOL SAFETY EVAL. FUNCTIONS NECESSAltY FOR SAFE FUNCTION OF VENT. SYS. ARE CLASS lE. 3638.00 FSAR 9. 4. 8. 3.B AUX. FEEDWATER SINGLE FAILUHE lHA X 0 PUMPHOUSE IIV AC, CillTERI A SAFETY EVALUATION 3610.00 FSAH 9. 4. 4. 3.D AUX. FEEDWATEN HVAC UNITS IN MOTOH 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC, DHIVEN PUMP HOOMS SAFETY EVALUATION PHOVIDED FROM SAME ESF THAIN AS PUMPS 3641.00 FSAR 9. 4. 8. 3.D AUX. FEEDWATER ESF INTAKE DAMPERS 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC HAVE CLASS lE POWEH. SAFETY EVAL. 3642.00 FSAH 9. 4. 8. 3.E A tiX . FEEDWATER ESF FANS AHE SEISMIC 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC CLASS 1 SAFETY EVAL. 3643.00 FSAH 9. 4. 8. 4 AUX. FEEDWATEH AMCA STD. 210, 1974 18A X 0 PUMPHOUSE HVAC FAN TESTS X 5095.00 FSAN 9. 4. 8. 5 AUX. FEEDWATER SMACNA, !!175 & ANSI 184 X X 25 X PUMPHOUSE HVAC N510 SECT. 6, 1980 X D UC TWFW K LEAK X TESTI.4 X 4393.00 FSAN 9. 4. 9. 1. 1. I MISC. HVAC SYSTEMS FAILUHE OF lHA X 14 EQUIPMENT BASIS NONSAFETY, NONSEISMIC HVAC SAFETY EQUIP./DUCTWOHK WILT. NOT COMPHOMISE ANY SAFETY llELATED SYSTEMS, STif DCTUNES , OH COMI'C NENTS Page No. 38 01/25/H8 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 NEADINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX MODULE 18A ======== = =:. = r==- . ===::== .=-.=.= l l HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN REMARKS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATUHE ULE IGN ST AMEN ==== =- ========= =:================== ===== ============== ==================== === === === ==== ===u.===- _ := - .. 3645.00 FSAR 9. 4. 9. 2. 1. 1.B MISC. HVAC SYSTEMS. SINGLE ACTIVE IBA X 0 ! ESSENTIAL ELECT. COMPONENT FAILUHE l TUNNEL VENT. SYS. COINCIDENT WITH LOSS I OF OFFSITE POWEH WILL NOT IMPAlH j SAFETY FUNCTION. l 3646.00 FSAH 9. 4. 9. 2. 1. 1.B MISC. HVAC SYSTEMS. FAILUHE OF ONE CLASS 18A X 0 ESSENTIAL lE POWER SUPPLY VENTILATION F0H NSCW CANNOT IMPAIR POWEH CABLE TUNNELS FUNCTION OF BOTH ESF AND DIESEL POWEH THAINS CABLE TUNNELS. 4394.00 FSAR 9. 4. 9. 2. 1. 1.D ELEC. TUNNEL VENT. FAILURE OF 18A X 14 SYSTEM NONSAFETY, NON SEISMIC HVAC SAFETY EQUIP./DUCTWOHK WILL NOT COMPHOMISE ANY SAFETY HELATED SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES. OR COMPONENTS 3647.00 FSAH 9. 4. 9. 2. 3.A MISC HVAC SYSTEMS, MAINTAIN CABLE 18A X 0 ELEC. TUNNEL VENT. TUNNELS AT OH BELOW SYSTEM, SAFETY EVAL. 104 DEGREES F. 3648.00 FSAH 9. 4. 9, 2. 3.B HISC. HVAC SINGLE COMPONENT 18A X 0 ELEC. TUNNEL VENT. FAILUHE WILL NOT SYSTEM, SAFETY PHEVENT SUFFICIENT EVALUATION COOLING OF CABLE TUNNELS 3G49.00 FSAN 9. 4. 9. 2. 3.B MISC. HVAC. SYSTEMS, FAN MOTORS POWEHED 18A X 0 ELEC. TUNNEL VENT. FROM SAME CLASS lE SYSTEM. SAFETY POWEH THA!N AS EVALUATION CABLES IN TUNNEL e O O E D O Page No. 39 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE 18A ===== ============== ======== ======== _ HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAR REMAHkS l NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN ======= ==== ===== ===== = ======-===== ==================== ==================== === === === ==== ======-.;=== . =. =. I 3650.03 FSAR 9. 4. 9. 2. 4 MISC HVAC SYSTEMS. AMCA STD. 210 1974 18A X 0 ELECT. TUNNEL VENT. , SYSTEM, FAN TEST X 5096.00 FSAN 9. 4. 9. 2. 4 MISC HVAC SYSTEMS. SMACNA, 1975 & ANSI 18A X X 25 ' X ELECT. TUNNEL VENT. N510, SECT. 6, 1980 X SYSTEM, DUCTWORK X LEAK TESTING X 4395.00 FSAR 9. 4, 9. 3. 1. I MISC. HwAC SYSTEMS, FAILURE OF IBA X 14 PIPING PENETRATION NONSAFETY. VENT. SYSTEM NONSEISMIC HVAC EQUIP /DUCTWORK WILL NOT COMPROMISE ANY SAFETY-NELATED SYSTEMS, STHUCTURES OR COMPONENTS 4850.00 FSAN 12. 3. 3. I VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH2O IBA X 0 OBJECTIVES 4851.00 FSAR 12. 3. 3. I VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH50 18A X 0 OBJECTIVES 4852.00 FSAR 12. 3. 3. 2.A VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH20 ALARA IBA X 0 CRITERIA l 4853.00 FSAR 12. 3. 3. 2.A VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH20 APP. B, 18A X 0 CHITERIA TABLE II 4855.00 FSAR 12. 3. 3. 2.B VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH50 APP. I 18A X 0 CRITERIA 4854.00 FSAR 12. 3. 3. 2.C VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH100 18A X 0 CRITEHIA 485G.C1 FSAR 12. 3. 3. 2.D VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH50 APP. A. GDC 18A X 0 CHITERIA 19 1 i i Page No. 40 01/25/88 Pl. ANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW Pif 0G H AM COMMITMENT MATHIX MODULE lHA HEF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAN HEMAWKS NUMBER SOUNCE SECTION SUHJECT FE Af tlHE ULE IGN ST AMEN - - _ . = = = ==== ==== ==== =============== - - ====- ===,= === ==; ===== ======== === - =- ==== = _ _ 4H78.00 FSAH 12. 3. 3. 3. 2.D DESIGN OF AlH HG 1.52 IHA X 0 FSAH 1.9 G.4, 9.4 CLEANING SYSTEM i 4H57.00 FSAH 12. 3. 3. 3. 2.G VENTILATION DESIGN GDC 54 IHA X 0 GUIDELINES l 4858.00 FSAR 12. 3. 3. 3. 2.G VENTILATION DESIGN GDC 56 IBA X 0 l GUIDELINES l 4859.00 FSAR 12. 3. 3. 3. 3.A GUIDELINES TO HG 8.H IHA X 0 MINIMlZE PERSONNEL EXPOSURE FHOM HVAC EQUIPMENT 4H00.00 FS All 12. 3. 3. 3. 3.B GUIDELINES TO HG 1.52 18A X 0 SEE FSAH set:T. MINIMlZE PENSONNEL 1.9.52 Fok EXPOSUHE FROM HVAC CONFORMANCE EQUIPMENT 48G2.00 FSAN 12. 3. 3. 5 AIR CLEANING UNITS HG 1.52 IBA X 0 SEE FSAR I.9.140 FOR CONFORMANCE 479G.00 NHC QUEST. 0450. 03 CALCULATION OF MUNPHY CAMPE IBA X 13 AMEND. 13 CORRES. CONTHOL HOOM X/Q METiiODOLOGY USED l VALUES l 4149.00 NHC QUEST. Q451. 05-1 HVAC DESIGN A S illl A E IBA % 0 HESPONSE TO OllESileN COHHES. 4232.00 NHC QUEST. 0451. 05--1 BASES F0H HG 1.76 HEGION I IHA X 0 HESPONSE TO OUESTION COHHES. METE 0HOLOGICAL l CONDITIONS , 1 4I57.00 NHC OllEST. 0460. 02 ESF ATM. CLEANUP ANSI N509 IHA X 0 HESPONSE TO OllESTION CONHES. SYSTEMS; SECOND VALVE ON FILTHATION UNIT HANDSWITCH CONTHOLLED l i l 9 9 9 O O O Page No. 41 01/25/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM COMMITMENT MATHIX - MODULE IBA =========-_s== : = =. _ _=: . ==== REF. COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / MOD DES CON FSAH HEMAHMS NUMBER SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE ULE IGN ST AMEN =====c= ========== =====s============== ==================== ==== =============== === ,== === ===- ======,==... _- =.a-3710.00 NHC QUEST. Q460. 03 COOLING MECHANISM ANSI N509-1980 IBA X 13 HESPONSE TO AMEND. CORHES. FOR EACH ESF FILTER 13 SYSTEM 3711.00 NRC QUEST. Q460. 08 COOLING HECHAN!SM RELIEF DAMPEH IN THE 18A X 0 TO PHEVENT CORRES. FOR EACH ESF FILTEH AUXILIARY BUILDING OVERPHESSUNIZATION SYSTEM EXTERNAL WALLS OF WALLS IN AllX DESIGNED TO OPEN AT BLDG. BLOW-OUT DOOH 3 paid USED IN LIEU OF HELIEF DAMPEN i I l i PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW PHOGHAM IMPLEMENTATION MATHlX ====== ============================= DESIGN CONST REF. Sh mCE AND DES CON CUHHENT DESIGN CUHRENT CONSTHINJTION NINBEli FdCTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLD4ENTATION kD1 ARKS ======- =============== ==================== ==================== === === ======== ====================== ======== ====================== =========Se==== == EMPLANATION OF FIELDS REF NO. - A reference number that corresponds to the approprlate line entry le the commitment metrin. SOURCE AND SECTION - The commitment source med section to be Implemented SUBJECT - The s e bj ec t of the commitment peregraph DOCUMENT / FEATURE - The document dlscussed In the FSAR sectles or the pleet festere described is the FSAR section. (See Commitment Matrix.) DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION - An X is placed ender the headleg for the organizatlos responsible for implementatlos of the comalteent DESIGN CURRENT - The date that commiteomt implementation was verlflod AS OF CONST CURRENT AS OF DESIGN --The Project documentis) that were revlemed to verify comeltment IMPLEMENTATION leptementetton i CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION l i 5 m _ _. ___ m _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , ,- - (R [ (% Papa No. 1 Ol/21/HH PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX -- MODULE 18A =:================================== DESIGN CONST REF. SOUIF'E AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NtNBER SFcTION SUBJECT DOCtMENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION RFMARKS = = === = - = = = = = = = , - = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 172.00 FSAR QUALIFICATION FUR RG 1.89, REY O, X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4A320-6.25 CLASS IE EQUIINENT 11/74 REY. 9, 1-22-87

1. 9. In 182.00 FSAR INSTALLATION DESIGN RG 1.128, REV. 1, X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.lF. REV. 3 AND INSTALLATION OF 10/78 8-1-83, DC-1806-1.0,

1. 9.12H LARGE LEAD STORAGE REV. 5, 8-23-85 BATTERIES 323.00 FSAR SPECS. FOR ALL ASME III, DIV 1 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ07 SECT.

PRESSURE RETAINING 4.108, REV. 12,

6. 1. 1. 1. 1 MATERIAL IN ESF 11-18-86 SYSTEM 321.00 FSAR MATERIAL SPECS EUR ASME III. NC-2000, X 11-16-87 DC-1505 REV. 5, PENETRATION PIPING ESF COMIONENTS IN CLASS 2 7/26/33, SEC. 3.2.C

6. 1. 1. 1. 1 QUALITY GROUP R DC-1506, REV. 5, 8/2/83, SEC. 3.2.C DC-1508, REV. 6, 8/5/83. SEC. 1.0

CS.00 F:sAR MATERIAL SPECS. FOR ASME III, ND-2000, X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4A307, SECT. ASME, SECT. III, ESF COMP. IN QUALITY CLASS 3 4.10B. REY. 12, UTV. 1, CLASS 3

6. l. 1. 1. I GROUP C 11-18-86 3211.00 FSAR ESF CONSTRUCTION ASME II, SFA 5.1, X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AQ37-5.0A, ASMR, SFA 5.1, MATERI ALS- WELD 5.2, 5.5, 5.17, 5.18 REV. 14, 3-5-87 5. 2, 5.5, E"Ir.

6. 1. 1. 1. 2 MAT'L FUR JOINING & 5.20 FERRITIC BASE MAT'LS 311.00 FSAR ESF CONST. ASME III & IX X 07-14 87 SPEC. X4AQ37-5.0A, X4AJ01, REV. 18, ASME III & IX, MAT'LS-WELD MATERIAL REV. 14, 3-5-87 9-13-85, FwP-9G9-304, WELDER QUAL.

6. 1. 1. 1. 2 00ALIFICATION REY. 2, 12-13-84 MATERIAL 333.00 FS4R ESF CONST. MAT' L -- LIMITED TO ho X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ16-5.3, REV. AUSTENITIC S.S.

COLD WORKED GREATER THAN 10, 12-10-8G, DWG. PIPE AND FITTINGS

6. 1. 1. 1. 2 AUSTENITIC S.S. 90,000gei YIELD X4AJ16-2, REY. 7 SPECIFIED. DWG.

STRENGTil 11-19 82 SHOWS PII'E AND FITTINGS NOT COLD WORKED _ _ _ __ _________ _ _ __ _ _ - - - _ - _ . _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ = S E m S L t MT L 5 FO B L - A L TN2 LS = AT OS INA T AT = = = TN AE DMA DD NN AU HYST N ONDt I O TI 2o SEI ON f ) ( cT EE S O C I HE MBN Sf O IEYM N P 9 S = AT6T TT SRO K - F kA5 OO OC R - E TN1 Y NN SG A = DK ET - L T WEC M- O NLCP EO OTA E - IUO EI DP EO HAV R - GB PF ' SFI SCH = = ~ = N - O NI = OT - I A - TT - CN - UE f = iM-TL. SI NP - OM . CI = = T = N : - TEF = SRO-NR = OUS = CCA = = , , . , = = , J. 1 V 1 . 3, A, 5 , 2 E 1 3 , H3 M = 0 E R .6 . . l - R A = = V. 2 L B , V E ,6. 4 V1 V . E3 1 1 V. G = E . . A 1 H 35 1 6 E3 R - , - E 0 = R 21 3 T R5 ,231 681 l . i f l A _ N = - T8 6 E. . . 3 O = T .N C &8 2. VT V ,1 i = lc51 0 Pll I - A CVC E0 - I B EC ET EN ,1 W = T- 0 EEM S1 07 A 6 HE NC l I . 1 - 2 . Ei - A - SRD - T ,S E .M 3 M - 2 T = 2 ,8 6 1 2 3 3I 2 I 8264-I ,S VUl = - N= ,1 ,3662 ,, 8 C 5 0 , ED - E = 23 1 0 , 0 - 5 03, 1 , 3 , ,503 RO NM= 98 6 8851 1 5 1 7 03 08 93 33553I 1 0E M _- G E. = 5 - 0 0 - 0H 0 - E1 H - 5881 H 5 M. 2 3 1 .h 1 3 S I I = 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 3 . 1 1 - S - - SP = - 1 - 002CV - V. 4 - .C4 1 96Ct Y' C2 E NX - - EM= DI = C - D8 C D28I DE R CE DR C , D5 C D4 C - PD D9L 4 C DH5- - D 8RI - EMD 8 9 I I - DH = 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 AT _ T = H 8 8 8 8 8 8 EA = RM _ NN GEF : = 4 4 4 4 4 6 4 I RO= 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2N = SH = - O - EUS = 7 7 7 7 7 1 7 TI = DCA - 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 I T NA N . = T OT= t N - CS = E _ E. M I SN = TE EG = GL DI - X X X X X X X OP VM - = 1 7 T I / N . 9 A. E - = 3, , . l P W-t T4 3, 3 I 1 T = R7 7 . V A = O - V. V / V E E = F5 E E 0 E l i F = M5 H H 1 R /- O 7, T CDR 0 . 9, N =. 0 6 1 2, 1 E = EA 1 2 2 6 9 1 1 5 = AD H = i F l 6 6 1 8 1 C = l N liA C 7 1 1 1 7 7 O= ST 0 M/ M G G/ G/ D - AS 1 I 2 i H H2 f i4 =. S N G T L = G . N N N A = DI SH I P OFA I - S SV FOL T E = E. E S AE N P LA S &AINP l l i D E L NN SN AP N NN = H CS TF EGH - HM CE f i PNAO DMNO IGO I T I. I E DSNOI O IS IGO I = T ST SW M& ST LS T A E UA ECS ODT T EA DC IAEV VDI GSTR SE EA DCI = AY F HNSEN I NEN S T= I S GA TE CF GCR I SECI OF C - T Y T ,SN NI A NNNI S D! E = Nf r T .SRAV IMSI ME I U0MY A S l. t i - = EE ST E F L ADTDM EWT SS IPSL MI C DI ff NS l ISL A NS HA A. l SA A ! iNAAO IEl A EU OE0EN OI tS EW S QAWIf C SC DSN CHCSA TC _ 1 = . - 1 4 2 D N . . A - 9 6. 6 9 l C 71 N - 2 2 i 9 f ! 2 EO I CI . . . PTC R A 2 N A 2 W A

9. H A

1 H 4

9. l l

A

9. i l

A 9 IOE S . A. S . S . h . S . S . SS F 92 E l F I F 1 *F 1 F l F I .u t o . R 0 0 d 0 0 0 N t, FF 0 0 U 0 0 0 8 EB . '2 ! St 2 1 3 7 2 . 7 0 1 1 0 2

m. 8 t

N 1 f Mf 'ef 7 7 7 f P0 ( % /7 Pag, No. 'I b O t r 21 s Hit Pl. ANT VOt2TI.h UNIT 2 IfEADINI SS REVIFW PIMiRAM IMPlFMENTATION MATHIX - MODULE 18A =. = = ==-===.~.= ============== DESIGN CONST IWF. SOURCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NISmER SICTION SURJECT DOCIMENT/FEATtTRE IGN ST. AS OF: IMI'LEMENTATION AS OF: IMPIINENTATION REMARKS =z ==== = =-- :============~.. === ============: ==~=== === === ====~=== ====- ===========:==== ======== ====================== ==-======= ===:- 785.01 ISAR CONFOHMANCE WITil NHC 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC X 07--14-87 DC-1516-1.0 R/l DC-1562 DOES NOT GENERAL DESIGN 2 DMCN-1516-2 9 84, AITLY TO ilNIT 2

3. I. I CRITERIA, DESIGN DC- 1531-1.0 R/3 BASES FOR PHOTECTION DMCN-1531-7 4-28-86 AGAINST NATUHAI. DC-1532-1.0 R/3 PHENOMENA 8-1-83, DC-1540-1.0 R/2 6-3-83, DC-1542-l.0 R/l DMCN-1542-2 8-5-85, DC-1555-1.0 R/l LEN-1555-2 8-23-83 DC-1561-1.0 R/2 8-2-83 DC-1562-1.0 R/l 8-10-83 7H5.02 ESAR CONFOINANCE WITlf NRC 10CTH50, APP. A GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1566-1.0, REV. 2, GENER4l. DESIGN 2 8-2-83, DMCN-1592-1,

3. I. I CRITEHIA, DESIGN 12-19-83 BASES FUR PHOTECTION DC -1592-1.0, REV. 2, AGAINST NATURAI. 8-12-83 PifENOMENA DC-IS93 -l .0, ifEV. 2, 8-10-83 T' M . 00 FS A H CONfDHMANCE WITil NHC 10CFR50, Al'P. A, GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1516--l .0 R/l 9-6-83 DC-1562 DOES NOT GDC, ENVilf0NMENTAL 4 DMCN -1516-2 9-25-84 APPLY IU UNIT 2

3. I, 1 AND MISSILE DESIGN DC-1531-1.0 N/3 BASES 8-9 83 DMCN-1531-7 4-28-86 DC-1532-1.0 R/3 8-1-83 DC-1540-1.0 R/2 6-3-83 DC 1555-1.0 R/l 10-17 -78 DMcN 1555-2 8-23-83 DC-1562-1.0 R/l 8 10 83 DC-15firri.0 R/2 8-2-83 IX'-1593-1.0 R/2 8-10 83

Pid" N'. I 01/21/HH ?LANT vtxiTI.E UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATHlX - MODUIE IHA ~_- -_ : ::- ===== :==========::== i DESIGN CONST ! HEF. SOfiHCE AND DES CON CI!HRENT DESIGN CUHHENT CONSTHUCTION l NIFiliFH SECTION SUIUECT I%1 MENT /FE ATURE 1GN ST. AS OF: IMPIMfENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION HEMARKS

-s .

=_ .:::_ ::::===_= - : : ::::::::: a = := = = = t :- ::: 2: .:=== ::================:=== ::====: :== ::::=::::::::= :: ::: :::= -::::: 7'11.01 P S AR CONFVINANCE WITil NHC 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1516-1.0 H/l GDC, Sl(ARING OF 5 DMCN-1516-2 9 25-84,

3. 1. I STHUCTUHES, SYSTEMS DC-1531- 1.0 R/3 AND COMIVNENTS DMCN-1531-7 4 86, DC -1532- 1.0 R/3 8-1-83, DC-1540-1.0 H/2 6-3 83, DC-1542-1.0 R/l DMCN -1542--2 8 5-83 DC-1555-1,0 N/1, DMCN 1555-2 8 23-83, l DC-1561-1.0 R/2 8-2-83, DC-1566-1.0 R/2 8--2-83 791.02 FS AH CONFOINANCE WITH NHC 10CFR50 APP. A, GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1592-1.0, REY. 2, GDC, SilAHING OF 5 8-12-83 DMCN 1592- 1,

L 1. I STRUCTUHES, SYSTEMS 12-19 83 AND COMPONENTS DC - 1593 - 1. 0, REV. 2, 8-10-83 H0H.OO F5AH CONFOINANCE WITil NHC 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC X 07-14 87 DC-1508-1.0, REV. G, DC-15G2 DOES NOT GI)C, CONTAINMENT 41 8-5-83, INCN 1508 -1, APPLY TO UNIT 2

3. l. 4 ATTR)SrilEHE CLEANUP 12-6-85 DC 1516-1.0, REV. 1, 9 G 83 DMCN -1516-2, 9 25-81 DC-1561 -1.0, REV. 2, 8 2-83 DC-1562 1.0, HEV. 1. H-10 83 809.00 FSAH CONFOINANCE WITil NHC 10CFH50, APP. A, GDC X 07- 14 87 DC-1516 -1.0, REV. I, DC-15G2 DOES NOT GIM , INSPECTION OF 42 9 6 83, ()MCN-1516 2, AITLY TO UNIT 2

3. 1. 1 CONTAINMENT 9-25 -84 AltK)SillEHE CLEANUP DC 1561-1.0, HEV. 2 SYSTEM 8-2-H3 DC - 1562 - 1. 0, HEV. 1, 8 10 83 O O O

D A 4 i%g. N. . ", 01 2 8 /itH PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVllM P110GHAM IMI'LEMENTATION MATHIX MODULE 18A

===:::a : := : :: s:==========

DESIGN CONST HEF. SOUlx:E AND DES CON CUNHENT DESIGN CUHHENT CONSTRfCTION NIN!! Fit SE(' TION SUltlECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLFMENTATION AS OF: IMPIIMENTATION llEMARKS -- ,= -- ::= .==:======--:::-==,==========================.:=======================:::==================--:===:::=:::==r= -:= l110.00 FSAR CONFOINANCE WIfil NHC 10CFR50, APP. A CDC X 07-14-87 DC-1516-1.0, liEV. 1 DC-1513 CDC, TESTING OF 43 9-6-83, DE N-1516-2,

3. 1. 4 CONTAINMENT 9 25-&l A1NOSPflERE CIEANUP SYSTEM HlH.00 FSAH CONFOINANCE WITil NHC 10CFH50 APP. A, GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1542-1.0, HEV. 1, GDC, FUEL AND 61 9-29-78, DMCN-1542-2,

3. l. 6 NEACTIVITY CONTHOL 8-5-83 DC-1561-1.0, HEV. 2, 8-2-83 H2').00 FS AN JTLE ELECTRIC 10CFH50 X 07-14-87 DC-1010. TABLE 1. HEV.

wENERATING PLANT 5, 2-7-86

3. 2. 2 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEN 8.10.00 FSAH CLASSIFICATION OF NOTE (s): I&C WIIICil X 07- 14-87 DC-1010 -TABI.E l- NOTE FVOTNOTES AND STRUCTURES, CAN EFFECT Tite S. HEV. 5, 2-7-86 COPNENTS

3. 2. 2I COMlUNENTS AND OPEHATION/ ACTUATION SYSTEMS OF A SAFETY IfELATED WNCTION MUST BE QUALIFIED TO HEQUIREMENTS OF PIMlIECT CLASS 11J.

H57.00 FSAN PHINCIPAL CODES AND AISI, SPEC. FOR X 07-14 87 DC-1010-TABLE 2. REV. PHINCIPAL STANDARDS FVH DESICN OF 5, 2-7-86 CONSTRUCTION CODES

3. 2. 21 T.3.2.2-1 COLD--WINED STEEL AND STANDARDS STN. MEMBERS, 1968, LIGilT CAGE C- F STAINLESS STEEL, 196H H5H 00 FSAH l'HINCIPAL CODES AND AMCA (AIR MOVING AND X 07-14 87 DC-1010 TABIE 1. HEV. PRINCIPAL.

STANDAHDS FOR CONDITIONING 5, 2-7-8G CONSTHt0 TION CODE

3. 2. 21 T.3.2.2 1 ASSOCfATION) COL. (g)

( g( . ~ = E E E E E E = D D D D D D Y ~ O O O O O O H - C C C C C C 0 S LT 4 C) PI g N O I I LT AC) I' N O I I g LT AC) PU g N O I LT AC) Pt! g N O I .I IA R )g PI N O T LT A' Pik I N O )g G F T A C C e ) 9 K R( tH( H( H( k( I H( I N ICT ICT . ICT ICT ICT CT M S ( A - M-NS I NL NS l NL NS I NL NS . I NL NS . I NL INS NL . L E ROO f OO HOO HOO HOO NOO LEO H PCC iFCC PCC PCC PCC PCC SC - ) E - 4 l U . 1 6 D O , N M - 2O N - 2I O O= S T NI - . I OT - VV . I A = EI C TT - HD I CNE I ( L T RM 1 7 08 I A TE - Sl - 3 NP - A1 TA OM 4 OH CI = X2 NI - 7 T = 7 H N . = 8 -- TEF = - 3 SHO- 3 0 NN - 1 OUS = - 4 CCA = 5 0 . N . . O . = Y. V V. V. Y. V. . OI V M - E E E E E E 2NT E A = H H H H H H A H H = . . T

= , , , . , ,

VFNC , l' H _ A = A 8 0 - H 0 - 8 - . 63RCS I 0 HO NM- 1 0 S E DI = D5, T NN ; = GEF ,. I SR RO= EUS : = 7 H 4 1 7 7 8 4 1 7 7 H 4 1 7 7 8 4 1 7 7 8 4 1 7 7 8 1 1 7 7 8 4 1 7 7 H 4 1 7 9 TI DCA = UT OT= EE I M SN - TF EG- SF A L l' N - U ATANI CA A - I N) 9ECE CC P F /= MFTT) AOAI S CT S 9 1 LSE ON ,M N 2 _ HI fi I I F S _ N N S S S G: CS Et k Ul IHT M ATNl CSAC S D N EO O I ICI T H A S S S - 1 1 1 1 I 1 EEEA 1 M A N = HHMV I O - E E E E. E E F. H E l I = L l. L l L L ,Et L W T - B B B B B B I' C B F E. A A A A A 0. E SMI A T = TG T7 T6 T6 T6 TG 1 I F T6 lVUI r N - H - 8 0 - 8 0 - - 8 ED E - 0 - 0 - 1 7 1 7 1 7 17 1 7 1 7 08OEM 1 7 M 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 FPE 0 S IGF L -= 1 2 1 2 1- 2 12 1 2 1 2 1 3 ST 1 2 S SP= - - - EM= C C D5, C C D5, C D5, C DS, C 9YY C , D5, D77BS D5 INX DHl AT EA HM 2N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I T NA N . = X N CS = X X X GI DI X X X X X OP L N C VM L N D ASO A T I - G, TRI C) O G N ND EOT I Ns A E - NI NG 4 MTA hoi l , , TAC CI TI O CTT SN T ENN D. ERO 2EAA A . ETS 7LI H L , P E = IHI E IOOI O . INS l SO C A. A T= ( HDR 0 - L I ASC l P , YENE IHN I 5 CA CNA/ l O 0 9 E ETGOE A N A/N MOI .SR I 5 H N A El CN ( . NAO 3 F R I C I ATSO E l I'L i CfRG l ADT MAHT C O- SOEI iN HE N MNA ENFO M 2.S S 0 G H - D = ASl % E AH A SAN N( MM A1 C 1 4 D D D D DE D - N N NL N N A A A A A B A O M A I L - S S ST S T T E E E E E E C S N = Df f DH DR DR DH DR E YTO OO OO OO OO OO OO T SNI ET CF CF CF CF CF CF O H l .N A . LS1 LSI LSI LS1 LS LS l' EOC A D AD AD AD - AD AD1 YNI I T- PR2 PH2 Pl 2 f PH2 PH1 E HUMF C - A I A I A A A - IPH A2 L OTOI E ICD 2 CD2 NN CD2 NN ICD 2 ICD NN 2 CD NN2 I S NN U A 3 A3 A 3 INN A3 I A2 A S T H D A. ST IHT PST IHT PST RT PST RT PS3 IRT3 PST I I' - 1 i i 4 l i N - 2 A 2 2 2 2 ' 2 . B. 2 M 2 H 2 H 2 H 2 H 2 N S R 7 A A A A A UC A A S S OI S S 3, 1. t.

t. F 3 SS F t.. F 3. F F : P : 1 t

F :

.u op t . H 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 N l F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l l - D o. e' l i t e 0 2 a b 7 1 C 3t

s. l M l

H 6 H lH o l i H tM 1 'N I' u O ~ ~ Pago No.. 7 Ul!21lHK PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW l'ROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE IHA ===u.=r u=====-====r================ DESIGN CONST Hi F. SOURCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NittnLil SECTION - SUBJECT DOCINENT/ FE ATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMFNTATION REMARKS - - = =2;e:::=,2===2= ..==3:=:========== =================================.================================================================e===== , i 1010.00 FSAR SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM MODAL RESPONSE X 07-14-87 DC-10000 REV. 3 ANALYSIS OF CAT. I SPECTRtN ANALYSIS 9-30-83. SECT. 5.6.7

3. 7.n. 3. L. 2 CABI.E TRAYS & METHOD OR EQUIVALENT SUPI%'TS AND ilVAC STATIC LOAD METHOD DUCTS & SUPI' ORTS 1012.00 FSAR SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM MODAL RESPONSE X 11-16-87 DC- 1005, HEV. 1, ANALYSIS OF CAT. I SPECTRtN OR 04/04/83, SECT. 3.6.3 i

3. 7. II . 3. 1. 3 SUBSYSTEMS AND EQUIVALENT STATIC

-COMPONENTS LOAD METHOD 1013.00 FSAR SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM EQUIVALENT STATIC X 11-16-87 DC-1000C, REV. 3 ANALYSIS, USE OF IDAD METHOD OF 9-30-83, SECT. 5.6.7

3. 7.H. 3. 5 EQUIVALENT STATIC ANALYSIS DC-1005 REV. 1 LOAD METHOD OF 4-4-83, SECT. 3.6.3 ANALYSIS 1011.00 FSAR SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM SEISP*1C ACCELERATION X 07-14-87 DC-1000C, REV. 3 ANALYSIS, USE OF VAL'_ ,. . . ARE 9-30-83, SECT. 5.6.8

t . 7.B 3. 5 EC'lIVALENT STATIC PEAK ACCELERATION

, LOAD METilOD OF VALUES MIITLIPLIED BY ANALYSIS A FACTOR OF 1.5 IINLESS A LOWER FACER IS JUSTIFIED 1017.00 FSAN SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM - BC-MP-4A, SEC. 4.2 X 07-14-87 DC-1005 REY. 1 4 R3, SECT. 3.6.4 ~ ANALYSIS, .

3. 7.B. 3. 7 COMHINATION OF MODAL RESPONSES 1018.00 FSAR SEISMIC SUBSYSTEM -RG 1.92 X 07-14-87 DC 1005, REV. 1 ANALYSIS, .

4-4 -83, SECT. 3.6.4 3 . 7 . 11 . 3. 7 COMBINATION OF MODAL RESPONSES 1202.00 FSAR SEISMIC QUAL. AND IEEE 344-1975 X 07-14-87 DC-1005-3.6.3, REV. 1 l DOCINENTATION IT)R 4-4-83 3.10.H. I SAFETY REIATED EOti!P. AND SU11' ORTS. - _.,wm - . , w.,%m r , -w cm e w - i 4-, .w.w nw=. . - - , -a-

w_. =w-- <=-r -e m - - . . 'es-- er * ,+v,-=-m - _-__-i _m ___---__ _ _ -_- - - - - _ v a- e- - -

Pge No. R .f. 01 2 Uf M PLANT VOGT!.E ITNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVlFW PHOGRAM IMI'I EMENTATION MATHlX - Pt)DIh E IHA - .== ===== ===-- ===--- .. DESIGN CONST 9EF. SOOHCE AND DES CON CUNHENT DESIGN CUNHENT CONSTRUCTION MHHFH SU* TION SUBJECT DOCIMENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPIEMENTATION AS OF: IMPI.EMENTATION RfRANKS -- --=.- = ==== =- r======= ====== ==================== === === ======== ====================== ======== ====================== ===== ==:-= ====== 12G3.00 ISAH QUALIFICATION TESTS IEEE 323 -1974 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X1AJ20 APPENDIX AND ANALYSES. TYPE EA, HEY. 9, 1-22-87 3.II.B. 2 1ESTING. 130G.00 FSAR FNGINFEHED SAFETY 10CFH100 X 07-14-87 DC-GENERAL PLANT e4ATURES CHIT., VOL. 1, PARA.

6. 0 2.2, HEV.0, 12-5-74 1326.00 FSAN CONTAINMENT COOLING ASME XI X 07 14-87 0C-1011-1.0C, HEV. 1, SYSTEM, SAFETY 12-9 80

6. 2. 2. 1. 1. DESIGN BASES, l.D IN SERVICE INSPECTION ITt2.00 FSAH CONTAINMENT 1NI ACTION PLAN TASK X 07-14-87 DC-2415-2.0, HEV. 1 NUHEG 0737 ISOLATION SYSTEM IIE.4.2 5-16-83 CLAHIFICATION OF G. 2. 4 1MI ACTION PLAN TASK II.E.4.2 1T13.00 FSAH CONTAINMENT 10CFH50, APP. A, GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1508 -l .0, HEV. G.

ISOLATION SYSTEM 54 8-5-83, DC-2415-1.0,

6. 2. -1. 1. SAFETY DESIGN HASIS HEV. 1, 5-16-83 1.D 1311.00 PiAR FSF FILTER SYSTEM MATERI AL SI'ECS X 07 87 SPEC. X4AJ07. HEV. 12, MATERIALS 11-18-86, SEC. 11,

6. 5. I3 DATA SHEETS 1312.00 FSAH FISSION PHODUCT CONTAINMENT MINI X 07-14-87 DC-1505-3.]B, HEV. 5, CONTHOL SYSTEMS PUHGE ISOLATION 7-26 83, DC-1506-3.lB,

6. 5. 3. I PRIMANY CONTAINMENT VALVES DESIGNED TO HEV. 5, H-2-83 CIDSE WITHIN 5 SLC.

OF HEVEIVING CLOSURE SIGNAL 1187.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT COOLING TO HEDUCE IT)ST X 07-14-87 DC-1501-1.0, HEV. 5, SYSTEM SIZING ACCIDENT CONTAINMENT 12-II-7H

1. 2. 6. 3 PhESS. TO LESS TilAN OR EQUAL TO 501, OF PEAK PHESS. WITitlN 24 HHS.

O O 9 O l' ye Net !I U 01 ;* l e tut Pl ANT VOGTIE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIFW l'ROGRAM IMI'LEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A - .,= ,- ======- == m == = ==== l { DESIGN CONST j REF. sol 4CE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CITRRENT CONSTRUCTION NitthER SECTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/FEATilHE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMAL S - = -- ====a-===r:. -~=-===s.====u======= . == ======== == m === ============ ====== = =====:==- ==== ==-- = ==:============ l 1191.00 FSAR SINGLE FAILUltE, IEEE 279 1971 X 07-14-87 DC-1009 2.0, REV. 2, ifEDUNDANCY AND 6-3 83

1. 2. 12. l. INDEPENDENM

2. I. CRITERIA ISDt.00 FS All DESIGN. TEST & RG 1.52. REV. 2, X X 07-14-87 DC-1531-1.0, REV. 3, 05-13-87 FVR IMPl.. OF ANSI MAINT. CRITFRIA FOR 3/78 8-9-83 N509/510 REQ'M'TS

1. 9. 52 POST - ACC. ESF DC-15%-1.0, REV. 1 CITED IN HG 1.52, SEE A1NOSPl!ERE CLEAN-tTP 9-29-78 FSAR 1.9.52, REF. '549 SYSTEM AIR DC-1561-1.0, REV. 2, & 1550 FILTRATION & 8-2-83 ADSORPTION UNITS 1519.00 FSAR DMIGN, TEST & CONFOINS TO ANSI X X 07-14-87 DC-IS31-2.03.6, REV. 5-13 87 X4 AJ01, REY. 22 MAINT, CRITERIA FOR N509-1976 OR 1980 3, 8-9-83 2-1-87 (DIVISION II 4)

1. 9. 52 POST-ACC. ESF DEPENDING ON DATE OF DC--1542-2.01.4, REY.

ATMOSPIIERE CLEAN-UP 00, OR CONFOINS TO 1, 9-29-78 SYSTEM AIR ANSI N509-1980 WilEN D0-1561-2.011.5, REY. FILTRATION & SPECIFICALLY Call,ED 2, 8-2-83 ADSOllPTION IfNITS OUT IN SPEC 1550.00 I MR DESIGN, TEST & CONR)lNS TO ANSI X X 07-14-87 DC-1531-2.03.7, HEV. 5-13-87 X4 AJ01, HEV. 22 MAINT. CRITERIA PVR N510 -1975 OR 1980 3, 8-9 83 2-1-87 (DIVISION H-4) i 9. 52 POST ACC. ESF DEPENDING ON DATE OF DC-1542 2.01.5, REV. ATNOSPilERE CilAN IIP PO, OR CONFOINS TO I, 9-29-78 SYSTtN AIR ANSI N510-19HO WHEN DC - 1561 -- 2. 011. 6, HEV. FILTRATION & SPECIFICALLY CALLED 2, 8 2-83 ADSORPTION tlNITS OUT IN SPEC. 1551.00 FSAR APPLICATION OF RG 1.53, REV. O, X 07-11-87 DC -1009 -l .0, HEV. 2 SINGLE FAILURE 6/73 6-3-H3

1. 9. 53. O CRITERION 157. 00 TSAR CONTAINMENT HG 1.141, HEV. O, X 07-14 87 DC 2115--l.P, REV. I, ISOLATION PROVISIONS 4/78 5-16-83

1. 9.111 FOR FilllD SYSTEMS 15%.00 FS AR CONTAINMENT ANSI N271-1976 X 07 11-H7 DC-2415-2.0, REV. 1, ISOLATION 11t0 VISIONS 5-16-83

1. 9.141 FVR FI,tilD SYSTEMS

'_ _ . _ . ._ ~ __ . ._ - . . - . Pag,. N., 10 Ol /2] Sul l'LANT YOGTIE UNIT 2 READINESS IfEVIEW Pif0GHAM IMi'LEMENTATION MATHIX M)DULE lHA == - = = - - - = = = = - = - DESIGN CONST lief. Sol!ffCE AND DES CON CUHHENT DESIGN CUHRENT CONSTRfCTION NL9UtLH St.CTION SUHJECT [KX:lMENT/ FE ATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION HENARKS

1. ; .-- - - -. ====--== =-..===== ===- = = == .= =====- = .====-==-====-====-=====.===============-:======= . = -- -- --==

15'r).00 FSAN FirNCTIONAL SPEC. FOR HG 1.148, liEV. O, X 07- 14 87 X5 AC03-3.2 A. 4.1.1.2A, ACTIVE VALVE 3/H1 HEY. 15, 3-20-87

1. 9.11H ASSEMBLIES IN SYSTEMS IMIORTANT TO SAFETY 1711.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT HG 1.7 X 07-14-87 DC-1501-1.0, HEV. 5, A1NOSPilEHE CLEAN -UP 12 78, DC-1516- 1. 0,

3. 1. 4 REV. 1, 9-6 83 1753.00 FSAR VEGP OUALITY GROUP HG 1.26 X 07-14-87 DC-1010-TABLE 1, REV. Q.1ALITY GHoffP COL. -

CLASSIFICATIONS 5, 2-7-86 (c)

3. 2. 2 .

