U-601825, 1990 Annual Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept
| ML20073D506 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1990 |
| From: | Spangenberg F ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| U-601825, NUDOCS 9104290099 | |
| Download: ML20073D506 (176) | |
Text
--
U.60182 5 -
L30 91(04-23)LP ILLINDIS POWER u.120-CLINTON POWER STATION, P.O. DOX 078, CLINTON, ILLINOIS 61727 0678 TELEPHONE (217) 935 8881 April 23, 1991 Docket No. 50 461 Document Control Desk Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Clinton Power Station Annual Radiolocical Environmental Monitorine Reoort
Dear Sir:
Illinois Power Company is submitting the 1990 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Clinton Power Station. This submittal is provided in accordance with the requirements of Section 6.9.1.6 of Clinton Power Station Technical ;
Specifications.
Sincerely,
! =
- v. ,.
F. A' Span enber ,.III Manager - L cens ng and Safety SFB/alg ;
Attachment '!
cc: NRC Resident Office NRC Region III, Regional. Administrator NRC Clinton Licensing Project Manager -
Illinois Department. of Nuclear Safety i
0k)&j R -ADOCK'05o004 g
\\ ;
ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY -
CLINTON POWER STATION 1990 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT j E
'E-i tp ;g./ .il'
' ?
f.f.
"\- t-
- !};' '
8
$ , l, '
- (i? l: ~
s -
99f, }llp , l]f
~
s le1l fll- ,
1 .,
.. .... ff 4 ', . h u ' .f a ' t -
t s , e
,1, ' 4 s rk
'i I
l
-- )
__ 3
I 1990 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONNENTAL MONITORING REPORT FOR THE CLINTON POWER STATION Prepared by i Radiological Environmental Group ')
~
Radiation Protection-Department, .
.3 .!
l May. - 1, . ' 19 91
_ 'b,. m
-.n_ _
TABLE OF CONTENTS IT.E DaE LIST OF TABLED 111 LIST OF FIGURES iv I. EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
1 II. INTRODUCTION 3 A. Characteristics of Radiation 3 B. Sources of Radiation Exposure 4 C. Description of the Clinton Power Station 9 D. Nuclear Reactor Operations 10 E. Containment of Radioactivity 11 F. Sources of Radioactive Effluents 12 G. Radioactive Waste Processing 16 III. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP) 19 A. Program Description 19 B. Direct Radiation Monitoring 40 C. Atmospheric Monitoring 45 D. Aquatic Monitoring 53 Fish 53 Shoreline Sediments 54 Bottom Sediments 55 Aquatic Vegetation (Periphyton) 56 E. Torrestrial Monitoring 58 Milk 59 Grass 63 Vegetables 63 Meat 64 F. Water Monitoring 64 Drinking Water 65 Surface Water 69 Well Water 73 G. Quality Assurance Program 80 H. Changes to the REMP During 1990 81 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
ITEM PAGE IV. ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS 83 Summary of Changes Idsntified in 1990 I Annual Land Use Census 85 V. METEOROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS 89 A. Description. 89 ;
B. Climatological Summary - 1990 93 l VI. LIST OF-REFERENCES- 107 VII. APPENDICES 111 A. Exceptions to the REMP During 1990 111 B. REMP Sample Collection and Analysis Methods 119 C. Glossary 143 D. CPS Radiological Environmental Monitoring Results Curing 1990 147 E. CPS Radiological Environmental Monitoring Quality Control Check Results 1990 176 l i
. 1 l
i I
1 11-
i LIST OF TABLES I&BLE SUBJECT PAGE 1 Common Sources of Radiation 7 2 1990 Radionuclide Composition of-CPS l Effluents 15 3 Clinton Power Station Sample Codes 33 l 4 REMP Sample Locations 34 i
5 1990 Annual TLD Results 41 6 Quarterly-Average TLD Results 45 7 1990 Average Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates 48 8 1990 Average Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates 49 9 1990 Tritium Concentrations in Drinking, Surface and Well Water 78 10 1990 Average Gross Beta Concentrations in Drinking, Surface and Well Water 79 11 Changes to the REMP During 1990 '82 !
12 1990 Annual Land Use Census 86- ;
13 Historical Climatological Data from Weather Stations surrounding the Clinton Power Station 92 14 Classification of Atmospheric Stability 94 15 Annual Joint Frequency Distribution of -
Meteorological Parameters During 1990_ . 95 i
q l
l l
t iii 4
a
.--. . ..- - . - -.- ~....-.-.. - .. - - - -.- -. _ . . _ . . . - - . _ .
)
LIDT OF FIGURES 1 FIGURE SUBJEcl PAGE ,
1 Dose Contributions to the U. S. Population from Principal Sources of Radiation Exposure 7 2 Clinton Power Station Basic Plant Schematic 13 3 Potential Exposure Pathways of Man Due to Releases of Radioactive Material to the Environment 23- -
4 REMP Sample Locations within 1 Mile 25-5 REMP Sample Locations from 1 - 2 Miles 27 6 REMP Sample Locations from 2 - 5 Miles 29 i 7 REMP Sample Locations Greater than 5 Miles 31 8 Direct Radiation Comparison 43 ;
9 Air Particulate Gross Beta Activity Comparison 51 10 Strontium-90 Activity in Milk 61 11 Drinking Water Gross Beta Activity Comparison .
67 ;
i 12 Surface Water Gross Beta Activity Comparison 71 13 Well Water Gross Beta Activity Comparison 75 14 Annual Land Use Census, Nearest Residence -!
(R) , Garden (G) , and Milk Animal _(M) _ within 5 miles 87- t 15 1990 Clinton Power Station 10 Meter-
Wind-Rose 103 16 1990 Clinton Power Station 60 Meter-Wind Rose- 105 4
iv-
- -wwg,p. 3 .. .gr. -,7,-y .;,.y. ..
9 s s. 4, > . . . -< , , y e:
'f '
p (i~ A 9} . [.
,. ,Y- ;" ^))n 3' - -; v M ;;;t -
it.-
. . 9 _.
m a sg yx;)su
+
.O l1
~d . 'c,. p ' .i \")hk.
- Q; r , : W~
- +
q;
~w a' t ..,
l; ,'gg,
, . l, n.
.T n 8
~
- o r
Q Oy 9
iy M 0
g y '+ -
]?Qif, "yp,( g, ,
~l< :. , <
i 4
.?y b :il', ;l,: c A .g.3 9
.s .
re ,. y k [ (y
' 'I * -
- k. . *
< j Jy, ,
s
(
, m ,
+ ,
e u, . +
,Y
.p' ((,'
.: , s cw
- y-m iin am ' t' M:
3-.0 , [G,llw;.':f;MyJQu
< , m e ..
f 14.7 i gsf
.gj::{
.gji w -'.
/ U ,g ' j' '
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
CLINTON POWER STATION OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT FOR 1990 I. EXECUTIVE SUM]ih]d This report describes the Operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) conducted during 1990 in the vicinity of the Clinton Power Station (the fourth year of the Clinton Power Station Operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program). The REMP was performed in 1990 as required by the Clinton Power Station Operating License issued by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
The purpose of the REMP is to assess any radiological impact upon the surrounding environment due to the j operation of the Clinton Power Station.
1 Over 1700 environmental samples were collected during 1990. These samples represented direct radiation; <
atmospheric, terrestrial, and aquatic environments; and Clinton Lake surface water and public drinking water supplies. More than 2200 analyses were performed on these environmental samples. Results showed that radioactivity levels were similar to the preoperational levels. The Clinton Power Station Preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report documented natural background radionuclides in the environment !
surrounding Clinton Power Station prior to plant 1 operations.
I Direct radiation measurements were taken at 83 locations using thermoluminescent dosimeters. The average annual dose was 69 mrem. This is consistent with the annual average dose documented in the Preoperational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report, 1980 - 1987.
Atmospheric monitoring results for 1990 were within the same range as environmental measurements made prior to the commercial operation of the Clinton Power Station (preoperational data). No radioactivity attributable to the operation of the Clinton Power Station was detected in any. atmospheric samples during 1990.
Terrestrial monitoring includes analyses of vegetation !
samples, grass samples, milk samples, and meat samples, j Results of the analyses showed natural radioactivity and radioactivity attributed to other historical nuclear events (i.e., fallout from nuclear weapons testing and the 1986 Russian reactor accident at Chernobyl). The radioactivity levels detected were consistent with the preoperational results.
I l=
l t
Aquatic monitoring includes analyses of fish samples, I lake bottom sediment samples, lake shoreline sediment samples and aquatic vegetations (periphyton) samples.
All sampled media, with the exception of one periphyton sample, showed that radioactivity levels were consistent with the levels in the preoperational program. One periphyton sample had a low level of-radioactivity attributed to the operation of Clinton Power Station. However, this result was well below any regulatory limit and was consistent with the activity released in liquid effluents.
Ground and surface water monitoring results were consistent with the results obtained during the preoperational program. .None of the 1990 samples showed radioactive material due to the. operation-of_the Clinton Power Station.
Releases of gaseous radioactive materials were accurately measured in plant-effluents during 1990. No release exceeded or even approached the limits specified in the Clinton Power Station offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). A total of 12.8 curies of gaseous radioactive effluents were. released.during 1990. This total includes 1.88 curies of tritium.
Releases of liquid radioactive materials were also accurately measured in plant effluents during 1990. As '
stated above for gaseous effluents,uno. release exceeded or approached the Clinton Power Station ODCM limits. A total of 2.63 curies of liquid radioactive effluents ,
were released during 1990. This total includes 2.60 l curies of tritium. 1 The highest calculated 1 total bodyidose received by a member of the_public due to the release of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents from Clinton Power Station was 0.0027 mrem.
14 Radiological-environmental measurements taken during. '
1990 demonstrated that_ operational and._ engineered .
controls on the radioactive-effluents released:from'the Clinton Power Station-functioned 1as' designed. ;Any radioactivity.that was detected in the environment at indicator locations was appropriately compared against=
both the measurements ~at-control locations (sample locations'not affected by . station' operations) and preoperational results.
All comparisons between 1990 operational' data ~and.
preoperational data showed that the' operation of -
Clinton: Power Station had a' negligible'effect.upon the-
]!
1 environment in 1990 '
--" J
~
n 1
l
. ,.% ,_,,, , , ,.. e.s, n .cW,A - ,,,,my.
g 41 i +- - >
m y
,'0
., \l~R _h( AkN h , J ~ ;. l '
._ . < m a n~ . :. ., r n o~ a m m *"ep
~~~. L a, ; ,,.7 , w:n,,- g"' ,m m , ;=;.as,:e
.J , ..:
7, d; c ,g.;; ;(T{._ _. m.w i.;;g,.,, gg n;, n.v l) 4
>r
- i- gg7_
=
n
' s ,9 "
qi
. . ,g ,
-. x .n
.-n.,gt 3r ya,::x ;;;;
3 INTRODUCTION
II. IETRODUCTION The following background information regarding basic radiation characteristics, plant operations, radioactive offluent controls and environmental monitoring is provided to assist the reader in reviewing this document. )
A. Characteristics of Radiation Atoms whose nuclei contain an excess of energy are called radioactive atoms. They releasc this excess energy by expelling electromagnetic or particulate radiation from their atomic centers to ;
become stable (non-radioactive). This process is called " radioactive decay". X-rays and gamma rays are examples of electromagnetic radiation and are similar in many ways to visible light, microwaves and radio-waves. Particulate radiation may be either electrically charged such as alpha and beta ,
particles, or have no charge, like neutrons.
The term " half-life" refers to the time it takes ;
for half of a given amount of a radionuclide to decay. Some radionuclidos have a half-life as short as a fraction of a second, while others have a half-life as long as a million years.
Radionuclides may decay directly into stable elements or may undergo a series of decays which ultimately end up reaching a stable element.
Radionuclides are found in nature (e.g.,
radioactive uranium, thorium, carbon and.
potassium), and may also be produced artificially in accelerators and nuclear reactors (e.g.,
radioactive iodine, cesium and cobalt).
The activity of a radioactive source is the number of nuclear disintegrations (decays) of the source per unit of time. The unit of activity is the curie. A one curie radioactive source undergoes 2.2 trillion disintegrations per minute, but in the realm of nuclear power plant effluents and environmental radioactivity, this is a large unit. .
Therefore, two fractional units, the microcurie i and the picocurie, are more commonly used. The i microcurie (uci) is one millionth of a curie (Ci) '
and represents 2.2 million decays per minute. The picoeurie (pci) is one millionth of a microcurie and represents 2.2 decays per minute. Another way of comparing the pci and the Ci is by analogy with distances. A picocurie would be.the width of a pencil mark while a curie would be 100 trips j around the earth, l
?
o 1
Radioactivity is related to the half-life and- the ,
atomic mass of a radionuclide. For example, Uranium-235-(U-235) with a half-life of 704 million years requires about 462,400 grams to- >
obtain an activity of one curie. But iodine-131 (I-131) with a half-life of 8.04 days only requires about 0.003 grams to produce an activ'ity of one curie.
4 Any mechanism that can supply the energy necessary to ionize an atom, break a chemical bond, or alter the chemistry of-a living cell is capable of '
producing biological damage. Electromagnetic _and particulate radiation can produce cellular. damage in any of these ways. In assessing the biological effects of radiation,~the type, energy, and amount of radiation.must be considered.
External total body radiation involves exposure of all organs. Most background exposures arelof this form. When radioactive elements enter the body through inhalation or ingestion, their distribution:may not be uniform. For example, radioiodine selectively concentrates in the thyroid gland, whereas radiocesium_ collects in. 4, muscle and liver tissue, and radiostrontium collects in uineralized bone. The total dose to organs by a given radionuclide is also influenced a by-the quantity and the duration of time that.the-radionuclide remains in the body, owing to radioactive decay and human metabolism factors, -
some radionuclides stay in.the body for very short times while others remain for years.
The amount'of radiation dose'which'an-individual F receives is expressed 11n rem. Since human ;
exposure to radiation usually involves.very small-exposures, the millirem (mram) is the unit most commonly used. _one millirem is-one thousandth of a rem.
B. Sources of Radiation Exoosure' Many sources of radiasion exposure e'xist. The- .
l most common and loast controllable source is f background radiation from cosmic ~ rays and _
-terrestrial radioactivity-whichtmankind bas alwayse lived.with and always"will. LEvery seconn of our '
lives,;over~seven thousand atoms underge radioactive decay'in the body of1the.avecage-adult.
6
- - . . m., , . , . . . - , 4, , , ,- e -,~..--.e.,r,wwe
. , y -w. , w
Radioactive elements have always been a part of our planet and everything which has come from the earth including our own bodies is, therefore, naturally radioactive. Radioactive materials found in the earth's crust today consist of such radionuclides as potassium-40 (K-40), uranium-238 (U-238), thorium-232 (Th-232), radium-226 (Ra-226) ,
and radon-222 (Rn-222). These radionuclides are introduced into the water, soil and air by such ,
natural processes as volcanic activity, weathering, erosion and radioactive decay.
Some of the naturally occurring radionuclides, such as radon, are a significant source of radiation exposure to the generai public.
Radioactive radon is a chemically inert gas produced naturally in the ground as a part of the uranium and thorium decay series. Radon continues to undergo radioactivo decay, producing new naturally radioactive materials called " radon i daughters". These new materials, which are solid particles, not gases, can stick to surfaces such as dust particles in the air. Concentrations of radon in air are variable and are affected by concentrations of uranium and thorium in soil, altitude, soil porosity, temperature, pressure, soil moisture, rainfall, snow cover, atmospheric conditions, and season. It can move through cracks and openings into basements of buildings and become trapped in a small air volume indoors.
Thus, indoor radon concentrations are usually higher than these found outdoors. Building materials such as cinder blocks and concrete are radon sources. Radon can also be dissolved in well water and contribute to airborno radon in houses when released through showers or washing.
Dust containing radon daughter particles can be inhaled and deposited on the surface of an_ d individual's lung, Radon daughters emit high energy alpha radiation dose to the lung lining.
Table 1 shows the average annual effective dose due to radon.
About three hundred cosmic rays originating from outer space pass through each person every second. i The interaction of cosmic rays with atoms in the earth's atmosphere produces radionuclides such as Bery111um-7 (Be-7), Beryllium-10 (Be-10),
Carbon-14 (C-14), tritium (H-3), and Sodium-22 (Na-22). Portions of these radionuclides become deposited on land or.in water while the remainder stay suspended in the atmosphere.
S
l l
Consequently, there are natural radioactive materials in the soil, water, air and building materials which contribute to radiation doses to the human body. Natural drinking water contains trace amounts of uranium and radium; milk contains measurable amounts of potassium-40. Sources of natural radiation and their average contributing radiation doses are summarized in Table 1. Figure 1 graphically shows the percent contribution from radiation exposure to the general population of the United States. Radiation exposure levels from natural radiation fluctuate with time and also can vary widely from location to location. The average individual in the United States receives approximately three hundred mrom per year from natural sources. In some areas of the country, the dose from natural radiation is significantly higher. Residents of Colorado, five thousand feet above sea level, receive additional dose due to the increase in cosmic and terrestrial radiation levels. In fact, for every_one thousand feet in elevation above sea level, an individual will receive an additional one mrein por year from .
cosmic radiation. In several areas of the world, ,
high concentrations of mineral deposits result in natural background radiation levels of several thousand mrem per year.
In addition to natural background radiation, the average individual is exposed to radiation from a number of man-made sources. The largest of these sources comes from medical diagnosis: X-rays, CAT-scans, fluoroscopic examinations and radio-pharmaceuticals. Approximately 160 million people in the United states are exposed to medical or dental X-rays in any given year. .The. annual l dose to an individual from such irradiation averages 53 mrem. Smaller doses from man-made sources come from consumer products (television, smoke detectors, fertilizer) , fallout from prior nuclear weapons tests, and production of nuclear power and its associated fuel cycle.
Fallout commonly refers to the radioactive debris that settles to the surface of the earth following-the detonation of nuclear weapons. Fallout is dispersed throughout the environment but can be-washed down to the earth's surface by rain or l
snow.
6-
TABLE 1 C!)didl%YRLURCIbs' 0F RAlllA TION A. Average Ar,nual Ef f ective Dose Equivalent to the U.S. Population 12.A9.!LLro f . So_u rc e s _m rp_m
- a. Redon 200
- b. Cosmic, Terrestrial, internal 100
- 2. M a n - M g d e._S o u rc_e s mrem
- a. Medical X-ray Diagnosis 39 Nuclear Medicine 14
- b. Consumer Products 10
- c. Occupational 1
- d. Miscellaneous Environmental <1
- e. Nuclear fuel Cycle <1 Approximate Tota 360 NCRP87a PERCENTAGE Of CONTRIBUTION CONSUMCR PRODUCTS (3%)
NUCL( AR W(DICINC (45) , qv-
/
' L
X-RAY DiACNOSl$ (111.)
.x h.,j
.' /,/' '
Qy' OTHER (<14)
MISC. [hylw0NMLNI AL 50VRCL5 -
'N.AN\Y./
A'{ ]-Q, ' j ,
i \ '. .
HUCLE AR IULL CYCLL [,[ ' (N " ' (
OCCUP AllON AL g/ j'p 4 3
,/ ,o
,/Nk COsuiC,1t wkts t RIAL ' !j!
m1[wnAL u (' s) / '7
... RADON ($$%)
/
FIGURE I: DOSE CONTitlHUTIONS T0 Tile U.S. POPUL1 TION Fil0AI PRINCIPAL SOURCES OF RADIATION EXPOSURE 7_
There are approximately two hundred radionuclides produced in the. nuclear weapon detonation processt a number of these are detected in fallout. The l radionuclidos found in fallout which produce most of the fallout radiation exposures to man are l iodine-131 (I-131), strontium-89 (Sr-89),
strontium-90 (Sr-90), and cesium-137 (Cs-137).
C. Descriotion of the Clinton Power Station The Clinton Power Station is located in Harp Township, DeWitt County, Illinois. It is approximately six miles east of the city of Clinton, Illinois.
The station, its V-shaped cooling lake, and the surrounding Illinois Power Company-owned land enclose 14,le2 acres. This includes the 4,895 acre man-made cooling lake and about 90 acres of privately-owned property. The Clinton Power Station is sited on approximately 150 acres on the northern arm of the lake. The cooling water discharge flume, which discharges to the eastern arm of the lake, occupies an additional 130 acres.
Although the nuclear reactor,. supporting equipment, and associated electrical generation and distribution equipment lie in Harp Township, portions of the 14,182 acres lie in Wilson, Rutledge, DeWitt, Creek, Nixon and Santa Anna Townships.
The cooling lake was formed by constructing an earthen dam near the confluence cf Salt Creek and the North Fork of Salt Creek. The resulting lake has an average depth of 15.6 feet, and-includes an
, ultimate heat sink of about 590 acre feet. The-i ultimate heat sink provides sufficient water volume and cooling capacity for approximately thirty days of operation without makeup water.
Through arrangements with the Illinois Department-of Conservation, Clinton Lake and much of the area immediately adjacent to the lake are used for ,
public recreation activities, including swimming, boating, waterskiing and fishing. ' Recreational facilities exist at Clinton Lake and accommodate up to 11,460 people per day during. peak usage periods. The outflow from Clinton' Lake falls into Salt Creek and flows.in a westerlyLdirection tor about 56 miles before joining the Sangamon River.
The Sangamon River drains into'the Illinois River which enters the Mississippi River near Grafton,-
Illinois. The nearest use of downstream water for drinking purposes is 242 river miles downstream of.
9
Clinton Lake at Alton, Illinois as verified in l July 1990 by the Illinois Environmental Protection l Agency Public Water Service. Although nome farms ,
in the Salt Crook drainage area downstream of Clinton Lake use irrigation, the irrigation water is drawn from wells, not from the waters of Salt Creek.
An estimated 810,000 individuals live within 50 miles of the Clinton Power Station. Over half of these are located in the major metropolitan contors of Bloomington-Normal (located about 23 miles north northwest), Champaign-Urbana (located about 31 miles east), Decatur (located about 22 miles south southwest) and Springfield (located about 48 miles west southwest). The n4arest city is Clinton, the county seat of DeWitt County, located about 6 miles west of the station. The estimated population of Clinton is about 8,000 people. Outside of the urban areas, most of the land within 50 miles of the Clinton Power Station is used for farming. The principal crops are corn and soybeans.
D. Nuclear Reactor Ooerations The fuel of a nuclear reactor is made of.the element uranium in the form of uranium oxide. The fuel produces power by the. process called
" fission". In fission, the uranium atom absorbs a neutron (an atomic particle found in nature and produced by the fissioning of uranium in the reactor) and splits to produce fission products, heat, radiation and free neutrons., The free neutrons travel in the core; further absorption of neutrons by uranium permits the fission process to continue. As the fisslun process continues, more fission products, radiation, heat and neutrons are produced and a sustained reaction occurs. The heat produced is extracted from the fuel to-produce steam which drives a turbine generator to produce electricity. The fission products are predominantly radioactive; they are unstable elements which emit radiation as they change from unstable to stable elements. Neutrons which are not absorbed by the uranium fuel may be absorbed by stable atoms in the materials which make up the components and structures of the reactor. In such l cases, stable atoms often become radioactive.
l This process is called " activation" and the
! radioactive atoms which result are called
" activation products".-
10 .
