ML20078A483
| ML20078A483 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 04/18/1986 |
| From: | Ramsey W GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20078A351 | List:
|
| References | |
| PROC-860418, NUDOCS 9406010263 | |
| Download: ML20078A483 (99) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:. Georgia Power Company f Vogtle Project - 7 Readiness Review
- Post Office Box 282 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Telephone 404 724 8114 l 404 554-9961 lQ Vogtle Project q April 18, 1986 Mr. D. O. Foster Vice President Vogtle Project Support Waynesboro, Ga. 30830 RE: Readiness Review Program Module 18B Fire Protection LOG: RR-855 ,
FILE: X7BD102
Dear Mr. Foster:
Pursuant to your instructions I an enclosing Module 18B of the Readiness Review Program entitled Fire Protection. This module reports-the work'of the Readiness Review Team including commitment implementation and an assessment of the activities'of the Vogtle Project Fire Protection Task Force (FPTF). The objective of the Commitment Implementation Assessment.was to determine whether licensing commitments for Fire Protection hatte ' been appropriately included in' project documents. The objective of the assessment of the FPTF was to determine whether the oversite activities of the FPTF are adequate in scope to ensure that the necessary elements of fire protection are being properly addressed by the Project. The results of the Commitment Implementation Assessment' , indicated that the project documentation included the identified commitments with the exception of two cases. Both cases were of minor significance. Details of the Commitment Implementation Assessment and the associated findings are presented in section 3 of'the module. 1 l l .O l 1 9406010263 940512 {DR ADOCK 0500o424
- . eda _ _ _ _ _ ___._ .
i l l l /~) Mr. D. O. Foster April 18, 1986 i (_) Page 2 l l The results of the assessment of the FPTF activities indicated that the FPTF has been deeply involved in the overview of the Vogtle fire protection program. Individuals were keenly aware ! of current industry problems and action necessary for satisfactory project completion. However, the Readiness Review Team offered several recommendations to the FPTF to further enhance their activities to provide added assurance for successful program results. These recommendations and : associated project responses are provided in Section 4 of this module. i Based on the reviews presented in this module we are confident I that the Vogtle fire protection program, within the scope of this module, has adequate oversight by the FPTF. The current activities by the FPTF and those enhancements as discussed in Section 4 will further ensure that the fire protection provisions for Plant Vogtle will meet design requirements and licensing commitments. f- Members of the Readiness Review Team and I are prepared to (,)S discuss this module with you at your convenience. If we can provide you with any further information or assistance regarding this matter, contact me. i Very truly yours 4 q;( . # NLb William C. Ramsey WCR/dah cc: R. E. Conway Readiness Review Board Members Reading File Document Control
/ )
Oll8r/119-6
a i.m. map. e-ed.aug_A.mm-,.4.w.a.amigaa.m- ,.m,i-a. ,-,,4,.ie34 .--2 m+-e .ammaaEsa ==4 --.a45.-==4-a.64 =-'am4-- *- er -- 4 -'-w+ aw 'h--%--e s mp M m. e s ,e mu dJ.e4eeJ 4 .4 imdimem-m .et aepse -e ma.-m >-m-a. O f t VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT t UNIT 1 f READINESS REVIEW t . O-- l MODULE 18B - FIRE PROTECTION R l
- O lO
Readiness Review - Module 18B O List of Effective Pages April 24, 1986 , Page Revised Date 1 I All pages unchanged i e .lO E 4 T j i 4 I I O 0086r/106-6 iii w - , ._4., _-, --.-,
l l l PREFACE O - Georgia Power Company (GPC), in order to gain added assurance of the operational readiness of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), is conducting a pilot Readiness Review Program. The VEGP pilot Readiness Review Program is a systematic, in-depth self-assessment of work processes and verification of complianco with regulatory commitments. To accomplish the VEGP pilot Readiness Review Program, the work processes and regulatory commitments were divided into manageable segments called modules. There are approximately 20 modules. Each module is a predefined scope of VEGP activities. Each module is intended to provide a brief description of the method of complying with project licensing commitments pertaining to the module scope and is not intended to make further commitments or to revise in any way prior commitments. If any differences exist between the commitments discussed in this document and the licensing documents, they are unintentional; and the licensing document governs. Activities common to several modules are provided as General Appendixes. There are approximately 10 appendixes. These appendixes, as appropriate, are referenced in the modules and l are augmented in each module with module-scope-specific details _ as needed.
\/ The VEGP Readiness Review Program is being conducted on a schedule to provide added operational readiness assurance to GPC management in support of the VEGP Unit 1 operating license.
I However, conclusions reache6 regarding programmatic and technical adequacy through review of VEGP Unit 1 are indicative ^ of Unit 2, since both units are being designed and constructed together under a single quality assurance program; with like l management controls, procedures, etc.; and to the same specifications and criteria. Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation has been contracted to provide technical management for, and technical personnel to implement, the independent design review as a part of the Readiness Review program. l The VEGP Readiness Review Program is not intended to eliminate or to diminish any authorities or regulatory responsibilities now assigned to or exercised by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or GPC. Further, the Readiness Review Program is not intended to change the techniques of inspections or assurance of quality program activities. Rather, the VEGP Readiness Review Program is an added program initiated by GPC management to assess the VEGP and to provide additional feedback to management so that they may initiate any needed corrective actions in an , /') orderly and timely manner. lV v
The scope of work processes and regulatory commitment compliance covered by each module will be assessed by, and the module prepared and reviewed by, individuals collectively familiar with the design, construction, and operational processes of nuclear power plants. It is the collective opinion of the Readiness Review Task Force, Readiness Review Board, and GPC management that, based on their experience, the methodology used in the module process will assess, on a programmatic basis, the adequacy of project commitment implementation. Readiness Review Discrepancy Reports and resulting dispositions are reviewed by the Readiness Review Program quality assurance staff and are input into the normal project process for safety significance and potential reportability evaluations in accordance with regulatory requirements. 1 9 0086r/106-6 vi
l
+N ,4 g
~
. %S* ' IMAGE EVALUATION /
((// / ,'S"* 19 4,
\
%$f' TEST TARGET (MT-3) qs g,*y '%s, f,,
+ %
I l l l l
!! l'" L'l l
l.0 E ll lllllM
- t. .
l,l f I.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 4 150mm > 4 6" >
$#' 35,%+1,%'7f
~
'< 4++,% A
$l' n; j hh
%; ,. s g0 ..
PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCES CORPORATION e - O 770 BASKET ROAD :--{p -(t " P.O. BOX 338 .m WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580 Y^ (716) 265 1600
O
., R th*g,
. t "" . .
v IMAGE EVALUATION \//j/ '0 [ ' N f /' TEST TARGET -(MT-3) s [ Qg l
+W/ /Q's 1.0 '12 M
[ ] lW i.i [ ~ L2g I.8 1.25 1.4 1.6 4 150mm > ' 4 6" >
% +
w >%i ,, /y'b PHOTOGRAPHIC SCIENCES CORPORATION F - h 770 BASKET ROAD s{D
' l[t.*
P.O. BOX 338 % WEBSTER, NEW YORK 14580 Y (716) 265-1600
t TABLE OF CONTENTS O 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope 1.2 Organization 2.0 Fire Protection Task Force Program Description 2.1 FPTF Objective 2.2 FPTF Organization and Responsibilities 2.3 FPTF Oversight of Project Activities 3.0 Commitment Implementation Assessment 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Summary Evaluation 3.3 Definitions 3.4 Sources 3.5 Commitment Matrix 3.6 Implementation Matrix 3.7 Findings, Project Responses, and Conclusions () 4.0 Fire Protection Task Force Program Assessment 4.1 Assessment Details and Results 4.2 Conclusions, Recommendations, and Project Responses s S.O Module Assessment 5.1 Open Corrective Actions 5.2 Quality Assurance Statement 5.3 Resumes S f 0086r/107-6 vii
l.0 INTRODUCTION A ~ (-) 1.1 SCOPE During the evolution of plant design, tne project management of Plant Vogtle recognized the extensive interdisciplinary and interorganizational ramifications of implementing fire protection requirements in a nuclear facility. Approximately 12 months ago, project management mandated the formation of a task force to ensure compliance with prevailing licensing requirements and industry-accepted standards relating to fire protection. Its ultimate goal was to ensure the implementation of a design capable of safe plant shutdown under postulated fire conditions. In light of the comprehensive scope of the Fire Protection Task Force (FPTF) oversight activities and of the substantial commitments of resources by the Project to carry out these activities, the Readiness Review Program has limited its review of fire protection to two areas: A. Review of FSAR licensing commitments keyed to their implementing documents. This review included commitments through FSAR Amendment 19. B. Review of the composition, responsibilities, and p) x activities of the FPTF to assess its potential of achieving its intended function. The effective date of this review was February 15, 1986. Relevant changes, if any, occurring after this date were not included. 1.2 ORGANIZATION This module is divided into the following sections: 1.0 Introduction. 2.0 Fire Protection Task Force Program Description - A brief description of the Vogtle FPTF and their activities applicable to the Vogtle fire protection program is presented. 3.0 Commitment Implementation Assessment - This section contains project licensing commitments pertaining to fire protection within the scope of this module, as found in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Generic Letters, and other documents. This section also lists documents that demonstrate inclusion of these commitments in project design criteria, specifications, procedures, etc. O
Fire Protection Task Force Program Assessment - This 4.0 section contains the evaluation of the FPTF program and recommendations by an independent Readiness . Review Team. 5.0 Module Assessment - This section includes an evaluation and conclusions by the VEGP Readiness Review Program Quality Assurance Staff, Readiness In Review Board, and design engineering management. addition, this section contains a listing of finding .' items (sections 3 and 4) still open and requiring I project resolution. Resumes of Readiness Review Team members involved in the development of this module , are also presented. ( O 0115r/ll2-6 1-2
2.0 FIRE PROTECTION TASK E7RCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ("}
\/
The VEGP Fire Protection Task Force (FPTF) was formed to ensure project compliance with the guidelines of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Branch Technical Position (BTP) CMEB 9.5-1, the fire protection codes as described in the FSAR, and other related licensing commitments. This section provides a brief description of the FPTF objectives, organization, and activities. 2.1 FPTF OBJECTIVE The objective of the FPTF is to provide oversight and evaluation of the Vogtle fire protection program to ensure that the design, construction, and operational aspects of Plant Vogtle are adequate to mitigate significant fires and that the safe plant shutdown capability will not be adversely affected by postulated fires. 2.2 FPTF ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 2.2.1 ORGANIZATION The FPTF is organized under the auspices of the vice president - project engineering. (See Figure 2-1.) The task force members C are representatives of the following project functional organizations, which have controlling fire protection responsibilities: o Project management. o Georgia Power Company (GPC) (Nuclear Operations Department). o GPC (Construction Department). o Southern Company Services (Design Engineering). o Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC) (Design Engineering). o Project Licensing. The FPTF performs work on an audit and overview basis, as opposed to a detailed point-by-point review. The task force provides general review and guidance for the responsible line organizations. It establishes project positions and guidance with appropriate project engineering management approval but does not perform actual work except for reviews. Task force guidance is promulgated to each responsible line organization by l its FPTF member, as shown in the organization chart in i() l Figure 2-1.
I l J In summary, each member obtains information from his line organization, brings that information and his experience to the FPTF, collectively establishes / obtains the task force's i direction, and then provides guidance to his organization for implementation of that direction. hf' 2.2.2 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.2.2.1 Overall FPTF Responsibilities The FPTF is responsible for ensuring that those aspects of the VEGP fire protection program outlined in section 2.3 are adequately addressed and implemented. The FPTF is also responsible for overseeing the identification, resolution, and justification of licensing deviations and project positions related to fire protection issues identified by or referred to the FPTF. This is accomplished through task force reviews of applicable criteria and commitments and associated project policies and procedures. 2.2.2.2 Individual FPTF Members' Responsibilities The individual project work activities presented on the fire protection program schedule (FP-100) are identified and organized in the format of BTP CMEB 9.5-1. Responsibilities are assigned to functional project organizi.tions which have members on the FPTF. Each functional member 11 responsible fo'r llh obtaining support / input from his respcctive organization and tracking the completion of those activities assigned to his line organization within FPTF schedule constraints. Responsibilities of the other FPTF members are as follows: A. FPTF Program Manager The FPTF program manager is responsible for overall j control of task force activities. He is responsible ! for reporting to management and for obtaining i management approval / support when required to accomplish l FPTF goals. He is also responsible for the development of generic project controle needed to implement FPTF activities. l B. Task Force Facilitator The task force facilitator is responsible for scheduling, statusing, and controlling the completion of FPTF work plan items. He maintains the task log and provides a coordination point between project entities engaged in task force work. O 2-2
2.2.2.3 Proiect Licensino Manacer Although the project licensing manager is not a task force
% member, he is responsible for ensuring that project fire protection licensing issues are adequately addressed. He also provides the coordination point between the task force and the NRC.
2.3 FPTF OVERSIGHT OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES This section defines those specific project (functional) fire protection work activities within the scope of review of the FPTF. A. Safe Shutdown Analysis The VEGP safe shutdown analysis is made up of several activities performed by project engineering. These activities are briefly described in items 1 through 9 below. The results of the safe shutdown analysis are filed as a project calculation and are updated as required as a result of plant modifications. The FPTF oversight activities related to the safe shutdown analysis are presented following item 9.
- 1. Safe Shutdown System and Components
,s The product of this task is a list of the minimum systems and components required to accomplish a safe shutdown. The fire event safe shutdown systems and components are those required to accomplish the following functions: o Reactivity control. o Reactor coolant system (RCS) inventory control. o RCS pressure control. o Core heat removal. o RCS heat removal. o Maintenance of vital auxiliaries. Components that can affect the capability to achieve safe shutdown, while not actually required to be operational for safe shutdown, are included in the safe shutdown systems and components list as
, " spurious actuation concerns only" to facilitate identification of these concerns during the <
l separation reviews. i t 2-3
e
- 2. Simplified Safe Shutdown System Sketches Simplified piping and instrumentation diagrams (P& ids) and electrical single-line diagrams which show the interrelationship of the safe shutdown systems and components are provided.
- 3. Safe Shutdown Component Locations Safe shutdown component locations are one input to ,
the safe shutdown separation review. The existence of safe shutdown components within a fire area is presented in the Fire Hazards Analysis, FSAR Appendix 9A, and is an important factor in the determination of fire area boundary locations.
- 4. Safe Shutdown Circuits Identification This task identifies the safe shutdown circuitry subject to the separation requirements of BTP CMEB 9.5-1, position C.5.b.2.
- 5. Safe Shutdown Circuits Location Safe shutdown circuit locations are one input to the safe shutdown separation review. The existence of safe shutdown circuits within a fire area is presented in the Fire Hazards Analysis, FSAR Appendix 9A, and is a factor in the determination h of fire area boundary locations.
- 6. Safe Shutdown Separation Review This review evaluates the degree of separation l between redundant safe shutdown train circuitry and components against the criteria of BTP CMEB 9.5-1, position C.5.b. This review identifies the need for alternative / dedicated safe shutdown capability (including design changes and operational considerations), raceway protective wrapping, or circuit relocation to ensure safe shutdown capability.
- 7. Separation Deviation Identification and Justification This effort provides justification for deviations from the separation criteria of BTP CMEB 9.5-1, I position C.5.b, identified during the separation I review efforts.
t l { 2-4
- 8. Safe Shutdown Coordinated Breaker, Relay, and Fuse Analysis O
(_/ This effort ensures that coordinated protection in breakers, relays, and/or fuses precludes fire-induced failures in nonsafe shutdown circuits from deenergizing a bus which is a common power source for safe shutdown equipment required to achieve safe shutdown for the fire under consideration. This analysis also defines the design considerations which preclude fire-induced failures in nonsafe shutdown circuits from being propagated in a common enclosure.
- 9. Spurious Actuation Analysis This effort identifies design changes and/or operational concerns necessary to preclude fire-induced hot shorts, open circuits, and shorts to ground in electrical circuitry from affecting the capability to achieve a safe shutdown plant condition. Spurious actuation concerns that could occur due to fires outside the control room are addressed by the safe shutdown separation review.
Spurious actuation concerns that could occur due to a control room fire are addressed by a control room fire alternate shutdown evaluation. () FPTF Oversicht: The FPTF reviews the safe shutdown analysis methodology and selected documentation to ensure that it is adequate to demonstrate compliance with the guidelines of BTP CMEB 9.5-1. In addition, the FPTF periodically reviews the progress of the work and conducts audits of the specific elements of the safe shutdown analysis. B. Fire Protection Verification Program The fire protection verification program (FPVP) ensures the correctness of design assumptions through walkdown of as-built configurations., The FPVP procedures include training requirements for walkdown personnel and mechanisms for identifying, reviewing, and initiating corrective action to resolve walkdown discrepancies. The FPVP is implemented in the Vogtle Project walkdown plan, WP-3, and is summarized below:
- 1. Walkdowns are required for buildings which contain components required for safe shutdown and will be performed using prepared checklists.
2-5
- 2. Checklists are developed for the following fire protection features to ensure a consistent method of verification and documentation. For each fire protection feature, a verification will be h performed to verify adequacy.
o Water sprinkler systems. o Penetration seals. o Fire dampers. . o Fire detection system. o Halon system. o Fire hose locations. o Portable extinguishers. o Fire door installations. o Emergency lighting. o Safe shutdown raceway locations.
- 3. Any observed conditions which differ from the design requiremente are noted. The goal of the program is not to verify exact measurements but to verify compliance with qualitative engineering criteria (e.g., blockages, obvious dimension problems, misuse or nonexistence of equipment).
The program is structured to find problems in l design concepts, not design specifics. Any item that does not meet the walkdown acceptance criteria is called a Walkdown Discrepancy (WD) and assigned a sequential number. An evaluation will be made of each WD by the walkdown coordinator to determine h whether a Deviation Report (DR) is required. A DR will be initiated if the WD constitutes a violation of a design document when appropriate design-allowed tolerances are considered. l FPTF Oversicht: The FPTF ensures the adequacy of the J FPVP as follows:
- 1. The FPTF evaluates procedures governing the walkdown to ensure that program concerns are adequately addressed.
- 2. Prior to the FPVP walkdowns, the FPTF will perform an evaluation of selected plant areas to determine the adequacy of the FPVP procedures and checklista. Procedural discrepancies noted during this evaluation will be corrected before beginning the FSVP.
O 2-6 L- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
C. Post-Walkdown Configuration Control Following plant walkdown activities, there is a potential for changes to area configuration due to design changes and/or construction completion activities. FPTF Oversicht: The FPTF ensures the adequacy of the project. configuration control mechanisms by evaluating the preoperational-phase control programs to ensure that project procedures governing changes or modifications to plant configurations adequately address fire protection concerns. D. Fire Protection Program Schedule Schedule FP-100, Fire Protection Program Schedule, identifies the milestones and target dates for the l project fire protection work activities. ! FPTP Oversicht: The FPTF has established a task log 2 which identifies the responsible FPTF member associated with each scheduled activity and each milestone. The task log is used to track activity progress and to l identify problem areas. It is submitted every 2 months I to the program facilitator. 0126r/122-6 2-7
+
e VICE PRESIDENT
- PROMCT ENGINEERING l
, PROKCT PROGRAM MANAGE R L tCEteS400G MANAGE R TA5K FORCE F ACit tiA TOR I I I l BECHTEL * "
gg , COMPANY GPC g PROMCT CORPORATION & VKE$ NUCL EAR CO885T RUCf TON E NS4NG IDES 8GN ENGtWEE RINGl IDESIG86 ENG4NEERINGl SNPUT sasPUT t8ePUT seuPUT I OPERATBONS VENOOR GPC I DEPARTnsENT TRAteResG OC E SPC 9eSTALLATION SPC DEPARTMENT HOE PFE GROUPS ggAgggTEMA8 ACE R E P. R E P. DEPARygsgest REGULATORY COedPLIAasCE DEPARTMEesT SMAL 88sPUT tesPUT 888 TE RF ACE I MECHAsseCAL asECH A80*C A L E L EC T RtC AL E L E C T RIC AL NUCLEAR 88UCLE AR A ftCH8 T ECTUR AL A RCHE T EC TUR AL CO8sTROLS COse T40L S WE S T888GHOUSE CO881R AC Toft INTERFACE MECHANSCAL OPO$tTIO8d ALSOSERVES AS WALKDouns$ FIRE EXPERTISE COesSULTANT LLECTRaCAL FOR PROGRAas MANAGER BOMES REPRESENT FPTF Mens 8ERS Figure 2-1 VEGP Fire Protection Task Force Functional Organization
3.0 COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This section contains project licensing commitments and the corresponding implementing documents. These are presented in two matrixes, the commitment matrix and the implementation matrix. A brief explanation of the development process for each matrix is also included. Any differences between the commitments discussed in this section and the VEGP Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) are unintentional, and the FSAR prevails. Additionally, the Project has an obligation to comply with other generic commitments, such as 10 CFR 50 Appendix B and American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 2.10. Although not specifically included in the matrix, the Project recognizes its obligation to comply with such commitments, which serve as a basis for establishment of the design programs. Readiness Review Findings and project responses are also included in this section. 3.2
SUMMARY
EVALUATION The Readiness Review Team reviewed 179 FSAR licensing O' commitments included in the commitment matrix and found all but two implemented in project design documents. One finding concerned a discrepancy in the revision number of the Nuclear Mutual Limited (NML) property loss prevention standard specified in the FSAR versus that specified in the design criteria. It was determined that the appropriate ~ revision will be the revision in effect at the time of NML review. Both the FSAR and design criteria will be corrected accordingly. In the other l case, FSAR requirements for fire pump hydrostatic test pressure differed from those specified in specification X4AF14 (the specification for fire system pumps and drivers). It was determined that the pumps had been appropriately tested, and the FSAR will be revised to reflect the specification requirements. These findings, per project response, have no safety or hardware impact; and the FSAR and corresponding design criteria will be revised to correct these discrepancies. 3.3 DEFINITIONS A commitment is defined as an obligation to comply with an industry standard, Regulatory Guide, Branch Technical Position, or owner plan of specific action.
