ML20078A492
| ML20078A492 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1986 |
| From: | Ramsey W GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20078A351 | List:
|
| References | |
| PROC-860403, NUDOCS 9406010266 | |
| Download: ML20078A492 (65) | |
Text
'
Georgia Power Cornpany Vogtie Project Readiness Review Post Office Box 282 Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 Telephone 404 724-8114 404 554 9 % 1 m
Vogtle Project April 1, 1986 Mr. . D. O. Foster Vice President Vogtle Project Support Waynesboro, Ga. 30830 i
RE: Readiness Review Program Module 18C Diesel Generators LOG: RR-846 FILE: X7BDlO2
Dear Mr. Foster:
Pursuant to your instructions I am enclosing Module 18C of the Readiness Review Program entitled Diesel Generators. This module reports the work of the Readiness Review Team and has been prepared in order to present you with an accurate picture of the readiness for operations of the Vogtle Project, based upon an close examination of the diesel generators program.
The scope of this module includes the diesel generators and associated support systems such as fuel oil and air start systems.
This module is restricted to an assessment of the implementation of project licensing commitments for the diesel generators and associated support systems. Other modules, as referenced in this module, include an assessment of those design and construction programs which include the design and construction work activities for the diesel generators.
The assessment in this module included a review of basic licensing documents to identify project commitments within the scope of the module. The Readiness Review Team then determined whether these commitments had been included in pertinent design and construction documents. The one finding identified during this review was determined to be of minor significance. The s de' tails and results of this review are presented in section 3 of the module.
9406010266 940512 PDR ADOCK 05000424 p PDR
Mr. D. O. Foster ON April 1, 1986 Page 2 Based on this module and the reviews described in other modules, l as referenced herein, we are confident that the design and l construction programs associated with the diesel generators have l been adequately appraised, and that these programs will ensure that the installed diesel generators will meet design requirements and licensing commitments.
Members of the Readiness Review Team and I are prepared to
! discuss this module with you at your convenience. If we can l provide you with any further information or assistance regarding l this matter, contact me.
1 l
Very truly ours.
William C. Ramsey
(~)
\_- WCR/bjd cc: R. E. Conway Readiness Review Board Members Reading File Document Control l
l l
O 4
Ol33r/094-6 1 i
i
O I
VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT UNIT 1 READINESS REVIEW MODULE 18C - DIESEL GENERATORS O
r+wra
Readiness Review - Module 18C O List of Effective Pages April 3, 1986 Pace Revised Date All pages unchanged O
i i
i I
l O .
iii
PREFACE Georgia Power Company (GPC), in order to gain added assurance of the operational readiness of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), is conducting a pilot Readiness Review Program.
The VEGP pilot Readiness Review Program is a systematic, in-depth self-assessment of work processes and verification of compliance with regulatory commitments. To accomplish the VEGP pilot Readiness Review Program, the work processes and' regulatory commitments were divided into manageable segments called modules. There are approximately 20 modules. Each module is a predefined scope of VEGP activities.
Each module is intended to provide a brief description of the method of complying with project licensing commitments pertaining to the module scope and is not intended to make further commitments or to revise in any way prior cominitments.
If any differences exist between the commitments discussed in this document and the licensing documents, they are I
unintentional; and the licenEing document governs.
Activities common to several modules are provided as General Appendixes. There are approximately 10 appendixes. These appendixes, as appropriate, are referenced in the modules and are augmented in each module with module-scope-specific details as needed.
The VEGP Readiness Review Program is being conducted on a schedule to provide added operational readiness assurance to GPC l
management in support of the VEGP Unit 1 operating license.
l However, conclusions reached regarding programmatic and l technical adequacy through review of VEGP Unit 1 are indicative I of Unit 2, since both units are being designed and constructed together under a single quality assurance program; with like
, management controls, procedures, etc.; and to the same l specifications and criteria.
Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation has been contracted to provide technical management for, and technical personnel to implement, the independent design review as a part of the Readiness Review program.
The VEGP Readiness Review Program is not intended to eliminate or to diminish any authorities or regulatory responsibilities now assigned to or exercised by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or GPC. Further, the Readiness Review Program is not intended to change the techniques of inspections or assurance of quality program activities. Rather, the VEGP Readiness Review Program is an added program initiated by GPC management to assess the VEGP and to provide additional feedback to management O so that they may initiate any needed corrective actions in an orderly and timely manner.
v
3 The scope of work processes and regulatory commitment compliance covered by each module will be assessed by, and the module l prepared and reviewed by, individuals collectively familiar with ,
the design, construction, and operational processes of nuclear !
power plants. It is the collective opinion of the Readiness Review Task Force, Readiness Review Board, and GPC management that, based on their experience, the methodology used in the module process will assess, on a programmatic basis, the adequacy of project commitment implementation.
Readiness Review Discrepancy Reports and resulting dispositions are reviewed by the Readiness Review Program quality assurance staff and are input into the normal project process for safety significance and potential reportability evaluations in accordance with regulatory requirements.
O i
1 9
vi
' TABLE OF CONTENTS O
1.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope 1.2 Module Organization 1.3 Vogtle Project Status 2.0 Program Description 2.1 Design 2.1.1 Diesel Generator Description ;
2.1.2 Diesel Generator Design Process 2.1.3 Design Criteria 1 2.1.4 Procurement l
2.2 Construction 2.3 Diesel Generator Quality Assessment Program 2.3.1 TDI Ownere Group Program )
2.3.2 GPC Activities 1 2.3.3 Quality Assurance / Activities l
(} 2.4 Program Conclusions 3.0 Commitment Implementation Assessment l 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Summary Evaluation 3.3 Definitions 3.4 Sources 3.5 Commitment Matrix 3.6 Implementation Matrix 3.7 Findings and Project Response 4.0 Assessment and Conclusions 4.1 Open Corrective Actions 4.2 QA Statement 4.3 Resumes 4.4 Statement of Readiness Review Board
(:)
0075r/094-6
. .-- ,.- , -. ,.....- - . . - . ./
1.0 INTRODUCTION
O 1.1 SCOPE Module 18C includes the diesel generator and associated support systems, such as the air-start, lubricating oil, and fuel oil systems.
Various design and construction work activities associated with the diesel generators are addressed in other modules, as described in sections 2.1 and 2.2, respectively, and are included for reference only. Testing and operational requirements are included within the scope of Module 3A, Initial Test Program, and Module 7, Plant Operations. The diesel generator quality assessment program, undertaken by the Project to address specific industry concerns regarding diesel generators, is discussed in this module.
In addition, this module contains a commitment implementation assessment performed by Readiness ReviJw to determine whether licensing commitments within the scope of this module have been adequately included in project documents.
The effective date of this module is November 11, 1985.
Relevant changes, if any, occurring after this date are not included.
1.2 MODULE ORGANIZATION This module is divided into the following sections:
o Introduction o Program Description - This section provides a brief description of design and construction activities associated with the diesel generators and their relationship to the subject matter of other modules.
Also addressed is the quality assessment program, performed by the Vogtle Project, as a part of Trans America DeLaval Incorporated (TDI) Generator Owners Group Program to resolve specific industry-wide concerns.
o Commitment Implementation Assessment - This section addresses the evaluation of licensing commitments by i Readiness Review to determine their implementation and I the results of this review.
o Assessment - The evaluations and conclusions of the VEGP Readiness Review Board and Readiness Review Program quality assurance staff are stated in this section. In addition, resumes of the Readiness Review Team members I
for this module are provided.
I
l l
l l
l 1.3 VOGTLE PROJECT STATUS The detail phases of the design process are complete. This included the issue of engineering drawings, procurement specifications, review of vendor design drawings and test data.
The current activity of the engineering design group includes 1 providing support to Unit 1 preoperational activities regarding test and maintenance activities.
The current diesel generator construction effort for Unit 1 has been completed. Preoperational tests of the diesel generators are scheduled to be completed approximately June 30, 1986.
l i
I l
O 0070r/100-6 1-2 l
\t i
i I
l l
2.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION O The following sections describe the identified programs for the standby diesel generators:
o 2.1 Design.
o 2.2 Construction, o 2.3 Diesel Generator Quality Assessment Program.
Module 18C provides references to other Readiness Review modules that describe the design and construction programs that govern the design and construction activities applicable to installation of the Vogtle diesel generators and associated systems and structures.
2.1 DESIGN 2.1.1 DIESEL GENERATOR DESCRIPTION The Vogtle design specification X4AK01, Standby Diesel l Generators, covers the performance, design, fabrication, i inspection, tests, and delivery of four 7000 kW diesel generator i units with auxiliaries. The auxiliaries include the cooling water. system, engine lubricating oil system, air start system, fuel oil system, excitation system, local control panels, and i motor control centers. The diesel generators, two per Plant Vogtle unit, have a rated output of 7000 kW, 0.8 pf, 3 phase, 60 i Hz, 4160 V, cnd are capable of providing this output as standby i power.
The diesel generator units are a part of the Class 1E system as defined in Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standard 308-1974. !
l 2.1.2 DIESEL GENERATOR DESIGN PROCESS The diesel generators were designed and manufactured by Transamerica DeLaval Incorporated (TDI). Specific performance, design, fabrication, inspection, test, and delivery requirements l for the diesel generators are set forth in specification X4AK01, the Vogtle Project Standby Diesel Generators.
I i The diesel generator associated support systems were designed by the Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC) Home Office Engineering i (HOE) Group. This design effort included provisions such as i proper foundation, support structure, installation, l
electrical / mechanical equipment interface, inlet / exhaust piping and supports, water to diesel engine cooling system, fuel oil l
)
storage tanks, transfer pumps, transfer piping to day tanks, day I tanks, piping from the day tank to the engine flange, piping, valves, and fittings.
The Vogtle Project Reference Manual (PRM), part C, contains the procedures for the preparation of design documents, including calculations, and the review of vendor documents, While this l module includes certain desian and construction documents associated with the diesel generators, the work activities associated with the diesel generators are addressed in other modules. Typical work activities are listed in Table 2-1, along with the module in which each activity is included.
I 1
I 2.1.3 DESIGN CRITERIA The major design criteria for the diesel generators are contained in Design Criteria (DC)-1000-E; General Design Criteria (Electrical); DC-1821, Standby Power System: DC-2403, Diesel Generator Systems; and specification X4AK01, Standby Diesel Generators.
The diesel generator systems were designed in accordance with applicable provisions of the following Bechtel topical report j
and major design codes:
o BC-TOP-4A, Revision 3, Seismic Analyses of Structures and Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants.
o IEEE 387-1977, Criteria for Diesel Generator Units Applied as Standby Power Supplies for Nuclear Power
! Generating Stations.
l o IEEE 308-1974, Standard Criteria for Class lE Power Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations.
o IEEE 323-1974, Standard for Qualifying 1E Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations.
o IEEE 344-1975, Recommended Practices for Seismic l Qualification of lE Equipment for Nuclear Power l Generating Stations.
I o NRC-BTP-ICSB-8(PSD), Use of Diesel Generator Sets for Peaking.
o NRC-BTP-PSB-2, Criteria for Alarms and Indications Associated with Diesel Generator Unit Bypass and Inoperable Status, o NRC-NUREG/CH 0660 Enhancement of Onsite Diesel Generator Reliability.
2-2 N
. _ _ . _. _ _ .. _. __ ~__ _ _ _ __ _ _ . _ _ _
1 i
! l l
1 o ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section III, !
$ Division 1, Class 1, 2, and 3, 1977 Edition with Addenda !
I 1
through Summer 1977 Nuclear Power Plant Components.
I i 2.1.4 PROCUREMENT l PRM, part C, section 5, describes the processing of vendor i data. The material specification (X4AK01) for the procurement
{
of the diesel generators was developed and administered by the j BPC HOE Mechanical Group. Vendor documents are processed j through the Home Office Document Control Center. The type, i quantity, and schedule for submittal of vendor documents are identified in section 17 (Drawing and Data Requirements) of the proposal form shown in specification X4AK01.
j The organization of, and responsibility for, procurement
- activities are described in Appendix C, Procurement.
l
- 2.2 CONSTRUCTION 1 l Construction activities which include installation and !
inspection of the diesel generators and associated hardware are l addressed in the appropriate modules (Table 2-1).
l
( 2.3 DIESEL GENERATOR OUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM in 1983, several models of TDI diesel _ generators, including
- model DSRV-16, procured for Plant Vogtle, experienced problems that appeared to be generic in nature.
! In late 1983, after several significant deficiencies were i reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in l compliance with requirements of 10 CFR 21 and 10 CFR 50.55(e),
Georgia Power Company (GPC) and other owners of TDI diesel ;
i generators formed a TDI Owners Group in an effort to resolve i these generic deficiencies.
I 2.3.1 TDI OWNERS GROUP PROGRAM i The TDI Owners Group established a comprehensive program which, through a combination c.f design reviews, quality revalidations, i engine tests, and compcnent inspections provided an in-depth
. assessment of the adequacy of the respective utilities' TDI
- engines to perform their intended safety-related functions.