1751.00 FSAR VEGP SEISMIC DESIGN HG 1.29 X 07-11-87 DC-1010- TABLE 1, HEV. SEISMIC CATEGORY CLASSIFICATION 5, 2-7-86 COL. (e)

3. 2. 2 SYSTD1 177H.00 FSAR PIPE ATTACIIED TO ASME 111, CLASS 2 X 07 14 -87 DC-1505-1.0, REV. 5, CONTAINMENT WALL 7-26-83, DC-1506-1.0,

.1. H. 2. ! PENETHATION SLEEVES IfEV. 5, 8 2 83, DC-1508-1.0, ifEV. 6 H 5- 83 1H%.00 PS AN CONTHOL OF FERRil'E HG 1.31 REV. 3, X 07 14-H7 DC-1000C, HEV. 3, CONTENT lh STAINI.ESS 04/78 9 30 83 APP. E, I . ') . 31. 2 STEEL WELD METAL X4A.101, HEV. 22, 2- 1-87. ATTACINENT If -3. 4. K IHi5.00 FSAN ASSIMPTIONS FOR IMi I 7H X 07-14-87 DC-1531-1.0, HEV. 3 EVAI.IIATING TIIE H 9-83

1. 9. 78 IIAHITABILITY OF A NPP CONTIM)L IKXH 110HING A IUSTUI.ATED 11AZAHDOilS Cl!EMICAL HEIEASE O O O

( ,/ f V [h k P. err ho 1I O f /21,644 PLANT VOGTI.E 11 NIT 2 READINESS liEVIEW P!f0 GRAM l IMPl.EMENTATION MATilIX - MODULE 18A - ::- .==,=:1 .: ==-==: - n: DESIGN CONST RE F. sol'!fCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CtWRENT CONSTR11CTION NINHElf SECTION SUlut:CT DOCINENT/FEATIHE IGN ST. AS OF: IMI'LEMENTATION AS OF: IMPI.EMENTATION RFMARKS

- := n _.:::.2: c =:== :: :__ u=-_ - == ::: :::, =: = = = = = : n = =. : - :: : : = = = ==== a: :::==2: 2_.: : -::2:= - . :e -

IH73.00 TSAR T0XIC CAS 2 MIN. ItG 1.78 it 07- 14 87 DC -1531- 1.0, REV. 3 l TIIRESl?LD LIMIT IN 8-9-83 I 2. 2. 3. l . 4. CONTROL ROOM i i I l'rli . 00 FS Ait SEISMIC RG 1.100 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ20 6.24, QUAI.IFICATION OF REY. 9, 1-22-87

1. 9.100 El.ECTRIC FOUlitti:NT FOR NHCLEAR IT)WER Pl. ANTS 2020.00 FSAR IWOTECTION OF NPP WI 1.95 REV. 1 X 07-14-87 DC-1531-3.lF REY. 3 CONTROL IKX)M I/77 8 9 83

1. 9. T Ol'ERATO;'S AGAINST AN ACCIDENTAL CllLORINE REl. EASE 2025.00 FSAit CONFOINANCE WITil NifC 10CFR50, Al'P. A, GDC X 07-14 87 DC-2415, REV. 1 GIC, PIPING SYSTIMS 54 5-16 63, SECT. 1.0

3. 4. 5 PENETRATIMI CONTAINMENT 20S.00 t N Alt CONfDENANCE WITil NifC 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC X 07-14 87 DC-2415. REV. 1, GDC, IHIMARY SG 5-16 83 SECT. 1.0

I . l. 5 CONTAINMENT ISOLATION 2039.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT REAT FANS ARE TESTED ANO X 07-14 87 DC- 1501-2.0.D. I!EV. 5, HEMOVAL SYSTEMS RATED BY TiiE 12-11-78

6. 2. 2. 1. 1 TESTING F. MANUFACTURER IN 7-INSPECTION ACCOffDANCE WITil T!!E STANDARDS OF TIIE AIR MOVING AND CONDIT10NIPK; ASSOCIATION 20ll.00 FSAR CONTROI. OF IN: 1.7 , REV. 2, X 07- 14 -H7 IC 1501- 1.0, REU. 5, COMBUSTIBLE GAS 11/78 12-11-78

1. 9. 7 CONCENTRATIONS IN -

CONTA ltNENT FT)LIDWIMi A IIM?A l 'a y - N. . . 12 La/23rHH Pl. ANT VOGTIE UNIT 2 READINESS REVlFW PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX MODULE IHA =- = .= = = === ======= =- === = DESIGN CONST REF. SOURCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NINDI:R SECTION SPBJECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE 1GN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPlHfENTATION REMARKS --- =,- - === =========== ==== ===============;=== === === ======== ====~============.=== ======= ==-==---========= ==== = = ===:= == ==== 2014.00 FSAR CONTAlletENT 10CFR50, APP.A. GDC X 07-14-87 DC-2415--l.0, REV. 1, ISOLATION SYSTEM, 66 5-16-83

6. 2. 4. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASIS 1.E 201H.00 l'SAR CONTAINMENT DESIGNED TO REMAIN X 07-14-87 DC-2415-1.0, REV. 1 ISOLATION SYSTEM, FUNCTIONAL FOLLOWING 5 8'1, I;C-1005-3.4,

6. 2. 4. I. SAFETY DESIGN BASIS A SSE REV. 1, 4-4-83 1.H 2051.00 FSAR CONTAlhMENT PREACCESS PURGE X 07-14-87 DC-2415. REV. 1 ISOIATION SYSTEM, SUITLT AND EXilAUST 5-1G-83, SECT. 3.1.G U. 2. 4. 3.C DESIGN EVALUATION VALVES IN 24-IN.

LINES ARE DESIGNED TO SIIUT IN LESS THAN 10 SEC. 2055.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT 10CFR50, APP. A, GDC X 07-14-87 DC-2415, REV. 1 ISOLATION SYSTEM, 54 PIPING SYSTEMS 5-16-83, SECT. 1.0 C. 2. 1. 3.D DESIGN EVALUATION PENETRATING CONTAINMENT 20%.00 IS AR CONTAINMENT 10CFR50 A!'P. A, CDC X 07-14-97 DC-2415-1.0, REV. 1 ISOLATION SYSTEM, 55 t, 56, PRIMARY 5-16 83

6. 2. 4. 3.E DESIGN EVALUATION CONTAINMENT ISOLATION 205H.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT X 07-14 87 DC-2115-1.0, REY. 1, ISOLATION SYSTEM, ISOLATION SYSTEM IS 5-16 83

6. 2. 4. 3.H DESIGN EVALUATION DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITl8 SEISMIC CATECORY I REQUIRI}fENTS.

2059.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT ASME XI X 07 -14 87 DC-10ll- l.0C, REV. 1, ISOLATION SYSTEM, DMCN-2, 1-27-83, G. 2. 4. 4 TESTS AND 12-9-80 INSPECTIONS O O O IQ l'.nr** No. J13 - U 01 l'l - Mt l'LANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW l'HUGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATHlX - MODULE 18A =====-== , . = - = = = = . = = = = = , = = - = DESIGN CONST lief. Sol'l/CE AND DES CON CURHENT DESIGN CURitENT CONSTRUCTION NIHM.R SECTION Sim.iECT DOCINENT/ FEAT 1HE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPl.EMENTATION AS OF: IMPI.EMENTATION RINARKS -- === :-- . =u - - . - == - ==- =v === ==== ====== = ==== = =- === ======== ==== = = ========= ====== = u ---- -- 20Gl.00 FSAR COMitUSTIBLE CAS 10CFR50, Al'P. A GDC X 07 14 87 DC-1508-1.0, itEY. 6 CONTHOL IN 4!, CONTAINMENT 8-5-83 DMCN-1508-1, G. 2. 5 CONTAINMI:NT A1NOSPitERE CLEANUP 12-6 H5, DC-151G 1.0, HEV. 1, 9-6-83 DMCN-1516-2, 9- 25-84 - 20G2.00 PE4H COMBUSTIBLE GAS DESIGNED FOR ALL X 07-14 87 DC-1513-3.1.lA, REY. CONTHOL IN NOffMAL AND ACCIDENT 0, 6-3 83 G. 2. 5. l CONTAINMENT LOADS INCLUDING SSE I.A ElEC. liYDROGEN AND PRESSURE RECOMBINERS THANSIENTS FROM A DESIGN BASIS LOCA 20bl.00 FSAR POST I.OCA DESIGNED AS SEISMIC X 07 87 DC-1508-1.0, HEV. 6, CONTAINMENT RYDHOGEN CATE(X)RY I EXCEPT 8-5-H3. DMCN 1508 1 G. 2. 5. 1. l'IWGE SYSTEM FOR DUCTWORK INSIDE 12-6-85 2.A CONTAINMENT UPSTREAM OF CONTAlfMENT ISOI.ATION VALVE. 20t 5. 00 U, W IUST 1.OCA CAVITY DESIGNED TO SEISMIC X 07-14-87 DC- 1516-1.0, HEV. 1, PUHGE SYSTEM CATEGORY I 9- 6-83, DMCN -1516-2, G. 2 5. 1. REOUIREMENTS 9 25-H4 .i . E 20t.H.00 INAR DESIGN PH0 VISIONS TO 10CFR50, APP. A, GDC X 07- 14 87 DC-1531-1.0, REV. 3 LIMIT PENSONNEL 19 8 83, DMCN - 1531 -7, G. 2. 5. 1. EXPOSlWE TO 4- 2H 86 4.E HADIATION 2070.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT llVDHOGEN ANY ACTIVE SYSTENS X 07 14-87 DC 1516 3.18 & C, 7.0 MIXING FOH MIXING REV. 1, 9-6-83, G. 2. 5. 1. CONTAINMENT A!H WILI, DW N 1516 3, 1-14 85, S.H MEET SAME DC-1501-3.1.C, H J. HEDUNDANCY, K, 7.0, REV. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL, AND 12- 11-78, DMCN- 1501 5, SEISMIC OIIALITY l- 29 HG & - G, 2 27 fig REQUllilNENTS AS IN FSAN 6.2.5.1.1. i F r l l'n? N. , t1 01 21. f tH PLANT VOCTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIFW Pif0 GRAM IMPLLNENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A .=- . .-- - .= - == DESIGN CONST HEF. SOUIM'E AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRIICTION M*fi!ER SFCTION SUHJECT DOCUMENT / FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPL.EMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION RINARl(S --- - -~ = ~ - ===- ================= == === === ======== === =,==--============ ======.= = ===. ===== - = == ==-=- --- 2071.00 FSAR IUST lilCA ISOLATION VALVES AND X 07 87 DC-- 1508 1. 0, REV. 6 RFFER TO IfEF. 5039 CONTAINMENT llYUROGEN INTEffCONNECTED 8 5-83, DMCN-1508-1 ALSO 7

6. 2. 5. 2. 2 PUHGE SYSTEM PIPING ARE SEISMIC 12-G-85 l CAT. 1

[ ALL OTHER PORTIONS l OF SYSTEM ARE i SEISMIC CAT. 2. l l 2072.00 FSAR 003T LOCA CAVITY DESIGNED TO SEISMIC X 07-14-87 DC-1516-1.0, HEV. 1 Pl!!<GE SYSTEM CAT. I 9-6-81 DMCN- 1516-2,

6. 2. 5. 2. 3 9-25-61 20H%.00 FMSR HABITABILITY SYSTEMS 10CFR50, APP. A, GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1531-1.0, 3.1.A &

DESIGN BASES 19 3.1.C, HEV. 3, 8-9-83, G. 4. I DMCN-1531 6, 5 6-85 & -7, 4-28-86 20H6.00 FSAR !!AHITABILITY SYSTLMS CONTROL ROOM X 07 87 DC-1531-1.0 & 3.1. E. DESIGN BASES ESSENTI AL IIVAC IS REV. 3. H-9 83, i fi . 1. I DESIGNED TO FUNCTION INCN-1531-G, 5-6 -85 & DURING/AFTER SSE AND -7, 4 86, DC-2167 ALL AIR DUCTS AND REV. 4, 9-28 -H4, SECT. THEIR SUPPORTS ABOVE 1.0 & 5.0.2 CONTif0L ROtH SUSPENDED CEILING (+ CEILING) ARE SEISMIC CAT. I 2087.00 FSAR HARITABILITY SYSTEMS RG 1..~,2 X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REV. 3 DFSIGN BASES H 9-83, DMCN-1531-6, ii. 1. I 5- 6-85 & -7, 4 8G, SECT. 1.0 , 3.1.C & E 20HH.00 FSAlf HABITABILITY SYSTEMS IfG 1.78 X 07 14-87 DC-1531 REV. 3, DESIGN BASES 8 9 83, INCN 1531- G,

6. 1. I 5-G 85 4 -7, 4-28 86, l SECT. 1.0, 3.1.E & J l

l l l O 0 9 '+ - I Sg, No.. %d 15 Q 01/21 f f01 Pl. ANT VOGTLE l' NIT 2 READINESS HEVllN PHOGifAM IMi'I.EMENTATION MATHIX - MODUI.E 18A ,=1====-- =:=== :===.=======. DESIGN CONST REF. SOUla:E AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NIMDEN SECTION SUBJECT DoctHENT/FEATUNE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPl.tNENTATION AS OF: IMPLFMENTATION REM 4RKS - . -- : = = ;. r- == ======== :.===========z:====== ==========================================:=====u=====,===-=== ===== = === ---=- 2089.00 FSAH HABITABILITY SYSTFMS HG l.95 ). 07- 14-87 DC -1531. REV. 3 DESIGN BASES 8-9-83, DE N-1531-4,

6. 1. I 7-9-81, -6, 5-6-85 &

-7, 4-28 86, SECT. 1.0, 3.1.F,1,J & P $ WI. 00 I S AH lt Ait lT Ap il.lTY IM 1.52 X 07-14 87 00-1531 REV. 3 SYSTEMS, VENTILATION 8 9 83 SECT. 1.0 &

6. 4. 2. 2. 1 SYSTIM ENVIRONktENTAL 3.1.E IIESIGN CNITEHIA 2091.00 FSAH 11 AH ITAB I LITY Fil.TER UNIT 1100 SINGS X 07-14 -87 DC- 1531. REV. 3 SYSTEMS, VENTil.ATION AHE SEISMIC CAT. I 8 9 83, DMcN-1531- 6, fi. 1. 2. 2. SYSTEM DESIGN 5 6-85, & -7, 4-28-86, 2.A SECT. 1.0, SPEC.

X1AJ07. REY. 12, 11-18-86, SECT. 4.1 2092.00 FSAR HABITARILITY HG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REV. 3 SYSTEMS, VENTil.AT10N 8 9 83, DMCN- 1531- 6,

6. 1. 2. 2. FILTER UNIT HOUSINGS 5-6-85 & -7, 4-28-86, 2.A SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.E.

SPEC. X4 AJ07. REV. 12, 11-18 86, SECT. 2.1.D & 4.8.A & B 20'83.00 FSAH IIABITARILITY SYSTEMS RG 1.52 X 07--14-87 DC-1531. REV. 3 VENTILATION 8 9 83 DMCN-1531-6,

6. 1. 2. 2. MOISTURE SEPARAlt)R 5-6-85 & -7, 4-28-86, 2.H SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.C.

SI'EC. X4AJ07, REV. 12, 11-18 86, SECT. 2.1.D & 4.8.A & B 2091.00 FSAR llARITABILITY SYSTEMS ANSI N'509 x 07-14 87 DC--IS31. REV. 3 VENTILATION 8 9 83, DMCN-1531- 6,

6. 4. 2. 2. EXEC 11 tlc IfEATENS 5- 6-HS, SECT. 2. 0 -J .6 2.C & 3.1.C. SPEC. X1AJ07, REV. 12, 11-18-86, SECT. 4.H.A & H

l '.s g.- N- . I s, O li 2 8, f45 PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 RE ADINESS REV!FW IMIHA*1 IMPLEMENTATION M4THIX - MODULE IHA ==-- - DESIGN CONST REF. SOIlWK AND DES CON C190 LENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NI*4M H SECTION SI'BJECT DOCLNENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMP 11NENTATION AS OF: IMP!JNENTATION REMARKS --- =====. -- ;=. ==~==== = = ==- : === === ===.:=== ======== ::::=== ===== -=====,= ::.::,=========.:::= - - == =- 20%.00 FS4R HARITABILITY SYSTENS MIL-F 51068 X 07-14-87 DC-1531, REV. 3 REQUIRED BY IiG VENTILATION ilEPA 8-9-H3 SECT. 2.J.6, 1.52 AND ANSI N509

6. 1. 2. 2. FILTERS SPEC. X4AJ07. REV. 12 PARA 5.1 2.D 11-18-86, SECT. 4.8.E 20'p;.00 65 4R HABITABILITY SYSTEMS MIN. ACCEPTANCE X 07-14-87 DC-1531-2.0A.1 & ERDA 76 21 VENTILATION HEPA CRITERIA FOR HEPA 2.0A.2, REV.3, 8-9-83 AACC/CS-1 & H

(, . 4. 2. 2. FILTERS FILTER IS RINOVAL OF DC-1531-2.0C.1, KEV.3, 2.0 99.97% OF 0.3 MICRO. 8-9-83 T1!EINAL GENERATED, MONODISPERSED DIOCTYL PflTHALATE PARTICLES. 2097.00 FS AR ltABITABILITY MIN. AIR RESIDENCE X 07- 14-87 DC-1531, REY. 3 REQUlHED BY RG SYSTEMS, VENTILATION TIME IN THE CARBON B-9 83 DMCN-1531-6, 1.52, 3.i

6. 4. 2. 2. CARBON ADSORBERS IS 0.5s, AT A 5-6-85 & -7, 4-28-8G, 2.E NOMINAL FACE SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.C VELOCITY OF 40 FT./ MIN.

20m.00 ISAR llABITABILITY DESIGNED 1X) SEISMIC X 07-14 H7 DC-1531, REV. 3 SYSTINS, VENTILATION CAT. I 8- 9 -83. DWN -1531-6, t._ l. 2 2. COGLING Colt 5 G-83 & -7, 4-28-86, 2.) SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.E. SPEC. X4AJ07. REV. 12, 11-18-86, SECT. 4.1 209).00 ES AR llMi! TAD ILITY ASME SECT, III, X 07- 14-87 DC-1531, REV. 3, SYSTEMS, VENTILATION CLASS 3 8 -W H3, SECT. 2.G.1, G. 1. 2. 2. COOLING COIL SPEC, X4A307. REV. 12, 2.0 11-18-86, SECT. 4.10 B 2100.00 FSAR HABITABILITY SYSTENi SEISMIC CAT. I X 07-14-87 DC-1531, REY. 3 VENTILATION H 9 83, DPEN 1531- 6,

6. 4. 2. 2. EMERGENCY FILTER S 6- 85 & -7, 4 PA, 2.G TRAIN FANS SFCT. 1.0 & 3.1.E.

SPEC. 14A.102, REY. 8, 7-2 Bli. SECT. 1.2.D & 4.7 O O O g . .% P. y. N.

17

~ O l / 21/ f 04 Pl. ANT VOGTI.E IINIT 2 READINESS REVIEW l'HOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATHIX - MODULE 18A - = - :-- - == =====. ==== =u = DESIGN CONST HEF. SOURCE AND DES CON CUHRENT DESIGN CUHRENT CONSTHUCTION NtNHFR SECTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IPD'LEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION HEMARKS - = -- . :- - =,.= ===== == ===========-=====:- -- ==- ======== ==========-====== = == ==== == ===== ==============:- -- - - ====2=== 2101.00 FSAR HAltlTABILITY SYSTEMS IC 1.52 X 07-14 87 DC-1531. HEV. 3, VENTILATION 8-9-83, DMCN-1531-6,

6. 4. 2. 2. EMIHGENCY FILTER 5-6-85 & -7, 4 28 8G, 2.G THAIN FANS SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.C. -

SPEC. X4AJ02, itEV. 8, 7--2-86, SECT. 3. 2 2102.00 FSAR HABITABILITY SYSTEMS SEISMIC CAT. I X 07-14 -87 DC-1531. REY. 3 FMEHG. CONTH01. HOOM 8-9-83, DMCN-1531-6,

6. 4. 2 2. RETURN FAN 5-6-85 & -7, 4-28-86,

?. H SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.E. SI'EC. >4AJ02-4.7, REV. 8, 7-2-86 210'I.00 FSAlt ifADITABILITY SYSTEMS SEISMIC CAT. I X 07-14-87 DC-1531. HEV. 3 VENTIt.ATION 8 83, DMCN - 1531- 6,

6. 4. 2. 2. DitnwORK & DAMPERS 5-6-85 & -7, 4-28-86, 2.! SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.E 2101.00 FSAH 18ARITABILITY SYSTEMS HG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REY. 3 kENTi!.A TION 8 9-83, DMCN -1531-7, M. 4. 2. 2. Dir!HORK & DAMPERS 4-28-86 SECT. 1.0, 2.I DC-2167, ItEV. 4, 9-28-84, DMCN-2167- 2, 9 25 85. SECT. 1.0, SPEC. X4 AJ01, REV. 22, 2 87, SECT. Il- 48 H 6.4D & 116.12 210s.00 FSAR ltABITABILITY CAPABLE OF CLOSING X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ20, REV. 9, SYSTEMS, VENTILATION WITilIN 6 SECONDS OF 1-22 87, SECT. 6.9 G.

6. 4. 2. 2. ISOLATION DAMPERS RECEIVING ACTUATION ATTACINENT 16. TABIE I 2.K SIGNAL 210fi.00 FS AR l!ABITABILITY SYSTEMS ASHAE flANDBOOK OF X 07 87 DC-1531. HEV. 3, S'ENTit.ATION I EAK FUNDAMENTALS 8 9 H3, SECT. 2.0 D 2 G. 4, 2. 3 TICI!TNESS

Pac No fit Ol/21/tDi PLANT V0GTLE t! NIT 2 READINESS REVIFW l'IN) GRAM IMPI.EMENTATION MATHlX - MODilLE 18A == === ============= ======== = ==. DESIGN CONST REF. SOURCE AND DES CON CL'RRENT DESIGN CtrHRENT CONSTRUCTION NIHliER SECTION SUSJECT DoctNENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMAffKS === ,==. = n == === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = === ==========:- i 2107.00 FSAR ltABITABILITT SYSTEMS RG 1.78 X 07- 14-87 DC -1531, HEV. 3 VENTILATION LEAK 8 9-83, DMCN-1511-6,

6. 4. 2. 3 TIGIITNESS 5- 6-85 & -7, 4 H6, I SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.G f 2109.00 FSAR I!ABITABILITY TIIE PLENIN SYSTEM IS X 07-14-87 DC-2ill, REV. 2, SYSTEMS, INTERACTION DESIGNED AS SEISMIC 8 83 SECT. 3.1 l 6. 4. 2. 4.A WITH OTHER ZONES AND CAT. I i

PRESSURIZED l EQU!IM:NT 2110.00 FSAR ilABITABILITY RG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1531-1.0, 3.34.2 & SYSTEMS, FILTERS FOR 3.3A 3, REV. 3,

6. 4. 2. 1.F MAKEUP AIR SUPPLY 8-9-113 DMCN-2, DURING EMERGENCY 11-17-83 & -7, 4-28-86 CONDITIONS 2113.00 FSAR CONTROL IMXW RG 1.78 X 07-14-87 DC-1531 REV. 3 PfiOTECTION FIKN 8-9-fl3, DMCN-4,

6. 4. 4. 2 TOXIC CAS 7-9-84, & -6, 5-6 85, SECT. 3.1.E.F,J & P 2118.00 FSAR CONTROL FKXN RG 1.95 X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REV. 3, 1ROTECTION FINN 8 9-83. DMCN 4, 6 4. 4 2 CliLORINE 7-9 84, -6, 5-6-85 &

-7, 4-28-86. SECT. 1.0 & 3.1. F,I & P 2116.00 FSAR CONTROL ROOM AIR RG 1.4 X 07-14-87 DC-1531, REV. 3 PtiRIFICATION AND 8-9 83. INCN 6, 5-6-85

6. 4. 4. 3 SHIELDING DESIGNS & -7, 4-28-86, SECT.

l.0 & 3.1.D.G,il & K 2117.00 FSAR CONTHOL ROOM HVAC DESIGNED To X 07-14-87 DC-1531, HEV. 3 PEESSURIZE if00M 11) 8 9 83, DMcN-6, G. 4. 4. 3 1/8 IN. WG DURING 5 85, SECT. 3.1 -G EMERGENCY OPERATION MODE O O O T ( uj I* age N. . . 19 ) O 01/21/10 l'IANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A =r=== =- :: ======= =- ========= = = DESIGN CONST HEF. sol'HCE AND DES CON CUHRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRIX' TION NIPtDEN SECTION SUBJECT DOCtNENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS .e _- - :=:- en 22.==== :=:= ============.=:::::: === === ======== ===:::=======a::====== ======== ====================== :::s= __r::::::::: ( 2118.00 ISAH CIIIJRINE IN CONTEOL RG 1.78 X 07-14-87 DC-1531, REY. 3 IKXSt BELOW ALLOWABLE 8-9-83. DMCN-4 U. 4. 4. 3 CONCENTRA TIONS 7 M. - 6, 5 85 & -7. 4-28-86. SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.F.J & P 2119.00 FSAR CHIDRINE IN CONTHOL ltG 1.95 X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REY. 3 HOOM BELOW ALLOWABLE 8 83. DWN-4

6. 4. 4. 3 CONCENTRATIONS 7-9-84. -6, 5-6-85 &

-7. 4-28-86. SECT. 1.0 & 3.1.F.J & P 2120.00 FSAR 14ABITABILITY CONTHOL ROOM X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REY. 3 SYSTEW., ESSENTIAL HVAC AND 8-9-83. DMCN-6, 5-6-85

6. 4. 4. 3 IMPIRfENTATION OF ISOLATION DAMPERS & -7. 4-28-86. SECT.

DESIGN BASES DESIGNED 'IO SEISMIC 1.0 & 3.1.E. DC-2167 CAT. I REV. 4. 9-28-84 DMCN 2167-4. 4-24-86 SECT. 2.0 SPEC. X44320. REV. 9 1-22-87. SECT. 6.24 2121.00 DEAH HABITABILITY DESIGNED AS SEISMIC X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REV. 3 SYSTEMS. CAT. I 8-9-83. DMCN 6. 5-6 85

6. 4. G INSTIRNENTATION & -7. 4-28-86. SECT.

REQUIRINENTS 1.0 & 3.1.E 2122.00 rSAN ESF FILTER SYSTEMS 10Cilf50, APP. A. GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1531. HEV. 3 DESIGN BASIS 19 8 83. DMCN -7 G. 5. 1. 1.A CONTHOL HOOM IIVAC 4-28-86. SECT. 1.0 2123.00 FSAH ESF FILTEH SYSTEMS DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN X DESIGN BASIS - 1/4-IN. WG WITH

6. 5. l. 1.B PIPING PENETHATION HESPECT TO A1 MIS.,

FILTER EXIIAflST NEGATIVE WITH SYSTEM HESPECT TO St!RHOUNDING AREAS IW:, N. , 20 Ul '2 t :H8 PLANT V k1 TIE !! NIT 2 HEADINESS HEVIEW Pif0GHAM IMi'LEMENTATION MATRIX - MODUIE IBA = -- : ==---=::======- - :- - DESIGN CONST HFF. SOUNCE AND DES %N Ct!NHENT DESIGN CUNHENT CONSTRIX' TION N101HEH SECTION S13ll3FUT DOCLNENT/ FEATURE sGN ST. AS OF: IMI'LEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION IflHAltKS c- 2:- : ::= : ,2: :: a. _:- -::: ============-::::=======================1:====:::===== ::====== ===:=: :::::::=:: == ==--: 2 :::: 2124.00 FSAN ESF FILTER SYSTUtS 10CFH100 X 07 11-87 DC-1561. REV. 2 DESIGN DASIS 8 2-83, DMCN-1,

6. 5. 1. 1.F PIPING l'ENETHATION 1-29 86, PAlfA. 2.0-M.i PILTEN EXI!AUST SYSTEM 2125.00 FSAlf ESF FILTER SYSTEM DESIGNED IV MAINTAIN X 07-14-87 DC-1542, HEV. 1. DMCN DESIGN BASIS A SLIGIITLY NEGATIVE 1542-3, 1-22-87, SECT.

6. 5. 1. l.C Flia IUST-ACCIDENT PHESSUHE IN THE FilH 3.1.B EXIIAUST S(STEM EVLIIMING A FTEL IIANDLING ACCIDENT.

2126.00 FSAN ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFH100 X 07 14 87 DC-1542, HEV. 1, SEE A1.50 2131 DESIGN BASIS 9-29-78. DMCN-3, G. 5. 1. 1.C FH!! FOST- ACCIDENT l-22-87, PAI'A. 2.0-0 EXHAllST SYSTFM 2127.00 FSAN ESF Fil,TER SYSTlH 10CFH50, APP. A. GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1000-M, REV. 2, SEE ALSO 2135 DESIGN BASIS 19 4-12-78, DMCN-9, H. 5. 1. 1.C Fila POST ACCIDENT 5-22 -87, 5-ll- PARA. EXIiAUST SYSTFM 3.4 DC-1512-1.0, HEV.1, 9-29 78. It1CN-2, 8 5-83 2129.00 FSAR ESF FILTEH SYSTEM ESF FILTER SYSTEM X 07-14 87 DC-1531. REV. 3 DI: SIGN BASIS DESIGNED TO HINAIN 8-9 83 DMCN-6, G. 5. 1. 1.E INTACT AND 5 6-85 SECT 3.1.E FUNCTIONAL F0H SSE DC 1542. HEV. 1, 9 78, DMCN - 2, 8 H3, SECT. 3.1. ll DC -15Gl . HEV. 2, 8 83, DWIN - 1, 1-29-86, SECT. 3.1.C 2130.00 FSAH ESF FILTER SYSTEM HG 1.52 X 07 14-87 DC-1531, ifEV. 3, DESIGN BASIS 8 9 83, IM;N -7, G. 5. I. 1.F 4 8G, SECT. 1.0 DC 1542. HEV. 1, 9 29 78, SECT. 1.0 DMCN-2, 8-5 83, inC-1561, REV. 2 H 2 83, SECT. 1.0 9 9 - _ _ - 9 } , l' age No. 21 01/21/101 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 184 , ===-r====a================= ======== g; DESIGN CONST REF. SOURCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRIXITION NINHER SECTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/ftATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPI.EMENTATION REMARKS a: === ==== =t==: =s== ===s================ ===================s === === ======== ====================== ======== ====================== ================== 2131.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR50, APP. A, CDC X 07-14-87 DC-1531 REV. 3 CONTROL ROOM 19 8-9-83, DMCN-6, 5-6-85

6. 5. 1. 3.A EMERGENCY FILTERS & & -7, 4-28-86, PAkA.

COMIVNENTS 1.0 & 3.1-K 2130.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR100 X 07-14-87 DC-1561 REV. 2 PIPING PENETRATION 8-2-83 DMCN-1, G. 5. 1. 3.B EXHAUST FILTERS 1-29-86, PARA. 2.0-M.1 r 2133.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR50, APP. A, CDC X 11-16-87 DC-1561. REV. 2 REFERENCE TO PIP!NG PENETRATION 19 8/2/83, PARA. 7.0.5 DC-1000-M

6. 5. ' l. 3.B EXHAlbi PLTERS DC-1000M, REV. 2, 4/12/78 PARA. 2.b DC-1531. REY. 3, '

8/9/83, FARA. 1.0 & 3.1.h 2131.00 FS AR - ESF FILTER SYSTEM, 10CFR100 X 07-14-87 DC-1542. REV. I, FilB 10ST- ACCIDENT 9 29-78, DMCN-3,

6. 5. 1. 3.C EXIIAUST SYSTEM l-22-87. PARA. 2.0-0 2135.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM 10CFR50,' APP. A. GDC X 07-14--87 DC-1000-M, REV. 2, FHR POST ACCIDENT 19 4-12-78. DMCN-9,

6. 5. 1. 3.C EXHAUST SYSTEM 5 85, PARA. 3.4 213H.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM DESIGNED TO SEISMIC X 07-14-87 DC-1531, HEV. 3 CAT. I 8 fl3, DMCN-7,

6. 5. 1. 3.E 4-28 86,' SECT. 1.0 DC-1542. REV. 1, 9-29-78, DMCN-3, 8-5-83 SECT. 1.0 j DC-1561, REV. 2, i 8-2-83, SECT. 1.0 2139.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM RG 1.53 X 07-14-87 SEE FSAR 6.5.1.1.F.

REF. No. 2130

6. 5. 1. 3.F ,.

F t 6 ----.-ge - ,--yy - ~,.c me . _ . - < . , .+ww.w- ,s e vm -- r ,,w , , - . - - - - - _,.-s-.-...._m . . _ . - - 4~e-v - , - - - . e.... - - - ,. , . , ,m.- r .e m- -- .%-, r. - - Par,e Nm 22 01/21/H8 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 IfEADINESS REVIEW PROGHAM IMPLEMENTATION MATHIX - MODULE 18A ======.===================.========= DESIGN CONST HEF. SOUNCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NtetitER SECTION SUBJECT DoctHENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS

-=============================================================================================================================

2140.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM, MIL-F-51068C X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ07-5.3.lA, MANUFACTUHING AND REV. 12, 11-18-86

6. 5. 1. 4. 1 TESTING 2149.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM, ANSI N509, PARA. 5.4 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4 AJ07- 5.3. l A, TESTING OF MOISTURE REY. 12, 11-18-86

6. 5. 1. 4. I SEPARATORS 2152.00 FSA!! ESF FILTER SYSTEM NG 1.52 X 07-14-87 SPEC, X4AJ07. REV. 12 INSTWINENTATION 11-18 86, SECT. 2.1.D 6 5. 1. 5 REQUIREMENTS 2153.00 FSAR ESF FILTER SYSTEM, ESF FILTER SYSTEM X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ07. HEV. 12, DESIGN PARANETERS EFFICIENCIES 11-18-86, SECT. 4.8

6. 5. 1-1 (TABIE) 2397.00 ISAR CONTAINMENT COOLING DESIGNED & X 07-14-87 DC-1010-TABLE 1. REV. QUALITY GHOUP COL.

SYSTEM SAFETY DESIGN FABRICATED TO CODES 5, 2-7-86 (c)

6. 2. 2. 1. 1. BASES CONSISTANT WITH HG 1.G 1.26 239H.00 FSAN CONTAINMENT COOLING HG 1.29 E 07-14-87 DC-1010-TABLE 1. REV. SEISMIC CATEGORY SYSTEM SAFETY DESIGN 5, 2-7-86 COL. (e)

G. 2. 2. 1. 1. BASES 1.G 2108.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT ASME III, CLASS 2 X 07-14-87 DC-1501, REV. 5, ISOLATION SYSTEM, 12-11-78, DMCN-6,

6. 2, 4. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASIS 2-27-86, SECT. 3.1.L l . F. 3 2422.00 FSAR SYSTEN GENERAL BTP CSB 6-4 X 07-14-87 DC-1505-1.0, NEV. 5, DESCRIPTION - 7-26-83, DC-1506-1.0,

6. 2. 4. 2. 1 CONTAINMENT PURGE REV. 5, 8-2-83 SYSTEM 2439.00 FSAR IT)ST LOCA THE REDUNDANT MOTOR X 07-14-87 DC-1508-3. lc, liEV. 6, CONTAlfNENT llYDHOGEN OPER. ISOLATION 8 H3

6. 2. 5. 1. PUlfGE SYSTEM VALVES LOCATED 2.D INSIDE THE CONTAINMENT ARE IN PAHALLEL AND IY)WERED FROM T!!E 480 V CLASS IE BUSES.

O O O

Pag. No. O' 23 C Ol/21/HH PLANT' YOGTIE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                      =  ==;=====,=======r=         =ce===-   ==.= .

DLSIGN CONST REF. SOUICE AND DES CON CUlfftENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NINHER SECTION SUBJECT DOCtHENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION RINARKS

    ====s  ========= ===== = =a===========-====
                             -                                     =========r=========-     === === ======== ====================== ======== ========== =========== =============== e 2117.00 FSAR                              POST IDCA CAVITY        EACH FAN f5 POWERED X                 07-14-87 DC-ISIG--3. IC, REV. 1,

PURGE SYSTEM FROM AN INDEI'ENDENT 9-G-83. DMCN-3,

6. 2. 5. 2. 3 CLASS lE IVWER l-14 85 SUPPLY.

21Hff.00 FSAR DESIGN BASIS FVR RG 1.141 X 07 14-87 DC-2415-1.0, REV. I,

                                       - CONTAl!#4ENT                                                              5-16-83

6. 2. 4. 2. 1 ISOLATION 2511.00 DIAR CONTAlfe4ENT COOLING LIMIT AMBIENT X 07-14-87 DC-1501-4.0-B, REY. 5 SYSTEM DESIGN BASES CONTAIPMENT AIR 12-11-78, DMCN-3,

6. 2. 2. 1. 1. TEMPERATURE TO 120 2-11 83 2 DEGt(EES F WITH ANY 4 OF 8 COOLERS OPERATING 2516.00 FSAR CONTAIPNENT CLASSIFIED AS X 07-14 87 DC-1010-TABLE 1. REV.

l'ENETRATIONS OUALITY GROUP B AND 5, 2-7-86

6. 2. 4. 2. 2 SEISMIC CATEGORY I 2HIH.00 FSAR IIABITABILITY SYSTEMS SEPARATE AND X 07-14-87 DC-1531-3.1-C, REV. 3 CONTilOL ROOM HVAC INDEPENDENT IE IVWER 8 9-63. DMCN -6, 5-6--85

6. 1. I SYSTEN -.$OURCE FOR EACH TRAIN 3110.00 FSAid ESSENTIAL CHII. LED ESSENTIAL CHILLED X 07-14-87 DC-1592-3 lF REV. 2 WATER SYSTEM - WATER SYSTEM 8 -12 83 ' DMCN - 1,

9. 2. 9. 1. l. SAFETY DESIGN BASIS DESIGNED TO REKtIN 12-19-83 I.A FUNCTIONAL DURING/FDLIDWING AN SSE 3141.00 FSAR ESSENTIAL CHILLED DESIGNED 1D MAINTAIN X 11-16-87 DC-1592, REV. 2 WATER SYSTEM ESF' 8/12/83, SECT. 3.1B

9. 2. 9. 1. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASIS EQUIINENT/SWITCHGEAR DC-1000M, REY. 2, l.H ROOMS BEIDW THE 4/12/78, DMCN-II, MAXIMIM DESIGN 'l/29/86, SECT. 2.0.7A AMBIENT AIR 8, 2.0.7D TEMPERATURE OF 104 DEGREES F. UNDER ACCIDENT CONDITIONS P ys P--+4r-'Tr p,ww-W rw '+ " '- P P 1 '-8'" % 4*W ' - --

Page No. 21 O l f71/HH PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE ISA

                                                                          === = := .======== ==== === == -- ==

DE",1GN CONST REF. SOUla'E AND DES CON CUHRENT DESIGN CUHRENT CONSTRUCTION NIMHER SECTION SUBJECT DOCtNENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPl.EMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS .=:- ==============-=======.:==-==-.:=================.=========:==========================================:================================= 3111.00 FSAH ESSENTIAL CHILLED CONDFNSER WATER X 07 87 DC-1592-1.0, REV. 2 WATER SYSTEM PINP, CIIILLER, 8-12-83, SPEC. X4AJ04,

9. 2. 9. 1. S AFETY EVAL.'Jr. TION CHILLED WATER PINP, REV. 8, 6-18-86, SECT.

3.A AND PIPING DESIGNED 3.5 TO SEISMIC CAT. 1 HEQUIREMENTS 3117.00 FSAH ESSENTI AL IIVAC REDUNDANT X 07-14-87 DC-1010-TABLE 1. REV. SEISMIC CATEGOHY SYSTEMS SAFETY-RELATED 5, 2-7-8G (e)

9. 4 SEISMIC CAT. 1 TRAINS PROVIDED 31Gl.00 FSAR CENTRAL ALARM DESIGNED 1D LIMIT 112 X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.28. REV. J.

STATION BACKtT HVt.C CONC. TO LESS TilAN 8-1-83

9. 4. 1. 3.F SYSTEM 2t BY VOLINE IN SYSTEM OPERATION BATTERY ROOM.

34HU.00 FSAR CONTROL BUILDING FAILURE OF X 07-14-87 DC-1533-3.lA, HEV. 2 IIVAC - SAFETY DESIGN NON-SAFETY, 8-5-83. DC-1535-3.lA.

9. 4. 1. 1. I BASES NON-SEISMIC HVAC REV. 2, 8-2-83 EQUIINENT/D'JCTdOliK DC-1537-3.lA, REV. O, WILL NOT COMPPOMIEE 5-27-77 DC-1539-3.lA, ANY SAFETY RELATEC HEV. 2, 8-9 S3 SYST., STHS., OR COMPONENTS 3tfl0.00 FSAR FHH NOINAL VENT FAILURE OF X 07-14 87 DC-1541-3.lA, REV. 1, SYSTEM NON-SAFETY, 9 29-78

9. 4. 2. 1. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASES NON-SEISMIC HVAC I EQUIIMENT/DUC1H0HK WILL NOT COMPINNISE ANY SAFETY RELATED SYS., STHUCTURES. OR COMPONENTS.

3553.00 FSAR ESSENTIAL CilILLED SINGLE FAILURE PIUS X 07-14 87 DC 1592- 3.1C. HEV. 2, WATEH SAFETY DESIGN L.O.O.P. WILL NOT 8-12-83

9. 2. 9. 1. 1. BASES IMPAIR SYSTEM 1.C O O O

i Page No. ; 25 Ol/21/HR

                                                                                                 - PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

s==m========x=-=====v;======

DESIGN CONST REF. SOUIMIE AND DES CON Cl!HRENT DESIGN CURNENT CONSTRUCTION , NIMilEH SECTION SUILIECT ' DOCtMENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPIIMENTATION REMAPKS

                   >=-  - ==            =  =a,.=   a === ====-=========== ==~==== ============ === === ========                        ==============e=======     ======== ======a=========1=====    ======: ====,=====

3Z6.00 FSAH SYSTEM OPERATION A!H OPERATED VALVES X 14-87 DC-2415. REV. 1 CONTAINMENT HVAC ' AT CONTAIPMENT 5-18 83, SECT. 3.1.M

9. 4. 6. 2. SYSTENS PENETRATIONS ARE 3.D DESIGNED TO FAIL CIDSED ON IDSS OF POWER 3607.00 FSAN CONTAINMENT VENT. ASPE CODE CASE N-2% N 07-14-87 SPEC. X4 AJ16-2. lC.1, SYS. CONTAlfEENT REV. 10, 12-10-86

                          '9.      4. 6. 2.      COOLENS 2.A 3G08.00 FSAN                         CONTAINMENT Bl.DG.        SEISMIC CLASS 1 AND X                      07-14-87 DC-1505-3.20, REV. 5, VENT. SYS.                QUALITY CLASS 2                                         7-26-83, DC-1506-3.2C,

9. 4. 6. 2. CONTAl!NENT REV. 5, 8-2-83 3.D PENETRATIONS 4

3611.00 bSAR CONTAIPMENT HLDU. DIX'TS, DAWERS. AND X 07-14-87 DC-2167-1.0, REV. 4, 4 VENT. SYS. CCMIVNENTS SUFFORTED 9-28-81

9. 4. G. 3 SAFETY EVALUATION BT SEISMIC CAT. I j Sl'PPORTS 3612.00 FSAW CONTAINMENT BLDG. PENETRATIONS OF X C7-14-87 DC-1505-3.2.C. REY. 5 <

VENT. SYS., SAFETY CONTAllNENT BOUNDARY 7-26-83, " 9 1. G. 3 EVALUATION ARE SEISMIC CAT. I 8. DC--150G-3.2.C. REV. 5, , SAFETY CLASS 2 8-2-83, DC-1508-1.0, REV. 6, 8 83 3v23.OO FSAH DIESEL GENEHATOR DESIGNED 1V LIMIT X 07-14-87 DC-1566-3.1.A. REY. 2,. BLDG.' VENT SYS. MAX.. TEMPERATURE IN 8-2-83

9. 1. 7. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASES BLDG. 'IU 120 DEGREES 1.A F WITH DIESEL GEN. '

IN OPERATION. 3G24.00 FSAH DIESEL GENEHATON SINGLE ACIVE X 07- 14 87 DC-1566 -3.1.B. HEV. 2 BLDG. VENTILATION COMPONENT FAILIIRE 8-2-83

9. 4/ 7. 1. SYSTEM COINCIDENT WITl! IDSS l . 11 SAFETY DESIGN BASES OF OFFSITE IVWEFr DOES NOT IMPAIR SAFETY FUNCTION J

[

 .evwe 1 c. ? v     --            e   e          .  --#v    -                ,  4,- - - -,e--,vw     w       = - . - . '      -=r..~..                                              -.          +<  --          -

Pade No. 26 01/21/HR PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATNIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                 ======== ==========================

DESIGN CONST REF. SOURCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NIDmER SECTION SUBJECT DoctMENT/WATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPU' MENTATION REMARKS

.== ======-===== == ==================== : ================== === === ======== =========== ========== ======== ===================== ===============

3G25.00 FSAR DIESEL CENERATOR VENT. SYSTEM X 07-14-87 DC-1566-1.0, REV. 2, BLDG. VENTILATION CONNECTED TO SAME 8-2-83 DC-1805-3.1.A.