An implementing document is the working-level document that identifies project commitmente applicable to the specific work activity. 3.4 SOURCES Commitments covered by this module are identified from the FSAR, ! including responses to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) questions. These sources are reviewed for commitments based upon guidelines developed from the definition in section 3.2. Commitments identified in the commitment matrix are typically implemented through design criteria and material specifications. 1 I t ! 3.5 COMMITMENT MATRIX Once identified by the Readiness Review Team, the commitments are placed on the commitment matrix. Information identifying the source, source section, subject, and modole are also listed on the matrix. Any relevant comments concerning the commitments or subject of the section are indicated in the Remarks column. The commitment matrix is presented at the end of this section. Commitments on the matrix include those commitments through Amendment 19 of the FSAR. 3.6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX After the commitments are identified, the appropriate design documents are reviewed to determine whether the commitments were incorporated. Most of the commitments reference the requirements of industry standards, Regulatory Guides, Branch Technical Positions, etc. The Readiness Review Team compared these requirements with project design documents for appropriate inclusion. In some cases, project design documents invoked the requirements of industry standards or regulatory documents instead of implementing the specific commitment. For example, FSAR section 9.5.1.4 commits that the Halon 1301 system should be tested by full system discharge. This commitment is not specifically included in Design Criteria DC-2304 or specification X4AXO3, but both documents invoke National Fire l Protection Association (NFPA) 12A, which includes this commitment. In other words, the implementation of the above-mentioned commitment is through NFPA 12A, which is invoked in DC-2304 and cpecification X4AX03. The current implementation of each commitment is listed in the Design Last column, with the earliest documented location of the commitment listed in the Design First column. 3-2
The Module 18B commitment matrix includes a unique number for each commitment selected from the FSAR. The implementation l (~ matrix contains several entries on the same commitment subject. l \~ In these cases, the implementing documents are listed once; and l each additional entry references, in the Remarks column, the original listing. 3.7 FINDINGS, PROJECT RESPONSES, AND CONCLUSIONS The commitment implementation assessment was structured to disclose any discrepancies between commitments and implementing documents. When discrepancies were found, they were identified on a numbered finding report. Findings were then referred to the appropriate project organization to evaluate the direct or indirect impact on design and to determine the necessary corrective actions. Findings were classified into three levels of importance relating to plant safety: ) i I - Violation of licensing commitments, project procedures, or engineering requirements with indication of safety concern. II - Violation of licensing commitments or engineering I requirements with no safety concerns. l III - Violation of project procedures with no safety ; concerns. ; 3.7.1 READINESS REVIEW FINDINGS AND PROJECT RESPONSES The FSAR commitment implementation assessment program consisted of a review of 179 FSAR licensing commitments pertaining to fire protection for their implementation into appropriate design engineering documents. This assessment resulted in two findings, which were classified as Level II findings. These findings and project responses are summarized below: o Finding 18B-1 (Level II)
Description:
This finding identified a discrepancy between the required design criteria (DC-1000-A, Revision 1, December 4, 1985) and the FSAR commitment. It identified that the revision of the NML property loss prevention standard for nuclear generating stations specified in the FSAR differed from that specified in the design criteria. Proiect Response: The Project responded that, for NML standards, the revision in effect at the time of the O' NML review and inspection is the applicable and 3-3
enforced revision. Therefore, the FSAR and the design criteria should not refer to the specific revision. The FSAR and the design criteria will be revised to reflect this. The Project ensured that no safety or hardware impact was caused by this discrepancy. The Project committed to revise FSAR section 3.1.1 and DC-1000-A to delete the year reference to the NML standard by May 1, 1986. o Finding 18B-2 (Level II)
Description:
This finding identified that FSAR section 9.5.1.4 (Inspection and Testing Requirements) requires that each fire pump be hydrostatically tested at the factory to twice the maximum pressure developed at shutoff. Contrary to the FSAR, section 5.3.1 (shop tests) of specification X4AF14 (specification for fire system pumps and drivers) states that all shop tests shall be in accordance with NFPA 20, the test code of the Hydraulic Institute, and Diesel Engine Manufacturers Association (DEMA) standards. Requirements of NFPA 20 and the test code of the Hydraulic Institute differ from those specified in the FSAR commitment. According to NFPA 20-1976, section 2-12.2, test pressure shall not be less than one and one-half times the maximum design working pressure, but in no case less than 250 psi. The test code of the Hydraulic Institute requires that the pump be hydrostatically tested at not less than 150 percent of rated pressure or 125 percent of shutoff pressure for at least 5 minutes. Proiect Response: The pumps have a design working pressure of 125 psig. The pump manufacturer conducted the hydrostatic test per NFPA 20, i.e., 250 psi for 5 minutes. Further, there are no code or regulatory requirements to test fire pumps in excess of those pressures specified.lmr NFPA 20. The Project committed to revise the FSAR during the 1986 update to be consistent with NFPA 20-1976. 3.7.2 READINESS REVIEW CONCLUSION The Readiness Review Team agrees with the project response for both findings and corrective actions. 0127r/112-6 3-4
O O COMITENTS O SORTED BY SOURE AND SECTION COPMITENT CDPMITENT CDPMITENT DOCUENT/ KSPONSIBILITY SOURT SECTION SLBJECT , FEATURE E Sif4 metST EMARKS KF NO. EXPLANATION OF FIELDS 00PMITENT SOURCE - The doctanent containing the commitment (FSAR, Generic Lettcir, l.E. liulletin Response, etc.) COPMITENT SECTION - Identifies the FSAR section, Istter nuneer, or question number CDPMITENT SUBJECT - The subject of the FSAR section or Generic Letter DOCUENT/ FEATURE - The document discussed in the FSAR section or the plant feature described in the FSAR section ESPONSIBILITY - An X is placed under the heading for the organization responsible for implementation of the connitment 1 KF. NO. - A reference number that corresponds to the appropriate line entry in the implementation matrix t
Page 3
<v.
04/29/86 1 O 'O COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJ1CT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
==== ==================== ==================== =========================s== ======= ======= ==================== ==
FSAR 1. 9. 23 5EISMIC DESIGN RG 1.29 REV 3. 9/78 I REF. TABLE T3.2.2-1 685 CLASSIFICATION FSAR 1. 9. 61 DAMPING YALUES FOR RG 1.61, 10/73 I SEE F5AR 3.7.B.I. 707 SEISMIC DESIGN OF 3.7.N.1 NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS FSAR 1. 9. 84 DESIGN AND FAS. CODE RG 1.84. REY. 20 11/82 I REF. TABLE 1.9-1, 1565 CASE ACCEPT. A5ME PARA. 5.2.1.2 TABLE III. DIV. 1 I.9-3 FSAR 1. 9. 85 MATERIAL CODE CARE RG 1.85 REY. 20 11/82 I REF. TABLE 1.9-2 1569 ACCEPT. ASME III. 1.9-3 PARA. 5.2.1.2 DIV. I . FSAR 1. 9.120 FIRE PROTECTION 10CFR50 APP. A, GDC 3 I REF. APP. 99 FOR 1582 GUIDELINE 8 FOR CONFORMANCE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS FSAR 1. 9.120 FIRE PROTECTION BTP-CMEB 9.5-1 1 REF. APP. 98 FOR 1583 GUIDELINES FOR CONFORMANCE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS FSAR 1. 9.141 CONTAINMENT RG 1.141. REY. O. 4/78 I REF. 6.2.4 1595 ISOLATION PROVISIONS FOR FLUID SYSTEMS F5AR 1. 9.141. 1 CONTAINMENT 10CFR50 APP. A. I REF. 6.2.4 1597 ISOLATION PROVISIONS FOR FLUIB ST5TEMS , 1 FSAR 1. 9.141.1 CONTAINMENT ANSI N271-1976 I REF. 6.1.4 1596 l ISOLATION PROVISIONS FOR FLUID 8787 EMS FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE V 78 ARC 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 3 I 789 GENERAL DESP CRITERIA. OYt ' *LL REQUIREMENTS I
Psgs No. 2 04/29/R6 COMMITMENT 8
===========
MODULE IBB - 3ORTED BT SOURCE & 8ECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPON8 IBILITT REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DE8IGN CONST
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR 3. 1. I CONFORMANCE WITR NRC BTP-CMEB 9.5-1 I 784 CENERAL DE81GM CRITERIA. OVERALL REQUIREMENTS F8AR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITR NRC 10CFR50. APP. A. GDC 2 I 785 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA. OVERALL REQUIREMENTS FSAR 3. 1. I CONFORMANCE WITH NRC NFPA X 788 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA. OVERALL REQUIREMENTS FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC BTP-APCSB 9.5-1 APP. A E 788 OENERAL DE8 ION (5/76) CRITERIA. OVENALL REQUIREMENT 8 FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50. APP. A. GDC 4 I 790 GDC. OVERALL REQUIREMENTS FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50. APP. A. GDC 5 I 791 GDC. OVERALL REQUIREMENTS + FSAR 3. 1. I CONFORMANCE WITH NUCLEAR MUTUAL LIMITED I 1942 NUCLEAR REGULATORY PROPERTT LOS8 PREVENTION COMMISSION GENERAL STANDARDS FOR NUCLEAR DESIGN CRITERIA. GENERATING STATIONS, JUNE OVERALL REQUIREMENTS '978 FSAR 3. 1. 5 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFn50 APP. A. GDC 54 - K 2025 0D0 REACTOR PIPING ST87 EMS PENETRATING CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT
- , . . . - ~ ~
O O O
Pete - 3 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT CodMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARE5 REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR 3. 1. 5 ALLONANCE OF 10CFR50, APP. J I BER FSAR 3.1.5, 2026 PERIODIC LEAR RATE GDC54 TESTING TO ENSURE WITRIN LIMITS FSAR 3. 1. 5 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC ST I 2028 ODC, CLOSED BT5 FEM ISOLATION VALVES FSAR 3. 2. 2 VROP 5EISMIC DESIGN RG 1.29 I 1754 CLAs5IFICATION SYSTEM FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 CLASSIFICATION OF NOTE (v): BTP CMEB 9.5-1 I TABLE 3.2.2-1 848 STRUCTURES, APP. A. FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 CLASSIFICATION OF NOTE (m): FIRE PROTECTION I 850 STRUCTURES, STANDPIPE PROJECT CLASS. 313 COMPONENTS AND TO ENSURE IMPL. OF A BRISMIC SYSTEM 5 CAT. 1. A5ME III-3 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL NEMA M01 1972 (NATIONAL I TABLE 3.2.2-1 COL. 865 CON 5TRUCTION CODE ELECTRICAL MFRS. ASSOC.) (g) FOR FIRE PROTECTION MOTOR 5/ORNERATOR5 SYSTEMS , FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL NFPA I TABLE 3.2.2-1 COL. 873 CONSTRUCTION CODE (g) FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL A5ME III, CLASS I.2,3 OR MC, I I TABLE 3.2.2-1 COL. BP0 CONSTRUCTION CODE NF. OR C5 (E) FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS i i
Pege No. 4 04/29/C6 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF No SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
==== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ==
FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 CODE 5 AND STANDARD 5 ANSI B31.1 I I CODES AND STANDARD 5 884 DESIGNATOR FOR FIRE DESIGNATOR 9 - SEE FROTECTION SYSTEMS PARA. 3.2.2.3.4 FSAR 3. 2. 2-2 CONST. CODES /STDS. ASME III. SUBSECTION ND. I I TABLE 3.2.2-1 QGC 889 Q.G.-C FOR PRESSURE CLASS 3 SUBSECTION NF FOR TESSELS. PIPING. SUPPORTS PUMP 5 TALVES. ATM. STORAGE TANKS. 0-15pelE STORAGE TAMKS. SUPPORTS. FSAR 3. 2. 2. 3.4 CLASSIFICATION OF AWWA I INTORED BT MFPA 911 STRUCTURES. COMPONENTS. EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEM 5-CODES /8TANDA RDS DESIGNATOR 9 FSAR 3. T.B. 3. 1.3 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BC-TOP-4A I 1011 CATEGORY l SUBSYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS FSAR 6. 2. 4. 3.D CONTAINMENT 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 54 I 2055 150LATION SYSTEM. PIPING SYSTEMS PENETRATING DESIGN ETALUATION CONTAINMENT , FSAR 6. 2. 4. 3.F CONTAINMENT 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 57 I 205T ISOLATION SYSTEM. CLOSED SYSTEM ISOLATION DESIGN ETALUATION VALTES FSAR T. 1. 2. 2.3 FIRE PROTECTION FIRE RETARDANT PAINT 18 USED I 4591 IDENTIFICATION OF ON PROTECTION RACE OR 5AFETY CRITERIA CABINET CONSTRUCTION TO RETARD FIRE OR NEAT PROPAGATION FROM RACK TO RACK. O O O
O Pete No. U 5 d 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR T. 1. 2. 2.3 FIRE PROTECTION ICEA PUB. P-46-426 OR I 4592 IDENTIFICATION OF P-54-440 SAFETY CRITERIA FSAR 8. 2. 2. 4 CONFORMANCE TO 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 3 I 40 CRITERIA (PREFERRED POWER SOURCE 5) FSAR 8. 3. 1. 4.4 FIRE PROTECTION AUTOMATIC SPRINELERS ARE I 91 PROVIDED FOR ALL SAFETY-RELATED CABLE TRAYS. FSAR 8. 3. 1. 4.4 ONSITE POWER SYSTEM VERTICAL AND RORIZONTAL I 4821 FIRE PROTECTION CABLE TRAY FLOOR OR WALL PENETRATIONS ARE SEALED TO GIVE PROTECTION EQUIVALENT TO OR GREATER TRAN THE FIRE BARRIER RATING FSAR 9. 4. 1. 2.1 CONTROL ROOM NORMAL 35. CURTAIN TYPE FIRE I 3458 RVAC DAMPER 5 LOCATED A5 NECESSART. BETWEEN FIRE WALLS TO MAINTAIN FIRE RATINGS OF BARRIERS. FSAR 9. 4. 2. 2.2.2~.C.5 POST ACCIDENT OR TRREE ROUR RATED CURTAIN I 3975 BMERGENCY OPER. OF TYPE FIRE DAMPERS LOCATED IN ' THE FRB SYSTEM FIRE FIRE BARRIERS A5 NECESSARY DAMPERS FSAR 9. 5. 1 FIRE PROTECTION BTP CMEB 9.5-I 1 SEE APPENDIX 98 FOR 3654 PROGRAM CONFORMANCE FSAR 9. 5. 1. 1.5 FIRE SUPPRESSION BTP MEB 3-1 I 3656 SYSTEM DAMAGE FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.1 FIRE PROTECTION STRUCTURE STEEL NEMBERS I 3657 PROGRAM SUPPORTING FIRE BARRIERS ARE SY5 FEM DESCRIPTION. PROTECTED TO SAME HOURLY PLANT LAYOUT FIRE RATING A5 FIRE BARRIER.
. _ _ . _ _ - - - . _ . - - . _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ . _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ , - __- r..,-, n- , , - - ev-.- <v - ---< - - + -
Page No. 6 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE IBB - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
. n----=== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
NFPA 30 I SEE APP. 98 FOR 3658 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.1 FIRE PROTECTION EXCEPTIONS PROGRAM SYSTEM DESCRIPTION STORAGE AND USE OF
- FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS.
BULE STORACE OF COMPRESSED I 3659 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.1 FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM, SYSTEM. OR CRYOGENIC CASES IS NOT g DESCRIP PERMITTED WITRIN STRUCTURES PLANT LAYOUT ROUSING SAFETY RELATED EQUIP. FIRE PROTECTION BULE FLAMMABLE GABES STORED I 3660 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.1 PROGRAM. SYSTEM OUTDOORS OR IN SEPARATE DE5CRIPTION DETACRED BLDG 5. AND ARE NOT PLANT LAYOUT EXPOSED TO SAFETY RELATED EQUIP. SYSTEMS OR STRUCTURES.
- 1. 2.1.1 FIRE PROTECTION OIL FILLED TRANSFORMERS IN I 3662 FSAR 9. 5.
PROGRAM 8MITCRYARD ARE MIN. OF 50 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION. FT. FROM 8AFETT RELATED PLANT LAYOUT STRUCTURES
- 5. 1. 2.1.1' FIRE PROTECTION REDUNDANT SAFETT DIVISION I 3663 FSAR 9.
PROGRAM TRAINS A AND B ARE IN ' SYSTEM DESCRIPTION. INDIVIDUAL CABLE SPREADING ( PLANT LAYOUT ROOMS SEPARATED BT 3R FIRE BARRIERS FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.1 FIRE PROTECTION SAFETY RELATED CRARCOAL I 3667 PROGRAM FILTER ASSEMBLIES RAVE A l SYSTEM DESCRIPTION, DELUGE SYSTEM. PLANT LAYOUT FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.1 FIRE PROTECTION MANUAL FIRE SUPPRESSION I 3668 l PROGRAM, 5YSTEM SYSTEMS PROVIDED OVER DESCRIPTION, PLANT CHARCOAL FILTER NOUSING. LAYOUT 4 i . l O 0 9
. . _ . . . . - - . - ___. _ ~ . _ -- . . . ~ _ . - _ . . . . _ _ _ .-- . . ...- . - _
O Pete Mo. 7 O O 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CON 8T
=====ee=== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
- 1. 2.1.1.A FIRE PROGRAM SEPARATION OF REDUNDANT X 3664 FSAR 9. 5.
PROGRAM, 8YSTEM TRAINS DESCRIPTION, PLANT LAYOUT
- 5. 1. 2.1.1.A FIRE PROTECTION SEPARATION BY 3R FIRE R 3665 FSAR 9.
. PROGRAM BARRIER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION, t PLANT LAYOUT FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.1.8 FIRE PROTECTION MIN. 20 FT. SEPARATION WITH I 3666 PROGRAM NO INTERVENING COMBUSTIBLE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION, RAZARD8 PLANT LAYOUT FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION B00R8 TRRU FIRE BARRIERS X 3669 PROGRAM RAVE FIRE RATING BARRIERS AND ACCESS COMMENSURATE WITN FIRE BARRIER FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION CABLE, CABLE TRAT8, I 3670 PROGWAN CONDUIT 8, ANB PIPING BARRIERS AND ACCESS PENETRATIONS OF FIRE BARRIER 8 RAVE SEALS WITH SAME ROURLT RATING A8 BARRIER.
BER NFPA 9A, AC AND 36Y1 ! FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION TENT. SYSTEM PENETRATION I PROGRAM OPENING 8 WILL MATE FIRE VENTILATING SYSTEMS BARRIERS AND ACCESS BAMPER8 WITH RATING EQUIVALENT TO FIRE BARRIER. FSAR 9. 5. 1, 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION FLEXIBLE AIR BUCT COUPLINGS I 3672 PROGRAM IN TENT AND FILTER SYSTEMS BARRIERS AND ACCESS WILL BE MONCUMBUSTIBLE. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION FUSIBLE LINE CLOBING ANB I 36'W PROGRAM MANUAL REOPENING FIRE BARRIERS AND ACCESS BAMPER8 USEB WRERE MON SAFETT-RELATES DUCTWORE PENETRATES FIRE BARRIERS AND FIRE TOWER WALLS. i
, Pnge Co. R 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE IBB - SORTED PT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
=-======== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION ELEVATOR 5 AND LIFE 5AFETT I IN ACCORDANCE WITH 3674 PROGRAM STAIRWELLS ENCASED IN NFPA LIFE 5AFETY BPRRIERS AND ACCESS CONCRETE SHAFT 5 WITH 2R FIRE CODE RATING 5 AND CLAS5 B SELF CLOSING SIMILARLY RATED DOOR 5. FSAR 9. 5. I. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION WALLS AND STRUCTURAL I 3675 PROGRAM MATERIALS ARE NON BARRIERS AND ACCESS COMBUSTIBLE FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS I As DEFINED BT ASTM 3676 PROGRAM ARE MON-COMBUSTIBLE OR HAVE E-84. INCLUDES BARRIERS AND SCCESS A FLAME SPREAD, 5MORE AND THERMAL INSULATION, FUEL CONTRIBUTION OF 25 OR RADIATION SHIELDING, LESS. AND SOUND PROOFING FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 FIRE PROTECTION ELEC WIRING TO LIGHTING AND I 3677 PROGRAM BARRIERS AND RVAC ABOVE SU5 PENDED ACCESS CEILINGS IS ENCLOSED IN CONDUIT FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.2 BARRIERS AND ACCESS NFPA 80 AND 252 I AMEND. 15 4944 j DOORS \ . FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1. 3^ FIRE PROTECTION AUTO. FUSIBLE CLO5ING/ MANUAL I 3678 i PROGRAM REOPENING FIRE DAMPER 5 *
- LIMITATION OF FIRE PROVIDED FOR VENT. OPENING EFFECT5 THRU FIRE BARRIERS WHICH ARE NOT PROVIDED WITH DUCTWORE ON EITRER SIDE FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.3 FIRE PROTECTION ETAIRWELLS RAVE A MIN. I 1 CHANGED BT AMEND. 15 3679 PROGRAM, LIMITATION 1/2-8 RATED FIRE DOOR OF FIRE EFFECTS FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4 FIRE PROTECTION WIRING RUNS OUTSIDE CABLE I 3680 PROGRAM TRATS ENCLOSED IN METAL FIRE PROTECTION OF CONDUIT CABLES AND I
CIRCUITRY. I O O O
Page Nu. 04/29/86 O 9 O O COMMITMENTS
* ===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / ERSPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
========e= ================2=== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4 FIRE PROTECTION IEEE 383-74 I SEE APP. 98 FOR 3681 PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS. APPLIES FIRE PROTECTION OF 70 FLAME TEST OF CABLES AND CIRCUITRY ELEC. RACENAT CABLE CONSTRUCTION. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4 FIRE PROTECTION CABLE TRAY CONSTRUCTION X 3682 PROGRAM MATERIALS ARE NONCOMBUSTIBLE FIRE PROTECTION OF CABLES AND CIRCUITRY. F5AR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4 FIRE PROTECTION INTERIOR TRANSFORMERS ARE I 3683 PROGRAM DRY TYPK. FIRE PROTECTION OF CABLES AND CIRCUITRY. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4 FIRE PROTECTION NFPA 803-1978, SECT. 6-3 X APPLIES TO FIRESTOPS 3684 PROGRAM, FIRE NMERE CABLE TRATS PROTECTIGN OF CABLE 5 PENETRATE FIRE AND CIRCUITRY. BARRIERS AND FLOORS. SEE APP. 98 FOR EXCEPTIONS. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4 FIRE PROTECTION IN THE CABLE SPREADING I 3688 PROGRAM ROOMS. CABLING FOR REDUNDANT ' FIRE PROTECTION OF SAFETY DIVISIONS I5 ROUTED CABLES AND CIRCUITRY IN INDIVIBUAL CABLE SPREADING ROOMS SEPARATELY FOR EACN UNIT AND ARE SEPARATED BY 3-N FIRE . BARRIERS. FSAR 9. 5. I. 2.1.4 FIRE PROTECTION CABLE AND CABLE TRAY PEN. OF I 4092 PROGRAM FIRE BARRIERS (VERT. AND FIRE PROTECTION OF EORIZ.) ARE SEALED (FIRE CABLES AND STOPS) TO GIVE PROTECTION AT , CIRCUITRY. LEAST EQUIV. FOR THE FIRE l BARRIERS. t
- - -- . _ _m i .