5 This assessment consisted of three phaseo, as follows:
i o Resolution of known generic problems.
l
! 2-3 l
- ,)
o Design review of important engine components and quality revalidation of important attributes of selected engine components.
o Expanded engine testing and inspection recommendations.
2.3.1.1 Resolution of Generic Problems - Phase I The first major program element (Phase I) involved the resolution of generic known problems. A review of the accumulated operational experience resulted in the conclusion by the Owners Group Technical staff that a limited number of components warranted priority attention and consideration because of significant known problems that had potentially generic applicability. The Owners Group technical staff and censultants conducted a technical assessment of the components and developed inspection procedures / guides, The Owners Group identified inspection criteria for specific components to determine their acceptability. Components not meeting the acceptance criteria were replaced.
2.3.1.2 Comprehensive Desian Review and Ouality Revalidation -
Phase II The second major program element was a design review and quality revalidation of 171 engine components. The Owners Group established a design review and quality revalidation program to assess the quality and ability of each engine to reliably perform its intended function. Included, where appropriate, were inspection criteria and procedures. The effort was conducted by a team of engineering personnel with specialized skill in such fields as nondestructive testing, diesel generator
- design, operation, and manufacturing. This effort is further
- described in section 2.3.2.2. The results of this effort provided GPC and the Vogtle Project assurance of the quality and reliability of the diesel generators.
2.3.1.3 Maintenance and Surveillance Recommendations - Phase III I
J The third major program element involved specific component tests and inspections. The Owners Group Technical Staff, in evaluating specific engine components, provided technical recommendations to each owner regarding component inspections, preventive maintenance, and surveillance recommendations, which will give added assurance that the engines and components will perform their intended operational functions over the life of the plant. The implementation of these recommendations is a I
plant-specific function. The results of Phase III are further l
described in section 2.3.1.4.
i i
l 2-4
\
. - . - - . - - - . ~. - - _ . ~ . . . - - . . - - . - - .- -
2.3.1.4 Results
() The results of the TDI Owners Group program, with regard to Vogtle, were provided to the NRC in a report entitled, TDI Diesel Generator Design Review and Quality Revalidation Report.
In conclusion, the three phases discussed in these paragraphs I corrected actual and suspected faults in the engines. Further, l the completion of the three phases has provided GPC assurance of the quality of the engines and that the engines will perform I their intended function.
i 2.3.2 GPC ACTIVITIES GPC instituted a program. TDI Emergency Diesel Generator Resolution Program, to define objectives, organization, division of responsibility, and interface requirements for the satisfactory closeout of diesel generator concerns.
1 2.3.2.1 Inspection of the Diesel Encines GPC. developed necessary procedures and equipment and began the j disassembly of the stored diesel generators in April 1984. This initial work involved inspections, replacement of suspect parts, and reassembly prior to placement of the diesel generators in
() the diesel generator buildings. Subsequent to installation, additional inspections were performed. -The work was performed by GPC Power Generation maintenance personnel and the initial work was monitored by representatives from TDI. The Owners l Group contractors performed certain Nondestructive Examination i (NDE) tests and inspections. GPC quality control (QC) and ,
quality assurance (OA) personnel closely followed the work with l documented inspections, audits, and surveillances. The work was I i documented in Maintenance Work Orders DP84-001 (1-84-00916),
l DP84-078 (1-84-00937). DP84-2000 (2-84-00002), DP84-1000
{2-84-00085), MWO-1-85-07978, and MWO l-85-04381.
2.3.2.2 Diesel Generator Status The Unit 1 diesel generators are currently undergoing preoperational tests. Approximately mid-March 1986, the diesel generators will be test operated in a 100-hour run.
Preoperational tests are scheduled for completion by mid-June 1986. The diesel generators are also scheduled for additional inspections and maintenance tests as prescribed by the Owners Group after achieving sufficient operational hours and number of starts.
O 2-5
1 l
Long-term maintenance recommendations of the Owners Group are l being tracked on the Vogtle Maintenance Matrix for incorporation into Plant Vogtle maintenance procedures.
2.3.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES Project QA, as noted above, has been involved in the review and inspection of items during the disassembly, reassembly, and evaluation of the diesel generators. In addition, the project QA program also included formal QA audits and QA surveillances (an informal review of an activity).
During the period from August 1984 through May 1985 five Vogtle site QA audits were performed. In addition, 87 QA surveillances were performed from March 1984 through February 1986.
The scope of the QA audits and their findings are as follows:
o Audit SP01-84/30, conducted May 7 through 11 and June 11 through 20, 1984.
Scope: Included NRC concerns reported in Inspection and Enforcement (IE) Information Notice 82-56, specific portions of the special maintenance and QC procedures, and requirements from the vendor's instruction manual.
Results: No Findings. h o Audit SP01-84/47, conducted July 2 through 16, 1984.
Scope: Included portions of specially written procedures, applicable ANSI standards, the PRM, and NRC l
1E Circular 80-11.
Results: Finding 669 was issued against Bechtel QA
! because of an inadequate response to IE Circular 80-11.
The Bechtel response did not address all engine materials wetted by the engine coolant. Circular 80-11 required verification that the corrosion inhibitor used in the cooling water is compatible with all materials wetted by the cooling water.
Resolution: The concern was resolved by Bechtel Letter (Log No. BG 32640). The letter noted that the vendor's Instruction Manual, AX4AK01-509-1, section 6-J, i specified that the cooling water, treated with the l
corrosion inhibitor, is compatible with all materials wetted by the cooling water.
O I
l 2-6
o Audit SP01-84/79, conducted October 23 through November 7, 1984. >
Scope: Included requirements from TDI procedures and Appendix 6 of the Project Policy and Procedures Manual including QC sign-off of hold points; procedure approvals, including changes: receipt inspections; !
material storage; etc.
Results: Finding 713 was issued against GPC QC for inadequate completion of QA program records.
Resolution: A subsequent QA review of inspector plans indicated the noted deficiencies had been corrected, and the audit finding was closed.
o Audit SP01-84/84, conducted December 17, 1984, through January 2, 1985.
Scope: Included verification of inspections reported to the NRC, mechanical procedures, QC activities, and .
safety. j Results: Finding 745 was issued against GPC Construction for not f ollowing torg' . ;, requirements. Finding 746 was issued against GPC - arement for not following O interface requirements.
Resolution: A letter from TDI provided clarification of the torquing requirements which resolved the concern, and finding 745 was closed. Appendix 6 of the Project :
Policy and Procedures Manual was revised to list the l purchase order for the Unit 2 diesel generators, which i corrected the interface concern, and Finding 746 was I closed.
o Audit SP01-85/48, conducted April 8 through 16, 1985.
Scope: Included the TDI diesel engine repair program documentation of the repair, proposed testing programs, storage and maintenance conditions, and control of design changes in addition to evaluations performed on NRC-identified potentially defective TDI items.
Results: Finding 800 was issued against Vogtle Nuclear Operations for writing a preoperational test procedure which was not in compliance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.108 and the FSAR.
Resolution: Preoperational test procedure 1-3KJ-01 was O revised to include the FSAR commitment for a 24-hour 2-7 ,
load test in the prescribed sequence. This corrective action resolved the concern and the finding was closed.
The QA surveillance program verified site compliance with requirements of the TDI instruction manuals, GPC procedures, and Bechtel drawing requirements. These documents include requirements for storage, inspection, test, installation, assembly integrity, workmanship, and final physical appearance.
While the QA surveillance program documented numerous nonconforming conditions, there were no significant findings or generic problems determined to have adverse effects on the diesel generator activities. Nonconformances generally involved not following procedures, improper work, or inadequate personnel training. These surveillances were instrumental in recognizing nonconforming conditions at an early stage before they could become problems.
2.4 PROGRAM CONCLUSIONS The diesel generator resolution program, with the resulting engine modifications, has provided assurance of the quality and the adequacy of the VEGP emergency diesel generators to perform their intended function. The results of the program has been submitted to the NRC.
O O
0076r/094-6 2-8
i l ' ! t, !
O d t
e d n
d e n r a es f
oer d a a g w g n e n ic s l
a gi s n , n o w d e s a o n c nh ip s et sii t t s nd s s o i T i v st a e a u r s i inla o n pl ali i rl f d ei o .
a rt oar h o .id o
v s s lct r n a
, f edi s oir s t c e c).ta a n m , cc
, v n si t a yn e d s e gl a n m l
e oeg n n . . t i s n a gef miv o rt e eig f ,Cd
. wi pn o e ,i. a p s e n v mecrg ipev g d s r e eii n ai rc i
) (
n
.ta gt e cere i
c v oi epa ,ts la c s d
l , r ofl p i ost si e s dt a vi n l
e ae i i
u r p ns a o ta ri s gw e m ,
y n n v e r g s sd b b sid n a i omd g e iei h e
) e etl i dT h a r rd ae d i tr ef l
sli pn ai n s ly t -
(
s o u cw r o ixt ad( u pd l f t
a
,l od ou s es en p a n qsi n a o g.f o e e cl a i r t n c c a rt nh ggif s e o r n n t e ei r oiep g i n r af r si nt ont i v e ck b o ot on t i a i
t c l g n r erl o o c w o d
n i af iwia,oa rfyc ed mndif yi m i pteiI c pr e
p et o
A e , r v n e t d o at io ,t sl s i
k s f s gt g n c n r inbad ie oinn st r ee eof S r o n r ya od ph c cn E o d nT h f io c i os rt i st g d i a I W f o o, d t u al a a egi n n nl a p e T
S o i
t . rd l r i pe es r a) zi tl p c c
I V R a s pe eor np miisl n a na I
O n l n r r n n e a rd e u o _
T T ig lait o ei u i
(
ee e g r gterda s gb i h n _
) CA s t t aq e . t t e AR l aad c rd ait 3 e s c wer F K N R E E d i
n e p ,
ignl e luh sd s es e t eimni gt af s vl i nl at a el w n i O O G l s ps s en ei n ns c o ot n m W a n ea eiidd ei s s e he i t I
T E l
. r u T s ,
rd d d g u nl etioi ipt sopt c rI p nen mg T
E CS t c
l o en meech aP a ii E E E u eh nt t d r rd u r J l : r t a n t t t ,i n e oen : qe OS l
a em oomsr oe i
OD r s .pf t a n ev . _
R t o n w , y r n o os
(
P1 1 S i o s did i d ce 1
Gl T
t c
c k u
,t S otsl f sf ut y a) t ev s el c r n lee et e t s r i
NW : u y r o : s s 1 s m e ul f u a ai ma 2 n r t o- n t t 0 n ud bi r _
E ID U
D ig t s ia rmco l
wk l
a c eoA e r r
rK i t ob ss nens ic eit t ogi r l _
- B L L IE CA s
e n
o u ol s
e pt f 4 d s s s s r u ox D s A D C qf b af X n nl ood o a w e( aiat pi C a p a T N I I
C O
S S _
E S L A g U
0 s n 0 e ip 1 r
_ f u i t P c
u d _
r n t a -
le S t
t e n i t e
- T e m r ip e c l
n u u o q d C E i
o f d l
_ e a c
r ic o n
_ f n h a
_ i c
e n R M l
. /
o 6-N 4
e l 4 9 l 0 u /
j r
h P
5 3
l
_O O
- , i '
ll_
. , d n s l s n o r a d ai os p r c e t u g a t
d tar lo rl o u
ei pr ot n
a s b
m e
d r nl nt i l et er n n s g r c pe sh i
a sd a l t e oe l rT t s l ,es gciyd r e o n e
t es w n d
nl ,dt teo l f f t
a . m l
o t et l l I
a en ea a o rt p b s oag s ghil s eni b r n n eit c en e n emq e u r l ui gi s e r oc n o a rt r id e r p - i g p e h r ocu s
e e d os f yt l s de l i
uf .
c n
uh ud t cr dh s a few n eq ot a c nt d n
e y y a r poe t ms s e e u aS e e e , r , m
)
h rt ab s p e t os w d i
d a l
lom r p l
e t
s s .o r
a f y edf s n for ict i e et f o oqn u
( s c e oei t f v u r s t t at d s oer e e nt r r n ul t c e g et p i n emednpi cc ool a n c n
nl s osi o t i e el n s i
v a p mn pt ni t i r ui p a u ai s s c y i
t o c
let c h a i d
i tc eUl p a e or ir i l t eq u s i oh i eid c p eqt sf s p pt ot u p p n s A
yl eiiil u l a ,.
s n s f c e
b s n ,a aw k e al cp a s c i esl I ,
r h ca r u u p nt t n e y i les s o t i cioq u oe d a o d e el W st r ri cr Gl rt ,
oi nl i f a es o r
o nt t a a s ai g
a ct d ec nl t aG a n r o n ri v e e nd lper sl ea a nl t i ot og t a
oedt a .
t ieel ce a et i i r a
) t I e ,i n r ni ee mc n c t a s p r o
C ita ee d r msr 3 s gt or pt l adt f l b s r o i s ei c rt v o lat de s o l n n et F
O i asdus el t
eiclv reap t n u e n t a eil a l r
cl l dE nl c s el h g s s eie 2 aC c eEid r a Inipmct i n at f n e
nl e n s I e
T nf i ah r et o i d e h rd g E ig o yi cT oh cl u q oa n d ccl E f T : : u n el l
i s nt s lere n es e n s cowe s S e oi y . e
.evo o l e h o
( Di vh sl d a c T i s ,f e t i p r bt f ti e n t t oi 1 ,at oin o ,
c t y a c n s d _
- t l c ,t a g a n mn m s e s u at n : u el l 2 n r ii e n r heoe ia la n r o p g e t c vt a t c n rh E t si opiit s oin i . s e nt t L s sl r n s u s s n s t i s c n ba B o nh D_il iwgr ed s a e q e y o s c a e t o n h nof A
1 C a a m D e C ecco e
l t t n i e _
T m e ip l u e _
e lu l
q t x E S _
j l l f
a a _
c r -
i r
u _
t -
t c _
ce u r
l t _
E S 2 _
/
o 6-N 4 9
e 6 O 0 lu /
r d 5 l
o 3 f l O
V d d e d
t es ni a t e al p
e w ad n p irh e oi u h rl cl o u g
ad t i oc d n
i s t t n ed s n -
n n s a r h n si a a r i a o t a a t o r e _
n p s f s s nd o _
ih e d mr r n e n t i .
p c n s n ui o o me u v a
r t
r _
ui t ai et i r s g r d h a t r e. e p -
o n o s et r a t f r p e n s o e _
f t,
e p lem d n i n n
g s
n g -, e h u ba se na eg m i n -
= s r o l o
i
.t cd e r i e s r e u sl t ot s i e
p IElcl see t a t ei o a r a d ut d i z .