9. 4. 7. 1. SYSTEM CLASS lE BUS TRAIN REV. 5, 8-6-85 1.C SAFETY DESIGN BASES AS DIESEL GENERATOR SET BEING VENTILATED.

3629.00 FSAH DIESEL GENERATOR ESF SUPPLY FANS X 07-14-87 DC-1566-3.1.C. REV. 2 BLDG. VENTILATION DESIGNED /CONSTRIK'TED 8-2-83

9. 4. 7. 3.D SYSTEM AS SEISMIC CAT. I SAFETY EVALUATION.

3630.00 FSAR DIESEL CEN. BLDG. AMCA STD. 210, 1974 X 07-14-87 DC-1566-2.0.B. REV. 2 VENT. SYS. 8-2-83

9. 4. 7. 4 FAN TESTS 3631.00 FSAR AUX. FEEDWATER SAFETY FUNCTION NOT X 07-14-87 DC-1593-3.3.D.3.6, PLMPilOUSE HVAC. IMPAIRED BY SINGLE REV. 2, 8-10-83

9. 4. 8. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASES ACTIVE COMFONENT 1.B FAILURE COINCIDENT WITH LOSS OF OFFSITE FOWER 3632.00 ISAR AUX. FEEDWATER LIMIT BLDC. X 07-14-87 DC-1593-3.2.D. REV. 2, PLMPilOUSE HVAC TEMPERATURE TO 120 8-10-83

9. 4. 8. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASES DEGREES F MAX.

1.C 3G31.00 FSAR AUX. FEEDWATER ESF FANS LIMIT X 07-14-87 DC-1593-3.2.D. REV. 2, 11MPHOUSE IIVAC TEMPERATURE TO 120 8-10-83

9. 4. 8. 2. 3 SYSTEM OPE 2. DEGREES F MAX. IN ELECTRICAL DRIVEN PtHP ROOM 3637.00 FSAR AUX. FEEDWATER ALL POWER SUPPLIES X 07-14-87 DC-1593-3.1.B. REV. 2 PUMPHOUSE fiVAC AND CONTROL 8-10-83

9. 4. R. 3.A SAFETY EVAL. FUNCTIONS NECESSARY FOR SAFE FUNCTION OF VENT. SYS. ARE CLASS lE.

O

9 O

t hge- No. 27. Ul/21/ Hit PLANT VOGTIE HNIT 2 READINESS ItEVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX'- MODULE IRA

                                                                             ===r:===============  .=== ===========

DESIGN CONST REF. SOUNCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESICN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NietBER SECTION SUBJECT DOCIMENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS en n= =======:=====a================== ==================== === === ======== ====================== ======== ==========.=========== ============ u====

  '3638.00 FSAR                       AUX. FEEIWATER       SINGLE FAILURE        X        07-14-87 DC-1593-3.3.D.3.B.

j PINPHOUSP HVAC, CRITERIA REV. 2, 8-10-83

9. 4. R. 3.B SAFETY EVALUATION

, 3G10.00 FSAR AUX. FEEDWATER HVAC UNITS IN MOTOR X 07-14-87 DC-IS93-3.1.B. REV. 2 PtN HOUSE HVAC, DRIVEN PlNP HOOMS 8-10-83

9. 4. H. 3.D SAFETY EViLUATION PROVIDED FROM SAME ESF TRAIN AS PLMPS 3Gil.00 FSAR AUX. FEEIWATER ESF INTAKE DAM ERS X 07-14-87 DC 1593-3.1.B. HEV. 2 PUMPiWJSF HVAC HAVE CLASS lE POWER. 8-10-83

9. 4. 8. 3.D SAFETY tdAL.

 -3G12.00 FSAR                        AUX. FEEWtTER        ESF FANS ARE SEISMIC X         07-14-87 DC-1593-3.1.A. REV. 2 P0 MPH 0tfSE !!YAC   CLASS 1                                 8-10-83

9. 4. 8. 3.E SAFETY EVAL.

3G13.00 FSAR AUX. FEECWATER !.4CA STD. 210,1974 X 07-14-87 DC-1593-2.0.B.3, REY.

                                     .PtNPl!OUSE HVAC                                              2, 8-10-83, X4AJ02-2,2

9. 4. 8.-4 FAN TESTS 8. 8.3A, REV. 8, 7-2-86 3GF 00 FSAN MISC. i*VAC SYSTEMS, MISC. HVAC ESS. EL. X 07-14-87 DC-1540-3.3.E.3.C.2, ESSENTIA!,FLECT. TUNNEL VENT, SINGLE REV. 2, 6-3-83

9. 4. 9. 2. 1.' TUNNEL VENT. SYS. ACTIVE COMFONENT

1. It FAILURE TOGETHER WITH IDSS OF OFF SITE POWER WILL NOT IMPAIR OPERATION 3G16.00 FSAR MISC. HVAC SYSTEMS, MISC. HVAC ESS. VENT X 07-14-87 DC-1540-3.3.E.3.E.3, ESSENTIAL NR NSCW POWER REV. 2, 6-3-83

9. 4. 9. 2. 1. VENTIIATION FOR NSCW CABLES AND DIESEL 1.8 POWER CABLE TUNNELS POWER CABLES TUNNEL.

AND DIESEI. POWER FAILURE OF ONE IE CABLE TUNNELS. POWER SUPPLY CANNOT IMPAIR FUNCTION OF BOTH ESF TRAINS

Pa g e - No. 2H 01/L'l /f#1 ' PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 kEADINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                                            ===.=== e:======   a========__========

DESIGN CONST REF. SOUHCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NIMHEH SFCTION SUBJECT DOCWfENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF- IMPLINENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION HINARKS

   - === :==- =_:=: =:= ========= ========== ==================== === === ======== ====================== ======== ==== ================= ==================

i 3647.00 FSAH MISC HVAC SYSTEMS, MISC. HVAC EL. X 07-14-87 DC-1540-3.2.B. REV. 2 l ELEC. TUNNEL VENT. TUNNEL VENT. 6-3-83

9. 4. 9. 2. SYSTEN, SAFETY EVAL. MAINTAIN CABLE l 3.A TUNNEL, BELOW 104 DEGREES F.

3G18.00 FSAR MISC. liVAC SINGLE COMPONENT X 07-14-87 DC-1540-3.2.E.C.2, ELEC. T"NNEL VENT. FAILURE WILL NOT REV. 2, 6-3-83

9. 4. 9. 2. SYSTEM, SAFETY PREVENT SUFFICIENT 3.B EVALUATION COOLING OF CABLE TUNNE!S 3rA9.00 FSAR MISC. HVr.C. SYSTEMS, FAN MOTORS POWERED X 07-14-87 DC-1540 -3.3.C. REV. 2 ELEC. TUNNEL VENT. FROM SAME CLASS IE 6-3-83

9. 4. 9. 2. SYSTFN, SAFETY POWER TRAIN AS 3.B EVALUATION CABLES IN TUNNEL 3650.00 FSAR MISC HVAC SYSTEMS, AMCA STD. 210, 1974 X 07-14-87 DC-1540-2.0. B. REV. 2 ELECT. TUMNEL VENT. 6-3-83, X4AJ02-2.2 &

9. 4. 9. 2, 4 SYSTEM, FAN TEST 8.3A, REV. 8, 7-2-86 3710.00 Nin: QUEST. COOLING MECHANISM ANSI N509--1980 X 07-14-87 DC-1506-2.0.I.5, REV.

COUHES. F'OR EACH ESF FILTEH 5, 8-2-83 0160. 03 SYSTFM 3711.00 NIM? OUEST. COOLING trECHANISM RELIEF DAMFER IN TiiE X 07 87 CCP 8B10285C, REV. 1 CORRES. FOR EACh ECF FILTER AUXILIAl?Y BUILDING l-6-87 0460. 08 SYSTEM EXTERNAL WALLS DESIGNED TO OPEN AT 3 psi 38G1.00 FSAH CONTAINMENT BLDG. NON-SAFETY RELATED X 07-14-87 DC-1503-3.1, REV. 5, VENTILATION SYSTEM, HVAC DESIGNED TO 9-29 78, DC-1511-3.1,

9. 4. G. 1. DESIGN BASES MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL REV. 4, 8-2-83, 2.G INTEGRITY FOLIDWING DC-1512-3.lA, REV. 3 SSE. 8-9-83 DC-1515-3.lA, REV. 1, 8 5-83 i

G G G

Pa m No, s 29 V Ol/28iHH PIANT YOGTLE IINIT 2 READINESS REVIFW Plf0 GRAM IMPIEMENTATION fMTRIX - HODUIE 18A

==----=========- = ====-- - - - =

DESIGN CONST REF. SollHCE AND DES CON Ct% RENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NINI1ER SECT 20N SUBJECT DOCtNENT/ FEAT 1HE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLFMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS

       .= ==== 2                 ====       =- : u === ======== ==================================================================.===========================:===.=

3972.00 FSAR POST ACCIDENT DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN X 07-14-87 DC-1542. REV. 1, OPERATION OF FilB A SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE 9-29-78, DMCN 1542-3,

9. 4. 2. 2. l. VENT. SUBSYSTEM PRESSURE FOLLOWING l-22-87, SECT. 3.1.B l.B AN ACCIDENT.

3973.00 FSAR POST ACCIDENT FIIB FOWERED SO FAILINE X 07-14-87 DC-1542--3.1.G. REV. 1 VENT. SUBSTSTEM. OF ONE CLASS IE 9-29-78

9. 4. 2. 2. 1. POWER SUPPLY WILL 1.C NOT IMPAIR FUNCTION OF BOTil ESF TRAINS 3971.00 FSAR IVST ACCIDENT OR RG. 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1542-1.0, REV. I, EMEIRIENCY OPER. OF P 29-78

9. 4. 2. 2. 1. THE FifB VENT.

3 SYSTEN, CODES AND STDS. Yl75.00 FSAR POST ACCIDENT OR 3 h RATED ClWTAIN X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ21 - ATT. 1 DAMPER TYPE SHohW EMElfGENCY OFTR. OF TYFT FIRE DAMPERS REV. 9, 6-23-86 ON VENDOR DRAWING

9. 1. 2. 2. 2. THE FIIB SYSTIN LOCATED IN FIRE

2. . 5 FIRE DAMPERS BARRIERS, AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN FIRE RATING 3't77.09 FSAR IV)ST ACCIDENT OR HEATING Coll X 07 14-87 DC 1542-2.0.I.4 ret. BY ADOPTION OF EMFifGENCY OITR. OF MAINTAINS RELATIVE 1, 9 29-78 SPEC. ANSI N509

f. I. 2. 2. 2. Tile FHH SYSTEM - IGNIDITY OF AIR X44J07, REV. 12, 3 (SYSTEM OITif. ) ENTERING TifE 11-18 86 ELECT. Il1VI CllANCOAL BFIOW 70% COIL DATA SifEET (BY NOTE)

T17fl.00 FS AR POST ACCIDENT OR 10CFifl00 X 07-14-07 DC-1542-2.0.0, REV. 1 EMFli. OITH. OF TIIE 9 29-78

9. 4. 2. 2. FilH SYSTEM - SAFETY 3.A EV Al.f f nTION 39H0.00 FSAit IUST ACCIDENT OR ESF FANS X 07-14 H7 DC 1542 3.111. REV. I, EMENGENCY OPERATION DESIGNED / CONSTRICTED 9 29 7H

9. 4. 2. 2. OF Tl!E FIIB SYSTFM - TO SEISMIC CAT I.

3.D SAFETY EVAI.t!ATION I I 3- . e - s - m_.

l' ig. No. :t0 01/21/HH Pl ANT VtxiTLE UN'T 2 HEADINFSS HEVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATHlX - MODULE 18A _ = == =-- :-_ _-- = =_== DESIGN CONST ffFF. SOf flME AND DES CON CUHHENT bESIGN CURRENT CONSTHt!CTION NittM H SrtTION SlfiUECT DoctNENT/WATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLDfENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION HFNARKS

                                                    ==- ==== = == =_==-======,=== - =                    == ======== ====================== =======- - = = ===== --=======: === =============-

3'p11.00 FSAH IUST ACCIDENT OR SUBSYSTEN X 07-14 H7 DC-1542-3.111. HEV. 1 DiFHGENCY OPERATION DESIGNED / CONSTRICTED 9 29-78 ft. 4. 2. 2. OF 1HE FHit SYSTEM - TO SEISMIC CAT. I 3.E SAFETY EVALUATION. 3Mt2.00 FSAN IUST ACCIDENT OH AMCA STD. 210 X 07-14 87 DC-1542-2.0.E.3, REV. ANSI NSIO HEQUlliES EMEiniENCY OPERATION 1, 9-29 78, SPEC. TESTING IN

9. 1, 2. 2. 4 0F FIIB VENT. SYSTEM X4AJ07-5.3.lD, HEV. ACCONDANCE WITH

                                         - TESTS AND                                                                   12, 11-18 86                                                 AMCA 210 INSI'ECTIONS
 'Miu. 00 FS AH                          POST ACCIDENT OH               HEPA FILTEH UNITS          X        07 87 DC-1542-2.0.B.1 &                                             BY APPLICATION OF EMERGENCY OPERATION TESTED INDIVIDUALLT                                      2.0.1.5, REV. 1,                                              ENDA 76 21 & ANSI

9. 4. 2. 2. 4 OF FIIH VENT. SYSTDI PHIOH 1V 9-29-78 N510 TESTS AND INSTALLATION TO INSPECTIONS. VERIFY AN EFFICIENCY OF 99.97%

39Hl.00 FSAR AUX, Bl.DG, NOINA L FAllDHE OF X 07-14-87 DC-1551- 3.2. F. REV. 2, VENT. SYS. NON-SAFETY, 8-17-83 II. 1. 3. I 1. NON SEISMIC HVAC i EQUID 1Eter/DilC190HK WILL NGT COMPHOMISE ANY SAFETY HELATED t SYS., STHtCTURES OH l COMPONENTS 3:PMt.00 FSAW AUX. BIDG. ENEH. EACH EQUIP. IMXN X 07- 14 -87 DC 1555- 3.1.C. HEV. 1 VENT. SYS. - SAFETY COOLING UNIT FAN 10-17-78

9. 4. 3. 2. I. DESIGN MASES POWEHED BY SAME l

I l.H SAFETY FEAttiHE DUS l AS EQUIP. IN HOOM. i

f'f ri. 00 FS AR AllX. B LIK1. DfElai . ANY SINGLE Fall.IINE X 07 14-87 DC-1555-3.3.C.3b, HEV.

VENT. SYS. - SAFETY CANNOT CAllSE IDSS OF 1, 10-17-78

9. 1. 3. 2. I. DESIGN BASES ESF FUNCTION 1.0 9 9 9

D f f% Page No. 31 h Ol/21/HH PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PIDIRAM IMt'LIMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                                                                      ===========================_========

DESIGN CONST ltEF. SOUlfCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NtMPER SECTION SUBJECT DoctNENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLDENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS m= ==== ===================,===========================e=== === === ======== ========= ============ ======== ====================== ==== ============ 4000.00 FSAR AUX. BLDG. EMEffG. DESIGNED TO MAINTAIN X 07-14-87 DC-1561-3.18. REV. 2 VFN' SYS. - SAFETY NEG. PRESSURE TO 8-2-83

9. 4. 3. 2. 1. CESIGN BASES PREVENT 1.F RADIOACTIVITY RELEASE 4001.00 FSAR AUX. BLDG. EMERG. RG. 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1561-1.0, REY. 2 VENT. SYS. - CODES 8-2-83

9. 4. 3. 2. 1. AND STDS.

3 4002.00 FSAR AUX. BLDG. EMERG. EACH EQUllNENT ROOM X 07-14-87 DC-1555-3.1.C f. 3.2A. VENT. SYSTEM - COOLED BY UNIT WHOSE REV. 1. 10--17-78

9. 4. 3. 2. SAFETY EVALUATION IWER AND CHILLED 3.B WATER ARE FROM SAME SAFETY FEATURES TRAIN AS EQUIINENT l'1 ROOM.

4003.00 FSAR AUX. BLDG. EMERGENCY SYSTD1 X 07-14-87 DC-1555-3.lD. REV. 1 VENT. SYSTEM - DESIGNED /CONSTRTICTED 10-17-78

9. 4. 3. 2. SAFETY EVALUATION AS SEISMIC CAT. I 3.C 4004.00 FSAR AUX. BI.DG. D(ERG. NO SINGLE FAILURE X 07-14-87 DC-1555-3.3C.3b, REV.

VENT. SYS. - SAFETY CAN CAUSE IDSS OF 1. 10-17-78

9. 4. 3. 2. EVAL. ANY ESF FUNCTION 3.D 4005.00 FSAR AUX. BLDG. DtERG. AMCA 210--1974 X 07-14-87 X4AJ07-5.3.lA. REV. BY COMPLIANCE WITH VENT. SYS. 12. 11-18-86 ANSI N509. PARA.

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 FAN TESTS 5.7 4006.00 FSAR AUX BLDG. EMEI!G. RG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-15GI-1.0, REV. 2 VENT SYS., FILTER 8-2-83. X4AJ07-5.3.2B.

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 UNIT TESTS. Edv. 12. 11-18-86 4007.00 FSAR AUX. RIDG. EMERGENCY ARI 410-1972 X 07-14-87 X4AJ07-5.3.lc. REY.

VENT. SYSTEM 12. 11-18-86

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 COIL TESTS

Pago No. 32 01/21/88 PLANT VOGTIE l' NIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - 4)DULE 1RA

                                                                                        ========== =============== ..=======

DESIGN CONST REF. SOURCE AND DES CON CURHENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NINilFR SECTION SURJECT DOCIMENT/fTATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLENENTATION RLMAHKS

.==:- === ==--======= ==========: =======> ==================== === === ======== ====================== ======== =2====================

_ ================== 4008.00 FSG AUX. BLDG. EMEHG. MIL- F-510CHC X 07- 14-87 I4 AJ07-4.BB, REV, 12, BY COMPLIANCE WITH VENT. SYS. - HEPA 11-18-86 ANSI N509, PAHA.

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 FILTER MANUFACTURING 5.1 I

AND TESTING 1009.00 FSAH AUX. BLDG. EMERG. RG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1561-1.0, REV. 2, i VENT. SYS., HEPA 8-2-83, X4 WO7-5.J.28,

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 FILTFH TESTS REV. 12, 11-18-86 1010.00 FSAR AUX. BLDG. EMEHG. RG 1.52. TABLE 1 X 07-14-87 DC-1561-1.0 & 2.0.H.5, HEFERS TO ANSI I VENT. SYSTEM - REV. 2, 8-2-83 N510-1980

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 ACTIVATED CARBON ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 4011.00 FSAH AUX. BISG. EMER. EDT-M-16-lT JUNE X 07-14-87 DC-1561-2.0.F. HEV. 2 VENT. STS. - 1972 6-2-83 l 9. 4. 3. 2. 4 ACTIVATED CAHBON ACCEPTANCE CRITEHIA 4013.00 PSAN AUX. BLDG. EMERG. HG 1.52 X 07-14-87 I4 U07-5.3.2B, REY.

VENT. SYS. - 12, 11-18-86

9. 1. 3. 2. -l IMPREGNATED ACTIVATED CHARCOAL ,

1011.00 FSAH AUI. BLDG. ENER. ANSI /ASME N509-1976 X 07-14-87 I4AJ07-5.3.lA, REV. [ VENT. STS. - PARAGRAPfl 5.4 12, 11-18-86

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 W)lSTURE SEPARAltRS l

4015.00 FSAR AUX. BLDG. EMERG. SMACNA, 1975 & ANSI X X 07-14-87 X4 AJ01-H-4B & H-6.0, 5-13-87 F4AJ01, REV. 22, VENT. SYSTDI - DUCT M510 SECT. 6, 1980 REV. 22, 2-1-87 2-1-87 (DIVISION H-4)

9. 4. 3. 2. 4 LEAK TESTING 4057.00 FSAR CONTHOL BIDG. ESF ELEC. EOUIP. H00M X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.1.C. REY. 3 VENT. SYSTDI - ELEC. HVAC SHALL REMAIN 8-1 83

9. 4. 5. 1. 1. EOUlFNENT ff0tH FUNCTIONAL FDR SSE, l.B DESIGN BASES TOHNADO, LOCA, MAJOH PIPE-RUPTURE OR SINGLE FAILUHE OF ANY COMPONENT.

l l 9 9 9

, . A.. 0I/21/HH N. . . r% V O o PLANT V0GTI.E UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIN - MODULE 18A

.=- = == ================ =========

DESIGN CONST REF. SOUNCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION SUlUECT IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION NfMARKS Nt?ttiER SFCTION DOCINENT/ FEATURE

   ----- === ===========       ==================== ==================== === === ======== ====================== ======== ===== ====== ========= ==================

4058.00 FSAR CONTHOL BLDG. ESF EACH THAIN OF SAFETY X 07 87 DC-1532-3.1.E. REV. 3 VENT. SYSTEM - FEATURES ELECTRICAL 8-1-83

9. 4. 5. 1. 1. EIECT. EQUIP. H00M EQUIINENT ROOM HVAC 1.C IS h>WERED BY A SEPARATE INDEPENDENT CLASS IE IVWER SYSTEM.

4061.00 FSAR CONTHOL BLDG. ESF REMAINS FITNCTIONAL X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.1.C. REV. 3 HVAC EQUltMnNT HOOM DURING AN SSE, 8-1-83

9. 4. 5. 1. 1. 'WNT SYSTEM. DESIGN BASIS 2.B TURNADO, OR IDCA AIDNG WITH A SINGLE FAILURE OF ANY COMPONENT.

40fi2.00 FSAH CONTROL Bl.DG. SAFETY HVAC SYSTEMS X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.2.A. REV. 3 FEATURE EI.EC. DESIGNED 10 MAINTAIN 8-1-83

9. 4. 5.1. 2 EQUlINENT H00M HVAC SPACE TEMPEHATURES 1 SYSTEM. BETWEEN 65 DEGREES F. AND 100 DEGREES F.

30fi3.00 FS AN CONTHOL BLDG. SAFETY BATTERY ROOM EXH. X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.2.B. REV. 3, FEATURE ELEC. FAN MAINTAINS 8-1-83

9. 4. 5. 1. 2. EQUIINENT HOOM HVAC HYDHOGEN 1.B SYSTEM. CONCENTRATION BELOW 2%.

4065.00 FSAM CONTH. BLDG, ESF RG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1562-1.0, REV. 1, COFNI1NENT NOT VENT. SYSTEMS 8-10-83 APPLICABLE TO UNIT

9. 4. 5. 1. 3 2 4066.00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. SAFETY BATTERY ROOM . X 07-14-87 DC-1532, REV. 3 FEATURE El.EC. MAINTAINED AT A 8-1-83, DMCN 1532-1,

9. 4. 5. 2. 1 EQUlINENT HOOM HVAC SLIGHTLY NEGATIVE 12 22-86, SECT. 3.3.C PRESSURE

hig No. 34 01/21/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPlJNENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

===u======:===:e===== =========

DESIGN CONST REF. SOUNCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NIMBER SICTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLINENTATION RENARKS 2 - :: : :.: ==:: ==== ==:================= ==================== === === ======== ================z:==== _r===== =======u ===: ::====:: : ==:ee==== :=== 10G7.00 FSAR EIEC. PEreETRATION EACII TRAIN IVWERED X 07 87 DC-1562 3.1.D. IfEV. I, SYSTEN NOT ROOM FILTER EXIIAUST BY SEPARATE CLASS lE 8-10-83 INSTALLED IN UNIT

9. 4. 5. 2. 2 SYSTEM ITMER SUPPLY 2 4068.00 FSAR CONTif0L BLDG. SAFETY ROOMS MAINTAINED AT X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.2.A. REV. 3 FEATURE ELEC. EQUIP, MAXIMtN 100 DEGREES 8-1-83,

9. 4. 5. 3. I ROOM HVAC SYSTEM. F DC-1000-M-2.0.7A, REV.

2, 4-12-78 1069.00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. SAFETT BATTERY ROOMS HAVE X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.3.A. REV. 3, FEATURE ELEC. EQUIP. ELEC. REllEAT COILS 8-1-83,

9. 4. 5. 3. I ROOM llVAC SYSTEM. TO MAINTAIN A ROOM DC-1000 M-2.0.7A, REV.

DESIGN TEMP. OF 70 2, 4-12-78 DEGREES TO 80 DEGREES F. 4070.00 FSAR ELEC. PENETRATION UPON RECEIPT OF X 07-14-87 DC-1562. REV. 1, SYSTEN NOT IKNM FILTRATION AND CONTAINMENT 8-10-83, DMCN 1562-2 INSTALI ED IN liNIT

9. 4. 5. 3. 2 EXilAUST SYSTEM ISOLATION SIGNAL Tile 11-11-85, 3.1.C & 2 ELEC. PENETRATION 3.1.D ROOM EXRAUST FILTRATION UNITS ARE ACTIVATED 4071.00 FSAR ESF ELEC. EQUIP. ESSENTIAL HVAC X 07-14-87 DC-1532-1.0, REV. 3, ROOM HVAC SYSTEMS SYSTEMS FOR ESF 8 1-83

9. 4. 5. 4. SWITCHGEAR. ESF l.A EQUIP. ROOMS, AND BATTERY It00MS DESIGNED 'lV SEISMIC CAT. I 1072.00 FSAR ESF ElEC. EQUIP. SINGIE ACTIVE X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.1.C. IfEV. 3 ROOM llVAC SYSTEM FAILURE IN ESSENTIAL 8-1-83

9. 4. 5. 4. IIVAC SYSTEM OR 1 . 11 SUPITXtTING SYSTEMS (INCL. CFFSITE POWER) DOES NOT IMPAIR SYSTEN'S ARILITY *.T PERFOIN FUNCTION.

O O O

f A 7.,

              \     l v                                                                                                                                                         m Pa g. krs.       35 01/21/H8 l'LANT V0GTIE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE IBA
                                                                                        = == = =======-====== ========

DESIGN CONST ltE F. SOUHCE AND DES CON CirHRENT DESIGN Cl!RHENT CONSTRUCTION NIMHEN SECTION SUluECT DOCINENT/FEATUHE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPIENENTATION liEM4HKS

           -- -              - .. ~= = ,_- ===~== = === == = = == ===== === === ======== ====== =============== ==== == ======== =========: =- - ====- = ===-==

1073.00 FSAH ESF ELEC. EQUIP. EACil ElEC. EQUlINENT X 07-14 87 DC -1532 -3.1.B. 3.1. E & INXh IIVAC SYSTEM IMAN COOLED BY A 4.0 A. REV. 3. B-1-83,

9. 4. 5. 4. UNIT W110SE FAN IS DC-1620-3.1.G. HEV. 2, 1.C POWEHED FROM SAME 3-29-83 ESF BUS AS EQUIP. IN IKXN 4071.00 FSAR ESF EIIC. EQUIP. HG 1.128 X 07-14-87 DC-1532-3.2.B. REV. 3 HOOM HVAC SYSTEMS 8-1-83

9. 4. 5. 4.

1.D 4075.00 FSAR CONTIM)L Bl.DC. ESF SINGLE ACTIVE X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REV. 3, IIVAC EQUllNENT HOOM FAILURE IN HVAC 8-9-83, SECT. 3.1.E

9. 4. 5. 4. VENT. SYSTI}1 EQUllHENT HOOH IEVEL 2.H 3 VENT. SYSTEM DOES NOT IMPAIR SAFETT FUNCTION CAPABILITY.

407fi.00 bS AN CONTIK)L BLDG. ESF AIR HANDLING UNIT X 11-16-87 DC 1531, REV. 3, i.7*<* SYSTEM, SYSTEM llOUSINGS ARE SEISMIC 8-9-83, SECT. 1.0 9 4. 5. 5.A COMPONENTS CAT. I DC-1532, REV. 3, 8-1-83, SECT. 10 DC-1562. REV. 1, 8-10-83, SECT. 1.0 4077.00 FSAN CONTROL BLliG. ESF MIN. AVG. EFFICIENCY X 07-14-87 DC-1532-2.0.A.1, REV. IIVAC SYSTEM OF PHEFILTER, USING 3, 8-1-83

9. 4. 5. 5.B SYSTEM COMPONENTS A1NOSPERIC DUST IS 20 10 60 PEHCENT WlIEN TESTED BY ASIIHAE STD. 52 407H.00 FSAR CONTH01. BIDG. ESF FANS ARE SEINIC X 07-14 H7 SPFC. X4AJ02-4.lA & SEISMIC CAT. 1 IIVAC SYSTEM CAT. I 4.2A, REV. 8, 7-2-86 INDICATED ON DATA

9. 4. 5. 5.D SYSTEM CtNi'ONENTS Sl!EETS 4079.00 FSAR CONTIM)L Bl.DG. ESF DilCTWORK AND DAMPERS X 07- 14 -87 DC-2167-1.0, REV. 4 IIVAC SYSTEM ARE SEISMIC CAT. I 9 28 H4, SPEC.

9. 4. 5. 5.E SYSTEM COMIXiNENTS X4AJ01 H-6, REV. 22, 2-1-87, SPEC.

X1AJ20 6.21, REY. 9. 1-22-87

l '.s r . h. . . 3G Ofc'l/HH Pl. ANT VOGTIE UNIT 2 RFADINESS liEVIEW PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PtiTRIX - PODULE 18A

                                                                                                                                            .= ===== ====== .= - = -- = = .

DESIGN CONST liFF. SOIF E AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CIHRENT CONSTRUCTION NtMN R SECTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLDIENT ATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION film 4HKS

                                                                        =      . =.- - = - === =======--- == = ==: .== === ===. === ==,=================== ====== = ========= ====:===== =                             ===- =====----=

10HO.00 FSAR CONTROL BIDG. ESF BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST X 07-14-87 SPEC. X1AJ02-4.7, REY. IIVAC SYSTEM FANS AfiE SEISMIC 8, 7-2-86

9. 4. 5. 5.F SYSTEM COMPONENTS CAT. I 4081.00 ISAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF M0ISTURE SEPARATOR X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4 AJ07-3.2, D ATA CteNITMENT NOT HVAC SYSTEM WILL REMOVE 99.7% OF SHEETS, REV. 12 APPLICABLE TO UNIT

9. 4. 5. 5.I SYSTEM CW1TVNENTS ALL FifEE WATER 11-18-86 2 DROPLETS DOWN 1V 2 MICRON DIAMETER WITHOUT VISIBLE CARRYOVER.

1082.00 FSAR CONTROL Bl.DG. ESF RG. 1.52 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ07-4.8.A. COFNID"LNT NOT HVAC REV. 12, 11-18-86 APPLICABLE TO PNIT

9. 4. 5. 5.I SYSTD4 C(NPONENTS 2 MolSTtHE SEPAHATOR 10H1.00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF MIL F-510GH X 07-14-87 SPEC. X1AJ07-4.8.D. COFNID1FNT NOT HVAC REV. 12, 11-18-86, Af'PLICARLE TO UNIT

9. 1. 5. 5.J SYSTEM COMIVNENTS, ANSI N509 2 HEPA FILTERS 10Hl.OO FSAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF MIN. ACCEPTANCE X 07-14-87 SPEC. X44JO7-4.8.B. COFH11 MENT NOT HVAC CRITERIA IS REMOYAL REV. 12, 11-18-86 APPLICABLE TO UNIT

9. 4. 5. 5.J SYSTEM COMTVNENTS OF 99.97% OF 0.3 ANSI N509 2 IIEPA FILTERS MICRON THEINALLY GENERATED, MON 0 DISPERSED DIOCTYL PHTHAlATE PARTICLES 1085.00 6 SAN CONTROL BLDG ESF AMCA STANDARDS 210 X 07-14 67 DC-1532-7.0.C.3, REV. ANSI NT;09, DC-1562 IIVAC 3, 8-1-83, DOES NOT APPLY TO

9. 1. 5. 6 FAN TESTS DC 1562-2.0.F.2, HEV. (INIT 2 1, 8-10 83 SPEC.

X1AJ07-5.3.lA, REV. 12, 11-18 86 O O O

h Page No. d 37 V V

01e21/HH PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPLUfENTATION MATRIX - MODUIE IBA

                                                                                                 ===========_:================= =====

DESIGN CONST REF. SOURCE.AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRICTION NINBER SECTION SUBJECT DOCLNENT/FE ATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPIEMENTATION REMARKS

                          . == ======. ;====== ====:==;===========,           m========   ========== === === ======== ====================== ======== ====================== =========- =======

4086.00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF RG. 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1562-1.0, REY. 1 COFNITNENT NOT HVAC 8-10-83, SPEC. APPLICABLE 1U UNIT

9. 4. S. 6 FILTER IWITS TESTS X4AJ07-5.3.2D, REV. 2 :

12, 11-18-86 1087.00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF ARI STANDARD 410 X 07-14-87 DC-1532-2.0.E.1, REV. HVAC 3, 8-1-83, SPEC.

9. 4. 5. 6 C0ll TESTS X4AJ07-5.3.lc, REV.

12, 11-18-86 40H8.00 F3AR CONTROL BLDG. ESF MIL-F-51068 x 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ07-5.3.lA, ANSI N509, PARA. IlVAC REV. 12, 11-18-86 5.1, C0FN11NENT

9. 4. 5. G HEPA FILTERS NOT APPLICABLE TO UNIT 2 1089.00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF MIN AIR RESIDENCE X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4 AJO7-4.8.B.6, ANSI N509 HVAC, SYSTDI 11ME IN THE CARBON REV. 12, 11-18-86 COFN11NENT NOT

9. 4. 5. 5.K COMNNENTS, CARBON IS 0.5 SEC. AT A APPLICABLE TO trNIT ADSORDERS NOMINAL FACE 2

VEIDCITY OF 40 F1/:41N. 10!M).00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA X 07-14-87 S3'EC. X4AJ07-4.8. A & ANSI N509 HVAC IS MIN. EFFICIENCY B, REV. 12, 11-18-86 NG-1.52, REFER TO

9. 4. 5. 5.K SYSTEM Ctt1PONENTS, OF 9% RINOVAL OF ADSORBER DATA CARBON ADSORBERS ELEMENTARY ORGANIC SHEETS IODINES AT A COFNIINENT NOT CONTROLLED R.fl. OF APPLICABLE TO UNIT 70%. 2 1091.00 F3AR CONTROL BLDG. ESF RG 1.52 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4A307-4.8A, REFER M MOISTURE IIVAC, MOISTURE REV. 12, 11 BG SEPARATOR DATA

9. 4. 5. 6 SEPARATOR TESTS SHEET COFNI1NENT NOT APPLICABLE M UNIT 2

40!rt,00 FSAR CONTROL. BLDG. ESF RG 1.52 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ07-4.HA, COFN11NENT NOT HVAC, IIEPA FILTER REV. 12, 11-18-86 APPLICABLE TO UNIT

9. 4. 5. 6 TESTS 2

P.t ge- No. 3H Ol/21/H3 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PHOGHAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE IBA

                                                                                                                                                                          - ===================== == =-- =====

DESIGN CONST NEF. SOUIN:E AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURNENT CONSTRUCTION NtetBER SECTION SUBJECT DOctNENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPI.DtENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION HEMARKS

                                                                                                         = .     ===      ==== ==== =======.== ==== ====== === ========= === === ======== ====================== ======== =========,============ ==================

4031.00 FSA3 CONTHOL BLDG. ESF RDT- M -I T X 07-14-87 DC-1562-2.0.C.l. REY. COFN11 MENT NOT llVAC 1, 8-10-83 APPLICABLE 1B UNIT

9. 4. 5. 6 ACCEPT. CRITEHIA 2 FOR ACTIVATED CARBON 4095.00 FSAR CONTitOL BLDG. ESF HG 1.52, POSITION C6 X 07-14-87 SPEC. X4AJ07-4.8.A. COFNI1NENT NOT HVAC - TEST ON AND TABLE 2 REV. 12, 11-18-86 APPLICABLE TO UNIT

9. 4. 5. G IMPREGNATED 2 ACTIVATED CHARCOAL TO VEHIFY IODINE REMOVAL EFFICIENCY 40!ki.00 FSAR CONTROL BLDG. ESF SMACNA 1975 & ANSI X X 07-14-87 DC-1532-2.0.K.1, REV. 5-13-87 X4 AJ01, REV. 22 HVAC DUC1NOHK LEAK N510, SECT. 6, 1380 3, 8-1-83, 2 -l- 87 (DIVISION 0-4)

9. 4. 5. 6 TESTING DC-1562-2.0.H.5, REV.

1, 8-10-83, SPEC. X4 AJ01-H-48, REV. 22, 2-1-87 4038.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT BLDG. CONTAIPNENT IIVAC X 07-14-87 DC-1508-3.lA, HEv. 6, VENTILATION SYSTEM PENETRATIONS 8-5-83

9. 4. G. I PENETRATING CONTAINMENT DESIGNED TO SEISMIC CAT. I 1119.00 NiC QUEST. HVAC DESIGN ASHHAE X 07-14-87 DC-1000-M-2.0.6, REV.

CORNES. 2, 4-12-78 0151. 05-1 1?S7.00 NHC QUEST. ESF AIN. CLEANUP cNSI N509 X 07-14-87 DC-1508 3.1F, REV. 6 COHHES. SYSTEMS: SECOND 8-5-83 0160. 02 VALVE ON FILTHATION UNIT HANDSWITCH CONTHOLI ED 1232.00 NRC QUEST. BASES FOR HG 1.76, 11EGION 1 X 07 14 87 DC-1000-C-5.7.2, REY. COHHES. METEOftOLOGICAL 3, 9-30-83 0151. 05-1 CONDITIONS O O O

Pago No. O39 Ol/21/R8 I'LANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW IHOGRAM IMPLINENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                    ====================================

DESIGN CONST IlEF SOURCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NtMBER SECTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPIIMENTATION liENARKS

===== ===_=========== ==== ======= ======= ==================== === === ======== _===================== ======== ====================== ====== :==========

4370.00 FSAR DAMPING VAll!ES IOR SEISMIC I'ERCENT OF X 07-14-87 DC-1005-3.6.2, REV. 1 FIXED BASE CRITICAL DAPG'ING PER 4-4-83 DMCN-4,

3. 7.B. 1-1 STRUCTURES AND MODE 08--23-85 COMPONENTS 4390.00 FSAR RADWASTE BLDG. VENT. FAILURE OF X 07-14-87 DC-1546-3.2.G. REV. O.

SYS. NON-SAFETY 6-21-83, SMACNA,

9. 4. 3. 3. 1. - NONSEISMIC RVAC DC-1547-3.2.J. REY. O, 1 EQUIP./DUCWORK WILL 6-10-83, SMACNA.

NOT COMPROMISE ANY DC-1548-2.0.I. REV. O. SAFETY RELATED 12-27-82 SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, OR CtMVNENTS. 4391.00 FSAR DIESEL GEN. BLDG. FAILURE OF X 07-14-87 DC-1566-3.2.F REV. 2, VENT. SYS. NONSAFETY, 8-2-83

9. 4. 7. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASIS NONSEISMIC HVAC .

3 1.E EQUIINENT/DUCWORK WILL NOT C0Pf'HOMISE ANY SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, OR COMPONENTS. 4392.00 FSAR AUX. FEEDWATEH FAILURE OF X 07-14-87 DC-1593-3.2.A. REV. 2 FLNPHOUSE HVAC, NONSAFETY, 8-10-83, DC-1005-3.5B, ,

9. 4. 8. 1. SAFETY DESIGN BASIS NONSEISMIC HVAC REV. 1, 4-4-83 I.F EQUlfNENT/DUCWORK WILL NOT CapfwoMISE ANY SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES, OR COMPONENTS 4333.00 FSAN MISC. HVAC SYSTEMS FAILURE OF NON

X 07-14 87 DC-1526-3.1, REV. O.

EQUllHENT BASIS SAFETY, NON SEISMIC 9-21-83

9. 4. 9. 1. 1. HVAC 1 EQUlfNENT/DUCW ORK WILL NOT COMPHOMISE ANY SAFETY RELATED

                                                -SYSTEMS, STRUCTUHES OR COMPONENTS 1

1

Page No. 40 Ol/28/H8 I'LANT VOITLE UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM IMi'LEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                             = = ===============- ======= =======

DESIGN CONST DES CON CURHENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTHUCTION REF. SOUliCE AND IMPLENENTATION REMARKS DOCUMENT / FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMI'LEMENTATION AS OF: NIMM H SFCTION S!!BJECT . == = ==== =- ==- r=================== =============== ===- === === ======= ====================== ======== ====================== ================== FAILLEE OF NON X 07-14-87 DC-1540-3.3.D.2, HEV. 4331.00 FSAR ElEC. TUNNEL VENT. SYSTEM SAFETY, NON SEISMIC 2. 6-3-83

9. 4. 9. 2. I. liVAC 1.D EQUIINENT/DUCIMORK WILL NOT COMPROMISE 1 ANY SAFETY HELATED SYSTEMS, STRUCTURES OH COM19NENTS 4395.00 FSAN MISC. HVAC SYSTEMS, FAILURE OF NON X 07-14-87 DC-1556--l.0 & 3.2.A.