Page No. 10 01/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
l i MODULE 188 - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION l =======n=============================== l RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF MO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / l l SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
========e= ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
SMORE DETECTORS ARE PROVIDED I 3685 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4.A FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM FOR ALL SAFE SRUTDOWN CABLE FIRE PROTECTION OF TRATS CABLES AND CIRCUITRY. FIRE PROTECTION LINE TYPE FIRE DETECTORS ARE I 3686 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4.A PROGRAM PROTIDED IN CONTAINMENT FIRE PROTECTION OF CABLE TRATS CABLES AND CIRCUITRT. FIRE PROTECTION ESSENTIAL CIRCUITS DURING I 3687 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.1.4.C PROGRAM SAFE SRUTDONN ARE DESIGNED FIRE PROTECTION OF 70 ALLOW WETTING WITROUT CABLES AND FAULTING CIRCUITRY.
- 1. 2.2.11 FIRE PROTECTION TWO SEPARATE RALON STORAGE I 3696 FSAR 9. 5.
PROGRAM TANES WITH INDIVIDUAL HALON 1301 CYLINDER VALTES PROVIDE FOR TWO SEPARATE DISCRARGES IN ANY PROTECTED AREA. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.15 EMERGENCY LIGRTING B ROUR SEALED BEAM FIXTURES. I 3585 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.4.C FIRE PROTECTION RTDRANTS INSTALLED AT A I 36q9 PROGRAM - MAXIMUM INTERTAL OF 250 FT. UNDERGROUND LOOP ALONG YARD MAIN SYSTEM FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.5 FIRE PROTECTION UL LISTED AND/OR FM APPROVED I 3690 PROGRAM FIRE EXTINGUISHERS FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.5 FIRE PROTECTION NFPA 10 X 3691 PROGRAM FIRE EXTINGUISHERS 9 9 e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
m.. - . .m__.m__- . _ _ _ _ _ 1 __.__m.m ...__m. m_ . . m -. _..-m. -___m . _. _.m._m . ..m . _ . , .. _. . P.R. O 04/29/86
,1 O O COMMITNE3TS
===========
MODULE 188 - 80RTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARK 5 REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
========== ==================== ===================e FIRE PROTECTION NFPA 14 CLASS 2 I SEE APP. 98 FOR 3692 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.6 PROGRAM EXCEPTION WET STANDPIPE AND ROSE SYSTEM
- 9. 5. 1. 2.2.6 FIRE PROTECTION INDIVIDUAL STANDPIPES ARE 4 I 3693 FSAR PROGRAM IN. DIA. MIN FOR MULTIPLE WET STANDPIPE AND BCSE CONNECTION 5 AND 2.5 IN.
ROSE SYSTEM DIA. MIN. FOR SINGLE NOSE CONNECTIONS. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.7 FIRE PROTECTION INDEPENDENT SEIBMIC DRY I 3694
- PROGRAM STANDPIPE AND NOSE SYSTEM SEISMIC DRT PROVIDES MANUAL FIRE CONTROL STANDPIPE SYSTEM IN AREA 8 REQUIRED FOR SAFE 8RUTDOWN FOLLOWING AN SSE.
FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.7 FIRE PROTECTION A8ME III. CLA8s 3 I APPLIES TO PIPING 3695 PROGRAM AND VALVES OF DRY SEISMIC DRT SEISMIC STANDPIPE STANDPIPE SYSTEM AND ROSE SYSTEM. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.2.9 AUTOMATIC PREACTION ALL SPRINELER SYSTEM PIPING I AMEND. 15 4945 SPRINKLERS IN CAT. I STRUCTURES IS DE5IGNED FOR SSE LOADS FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.3.1.0 SYSTEM OPERATION TWO (2) SEPARATE DETECTOR 8 I 3558 l (FIRE DETECTION) REQUIRED TO ACTUATE BALON 1301 SYSTEM. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.3.2 FIRE PROTECTION NFPA 72E. I SMORE DETECTOR 3698 PROGRAM PROVISION GUIDE FIRE DETECTOR 8 AND ! MANUAL ALARMS SMORE DETECTORS. FSAR 9. 5. I. 2.3.2 FIRE PROTECTION NFPA T2A X BER APP. 98 FOR 3699 PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS i FIRE DFTECTORS. AND MANUAL ALARMS l l I
- - _ . . _ _ . . . s r . - ., - - _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ .
PEEe No. 12 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARKS REF MO
~ SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST ========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR 9. 5. 1. 2.4.A FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE BLDO. RECORD STORAGE I 3700 PROGRAM - MISC. FACILITT HAS AN AUTOMATIC AREAS HALON 1301 SYSTEM PROVIDING A MINIMUM 5% CONCENTRATION. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.A FIRE SAFETY PROGRAM CLASS A ROOT DECE K 3702 SAFETY EVAL. ASSEMBLIES, AS LISTED BT UL, ARE USED ON SAFETY RELATED STRUCTURES. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.B FIRE PROTECTION IEEE 383-1974 X APPLIES TO FLAME 3704 PROGRAM RETARDANCE OF POWER SAFETT EVALUATION CONTROL, INSTRUMENTATION AND COMMUNICATION CABLE FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.C THERMAL ANTI-SWEAT ASTM E-84 RATINGS OF 25 FOR X PROVIDED FOR SERVICE 3705 INSULATION FLAME SPREAD, 50 FCR FUEL OR COOLING NATER CONTRIBUTED, AND 50 FOR PIPING SMOKE GENERATED. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.C FIRE PROTECTION UL RATINGS OF 25 FOR FLAME X 3706 PROGRAM SPREAD, FUEL CONTRIBUTED AND SAFETY ETALUATION SMOKE GENERATED INSULATION-DUCTWORK ABOVE CEILING OF CONTROL ROOM , FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.F FIRE PROTECTION PREACTION SPRINELER STSTEMS X 3707 PROGRAM INSTALLED IN ESF ROOMS SAFETY ETALUATION INSULATION-DUCTNORK ABOYE CEILING OF CONTROL ROOM FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.F EC PUMP AND ELEC. PROTECTED BT REMOTE-MANUAL I 3708 CABLES IN PREACTION SPRINKLER SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT
*
- O
O PsRe M&. 13 O P 04/29/06 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 185 - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
EXTERIOR WALL 5 BAVE 3R FIRE I 3905 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3. 0. F.1 FIRE PROTECTION PROGRAM RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION. SAFETY EVALUATION FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY RELATED CAT. I STRUCTURES. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.0.F.2 FIRE PROTECTION INTERIOR BEARING MnLLS NAVE I 3906 PROGERAM 3B FIRE RESISTANCE SAFETT EVALUATION CONSTRUCTION FIRk RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY RELATED CAT I 4 STRUCTURES FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.G.F.3 FIRE PROTECTION INTERIOR NON BEARING X WHERE REQUIRED TOR 3907 PROGRAM WALL 8-3R FIRE RESISTANCE SAFETT SYSTEM SAFETT EVALUATION CONSTRUCTION SEPARATION. ALL FIRE RESISTANCE OTHER WALLS TO BE REQUIREMENTS FOR NONCOMBUSTIRLES. SAFETY RELATED CAT. I STRUCTURES. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.G.F.4 FIRE PROTECTION PRINCIPAL STRUCTURAL I 3908 PROGRAM SUPPORTING MEMBERS OF SINGLE 5AFETY EVALUATION STORY BLDGB. 2N FIRE , FIRE RESISTANCE RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION. REQUIREMENT 8 FOR 4 SAFETY RELATED CAT. I STRUCTURES FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3. 0. F. 5 FIRE PROTECTION PRINCIPAL STRUCTURAL I 3909 PROGRAM SUPPORTING MEMBERS OF SAFETY EVALUATION MULTI-STORY BLDOS.-3H FIRE FIRE RESISTANCE RESISTAMCE CONSTRUCTION. REQUIREMENTS FOR BAFETY RELATED CAT. I STRUCTURES.
Page No. 14 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGd CONST e========= ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ======== FIRE PROTECTION SECONDARY STRUCTURAL FLOOR I 3910 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.0.F.6 PROGRAM SUPPORTING MEMBERS- 2R FIRE SAFETY EVALUATION RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION. FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETT RELATED CAf. I STRUCTURES. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3. 0. F. T FIRE PROTECTION SECONDARY STRUCTURAL ROOF I 3911 PROGRAM SUPPORTING MEMBERS-1 1/2 SAFETY EVLAUATION ROUR FIRE RESISTANCE FIRE RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION. REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY RELATED CAT. I STRUCTURES. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 3.G.F.8 FIRE PROTECTION INTERIOR NTAIR AND ELEVATOR I 3912 PROGRAM ENCLOSURE WALLS-2R FIRE SAFETY EVALUATION RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION. FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SAFETY RELATED CAT. I STRUCTURES. FSAR 9. 5. 1. 4 FIRE PROTECTION FIRE PUMPS HYDR 0 STATICALLY X 3913 PROGRAM FACTORY TESTED FOR TWICE INSPECTION AND MAXIMUM SRUTOFF PRESSURE. . TESTING REQUIREMENTS FSAR 9. 5. 1. 4 FIRE PROTECTION FIRE PUMPS FIELD TESTED TO X 3914 PROGRAM 15C% OF Rt.TED CAPACITT. INSPECTION AND TESTING REQUIREMENTS FSAR 9. 5. 1. 4 FIRE PROTECTION UNDERGROUND FIRE PROTECTION I X 3915 PROGRAM PIPING RTDR0 STATICALLY INSPECTION AND TESTED AT 200ps1R WITH A TESTING LEARAGE OF 207./R/100 REQUIREMENTS. JOINTS. O O O
- x 5' age b 15 V 04/29/06 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DESIGN CONST i SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE
========
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ====================
FIRE PROTECTION HALON 1301 SYSTEM TESTED BT I 3917 FSAR 9. 5. 1. 4 PROGRAM FULL SYSTEM DISCHARGE INSPECTION AND TESTING R EQt* :R EME NT3.
- 1. 4 FIRE PROTECTION WET STANDPIPE. WET X 3916 FSAR 9. 5.
PROGRAM SPRINELER. AND SPRAT SYSTEM INSPECTION AND PIPING HYDROSTATICALLY TESTING TESTED AT 200psiR WITH NO REQUIREMENTS. VISIBLE LEARAGE.
- 3. 2.3.A MAIN CONTROL BOARD SEALED BEAM LIGHTING FIITURE K 3560 FSAR 9. 5.
EMERG. LIGHTING. WITR 8-H. RELF-CONTAINED BATTERY AND CHARGER. FSAR 9. 5. 3. 2.3.8 SAFE SEUTDOWN PNL SEALED BEAM FIXTURES SMALL I 3561 EMERGENCT LIGHTING BE 8-8 RATED WITH SELF-CONTAINED BATTERT AND CHARGER UNITS. FSAR 9. 5. 4. 1 DESIGN FOR EMERGENCY RG. 1.137 I 3586 D/G FUEL OIL STORAGE AND TRANSFER SYSTEM FSAR 9. B COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMER 9.5-1. POSITION X SEE POSITION C.I.b 3935 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.5.c. GENERAL PLANT , REQUIREMENTS OF BTP GUIDELINES. ALTERNATIVE OR CMEB 9.5-1 DEDICATED SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY FSAR 9. B COMPARISON OF TEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION X 3946 UNITS 1& 2 WITH C.T.a. GUIDELINES FOR SPEC. REQUIREMENTS OF BTP PLANT AREAS. PRIMARY AND CMEB 9.5-1 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FSAR 9.A.1 FIRE HAZARDS FIRE RATINGS OF BARRIERS. I REF. 9A 3922 ANALYSIS DOORS. DAMPERS, AND FIRE AREA PEMETRATION 5EALS OF EACH BOUNDARIES. FIRE AREA. 1 i
- e --, -- , . - _ . . - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - --
Page No. 16 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE IBB - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARKS REF No COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
==e===== ========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= *====== ====================
FIRE RAZARDS FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND X REF. 9A 3924 FSAR 9.A.1 ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT PROVIDED FOR EACH FIRE ZONE FIRE FIRE ZONE. PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT. FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3926 UNITS I & 2 WITH C.I.b. FIRE RAZARDS REOUIREMENTS OF BTP ANALYSIS. CtiEB 9.5-1 FSAR 9.B COP.PARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5.-1, POSITION I 3927 URIT: 1 & 2 WITH C.I.C. FIRE SUPPRESSION REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS CMEB 9.5.-l e FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF YEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I SEE POSITION C.I.b 3928 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.I.d. ALTERNATIVE OR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP DEDICATED SHUTDOWN CMEB 9.5-1 FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION C4, I QA PROGRAM IS PART 3932 UNITS 1 & 2 YITH QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM. OF OVERALL QA REQUIREMENTS OF BTP PROGRAM CMEB 9.5-1 FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF YEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3943 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.5.a. GEN. PLANT WEQUIREMENTS OF BTP GUIDELINES, BLDG. DESIGN. CMEB 9.5-1 FSAR 9.5 COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1, POSITION I 3934 UNITS 1 & 2 WITR C.S.b. GEN. PLANT REQUIREMENTS OF BTP GUIDELINES. SAFE SHUTDOWN CMEB 9.5-1 CAPABILITY. FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF YEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3936 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.5.d. GEN. PLANT REQUIREMENTS OF BTP GUIDELINES. CONTROL OF CMER 9.5-1 COMBUSTIBLES. O O O
P r. g e bu r 17 V b 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 18B - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO COMMITMRNT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== === ====
FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VROP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION X 3937 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.5.e. GEN. PLANT REQUIREMENTS OF BTP OUIDELINES. ELEC. CABLE CMEB 9.5-1 CONSTRUCTION. CABLE TRAYS AND CABLE PENETRATIONS. FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEOP BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION X 3938 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.5.f. GEN. PLANT REQUIREMENTS OF BTP GUIDELIN85 VENTILATION. CMEB 9.5-1 FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEOP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3939 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.5.g. GEN. PLANT REQUIREMENTS OF BTP GUIDELINES. LIGHTING AND CHEB 9.5-1 COMMUNICATION. FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VROP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION X 3940 UNITS 1& 2 WITH C.6.a. FIRE DETECTION AND REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SUPPRESSION, FIRE DETECTION CMEB 9.5-1 FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF YEOP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3941 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.6.b. FIRE DETECTION AND REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SUPPRESSION. FIRE PROTECTION CMEB 9.5-1 WATER SUPPLT SYSTEMS FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF VROP BTP CMER 9.5-1. POSITION I 3942 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.6.c. FIRE DETECTION AND REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SUPPRESION. WATER SPRINELER CMEB 9.5-1 AND ROSE STANDPIPE SYSTEMS. FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEOP BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION X 3943 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.6.d. FIRE DETECTION AND REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SUPRESSION. HALON CMEB 9.5-1 SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS. FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VROP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I NO CO2 STSTEMS AT 3944 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.6.e. FIRE DETECTION AND VROP - N/A REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SUPPRESSION. CARBON DIOXIDE CMEB 9.5-1 SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS.
Page No. 18 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE IBB - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
COMMITMRNT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
=-======== ==================== ==================== ==================-: ======= ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POOITION I 3945 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.6.f. FIRE DETECTI9N AND REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SUPPRESSION. PORTABLM CMEB 9.5-1 EXTINGUISHERS. FSAR 9.9 COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITItN X 3947 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.b. GUIDELINES FOR REEQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. C047ROL CMEB 9.5-1 ROOM COMPLEX. FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3948 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.c., GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS, CABLE CMEB 9.5-1 SPREADING ROOM. PSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION X 3949 UNITS I & 2 WITH C.7.d. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. PLANT CMEB 9.5-1 COMPUTER ROOMS. FSAR 9.B COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3950 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.e. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS, CMEB 9.5-1 SWITCBGEAR ROOMS. FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3951 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.f. GUIDELINES FOR , REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. RBMOTE CMEB 9.5-1 SAFETY-RELATED PANELS. FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3952 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.0, GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREA. SAFETY CMEB 9.5-1 RELATED BATTERY ROOMS. FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF TEGP BTP CMEB 9.5.-l. POSITION X 3953 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.h. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. ARRAS. TURBINE CMEB 9.5-1 BLDG. 9 O O
() (b , s Pags N r# 19 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARKS REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CON 5T
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3954 FSAR 9.B UNITS 1& 2 WITH C.7.1, GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. DIESEL CMEB 9.5-1 GENERATOR AREAS COMPARISON OF YRGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION I 3955 FSAR 9.8 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.J. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. DIE 8EL CHEB 9.5-1 FUEL OIL STORAGE TANE 9.B COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION X 3956 FSAR UNITS I& 2 WITH C.7.k. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS, CMEB 9.5-1 SAFETY-RELATED PUMPS. FSAR 9.8 COMPARI50N OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION I 3957 UAITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.1. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. NEN CHER 9.5-1 FUEL AREA FSAR 9.8 COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3958 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.m. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. SPENT CMRB 9.5-1 FUEL POOL AREA. FSAR 9.8 COMPARI5ON OF VROP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3959 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.n. GUIDELINES FOR , REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT AREAS. RADWASTE CMEB 9.5-1 AND DECONTAMINATION AREAS. FSAR 9.B COMPakiSON OF TEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3960 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C 7.o. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS, CMEB 9.5-1 SAFETT-RELATED WATER TAMES. FSAR 9.8 COMPARI5ON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITON X 3961 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.7.p. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS. RECORDS CMEB 9.5-1 STORAGE AREA 5. __.__-__________________m._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
, e' .
Page No. 20 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
COMPARISON OF TROP BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3962 FSAR 9.B UNITS 1 & 2 WITR C.T.g. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. AREAS, COOLING CMEB 9.5-1 TONERS. COMPARISON OF VEGP BTP CMEB 9.5-1, POSITION I 3963 FSAR 9.8 UNITS 1 & 2 WITH C.T.r. GUIDELINES FOR REQUIREMENTS OF BTP SPECIFIC PLT. ARRAS, MISC. CMEB 9.5-1 ARRAS. COMPARISON OF VEGP BPT CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION I 3967 FSAR 9.8 UNITS 1 & 2 WITR C.8.d. SPECIAL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS OF BTP GUIDLELINES, MATERIALS CMEB 9.5-1 CONTAINING RADICACTIVITT. SEALING OF OPENINGS SEALS BUILT IN COMPLIANCE I RESPONSE TO QUESTION 4143 NRC QUEST. Q280. 4 CORRES. IN FIRE BARRIERS WITH PROTOTTPE TESTED BT ASTM E-119 FIRE PUMPS, MOTORS NFPA 20.1978 E RESPONSE TO QUESTION 4144 MRC QUEST. Q280. 10 CORRES. AND CONTROLLERS FIRE PUMP STSTEM NFPA 20-1978 I REFER TO NRC 4292 NRC QUEST. Q280. 10 CORRES. QUESTION - RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF ' STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION , FIRE PUMP STSTEM ANSI C37.04 X REFER TO NRC 4293 NRC QUEST. Q280. 10 CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION. NRC QUEST. 0280. 10 FIRE PUMP STSTEM ANSI C37.072 X REFE2 TO NRC 4294 CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION. O O O
- - - ._ _ _. _ .__ - .- - .__..- .. ..--.-..-m..__m m._- .-..._-._._-.m . . . . . - . . _ _ . . - - _ ~
t Page Nb 21 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS
===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
====================,==================
DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESION CON 51
========== ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FIRE PUMP SYSTEM ANSI N45.2-1971 I REFER TO NRC 4295 MRC QUEST. 0280. 10 CORRES. QUESTION-RB5PONSE FOR TITLE OF STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION. FIRE PUMP SYSTEM ANSI C37.06 I REFER TO NRC 4296 NRC QUEST. Q280. 10 CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION. NRC QUEST. 0280. 10 FIRE PUMP SYSTEM ANSI C37.09 X REFER TO NRC 4297 CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION. NRC QUEST. 0280. 10 FIRE PUMP SYSTEM ANSI C37.20 I REFER TO NRC 4298 CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION. NRC QUEST. Q280. 10 FIRE PUMP SYSTEM ANSI C37.90 I REFER TO NRC 4299 CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF
- STANDARDS. RESPONSE
' 70 QUESTION. 1 i URC QUEST. 0280. 10 FIRE PUMP SYSTEM AN5I C57.13 X REFER TO NRC 4300
- CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE i FOR TITLE OF .