. _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . . _ . _.
j The reactor at the Clinton Power Station is a 1 boiling water reactor (BWR). . In this type of
! reactor the fuel is formed into small ceramic pellets which are loaded-into sealed fuel rods. -
The fuel rods are arranged in. arrays called ,
bundles which are supported within a massive steel l I reactor vessel.
s i
The spaces between the fuel rods'are filled with J water. The heat released during the fission of fuel atoms is transferred to the water surrounding the fuel rods'.. A type of pump which contains no moving parts (a jet pump) , and recirculation pumps are used to force the water to circulate through the fuel bundles to assure even cooling.of.the fuel rods. As the water absorbs heat from the fuel rods some of it is changed to steam._ _The' i steam is used to drive a turbine which'is coupled- .
to a generator, thereby completing the conversion of the energy released during:fissionrto electricity.
After the steam passes.through the turbine _it is-condensed back to water:and returned to the ,
reactor vessel to repeat-the process. As the -,
water circulates-through the reactor' pressure 1 vessel, corrosion allows trace quantities _of'the component and structure surfaces to get intoLthe-water. The corroded material.'also contains radioactive substances known as activated-I corrosion products.= Radioactive' fission'and.
activation products are normally-confined to the primary system although small-leakstfrom the primary system may occur. Figure-2_-provides'a basic. plant schematic for.the:Clinton Power- ,
! Station and shows the separation =of the= cooling i
! water from plant systems. :
l >
E. Containment'of Radioactivity Under: normal' operating conditions, essentiallyLall radioactivity is contained within the firstLof.
several barriers of'the primary--system:which collectively. prevent-escape of. radioactivity to the environment..
-The fuel: cladding -(meta 11 tubes)lprovides'the-first' barrier. The ceramicLfuel pellets arelsealed- l l within.zircaloy metal tubes. -There is alsmall; gap between the fuel'and the; cladding _wherenthe noble:
L gases and other volatile nuclidesTcollect.'
L 1
l-111 -'
a -
, . . . _ . _ J
- - . - - - _ - - - - - -- _ . - - . - - .-.~_-.- _ -_ .
The reactor pressure vessel and the steel piping ,
of the primary coolant system provide the second ,
barrier. The reactor pressure vessel is a seventy-foot high vessel with steel walls approximately four to seven inches thick which f encase the reactor core. The reactor pressure vessel and the steel piping provide containment for all radionuclides in the primary coolant.
The Containment Building provides the third barrier. The Containment Building has steel-lined, four-foot thick reinforced concrete walls which completely enclose the reactor pressure vessel and vital auxiliary equipment. This structure provides a third line.of defense against the uncontrolled release of radioactive materials to the environment. The massive concrete walls also serve to absorb much of the radiation emitted during reactor operation or from radioactive-materials created during reactor operations.
F. Sources of Radioactive Effluents In a normal operating nuclear power plant, most of the fission products are retained within the fuel and fuel cladding. However, the fuel manufacturing process leaves traces of uranium on the exterior of the fuel tubes. Fission products from the eventual fission of these traces may be released to the primary coolant.- other small ,
amounts of radioactive fission products are able to diffuse or migrate through the fuel cladding-and into the primary coolant. Trace quantities of the corrosion products from. component and structural surfaces which have been activated,-
also get.into the primary coolant. Many_ soluble fission and activation products such as radioactive iodines, strontiums, cobalts and cesiumsJare removed by demineralizers.in.the purification systems. The noble' gas fission -
products, activated atmospheric gases introduced with reactor.feedwater,;and some of the volatile fission products such as iodine-_and bromine, are-carried from the reactor : pressure - vesseloto 'the -
condenser with the-steam._~The steam: jet air- 4
-ejectors or the condenser vacuum pump remove.thef gases from the condenser and_ transfer them to the '
off-gas treatment system. =In the off-gas treatment system the gases;are held-up by .
adsorption on specially-treated charcoal beds to -
a allow the radioactive gases to decay before they-l .are released through-the main ventilation exhaust.
. stack.
l 3 l
12
-r n- 9 m-ne- - E $ yc9 p--
li I il1!
C I
r o T t
a
=
> A r
e n
.w
,i u
M G
e T E n
e H i
v r
r e C D sgm nn S ne m
a e otsoy T e
t S gCS N A
L i - P C
I -
_ N S o M A G
i B
w:J{, N O
I T
A p T 5
f m u
S b
P iw R s
s # E A W l
F e
u W P O
N Y
-a
~
~- '
1; ."T 7
4 O
,1; _
e T x B c,4. ?i,W
?
- N J
f is
.fy c_
1 . .
T C
=:s [? 3 aQ*~:%Dufj- - f' ;.
-c Mpm.
A T
N e
+~-
i 2
O C-
?le rl u es ~-
%. El[-~ m E
s -
R npV- : -
s s e ei .; 4: _
U
- 5 r .
1e .
G 5 ( I F
gu
\iiii
l l
Small releases of radioactive liquids from valves, piping, or equipment associated with the primary coolant system may occur in the containment, Auxiliary, Turbine, RadWaste and Fuel Buildings.
The noble gases become part of the gaseous wastes while the remaining radioactive liquids are collected in sumps and processed prior to release.
Processed primary coolant water that does not meet chemical specifications for reuse may also become waste water. These represent the principal sources of liquid affluents.
Table 2 summarizes the composition of radioactive effluents (gaseous and liquid) released _from the clinton Power Station during 1990. The highest calculated total body dose received by-a member-of the public due to the_ release of these radioactive -
materials was 0.0027 mrem. This is compared to ,
the 93 mrem per year received in Central Illinois )
due to-natural background radiation.
TABLE 2 1990 RADIONucLIDE COMP 0tifl0N OF CPB EFFlutNil R_edt onue t ide HeLf.Iife Caseous tfftuente(Cl) ilaufd tfftuents(C1) .,
Gross Alpha NA 0.0000404 0.00000217 4 ieitlum (H+3) 12.3y 1.88 2.60:
Chromium 51 27.7d 0.00820 0.00250 Manganese 54 312.7d =0.0000556 0.00525 fron 55 2.7y
- 0.000482 -4 Cobalt $8 70.8d 0.0000302 0.000399
{
cobalt 60 5.3y 0.00020t 0.0165' ;
Krypton 85- 10.76y 9.20
- Krypton *87 76.3m 1,72 * )
i
$tronttun 89 50.6d 0.0000849
- Sitver+110m 249.8d -* 0.000134 j
lodine 131 8.0d 0.000153-
- Iodine 133 20.8h 0.000150
- Total 12.8 2.63
- lsotopes not detected at the 95% confidence level in effluents released from the Clinton-Power $tation.:
l 4
1 15" ,.
l G. Radikpctive Waste Processing l
In a normal operating nuclear pnwer plant, ,
radioactive liquid and gaseous wastes are I
' collected, stored and processed through treatment systems to remove or reduce most of the i radioactivity (excluding tritium) prior to reuse j within the plant or discharge to the environment.- j These processing systems are required by the
- Clinton power Station offsite Dose calculation Manual to be installed and operable to help ensure all releases of radioactive liquid and gaseous
-effluents are As Low As Beasonably Achievable
( ALARA) .
The liquid waste treatment systems consist of filters, demineralizers and evaporators. Liquid wastes are routed through the waste evaporators to ;
be degassed and distilled thereby reducing their volume and concentrating their radioactivity. The distillates are further treated through demineralizers and filters.and transferred to the waste evaporator condensate storage tanks. Liquid wastes are processed through the appropriate
. portions of the liquid waste treatment system to j provide asourance that the releases of radioactive
- i materials in liquid effluentsEwill be kept ALARA.
Liquid wastes are discharged into the plant i cooling water stream which varies frotn approximately 5,000 gallons per minute, when the plant is in shutdown, to 567,000 gallons per minute, when the plant is at_ full power. The liquid effluents are thoroughly mixed with and diluted by the plant cooling water as it. travels-the 3.4 miles of the discharge canal before it enters Clinton Lake east of DeWitt County Road 14.
The clinton power Station offsite Dose-calculation J Manual requires that liquid effluents shall not contain a' higher concentration of any.racioisotope-than that set for continuous exposura.to the i general public. -This condition is satisfied at the point the liquid effluent is first introduced into the cooling water flow. _The additional ,
dilution which occurs in-the cooling water canal reduces the concentrations of radioisotopes-to '
between 1/73 (minimum flow) and 1/1890_of their original value before the water enters'clinton-Lake.
The concentrated radioactive solids captured in -
the liquid waste treatmont system are solidified and shipped off-site for disposal at-licensed-low -
L level waste-disposal facilities.-
16-l -- _ -. . - _ _ _ , _ _ _ - _ _ - _ . -_ _ _ e
4 1
) The gaseous effluents from the main condenser are held up in
, the off-gas charcoal beds for at least 46 hours5.324074e-4 days <br />0.0128 hours <br />7.60582e-5 weeks <br />1.7503e-5 months <br />. This provides time for the decay of most of the radionuclides present since most have a half-life of less than 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />.
, If gaseous effluents in the ventilation exhaust system for the containment Building and for the Secondary containment
'i structure exceed conservatively set levels, they are processed through charcoal beds and high efficiency particulate air filters in the Standby Gas Treatment System before being discharged to the environment. This combination of filters and charcoal beds is rated to be 95%
efficient for removing iodines and greater than 99%
efficient for removing particulate material larger than one micron (one millionth of an inch) in diameter.
4 i
l 17
)
L 4 ,
' 4 /,
/> i,..
^
.. / . _
~
\.;; ~l -
l[
[. .
2
. A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PRCGRAM
4, .
O i
h .
't
[4 '
N -
~
y
~
~;, e i
..... h, e h e<
%l
+
, %m
'f%s-
. ,[- ) . . ,'
..e.'
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMEN"A_
MONITORING PROGRAM
III. NTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)
A. Proaram Descriotion ,
The Clinton Power Station is required to maintain a radiological environmental monitoring program in accordance with the Code of Federal--Regulations '
l (CFR) Title 10, Section 20.201 and Criterion 64 of CFR Title 10, Part 50, Appendix-A. The-program was developed using_the following guidance published by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC):
Regulatory Guide 4.1, " Programs for Monitoring Radioactivity-in the Environs of Nuclear Power Plants" USNRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Radiological. 4 Environmental Monitoring (1979) p i
The licensee has been notified of pending changes. ,
to the Code of Federal Regulations Title 10 Part i
- 20. These changes are currently scheduled to be implemented January 1, 1993. A preliminary i of the proposed changes indicates minor impa.roview ct on the Clinton Power Station Radiological l Environmental Monitoring Program.
The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Prcgram is an extensive program of sampling, measuring and- i analyzing that was instituted to monitor: tbe radiological impact of reactor operation on'the environment. Objectives of the. program include identification, measurement and evaluation of existing radionuclides in the environs of.the {
Clinton Power Station and fluctuations-in- '
radioactivity levels which may occur evaluation of the neasurements'to determine i the impact of the Clinton Power Station {
operations on the local radiation environment !
collection of data.needed to~ refine environmental radiation transport models'used in offsite dose calculations-verification that radioactive mater'lal containment systems are functioning to.
minimize environmental'releasesito levels ,
that are ALARA i l
19 l
- - . ~- _- , . _ . . _ __ . . . ._- ___
demonstration of compliance with regulations and the Clinton Power Station offsite Dose calculation Manual (formerly the Radiological Effluent Technical Specification (RETS) requirrments which were moved to the ODCM in 1990). l t
Implicit in these objectives are the requirements to teer,d ar.d assess radiation exposure rates and radiceetl<ity concentrations in the environment that may :ontribute to radiation exposure to the public. se program consists of two phases, preoperational and operational. The preoperational portion of,the program (the program was initiated in May, 1980 and was completed on February 27, 1987) established the baseline for the local radiation environment. Assessment of the operational impact of the Clinton Power Ste. tion on the radiation environment is based on data collected since the beginning of reactor operation. The operational phase implements confirmatory measurements to verify the in-station controls for the release of radioactive material are functioning as designed. Figure 3 shows the basic pathways of gaseous and liquid radioactive effluents to man.
Illinois Power Company maintains a contrace with Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory (TIML) for analysis of all radiological environmental samples. TIML is located in Northbrook, Illinois.
Samples are collected-by Illinois Power company personnel and shipped to TIML for analysis. After analysis, environmental samples are saved at TIML for a specified period of time in case additional analysis is required. Analytical results are reported monthly to the clinton Power Station and reviewed by company radiation protection personnel.
Current regulatory guidance recommends evaluating direct pathways, or-the highest trophic level in a '
dietary pathway, that contribute to an' individual's dose. The "important pathways" are selected based primarily on how radionuclides move through the environment and eventually expose individuals, as woll as on man's use of the environment. :The scope of the program-includes 20-
l the monitoring of five environmental compartmentst
- direct radiation
' atmospheric :
- aquatic ;
' terrestrial environments :
' ground and surface water. j Each pathway is monitored at " indicator" and 1
" control" locations. Indicator locations are a generally within the-10-mile radius of the j station. Control locations are located at least i ten miles from_the plant, far enough to be unaffected by plant operations. An increase in dose rate or radioactive material concentration at an indicator location may be dus to plant operations.
Locations of sampling stations are shown on maps in Figures 4 through 7. Table 3 provides a list of the sample codes for each sample medium and !
Table 4 provides information on sample location, l media-sampled at each location, and a-brief description of each location where samples ~are taken. The location is listed according to ;
distance (in miles) and the compass sector- t
-relative to the Station Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (RVAC) stack.-
An on-site meteorological tower collects i information such as_ wind speed, wind direction and' air temperature at various levels. Meteorological monitoring is further discussed in Section V of ,
this report.
1
. 4 o
i
- i 21
~
RELEASES DILUTED BY ATMOSPHERE g
=, )l
, _ = , ,
x , = -
N i
= , m, e Y ,_
e Res f
1
~
BY LAKE
/ E W
/
?= (*= s'" == o *:> ess FIGURE 3: P THW YS MAN UE TO REI2ASES OF
i
~i I
i !
[
N:
i - 137 15 !
76 s
-21 70: -
6A 36 .69 p 2-3 5 71 116 35 I l 'l-i 23 i
O 24- 84 86- t CLINTON '#
LAKE
{
92]O&
o
'I6 1
.93
' _25 ,_
U 3f
' I09 ..,
6 3) .j- ,
66 28 -27
, ;30 l10 29 7
4 67 f
, :i 1
N }/
K .,
- FIGURE 4
- REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONSLWITHIN 1 MILE' j
2s ,,g g
\
fN N
~~
1 63 ILL RT 54 N ,
. 12 ,
7c cL1t;Tyon 0
FIGURE 5: REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM 1 - 2. MILES 2'24-89 M,02349B
i i
i
'l
.r-tia .N 76 68 39 !
[ 52 72
! 37 ' 38 i 51 39 j
[' -8 50 DE WITT vt if9~-
f BIRF BECK .
53 so / g( e ,
' 48 54 54 'I 10 61 '
$-,7 fQ $d
, Jl 44
~%
43 (4) 8 j
i
' 55: j.
4 m %. !
60 ' SALT @. LANE 56 FIGURE 6: REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM 2 - 5 ~ MILES i M,02349C 29: 3-8-91 .
l 1
^ "
[8 s -
sh ss MORTON R x -v 9 %
v 3l NORMAL a I, i stoosinoToh fj- 1 /*s y
>8 3
_,3 s
A) \ 55 3 2 iis FARME f
<j r5" / h ~^
e 1"';"y;!,mo"q3}F g.,
/ 93 psAspAton
$g r
a ,,, ,, s gg 36 72 _
Je# fun
'DECATUR k (
' 57)
SPM , h <
m, 2
~Bavu y l
[ :
- P FIGURE 7: REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS GREATER THAN 5 MILES- g
-1
- 31. 89-
. - . . . . _ . - . . . . -- ...... - . .. . . . _ . . .. . ~ . . , - _ - _ . . -
U a
TABLE 3 CLINTON POWER STATION SAMPLE CODES-Code Samole Medium AP Airborne Particulate- -
I AI Airborne Iodine ]
TLD Direct Radiation'(Thermoluminescent' #
- Dosimeter)
M Milk' DW . Drinking-Water SW Surface Water. -
t WW WellEWater ,
VE Green Leafy Vegetables F- Fish SL -Periphyton, Slime, Bottom Organisms o and AquaticLVegetation( '
[
-t BS- 1 Bottom Sediments- , [
SS Shoreline Sediments l q
SO Soil-L ME- Meat
- e -
1 k
l
-l 1
i
. ~': )
~
33 '
.I 1
}
TA8tt.4 !
REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS' 1 Station Sanple -
Code Medium Location Descriotion '
Ct 1 AP,Al,TLD,$0,C _1.8 miles W Near the gate to Canp Quest, 5 of Birkbeck I
CL 2 AP,Al,TLD,$0,G 0.7 miles NNE Located on site's main access road, l Collocated with CL 70 and CL 71.
CL 3 AP,Al,TLD,50 0.7 miles NE Located on site's secondary access road.
Collocated with CL 69.
i CL 4 AP,Al,TLD,$0 0.8 miles SW Located on farm SE of Illinois Power Recreation Area. Col Located with CL 67. ;
11 CL 5 TLD 0.7 miles NNE Located on site's main access road. )
CL 6 AP,Al,TLD,$0 0.8 miles WSW Located near the Illinois Power Recreation -
Area softball fletd. Collocated with.CL 66.
CL 7 AP,AI,TLD,50 2.3 miles;SE Located in the Mascoutin State Recreation Area
'f CL 7B SS,$L 2.1 miles SE SE of site on-Clinton Lake CL 7C BS,$L,SS 1.3 miles SE SE of site on CtInton Lake CL 7D W 2.3 miles ESE - Located in Illinols Power Department of , -i Conservation of fice at the Mascoutin! 3 State Recreation Area CL 8 AP,Al,TLD,$0,G 2.2 miles E Located at DeWitt Cemetery _-
! j CL 9 SW,SL 2.7 miles ESE' ~ Located on NE side of DeWitt County Route 14. ll
-bridge CL 10c SW,BS,$S,SL(1) 5.0 miles ENE Located on SE side of _ lltinois Route 48 bridge CL lic AP,Al,TLD.SO,G 16 miles S Located SW of_Arge'ta n at the ILllnois Power .
_ Substation-
-l CL 12 W 1.6 miles E Located at the DeWitt pupphouse :
CL 13 SW 3.6 miles SW . Located near'the Salt Creek bridge on.lltinois- _
Route 10 - ,\q CL 13A BS 5.0 miles SW- Located on Salt Creek'at' the hute 1300E
, bridge:
CL*14 DW Plant Service Located in the Plant Service Building -
Building
- 34 i
TABLE 4 (Cont'd)
Station Sample Qde Meditsn Location Descriotion CL 15 AP,AI,TLD 0.9 miles N Located north of CP* on Route 900N (added to program in Jan 1990)
CL 16 SO 0.6 miles ESE Located ESE of CPS just north of discharge flume (added tp program in Oct 1990)
CL 17 BS 3.5 miles SW Located on the Lake side of Cttnton Lake dam (added to program in Oct 1990)
CL 19 F,BS,$$,$L 3.4 miles E Located E of site at the end of the discharge f lune CL 20 TLD 9.1 miles ENE Located at the Canpground Cemetery W of Farmer City CL 21 TLD 0.9 miles NNE . Located et the intersection of Illinois Route 54 and the site's secondary access road CL 22 TLD 0.6 miles NE Located on the alte's secondary access road CL 23 TLD 0.5 miles ENE Located on the site's secondary &ccess road CL 24 TLD 0.5 miles E Located on the site's secondary access road CL 25 TLD 0.4 miles ESE Located on the Owner Controtted Area fence CL 26 TLD 0.3 miles SE Located on the Owner Controlled Area fence CL 27 TLD 0.6 miles SSE Located on the Owner Controlled Area fence near the Meteorological Tower CL 28 TLD 0.5 miles S Located on the Owner Controlled Area fence CL 29 TLD 0.6 miles SSW Located on the Owner controtted Arts fence CL 30 TLD 0.7 miles SW Located on the Owner controlled Area fence at the entrance to Illinois Power Recreation Area CL 31 TLD 0.8 miles WSW Located on the owner Controtted Area fence near the ILllnois Power Recreation Area softball fletd CL 32 TLD 0.7 miles WSW Located on the Owner Controtted Area fence near Clinton Lake CL 33c TLD 11.7 miles SW Located in Maroa at family residence 35
-1 I
I TABLE 4 (Cont 8d)
Statton . Sample
)
Code Medlm Locatton Deserlotion - '
i CL*34 TLD 0.8 miles WNW Located near CPS Vlsltor Center l 1
CL*35 TLD- 0.7 miles WW Located near CPS Visitor Center near. !Lllnois Route 54 bridoe j CL 36 TLD 0.6 miles N Located on Illinois Route 54 near intersection with site's main access road: !
CL 37 TLD 3.4 miles N Located N of alte CL*38 TLD 3.6 alles NNE Located near. ic.lcrowave tower N of site CL 39 TLD 3.8 miles NE Located 2 miles N of reWitt
-a
~ ~
CL 4D TLD 3.5 miles NE . Located D.6 miles N of DeWitt CL 41 TLD 2.4 miles E Located at 5 DeWitt city limit CL 42 TLD 2.8 miles ESE- Located S of DeWitt County Route 14 bridge CL 43 TLD 2.8 miles SE - Located on Clinton Marina access road CL 44 TLD .2.3 miles SSE Located near Clinton Marine Boat Sales-CL 45 TLD 2.8 miles S -Located at Lane Day Use Area-CL 46 TLD 2.8 alles $$W Located at Peninsula Day-Use Area CL 47 TLD 3.3 miles SW- Located near Clinton Lake Dam Access Road i
CL 48 TLD 2.3 miles WSW .' Located at residence on' West $1de Access. Road--- 1
\
CL 49 TLD 3.5 miles W- . Located W of'alte along illinois Route 54 '
i' CL 50 TLD 3.2 miles WNW . Located WNW of site -
nl CL 51 TLD L4.4 miles NW = Located NW of site' CL 52 TLD 4.3 miles NNW Located NNW of site CL 53 TLD-' 4.3 miles E . Located E of alte 1 4
CL 54 TLD .4.6 miles ESE. ' Located 2 elles N of Weldon
'CL 55' TLD 4.1 miles SE Located 1.5 miles W of Weldon '
l CL 56 TLD 4.'1-miles SSE. . Located SSE of site. t
-36
l l
l TABLE 4 (Cont'd)
Station Sample Code !!.td.!E Loc 0 tion Deserfotion CL 57 TLD 4.6 miles s Located 5 of site CL 58 TLD 4.3 miles tsW Locateo in rural Lane CL 59 TLD 3.3 miles ssW Located near Lane ef ty limit CL 60 TLD 4,5 mites su Located SW of Clinton Lake Dam near Salt Creek CL 61 TLD 4.5 miles vsW Located WSW of site CL 62 TLD 1.9 miles NW Located NW of site i
CL 63 TLD 1.3 miles NNW Located at North Fork Boat Access CL 64 TLD 2.1 miles WNW Located 0.5 miles N of Birkbeck CL 65 TLD 2.6 miles ENE Located at residence in DeWitt CL 66 TLD 0.8 miles VsW Located near the Illinois Power Recreation Area softball field. Collocated with CL-6.
l CL 67 TLD 0.8 miles SW Located on farm SE of Illinois Power Recreation Area. Collocated with CL 4.
CL 68 TLD 4.6 miles N Located N'of site. Collocated with CL 112.
l CL 69 TLD 0.7 miles NE Located on site's secondary access road.
Collocated with CL 3.
CL 70 TLD 0.7 miles NNE Located on site's secondary access road.
Collocated with CL 2 and CL 71.-
CL 71 TLD 0.7 miles NME Located on site's secondary access road.