PIPING PENETRATION SAFETY, NON SEISMIC REV. I, 7-26-83

9. 4. 9. 3. 1. VENT. SYSTE,M EQUIIMENT/DUC1 WORK 1 WILL NOT COMPROMISE ANY SAETTY RELATED SYSTENS, STRUCTURES OR COMIVNEhTS 4 WI.00 FSAN CONTHOL BUILDING NO SINGLE FAILURE X 07-14-87 DC-1531-3.1.E REV. 3 HVAC DESIGN BASES WITilIN SYSTEM NOR 8-9-83

7. 3. 12. 1. 2 ANY SUPPORTING SYSTEM SilALL PREVENT IT Fif0M PERIVINING ITS SAFETY FUNCTION, 4500.00 FSAH AUX. BLDG. ESF HVAC NO SINGLE FAILURE X 07-14-87 DC-1555-3.3.C. REV. 1 DESIGN BASES WITIIIN SYS. NOR ANY 8-23-83,

7. 3. 13. 1. 2 SUPPORTING SYS. DC-1561-3.3.B. HEV. 2 SHALL PREVENT IF 8-2-83 FHOM l'ERIVINING ITS SAFETY FUNCTIONS 4515.00 FSAR CONTHOL HOOM NO SINGLE FAILURE X 07-14-87 DC-1531-3.1.E & 4.0.A.

VENTILATION SYSTEM CAN l'HEVENT THE REV. 3, 8 9 83

7. 3. 6. 1. 2 DESIGN BASES ISOLATION OF THE CONTHOL HOOM VENTILATION SYSTEM IEEE 279-1971 x 07-14-87 DC-1508-2.0.11.1, HEV.

4r20.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT PURGE ISOLATION SYSTEM 6, 8-5-83

7. 3. 4. 2.B e -- - -- .

G . G

Page No.. 41 O 01/21/H8 PLANT /0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PIf0 GRAM , lifLEENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 184 i

                                                                                                                                         =======================_============

i DESIGN CONST HEF. SOffRCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION

            . NINBEH SECTIC.1                             SUBJECT                     DOctMENT/ FEATURE                                        IGN ST. AS OF:     IMPLEMENTATION               AS OF:   IPFLEENTATION            REMARKS

- -- =============== ======-============= ==================== === === ==== === ====================== ======== ======e=============== ==================

1521.00 FTAli FtEl. HANDLING IEEE 279-1971 X 07-14-87 DC-IS42-2.0.J.1, REV. BUILDING, 1, 9-29-78 i 7. 3. $. 4.B VENTILATION ISOLATION 4522.00 FSAR CONTROL ROOM IEEE 279-1971 X 07-14-87 DC-1531-2.0.L-1, REV. VENTILATION SYSTIN 3, 8-9-83

7. 3. 6. 2.B ' ANALYSIS 461ut00 FSAR SEISMIC SUBSYSTEN COPEONENT EARTHQUAKE X 03-16-87 DC-1005, REV. 1 ANALYSIS - THREE EFFECTS COMBINED BY 4-4-83, SECT. 3.6.4

3. 7.B. 3. 6 COMFVMENTS OF SRSS METHOD (ft)H EARTHOUAKE MOTION QUAL. BY ANALYSIS) 479G 00 NRC Qt!EST. CAlfULATION OF MURPHY CAffE X 07-14-87 SEE LETTER FROM E.

CORHES. CONTROL BOOM X/O METHODOLOGY USED WOODARD (PICEARD, LOWE Q450. 03 VALUES 8. GARRICR) 10 K. - KOPECKY (SCS , LICENCING) DATED 6-27-84 48r.0.00 FSAR VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFR20 X 07-14-87 DC-100044-3.4, REV. 2, OBJECTIVES 4-12-78

12. 3. 3. 1 .l.

4H51.00 FSAR . VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFR50 X 07-14-87 DC-1000-M-3.4, REV. 2, ORJECTIVES 4-12-78

12. 3. 3. I 4H52.00 FSAR VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFR20,-ALARA X 07-14-87 DC-1000-N-3,0A 5.

CRITERIA 3.0B.2, REV. 3, 5-2-83

12. 3, 3. 2.A 1853.00 WAR VENTILATION DESIGN 10CF,.20 APP. B, X 07-14-87 DC-1000-N- 2.0A, REV.

CRITERIA TABLE-II 3, 5-2-83

12. 3. 3. 2.A ,

1854.00 FSAR VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFH100 X 07-14-87 DC-1000 N-3.lc, REV. CRITERIA 3, 5-2-83

12. 3. 3. 2.C

 - . - - . _. , _ .           ._.. , , , - . . . - _ . .              . - ,   . ~ . . - , _ . . ~ . . _ . _ - ~ . . . . _ , - . -.- -- .                                       -- --- .-.___ .  -

iYo. No. 42 03/21/1G PIJLNT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPLFNENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                            == ====== =============_========:::=

DESIGN CONST DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION REF. SOUNCE AND IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS NIMBER SECT 10N StrBJECT DoctNENT/FEATtfRE :===

::= === ======== ==:=================== ::::==== :::=====: ============ ::==::======r

_=:: ::=: : =, - __ :__ =:::: ::::::::== ==e:==:::=======

4855.00 FSAR VENTILATION DESIGN 10CFR50. APP. I I 07-14 87 DC -1000-N 3.1B, REV. CRITERIA 3, 5-2-83

12. 3. 3. 2.B 1856.00 FSAN VENTII.ATION DESIGN 10CFH50, AI'P. A GDC X 07-14-87 DC-1531-3. lK, REV. 3 CRITERIA 19 8-9-83

12. 3. 3. 2.D

                                                                                  "        07-14-87 DC 2415-1.0, REY. I, 4857.00 FSAR               VENTILATION DESIGN GDC 54 GUIDELINES                                                                       5-16-83

12. 3. 3. 3.

2.G 4W.H.00 FSAR VENT!!ATION DESIGN GDC 56 X 07-14-87 DC-2415-1.0, HEV. 1 GUIDELINES 5-16-83

12. 3. 3. 3.

2.0 4859.00 ESAR GtlIDELINES 70 HG 8.8 X 07 87 DC-1000 -N -1. 0, REV. 3, MINIMIZE l'ERSONNEL 5-2-83

12. 3. 3. 3. EXPOSURE Fif0M HV AC

3. A EQUlit1ENT DG 1.52 07-14-87 DC-1531-1.0, REV. 3, DC-1562 DOES NOT 4HbO.00 ISAR GUIDELINES To X MINIMIZE PERSONNEL 8-9-83. DC-1542-1.0, APPLY TO UNIT 2

12. 3. 3. 3. EXPOSURE Fit 0M IIVAC REV. 1, 9-29 78, 3.D EQUIINENT DC-1561-1.0, REV. 2, 8-2-83, DC-1562-1.0, REV. 1, 8-10-83 AIR CLEANING UNITS IfG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1531-1.0, REV. 3, DC-1562 DOES NOT 4862. 00 FS AR 8 9-83, DC-1542-1.0, APPLY TV UNIT 2

12. 3. 3. 5 REV. 1, 9-29-78, DC-1561-1.0, REY. 2, 8 83, DC - 1562- 1. 0, REV. 1, 8-10 83 DESIGN OF AIR RG 1.52 X 07-14-87 DC-1531-1.0, REV. 3 DC-1562 DOES NOT 4H78.00 FSAR CLEANING SYSTEM 8 9 83. DC-1542-1.0, AITLY 1U UNIT 2

12. 3. 3. 3. REV. 1, 9-29-78, 2.D DC-1561-1.0, HEV. 2, H 2-83, DC-1562-1.0, REV. 1, H 10 R3 m___ . ,

bh l' w \ n, - N .. i u O ( 01/21/88 PLANT V0GTLE TWIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW PHOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATHIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                        =============.==================== ==

DESIGN CONST REF. SOUNCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRtCTION NtetMI'R SECTION SUILIECT DOCtNENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPIEMENTATION RIMARKS

==== r = : .====== ==================== =====-============== =_= === =_:===== =================_==== ======== ====================== =================

1973.00 FSAR VISUAL WELDING WELDING VISUAL X 01-20-88 X4AJ01, REV. 23, ACCEPTANCE CHITERIA INSPECTION 8-19-87, ATTACH.11-3,

l. 9. 91. 2. 9 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA PARA 3.7.A, APPENDIX IN ACCORDANCE WITH VC AWS DI.1-75 FOR INSPECTIONS PERFOHMED PRIOR TO 12-02-85. AND NClG-01, REV. 2 FDR INSPECTIONS PERFUHMED AFTER 12-02-85 5025.00 FSAR WELDING OF WELDING OF X X 07-14-87 DC-2167-3.3.3, REV. 4, 5-13-87 X4AJ01, ATT. H-21 CLPNITS M AWS STRUCTURAL STEEL STRUCTURAL STEEL 9-28-84. DM(N-4, H.21.2, REY. 22 Dl,1-1977

3. H. 4. 5 MISC, STEEL, RACEWAY 04-24-86. DC-1000-C, 2-1-87 SUITORTS, HVAC DUCT 2.1.D. REV. 3 SUPPORTS IS 9-30-83, DMCM-8, PERFOHMED IN ACCORD. 06-09-86 WITH AWS DI.1-1975 OR LATER 50 N.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT H/2 EXHAUST FILTERS AND X 07-14-87 DC-1508-1.0, REV. 6 PUNGE SYSTEM EX!!AUST DUCTS M 8-5-83 6 2. 5. 2. 2 PLANT VENT ARE DESIGNED AS SEISMIC CAT. 1 5010.00 FSAR POST LOCA CAVITY POST LOCA HYDHOGEN X 07-14-87 DC-1516 3.1.D. REV. 1 HYDROGEN PUHGE PURGE DESIGNED M 09/06/83, P&ID

6. 2. 5. I. SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY START IX4DB214-2, REV. 7, 3.D UPON RECEIPT OF A 12-31-86 LOGIC DIAGRAM SAFETY INJECTION IX5DN017-2, REV. 3 SIGNAL 5-8-85 5012.00 FSAR HABITABILITY SYSTEMS CONTHOL HOOM DOOHS X 07-14-87 X1AH01 4.1.2.E. REY.

ARE EQUIPPED WITII 3, 07/25/85, X1AJ10, G. 4. 2. 2. SELF CLOSING DEVICES HEV. 3, 10-14-86 2.3

V ws. Na. 11 Ol/247HH

PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW ITOGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE IHA

                                                                                              =.== = ===== =-. ==.:=               ===-- =- - -

DESIGN CONST REF. SOURCE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NittHER SECTION SUBJECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. As OF: IMPI.EMENTATION AS OF: IMPI.LNENTATION REMARKS . = == =====- ,====== ====- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = - ====-- ==== 5013.00 FSAR IIABITABILITY SYSTEMS REDUNDANT CillDRINE X 07- 14 87 DC-1531 3.1. F P,0, DETECTORS INSTALLED 4.0.A. REV. 3,

6. 4. 2. 2. IN CONTROL ROOM 08/09/83, DC-1009 2.L YENTILATION CAPABFE TABLE "1" REV. 2 OF DETECTING 1 PIN 06/03/83 AND HIGHER 5041.00 FSAR flABITABILITY SYSTEMS REDUNDANT RADIATION X 07-14-87 DC-1609 3.1.B.C, REV. SEE MOD. 20 f3AR DETECTORS INSTALLED 1, 04/21/83, DC-1531 11.5.2.2 (TABLE)

6. 4. 2. 2. IN CONTROL ROOM 3.1.H. REV. 3, REF. 510 2.M WENTILATION 08/09/83 5015.00 FSAR liABITABILITY SYSTEMS RED'JNDANT SMOKE X 07-14-87 DWG. AX4DB206-3, REV.

DETECTORS INSTALLED 17, 12-17-86

6. 4. 2. 2. IN CONTROL ROOM 2.N 501G.00 ISAR ENGINEERED SAFETY SINGLE FAILURE IN Ti 07-14-87 DC-1009, REV. 2 FEATURES FILTER FILTRATION SYST're 6-3-83

6. 5. 1. l.D SYSTEMS DC-1531. REV. 3, 8-9-83, SECT. 3.1.C.

3.1.E. 4.0.A DC-1542. REV. 1, 9-29-78, SECT. 4.0. A. I DC-1561, REV. 2, 8 2-83, SECT. 3.3.B.2 5017.00 FSAR ENGINEERED SAFETY two INDEPENDENT AND X 07-14-87 DC-1531. REV. 3, FEATURES FILTER REDUNDANT FILTRATION 8-9-83, SECT. 3.1.C G. S. 1. 3.D SYSTEMS TRAINS R)R HVAC DC-1541. REV. 1, IWERED BY SEI'ARATE 9-29-78, SECT. 3.2.G CLASS IE ELECT. BUS. DC-15GI, REY. 2, 8 83, SECT. 3.1.D 5019.00 FSAR CONTAINMENT BUILDING LIMIT TEMPERATURE OF X 07-14 87 DC-1511 3.2.11, 4.0. B. YFNTILATION SYSTEM CONCRE1E STRUCTURES REV. 4. 08/02/83, L8 1. 6. 1. 2.A WITHIN CONTAINMENT DC-1512 3.2.A, REV. 3, TO 200F AND CONCRETE 09/0H/83 UNDER VESSEL COLINN BASEPLATES TO 150F 9 O O

(*~% % ( Page No. 45 01/21/H3 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE IBA

                                                                                                                                          ====.r========   ========e   ========

DESIGN CONST REF. SOUICE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NINHER SECTION SI'ILIECT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPIDfENTATION AS OF IMPIIMENTATION IfEMARKS n== ===== ====e === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = . = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 5055.00 FSAR HABITABILITY SYSTEMS 1HO SETS OF DOORS X 07-14-87 AX1DllA04, REV. 18 WITH VESTIBULE ACT

6. 1. .2. 2. AS AN AIR LOCK AT 2.J CONTROL ROOM ENTRANCES 5057.00 ESAR CONTAINMENT HYDROGEN MAINTAIN IOCAL X 07-14-87 DC-1501-3.lK, REV. 5, SEE FSAR 6.2.5.2.5 MIXING HYDROGEN 12-11-78, fi . 2. 5. 1. CONCENTRATIONS AT DC-1513-3.1.lE, REV.

5.A LESS THAN 4 VOttNE 0, 6-3-83, PERCENT DC-1516-3.lA, REV. 1, 9-6-83 5092.00 ISAR liABITABILITY SYSTEMS CONVENTIONAL BILGS. X 07-14-87 GIT FILE X7BC3.5, LOG:

                                     - VENTILATION                           FOR REACTOR                                                                         GN-808, DATED

6. 4. 2. 3 LEAK-TIGHTNESS CONTAllNENT 2-19-86 SER OPEN ITEM PUBLISHED BY AfWICS 4, 1DXIC CAS INT'L., CAT. NO: EVALUATION, NAA-SR-10100, " EVALUATION OF THE 6-15-65 CHIDRINE CONCENTRATION IN THE VEGP CONTROL ROOM", REF. 6.8 2-14-86 5041.00 FSAR DIESEL GEN. BLDG, SMACNA, 1975 & ANSI X X 07-14 -87 X4 AJ01-H-4R H-6.0, 5-13-87 X4 AJ01-H -48. H-6.0, VENT. SYSTEM N510, SECT. 6, 1980 REV. 22, 2-1-87 REV. 22, 2-1-87

9. 4. 7. 4 DtC1HORK LEAK TESTING 5095.00 FSAR AUX. FEEDWATER SMACNA. 1975 & ANSI X X 12-1T- 86 X4001-H-48, H-6.0, 5-13-87 X4AJ01-H-4B, H-6.0, 11NPHOUSE HVAC N510, SECT. 6, 1980 REV. 22, 2-1-87 REV. 22, 2-1-87

9. 4. 8. 5 DtC1HORK LEAK TESTING 50fNi.00 FS4R HISC. HVAC SYSTEMS: SMACNA, 1975 & ANSI X X 07-14-87 X4AJ01-H-4H, 6.0, REV. 5 87 X4AJ01-H-48, 6.0, REV.

ELECT. TUNNEL VENT. N510, SECT. 6, 1980 22, 2-1-87 22, 2-1-87

9. 4. 9. 2. 4 SYSTEM, DIC1 WORK LEAK TESTING

Page No. 46 Ol /21/ f tH PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM IMPl.EMENTATION MATRIX - MODULE 18A

                                                                          ==== ======_===============_========

DESIGN CONS! REF. SOUICE AND DES CON CURRENT DESIGN CURRENT CONSTRUCTION NINEER SECTION SUBJLCT DOCINENT/ FEATURE IGN ST. AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION AS OF: IMPLEMENTATION REMAHKS

    ==== == ==-        --===     = ===============   =======e============      === === ======== ====================== ======== ====================== ==================

5I12.00 FSAR ILABITABILITY SYSTEMS DOORS TO RECORD X 07-14-87 AX1DilA04, REV. 18, STORAGE AREAS ARE DOOR 175

6. 1. 2. 2. EQUIPPED WT!H AX1AJ10-1-7, PAGE 43 2.J SELF-CLOSING DEVICES 5113.00 FSAH llABITABILITY SYSTDIS ACCESS M RECORD I 07-14-87 AX1DllA04, REV. 18 STORAGE AREA THROUGH

6. 4. 2. 2. AN AIRLOCK OR 1HO 2.J DOORS IN SERIES 5114.09 FSAR HABITABILITY CONTROL ROOM X 07-14-87 AX1DilA04 REV. 18 SYSTEMS, INTERACTION D00HWAYS WITH 1MO

6. 4. 2. 4.E WITH OTHER ZONES SE1 OF DOORS ACTING AS AN AlRIDCK 5115.00 FSAR liABITABILITY DOORS TO RECORD X 07-14-87 AX1DllA04, REV. 18, SYSTEMS, INTERACTION SMRAGE AREAS ARE D(X)R 175 G. 4. 2. 4.E WITH OTHER ZONES EQUIPPED WITH AX1AJ10-1-7 PAGE 43 SELF-CLOSING DEVICES 5116.00 FSAR HABITABILITY ACCESS TO RECORD X 07-14-87 AX1DilA04, REV. 18 SYSTEMS, INTERACTION SMRAGE AREA TIGIOUGH 6 1. 2. 4.E WITH OTHER ZONES AN AIRLOCK OR 1HO DOORS IN SERIES 5117.00 FSAR COPfil1 MENT ISOI.ATION PREACCESS MINI PURGE X 07-14-87 DC-1505 REV. 5 SYSTEM, DESIGN LINE ISOLATION 7-26-83, SECT. 3.1.B

6. 2. 4. 3.C EVALUATION VALVES SHUT IN LESS DC-1506 REY. 5 THAN 5 SEC. 8--2-83, SECT. 3.1.B O O 9

4 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 4.1 DESIGN This section provides a description of design procedures, workflow path, documentation, and design control activities pertaining to the design of safety-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. 4.1.1 DESIGN PROCESS The design and layout of safety-related HVAC duct systems, including supports, is based upon the design and operational requirements delineated in the Vogtle Project Desiga Manual and described in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). The design workflow process has been divided into the following four phases: o Development of design criteria. > o Preliminary design and layout (includes development and issuance of specifications). o Final design and clarification of technical interfaces () and release of drawings for construction. o Construction support and interface. The first three phases of the design process are substantially completed and engineering drawings, construction specifications, , and material specifications are issued. The current activity of l the engineering groups centers on processing Field Change : Requests (FCRs) and Deviation Reports (DRs) and issuing change notices or revisions to design documents and drawings. The ,

        . 1 verification of drawings and issue of drawings are the     l conclusion of the construction support phase.                     i i

4.1.1.1 Desian Criteria Development The initial criteria for the design of the safety-related mechanical systems and components are contained in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR) submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in August 1972. The mechanical general design criteria were first issued May 1 1973. The mechanical design criteria were established through various multidiscipline interactions and were based on applicable licensing commitments, industry codes, and standards. The {}/ s, design criteria were implemented in accordance with established controlled project procedures. 0264r/027-8 4-1 l

4.1.1.2 Preliminary Design The preliminary design of the plant was developed using general arrangement and equipment location drawings which depict plant overall and individual building layouts, location of major equipment, and routing of major piping and raceways. The development of these drawings was the primary responsibility of the Bechtel Plant Design Group which had lead responsibility for a multidiscipline interactive design effort. The Mechanical and Nuclear Groups participated in this activity using the various system and interdiscipline criteria (equipment separation, pipe break, radiation shielding, etc.) to develop the basic layout of each system. This included defining the location of equipment, required structural openings, space required for maintenance, necessary foundations, and piping layout. Schematic drawings of process systems (flow diagrams) and ductwork piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID) were then prepared by the Mechanical Discipline in accordance with the developed system design criteria. The identifying equipment tag numbers were assigned by the Mechanical Group and were listed in the equipment index. Line numbers and manual valve numbers were assigned by Plant Design and were included in the line designation list and valve designation list, respectively. Instrument numbers and control valve numbers were assigned by the Control Group and were listed in the instrument index. Preliminary P& ids were distributed to the Control, Nuclear, Plant Design, and Electrical Groups for interdiscipline lh coordination and review. Procurement specifications for HVAC duct systems and components were developed by the appropriate design discipline and issued to Georgia Power Company (GPC) Procurement Department. Calculations and analyses were prepared during this phase to support the design of mechanical systems and issuance of material specifications. 4.1.1.3 Final Design After the system and equipment layout was defined and interface requirements were obtained from the various engineering disciplines and equipment vendors, the final design phase began. Design criteria prepared during the initial stages of the design work are maintained to serve as a basis for the final design. System design calculations were completed, logic diagrams for system operations were developed, and P& ids were issued for construction. HVAC area drawings (orthographics) were issued for construction after concurrent design review by the Mechanical, Electrical, Control, and Nuclear Groups. 0264r/027-8 4-2

Duct and damper supports were located, and their detailed O structural drawings were developed by the Bechtel Western Power Company (BWPC) Civil / Structural Group. Calculations verifyirg the structural integrity of the HVAC ducts and supports were also produced by the BWPC Civil / Structural Group. Engineering reviews and assigns statuses to Pullman Construction ; Industries / Pullman /Kenith-Fortson vendor drawings in accordance with the Plant Reference Manual (PRM), part C, section 5. 4.1.1.4 Construction Support ; After release of the design for construction, the Mechanical and

Civil / Structural Installation Engineering (IE) groups provide support to the Field Engineering Group in processing design changes (FCRs and DRs). Supplier Deviation Disposition Requests, calculation revisions and issuance of Design Change Notices (DCNs) are handled by Design Engineering (DE). These activities ensure consideration of design developments and that the as-built conditions are taken into account.

4.1.2 DESIGN CRITERIA - MECHANICAL HEATING, VENTILATION, AND i AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEMS () Design criteria were initially provided in the PSAR, which was prepared by BWPC and submitted to the NSC in August 1972. j Subsequently, BWPC developed and issued detailed design criteria l contained in the Vogtle Nuclear Plant (VNP) Project Design Manual, Volumes 1 through 5. l l HVAC design criteria are contained in Volume 4 of the VNP 1 Project Design Manual. Design criteria for these systems are ; listed in Table 4-1. e To coordinate the design interface of technical information on l I safety-related systems, interdiscipline design criteria which have multidiscipline applicability are used by the Civil / Structural, Plant Design, Mechanical, Control Systems, Nuclear and Electrical Groups. The interdiscipline criteria ]. pertaining to this module are listed in Table 4-2. 4.1.3 DESIGN DOCUMENTATION I Design of HVAC systems is documented as follows: o Studies. o Analyses: failure modes and effects analyses. O 0264r/027-8 4-3

o Calculations. 1 1

       -   Equipment design calculations.
       -   System design calculations.
        -  System / equipment verification calculations.
        -  HVAC ductwork including supports structural adequacy calculations.

o Drawings

       -   Flow diagrams.
       -   Piping and instrumentation diagrams.
       -   General arrangement drawings.
        -  Equipment location drawings.
       -   HVAC area drawings (orthographics).
       -   Instrument location drawings
       -   Support Drawings o  Material control documents.

o Specifications.

       - Procurement specifications.
       - Procurement / installation specifications.

4.1.3.1 Studies gg An engineering study is used to investigate alternate solutions to a particular engineering problem or to report on the anticipated solution. Informal studies are used to develop project design within the scope of the contract. Usually, they are performed as a matter of course to define physical aspects, to resolve problem areas, or to investigate new or improved methods, materials, or processes. Formal studies investigate concepts or develop criteria that define the project scope. 4.1.3.2 Failure Modec and Effect Analyses Failure modes and effects analyses (FMEA) for equipment and systems within the scope of this module are prepared by the Mechanical Discipline in accordance with Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) PRM, part C, section 16. The FMEA is conducted to determine the effects of failure of major plant components critical to the achievement of overall system safety performance. The failure modes of components that could contribute to unsafe system operations are identified and corrective action taken to obtain compliance with the single failure criteria (Design Criteria DC-1009). Mechanical FMEAs are listed in the Mechanical Calculation Control Log, and their results are summarized in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). 0264r/027-8 4-4

('} (- 4.1.3.3 Calculations Calculations are prepared and controlled in accordance with the PRM, part C, section 9. HVAC system design and equipment design calculations were, in general, prepared to apply to both Unit 1 and Unit 2. Equipment was procured based on these common calculations and is identical for both units. Design margins are sufficient to compensate for minor heat load variations or duct routing changes between essentially identical units. Upon submission of final vendor data, verification calculations are prepared confirming the adequacy of initial design assumptions. Thereafter, calculations are revised, if required, as a result of proposed design changes or startup test data which may affect results of previously completed calculations. Unit 1 design changes are incorporated, as applicable, into Unit 2 prior to startup. Based on the results of the Unit 1 test and balance of HVAC systems, an overview was made of the counterpart Unit 2 HVAC systems. Where appropriate, pressure drop verification calculations are prepared to confirm the capability of the equipment to meet design requirements. () Ductwork and duct support calculations are prepared for standard duct and duct support configurations which are utilized in both Unit 1 and Unit 2. Changes from standard configurations are supported by additional calculations, as necessary, prepared at the time the change is authorized. No separate Unit 2 calculations or reviews are required. Calculations are listed in the Mechanical and Civil Calculation Control Logs. The following sections provide a description of the contents of the various types of calculations within the scope of this module. L 4.1.3.3.1 Heating. Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning Equipment i Design Calculations (Mechanical) Equipment sizing calculations include HVAC fan sizing, HVAC unit sizing, chillers, pump and expansion tank sizing. pump parameters such as net positive suction head, capacity, head, brake horsepower, and efficiency were evaluated. The results of these calculations were used for input to procurement and design specifications, as well as system calculations. ! O 0264r/027-8 4-5

4.1.3.3.2 System Design Calculations (Mechanical) Systems are designed to supply air at a sufficient rate and pressure to the point (s) of use. Pressure drop calculations are performed for all systems. As a result of system design calculations, process design conditions such as pressure, temperature, pressure drop, and setpoint pressure of chiller safety relief valves were established for input into procurement specifications. Calculations were also performed to size the refrigerant vent stacks of safety relief valves. 4.1.3.3.3 Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning Ductwork And Duct Support Structural Adequacy Calculations HVAC ductwork and duct support structural adequacy calculations were made by the Civil / Structural Group. These calculations verify the structural adequacy of the HVAC ductwork and duct supports when subjected to operating and seismic loads. The calculations consist of the following: o Ducting calculation. o Duct support calculations. h o Damper support calculations. 4.1.3.4 Drawings Design drawings were prepared and controlled by BWPC in accordance with the PRM, part C, section 4. Drawings needed to support the design of the HVAC equipment / components and ductwork support structures covered by this module are: o Flow diagrams, ductwork, and P& ids. o General arrangement and equipment layout drawings, o Duct and damper support location drawings. o Duct, duct support, and damper support detail drawings. o HVAC orthographics drawings. o Instrument location drawings. O 0264r/027-8 4-6

1 (~ 4.1.3.4.1 Plow Diagrams and Piping Ductwork and Instrumentation (_)3 Diagrams A system flow diagram is a schematic representation of a mechanical system showing the operational relationship between l the various components and defining the design variables for l specific modes of operation. 1 A system P&ID is a detailed schematic representation of the i HVAC, process controls, and instrumentation for a specific mechanical system. These diagrams provide the basic HVAC engineering information (e.g., flow connections, types of dampers, controls, etc.) for process systems. 4.1.3.4.2 General Arrangement and Equipment Layout Drawings HVAC ductwork and equipment layout drawings were developed to dimensionally locate HVAC equipment in the plant, coordinating inputs of all disciplines. These drawings were generated for each building level. In addition to showing location dimensions of HVAC equipment, they also designate equipment laydown or tube pullout space (chillers) to ensure proper installation and maintenance. The layouts were developed based on equipment, vendor requirements, system process requirement, NRC requirements, and industry /BWPC standards. 4.1.3.4.3 Duct and Damper Support Location Drawings HVAC duct and damper supports location drawings were developed by the BWPC Civil / Structural Group to identify and dimensionally locate supports for each HVAC duct system. 4.1.3.4.4 Duct. Duct Support, and Damper Support Detail Drawings Duct, duct support, and damper support detail drawings for each duct type and damper support were developed by the BWPC Civil / Structural Group to specify sufficient structural design details to allow procurement and fabrication. Support attachment details to embedded plates, along with weld details, are indicated. Support details are presented in the AX2D67--- series drawings. 4.1.3.4.5 HVAC Orthographic Drawings HVAC orthographic drawings show the routing and sizes of the ductwork. O 0264r/027-8 4-7

4.1.3.4'.6 Instrument Location Drawings. Instrument location drawings show the location of HVAC instruments including duct-mounted instruments. 4.1.3.5 Specifications Specifications for HVAC equipment were developed by the BWPC HVAC-Mechanical Group to provide adequate design details for procurement. The technical provision section of each equipment specification covers scope, applicable documents, characteristics and design / construction. Additional attachments to the specification detail inspection and tests, preparation for delivery, storage, etc. There are 19 specifications covering HVAC equipment. Three additional specifications detail the necessary spare parts for engineered safety feature equipment. 4.1.4 DESIGN CONTROL AND REVIEW During the design process, periodic technical and administrative reviews of design documents were conducted. These reviews involved interdisciplinary coordination, review, and approval of design documents by the Bechtel chief mechanical engineer or designated staff member. h The following sections describe, in detail, the various design reviews, interdiscipline coordination, and documentation / drawing controls. 4.1.4.1 Interdisciplinary Design Review There are two types of interdisciplinary design reviews: the concurrent discipline review and the group review. The concurrent discipline review is performed using specific design documents; e.g., design criteria, drawings, specifications, vendor prints. Information is transmitted between discipline groups in the form of coordination prints, Document Review Notices, etc. This review takes place concurrently within the discipline groups, and comments are transmitted to the originating discipline for resolution and/or incorporation. The concurrent discipline review is conducted as needed. The interdiscipline group reviews involve group consultation and frequent coordination among personnel from affected disciplines. O 0264r/027-8 4-8

1 a

 -) 4.1.4.2  Desian Verification Review Design verification reviews were performed on VEGP safety-related components and systems. The design verification review procedure is shown graphically on the flowchart in Figure 4-1. Typical design verification review package contents are shown in attachment 1 to the Design Manual Preface, section 4.

Seven design verification reviews of HVAC systems or components were conducted between 1982 and 1984 These reviews have resulted in no significant findings pertaining to the design of safety-related HVAC systems or components. 4.1.4.3 Off-Proiect Chief Engineer's Review Technical reviews of safety-related system design are primarily the responsibility of the BWPC chief mechanical engineer, who is assisted by a staff of technical specialists and experienced personnel from other similar nuclear projects. The chief mechanical engineer reviewr and approves certain specific engineering documents, which are identified on the Design Control Checklist (DCCL). In addition to the review and approval of specific documents, the chief mechanical engineer and his staff perform reviews (3 ring the design process. These [~h reviews include the presentati 4 and status of the work by the \2 project team. The chief plant design engineer reviews and approves the plant general arrangement drawings, equipment location drawings, and the HVAC system design specification for American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel (B&PV) Code, Section III, components / systems. Reviews are documented by signing the approval block of the drawing / document cover sheets and/or the Design Review Notices. The DCCL is prepared and controlled in accordance with subsection 20.7 of the PRM, part C, section 20. Approved DCCLs are filed in Project Subject File X7BD68. The chief mechanical engineer also participates in the design verification program and receives approved design verification reports. In addition to formal reviews, the chief mechanical engineer and his staff provide informal review and consultation as requested when specific items arise that necessitate either special consideration or contact with other BWPC groups. As part of his project technical review and supervisory responsibilities, the chief mechanical engineer also issues problem alerts describing problems. encountered on BWPC projects other than VEGP. The problem alerts require a project response (T concerning the applicability of the particular problem and the (,) specific project action taken to ensure that it does not occur at Plant Vogtle. 0264r/027-8 4-9

4.1.5 DESIGN CHANGE CONTROL IE supports construction by preparing design changes and by taking appropriate action on deviations. Subsequent to the issuance of revision 0 design documents, changes may be made by approving FCRs, by issuing change notices against the design documents, by Change Control Packages (CCPs), by directly revising documents generated by responsible design groups, and by taking appropriate action on DRs. These changes, to be considered part of the design documentation, are logged and tracked by Project Administration and approved by the affected discipline engineering supervision. The PRM provides procedures for identifying changes to design, evaluating the licensing impact, tracking and implementing approved changes, and incorporating the changes into the affected original documentation. The following sections discuss the process by which potential engineering changes. FCRs, CCPs DRs, and specification changes are controlled. Potential Change Control A potential change to the plant design generally results from new or revised regulatory requirements, changes to codes, client requests, requests from construction, startup problem reports, or the results of design verification reviews. Changes may be identified by BWPC, Georgia Power Company, Southern Company Services. Inc., or the equipment suppliers. The control process for potential changes is discussed in the PRM, part C, section 27. Field Change Requests FCRs are processed in accordance with the procedure described in the PRM, part C, section 17. The following paragraphs describe the activities involved in processing FCRs. When appropriate, the FCR states whether calculation revisions are required (as determined by the approving engineer), and an engineering rationale or numerical justification is provided. When calculations are involved, documentation indicates that the appropriate calculations have been reviewed hafore an FCR is approved by Engineering. For limited, predefined areas, Authorizations To Continue Work (ATCWs) may be generated to allow work to continue prior to issuing an FCR. The procedure for ATCWs is described in the PRM, Appendix 2, section 14. Designated engineers in the IE Group may approve ATCWs. With an approved ATCW, work may proceed and in-process inspection may be performed. The approved ATCW is forwarded to GPC Document Control for 0264r/027-8 4-10

_ i l l l l i f- processing as an FCR. Final acceptance of the work is based on (j a final inspection and comparison with the approvel FCR. Deviation Reports i The procedure for processing DRs is discussed in detail in the PRM, part C, section 18. Specification Chances Changes to equipment, material, and construction specifications are made in accordance with the procedures discussed in the PRM, part C; sections 8, 23, and 26. The IE HVAC group has responsibility for the administration of Specification X4AJ01. HVAC Equipment Installation and Duct Fabrication and Installation, and for issuing changes in accordance with the procedures described above. The DE Mechanical Group has responsibility for control of and changes to the remaining HVAC specifications covered in this module. The following documents, when evaluated and approved, may result in changes to the design of HVAC systems: o FCRs initiated by the field and dispositioned by Project Engineering. o DRs initiated by the contractor and dispositioned by Project Engineering. o Supplier Deviation Disposition Requests initiated by a supplier and dispositioned by DE. Changes to construction and procurement specifications may be made by a Construction Specification Change Notice (CSCN) and by a Material Specification Change Notice (MSCN), respectively. CSCNs and MSCNs are initiated by DE. Once approved, these changes are considered part of the parent document and are incorporated into a revised specification subsequent to their approval. Chance Control Packages ' CCPs ensure that design changes requiring physical modification to systems or components that have been or are about to be released to the startup group for testing operations are processed in a controlled manner. CCPs are controlled by the procedures established in the PRM, part C, section 35. The CCPs describe the change and the design basis for the change. They identify the impact of the changes on the FSAR, O 0264r/027-8 4_11

i Design Manual, supplier technical manuals, hazard analyses, etc. They list the material required to implement the change. , Also they include the design change documents. The system design documents are not changed until the physical changes

  .uired by the CCP have been completed.

2 sign document changes are made by Interim Drawing Change

.otices (IDCNs). IDCN-Suppliers are used for revisions to vendor documents.

CCPs containing safety-related documents are identified on the cover sheet. The cover sheet also identifies the lead discipline. The CCPs are approved by the engineering group supervisor and project engineer. Project Administration is responsible for issuing CCP numbers and maintaining the CCP and associated documents log. Upon completion of a CCP, the IDCNs and appropriate Interim Field Change Requests are converted to DCNs. ASME B&PV Code, Section III. Equipment Modification Program Prior to any modification or repair to ASME B&PV, Section III, equipment, the supplier is notified of the proposed changes / repairs and is requested to revise the applicable drawings. Engineering makes revisions to supplier drawings only after the supplier has indicated concurrence in writing with the f proposed changes but has declined to provide revised drawings. Changes to installed equipment are initiated by preparing a Field Equipment Change Order, as discussed in the PRM, part C, section 24. Repairs to ASME B&PV, Section III, items may be initiated by an approved DR. The instructions for the control of repairs, modifications, and replacements to N-stamped items are discussed in the PRM, Appendix 2, section 12. Repairs and modifications to an N-stamped item should be performed by the original N-certificate holder (manufacturer). When the manufacturer no longer possesses an ASME Certificate of Authorization to construct an ASME B&PV, Section III, component or when it is not practicable to be done by the originator, repairs are performed by the NA-certificate holder at the jobsite. 4.1.6 Finalization /As Built ProQram The finalization /as-built program defines the methods for providing certain as-constructed design drawings as required: 6 0264r/027-8 4-12

                                              -      -         ~ ~.  .- .    - _ _ .-         .

E t o For future operation and maintenance of the plant. f i o To assure that design documents address the effects of ! cumulative changes to the design. 4 The administrative controls for this program are contained in part B, section 5 of the Vogtle Project Policy and Procedures . Manual. As a part of the process for developing the final as-built documents, several areas of the plant will be walked j down to observe as-constructed conditions. The procedures for l these walkdowns are contained in the Finalization /As-Built ; Program Manual. } In mid-1987, the Project evaluated the results of the Unit 1 ! finalization program to identify lessons that could be applied i to the Unit 2 program. This effort received input from Project. i Engineering, Project Construction, and Nuclear Operations, and j considered other information such as Unit 1 NRC, Quality - Assurance, and Readiness Review evaluations and findings. ! The modified finalization programs were reviewed by involved project organizations, including Readiness Review, who provided ! comments on the proposed modifications. Resolution of these ; comments and approval of each finalization plan by project l management were ongoing at the time this module was prepared. { O Finalization programs FP-2 (Hazards), which includes the seismic II/I walkdown, and FP-14 (Seismic Separation) are applicable to j J the scope of this module and are presently scheduled for the i latter part of 1988. l 9 i i 1 i (:) 1; i 0264r/027-8 4-13

j O 1 l l I i 1 l l i I O i. 4 J 0264r/027-8 4-14

l 4.2 CONSTRUCTION This section contains a brief description, flowcharts, and list l of codes and standards applicable to fabrication, insta!!crion, and inspection work relevant to Module 18A. l.

The flowcharts listed as Figures 4-2 through 4-6 illustrate the contractors' work activity as well as resulting inspection and ' engineering activities required to support, inspect, and document these work processes. Each organization listed in the left hand margin of the flowchart is responsible for the activities shown to the right of it. The nodes (circles) denote l the starting and completion points of work activities. Between ; the nodes are descriptions of the work activities performed and ; the applicable procedure governing that work activity. The i dotted lines with directional arrows indicate the flow of ; documentation or instructions for an activity. The flowcharts i do not contain the flow of documents such as Deviation Reports ) or Field Change Requests as they may be generated at any time. Receipt, storage, fabrication (onsite), installation, and inspection of HVAC systems and components are performed following the applicable GPC or P/K-F procedures. P/K-F ; procedures are reviewed and approved by GPC. In addition, the work is governed by-Specification X4AJ01 HVAC Equipment Installation and HVAC Duct Fabrication and Installation. Principal codes and standards referenced in.the specification O- are: o ANSI (a) N509-80 Nuclear Power Plant Air-Cleaning , Units and Components. ! o AISC(b) Manual of Steel Construction, 7th Edition. l o AWS(c) Dl.1-77 Structural Welding Code. o SMACNA(d)-75 High Pressure Duct Construction Standards. , o ANSI N510-80 Testing of Nuclear Air-Cleaning - Systems. . i t

a. American National Standards Institute Inc.

b. American Institute of Steel Construction :

c. Am.erican Welding Society

d. Sheet Metal and Air-Conditioning Contractors National Association .

C 0264r/027-8 4-15 't _ _ . - __________.____j

o ANSI B31.1-77 Power Piping. o AWS D9.1-80 Welding of Sheet Metal. o AWS B3.0-77 Welding Procedure and Performance Qualification. O O 0264r/027-8 4-16

 /- 4.3  PROGRAM CHANGES C' Programs have been modified or added since completion of the Unit 1 Readiness Review Program to reflect the effort of management to incorporate lessons learned from Unit 1, and to reflect construction interface with an operating unit. The only major change affecting the scope of this module is the addition of the component removal program.

A program was developed to control component transfer from Unit 2 to Unit 1. This program, prescribed by Field Procedure GD-T-28, includes provisions for maintaining traceability of the removed component, ensuring that qualified replacement parts are procured in accordance with the original specification requirements, and tracking the re-installation status of the replacement. O I l i 1 0264r/027-8 4-17 I

                               -   -      -_       .. .            -            -             ~.

5 TABLE 4-1

 .( )                                                                                            l HVAC SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA 7
                                                                                                 ?