, STANDARDS. RESPONSE To QUESTION. i ! NRC QUEST. 0280. 10 FIRE PUMP SYSTEM ANSI N45.2.2-1972 X REFER TO NRC 4301 l CORRES. QUESTION-RESPONSE FOR TITLE OF l STANDARDS. RESPONSE TO QUESTION. J t l J
- _ _ m _
Pege No. 22 ! 04/29/86 COMMITMENTS i =========== r MODULE 188 - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
=======================================
RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
==e======= ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ========
FIRE PUMP SYSTEM ANSI 755.1 I RESPONSE TO 4302 NRC QUEST. 0280. 10 QUESTION. CORRES. FIRE PUMP SYSTEM IEEE 279 I RESPONSE 70 QUESTION 4303 MRC QUEST. Q280. 10 CORRES. FIRE PUMP SYSTEM IEEE 472 I RESPONSE TO 4304 NRC QUEST. Q280. 10 QUESTION. CORRES. FIRE PUMP SYSTEM IPCEA-5-19-81 X RESPONSE TO QUESTION 4305 NRC QUEST. Q280. 10 CORRES. FIRE PUMP SYSTEM NEMA 505 I RESPON5E TO QUESTION 4306 CRC QUES?. Q280. 10 CoaPYb. FIRE PUMP SYSTEM UBC X RESPONSE 70 QUESTION 4307 NRC QUEST. 0280. 10 CORRES. NRC QUEST. 0280. 12 FIRE DETECTION IEEE 383 X RESPONSE TO QUESTION 4308 CORRES. SYSTEM NRC QUEST. Q280. 12 FIRE DETECTION CLASS "A" SYSTEM DEFINED IW I FOR EXCEPTIONS AND 4309 CORRES. SYSTEM NFPA 72D-1975 AND CLASS I CLARIFICATIONS. CIRCUITS DEFINED IN NFPA 70 REFER TO EXCEPT AS NOTED QUESTION-RESPONSE. NRC QUEST. Q280. 13 A'.7T0MATIC SPRINELER NFPA 13 I RESPONSE 4147 CORRES. SYSTEMS NRC QUEST. 0280. 13 AUTOMATIC.1PRINELER NFPA 15 I X RESPONSE TO QUESTION 4148 CORRES. SYSTEMS ( NRC QUEST. Q430. 5-1 MAIN CONTROL BOARD NURRO 0700 K RESPONSE TO 4271 CORRES. AND REMOTE SRUTDONN QUESTION. PANEL ILLUMINATION LEVELS OF EMER0ENCY LIGHTING. O O O
O . O O IIFLEENTATION SORTED BY KFEKIICE NUNIER 4 SECTION DESIGI LAST DESIGel FIRST CONST LAST (XIIIST FIRST REMAIES REF NO. DOCUENT/FEATUE_ EXPLAlsATION OF FIELDS DOCUENT/ FEATURE - The doctanent discussed in the FSAR section or the plant feature described in the FSAR section. (See Comitent Matrix.) SECTION - The section of the document / feature that is being discussed DESIGN LAST, CONST LAST - "Last" Indicates the project document currently containing the Information found in the comitment DESIGil FIRST, 000lST FIRST - "First" indicates the project document that contained the information found in the comitment when the a ctivities governed by the document first t g an. EF NO. - A reference number that corresponds to the appropriate line entry in the cwaltme. t matrix. 0042F
_ . . .. m . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ .. .., - _ . _ _ _._.m . _ _ . - _ _ . . . _ . . . . . . . _ _ _ . . . - __ _
~
Page No. I 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
====================================s==
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
10CFR50. APP.A.0DC 3 DC-1801-3.1.N. DC-1801-3.1.R. 40.00 (PREFERRED POWER SOURCES) REY. 3. 7-19-83, REV. 2 DC-1810-3.1.2 11-26-80, , REY. 7, 9-24-83 DC-1810-3.1.2 REY. 6 10-3-83 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS ARE DC-1809-3.1.3 DC-1809-3.1.3 91.00 PROVIDED FOR ALL REY. 6, 9-20-85, RET. 3, 2-6-78 SAFETY-RELATED CABLE TRAYS I4AX03-ATTACRMEN X4AIO3-ATTACEMEN T 1. REY. 8 T 1, REY. O, 11-11-85 4-27-82 FIRE STOPS ARE USED IN DC-1809-3.1.1 DC-1809-3.1.1 92.00 LONG VERTICAL RUNS OF TRAY REY. 5, 9-20-85 REY. 3. 2-6-78 AT INTERVALS OF UP TO 20 FT. OR AT A POINT LEVEL WITR ADJACENT FLOORS REO. QUIDE 1.29 DC-2303-3.1 DC-2303-3.1, 685.00 REY. 2. 4-28-83. RET. O, 7-20-78 DMCN-2303-1 DC-2301-3.0.0.7 7-12-83 REY. 3. 4-27-77, DC-2301-3.2.G.9 X4AIO3-2.1.B. REY. 5. 8-14-79, REV. O. 4-27-82 X4AIO3-2.1.3 ' REY. 8 11-11-85 RG 1.61, 10/73 DC-1000-C, DC-1000-c. 7d7.00 APPENDIX E. REY. APPENDIN E. REY. 3, 9-30-83 1, 11-22-77 DC-1017-1.0 DC-1017-1.0, REY. 4, 8-9-85 REY. 1, 1,-24-83 4
Page Co. 2 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION
========================== =======s===s ================ ================ ================ ================ ====-======== ========
BTP-CMEB 9.5-1 SEE REMARKS SEE REF. NO. 784.00 1583 FOR DESIGN IMPLEMENTATIO NS 10CFR50, APP. A, ODC 2 DC-2303-3.1, DC-2303-3.1, 785.00 REY. 3, 4-28-83 REV. 3, 4-28-83 DC-1017-3.3.1, DC-1017-3.3.1, REY. 4, 8-9-85 REY. 1, 1-24-83 DC-1002-2.0, DC-1002-2.0, 786.01 NFPA REY. 2, 8-14-78 RET. 2, 8-14-79 DC-1000-A-3.3, DC-1000-A-3.3, REY. 1, 12-4-85, REY. O. 6-19-79 DC-1225-2.2 DC-1225-2.2 RE". 1, 2-11-85 RET. O, 4-3-78 DC-1324-2.0, DC-1324-2.0, REY. O. REY. O. 10-18-77, . 10-18-77 DC-1408-2.0, DC-1408-2.0, RET. 4 RET. 2, 8-27-77, 10-16-81 DC-1504-2.0.I. DC-1504-2.0.I. RET. 4, 9-29-78 REY. 5, 8-2-83, DC-1505-2.0.J, DC-1505-2.0.J. RET. 4 REY. 5, 7-26-83, 10-23-78
- DC-1511-2.0.0, DC-1511-2.0.0, RET. 4, 8-2-83 REY. 3, 10-13-78 9
9 e
' N-Page N. 3 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= =======. ,
NFPA DC-1515-2.0.F, DC-1515-2.0.0 786.02 REY. 1. 8-5-83 REY. O. 9-27-78 DC-1521-2.0.D. DC-1521-2.0 D. REY. 1 1-3-78 REY. 1, 1-3-78 DC-1524-2.0.D. DC-1524-2.0.D. REY. 3, 8-2-83, REY. 2, 3-23-77 DC-1526-2.0.A. DC-1526-2.0.A. RET. O. 9-21-83 RET. O. 9-21-83 DC-1531-2.0.N. DC-1531-2.0.0 RET. 3 B-9-83, REV. 1 8-15-77 DC-1532-2.0.J. DC-1532-2.0.0, REV. 3, 8-1-83 REY. O. 6-27-74 DC-1533-2.0.D. DC-1533-2.0.D. . REV. 2 B-5-83 REY. 1, 5-26-77 DC-1535-2.0.F. DC-1535-2.0.F. REY. 2 8-2-83 REY. 1 10-13-78 NFPA DC-1537-2.0.D. DC-1537-2.0.D. 786.03 REY. O. 5-27-77 RET. O, 6-27-77 DC-1539-2.0.I. DC-1539-2.0.R. REY. 2, 8-9-83 REY. 1. 9-29-78 DC-1541-2.0.J. DC-1541-2.0.J. REY. 1, 9-29-78 REY. C, 8-22-77 DC-1542-2.0.L. DC-1542-2.0.L. REY. 1, 9-29-78 REY. O. 8-22-77, DC-1548-2.0.R. DC-1548-2.0.R. REY. O. REY. O. , 12-27-82 12-27-82 DC-1550-2.0.R. DC-1550-2.0.R. REV. O. 4-14-83, REY. O. 4-14-83 DC-1551-2.0.0, DC-1551-2.0.0 l REY. 2 8-17-83 REY. O. 6-8-77 DC-1553-2.0.0 DC-1553-2.0.0, REY. 2 8-2-83 REY. 2, 8-2-83 I t f
Page No. 4 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
NFPA DC-1557-2.0.F. DC-1557-2.0.F. 786.04 REY. O. REY. O. 11-18-82 11-18-82 . DC-1561-2.0.K. DC-1561-2.0.D. REY. 2 8-2-83 REV. O. DC-1563-2.0.K. 11-22-77 REY. O. 9-21-83 DC-1563-2.0.K. DC-1566-2.0.7 REV. O. 9-21-83 REV. 2, 8-2-83 DC-1566-2.0.R. DC-1590-2.0.R. REY. O. 8-8-77 REY. 1, 7-26-83 DC-1590-2.0.R. DC-1808-2.0 REY. O. 8-18-78 REY. 4 11-7-85 DC-1808-2.0 DC-1811-2.0, REY. 4 11-7-85 REY. 1. 5-6-80 DC-1811-2.0 DC-1813-2.0 REY. O. 9-27-77 REY. 3, 4-18-83 DC-1813-2.0 REY. 1, 5-9-77 NFPA DC-1817-2.0 DC-1817-2.0 786.05 RRY. 4. 6-11-84 REY. 3. 4-12-77 DC-2301-2.0 DC-2301-2.0 REY. 5, 8-14-79 REY. 3 4-27-77 DC-2303-2.0 DC-2303-2.0 REY. 3, 4-28-83 REY. O. 7-20-78 DC-2304-2.0 DC-2304-2.0, REY. 2. 4-28-83 REY. O. 1-19-78 ,
- DC-2403-2.0.E. DC-2403-2.0.E.
REY. 3 5-2-79 REY. 2 12-6-77 DC-2406-2.0 DC-2406-2.0 REY. 2 10-5-82 REY. 2 10-5-82 DC-2418-2.0 DC-2418-2.0 REY. 1. 4-29-82 RET. O. 7-1-77 DC-2506-2.0 DC-2506-2.0, REY. 1 10-31-77 REY. O. 6-27-77 O O O
..-m... - _. . _ -
_m
-. _ _ . . - - . __-._-.~.._.__m. _.--._m , . . _ _ - - . _.. _._- . . . - . . - _ . - _ - _ - . _ . -
m .. . . _ . . --. . C Page M8. 5 O 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
NFPA DC-2508-2.0 DC-2508-2.0, 786.06 REY. O. 11-2-79. REY. 0, 11-2-79 DC-2510-2.0.E. DC-2510-2.0,E. REY. O. 4-5-84 REV. O. 4-5-84 DC-2511-2.0.I. DC-2511-2.0.K. REY. O. 4-5-84 REV. O. 4-5-84 DC-2512-2.0.E. DC-2512-2.0.E. REY. O. 4-5-84 REY. O. 4-5-84 DC-2514-2.0.E. DC-2514-2.0.E. REY. O. 10-1-81. REY. O. 10-1-81 DC-2515-2.0.K. DC-2515-2.0.E. REY. O. 4-21-80 REY. O 4-21-80 DC-2517-2.0.E. DC-2517-2.0.E.
, REY. O. 4-21-80 REV. O. 4-21-80 DC-2518-2.0.E. DC-2518-2.0.E.
REY. 1. 11-21-80 REY. 1, 11-21-80 NFPA DC-2519-2.0.E. DC-2519-2.0.E. 786.07 REY.1. 4-5-84 REY.O. 4-21-80 DC-2520-2.0.E. DC-2520-2.0.E. REY.O. 10-1-79 REY.O. 10-1-79 DC-2523-2.0.E. DC-2523-2.0.2 REY.0, 10-1-81 REV.0, 10-1-81 DC-2524-2.0.1 DC-2524-2.0.I. REY.0 10-1-81 REV.O. 10-1-81 X4AX03-2.1.1 X4AR03-2.1.1 REY.7 10-8-85 REY.O. 4-27-82 , X3AQO1-2.3.C. X3A001-2.3.C. REY.6 10-21-85. REY.0 1-11-80 I4AJ21-2.0 I4AJ21-2.0 REY.7 10-21-86. REY.O. 10-6-80 14AF14-2.0 X4AF14-2.0 REV.3 11-1-83 REY.O. 11-1-73 i d
- _ __ _ _ -_ __ m __ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _
Pete No. 6 04/29/66 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BV REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================= ============ ================ ================ ===e3=========== ================ ============= ========
NFPA I3A009-2.3.C. 13A009-2.3.C. 786.08 REY. 2, 2-13-85 REV. O, 6-27-84 BTP APCSB 9.5-1 APP. A SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 788.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N, SEE REF. NO. 1581 3934 AND 3935 10CFR$0 APP.A.GDC 3 SEE REMARES SEE REF. NO. 789.00 1582 FOR DESIGN IMPLEMENTATIO NS 10CFR50, APP.A.GDC 4 DC-1001-1.0, DC-1001-1.0 790.01 REY. 1, 8-30-83 REV. 0, 1-24-78 DC-1006-1.0 DC-1006-1.0 REY. 2. 7-13-85. REY. O. DC-1017-1.0 12-19-77 REY. 4, 8-9-85, DC-1017-1.0, DC-1018-1.0, REY. O. 1-19-78 REY. 2 DC-1018-1.0 10-11-83 REV. O. DMCN-1018-2 12-13-77, 6-15-85 DC-1000-A-1.0, DC-1000-A-1.0, REV. O 6-19-79,
- REY. 1 12-4-85. DC-1000-C-1.0 DC-1000-C-1.0 REY. O, 2-28-74 REV. 3. 9-30-83, DC-1000-E-1.0 DC-1000-E-1.0, REY. O, 7-24-73 REY. 6 B-29-85 BC-1000-N-1.0, REY. O, 6-1-73 9 O O
_. _ . . ._ _ ....m . . . - - .- .= - - --- _........ -._ .~.-...-._. __ ....__mmm . -. . . . .-- _m . -. _ ._.- ... ( Page Nb ( 7 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DE5 ION LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REM 4RES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
DC-1000-N-1.0, DC-1000-J-1.0, 790.02 10CFR50. APP.A.CDC 4 REY. 3, 5-2-83, REY. O, 6-10-73, DC-1000-J-1.0, DC-1003-1.0, REY. 4, 4-4-85 REV. O. 1-12-78, DC-1003-1.0, DC 1004-1.0, REV. 2, 6-29-83, REY. O, 8-14-78 DC-1004-1.0, REV. 3, 8-23-83 10CFR50, APP.A,0DC 5 DC-1001-1.0, DC-1000-1.0, 791.00 REY. 1, 8-30-83, REV. O, 1-24-78 DC-1000-A-1.0, DC-1000-A-1.0, REV. 1, 12-4-85 REY. O, 6-19-79, DC-1000-C-1.0, DC-1000-C-1.0, REY. 3, 9-30-R3, REV. O, 2-28-74 DC-1000-E-1.0, DC-1000-E-1.0, REY. 6, 8-29-85, REY. O, 7-24-73 DC-1000-J-1,0, DC-1000-J-1.0, REV. 4, 4-4-85 REY. O 5-10-73 DC-2303-1.0, DC-2303-1.0, REY. 2, 4-28-83. REY. 2, 4-28-83, DC-2304-1.0, DC-2304-1.0, REY. 2, 4-28-83, REY. 2, 4-28-83 DC-1000-N-3.4 DC-1000-N-3.4, REY. 2, 4-12-78 REY. O, 5-1-73 10CFR50, APP. A, ODC 10 DC-1201-2.0, DC-1201-2.0, 742.00 3.1, REY. 2, 3.1, REV. 1, 3-9-84, 4-21-83 ' DMCN-1201-1, l 7-23-84 I l s t h __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ __ . ._.____._m_ ~ ~ - . , . --.-m _. ,-, . , _ _ . - - s- . .,- , . . , - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . s ....
Pago No. 8 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 185 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ st============== ============= ========
NOTE (V): BTP CMEB V0GTLE PROJECT V0GTLE PROJECT 848.00 9.5-1. APP.A. FIRE POLICIES & POLICIES & PROTECTION (FSAR TABLE PROCEDURE PROCEDURE 3.2.2-1) MANUAL. SECTION MANUAL. SECTION C.7.5, REY. 1 C.7.5, RRY. 1 1-2-85 1-2-85 NOTE (X): FIRE PROTECTION DC-2303-3.1 DC-2303-3.2.3 850.00 STAND PIPE PROJECT CLASS REV. 3. 4-28-83. REY. 4 12-19-77 313 TO ENSURE DMCN-2303-1 , IMPLEMENTATION OF A 7-12-83 SEISMIC CAT. I. ASME III-3 (FSAR TABLE 3.2.2-1) NEMA MGI-1972 (NATIONAL X4AF14-2.0. REY. 24AF14-2.0. REY. 865.00 ELECTRICAL MRFS ASSOC.) 3 11-1-83 O. 11-1-73 MOTORS / GENERATORS DC-1000-E-2.0.B. DC-1000-E-2.0.B.
- 5. REV. 6 6. REV. 2 8-29-85 12-13-77 NEMA M01-1972 (NATIONAL SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 867.00 ELECTRICAL MFRS ASSOC.) IMPLEMENTATIO MOTORS / GENERATORS N. REFER TO REF. NO. 865 NFPA (PRINCIPAL CODES AND DC-2301-2.0 0C-2301-2.0 873.00 STANDARDS FOR TABLE REY. 5, 8-14-79. REY. 3 4-27-77
- T.3.2.2-1) DC-2303-2.0 DC-2303-2.0 REY. 3. 4-28-83 REV. O. 7-20-78 DC-2304-2.0 DC-2304-2.0 REY. 2. 4-28-83. REY. O. 1-19-78 I4AF14-2.0, REV. I4AF14-2.0. REV.
3, 11-1-83 O. 1-19-78 I4A505-2.0. REV. X4AH05-2.0 REV.
- 3. 8-17-85 O. 2-14-74 X4 AID 3-2.0, REY. X4 AID 3-2.0 REV.
7 9-9-85 0, 4-27-82 O O O
[ Page kv. 9 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARK 5 REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
ASME SEC. III. CLASS 1, 2 DC-2303-3.1 DC-2303-3.1 880.00 3 OR MC. Mr OR C8 REY. 3 4-28-83 REY. O. 7-20-78 ANSI B31.1 DC-2301-3.2.0.9 DC-2301-3.2'.G.9 884.00 REY. 5 8-14-79 REY. 3 4-27-77 DMcN-2301-7-, DC-1017-2.2 4-16-84 TABLE 1. REY. 1 , DC-1017-2.2 1-24-83 TABLE 1. REY. 4, 8-9-85 DMCN-1017-4 12-30-85 ASME B & PV. SEC. III. DC-2303-3.1, DC-2303-3.3.D. 889.00 DIV. 1. SUBSECTION ND. 3.3.D. REY. 3 REY. O. 7-20-78 CLASS 3 4-28-83 DMCN-2303-1, 7-12-83 I AWWA DC-2301-2.0 DC-2301-2.0 911.00 REY. 5. 8-14-79. RE.. 4
- X2AC01. REY. 3 12-19-77 3-4-77 12AC01. REY. O.