Collocated with CL-2 and CL 70.
CL-72 TLD 4.5 miles NNE Located NNE of site. Collocated with CL 77.
CL 73 TLD 5.1 miles ENE Located near the MidAmerica Corrmodities plant on Illinois Route 48. Collocated with CL 113.
CL 74 TLD _1.9 miles W Located at Carnp Quest CL 75 TLD 0.9 miles N Located N of site CL 76 TLD 4.6 miles N Located N of site CL 77 TLD 4.5 miles NNE Locatcd NNE of site. Collocated with CL 72.
I
-37
j 1
I TABLE 4 (Cont 8d)
!r Station. Sample Code _._ Medlun Locetlon DeserlotIon-CL 78 TLD 4.8 miles NE Located NE of site -
CL 79 TLD -4.5 miles ENE- Located ENE of site i
CL 80 TLD 4.1 miles W Located V of site-CL 81- TLD - 4.5 miles WNW Located WNW of site -
i
~
CL 82 'TLD 0.9 miles W Located at Illinois Power Recreation Area CL 83 TLD 0.5 miles NNW Located near lltinois Route 54 E of the bridge CL 84 TLD 0.6 miles Et tocat'ed on Old Clinton Road between DeWitt and_ !
site. Collocated with CL 94 and CL 86,_ -)
i CL 85 TLD 0.6 miles ESE Located ESE'ofl site ' .f CL 86 TLD 0.6 miles E Located on Old Clinton Road between DeWitt and -
site. Collocated with CL 84.and CL 94 CL 87 TLD 0.6 miles SE -Located near discharge flune access' road;
~;i CL 88- SS - 2.4 miles SE Located SE of site CL 89 -85,$$ 3.6 miles NNE.- Located WNE of site-
~
CL 90 SW . 0.4 miles SE- -Located at start.'of discharge flume-
~
'CL 91 SW '6.1 miles (NE Located at Parnell Boat Access l 1
CL 92 - ' SW c 0.1 miles NW . Located at CPS Intake Screenhouse .
CL 93 'SW,SS "0.4 miles SW - . Located at CPS Settling Pond I
CL 94 -AP,AI,50 _ 0.6 miles E ~ Located on Old Cilnton Road between dew'Itt and site. Collocated with CL 84 and CL 86.
CL 105c, F,Ss,BS,SL- 50 miles S Located at Lake Shelbyvitte -
CL 106 ME- ;2.0 miles NNE. Located NNE of site- _;
CL 109 TLD - -0.7 miles usu < Located on the owner controlled Area fence-LnearShootingR_ange; CL 110 TLD- 0.8 miles SW - stocatedonth$ownercontrottedAreafence e CL 111 TLD 0.6 miles NE ' Located near site's secondary access road-
-L -j
--38
l I
l TABLE 4 (Cont'd)
Station Sample Code . . . .. Medite tocation Descriotten CL 112 TLD 4.6 miles N Located N of site. Collocated with CL 68.
CL 113 TLD 5.1 miles ENE Located near the MidAmerica Corrrnodities plant on Illinois Route 48. Collocated with CL 73.
CL 114c VE 12.5 miles SSE Located 5 of Cisco CL 115 VE 0.7 alles NE Located on site's secondary access road CL 116c M,G 14 miles WSW Located in rural Kenney l
CL 117 VE 0.9 miles N Located W of site
- sample location is listed by station code, location and nunber. Station Code is Clinton (CL) Nunber (site's nunber designa't or). Location la listed by distance in miles and directional sector from the Station HVAC stack, c control location; all other locations are Indicators.
(1) Control location for surface water only.
l 1
i 39
i B. Direct Radiation Monitorina; Radionuclides present in the air, and those deposited in or on the ground cause human exposure by immersion in the atmosphere or by deposition on-the ground. TLDs (thermoluminescent dosimeters) are used to measure the ambient gamma radiation field at many locations around the Clinton power 1 Station. TLDs are-crystalline devices that store "
energy when they are exposed to radiation. They can be processed months,after exposure with- l minimal loss of information. This makes them well <
suited for quarterly environmental radiation-measurements. During processing, the stored H]
energy is released asLlight-and measured by a TLD- -j reader. The light-intensity is proportional to !
the radiation dose the;TLD received. The TLDs used in monitoring around theLClinton power-Station are easily capable of-measuring:
environmental levels of radiation, approximately_ j 20 mrem per quarter, j 1
Monitoring stations are placed near_the site -_ l boundary and approximately;five miles-from the 1 reactor, in locations: representing the sixteen compass sectors. Other' locations _are chosen to a ~
measure the radiation' field at. places of special interest such as nearby residences, meeting places and-population; centers.- Control' sites are located ;
farther-than ten miles from-the site, in areas that'should not be affected by' plant operations. ;
TLD measurements register;the gamma ray. exposure <
in milliroentgen (mR). 'For reporting purposes mR-is numerically equivalent'to-mrem. -Consequently-tho terms are.used-interchangeably. 4 Results of the annualized TLD dose measurements are summarized by locationcin Tablei5. ' Figure.8 compares 1990 control and ' indicator location-average-quarterly gamma; dose. rates to.
j preoperational. program.: measurements. .A total of 331 TLD measuraments were made in 1990.. The '
average quarterly dose at indicator' locations was.
.17.1 ic0.8 mrem. The-quarterly. measurements l .!
ranged from 10.6'to 24.3. mrem. At control o locations the average' quarterly. dose was 18.4 j
1.8 mrem.- The_' quarterly 1 control measurements i ranged-from 16.2 to 20.9fmrem.- q i
40 H
I TABLE 5 l 1990 ANNUAL TLD-RESULTS=
Station Code (a) Annual Total ( 2 s . d ~. ) , mR(b)
CL-1 71.8 2.8 3 CL-2 72.4 i 1.5 CL-3 73.3/i-2.2- !
CL-4 '72.2 i 4.2 CL-5 69.2 3.4 CL-6 62.5-1-2.5 CL-7 69.5 i 3.7
CL-8 74.9 1 2.Si CL-11(c) 68.5- 2.9-0 CL-15 48.9 i!1.3 CL-20 66.2 t'2.9 CL-21 73.9 1-3.1 '
CL-22 69.8 i 2.2 :
_l CL-23 50.0 i~2.7 .i '
CL-24 70.0 0.7 CL-25 53.2 i 2.2 CL-26 62.~2 .2.5 CL-27 68.6 i 2.7- 1 CL-28 67.8 t 2.9.
CL-29 73.7 i 2.3 CL-30 78.8'114.O CL-31 66.2 2. 3 -
CL-32 71.5L 2.4 CL-33(c) ,78.9 i 2.2--
CL-34 85.5 i 1.8
-CL-35 -6 8 . 7. i'.'1 . 2 CL-36 66.3= 2 .' 5 CL-37 69.9 i 2.0.
CL 174.9 - 1. 9 I CL-39 ' 62. 5 '
-1.6; CL-40' 67.6 111.8 .
CL-41 70.1-i-2.'3 I CL-42 66.6 1.9 '
CL-43 70.9= ; 2.4 :
CL-44 75.9:i-2;8- ,
CL-45 70.2:i 5.2 !
CL-46 6 4 . 7. . .L3.0- j CL-47 7 2'. 1 - t i 3 =. 7 - -l CL 68.0i .10;9 a
- CL-49: 73.9' 15.1-
'CL-50 ~-71' 7 i ' 6. 9 :.
CL 73.4 t.5.2-CL - 71. 3 -- 1 4 . 11 CL-53 ~ 6 2. 0. ~ 4. 6- :
CL-54 65.6- 4 . 71 CL-55 63.9 -3.2' 3 CL-56 6 7 '. 3 - 3.7
-41 :I 3
~l TABLE 5~(C'ont'd)
Station Code (a) Annual Total-( 2 s.d.). mR(b) !
CL-57 66.0-i 3.~1 CL-58 66.3 i 2.6 CL-59 69.6 i 2.1-'
CL-60 66.8. 5.3- i CL-61 67.6 t 4.1 ]
CL-62 69.4 iL4.6 i CL-63 -74.5 i 5.8-CL-64 75.3 2.2 CL-65 79.5^t-3.7 -!
CL-66 57.6 i 3.4- j CL-67 66.8- 2.3 i CL 62.0 i 6.2 CL-69 71.3- 2.8-CL-70 64.3~-i 5.4 CL-71 67.7-1 1 3 CL-72 62.7 '2.0-CL-73 71.9--1 .2.3 CL-74 65.0 i 2.6-CL-75 67.8 i 3.1' i CL-76 64.4;i 2.7 CL-77 65.3-i:2.11 ;
CL-78 64.2 2.9- 1' CL-79 68.2 3 ^. 3 ?
CL-80 67.8.i-:2.6 CL-81 71.9 i!3.4 ;;
CL-82 ~ 6 8 . 4 . - i 3 . 0, 1
,CL-83 -.71. 0 ? ?2.3- 4 CL-84 68'.'2 Ei 12. 2
-CL-85 69.0 i 11 6
-CL-86 71.2 2"1.4 CL-87 70.41- 1.9. g CL-109 60.6 '2 . 2 '
- CL-110 64'. 8 2 ifl . 2 >
CL- 111- - 56.9;-i:8.4 CL-112 62. 2 : 1 1. 6 = i CL-113' 71' ' 7 : 1. 2 . 8 -
-(a) For: station location ~ description refer;to Table 41 Annual TLD results'are-the: total of the quarterly doses..
-(b) at-the-location-
'(c) Control' Station 42- -s
_2-_--_-__-__'- .__--
30 K7a 1990 CONTROL NNNN1 1990 INDICATOR 25 -
PREOP 4DI TR 20 - 'u
'u se, , a iu
'u 'u ,u su
-15 - -
. . .10 5 -- -
First . 'Second- Third Fourth Quarter -
FIGURE 8: DIRECT RADIATION COMPARISON-
. . - - , 4 4,%..
, s. .s . . . -!,.ra,- ..w-c.,swy,
...% rw . ,, y - a -v.y. ..,e-,, a ,e ,..,
i Average doses (f2 standard deviations (s.d.)),
broken down by calendar. quarter, are shown in Table 6 for both indicator and control locations.
The error in the doses for the control TLDs.can not be statistically determined due to.the limited number of control TLDs (2 control TLD locations). .
TABLE 6 OUARTERLY AVERAGE TLD RESULTS Indicator Control First Quarter _ 16.5 1 4'.'9 19.6 !
Second Quarter 17.3 i-4.0 18.3 Third Quarter 16.3 t'3.0 18.8 .
Fourth-Quarter 18.1:113.6- .18.6 '
Site CL-34,. located 0.8 miles WNW of the. station, registered the-highest annualized dose: 85.5 mrem l during 1990. The elevated measurements are !
attributed to the. proximity of CL-34 to a tilo '
field constructed of ceramic pipe-tile. This material is known to'be rich in naturally-occurring radionuclides, Preoperational data indicate that the dose at this-location'has been j' among the highest measured. JBetween 1980 and 1984 CL-34 registered, on'the: average, the_ highest annual-dose.- In 1985 and 1986 its dose was in the top 20% of all' locations monitored..
From these observations,.no increase in-environmental gamma.radiationLlevels resulted:from l
operation of the-Clinton' Power Station.during
'1990.
C. Atmosoheric Monitorina i
The inhalation and. ingestion.of radionuclides ,
present in-the atmosphere =is a' direct exposure o pathway to man.' A1 network of ten: active air j l
samplers around the Clinton Power' Station monitors this pathway...Nine ofrthe' air sampling. stations-l are strategically locatedDin areas 1which'are most' L
likely'to indicate #effectsidue to the release of radioactive effluentstfrom the Clinton Power Station. The control lccation is located ,
approximately 16_ miles south of1the: plant in an .
areaLwhich'is;likely to'beLindependent of the
-effectsrof station operations.- Historical
! . meteorological data indicatec this control locationLis normally upwind-from the plant, 5
45-L
E No contribution to the general level of-airborne particulate radioactivity could be identified as a result of station operations during 1990. The radioactivity that was detected is normally found in the environment and is consistent with expected concentrations of natural radioactivity and fallout from prior atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
Mechanical air samplers are used to draw a continuous volume of air through two filters .
designed to collect particulates and radiciodines present in the atmosphere. The samplers are equipped with a pressure-sensing flow regulator to maintain a constant sampling flow rate of about one cubic foot per minute. The total volume is calculated based on the amount of-time the air sampler ran and its flow rate. The air sampling ,
~
equipment is maintained and calibrated by the Clinton Power Station personnel using reference j standards traceable to the National Institute.of Standards and Technology.
Air samples are collected weekly and analyzed for gross beta and I-131 activities. Quarterly all air particulate filters collected during that period are combined and counted for gamma isotopic activity. Since the intent of particulate sampling is to measure airborne radioactivity released from the plant, the-counting.of short- 1 lived daughters produced by the decayaof natural radon and thoron may mask plant contributions.
Therefore, the filters are not analyzed for at least five days after their collection to allow for the decay of'the short-lived daughters, ;
thereby reducing their contribution'to the gross I beta activity.
A new air sempling location was added to the.
Clinton Power Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program in January 1990.' This air sampling station is located in the north sector at 0.9 miles. This indicator sample. location was added because the north sector has-historically had one of the highest annual average ground level D/Q (Radiciodine and Particulate Relative Disposition Factor) values.
Results of the gross beta airborne particulate analyses provided comparisons between indicator and control locations for the year, as well as comparisons between locations in relation to spatial and temporal differences. The calculated 46
i i
3 annual average was 0.021 gC1/m for all indicator locations and 0.022 pCi/m for the control location. These results are consistent with the preoperational averages for both indicatgr and control locations which were 0.027 pCi/m . The location with the highest annual average was control location CL-11 located 16.0 miles south of the Clinton Power Station. This locgtion had an average Ocncentration of 0.022 pCi/m . Individual location averages for the year are presented in Table 7.
Minor fluctuations in the gross beta concentrations were noted throughout the year.
The general trend for average weekly gross beta concentrations in the indicator locations correlated to the trend for control locations throughout the monitoring period. This correlation is evidenced by the similarity of the trends in the average monthly gross beta concentrations displayed in Figure 9. No significant difference was indicated between individual locations. Monthly averages for indicator and control' locations for the year are ->
presented in Table 8.
All gross beta concentrations for 1990 were within normal background levels and no increases were noted as a result of-the operation of the Clinton Power Station.
Naturally occurring Be-7 was the only gamma-emitting radionuclide detected in analyses of particulate filters.
l 47
I TABLE 7 1990 AVERAGE GRQ18 BETA CONCENTRATIONS-IN AIR PARTICULATES Average i 2 s.d.
Station Description (pCi/m )
CL-1 (I) Camp Quest (Birkbeck) 0.021 i 0.013 !
CL-2 (I) CPS Main Access Road 0.022-i 0.014 CL-3 (I) CPS Secondary Access Road 0.021 i 0.016 CL-4 (I) 0.8 Miles SW 0.021 -0.015 CL-6 (I) IP Recreation Area 0.021 1 0.015' CL-7 (I) Mascoutin State Recreation Area 0.'02111 0.016 CL-8 (I) DeWitt Cemetery- 0.022 i'O.014 CL-11 (C) IP Substation (Argenta) 0.022 1 0.016 1
CL-15 (I) 0.9 Miles N 0.020 1 0.015 CL-94 (I) Old Clinton Road (0.6 miles E) 0.021- 10.016 (I) Indicator Station (C) Control Station i
1 J4'8' 1
l TABLE 8 1990 AVERAGE MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES Indicator, pC1/m 3 Control, pCi/m 3 ,
Month 1Averaae 2 s.d.) 1Averaae 2 s.d.)
January 0.023 t 0.014 0.025 1 0.017 February 0.019 0.011 0.018 1 0.007 !
March 0.018 i 0.008 0.017 i 0.010 :
April 0.019 0.007 0.018 0.006 May 0.013 0.008 0.012 1 0.008 June 0.015 0.009 0.015 0.010 July 0.019 i 0.010 0.020 0.015 August 0.021 1 0.007 0.022 0.004 i September 0.027 i 0.015 0.029 0.017 October 0.023.i 0.010 0.022 1 0.010 November 0.028 i 0.012 0.028 t 0.009 December 0.031 1 0.013 0.031 0.014
.I
. 4 9-
'A 0.045 m 1990 INDICATOR 0 1990 CONTROL 0.040 A Pf'EOP INDICATOR f
/
x PREOP CONTROL
/
0.035 -
/
n
/
k O.030 -
- L'
/
j 3 $ 0.025 -
. .s
$ \ "'N _
O 0.020 -
l v v 0.015 -
0.010 ' '
.JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL- AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH FIGURE 9: AIR PARTICULATE GROSS' BETA ACTIVITY COMPARISON
.. - =- . .. . - - . . .
D. &cuatic Monitoring The Clinton Power Station utilizes an artificial lake as the source of cooling water and returns the used cooling water to the same lake while most '
nuclear power stations use once-through flow from a river, the ocean or a body of water much larger than Clinton Lake. When radioactive liquid effluents are discharged from the Clinton Power Station into the cooling water outfall, radioisotopes with long half-lives could build up as the same water is reused on successive trips through the plant. This water travels from the plant, into the eastern arm of the lake, then.into the northern arm of the lake and back into the plant. Although the only user of Clinton Lake as a source of drinking water is the Clinton Power Station, the lake is a major recreational facility, used for fishing, swimming, water skiing, boating and hunting.
Clinton Lake constitutes the primary. environmental exposure pathway for radioactive materials in liquid effluents. Aquatic monitoring provides.for the collection of fish, shoreline and bottom sediments, and periphyton samples to detect the presence of any radioisotopes related to operation of the Clinton power Station. These samples are analyzed for naturally occurring and man-made.
radioactive materials. Both indicator and control locations were sampled during 1990.. Indicator samples were taken.from various locations on Clinton Lake and the control samples were taken at Lake Shelbyville which is approximately 50 miles-south of Clinton Power Station.
Aquatic monitoring samples. are collected by, the personnel from the Field Biology Laboratory of 'the Environmental Affairs Department of Illinois Power Company.
Fish Samples of fish are collected from Clinton Lake and Lake Shelbyville. In both~ lakes the samples include largemouth bass, crappie, carp and bluegill. These species are the' fish most commonly harvested from.the lakes by sportsfishermen. . Fish ingest sediments during bottom feeding, or prey on other-organisms which.
ingest sediments or otherwise retain radionuclides. Radiological analyses of these-fish' samples provide information on the potential
~
ingestion of radionuclides by humans via-the-53
-i aquatic pathway. These samples are collected- ti semiannually and analyzed 1by. gamma _ spectroscopy. :
The results of gamma isotopic analysis on the fish- l samples showed the presence of naturally occurring-K-40 in all 1990-samples ranging from 2.24 to 3.08- ~i pCi/g (wet) . Preoperational K-40 concentrations ranged from 1.71 to 4.61 pCi/g (wet). . .All other.
analytical results were-less than the lower limit of detection (LLD) for each radionuclide.
Shoreline Sediments Samples _of shoreline sediments are collected at six locations from Clinton Lake, at one location-from the'Clinton Power Station lower settling pond ,
and at one location from Lake Shelbyville.- l Radiological analyses of-shoreline sediments q
provide-information on the potential-shoreline- 1 exposure to humans and_-for determiningJlong. term trends and accumulation of-long-livedi )
radionuclides in the-environment.- Samples are "
collected semiannually and analyzed for gross i beta, gross-alpha, Sr-90 and1 gamma isotopic )
activities. :
Shoreline sediment samples are dried _ prior _'to analysis-and the results are' reported in pCi/g dry weight. Naturally occurringtradioisotopes,-such:
as K-40, Ra-226 and Pb-212, g were: present 1n 7 samples taken-at both indicator and control.
locations. Two1 fission products,.Sr-00;and:
Cs-137, were detected in samples'from; indicator locations. Sr-90 was detected in.one sample and-Cs-137 was detected in two samples. Noifission products were detected at the control location. 3 '
The activity detected was not substantially~
different from--that measuredLduring'the preoperational program. . <
)
Preoperational- Range- 1990 Range (DCi/a drvi -(DC1/c drvi Sr-90 0.009 to 0.087' O.034*
Cs-137' O.015 to-0=.045 0 . 0 0 6 . t o 0 .'O'3 7 - J The presence of these! fission productsLis attributed to previousfnuclear_ weapons _ testing and atmospheric fallout from the accident >at j chernobyl. J
- -Sr-90 was detected-in only one sample in,1990, i
54 n ,s
Gross alpha activity in samples of shoreline sediments collected from all locations ranged from 4.0 to 5.5 pCi/g (dry) during 1990. This activity was attributed to naturally occurring radium isotopes and decay products present in soil. These values compare closely with the activity detected in the preoperational program which ranged from 3.8 to 8.0 pci/g (dry).
Gross beta activity in samples of shoreline sediments collected from all locations ranged from 5.3 to 11.9 pCi/g (dry) during 1990. The majority of this activity was attributed to naturally occurring K-40. These values are comparable with the activity detected in the preoperational program which ranged from 7.0 to 17.2 pCi/g (dry).
Bottom Sediments Samples of bottom sediments are collected from Clinton Lake at six locations and Lake Shelbyville at one location. Radiological analyaes of bottom sediments primarily provide information about the amount of radionuclides available to' predators who !
feed on the organisms found in bottom sediments.
Samples are collected semiannually and analyzed for gross beta, gross alpha, Sr-90 and gamma isotopic activities.
A new bottom sediment sampling location was added to the Clinton Power Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program in October 1990.
This location is at 3.5 miles in the southwest sector on the lake side of the Clinton Lake damn.
This location was added since it is considered to l be a excellent location for the accumulation of radioactivity from Clinton Power Station.
Bottom sediment samples are dried' prior to analysis and the results are reported in pCi/g dry weight. Naturally occurring radioisotopes, such as K-40 and Pb-212, were,present in all'1990 control and indicator sample locations.
Fission product, Cs-137, was detected in samples from indicator and control locations. Strontium-90, also a fission product, was detected in indicator samples and in one control sample.
Preoperational Range 1990 Range l
(oCi/a drvi (nci/o drv) l Sr-90 0.011 to 0.056- 0.014 to 0.031 l
Cs-137 0.008 to 1.39 0.058 to 0.45 l 55 l l
The presence of these fission products is attributed to previous nuclear weapons testing and atmospheric fallout from the accident at chernobyl.
Gross alpha activity in samples of bottom sediments collected from both lakes ranged from 5.8 to 14.5 pCi/g (dry) during 1990. This activity was attributed to naturally occurring radium isotopes and decay products present-in '
soil. The preoperational gross alpha activity ranged from 4.4 to 14.7 pCi/g (dry).
Gross beta activity in samples of bottom sediments collected from both lakes ranged from 6.7 to 33.8 -
pCi/g (dry) during 1990. The majority of this activity was attributed to naturally occurring K-
- 40. The preoperational gross beta activity ranged .
from 8.3 to 27.7 pCi/g (dry).-
Two additional bottom sediment-samples were collected in 1990 from different locations in the area of the Ultimate Heat Sink in Clinton Lake. !
These samples were drawn during dredging i Samples operations of the Ultimate Heat Sink.
were analyzed for gross beta, gross alpha, Sr-90 and gamma isotopic activities. Results of these .
analyses were consistent with bottom sediment samples obtained from the normal bottom sediment !
sample locations. No activity detected was -
attributed to the operation of Clinton Power Station.