J Design Criteria t Designation . Number Title Safety-Related Equipment ___ { DC-2167 HVAC Ducts and Supports Ducts and duct supports i DC-1501 CTB Air Cooling System Air handling units ; DC-1508 CTB post-LOCA purge Exhaust Ductwork, filter housing, penetration, f System piping, and isolation valves t DC-1516 CTB post-LOCA Cavity Purge Ductwork, duct supports, backdraft . System dampers, damper, supports, and fans DC-1531 CB Control Room HVAC System Ductwork, duct supports, dampers, damper supports, air cleaning units, , and fans DC-1532 CB Safety Feature Electrical Ductwork, duct supports, cooling units, l ' Equipment Room HVAC System and fans DC-1539 CB Cable Spreading Rooms HVAC Ductwork, duct supports, cooling units, System and fans DC-1540 Electrical Tunnel Ventilation Ductwork and exhaust fan System DC-1542 FHB post-Accident Exhaust Ductwork, duct supports, dampers, System dampers supports, air cleaning units, and fans DC-1555 AB Engineered Safety Feature Ductwork, duct supports,-and-room Room Coo?.ers coolers DC-1561 piping penetration Filter Ductwork, duct supports, air cleaning Exhaust System units, and fans r0-1566 Diesel Generator Building Ductwork, duct supports, fans, and HVAC System dampers DC-1592 Essential Chilled Water System . Chillers, pumps, and compression tanks DC-1593 Auxiliary Feedwater pump House Ductwork, duct supports, dampers, HVAC System dampers supports, and fans 0 0265r/032-8/1

TABLE 4-2 APPLICABLE INTERDISCIPLINE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR HVAC DUCT SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS Design Criteria Designation Number Title DC-1001 Separation l DC-1002 Fire DC-1003 Flooding DC-1004 Tornado DC-1005 Seismic DC-1006 Missile DC-LOO 7 Environment . DC-1009 Single Failure Criteria () DC-1010 Project Classification List DC-loll Inservice Inspection DC-1014 ALARA , DC-1018 , Pipe Break Criteria i 0266r/313-7/1 i I

w' RE RE REVIEWE RS RE GATHER DOCUMENTS PREPARE AND COMMENTS FROM THE DISCIPLINES REVIEW RESOLVE

                                                                                 %     DISTRIBUTE FOR THE DVRP                    DVRP FOR REVIEW                   DVRP                                            COMMENTS NO COMMENTS 1r                                               1r-PE/RE/ LEGS / REVIEWERS                   RE/ LEGS                  RE/ LEGS                     PE/DV RC                            L,g,

ME TING MEET N MINUTES O I R RT EN AND ACTION ITEMS REPORT JL DISAPPROVE l' DVRC TRACK ACTION ITEMS DVRP - DESIGN VERIFICATION REVIEW PACKAGE DVR - DESIGN VE RIFICATION REVIEW DV - DESIGN VERIFICATION RE - RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER REVIEWE RS - AS DESIGN ATED LEGS - LEAD ENGINEERING 'IROUP SUPERVISOR DVRC - DESIGN VERIFICATIOrJ REVIEW COORDINATOR PE - PROJECT ENGINEER Figure 4-1 Design Verification Review Procedure Flow Chart

h , _ _ ..... _ =,.c.-._. =O --- Q

                                                                 ._.r._...                                                                                                 .m c oocu .                                                                                          iP ..i,              ,c. noc ,oo...

4GO. 30. n p. a c.,nc..o.s. .

t ..ec &

                                     ..c ,,

C....MOu ..C f.5, , 4.. ..s.t .t. O 4GO . 396 7O. au. .O

30.

I , 1 i ..c . .n ......

 = , oc                                                                                             .    .c ,.o. _n     .., nm.

n 1.o _ c, _ .cc.,, l m y um -

                                                                                                                                                                                  .,u,,         -

(i 1 / N

                                                                                                                                                   '                                               i i                            i                                               i                         .c,. 1
                                      .c...n...tooc,. c,                                                               I                         i                     1                     -=I vm c. m .. .. ...u.......n..                          I                C,                                    I                     l
                                                                                                                                                                                               = = =   .

m,i i

                                                                                                             . . .'. ;I, 1                                                      g                     ;

T l 1 l "'u"^m* w

g l l I I I I

                                                                              ..                                           n...c.
 ,,. . ..oouct.o.,                                                         ..n    ..t   _                        l         . m t . .o      _

l

                                                                                 .. -                                      w a.            -

1 l l ll, _

                                                                                                                                                   .I __
                                                                                                                                                                         !                         i
 .. .     .c.      ..

O ""u~m~~"'"" - -

                                                                                  ~^g g       l                    O ' .'",.u =
                                                                                                                                                                            -~                     l         ,'

i n.n.. 1l l l l l 6 . .. , nc . .

                                                                                              .,-u.

I l g I

                                                                                                                                                                                                         /
                                                                                                                                                                                                           )
                                                                                                                                                                                                               ..v _
 .MFOu.t.,,..CO.DS                                                                                                         .. V1. F.C . _

Ff ;

                                                                                                                                                                                                               ,, t , ,,

i, .r i. Figure 4-2 Installation of Duct, Duct Supports, and Accessories

s t i REWtEW OU AL. GPC DUttsestug mgygges yg pey DOC. - Pet t _ IDC-A SS4 Mlf eCAfeOes B4AJDe, R4A,333 auat. ve nes. 4I ArruCAsts anoteounes DOCUsetNTS 4GD A M6 I l

RECEIPT REC eW esAftRI AL RELI A$ED GPC esAmteeouse __

000 A M FOR tmut (00 A me i I ' DieAev ' FWF PeeDOUCTeDes esA TE heat _ O essGT At t

fuse ASte 4, st eg i 1 e ' I I I ..v u. W PfB F TC EssGesette PesGPAmt geSTAtlaf tese PACE Aes

                                                                                           . - - -                                     6                             l i

toespec.f

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            , e. e g

l ' I 1 l j

     ' Ptol F QC 6                                ee 1 ,sspgcT t..,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   =                             -"

eseEP, teeST ALL P Acet AGE itF 18141 h

       ,= ,.A..C       o.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ;wel=ai g i

t I Figure 4-3 Installation of Temperature Controls i - ___ _ < _ _m __ _ .- ..< . _ .. ,,~. .~+..,.m,--.-, .~,...--.mi - - - - - - - - . - - - - .~ . . - + . . . __ _ _ _ _ . - _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - . . . _ . . _ _ _ , _ - -. - . . - , - . . . - . _ , . - -

i % l .

).

l'

-r

! v.ev. ooCie. auAu.r, t C-....v.. _ ' 4DC-A 406

                                                                                                                                                                          .PECf9EAftues R4ASt. SOUDPMENT eu.C A                c car O QUALITY vener.                                                         4B          - APPLICAsts PnOCEDunts DOCURSENTS l'                                                                                                  lGO A 3bt I

a'c =

                                     - -A.. -

o= ,

                                                                                                              .An .. . A .

100 A-Est I I C..P, l P/E F OC _ ACCSPT I #segPECT.

                                                                                                                                                .. -                                                     ISS.PEC T  -

1 I I I i I A. uaf f ntAt _ paggggt Pts 9 PRODUCTIOes

                                                                                                                -A..

i, . 1 I I I PREPARE MEC9tANeCAL Pts 7 gewertetesi EseGaseEER C 'f,ES.I

                                                                                                                       .           AL.L AflO88 PEG BAIPI    -

nav.et. _ ggggpy I j P,. . oUAury . ; a,=,-

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       -4,...

i I PimpOAatCORDS tE _._ O 3 t I t s f Figure 4-4 Installation of Mechanical Equipment 1 1' i m.m____.m .__.mm____-.______m_-____.____m __-_____mm - .___u__. _ao w-- --w.r w m , w. 3 4 vr. =w --w.-. .+a w~ e. _ . . , , _._________m .m . . _ _ - ~ _ , . . , ,,.-ww-, -.+-w,,- ,---.u. . ..,-ann..

fh ^n s-% NOTES SPECIFKATION M4AJGt () . APPLIC ASA E PROCEDUR15 PREPARE TEST vfR8FYPREP vf Rep y P/6 f MW AC TESTING REPORT _ TEST DUCT ,- RESTOR ATM)N _

             $UPE RVISOR ACCEPT is it 1)                                             gp g g g,                                                  sp gi gg I

1 l l 1 l l 1 l l I l 1 l l PREPARE DUCT RESTORE PfR F PRODUCitON FOR T EST DUCT l i,... , , , , , .

l g i i l I l l l

                                                                                                                                                                             '                                                             i l                l              t         . T .E P/K F QC                                                                                                                                              TEST l                l              U         . , . . =U                                                               l l                l                                                                                                 l VE RDF Y INSP.

l PtK f OUntITY F%&NE E R COR 1 P/K F QA REf ADS 6 REvtivvFitf 4717 H Figure 4-5 Duct Leak Test (Fan Peak Pressure Test, JP 11.2, and Filtration Unit Leak Test, JP 11.3, Are Similar)

r % #-*g et f k

     %/                                                                                       -

I I t INSPE C T NO T E S-f P/K F QC ,, i (P to III SPECIFICATION K4AJ01

                                                                                                                                   $$        ~ APPLICA84 E PROCEDURES

( I I

                                .N Y. ATE F.NAt W At =DOWN                                 I                   l P/K F PROJECT MGR/             VE RIFtC A TtON TR AVEL t s R _

DE SIGNE E (JP 10111 I I 1 i 1 I 1 REVtEW P/K F OUALITf ENGINEERif.3 FW V1 - ACCEPT

                                                                 -                                                                           (JP 10 t il I

I I I I l RECORDS PIN F OA RECORDS ST A TUS I T E MS _ R E wlE W - A MEPT RF #'EW F'L I - (F 1011) (F 17 2) (p gy g) REVIEW FDC ALCEPT IE W ACCEPT P/K F GA MANAGE R 4JP 17 31 I 1 I PREPARE FINAL ASSEMBLE PKG l P/M F GA RECORDS HECMLIST N) = R E VIE W -

                                                                                                                 '       ACTEPT                          l tJP 17.39                                                          (p 3 7 3)                                              g i

I _ __ N T RE. E W R= (DC Ae68

o I Figure 4-6 Final Walkdown Inspection and Document Turnover

5 AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS

5.1 INTRODUCTION

Module section 5 contains a brief discussion of Quality Assurance audits, Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspections, and Project reportability evaluations performed in the area of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC). In addition, a description of a special evaluation and a discussion of the project evaluation of Unit 1 finding followup are included. The findings, violations and evaluations applicable to HVAC were reviewed by the Readiness Review Team and factored into the assessments presented in section 6 of this module. Audits and findings, inspections and violations, reportability evaluations, and the Unit 1 finding followup results are listed at the end of i the section. l l O O O270r/040-8 5-1

I O l l l O O 0270r/040-8 5 -- 2

- - - - = _ . __ . _ - . _ r 5.2 PROJECT AUDITS O Project Quality Assurance (QA), consisting of Georgia Power t Company (GPC) QA and Bechtel Western Power Company (BWPC) QA, conducts regularly scheduled audits to verify compliance to , project requirements. Any finding from an audit is reported to i the management of the audited organization for corrective i action. The audit listing at the end of this section includes ! the audits conducted and findings issued since the Unit 1 module. I

     -5.2.1   GEORGIA POWER COMPANY AUDITS AND FINDINGS                 !

GPC QA audits are performed in functional areas such as ) equipment, piping, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning i etc., and are readily identifiable to module scopes. GP" ,A conducted 12 audits within the scope of this module. Th. , audits resulted in 13 findings which identified i dit ,repancies in documentation requirements, incidences of hardware nonconformance, and failure to follow procedures. For each finding the extent and significance of the discrepancy was identified and corrective action taken was adequate to. , resolve the deficiency. O 5.2.2 BECHTEL WESTERN POWER CORPORATION AUDITS AND t FINDINGS - BWPC QA audits are generally performed in design functional ' areas such as. drawings, calculations, and Field' Change Requests and are-applied to all disciplines, rather than a specific discipline or hardware category. Therefore, it is impractical ! to assign audits to a cpecific module; however findings were categorized by module. ' The one finding within the scope of this module identified a failure to meet committed dates for completion of Unit 1 Readiness Review corrective actions. The finding was resolved by completion of the committed corrective action. - I l O l 1 0270r/040-8 5-3 l

I 1 O i l l [ l i i e t

i 1

i P O 0270r/040-8 5-4

1 5.3 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INSPECTIONS C Readiness Review identified 10 Nuclear Regulatory Commission r inspections within the scope of this module. These inspections resulted in three deviations and four violations. Three of the violations were identified as severity Level IV, the other two as severity Level V. Two of the violations addressed hardware: one for failure to protect installed components, and one for ; improper installations. The remaining two violations addressed inadequate documentation of activities or 'aterials. Two of the- ! deviations identified a failure to install certain heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning system components as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). The remaining deviation was for failure to revise the FSAR within the committed time. Corrective action for all violations and ! deviations was initiated and completed. , L I 0270r/040-0 5-5

O 1 l 1 1 l l O I O 0270r/040-8 5-6 ( i

a 5.4 REPORTABLE DEFICIENCIES AND SPECIAL EVALUATIONS Reportable Deficiencies: Since completion of the Unit 1 module, 13 deviating conditions in the plant applicable to the scope of this module have required formal evaluation for reportability on Deficiency Evaluation Reports (DERs). Of these, five were determined to be reportable per the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55(e). These are discussed below. DER-121 (CDR-M96) identified that four fan hubs supplied by ! American Air Filter for Units 1 and 2 may be cracked. Evaluation showed that failure of the hubs would result in loss of cooling air supply and could result in malfunction or reduction of qualified life for the safety-related electronic devices in the cooled space. Both Unit 1 and Unit 2 hubs were ' replaced. DER-157 (CDR-M122) identified the use of improper lubricant in the bearing cavity of the containment cooler fan motors. Investigation showed this condition also existed in other safety-related fan motors. The evaluation concluded that the condition could lead to motor and cooling unit failure and ' consequently could jeopardize the safety-related function of the cooling unit. Bearings were replaced in all motors required for () Unit 1 and Unit 2 operation where the lubricant was unapproved or questionable. DER-166 (CDR-M129) identified a failure to properly consider thermal stresses in the design of the manifold nozzles for the containment cooling units for Units 1 and 2. The evaluation ' concluded that pipe support modification was necessary to preclude failure and possible loss of function. Pipe support modifications have been completed for Unit 1 and Unit 2. DER-1/1 (CDR M132) identified a failure to provide for properly securing dampers in the exhaust registers of the containment normal purge system. During testing for Unit 1, a damper pulled loose and damaged parts passed.through both containment isolation valves. Evaluation showed these parts could have damaged the valves or lodged in the valve seats to prevent containment isolation. Hardware modifications were completed for Unit 1 and Unit 2. DER-185 (CDR M139) identified a failure mode for.the Unit 1 control building control room essential heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system which would allow additional flow patha, potentially reducing the makeup air flow and i reducing control room pressure below design pressure, j t 0270r/041-8 5-7 i i

    - - , _ _ . . . _ _ . . . _ . .       .  - , _ _ _       . _      ~ - . . . _ _ _

Backdraft dampers, designed to eliminate the potential for l reduced makeup air flow, have been installed and successfully j tested in train A of Unit 1. Necessary planning and approvals I for the same modification to Unit 1, train B are in progress. Modification of both trains of Unit 2 is complete. Special Evaluations: Items identified during the startup phase of Unit 1 were reviewed for applicability to Unit-2. Corrective action for all items reviewed was found to be properly applied to Unit 2. Items reviewed included: o Diesel generator and containment cooling fan capacities. During testing of the Unit 1 diesel generator and containment cooling HVAC systems, it was established that the fans were delivering less than the design flow and were operating in an unstable range. The fan blade pitch angle was adjusted to stabilize the fans and the lower flow rate was reviewed by Engineering and found to be acceptable. The same corrective action was applicable to Unit 2 and was implemented (reference DER-162 and DER-163). o Volume control dampers. During balancing of the Unit 1 HVAC systems, a O requirement for additional flow control was identified in a number of systems. This requirement was met with added baffles. The same requirement is applicable to Unit 2 and was met by adding volume control dampers and baffle plates. In addition, the dampers, as designed, are adjusted from inside the duct which was deemed inconvenient for rebalancing. Unit 2 volume control dampers wece revised for adjustment from outside the duct except where physical interference prevented this modification. o Control Building, Control Room HVAC Flow. A failure mode resulting in unanalyzed flow paths was identified (See discussion of DER-185, CDR-M139, j above). Backdraft dampers to eliminate the flow paths were added in Unit 1 on each outside air makeup and return air line. The same corrective action was applicable to Unit 2 and was implemented. O 0270r/041-8 5-8

5.5 UNIT 1 FINDING FOLLOWUP Unit 1 finding followup consisted of identification of all findings and corrective actions for findings as a result of Unit 1 Readiness Review or Nuclear Regulatory Commission ) I evaluation of the Unit 1 modules. For Unit 2, a list of those findings was compiled and transmitted to the responsible Project organizations for verification that corrective action taken continued into Unit 2. The Project evaluated each finding to determine the following: o If the finding was an isolated occurrence in Unit 1 and did not require Unit 2 action (or applicable to Unit 1 only).

o If corrective action taken for Unit 1 remains in place and acceptable. o If corrective action in place for Unit 2 has changed from that specified in the Unit 1 module. o If corrective action taken for Unit 1 has not been entirely effective in Unit 2 and therefore is modified. For each finding that the Project determined was applicable to Unit 2, a response was returned to Readiness Review that stated which documents identified the corrective action required, any Os changes to committed actions, and action taken if corrective action was not effective. The listing at the end of this section presents the findings, the type of action taken for Unit 2, and explanations if corrective action was changed or not entirely effective. Selected findings were included in the assessment discussed in section 6 to provide independent Readiness Review verification of the project evaluation results. Forty findings were identified for Unit 1 applicable to i Module 18A. The Project Desiga and Construction Departments ) evaluation of these findings concluded that 37 of the 40 findings were either not applicable to Unit 2 or the Unit 1 I corrective action had been applied in Unit 2. Two findings were identified with changed corrective action: I IDR 22-G005_ Corrective action for Finding IDR 22-G005 originally included design changes to provide spot cooling. Abnormal temperature conditions in room B-17 and room 212 of Unit 1 and Unit 2 were reviewed in DER-ll5. The review showed that abnormal temperatures-in the rooms did not exceed the qualification temperature for the HVAC equipment in the rooms. Spot cooling and design changes as committed in the finding response were not required in either Unit 1 or Unit 2.

  ]          }

0270r/040-8 5-9

RRF-18A-037 Corrective action for RRF-18A-037 included a clarification to Design Criteria 1501, showing that the containment coolers were designed with a capability to condense and remove 2 gallons per minute of unidentified leakage. Upon further review, it was determined that the language of Regulatory Guide 1.45, which is explicitly referenced in section 1.0 of Design Criteria 1501, provides a clearer description of the requirement for containment cooler condensing capability than the language committed in the. response to Finding RRF-18A-037. Accordingly, the discussion of condensing capability in the design criteria was deleted, leaving the requirement for conformance to Regulatory Guide 1.45. One finding was identified with corrective action not entirely effective: $ RRF-18A-001 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) revisions in response to Finding RRF-18A-001, to clarify leak testing requirements, did not include revisions to Table 3.2.2-1 necessary to conform the table to the revised text in FSAR section 9.4. Unit 2 Finding 2RRF-18A-008 was issued (see section 6). O 9 0270r/040-8 5-10 l

Page No. I Ol/19/H8 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM QUALITT ASSURANCE AUDITS TABLE 5-1

                                                             ============== ============================

EDIT AUDITING AUDIT FINDING

   -NO ORGANIZATION NUMBER            NUMBER                   LEVEL DATE        SOBJECT                                        REMARKS t,z.    ===:-=.====6:= ==a========== ============= ===== ======== ============================================= ======================
    ~10 BPC CAR                       RR-VS-86-10                     06/09/86 RR FINDING 18A-1     SPECIFICATION & FSAR NOT REVISED BT DATE COMMITTED 207 GPC              CP02-85/77                                    10/31/65 CANNIBALIZAITON OF MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND INSTRUMENT & CONTROL COMPONENTS 214 GPC              CP02-87/0?                                    01/30/87 EXAMINATION OF P/E-F QA PROGRAM FOR TNSTALLATION OF HVAC TEMPERATURE CONTROLS 222 GPC              CPO4-87/15                                    04/30/87 AUDIT OF ASME/AWS WELDING PROGRAM WHIdH          REVIEWED WELD INSP.

INCLUDED A REVIEW OF DESIGN CONTROL, CERTS FOR 10 GPC, 6 PROCUREMENT, PROC'S & DWG'S, TRAINING & PKF, AND 10 PPP QUALIFICATION, MATERIAL CONTROL, RECEIPT, INSPECTORS - ALL STORAGE & HANDLING. PROCESS PERFORMANCE, ACCEPTABLE PROCES3 RECORDS, DOCUMENT CONTROL & M&TE 253 GPC CPll-87/31 07/28/87 AUDIT OF FIRE PROTECTION STSTEMS CURRENTLT BEING IN3TALLED '! 279 CPC CP20/CP22-85/ 12/06/85 INSTALLATION, DOCUMENTATION, WELDING AND 80 STORAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR HVAC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPORTS l 280 GPC CP20/CP22-86/ 10/21/86 PULLMAN /KENITR-FORTSON (P/K-F) QA PROGRAM FOR 50 FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF HVAC DUCT SUPPORTS 285 GPC CP22-86/I6 04/15/86 CORRECT!YE ACTIONS ON AFR'S 584-I AND 867-III IN HVAC EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 286 GPC CP22- 86/29 07/07/86 ADEQUACT OF P/K-F'S QA PROGRAM FOR INSTALLATION OF HVAC SYSTEMS AS PER 7 FUNCTIONAL AREAS COVERING 17 CRITERIA OF 10CFR50, APPENDIX B 982 GPC CP22-87/38 09/03/87 REVIEW OF P/K-P QA PROGRAM WITH RESPECT TO REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING INSTALLATION OF HVAC ACTIVITIES 237 GPC SP01-86/51 10/09/86 PLANNED AND SYSTEMATIC CONTROLS' APPLIED IN FINALIZATION WALKDOWN PROGRAM _a-_ ___-___---._.A_ _ _ . _

- Page Ns{ ), 2 D

01/19/8N '

PLANT VOGTLE: UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDrTS TABLE 5-1

                                                                                 ===========================================

EDIT AUDITING AUDIT FINDING NO ORGANIZATION NUMBER NUMBER LEVEL DATE SUBJECT REMARKS

== ==s-en======= ============= ============= ===== ======== ============================================= ======= ==============

980 CPC S P01- 87/34 08/20/87 REMOVAL, INSTALLATION, AND REPLACEMENT OF PERMANENT PLANT MATERIALS, COMPONENTS, AND EQUIPMENT 306 GPC SP01/OP26-86/ 08/20/86 IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 42 PERTAINING TO READINESS REVIEW FINDINGS 353 GPC AFR 0867 III 12/06/85 INTERNAL INSPECTION OF DUCTWORK NOT REQUIRED CP20/CP22-85/80 IN P/M-F FINAL WALKDOWN INSPECTION PROCEDURE ALLOWING TRASH TO REMAIN 36H CPC AFR 0882 III 12/20/85 TRAIN B D/G OPERATION PRODUCES TEMPERATURES CPil-85/87 IN EXCESS OF SPRINKLER RATING SUCH THAT 5 HEADS WERE ACTUATED ON 2 OCCASIONS 405 GPC AFR 0919 II 04/15/86 HVAC EQUIPMENT REWELDED WITH UNSPECIFIED CP22-86/16 PROCDURE BY UNQUALIFIED WELDER 422 GPC AFR 0936 II 07/07/86 DRAWINGS & DOCUMENTS NOT INITIALED & DATED AS CP22-86/29 REQUIRED BY P/K-F PROCEDURE 423 GPC AFH 0937 II 07/07/86 RR FINDING 18A-31 VENDOR DRAWINGS NOT CP22-86/29 PROCESSED WITHIN SPECIFIED PERIOD 449 GPC AFR 0962 II 09/10/86 INADEQUATE OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE TO INDICATE CP02/CP05-86/46. APPLICABLE CFO PERSONNEL ARE NOTIFIED OF PERTINENT PROCEDURE REVISIONS 468 GPC AFR 0980 II 10/21/86 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN FIELD DIMENSION AND CP20/CP22-86/50 DESIGN DRAWING OF DUGT SUPPORT 469 GPC AFR 0981 II 10/21/86 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN FIELD DIMENSION AND CP20/CP22-86/50 DESIGN DRAWING OF BOLT HOLE LOCATION ON SURFACE MOUNTED BASE PLATES FOR DUCT SUPPORT 991 GPC AFR 1029 III 08/20/87 NONAUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ARE APPROVING SP01-87/34 EQUIPMENT / COMPONENT REMOVAL (E/CR) FORMS CONTRAkY TO PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS 992 GPC AFR 1030 II 08/20/87 PERSONNEL USING E/CR FORMS ARE NOT COMPLETING SP01-87/34 t - THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL INSTRUCTIONS. FORMS CURRENTLY IN USE ARE OBSOLETE _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ - ~ w "

Page No. 3 - 01/19/88 PLANT WOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM QUALITT ASSURANCE AUDITS j TABLE S-1

                                                                                                                                       ======================== ==================

EDIT AUDITING AUDIT FINDING NO ORGANIZATION NUMBER NUMBER LEVEL DATE SUBJECT REMARKS

             ==4         ===========2=                                                         ===-========= ============= ===== ======== =============================================                         =================e====

993 GPC AFR 1031 II 08/20/87 PROCEDURE GD-T-28 R/4 HAS NOT BEEN REVISED TO SP01-87/34 l REFLECT CURRENT WORK PRACTICES. PERSONNEL NOT ' TRACIING ALL CODE 4 &5 ITEMS AS REQUIRED 994 GPC AFR 1032 1 08/20/87 NO OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE THAT DOCUMENTATION' SP01-87/34 EXISTS 70 SUPPORT THE REMOVAL OF CERTAIN COMPONENTS. TWO DISASSEMBLED ASME VALVES DID MOT HAVE COMPONENT REMOVAL TAGS ATTACHED 995 GPC.AFR 1033 III 08/20/87 NUC. OPS. PERSONNEL ARE REMOVING UNIT 2 SP01-87/34 MATERIALS AND/OR COMPONENTS WTHOUT APPLICABLE DOCUMENTATION TO MAIN?AIN TRACE 4BILITT. FORMS ARE BEING GENERATED AFTER ITEMS ARE REMOVED. r 4 r

4

                                                                             -~                                                                                                                                                                                                                  .

Page Nn. l 01/19/HH PLANT YOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM f MRC INSPECTIONS TABLE 5-2

                                                                                                                                                 ================================e==========                                                                                                        {

EDIT INSPECTION FINDING ; NO ORGANIZATION NUMBER NUMBER LEVEL DATE SUBJECT REMARKS 22= =====-:====== =========e=== ============= ===== ======== ============================================= ====================== 595 NRC 424/85-060 01/17/86 INSPECTION OF STEEL STRUCTURES & HVAC SYSTEMS 425/85-040 WITH I UNRESOLVED ITEM IDENTIFIED AND 1 VIOLATION CONCERNING THE FAILURE TO COMPLT . WITH WELDING REQUIREMENTS A 607 NRC 424/86-009 05/05/86 INSP. OF STRUCT. CONCRETE. CONT. 6 425/86-004 POST-TENSINING. STEEL STRUCT., PIPING & . SUPPORTS. HVAC. REACTOR VESSEL. MECH. EQUIP., !

                                                                                                                                                                                       . ELECT. BOUIP., INSTR., CABLES & RACEWAYS &                                                                 ,

PREOP. TESTING RESULTING IN 1 VIOLATION FOR ' INADEQUATE SYSTEM WALEDOWN DURING TURNOVER & : IDE [ i G17 NRC 424/86-019 04/11/86 INSPECTION OF STEEL STRUCTURES & HVAC WITH I ' UNRESOLVED & 1 INSPECTOR FOLLOWUP ITEM IDENTIFIED , 651 NRC 424/86-056 07/29/86 REVIEW OF READINESS REVIEW MODULE 18A WITH I 425/86-025 INSPECTOR FOLLOWUP ITEM IDENTIFIED GS-1 NRC 424/86-059 08/29/86 INSP. OF MATRL CONTR WITH I IFI IDENT & 425/86-026 REVIEW OF RR MOD 18A RESULTING IN 1 VIOL FOR i FAILURE TO PROCURE HVAC SYSTEMS IN ACCORD WITH PROC & DRAW. 2 DEV FOR FAILURE TO < PROCURE EXPLOSION-PROOF FAN MOTORS & INSTALL ! ELECTRIC 4LLT INTERLOCKED & ALARMED CONTROL R ! 602 NRC 424/86-068 01/05/87 REVIEW OF READINESS REVIEW MODULE IBA 666 NRC 424/86-072 10/02/86 INSP OF MATRL CONTROL, PROC & HVAC RESULTING 425/86-034 IN 2 VIOL'S FOR FAILURE TO PROTECT EQUIP FROM f CONST LOADS & FAILURE TO ASSURE THE APPLICABLE REQUIRE *TS INCLUDED IN PROC DOCUMENTS & IDENT OF 1 IFI 717 NRC 424/86-129 12/29/86 INSPECTION OF PIPING. HVAC. AND QUALIFICATION URI LATER CLOSED AFTER ; 425/86-059 RECORDS OF INSPECTION PERSONNEL WITH I INFORMATION ON UNRESOLVED ITEM IDENTIFIED (QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSOMMEL PROVIDED , PERSONNEL ADMINISTERING ETE EXAMS) [ 726 NRC 424/87-004 01/29/87 INSPECTION OF NDE UNIT 2 AND MATERIAL STORAGE f 425/87-004 e I f _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - , , , . . ~ - - _ - , .- .-r _r - . . , - _ .__ _ ___ _-_-2_ - _ m-- - m----, , e- ,

f~h Page No. 2 01/19/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM NRC INSPECTIONS TABLE 5-2

                                             ==== ====================: ====: ==========

EDIT INSPECTION FINDING NO ORGANIZATION NUMBER NUMBER LEVEL DATE SUBJECT REMARES

  = ============= ============= ============= ===== ======== ============================== ============== ======================

732 NRC 424/87-01). 03/03/87 INSP. OF SAFETY-RELATED HVAC SYS'S STEEL 425/87-007 STRUCT'S & SUPPORTS. & MAT'L CONTROL WITH I VIOLATION IDENTIFIED FAILURE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE REPORT OF SIGNIFICANT CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCT 745 NRC DEVIATION 424/86-56-01 07/29/86 FAILURE TO REVISE FSAR AS COMMITTED IN CORRECTIVE ACTION TO VIOLATE 85-23-02 746 NRC DEVIATION 424/86-59-02 08/29/86 FAILURE TO PROCURE EXPLOSION-PROOF FAN MOTORS AS COMMITTED 747 NRC DEVIATION 424/86-59-03 08/29/86 FAILURE TO INSTALL ELECTRICALLT INTERLOCEED AND ALARMED CONTROL ROOM DOORS AS COMMITTED 950 NRC VIOLATION 424/86-59-01 IV 08/29/86 FAILURE TO PROCURE HVAC SYSTEMS THAT WERE FABRICATED. INSTALLED, AND INSPECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 959 NRC VIOLATION 424/86-72-01 V 10/02/86 FALURE TO PROTECT INSTALLED HVAC DUCT. DUCT 425/86-34-01 SUPPORTS. PIPE AND PIPE SUPPORTS FROM CONSTRUCTION LOADS Ofs0 NRC VIOLATION 424/86-72-02 V 10/02/86 FAILURE TO SPECIFY AND OBTAIN REQUIRED TEST 425/86-34-02 REPORTS FOR AIR FILTER CHARCOAL 972 NRC VIOLATION 424/07-11-02 IV 03/03/87 NO RECORDS TO DOCUMENT CORRECTIVE ACTION TO 425/87-07-02 120 DEFECTIVE DUCT SUPPORTS REPORTED IN DER-025 424 425 CDR-82-32

(

R E

                          =                 T
                          =                L                                                                                     .
                          =                I
                          =                F
                          =
                          =                R
                          =
                          =
                          =
                          =

I A

                          =                M                                                                                     _

S = A _ K= R = - A = 8 8 3 2 2 8 7 9 M= E = G 9 5 9 0 1 0 1 l l 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 R - M M M M M M M M M M -

                          =                             L                              Y               WE M                   =                             A                              T         Y     DH      T A         =         =  EF            F            N           D           1      I        T      I  T     N R         =         =  SO       F     S           I          I              -    V        I      F        E      T         .

G =

                =
                          =  U        O     E           N           ON          R      AL        V        F     N      N O                   =  OS                         I           NO          E      CA       A      RO      P       E         _

R = = HS G N E S EI V N C I I M l' = =

                          =      D    N     O           T     EN VO LT OA      MC         GR              AM      A       N W

E

                =
                =
                =
                          =
                          =  wI t R I

L O S B NN I IE LI AT SL O S2 R NE I T RN G I N EO TR O T N O I A T PO I S VN EO

C U H SSA RTT G VA DO L MI S EC TI AM AI E BR R A ES A UR QE N C N O C RI -

                =
                          =  I R A

T L OLL TUO I S GM ES O BR EC I T = O E 0I NO HI NT O DN R SA SU

YT RS f' S H E OSV ME N EM I O PR TS E I O M NT I O AE NL S N O F EL = = A I P R W RD LO I I T M I I A OO NN NA3 = = 4 E PL NA D S F S I V - = DE5=

                          =
                          =

LW I F U N A FTA ST SR RR O U N AO C EN SA D NR I S A = = XA f F OI R OL I T RI I T UF AE WK _ E RTlY E.

            = =
                          =  U AN T

U N N TO AN O RS SR L l lY. .

                          =                               %      R      O   FD         BU             EF       F       A I B =           =      O    O    I        NG  U. 5  GT    NC          A      UR       TE     RF              N 2LA =               =
                          =

O TR Y A G I G7 TN NN I D SD L NL UU W A TB I T ~.

                =                E         N I O       GE  TI             F    AO    TM       O               ,
                          =           L              RI N     PC    SNR     R          GO       CO    A        L       S I A NT
                =
                =
                          =
                          =

LP AM T I K ALA TOH I PE GLM EI VE f S N OS I C R RE EH F S E Uif = = NA C C SOT H NLS PS RN BT ' I T R R GDR U WO EI V = =

                          =                 A           C     RT    AOE     U                   UN     N               TS      -

LE =

                          =
                          =

I SRW E D S R C S UTS S I AG fl RR CT SN AN I LE M FNG IAT ST . TR G

                =         =      I t  ER          S  ONE         N      NT  E       O FT OA       DN    TI IN    EN I

EN I

                =         =  SAf           LT        EEL      TI    YOO     TDI            C    EI    ESD      TU      TU      .

0 V

                =
                =    T=
                          =  U OEE TM A

UO AI I N NM Af E CL ELS RCN A ANT UAC EI CD VA OT VNL I AI A UG E LG

                =    C=      EDT      QM   TU N

Tl G ROR RSS QTA NNG RN SFU QN PN ;_ T = E = NI I E LAA RRE OEE ESR EI N PO S B EI Ml N = J = OSS DC EC UTT OTP iVV DHE S I PC EM DL Oi A = B = RTF AA TA MNL CNM M' LL ATT EDS A C0G AO C0 L = U = RUF NV VV I OO NOA EAA NI N RNA NF Xi/f NO N0 P , S = EOO I H I H SCV I CD TVV I WI PAC UO EFD I C I C _ .

                          = 5        5     6        6        6     6        6         6        6      6       G       6
                          = 8        8     8        8         H    8        8         8        8      8       8       8        -
                          = /         /     /        /        /    /        /         /         /     /        /      /
                          = 8        5     6        7        7     7        2         0        0      2       2       2 E=

0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 _ T= A = 0

2

1/ / 2

                                                             /     /

3

                                                                            /         /        1/     /       /       /        _

3 4 7 7 8 8 9 , D = 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

                          =
                          =
                          =

N O

                          =
                          =

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u - I = . . . . . . _ T = V V. V V. V. Y V. V V V. V. V AR= E E E E E E E E E E E E UE = R F R R I f R f f ff H R H i l . L B = . AN:= V I 9 0 5 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 6 4 7 5 7 5 2 6 3 6 i W f EN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I - N = O= I = I T = A : 2: R R R R f l R R R f l R R R I : E E E E E E E E E E E E N ; D D D D D l i D D D U D D A =

 .H                  G -    t        t     t        C        t     t                  t                       U       t oH N/

R O: i D Bi i B I B i H i P tiB i B t i D UI H l B i B 7 e2 g/ TO . 5 1 G 7 H 9 2 3 4 H 9 2 I N 1 2 2 3 3 5 6 6 G H al D 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 71 PO E 1

O O Page No. 2 i 01/27/8H l Pl. ANT V0GTI.E UNIT 2 READINESS HEVIEW I1K1GHAM HEPORTABILITY EVALUATIONS TABLE S-3

                                                                                          ======================== ========r     2=======

EDIT EVALUATION NO OHGANIZATION NINBFR DATE SUBJECT REMARKS

                                               - = _ __=====_:======================================================-====.============================

17tt Di'C DER 171 REY. 0 10/21/86 DAMITR SECTION OF A HETURN REGISTER IN M132 CorrAINMENT PUHGE SYSTEM PULLED LOOSE AND TRAVELED Tilfl00Gli ISOLATION VALVES 188 BI'C 00!! 181 REV. 2 02/27/87 IVST ACCIDENT PIPING IfEAT IDADS WERE NOT AIL ACCOUNTED R)R IN CALC. X4C2108V01 192 BI'C DER 185 fiEV. 0 07/14/87 CONTHOL HOOM HVAC SYSTEM HAS NOT BEEN M139 ALEQUATLY ANALYZED HELATIVE 10 WORST CASE FAILURE.

                                                                                                                                                           ~                                                                                  '. ,_.

Page No. 1 02/10/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM FOLLOW-UP OF UNIT I FINDINGS (RR.lDR.NRC) TABLE 5-4

                                                                                                 ============================================================

I EDIT SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 1 DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 2 NO FINDING DESIGN CONST LEVEL FINDING CORRECTIVE ACTION FOLLOW-UP ACTION

                 ==== =============== ====== ====== ===== ============================== ============================== ==============================

l 91 IDH X I AFW AREA UNIT HEATER. SEISMIC REVISE PROCEDURE FHM C-39 TO CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS l 22-B005 II/I REVIEW DID NOT REVEAL ADD ASSESSMENT OF IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE INADEQUACIES IN VENDOR-SUPPLIED SUPPORTS. VENDOR-SUPPLIED SUPPORT REVISE HAZARDS WALKDOWN PROCEDURES TO ADD EVALUATION OF II/I SUPPORTS. DER-146 ISSUED TO EVALUATE REPORTABILITY. 561 1DR X II ALLOWABLE STRESSES FOR DUCT THIS VERIFIED AS AN ISOLATED CORRECTIVE ACi10N REMAINS 22-D019 WORK NOT CONSISTENT WITH FSAR OCCURRANCE AND FSAR & DC-1010 IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE COMMITMENT REVISED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH DESIGN 563 IDR X II INCORRECT DETERMINATION OF CALCULATION X2CQ4.4 REVISED TO ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 22-D021 MAXIMUM MOMENT ON A DUCT DOCUMENT NECESSARY CONNECTION CORRECTIVE ACTION SUPPORT WELDED CONNECTION CAPACITY COMPARISON AND PROJECT TRAINING GIVEN TO ENGINEERS 564 IDR X II WORST CASE NOT CONSIDERED WHEN DCN-R NO. 71 ISSUED TO ALLOW ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 22-D022 PERFORMING ANALYSIS OF WELDED REDUCTION OF WELD LENGTH ON CORRECTIVE ACTION i CONNECTION THAT JOINS DUCT AND SHORT SIDES OF RETANGULAR DUCT DUCT STIFFENER 565 IDR X II WELDS NOT QUALIFIED IN EXPLANATION OF WELD ANALYSIS ISOLATED INSTANCE /ONE TIME 22-D023 ANALYSIS OF DUCT SUPPORT ACCEPTED CORRECTIVE ACTION i 566 IDR X II CALCULATION DOES NOT AGREE- COMMITHENT TO PERFORM HVAC CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 22-G002 WITH DUCT WORK ARRANGEMENT TEST OF TURBINE DRIVEN AFW IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE ' PUMP ROOM AS PART OF PRE-OP l TESTING AND THEN FINALIZE THE i CALCULATION 56T IDH X II LATEST ELECTRICAL LOADS NOT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS , 22-G003 INCLUDED IN AUXILIARY BUILDING PROVIDED BY PROJECT TO IDR IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE ! HVAC CALCULATIONS SATISFIED FINDING - NO I CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED ; 568 IDH X I NO CALC. FOR ABNORMAL RE-REVIEW OF SPOT COOLING CORRECTIVE ACTION HAS CHANGED- 1 22-G005 CONDITION IN AUXILIARY APPLICATIONS PERFORMED AND 'SEE SECTION 5.5 t BUILDING ROOM B-17 DESIGN CHANGES ISSUED AS REQUIRED. DER 115 ISSUED To l EVALUATE REPORTABILITY j i f

   . . _ _ - _ -          -,   .- -         __     .._.- - - _ _ , . _ - - _ . _ . . - _ . . . - _ _ . _ _ ~ _ . _ _ _ ~ _ . - . ,.                                                         _ , . _ . . ~ _ . _ - . . . - - _ ._~ _ _ . _ _ _

Page No. 2 02/10/88 PLANT VOGTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM FOLLOW-UP OF UNIT I FINDINGS (RR.IDR,NRC) TABLE 5-4

                                                       ==========_==== ======== =======================_===========

EDIT SOUNCE AND DESCRIPTION OF DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 1 DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 2 NO FINDING DESIGN CONST LEVEL FINDING CORRECTIVE ACTION FOLLOW-UP ACTION

=============== ====== ====== ===== ============================== ============================== ======== =================

569 IDH X II DUCT LEAK TEST METHOD AND COMMITMENT TO ENSURE ISOLATED INSTANCE /ONE TIME 22-G019 TEMPERATURE RECORDING NOT IN RETRAINING OF CONTRACTOR CORRECTIVE ACTION CONFORMANCE WITH ANSI PERSONNEL CONCERNING N510-1980 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS 571 NRC X VIOL INADEQUATE CONTROLS TO ASSURE DR - REWORK. ALL SIMILAR ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 86-59-01 PART I CONFORMANCE OF HVAC. MISSING UNITS CHECKED AND REWORKED CORRECTIVE ACTION BOLTS / BOLT HOLES - FAN SUPPORT 572 NRC 4 VIOL INADEQUATE CONTROLS TO ASSUHE DR'S - REWOHK/USE-AS-IS. ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 86-59-01 PART 2 CONFORMANCE OF HVAC ADD'L INVESTIGATION, CORRECTIVE ACTION MISSING / LOOSE BOLTS & WASHERS, RETRAINING DIMENSIONAL ERRORS - DUCTWORK 573 NHC X DEV FAILURE TO PROCURE EXPLOSION FSAR CHANGED TO REFLECT DESIGN CORRECTIVE ACTION HEMAINS H6-59-02 PROOF MOTOR FOR BATTERY ROOM DEVELOPMENT IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE ! EXHAUST FAN 574 NHC X DEV CONTROL ROOM DOORS ARE NOT FSAN CHANGED TO REFLECT DESIGN CORRECTIVE ACTION HEMAINS H6 59-03 ELECTRICALLT INTERLOCEED & DEVELOPMENT. ADD'L FSAR IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE ALARMED AS REQUIRED SAMPLE REVIEWED FOR SIMILAR PROBLEMS 587 HRF X II ANSI N509/N510 RE0'M'TS FOR SPEC. AND/OR FSAR REVISED TO CORRECTIVE ACTION NOT ENTIRELY 18A-001 PAHT l LEAK TESTING NOT IN SPEC. CORRECT DISCREPANCIES EFFECTIVE SEE SECTION 5.5 588 RRF X 11 FSAR SECT. 9.4 CONFLICTS WITH INCONSISTANCIES CORRECTED CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 18A-001 PART 2 FSAR TABLE 3.2.2-1 IDENTICAL AND ACCFPTABLE SH9 RHF X 11 CONTRACTOR WELD INSPECTION SUBSEQUENT ISSUE OF APPENDIX ISOLATED INSTANCE /ONE TIME 18 A- 003 PROCEURE DO'NOT INCLUDE ALL VC, REY. II, SPEC & CONTRACT 0H CORRECTIVE ACTION SEPCIFIED CRITERIA PROCEDURE REVISIONS, RESOLVES THIS FINDING 590 HHF X III NO INSTALLATION DOCUMENATATION DOCUMENTS FOUND WITH WRONG ID ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME IHA-004 FOR MAX 1 BOLTS NUMBER - CORRECTED CONNECTIVE ACTION 591 RHF X III DUCT SUPPORT REINSPECTED. DR - USE-AS-IS. ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME IHA 005 DRILLED IN-ANCHORS DO NOT MEET ADD'l SAMPLE HEVIEWED - CORRECTIVE ACTION PHOCEDUHE HE0'M'TS ACCEPTABLE ____--e

[N ' Page No. 3 02/10/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM FOLLOW-UP OF UNIT I FINDINGS (RR.lDR.NRC) TABLE S-4

                                                       ===========================================================-

EDif $OURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF 0:3CRIPTION OF UNIT I DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 2 NO FINDING DESIGN CONST LEVEL FINDING CORRECTIVE ACTION FOLLOW-UP ACTION

   ==== =============== ======             =e==== ===== ============================== ============================== ==============================

592 ERF X III No HIGH STRENGTH BOLT INSP. DR - OBTAIN VALID ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-009 REPORT IN DAMPER PKG. DOCUMENTATION. REVIEW OF CORRECTIVE ACTION APPLICABLE DOC. PEG. - ACCEPTABLE 593 HRF X II BOLT HOLES IN DUCT SUPPORT DR - REPAIR, ADD'L SAMPLE ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-010 OVERSIZE, FLAME CUT & WITHOUT INSPECTED - ACCEPTABLE CORRECTIVE ACTION WASHERS 594 RNF X !! FIELD COPES IN TEE SECTIONS DR - ADD'L SAMPLE INSPECTED, ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-Oll NOT ROUNDED CRAFT TRAINING CONDUCTED CORRECTIVE ACTION SDS RRF X II AS-INSTALLED DETAILS DO NOT DR - USE-AS-IS, LOW PERCENT OF ISOIATED INSTANCE /ONE TIME 18A-012 MATCH DRAWINGS ATTRIBUTES ASSESSED - ISOLATED CORRECTIVE ACTION 596 RRF X III DUCT STIFFNER ANGLES WITH ONE DETAIL IS ACCEPTABLE, FCR WAS CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS IHA-013 JOINT. TWO SHOWN ON DWG. IMPROPERLY INCORPORATED, NEW IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE ICH ISSUED 597 HHF X III INCOMPLETE DUCT INSPECTION CORRECTED - ISOLATED ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME IBA-014 REPORT CORRECTIVE ACTION S98 RhF X II DUCT & DUCT SUPPORT MATERIAL VENDOR SUBMITTAL SHOULD HAVE CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 2 18A-016 CERTIFIED TO ASTM WITH EFF. BEEN SUPERSEDED. NEW VENDOR IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE l DATE NOT AS APPROVED BY ENGRG. Doc. SUBMITTED, SPEC. REVISED !