5-6-74 I i BC-TOP-4A DC-1000-C-2.3.C. DC-1000-C-2.3.C. 1011.00 REY. 3. 9-30-83 REY. 1 . 1 DC-1005-2.0.E. 11-22-77 REY. 1. 4-4-83 DC-1005-2.0.E. 1 REY. O. 3-10-80 i 4 e l 5 e ( l i i
-------u, - , - - , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Psge Ms. 10 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DERIGN FIRST CON 5T LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
=-======================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
RG 1.84. REY. 20, 11/82 DC-1017-1.0 DC-1017-1.0 1565.00 REY. 4, 8-9-85 REY. 1, 1-24-83 DC-1017-1.0 DC-1017-1.0'. 1569.00 RG 1.85 REV. 20 11/82 REY. 4 B-3-85 REY. 1 1-24-83 10CFR50. APP.A.GDC 3 DC-1001-1.0 DC-1000-1.0 1582.01 REY. 1. 8-30-83 REY. O. 1-24-78 DC-1002-1.0 DC-1002-1.0, REY. 2 8-14-79 REY. O. DC-1000-E-1.0, 12-20-77 REY. 6 8-29-85 DC-1000-E-1.0 DC-1000-C-1.0 REV. O. 7-24-73 REY. 3. 9-30-83. DC-1000-C-1.0 DC-1000-A-1.0 REY. O. 2-28-74 REV. 1 12-4-85 DC-1000-A-1.0 DC-2301-1.0, REV. O. 6-19-79 REY. 5, 8-14-79. DC-2301-1.0 DC-2303-1.0, REY. 3, 4-27-77 REY. 2. 4-28-83. DC-2303-1.0 DC-2304-1.0 REY. O. 7-20-78 REY. 2 4-28-83 DC-2304-1.0, RIV.0, 1-19-78 10CFR50. APP.A.GDC 3 DC-1000-M-3.4 DC-1000-M. REY. 1582.02 REY. 2 4-28-83 0, 5-1-73 t BTP CMEB 9.5-1 ERE REMARES FOR DE510N 15$3.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N. SEE REF. No. 3925 THRU 3967 l
- O O
Pese kw. 11 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
=========..===
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
====== .===============================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIR 8T REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE ========
========================== === ====.... =========....=== ===3..========== ====............ .... ====....... ====e========
RG 1.141. REY. O. 4/78 DC-2415-1.0 DC-2415-1.0, 1595.00 REY. 1, 5-16-83 REY. 1. 5-16-83 ANSI N271-1976 DC-2415-2.0 DC-2415-2.0'. 1596.00 REY. 1. 5-16-83 RET. O, 3-23-78 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 56 DC-2415-3.1.B. DC-2415-2.0 1597.00 REY. 1. 6-16-83 REY. O. 3-23-78 RG 1.29 SEE REMARE8 FOR DESIGN 1754.00 ' IMPLEMENTATIO N. SEE REF. NO. 685 N.M.L. (NUCLEAR MUTUAL DC-2301-2.0, DC-2301-2.0 SEE PROJECT 1942.01 LIMITED - PROPERTY LOSS REY. 5. 8-14-79, REY. 0. 6-30-74 RESPONSE TO PREVENTION STANDARDS FOR DC-2304-2.0 DC-2304-2.0, RRF 188-1 NUCLEAR GENERATING REV. 2. 4-28-83, dEY. 1. 8-14-79 STANDARDS, JUNE 1978) DC-1000-A-3.9, DC-1000-A-3.9 REV. 1, 12-4-85 REY. 0, 6-19-79, DC-1000-E-2.0.4. DC-1000-E-2.0.4, REY. 6, 8-29-85. REY. 5, 4-3-84 DC-1000-M-3.5 DC-1000-M-3.5
. REY. 2, 4-12-78 REY. 1, 8-22-74 DC-1002-2.0, DC-1002-2.0 RET. 2, 8-14-79 REY. 2, 8-14-79, DC-1811-2.0 DC-1811-2.0 ,
- REY. 1, 5-6-80, REY. O, 9-27-77 DC-1813-2.0 DC-1813-2.0 RET. 3, 4-18-83 REY. 3. 4-19-84 i
I i e e a .~... .-w .- a-.- , - - , - -- - n . ~ . . . , ,,.w. - - . - - - . - , - < - - -.
Psge No. 12 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRF7 CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
==================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
I4AF14-2.0 REV. X4AF14-2.0, REY. BEE PROJECT 1942.02 N.M.L. (NUCLEAR MUTUAL LIMITED - PROPERTY LOSS 3 11-1-83 O. 11-1-73 RESPONSE TO PREVENTION STANDARDS FOR IIAGil-2.0 REY. IIA 0ll-2.0., REY. RRF 185-1 NUCLEAR GENERATING 5 10-23-85 O. 11-13-81 STANDARDS. JUNE 1978) I4AP01-2.0 REY. I4AP01-2.0 REV. 8, 9-6-85 O. 12-18-80 X3AQ09-2.3.C. X3AQ09-2.3.C. REY. 2 2-13-85 REY. O. 6-27-84 X3AG01-2.3.C. X3A001-2.3.C. REY. 5 REY. O. 1-11-80 10-21-85 X4AX03-2.1.10 X4AX03-2.1.10 REY. O 4-27-82 REY. 8 DC-2110-2.3 11-11-85 3.7.D. REY. 5 DC-2110-2.0 3-10-78 3.7.D. REY. 7 9-21-83 10CFR50 APP.L.0DC 54 - SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 2025.00 PIPING STSTEM PENETRATION IMPLEMENTATIO OF CONTAINMENT N. SEE REF. No. 817 10CFR50.AP/.J DC-1222-2.0 DC-1222-2.0, 2026.00 REV. 1. 5-9-83 REY. 1. 5-9-83 10CFR50. APP.A.GDC 57 DC-2301-3.2.0.2 DC-2301-3.2.0.2 2028.00
& 3. REY. 5 &3 REY. 5 8-14-79, 8-14-79 DC-2415-1.0 5C-2415-1.0 REY. 1. 6-16-83 REY. O. 5-16-83 O O O
PcEs E- 13 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST RMMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
10CFR50. APP.A.GDC 54 DC-2415-1.0 DC-2415-1.0, 2055.00 (PIPING SYSTEMS RET. 1. 5-16-83. REV. O. 5-16-83 PENETRATING CONTAINMENT) DC-1222-1.0 DC-1222-1.0, RET. 1. 5-9-83 RET. O. 7-9-79 10CFR50 APP.A.GDC 57 SEE REMARES SEE REF. NO. 2057.00 (CLOSED SYSTEM ISOLATION 2028 FOR VALVES) . DESIGN IMPLEMENTATIO N
. TRREE ROUR CURTAIN TYPE I4AJ21-ATTACEMEN I4AJ21-ATTACRMEN DAMPER TYPE 3458.00 FIRE DAMPERS LOCATED, AS T 1. REV. 7 T 1. REV. O. SHOWN ON NECESSARY. BETWEEN FIRE 10-21-85 SEE 10-6-80 YENDOR WALLS TO MAINTAIN FIRE REMARR5 DRAWINGS RATINGS OF BARRIERS TWO SEPARATE DETECTORS DC-1813-3.3.F. DC-1813-3.3.F. 3558.00 REQUIRED TO ACTUATE HALOM REY. 3. 4-18-83. REY. 3. 4-18-83, 1301 SYSTEM I4AX03-4.3.6.A, 14AX03-4.3.8.A.
REY. 8 11-11-85 REY. O 4-27-82 SEALED BEAM LIGHTING DC-1808-3.0.C.3 DC-1808-3.0.C.3 3560.00 FIXTURE WITR EIGRT NOUR. RET. 3. 3-5-81 REY. 3 3-5-81 SELF-CONTAINED BATTERT AND CHARGER SEALED BRAM FIXTURES SHALL SEE REMARKS SEE REF. NO. 3561.00 BE EIGRT ROUR RATED WITH 3560 FOR SELF-CONTAINED BATTER 7 AND DESIGN CRARGER UNITS IMPLEMENTATIO N 1 I 4 i
Page No. 14 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
EIGHT HOUR SEALED BEAM DC-1808-3.0.C. DC-1808-3.0.C. 3585.00 FIITURES REY. 3 3-5-81 REY. 3 3-5-81 R0 1.137 DC-2403-1.0 DC-2403-1.0'. 3586.00 REV. 3 5-2-79 REY. 3 5-2-79 I4AE01-2.0.15 I4AE01-2.0.15 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1. 9-12-78 BTP-CMEB 9.5-1 SEE REMARES SEE REF. No. 3654.00 1583 FOR DESIGN IMPLEMENTATIO NS BTP MEB 3-1 DC-1018-1.0 DC-1003-1.0 3656.00 REV. 2 REY. O. 10-11-83, 12-13-77 DC-1003-1.0 DC-1003-1.0, REY. 2, 6-29-83 REY. O. 1-12-78 STRUCTURAL STEEL MEMBERS DC-1000-A-4.3 DC-1000-A-4.3 3657.00 SUPPORTING FIRE BARRIERS REY. 1 12-4-85. REY. O 6-19-79 ARE PROTECTED TO SAME IIA 010 REY. 2 IIA 010. REY. O. ROURLY FIRE RATING AS FIRE 5-11-82 4-4-79 EARRIER NFPA 30 DC-2403-2.0.E. DC-2403-2.0.E. 36q8.00 REY. 3, 5-2-79 REY. 2, 12-6-77
l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ . ' Page No. 04/29/86 O 15 C IMPLEMENTATION
= ...=...=..=...
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
.....=.....=.= .....==.=.==. =........=
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO ( DOCUMENT / FEATURE
====....==......==........ ............ ................ ........=.====.. ...........=.... ....=.......=... ............. ........
I i BULK STORAGE OF COMPRESSED DC-2402-3.0.8 DC-2402-3.0.8 3659.00 OR CRTOGENIC GASES IS NOT REY. 2. 4-29-82. REV. 1. 2-11-77 PERMITTED MITRIN DC-1325-4.0 DC-1325-4.0, STRUCTURES BOUSING SAFETT REY. 1. 4-29-82 REV. 1. 4-29-82 RELATED EQUIPMENT DC'-2418-2.0 DC-2418-2.0 3.2.A. REY. 1 3.2.A. RET. O. 4-29-82 7-1-77 BULK FLAMMABLE GASES DC-2406-2.0 DC-2406-2.0 3660.00 STORED OUTDOORS OR IN 3.2.C. REY. 2 3.2.C. REY. 1 SEPERATE DETACHED 10-5-82 4-4-77 BUILDINGS AND ARE NOT EXPOSED TO SAFETT RELATED EQUIPMENO SYSTEMS OR STRUCTURES . , OIL FILLED TRANSFORMERS IN DC-1801-3.2.R. DC-1801-3.2.R. 3662.00 SMITCRYARD ARE MIN. OF 50 RET. 3. 7-19-83. REV. 3. 7-19-83 FT. FROM SAFITT RELATED DC-1802-4.0.B. DC-1802-4.0.B. STRUCTURES REY. 1 11-7-80 RET. 1 11-7-80 REDUNDANT SAFETT DIVISION DC-1810-3.1.2.C. DC-1810-3.1.2.C. 3663.00 TRAINS A AND B ARE IN REV. 7 9-24-85 -REY. 6 10-3-83 INDIVIDUAL CABLE SPREADING ROOMS. SEPARATED BY THREE HOUR FIRE BARRIERS SEPARATION OF REDUNDANT DC-1810-3.1.2 DC-1810-3.1.2 3644.00 TRAINS RET. 7 9-24-85 REY. 6 10-3-83 l a
Page No. 16 04/29/86
- IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 185 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
=====-==================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
SEPARATION BY THREE HOUR DC-1810-3.1.2 DC-1810-3.1.2 3665.00 FIRE BARRIER REY. 7, 9-24-85 REV. 6 10-3-83 DC-1000-A-4.3 DC-1000-A-4 3 REY. 1 12-4-85 REY. O. 6-19-79 DC-1002-3.3.8.E. DC-1002-3.3.8.E. REV. 2 8-14-79 REV. 2, 8-14-79 MINIMUM 20 FT. SEPARATION DC-1810-3.1.2.D. DC-1810-3.1.2.D. IMPLEMENTATIO 3666.00 WITH NO INTERVENING 2 REY. 7 2. REY. 6 N PER BTP COMBUSTIBLE HAZARDS 9-24-85 10-3-83 CMEB 9.5-1 SECTION 5.b.2.b AS INVOKED IN REFERENCED DESIGN DOCUMENTS SAFETY RELATED CHARCOAL DC-2301-3.2.0.5. DC-2301-3.2.0.5 3667.00 FILTER ASSEMBLIES HAVE A REY. 5, 8-14-79 REY. 5, 8-14-79 DELUGE SYSTEM E4AJ07-11.0 K4AJ07-11.0, REY. 10, 9-24-85 REY. 1, 7-7-78 MANUAL FIRE SUPPRESSION SEE REMARKS REFER TO REF. 3668.00 SYSTEMS PROVIDED OVER No. 3667 FOR CRARCOAL FILTER HOUSING DESIGN IMPLEMENTATIO N , i I . l O O O
..- . . . . . , ~ . _ . . . . , _ _ _ . . - - - . - . - _ . . _ - .- ._. _ . . . . . . . - ..
~
O Page f. . 17 O O 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 18B - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
DOORS TRRU FIRE BARRIERS DC-1000-A-3.1.1. DC-1000-A-3.1.1. 3669.00 HAVE FIRE RATING C. REY. 1 C. RET. O. COMMENSURATE WITH FIRE 12-4-85 6-19-79 , BARRIER X1AW01-4.1.4.D. X1AH01-4.1.4.D. REY. 3 7-25-85 REY. O. 1-29-81 CABLE. CABLE TRAYS. DC-1809-3.1.1 DC-ISO 9-3.1.1 3670.00 CONDUITS AND PIPING REY. 4 1-21-82 REY. 3. 2-6-78 PENETRATIONS OF FIRE IIAGil. REY. 3 IIAGil. REV. O. BARRIERS HAVE SEALS WITH 1-11-85 11-13-85 SAME HOURLY RATING AS BARRIER VENTILATION SYSTEM I4AJ21-3.1 X4AJ21-3.1, 3671.00 PENETRATION OPENING WILL ATTACEMENT 1 ATTACEMENT 1 RAVE FIRE DAMPERS WITH REY. 7 10-21-85 REY. O. 10-6-80 RATING EQUIVALENT TO FIRE BARRIER FLEXIBLE AIR DUCT 14AJ01-N-6.3.I. 14AJ01-E-6.3.I. 3672.00 COUPLINGS IN VENT AND REY. 18, 9-13-85 REV. 18, 9-13-85 FILTER SYSTEMS WILL BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE FUSIBLE LINE CLOSING AND I4AJ21-4.3. REY. 14AJ21-4.3. REY. 3673.00 MANUAL REOPENING IIEE 7 10-21-85 0, 10-6-80 DAMPERS USED WHERE , ; NON-SAFETV RELATED DUCTWORE PENETRATES FIRE BARRIERS AND FIRE TOWER WALLS 4 1
- _ - - _ . . _ _ _ _.---_-__--_-_____-_----._a .
Psga Co. 10 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========== =============== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
ELEVATORS AND LIFE fiFETT DC-1000-A-4.3.2. DC-1000-A-4.3.2 IMPLEMENTATIO 3674.00 STAIRWELLS ENC.iSED IN 3.3.1 RET. 1 3.3.1. REV. O. N PER NFPA CONCRETE SHAFTS WITH TWO 12-4-85 6-19-79 101. CHAPTERS ROUR FIRE RATINGS AND 6 & 7 AND CLASS B SELF-CLOSING CMEB 9.5-1 AS SIMILARLT RATED DOORS INV0EED IN REFERENCED DESIGN DOCUMENTS WALLS AND STRUCTURAL DC-1000-A-4.3 DC-1000-A-4.3 3675.00 MATERIALS ARE REY. 1 12-4-85 REV. O. 6-19-79 NON-COMBUSTIBLE , INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS DC-1000-A-3.1.1. DC-1000-A-3.1.1. 3676.00 ARE MON-COMBUSTIBLE OR B. REY. 1 B, REY. 1 HAVE A FLAME SPREAD. SMORE 12-4-85 12-4-85 , AND FUEL CONTRIBUTION OF 25 OR LESS ELECTRIC WIRING TO DC-1810-3.1.2.C. DC-1810-3.1.2.0, 3677.00 LIGHTING AND HVAC ABOYE RET. 7, 9-24-85 REY. 6 10-3-83 SUSPENDED CEILINGS IS EIAN02-4.2. REV. X1AN02-4.2. REY. ENCLOSED IN CONDUIT 1 10-12-85 O. 11-19-79 AUTO. FUSIBLE LINE CLOSING SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 3678.00 AND MANUAL REOPENING FIRE IMPLEMENTATIO , DAMPERS ARE PROVIDED IN N. SEE REF. VENTILATION OPENINGS THRU NO. 3673 FIRE BARRIER WALLS WHICH
- ARE NOT PROVIDED WITH DUCTWORE ON EITHER SIDE O O O
Pete W . 19 04/29/96 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 189 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO ; DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
STAIRWELLS RAVE A MIN. I SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 3679.00 1/2 ROUR RATED FIRE DOOR IMPLEMENTATIO , N. REFER TO REF. NO. 3674 WIRING RUNS OUTSIDE CABLE DC-1000-E-3.1.2. DC-1000-E-3.1.2. 3680.00 TRAYS ENCLOSED IN METAL B, REY. 6 H. REV. 3,
, CONDUIT 8-29-85 6-19-81 IEEE 383-74 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 3681.00 REY. 6, 8-29-85, REY. 2 DC-1809-2.0, 12-13-77 REY. 4, 1-21-82. DC-1809-2.0, X3AJ01-2.0, REY. REY. 3, 2-6-78, 5, 5-9-85, X3AJ01-2.0, REV.
X3AJ02-2.0, REY. O, 2-23-79, 12, 8-16-85, X3AJ02-2.0, REY. X3AJ04-2.0, REY. 1, 2-14-79, 9, 6-2F-85 X3AJ04-2.0, REY. O, 5-9-78 CABLE TRAT CONSTRUCTION X3AH01-3.0, REY. X3AH01-3.0, REY. 3682.00 MATERIALS ARE 15, 2-25-85, 2, 2-7-79 MON-COMBUSTIBLE DC-1810-3.1.1.E. DC-1810-3.1.1.E. REY. 7, 9-24-85 REY. 6, 10-3-83 INTERIOR TRANSFORMERS ARE DC-1805-3.0.C.2, DC-1805-3.0.C.2, 3643.00 DRY TYPE REY. 6, 8-6-85 REY. 2, 9-27-77 4 a i i i i i i 1
O Pete No. 20 04/29/06 IMPLEMENTATION
=====-========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CON 5T LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
=======- ================= ============ ================ ======e========= ================ ================ ============= ========
NFPA 803-1978 6.3 IIAGil-2.0, REY. X1A0ll-2,0, REV. 3684.00 5, 10-23-85, 0, 11-13-81 DC-1809-3.1.1.A. DC-1809-3.1,1.A. REV. 4, 1-21-82 REY. 3, 2-8-78 SMORE DETECTORS ARE DC-1809-3.1.2 DC-1809-3.1.2, 3685.00 PROVIDED FOR ALL 5AFE REY. 4, 1-21-82 REV. 3, 2-8-78 SRUTDOWN CABLE TRAY RUN5 THROUOROUT THE PLANT LINE TYPE FIRE DETECTORS -73 AQO l-4. 5. C. I3AQ01-4.5.C, 3086.00 ARE PROVIDED IN REY. 5 REY. O, 1-11-80, CONTAINMENT CABLE TRAYS 10-21-85, I4AIO3-4.5.2.E. X4hM03-4.5.2.E. REV. O, 4-27-82 ' REY. 8, 11-11-85 FOR ESSENTIAL CIRCUITS , DC-1809-3.1.D. DC-1809-3.1.D. 3687.00 DURING 5AFE SHUTDOWN. REY. 4, 1-21-82 REY. 3, 2-8-78 ELECTRICAL CABLES ARE DESIGNED TO AL?,0W WETTING WITHOUT ELECTRICAL ' FAULTING IN THE CABLE SPREADING DC-1810-3.1.2.C. DC-1810-3.1.2.C. 3688.00 ROOMS, CABLING FOR REY. 7, 9-24-85 RET. 6, 10-3-83 REDUNDANT SAFETT DIVISIONS 15 ROUTED IN INDIVI-DUAL , CABLE SPREADING ROOMS SEPARATELT FOR RACH UNIT AND ARE SEPARATED BY THREE HOUR FIRE BARRIERS O O O
\
Page Lv. 21 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARFS REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
==================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
HYDRANTS INSTALLED AT A DC-2301-3.2.4.1, DC-2301-3.2.4.1, 3689.00 MAXIMUM INTERVAL OF 250 RET. 5, 8-14-79 REV. 4, 12-19-77 FT. ALONG YARD MAIN. . UL LISTED AND/OR FM I4AXO2, REY. 10, X4AX02 REY. O, 3690.00 APPROVED (FIRE 5-17-85 5-5-81 EXTINGUISHERS) NFPA-10 (FIRE DC-1002-2.0, DC-1002-2.0, IMPLEMENTATIO 3691.00 EXTINGUISHERS) REV. 2, 8-14-79, REV. O, 12-20-77 N PER NFPA DMCN-1002-1, 101 (LITE l-5-83 SAFETY CODE) AS INVORED IN REFERENCED DESIGN DOCUMENTS. NFPA 14 CLASS 2 (NET DC-2301-2.0, DC-2301-2.0, 3692.00 STAND PIPE & ROSE SYSTEM) REY. 5 B-14-79 REV. 3, 4-27-77 INDIVIDUAL STAND PIPES ARE DC-2301-3.2.0.4 DC-2301-3.2.0.4, 3693.00 4 IN. DIAMETER FOR REY. 6, R-14-79 REY. 3, 4-27-77 MULTIPLE ROSE CONNECTIONS AND 2.5 IN. DIAMETER FOR SINGLE HOSE CONNECTIONS AN INDEPENDENT SEISMIC DRY DC-2303-3.3, DC-2303-3.3, 36q4.00 STAND PIPE & ROSE SYS. IS REY. 3, 4-28-83 REY. O, 7-20-78 INSTALLED IN THE CONTAINMENT, AUE, CONTROL & DIESEL GEN. BLDOS., PROVIDES MANUAL FIRE CONTROL IN ARBAS REQUIRED FOR SAFE SMUT DONN FOLLONING AM SSR
O Page No. 22 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENC" NUMBER
=======================================
CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN TIRST ============= ======== e===============
========================== ====-======= ================ ================ ==-========e====
DC-2303-2.0, DC-2303-2.0, 3695.00 ASME. SEC. III. CLASS 3 (SEISMIC DRY STAND PIPE 3.1, REY. 3 RET. O, 7-20-78 SYSTEM) 4-28-83 DC-2304-3.3.E. 3696.00 TWO SEPARATE BALON 1301 DC-2304-3.3.E. STORAGE TANES WIT 8 RET. 2 4-28-83 REY. O. 1-19-78 INDIVIDUAL CTLINDER TALVES PROVIDE FOR TWO SEPARATE DISCRARGES IN ANY PROTECTED AREA. DC-1813-2.0, DC-1813-2.0 3698.00 NFPA 72E REY. 3 4-18-83 REY. 3. 4-18-83 13AQ01-2.3. REY. 23AQ01-2.3. REY. 5 10-21-85 O. 1-11-80 I4 AID 3-2.1. REY. I4AIO3-2.1. REY. 8 11-11-85 0, 4-27-82 DC-1813-2.0, DC-1813-2.0, 3699.00 NFPA 72A REY. 3, 4-18-83. REV. 3 4-18-83, I3AQ09-2.3. REY. I3AQ09-2.3. RET.