Acuatic Vecetation (Periphyton)
Samples of periphyton are collected from five locations in Clinton Lake'and one location in Lake Shelbyville. Periphyton-(attached algae) are collected from the submerged-surface ofz the permanently anchored buoys. Periphyton absorb trace elements:and radionuclides directly from ,
water, often c6ncentrating them to levels much i higher than the dilute concentrations that-occur ,
in the aquatic environment. .This is because most !
algae are coated with a carbohydrate jelly and have a large surface to volume ratio. Cell division usually occurs _once every one or'two days and, as a result,- nalf of the cell-wall is a new surface for sorption. -Periphyton represent one of the earliest links'in the food chain and provide information about the' amounts of radionuclides available to predators further up the food chain.
Samples of periphyton are collected every two 56 m________ ___
months between April and October (during the colder months growth is limited) at the indicator locations and semiannually at the control location and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy.
The results of the gamma isotopic analyses on periphyton samples showed the following concentrations of naturally occurring radioisotopes:
Preoperational Range 1990 Range (oC1/a wet) (DCi/a weti' Be-7 0.38 to 1.07 0.38 to 2.55 K-40 0.74 to 6.82 1.00 to 5.18 one fission product, Cs-137, was detected in several periphyton samples. Concentrations for
.Cs-137 in 1990 ranged from 0.030 to 0.120 pCi/g (wet). Preoperational results for Cs-137 showed concentrations ranging-from 0.042 to 0.15 pCi/g '
(wet). The prosence of Cs-137 is attributed to previous nuclear weapons testing and atmospheric -
fallout from the accident at Chernobyl.
One activation product, co-60, was detected at a downstream sample location in 1990. One sample result at CL-19 showed Co-60 at a concentration of 0.20 pCi/g (wet). This activity is attributed to liquid radioactive effluent discharges from Clinton Power Station. The presence of.Co-60 in Clinton Lake periphyton poses no-significant exposure pathway to man since the fish species (intermediate in the food chain to man) do not contain measurable amounts of this nuclide.
Periphyton analyses are included in the clinton Power Station Environmental Monitoring Program because of their sensitivity to the presence of radionuclides in the aquatic environment due to bio magnification. Periphyton provides good qualitative information, however, there are
- J quantitative limitations. Using periphyton as biomonitors for radionuclides in aquatic systems can be a highly sensitive and qualitatively effective means of environmental monitoring around nuclear power plants that release. radioactive i effluents to aquatic systems. It enables the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program to determine the relative presence of radioactivity before it becomes a problem.
57
E. Terrestrial Monitorina In addition to the direct radiation, radionuclides present in the atmosphere expose individuals when these radionuclides deposit on surfaces (such as plants and soil) and are subsequently ingested directly by man or indirectly by consumption of 1 animal products such as meat and milk. To monitor-this food pathway, control and indicator samples of green leafy vegetables, grass, milk (control-only) and meat (indicator only) are analyzed.
Surface soil samples are collected and analyzed at three vear intervals (triennially) to monitor the potential buildup of atmospherically deposited radionuclides.
Surface vegetation samples are collected from a number of locations for the purpose of monitoring the potential buildup of atmospherically deposited radionuclides. Because the-radionuclides of interest, with respect to the Clinton Power Station operations, are also_present in the environment as a result of several decades of worldwide fallout or because they are naturally occurring, the presence of these radionuclides is expected in all of the samples collected. 1 l
The possible contributions of radionuclides from the operation of the Clinton Power Station are assessed by comparing the results of samples collected in prevalent downwind locations (north to northeast of the plant) with control samples-and samples collected in locawiens generally _.
upwind of the plant. In addition, the results of samples collected during 1990 were compared with the results of samples collected.during the preoperational program.
In addition to naturally eccurring radioisotopes, Sr-90 and Cs-137 were found in a-number of 1990 samples. However, the concentrations.of radionuclides in samples _collecteo near the 4 Clinton Power Station were comparable to the concentrations in samples collected at! locations remote from the station. The presence of these fission products is attributable to previous nuclear weapons testing and fallout from the !
accident at Chernobyl. The operation of Clinton Power Station had no measurable contribution to-the radioactive concentration of the terrestrial environment.
58
Milk There is no known commercial production of milx for human consumption within a five-mile radius of the Clinton Power Station. Milk samples are collected from a dairy located about 14 miles west southwest of the station-(twice a month during May through October and once a month during November through April). These samples are analyzed for I-131, Sr-90 and gamma isotopic activities.
The results of the analyses showed positive concentrations of K-40 and Sr-90 in all 1990 samples with a range of 1120 to 1310 poi /l for K-40 and 1.0 to 3.3 pCi/l for Sr-90.
-Preoperational activity of K-40 in milk ranged from 706 to 1375 pCi/1. Strontium-90 (Sr-90) 3 analysis in milk was added'to the REMP in October of 1987. These results ranged from 2.3 to 2.5 pCi/1. I-131 was not detected in any milk sample obtained during 1990. Figure 10 presents the Sr-90 results graphically,
)
i 59
10 l
8 l 1
= \
hO
'6 O
F. .#
I j# 4 I
J' 2 y -
,'= u.
O ,'* u- v .- e om o : y,, .,, y,. ., ,, , , , ,,,,, ,,,,. ,,,,, , ,,
Date FIGURE 10: STRONTIUM-90 ACTIVITY IN MIIX
.-o. ,.u ., *..A ,.,,_,__
~ - ~ - - - " " " " ' " -
Grass In addition to milk samples, grass samples are collected at four indicator locations and at one control location. These samples are collected twice a month during May through October and once a month during November through April. Theso samples are analyzed for gamma isotopic activity including I-131.
The results of the analysos showed naturally occurring Bo-7 and K-40 in all 1990 samples. Ono control sample and four indicator samples showed the presence of Cs-137 in 1990.
Preoperational Rango 1990 Rango (oci/a wot) (001/a wet)
Be-7 0.22 to 14.0 0.12 to 17.10 K-40 0.22 to 14.5 1.90 to 9.57 Cs-137 0.017 to 0.085 0.017 to 0.049 i The prosonce of fission product Cs-137 is attributed to fallout from nuclear weapons testing and the Chernobyl accident.
I-131 was not detected in any grass cumple .
obtained during 1990.
Veaetables The Clinton Power Station obtains samples of cabbage, lettuce and swiss chard from two indicator locations and at one control location.
The indicator locations are located in the' sectors-with the highest potential for surface deposition .
and the control location is in a sector and at a i distance which is considered to be unaffected by plant operations. Samples are collected once a l month during the growing season (June through September) and analyzed for gross beta and gamma-isotopic activities including I-131.
The results of the gamma isotopic analysis.showed only naturally occurring K-40 and Be-7. K-40 was found in all 1990 samples and Be-7 was found in thirteen samples. 1
-i i
i 63
I l
Preoperational Range 1990 Range (DC1/a wet) (oC1/c wot) ;
i Be-7 0.082 to 0.69 0.078 to 0.220 K-40 1.45 to 7.00 1.55 to 5.80 l
, Gross Beta 0.87 to 8.80 1.89.to 5.70 I-131 was not' detected in any vegetation sample _
during 1990.
i Meat ;
As an additional check on the presence-of. l radioactive materials in terrestrial exposure .:
-pathways, the.Clinton Power Station environmental group collects annual samples of beef liver, beef _ !
thyroid and-ground beef from an animal raised near the Clinton Power Station. These samples are analyzed for gamma isotopic activity including I- :
131.
The results of the gamma' isotopic analysis showed i only naturally. occurring K-40 in the, ground beef, t liver and: thyroid at 1.37,.2,15 and 1.14 pci/g ,
(wet) respectively. Preoperational activity !
ranged from 1.95.to'2.78 pCi/q.-(wet). - I-131 was '
not detected in the mente samples during 1990.
F. Water Monitorina:
SectionI2.4sof the Updated Safety Analysis Report
'(USAR) for~the ClintonspowerJ Station provides.a; o technical description of the geologic.and hydrologic: conditions in-the vicinityLof'the . . - 1
-Clinton Power Station, and the-locations 1of public and private wells. Each year during:the; performance of the Annual Land Use. Census, the Illinois State Water Survey office is' contacted,to.
determine it any newLwells have been: drilled' fwithin 5.0 milescof:the ClintonfPoweriStation
. ~w hich areJnot referenced?in;Section12441ofithe-USAR.- The-:most' rapid verticalidiffusion of;
- surface: water'into-the sub-surface; aquifer. , .
supplying: local wells::is:about.10'.5-LfeetiperLyeart
'The'only identified user offwaterTfrom-LClinton
. Lake 1for domestic purposes?is the?Clinton-Power -
3 ~
Station;;all others:potentially;exposedLto:any '
Lradioisotopes releasedninto surfaceLor ground ,
water would not-be affected.forTsaveral years.
}
Water' monitoring providesifor...the collectioniof: i drinking water, ; surf ace - water: and ground water f ;
- (well water);,Jsamplesito> detect the: presence oft t
_p Y
=64- d J, r L,.n--.n., n a%L.--->,.n-- n,. - . . . - - .a,. , - - w - . , - , . , , s , + - .,.,n,,se+ ,
any radioisotopes related to the operation of the Clinton Power Station. Both indicator and control locations were sampled during 1990. These samples were analyzed for naturally occurring and man-made radioactive isotopes. Average tritium and gross beta concentrations in surface, drinking and well water are presented in Table 9 and Table 10.
Drinkina Water The Clinton Power Station domestic water system is the only known direct user of water from Clinton Lake for human consumption. A composite water ,
sampler located in the Service Building collects a j small, fixed volume sample at hourly intervals.
The sampler discharges each sample into a common sample collection bottle. Therefore, the monthly sample analyzed by the contracted laboratory service is a composite of the individual samples i collected throughout the month. The monthly ,
composite sample is analyzed for gross alpha, gross beta and gamma isotopic activities. A portion of each monthly sample is mixed with the other monthly samples collected during each calendar quarter. The quarterly composite sample i is analyzed for tritium.
Gross alpha activity was detected in one sample at 0.5 pCi/1. This autivity is attributed to naturally occurring radioisotopes, such as U-238 and Ra-226, suspended as fine sediment particles in water.
Gross beta activity ranged from 1.5 to 2.7 pCi/1.
These levels are attributed to very fine particles of sediment containing K-40 which are not removed during the chlorination and filtration process.
Monthly drinking water gross beta concentrations are presented in Figure 11.
Specific gamma-emitting radioisotopes were all below the lower limits of detection. Specific ,
searches were made for activated corrosion
- l products (manganese-54, iron-59, cobalt-58, i cobalt-60 and zinc-65) and fission products (niobium-95, zirconium-95, cesium-134, cesium-137, barium-140 and lanthanum-140). l The results of all analyses for tritium were less I than the lower limit of detection.
These results show no measurable effects on drinking water resulting from operation of the Clinton. Power ^ Station during 1990.
65
10
-*- 1990 ACTMTY
-+- PREOP ACTMTY
< 8 ,
c.
y 6 b
s 4
2 4 -
c Ng F .
,A o .
JAN FEB- MAR AFR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Month FIGURE 11: DRINKING' WATER. GROSS BETA ACnvrrf COMPARISON
_____m - - ' -' --
--__w._ '-
f E
2 Surface Water Composite water samplers are installed in three locations to H iple surface water from Clinton Lake. These seaplers collect a smc11-volume of water at regular intervals and discharge it to a e large sample collection bottle. These bottles are
- collected monthly. One of the composite samplers is located upstream from Clinton power Station and is unaffected by plant liquid releases downstream.
The two other composite samplers are positioned at the locations most likely to be affected by plant operations-(one samples the intake water to the Circulating Water Intake Structure and the other samples the water at the start of the plant discharge fiume). Monthly grab samples are collected from two indicator locations and one control location on Clinton Lake. :one additional indicator sample is obtained from the Clinton .
Power Station lower settling pond.
Surface water samples are analyzed for gross beta, gamma isotopic and tritium activities. -Additional analyses for-gross alpha activity are performed on the upstream water samples. Additional. analyses for gross alpha activity and I-131 activity are performed on water samples taken from the discharge flume.- Tritium analyses are performed monthly on samples from the lower settling pond, the intake structure water samples and the upstream composite water-samples, and quarterly
- from composites of monthly. samples at the other ,
locations.
The 1990 results of the gross beta analyses. ranged- ,
from 1.6 to 4.6 pCi/l at the indicator locations and 1.1 to 4.5 pCi/1 at the control location.
Preoperational gross beta activity ranged from 1.1 to 7.6 pCi/1. These results are attributed 1to ,
naturally occurring K-40 suspended-as fine:
- sediment particles =in water. .other types-of.
samples have confirmedithe-presence of K-40 in -
Clinton Lake-shoreline and bottom sediments.
Monthly surface water gross beta activity for the' control:and indicator locations are presented. ,
graphically in Figure 12.
Tritium analyses performed on samples; indicated one sample _with a concentration of 234 pC1/1.- All other concentrations- were11ess than: the . lower limit'of-detection. The preoperational tritium concentrations ranged from 220 to 330 pCi/1. As -
l noted in-reference (EI87), previous nuclear i
i 69
. .. _ . - - . _ _ . _ - _ . _ a. . . _ _ ,
t 4
. + PREOP CONTROL
- 8.0 -
a 1990 CONTROL
^
PREOP INDICATOR -
7.0 -
-M- 1990 INDICATOR 6.0 -
o N
U- 5.0 -
3 -
~ y 4.0 -
. ,5 .
N A ,
~
^
A y ~ -
~
.2.0 - 0 m .
t 1.0 -
l O.0 ' ' '
JAN :FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG' SED OCT NOV DEC Month FIGURE 12: SURFACE WATER GROSS: BETA ACTIVITY COMPARISON i
weapons testing increased the pre-1960 levels of tritium (6-24 pci/1) by a factor of approximately <
fifty (300-1200 pCi/1). Since the level of tritium reported in the one positive sample fell in the low end of the existing, non-reactor-related, natural inventory of tritium, it is considered this positive result is not associated with operation of the Clinton Power Station.
Specific gamma-emitting radioisotopes were all below the lower limits of detection. Specific searches were made for activated corrosion products (manganese-54, iron-59, cobalt-58, cobalt-60 and zinc-65) and fission products (niobium-95, zirconium-95, cesium-134,-casium-137,.
barium-140 and lanthanum-140). No I-131 was detected in any surface water sample during 1990.
Gross alpha activity was-detected in approximately half the surface water samples analyzed for gross alpha. The 1990 results ranged from 0.6 to 1.7 a pCi/1. Preoperational gross alpha activity ranged j from 1.3 to 1.9-pC1/1. These results were attributed to naturally occurring radioisotopes, such as U-238'and Ra-226, suspended as fine sediment particles in water.
These results show no measurable change in ;
radioactive material concentration in surface ~
water due to operation of the Clinton Power Station during 1990.
Well Water i
Every two weeks samples are-collected'from the !
well serving the Village lof DeWitt (both treated' .!
and untreated samples are obtained) and from a- !
well serving the Illinois-Department of Conservation at,the Mascoutin State Recreational Area. Each sample is analyzed for I-131. All samples drawn from the same well during a particular month are-combined and analyzedLfor gross alpha, gross beta and gamma isotopic activities. In' addition, a portion ~of each monthly composite is added.to the quarterly composite sample and isfanalyzed for tritium.
The 1990 results of the' gross beta analyses ranged from 0.9 to 4.1 pCi/1.: Preoperational' gross beta activity ranged from l'.'1 to 5.1-pci/1. The gross =
beta activity vas attributed to naturally-occurring K-40, suspended as-finefsediment particles in water.- Monthly.well water-gross betaL l
. activity is presented graphically in: Figure 13.
73J
t
-*- PREOP 10.0 -
-+- 1990 8.0 -
o S
.m o tn O-6.0 -
3 g
j
. 4.0 -
2.0
- e c y 0.0 ' ' ' ' '
JAN FEB MAR APR- MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Month FIGURE 13: WELL WATER ' GROSS BETA ACTIVITY COMPARISON
4 . _ . __. . __ ._
Gross alpha activity was detected in five well water samples in 1990 and ranged from 0.8 to 2.2 pCi/1. Preoperational gross alpha activity ranged from 0.9 to 1.8 pCi/1. These results were attributed to naturally occurring radioisotopes, such as U-238 and Ra-226, susponded as fine 9 sediment particles in water.
Specific gamma-emitting radioisotopes were all below the lower limits of detection. Specific searches were made for activated corrosion products (manganese-54, iron-59, cobalt-58, cobalt-60 and zinc-65) and fission products (niobium-95, zirconium-95, cesium-134, cesium-137, barium-140 and lanthanum-140). Tritium and I-131 were not detected in any well water samples taken during 1990.
These results show no measurable change in radioactive material concentration in well water resulting from operation of the Clinton Power Station during 1990.
77- .
t i
4 L
1990 TRITIUM. CONCENTRATIONS IN DRINKING, SURFACE AND WELL WATER 1
Ef,At;12D Descriotion loci /ll*
Drinkina Water ,
4 CL-14 (I) CPS Service Build $ng -<LLD Surface Water ,
CL-9 (I) DeWitt Road Bridge. <LLD CL-10 (C) Ill. 48 Bridge <LLD- .
CL-13 (I) Salt Creek (below' dam) <LLD CL-90 (I) CPS Discharge Flume '<LLD CL-91 (I) Parnell Boat Access - < LLD - s CL-92 (I) CPS Intake Screenhouse -<LLD CL-93 (I) CPS Settling Ponds 234 Well Water CL-7D (I) Mascoutin State Recreation <LLD Area i
CL-12 (I) DeWitt-Pump Station <LLD- "
Treated CL-12-(I) DeWitt Pump Station. l<LLD Untreated .
- Based on detectable activities only' .
(C) Control j (I) Indicator
+
- 78- ;
a
?
.-. - ,, .. ~ , - .-...m. _._,,_...,-,.._,.-.__---.+4 - - - - , , , , - - - - . -
i )
1
.' ThB1JI .10 l 1990 AVERAGE GROSS SETA CONCENTRATIONS IN.. DRINKING, SURFACE.hND.WELL.. WATER !
I Average i 2 s.d. !
Station Descriotion (oci/1)*
a Drinkina Water CL-14 (I) JPS (Service Building) 2.2 1 0.7 1
Surface Water i
CL-9 (I) DeWitt-Road Bridge- 2.5-1 1.3 CL-10 (C) Ill. 48 Bridge 2.5 1 1.9 ;
CL-13 (I) Salt Creek (below dam) 2.5't 0.7 CL-90 (I) CPS Discharge Flume 2.9 i-1.2 CL-91 (I) Parnell Boat Access ~2.5 1 0.6 CL-92 (I) CPS Intake Screenhouse 2.9 i 1.3 i CL-93 (I) CPS Settling Ponds 3.0 i 1.1 Epil Water-CL-7D (I) Mascoutin State Recreation- 1.4 1 0.7 Area CL-12 (I) DeWitt Pump Station 2 . 7.. L'1.3 Treated CL-12 (I) DeWitt Pump Station 1.8 i 0.9 Untreated
~
Based on detectable activities only j (C) Control +
(I)= Indicator ,
+
4 k
'f 79
{
G. Quality Assuranco Proaram To establish confidence that data developed and reported are accurate and precise, all REMP activities are incorporated into the Illinois Power Company Quality Assurance (QA) program of audits and surveillances. The Quality Assurance program requires:
Participation in intercomparison programs, such as the EPA crosscheck program.
- An annual audit of the analysis laboratory functions and facilities.
Biennial review of the Clinton Power Station procedures specifying sampling techniques.
Duplicate analysis of every tenth sample assayed (not including TLDs). This requiremont is to check laboratory precision.
The routine counting of quality control samples. Approximately ton percent of the total number of counts performed are to be quality control counts.
The analytical results provided by the laboratory were routinely reviewed by the Radiological Environmental Group of the Radiation Protection Department to ensure the required minimum sensitivities have been achieved and the proper analyses have been performed.
Tolodyno Isotopes Midwest Laboratory (TIML) participates in the Environmental Protection Agency crosschock program. The TIML participant code in the crosscheck program is CA.
Participation in this program provides assuranco that the laboratory is capable of mooting widely-accepted criteria for radioactivity analysis.
TIML correctly analyzed 96% of the U.S. EPA crosschock samples and 97% of in-house spiked samples. Those results indicate that TIML is capable of routinely performing high quality analysis on environmental samples.
Results of the 1990 crosschock program and other in-house quality programs are shown in Appendix E.
80
H. Chances to the REMP Durina 1990 occasionally changes to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program are necessary in order to improve the monitoring of the environmental expecure pathways. These changes may result from items identified during the performance of the Annual Land Use Census, revised or new regulatory requirements, Quality Assurance audits or supplemental periodic and long-term sampling and analyses.
During 1990, one air sample station was added due to a Quality Assurance audit finding. There were no changes necessary due to the Annual Land Use Census or regulatory requirements.
A soil sampling location and a lake bottom sediment sampling location were added as improvements by the Radiological Environmental staff in 1990.
Changes that were made and the reasons for the changes are listed in Table 11.
l i
'l 81
TABLE 11 !
CHANGES TO THE REMP DURING 1990 i
- 1. February, 1990 Collection of airborne particulates and radiciodines was initiated at CL-15. An environmental TLD location was also established at this location. CL-15 is located ,
0.9 miles in the North sector and was established to satisfy CPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual requirements which require that airborne particulates_and-radiolodine samples be collected in different sectors, close to. .
the CPS site boundary, with I the highest calculated annual average ground-level D/Q's.
Historically, the North sector has one of the h3ghest annual average ground-level D/Q's.
- 2. March, 1990 A soil sampling location CL-16 located 0.6 miles East-southeast was established.
CL-16 was established at this location because this is where CPS Sewage Treatment Plant waste sludge is land applied. i Sampling will commence in the I summer of 1991.
- 3. October, 1990 Collection of bottom sediments was initiated at CL-17. CL-17 i is located 3.5 miles Southwest i and was established to monitor- 1 the acco.mulation of radionuclides in bottom sediments in Clinton Lake on the lake side of the dam.
I 1
I,
-82
l
~
c..x
' ' * ' ' .t1 9
~
ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS
w ~ > ?, ._ , .
,{
4e a. - u.
)
- +- ~.d;Q . ,
5 * " S sik .,,- ,
4 . ..j
$f p1s -
ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS
1 IV. ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS A land use census is performed to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the site boundary are identified and that modifications to the REMP are made, if required, by evaluation of the land use census.
The land use census is performed to identify within a distance of 5 miles, the locations in each of the 16 l meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animals, the l nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 500 square feet producing broad leaf vegetation.
Also, the census shall identify within a distance of 3 miles, the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of all milk animals and all gardens of greater than 500 square feet producing broadleaf vegetation.
The 1990 Land Use Census was conducted during the growing season from July 16, 1990, through September 26, 1990, satisfying the CPS offsite Dose Calculation Manual requirements. Over 90 residences were surveyed by either mail survey, telephone follow-up, or direct contact. Data for this report was obtained using the following meanst Performing door-to-door solicitation of one-half of the residences / land owners identified in the 1989 Annual Land Use Census and the 1989 plat of DeWitt County.
i Soliciting the remaining half of the residences / land owners identified in the 1989 Annual Land Use Census by mail survey and telephone follow-up.
Driving along all roads within a five-mile radius-and performing door-to-door solicitation of residences / land owners not identified by the 1989 report.
Contacting several state and local agencies.
The results of the 1990 Annual Land Use Census were examined to ensure that the REMP will provide ,
representative measurements of radiation and ,
radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and 1 for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures to the general public resulting from the operation of the Clinton Power Station._ Table 12 provides the nearest residence, garden and livestock / dairy animal in each of the 16-meteorological sectors within a 5-mile radius of the Clinton Power Station. Figure 14 graphically shows the information' listed in Table 12.