 .                                                                                           ALL MAT'L ACCEPTABLE 599 RRF                                X      III     ROCK BOLT INSTALLATION SRETCH REVIEW OF ADD'L SEETCHES.              ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-017 PART I                              (N DOCUMENT PKG. IS WRONG          MORE ERRORS. ERRORS CORRECTED, CORRECTIVE ACTION INSPECTOR RETRAINED,    NO IMPACT ON HARDWARE 60D RHF                                X      lll     DR REPORTS MAXI-BOLTS. ROCK    ENTRY ON DR IN ERROR.             ISOLATED INSTANCE /ONE TIME IHA-017 PART 2                              BOLTS INSTALLED. DISPOSITIN        CORRECTED                         CORRECTIVE ACTION ADDRESSES ROCK BOLTS                                                                               '

G01 RHF X III INSPECTION DOCUMENT SHOWS ENTRY ERROR, SHOULD BE ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-019 PART I CALIBRATION DUE DATE OF CALIBRATION DUE 3-17-85, CORRECTIVE ACTION 3-17-84, USE DATE 9-17 CORRECTED ; i I

    - . , , _ . . , ,            , , ~ _ -           _              -~

T O O ' Page No. 4 02/10/88 PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM FOLLOW-UP OF UNIT 1 FINDINGS (RR.IDR,NRC) TABLE 5-4 . ============================================================ EDIT SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF DESCRIPTION OF UNIT I DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 2 NO FINDING DESIGN CONST LEVEL FINDING CORRECTIVE ACTION FOLLOW-UP ACTION ;

   ==== =============== ====== ====== ===== ============================== ============================== ==============================

602 RRF I III ID NUMBER FOR DAMPER NOT DRAFTING ERROR, ALL ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-019 PART 2 CONSISTANT BETWEEN P&ID AND SAFETY-RELATED DAMPER DWGS. CORRECTIVE ACTION DWG. REVlWED, CONFLICTS RESOLVED 603 RRF X III DR CHANGES ID NUMBER ON FAN. COPY OF DR FILED WITH RECEIPT ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-024 DR DOES NOT ADDRESS DOCUMENT PEG. INSTALLATION & CORRECTIVE ACTION DOCUMENTING CHANGE OF NUMBER MAINTENANCE RECORDS INDICATE IN OUALITY RECORDS NUMBER CHANGE. REVIEW SHOWS } ISOLATED 604 RHF X III FCR'S NOT IDENTIFIABLE FROM DCN WRITTEN TO PROVIDE COREECTIVE A7 TION REMAINS IHA-025 DESIGN DRAWING TRACEABILITY IDENTICAL ANL' ACCEPTABLE 605 RRF X III DR DISPOSITION HAS WRONG ITEM CORRECTED. ADD'L SAMPLE ISOLATED INSTANG2/0NE TIME 18A-026 NUMBERS REVIEWED, NO FURTHER ERROR CORRECTIVE ACTION 606 RRF X III DR SHOWS DESIGN CHG. REQ'D. DCN ISSUED, ADD'L SAMPLE OF ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-027 NO CHANGE ISSUED IN MORE THAN DR'S REVIEWED, NO FURTHER CORRECTIVE ACTION 5 MONTHS. FINDINGS 607 RRF X III ATCW ISSUED TO CHANGE DR - USE-AS-IS, ISOLATED. CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 18A-030 PART 1- INSTRUMENT LOCATION. INSTR. PROCEDURE REVISED TO PROVIDE IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE ACCEPTED WITH ATCW OPEN SPECIFIC DIRECTION ON ATCW'S i 608 HRF X III ATCW NEVER REISSUED AS AN FCR ATCW LOST. NEW FCR ISSUED, ISOLATED INSTANCE /0NE TIME 18A-030 PART 2 ISOLATED OCCURRENCE CORRECTIVE ACTION 609 RHF X 111 INTERIM CHANGES TO CHANGES APPROVED BY BECHTEL. CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 18A-031 BECHTEL-APPROVED CONTRACTOR ADD'L REVIEW, NO FURTHER IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE PROCEDURES ISSUED WITHOUT PROBLEM. PROCEDURE REVISED TO BECHTEL APPROVAL REQUIRE BECHTEL APPROVAL 610 RRF X II TEST PROCEDURE NOT SUBMITTED SUBMITTAL NOT REQ'D PER LTH. CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 184-032 TO BECHTEL FOR APPROVAL AS SPEC. REVISED IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE RE0'D BY SPEC. Gli RHF X II INCONSISTANCY BETWEEN DAMPER FSAR SECTION 1.9.52 REVISED CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 18A-034 SPEC. VENDOR DOCS. & FSAR ON IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE EFFECTIVE DATES OF ANSI NSO9 & N510

 ,   _ , .   . - - , _     __        .  . ,, . . -   _                  -  - . _ ,       -,_   . . _ . _ .._             - . . , _ _ . . _ ~ . _ - . . - -                     - -

s l l i Page No. 5 - 02/10/8R PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM FOLLOW-UP OF UNIT I FINDINGS (RR.IDR.NRC) TABLE 5-4

                                                                                              ====== =====================================================

EDIT SOURCE AND DESCRIPTION OF DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 1 DESCRIPTION OF UNIT 2 NO FINDING DESIGN CONST -LEVEL FINDING CORPECTIVE ACTION FOLLOW-UP ACTION

                              ==== =============== ====== ====== ===== ============================== ============================== ==============================

6]2 RRF X II INCONSISTANCY BETWEEN FSAR FSAR CORRECTED, REVIEW & CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 18A-036 TABLE 6.2.2-1 AND FSAR F7'UR' CORRECT. OF SAFETY-RELATED IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE 9.4.6-4. 'AC FSAR SECTIONS 613 RRF X II CONFLICT BETWEEN PRIMARY h31GN CRITERIA REVISED TO CORRECTIVE ACTION HAS CHANGED 184-037 LEAKAGE RATE IN DESIGN CLARIFT. DOCUMENT PROBLEM SEE SECTION 5.5 ' CRITERIA AND THAT USED IN ONLY CALC. 614 RRF X II DESIGN CRITERIA & SPEC. DC-1000C. DC-2167 & DC-2I66 CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 18A-039 CONFLICT ON REVISION DATE OF AND FSAR 3.8.4.5 ALL REVISED IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE WELD CODE AWS DI.I TO CITE CONSISTANT WELD CODE . STANDARD. NO EFFECT ON HARDWARE 798 RRF X III COMPARISON OF CALCULATION CALCULATIONS REVISED TO CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS IHA-040 EMBEDMENT LOADS TO ALLOWABLE DOCUMENT ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE NOT DOCUMENTED , 615 RRF X III CALC. NOT REVISED TO REFLECT EFFECT INSIGNIFICANT. CALC. ISOLATED INSTANCE /ONE TIME 18A-042 CHANGE IN ANOTHER CALC USED REVISED TO INCLUDE EVALUATION CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR DATA SOURCE 616 RRF X III CALCS. WITH UNDOCUMENTED VERIFICATION CALC. ISSUED. ISOLAThD INSTANCE /ONE TIME 18A-043 ENGRG. JUDGEMENT, MINORBhRORSERRORSCORRICTED. ALL CORRECTIVE ACTION DOCUMENTATION - NO HARDWARE CHANGE 617 RRF X II INCONSISTANCIES BETWEEN FSAR & FSAR REVISED. REVIFW & CORRECTIVE ACTION REMAINS 4 18A-044 DESIGN DOCUMENTS CORRECT. OF SAFETY-RELATED IDENTICAL AND ACCEPTABLE-HVAC FSAR SECTIONS

._ .      ~. --          .   - . - . . - . - -~       _-           .    . . -
                                                                                .=  - .- -             -.-

i 6 PROGRAM ASSESSMENT I

6.1 INTRODUCTION

This section describes the program developed and actions : performed to ascertain whether the design and construction . i activities related to heating, ventilation and air-conditioning ' for Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 2 have been adequately controlled to implement licensing commitments, to ascertain , whether the corrective actions resulting from the Unit 1 r Readiness Review were applied to Unit 2, and to verify that the results of the design and construction activities conform to project procedures and design requirements. The Readiness Review Team assembled for Module 18A consisted of ! two Readiness Review Task Force members and four members of site Quality Assurance with 60 years combined nuclear design and ! construction experience. Approximately 1800 manhours were expended in performance of the module review and assessment activities. The team members are listed in Table 6-1. Discrepancies noted during review activities were issued to the , Project as findings. The Project was required to respond in a manner that addressed the specific issue identified, addressed project investigative action to determine possible generic ! -O- implications, and described corrective actions performed. ! These project responses were evaluated and the findings were : categorized as follows; { o Level I - Violation of licensing commitments, project ; procedures, or engineering requirements with i indication of safety concern. (No findings i in this module were categorized as Level I) i o Level II - Violation of licensing commitments or !' engineering requirements with no safety concerns. ; o Level III - Violation of project procedures with no i safety concerns. i l O 0273r/027-8 6-1 i

O O i I O t 1 i ! 0273r/027-8 6-2 i l

6.2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The Readiness Review Program evaluation of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) in Plant Vogtle Unit 2 consisted of three major activities. These were commitment implementation review; followup of Unit 1 finding corrective actions as applied to Unit 2; and development and execution of an assessment plan to examine programs, activities, and hardware. Sections 3 and 5 of this module discuss project actions related to the commitment matrix and the application of Unit 1 finding corrective action to Unit 2, respectively. The assessment for Unit 2 HVAC was developed to accomplish the following objectives: o Provide added assurance that project procedures implement licensing commitments. o Determine that actions taken to resolve problems identified during the Unit 1 Readiness Review have been effective in preventing recurrence in Unit 2. o Determine that program and organizational enhancements made for Unit 2 have maintained the quality of the design and construction effort. O o Assess design completion and design change activities for compliance to engineering procedure controls. o Assess installed hardware for compliance to engineering and vendor requirements. The assessment and results are discussed in the following sections. i i O O273r/027-8 6-3

l O I l l l l l l l O I i l I 1 l O' i 0273r/027-8 6-4 1

6.3

SUMMARY

AND CONCLUSIONS Module 18A addresses Unit 2 safety-related heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems. Verification of the adequacy of the design and construction processes and results was accomplished by visually examining a selected hardware sample and by reviewing design and construction documents related to the selected hardware. Plans for selection of a verification sample and verification attributes were developed to ensure comprehensive coverage of the various types of hardware and documents. The hardware sample selected consisted of five ducts and duct supports, seven equipment items, seven instruments, and five dampers. Documentation assessed was directly related to the hardware sample. The assessment plan addressed: o Implementation of licensing commitment requirements. o Unit 2 application of corrective actions resulting from the Unit 1 Readiness Review. o The effects of program enhancements and newly developed programs. The above assessments resulted in nine findings, four of which were classified as Level II and five as Level III. Each of the findings identified was evaluated to determine the extent of the deficiency, the root cause of the finding, and the impact on hardware or documentation. A Project Response was prepared which documented remedial action for the specific case reported in the finding, corrective action for any additional deviations identified during the project evaluation, and any action necessary to prevent recurrence of similar deficiencies. Of the nine findings, seven were shown to be isolated or involving insignificant deficiencies such as typographic errors. These seven findings required only remedial action to correct the deficiency. The remaining two findings required corrective action to prevent recurrence, which in both cases was a re-emphasis of existing procedural requirements. Two of the remedial actions involved hardware, in one case a minor rework of duct, in the second, resolution of drawing conflicts resulted in relocation of a temperature sensing element. The other seven findings required revision of documents such as correction of drawing references, clarification of procedures, resolution of FSAR conflicts, and correction of calculations. None of these seven findings resulted in a change to design or design documents, incorrect Ox installation activities, or hardware nonconformance. 0273r/028-8 6-5

No commonality of cause between the findings was established. Causes were distinct as to type of problem or organization. No generic programmatic concerns were found. Based on Readiness Review assessment activities and Project responses to findings. Readiness Review has concluded that all the findings represent isolated cases of failure to comply with engineering or licensing requirements, or with procedures, with no safety concern and do not individually or collectively represent generic program concerns. The findings are listed in Table 6-2. Individual findings and the Project Responses are presented in section 6.5. O O O273r/027-8 6-6

() 6.4 ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS Readiness Review activity for this module consisted of the development and implementation of an assessment plan to provide a systematic review of activities, p'r o g r a m s , and hardware associated with heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC). The assessment was performed to provide added assurance that the Project continued to comply with licensing commitments. This section describes the development and implementation of the plan and the results of the assessment. The assessment was organized into three parts: o Part 1 - Commitment Implementation and Unit 1 Finding Followup. o Part 2 - Design and Construction Programs and Activities. o Part 3 - Design and Construction Completion. In preparation for development of the assessment plan, Readiness Review examined the information presented in section 5 of this module (audits, Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspections, etc.) to ensure that areas with a history of deficiency or weakness at Vogtle Electric Generating Plant or within the industry were factored into the assessment. The following were evaluated for inclusion in the assessment: i o Quality Assurance Audit Finding Reports and Corrective Action Requests, o NRC Violations. o Quality Concerns. o Industry Problems (from inspection and enforcement notices and bulletins). I o Unit 1 Licensing Event Reports. This review and evaluation identified the following issues that were included in the assessment plan: Issue Source Where Addressed Duct and Duct Support QA AFR Part 3 Configuration NRC Violation l Bolting of Ducts and NRC Violation Part 3

    ,.      Dampers                                                                       Quality Concern l-

! FSAR - Design Conformance NRC Violation Part 1 l 0273r/027-8 6-7

{ A compilation of problems identified during the Unit 1 startup h phase was obtained from Operations and was reviewed to identify design or construction-related problem areas. Additionally, copies of the NRC inspections of Comanche Peak, Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar for 1985, 1986, and the first quarter of 1987 were obtained from the NRC public document room and were examined to identify any new areas of industry concern. In the area of HVAC, no areas not already addressed were identified from these sources. Certain attributes examined during Unit 1 were included in the assessment to demonstrate continuity. During the assessment, it was determined that the planned review ~ of construction acceptance testing applicable to HVAC items was redundant to activities planned for Module 3A, Initial Test Program. Accordingly this review was omitted from Module 18A and will be performed and reported in Module 3A. A listing of the sample used for the module assessment is shown on Table 6-3. 6.4.1 PART 1. COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND UNIT 1 FINDING FOLLOWUP The objective of part 1 of the assessment was to assess implementation of licensing commitments, with emphasis on those revised or added since Unit 1 Readiness Review by Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) amendments or project letters and to assess the adequacy of application to Unit 2 of corrective actions resulting from Unit 1 Readiness Review. 6.4.1.1 Commitment Implementation Desian The commitment matrix presented in Section 3.2, contains 299 individual design commitments, of which 92 were reverified for implementation into design criteria and an additional 10 were checked for implementation into working level documents such as specifications, drawings and calculations. The assessment determined that the design licensing commitments had been appropriately and adequately implemented with two exceptions, which are documented in Finding 2RRF-18-008 In the first case, a specification change broadened the allowable use of huck bolts, a type of blind expansion fastener. This change permitted the huck bolts to be used in an application where the committed standard required welding. The project response showed that the application had been reviewed

0273r/028-8 6-8

j by Engineering, met engineering requirements and had been {%_/ licensed at other nuclear plants and further committed to changing the FSAR to allow this application. In the second deficiency an FSAR amendment added a specific commitment to maintain the piping penetration filtration unit rooms air pressure at -1/4-inch water gauge with respect to atmosphere. The design criteria was not revised to include the specific pressure. The project response stated that the design met the committed pressure requirement and the design criteria would be revised to include the requirement. Finding 2RRF-18A-008 also reported three typographical errors in the FSAR, a conflict in FSAR commitments for duct leak testing and a delinquent FSAR change. Those last two items are discussed in the construction commitment section below and in Section 6.4.1.2, Unit 1 Finding Followup, respectively. Construction The commitment matrix, presented in section 3.2, contains 10 entries requiring construction implementation. All 10 of these were selected for reverification. The HVAC construction commitments are contained in several industry standards as modified by the project position for the corresponding regulatory guide or by the FSAR text in section 9.4. () Implementation of these standards was assessed by verifying the inclusion of discrete requirements from the body of the standard within the construction specification or appropriate implementing procedure. A conflict in leak testing requirements between the FSAR text and an FSAR table was identified during this review. The specification and contractor procedures were in conformance with the FSAR text but did not meet commitments in the table. This discrepancy was reported in Finding 2RRF-10A-008. The project response committed to revise the FSAR to bring the table into conformance with the text. In addition to the construction commitments, 42 quality program commitments were applicable to the contractor's construction- l activities. The project reviewed these commitments against the Pullman /Kenith-Fortson (P/K-F) quality program and identified two discrepancies. Readiness Review verified the discreparcies and reported the findings in .RRF-18A-007 and 2RRF-18A-009. In five cases, the P/K-F Quality Assurance (QA) Manual cited i different editions of regulatory guides or standards than those committed in the FSAR. In addition, some P/K-F implementing procedures were not in agreement with the procedure numbers and . titles referenced in the P/K-F QA Manual. The Project response ! showed these to be documentation oversights in procedure i development and in conforming the QA Manual to the FSAR. The implementing procedure requirements had been in conformance with I' the FSAR. Readiness Review reverified 24 of the 42 quality O. program commitments with no further findings. 0273r/027-8 6-9

Two additional construction discrepancies reported in 2RRF-18A-009 are discussed in section 6.4.3.2, Construction Completion. 6.4.1.2 Unit 1 Findino Followup Unit 1 finding followup consisted of a review of actions taken by the Project to prevent recurrence in Unit 2 of the types of problems identified by Readiness Review during the Unit 1 assessment. A listing of the Unit 1 findings was provided to the Project, a review was performed by the Project, and information indicating the actions taken to address Unit 2 programs was provided to Readiness Review. Readiness Review evaluated a sample of these responses in parts 1, 2, and 3 to assess the accuracy and adequacy of the information provided. Of the 40 Unit 1 findings, 21 were not applicable to Unit 2. Readiness Review examined 13 of the remaining 19 findings and found that in all cases, except 2, the corrective action had been appropriately applied to Unit 2. In one case, involving FSAR changes to correct inconsistencies, the corrective action had not been completed within the committed time. In the second instance, which required FSAR changes to clarify leak testing requirements, the corrective action was incomplete. This second instance is discussed in section 6.4.1.1, Commitment Implementation. These discrepancies were reported in Finding 2RRF-18A-008. The project response committed to complete the required FSAR changes in the next FSAR amendment. In both cases, Unit 2 design and construction activities were in compliance with the intended FSAR commitments. 6.4.2 PART 2, IN-PROCESS ACTIVITIES The objectives of part 2 of the assessment were to examine ongoing design and construction processes. l 6.4.2.1 Desion Programs The design portion of part 2 examined the design programs controlling design changes and calculation development. Desian Chance Control Sixteen Field Change Requests (FCRs), two Design Change Notices and two Specification Change Notices were evaluated to assess compliance with applicable procedures and licensing commitments saw and control of design changes. The review included an lll 0273r/040-8 6-10

l [# evaluation of interdiscipline review, effects on FSAR statements, impact on previous installations and revision of calculations to support the change. Where calculations were performed to support the change, the calculations were reviewed for compliance with procedures, documentation of engineering judgement and consistency with applicable codes, standards, drawings and specifications. Forty additional FCRs were evaluated for interdiscipline review. The above attributes of the design change program were assessed and found to be acceptable. Finding 2RRF-18A-001 identified inconsistencies in the procedures governing interdiscipline review of FCRs. Calculations Thirty-nine calculations for Unit 2, safety-related, HVAC , systems were issued or revised after November, 1985, the ; effective date of the Unit 1 assessment. Of these 39, six were l applicable to the systems chosen for assessment. Five of these six calculations were selected for assessment. One additional verification calculation performed to determine minimum ventilation requirements for the diesel geaerator building was included in the assessment. These six calculations were assessed to evaluate compliance with project procedures. The review addressed conformance to design criteria and selected FSAR commitments, consistency with j Os referenced codes and standards, and documentation of engineering ; judgements. The assessment of procedural compliance checked a j total of 82 attributes in the six calculations and identified 1 two deficiencies. One was an instance of no documentation of a required calculation int erf ace review, and one was an instance of failure to revise design criteria within the prescribed time frame. The findings are reported in 2RRF-18A-005 and , 2RRF-18A-002, respectively. Investigation showed none of the errors impacted design or hardware or were of any safety significance. A similar deficiency in calculation reviews was reported in Finding 2RRF-006-007 (Module 6). Corrective action to that finding provided specific direction to Engineering for tracking and documenting such reviews and served as appropriate corrective action to Finding 2RRF-18A-005. The delay in revising a design criteria was determined to be caused by a management decision to prioritize Engineering resources by deferring noncritical items. Investigation showed that the delay cited, and also other similar delays disclosed in the broadness review, had no impact, thereby confirming the validity of the decision. The six calculations were also reviewed for technical adequacy, resulting in one finding of incorrect vendor data input, reported in 2RRF-18A-010. Engineering reviewed the two additional, similar calculations within the module scope, and () one additional similar calculation for a nonsafety-related system with no further finding of error. Corrections of the 0273r/028-8 6-11

calculation required no change to drawings or hardware and resulted in no safety concern. f Design Drawings During review of design documents in preparation for the design program assessment, a conflict was noted between design drawings showing the location of a temperature sensing element. This finding was reported in 2RRF-18A-004. The Project Engineering remedial action resolved the conflict and provided for the relocation of the sensing element to the intended location. A Project Engineering investigation of 20 additional instruments found no further instances of mislocated instruments or drawing conflicts. Readiness Review looked at planned completion and testing activities and determined that these activities would have identified the mislocated sensing element had it not been found by Readiness Review. There is no safety concern associated with this finding. 6.4.2.2 Construction Programs The construction portion of the part 2 assessment examined component removal and construction maintenance of equipment. Construction installation and testing programs were assessed in part 3. Component Removal The component removal program was developed subsequent to the Unit 1 assessment and provides a method of obtaining components from Unit 2 to support startup activities in Unit 1. The objective of the assessment was to verify compliance with the component removal procedure. Documents were examined to determine if the removal was properly approved and inspected. Hardware was examined to determine if removed components were documented and tagged. Five samples were selected from the equipment and instrument items reviewed in part 3. No findings resulted from this assessment. Construction Maintenance Since the Unit 1 assessment, the maintenance responsibility for HVAC equipment in storage has been changed from the contractor, P/K-F, to Georgia Power Company. Five items were selected for review to determine whether vendor requirements had been incorporated into maintenance instructions, that maintenance activities performed had been properly documented, and that the hardware showed no evidence of maintenance deficiencies. No findings resulted from this assessment. O 0273r/027-8 6-12 l

() 6.4.3 PART 3, CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN COMPLETION The objective of part 3 of the assessment was to evaluate the design and construction completion processes. 6.4.3.1 Design Completion Design completion was assessed by reviewing the finalization walkdowns and the as-built program applicable to HVAC. Finalization Walkdown Readiness Review examined the planned finalization programs for affect on HVAC. The FP-14 (Seismic Separation) walkdown and the Seismic II/I walkdown. which is a part of the FP-2 (Hazards) program, apply to HVAC systems and were found to be acceptable. No other walkdowns affecting HVAC were identified. No findings resulted from the review of finalization walkdowns. As-Built Program The Unit 2 HVAC as-built program was reviewed. No Unit 2 as-built activity had started and procedure details were still in revision. Readiness Review evaluated the planned actions and finds acceptable the proposed plan. No findings resulted from O the assessment of the as-built program. 6.4.3.2 Construction Completion The construction completion assessment examined installed hardware, inspection documentation, inspector certification, construction testing, and document turnover. The assessment looked at programs as well as the final product. Installed Hardware ( Five ducts, five duct supports, seven equipment items, five dampers, and seven instruments were walked down. Design drawings were examined and checked against the installation l package. Attributes were selected that related to Unit 1 l findings or changes in programs. Examples of such attributes ; are: o Configuration. I o Bolting. , 1 o Seismic Separation. [/) \- The walkdown resulted in one minor discrepancy of three pinholes in one duct piece which was reported in finding 2RRF-18A-009. 1 0273r/027-8 6-13

The pinholes were reworked to meet requirements. The remaining items of hardware were found to be in compliance with drawing and specification requirements. During preparation for the walkdown, several discrepancies in cross-references to other drawings were noted in the Equipment Index, specifications, and drawings. These were reported for correction in Finding 2RRF-18A-006. The data in conflict contained no design information, only a reference to another document. Investigation of this finding showed that the Equipment Index had been decontrolled. Project Engineering committed to re-establish control of the Equipment Index and correction of the erroneous data. Inspection Documentation Inspection documentation for the hardware assessed in the walkdown was reviewed against the installed hardware for conformance and checked for compliance to applicable quality control inspection procedures. Nineteen documents and 78 total attributes were reviewed. One minor discrepancy was found and reported in Finding 2RRF-18A-009. An incorrect drawing number was cited on an inspection report. The document was corrected. The remaining inspection documents assessed were found to correctly reflect installed hardware and to have been prepared in accordance with applicable procedures. g Inspector Certification Records for eight inspectors were selected from the inspection documentation reviewed. The record packages for the eight inspectors were checked to ascertain whether each inspector was properly certified on the date of inspection for the inspection performed. No discrepancies were found. Construction Testing Seven leak test reports were reviewed for compliance to procedural requirements. One leak test was witnessed. No findings resulted from this assessment. Document Turnover Five documents or document packages were selected from the inspection documentation reviewed. Applicable procedures and the documents themselves were reviewed for compliance to selected requirements of ANSI N45.2.9, Quality Assurance Records. No discrepancies were found during this assessment. 9 0273r/028-8 6-14

6.5 FINDINGS This section presents, in numerical order, the findings issued during the assessment, the Project response including corrective actions taken, and the Readiness Review conclusion for each finding. O O 0273r/027-8 6-15

E O 9 1 O l l 0273r/040-8 6-16

I l l l l 1 ("% Finding 2RRF-18A-001 (CAR RR-VS-87-22) (Level III) N.] Requirements: Project Reference Manual (PRM) part C, section 17, paragraph 17.7.3 states, in part, " . . . There are three checklists,

   ' Equipment Qualification Checklist', ' Hazards Checklist', ' Fire Protection Design Checklist', on the back of the form."        . . .
   "If any boxes are checked 'yes', the Field Change Request (FCR) will be processed in accordance with Appendix 2, section 16."

Finding: Neither PRM part C, section 17, nor PRM Appendix 2, section 16, revision 1, provide specific direction for processing an FCR when the "yes" box is checked in the " Fire Protection Checklist." Fifty-three FCRs were reviewed. The following six had "yes" marked on the Fire Protection Checklist. C-FCRB-20,325 M-PCRB-17,085 M-FCRB-16,641 M-FCRB-14,735 C-FCRB-20,420 M-PCRB-17,225 Project Response: [D The PRM did not specifically identify in paragraph 17.5.3 where \- FCRs with fire protection impact were to be submitted. Since paragraph 17.5.3 is entitled "Interdiscipline Design Review of FCRs," it was implied that the responsible engineer would submit the potential change to the appropriate discipline for review. Change Notice CN-17-51, dated September 14, 1987, changes PRM section C-17 to delete the reference to Appendix 2, section 16, for the fire protection checklist, and to provide direction for the handling of FCRs with any boxes checked "yes" on the fire protection checklist. Training concerning the change to PRM Section C-17 has been conducted. Readiness Review

Conclusion:

The finding cites a procedural deficiency. The procedure change corrects the deficiency. Of the 53 FCRs assessed, all were judged to have been properly evaluated for impact on fire protection features. Of the six FCRs impacting fire protection features, all were judged to have been properly reviewed. There was no finding of design or hardware deficiency. O 1 0273r/040-8 6-17 l

The root cause of the discrepancy was the use of a design The investigation process not prescribed by the procedure. showed the process to to valid. The corrective action corrects the procedure. The response is acceptable. O O 0273r/040-8 6-18

  ~T Finding 2RRF-18A-002      (CAR RR-VS-87-23) (Level III)

(U Requirements: Design Manual, Preface, section 3, revision 2, Preparation and Control of the VNP Design Manual, paragraph 3.6 states, in part,

       . . . Revisions to design criteria shall be issued within 60 days from identification of a need for a change or revision by an engineer . . ..

Finding: Bechtel Memo BB-51671 (dated October 15, 1986) identified a need for a change to DC-1007. A revision to DC-1007 has not been issued as of July 27, 1987. This is the only instance identified during this review. Proiect Response: Revision 7, the change to DC-1007 drafted in response to Bechtel Memo BB-51671, was issued for interdisciplinary review on January 26, 1987. Review of the revision was deferred until after commercial operation by Project Letter BS-6831 which deferred selected noncritical items. When the review was resumed in June 1987, additional O calculations were identified as necessary to support the DC-1007 revision. These calculations were completed on August 11, 1987. Revision 7 to DC-1007 was approved on September 24, 1987. The requirement for timely incorporation of changes to the Design Manual was reiterated to all engineering group supervisors (EGSs). (BB-54077, dated August 24, 1987). Readiness Review

Conclusion:

The design criteria change shows a 2*F increase in the maximum operating temperature of the auxiliary feedwater, turbine-driven pump room. This increase is projected from the results of the Unit 1 hot functional test. Engineering evaluated the change in temperature and found no impact on design. The equipment in the room is qualified to the higher temperature. The design criteria change is effectively an as-built change resulting in no' change to hardware. As a result of Readiness Review Finding 2RRF-004-005, Engineering performed a broadness review to determine the extent of failure to meet the Design Manual timeliness criteria for design changes. Additional examples were found; however, further review demonstrated that the failure to follow procedural requirements had no impact; i.e., the subsequent issued Design Manual Change Notices (DMCNs) and the design O. changes were compatible and the delay in issuing the DMCN was not significant. 0273r/040-8 6-19

4 Th root cause of the deficiency was a management decision to defer selected noncritical i tems. The investigation confirecd that the decision had no adverse impact. Publication of the revision to DC-1007 corrects the deficiency; the response is acceptable. O O 1 0273r/040-8 6-20 l

Finding 2RRF-18A-004 (Level II) Requirements: Drawing AX4DB206-1, revision 17, piping and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) control building control room heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC), requires the location of temperature sensing element 2TE-12124 on the return air ductwork upstream of the return air fan 2-1531-B7-005-M01 and downstream of the outside air / return air mixture point. Finding: Drawing AX4DJ2121, revision 15, control building HVAC plan, locates temperature sensing element 2TE-12124 on the return air ductwork upstream of the outside air / return air mixture point. Project Response: The '&ID provides the correct technical requirements. Te- 'ture sensing element 2TE-12124 is intended to sense the ou sir / return air mixture which could only be determined downstream of the connection point. Neither the instrument location drawing nor the HVAC drawing are consistent with the P&ID requirement. Exact locations of instruments are shown on the instrument location drawings (reference General Note 58, ,

   /"N Drawing AX4DJ004) and the instrument location drawings are used     )

for installation. L l F'~'d Change Request YFCRB-6050, issued against Drawing l A )X2121 (the instrument location drawing) and AX4DJ2121 (the HK orthographic drawing), revises these drawings to be consistent with the existing P&ID requirement. The instrument will be relocated to the intended configuration in accordance with the FCR. A review of installation requirements for 20 instrumento (selected at random from five different P& ids) was performed. The intent of the review was to ensure consistency of instrument location information between the P&ID and the instrument location drawings. No additional mislocated instruments were identified in the survey which indicates that there is consistency of location information between these two types of design drawings. 1 Readiness Review

Conclusion:

During construction walkdown before turnover, HVAC systems are check 2d to the P&ID, which is the controlling document. The system containing instrument 2TE-12124 has not yet been walked down for turnover. The walkdown, as well as subsequent testing would have identified the mislocation. There is no safety () concern associated with this finding. 0273r/040-8 6-21 m

The root cause of the discrepancy was an error in the transfer of data from the P&ID to the instrument location drawing. The remedial action corrects the discrepancy found. The review of additional instruments demonstrates that this is an isolated occurrence. The response is acceptable. O 9 0273r/040-8 6-22

N Finding 2RRF 18A-005 (Level III) Requirements: Calculation X4C2107V01, revision 1, dated November 5, 1986 DGB - Normal and Emergency Operation, page 6 of 38 shows Q=2,574,579 Btu /hr total emergency heat load for DGB Level I. PRM C-9 section 9.11, second paragraph states " revision to calculations . . . . It shall be determined whether or not other interfacing documents are affected by the revision and, if so, the required interface action is taken." Findinq: Currently, Calculation X4C2107V03, revision 0, dated October 24, 1986, DGB Minimum Ventilation Requirements; referenced Calculation X4C2107V01, revision 0, for input data of Q = 3,089,500 Btu /hr total emergency heat load for DGB Level I. Apparently, the input data has been changed in revision 1 to Calculation X4C2107V01. Neither calculation indicates that interface action was taken, as required in the PRM, C-9. Project Response: Revision 0 to Calculation X4C2107V01 was issued on March 29, 1985, and determined a heat load of 3,089,500 Btu /hr for Level 1 of the diesel generator building. Revision 1 to Calculation X4C2107V01, issued on November 5, 1986, revised this heat load to a lower value. Revision 0 to Calculation X4C2107V03 was issued on October 24, 1986, and used the higher heat load reflected in revision 0 of Calculation X4C2107V01. The air flow quantity determined in X4C2107VO3 was, therefore, conservative. This conservative quantity was an a'chievable value based on the satisfactory Unit 1 air balance test results corapleted prior to issuance of revision 1 to Calculation X4C2107V02. Revision to Calculation X4C2107V03, therefore, was not necessary. The corrective actions taken in response to 2RRF-06-007 and 2RRF-06-010, restated below, will preclude recurrence of the noted concern. Action to Prevent Recurrence "A memorandum has been issued to EGSs, requiring that the Calculation Control Log for each discipline shall be changed to reflect those calculations that are required to be reviewed and ; the scheduled date for review. The review is to to be 0 , 0273r/040-8 6-23

documented on a calculation review form which is to be with the calculation package, similar to a supplemental calculation." A calculation review form has been inserted in Calculation X4C21'J7V03 documenting the Engineering conclusion that the calci 21ation need not be revised to reflect the lower heat load obtr.ined in revision 1 to Calculation X4C2107V01. Readiness Review

Conclusion:

The response shows Engineering concluded that no purpose would be served by revising the diesel generator air flow calculations to reflect lower heat load values. The corrective action to Findings 2RRF-06-007 and 2RRF-06-010 provides direction to document such conclusions, thereby preventing recurrence. The root cause of the discrepancy was the lack of a tracking system to identify required calculation reviews. The corrective action provides for such a system. The response is acceptable. O IID ' 0273r/040-8 6-24

Finding 2RRF-10A-006 (Level III) I O Requirements: PRM C-4, section 4.6.3.2, second paragraph states in part,

 " Drawings are checked for correctness of information,              l consistency with design calculations, completeness, and             l interfaces with other disciplines, vendors, or existing client     '

facilities." l Findinc: The following minor discrepancies were found:

1. Equipment number 2-1531-W7-400 is in P&ID AX4DB241 per Specification X4AJ32. The Equipment Index indicates that it is in P&ID AX4DB206-2.

2. Equipment number 2-1531-W7-401 is in P&ID AX4DB241 and in layout drawing AX4DJ2121 per Specification X4AJ32, in P&ID AX4DB206-2 and layout drawing AX4DJ2122 per the Equipment Index.

3. Equipment number A-1531-W7-300 is in layout drawing AX4DJ2118 per Specification AX4J32, in layout drawing AX4DJ2101 per the Equipment Index.

4. Equipment number A-1531-W7-402 is actually shown in layout drawing AX4DJ2121, but Specification X4AJ32 and the Equipment Index reference layout drawing AX4DJ2122.

5. Equipment number A-1531-W7-403 is in layout drawing AX4DJ2121 per Specification X4AJ32, in layout drawing AX4DJ2122 per the Equipment Index.

6. Equipment number A-1531-W7-404 is in P&ID AX4DB206-1 and in layout drawing AX4DJ2121 per Specification AX4J32, in P&ID AX4DB206-2 and layout drawing AX4DJ2122 per the Equipment Index.

7. Equipment number A-1531-W7-405 is in layout drawing AX4DJ2109 per Specification X4AJ32, in layout drawing AX4DJ2115 per the Equipment Index.

8. Equipment number A-1531-W7-406 is in layout drawing AX4DJ2109 per Specification X4AJ32, in layout drawing AX4DJ2115 per the Equipment Index.

9. Unit 2 P&ID for control building control room is shown in the common drawing AX4DB206-1 and its current revision 17, note 2, states, "For essential chilled water train 'A' see Drawing IX4DB233, for train 'B' see 0273r/040-8 6-25

Drawing 1X4DB234." Unit 2 essential chilled water for train "A" and train "B" are shown in Drawings 2X4DB233 and 2X4DB234, respectively. l

10. Unit 2 P&ID for engineered safety feature (ESP) chilled water cooling coils for train "A" is 2X4DB233, and the 1 reference table in this drawing indicates that the continuation of coordinate arrow of the electrical signal to the temperature control valve TV-12124 for equipment number 2-1531-N7-000 is P&ID 206-3 (H-3). The i continuation of coordinate arrow of the electrical !

signal to the temperature control valve TV-12124 is in P&ID 206-1 (D-3), rather than in P&ID 206-3 (H-3). Project Response: The minor discrepancies identified in the P& ids are valid and DCNs (DCN 37 and DCN 30) have been issued to correct the noted discrepancies. The Equipment Index, unlike other commodity lists such as the line designation list and valve designation list, does not contain design basis information used by other engineering entities. Alternatively, the Equipment Index is used as a reference source to provide individual equipment parameters such as design drawing identification (e.g., P&ID), applicable procurement specification and purchase order, startup system designator, etc. lh In May 1987, the Bechtel Equipment Index was transferred to the field and was no longer maintained current by engineering home office. Subsequent changes to the data in the Equipment Index were not entered, although these changes were entered in the quality tracking system (QTS). Discussions with Nuclear Operations Maintenance Engineering noted that the nuclear plant management information system (NPMIS) data base is used to identify relevant equipment and system parameters. NPMIS provides the pertinent information that was available in the Equipment Index. This information included the Valve Designation List: Root, Vent, and Drain Valve Designation List; Instrument Index: QTS: etc. Accordingly, the Equipment Index parameters should be correct and maintained current. Based on the character of this particular index as discussed above, the PRM was revised in September 1987 to delete the requirement to maintain the Bechtel Equipment Index as an engineering document controlled as a drawing. The PRM has been further revised reinstating the requirement to maintain the Equipment Index as an engineering document controlled as a drawing and identifying a process for initiating future changes to the index and issuing periodic revisions. T 0273r/040-8 6-26

To re-establish a valid Equipment Index, changes to the ( Equipment Index/OTS made since May 1987 have been retrieved and incorporated into the May 1987 index data base and issued as a ~ revision of the Dechtel Equipment Index. The Readiness Review-identified discrepancies have also been resolved in a revision of the Bechtel Equipment Index. In addition, Nuclear Operations has been advised by letter to the project startup manager that the Equipment Index has been uncontrolled since May 1987. Readiness Review

Conclusion:

The discrepancies noted are indexing and cross referencing errors. These could result in lost time in obtaining desired information but could not result in any safety concern or design or construction error. The Equipment Index was decontrolled without adequate consideration of all potential users and without appropriate change to the controlling procedure. As discussed in the response, the Equipment Index is unlike the other commodity lists designated as engineering documents to be controlled as a drawing. None of these other commodity lists , have been decontrolled. The corrective action has corrected the errors and established the index under appropriate controls. O 1 I l I O 0273r/040-8 6-27

Finding 2RRF-18A-007 (Level II) Requirements: Specification X4AJ01, revision 22, February 1, 1987, section H-9.1A, requires that the onsite work covered by the specification (HVAC) be in accordance with the Vogtle Nuclear Plant Quality Assurance (QA) Manual or the contractor's OA Manual approved by Georgia Power Company (GPC). Finding: Pullman /Konith-Fortson (P/K-F) QA Manual, revision 1, November 15, 1983, was approved by GPC. Section 2.4. references, cites different revisions of regulatory guides and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standards than those committed to in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR). FSAR P/K-F Manual Standard FSAR Section STD.EFF.DATE STD.EFF.DATE 1 RG 1.38 1.9.38 3-16-73 3-17-83 17.1.2 3-17-73 NOTE: Regulatory Guide, FSAR, and P/K-F Manual all cite ANSI N45.2.2-1974.