- 2. 2-13-85 O. 6-27-84 I4 AID 3-2.1, REY. 14 AID 3-2.1. RET.
8 11-11-85 O. 4-27-82 DC-2519-3.2.6, DC-2519-3.2.8, 3700.00 SDRVICE EUILDING Rh00RD STORAGE FACILITY NAS AN REV. 1. 4-5-84, REY. O, 4-21-80 AUTOMATIC HALON 1301 DC-2304-3.3.A. DC-2304-3.3.A. . SYSTEM PROVIDING A MINIMUM RET. 2. 4-28-83 REY. 1. 8-14-79 5% CONCENTRATION O O O
.._ ,_... _.__.. - _. _ ._. - - . _ _ _ m_.. a .. _ m . . _ _ _ . . .-____.____m _ -- . . _ ..
O Page L . 23 O O , 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
=rs===========
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
X2A004-3.0. 3.1 I2A004-3.0, 3.1 3702.00 CLASS A ROOF DECK ASSEMBLIES. A5 LISTED BT REY. 7 5-11-82 REY. 1. 6-5-78 UL. ARE USED ON SAFETT-RELATED STRUCTURES IEEE 383-1974 SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 3704.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N. REFER 70 REF. No. 3681 THERMAL ANTI 5 NEAT I4AP01-3.1 RET. X4AP01-3.1 REY. 3705.00 INSULATION. WITR ASTM E-84 8. 9-6-85 0, 12-18-80 RATINGS OF 25 FOR FLAME SPREAD. 50 FOR FUEL CONTRIBUTED AND 50 FOR SMOKE GENERATED UL RATING OF 25 FOR FLAME I4AP01-2.0 REY. I4AP01-2.0. REV. 3706.00 SPREAD. FUBL CONTRIBUTED 8. 9-6-85 0 12-18-80 AND SMOKE GENERATED (INSULATION FOR DUCTWORK ABOVE TRE CEILING OF TRE CONTROL ROOM) PREACTION SPRINKLER I4AIO3-ATTACEMEN I4AIO3-ATTACRMEN 3707.00 SYSTEMS INSTALLED IN E5F T 1. REY. 8 T 1. RET. O. ROOMS 11-11-85 4-27-82 , b a.--_-______-___-- - - _ . _ _ - . _ _ - - -_ , --. -.a.- ~
P=ge No. 24 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DE5 ION LAST DESIOT FIRST CON 5T LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
==================== ============ ================ =====.========== ================ ================ ============= ==
INSIDE CONTAINMENT. RCP I4AIO3-ATTACRMEN I4AIO:t-ATTACBMEN 3708.00 AND ELECTRICAL CABLES ARE T 1. REY. 8 T 1. WEY. O. PROTECTED BT FIIED REMOTE 11-11-85 4-27-82 MANUAL PREACTION SPRINELER SYSTEMS BTP CMEB 9.5-1 (RCP AND SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 3709.C0 ELEC. CABLES IN IMPLEMENTATIO CONTAINMENT ARE PROTECTED N. REFER TO BY FIRED REMOTE - MANUAL REF. NO. 3708 PREACTION SPRINELER SYSTEMS) FIRE DETECTION SIONALS DC-1913-3.3.F. DC-1813-3.3.F. 3817.00 FROM TNO DETECTOR 5 ARE REY. 3, 4-18-83 REY. 3 4-18-83 REQUIRED BEFORE AN ACTUATION SIONAL TO AUTO. HALON 1301 SUPPRESSION SYSTEM EIGHT ROUR SEALED BEAM DC-1808-3.0.C.3. DC-1808-3.0.C.3 3844.00 FIITURES (EMERGENCY REY. 3. 3-5-81 REY. 3. 3-5-81 LIORTING) REQUIREMENTS OF SAFETT DC-1000-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. 3905.00 RELATED CAT. I STRUCTURES A. REY. 1 A. REV. O. - EXTERIOR WALLS HAVE 12-4-85 6-19-79
- THREE HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION O O O
Pste kv. 25 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER ' ======================================= DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LASt DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ =====e========== ============= ========
INTERIOR BEARING WALLS - DC-1000-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. 3906.00 THREE ROUR FIRE RESISTANCE B. REY. 1 B. REY. O. CONSTRUCTION 12-4-85 6-19-79 , INTERIOR NONDEARING WALLS DC-1000-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. 3907.00
- THREE ROUR FIRE C. REY. 1 C. REY. O.
RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION 12-4-85 6-19-79 PRINCIPAL STRUCTUNAL DC-1000-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. 3908.00 SUPPORTING MEMBERS OF D, REV. 1 D. REY. O. SINGLE STORT BUILDING - 12-4-85 6-19-79 TWO HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPAL STRUCTURAL DC-1000-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. 3909.00 i SUPPORTING MEMBERS OF E. REV. 1 E. REY. O. MULTI-STORT BUILDINGS - 12-4-85 6-19-79 TRREE ROUR FIRE RESISTANCE CONSTRUCTION SECONDART STRUCTURAL FLOOR DC-1000-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. 3910.00 SUPPORTING MEMBERS - TWO F. REY. 1 F. REY. O. HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE 12-4-85 6-19-79 CONSTRUCTION SECONDART STRUCTURAL ROOF DC-IO00-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. 3911.00 SUPPORTING MEMBERS - 1 1/2 G. REY. 1 G. REY. O. . ROUR FIRE RESISTANCE 12-4-85 6-19-79 CONSTRUCTION i l i s 1
?
i l i~
Page Eo. 26 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
=============-
MODULE IBB - SORTED BY REFERENCM NUMBER
=======================================
DESIGN FIRST CONET LAST CONST FIRST REMARK 5 REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST
============ ================ ================ ======st======== ================ ============= ========
e===================
3912.00 INTERIOR STAIR AND DC-1000-A-4.3.1. DC-1000-A-4.3.1. ELEVATOR ENCLOSURE WALL - R. REV. 1 R. REY. O. TWO ROUR FIRE RESISTANCE 12-4-85' 6-19-79 CONSTRUCTION BEE PROJECT 3913.00 FIRE PUMP 5 RYDROSTATICALLY SEE REMARK 5 RESPONSE TO FACTORY TESTED FOR TWICE RRF 188-2 MAXIMUM 5 RUT OFF PRES 5URE I4AF14-5.3.2 I4AF14-5.3.2 IMPLEMENTATIO 3914.00 FIRE PUMPS HYDR 0 STATICALLY N PER NFPA-20 FIELD TESTED FOR 150% OF RET. 3, 11-1-83 REY. O. 11-1-73 AS INVOKED IN RATED CAPACITY REFERENCED DESIGN DOCUMENTS DC-2301-3.2.5.T. DC-2301-3.2.5.7, IMPLEMENTATIO 3915.00 UNDERGROUND FIRE N PER NFPA-24 PROTECTION PIPING REY. 5 8-14-79 REV. 5. 8-14-79, I4 AID 3-7.0.0.3 I4AIO3-7.0.0.3 AS INYORED IN RYDROSTATICALLY TESTED AT REFERENCED 200 psit WITH A LEARACE OF REY. B. 11-11-85 REY. O. 4-27-82 DESIGN 2 07. PER ROUR PER 100 DOCUMENTS JOINTS WET STAND PIPE., WET I4AIO3-4.2.3.9 I4 AID 3-4.2.3.D. IMPLEMENTATIO 3916.00 REV. 8, 11-11-85 REV. O. 4-27-82 N PER NFPA-13 SPRINELER AND SPRAY SYSTEM AS INV0EED IN PIPING RYDR0 STATICALLY REFERENCED TESTED AT 200 poig WITH NO , DESIGN VISIBLE LEAKAGE DOCUMENT 5 8 ' 9 e
PeBe b v. 27 , 04/29/86 ' IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT REFCRENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
=-======================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ =====r======= ========
RALON 1301 STSTEM TESTED DC-2364-2.0 DC-2304-2.0 IMPLEMENTATIO 3917.00 BY FULL SYSTEM DISCRARGE REY. 2. 4-28-83. REV. O. 1-19-78 N PER I4AXO3-7.0.F. X4AX03-7.0.F. MFPA-12A. REY. 8 11-11-85 REY. O. 4-27-82 APPENDIX A AS INV0EED IN REFERENCED DESIGN DOCUMENTS FIRE RATINGS OF BARRIERS. DC-1000-A-4.3 DC-1000-A-4.3 3922.00 DOORS. DAMPERS AND REV. 1 12-4-85 REY. O. 6-19-79 PENETRATION SEALS OF EACR X1AGil-3.2. REY. X1AGil-3.2. REY. FIRE AREA 5 10-23-85 O, 11-13-81 IlAR01-4.1.1.F. X1AB01-4.1.1.F. REY. 3 7-25-85. REY. O. 1-29-81 X4AJ21-3.0. REV. X4AJ21-3.0, REY. 7 10-21-85 0 10-6-80 FIRE PROTECTION STSTEMS SEE REMARES FIRE 3924.00 AND EQUIPMENT PR0t'IDED FOR PROTECTION EACR FIRE ZONE SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENTS IN THE FIRE AREAS ZONE WILL BS VERIFIED AS DESCRIBED IN , WALEDOWN PLAN WP-3 e
PcEs No. 28 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE I8B - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION SEE REMARES SEE FSAR APP. 3926.00 C.I.b. FIRE RAZARDS 9A ANALYSIS BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2301-2.0 DC-2301-2.0, 3927.00 C.I.c. FIRE SUPPRESSION 3.2 REV. 5 REV. 3. 4-27-77 SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS 8-14-79 DC-2303-2.0
. DC-2303-2.0 REV. 1. 8-14-79 3.1. REY. 2 DC-1813-3.1 4-28-83 DEV. 3 4-18-83 DC-1813-3.1 DC-1002-3.3.2 REY. 3 4-18-83 REY. 2 8-14-79 DC-1002-3.3.2 REY. 2 8-14-79 BTP CMEB 9.5-1, POSITION SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 3928.00 C.1.d. ALTERNATE OR IMPLEMENTATIO DEDICATED SRUTDOWN N. REFER TO REF. No. 3935 BTP CMEB 9.5-1. POSITION VOGTLE PROJECT YOOTLE PROJECT 3932.00 C.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICIES AND POLICIES AND PROGRAM PROCEDURES PROCEDURES MANUAL. SECTION MANUAL. SECTION C.7.5 REY. 1 C.7.5. REY. 1 1-2-85 1-2-85 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1000-A-3.1.1. DC-1000-A-3.1.1 IMPLEMENTATIO 3933.01 C.S.e, GENERAL PLANT 3.3.1. 4.3 3.3.1. 4.3 N PER NFPA CUIDELINES 11.0 REY. 1 11.0 REY. O. 101 AS BUILDING DESIGN. 12-4-85 6-19-79 INV0EED IN DC-1002-3.2 DC-1002-3.2 REFERENCED REY. 2 8-14-79 REY. O. DESIGN DC-1801-3.2.R. 12-20-77 DOCUMENTS REY. 3 7-19-83. DC-1801-3.2.R.
DC-1805-3.0.C.2 REY. O. 6-24-77 REY. 5, 8-6-85 DC-1805-3.0.C.2 DC-1810-3.1.2 REV. 2. 9-27-77 REV. 7. 9-24-85 DC-1810-3.1.2 DC-1214-3.1 REY. 6 10-3-83 REY. 4 DC-1214-3.1 12-10-82 REY. O. 4-1-74 DC-1225-3.1 DC-1225-3.1 REY. 1. 2-11-82 REV. O. 4-3-78 O O O
r Pere No. 29 I 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 185 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER i
======================================= l l
DOCUMENT / FEATURE 5BCTION DESIGN LAST
- DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CON 57 FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ======== 1 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DMCN-1225-3 DC-1215-3.2 3933.02 C.S.e. GENERAL PLANT 3-18-85 REY. 2 1-3-78 GUIDELINES DC-1215-3.2 DC-1003-3.2.J.
BUILDING DESIGN REY. 4 10-5-82. REY. 1. 5-11-78 DMCN-1215-3 I4AJ21-3.0. 4.0 . 5-24-84 REY. O. 10-6-80 DC-1003-3.2.J. IIAG11-2.0, 3.2 REY. 2, 6-29-83. REY. O. I4AJ21-3.0 4.0 11-13-81 REY. 7 IIAN02-4.2. REV.
' 10-21-85 O. 11-19-79, r 3 X1AG11-2.0. 3.2 IIAN03-2.0 REY.
REY. 5 O. 3-18-80 10-23-85 21AN02-4.2. REY. 1 10-12-84, i 11AN03-2.0 REV. 1 6 1-25-85 1 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION I2A904-3.0, REY. I2AG04-3.0, REY. 3933.03 i ! C.S.a. GENERAL PLANT 7. 5-11-82 1. 6-5-78 , ! GUIDELINE 5 BUILDING DESIGN BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1824-3.1.J. DC-1624-3.1.J. 3934.01 REY. 2. 6-13-83. REY. 2. 6-13-83 j C.5.b. GENERAL PLANT GUIDELINES DC-1810-3.1.2 90-1810-3.1.2, , ! SAFE 8NUTDONN CAPABILITT REY. 7, 9-24-85. REY. 6, 10-3-83 DC-1208-3.1.0 DC-1208-3.1.G.
- REY. 1, 3-9-83 REY. O. 5-9-78
! DC-1205-3.2.C & EC-1205-3.2.C&D, . D. REY. 2 REY. 1. 3-29-79 ' 1 3-17-83 DC-1203-3.1.D. s DC-1203-3.1.C. REY. 4 12-6-77 REY. 6 11-2-83. DC-1202-A-3.4.B.
- DC-1202-A-3.1.C. REY. O. 6-26-73 I RET. 5. 4-19-83 DC-1821-3.1.C.
I DC-1821-3.1.C. REY. 3. 8-25-77
- RET'. 5. 5-2-83 DC-1531-3.1 DC-1531-3.1 REY.2.10-23-78 REY. 3.8-9-83 1
3
Pcts No. 30 i 04/29/86 I IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
====================-===== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
BTP CHER 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1532-3.1 DC-1532-3.1, 3934.02 C.S.b. GENERAL PLANT REV. 3 8-1-83 REV. 2 10-5-78 QUIDELINES DC-1002-3.3.2 DC-1002-3.3 2 SAFE SHUTDONN CAPABILITT REY. 2. 8-14-79 REY. 1 PC-1620-3.1 11-21-78 REY. 2 3-29-83 DC-1620-3.1 DC-1501-3.1 REY. O. 7-1-77 REV. 5 12-11-78 DC-1501-3.1 RET. 4 1-12-78 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1624-3.0 DC-1024-3.0 PROCEDURES 3935.01 C.S.c. GENERAL PLANT 3.1 REY. 2, 3.1 REY. 1 FOR REPAIR QUIDELINES 6-18-83 9-16-81 AND ALTERNATIVE OR DEDICATED DC-1002-3.3 DC-1002-3.3 MAINTAINING SHUTDONN CAPABILFTY RET. 2 8-14-79 RET. 2 8-14-79 SPARE PARTS DC-1205-3.1 DC-1205-3.2 TO REPAIR REY. 2 3-17-83 REY. 1. 3-29-79 SAFE SRUTDONN DC-1531-3.1, DC-1531-3.1 EQUIPMENTS REY. 3. 8-9-83 REY. 2 10-5-78 SUBJECTED TO DC-1620-3.1 DC-1620-3.1. FIRE DAMAGE - REY. 2, 3-29-83. REV. O. 7-1-77 COVERED IN DC-1821-3.1 DC-1821-3.1. MODULE 7 RET. 5. 5-2-83 REY. 3. 8-25-77 DC-1208-3.1 DC-1208-3.1 RET. 1. 3-9-83 REV. O. 5-9-78 DC-1203-3.1 DC-1203-3.1 REY. 6 11-2-83 REV. 4 12-6-77 , 9 O O
- , . -. ~ . -
. = , __._
Page No. 04/29/86 O 31 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE ================ ================ =;============== ================ ============= ========
========================== ============
DC-1204-3.1 DC-1204-3.1 PROCEDURES 3935.02 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION FOR REPAIR C.S.c. GENERAL PLANT RET. 2. 2-11-83 REY. 1. 3-30-79 AND GUIDELINES , ALTERNATIVE OR DEDICATED MAINTAINING SPARE PARTS SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY TO REPAIR SAFB 5RUTDOWN ' EQUIPMENTS SUBJECTED TO FIRE DAMAGE - COVERED IN MODULE 7 DTP CMEB 9.5 POSITION DC-2403-2.0.E. DC-2403-2.0.E. 3936.00 C.5.d. GENE mL PLANT REY. 3 5-2-79 REY. 2, 12-6-77 GUIDELINES DC-2406-3.2 DC-2406-3.2 CONTROL OF COMBUSTIBLES REY. 2 10-5-82 REY. 1. 4-4-77 DC-1325-4.0 DC-1325-4.0 REY. 1. 4-29-82, REY. 1. 4-29-82 DC-1809-3.2.6 DC-1809-3.2.8 REY. 5. 9-20-85. REY. 3. 2-8-78 DC-1810-3.1.1.R. DC-1810-3.1.1.E. REY. 7. 9-24-85. REY. 6, 10-3-83 DC-2402-3.0.8 DC-2402-3.0.8 REY. 2. 4-29-82 REV. 1. 2-11-77
- DC-1902-3.3 DC-1902-3.3 REY. 1. 4-27-83 REV. O 7-21-78 ,
DC-1201-6.0.D. DC-1201-6.0.D. REV. 2. 3-9-84 REV. 1. 4-21-83 t w - -- - - - - - - - . - - . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - _ _ - - ~ - - - - - - - + ->m --
Psge No. 32 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BV REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE DESIOV FIRST
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
DC-1810-3.1, DC-1810-3.1 3937.01 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION C.S.e, GENERAL PLANT 3.2 REV. 7 3.2 REV. 6, GUIDELINES 9-24-85, 10-3-83, , ELEC. CABLE CONSTRUCTION. DC-1809-2.0 DC-1809-2.0, CABLE TRAVS AND CABLE 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.1. 3.1.2 PENETRATIONS 3.1.3 REY. 5 3.1.3 REY. 3 9-20-85 2-6-78 X3AJ01-2.2 RET. X3AJ01-2.2 REV. 5, 5-9-85 O, 2-23-79, X3AJ02-2.2 REV. X3AJ02-2.2 REV. 12, 8-16-85, O. 2-14-79 X3AJ03-2.0, REY. X3AJ03-2.0 REV. 9 6-27-85 O. 5-9-78, X3AH01-3.0 REY. X3AH01-3.0 REV. 15, 2-25-85, 2, 2-7-79, X3AR02-3.0 REY. X3AH02-3.0, REY. 24 10-15-85 2 8-18-78 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION X3A001-4.5.C. X3AQ01-4.5.C. 3937.02 C.S.e. GENERAL PLANT REY. 5 10-21-85 REY. O. 1-11-80 GUIDELINES ELEC. CABLE CONSTRUCTION. CABLE TRAVS AND CABLE PENETRATIONS BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1531-3.1, DC-1531-3.1 3938.01 C.S.f. GENERAL PLANT 3.2, REY. 3 3.2, REV. 1 , GUIDELINES B-9-83, 8-15-77 VENTILATION DC-1532-3.1 DC-1532-3.1 3.3 REY. 3 3.3 REY. 1 8-1-83 9-14-77 DC-1533-3.3 DC-1533-3.3 REY. 2 B-5-83, REY. 2, 8-5-83 DC-1535-3.2 DC-1535-3.2 REV. 2 8-2-83 REY. 1 DC-1539-3.2 10-13-78 3.3, REY. 2 DC-1539-3.2 B-9-83 3.3. REY. 1 DMCN-1539-1 9-29-78 5-2-85 DC-1540-3.2 DC-1540-3.2 3.3 REY. 1 3.3, REY. 2 9-29-78, 6-3-83 DC-1541-3.2 DC-1541-3.2 REV. O. 8-22-77 REY. 1 9-29-78 O O O
. . . _ _ - . _ . ... . . . - . . . . . - .. - . . . . ..-~~x . . .- -.- . . _ - - - - -- ._ . . . _ . .