83
l Summary of Changes Identified in 1990 Annual Land Use census Nearest Residence Four changes were identified for the nearest residence.
The changes were attributed to new residence and ownership change. Changes in nearest residence are shown below:
NNE Sector - Change in residence ownership at 0.9 l miles.
SSE Sector - Change in residence ownership at 1.7 miles.
SSW Sector - Change in residence ownership at 3.0 !
miles.
WNW Sector - Change in residence ownership at 1.6 miles.
Nearest Garden A total of 60 gardens were identified in the 16 sectors ,
within a 5-mile radius of Clinton Power Station of l which 39 produced broad leaf vegetation (spinach, i lettuce, cabbage and chard). In most cases, tomatoes, sweet corn and beans were grown in gardens identified.
Changes in census locations for the nearest garden were identified in 9 of the 16 sectors and are shown below:
1989 Census Location 1990 Census Location 0.9 miles NNE 2.0 miles NNE 1.2 miles NE 2.0 miles NE 1.1 miles E 1.5 miles E 4.6 miles SE None identified 2.7 miles SSE None identified 3.0 miles S None identified 3.0 miles SSW 3.2 miles SSW 2.3 miles WSW 3.4 miles-WSW 2.5 miles NNW 2.3 miles NNW Nearest Livestock / Dairy Over 400 head of cattle were counted in the 16 sectors l' within a 5-mile radius of Clinton Power Station. 150 head were cows whose milk was uLud for calf nursing.
The balance of cattle are used solely for meat production.
Over 450 other farm animals in addition to the cattle identified were counted. The predominant species were chickens, turkeys, pigs, and sheep. No goats were counted during the land use census..
85
Changes in the census locations for the nearest livestock / dairy were identified in 7 of the 16 sectors and are shown below:
1989 Census Location 1990 Census Location 0.9 miles N (B. Wells) 0.9 miles N (R. Wilson) 2.4 miles NE 3.5 miles NE None identified ENE 4.6 miles ENE 2.4 miles ENE 2.0 miles SSE 4.9 miles WNW 2.8 miles WNW*
2.2 miles NW 1.7 miles NW*
None identified NNW 2.3 miles NNW*
- Chickens and/or rabbits. i IARLE.J.2.
1990, ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS NEAREST NEAREST NEAREST DAIRY j RESIDENCE GARDEN' OR LIVESTOCK l DIRECTION (in miles) (in miles) fin miles)
N 0.9 0.9 0.9 NNE 0.9 1.0 1.3 NE 1.2 2.0 3.5 ENE 2.5 2.5 4.6 E 1.1 1.5 3.1 ESE 3.2 b a SE 2.9 b 2.9 ;
SSE 1.7 b '2.0 S 3.0 b 3.0 SSW 3.0 3.2 3. 2.
SW 0.8 3.7 3. 7-WSW 1.5 3. 4- 3.4 W 1.5 2.3 a l WNW 1.6 0.8 2.8 )
NW 1.6. 2.2 1.7.
NNW- 1.6= 2.3 .2.3 a- No dairy or livestock within 5 miles of CPS in this meteorological' sector, b No garden.within 5 miles'of. CPS in this-meteorological sector.- ,
- 86
i m
@ l 8L P
/
/
\ ,
R j
o o
/ 6 G R / G y s~
DEWITTg l eins etex pR
<r "Ml %/f' 4 d'l' g j f
s/A Q'k( w % '
u }
fF I'p()WV ~*j\'f ;/
iD a h,w d R 0
)
3 4o %, " "
T lG @ LANE weevou y' N /
FIGURE 14: ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS, NEAREST RESIDENCE (R),
GARDEN (G), AND MILK ANIMAL (M) WITHIN 5 MILES i 87 -
l
l 5 .
8-O O
h
, . 1 ;1; - ( q) q.;;_ , el ;")7r c
+ .
sO.
a 4
/ '
dv e c., ; , -
.g ! ,
- 1 :'
.k ;- , ; -
g (
)< 2
)~ ,'"' ' '
/J,,. , -
. q l4 .,, !. [ -' :.. ;-'". . I , j -. ... __
I 5
0 s
a
.ONE d MbM k5MS M 4 7 iP. #-}3%tMM&
METEOROLOGICAL MONITC RING e
e
=
.;- y ;.
1: p '
r <..,;- i; ,
r 7 k
,E -
,[ [,-- qji " -
1 4;;a
,._u.. . n.um... .
METECROLCGl CAL MONITORING
. . - . . - _ - - . . - _ _ - . . . . . . . . - , - - - - ~ ~_.. - . - . . . - . -
3 f i
I i
V. METEOBOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS A. Descriotion The climate of central Illinois is typical of the Midwest, with cold winters, warm summers and
> frequent short-period fluctuations in temperature, humidity, cloudiness and wind direction. The ,
variability in central Illinois climate is due to I its location in a confluence zone (particularly during the cooler months) between different air masses. The specific air masses which affect
' central Illinois include maritime tropical air which originates in the Gulf of Mexico; continental tropical air which originates in Mexico and the southern Rockiest Pacific air which originates in.the eastern: North Pacific Oceant and continental polar and continental arctic air which originates in Canada. ,
Monthly streamline analyses of resultant. surface [
winds suggest that air reaching. central Illinois most frequently originates over the Gulf of Mexico from April through August, over the southeastern United States from September through November, and over both the-Pacific Ocean and-the Gulf of Mexico from December through March.
The major factors controlling the frequency-and "
variation of weather types ar: determined by the movement of storm systems which commonly follow paths along a major confluence: zone between air masses. The confluence zone is usually oriented .
from southwest to northeast chrough the region and normally shifts.in latitude;during this period, l ranging in position-from the central. states to the United States - Canadian border. The average frequency of passage of storm systems along this zone is about once every-5 to 8-days. These storm-systems are most frequent during the winter and-spring months, causing a-maximum of cloudiness
- during these seasons. Winter.is-characterized by alternating periods of' steady _ precipitation and_
periodsLof clear,-crisp;and cold weather.- ,
Springtime-precipitation is'primarily showeryLin nature. The frequent passage of' storm systems,_
. presence of high winds, and frequent occurrence of .,
unstable. conditions caused by.the close proximity
.between warm,. moist air. masses and cold,.. dry air masses, result in this season's thunderstorms and 1
i
= 189 "
_ r , . - . - - 2 :. i -. r . - . . . . , _
%.. ., ,a. -.,s. _. _,__,;
on occasion, are the source of hall, damaging winds and tornados. Although storm systems also occur during the fall months, the frequency of occurrence during these months is less than that of the winter or spring months. Periods of dry weather characterize the fall season which ends rather abruptly with increasing storminess that usually begins in November. j In contrast, weather during the summer months is.
characterized by weaker storm systems which tend to pass to the north of Illinois. A major confluence zone is not present in this region,-and the-region's weather is characterized by much-sunshine interspersed with thunderstorms. Showers and thunderstorms-are usually of the hir mass type, although occasional outbreaks of cold air-bring precipitation and weather. typical of that associated with the fronts and storm systems of l the spring months. l i
When southeasterly and easterly winds are present:
in central Illinois, they usually bring mild and-wet weather. . Southerly winds are warm and showery, westerly winds are dry.with moderate temperatures, and winds from the northwest and ;
north are cool and dry. i The prevailing wind is sontherly at the clinton Power Station. The frequency-of winds from othor-directions is relatively well distributed.' The monthly average wind speed is lowest during late j summer and. highest during late winter and.early spring.
Table 13 presents a' summary of climatological data at meteorological stations surrounding the clinton Power Station site from.1937 through-1976.: The annual average temperature at the clintoniPower.
Station is about 52*F. Monthly average terparatures in the1 region range.from the middic twenties in January to the middle seventiesfin July.. Maximum temperatures in the clinton Power Station region equal or. exceed 90'F on'an. average q between 17 and 28 times'per year. Minimum 1 temperatures in this region are less'than or equal.
to 32*F on an average between.119 and-132 times' ,
per year.
Humidity varies.with wind. direction,. lower with' westerly or northwesterly winds _and higher with- ,
easterly or southerly winds. . -The early morning '
relative humidity'is highest during.the= late-summer,.with an average of 87%'at both Peoria and
_ 90 ~ _ _
s
i l t s
i Springfield. The relative humidity is highest I l
- throughout the day during December, ranging from
~
83% in early morning to 72% at noon at both Peoria .i and Springfield. Heavy fog with visibility less than 1/4 mile occurs an average of 21 times per ;
year at Peoria and 18 times per year.at t Springfield. Heavy fog occurs most frequently during the winter' months. t Annual precipitation in the clinton Power Station ,
area averages about 35 inches per year. On the '
average, about 45% of the annual precipitation in the-clinton Power Station region occurs in the- 1 5-month period from April through August. i However, in this region no month averages-less than 4% of the annual total. Monthly; precipitation totals have ranged from 0.03 to -
13.09 inches (Peoria).. Snowfall commonly-occurs
- from November through March, with an annual average of 23.4 inches at Peoria, and.22.3 inches t at Springfield.
The monthly maximum snowfall of 18.9 inches'at Peoria, and 22.7 inches at Springfield, occurred .
, in December 1973.- The 24-hour maximum snowfall, i which also occurred in December.1973, was 10.2
-inches at Peoria, and 10.9 inches at Springfield.
'The terrain in central Illinois.is relatively flat and differences in elevation haveLno_significant
, impact on the generalEclimate. . However,'the low hills'and river valleys that-exist cause a small effect.upea nocturnal-wind' drainage patterns and fog frequency.
o 5
'I s
91: -
. ce '
..___._..._.-._i.__. ._ _ . _ . _ _ .. . _J '!
TA9tt 13 MitTORicAt ellMAtot00ltAt DATA FROM VEATHER STAfl0NS SURROUNDlWG THE CLINTON PNER STAIRg STATION PAeAMETER PEDRIA SP#1NCFlfl0 fencerature t'F)
Anrust average 50.8 52.7 Maxisun 103 (Jul 1940) 112 (Jul 1934)
Mininue 20 (Jan 1963) *22 (Feb 1963) gelative H eldity (1Q Annual average at:
6 a.m. 83 82 12 noen 62 60 D
Annual average speed (mph) 10.3 11.4
- Prevalling direction s S I
Fastest mitet speed (mphi 75 (Jul 1953) 75 (Jun 1957)
Direction WW SW i
l Preeleitation (In.)
Annual everage 35.06 35.02 l Monthly maximum 13.09 (Sep 1961) 9.91 (Apr 1964)
Monthly minimum 0.03 (Oct 1964) 0.15 (Dec 1955) 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> maximm 5.06 (Apr 1950) 5.12 (Sep 1959)
Snowfall fin.)
)
Annual everage 23.4 22.3 Monthly maxiass 18.9 (Dec 1973) 22.7 (Dec 1973) 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> maxleun 10.2 (Dec 1973) 10.9 (Dec 1973)
Mean Arvwel (no. of deY1)
Precipitation 1 0.1 in. 1.11 112 Snow, steet, hall y, 1.0 in. 8 8 i
.j Thunderstorms 49 50 j Neavy fog (visibility 1/4 m or less) 21 18 i Maxinun terrperature 90'F 17 28 Minlaun temperature 3 32'F 132 119
)
l The data presented in this table are based upon references (DOC 764) and (Doc 76b). These !
.j statistics are based on periods of record ranging frorn 17 to 39 years in length. The ranges span !
the years 1937 to 1976. '
92 i I
B. Climatolocical Summary - 1990 Temperatures in Springfield for the months of April, May, July, August, October and December averaged below normal while January, February, March, September and November averaged above normal. Temperatures for the month of June were average, over the year, the average monthly temperature ranged from 30.0'F in December to 75.2*F in July. The lowest hourly temperature of the year occurred on December 24 when it dropped to -B'F. On July 4, 5 and 6, 97'F was recorded, marking the year's highest hourly temperatures.
(IPC 90)
In Springfield a total of 52.67 (water equivalent) inches of precipitation fell during 1990, which amounts to approximately 18.89 inches above the annual average. Monthly precipitation totals ranged from a low of 1.28 inches in April to a high of 9.22 inches in June. The largest precipitation event came on June 20 when 4.03 inches of rain fell. The year's heaviest snowfall occurred December 22 when 3.1 inches fell. (IPC 90)
The onsite meteorological tower obtains information that is valuable in determining plume dispersion by providing differential temperature, wind speed and direction. Table 14 summarizes the seven stability classes, with unstable conditions dispersing a plume more than stable conditions.
Table 15 compiles the total hours for different wind speeds for each stability class during 1990, at 10 meters and 60 meters. Figures 15 and 16 are wind rose graphs which show predominant wind direction at 10 and 60 meters for the Clinton Power Station.
I 93
.. n -
1 A9tt.14 CLAt$1FICAtt04 0F ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY Stability Pasquill Defining Ctessification Cetecortes Condttiorm Extremely unstable A 0.900<ATs-0.019 Moderately unstable B 0.019<4Ts-0.017 Stightty unstable C -0.017<ATs-0.015'
> :t r al D 0.015<Ais-0.005 Slightly stable E 0.005<aiso.015 Moderately stable f 0.015<4Tso.040 Extremely stable G 0.040<ais0.900 l
l
~94
l TABLE 15 ANNUAL J0lNT FREQUCNCY DISTRIBUTION OF METEOROLOGICAL PARAMETERS DURING 1990 STABILITY CLASS 4 WIND SPEED (MPW) AT 10 METER LEVEL DIRECTION 13 47 8 12 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL N 1.40E 01 4.40E 01 8.60E 01 4.90E 01 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.96E 02 NNE 1.00E 01 5.00E 01 5.70E 01 9.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.28E 02 NE 6.00E 00 3.40E 01 3.10E 01 6.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 7.80E 01 ENE 6.00E 00 1.70E 01 1.70E 01 1.90E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 5.90E 01 i E 1.00E 01 3.50E 01 4.40E 01 1.10E 01 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.02E 02 ESE 1.10E 01 5.40E 01 3.60E 01 1.10E 01 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.15E 02 SE 4.00E 00 9.10E 01 4.00E 01 1.30E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.50E 02 i 6.00E 00 i SSE 9.20E 01 8.40E 01 3.00E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 2.14E 02 S 1.00E 01 9.40E 01 1.32E 02 8.00E 01 1.30E 01 7.00E 00 3.36E 02 I SSW 1.10E 01 5.40E 01 1.27E 02 9.90E 01 1.90E 01 3.00E 00- 3.13E 02 SW 8.00E 00 3.00E 01 9.10E 01 4.80E 01 6.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.83E 02 WSW 4.00E 00 3.40E 01 5.20E 01 2.60E 01 8.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.27E 02 W 8.00E 00 3.10E 01 6.70E 01 3.20E 01 1.70E 01 2.40E 01 1.79E 02 WNW 9.00E 00 4.000 01 4.60E 01 3.50E 01 2.10E 01 9.00E 00 1.60E 02 WW 1.00E 01 3.50E 01 5.70E 01 5.40E 01 1.50E 01 1.90E 01 1.90E 02 NNW 6.00E 00 3.70E 01 5.80E 01 2.70E 01 3.00E 00 5.00E 00 1.36E 02 TOTAL 1.33E 02 7.72E 02 1.03E 03 5.49E 02 1.16E 02 7.10E 01 2.67E 03 PERICOS OF CALM (h0URS): 8.80E 01 WIND SPEED (MPH) AT 60 METER LEVEL DIRECitDN 13 47 8 12 13 18 19 24 324 TOTAL N 5.00E 00 2.70E 01 7.40E 01 6.30E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.71E 02 NNE 6.00E 00 1.90E 01 6.60E 01 1.80E 01 9.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.20E 02 NE 5.00E 00 2.10E 01 3.60E 01 2.20E 01 7.00E 00 2.00E 00 9.30E 01 ENE 1.00E 00 1.50E 01 2.60E 01 1.90E 01 6.00E 00 2.00E 01 8.70E 01 E 3.00E 00 1.50E 01 2.60E 01 2.00E 01 3.50E 01 1.30E 01 1.12E 02 ESE 5.00E 00 2.60E 01 3.10E 01 2.00E 01 6.00E 00 0.00E 01 8.80E 01 SE 8.00E 00 6.20E 01 5.20E 01 1.30E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.35E 02 SSE 1.10E 01 3.80E 01 5.90E 01 4.30E 01 2.10E 01 3.00E 00 1.75E 02 S 5.00E 00 5.40E 01 9.00E 01 8.60E 01 4.50E 01 4.20E 01 3.22E 02 SSW 5.00E 00 3.20E 01 9.20E 01 9.30E 01 5.00E 01 4.10E 01 3.13E 02 SW 3.00E 00 2.00E 01 8.70E 01 9.40E 01 4.50E 01 1.80E 01 2.67E 02 WSW 6.00E 00 2.80E 01 3.90E 01 3.20E 01 1'20E 01
. 2.50E 01 1.42E 02 W 4.00E 00 2.50E 01 4.20E 01 4.10E 01 1.30E 01 3.40E 01 1.59E 02 WNV 5.00E 00 2.00E 01 4.10E 01 3.50E 01 1.70E 01 2.70E 01 1.45E U2 NW 1.10E 01 2.90E 01 3.40E 01 5.60E 01 2.20E 01 2.00E 01 1.72E 02 NNW 7.00E 00 2.90E 01 4.70E 01 5.20E 01 1.00E 01 7.00E 00 1.52E 02 TOTAL 9.00E 01 4.60E 02 8.42E 02 7.07E 02 3.00E 02 2.54E 02 2.65E 03 PERICOS OF CALM (HOURS): 7.70E 01 l
95 l
i taste 15 (Cont 8d)
STABILITY CLASS B VIND SPEED (MPH) AT 10 METER LEVEL !
Ol#ECTION 13 47 6 12 13 18 19 2. >24 TOTAL !
N 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 9.00E 00 7.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 2.00E 01 ,
NNE 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 1.00E 03 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 NE 0.00E 01 4.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.20E 01 1.00E(1 0.00E 01 1.90E 01 ENE 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 4.00E 00 E 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.00e 00 ESE 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 8.00E 00 SE 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 6.00E 00 SSE 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 6.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 *s10E 01
$ 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 8.00E 00 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 1.90E 01 ,
SSW 0.00E 01 3.00E 00 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.00E 00 - 1.60E 01 SW 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 6.00E 00 VSW 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.00E 00 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 6.00E 00 W 0.00E 01 3.00E 00 4.00E 00 4.00E 00 2.00E 00 4.00E 00 1.?0E 01 WNV 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00F 00 1.10E 01 NW 0.00E 01 0.00E*01 4.00E 00 9.00E 00 8.n0E 00 1.00E 00- 2.20E 01 NNV 0.00E 01 3.00E 00 5.00E 00 4.00E 00 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.50E 01 TOTAL 5.00E 00 3.80E 01 5.60E 01 5.70E 01 2.20E 01 1.00E 01 1.88E 02 PERl(X)$ OF CALM (HOURS): 1.00E 01 ,
J WIND SPEED (MPW) AT 60 METER LEVEL DIRECTION 13 47 8-12 13 18 19 24 ,
324 TOTAL N 0.00E-01 0.00E 01 4.00E 00 5.00E 00 2.ttd 00 0.00E 01 .1.10E 01 WNE 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 5.00E 00 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.40E 01 l NE 0.00E 01 0.00E 01- 3.00E 00 3.00E 00 5.00E 00 5.00E 00 1.60E 01 !
ENE 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 7.00E 00 E 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 ESE 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 6.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.00E 01 SE 0.00E-01 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E*01 5.00E 00 SSE 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 6.00E 00 S 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 5.00E 00 6.00E 00 3.00E 00 7.00E 00 2.20E 01 q SSW 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 5.00E 00 6.00E 00 2.00E 00 9.00E 00 2.30E 01 SW 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.00F 00 0.00E 01 7.00E 00 WSW 0.00E 01 .0.00E 01 4.00E 00' O.00E 01 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 8.00E 00 W 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.00E 00 4.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.50E 0*
WNV 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 3.00E 00 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.60E 01 NW 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 2.00E 00' 6.00E 00 5.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.50E 01-NNW 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 ?.00E 00 1.00E 00 4.00E 00 1.10E 01 TOTAL 1.00E 00- 1.50E 01 4.80E 01 60E 01 3.30E 01 4.50E 01 1.88E 02 PERIOOS OF CALM (HOURS): 8.00E 00 96 i l
\
i TABLE 15 (cont'd) l STABILITY CLASS C
{
WIND SPEED (MPH) AT 10 METER LEVEL 019ECit04 13 47 82 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL 4 N 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 01 5.00E 00 7.00E 00 1.00E 00 2.50E 01 !
NNE 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 7.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.20E 01 NE 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.20E 01 ENE 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 8.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.20E 01 E 0.00Ea01 3.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E*01 1.00E 00 6.00E 00 ESE 1.00E 00 4.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 6.00E 00 SE 0.00E 01 4.00E 00 7.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.10E 01 SSE 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 5.00E 00 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.30E 01 S 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 5.00E 00 7.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.50E 01
$$W 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 4.00E 00 9.00E 00 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 2.00E 01 SW 0.00E 01 4.00E 00 4.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.10E 01 WSW 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.20E 01 W 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 2.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.60E 01 WNW 0.00E 01 3.00E 00 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.50E 01 NW 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.20E 01 4.00E 00 2.00E 00 2.90E 01 NSW 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.00E 01 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 1.50E 01 TOTAL 7.00E 00 3.80E 01 8.40E 01 6.90E 01 2.30E 01 9.00E 00 2.30E 02 PERICOS OF CALM (NOURS): 7.iOE 00 WIND SPEtt> (MPH) A1 60 METER LEVEL D PECTION 13 4-7 8 12 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL N 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 1.00E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.70E 01 ANE 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.00E 00 6.00E.00 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.10E 01 NE 1.00E 00 0.00E-01 4.00E 00 7.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.30E 01 D ENE 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 5.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.10E 01 E 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 6.00E 00 ESE 1.00E 00 4.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 9.00E 00 SE 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 8.00E 00 SSE 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 2.00E 00. 2.00E 00 9.00E 00 S 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 6.00E 00 3.00E 00 5.00E 00 6.00E 00 2.00E 01 SSW 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 6.00E 00 4.00E 00 1.10E 01 2.60E 01 SW 0.00E-01 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 3.00E 01 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E.01 WSW 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 9.00E 00 W 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 - 2.00E 00 5.00E 00 1.00E 00 7.00E 00 1.70E 01 WNW 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 4.00E 00 5.00E 00 7.00E 00 1.90E 01 NV 0.00E 01 2.00E 00 4.00E 00 1.10E 01 5.00E 00 2.00E 00 2.40E 01 NNW 0.00E-01 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 5.00E 00 3.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.90E 01 !