) q ip nb e e r g d a t eg si ai t a
e e i s n e
( r n f s cd nt f s osi o a os n e e n o ai e pi p ic gi n
gt t
i ph uT ip n o
lClaitoh o s l d o ri ov .
i s i h t y a n s
a e
s a n i t d t i
v r t t i e . e . c t t o . e c e c _
p st g e iwiv ed n d s n e v a _
t A
c i r a n p owi p
s di me m
. nm a te id o i p
s loe t p n et u ma et n v s _
k d a gi i t c r r r ni h a i n e _
r n r n p a at og o t n d
i h o a ei d sf o i d i n e t
W nl m n ic s n r r t e rd s eo i g ot e a oiiep sh p lata f or o a ,
s h e t d s c sy n s T d y l t o nl u _
yl o a nt a a s s c o o t a lc l e , s i a r w t n i tr a s a t y . oec s e o se t a n h n
) n e nl t s ,f n v t i 3 aiii la i nl f a i o isdu l o n , .
d ip o la v ooor b i l c _
F s .
iti t r v a i es _
l O s epl t g t sd lea oc t d eh e s n c a ni n b e r n s n ,l n a 3 r t t u n oh a ah pi s u _
Ini ed T
E t
sh u t
sf ad ip p a g im, n
cT l
e Ct f
nh ig c I
n o
i o t m E eih n : er .b : o i : i ivd l
ip w ex a n d ist es a n s h n t vS e o s e w o ta e i
o te w n c n ic c
( P d , i D d o o i D i t ed r t a epi 0 t o , t n n 1 ,t n e c t t t 0 cu t i s cu em a er
- : a a g u s : a ea5 : l 2 ni n r n g nE r c n o . r u k e ig oct a t e a ic aiE t s
e p ia t m r s t s t r r f oe E.
l B
se ss leh n xc s
n o o b v
ls ot m sl r e e s oeh n s o n s n e e ot n s o n w r A D ai e C a D a vt t Ci D ci Ci ee sh 1
et h
t n i
f od e
l s eb gi o a r r r c s t e s i n v e r s o od e o n C c s l p p o e a t i d i u t n d T S a a iv s n
e d i n om r a l n m o p r u a r i g
d e t o s T a s o M s t erp e d n l r n e u t a m d y S u o e e r mk e l t s dd ip b a n iena
. P C I f
it n n
ei o 3
/
. d t 6-o ia t 4 N 1 en 9 0
l e 1 1
2 2
0 h e T m /
u u r d c 5 o . o 3 M ad l O
f
l 3.0 COMMITMENT IMPLEMENTATION ASSESSMENT O
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This section contains a listing of Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) licensing commitments and corresponding implementing documents applicable to the diesel generators. These commitments are presented in two matrixes, the commitment matrix and the implementation matrix. A brief explanation of the development process for each matrix is included. Differences, if any, between the commitments discussed in this section and the FSAR are unintentional and the commitments in the FSAR govern.
3.2
SUMMARY
EVALUATION Module 18C provides an assessment of the implementation of commitments into design documentation. Applicable design documents (e.g., project design criteria, specifications, drawings, etc.) were reviewed to ascertain whether commitments had been recognized by the applicable engineering discipline as a requirement of the detail design or construction effort, as appropriate. The reviewers concluded that applicable commitments made in the FSAR are implemented in design documents. However, during this review Finding 18C-1 was issued O and satisfactorily resolved. This finding concerned a reference to an~early revision level to Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 387: the finding was categorized a level II. See section 3.7 for a description of this finding.
3.3 DEFINITIONS An FSAR commitment is an obligation to comply with an industry standard, Regulatory Guide, Branch Technical Position, or owner plan of specific action, and other licensing documents.
An implementing document is the working level document that identifies project commitments applicable to the specific activity.
l 3.4 SOURCES Commitments covered by this module are typically identified from the following sources:
o FSAR, including responses to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) questions.
o Responses to Inspection and Enforcement (I&E) Bulletins.
o Responses to generic letters.
l
l These sources are reviewed for commitments based upon guidelines developed from the definition.
1mplementation of commitments stated in the commitment matrix is O
typically contained in:
o Design criteria.
o Material specifications.
o Construction specifications.
o Construction procedures.
3.5 COMMITMENT MATRIX Once identified by the Readiness Review Team, the commitments are placed on the commitment matrix. Information identifying the source, source section, and subject are also listed on the matrix. Any relevant comments concerning the commitments or subject of the section are indicated in the remarks column.
The commitment matrix is presented at the end of this section.
Commitments on the matrix are accurate as of November 11, 1985, and reflect Amendment 19 of the FSAR.
3.6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX O
After the commitments were identified, as shown in the commitment matrix, applicable design documents were reviewed to t
determine whether the applicable commitment has been incorporated. Documents reviewed during this review primarily t
included project design criteria. In those cases where a l commitment was of specific detail and not included within the l design criteria, material specifications or drawings were l
reviewed to determine appropriate inclusion of the commitment.
See section 2.1.3 for a listing of major design criteria.
j As a result of this review, one Finding (18C-1) was issued.
- This finding is described in section 3.7.
Results of this review are provided in the implementation matrix, which identifies the design document in which the l commitment is incorporated. This matrix identifies the design criteria document revision in which the commitment was first implemented and the most recent revision that includes the commitment.
O 3-2 f
1
1 l
The implementation matrix is presented at the end of this i()
i%)
section.
1 1
i 3.7 FINDINGS AND PROJECT RESPONSE The results of the verification review are described in this section. This review for implementation of the 103 design commitments identified in the commitment matrix was satisfactorily completed.
It was concluded that all the commitments made in the FSAR are implemented in design documents; however, during this review, Finding 18C-1 was issued. Findings are categorized to indicate their importance, as follows:
Level I Violation of licensing commitments, project procedures, or engineering requirements with indication of safety concern.
Level II Violation of licensing commitments or engineering requirements with no safety concerns.
Level III Violation of project procedures with no safety concerns.
p)
(- A statement of this finding, the Project's response, and the Readiness Review conclusion are as follows: )
o Finding 18C-1 (Level II)
The FSAR, section 1.9.1, and the specification (X4AK01) ;
for the diesel generator both specify 1977 as the j applicable revision of IEEE-387. Further, applicable design criteria (DC) (e.g., DC-1821, section 2.0D) specify that the applicable revision dates for the standards are indicated in DC-1000-E. However, DC-1000-E, Revision 6, specifies 1972 as the applicable '
edition of IEEE-387.
Proiect Response: The 1972 edition of IEEE-387 was compared to the 1977 edition and it was determined that the 1977 edition expanded on qualification requirements and testing analysis as well as adding a paragraph on preventive maintenance, inspection, and testing.
DC-1000-E will be revised by April 18, 1986, to show IEEE-387-1977 to be consistent with the FSAR and specification X4AK01.
Electrical Design Criteria document DC-1000-E did not
(~T show the correct applicable date for the IEEE standard
\-) because of an engineering oversight. To determine 3-3
whether this was an isolated incident, applicable dates of codes and standards in DC-1000-E were checked against FSAR sections 1.9 and 8. No other errors were found. h Readiness Review
Conclusion:
The project response is acceptable. The corrective action taken by the Project resolves the concern. This finding has been determined to have no effect on the design since specification X4AK01 and the FSAR included the proper edition of IEEE 387.
O L
O OO82r/094-6 3-4
O -
O O COPNITENTS SORTE0 BY SOURCE AND SECTION CotN11KNT COPNITENT C0fNIIKNT DOCUENT/ RESPONSIBILITY SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT TEATURE DESIGN CONST REMARKS REF NO.
EXPLANATION OF FIELDS C0fHITMENT SOURCE - Ibe document containing ihe conniiment (FSAR, Generic Let ter, l.E. Bulletin Response, etc.)
C0fMITMENT SECTION - Identifies the FSAR section, let ter number, or question nunber
! C0fNIT K NT SUBJECT - The subject of the TSAR section or Generic Letter j DOCUMENT / FEATURE - The document discussed in the FSAR r.ection or the plant feature described in the FSAR section 1
i j RESPONSIBILITY - An X is placed under the heading for the organization responsible for implementation of the comitment i
) REF. NO. - A reference number that corresponds to the appropriate line entry in the implementation matrix i
i i
i Ollir/4/073-6 l
-x Page N o\" 1 04/03/86 COMMITMENT 3
=
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT BOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN COMBT
===== ============e======= ===========e======ce ==ce======================== ======= ======= ==================== ====
FSAR I. 9. 6. 2 INDEPENDENCE BETWEEN RG 1.6, REY. O, 3/71 X SEE F8AR SECTIONS 1601 REDUNDANT STAND-BY 8.3.1.1.2.D. 8.1 AND (ON-SITE) POWER 8.3 SOURCES AND TREIR (
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN RO 1.9, REY. 2, 12/79 I YOLTAGE AND 113 AND QUALIFICATION OF FREQUENCY DIESEL GENERATOR REQUIREMENT 8 NOT MRT UNITS USED AS DURING TIME 05.
STANDBY POWER SUPPLY DURING LOAD CENTER FOR NUCLEAR PONER ENERGIZATION REF.
PLANTS 8.3 FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN RG 1.108 X 117 AND QUALIFICATION OF DIE 8EL GENERATOR UNITS USED AS STANDBY POWER SUPPLY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS.
FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 279-1971 I 118 AND QUALIFICATION OF DIE 5EL GENERATOR
, UNITS USED A5 STANDBY POWER SUPPLY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 5 FSAR I. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977. SECT. 3.7.1 X 1514 AND QUALITY OF DIE 8EL-GEN. UNITS AS STANDBY POWER FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DE5IGN IEEE 387-1977. SECT. 3.7.2 X 1515 AND QUAL. OF DIESEL-GEN. UNITS A5 STANDBY POWER
Page No. 2 04/03/86 COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE 10C - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
,---===-e ==-=-=e====== =ce=== ==================== re========================== ======= ======= ==================== ========
FSAR I. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 308-1574 4 387-1977, X SUBJECT TO REO. 1516 AND QUAL. OF SECT. 5.1.1 OUIDE 1.32 DIESEL-GEN. UNITS As STANDBY POWER A FSAR 1. 9. 9 5 ELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977, SECT. 5.1.2 X 1517 AND QUAL. OF DIRBEL-GEN. UNITS A5 STANDBY POWER FS%R 1. 9. 9 SELECTIOM, DESIGN IEEE 323-1974 AND 387-1977, X SUBJECT TO REO. 1518 AND QUAL. OF SECT. 5.4 GUIDE 1.89 D I E S E L-G E N . UNITS AS STANDBY POWER FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977, SECT. 5.5 X REF. RG 1.108 1519 AND QUAL. OF DIESEL-GEN. UNITS A5 STANDBY POWER FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977. BBCT. 5.6.2.2 X 1520 AND QUAL. OF DIE 5EL-GEN. UNITS AS STANDBY POWER FSAR I. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977. SECT. 5.6.3.1 X 1521 AND QUAL. OF DIESEL-GEN. UNIT 5 A5 STANDBY POWER FSAR 1. 9. 9 5 ELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977 AND 344-1975 K SUBJECT TO RG. 1.100 1522 AND QUAL. OF DIESEL-GEN. UNITS AS STANBY POWER FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977. SECT. k 1523 AND QUAL. OF 6.3.2(5)(c)
DIESEL-GEN. UNITS A5 STANDBY POWER O O O
- . __ . .- m..___. -- .. _ . . . .. __ . .