)
Page 6 33 \ ' 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
=====================23=== ============ ======u========= ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1542-3.1 DC-1542-3.1 3938.02 C.S.f. GENERAL PLANT REY. 1. 9-29-78 REY. 1. 9-29-78 GUIDELINES DC-1546-3.2 DC-1546-3.2, VENTILATION REV. O. 6-21-83 REY. O. 6-21-83 DC-1547-3.2 DC-1547-3.2 REY. O. 6-10-83. REV. O. 6-10-83 DC-1548-3.2 DC-1548-3.2 REY. O. REV. O. 12-27-87 12-27-82
. DC-1553-3.2 DC-1553-3.2 REY. 2 3-2-83 REY. 1. 9-29-78 DC-1561-3.1 DC-1561-3.1 RET. 2. 8-2-83 REY. 1 DC-1562-3.1 11-22-77 REY. 1 B-10-83. DC-1562-3.1 DC-1566-3.2 REY. 1. 8-10-83
. REY. 2 8-2-83 DC-1566-3.2 REV. 1 12-8-78 BTP CHEB 9.5-1 POSI?!C DC-1575-3.2 DC-1575-3.2 3938.03 b.5.f. GENERAL PLA?f REY. 1. 8-5-83 REY. O 2-11-77 GUIDELINES DC-2301-3.2.0.5. DC-2301-3.2.0.4 VENTILATION REY. 5 8-14-79. REY. 3 4-27-77 DMCN-2301-5 DC-1000-A-4.3 2-27-84 REY. O. 6-19-79 DC-1000-A-4.3 I4AIO3-4.3.9 REV. 1 12-4-85. 2.1.1. REY. O. ,
14AIO3-4.3.9 4-27-82 2.1.1. REY. 8 IIAR01-4.1.0 l 11-11-85 REY. O. 1-29-81 IIAR01-4.1.0, REY. 3. 7-25-85 l l l 4
- . - _ - _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ . - . - , - n - - _. - . _ . . . _ -
Page No. 34 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
.......=====..
MODULE 18B - SORTED BY REFERENCE MUMBER
...==.m.=======.=....=.......====.==..=
l i 1 DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CON 5T LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO
...=-===...........==..... ...=........ ...==........... ............=... ................ ................ ........=.... ........ .
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1808-3.0.C. DC-1808-3.0.C. 3939.00 C.S.g. GENERAL PLANT 4.0.C. 3.2.A. 4.0.C. 3.2.A. GUIDELINES DEY. 4 11-7-85. DRY. 3 3-5-81 LIGHTING AND DC-1708-3.2.B. DC-1708-3.2.B. COMMUNICATION REY. 3. 6-3-83 REY. 1 1-19-78 DC-1701-3.2 DC-1701-3.2 RET. 4 1-18-83 REY. 2 1-19-78 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1813-3.1.5 DC-1813-3.1.B. 3940.00 C.6.a. FIRE DETECTION AND 2.0 3.2 3.3 2.0, 3.2 3.3 SUPPRESSION RET. 3. 4-18-83 BET. 1 5-9-77 FIRE DETECTION DMcN-1813-1 X3AQ01. REY. O. 11-13-84 1-11-80 I3A001. REY. 5 10-21-85 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 PostTION DC-2301-3.2.4 DC-2301-3.2.4 3941.00 C.6.b. FIRE DETECTION AND 3.2 3.2.5.7 3.2 3.2.5.7 SUPPRESSION 3.2.5.8 REY. 5, 3.2.5.8. RET. 4 FIRE PROTECTION NATER 8-14-79 12-19-77 SUPPLY SYSTEMS DMCN-2301-7 DC-1000-C-4.4.3 4-16-84 REY. 1 DC-1000-C-4.4.3 11-22-77 REY. 3 9-30-83 12AC04. REV. O. DMCN-1000-C-7 4-30-74 14AR36, 8-30-85 12AC04. RET. O. 5-13-82 REY. 4 3-4-77 I4AIO2 REY. O. . I4AR38. RET. 5 5-5-81 5-1-84 I4AIO2 I4AF14-4.1. REY. REY. 10 O, 11-1-73 5-17-85 I4AF14-4.1 REY. 3 11-1-83 O O O
b Pete E6. l 35 U ** 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
l l , MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
l l SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LA8T CONST FIRST REMARE8 REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ me============== ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2301-3.2.4 DC-2301-3.2.4 3942.00 C.6.c. FIRE DETECTION AND 3.2.0, 2.0 REY. 3.2.0, 2.0, REY. SUPPRESSION 5, 8-14-79 4 12-19-77, WATER SPRIMELER AND ROSE DC-2303-3.3 DC-2303-3.3 STAND PIPE STTTEMS REY. 2, 4-28-83. REY. O. 7-20-78 DC-1225-2.2 DC-1225-2.2 REY. 1. 2-11-82 RET. O. 4-3-78 X4AX02 REY. 10 X4AX02. RET. O. 5-17-85 5-5-81 X4AX03-2.1. 2.2 X4AX03-2.1, 2.2 3.2. 4.0, 3.2. 4.0 ATTACRMENT 1. ATTACRMENT 1 REY. 8 11-11-85 REV. O 4-27-82 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2304-2.0 DC-2304-2.0, 3943.00 C.G.d. FIRE DETECTION AND 3.3 REV. 2 3.3. RET. 1 SUPPRESSION 4-28-83 8-14-79 H ALON Sl!PPRESSION SYSTEMS I4AXO3-4.3 4.5 X4AX03-4.3. 4.5 4.7.1 AND 4.7.1 AND ATTACRMENT 2 ATTACEMENT 2 RET. 8 11-11-85 REY. O 4-27-82 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION N/A N/A NO CO2 3944.00 C.6.e. FIRE DETECTION AND SUPPRESSION SUPPRESSION IN VEGP CARBON DIOXIDE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS , t 4 4 I I i
. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - . _ _ = - _ _ _ - - - __. _ ,_. _ _ _ . . ..~. _ _ _ _ _ ___ ._. ._ __. _ . . _ . . .
PcBe No. 36 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CON 5T FIRST REMARE5 REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== = ========== ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
202 ITEM 8 I4AIO2 ITEM 8 FOR PORTABLE 3945.00 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION FIRE C. 6. f. FIRE DETECTION AND ii. 10 REY. O. 5-5-81 85 SEE EXTINGUISERR5 SUPPRESSION 71 MARKS LOCATIONS AND PORTABLE EXTINGUI5HERS INSTALLATIONS PER NFPA 10 REFER TO FIRE PROTECTION DRANINGS BTP CNEB 9.5-1 POSITION I4AX03-4.2.1 14 AID 3-4.2.1 REFUELING AND 3946.01 ATTACR. 1. PG5 ATTACR. 1. PG5 MAINTENANCE C.7.e. GUIDELINE 5 FOR SPECIFIC PLANT ARRA5 1-102 70 1-109, 1-102 TO 1-109 OPERATIONS PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REY. B. REY. O. 4-27-82 MANAGEMENT CONTAIMMENT 11-11-85 DC-1505-2.0.J. PROCEDURES DC-1505-2.0.J. BEY. 4 AND CONTROLS REY. 5, 7-26-83, 10-23-78 TO ENSURE DC-1506-2.0.M. DC-1506-2.0.M. ADEQUATE F.P. RET. 5. B-2-83 REY. 4. 9-29-78 FOR TRAN5IENT DC-1810-3.1.2 DC-1810-3.1.2 5 FIRE LOADS - RET. 7. 9-24-85. REY. 8, 10-3-83 COVERED IN DC-1624-3.1.J. DC-1824-3.1.J., MODULE 7 REY. 2 6-13-83. RET. 2. 8-13-83 DC-1813-3.3.R. DC 1913-3.3.5, REY. 3. 4-18-83. REY. 1. 5-9-77 DC-2303-3.3 DC-2303-3.3 RET. 3. 4-28-83 REY. O. 7-20-78 , O - O O
m .. .. ._._____.m...m.____ ..__.._-....m...._ . . . - . . _ . . . . . . _ . - _ h s O Pete Ma. 04/29/86 37 IMPLEMENTATION
============== ,
MODULE 189 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER '
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAET CONST FIRST RBMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
i i DC-1809-3.1.1, 3948.02 I BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DMcN-2303-1 c.7.a. GUIDELINE 5 FOR 7-12-83, 3.1.2. 3.1.3 - SPECIFIC PLANT ARRAS DC-1809-3.1.1 RET. 3, 2-8-78 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY 3.1.2. 3.1.3 DC-1201-8.0.9 CONTAINMENT RET. 5 9-20-85 REY. 1, 4-21-83 DC-1201-8.0.D. REY. 2 3-9-84 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1000-A-4.3 DC-lOOO-A-4.3 FOR'TRE 3947.00 ! C.7.b. GUIDELINE 5 FOR REY. 1 12-4-85. REY. O. 8-19-79 LOCATION OF SPECIFIC PLANT ARRAS I4AX03-ATT. 1 X4AIO3-ATT. 1 Nose STATIONS CONTROL ROOM ARRAS PG l-55 THRU PGs 1-55 YERU AND FIRE l-95. ATT. 2, PG l-95 AND ATT. 2 EXTINGUI5NERS 2-2 TERU 2-8 PG5 2-2 TRRU . 5BE FIRE ATT. 3. TABLE 2-8. ATT. 3 PROTECTION A-2. B-1, REV. TABLE A-2. B-l. DRAWINGS OF 8 11-11-85 RET. 0. 4-27-82 CONTROL 90-1531-3.1 90-1531-3.1 BUILDING REY. 3. 8-9-83 REY. 1. 8-15-77 '
. DC-1810-3.1.2.C. DC-1810-3.1.2.C, REY. 7 9-24-85 REY. 8, 10-3-83 i
RTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION X4AIO3-ATT. 1 X4AX03-ATT. 1 SEE REMARE5 3948.00 i C.7.c. GUIDELINE 5 FOR PG l-89, 1-70 PG 1-89, 1-70 ABOVE FOR SPECIFIC PLANT AREA 5 1-82. REY. 8 1-82. RET. 9 ROSE STATIONS f l CABLE SPREADING ROOMS 11-11-85 4-27-82 AND FIRE l DC-2301-3.2.G.3. DC-2301-3.2.G.3 RITINGUISHERS , .! ! REY. 5, 8-14-79. RET. 5, 8-14-79 I DC-1809-3.1.3 DC-1809-3.1.D. I 3.1.2. 3.1.3 3.1.2. 3.1.3 , i REY. 5. 9-20-85. REY. 3, 2-8-78, t 4 DC-1810-3.1.2.A DC-1810-3.1.2.A A
& C. RET. 7 & C. REV. 8 i 9-24-85, 10-3-83 DC-1225-3.1 DC-1225-3.1
. RET. 1. 3-11-82. REY. O 4-3-78 -
DMCN-1225-3, DC-1539-3.2 ' 3-18-85 REY. 1. 9-28-78 l DC-1539-3.2 REY. 2 8-9-83 , i i
- - _ _ --- - --------------- ~w
Pago No. 38 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CON 5T LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
====================== ============ ================ =========,;s==== ================ ================ ========se=== ===a
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1618-3.3.A. DC-1618 *.3.A. 3949.00 C.7.d. GUIDELINE 5 FOR REY. 2 3-9-83 REY. 1 9-29-78 SPECIFIC PLANT ARRAS I4AIO3 14AIC3 , PLANT COMPUTER ROOM 5 ATTACHMENT 2 ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 2-4 REY. PAGE 2-4 REV. 8, 11-11-85 0, 4-27-82 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 P051 TION DC-1805-3.0.B.2. DC-1805-3.0.B.2 FOR FIRE 3950.00 C.".e. OUIDELINES FOR 3.0.E. REY. 5 3.0.E. REY. 3 ORTECTOR FIRE SPECIFIC PLANT AREA 5 8-6-85 7-1-80 HOSE AND FIRE SWITCRGEAR ROOMS DC-1804-3.1.0 DC-1804-3.1.0 EXTINGUISRER 3.1.J. REY. 5 3.1.J. REY. 4 LOCATION, 10-2-85 9-14-83 REFER TO FIRE DC-1532-3.3.E. DC-1532-3.0.R. PROTECTION REY. 3 8-1-83 REY. 3. 8-1-83 DRAWINGS OF SWITCHGEAR ROOMS BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1624-1.0 DC-1624-1.0 FOR FIRE ROSE 3951.00 C.7. f. GUIDELINE 5 FOR 3.1.J, REY. 2 3.1.J. REV. 2 AND FIRE SPECIFIC PLANT ARRA5 6-13-83 8-13-83 EXTINGUI5HER REMOTE 5AFETT-RELATED LOCATIONS. PANELS SEE REMARES ABOVE BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-1532-3.1.F. DC-1532-3.1.F. FOR FIRE 3952.00 C.7.g. QUIDELINE5 FOR 3.2.B. 3.3, REV. 3.2.B. 3.3 REY. EXTINGUI5NERS , GPECIFIC PLANT AREA 5 3. 3-1-83, 2, 10-6-78 AND FIRE ROSE SAFETT-RELATED BATTERT DC-1000-A-4.3 DC-1000-A-4.3 LOCATION. SEE ROOMS REV. 1 12-4-85 REY. O. 6-19-79 RESPECTIVE FIRE
- PROTECTION DRAWING 5
# 9 9
. _ . . _ __ __. ... . _ . _ . _ . _ . ~. m. . ...._ s .- - . ~
- .m.- . . . . . . _ . _- ... . .. -. m.._-.__ . - m. .m. _ __ . -
b Page No! 39 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE MUMBER
========r==============================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ======== [
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2110-3.2 DC-2110-3.2 3953.00 C.7.h. GUIDELINES FOR 3.7. RET. 7 3.7. REY. 5 , SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS 9-21-83 3-10-78 . TURBINE BLDG. , BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2107-3.1 DC-2107-3.1 FOR PORTABLE 3954.00 C.7.1. GUIDELINES FOR 4.0. RET. 2 4.0. REY. 1 FIRE SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS 8-9-83 5-26-78 IETINGUISBERS DIESEL GENERATOR BLDG. DC-2403-E.0.E. DC-2403-2.0.E. AND FIRE ROSE l 3.1.F, REY. 3 3.1.Y. RET. 2 LOCATIONS. 5-2-79 E4AE03 6-77. E4AE03 SEE ATTACBMENT 1 - ATTACEMENT 1 RESPECTIVE PAGE 1-100 PAGE 1-100 FIRE 1-101, RET. 8, 1-101. REY. O. PROTECTION 11-11-85 4-27-82 DRAWING IN j DIESEL-GEN BLDG. BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2131-3.1.B. DC-2131-3.1.B. 3955.00 C.7.J. GUIDELINES FOR RET. 2, 7-19-83 REY. 1. 4-28-78 SPECIFIC PLANT AREA 5 DIESEL FUBL STORAGE TANE BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2131-3.1 90-2131-3.1, FOR ROSE 3956.01 RET. 2. 7-19-83. REY. 1. 4-28-78 STATIONS AND C.7.k. GUIDELINES FOR ! SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS DC-2159-3.1.4.0 DC-2159-3.1.4.0 FIRE i SAFETT-RELATED / UMPS RET. 2. 7-19-83. REY. 1. 5-9-78 ERTINGUISMERS . I DC-1002-3.2.1 DC-1002-3.2.1 LOCATION. SEE I RET. 2. 8-14-79.. REY. O. CORRESPONDING j DC-1214-3.2 12-20-77 FIRE AREA
' REY. 4 DC-1214-3.2 DRAWINGS 12-10-82 RET. O. 4-1-74
? DC-1215-3.2.D & DC-1215-3.2.9 & E. REY. 4 E. REV. 2 i 10-5-82 1-3-78 i i + t E i, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______.____.rs._ u w-_----e--- ~m.. .,,-- . 4e
- e = en w e .,-,up - - . - - - -
- v e *, me-'e w ,..m -- = _ = -m.%.. ,,,e-rw_ < - . . _ , - sw-- __ _.. _
l l l I PCRs No. 40 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION l ============== l MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER l ----- ================================= 1 DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS RdF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION I4AIO3-APP. 1 I4 AID 3-APP. A. FOR ROSE 3956.02 C.7.k. GUIDELINES FOR PC, PG. STATIONS AND SPECIFIC PLANT ARRAS 1-11.13.14.15.17 1-11.13.14.15.17 FIRE SAFETT-RELATED PUMPS 18.19.23.24.25 18.19.23.24.25 EITINGUISHERS 26.30.31.39.40.1 26.30.31.39.40.1 LOCATION. SEE 02.103.108.109.1 02.103.108.109.1 CORRESPONDING 13.114.115. REY. 13.114.115. REY. FIRE AREA 8 11-11-85 0, 4-27-82 DRAWINGS BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION X3AQ01-ATTACRMEN I3A001-ATTACRMEN FOR FIRE HOSE 3957.00 C.7.1. GUIDELINES FOR T 5. PAGE 5-50 T 5. PAGE 5-50 AND FIRE SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS REY. 5 REY. O. 1-11-80 EXTINGUISHERS NEN FUEL AREAS 10-21-85 SEE . SEE FIRE REMARES PROTECTION DRAWING OF THIS AREA. NEW FUEL S'.'ORAGE RACE DESGN IS NEST. PROPRIETART INFO. & VERIF. AT WEST. REF: LTR OP 19650 0F 2/24/86 - WEST. TO BPC O O O
' [D Page Ka- 41 04/29/86 IMPLEME%TATIO3
==============
MODULE 189 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT /FRATURE SECTION
==========-=============== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION X3AQ01-ATTACNMEN X3A001-ATTACRMEN FOR FIRE ROSE 3958.00 T 5. PAGES 5-50. T 5. PAGES 5-50 FIRE C.7.m. GUIDELINES FOR EXTINGUISHERS SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS 51, 52 REY. 5 51. 52. REY. O. SEE FIRE SPENT FUEL AREAS 10-21-85 SEE 1-11-80 . REMARES PROTECTION DRAWING OF THIS AREA BTP CMEB 9.5-I POSITION I4AIO3-ATTACRMEN I4AIO3-ATTACRMEN 3959.00 C.7.n. GUIDELINES FOR T 1. PAGES 1-117 T 1. PAGES 1-117 SPECIFIC PLANT ARRAS TERU 121. REY. THRU 121. REY. RADWASTE AND 8, 11-11-85 O. 4-27-82 DECONTAMINATION ARRAS DC-1557-2.0.F. DC-1557-2.0.F. REY. O. REY. O. 11-18-82 11-18-82 DC-1550-2.0.R. DC-1550-2.0.R. NET. O. 4-14-83 RET. O. 4-14-83 DC-2128-3.4 DC-2128-3.4 FOR LOCATION 3960.00 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION REY. 2. 8-19-83. REY. 1. 5-10-79 OF THESE C.7.o. GUIDELINES FOR TANES AND SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS DC-2129-3.3 BC-2129-3.3 SAFETY-RELATED WATER REY. 4, 8-9-83 REY. 2. 3-29-79 FIRE BYDRANT TANKS DC-2130-3.3 DC-2130-3.3 LOCATIONS. REY. 3, 7-27-83 REY. 1. 4-7-78 SEE FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS OF OUTDOOR TARD , _ _ _ _ . . - _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ___-__.m _.___mm__ _____-m _ _ _ - - _ . - < _i _ _ _. ----e -
Psge No. 42 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 188 - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
===e====================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2519-3.2.6 DC-2519-3.2.6 FOR FIRE ROSE 3961.00 C.7.p. GUIDELINES FOR REY. 1, 4-5-84 REV. O. 4-21-80 AND FIRE SPECIFIC PLANT ARRAS DC-2304-3.3.A. DC-2304-3.3 A. EXTINGUISHERS RECORD STORAGE AREA REY. 2. 4-28-83. REY. 1 8-14-79 LOCATIONS. X3AQOl-ATTACHMEN K3A001-ATTACHMEN SEE FIRE T 5. PAGE 5-33 T 5. PAGE 5-33 PROTECTION REY. 5 REY. O. 1-11-80 DRAWINGS OF 10-21-85 X4AIO3-ATTACHMEN THESE AREAS I4AIO3-ATTACEMEN T 2 PAGE 2-7 T2 PAGE 2-7 REV. O. 4-27-82 REY. 8 11-11-85 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2105-3.1 DC-2105-3.1 PROPRIETART 3962.00 C.7.q. GUIDELINES FOR REY. 4, 7-27-83. REY. 4, 7-27-83 INFO. FOR SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS SEE REMARES NATURAL DRAFT COOLING TOWERS COOLING TOWERS. IMPLEMENTATIO N VERIFIED AT RESEARCH-COTR ELL BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION DC-2515-2.0.E. DC-2515-2.0.E. 3963.00 C.7.r. GUIDELINES FOR REV. O. 4-21-80. REV. O. 4-21-80 SPECIFIC PLANT AREAS DC-2517-2.0.E. DC-2517-2.0.E. MISCELLEMBOUS AREAS REY. O. 4-21-80 REY. O. 4-21-80 DC-2518-2.0.E. DC-2518-2.0.E. , REY. 1 REY. 1 11-21-80, 11-21-80 DC-2519-2.0.E. DC-2519-2.0.E. REY. 1. 4-5-84 REY. O. 4-21-80 O O O
._..m . . . ._ . - _ _ _ ._ _ . _ _ . m -. .. ._. . . . _ . . _ _ .