. TOT Al. 3.00E 00 '1.00E 01 5.30E 01 7.50E 01 3.80E 01 4.00E 01 2.28E 02-PERIODS OF CALM (HQ1RS): 6.00E 00 l
97 l
TABLE 15 (Cont'd)
$1ABillTY class D VIND SPEED (WPH) AT 10 NETER LEVEL DIRECTION 13 47 8 12 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL N 4.00E 00 4.40E 01 9.40E 01 4.90E 01 8.00E 00 1.00E 00 2.00E 02 NNE 9.00E 00 3.80E 01 9.20E 01 3.10E 01 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.75E 02 NE 3.00E 00 3.50E 01 3.00E 01 1.20E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 8.20E 01 ENE 3.00E 00 1.60E 01 1.10E 01 4.00E 00 0.00E*01 0.00E 01 3.40E 01 E 1.00E 00 1.50E 01 7.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.30E 01 ESE 5.00E 00 2.10E 01 7.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.30E 01 SE 0.00E 01 2.80E 01 2.40E 01 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 5.50E 01 SSE 3.00E 00 4.10E 01 4.20E 01 1.70E 01 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 1,04E 02- )
S 2.00E 00 2.80E 01 6.50E 01 3.30E 01 7.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.36E 02 l SSW 4.00E 00 2.30E 01 7.60E 01 5.00E 01 9.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.64E 02 SW 4.00E 00 1.90E 01 3.30E 01 2.20E 01 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 8.30E 01 a VSW 3.00E 00 1.60E 01 1.40E 01 2.30E 01 1.60E 01 1.00E 00 7.30E 01 2.00E 00 l
W 9.00E 00 3.70E 01-2.50E 01 8.00E 00 1.30E 01 9.40E 01 WNW 3.00E 00 1.10E 01 3.20E 01 4.80E 01 1.90E 01 1.20E 01 1.25E 02 NW 1.00E 00 2.10E 01 4.00E 01 3.80E 01 1.40E 01 5.00E 00 1.19E 02 Nw 1.00E 00 2.60E 01 7.60E 01 3.40E 01 6.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.44E 02 TOTAL 4.80E 01 3.91E 02 6.682 02 4.01E 02 9.90E 01 3.70E 01 1.64E 03 PERICDS OF CALM (HOURS): 4.10E 01 WIND SPEED (MPM) AT 60 METER LEVEL -
DIRECTION 13 47 8 12- 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL 3
W 1.00E 00 2.10E 01 4.60E 01 8.80E 01 3.10E 01 7.00E 00 1.94E 02 NNE 0.00E-01 2.10E 01 5.60E 01 8.20E 01 1.90E 01 1.60E 01 1.94E 02 NE 1.00E 00 1.006 01 2.80E 01 4.50E 01 1.00E 01 2.00E 00 9.60E 01 ENE 2.00E 00 7.00E 00 1.80E 01 7.00E 00 6.00E 00 -1.00E 00 4.10E 01 E 2.00E 00 4.00E 00 1.20E 01 1.40E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 3.30E 01 ESE 0.00E-01 1.50E 01 -2.10E 01 8.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 4.40E 01 SE 1.00E 00 1.30E 01 3.20E 01 8.00E 00 4.00E 00 3.00E 00- 6.10E 01 SSE 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 3.40E 01 3.00E 01 1.10E 01 9.00E 00 8.70E 01 S 1.00E 00 6.00E 00 3.90E 01 4.60E 01 4.80E 01 3.90E 01 .1.79E C?
S$V 2.00E.00 5.00E 00 3.00E 01 6.30E 01 4.70E 01 2.60E 01 1.73E 02 l SW 1.00E 00 9.00E 00 1.80E 01 2.60E 01 1.20E 01- 4.00E 00 7.00E 01 WSW 1.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.20E 01 1.90E 01 1.40E 01 5.00E 00 5.40E 01-W 2.00E 00 9.00E 00 1.90E 01 2.70E 01 1.30E 01 2.10E 01 9.10E 01 WNW 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 2.10E 01 3.30E 01 1.10E 01 2.70E 01 9.70E 01 NW 0.00E 01 8.00E 00 1.60E 01 4.40E 01 1.30E 01 1.10E 01 9.20E 01 NwW 1.00E 00 1.40E 01 3.50E 01 3.40E 01 1.70E 01 7.00E 00 1.08E 02 TOTAL 1.60E 01 1.52E 02 4.37E 02 5.74E 02 2.57E 02 1.78E 02 1.61E 03' l PERICOS OF CALM (HOURS): 4.30E 01 98 h_-m._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . - -
l I
TABLE 15 (Cont'd) 1 STABILITY Ct43$ E VJD SPEED (MPH) AT 10 METER LEVEL DIRECTION 1-3 47 8 12 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL N 8.00E 00 5.90E 01 4.50E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.13E 02 NNE 1.50E 01 5.40E 01 2.30E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 9.40E 01 NE 8.00E 00 3.40E 01 1.90E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 6.20E 01 ENE 1.00E 01 2.80E 01 3.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 4.30E 01 E 1.60E 01 2.50E 01 1.20E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 5.30E 01 ESE 1.90E 01 5.60E 01 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 7.80E 01 SE 1.90E 01 1.11E 02 1.60E 01 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.50E 02 SSE 1.10E 01 1.28E 02 9.40E 01 9.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 2.43E 02 S 1.60E 01 9.40E 01 2.04E 02 4.80E 01 3.00E 00 9.00E 01 3.65E 02 SSW 1.40E 01 7.70E 01 1.53E 02 6.90E 01 6.00E 00 0.00E 01' 3.19E 02 SV 1.30E 01 3.30E 01 4.70E 01 1.00E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.04E 02 WSW 9.00E 00 2.70E 01 5.80E 01 3.10E 01 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.30E 02 W 5.00E 00 2.60E 01 4.90E 01 3.30E 01 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.16E 02 WNW 6.00E 00 3.60E 01 3.70E 01 1.80E 01 3.00E 00 2.00E 00 1.02E 02.
NW 4.00E 00 4.60E 01 4.40E 01 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 9.70E 01 NNW 1.20E 01 4.30E 01 1.80E 01 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 7.80E 01 TOTAL 1.85E 02 8.77E 02 8.25E 02 2.34E 02 2.10E 01 5.00E 00 2.15E 03 PER100$ Of CALM (HOURS): 2.50E 01 VIND SPEED (Mow) AT 60 METER LEVEL DIRECTION 13 47 8 12 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL N 4.00E 00 1.90E 01 4.40E 01 3.80E 01 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.09E 02 NNE 1.00E 00 1.50E 01 3.50E 01 2.60E 01 6.00E 00 0.00E 01 8.30E 01 NE 0.00E 01 6.00E 00 2.60E 01 3.70E 01- 7.00E 00 0.00E 01 7.60E 01 ENE 1.00E 00 4.00E 00 2.90E 01 1.50E 01 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 5.00E 01 E 3.00E 00 7.00E 00 8.00E 00 1.80E 01 0.00C 01 0.00E 01 3.60E 01 ESE 6.00h 00 1.40E 01 2.70E 01 6.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 5.40E 01 SE 5.00E 00 3.30E 01 5.10E 01 9.00E 00 3.005 00 0.00E 01 1.01E 02 SSE 3.00E 00 1.80E 01 8.50E 01 7.80E 01 2.30E 01 8.00E 00 2.15E 02 S 5.00E 00 1.80E 01 7.60E 01 1.37E 02 9.30E 01 3.30E 01 3.62E 02 SSW 3.00E 00 1.60E 01 4.50E 01 1.98E 02 1.24E 02 3.30E 01 4.19E 02 SW 0.00E 01 1.00E 01 4.10E 01 8.00E 01 3.10E 01 8.00E 00 1.70F 02 VSW 3.00E 00 1.70E 01 2.10E 01 3.30E 01 1.20E 01 1.00E 00 8.70E 01-W 3.00E 00 1.00E 01 2.00E 01 2.90E 01 1.10E 01 1.10E 01 8.40E 01 ,
WNW 3.00E 00 8.00E 00 3.70E 01 2.70E 01 8.00E 00 1.00E 00 8.40E 01 NW 1.00E 00 1.20E 01 3.30E 01 3.60E 01 1.30E 01 0.00E 01 9.50E 01 NNW 1,006 00 1.30E 01 4.10E 01 2.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E-01 7.50E 01 TotAt 4.20E 01 2.20E 02 6.19E 02 7.87E 02 3.36E 02 9.60E 01 2.10E 03 PER100s of CALM (HOURS): 4.30E 01 1
99
trett 15 ft nt8d>
STABILITY CLASS F .
WIND SPEED (MPH) AT 10 METER LEVEL i
DIRECTION 13 47 B 12 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL j N 4.00E 00 3.40E 01 6.006 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 '4.40E 01-NNE 1.10E 01 3.50E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 -4.90E 01 NE 1.80E 01 2.20E 01- 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01- 4.00E 01 ENE- --1.30E 01- 2.20E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01- 3.50E 01 O E 2.60E 01 2.20E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01. 0.00E 01- . 4.90E 01' I ESE 2.10E 01 2.30E 01 2.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01i 4.70E 01 1 SE 1.80E 01 4.90E 01 -1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E*01 0.00E 01 -6.80E 01 SSE 1.60E 01 8.00E 01 7.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01- 1.03E 02 :
S- 1.20E 01 7.70E 01 ~1.70E 01 1.00E 00 =0.00E*01- 0.00E*01 1.07E 02 -
SSW 1.10E 01 .4.50E 01 2.80E 01 0.00E*01 0.00E 01 - 0.00E 01 -8.40E.01' l SW 4.00E 00= 2.70E 01 1.90E 01~ 1.00E 00 0.00E*01 0.00E 01 5.10E 01 i WSW 7.00E 00- 2.80E 01 2.00E 01" 0.00E*01 0.00E 01- 0.00E 01 .5.50E 01-W 9.00E 00 3.20E 011 2.10E 01 1.00E 00. - 0.00E 01- 0.00E 01 ' . 6.30E 01 -j WWW 0.00E 00 4.20E 01 1.50E 01 0.00E 01-' O.00E 01- 0.00E 01 6.606 01 !
NW 4.00E 00- 2.50E 01 6.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.000 01 0.00E 01 -3.50E 01 I NNW 4.00E 00 9.00E 00 3.00E 00 0.00E 0;00E 01' O.000 01 1.60E 01 3
TOTAL 1.87E 02 5.72E 02 1.48E 02 _4.00E 00 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 9.12E 02 PERICOS OF CALM (HOURS): 3.00E 00
- VINO SPEED (MPM) AT 60 METER LE'ML DIRECTION 13 47 8-12 13 18-- -19 24- >24 I TOTAL N 4.00E 00 3.00E 00- ]
1 2.606 01 - 1.00E 01~- ' O.00E 01 0.00E 01- _4.30E 01 NNE . 0.00E 01 3.00E 00 1.40E'01i 1.60E 01 0.00E 01 > 1.00E 00 : 3.40E 01 NE 2.00E 00 8.00E 00 1.20E 01 1.20E 01; =1.00E 00 10.00E 01 -3.50E 01 q ENE 2.00E.00- 4.00E 00 1.20E 01 8.00E 00 0.00E 01' : 0.00E*01 ; : 2.60E 01 E 2.00E 00 4.00E.00 1.20E ' 01 9.00E 00t 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 :2.70E-01.
ESE 1.00E 00 1.10E 01 2.60E 01 3.00E 00 0.00E 01: 0.00E 01 - -. 4.10E 01 I SE 3.00E 00 3.30E 01. . 2.10E 01 5.00E 00 . 1.00E 00: 0.00E 011 6.30E 01' SSE 1.00E 00 2.40E 01 2.70E 01 L ' 2.30E 01 -- 2.00E 00: 0.00E 01' 7.70E 01-S 1.00E 00 1.20E 01 2.80E 01 ; . 5.90E 01 = 1.10E 01 0.00E 01' 1.11E 02--
- $$W 0.00E 01- 7.00E 00 3.70E 01: 7.40E 01 1.20E 011 0.00E 012 1.30E:02 SW - 2.00E 00 6.00E 00. 1.90E 01' 5.00E 01' '6.00E 00' ~0.00E 01. z 8.30E 011 WSW 1.00E 00 -5.00E 00 - 1.40E 01 2.70E 015 7.00E 00 0.00E 01: 5.40E 01 W. 1.00E 00 ' 1.00E 00 . 2.00E 01-- 2.40E Ol' ,3.00E 00 .0.00E 01 4.90E 01 WNW - 2.00E 00 :4.00E 00 '1.70E 01. 2.20E 01 1.00E 002 0.00E 01: 4.60E 01:
NW - 0.00E*01' 6.00E 00- 2.90E 01 1.70E 01 ' 1.00E :00 . 0.00E 01 5.30E 01-NNV 4.00E 00 6.00E 00 9.00E 00 1.00E 01- 0.00E 01 0.00E*01 2.90E 01 T0fe. 2.60E 01 - 1.37E 02 - 3.23E 02 - 3.69E 02- '4;50E 01 .1.00E 00.. 9.01E 025.
. PERIODS OF CALM (HOURS):L 1.40E 01 1
- 1001
_. . .. .. .. ~. .
TA8tt 15 (Cont'd) t STABillTY CLASS 0 gly) SPEED (McN) AT 10 METER LEVEL DIPECTION 13 47 8 12 13*18 19 24 >24 TOTAL N 1.10E 01 1.00E 01 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00t-01 2.60E 01 NNE 3.20E 01 2.60E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 5.90E 01 NE 2.40E 01 1.40E 01 0.00E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.90E 01 ENE 1.90E 01 1.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.90E 01 E 1.30E 01 9.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.30E 01 ESE 1.10E 01 1.50E 01 5.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.10E 01 SE 4.00E 00 1.50E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E*01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.00f 01 SSE 9.00E 00 1.50E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.40E 01 S 1.00E 01 1.30E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E*01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.30E 01 SSW 6.00E 00 1.60E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E-01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.20E 01 SW 1.20E 01 2.50E 01 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.80E 01 WSW 1.60E 0, 1.40E 01 3.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.30E 01 W 1.40E 01 7.006 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E*01 2.30E 01 WNW 1.20E 01 7.00E 00 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.30E 01 NW 3.00E 00 8.00E 00 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.50E 01 NNV 8.00E 00 8.00E 00 3.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.00E 01 TOTAL. 2.04E 02 2.12E 02 3.00E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 4.48E 02 PERICOS OF CALM (HOURS): 6.00E 00 WIND SPEFD AT 60 METER LEVEL DIRECTION 13 4-7 8 12 13 18 19 24 >24 TOTAL N 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.00E 01 8.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.70E 01 NNE 4.00E 00 8.00E 00 5.00E 00 7.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.40E 01 NE 2.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.50E 01 9.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.20E 01 ENE 4.00E 00 8.00E 00 1.40E 01 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.00E 01 E 5.00E 00 6.00E 00 2.90E 01 8.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 4.90E 01 ESE 2.00E 00- 1.00E 01 1.20E 01 4.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.80E 01 SE 2.00E 00 1.20E 01 4.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 2.00E 01
$$E 9.00E 00 5.00E 00 7.00E 00 1.50E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.60E 01 S 3.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.00E 00 1.10E 01 - 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 2.20E 01 SSW 1.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.10E 01 1.70E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E*01 3.70E 01 SW 3.00E 00 5.00E 00 1.30E 01 1.30E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 3.40E 01 WSV 1.00E 00 6.00E 00 1.00E 01 1.70E 01 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 3.60E 01 W 0.00E 01 1.00E 01 8.00E 00 9.00E 00 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 2.80E 01 WNW 0.00E 01 5.00E 00 1.00E 00 2.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 8.00E 00 NW 2.00E 00 2.00E 00 9.00E 00- 1.00E 00 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 1.40E 01 NNW 4.00E 00 4.00E 00 5.00E 00 1.00E 01 0.00E 01 0.00E 01 2.30E 01 TOTAL 4.50E 01 1.05E 02 1.54E 02. 1.36E 02 8.00E 00 0.00E 01 4.48E 02 PERICO OF CALM (HOURS): 5.00E 00 101 '
i N
NNW .NNE 5.0% 6.1%-
NW NE 6.1% 3.8% ..
rev ENE WNW 2.6%
6.0% ,
, g g
s .. ;
35 i
E 6.0% I0 M lllll k h$$ E81llIllB81 3,0%-
g
=
~
s '
f
, WSW .
E 5.I% 2 '
g ES -
d ll
- -SW SE 5.6% .
5.3%
m
I).1%. 8.3%
-S WINO: SPEED KEY-1 I . 8%. -
>24HPH^
3 19-24 MPH
= 13-l8 MPH 8-l2 MPH 4-7 MPH.
1-3HPH- ;
FIGURE 15: 1990- CLINTON1 POWER STATION.
10 METER -WIND - ROSE' 103' 'j
i i
l N
NNW 6.%
NNE 4.9% S,73 NW 5.6% "-
4$g m
ENE WNW -
3.0%
4.9%
EE W --
5.3% l KM'NNll x
{.{ Nllgsgl E ,,
/ '
WSW a x -
4.5% 5, -
1 o-ESE 3.3%
/
SW 7.7% ,
y _
- S .
4h%
ssw ssE-
- 13. 4 *: 7.2%
- WIND SPEED KEY 12 n ~
i
>24HPH E
=
19-24 MPH .
13-18 MPH l 8-12 MPH' 4-7 MPH I-3 MPH FIGURE 16: 1990 CLINTON POWER STATION 60: METER WIND ROSE- ,
105-
ir; *
'T
. +'
il i
- ll)
~
i ' ::1 Qin '. M , ll! 1
': (.. . :. s i . i- I'[ty .-
(: q #
~
ji s , .,1.
.'i.{'
,j ag + p;4gj
%y ,g;>; ,, ~
3 g
- eO y'
gi; 4-ogy:
,p !i < + 4 -
i
, ,5 LIST OF REFERENCES
ba
, ;.. .p,, ,,_ -
3y 1 < : v, -y '- p y__,y~ :* rti 7;y~;f % m 'y
- U,'- '
.. > t-- .
, - ti, (
- t 4.
?; ;
'.M ,
Q (is-i;-; .;u e
, .> ;v-e x.-y j.fi!9F _. - -
" /,; <: r, s-g s ;Q<V.. - - .a
$m;l,) ; c li
! 'p .Vh ,
r >
>W- ,
' ,p'; .,,.'
. 1,5 c
i' of','ff"-& ,q : r .&c _y',
i '
p,.J g;d.7_l,' y,. ;--lmg, s ,
g oy% N .
g,' ,7 i!
1
.;Y.
s
+
- -l_ .1[. .-
E
,[M ,,zM s-,
F,N_. }, 1 >' '
a ,; ,
g 5 [' ,
t %
1 s,i.
t9 . 4 ~.
3
) 4 *$'f
/-
1
' .! { h . , s _[- .4= .
x
- 5,b
~
4 ' , , ' V;. .I f./?$;l'y"' > ,
W .o,. p[3 9: v' }% if h*g
- n. t;d x .r hg.
+: :o '
r-n -
a' {tn'2 s a y ;; g p) L
,')} :
, l;tl;le[',t.:;yt-aif >}
(, :
- gy , . . - 4 A. ' -
i L
LIST OF REFERENCES
VI. LIST OF REFERENCES ANSI 75 American National Standards Institute, Inc., " Performance, Testing and Procedural Specifications for g Thermoluminescent Dosimetry," ANSI N545-1975.
ASTM 75 American Society for Testing and Materials, " Standard Recommended Practice for Dealing with outlying Observations," ASTM E178-75.
) BR66 "Airmass, Streamlines and the Bored Forest," A. Bryson, Technical Report No.
24, University of Wisconsin; Department of Meteorology: Madison, Wisconsin, 1966.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20 (Nuclear Regulatory Commission).
. CL90a CPS Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report January 1, 1990 - June 30, 1990.
CL90b CPS Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report July 1, 1990 - December 31, 1990.
DOC 76a " Local Climatological Data, Annual Summary with Comparative Data, Peoria, Illinois, 1976," U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA, Asheville, North Carolina.
DOC 76b " Local Climatological Data, Annual Summary with Comparative Data, Springfield, Illinois, 1976," U.S.
Department of Commerce, NOAA, Asheville, North Carolina.
EI87 " Environmental Radioactivity," M.
Eisenbud, 1987..
EPA 72 " Natural Radon Exposure in the United States," Donald T. Oakley, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
ORP/SID 72-1, June 1972.
l 107
FRC60 Federal Radiation Council ReportiNo. 1,
" Background Material for the Development of Radiation Protection-Standards," May ,
13, 1960.
ICRP77 International: Commission on Radiological -!
Protection, Publication 2, " Report of !
- Committee II;on Permissible Dose for-Internal Radiation,"-(1959).with-1962 SupplementLissued in ICRP Publication 6; ,
Publication 9, " Recommendations on. [
Radiation Exposure," (1965);.ICRP {
Publication 7 (1965), amplifying' specific recommendations of Publication 26-(1977).
-ICRP84 International' Commission on Radiation Protection, Publication No. 391(1984),
" Principles-of Limiting-Exposure to;the a Public to Natural-Sources of Radiation."- !
IPC90 Illinois Power Company, North Decatur.
Dispatch Office, 1990..
i KAS4 " Radioactivity in-the_ Environment - ;
Sources,-Distribution and= Surveillance,'" l Ronald L. Kathren, 1984.
NCRPS9 National Councilson Radiation Protection !
and Measurements, Report No.~ 22,
" Maximum-Permissible-Body Burdens and 1 Maximum' Permissible ~ Concentrations of'
- Radionuclides,in Air and3 Water fort --!
Occupational' Exposure,"E(Published as National Bureau:of-StandardsLHandbook 69,--issued: June 1959b superseding; i Handbook'52):.-
I NCRP71 National 1 Council on. Radiation Protection I
.and Measurements,: Report No.? 39, " Basic Radiation Protection Criteria,"; January- j 1971.-
NCRP75 ' National: Council on. Radiation' Protection' '
and' Measurements, Report 1No.,44,- ,
" Krypton-85 ingthe Atmosphere -
Accumulation,1 Biological: Significance, 1' and control Technology," July 1975.
I i
4 108
- \
j l
NCRP87a -National-Council on Radiation-Protection' l and Measurements,_ Report No. 91,
" Recommendations on Limits for Exposure to Ionizing Radiation," June 1987.
NCRP87b National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 93, '
" Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the- :
Population of the United States," .j September 1987. H NR90 National Research Council,'1990, Committee on Biological Effects of .{
Ionizing Radiations (BEIR V),: Board-on Radiation Effects.Research on Life Sciences, "The Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing-Radiation".
NRC74 United States Nuclear Regulatory.- l 1 Commission, Regulatory Guide (5.36, "
" Recommended Practice-for' Dealing.with Outlying Observations," June 1974.
NRC75 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory, Guide 4.1, .
" Programs for Monitoring Radioactivity in'the Environs of. Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, April L 1975.c NRC77a United States Nuclear Regulatory',
Commission, RegulatoryDGuide'4.13,.
" Performance, Testing:and Procedural.
Specifications for Thermoluminescence-Dosimetry: Environmental? Applications.,"
Revision 1, July 197.7.
NRC77b United States-Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide-l'109',; i
" Calculation of Annual = Dose to Man from
~
Routine Releases-of' Reactor' Effluents.
for the Purposelof Evaluating Compliance with 10CFR Part-50,-Appendix I,'"
~'
i Revision 1, October 71977.
NRC79a United States-NuclearoRegulatory:
Commission Branch Technical Position, 1
"An. Acceptable Radiological:
Environmental 1 Monitoring Program," 3 Revision l', November-1979. ,
'109
1
-i
.i NRC79b United-States Nuclear Regulatory.
Commission-, Regulatory Guide 4.15,.
" Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Norm operations) -
Effluent Streams.and the Environment,"-
Revision.1, February 1979.
NUREG86 -Technical! Specification, Clinton Power Station, Unit No. 1, Docket ~No. 50-461, Office of-Nuclear Reactor-Regulation,'
1986.
NWS87 National Weather Service, Springfield, '
Illinois,-1987.- j PERI 88 "The Use of Diatoms'(Periphyton)Lin Monitoring Light Water Reactor' .,
Radioactive-Liquid: Effluence'in the' i
Susquehanna River," Ruth ~ Patrick _and John M. Palms ,- ~-'19 8 8 . ~3 TEPM Analytical 1 Procedu'res: Manual, -Teledyne t.