Page No. 3 04/03/86 COMMITME TS
=
MODULE IBC - SORTED BY 8OURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE , DESIGN CONST 2======== ================e=re ==================== ====n======================= ======= ======= ========s=========== ========
l FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977. SECT. 6.5 I RG 1.108 8UPPLEMENT8 1524 AND QUAL. OF DIESEL-GEN. UNITS AS STANDBT POWER q FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977, BECT. 4 X 1525 AND QUAL. OF DIESEL-GEN. UNITS AS STANDBT POWER FSAR 1. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977, BBCT. 6.3.2 X 1526 AND QUAL OF DIESEL-GEN. UNIT 8 A8 STANDBY PONER FSAR I. 9. 9 SELECTION, DESIGN IEEE 387-1977, BBCT. 6.3.1 X 1627 AND QUAL. OF I D I ES E L-G E N . UNITS A8 STANDBT POWER FSAR I. 9. 61 DAMPING VALUE8 FOR RG 1.61, 10/73 I SEE FSAR 3.7.3.1, 707 SEISMIC DESIGN OF 3.7.N.1 NUCLEAR PONER PLANTS 1
< FSAR 1. 9.100 SEISMIC RG 1.100 REF. 1, 8/77 I BER F8AR 3.10.8.2 175
. QUALIFICATION OF 1 CLASS IE ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT i
l FSAR 1. 9.137 FUEL-0IL SYSTEM 5 FOR RG 1.137 REY. 1, 10/79 X REF. TECR. SPEC 8, 1592 STAMB-BT DIE 8EL' REF. 9.5.4 i GENERATORS FSAR 1. 9.137 FUEL-0IL SYSTEM 8 FOR ANSI N195-1976 X REF. TECE. SPEC 8, 1593 STAND-87 DIESEL REF. 9.5.4 GENERATOR 8 FSAR 1. 9.137 FUEL-0IL SYSTEMS FOR 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 17 I REF. TECR. SPEC 8, 1594 2 STAND-BT DIRBEL REF. 9.5.4
< GENERATORS 4
I l
_ _ _ - . _ ___ w._ _ _ vwT P m_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ - . - _ _ - _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . _
Page No. 4 04/03/86 COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE IBC - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE , DESIGN CONST
-==e==e= ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ======
FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITH NRC 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 2 X 785 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA. OVERALL REQUIREMENTS t FSAR 3. 1. 1 CONFORMANCE WITR 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 5 I 4118 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA, OVERALL REQUIREMENT 8 FSAR 3. 2. 2 VEGP SEISMIC DESIGN RG 1.29 X 1754 CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL CODES AND DEMA (DIESEL ENGINE MTR. I 864 STANDARDS FOR ASSOC.) STATIONARY T.3.2.2-1 DIRBEL/GA5 ENGINES-19T1 FSAR 3. 2. 2-1 PRINCIPAL ABME III, CLA88 1;2,3 OR MC, I X TABLE 3.2.2-1 NOTE 880 CONSTRUCTION CODE NF, OR C8 (E)
FOR TABLE 3.2.2-1.
FSAR 3. 2. 2-2 CONST. CODE 5/STDS. A8ME III, D.1, SUB8ECTION I TABLE 3.2.2-1 NOTE 885 0.0.-B FOR PRES 5URE NC, CLAS8 2 (E) SUB8ECT. NF FOR VESSEL 8, PIPING, SUPPORT 8, SUBSECT.
PUMPS, VALVES, ATM. NE, CLASS MC FOR STORAGE TAMES, METAL CONT. COMP.,
0-15ps1R STORAGE BUB 5ECT. NG FOR CORE TAMES, SUPPORTS, SUPPORT STRS. N5R METAL CONT. COMP, CORE SUPPORT STR5.
FSAR 3. 7.B. 3. 1.3 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BC-TOP-4A X 1011 CATEGORT 1 SUB8YSTEMS AND COMPONENTS FSAR 8. 1-1 ACCEPTANCE . RG 1.9 I 2367 CRITERIA / GUIDELINES FOR ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS
'l O O O
Page No 5 01/03/8G COMMITMEETS
=
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS ISILITY REMARR5 REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CON 8T
===e ==================== ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ==
FSAR 8. 1-1 ACCEPTANCE BTP IC88 8(PSB) I 23T9 CRITERIA / GUIDELINES FOR ELECTRIC POWER 5 SYSTEMS t FSAR 8. 1-1 ACCEPTANCE STP PSB-2 X 2384 l CRITERIA / GUIDELINE 8 i t
FOR ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS i
FSAR 8. 1-1 ACCEPTANCE NUREG/CR 0680 X 2385 CRITERIA / GUIDELINE 5 ;
FOR ELECTRIC POWER 878TEMS
} FSAR 8. 1. 4. 2.A ONSITE POWER SYSTEM 10CFR50, APP.A. GDC 17 X 2180 I
, FSAR 8. 1. 4. 2.5 ONSITE POWER SYSTEM 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 17 I 4810
! - CAPABILITT OF EACH
! ONSITE lE AC POWER
! SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN 1 ONE UNIT SAFE l CONDITION 5 t 4
FSAR 8. 1. 4. 2.C ONSITE POWER SYSTEM IBRE 387 I 4811 l . - DESIGN CONDITIONS i A5 VIBRATION, !
j OVERSPEED FSAR 8. 1. 4. 2.C ONSITE POWER SYSTEM IEEE 387 I FSAR 59.5.4, 4812
- SUETRILLANCE 9.5.8,88.3.1.1.3
- INSTR. AND TESTING.
FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 4 X 2
) REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE ETANDARDS
' FSAR 8. I. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 5 I 3 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARD 5 i
i 8
I
_ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ ~ _ _ - - ~.. - - . - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . - - . _ - .
Page No. 6 01/03/06 COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY SOURCE & 5ECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FRATURE DESIGN CONST
e===== ==========-========= ==================== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== =====
FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 18 I 4 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEER STANDARDS i
FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 50 X 5 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, RG 1.6 I 6 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, RG 1.9 X 7 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, RG 1.29 I 9 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, RG 1.32 I 11 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, RG 1.47 X 14 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR B. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. RG 1.53 I 15 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS l
, FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, RG 1.62 I 16 f REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS l
l FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA, RG 1.75 X X SEE TABLE 8.1-1 18
! REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS i
p
- O O O
. _ . .-- . . . _ _ . ____m - ._ . __ _. . . . _m . _ . m . _ =_. .__ . . _ _ . _ . . ~ - . .. . _ . - . _,
l l PnRe N
)
. 7 l
04/03/86 COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE IBC - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
, COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO l SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE , DESInN CON 5T
-=== =====e============== ========e====-====== =e============e============= ======= ======= =====e============== ==
FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. RG 1.81 X 19 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. RG 1.89 X 20 REGULATORT GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. RG 1.93 I 21 REGULATORY GUIDES r
AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. RG 1.100 X 22 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARD 5 FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. IEEE 308-1974 X 27 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. IEEE 323-1974 X 29 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR B. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. IEEE 334-1974 I 30 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. IEEE 336-1971 X 31 REGULATORY GUIDE 5 AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR B. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. IEEE 344-1975 E 32 REGULATORY GUIDE 5 AND IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. IEEE 379-1972 X 33 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARD 5
Page No. 8 04/03/06 COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE ISC - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITY REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
===== ============================ ======= ======= =================e== =======
e-e--===== ========-- ========= =-=========e FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 DESIGN CRITERIA. IEEE 384-1974 X X 35 REGULATORY GUIDES AND IEEE STANDARDS i
FSAR 8. 1. 4. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH RG IEEE 387-1972 I 2358
& IEEE STANDARDS FSAR 8. 3. 1. 1 AC POWER SYSTEM RG 1.32 I 99 CLASS lE -SRARING OF SYSTEM BETWEEN UNITS FSAR 8. 3. 1. 1 AC POWER SYSTEM, RG 1,81 I 100 CLASS lE, SRARING OF SYSTEMS BETWEEN UNITS FSAR 8. 3. 1. 1 AC POWER STANDBY RG 1.9 I 101 POWER SUPPLT FSAR 8. 3. 1. 1 TIME FOR LOADING D/G DIESEL GENERATOR- DESIGNED I 4816 STANDBT POWER SUPPLY TO ACCEPT LOADE WITEIN 9.6 SEC. AFTER RECEIPT OF START SIGNAL FSAR 8. 3. 1. 1 DIESEL GENERATOR 7000 KW (CONTINUOUS I 4818 RATING CRITERIA OPERATION), 7700 KW (SRORT TERM (2-h) PERIOD EVERY 24h.)
l FSAR 8. 3. 1. 5 SRP EVALUATION IEEE 323-1974 X 93 FSAR 9. 5. 4. I DESIGN OF DIESEL ANSI N195-1976 I 3587
(
l GENERATOR FUEL SYSTEM FSAR 9. 5. 4. I DESIGN OF DIESEL RG. 1.26 QUALITY GROUP C I 3588 GENERATOR FUEL SYSTEM O O O
Page No. 9 04/03/86 COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE IBC - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF NO SOURCE SECTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CON 87
==re ==================== ==========e========= ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ==
FSAR 9. 5. 4. I DIESEL GENERATOR RG 1.29 5EISMIC CAT. 1 X 3589 FUEL OIL SYSTEM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ;
FSAR 9. 5. 4. 2 INSTALLAT*0N OF F.O. 29 CFR 1910 SUBPART R. I 3591 STORAGE TANK SECTION 1910.106 FSAR 9. 5. 4. 4 TdSTING OF D/G F.O. ASME III, CLASS 3 X NIL DUCTILITY 3592 SYSTEM TRANSITION NOT EIAM FSAR 9. 5. 5-1 EMERGENCY DIESEL DESIGN CODE 5 AND STDS. X TABLE 3599 ENGINE COOLING WATER SYSTEM COMPONENT DATA FSAR 9. 5. 5. I COOLING WATER SYSTEM DESIGNED TO REMAIN I 3593 FUNCTIONAL DURING AND AFTER 88E FSAR 9. 5. 6-1 DIESEL GENERATOR DESIGN CODES AND STDS. I TABLE 3600 STARTING SYSTEM COMPONENT DATA FSAR 9. 5. 6-1 DIESEL GENERATOR DESIGN CODES AND STDS. I TABLE 3859 STARTING SYSTEM COMPONENT DATA FSAR 9. 5. 6. 2 RATING CONDITION FOR NFPA T3.27.2(1975)CLA55 R I 3594 AIR DRTERS OF D/G COMPRESSOR FSAR 9. 5. T-1 DIESEL GENERATOR DESIGN CODES AND 87D5. X TABLE 3601 LUBRICATION SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETERS FSAR 9. 5. 7. I D/G LUBRICATION DESIGNED TO REMAIN I I 3595 SYSTEM-DESIGN BASIS FUNCTIONAL DURING AND AFTER SSE
Page No. 10 04/03/86 COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMENT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IRILITY REMARKS REF NO SOURCE SRCTION SUBJECT FEATURE DESIGN CONST
--=-== , ============ = === = ========-=========== ============================ ======= ======= ==================== =======
FSAR 9. 5. 7. I D/0 LUBRICATION A SINGLE FAILURE NITH I 3596 S$ STEM-DESIGN BASIS L.0.0.P. CANNOT RESULT IN COMPLETE LOSS OF STANDBY POWER SOURCE FUNCTION FSAR 9. 5. 8-I DIESEL ENGINE AIR DESIGN CODES X TABLE 3602 INTAER AND EXRAUST SYSTEM DESIGN PARAMETER GENERIC C-84/00/00 TDI DIESEL GENERATOR DEMA STANDARDS X 4TTACNMENT TO LETTER 4504 LETTER SROP TESTS NO. GN 84-2T (NO CORR. DATE ON LETTER)
GENERIC C-85/01/14 TDI DIESEL GENERATOR IEEE 387-1977 PARA. 6.1.2 & X 4505 LETTER SHOP TESTS 6.2 CORR.
NRC QUEST. 0210. 14 SAFETY-RELATED ASME III. CLASS 3 X 0210.12 COMPONENTS 4225 CORRES. PORTIONS OF DIESEL LISTED IN A.B.C.
GENERATOR SYSTEM RESPONSE TO QUESTION NRC QUEST. 0430. 4 DIESEL GENERATOR IEEE 323-1974 I AMEND. 13 4788 CORRES. AYAILABILITY (QUALIFICATIONS)
NRC QUEST. 0430. 6 DIESEL GENERATOR ASME SECT. III, CL. 3 X RESPONSE TO 4175 CORRES. PIPE AND COMPONENTS QUESTION.
WITRIN AUK. MODULE (SEID)
NRC QUEST. Q430. 6 PRESSURE CONNECTIONS ASME RATED EXPANSION I RESPONSE TO QUESTION 4185 CORRES. TO DIESEL GENERATOR COUPLING ENGINER NRC QUEST. 0430. 006 PRESSUPE CONNECTIONS ANSI STD. NPT THREADED X RESPONSE TO QUESTION 4184 CORRES. TO DIESEL GENERATOR ENGINE NRC QUEST. 0430. 10 DIESF', GENERATORS: ASME SECT. III, CL. 3 X RESPONSE TO 4176 CORRES. STARTING AIR QUESTION.