2. RG 1.39 1.9.39, 17.1.2 1977 3-17-73 NOTE: Regulatory Guide, FSAR, and P/K-F Manual all cite ANSI N45.2.3-1975.

3. RG 1.58 1.9.58, 17.1.2 9-80 8-73 NOTE: Regulatory Guide, FSAR, and P/K-F Manual all cite invoke ANSI N45.2.6-1978.

4. ANSI 1.9.88, 17.1 Draft 11 1974 N45.2.9 Rev. O 1-17-73

5. ANSI 1.9.123, 17.1.2 Draft 1974 N45.2.13 5-31-73 Project Response:

The five deficiencies identified in this finding are the result of inadequate revitw, typographic errors, and failure to update those references fallowing revising commitments. Review of these deficiencies and the impact on activities conducted under the respective function addressed are as follows: 0273r/040-8 6-28

e

1. Regulatory Guide 1.38, QA Requirements for Packaging, ,

Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, reference effective issue of March 17, 1983, instead of March 16, 1973, which is a typographical error. This has had no impact on work performed.

2. Regulatory Guide 1.39, Housekeeping Requirements for ;

Water-cooled Nuclear Power Plants, reference effective issue of March 17, 1973, instead of 1977. Review of these two issues finds no impact on work performed. t

3. Regulatory Guide 1.58 - Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel, referenced effective issue of August 1973, which should -

be September 1980. P/K-F inspection personnel have been qualified in accordance with the appropriate issue since the GPC commitment change. Procedures reference the i appropriate issue. This has no impact on work performed. l

4. ANSI N45.2.9, Requirements for Collection, Storage, and ,

Maintenance of QA Records for Nuclear Power Plants, referenced effective issue of 1974, which should be draft 11, revision 0, January 17, 1973. Procedures referenced the appropriate issue. This has no impact on work performed. ! () 5. ANSI N45.2.13, QA Requirements for Control of Procurement of Equipment Materials and Services for Nuclear Power Plants, referenced effective issue of 1974, which should be (if used) Draft May 31, 1973. Referenced activities are not within the scope of this QA Manual. This has no impact on work performed. , Review of areas affected by the cited QA Manual errors in issue l dates of committed standards has determined that correct issues ; have been adequately addressed in implementing documents. The l identified errors have had no impact on activities conducted in ' the affected work area. The P/K-F QA Manual is currently being revised with changes l addressing items including those noted in this finding. No additional action is required. Readiness Review

Conclusion:

l The Project response demonstrates that the deficiencies have had '! no' impact on the work performed. The. revised P/K-F QA Manual

has been approved by GPC and issued. ! 4 GPC, as constructor, has a QA program which is used by those contractors who choose to do so. Four major contractors chose 0273r/040-8 6-29 ! s , .., _

to use their own Corporate QA program modified to conform to Vogtle criteria (FSAR and QA Manual). For broadness, Project QA reviewed one additional contractor QA manual for similar deficiencies with no findings. Readiness Review checked the remaining two contractor QA manuals finding one additional instance of reference to the wrong edition of a standard, although the contractors program followed the correct standard. The manual will be corrected in the next revision. Readiness Review considers this additional instance to be an oversight and not evidence of a generic condition. The response is acceptable. O O 0273r/040-8 6-30

l Finding 2RRF-18A-008 (Level II) O Requirement: , Design shall be consistent with FSAR. Finding: FSAR - Design inconsistencies i'

1. FSAR Table 3.2.2-1 commits to ANSI N509 as the construction standard for safety-related HVAC systems, ANSI N509 prescribes leak testing of all duct with certain minor exceptions.

The FSAR text in sections 9.4 commits to leak testing in i accordance with Sheet Medal and Air-Conditioning National Association (SMACNA) and ANSI N510. SMACNA leaves the scope of leak testing to the engineer's discretion and ANSI N510 does not address this subject. . In addition, FSAR sections 1.9.52 and 1.9.140 commit to ' ANSI N509 leak testing scope for filtration duct systems. l For safety-related, nonfiltration ductwork, the Project follows SMACNA and ANSI N510 as committed in FSAR , section 9.4. FSAR Table 3.2.2-1 is inconsistent with FSAR section 9.4 l' and Project practice for leak-testing of safety-related nonfiltration ductwork. l l

2. FSAR Table 3.2.2-1 commits to ANSI N509 as the governing l construction specification for safety-related and filtration ductwork. ANSI N509 requires that duct stiffeners be welded to the duct. FSAR section 1.9.140 allows huck bolts as an exception to welding for non-engineered safety feature filtration systems. No exception allowing huck bolts was found for safety-related, nonfiltration systems.

FCR C-FCRB-21,792, dated January 26 -1987, - to Specification X4AJ01 allows huck bolt attachment of stiffeners for nonfiltration systems committed to in ANSI N509. Examples of affected systems include: o 1524 Equipment Building HVAC. 1 o 1532 Safety Feature Electrical Equipment Room HVAC. i o 1539 Control Building Cable Spreading Room HVAC. l 0273r/041-8 6-31 l n . . _ ,

o 1555 Auxiliary Building - ESF Room Coolers. o 1566 Diesel Generator Building HVAC. O

3. The response to Unit 1 Readiness Review Finding 18A-044 committed to deleting FSAR references to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Health and Information Issue 306 in connection with commitments to Specification MIL-F-51068. In addition, the response committed to a review and correction of inconsistencies in HVAC commitments in the FSAR. FSAR changes were to be completed by April 1986.

FSAR changes to meet this commitment in FSAR Change Notices 306 and 526 have not been issued.

4. Minor FSAR inconsistencies noted:

o Section 9.4.1.6 cites ANSI N510, section 6(5), should be ANSI N510, section 6(6), o Section 9.4.3.1.4 cites ANSI B510, which should be ANSI N510. o Section 9.4.1, page 9.4.1-2 refers to " safety features electrical penetration area . . . Amendment 30 deleted safety features of this system.

5. FSAR section 6.5.1.1.B. Amendment 30, commits to maintaining the piping penetration filtration unit room as -1/4 in. WG with respect to atmosphere.

Design Criteria 1561, Section 3.1.B does not include the

        -1/4 in. WG criteria.                                                                     .

Proiect Response: The cause for the inconsistencies between the design and the FSAR is attributed to personnel oversights and a management decision in late 1986 to categorize FSAR changes prior to fuel load. The categories were based on (a) changes required prior to fuel load and (b) changes of no safety significance not required prior to fuel load. Some FSAR changes committed in Unit 1 Readiness Review responses were deferred until after fuel load. The following are Engineering responses to the above fincings:

1. The FSAR changes to clarify HVAC leak testing commitments, initiated in response to Unit 1 Readiness Review Finding RRF-18A-001, were incomplete in that although the text in section 9.4 was clarified, inadvertently no conforming change was made to Table 3.2.2-1. Engineering will, therefore, add a note to Table 3.2.2-1 in the footnotes and comments section that h

0273r/040-8 6-32

,_ states, " Leak testing for nonfiltration systems and /D portions of filtration systems (i.e. flexible J connections and terminating duct pieces and accessories at inlets, outlets and exhaust shafts) is performed per SMACNA requirements using ANSI N510 requirements that address methods for performing leak tests." This note will be included in an FSAR amendment and will bring the commitments in Table 3.2.2-1 into conformance with the text in FSAR section 9.4.

2. The use of huck bolts to fasten duct stiffeners in HVAC systems was originally proposed in 1984. Testing by the manufacturer (Huck Manufacturing) and calculations by Engineering were performed to show that the use of huck bolts rather than welding would meet the structural requirements of ANSI N509 5.10.3. The use of huck bolts for duct stiffeners is restricted to safety-related nonfiltration systems or any nonsafety-related system.

This approach for attaching duct stiffeners has been utilized on other projects that have been licensed. FSAR section 1.9.140 was revised in Amendment 17 to reflect the use of huck bolts in nonsafety-related filtration systems. Recently, the construction specification was revised to allow the use of huck bolts in portions of safety-related nonfiltration systems in Unit 2. A change to the project classification list and O- FSAR Table 3.2.2-1 should have been identified at that time. Engineering will add a note to Table 3.2.2-1 in j the footnotes and comments section that states, " Duct stiffener angles may be attached to the duct using huck bolts in safety-related nonfiltration systems or any portion of nonsafety-related systems " This note will be included in an FSAR amendment.

3. FSAR changes committed in response to Unit 1 Readiness Review Finding 18A-044 were deferred due to prioritization associated with Unit 1 fuel load activities. Subsequently, these changes were further i deferred pending resolution of technical issues which, l although included in the change notices, were unrelated to the Unit 1 finding.

4. Minor typographical errors in the FSAR text have been identified to Project Licensing for correction. Section 9.4.1 addressing safety features of the electrical penetration filter and exhaust system Nill be revised to make this discussion consistent witt Amendment 30. 1

5. Compliance with the current licensing commitment in Amendment 30 to the FSAR was achieved based on receipt of Nuclear Operations test data, review of this data by

() Engineering, and preparation and issuance of Calculation-0273r/040-8 6-33

X4C1561V04. Bechtel Western Power Corporation (BWPC) & approved the test data indicating that the system meets T its design and performance objectives. To be consistent with the current licensing commitment, DC-1561 and DC-1000-M have been revised. Readiness Review

Conclusion:

The actions committed in the response will correct the conditions of the finding. The notes to Table 3.2.2-1 described in items 1 and 2 of the response do not raise new technical issues. The 100-percent project review of commitment implementation and the Readiness Review reverification of a sampling of commitment implementation adequately demonstrates that the inconsistencies are limited to the identified items. Project Licensing and BWPC Nuclear Engineering have extracted the FSAR changes in response to Readiness Review findings and are processing those in separate packages to ensure these changes will not be delayed. The FSAR changes discussed in this finding will be in an FSAR amendment, presently planned for the first quarter of 1988. The response is acceptable. O O 0273r/040-8 6-34

Finding 2RRF-18A-009 (Level III)

/')

U Minor deficiencies were noted during the assessment of construction activities. Note: These deficiencies represent a small part of the attributes assessed and are considered to be isolated. The response to this finding need address only the action taken to correct the deficiencies noted. (Item 1) Requirement:

         "The duct piece    . . . shall be free from . . . holes" (JP-14.2, exhibit. 12)

Findinc: Three pinholes were noted in duct piece A-1480 (duct from RHR pump room cooler). Project Response: Deviation Report PK-4130 has been issued to track this item. Readiness Review Comment: O Four duct pieces and a total of 47 hardware attributes were examined during the walkdown, with one deficiency found. The pinholes were apparently due to center punch marks used in duct fabrication layout. Deviation report PK-4130 was dispositioned rework. Rework is complete and the report is closed. (Item 2) Requirement:

         " Enter the Bechtel HVAC drawing number / current revision required for installation" (JP-14.2, Exhibit. 2, Instructions for Fabrication, Installation, and Assembly Traveler (FIAT),

Item 10). Finding: The FIAT for duct piece C-4528 shows BWPC Drawing AX4DJ2121, which should be Drawing AX4DJ2119. Project Response: The original FIAT for duct piece C-4528 has been amended to reflect the correct drawing number. O 0273r/040-8 6-35 m ,

Readiness Review Comment: Fifteen documents and a total of 59 attributes were examined during the review of duct installation documentation with only the above discrepancy noted in recording the reference drawing. (Item 3) Requirement:

 " Methods of complying with each of the 18 criteria . . . are delineated . . . by documented procedures . . . .   "(P/K-F QA Manual, section 5.2A)

Finding: Implementing procedures referenced in the P/K-F QA Manual in l section 9, 10, 11, 14, and 17 have not been updated to be in i agreement with the P/K-F Procedures Manual. Project Response: The P/K-F QA Manual has been revised. Readiness Review Comment: The P/K-F procedures were found to be complete and acceptable however, they had been rewritten and renumbered so as to no longer be in agreement with the Quality Manual references. The revised QA Manual has been approved by GPC and issued. Readiness Review

Conclusion:

The actions in the project response provide.for correction of the deficiencies noted. The deficiencies noted are considered by Readiness Review to be isolated. None of the deficiencies were of any safety concern. The response is acceptable. l t O l 0273r/040-8 6-36 l

Finding 2RRF-18A-010 (Level II)

 %/ Requirement:

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant PRM C-9 Design Calculation, section 9.7.1, states "The checker is responsible for . . . checking calculations against input design documents to verify conformance with specified configurations, dimensions, and materials." Finding:

1. Calculation X4C1531V04, revision 1, control room ESF supply duct verification used electric heater size (face areas) = 30ft2 for obtaining air velocity and pressure drop across the heater. Vendor Drawing AX4J07-348-5, and AX4AJ07-622-3, page 7 of 28 of the calculations, indicated that the heater size is 44 in. X 44 in.=

13.44 ft2 (face area).

2. Calculation X4C1531V04, revision 1, page 9, note 1, '

indicated that the pressure drop across the clean high -efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter is 1.25 in. WG and indicated that the source of data ic reference 1. Reference 1, which is Specification X4AJ07, revision 10, data sheet on page 64, indicates 7g that HEPA filter pressure differential at rated flow, clean, is 1.0 in. WG maximum. (_) Project Response: Engineering has reviewed the condition identified and agrees ! that the inconsistencies exist. It should be noted that the 1.25-in. WG value in item 2 above was only identified in a calculation note. The 1.25-in. WG value was not used in the computations. To determine the extent, Engineering contacted the vendor, American Air Filter, and obtained vendor data regarding air velocity and pressure drop values. Calculation X4C1531V04 was further reviewed to dotermine if other inconsistencies existed with other system components (heater banks, upstream HEPA, downstream HEPA, charcoal bed, and cooling coil) which could affect the air velocity or pressure drop. As a result of this review, it was concluded that the values used in the calculation were the same as the input sources (vendor drawings and specification data sheets for the components) or were found to be conservative. In addition, three other pressure drop calculations were reviewed for consistency between the values used in the calculations versus the input sources values for the system components. The calculations reviewed are X4C1561V01, revision 2. Auxiliary Building; X4C1542V01, revision 2 Fuel (") 'u.) Handling Building; and X4C1508S01, revision 2, Containment 0273r/040-8 6-37

Building. The review concluded that the values used in calculations were comparable with the input source values. ll Based on the above review results, the two inconsistencies identified are considered not to be indicative of a generic problem. Therefore, the cause is attributed to isolated personnel oversights. The two conditions identified will have no impact on the technical adequacy of the system, based on Unit 1 test results, test data provided by the testing contractor NUCCN, and fan curves provided by the vendor per vendor document number 9510-AX4AJ07-463-1. A revision to Calculation X4C1531V04 has been issued to include the correct values for the heater face area (13.44 ft2) and the vendor data for pressure drop across the clean HEPA filter. Readiness Feview

Conclusion:

The revised calculations includes the correct values for pressure drop in the filter unit. The corrected values meet design requirements, are in agreement with the alarm set-points, and should result in no operating or maintenance problems. Calculations within the scope this module included three filtration unit pressure drop calculations. Readiness Review assessed one of these: the remaining two were examined by Engineering in their broadness review. In addition, engineering looked at one pressure drop calculation from a nonsafety-related system. The review demonstrates that the deficiency is isolated. There is no design drawing or hardware change and no safety concern associated with this finding. 9 0273r/040-8 6-38

TABLE 6-1 READINESS REVIEW TEAM FOR MODULE 18A S. R. Esperanza Readiness Review Task Force P. R. Thomas Readiness Review Task Force J. M. Watson GPC Quality Assurance C. Sarver GPC Quality Assurance D. G. Lunsford GPC Quality Assurance D. B. Fugitt Bechtel Quality Assurance O O 0274r/026-8

TABLE 6-2 UNIT 2 FINDINGS Humber Level Description 2RRF-18A-001 III PRM Procedure on processing FCR's is inconsistent. 2RRF-18A-002 III Design Manual revision not issued within prescribed time limit. 2RRF-18A-004 II P&ID conflict with Orthographic and Instrument Location drawing on thermostat location. 2RRF-18A-005 III Required calculation review was not documented. 2RRF-18A-006 III Cross-references in the equipment index, in specifications, and in drawings are not consistent. 2RRF-18A-007 II Approved contractor Quality Manual cites different revisions of Regulatory Guides and Standards than those committed in the FSAR. 2RRF-18A-008 II Inconsistencies between the FSAR and specifications or Design Criteria. Minor inconsistencies in the FSAR. () 2RRF-18A-009 III Minor construction deficiencies - one hardware, one documentation, and one procedures. 2RRF-18A-010 II Wrong vendor input data used in preparing pressure drop calculation. L E O 0275r/006-8

TABLE 6-3 \- ASSESSMENT SAMPLE Item Number Assessed Desion Field Change Requests 16

Design Change Notices 2 Specification Change Notices 2 Calculations 6 Licensing Commitments 10 **

Unit 1 Findings 11 Construction Duct 5 g Duct Supports 5 Y Equipment 7 Dampers 5 Instrumentation 7 Component Removal 5 Construction Maintenance 7 Inspector Qualification 8 Records 5 Construction Testing 7 Licensing Commitments 33 Unit 1 Findings 5

40 additional assessed for limited attributes.

90 Additional assessed for limited attributes. 0274r/026-8

TABLE 6-4 ( UNIT 1 FINDING FOLLOW-UP Unit 1 Finding Issue Checklist No. IDR 22-B005 Seismic II/I Review 18A-202 IDR 22-G002 Test Turbine Driven AFW Pump - 18A-202 Finalize Calculation IDR 22-G005 Re-review of Spot Cooling Applications 18A-202 NRC 86-59-01 Fan Support Bolting Configuration 18A-305 NRC 86-59-01 Missing, Loose Bolts, Dimensional 18A-303, 307 Errors NRC 86-59-02 Design Not Per FSAR - Explosion Proof 18A-101 Material NRC 86-59-03 Design Not Per FSAR - Control Room 18A-101 Doors l l 18A-001 Specification Not Per FSAR - Leak 18A-101 i Testing 18A-001 FSAR Conflicts 18A-202 i l 18A-025 As-built Drawing - FCRs Not Traceable 18A-302 18A-030 Reference Design Document For 18A-300 Acceptance Improper Series 18A-030 FCR Control 18A-201 18A-031 Contractor Procedure Approval 18A-202 18A-032 Test Procedure Approval 18A-202 18A-034 Effective Dates of ANSI N509 18A-101 18A-044 Design Documents Not Per FSAR 18A-101 0 0274r/026-8 1

Georga Pow;r Company Project M:nagtmmt R)st offic3 Box 282 ! Waynssboro. Georgia 30830 Telephone 404 724 8114 404 554 9961 O

    \
     /

L Vogtle Project DATE: December 15, 1987 RE: Pl an t Vogtle Unit 2 Readiness IE61ew Module 18A F R J(1: W. C. Rams ey TO: R. W. McMan u s Eng in ee ri ng has revi ewed Mo dule 18 A, Heating: Ventilation; and Air Conditioning (HVAC), for general accuracy and compl et e ne ss. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the module is a complete and accurate representation of the HVAC, and the eng ineering process and commi tme nt s re lat ed the re to. s-

               . .dri             CHt M A     /

W. C. RamseyPJr. Pro ject E ng i ne e ri n g( Mwager RUli /WCR/bj d i n i

'L/

Georgia Pow r Company Project ManagtmInt Post offica Box 282 Wrynisboro. GIorgia 30830 Telephone 404 724 8114 404 554-9961 o v o Vogtle Project December 10, 1987 MEMO TO: R. W. McManu s

SUBJECT:

Plant Vogtle Unit 2 Readiness Review, Module 18 A Nuclear const ruction has revi ewed Mo dule 18 A. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the module is a complete and accurate representation of the site Heating , Vent ilation, and Air Conditioning program and commitments related there to. l\_')') i Akac R. H. Pinson

                                          ,    Vice Pre sident Vogtle Construction i

RWM/RH P/bj d ,e ,

Georgla Pow;r Compiny Project Managimcnt Post Offica Box 282 Waynisboro, Gsorgia 30830 Telephone 404 724-8114 404 554 9961 (~')

w. L Vogtle Project DATE: December 14, 1987 RE : P1 a nt Vog t le__U,n it 2 Readiness Review Module 18A F20:1: C. W. Hayes TO: R. W. McMan u s Project Quality Assu ra nc e ha s reviewed Mo dule 18 A , Heating; Ventilation; and Air Conditioning (HVAC). To the best of our knoaledge and belief, th e mo dule i s a c ompl e t e a nd ac c u ra t e representation of the site HVAC prog ram and commitments te lated thereto.

^O V ad C. W .' H age s Pro ject" Quality Assura nc e Ma nager RWM/CWH /bj d (vD

b('~ PLANT V0GTLE UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM Hedting, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning - Module 18A Readiness Review Board Acceptance Letter The Readiness Review Board has been apprised of the scope and content of Module 18A, Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning (HVAC). The Board has reviewed the program assessment, as well as corrective i actions, both proposed and implemented, by the Vogtle Project. Based i upon this review and based upon the collective experience and professional judgement of the members, the Readiness Review Board is of the opinion that the corrective actions proposed are acceptable, and upon their implementation the HVAC at Plant Vogtle will be sound and comply with commitments set forth in the FSAR. I _ APPROVED: Doug Dutton I i Chairman, Readiness Review Board i Vogtle Electric Generating Plant I l I l

I I l rw k-), PLANT VOGTLE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM AS SES StiENT PLAN FOR MODULE 18A HE ATING , VE NTI LATION , At1D AIR CONDITIOIIING gs, ASSESSMENT PLAll APPROVAL b' TEAM LEADER: !s j DATE: 7 /J 87

' /

RR PROGRAM MAI1AGER: , f _- - DATE: /k M Pf7 RR BOARD SPONSOR:

                                 ./ .          .
                                                     ,,I~  ,

DATE: 7/////f'7 7

UNIT 2 READINESS REVIEW MODULE 18A; HEATING, VENTILATION, AND AIR-CONDITIONING ASSESSMENT PLAN 1.0 OBJECTIVE i i This assessment plan provides direction for evaluating Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit ? Design, Const ruction, and Initial Test Program Construction Acceptance Testing activities associated with heating, ventilation and , , air-cond i tioni ng (HVAC). 2.0 SCOPE , This section describes the project components and activiti?s included in Module 18A, HVAC. The section also describes the scope of the assessment planned for Unit 2 HVAC activities, i 2.1 MODULE SCOPE Module 18A, HVAC, includes design , - procurement , installation, and inspection activities associated with safety-related and () Seismic Category I HVAC systems. Details of the interfaces 0151r/19 4-7 1 ;

between Module 18A and other modules is contained in Readiness Review Program Procedure 3.4. O 2.2 ASSESSMENT SCOPE 3ased on a review of the Unit 1 HVAC module results, and on Quality Assurance (QA) audits, Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( NRC ) inspections, indust ry problems, and project program changes since the Unit I assessment , the Unit 2 HVAC assessment will review a sampling of the following activities, i t ems , and programs: o Conmi t me nt implementation. o Application of Unit 1 findings to Unit 2 activities. o Design changes, o New or revised calculations. o Component removal. o Equipment mai nten a nc e. l o Hardware and installation with emphasis on duct and l damper bolting, duct support configuration, and lll ' equipment configuration. 0151r/194-7 2 i

o Seismic walkdown. I o As-built program. l o Construction testing . 5 o Construction acceptance testing. Samples were selected f rom the control building, control room ; HVAC system. The system includes a variety of equipment, supports, and duct configurations, providing a broad population 2 for sample selection. In addition, samples were selected f rom . the residual heat removal pump and the component cooling water pump room cooler systems, and the auxiliary feedwater pumphouse HVAC system. These samples will provide a continuity of assessment with samples selected for assessment in the , i electrical and mechanical modules.

Design documents and calculations related to the selected HVAC systems were selected for review. In addition, one minimum i ventilation requirement calculation, performed in response to Unit 1 initial test results, will be assessed for application to '

Unit 2 design. f f t i 0151r/194-7 3 i i 1

l l l l 3.0 IMPLEMENTATION The as.'essment will be conducted in th ree st ages of g rouped activi ties or parts. Part 1 i s c ommi t me nt implement ation and cor rective action, Part 2 is design and construction programs and activities, and Part 3 is design and construction completion a nd const ruction accc %:ance testing . 3.1 COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION Project organizations provide the commitment implementation for the Unit 2 HVAC assessment. A sampling of the implementations provided will be assessed to ascertain their cor rectness. ll Cor rective actions will be assessed in conjunction with the commitment implementation and the Part 2 and Part 3 assessments. Part 1 assessment is performed by Readiness Review. 3.1.1 COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION Review Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) and implement ation mat rix cross-ref erences and cited document /f eat ures. Identify any inconsistencies or conflicts as " Reject". Describe the inconsistency or conflict in the " Comment" section of the che ck list . 0151r/19 4-7 4

Note: The implementation matrixes are an index and O an aid to maintaining VEGP conformance to licensing commitments. The matrixes are not, of themselves, Project commitment documents. Errors, conflicts or lack of clarity in the matrixes are not findings against the Project Quality Program and should not be marked as

                            " Reject" on the checklists.                 Any such problems should be noted as " Comments" for resolution by Readiness Review.

Verify that the implementation document cited on the implementation matrix satisfies the commitment. l Further direction on commitment identification and verification is found in The Vogtle Project Unit 2 Readiness Review Program Procedure 3.2. Document results on checklist 18A-101. 3.1.2 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The Unit 1 findings included f ailure to maintain the design criteria and design documents in conformance with FSAR commi t me nt s . The Unit 2 HVAC commitment impleme nt ation 0151r/19 4-7 5

assessment will provide assurance that the cor rective action to these findings has been applied to Unit 2. A f urther assessment of the application of Unit 1 cor rective action to Unit 2 activities is performed in conjunction with the design assessment in Part 2 and the const ruction assessment in Part 3. Unit 1 findings included one Independent Design Review (IDR) Finding designated as Level I. The application to Unit 2 of cor rective action to this finding is evaluated with the Part 2 design assessment . l Unit I findings included two NRC violations. The application to Unit 2 of corrective action to these violations is evaluated with the Part 3 construction assessment. 3.2 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROGRA,MS AND ACTIVITIES Documents associated with a sampling of HVAC equipment and components will be assessed to assure engineering and construction compliance to design and procedure requ ir e me nt s . l Engineering documents will be assessed for technical adequacy. l l The Part 2 construction assessment examines component removal l and equipment maintenance. Both these programs have changed 0151r/19 4-7 6

since the Unit 1 assessment. Construction installation is O assessed in Part 3. Part 2 assessment is perf ormed by QA. 3.2.1 DESIGN PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES Select 20 Field Change Requests and Design Change Notices issued af ter November 1, 1985. Select a maximum of five changes per drawing or specification. Assess the design change documents for compliance to procedural requirements and American National Standards Institute, Inc., (ANSI) N45.2.ll, and for technical adequacy. Docume nt results on checklist 18A-201. From the Trending of Unit 1 Findings Matrix, select five findings requiring design cor rective action. For each finding, assess the incorporation of corrective action into Unit 2 design. Design findings selected shall include the IDR Level I Finding (IDR 2 2-G005) . Document results on checklist 18A-202. Select six calculations performed after November 1, 1985. () Selections may be calculations or calculation revisions. Assess 0151r/19 4-7 7

the selected calculations for compliance to procedural req u i reme n t s , ANSI M45.2.ll, and for technical adequacy. O Document results on checklist 18A-203. 3.2.2 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES From the Equipment / Component Removal log, select five items removed f rom equipmen; selected for assessment. For each c ompone nt removal, review the documentation to ascertain that the removal was properly authorized, that work was properly inspected, and that the replac eme n t item, if any, was documented to show conformance to specification requirements. Document results on checklist 18 A-204. For each equipment item in the sample, review vendor maintenance r eq u i reme n t s . Select three requirements for each equipment item and check inclusion in the maintenance program. Review the maintenance records for each equipment item in the sample and check that required maintenance activities have been perf ormed since November 1985. O 0151 r/19 4-7 3 l

1 l l

Walk down the equipment items and review each for evidence of acceptable maintenance activities. ;

Doc ume nt results on checklist 18A-205. i 3.3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION , CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTANCE TESTING Documents associated with a sanpling of HVAC equipment and components will be assessed to assure engineering compliance with design completion requirements. Quality records and as-built hardware will be inspected to assure product acceptability. Documentation of construction and construction acceptance testing will be reviewed for compliance with project procedures and evidence of an acceptable product. Part 3 assessment is performed by QA. The audit team performing the field walkdown assessment of duct support configuration should include personnel with specific experience in using and interpreting the VEGP duct support d rawi ngs . i O 0151r/194-7 9

3.3.1 DESIGN COMPLETION Review the seismic separation finalization program as planned for Unit 2 and as applicable to HVAC items. Assess application to Unit 2 of cor rective action to Unit 1 Readiness Review and IDR f i ndi ngs . Docume nt results on checklist 18A-301. Review the as-built prog ram applicable to HV AC drawings. Check that as-built drawings prepared per orogram accurately reflect HVAC configuration and that cor rect ive action to the Unit 1 finding has been applied into Unit 2. A physical check of the an-built configuration of ducts and duct supports is performed gg in Part 3. Doc ume nt results on checklist 18A-302. 3.3.2 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION Review the quality verification records for seven equipment items, five duct supports, five Facts, five dampers and eight i nst r u me nt s . Check that records are complete and in compliance with applicable procedures, deview vendor documents applicable to the selected items. For each item, check that vendor requirements have been incorporated in the installation package. h 0151 r /19 4 -7 30

                    --   .-.  ..        .-          -  -     . = . .   . -    _

o For each item assessed, the document package ref erences , applicable documents and details. Note the cited design documents, details, design change documents, deviation reports, component removal records, and vendor documents. o The adequacy for installation of the documents cited in the document package is checked during the walkdown assessme nt by the use of these documents for the walkdown assessment , i Docume nt results on checklists 18A-303, 18A-304, 18A-305, i 18A-306 and 18A-307. l l (} Select eight inspectors performing the inspections documented' by the records reviewed. Check that each inspector was qualified to perform the inspection on the date of the inspection. I Document results on checklist 18A-308. Select one document or document set from an equipment package, one f rom a duct package, one f rom a duct support package, one f rom a damper installation package, and one f rom an instrument package. Choose five requirements f rom ANSI N45.2.9 and review ipplicable procedures to assure requirements are incorporated. O 0151r/19 4-7 11

Check that documents on file reflect document handling to meet procedural requirements. Document results on checklist 18A-309. , Inspect the installed hardware in the field for compliance to design and specification requirements. Check for missing component identification by component removal tag. Check dimensions, configuration, connections, identification, seismic sepa r a t ion, cleanliness, and wor kmanship. o The inspection for compliance to design requirements is based on Bechtel drawings and specifications and Bechtel--reviewed vendor drawings, o The documentation list in the installation package is used to identif y the applicable design drawings and details so as to provide a check on the adequacy of the list. Note on the checklist any errors, conflicts, or omissions in the list of applicable drawings. Doc ument results on checklists 18A-303, 18A-304, 18A-305, 18A-306 and 18A-307. l For selected duct and equipment items, review construction I testing documentation for duct, filter housing, and filter mo unt ing leak t est ing . Review documentation for peak pressure h j 0151 r/19 4-7 12 1

testing. Check that scope, test methods , inspection , and O j documents meet procedural requirements. Witness one leak or pressure test of a Class 015 system to ascertain that procedural t requirements are me t. Document results on checklist 18A-310. Review Construction Acceptance Test (CAT) procedures CAT-M-02, fans, and CAT-M-07, HVAC Pneumatic Operated Dampers. Check that procedural requirements meet licensing commitments. For selected fans and dampers, review documentation of any construction acceptance testing. Check that scope, test methods, and documents meet procedure requirements. O Document results on checklist 18A-311. l l l 4.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS Additional instructions for performing assessment activities are contained in the Vogtle Project Unit 2 Readiness Review Program Procedures Manual. In particular, personnel performing the i assessment activities outlined in this plan should be f amiliar with the requirements of procedures 2.3, 2.4, 3.5, and 4. l O l 0151r/19 4-7 13 l

4.1 CHECKLIST COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS An individual checklist is to be used for each component assessed. The checklist column marked " item" provides a numerical ref erence if needed when corresponding with the Pro ject. Numbers in this column in parenthesis () i nd icat e ref erence to the Master Commitment Tracking List. The column marked " reference" provides the source of the requirement to be verified. The column marked " requirement" is repeated f rom the source document. The column mar ked " finding / comment" is for explanatory materials and recording of supplementary data. Comments entered on the checklist should include as appropriate: g o A description of the actual condition found. o Docume nt filing locations and hardware identification to permit tracing the specific documents and hardware re vi ewed . o Data gathered during reviews to f acilitate inter-relating assessment att ributes, o Any necessary explanation of assessment activity and methods, concerns, findings , or issues requiring f urther assessmer h 0151 r/19 4-7 14

l o An explanation for all reject conditions found. .O I l

                                                                    .i o  An explanation for reject conditions closed by further      !

assessment without a finding. l l A checkmark in the acceptable column indicates that the condition found is acceptable. An N/A in the acceptable column indicates that the attribute listed is not applicable. An N/V entry in the acceptable column indicates that the attribute was not verified (due to accessibility, work in progress, etc.). N/A and N/V entries require a short explanatory statement in the Finding / Comme nt column, (see 4.2 below for direction in j substituting items) . , A checkmark in the Reject column indicates that the requirement of the checklist item was not met at the time of assessment. The Resolution column is used to indicate whether a Readiness Review Finding or Audit Finding Report was issued, or if the Project was able to provide suf ficient information to close the ! item. ; The checklists are to be signed and dated on each page by the person or persons performing the assessment and are to be completed neatly and legibly in black ink. Original checklists are to be returned to Readiness Review for storage. O 0151r/194-7 15

4.2 SAMPLE REPLACEMENT OR REDUCTION The selections for assessment indicated on the checklists may prove inadequate for evaluation due to attributes not applicable to selections or for other reasons. In such cases, additional items, c o mpo nent s , or attributes are to be selected for assessment in the f ollowing order of preference:

1. Additional components or attributes from the items, p roc ed u re s , or standards already selected for assessment.

2. Additional items or components f rom the population of items and components within the systems selected for assessment.

3. O Additional items and components f rom the population of items and components in other systems within the scope of the module. Plans for expanding or reducing the sample size, or concerns that the sample may be inadequate, shall be reviewed with the Readiness Review program manager, who will provide direction. O 0151r/19 4-7 16

Attachment 1, checklists o 18A-101 Commi tme nt Implementation o 18 A-2 01 Design Changes o 18A-202 Design Trends o 18A-203 Calculations o 18A-204 Component Removal o 18A-205 Equipment Maintenance , o 18A-301 Seismic Separation , o 18A-302 As-built Program o 18A-303 Duct Documentation and Walkdown ! o 18A-304 Duct Support Documentation and Walkdown , o 18A-305 Equipment Documentation and Walkdown o 18A-306 Instrument Documentation and Walkdown o 18A-307 Damper Documentation and Walkdown o 18 A-3 0 8 Inspector Qualification o 18A-309 Collection, Storage, and Turnover of Records

 ,      o   18A-310    Construction Testing o   18A-311    Construction Acceptance Testing O

0151r/19 4-7 17 l

O O O READINESS REVIEW . CHECKLIST .

                                               '.                 NO. RR- iB A - /o/

PRE PARED BY DATE PAGE O/ OF SAMPLE IDE NTIFIC ATION AUDIT DATE AREA (TMcWT hWC6 6. AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION mN bte-ns rr-ObMMf PERFORMED BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADER DATE u '

O O O IB A -I ' READINESS REVl5W CHECKLIST NO. RR CONTINUATION SHEET l^ ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION

                                & & t r M cGr Su W                AStsssMW
     /             bestmeWr As berstAt6 erd nN Soup.cs I)ccuewrwT- W CLtWho , COM5n5M AND ,
                   ~c            ~ r~a                     _..

l l l

                                                           % ou um A I

A betr M wvur HA5 Buwid ! IM/L6 tucWTbna truTO

                   ?Q.bMr D40vnW l

l l l PERFORMED BY DATE _ _ . . . . _ _ g

O O O . READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST NO. RR- IBA- 901 PREPARED BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAG E I OF '} 60L R. EsocruA/YA 6/8/67 SAMPLE IDE NTIFlC ATlON [S$/G/ CMiV6ES(E%, TC#5/SC( AUDIT DATE AREA DOCUMFIIT FIO. 25 V' AUDITOns

00 Cutt 1L=~h17 CHNMS A/O. ___ ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION

   /    p./2A -t        Wps yks cb'AN6E con-c.f. c;'        flic7th/Cr oid DEv/AftNG C / *!. G. 5'   f=;eoM p'Is :192ct,c!!~P c C.    . 7. /      .J E' :wcftos.1.1Nu 02 DES /c+! ctz/7EM/ L   '

BElowl ? f=iuoN6S N W % - 5 7- 0 g a BAM'secpou 03}lol, RRF/84 - O/, c, Os5/G^t 62/,m/2/A t/O. DC-3f591/44 list Zje cogtzeS so, wasTONuy/A/G CkN/6E EE!OW /Al/~/h7fP / AMD

                        ,02CCE555P 4cc       7   MV/.tWr j0fMO* )EcffADCEPurf5f C 32              o /=54/2 CFI
                          " l/CD'::!" bl*M'"'

C/9 ik'L'liA1!~*1 7 (b.D D ) - - ..-.- Chi;wif3a o lJESriN k!ntaiL. Ci/ - - . o77 -: PERFORMED BY lR R TEAM LE ADER lD Alf~ lDATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST NO. RR- 18A- 2 01 PAG E ? OF -1 CONTINUATION SHEET-OE5/6N CNJA/655 lAU IT N

 ,I TEM   REFERENCE               REQUIREMENT              FINDING / COMMENT  ACQEPT R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION 2  PRN              Q9 tug 7    4 g checMigy,s C4 8            CN fll2 curacsHf FC/C C/7 5.3        f0Mht , DEfE/2M JHE >

CC6, 7 / /f cf Ek foll0W/A/G A2Ei Aj )"EcfBP l AODEMO/ X 2 L L C /QV _6!qto Al /b-C39

Nb EA.KP S

        ._A/y[GfECf/&

c/7 ftE E R zo y g c fi o Al ATTe9b ^'!elle - . - - 4"60-- , w.as iT P20C&%@ ACCO20/hiG Td pr///: CO2/dC5lDAIDthiG ESfM'l,/6llED j)/JMCDi/CL . gcj= Erd 6MCGD IN Tlll5 3lfCl:f ? 3 PNM I,f T A's clisuae i c cq.8 nu,opoc722 8y usty c/7.de.'l CALCULAFD A), (ZEvlEW C ng, . ~f. l TIfE da L Cul^T/0" A S foL40Vv 6 : c.WJ5 EunJ.vtsg>Nc", 3,a y u o n c uic+t T c xr e '/ w p ? _ _ _ .

                                  ' COF/ 7 'O         )

PERFORMED BY lDATE ~{

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST NO. RR- I A A- Zo I -

                                                                                             "*"' f                F  #

CONTINUATION SHEET-oss/nu cNAv6E5l^" " "

 'IT E M  REFERENCE         REQUIR E MEN T                 FINDING / COMMENT   ACQEPT REJEC T , RE SOLUTION

, y (c ou,- 's!. ) b

                    .7f GO, / $ /f Su,lcF/Cifuf         )'

POCUME O, b [kB Es V E F/c % 6 l-,C MJ/OS/A By p/M,OSE NAFN,) Chl CU/.4J/OFl, BY EEk/CE fO A D/J/OA%l AVAl(;c:(_,E L b C U M,Ei/J~h/ f/0/1, O b? i 8y!-

                    'c.. !c.i,ii N
                              ~

15F W/DE O L'A 1L'q' 0)/ n/ TD AM NE

                     /atoy1C tM 7;         fit f t> f, y.b   P/?M       oDocs n,4s cs! cuts 7/ nil C G!. b' LtSf fME f~OllOW/^'A ?
                      -Dc5/6.u AffuAffMIS                                               -           . _ _
                        /
                      - Q.mt .x co u                                                                                  -.

h'nj-L. L'f2 L / Clf _- - - . . - - - PERFDRMED BY lDATE {

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST 90. RR- isA '20 I PAGE '1 OF '1 CONTINUATION SHEET-OES/GA/ a'.1 A/6ES IAUDIT NO'

 'IT E M  REFERENCE                                           REQUIREMENT            FINDING / COMMENT    AC EPT    R,EJEC T    RESOLUTION

, 3.C PRWI 15 7~b E C A L C U L ^ 7/ OfI C Cf. & CO,LJ.5'/6 fshl}' LV/ f.b 5 ojc REcpu/MAmAfxxaru 7/ w gicfn'-

                                                          < Goods                                                                _ - - - -                 -
                                                           . Sypc cps                                         -.

c, ,0csw/MGS --- s SPEctfit.:por/5 - - - - Oj4E2 CAla O p O.US o - - ZF 7iIE' (bA%QE lcLQUll'!y 4- PMi C42 di:ViGi II 70 Ht Exisf."m C 17 S ? O!CulspOW,WAS17 c .n , y, j ,vt .oci b .; t> ACCOeOP.Y:7 70 / % 'A 1 C 9. /-l ? - - . .. DME ,_{

O O- O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST '. NO. RR- IRA-202 Sol /2. EsoexwEA &/3 /87 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION 'BES/6N TfEMD5 AUDIT DATE AREA 60u/2cE /F/^to/Ncv ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MEN T FINDING / COMMENT AC(;EPT REJECT , RESOLUTION

 /                If T f5k ,EEQUWED lb//p CO2MECf/VE ACf/ON DES /ftM CNAA/GE              D/D NOT /HCluPE 7 E
                   &OCGES,DONDbVG ./*//~j' 3 Olh*/isV C)AA/GE$),
                    /DEUf!f f /5     / foCf.otv/AK; fd%! lb       "C    l'ES/GM c / % ).t&!35 ) m . Ul2 f/ N l*                                                          --
                      " lf4Cb/UC7 (PCW', M 75&SJ)5/.]