1 Isotopes Midwest Laboratory - (Northbrook,-
Illinois). 60062-4197. ;
USAR Illinois Power, Clinton1 Power Station,
' Updated Safety Analysis. Report, Revision 2, September 1990.
4
'j 1
3 110- q 1
3per ' w gr~emmer nxzr-m -
ig fy[> . T* .I 'I@xmuwNN/; 7': ;jh 7ngr: , - :.em]jj
'i illlcfMp[ y;.
EW ng%l;y 1 ,
s s ingjQ .
-,g.m[gf 4 '-[ ,.
. :lag
,m;gC.
g 9 7 ,3 4:e
~
m~g w ., ,
., 7,m 34 n.s--s , r.
2
_t.. e;VQ.$n _.
p#yg.g$6g% . .. 2%n 3
.?~*,
n <>.
, w7. u A g.w, u' +
w.s,yf ,.
m <
h~gil h~h. hik&$a$am f
f,h,yp[hlhy,Mk.%
et y M.': 1 fJ h}U ' OMi
-m N11.,~(
- .c e n.
c.
olm
, w%n-
'R
, . MUh p; . j,?s.h ff[.0M.
49r q$c~ ;4+;
g: es l,
~ , uus cws%gu
- f ,I&ljv Di
,j'g% lNA
& yjn;:@M.f.
'st
- 9 l'fk ?
ps (f $N, hk,,
e: X Yh ,1!(
ff ljl/@"'Nist g
)gg 'e,.a sM~
f"byl4j
'l-M
- c4 dn,.3dlJg
-r . My 4% gg "gt ccy,'%ses!' 1t
} i 4.%p;q p,3 .
u 9: ,
< g::. .M p:lv >y:::j:
,< S'%:1'
- sc,iA
' ff i : *j h f gg- w ;c c w $m ;g- ~ A. w 2
APPENDICES.
l
l APPENDIX A Exceptions to the REMP During 1990
'l 111
( _, - -, ,. . -
Data from-the radiological analysis of environmental samples q are routinely reviewed and evaluated by the-Clinton Power 1 Station Radiological Environmental. Group. This-data is- !
checked for LLD compliance, anomalous values,1 quality -!
control sample agreement, and-any positiveLresults which are -i inconsistent-with expected results or which' exceed any offsite Dose Calculation Manual = reporting-levels._ Table 1A-1 lists the reporting-levels for positive-radioactivity concentrations'in environmental samples required by the Clinton Power Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.
If an inconsistent-result. occurs, an investigation is ,
initiatwd which may consist of some t of the following.
actions:-
Examine the collection data sheets for any,-indication of collection or delivery errors, tampering,-vandal-ism and equipment' calibration or malfunctions due to electrical power failure,. weather conditions,cetc.
Perform statistical tests- ]
- i Examine previous data for trends- ;
Review other results from same sample media and different sample media Review control station data-Review quality' control or duplicate sample data Review CPS effluent reports; '
Recount and/or reanalyze the sample-Collect additional samples-as necessary During 1990, no investigations were performed as a(result of reaching any Offsite-Dose calculation Manualfreporting4 level. Five LLD exceptions occurredfduring 1990-andLare, documented in Table A-2 of this' appendix. LTable'D-19; lists' Lthe LLDs' required by the Clinton Power:-Station Offsite. Dose" Calculation Manual. . Other samplingLand analysis; exceptions-are listed in Table A-3'of this~ appendix.- 1 1
(
112" ;
_____._..___.._m_. ._ _ - - - _
1 TABLE A 1 l
CPS REMP REPORilNG LEVEtt FOR PostflVF RAD 10ActlVlfY I CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE $a. ]
d t
Water Altborne Particulate Fish Mith Food Products Analysis (pCl/l) or Gases (pCl/m3 ) (pCl/kg, wet) .(pCl/l)- -(pCl/kg, wet) ,
H3 20,000* " ". ... "- -l Mn 54 1,000 "- 30,000 ~ "
a Fe 59 400 - - " 10,000' ... ..+
.\
Co 56 - 1,000 " 30,000- "- - " -
Co 60 300 "- 10,000 - "- -"
e i
Zn 65 300 --
'20,000 "; "-
Zr/Nb 95 400# .- - ... '...
I 131 2** 0.9 "
- 3. -100 -
Cs 134 30 10 1,000 - 60 i,0001 Cs 137- .50 20 2,000 70 2,000: 1 Ba/La 140 200# " ." 300 "
For drinking water senples.. This is the 40 CFR_Part 141 value. Ifnodrinkindwater-pathway exists, a value of'30,000 pCl/t-may_be used.-
If no drinking wetor pathway exists, a value of 20 pCl/l may be used.
- Total for parent and daughter..
a This list does not mean these nuclides are the only ones considered. Other nuclidesl f identifled are also analyzed and reported when applicable.
1 1131- -
i
i TABLE A 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS WWlCH FAILED TO MEET THE Rf0VIRED LLD DURING 1990 Date temple Meditsn Anetysle Reauired LLD Obtained LLO locations 2/21/90 At 1 131 0.07 pCl/m3 0.083 pct /m3 CL 15b l 4/11/90 Al 1 131 0.07 pCl/m 3 0.11 pCl/m 3 CL 6b 1 5/9/90 Al 1 131 0.07 pcl/m3 0.88 pCl/m 3 CL 11b 10/10/90 Al 1 131 0.07 pcl/m3 0.15 pct, ' CL 1D !
10/24/90 Al 1 131 0.07 pC1/m3 0.49 pcl/m3 CL 7D a
Refer to Table 4 for location description.
b LLD not reached due to low sample volume, a
114
l TABLE A-3 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIB EXCEPTIONS FOR 1990
- 1. January 3, 1990, to April 25, 1990 Two-liter grab sample obtained on a weekly basis at-CL-91. Grab sample initiated because of a) ice formation in the vicinity, b) clogged / frozen-line.
- 2. January 31, February 28, and March 28, 1990 Grass samples not fresh green grass.*
- 3. January 31, 1990 CL-6 elapsed timer was off 8.4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> due to a power outage. Indicated elapsed time was used for sample calculation.
- 4. February 21, 1990 All air sampler elapsed timers were off due to an ice storm causing power outages; consequently, CL-15 did not obtain required minimum volume. Following is a listing of locations and elapsed timer differences:
LOCATION HOURS CL-1 4.0 CL-2 5.3 CL-3 5.2 CL-4 27.8 CL-6 27.8 CL-7 7.4 CL-8 13.0 CL-11 1.3 CL-15 97.0 CL-94 1.2
- 5. February 28, 1990 CL-1 air sampler elapsed timer was off 1.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />; this was attributed to power restoration'atter ice storm.
Indicated elapsed time was used for' sample calculation.
- Grass samples are normally anal.yzed wet. During winter months and drought conditions, the grass will dry up and die._ Dry, dead grass has a moisture content much lower than that of fresh green grass. Analysis of dry -
dead grass may be biased.
l 115'
l-TABLE A-3 (Cont'd)
- 6. March 28, and April 4, 1990 j CL-11 air sampler elapsed timer was off 1.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> on. -j March 28, 1990 and was off 1.4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />st on April 4, 1990.
The timer was replaced on April 4, 1990.- The indicated elapsed time was used for calculations.
- 7. April 6-to-April 18, 1990 -.i Power outage discontinued electric serviceito CL-6. 1 Sample volume for April 11 was: insufficient.- NoJsample was obtained on April 18. Powerfwas restored _.on-April 18, at 1625 hours0.0188 days <br />0.451 hours <br />0.00269 weeks <br />6.183125e-4 months <br />.
- 8. April 11, 1990- ;
Required vacuum of 16" Hg was not obtained,Euntil quick' disconnects were replaced.
- 9. May 2, 1990 i
CL-2 air sampler elapsed timer was:off 1.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, and the CL-3 air sampler elapsed timer was off 0.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> the reasons are unknown.-' j
- 10. May 9, 1990 -
CL-11_ power was found to be'out. The cord'was-apparently severed by a grass ~ trimmer. The, minimum +
(
required sample-volume was not'obtained. The cord was_ i repaired at 13341 hours on this' day. j
- 11. May 10, to May 16, 1990 CL-6 air sample shelter was blown over renderingLthe i air sample pump 1 inoperable.. This occurred during the! l{
process of installing a concrete pad-at?this< site. On May 11, temporary power-was-runito a,new air. sample shelter and permanent. power was installed'onLMay:15.
On May 16, the:CL-6tair" sample failed to obtain:the' minimum' required volume.- This was attributed to the-previous events:of the week.
,12. June :13, 1990 ,
CL-15 air sampler elapsed SimerJwas off12;77 hours8.912037e-4 days <br />0.0214 hours <br />1.273148e-4 weeks <br />2.92985e-5 months <br /> and ->
the CL-94-airisampler elapsedLtimer?was1off'2.9: hours' .
This may.have been caused by power outages' incurred' during severe thunderstorm ~ activity on the days c June 9 and 10.
1 I
1116
A
\
TABLE ~A-3 (Cont'd)
- 13. June 20, 1990=
CL-3 air' sampler elapsed timer was'not functioning.: ,
The indicated time was used for volume ~ calculation;- -
hence, minimum required volume was not achieved.- The i "
elapsed timer was replaced.
'i
- 14. June 27, and July _ 25,:1990-Due to insufficient growth.of swiss-chard, cabbage and l lettuce at CL-115;for June-27, no sample:WasDobtained.
- Insufficient growth of -lettuce; at CL-115 for July, 25:
-resulted:in~no sample being:obtained. L;i
- 15. August 29,.and-September 26,"1990 Lettuce was dead :at sites CL-114, and CL-117_; therefore, no-samples obtained for-these dates, i
- 16. October 10,: 1990 Electricity was; turned-off to the air samplesstation:at ;
CL-1.=-Electricity'was apparently' turned.off because:
the air sample' motor was. making la high-pitched-squeak. 'j The minimum required-sample volume was not achieved for= '
-this week-at CL-1,
- 17. October. 24,'1990- 4 CL-7.-air sample _ pump motor seized; therefore,athe-
~
minimum required sample. volume was notiachieved; i r!
- 18. November:14, 1990 ,
q t
CL-11 air sampler elapsed? timer:wasieff 2.6-hours,-of'
_)
which only-0.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> was accounted'for. The(remaining 2.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> was unaccounted-for._ Indicated 1 elapsed l time -
was-used:for: sample-volume calculat' ion.
^!'
- 19. December 12, 1990t 3 CL-94-' air sampler; elapsed: timer was?off:1~.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and; '
CL air sampler elapsed - timer: Was.-off 1.7Thours.. The areason for ithese = discrepancies 'is:: unknown. ; Elapsed:
timer readings were used L for_-~ sample. volume ' '
calculation. q q
f v
1 .
117- i
- l
. . . . . . . . . _ . . , ..,:,4 . , , , . , .; _, . , , :#L ,
1 i
TABLE A-3 (Cont'd) i
- 20. December 26, 1990 Grass samples were not collected due to snow cover.
- 21. January 2, 1991 CL-94 and CL-15-air' sampler elapseditimers were off:7.3' hours for the week of December 26, 1990 through January i 2, 1991. The reason-for this is; unknown; however, power may have been lost due to severe weather..
Elapsed timo readings were, used;for; sample volume calculations. .l l
1 s.
1 i
a o
e i
118
1 i
APPENDIX B REMP Sample Collection and Analysis Methods l
l l
l l
I 1
l 119-
TABLE B-1 CLINTON POWER STATION -
RACl0 LOGICAL ENVIROWENTAL MON!TORING PROGRAM -.-
St.NetARY OF SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS" I ~ Approximate - Tetedyne
- Sample Sample Site- Procedure Procedure
! - Analysis : Medium- rSamptino Method' Collected Number Abstract 80m3' Sample counted on a low levet gas flow * .
Ccntinuous air' ,TIML-AP-02
, Gross Beta' : AP;
- saapting through .- proportfonal counter..
-- ' fitter media.
' Grab' 7.6L TIMt.-W(DS)-01.-- .Sampte evaporated on a st'aintess steet' d WW .
ptanchet for tow-tevei gas f1ou proportional counting Grab ; 3.8ti . TIMI.-W(DS)-01 Sample evaporated on a staintess steet' l SW ~ ,
ptanchet.for tow-levet gas fIou proportional ceimting:
- SW - - : Composite.' ;3.8Lr T IMt.-W(DS)-01 - Sample evaporated on a stainless steet-c.
1m : ' planchet for to.e-level gas flow .
proportional rounting.
+
J VE . _ Grab- 2.5kg "'
TIML-As-01 Sampte' ashed for tow-tevet gas flow-proportional countingJ Grab /1.5-2.0kg ~ TIML-AB-01; Sample pulverized and dried for tow-level
- l ss ~
(gasflowproportionalcounting; k g.
~ w-
-ih-'l k
+a r Y ,
.- ^3
,e
, i u 4r <,-.,i-,-,,r.,
-~.r.~<-.,,.,,..m .._,..w,,,..
._a .x. . _ _ . . , ...mm.m.--_.... .
.um _ ,_,,m
%t*-. __..--r.__.___________< - --
D
.i
.k i
TA8tE B-1 (Cont'd)
Approximate Teledyne Sample- Sample Size Procedse Procedare t
' Analysis Medium Sams> tins Method Cottected skaber Abstract *
.]
Gross Beta SS Grab' 1.5-2.Okg .YlML-A8-01 Sample pulverized and dried for tow-tevel (cont'd) ges flow proportional comting
, Du composite 3.81 TIE -V(DS)-01 Sample evaporated on a stainless steet
. planchet for tow-levet gas flow .;
proportioneL comting P So . Grab 1.0kg TIML-AB-01 Sample pulverized and dried for tow-levet
.ra. .t
- p . gas flow proportionet counting t F
. th- AP - Composite- 3640m 3 TIML-GS Germanitse gamme isotopic annlysis
~ Spectroscopy.
G Grab 1.Okg TIML-GS-01 Gerusaltse gamme isotopic anetysis .j
.I Wu Grab 7.61 TIML-GS-01 Germanitse gesume isotopic anetysis [
~
su . ccuposite '3.8t- .TIML-GS-01 ~ Germanitse gammes isotopic analysis a
- VE - EGrab 2.5kg iIML-GS Germanitse gemas isotopic anotysis '
i es Grab . 1.5-2.0kg TIML-GS-01 Genmanism gamme isotopic anetysis ?
SS Grab ~ 1.5-2.0k g TIMt.-GS-01' Germantun gamme isotopic analysis
.rh.
,s-.
b
- 1
_ , . . - . .~. . .. . ~ . - - . ~ ~ - .h. ~ ; ~ ,- - e ~+r ~ e~-- ~r~ ~~ ~ ' , - - < - - ~ A * -- ~~ t
- - - ~ - ~~ ' ~
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ __. . . . _ _ . __ . _ .. .. m t
1 o >
i t
s 7
j 6
i 4 !
fatLE S-1 (Cont'd)
I-Approximate Teled e
, Sample - Sample Size Processre PrecedJre Analysis feedium Sampling Method Collected tumber , Abstract ;
= !
5.
i 2 . f.amme $L '., Grab 0.%g TIM-GS-61 Gerumnitse gonne isotepic anetysis j I
-Spectroscopy.
(cont'd) F Grab 2.Mg T84-GS-01 Geriumnissa genume isotopic anetysis e
94E - Grab 3.0kg , ~ TIE-GS-81 Gerumnitam gummum footepic anstysis j
, (
IM ' Composite 3.81 TI E -GS-01 Geresiniten gamme isMopic analysis H
- Su Grab 3.81 TIE-GS-61 Germanitse gamma tootopic a6#s [
' S0 Grab' -1.0kg TI E-GS-01 Gerunnitse gemuum iset.wie erotysis st -Grab 3.81 ' T194L-Gt-01 Germanitse samme isotopic anstysis i
- Direct gediation TL.D Continuous . m Tisit-TLD-01 Integret'st cf thermetty stianslated '
- . Exposure ~ visible photons [
i Gross Alphe - SW Composite 3.31- flout-WDS)-01 Sample ewsporeted on a steintess steet ptanctiet for Iow-tevet gas fIou !
proportier.et cotMing !
t
- . W Grab- T.61 ' TIpil-WDS)-01 Sample evaporated en a Steintess steet [
I planchet for low-tewet gas flow -
propretienet comming L
.l .
i
?
6
-e.,-
,g. r 3 , s.- , .~, , ,
r . , . - - -mv3 3 -. , ._ -.c nn i rc- , - - , ,s :.n i +- w_-. _.______.___.,_.u_m__._.._ _ _ _ _ .__. .__m .=.__._
l Thett g-1 (Cont *d)
Approximate Teledyne Sample Sample Size Procedure Procedure ,
^
Anelvsis Medise Sometine Method Cettected thaber Abstract
. Gross Alphe- as ' Grab 1.5-2.0kg TIE-As-01 semple'ptdwerized and dried for low-tewet ges flew proportional casiting
'(cent'd)~
I DW- Composite 3.81 TIE -W<DS)-01 Sample evaporated on steintess steet planchet for tow-tevet ges flow -l-proporttenet counting SO Grab - 1.0kg TIMt.-As-01 Saupte putverired and drled for Iow-tevet uK ges fIou proportlenet consiting iU, ss Grab- 1.5-2.0kg . TIE -As-01 sampte padwerized and dried for Iow-tevet ges flou proportionet cotriting 1.5-2.0kg TIE-se-06 wydrochteric acid teach and tow-tewet Sr-90 . BS . Grab-ses flow proportlenet corriting ss - Grab - 1.5-2.0kg TIE-St-06 Wydrochtoric acid teach and tow-tewet ges flow proportionet cotriting M Grab-- 3.81 . TIM-St-07 SWe chemicalty seperated and dried for low-tewet ses flew proportionet c m ing Couposite . 3.81 TI E-T-02 Distittetion fottoued tv counting in a
.Tritfue. . SW '
tIqtsid scintittotion cowiter b
--J---- - - . - - .-
'. i.' u-
_c_ . _ _ . .
. . _ . . .. -- _. . _ _____m 1
j .. I i
b~
i !
t 3
49
- . TASLE 8-1 (Cent'd) [
Approximate Teledyne. I I Sample - Sample size- Procedsre Precedsre
- v. l
!~ Anotysis . Medius Samplina Method Cotteeted suuber Abstreet !
- F t
1.
Trittun DW' Composite . 3.81.. TIE -T-02. Distillation fetteued by counting in e -
. -(cont'd) timid scintittetieri cemter ;
i L 3' su Grab 11.41 TI E-T-02 Distittation followed tv conting in a .f
{ tignid scintittetion co mter .
1 e
-w- Grab 22.81 . TIE-T-02 . sistittetten fottomed by comtIns in e i
, [; .n ligsid scintittetion comter
,- s. c a
- l .su Grab 3.8t' IIE -T-02' .Distittotion foitoued by co m ting in e {
- ligeld scintittation comter l
- i. !
- I-131- i ME ' Grabi 3kg. TIE-GS-01 Gerunnite gamme isotopic emlysis !
,=
' {
r
. AIL ~ Contir== eir -- 280E TIM -t-131-02 ~ Gerunnits samme isotopic anstysis sempting through- [
' fitter media f
! [*
TIE-t-131-03
~
f' , su Grab. - 3.8t . : ten enchange and propertienet beto co mting w' Grab ; 7.61: . TIE -I-131-03 ten enchange and propertionet beto co m ting
. I JG Grab . .1.0kg T*E -GS-01 Gerumnite gamme isotopic anstysis L
~ ! .' M - Grab - ., 3.8t ' TIE *I-131*01 ton enchange ord preportic. net beto counting 1
i
?
1 +
-- , , . - -. . ._ . - s_ a ._, ,
. , - . . _ . . ~ __ - . . _ ~. . ., a. . . . . . _ _ _ . . _ _
TABtf 8-2 1990 RE4P SAMPt TNG AND ANALYSIS FeEQUEuCT St***ARY I
Nu eer of Ntaber of Mirber of i Type of Analysis Samples Sanple Sappling Cottection Samples FrerJJenCY *n8Iyled*
Tyce locations Frecuency Cottected Anstysis Gross Beta weekly 515 Air Particulate 10 Weekly $15 Game Isotopic Quarterty Corposite 40 515 todine-131 Weekty 515 Air lodine to weekly Quarterly 331 Game Exposure Our,rterly 331 Direct Radiation 83 (TLD)
(continuous) 48 Gama isotopic Montfily 48 Surface Water 4 Monthly (Grab)
Tritfus' Ouerter1y Composite" 12 Gross Beta Monthly 48 Tritius' Monthly a 12 g -
2J Ut 24 Garans Isotopic w thly 24 surface urter 2 Monthly Trit ture Monthly 24 (Intake Corposite)
Gross Beta Monthly 24 Gross AlphaD Monthly D 12 12 Garmss setopie Monthty 12 Surface uater 1 Monthty Gross Beta Monthty 12
--(EffIuent Composite)
Gross Alpha Monthly 12 Tritius Quarterly Composite &
Todine-131 Monthly 12 I
todine-131 Semimonthly 78 vett uater c 2 Semimonthly 78 Gross Alpha Monthly Corposite 36 Gross Seta Monthly Composite 36 Game isotopic Monthly Corposite 36
~-
TABLE B-2 (Cont'd)
IPmber of Nisber of ut.sdaer of sampting Cottection samples Type of Analysis sanples Sample tocations F requmey Cottected Analysis frequency Anelyree Tee Drinking Water 1 Merrthly 12 Gross Atstia Monthly 12 Gross seta Monthly 12 Ca m a Isotopic Monthly 12 Tritius cuarterly composite 4 7 semiamust ty 13 Gross Afgha Semiarnualty 13 Sottoer Sediments Gross Beta Semiamust t y 13 Ganuma !setopic Semiamust ty 13 Sr-90 Semiennustty 13 Gross At;ha Seef amually 16 y shoreline Sediments 8 psalamuelty 16 Gross Bete semismually 16 m
Game Isotopic Semiannually 16 sr-90 SemiamuelIy 16 Aquatic Vegetation 6 Semiannuatty/Simonthly 22 Gansna Isotopic Seef s-muel ty/timenthly 22 (April - October)d 5 Monthly /Semisenthly 90 Gausna Isotopic Monthly /Semisonthly 90 Grass (May - October) (inchsfing 1-131) vegetables 3 Monthly (during 28 Gross sets Montrity 28 g o ing season) Cauria Isotopic Marithly 23
-(including I-131)
Fish 2 semiamust ty 16 Cama Isotopie semiannustty 16 Monthly /Semianonthly 19 Ganuma Isotopic sionthly/Sesiaant%ty 19 Milk 1 (May - October) Iodine-131 Monthly /semiarnthly 19 Sr-90 Monthly / Semimonthly 19
. . . . . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ . = . . . _ _.
q, t
+ t 4 ~ j e :
i :. >
1
'4 i TABLE 8-2 (Cont'd) s i: Number of ' skaber of Number of 7
Sample sampting' ' Cottection samples Type of analysis samples ;
LType toestiens Freesency ColIected Anetysis Fre @ encY Aret vred* -i n l 1 : Meat -1 Annuetty 3 Gamme Isotopic Annustty 3 !
.. (aAen avaltabte) - (including I-131) 4 i f
V !
~
I
- ' Ntaber of samples anatyred does not include delicate analysis, recounts or rennetys!s.