RECEIVERS DESIGN O O O
Page No.
04/03/86 O 11 o
COMMITMENTS
=
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT SOURCE & SECTION
===========================
COMMITMRNT COMMITMENT COMMITMENT DOCUMENT / RESPONS IBILITT REMARES REF NO SOURCE SRCTION SUBJECT FRATURE , DESIGN CON 8T
==== e=========e======e== ==========e======= = ============================ ======= ======= ==================== ==
NRC QUEST. 0430. 16 DIESRL GENERATOR 90 1.137 I RESPONSB TO QUESTION 4177 CORRES. FURL OIL STORAGE CAPACITY NRC QUR57. 0430. 41 COM8USTION AIR . A8MB SECT. 3. CL. 3 I RESPONSR 70 QUESTION 4178 CORRES. INTAKE PIPING DE8IGN HEQUIREMENTS NRC QUEST. 0430. 41 DIESRL GENERATOR ANSI B31.1 WITH ALLOWARLE I RR5PON8B TO QUESTION 4179 CORRES. ENGINE EXRAUST STRR85R5 IN ACCORDANCE WITH PIPING DESIGN ASMB, SRCT. III REQUIREMENTS NRC QUEST. 0430. 45 DIESBL GENERATOR NEMA 12 R AMEND. 13 4791 CORRES. ENGINE DUST CONTROL NRC QUEST. Q430. 67 DG QUALIFICATION IRRE 344-1975 I 4282 CORRES.
IWLEENTAT10N
- SORTED BY REFERENCE NUPEER DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FI' KMARKS REF NO.
EXPLANATION OF FIELDS DOCUMENT / FEATURE - The document discussed in the Fe section or the plant feature described in the FSAR section. (See Consniiment Matrix.)
SECT 10N - The section of the document / feature that is being dist j DESIGN LAST, CONST LAST - "Last" indicates the project document currently contair.Ir:g the infonnation found in the connitment DESIGN FIRST, CONST FIRST - "First" indicates the p~) Ject document that contained the Information found in the connitment when the a j ctivities governed by the document first began.
i
! REF NO. - A reference number that corresponds to the appropriate line entry in the connitment matrix.
i i
4 4
i 4
i i
2 011Ir/5/073-6
- l
Page No. 1 04/03/8G IMPLEMENTATION
2===S===3=
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
DOCUMENT /FRATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST C'510N TIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARE5 REF NO
======================= =========-== ================ =.=======. ==e== ========3======= ========e3=e==== =======e33s== ====ss
DC-2403-1.0, DC-2403-1.0 2.00 10CFR50 ' APP. A. GDC 4 3.1.F. REY. 3 3.1.F. REY. 2, 5-2-79 12-8-77 DC-1821-1.0 DC-1821-1.0; REY. 5 5-2-83 REY. 5 5-2-83 10CFR50 APP. A, GDC 5 BC-1821-1.0, DC-1821-1.0 3.00 REV. 5 5-2-83 REY. 5 5-2-83, DC-2403-1.0 DC-2403-1.0, REY. 3, 6-2-79 REY. 3 5-2-79 10CFR50, APP. A. GDC 18 DC-2403-1.0 DC-2403-1.0 4.00 REY. 3, 6-2-79 REY. O. 7-17-83 DC-1821-1.0 DC-1821-1.0 REY. 5 5-2-79 REY. O, 3-14-74 10CFR50 APP. A. GDC 50 DC-1818-1.0 DC-1818-1.0 5.00 REY. 3, 8-22-85 RET. 1, 6-21-77 RC 1.6-1971 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 8.00
- 2. REY. 8 2 REY. 2, 8-29-85 12-13-77 DC-1821-1.0 DC-1821-1.0 -
3.1.C. REY. 5 3.1.C. RET. 1, 6-2-93 4-19-74 RG 1.9-1979 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 7.00
- 2. REY. 8, 2 REY. 2, 8-29-85 12-13-77, DC-1821-1.0, DC-1821-1.0, 3.1.B. REY. 5, 3.1.B. RET. 3 5-2-83, 8-25-77,
' DC-2403-1.0, DC-2403-1.0 i 3.3.A. REV. 3 3.3.A.eREY. 2, 5-2-79, 12-8-77 X4AE01-2.0.15 X4AE01-2.0.15 REY. 7, 11-5-85 REY. 1, 9-12-78 4
9 4
I I
t
.. _ .- . _- . . - _ _ = _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ -
Page No. 2 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
==============-============
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARK 5 REF NO
=== ================- e======-==== ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
RG 1.29-1978 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 9.00 2 REY. 6 2, REV. 2, 8-29-85, 12-13-77 DC-1010-1.0 DC-1010-1.0; TABLE 1, 5R. 60 TABLE 1. 5R. 60 THRU 63 REV. 4 THRU 63. REY. 3, 6-29-83 8-11-81, X4AK01-2.0.15, X4AK01-2.0.15 REV. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1. 9-12-78 RG 1.32-1977 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. IMPLEMENTATIO 11.00 2 REV. 6, 2 REV. 2 N PER IEEE 8-29-85, 12-13-77 308-1974 DC-1821-1.0 DC-1821-1.0 REV. 5. 5-2-83 REY. 1. 4-19-74 X4AE01-2.0.7, X4AK01-2.0.7 REV. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1, 9-12-78 RG 1.47-1973 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. IMPLEMENTATIO 14.00 2 REY. 6, 2 REV. 2 N PER 8-29-85, 12-13-77, IEEE-279-1971 DC-1821-1.0 DC-1821-1.0 . PARA. 4.13 REY. 5, 5-2-83 REY. 5. 5-2-83, X4AK01-2.0.7, X4AK01-2.0.7, REY. 7, 11-5-85 REY. 1. 9-12-78 RG 1.53-1973 DC-2403-2.0.D. DC-2403-2.0.D. IMPLEMENTATIO 15.00 REV. 3, 5-2-79, REY. 2, 12-6-77 N PER IEEE X4AK01-2.0.7, X4AE01-2.0.7, 279-71. SECT.
REV. 7, 11-5-85 REV. 1. 9-12-78 4.2 O O O
D '
Pnge No.
V 3 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN TIR57 CON 8T LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT / FEATURE e-======================== ===== ====== ===--===-======= ==============-= ===============- ================ ============= ========
RG 1.62-1973 DC-2403-2.0.D. DC-2403-2.0.D. IMPLEMENTATIO 16.00 REY. 3, 5-2-79 REY. 2 12-6-77 N PER IEEE X4AB01-2.0.7, X4AB01-2.0.7 279-71. SECT.
REV. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1 9-15-78 4.17 RG 1.75-1978 DC-1821-1.0 DC-1821-1.0 ED-T-07. RET. 9 ED-T-07 REY. 4~ IMPLEMENTATIO 18.00 3.1.C, REV. 5 3.1.C. REY. 4 7-18-85 4-7-83. ED-T-08. N PER IEEE REV. 2. 8-19-82 384-1975 5-2-83 12-18-78 ED-7-08 REY. 7 DC-2403-2.0.D.6 DC-2403-2.0.D.6 7-19-85 REY. 3, 5-2-79 REY. 2 12-6-77 X4AB01-2.0.15 X4AB01-2.0.15 REY. 7 11-5-85 RET. 1 9-12-78 RG 1.81-1975 DC-1821-1.0 DC-1821-1.0 19.00 REY. 5. 5-2-83 REY. 5. 5-2-83 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D.
2 REY. 6, 2 REY. 2 8-29-85 12-13-77 i'
RG 1.89-1984 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. IMPLEMENTATIO 20.00
- 2. REV. 6, 2 REY. 2 N PER IEEE B-29-85, 12-13-77 323-1974 AND DC-2403-2.0.D.3 DC-2403-2.0.2 IEEE 344-1975
&5 REV. 3 REV. 1 9-19-85, 12-19-73 DC-1821-2.0.B. DC-1821-2.0.E.
REY. 5. 5-2-83, 1.0, RET. 4 X4AE01-2.0.15, 12-18-78 REY. 7 11-5-85 X4AB01-2.0.15 REY. 1. 9-12-78 i
1 4
i i
I 4
Page No. 4 04/03/H6 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
-=====================-================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
--=========-============ ============ -==========-==== m-============== e ============== ================ ============= =======
RG 1.93-1974 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 21.00 2 REV. 6 2 REY. 2, 8-29-85, 12-13-77 DC-1821-2.0.D. DC-1821-2.0tD.
REV. 5 5-2-83 1.0 REV. 4 12-18-78 RG 1.100-1977 DC-1821-2.0.5 DC-1821-2.0.B. IMPLEMENTATIO 22.00 REY. 5 5-2-83 1.0 REY. 4 N PER IEEE DC-2403-2.0.D.5, 12-18-78 344-1975 REV. 3, 5-2-79 DC-2403-2.0.2 X4AE01-2.0.15 REV. 1 REY. 7 11-5-85 12-19-73 X4AK01-2.0.15 REY. 1. 9-12-78 IRER 308-1974 DC-1821-2.0.8 DC-1821-2.0.2 27.00 REY. 5 5-2-83 REY. 1. 4-19-74 DC-2403-2.0.D.2 DC-2403-2.0.2 REY. 3 5-2-79 REY. 1 X4AK01-2.0.7 12-19-73 REV. 7 11-5-85 I4AK01-2.0.7 REY. 1 9-12-78 IEEE 323-1974 DC-1821-2.0.B. DC-1821-2.0.C. 29.00 REY. 5 5-2-83 REY. 3. 8-25-77 DC-2403-2.0.D.3 DC-2403-2.0.2 REV. 3. 5-2-79 REY. 1 X4AK01-2.0.7 12-19-73 REV. 7, 11-5-85 X4AK01-2.0.7 REV. 1. 9-12-78 O O O
O Page No.
01/03/86 5
o -
IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
e==========================
D0ctiMENT/ FE ATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
====-============== ============ =============-== ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
IEEE 334-1974 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 30.00 REV. 6 8-29-85 REV. 2 DC-1821-2.0.D. 12-13-77 REY. 5, 6-2-83 DC-1821-2.0;E.
X4AT04-APP. AB, REY. 3, 8-25-77 2.2 REY. 6, I44F04-APP. AB, 11-5-84 2.2, REV. 2 2-8-79 IEER 336-1971 ED-T-04 REY. 8 ED-T-04. REY. 1, 31.00 11-21-84 4-17-80 ED-T-19, REY. 1. ED-T-19, REY. O, 12-21-84 5-11-83, OD-A-30 REY. 8. GB-A-30 REY. O, 9-19-84, 9-17-79 GD-A-08 REY. GD-A-08 REY. O, 14, 12-5-84 6-28-78 OC-A-01, RET. 3, QC-A-01 REY. O, 3-7-85. GD-T-01, 1-7-83, OD-T-01 RET. 11, RET. O, 2-17-77, 6-18-84 DC-A-06 REY. O.
DC-A-06, REY. 9, 12-4-78 8-14-84, 00-T-09 REY. O.
GD-T-09 REV. 7, 9-25-79, 2-15-85 GD-T-31. REY. O.
GD-T-31 REV. O. 7-13-84
- 7-13-84 IEEE 344-1975 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 32.00 REV. 8, 8-29-85, REY. 2, DC-1821-2.0.B. 12-13-77 REY. 5, 5-2-83 DC-1821-2.0.1, 1
DC-2403-2.0.D.5, REY. 2
- REY. 3, 5-2-79, 12-20-74, I4AE01-2.0.7 DC-2403-2.0.2 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1, 12-19-73, X4AE01-2.0.7, REY. 1, 9-12-78
Page No. 6 04/03/R6 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=====e=====================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARE8 REF NO
===---~==-=== ==- === ========-=== ================ ====a=========== ================ ================ ============= =====
IEEE 379-1972 DC-1821-2.0.B. DC-1821-2.0.8, 33.00 REY. 5, 5-2-83 RET. 5, 5-2-83 DC-1009-2.0, DC-1009-2.0, REV. 2, 6-3-83 REY. 1, 3-12-81 IEEE 384-1974 DC-2403-2.0 D.6, DC-2403-2.0.D.6 ED-T-07. REY. 9 ED-T-07. RET. 4, 35.00 REY. 3, 5-2-79, REY. 2, 12-6-77, 7-18-85, 4-7-85 ED-T-08, DC-1821-2.0.E. DC-1821-2.0.C. ED-T-08 REY. 7. REY. 2, 8-19-82 REY. 5, 5-2-83, REV. 3, 8-25-77, 7-18-85 X4AE01-2.0.7, E4AE01-2.0.7, REY. 7, 11-5-85 REY. 1, 9-12-78 IEEE 323-1974 SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 93.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N, SEE REF.
No. 29 RG 1.32-1977 SEE REMARE5 FOR DESIGN 99.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N, SEE REF.
No. 11 RG 1.81-1975 SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 100.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N, BER REF.
NO. 19 RG 1.9-1979 SEE REMAREE FOR DESIGN 101.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N. SEE REF.