' b Pere NS'. 43 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 185 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
DC-1903-3.3 DC-1903-3.3 3967.00 BTP CMEB 9.5-1 POSITION , t C.8.d. SPECIAL PROTECTION 4.0 REY. 2 4.0, RET. 2 GUIDELINES 2-7-83 2-7-83 MATERIALS CONTAINING t RADIOACTIVITY SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 3975.00 THREE HOUR RATED CURTAIN TYPE FIRE DAMPERS LOCATED .IMPLEMENTATIO IN FIRE BARRIERS AS N. SEE REF. No. 3458 NECESSARY SEE REMARE8 REFER TO REF. 4092.00 CABLE AND CABLE TRAY PENETRATIONS OF FIRE NO. 3670 FOR DESIGN BARRIERS (VERT. AND IMPLEMENTATIO RORIZ.) ARE SEALED (FIRE N .i STOPS) TO OIVE PROTECTION AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THAT OF FIRE BARRIERS X1A011-3.2.D. 11A011-3.2.D. 4143.00 i SSALS BUILT IN COMPLIANCE MITH PROTOTYPE TESTED BY 2.0, REY. 5, 2.0, REY. O. ASTM E-119 10-23-85 11-13-81 I4AF14-4.1 I4AF14-4.1 4144.00 NFPA 20 1978 APPENDIX 4A-5.0 APPENDIX BA-5.0 REY. 3 11-1-83. REY. O. 11-1-73 DC-1804-3.1 DC-1804-3.1 . 3.2. 3.3 REY. 3.2. 3.3. REY. 5 11-2-85 3 5-25-79 I3AC01-4.1. 4.3 X3AC01-4.1. 4.3 i 5.0 REY. 6 5.0 REY. O. 4-13-84 4-3-78 J i 1
- . . _ _ _ - . _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - _ - _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ . . - - - - - .- ~ - -
Pcge No. 44 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 18B - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CON 5T FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
NFPA 13 I4AIO3-2.1 I4AIO3-2.1 4147.00 4.2.1 4.2.1 ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACRMENT ,1 REY. 8 REY. O. 4-27-D2 11-11-85 SEE REMARES NFPA 15 I4AIO3-2.1 I4AIO3-2.1 SEE REMARES 4148.00 4.2.2.C. 4.2.2.C. OF REF. NO. ATTACBMENT 1 ATTACEMENT 1 4147 REV. 8 REY. O. 4-27-82 11-11-85 SEE REMARE8 NUREG-700 DC-1808-3.0.C. DC-1808-3.0.C. 4271.00 3.2.C. 3.3.C. 3.2.C. 3.3.C. REY. 4 11-7-85 REY. 1 DC-1619-2.0 11-10-77 REV. 2, 3-9-83 DC-1619-2.0, REY. 2. 3-9-83 NFPA 20-1978 SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 4292.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N. SEE REF. NO. 4144 ANSI C37.04 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0 4213.00 REY. 5, 10-2-85 REY. 3, 5-25-79 I3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. REY. 6 4-13-84 REY. O. 4-3-78 O O O
fn
\ l k Pete No r 45 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE 18B - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
================~e=====================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESION FI2ST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
ANSI C37.072 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0, 4294.00 RET. 5 10-2-85 RET. 3. 5-25-79 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. REY. 6, 4-13-84 REY. O. 4-3-78 ANSI N45.2-1971 X3AC01-2.1.C. I3AC01-2.1.C. 4295.00 RET. 8 4-13-84. REY. O. 4-3-78 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0, REV. 5 10-2-85 RET. 3. 5-25-79 ANSI C37.06 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0 4296.00 REY. 5 10-2-85. REY. 3, 5-25-79 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. REV. 6. 4-13-84 RET. O. 4-3-78 ANSI C37.09 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0 4297.00 RET. 5 10-2-85 REY. 3. 5-25-79 I3AC01-2.1.C. 23AC01-2.1.C. REV. 6. 4-13-84 REY. O. 4-3-78 i ANSI 037.20 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0, 4298.00 RET. 5 10-2-85. RET. 3. 5-25-79 13AC01-2.1.C. 13AC01-2.1.C. RET. 6, 4-13-84 REY. O. 4-3-78 ANSI C37.90 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0 4299.00 REY. 5 10-2-85. RET. 3. 5-25-79 , I3AC01-2.1.C, I3AC01-2.1.C. REY. 6 4-13-84 REV. O. 4-3-78 l l 4 i t
i l l
- Page No. 46
( 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
l MODULR 188 - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST COMBT LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
ANSI C57.13 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0 4300.00 REY. 5 10-2-85. REY. 3. 5-25-79 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. REY. 8, 4-13-84 REY. O. 4-3-78 ANSI M45.2.2-1972 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. 4301.00 REY. 6 4-13-84 REV. O. 4-3-78 ANSI Z55.1 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. 4302.00 REY. 6. 4-13-84 REY. O. 4-3-78 IEEE 279 DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0 4303.00 REY. 5 10-2-85. REV. 3. 5-25-79 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. REV. 6 4-13-84 REV. O. 4-3-78 IEEE 472 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. 4304.00 REV. 6. 4-13-84 RET. O. 4-3-78 IPCEA S-19-81 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. 4305.00 REY. 6 4-13-84 REY. D. 4-3-78 NEMA SG5 DC-1825-2.0 DC-1825-2.8 4306.00 REV. 2 9-24-85. REY. 1. 9-13-83
- DC-1804-2.0 DC-1804-2.0, REV. 5 10-2-85. REY. 3, 5-25-79 X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. ,
REY. 6 4-13-84. REY. O. 4-3-78 DC-1805-2.0 DC-1805-2.0 REY. 5, 8-6-85 REV. O. 6-6-74 DC-1808-2.0 DC-1808-2.0 REV. 4 11-7-85 REV. 1 11-10-77 O O O
_. m.-_ .m. .m. _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ . _. m_ m _ _ . _ _ . _ - .._m___m_____ . _ _ _ . , . _ _ _ . , - fig Page Nh. 47 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED DT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CON 5T FIRST REMARES REF NO
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
UBC X3AC01-2.1.C. X3AC01-2.1.C. 4307.00 RET. 6 4-13-84 REY. O. 4-3-78 IEEE 383 X3AJ02-2.2. 5.3 X3AJ02-2.2.'5.3 4308.00 REV. 12 RET. 1. 2-14-79 8-16-85 DC-1809-2.0 DC-1809-2.0, REY. 3 2-6-78 REY. 5 9-20-85 CLA55 "A" 5TSTEM DEFINED DC-1813-2.0 DC-1813-2.0, 4309.00 IN NFPA 72D-1975 AND CLASS 4.0. REV. 3, 4.0. RET. 3 I CIRCUITS DEFINED IN NFPA 4-18-83 4-18-83 70 EXCEPT A8 NOTED X3A001-4.1.0 X3A001-4.1.G. 2.3.C. RET. 5, 2.3.C. REY. O. 10-21-85 1-11-80 DC-1810-3.1.2.A. DC-1810-3.1.2.A.
- 4. RET. 7 4. REY. 8 9-24-85, 10-3-83 DC-1809-2.0 9C-1909-2.0 REY. 5, 9-20-85. REY. 3, 2-8-78 X3AJ02-2.2. 5.3 X3AJ02-2.2, 8.3 REY. 12 REY. 1, 2-14-79 8-16-85 X4AIO3-4.4.2.F.7 X4AXO3-4.4.2.F.7 RET. O.
. REY. 5, 4-27-82 11-11-85 FIRE RETARDANT PAINT IS SEE REMARES PROPRIETART 4591.00 USED ON PROTECTION RACE OR INFO.
CABINET CONSTRUCTION TO IMPLEMENTATIO RETARD FIRE OR NEAT N VERIFIED AT PROP 00ATION FROM RACE TO RESTINGROUSE RACE (7300 SERIES
- CABINETS)
Page No. 48 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CON 57 LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
ICEA PUB. P-46-426 OR DC-1809-2.0 DC-1809-2.0, 4592.00 P-54-440 REY. 5 9-20-85 REY. 3 2-8-78 DC-1810-2.0 DC-1810-2.0 REY. 7, 9-24-85 REY. 6 10-b-83 VERTICAL AND RORIZONTAL DC-1809-3.1.1 DC-1809-3.1.1 4821.00 CABLE TRAT FLOOR OR WALL REY. 5. 9-20-85 REY. 3, 2-6-78 PENETRATIONS ARE SEALED TO GIVE PROTECTION EQUlVALENT TO OR OREATER TRAN THE FIRE BARRIER RATING NFPA 80 AND 252 DRG. NO. DRO. NO. 4944.00 AIIAR01-915-1 AIIAR01-915-1 11-1-85 DRG. 11-1-85 DRG. NO. NO. IIIAB01-916-1 IIIAN01-916-1 11-1-85 DRG. 11-1-85. DRG. NO. NO. AX1ARO1-917-1 AX1AN01-917-1 11-1-85. DRG. 11-1-85. DRG. NO. NO. AIIAR01-918-1, AtlAR01-918-1 11-1-85, DRG. 11-1-85 DRG. NO. NO. AX1AB01-919-1 AX1AR01-919-1 11-1-85 11-1-85 , 9 O O
Pen No. 49 04/29/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==============
MODULE IBB - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
========_-===n==========================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARR5 REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE
========================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
DC-2301-3.2.0.9, DC-2301-3.0.0.7, 4945.00 ALL SPRINKLER SYSTEM PIPING IN CATEGORT I RET. 5, 8-14-79, RET. 3, 4-27-77, STRUCTURES IS DESIGNED FOR I4AX03-4.6.B. I4AE03-4.6.B. SSE LOADS REV. 8, 11-11-85 REV. O, 4-27-82 h a l 1 . i a j 4 d
- e 4
, . , , . , -__ __ , - - - - - - n - --vn , ~ , , - - , - ~ . , - - -. ,- -- , -,e , - , , - ,e, .,, -, a. ,, - - , , _
4.0 FIRE PROTECTION TASK FORCE PROGRAM ASSESSMENT () 4.1 ASSESSMENT DETAILS AND RESULTS { The review team which conducted the Fire Protection Task Force (FPTF) program assessment was composed of two Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC) engineers experienced in the design, engineering, and construction of nuclear power plants, neither of whom had any previous association with the Vogtle Project. l l The collective experience of the review team represents over 25 l years experience in engineering and over 30 years experience in nuclear power plant design and operation. Both team members had recent experience with operating and near-term operating license (NTOL) plants directly related to their preparation for Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) fire protection audits. , The review was conducted at Plant Vogtle and in SWEC's Boston office. On February 6, 1986, the review team visited Plant Vogtle to solidify with the Readinees Review organization the intended scope of this review. While at the site, the team ! familiarized themselves with the plant layout and the present , status of construction completion as it directly affects the r schedule for the Branch Technical Position (BTP) CMEB 9.5-1 ; implementation walkdowns. t l Additionally, the team interviewed two of the FPTF members, the l fire protection program manager and the Bechtel Project Field l Engineering (PFE) member. ; Discussions with these individuals focused on the organizational , structure and division of responsibility of FPTF. A subsequent telephone conversation with the Bechtel Home Office task force ' member, focused on his function and responsibilities on the FPTF. The review team also used these documents: o Fire Protection Program Schedule U-l and Common, Revision 5, April 4, 1985. , i o Fire Protection Design and Installation Verification Program Checklists (Draft). The former, a comprehensive schedule delineating all anticipated work efforts and organizational responsibilities, has not been updated to reflect the current project milestone dates. It does i not explain the scope of the efforts other than by activity name. The latter is a detailed checklist of design and I installation attributes to be verified by the site walkdown teams. The walkdown procedure is subject to extensive modifications, which were annotated on the copy given to the review team.
. , , _ ,.-,,, ,._._,,,.n,,._,
Using these documents and the current Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) amendments, the review team reviewed FPTF objectives and planning to assess the adequacy of the scope of the effort.
4.2 CONCLUSION
S, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND PROJECT RESPONSES From interviews with task force members, reviews of the draft documents, and a review of the FSAR documentation and commitments, it is apparent that the Project has given fire protection concerns significant forethought. This is particularly apparent frem the detail present in chapters 8 and 9 of the FSAR as they relate to the fire hazards analyses, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code, and BTP CMEB 9.5-1 compliance. Individuals interviewed were keenly aware of current industry practices relating to the implementation of BTP CMEB 9.5-1 and recognized the significant level of interdisciplinary and interorganizational cooperation required for satisfactory project completion. The Readiness Review Team offers the following comments relative to the programmatic sufficiency of the FPTF organization and goals. These issues were selected by the review team as areas of concern because of their potential impact on the licensability of Plant Vogtle with regard to fire protection matters within the current overall plant schedule. o Recommendation No. 1: Task Force Charter h Given the reliance of the Readiness Review Program upon the activities of the FPTF to ensure project readiness in all technical, procedural, and administrative matters as they relate to fire protection issues, Readiness Review Team members deem it prudent that a task force charter be issued to address at least the following points: Goals.
- Organizational makeup.
Definition of intended products. Responsibilities for product generation / audit support. Proiect Response: The charter documenting the FPTF , goals, organizational makeup, definition of intended ! products, and responsibility for product generation and NRC audit support will be developed and issued by April 30, 1986. l l l 4-2 l
o Recommendation No. 2: Task Force Schedule As an integral part of its charter, the FPTF, as it () g-represents the Vogtle Project, should commit to the maintenance of a definitive schedule and/or punchlist of activities keyed to responsible individuals as well as organizations. It is recommended that each line item of the schedule or punchlist be annotated with a traceable identification of the products; i.e., calculation number or procedure number. Proiect Response: The fire protection program schedule j for Unit 1 and common has been revised to reflect the current schedule and commitments associated with the l Project's fire protection activities for which the FPTF I has oversight. This schedule and a supporting detailed , task list will be revised every 2 months thereafter. o Recommendation No. 3: Safe Shutdown Analysis Because of the highly interdisciplinary nature of this analysis among system engineers, electrical engineers, and, ultimately, the operating staff, it is considered imperative that an eventual effort of the FPTF be to direct the integration of the functional analysis of the system designers with the circuit analysis of t electrical engineers. This document would reference key assumptions and benchmark design documents forming the basis for the eventual long-term maintenance of the analysis. Proiect Response: The Fire Event Safe Shutdown Evaluation report, per BTP CMEB 9.5-1, references key assumptions and benchmark design documents forming the basis for the safe shutdown analysis. This report is scheduled for completion by May 1986. 4 o Recommendation No. 4: Long-Term /Short-Term Design Input Maintenance Due to the dynamic nature of the input variables to the Fire Hazards / Safe Shutdown Study, the FPTF should draft a project procedure to account for design changes issued subsequent to the benchmark design documents used in the initial study effort. The most sensitive area revolves around electrical circuit modifications. Proj ect Response: The short-term and long-term input maintenance will be documented in the project-developed design modification review procedures. This effort is scheduled for completion in May 1986. O 4-3
o Recommendation No. 5: Plant Walkdown Program A definitive project commitment must be made relative to the content and schedule of the walkdown verification. Discussions with FPTF members and review of the draft walkdown procedure have assured Readiness Review Team members that the program is heading in the right direction. This assurance notwithstanding, the Project must take a definitive posture relative to the content and schedule of the walkdown program. Proiect Response: The revised fire protection verification program content will be issued with an updated implementation schedule by May 1, 1986. o Recommendation No. 6: Comparison of FSAR Appendix 9B Design Requirements to Detail Requirements From discussions with the FPTF members, it was determined that it was not their intention to review Appendix 9B of the FSAR to verify implementation of key design requirements. For example, section C.1.C.2 states that isolation of certain headers might be required under crack situations in order to maintain the viability of the primary or backup system. Also, section C.3.C does not explain how the air compressor is powered under loss-of-power conditions. These are examples of design requirements which, without special l attention, can easily be overlooked. It is recommended that the FPTF assume the responsibility of reviewing Appendix 9B, identifying these design requirements, and , verifying their implementation. l l Proiect Response: A cross-reference between design documents and fire protection design parameters provided in Appendix 9B will be developed by July 1986. Any identified discrepancies will be resolved through the normal projuct activities. I Readiness Review
Conclusion:
The Readiness Review Team is satisfied with the definitive commitments made by the Project in their responses to the recommendations. Assuming the aggressive implementation of the responsibilities defined in section 2 of this module by individuals as qualified as those presently involved and tne satisfactory resolution of the recommendations, the Readiness Review Team is confident that the Project will adequately address the implementation of its fire protection design and licensing commitments. 0128r/119-6 4-4
I , ' i 5.0 MODULE ASSESSMENT 5.1 OPEN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS i The open actions, completion dates, and organizations responsible for completing the actions are provided below: o Finding 18B-1 f Action: Revise Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) section 3.1.1 and DC-1000-A to delete the year reference to the Nuclear Mutual Limited (NML) property loss prevention standard. 6 Completion Date: May 1, 1986. Responsible Orqanization: Bechtel Home Office. l t l l l o Finding 18B-2 l Action: Revise the FSAR to be consistent with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 20-1976. ; 1 Completion Date: During 1986 FSAR update. (} Responsible Orqanization: Bechtel Home Office. i o Recommendation 1 Action: Develop charter for the Fire Protection Task l Force (FPTF). Completion Date: . April 30, 1986. Responsible Oroanization: FPTF. o Recommendation 3 Action: Complete Fire Event Safe Shutdown Evaluation report. Completion Date: May 1986. Responsible Orcanization: Bechtel Home Office. O i _ _ . - . . . - - . _ - , . ~ _ _ - . _ . . . _ . . _ . . _ _ . _ . . . . . _ _ . _ , _ _ , . . _ - _ . . _
1 o Recommendation 4 Action: Prepare project design modification review I procedures.
, Completion Date: May 1986.
Responsible Organization: Project management. . 1 o Recommendation 5 Action: Update fire protection verification program ! implementation schedule and content. Completion Date: May 1, 1986. Responsible Organization: Bechtel Project Field Engineering. o Recommendation 6 Action: Prepare cross-reference between design documents and fire protection design parameters. Completion Date: July 1986. Responsible Organization: Project Design Organization. O I O 5-2
5.2 OUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT The process for the development of Module 18B was monitored by the Readiness Review quality assurance (QA) staff for general adequacy. Monitoring activities consisted of reviewing the findings and confirming the availability of records for Readiness Review personnel qualification and training. The findings were screened for reportability [10 CFR 21, 10 CFR 50.55(e)] in accordance with existing QA procedures. No findings were identified which required additional evaluation by the project for reportability. An independent reverification was performed on a sampling basis under Readiness Review QA overview to determine the adequacy of the commitment /implementatien matrixes. Based upon these monitoring efforts, this module and the Readiness Review Team conclusions are judged to be acceptable. O \/ , l l
/f' A il~ f l ( n] . , o -
/ John H. Dragge//
Readiness Review Team () Quality Assurance Representative 5-3
5.3 RESUMES JERAD H. BARNHART, Electrical Engineer, Team Member (FPTF Assessment) Mr. Barnhart has been employed by Stone & Webster Engineering i Corporation (SWEC) since 1970 and has 15 years of experience in the engineering and design of power plants. Currently, he is temporarily assigned to the Yankee Atomic Electrical Company at Framingham working on various projects including Appendix R, emergency lighting, and static exciter upgrade. Prior to this assignment, he was a support electrical engineer for the Surry Nuclear Power Station Units 1 and 2, and North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2. In addition, he was the lead electrical engineer responsible for directing design and engineering for the Surry and North Anna Nuclear Power Stations. Also, he has been assigned to a reconciliation study ct the South Texas Project, design and engineering of nuclear power stations, and design and engineering additions to existing substations. Education: University of Massachusetts B.S., Electrical Engineering Northeastern University h M.S., Electrical Engineering P.E., State of Massachusetts MICHAEL R. SCANLON, Power Engineer, Team Leader (FPTF Assessment) Mr. Scanlon has been employed by SWEC since 1974 and has 16 years of experience in the nuclear engineering field. As lead power engineer, he was responsible for all nuclear / mechanical engineering and design aspects related to the Millstone Nuclear Power Station. He has also been assigned to the Millstone Nuclear Power Station Project as an engineer in the Nuclear and Facilities Engineering Groups and was previously assigned as the principal facilities engineer there. Also, he worked au the lead power engineer at the Beaver Valley Power Station Project. Prior to joining SWEC, Mr. Scanlon served in the U.S. Navy as a nuclear-qualified officer. 9 5-4
/
Education: i (_/ Holy Cross College B.S., Physics Naval Nuclear Power School and Prototype Training MAHESH A. SUTHAR, Engineer, Team Member (Commitments) Mr. Suthar began his employment with Bechtel Power Corporation in 1980 and has 6 years experience in designing pipe supports for nuclear power plants. In 1982, he was assigned to the Grand Gulf Project, where he was involved with pressure drop calculations in piping systems and was responsible for designing fire protection systems such as deluge and sprinkler systems, Halon and CO2 fire suppression systems, portabla fire extinguishers, fire hydrants, fire hose stations, and fire and smoke detection systems. Also, he was responsible for the suppression pool makeup system and was involved in the fire protection analysis for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning modifications in the control building. He also designed containment systems pipe supports for subjection to jet impingement due to loss-of-coolant accident conditions. Before coming to Bechtel Power (- Corporation, Mr. Suthat worked for companies engaged in process '\_)' equipment and electromechanical design and taught several mechanical engineering-related courses. Education: Sardar Patel University M.S., Mechanical Engineering P.E., District of Columbia 0129r/107-6 5-5
Georgi 3 Power Company Project M!rgement Post Offica Box 282 Waynesboro, Georcia 30830 Telephone 404 724-8114 404 554 9961 Southem Company Services, Inc. l O Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Telephone 205 8704011 VOntle 5 Project l t Date: April 3,1986 Re: Plant Vogtle - Units 1 & 2 Readiness Review Module 18B 1 l File: X7BD102 Log: SS-5529 '
)
From: 0. Batum ' j To: W. C. Ramsey Engineering has reviewed Module 188, Fi re Protection, for general accuracy and completeness. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the module is a complete and accurate representation of the Fire Protection, and the engineering process and commitments related thereto. O l l
/
Ozen Batum
- Deputy to Vice President Project Engineering xc: Project File O
Fire Protection - Module 19B l ( Readiness Review Board Acceptance The Readiness Review Board has been apprised of the scope and content of Module 18B, Fire Protection. The Board has reviewed the assessment of'the activities of the Fire Protection Task Force, both implemented and planned, and commitment verification, as well as corrective actions, both proposed and implemented, by the Vogtle Project. Based upon this review and based upon the collective experience and professional judgement of its members, the Readiness Review Board is of the opinion that the corrective actions proposed are acceptable, and that the activities of the Fire Protection Task Force at Plant Vogtle are sound. The Fire Protection Task Force activities, when completed, will ensure compliance with commitments set forth in the FSAR.
'~'
/
l O APPROVED: D
+-
DATE: f/7- as Doug Duttob Chairman, Readiness Review Board Vogtle Electric Generating Plant () 0120r/118-6
.. .. ...}}