JMS! Y1AfS/S!E. C)/dGAA//?A,7/obl CCb117!PfKUl - . _ . - - whcuuk:. 2- 5 /~ h AICZ CA7/(M)

                   ,% % " 70 7 2 dok'!!i"G -
                  })ok     './M *'l]^//7 2 D,CGif/N C//AA/GEO 1, m f1 S / 7 j A 7/::r}' 7 l/.i 2EG'ut2ED COPA$Y71 C Ac/tRaf?

PERFORMED BY DAIf lDATE lR R TE AM LE ADER

O .O O

READINESS REVIEW . CHECKLIST NO. RR- is A - ? 03 PREPARED BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAG E - I OF '# S o L /P. 25.osRA A/ZA S/'2 / /87 SAMPLE IDENTIFIC ATION CAL CuLA7/ON 5 AUDIT DATE AREA CALCULAT/OS/ h/O. IEE V. S vSTEM No . ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION I AW1 Does ca'cukpca c993 cau,conwr 70 :

       ,t=0f. >p / 95    aDESKJ/CE/pi2/A                     v

[JK P-/B k B~/ 6ECf/OAJ R/2F-/Sk44

                         . FSAR 6.Ecpcw a F5k/2 Dsstal DAps
                                    /ABl. E.
                         . 68/2 f/GlM'E                                                                    - - -

7 f;QA/] \Q'A S 54LGl^JEEL'OlO lru.9ciE-C <7. 3. 3 exsec/SEP?7 ,750, l u.sv[7^

                         /$ /,      St/,r-f/C/L~F ff 5.Y

f]h/DI,"!Os S DCLL/A Wb i7.' l'r O/2 10K 20-02l l5,7ll1_ ,t 'A~j,'C'!' A dl:-

f'U.? /SN'-l0 f/5/c'/f//kH[.6 f3 t/ IOS '?' S//,lD[f~ //AA/ cy t ait.:. r/ o ,v,

t ((Nf O ' PERFORMED BY DATE lR R TEAM LE ADER lDATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST NO. RR- IBA- 2 o3 PAGE 'l OF 3 CONTINUATION SHEET l AUDIT N -

 ,I TEM  REFERENCE           REQUIR EMEN T           FINDING / COMMENT   ACCEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION

, 9 (c0Hf 'M ) 8)/ /ZGf2EEA/CE To ADD /f/O AJ4 L i ;/AllA8fE s DO CubigAlj~b J/0 Al, crz B y /A/,#~O2/vt.Af/O Al-W/-//C// /S +//D E L\/ AN ONE

                     /<NolwA/
                      /rJ 7 tE "lF Lt?

3 ?IE%I i DOCS kf E ChLculAT/civ c9. & LT Tb" f* "'N's ?

        ,,go,uc,      c pesicia Assunipiw ws 24'F/Be(-d3 a,
                          ,Ay,pl/csSLs Gwr c
                            ,y>.wAcp s a
                           /?GfE/2Eb/CE S PERFORMED BY lDATE              {                               -

O O O l READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST NO. RR- 18 A- 20 3 CONTINUATlON SHEET-CALCuz.A7/ CMS l^""~ "

   'IT E M   REFERENCE           REQUIREMENT            FINDING / COMMENT  ACQEPT   REJEC T , RESOLUTION =

4 R6t/ C 9. G

                        .B    7A'E C4 L culAflotI k

l l /MQU/ic[EM2Alj'SCoA/D/6 dj EAlf WIf ' 10V-2'2'bO2 IdEfEK E UCB D ,' l

           /t%'T /Bh-42 1012- G'zc     o CooE5 g/ZF /S A- h o DjLut%RO S                                       __

o ['/24%U/AlGI 3 SfEC/f-/ CAPONS o o Of / /E/E C;1Lcu/Aj;?oA/; 5 PRM CC,(o./ f DMS pl/E CAL CU!Af/OU U ///EE A 2#C

                              ~ MQ.L /L'D c'ON:T!T," Al Ol%CG/2AM(5CP             WP
                         '/f 30, l's f /ti? ,ULO)G/sLM N U M & B /2 A +/t> a l~'
                          / /A A 7,E. AND VEKS /O ^1 gt?fj: 1.'::n cE_ D  '7 PERFORMED BY                         DATE

{ .,

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST . NO. RR- #p.2d PRE PARE D BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAGE C/ OF m SAMPLE IDE NTIFIC ATION dmerec M. AUDIT DATE AREA [,U flb. ?uh%H

                                  -                             AUDITORS kN//                           Not ITEM    REFERENCE                  REQUIR E MEN T           FINDING / COMMENT      ACCEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION foys z r/o yverttr    )Y owu
  /    SD-7* .28            /Jenmy DESCMA%>> /s
       ))sA  't'. /,        .Lis7a2:1/N AdM& W WY/
        +3                  ,wo a a w o               rxr 6:wMb /Envincrf
                           ,/./f7w /A/ A/?AWG04AV       $.

A (lD-/C.26' Ah;rrs>v AccownsW/ Jack i AJrtA Y%l /S,5/~bve2? Ay SawfM i . y:c2,ess, a S25 on er ne d/C l Exa. o2 s;rsan u m e .ip .n r s w u u wznn cn=- Rusas,.w asy s><< thsT, 3 6bt'//asc>vY /S 75 88 17]ANYArN/4-D 75 i+as74at d/C Smrce n i Anc7htnt bnory, $lrcnod 6~~

                           /A! cwa &f '7/1if~TMNAD/Af l                            W W bloJ?TCT' &S7?te An,ia.n .

j PERFORMED BY DATE R. R.TE AM LE A DER DATE

                                             .o_ ,   . --

O 9 ! d k i ri 4 t 4 E I 6 :g z g g : . E ; O i- ic - E m - ill m}aI kll)$a.s e . 5 t i e gl 3 gag y kh

i_E tl}1Al alhdll o U ' 9N m - = N* s Nb a 0 0 e%g/*3'44

                      ;      B 1!                               ;
   ?a@

0 - w!8 09 m W e o x 3 M, h

O o o l READINESS REVl5W CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- /BA -Jo/

                                                           '                 -                PAGE 63 . FM CONTINUATION                 SHEET                               lAUITN I

ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION i tr1.?OJCC Asimt f Pc1vvvv1C

    $      $0-/] -1N g     k g ?f m t crtir~ % pa W c W f AdoC. /$ruCV l OAD6710ll 7b $49*18 $8c.-

j92oc /11 & v M A$ ex/6llJd/ , 0?! tf9/ /14%#-{ J A:rcr* l* S Of GV6/ts/db72/dd / &N ...

                           /Jds O b'T W tsvb W .

S. rv )?CGu/d87hd1Vr3 fen demcemswr sar nc-Af G/Zl/tsW 1-i.- Q 0C-A-04 llanWm Luccas,pyvrWildst) EnL- frf/Aco?stko sHabTf

                           $/'d2ldnichWrd~'

i 01LG072 A6&Ut//ftVton)75

O

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .

                                                                                       '.                   NO. RR- 184-Iof PRE PARE D BY                                  DATE            AUDIT NO.                 PAGE on   OF 03 SAMPLE IDE NTIFIC ATION                                         AUDIT DATE              AREA 6GutAMewr Tac, G.

g AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC1 , RESOL _UTIOt2 6 0 os. h e w t- Msor cno e Gr iha Lont uousmas son as unana) . a m,name ,o smue, on ,nw a /o n n-cu, Wcc 3 25oorocncws Pavr a1>>uc . HO kW 3CLCU

O O o READINESS REVl5W CHECKLIST .e NO. RR- IB A - 205 CONTINUATION SHEET l^"" "^*' # 'IT E M REFERENCE IPEQUIR EMEN T , FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJECT < RESOLUTION [ CA-T-03 \/ewca c. MNuTuw A oc(~ gw L,m , 9)4AA I1 L 96CotitsMtWG ARE'

           % s.1-. \                  wcasem w eaaan on 63csyne ur Docu e gvurvo Pen-                    ,

94cw u44' ,.. 2- CM-T-0L Mwrewce Acnume's '6u, L.wr. PAe 6,2.4 PevfoA W V OA. 6xcwperuf 4 6'.2.7 DOCOMtmOIO N5 MGUL4dN suscc % w sem- Mes. CG PC 9Aer.h $ inca-Autu5r 886, 9/nc- F P 4 e & A. m PA soit, 'T5 h605Y \16L). 0

PERFORMED BY DATE [ l

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .e NO. RR- 18 A .2.or CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' ' " ITEM REFERENCE REQUIRFMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION 6xa. Og T) kac dATPLAJ W M W is No GViotryve cf MM a ruvuonu DSFict eact=5 : o Visu% Ct,W ' o Qggnrt.nug & l$ayu,s o %smewus/awnss o tw.s suum.wa O .

i O O- O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST NO. RR- 16A- 30 l PREPARED BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAGE- 1 OF 9 SOL M EsofreAn/EA 6/2/87 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION AUDIT DATE AREA I AUDITORS 5 E IS fv1/ G SEPARAT/OS/ ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MEN T FINDING / COMMENT AC EPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION FP -/4 65/bM/G SEPARh/7Obl. peoGieAM FP-/4 /s 8E/NG RCV/ SED [@ JUNE /987). A%rss 7;let (dEv/ BED MCk1L%M AGA/NSf A JEND/X 6C $2/SMIG D -P4J2%7/0Al G!171:k'IA . AA//_.) AGA/A/$ ~/

                        /24LAfCP f/.A /D/A/Ci$     t/Nt, f /

la PgwS rk E N iN.wi u si 65fAl247/M/ Gkj)

                        /N pL2.flj/E X f?.Afif RG1//S/~      C' f=f-l-l b4E6f                                                                     <
                       'p'//5 M/N/^4U/v'l Llf^^L'?A/qE C/2/fEq/A esp idL/5ltl u /,v 7//E
                        / '/.ubf ?,GfBNS O/Y D C ?
  }g                   ArvD Pkt= iTPldo 2.

Exttsdo r /B ,7 PERFORMED BY (DATE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ lR R TEAM LE ADER lD A TI:

O

O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST NO. RR- I SA- 3 O 1 CONTINUATION " * ' ~ SHEET-5E/5M/C 54ciffA7/OA/l*" 'T " ~

    'lT E M REFERENCE                REQUIRE MEN T             FINDING / COMMENT                       R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION ACCEPT 2                   Wp3 [b5 CD/Zt3ECf All, ACf/O M As /22CfLitti'ED jy ykg f=Ol f-OW)NG p/ ^ / lt)inio/+)G,s       eafLsey? u JE/ san / C CAJ 6pj    t  v.sf/0M     NN4lJ2Afi j;LcG7L%vi ?~l '- /-/ '?
                            ~

c, - ~'? %.' 'd'd-f=2 & aAFR %7

                               . AFiz 9 70 l

PERFORMED BY DATE { -

O O O RE ADINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST ' NO. RR- IBA-Sol A PRE PARE D BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAG E OF l SAMPL E IDE NTIFIC ATION AUDIT DATE AREA 1 b9 %~$ AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE RECulR E MEN T FINDINC / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T RE SOLUTION

            /     S ouvc                             //pgp,ws Mucpww ZDR                                fp-2 ) 7D />vcwcr 22-Boof                           XVAwH2nt) of Ab' SWN"#

COO rh//3 f PERFORMED BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADER DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST

                                                   .                   NO. RR- IBA- an-PRE PARED BY                               DATE            AUDIT NO.                  PAGE C/     OF d2 1

SAMPL E IDE NTIFIC ATION AUDIT DATE AREA OCT POAY b- AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MENT FINDING / COMMENT REJEC T , RESOLUTION ACQEPT As Boier Paoce.an t A ero u+4<s Stecere c-pas.s./Dewu.s/ car, bs. [Fm L.NsewwwiN 9v4

                        - Rer: P/g-F Paswunc 79\41,ExtbL)

Aopmmu_ h+w b6s. O91 DcYAtL5 h9fLACA6ff 4 Swwcdv in A6wer Dt2.MasdGS l Vawout. Da w acs l PERFORMED DY 'DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADE R DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- Is A 302.

                                                            '                                        PAGE OL OF O b CONTINUATION                SHEET                               lAU IT N t

ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT R,EJEC T < RESOLUTION 1 Pk-F 9ecc. DAwio6s onso mo FIAT-0'P 14.1, PACx A6G , TD 6erTHtot, 9tTg

              &n.1,           ReFtntewcdr cru cetreo
             'Coirviocrieros  DRAWW67, 99.4vid6 A LO 4 %          Cam /usTtr M EX/uC(T' Dt!!ISCdlPT1sm 0F Titts'      ..-

tm co,oes s aszmwoa. A. PPtpm , Dssi4m Document +s ..

iA90. q , ca rte im As - Bo.ur- ,' Acc4 A, Marnm PW, Pa r 2-P u r 2. < oc paar- s , P.tova oC Pner s~ A compurnr t Opucss-l DcscAsPnno or Tn<s-lT h ceNPL4OR,AricrV. {RtSF: UNLY \ R(uPltGL RRF 16 A -M)

A 'cas ; dece u e rs lB A -303 4 \B A-3c4 hm mr mie Wpoowe n+Ar cete cxs pio p ny sicg , ' ConA6us NTicM OF Tocr i D0ct 50&oA Ts Fod. coof:od at drucer m A -sou-r 4 Desic o i aconunors. PERFORMED BY DATE

l 1 1 l l' 1 - N O M T I U F _ O L - O S

           /                       E R

O E E T T G A C A A E E D P R J 3 A E 4 R 3 - T P 4# E Q

 /                               C A

R R R E

         .                       T                                                         D O                             N E

A E - N E M L

              . T A             M     d O                     O                                                         M N       D     S R       C we                                                 A T

I T I O T / o E T D D I D G R U A U A U A N I D J m R I F N L smK o waa V vr B z l0-a T S E T A D w n w saa )u ' s i L T

                                        -       mnS                   (o                  E T                   <
                                                     + w                            s,m   T K                               N s~s.

A C E E M wo

Vaw0a> i r 1D sy n. v D H E R I c 4 A J c a / usa C U Q D m W E E R e r v, s y r c o bsuwaS r/ n S D ZA Sr D I V O N E R I T A N E I C f c C S F N I 6 E Y S E Y B T N E hr F R E B D E N D D I c E M I E R R D R A E O A P E L P M T K E R M E E R P A S T I P - l lllIl!!!ll

READINESS REVIEW GHECKLIST .: - NO. RR- 18A-L3

                                                                                                 "^*'*       ""

CONTINUATION SHEET l^""~ ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION Pfy-Fhwfus 0mlTV UUnt A, A Dan) Docu wawwnan)

9. A w %- e s-m , c, rums- w ypucasur *Dtwenos , Tkrmes no caww po w owry A rire Tasermo haw tbsviWuw )N nt:5'- Doceewr As3055mewr, f ) 19 \N*b. $/6CTnud Op- duTWI h Li NO l Las % Cucowwo a Toown n(Anod ,

D,m 4,56owy
d%M6'

*&M

drAn N6

                       . hrt

Mfo,0M

                       *   &nML
                        . Arm m -r-QC Gmen 1  JP 4 L                                                  Oc4 Ce n t)                                                per            .

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- 18 A ~ 3 3 CONTINUATION SHEET l ^" ' 'IT E M REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION 3 UF t4.1 W atos bewreno (cau. 3) o Who 44 3P go.L

LJew b ar

                           -  oc    sa,o e                Qcr D&ns
                                                    ,4*

4 se tw.t ha fw,mm Awa <- Cem. t) h-mo. 79- Y)3

MS dove T Q ((g,c k/c4 FtWr h cre e-ThogscMiav0 adnMLM16rd 3

i Assem6 L>( DupL 5 G9 M 1 tb>ce Emm D.co,mwruo. eea 9,6

Awn 4ar Sv .
Avaa w c k ot.scnn.&

OcCOMoWr?+nv>G h FwTi -

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- iBA-3o3 CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' "^*'-'##-- F ## REJECT , RESOLUTION ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT Socr iJma 'o co <v b heg$s6it) pousM uwr7 Cf 71/27 1Al /NTMAnard P A C / A s f s+f2 1 /7#64 jar 21 h JAJS7N4.Ls+nct) Atv0 ,, t.J M eC4/42~!AI.

-f              hauawrterr1H /*)3W OWF/4AAR N w a r.

Doer -

EffDWMS

                      * [cvss/RoutoW Arv&LBT o  Doce sv<>

[RJF JVEC V/K $$~$1 -8/-Z 8 Downnc+nw cm,4rcr, , Compter8 ,4rvo cru ss 4o77st 7tP4

O PERFORMED BY 'DATE

O o o j READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .< - NO. RR- /BMJos I CONTINUATION

    'IT E M   REFERENCE SHEET                            '

l^"" " * " ' ' ' "# REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION

                                  'Y
     /0     MA30/        J%r 20tniv&
             //-6. 2 8

M)Snwa? '
J o c k u k si n a l%sf/Wfsch O h6VdL N/ 4SHs%S /QL4f.A) &

(Rsf. N/7C V/ot et-YS-B-2 , me wu es-s9-x)

     //    X'/Mo /      6~4rary ss.o u%r-N- 4.3.N     cmwr- Psr/eret /
           // - C./ V    jnvn w u
   /2                   SSGodler0 4ltnDr Gmownro e

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- //A -143 CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' "*"' # R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION i ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT

     /3 XVATO /      A?rooutes snsmc p n 5c',     m ca-ptMAstr+1Nd27
     /y             Gweeruni va                ..-

SDyso>sr pa Ossad.

                       *4)ewnu ca.rnorr a hat;}st)b brytACCr*

Joa pnrens ..

[4%$*//Zd5$0kJ f$ 1, Boert *7Bx'Stawa'22

      /6~           //ucst. SoLnAJG llacWMdW
                       *//uawaw S w o //acwnd&' h/kcswapJ o '// " y"y"si m c/
                       '  /brw 357A4tv4   ~

2~// pow W M J6xMrstr~

e

          '              N J              O O          #

F O I T U L O S

          /               E R

O , E E T T G A C A Y P A E R E J D 0 A E 3 R T A P E S Q I C A R MJ R A t R E

        .               T      a                                      D O                     N E     Q-                                      A N             E       M     v.                                      E L

O

            . T A       M     W
                              /

D S O M N A T I T I R O T C

U E T D D I D G U A U A U N k . R. O I A D t R N 0 . e I F 1 o c-eve 1 T t 7 T bRt - wa D t G T E T m m.4 (D s ) i S A D u. c mw ansM n0 vbC I L K T N o o e wOv. s e w. s n A E T C E E M E T. Nmt mDsO e e4W wD mb b sss D H R R r e oo C I U Q E P O p ; e D a uro o$ T. 2 n 4 uc Ce R m e W E b yws e mwc o . e r I V E I O N O g

T w G hSD t @T R T A E S C FI M C N D I E Y S Y T P P R B N O E N I B D E E D I O E F E R D E M D R R A E 4 O A P E L 0 P M F R E H M A E E R P S IT P

O O O READINESS REVIEW GHECKLIST .e NO. RR- /dA - 3e+'

                                                                                      "^*' "

CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' "# R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT Qun rv Vmeiftca ryc w h ee m u w r n n etJ Mrs: Pm n www a ssessuawr, esmeurii m mucnur sansar, orrma as me P CU/HWW75 // M 7?rh i /A/57HtLAi]&& /WAdd

                         ,gsviezJco w TW71', &     uirtcw'r AsrcrSrmed.
 /  LTA)</. Z- .".4sssccnos) sf /lnnt8orss       fhe L, ann.

(62H 0 dwet* WMA

                   *Es vnncan6n)
                   * /h:Anort.)
                   ' GidvAnow o CA/Wnr Grvr-t4oit m2 &
                   #    $/ *ttf SMs+6W 2   0~h-14 L    OC $4^)off                      &(./

Com z) . psnr e

             - ~ -

O O O READINESS REVisW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR (GA 3of CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' " ^ ' ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJECT RESOLUTION (exa 3) o {,jerto MV U~P - (b . L o WdLD MAT o QC St4Nc@F CCA Danr

                                                    , 48 h 1)        Dow mewrero N 60

NS br ~51

                         . s- s-w aanao,wsma a d s Ag-msut 'TitAv1c1 l

l l

                                                     /
                                                                     .e l

l PERFORMED BY 'DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- #A -30/

                                                               '                                  PAGE d( OF of CONTINUATION                SHEET                                lAUITN -

I ITE M REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION hcr So Ax-r Ww w n) S h6S/(wt) &&I41ov/5 Crr6~Z)

                               /A) //VfTNccATWn) Aiw W
                               /?As A44DUAW SA jivSrnc.uannJ AivG tuRWDich)

{ Go 6urini Jan) iS AE

                                 /b1. Derst6N o Loemwu                    .-

o .$~wso ntr~ 7}pC

A/d We W di
Nt+Tb1Lt% SIEC
BON 6ttveM M 54 mrv 6
Dima>vsinos pen.

S~c m o w k . t Trs, Dem a

                                   #  b its - b fus, $csr-
                                      /Arte , drrG..             ,
                               /

j/ ? c'F: NAC V/ot- $C-$9-of - 2, Aff /dA -// , RA?)~ /fA -/0, , Aff /fA -/2) PERFORMED BY DATE

l l O O O 1 ! READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- 10A-SoI l CONTINUATION SHEET l^""~ { ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION l esur, Goo 6ctw, Caf. Erf-

g 304 ~n t0 b ,

o \noc ... o Da watWL-

bMth$

                                   *    \ aturno E/06MNr o    WCW.MtW e     Bism-t.e o As%d' o TtsNTtovo @

(\fLSn%LA bo Q s)\ser.dl> oft D o m n av0 ) (Qtrp NQL l)R \ S L- 5'l ~ \ G ) 9 kos m ukas WPM

PERFORMED BY DATE [ l _ - - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ ---mm ---- _ _ _-. =,---v- -

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST '. NO. RR- 18 A ' 3m' PRE PARE D BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAGE O/ OF 07 SAMPLE IDE NTIFIC ATION i AUDIT DATE AREA SsfetarlT EG 00 AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJEC T RESOLUTION E not amewr 3 oovmow rwr ion) Amn (MAuccowal sysm : O um s - M ce.ipn<W bMS 640 Whewr bc.Anaru: 3t.o q Lov o 1

                      $Qur a Fs mM Dtru s t. rd 9:2. N .av 4
                       \/wWo ovt, D W 6*vo(53 N#         45 Ttsv% \

Si> e se m . PERFORMED BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADER DATE

                                                                                                   .m.2 m - - ,_

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST . NO. RR- /B/> -Sor CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' l "" * ' " ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION Oo>tu rv Ym2spicAnci ) h c uma,0 n+n art) Pjv &aw s.. ne,n n -oc~~ n ss - ~ ,, as - n a n a a ,aaa *

                              /2kAkJ/AJ6S, M75tL5, A "t/D C//A/v$d" f)Cet)nto197$ / fesos '77/4
                              /AJSMAf?O/O j /09WAtCC ,   f6Vrdwe'k:1 /A/ 7Nrf W 4   wr Affd jar 6%IC
                                                     ,e l  llf $l0    hfdCndid Of h/84112C5               hW )et.+11ert)

Esti. 2.- w mswrso.

SfCd1t/sN4
ko46/A)6 O hs1Sr CLerA/O o sun s &.swn
k isas i A sy n t/ nit o ,locmnard
d/lso r" Bawiv<

                          -     Aus, brus Auevs a    twmo hd2tr7Ffd2)            i O

i, ljlll \j ll' N

          "      O I

T

           "     U L

O S E

           "     R
           '     T C

f " E J E o l R J T A B P E C

 /               C A

R R

        .        T O              N E

N ' M M

           "     O                                                                             .
                                                                                               . e C
                 /

G l

           "     N I

D N I F t n u . .

                              $ n                 m             o NI7     1 0 rv m

T S

                              'd 1 e n,

8A ! r n I L T O4r% C U ivc > r r n h m & wk. K N E S P T r mno /s a =c> o wo

                                                                                          ,r C                                    M                   s. wf             mR nu csec)n M

E E R J L

r ref y r un r v H T I U

                                      /s op t         we        wRo                  oo       raa C                                    ers                  a                   t t Gn
                                                                               )s JeC Q                                                                          a E   E
                              $rpZ                         u se o W          H E   R             /

C2 v/ a w,e t~ tG

r ic ss u E I S he

J uwm O *s A92 V / gsi / E R N E O C N S I T E ) b 3/ S L 3 h> T E U A F R E $l s Q N N E m Pw O T I D I T R d TEu t A N M E O E T 3 f R C I 1 1l, lll ll i

O O O READINESS REVIEW GHECKLIST .: NO. RR- /fAM CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' "* ' ## ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION Em 2 P nr [smpovenrr SantcVAL Q '" DocusirSWWD fd JS.7~ 0Ter/cNMV/T \

O l

O O O

READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .< NO. RR- /BA Jd5'

                                                            .                                 PAGE ST OF 09 CONTINUATION                    SHEET                           !. AUDIT NO.

ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION [SO///hervi~ NAG :DoWN 8 Daa) Te> mews onco w -

                               /Alh1klAl20/U Psky466* A#A~

AAT&ud7C fa>t pVSTNNAMf

                                /}nho LIALcDet.~1AJs hb7 A!M VfDL 8d-59 of->

k iDo7VDF/C,417orO

     /o                        banoiv. caucismnsa k/VD CA/6?t)7??P76/t) /A.)

GYPfdAntMW 70 Mt"/dk

      //                        06nNNay, swoorwo o/*

psunac i PERFORMED BY DATE [ l

    . . - - ~ . . . - .  , . .                                      l

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- /#A - 3o5' CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' " " ' " '#" R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT s

       /A            klt. 0n19syt107v7$
                     /NSF)}(,Lb8 CA MCatwTcQ7                                                                  ;

fcnL .

       /3            k rntevov S idavenirs Ddd60 AND DoCwievrz<n
       //            Bocnwt- Foswaanov,                 -*

Assem6LY, Dier CavDecrious,

                     /kctssso aJ5S.

Sst, Nomeerz, ryps-

                          - Bova. msnar auswas                                                                 .

Ti&Hr- Loex Asasacres C.ov>19A2rstefD, "fEWS/OA)c27, Suos.

()?w /vfed visc. CC-54-o/-I, NAC HDL ff-f4-o/-2, ' A/Mc V/2/ fG-59-/4)

READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- /BA' -Sof

                                                                                                   "# '#7       ""

CONTINUATION SHEET l^""~ ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MENT FINDING / COMMENT ACGEPT R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION ff /~/acDs Cannarrs~ l serv.o A cccv174B W l l M XYA G~0 /, STrisina shransna/J .

           ,/ 0/r' SC                    /hnuv733/ No"O       _,.

I J e a PERFORMED BY DATE {

                 . - . - - . . _ . . _ .                              l

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .

                                                       '.                   NO. RR- IS A - N PHE PARED BY                                    DATE            AUDIT NO.                  PAGE 6 I    OF C.;p'_

SAMPL E IDE NTIFIC ATIO N AUbT DATE AREA Tesutow Tu Ak-AUDITORS Ds%CxMPn &< ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION __Ln)s T- R u A cn v. Duco MN' NW W Wh Dow 1) 5'usw Nma% u's(dLt s# T"1 M cm,

                       % Tenmenar            &M           8Lo (s bm Wn
                         $psca at cunm)

PM/ Wwas Danw.wos: PtIO Locemo

                                           %mron Amceo To Ceauir~wd
      ,                  suwg Gst. s fosssst.

PM ~.r>ME D BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADER DATE

_ u ,,,, .au . ma _- n-O b ! 8 ;

        $   5 i   s                    i F        i              i     !

4 5 4 M I y Is

                               '                          =

I

            !      l       11 i      i               >

O i-l m c4 3 3 In ah}

                              $e          4 3

s

                    ,      ass            4 g      j (, %       .

g p, s 1 31 , 4 L sm i 3 e'l sPtllals, 1424 m sc . hgs f$ y3

             !     j3)s                      p    .4dk idde 3.e.

m - e z . = 00 S d >- 0 052: e 4 '1 i

   !5                 1                   %4                    h                   !
   <z        .

w o w N N u m o .iii, . .

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- /BA-Sot ' ' - PAE CM OF AT CONTINUATION SHEET lAUIIN

     'IT E M  REFERENCE              REQUIR EMENT              FINDING / COhisENT         ACQEPT  REJEC T , RESOLUTinN
                                  'f S N. L         hpoznnd l Sderr.
                                * ,2rovians J~wxunsus.
                                     %+ mrw             ...
                                - Oc %-,=a                  Oc/

Dsw Akwu anmaa-r 9' zbcoinervrav 7 6irr-Onssc>vnun) PERFORMED BY DATE { - _ - - __ _

O o O l READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- /'M -M l . E AUDIT NO. PAGE M OF W l CONTINUATION SHEET l \ f l ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION I l' b y$)N Dyko>vT~ Un ',ACDo w it.) l l

      $              St&l) 21rz/AtdA//5 C/732;7 J N /AJST7HZ/4770sU s 0  AdKJSC
                     ///lf A M&l) M M                   '
                      /ND*?WZ.AV7CW /,?)t/D L)/H /C /)6 t<} ^)

l b 55772#saaw1' /}Ae/cyZcV socivnnan. i 9 /Hovisirr?) /sv c.snsttrcr'

                       ,1 o c,+n at)

B G stav aisn a<> Arvs1 C/2torvrnr7en) /W fd14 OLM/dAJ'

G I _ -

O O o i READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- / SAN , . I AUDIT NO. PAGE Cf 0F Of CONTINUATION SHEET l ITEM REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION REFERENCE i 9 A4 erwnuce w . skauac l# h / /C/l/221 Of /8X , Deraa 4

      //  X Mo/     frisiiru Sriusnoa

dismranven

          .48 sc                                -

Y J2 / U)ustrol) 09:/cwoorY 77uwo avu /ko~wn>v

e

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .

                                                            '.                                NO. RR- IG A- So'?

PRE PARED BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAGE C / OF f4-SAMPLE IDE N TIFIC ATION AUDIT DATE AREA 3AM9h 4 k. AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJEC T RESOLUTION bAM#eyt- o c u s k m cv ) ANO UMxDMA] Sh%: iVo,vio% M cda9ritn3 Cms .

                     %pm Loumoai                               Beoc.

Ps. n Dm kawc-yts u m ba.w.a seseretcwnca VesWo ort-

                      $TD/LTUP &stvn    '%

Siiesssa PERFORMED BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADER DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST : NO. RR- l6A - sm '

                                                  '                    -                     PAGE O 2- OF a f CONTINUATION        SHEET                                 lAUITN ITEM  REFERENCE        REQUIREMENT                   FINDING / COMMENT       ACCEPT   REJECT < RESOLUTION f    S Ph+bn>as       Ac /% n uneo.~~usaucer, ss,nsuse ,&c,. wama n /wi m Lkrn<c<, +w oi,ana aawenrs 7             on m    -
                              /AlG77HMnon) /Nuc//s C faytowD /Al 7Hir &cora ur s}rss S/* W
     /  $l]If*b    TA/$/* dZ/76 N CF krTXf/Jo735      Sw hcanna sce o      Zhco,nc~rus
                     *SNrJActlnas/

o Drunusiews 4cAnud o digstui W -

DeWrd

                     ' &nnsV4 s 3;.wrs o by+v/JyvbMJf5 a Sov7yv4 kW0// N         j/JrW 2  50 /% L      GC Ssivsps                    -  $&y A/ar e

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST < NO. RR- /M-Jo?

                                                                                                            "^*'"'      '"

l ^" " " ' CONTINUATION SHEET I ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACGEPT REJECT < RESOLUTION 3 Seuwav Gr>udemvrs-ZLHanrus ? losr c ~ ~ ~ vir)

                                           , 48 OYY      lC4/kHOTUO'h 6Aao nzw              .-

hldv0 /b71 DW

                   * &C $&voff b
                  %... ewreu PERFORMED DY                   DATE                I l

l ---- - ___-_____-_ - - __- - _ __ __

O O O . READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST . NO. RR- /M-D')

                                                       '                                   PAGE B4    F G7f CONTINUATION         SHEET                                    ladITN r                                                                                                        '

ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJEC T RESOLUTION basesuit Um Dows) 4 Ws,v wawurc cirm hv husrnttAnoil PAcxsw A ds sMS^00Artr Forl '

                    /SS7Dl44?ws) Al h)   tt JJa u-Osu^)

9 ScwunftcAr7an)

                     /*l<  h l hi/4^]

q 6 ,vacna w ,% - o asurr anuav Ban ~< - sau7wr, 77/doND 67VdAddM<artJT'*,

                         ,L,oc/L &n n/ tent assr// Mo'q Buvot- /~btskrer Alttriu627,                    ..

Eser< 77te/v/~ 7awissi<0. (,e~ sf /dsX V/st GC-59 6/- ) PERFORMED BY DATE

O O O , READINESS REVIEW GHECKLIST .: NO. RR- IM 2>o7

                                                            '                                 PAGE OS~ OF df CONTINUATION           SHEET                                    lAUITN -
   ,I TEM  REFERENCE                 REQUIR EMEN T              FINDING / COMMENT    ACCEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION
      /0             /lcearsawr o Cantew
                            &       Sobnita - fjgerj f fct",

2 6>M 6% & W n T, pl.oas /~lWAnu dru/MsY& Boa, .nua as f>icaie <

                     ' M /l C //E dEf-M "tV-2
      //

E/Mouch sf 0pirM -

      /2  X//4 D~o /    & s/>ric & stzstnim)    i
          //s/' 5~C      /nnwrnwo 27
      }3                fcr>stevox? Coss/ntlaw rr
                        -7;mes e 7]saimswrw
                                                                           .e

READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST ~ '. NO. RR- IG A -sos PRE PARED BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAGE O/ OF C/ SAMPL E IDE NTIFIC ATION AUDIT DATE AREA 5#E" AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION

               %s p e cruvt          O o m <=> co-r ,md-5)Ars E s &c.rwo Pa%sw TY 96    .k(uT /et.a.m)         _
/    TP 2 . 2-       %euw %pvo                 n Mw Esrat.o aa on Daw          9esem~4 PERFORMED BY                            DATE               R.R. TEAM LE ADER                                                                    DATE

O O O RE ADINESS REVIEW. . CHECKLIST '

                                                    .               NO. RR- ISA- 34 PRE PARED BY                                DATE           AUDIT NO.                 PAGE Cl     OF b h SAMPLE IDE NTIFIC ATION : Decca= M t- o n. pac.a 6c :     AUDIT DATE                AREA AUDITORS ITEM   REFERENCE              REQUIREMENT              FINDING / COMMENT    ACQEPT REJEC T , RESO LU TION

[ot weno>v [ m u .r i Juwov a oc Seca os l ANf/ NwI.9 / ll hl8ff,

    )?6V 0, /-/7-1]

Y3 A /?dColff CWWs- fyrms, sm wc wn e.'

/                     l!) /? A cco n e r w or r Mstwnnsus 77ar portpouzes
                      $///#Csty' A$YudAAicd~

RtrCa>LDS 2 (4 A pscons sie atacaw Assaitswar pecatos Retavec PERFORMED BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADER DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .e NO. RR- Is A - aos CONTINUATION SHEET l^"" "^ * ' # ' ' ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT R,EJEC T , RESOLUTION S3 %ss KLscn wsht s St % u - n u e.t.ous . - : 3 (2.1 Trts 5: tuna Syse 3 Os osW ,

                        /                O) A MerTwoo Fert. thot iGYevu[

w nts REeb<tos Retowa M r IN Ad h W (JaTTlTHC TiltAarmtT7pc DocuptortW huo W % RicofLOS Ntc nN 6000 tow 08 n ot).

                        $                LY h MC11\e0 bF Vbn-tFtsNL TirAr Th6 Recmo5 Meer WITN TH6 PR6-t:13tMdL45etf9 R6coilOS CMauc HST.

e o e

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST '. NO. RR- 18A '3/o PRE PARED BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAGE o i OF M3 SAMPLE IDE NTIFIC ATION AUDIT DATE AREA :

  '    d'#  0*

AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR E MEN T FINDING / COMMENT REJEC T , RESOLUTION ACQEPT Cousntuc;now Tere m ^) c 5~t sw : Mu m e art. So 5 CAs e nO *J bM5 OCADM; Buo k be L.,v a

                     % a Daawwc.

P/K-F 3AW.N G

                      $D AT p9 SVs m it.

EuBSum PERFORMED BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADE R DATE

O .O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .e NO. RR- is A - 310 CONTINUATION SHEET l^""~ ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMEN T FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT R,EJEC T < RESOLUTION

   )   39 n. \         kcnMw LowwTense Em. 4       en_ pep a r compurns     t 6,ni 6         Si4Nu O off     69 QC
              \*          M            MY    Ih bbb Ea ti.   )     oF $v5fbn b4LJnr AN D                                                              '
                       $~i6 A)tfp ofF BV T6 cw 3   JP ti. )        L ow w Test Rer Gxa S          60erev ceawre $

sisvan or+ By Tc: an- 1 S. Penn Burtsuu~~TG sr h en n s w m n c>d of W li .'L Ehfo PEN 94u5502r iWr' 6w. 1 Pavne %own wo 6\bnet otY B4 QC PERFORMED BY DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- Is A '3lo 3 CONTINUATION SHEET l*""~ l"'" ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACGEPT R,EJEC T . RESOLUTION k 1TNas & WAgTe57 A oD n. Mewg MAamoIM ~IITT-

                              $TMLTUP $Y5 % A+rd 526svsTtws~ TersTtrG DtHY          OF     leT T~

1 b5h M a> m 4 c w Dorc4s9nord 5

         \     $U\            \A5&M \6%T         c tL4 m~stD Qan        filsurvad                  QCl 2-     69 n t         Passsget< Tar- Peww Pe P e uvt4s-                         Oct
                                                                  /

PERFORMED BY DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST '. NO. RR- IB A - 31l PHE PARED BY DATE AUDIT NO. PAGE 01 OF C3 SAMPL E IDE NTIFIC ATION AUDIT DATE AREA SAo w v46 sVa . [srC41,or/ces/ AUDITORS ITEM REFERENCE REQUIREMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJEC T , RESOLUTION Y3/739CDht! AMTM/v CC' Gr Pnoceovas />savrs

                     ./,/Ccrrt/ sow 4 A?G4?sh/2076:.nV1T.

(es sos*,nts cA fler)

/ /?G / 33            C.24usv secrea/rar s4sts/ /8.9     fifo64M*1 Ec"GU444* bit /JVA(

Atus3.b hisas C s;9 fouikwr-

                     ?s~nr r., PA4 A 64 os*/ W
                     $/~c?PS ~7b EC [.0v>rAf d'7527
                     /A/oA 75         }kd%# 7E177:

[Unsir/ses/: Sur+113, f A6V$,* SWM 1(, Akt! 1) PERFORMED BY DATE R.R.TE AM LE ADER DATE m , . .._ _ . _ _

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST . NO. RR- te A - 3// CONTINUATION

SHEET l^""' l PAGE L- F d3 ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACQEPT REJECT , RESOLUTION hissu, {5snius

1 S S l' S 2 , 't ANSt /VSO9 /H+rivrunimvCd* Giraxon

           /1NSI /YS/o     s fon hsr )?ccikwr sw6sourd9sr0 S pd7Y ffNrvRG & *ffNtfRd~                    **

[4dntus/ $y'fM sash kL77tAndW /\>MG &Ryneid L /A)o T3' . (om r / im e. : car-m -o 2, Ra. o ) . - 3 RG A//d biv&acAwes* 4t'S/ MCZ. 6 Ricaciasmcwrr m [Alf7?+tos+o'20W, SSptrcnon) sivs Trsnm sp I h6CHAstJttAf [4Wi//M W Arvo Tyrrums, .frez s;/ l *C2 (UNer* / /MP: Spirs - f, ,

                               //, / A C , 13, I'l, tr, / 2 ,
                              / R,'     003ccl - G )

o . _ i . PERFORMED BY DATE

O O O READINESS REVIEW CHECKLIST .: NO. RR- /BA - 3# CONTINUATION SHEET l^""' l""'#- ITEM REFERENCE REQUIR EMENT FINDING / COMMENT ACCEPT REJECT k RESOLUTION RG/.42 & n&u 72sr- k os. w k s isri t).mn- &vwo

                               / u w m Pow m. /wis

( M r / m s.: Som - As) g h f f$bk /24f02tu& M.2.t-l Aeovxsnerv .

l

 - -     . - - - -          =                                    .        - _ _               _}}

ML20078A612

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

Conclusion:

6.5 Findings

3.1 INTRODUCTION

-=============================================================================================================================

.== ======-===== == ==================== : ================== === === ======== =========== ========== ======== ===================== ===============

==== r = : .====== ==================== =====-============== =_= === =_:===== =================_==== ======== ====================== =================

5.1 INTRODUCTION

=============== ====== ====== ===== ============================== ============================== ======== =================

6.1 INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

ML20078A612

Text

SUMMARY

Conclusion:

6.5 Findings

3.1 INTRODUCTION

-=============================================================================================================================

.== ======-===== == ==================== : ================== === === ======== =========== ========== ======== ===================== ===============

==== r = : .====== ==================== =====-============== =_= === =_:===== =================_==== ======== ====================== =================

5.1 INTRODUCTION

=============== ====== ====== ===== ============================== ============================== ======== =================

6.1 INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

Conclusion:

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

Search