NO. 7 O O O
T
\
Page No. 7 04/03/86 IMPLRMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
DOCUMRNT/FRATURR SRCTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARE5 REF NO
==== ============== === ===== =e==== ========-======= ===e==========
=============== ================ ============= =====.
RG 1.9 REY. 2 12/79 ALL DC-1000-R. REY. DC-1000-E. REY. 113.00 6 8-85 SECT. 2 12-13-77, 2.0.D.2 SECT. 2.0.D.2 DC-1823 REY. 3. DC-1823 REF. 1 2-84 SECT. 1.0, 4-1-77 SECT.
REV. 5. 5-83 DC-1821 REY. 1 SECT. 1.0 RO. 4-19-74 SECT.
DC-1804 REY. 5 1.0 RG.
10-85 SECT. DC-1804 REV. 5 1.0, RG 10-2-85 SECT.
1.0, RG RG 1.108, REY. 1. 8/77 ALL DC-1000-E. RET. DC-1000-E. REV. 117.00 6, 8-85 SECT. 2 2-13-77, 2.0.D.2 SECT. 2.0.D.2 DC-1821 REV. 5 DC-1821. REY. 4 5-83 SECT. 1.0 12-18-78 SECT.
RET. 3, 2-84 DC-1823 RET. 1 SECT. 1.0, RG 4-1-77. SECT.
1.0 RG IEEE 279-1977 ALL DC-1000-E. REV. DC-1000-I. REY. 118.01 6 8-85. BBCT. 2 12-13-77, 2.0.D.2 SECT. 2.0.D.I.
DC-1804 REY. 5. DC-1804 REY. 2 10-85 SECT. 10-3-77. SECT.
3.1.J. DC-1805 2.0 DC-1805 REY. 5, 8-85 REV. O. 6-6-74 SECT. 2.0 SECT. 2.0.1 DC-1806 REV. 5 DC-1806 REY. 2, 8-85. SECT. 10-13-77 SECT.
2.0.A. DC-1816, 2.0.C. DC-1816 REV. 3 9-85 REY. O. 5-27-77
- SECT. 2.0 SECT. 2.0 DC-2403 REY. 3 DC-2403 REY. 2 5-79 SECT. 12-6-77 BBCT.
2.0.D. DC-1009, 2.0.D.1 R E V '. 2. 6-83 SECT. 2.0 I
l l 1
i
Page No. 8 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BV REFERENCE NUMBER
==e===-====================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SRCTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
-==e=-==================e- ======e= ==- = ============== ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
IEEE 279-1977 ALL DC-1624 REY. 2 DC-1009 REV. O. 118.02 6-03 SECT. 2.0 3-23-77. SECT.
DC-1625 REV. 1 2.0 DC-1624 B-83 SECT. 2.0, REY. O. 4-29-78 DC-1623 REV. 1 SECT. 2.0 5-83 SECT. DC-1625. REY. O.
2.0.I. 2-5-79 SECT.
2.0 DC-1623 REV. O. 7-7-77 SECT. 2.0 RG l.100 REV. 1 R/77 ALL DC-1000-E. REV. DC-1000-E. REY. IMPLEMENTATIO 175.00 6, 8-29-85, 2 12-13-77 N PER SECT. 2.0.D.2 SECT. 2.0.D.2 IEEE-344 DC-2403 REV. 3 DC-2403 RET. O. 1975 5-2-79 SECT. 7-17-73 SECT.
2.0.D.5 SPEC. 2.0.2, SPEC.
X4AE01 REY. 7 E4AE01. REV. 4 11-5-85. SECT. 6-30-84. SECT.
3.3.3 3.3.3 RG 1.61 10/73 ALL SPEC. E4AK01 SPEC. E4AI01 DAMPING 707.00 REV. 7 11-5-85. REV. 4, 6-30-84 VALUES BECT. 3.3.3 SECT. 3.3.3 CONTAINEO IN IEEE-344, 1975 10CFR50 APP. A GDC-2 DC-1821. REY. 5 DC-1821. REY. 5 785.00
, 5-2-83 BBCT. 5-2-83 SECT.
1.0 GDC. 1.0 CDC.
DC-2403 REY. 3 DC-2403 REY. O.
5-2-79 SECT. 7-17-73 SECT.
1.0 GDC 1.0 GDC O O O
Page No.
O 9 O a 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATIOM
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
====-======================
DOCUMENT /FRATliRE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
=e===== ============== ==e========= ==-============= ================ ================ ================ ============= =====
DEMA-1971 (DIESEL ENGIME ALL DC-2403 REV. 3, DC-2403 REY. 3 864.00 MFG. ASSOC.) 6-2-79, SECT. 5-2-79 SECT.
2.0.C.2, SPEC. 2.0.C.2 SPEC.
X4AE01, REY. 7, X4AE01, REvg 0, 11-5-85 SECT. 2-14-74 SECT.
4.1 & 5.3.1 4.1 & 5.3.1 ASME III. CLASS 1.2.3 OR DC-2403 REV. 3 DC-2403 RET. O. SPEC. I4AE01 SPEC. X4AE01, 880.00 MC. NF. OR CS $~2-79, SECT. 7-17-73, SECT. RET. 7 11-5-85. REY. O. 2-14-74, 2.0.A.2, 2.0.A.1, SECT. 2.0-1 SECT. 2.0-1 0C-1090-E, REY. DC-1000-B. REY.
6, 8-29-85 6, 8-29-85, SECT. 2.0.8.10 SECT. 2.0.B.10 SPEC. 14AE01, SPEC. X4A101 REY. 7 11-5-85 RET. O, 2-14-74 SECT. 2.0-1 SECT. 2.0-1 DC-1010-TABLE 1 DC-1010-TABLE 1, SR. 61 TRRU 63 SR. 61 TRRU 63 REY. 4, 6-29-82 REY. 3, 8-11-83 ASMR III. D.I. SUBSECTION SPEC. I4AE01 SPEC. I4AE01, 885.00 NC, CLASS 2 REY. 7 11-5-85, REY. O, 6-30-81 SECT. 2.0-1 SECT. 2.0-1 DC-2403 REY. 3 DC-2403, REY. O.
5-2-79 SECT. 7-17-73. SECT.
2.0.A.2 2.0.A.1, DC-1000-E. REY. DC-1000-E. REY.
6, 8-29-85 6, 8-29-85 SECT. 2.0.8.10 SECT. 2.0.B.10
Pnge No. 10 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=--=-======-==========-====
CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO DOCUMENT /FRATURR SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST =====e-=
--==e=== ==e,======-===- =--=--== === ================ ================ ================ ================ ============
DC-1000-C, REY. DC-1000-C, REY. 1011.00 BC-TOP-4A, REV. 3, 11/74 ALL 3, 9-30-83, 0, 2-28-74, SECT. 2.3.C. SECT. 2.3.C.
SPEC. X4AK01, SPEC. I4AK01, REY. 7 11-5-85 REV. 1, 9-12-78 SECT. 3.3.1 SECT. 3.3.1 SPEC. X4AR01, SPEC. X4AK01, 1514.00 IEEE 387-1977 3.7.1 REV. 7, 11-5-85 REV. 1, 9-12-78, SECT. 3.2.1.1 SECT. 3.2.1.1 SPEC. X4AK01, SPEC. I4AE01, 1515.00 lERE 387-1977 3.7.2 REV. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1, 9-12-78, SECT. 3.2.1.2, SECT. 3.2.1.2 DC-1821. REV. 5 DC-1821. REY. 3, 6-2-83, SECT. 8-25-77, SECT.
3.1.8 3.1.5 IEEE 308-1974 & 387-1977 ALL 5.1.1 DC-1000-E, REY. DC-1000-E, RET. RRF No. 18C-1 1516.00 6, 8-29-85, 2, 12-13-77 SECT. 3.1.2.B.3, SECT. 3.1.2.B.3, DC-1821 REY. 5. DC-1821. RET. 3, 5-2-83, SECT. B-25-77, BBCT.
2.0.B. SPEC. 2.0.B. SPEC.
14AE01 REV. 7, X4AR01, REY. O, 11-5-85, SECT. 2-14-74, SECT.
3.1 3.1 IEEE 387-1977 5.1.2 DC-1000-E, REY. DC-1000-E, REY. RRF NO. IBC-1 1517.00 6, 8-29-85, 2, 12-13-77, SECT. 3.1.2.B.3, SECT. 3.1.2.B.3, DC-1821 REV. 5 DC-1821. REY. 3, 5-2-83,5ECT. 8-25-77, SECT.
3.1.B. SPEC. 3 .1. B .' 8PEC.
X4AR01, REV. 7 I4AE01, REY. 1, 11-5-85, SECT. 9-12-78, BBCT.
3.2.1.6 3.2.1.6 O O O
a Pnne No. 11 01/03/R6 IMPLEMENTATION l
==
! MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
l DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN TIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF RO
=e=e-=============== ========-e== ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
1 IRRE 387-1977 & 323-1974 5.4 f.L L DC-1821 REY. 5 DC-1821. REV. 3 1518.00 5-2-83 SECT. 8-25-77, SECT.
2.0.B. DC-2403, 2.0.B. DC-2403 REY. 3 5-2-79 REY. O. 7-17-73, i SECT. 2.0.D. SECT. 2.0.2 SPEC. I4AK01 SPEC, I4AE01 I REY. 7, 11-5-85 REY. 1. 9-12-78 SECT. 2.0.7 SECT. 2.0.7 IEEE 387-1977 5.5 DC-1821. REY. S', DC-1821. REY. 3 1519.00 1 5-2-83. SECT. 8-25-77 SECT.
3.1.E & 3.3 3.1.E & 3.3 i DC-2403 REY. 3. DC-2403 REV. 2 i 5-2-79 SECT. 12-6-77. SECT.
3.1.C. SPEC. 3.1.C. SPEC.
, I4AK01. REY. 7 I4AK01. REY. 1 '
! 11-5-85. SECT. 9-12-78 SECT.
5.3 5.3
, IEEE 387-1977 5.6.2.2 DC-1821. REY. 5. DC-1821. REY. 3 1520.00 5-2-83 SECT. B-25-77. SECT.
~
3.1.D. DC-2403, 3.1.D. DC-2403 i
REV. 3. 5-2-79 REY. 2. 13-6-77 SECT. 3.3.5 BBCT. 3.3.9
- SPEC. I4AE01 SPEC. I4AE01, i ,
REY. 7 11-5-85. REY. 1. 9-12-78 SECT. 3.2.2.3 SECT. 3.2.2.3 4
,i IEEE 387-1977 5.6.3.1 DC-1821. REY. 5. DC-1821. REY. 3 1521.00 i 5-2-83 SECT. 8-25-77 SECT.
3.1.D. DC-2403 3.1.D. DC-2403
- REY. 3. 5-2-79 RET. 2 12-8-77 BBCT. 3.3.F. SECT. 3.3.F.
- SPEC. I4AE01 SPEC. I4AK01 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1. 9-12-78
, SECT. 3.2.5 8ECT. 3.2.5 1
i i
1 1
1 i
4 1
4
Page No. 12 04/03/RG IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
=======================s===
DOCUMENT /FEATURR SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
=====e ==-========= ====-=e3==== ==-============= ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
IEEE 387-1977 & 544-1975 6.3 ALL DC-1821 REV. 5 DC-1821 REV. 3 1522.00 5-2-83 SECT. 8-25-77. SECT.
2.0.B. DC-2403 2.0.B. DC-2403 REV. 3, 5-2-79 REY. O. 7-17-73 SECT. 2.0.D. SECT. 2.0.2 SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. X4AE01 REY. 7 11-5-85 REV. O. 2-14-74 SECT. 2.0.7 5ECT. 2.0.7 IEEE 387-1977 6.3.2(5)(c) SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. 14AE01 1523.00 REY. 7, 11-5-85 REV. 1 9-12-78 SECT. 5.3 SECT. 5.3 IEEE 387-1977 6 . f. DC-1821. REY. 5 DC-1821. REV. 3 1524.00 5-2-83 SECT. 8-25-77 SECT.
3.1.E. DC-2403, 3.1.E. DC-2403 REV. 3, 5-2-79 REY. 2 12-8-77 SECT. 3.1.C. SECT. 3.1.C.
SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC.,X4AE01 REY. 7 11-5-05. REY. 1. 9-12-78 SECT. 5.3 SECT. 5.3 IEEE 387-1977 4.0 DC-1821, REY. 5 DC-1821. RET. 3 RRF No. 18C-1 1525.00 5-2-83 SECT. B-25-77. SECT.
2.0 DC-2403 2.0 DC-2403 REY. 3. 5-2-79 REY. O. 7-17-73 SECT. 2.0, SPEC. SECT. 2.0. SPEC.
X4AE01. REY. 7 E4AI01. REY. O, 11-5-85. BBCT. 2-14-74 8ECT.
2.0.7 2.0.7 DC-1000-E. REV. DC-1000-E, REV.
6, 8-29-85 O. 5-17-73) 8ECT. 2.0.D.2 SECT. 2.0.D.2 O O O
s
\
Page No. 13 01/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
=================e=========
SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT /FRATURE
-=======e================= =====e====== ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
l IEEE 387-1977 6.3.2 SPEC. X4AE01, SPEC. X4AE01 1526.00 REV. 7, 11-5-85 REY. 1, 9-12-78 SECT. 5.3.2.A.2 SECT. 5.3.2.A.3 s
IERR 387-1977 6.3.1 SPEC. X4AB01 SPEC. X4AE01, 1527.00 REV. 7 11-5-85 REV. 1 9-12-78 SECT. 5.3.1 & SECT. 5.3.1 &
5.3.3.2 5.3.3.2 i RG 1.137 REV. 1 10/79 ALL DMCN-2403-5, DMCN-2403-6, TESTING TO BE 1592.00 9-19-85 SECT. 9-19-85 SECT. IMPLEMENTED 1.0, RG. SPEC. 1.0 RG. SPEC. PER TECE.
X4AB01, REY. 7 X4AE01, REY. 4 SPEC. REF.
11-5-85 SECT. 6-30-84, SECT. 9.5.4 i 2.0-15 2.0-15
, ANSI N196-1976 ALL DC-2403 REY. 3. DC-2403. REV. 2 TESTING /APPX. 1593.00 5-2-79, SECT. 12-6-77 SECT. B 0F 2.0.8 SPEC. 2.0.B. SPEC. ANSI-N195 70 X4AE01, REY. 7, X4AB01 REV. 1, SE 11-5-85, SECT. 9-12-78 SECT. IMPLEMENTED 2.0-2 2.0-2 PER TECH.
I SPEC. REF.
l 9.5.4 10CFR50, APP. A GDC-17 DC-2403. REY. 3 DC-2403, REY. O. TESTING TO BE 1594.00 5-2-79, SECT. 7-17-73 SECT. IMPLEMENTED 1.0, GDC. 1.0 GDC. PER TECH.
DC-1821. REY. 5 DC-1821 REY. O. SPEC. REF.
5-2-83, SECT. 3-4-78 SECT. 9.5.4 1.0 GDC 1.0.'GDC l
4 i
i
1 Page No. 14 01/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
==-========================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMAR15 REF NO
-====.== ======e====== ============ ====-=========-= ====e=========== ================ ================ ============= ====
RG 1.6 REV. O, 3/71 ALL DC-1000-E, REY. DC-1000-E. REY. 1801.00 6, 8-85, SECT. 2, 12-13-77 2.0.D.2, SECT. 2.0.D.2 DC-1804, REY. 5 DC-1804 REY. O.
10-85, SECT. 5-1-74; SECT.
3.1.J. DC-1805, 1.0, RG.
REV. 5, 8-85, DC-1805 REV. O.
SECT. 1.0, RG. 6-6-74, SECT.
DC-1806 REV. 5, 1.0 RG.
8-85, SECT. 1.0, DC-1806, REY. 3 RG, DC-1807, 10-3-78 SECT.
REV. 3, 8-85, 1.0 RG, SECT. 1.0 RG, DC-1807 REY. O.
DC-1821 REY. 5 9-27-77, BECT.
5-83 SECT. 1.0 1.0 RG.
RG DC-1821 REY. 1, 4-19-74 SECT.
1.0, RG RG 1.29 REV. 3, 9/78 ALL SPEC. X4A101 SPEC. X4A101, 1754.00 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1, 9-12-78 SECT. 3.3.1, SECT. 3.3.1 DC-1000-E. REV. DC-1000-I, REY.
6, 8-29-85, 2 12-13-77 SECT. 2.0.D.2 SECT. 2.0.D.2 i
10CFR50 APP.A GDC-17 DC-1821. REY. 5. DC-1821. REV. O. 2180.00 5-2-83, SECT. 3-4-78 SECT.
1.0 GDC. 1.0, GDC.
DC-2403 REV. 3 DC-2403 REY. O, 5-2-79. SECT. 7-17-73. SECT.
1.0. GDC. SPEC. 1.0 GDC, 8PEC.
X4A101, REY. 7 X4A101. REY. O, 11-5-85, SECT. 2-14-74 SECT.
3.0 3.0 0 0 0
.__. m _ _ . . _ . . . - -. , _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . . . . _ _ = ~ . -
_ _ _ . . __ ,m . _ . . . . _ . . . _ . . . . _ ._.
Page No. 15 04/03/96 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DRSIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARE5 REF NO
,-==-============,======== -=======-=== ===========-==== =,============== ================ ===============- ============= ========
IEEE 387-1972 DC-2403-2.0.D.7 DC-2403-2.0.2 2368.00 REY. 3 5-2-79 REV. 1.
DC-1821-2.0.B. 12-19-73 REY. 5 5-2-83, DC-1821-2.0.C.
X4AR01-2.0.7, REY. 3. 8-28-77 REV. 7 11-5-85 I4AR01-2.0.7 REV. 1, 9-12-78 RG 1.9 REY. 2, 12/79 ALL .'-1821 REY. 5. DC-1821. REY. 1 2367.00 5-3-83 SECT. 4-19-74 RECT.
f G. RG. 1.0, RG, 40-2403, REY. 3 DC-2403, REY. 2, 5-2-79, SECT. 12-6-77, SECT.
j 1.0 RG, SPEC. 1.0, RG, SPEC.
I4AE01 REY. 7, X4AR01. REY. 4
! 11-5-85 SECT. 6-30-81, SECT.
- 2.0-15 2.0-15
$ BTP ICSB 8(PSB) ALL DC-1821. REY. 5, DC-1821. REY. 3 IMPLEMENTATIO 2379.00 5-2-83. SECT. 8-25-77. SECT. N PER 1.0 BTP, 1.0 BTP. IEEE-308 3
DC-2403 REV. 3 DC-2403 REV. O.
9 5-2-79 SECT. 7-17-73. SECT.
- 1.0, GDC-17, 1.0 GDC-17 SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. X4AE01, REY. 7, 11-5-85 REY. O, 2-14-74 SECT. 2.0-7 SECT. 2.0-7 BTP PSB-2 ALL DC-1821. REY. 5 DC-1821, REV. 3 IMPLEMENTATIO 2384.00 i 5-2-83 SECT. 8-25-77. SECT. N PER 1.0, BTP. 1.0 BTP. IEEE-279 DC-2403, REY. 3. 90-2403, REY. 2, 5-2-79 SECT. 12-6-77, SECT.
2.0.D.1, SPEC. 2.0.9.1, 8PEC.
X4AR01, REV. 7, 24AE01. REV. O, 11-5-85 SECT. 2-14-74, BBCT.
2.0-7 2.0-7 1
1 1
4 4
Page No. 16 04/03/06 ,
IMPLEMENTATION
s===
MODULE IBC - BORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
==========-================
1 DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CON 5T FIRST REMARES REF NO
====== = = ===-======== =====eme==== =====-========== === ============ ================ ================ ============= =======
NUREG/CR 0660 ALL DMCN-2403-5, DMCN-2403-5, 2385.00 9-19-85, SECT. 9-19-85, SECT.
2.0.J 2.0.J t
ANSI N195-1976 DC-2403-2.0.8.7 DC-2403-2.0.8.8, 3587.00 REV. 3 5-2-79 REY. 2, 12-6-77 I4AK01-2.0 REY. X4AK01-2.0, RET.
7, 11-5-85 1 9-12-78 RG. 1.26 QUALITT GROUP C DC-2403-2.0.A. DC-2403-2.0.1 IMPLEMENTATIO 3588.00 REV. 3 5-2-79, RET. 1 N PER A5ME X4AK01-2.0.1 12-19-73 CODE. SEC.
REV. 7 11-5-85 I4AK01-2.0.1 III, CLAS5 3 REY. 1, 9-12-78 RG 1.29 SEISMIC CAT. I SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 3589.00 IMPLEMENTATIO N. REFER TO RET. NO. 9 29 CFR 1910, SUBPART R. DC-1000-C-2.5.3 DC-1000-C-2.5.3 3591.00 SECTION 1910.106 REY. 3, 9-30-83, REY. O. 2-28-74, (INSTALLATION OF FUEL OIL X4AR03 REV. 8 I4AR03, RET. 2, STORAGE TANK) 4-27-84 12-1-78 ASME III, CLASS 3 (TESTING DC-2403-3.3.P. DC-2403-3.3.P. 3592.00 OF D/0 F.O. STSTEM) REV. 4, 5-2-79 REY. 2 12-6-77, DMCN-2403-1 DMCN-2403-1, 5-18-82, 6-18-82 DC-1010-TABLE 1. DC-1010-TABLE 1, SR. 62. REY. 4 SR. 62 RET. 3, 6-29-82 8-11-81 O O 9
Pege No. 17 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
4=======
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
===e========.==============
DOCUMENT /FRATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
==-================ ======= ===- =============e== ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
COOLING WATER SYSTEM DC-1202-3.1.E & DC-1202-3.1.E & 3593.00 DESIONED TO REMAIN F. REV. 5 F. REY. 4 FUNCTIONAL DURING AND 4-19-83 1-3-78 AFTER SSE I4AE01-3.3.1 X4AE01-3.3.1.
REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1. 9-12-78 DC-1010-TABLE 1. DC-1010-TABLE 1 SR. 61 62 REY. SR. 61. 62 REY.
4 6-29-82 3 8-11-81 NFPA T3.27.2(1975) CLASS R IX4AE01-319-6 IX4AE01-319-6 3594.00 APPROVED 1-24-84 APPROVED 1-24-84 D/0 LUBRICATION SYSTEM - DC-1010-TABLE 1. DC-1010-TABLE 1 3595.00 DESIGN BASIS - DESIGNED TO SR. 61 TERU 63 85. 61 THRU 63 REMAIN FUNCTIONAL DURING REV. 4 6-29-82 REY. 3. 8-11-81 AND AFTER SSE I4AE01-3.3.1 I4AE01-3.3.1 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. 1. 9-12-78 D/0 LUBRICATION SYSTEM - A DC-2403-3.1.A & DC-2403-3.1.A & 3596.00 SINGLE FAILURE WITH LOSS E. REY. 3 E. REY. 2 OF OFFSITE POWER CANNOT 5-2-79 12-6-77 RESULT IN COMPLETE LOSS OF DC-1821-3.1.A & DC-1821-3.1.A &
STANDBT POWER SOURCE C. REY. 5 C. REY. 3
, FUNCTION 5-2-83 8-25-77 DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS DC-1010-TABLE 1. DC-1010-TABLE 1 3599.00 (EMERGENCT DIESEL ENGINE SR. 60 THRU 63 SH. 60 THRU 63 COOLING WATER SYSTEM REV. 4 6-29-82 REY. 3, 8-11-81 COMPONENT DATA) X4AT.01-2.0 REY. I4AE01-2.A. REY.
7 11-5-85 1. 9-12-78 i
I 1
4 l
Page No. 18 04/03/R6 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED ET REFERENCE NUMBER
=============-=============
DOCUMENT /FEATUltR SECTION DESIGN LAST DRBION FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO
- =-======-============ == =====-=-==-= ===========i==== ====w=========== ================ ================ ============= ========
DRSIGN CODRS AND STANDARDS DC-1010-TABLE 1, DC-10lO-TABLE 1, 3600.00 (DIESRL GRNERATOR STARTING SH. 60 THRU 63 SR. 60 THRU 63, SYSTRM COMPONENT DATA) REY. 4, 6-29-82 REY. 3, 8-11-81, X4AE01-2.0, REY. X4AE01-2.0.4REV.
7, 11-5-85 1, 9-12-78 DRSIGN CODES AND STANDARDS DC-1010-TABLE 1 DC-1010-TABLE 1, 3601.00 (LUBRICATION SYSTEM DESIGN SH. GO THRU 63, SR. 60 THRU 63, PARAMRTERS) REY. 4, 6-29-82, REV. 3, 8-11-81, X4AE01-2.0, REY. X4AK01-2.0, REY.
7, 11-5-85 1, 9-12-70 DRSIGN CODES ALL SPEC. X4AE01, SPEC. E4AE01, 3602.00 REV. 7, 11-5-85, REY. O, 2-14-74 SECT. 2.0, SECT. 2.0, DC-1000-R, REY. DC-1000-E, REY.
6, 8-29-85, 0, 5-17-73, SECT. 1.0 & 2.0, SECT. 1.0 & 2.0, DC-1821 REY. 5. DC-1821, RRV. O, 5-2-83, SECT. 3-4-78, SECT, 1.0 & 2.0, 1.0 & R.0, DC-2403, REY. 3 DC-2403 RIT. O, 5-2-79, SECT. 7-17-73, SECT.
1.0 & 2.0 1.0 & 2.0 DES. D/0 STORAGE & SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 3845.00 TRANSFER, RG 1.137 IMPLEMENTATIO N SEE REF.
NO. 1592 O O O
Pnge No.
O 19 O O 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO
,======,====e=== ======== ============ =============e== ================ ================ ================ ============= =======
DES. D/G FUEL SYSTEM ANSI SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 3846.00 N195-1976 IMPLEMENTATIO N SEE REF.
t No. 1593 DES. D/G FUEL STSTEM, RG SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 3847.00 1.26 00ALITY GROUP C IMPLEMENTATIO N SEE REF.
NO. 3588 DES D/G FUEL SYSTEM. RG SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 3848.00 1.29 CAT. I IMPLEMENTATIO N SEE REF.
NO. 9 DESIGN CODES AND STANDARDS SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 3859.00 (DIESEL GENERATOR STARTING IMPLEMENTATIO SYSTEM COMPONENT DATA) N. SEE REF.
NO. 3600 D/G - LUBRICATION SYSTEM SEE REMARES FOR DESIGN 3860.00 DESIGN PARA. CODES & IMPLEMENTATIO STANDARDS N SEE REF.
No. 3601 DIESEL ENGINE AIR INTARE & . SEE REMARKS FOR DESIGN 3861.00 EXHAUST STSTEM DESIGN IMPLEMENTATIO PARAMETERS N SEE REF.
NO. 4179 i
4
l l
j Page No. 20 l 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
l MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER l
=======e===================
l DOCUMENT /FEATURR SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO e r= ===,=====-=e========= ============ -============-== ================ ================ ================ ============= ========
10CFR50 APP. A GDC-5 DC-1821 REV. 5 DC-1821, REY. 5 4116.00 5-2-83, SECT. 5-2-83 SECT.
1.0 GDC, 1.0 GDC, DMCN-2403-5 DMCN-2403-5i 9-19-85 SECT. 9-19-85 SECT.
1.0, ODC 1.0 GDC ASME SECT. III. CL. 3 ALL SPEC. I4AE01, SPEC. I4AE01, 4175.00 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. O. 2-14-74 SECT. 4.5.3 & SECT. 4.5.3 &
2.0-1, DC-2403, 2.0-1. DC-2403, REY. 3 5-2-79 REY. O. 7-17-73, SECT. 2.0.A.2 SECT. 2.0-1 ASME SECT. III, CL. 3 ALL SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. I4AE01 4176.00 REV. 7 11-5-85, REY. O. 2-14-74 SECT. 4.1.5 8ECT. 4.1.5 RG 1.137 REV. 1 10/79 ALL DMCN-2403-4, DMCN-2403-4 4177.00 4-23-85, SECT. 4-23-85 SECT.
3.1.C. SPEC. 3.1.C. SPEC.
I4AE01 REY. 7 X4AE01 REY. 4 11-5-85 SECT. 6-30-81, SECT.
2.0-15 2.0-15 QSME SECT. III. CL. 3 ALL DC-2403, REY. 3, DC-2403 REY. O. 4178.00 5-2-79, SECT. 7-17-73. SECT.
2.0.A.2. SPEC. 2.0-1. SPEC.
X4AE01 REY. 7 14AE01 REV. 4 11-5-85 SECT. 6-30-81. SECT.
4.1.5 4.1.5 O O O
Pnte No. 21 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIR 5T REMARE8 REF RO
======er===========- =======e==== ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
ANSI B31.1 WITH ALLOWABLE ALL CALC. NO. SAME A8 DESIGN 4179.00 STRESSES /ASME SECT III, 1E5-2403-009-02 LAST CL. 3 REV. O. 3-12-84, 1E5-2403-036-01, t REV. O. 11-14-84 ANSI STD. NPT THREADED SPEC. I4AE01 SPEC. I4AE01, 4184.00 REV. 7 11-5-85 REY. 4 6-30-81 SECT. 4.5.3.1.A 5ECT. 4.5.3.1.A
&C &C ASME RATED EXPANSION SPEC. 14AE01 SPEC. X4AE01, 4185.00 COUPLING REV. 7 11-5-85 REY. O. 2-14-74 SECT. 4.5.3 SECT. 4.5.3 DC-2403 REY. 3 DC-2403. REV. O.
5-2-79 SECT. 7-17-73 SECT.
2.0.A.2 2.0-1 ASME III. CLASS 3 ALL DC-2403 REY. 3. DC-2403 REY. D. 4225.00 5-2-79 SECT. 7-17-73. SECT.
2.0.A.2. SPEC. 2.0-1. SPEC.
R4AE01. REV. 7 X4&E01. RET. O, 11-5-85 SECT. 2-14-74 BBCT.
2.0-1 2.0-1 IEEE 344-1975 ALL 8PEC. 14AE01 BPEC. X4AE01, 4282.00 REV. 7 11-5-85 REY. 4. 6-30-81 BBCT. 3.3.3 8BCT. 3.3.3
Page No. 22 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
DOCUMENT / FEATURE SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARES REF NO
===--=============== ============ ================ ================ ==-============= ================ ============= ==
LOAD SEQUENCING OF CLASS SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. X4AE01, 4285.00 IE RUSES. IEEE 323-1974 REV. 7 SECT. REY. 4 SECT.
5.3.2 & 3.3.3 5.3.2 & 3.3.3 11-5-85 6-30-81 i DEMA STANDARDS ALL SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. 14AE01 LETTER LOG 4504.00 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. O. 2-14-74 GN-508 WAS SECT. 2.0-4 SEE SECT. 2.0-4 ISSUED IN REMARES - RESPONSE TO RESPONSE TO LETTER LOG OENERIC LETTER ON-384 IEEE 387-1977 6.1.2 & 6.2 SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. X4AE01 LETTER LOG 4505.00 REV. 7, 11-5-85 REY. O. 2-14-74 ON-585 WAS SECT. 2.0-7 SEE SECT. 2.0-7 ISSUED IN
. REMARKS - RESPONSE TO RESPONSE TO LETTER LOG OENERIC LETTER ON-508 IEEE 323-1974 ALL DC-1000-E. REY. DC-1000-E. REY. 4788.00 6, 8-29-85 2 12-13-77 SECT. 2.0.D.I. SECT. 2.0.D.1 DC-1821 REV. 5. DC-1821. REY. 3 5-2-83. SECT. 8-25-77 EECT.
2.0.8 DC-2403 2.0.C. DC-2403 REY. 3. 5-2-79 REV. O. 7-17-73 SECT. 2.0.D.3 SECT. 2.0-2 SPEC. X4AE01 SPEC. X4AE01 REY. 7 11-5-85 REY. O. 2-14-74 SECT. 3.3.3 SECT. 2.0-7 O O O
f V" \
Page No. 23 04/03/86 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE 18C - SORTED BY REFERENCE NUMBER
===========================
DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST COMET FIRST REMARES REF NO DOCUMENT /FRATURE SECTION
==================== ============ ================ ================ ================ ================ ============= ==
ALL DC-1816 REY. 3 DC-1816 REV. 1 4791.00 NEMA 12 9-3-85 SECT. 4-16-82. SECT.
3.1.B 3.1.8 10CFR50 APP. A GDC-17 DC-1821 REY. 5. DC-1821 REY. O. 4810.00 5-2-83 SECT. 3-4-78 BBCT.
1.0 GDC. 1.0 GDC.
DC-2403 REY. 3 DC-2403 REY. O.
5-2-79 SECT. 7-17-73 SECT.
1.0 SPEC. 1.0 SPEC.
X4AE01. REV. 7 14AK01 REY. O, 11-5-85 SECT. 2-14-74. SECT.
3.1 3.1 DC-1821. REY. 5, DC-1821. REY. 3 4811.00 IEEE 387-1977 5.6 5-2-83 SECT. 8-25-77. SECT.
3.1.D. DC-2403 3.1.D. DC-2403 REY. 3 5-2-79 REY. O. 7-17-73 SECT. 2.0.D.2 SECT. 2.0-2 SPEC. I4AE01 SPEC. I4&E01 REV. 7 11-5-85. REY. O. 2-14-74 SECT. 3.2.3 8ECT. 3.2.3 IEEE 387-1977 DC-2403-2.0.D. DC-2403-2.0.2 4812.00 REY. 3. 5-2-79 REV. 1 DC-1000-E-2.0.D. 12-19-73, 1 REY. 6 DC-1000-E-2.0.D.
8-29-85 1. REY. 2 DC-1821-2.0.B. 12-13-77 REY. 5. 5-2-83 DC-1821-2.0.C.
X4AE01-2.0.7 REV. 3. 8-25-77 REV. 7 11-5-85 I4AE01-2.0.7 REY. 1 9-12-78
Page No. 24 04/03/06 IMPLEMENTATION
==
MODULE IBC - SORTED BT REFERENCE NUMBER i =======================================
DOCUMENT /FEATURR SECTION DESIGN LAST DESIGN FIRST CONST LAST CONST FIRST REMARKS REF NO
=== === ===-===ce=== ===e=====--= ==========e===== ================ ================ ================ ============= ====
DIESEL GENERATOR DESIGNED SPEC. X4AK01 SPEC. X4AK01, 4816.00 TO ACCEPT LOADS WITHIN 9.5 REV. 7 11-5-85, REY. 4, 6-30-81 SEC. AFTER RECEIPT OF SECT. 3.2.1.6 SECT. 3.2.1.6 START SIGNAL 3.2.2.1 & 3.4.3 3.2.2.1 & 3.'4.3 7000 KW (CONTINUOUS DC-1821-3.1.B. DC-1821-3.1.B. 4818.00 OPERATION), 7700 EW (SRORT REV. 5, 5-2-83 REY. 3, 8-25-77 TRRM (2 HR) PERIOD EVERY X4AK01-3.2 REY. X4AK01-3.2, REY.
24 HRS) 7 11-5-85 1, 9-12-78 O O. O
1 4.0 ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS 4.1 OPEN CORRECTIVE ACTIONS The open action, completion date, and organization responsible for completing the action are provided below.
o Finding 18C-1 Action: Revise design criteria (DC)-1000-E to show correct edition of standard.
Completion Date: April 18, 1986.
Responsible Orcanization: Bechtel Power Corporation Home Office Engineering.
l l
l l
l 0107r/094-6
4.2 OA STATEMENT O The process for the development of Module 18C was monitored by the Readiness Review quality assurance (QA) staff for general adequacy.
Monitoring activities consisted of reviewing the findings and confirming the availability of records for Readiness Review personnel qualification and training. The findings were screened for reportability [10.CFR 21, 10 CFR 50.55(e)] in accordance with existing QA procedures. No findings were identified which required additional evaluation by the project for reportability. !
An independent reverification was performed-on a. sampling basis under Readiness Review QA overview to determine the adequacy of the commitment / implementation matrixes.
Based upon these monitoring efforts, this modulerand the Readiness Review Team conclusions are judged to be acceptable.
I l
i kTM% N J. Taylor" /$ohn H. Draggef '
Readiness Review Team Readiness Review Team Quality Assurance Representative Quality Assurance Representative
(} 0110r/076-6
4.3 RESUMES The resumes which follow present a brief professional history of those personnel involved in the development of Module 18C.
JOSEPH ARBAIZA, Senior Quality Engineer, Team Leader Mr. Arbaiza has been employed by Bechtel Power Corporation since 1973.
l Mr. Arbaiza has held the positions of project quality engineer (PQE) on Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (GGNS), Unit 2, and drouty l PQE on GGNS, Unit 1. His duties included reviewing project engineering and vendor documents for compliance with engineering and quality program requirements, preparing and revising project engineering procedures, and representing the project engineer on matters related to quality (audits, training, etc.).
Education:
1 Finlay College B.S., Mechanical Engineering P.E., State of California lt MAHESH A. SUTHAR, Engineer, Team Member l Mr. Suthat began his employment with Bechtel Power Corporation l
in 1980 and has 6 years experience in designing pipe supports for nuclear power plants.
In 1982, he was assigned to the Grand Gulf Project where he was involved with pressure drop calculatic7s in piping systems and was responsible for designing fire protection systems such as deluge and sprinkler systems, Halon and CO2 fire suppression systems, portable fire extinguishers, fire hydrants, fire hose stations, and fire and smoke detection systems. Also, he was responsible for the suppression pool make-up system and was involved in the fire protection analysis for HVAC modifications in the control building. He also designed containment systems pipe supports which would be subjected to jet impingement due to loss-of-coolant accident conditions. Beiore coming to Bechtel l l Power Corporation, Mr. Suthar worked for companies engaged in l process equipment and electromechanical design and taught several mechanical engineering-related courses.
Education:
, Sardar Patel University l M.S., Mechanical Engineering P.E., District of Columbia 1
i l 0136r/084-6
O- Diesel Generators - Module 18C Readiness Review Board Acceptance The Readiness Review Board has been apprised of the scope and content of Module 18C, Diesel Generators.
The Board has reviewed the program verification, as well'as corrective actions, both proposed and implemented, by the Vogtle Project. Band upon this review and based upon the collective experience as.d professional judgement of the members, the.
Readiness Review Board is of the opinion that the corrective actions proposed are acceptable, and that the standby diesel generators at Plant Vogtle are sound and comply with commitments set forth in the TSAR and acceptable practices.
APPROVED: DATE: b- '-
Doug Duttoh Chairman, Readiness Review Board Vogtle Electric Generating Plant l
l 0 -
Oll2r/076-6 i
... . ..