1' i
, - i
- a-p j" 3 ,pges taken et CL-93 are anstyred monthly for tritissa, att other surface water grab samples are composited for wterly anetysis. ;
3 .. I I A !
Samples taken at CL-92 are not anatyred for gross alpha.
L C Samples collected at CL-12 are taken prior to water treatment and af ter water treeteent.
.. ?
!' .y .
'd~ .. samples are collected Semiannuetty at CL-105 and almonthly at att other tocations frasi Aprit to October.
I
- n. ;
r i
i l
i -[
i i
4 1
4 p
?- ;
1 i
!? .s1. j a- r
- { '
I 1
.t j
^
_~ .= _ L . _ - _ . _ _ .w u,- . . ~~ .w. . . _
, .c , - . . . . . , . . = _ . . . _ _ - . - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ . _ .
l TAstf M RADIOLOGICAL EwtrtRouMENTAL teF2 )fluG PROGRmt meM SumARY meme of Facility: Clinton Power Statiore Decitet No. 50-461 Location of Facility: DeWitt, fltinois Reporting Period Jarusory 1 - Dec. ember 31. 1990 (county, state)
Location witit. Control alus6er of feedius or ~ Type of' Lower Limit All Indicator Michest arouset steen Locations: manreutine Patheser Sampted : Anotysis of - Locations:
game feean(f) stean(f) Reported (thit of ' Totet uusber Detection 'feeen(f)
Distance and Direction (Range) (Range) seesourguents feeeeurement)- Performed -(LLD) (Range)
-CL-34 21.4(4/4)* 18.4(s/s) 0 TLD sen 17.1(323/323)
Ep LDirect Radiation' - 0.8 mites imme , (20.2 - 22.1) (15.2 - 20.9)
_ (sa/etr) - 83- (10.6 n 24.3)
CL-2 8.622(52/52) 0.022t51/52) 0
' Air Porticutetes. ~ Gross Sete 10.01 0.021(&S9/459)b .
(0.006 - 0.061) 0.7 miles sue (0.0S8 - 0.038) (0.008 - 0.060) f (pti/sE) E '515
- ,' Gasse' spec
.sg CL-11 8.059t&/4) 0.059(4/4) 0
. se 0.05l 0.053(36/36).
(0.33 - 0.070) 16 miles s- (0.066 0.874) (0.066 - 0.076)
LLD LLD 0 Co-60! 0.014 : 'LLD- --.
i Wu-103 LLD .
- LLD 'LLD 0-Ru-106' i0.015 LLD
'- LLD- - LtD 0 Cs-134 0.001' LLD LLD Li.D 0
- 9.001 - -
~
- LtD 0 Ce-141 -0.006 LLD tid -
- LLD - LLD 0 Ce-1&& .-- 0.005- LLD.- .
c sootei cotum emptanations at the end of Tabte B-3.
s e
i a.
f f .
oid t e ut r o r u hr s # r M n poe s c e e 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
)
- ) 5 s
v 2
) ) 1 4 t & /
oi f e g 2 -
r t ( 1 n c n n t a ( 1 a a D 5 D D D D D D D D D D o o e t( L 1 A L A L L L L L L L L L C L M L 2 ( m L R L L L L L L L L L
)
e g
n a ) 7
)
)
)
7 t 2 2 )
( 1 3 1 1 2
) / / 1 f n e
1 1
- 5 -
(
/
1 t
ni ( 9 2 9 ( .
n e a t D 0 3 & D D D oD D D D oD _
e c L 1 0 3 L L L t L L L t t L -
M ai r er L 3 ( 1 ( 2 - L L L t L L L L t t .
i _
! D _
h a E _
i t u d n
V S E N u S
) e r
m a _
d A s s s n e e e e
'tn o t i s c
n t
i l
i t
i r
o t e a 3 s 1 m 3 e C a e t 9-( ch oi t m s a i L 4
9 L
- 1 9
L
- 4 _
3 L W n D - C 0 C 6 C 0 - - - - - - - - - - _
B -
E _
L .
B _
A T
r o
t ) )
a : ) 6 ) 7 2 4 )
ic s n 7 4 2 1 8 d o ) ) / / 4 ni f e g 1 - 3 - /
I t ( 7 1 1 a
c n n a a
( 6 ( 6 (
t D 7 4 D D D D D D D o0 D
_ t o e R L 1 1 0 3 L L L L L L L t t L A L M ( L 2 ( 1 ( 2 - L L L E L L L L L L t
i m n i o L i t
r c )
e e D 7 0 0 0 w t L 0 0 0 G 5 0 0 0 0 of eL 0 2 0 0 L oD ( 0 2 2 2 0 - - 5 1 5 5 6 1 1 r
e s 6 a e c f is wed wm t
s e t A s e
p S
osy r o s s u
a el l
a f 1
s s i 1 m
4 9 80 5 5 5 p a r 3
o t 3 7 0 5 5 5 6 6 9 9 y n t
o e 1 5 o i 1 m - - - - - -
- 1 r 4 r 4 r 2 - 2 a 4 e - ne o o nb r T A T P t 5 C 8 G 2 T 5 1 1 C 2 B K M F C C z m Z d
e t r c
n
)
t s e
t a n e a rS e n W o f m i) a o er y d3 e) m uw om ct t u t / a /
ih i s i f i d t e a n e r C p
rup c U e i M P ( M A ( S (
[@
l
taste 9-3 (Cont *d)
Location with Contret Number of
- Medium or ; Type of Loeser Lleit Att Indicator fliehest Amust noen tocationst monroutine
. Patheev Sampled Anotysis. of Locations:
name steen(f) steentf) Reported (Unit of" Totet W - Detection- steen(f)
(Range)- Distance and Direction (Range) (Range) Meesurements IIeesurement)- Performed (LLD)-
- LtB LLD 0 surface unter-
~
Cs-134: -5.0 LLD'
- LLD LLD 0 (cont'd) Cs-137 -5.0 LLD
~- -
- LLD LLD 0 Ce-144- 30.0 LLD I-2.0 2.2(12/12) CL-14 L2(12/123 m o ,
u :- -trinkins unter" Gross sete '
'O' (1.5 - 2.7) 0 sites (1.5 - 2.7)
-(pCf/t) . 12
- Gross Alphe: 2.0 ' O.5(1/12) CL-14 0.5(1/12) m 0
- 12
- O mile. -
- LLD m 0 l
- Tritius"-
200 LLD -
Ga m Spec '
12
- LLD ~
LLD . M 0
. Se-T LLD' .- .LLD M 0 K-40~ --
LLD- mA 0-
' pen 5.0 - LLD ' ----
' ' ' 12.0 . LLD
-- LLD m 0 Fe-59 -
LLD - . nn .O co-58 5.0' - LLD
'- , Lto sea . 0 Co-60 ~ 5.0 , . LtD
- LtD mA 0-
. Zn-65 - 6.0 . . - LLD ~
LLD' ' #4 0
- asb-95 ~10.0- LLD
- LLD MA 0
- Zr-95 -- 10.0 LLD
---o. - - - - - - -
'm.
_, _- m m_.- .- -- ---h - - - u,- _ . - ---
i
[
A ,
.. t
!: L TA*LE 8-3 (Cont'd) s
'[
~
- t g Meditse or.1 Type of Louer Limit Att Indicator Location neitti Control skaber of -
r
{ Pathuey Sampled :
,(Unit of Anotysis
. Totat glimber of Detection Locations:
stean(f)
Nighest Annuel steen steen(f)
Locations: Isonroutine Reported i
Isame steen(f) feessurement) - Performed. (LLD) .(tange) Disterre and Direction (Range) (tense) seesourements :
4 i l Drinking Water.' Cs-134 - 5.0 ~ LLD -
LLD sea 0
'(cont'd)- Cs-137 5.0 LtD -
tLD mA 0 i - se-140- '- LLD -
LtD sea 0 to-140 --
LLD -
LLD IIA 0
~
r
.-H.
t,a Dett Weter ~
Gross sete.
~
f.1-7D 3.0 - 2.0(34/36) .CL-12(T)* 2.7(12/12) mA 0 p/ (pci/t) 36 CL-12 3.7 - -(0.9 -'4.1)' 1.6 miles E (1.9 - 4.1) I 4
. Gross Alphe CL-70 3.0 1.2(5/36) CL-12(u) 1.8(1/12) 18 4 ' 0 36 CL-12 3.7 (0.8 - 2.2) 1.6 miles E - ,
i-
~
'l 0.5 i I-131 LLD .- LLD 10 4 0
~ 78 i
- Tritium- 200 LLD -
LLD IIA 0 12 '
l
. Gamme spec'
. 36 -
2 l
3 . .l. Se-7 .- -LLD -
LLD h4 0 l
~ >
K-40 -- L- LLD .-' LLD mA e r I
pen-54 ' 5.0 LLD -
LLD mA 0 '
l' -
' Fe-59 . - 12.0 LLD . --
LLD sea - 0 :
[ - Co-58 L _ 5.0 LLD -
LLD sea 0
~
. Co-60: ' 5.0 ' LLD -
LtD mA 0
[ Zn-65 - 6.0 - .LLD' -
.LLD WA 0 g .
4-e.
f
_a .m_ . _... . . ,.m, ., ,., , ,,, . _ - _, - - _ . , _
t J- >
g ..s
,u. i p~ t l
I t - TABLE 8-3 (Cont'd)
~
.$?
f' ...
.1 1 . Med'issa or ' -
Type of Lower Limit All Indicator Locatiert erith Control #taber of i
' i Pathuev Samoted Anotysis -of Locations: miehest Annust sneert Locations: nonroutine j U (Unit of.- Totet misber Detectiert steen(f) name sneen(f) steen(f) soported l b Meesurement) Performed ..( LLD) (Range) Distance and Direction (Range) (Range) steesurements f I
- uet t Water :- seb-95 10.0 LLD -
LLD WA 0 f (cont'd) Zr 10.0 LLD -
LLD sen 0 ;
Cs-134 - 5.0 ' .LLD -
LLD m 0 , 5.0 0
,Cs-137'. -LLD -
LLD mA l Ba-140 - LLD = LLD lea 0 I 'Le-140 .. LLD - LLD WA 0 ! Ce-1441 30.0 LLD - LLD R4 0
- . 63 .
. u- . . .u; t 5:ltit d 1-131 0.5 un - ma na llc 0 f (pCf/t)~ [19 ? l t
t- .
- sr-90 ; 1.0 ; : um - CL-114 2.1(19/19) '2.1(19/19) ~ 0' !
19 " 14 arites WSU (1.0 - 3.33 (1.9 - 3.3) 6
. .r
- _19c r e
5 se-7 ma s een mA. _ LLS - 0 -[ i K . : .. ma ..CL-116 1218(19/19) 1218(19/19) 0 ( 14 imites usu .(1120-1310) (1120-1310) { sen-54 . 5.0 ' mA sea - . een . ttD 0 .; Fe-59 12.0- mA set MA itD 0 ; Co-58 ' 5.0 na na na . . LLs 0
- Co ' 5.0 - mA ^ . ma mA LLD 0 {
..In-651 6.0 " mA mA .. ~ma LLD 0 ;
esb-95' ~10.0 inn sea - ma . LLD 0 Zr-95 , :10.0 -- ma - sen set .. LLD 0 L T h h
.._...._- m, , _ _ , , , , . , . . . .. , . _ . _ , ~, __ , . . , _ . ,, _ , , , . . _ , , _ _ _. . _ _ , ,, ,
. , , . . , , . __ . _t
1 1 t 1 j 1 , 1 1.! y canaa oa aceaaaaaoeaoaao. 8 , i -W. - I" I y% n O ^l S sW*4 n'
~
$s8 . -
- sS .S, ss. S S S, SS$SSSSSSSSSS-SS ss ssssssss-ssss a
h *
. . -a 0
~
5-e
)"I"[- 55i15 S*n s u 4 S sas SSS$$SS s $'S-9 ss. 9 9. s99a ,
- E i
? .hf }* .-
t { :E "t I s-l .; e g4 f5 . i ; r sE#5 11111 . d2.1 . . . .< + .. .. . .. .- 4 h. I g xo .. -8 - n- t 1It Oa I' ; [. g ;C
':<s 8 .
- 15 = 15 S,u.
4 o S.lS
.ss..S S .S S ssa S S'S s .S s d aSaSSSss r
L L aa a a ea^ b s1E6 AA. . R . .
.d's a a a a d ..'d d .;. ..d' "
s naaa n' n.s*1J sun - - L <u,na m , tun3nus -
,. . ~ e w ;
?
-r
^!
I i
- d 'M ,'-
-b l- - -t L;
, : ?
}I -
5 cy s g 2" : R 4
.} V - .,
o.
-~ . ,
'h
- 133' e -
m_..-.._ ._._--.-w..- _ _ . . - . . . . , . . . . . . . . _ . . ,-.-.--_,_.-.---._-,s . _ . . . ~ , . .
1 l TABLE 8-3 (Cont'd) Location with Control wsster of Medium or Type of Lower Limit Alt Indicator Locat ters: Nighest Annual M*en Locations: Nonroutine Pathway Sampled Analysis of name Mean(f) mean(f) Reperted (Unit of Total Nuter Detection Mean(f) (Range} Distance and Direction (Range) (Range) Measurements Measurement) Performed (LLD) 0.10 17.7(11/11) CL-10 23.8(2/2) 23.7(2/2) 0 sottom sediments Gross Beta (pci/g dry) 13 (6.7 - 33.8) 5.0 miles ENE (23.6 - 24.0) (22.2 - 25.1) 0.30 10.3(8/11) CL-7C 12.5(2/2) 12.3(2/2) 0 Gross Alpha 13 (5.8 - 14.5) 1.3 cites SE' (12.3 - 12.7) (10.4 - 14.2) 0.C22(5/11) CL-7C 0.030(1/2) 0.020(1/2) 0 sr-90 0.02 13 (0.c14 - 0.031) 1.3 miles SE - - W Gama Spec ta y 13 0.49(1/11) CL-7C 0.49(1/2) LLD 0 Be.7 -
- 1.3 mites SE - -
10.80(11/11) CL-7C 14.73(2/2) 14.26(2/2) 0 K-40 - (5.77 - 15.48) 1.3 miles SE (13.97 - 15.48) (13.40 - 15.12) 0.05 LLD - LLD LLD 0 Mn-54 0.10 LLD - LLD LLD 0 Fe-59 0.04 LLD U.D LLD 0 Co-53 0.04 LLD - LLD LLD 0 Co-60 0.10 LLD - LLD LLD 0 2n-65 0.06 LLD - LLD LLD 0 mb-95 0.07 LLD - LLD LLD 0 2r-95 0.04 LLD - Ltp LLD 0 Cs-134 0.03 0.25S(6/11) CL-10 0.44(2/2) 0.38(2/2) 0 Cs-137 (0.053 - 0.45) 5.0 miles eke (0.42 - 0.45) (0.36 - 0.39) LLD - LLD LLD 0 Ba-140 - LLD LLD LLD 0 ta-140 - 0.30 LLD LLD LLD 0 Ce-144 0.65(10/11) CL-105 1.24(2/2) 1.24(2/2) 0 Ac-228 - (0.21 - 1.36) 50 miles s (1.05 - 1.42) (1.05 - 1.42) l l
._ _ _ . , _ . _ . . - .. - . . . -. .__ _ . . . _= . ._m_. _
F. i 4 1 i 1A8tE B-3 (Cont'd) I = i !
< Medium or.'- Type of Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Control Numtwr of f t
- Pathesay Saapted ' Anotysis- of Locations: Michest Annual Mean Locations: Nonroutine (Unit of totat Number Detection 'Meen(f) name Meen(f) Meen(f) Reported '
, , Meesurement). Performed (LLD) (Range) Distance and Direction (Range) (targe) Meesurements l l, Gotton' Sediments 81-212 - LLD - LLD LLD 0 i} I (cent'd) si-214- :- 0.61(7/11) CL-7C 0.91(2/2) 0.67(2/2) 0 f l1 (0.12 - 1.04) 1.3 miles SE (0.78 - 1.04) (0.62 - 0.71) !
- .. Ptr212 -
0.73(11/11) CL-10 1.47(2/2)' - 1.43(2/2) 0 (0.17 - 1.67) 5.0 miles ENE (1.42 - 1.51) (1.42 - 1.43) 'i Pb-214' ' - 0.52(11/11) CL-7C 1.13(2/2) 0.80(2/2) 0 'f r (0.14 - 1.33)-' 1.3 mites SE (0.93 - 1.33) (0.70 - 0.99) i , . p Re-226 - 1.14(11/11) CL-7C 2.49(2/2) 2.14(2/2) 0 <;u- f (0.25 - 3.24)- 1.3 miles SE (1.73 - 3.24) (1.% - 2.31)
'11-208 .- O.57(11/11) CL-7C 1.15(2/2) 1.05(2/2) 0 (0.19 - 1.39). 1.3 miles SE (0.90 - 1.39) (0.98 - 1.11) .i
~
it ' shoreline sediments - 4 Gross seta 0.10 - 18.9(14/14) CL-89 11.0(2/2) 8.6(2/2) 0 ( ! ~(pci/s dry) 16 (5.3 - 11.9) 3.6 miles WWE - (10.1 - 11.9) (7.6 - 9.6) I t 2 i , ' Gross Algha~ 0.30 - '4.6(3/14)' CL-93 5.5(1/2) LLD 0 16 - ..(4.0 - 5.5). 0.4 mites su - - I
'5r-90 ' /0.02 0.034(1/14). 'CL-93; 0.034(1/14) 'LLD G
.16 - --
0.4 miles SW - i
-F i
e
- +,
. t j .- 1._
- j l I 1
.~..
,, . , _ _ . [ . . _- . ,; 4., , r. ~ _, -- ~ , . . . __
%5 1
.I e o ooooooooo oooo ao k 3 I ~ s' ~s n O *- E_'
.3* >
yE _l g3 g 5s I .f ' - e . 8. M. s s, s s. e $ s e s s .=s e e . s e . a .... ass a s so-so . q
- a
( *a-e8 -s 3
~ q -
c $'S* g3:4 0-3- 3' j
)
{
"s*s$se$sess8
--o- .s sa a ao . s e asso9 *s
.s,X
- o. S i
E !
?
g (f 5*
]
- 3 8
I 8 I 8 I? 8 3
'I i
*8 e -gi u
o Q$ { .g ,
- 2. 4 g .a
- g. _ *a 9 sE=3 dad 4. .. .-.
. . . . d 4 . . . d 4: da s
t A M s-38! -
- .: x e x=
- _ :; - -a
- M
.. x s . s s -
jI a a R.3. U 4 >. 'd.
"I U $( U"
= 8 'f
<s -
Rq[~Coon -a ss- . a sssssao e $ eh$ ess .
..so s s e.s .s o -
Re s9s a
** I 1s -
s O. a oo s . .. . oo. . . . . o.. . .: 4 y,351
,1 -
j
- n. w . aan . .,w ,oan s _an
- as 1 *i I18 8 A I h S-S- T A S h i' .ii T .5
.j 0 -3 <
sj v 1- .,, le 5 :.
$I t}2 5- N 3.
,-]J
-. a gg_ -.__- - -
-136 1 o Or, 1 1
TABLE 8-3 (Cent *d) l l Location with Control sksuber of !
- Itedlun or. . Type of. Lower Limit Att Indicator Locations: Niehest Arsiuol Mean Locations: nonroutine j Petfussy Saapted fnelysis of mese lesentf) steerif) Reportad 24t of Tc*d slumber Detection 14een(f)
(Range) Distance and Direction (aange) (aange) semesurements steesurement) . Werformed- (LLD)
~- 0.24(14/14) . CL-89 0.36 u/2) 0.23(2/2) 0
. f- Shoretine sediments Ptr212
.(0.12 - 0.49) 3.6 mites muE (0.30 - 0.42) (0.20 - 0.26)
.-i(cont'd) - 0.18(2/2) 0 Ptr214 -- 0.22(14/14) CL-93 0.42(2/2)
(0.11 - 0.42) 0.4 miles su (0.41 - 0.42) (0.13 - 0.23)
.0.65(12/14) CL-93 1.49t2/2) 0.46(2/2) 0 Jae-226' --
(0.29 - 1.58) 0.4 miles su (1.40 1.58) (0.27 - 0.64)
~
ft.20s- -' O.21(14/14)- CL-89 0.3t(2/2) 0.20(2/2) O P- (3.12 - 0.38) 3.6 mites umE (0.23 - 0.38) (0.13 - 0.26) uu
,Q:
[ Aquatic Vegetation" - Gamme Spec
.(pci/g vet) ' 22 0.94(12/20) CL-19 1.52(3/4) 0.59(1/2) 0 se-T
~
(0.38 - 2.55). 3.4 miles E' (0.68 - 2.55) - 2.47(20/20) CL 3.28(4/4) 3.20(2/2) 0
.K-40. ' -
- ,(1.00 - 5.18) 3.4 miles E (1.52 - 4.65) (1.70 - 4.70)
LtD LLD '0 sh .0.02 - LLD i 0.04- LLD - LLD ' LLD 0 Fe 0.01 - -LLD - LLD LLD 0 co - 0.01 0.20(1/20) : CL 19 0.20(1/4) LLD 0 Co-60: 3.4 srites E " .-
-- . ~ . - - - - - . - . - - . - - - .
- -_.a - - - . , . _ . - . -
. , , - - ~
- m. .a- .a: v-
_ .~ _. ._. _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . - - _ . _ _ - . _ _ _ . ~ - . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . - - . _ _ . _ I i t
%5 a
l3I . ooooo ooo o a- o .ooooooo ; m E o . .
. ~$ ?~8
" ** S&. 8 d E d. :
I .- E.
-no s, t.&. i e: =m s^. : $ .
5'I - -[ m-m
.us .
SS.SSgdSS.,S
- s. s. o-s.
a I! m-4 ,
".d"4$s'aasSSSSS$
o-m- s i k
^ ~
~ n AR Rf S '-
.f*
, e a. -d-d It . -
o -Y &.
- 2 0 $~~3 s-- 4 S '
SSS s* 4 $
- 5 g I .5 t g
9.,999.4 a s ". o e a a .a - m-
"d9: mSa o-- w 9.a 9a 9.4 9.a9a 9
. s-
=
?~ .f y
]*
g W 8
=
8
.W m 8zm
'E r
- b. 5. j" V
. .A.
' ;8
.. ". ~ .
3 ._ a = . . . d u, d o. _ d o, d _ .....1. m a ... . . . . 2 3
- A A -
b N --
^
6 - g- - g .. a
's R 2 d -g '.;
6-d t* " i g - c, s- .E..ta
- .-.8 u [
- 9 9 .9 9 *t.-as ass.
co
' d S S .S m-
.J a-
'"d m , se-oEs-4 c - m - s s,s a s S S S S'S'S a
.4 s M
E ; 5 ' 3-
- ooo. '
s oat - ddddd ..:d.. =.- .; d d d d d:d d - 4 34
- w -- ; k , ---
d . g 's g A B 2 3 3, f. s. ,_ .g g g g g:s s : 3}35! A146b i i ~b "5a d:a k1 A 1-'b's A 1 4 j E' i ti~
~
9 _-- (: e _,g. -
,8
..4 8 .1 r_ .
r n o 3y , ; .g o . 5y eE . .
; ,s,_ .;
Es 3 5
- [R
-E l I
( t. , l
- 138
~ ~
.n ';
,,m, ,+- . - . ,--~,.cv.e , , , .-. 4 r , .m . . . - .< --a, *. . ;, ,m ,
9 - TABLE B-3 (Cont'd) Location with Controt estaber of stedium or Type of Lower Lielt All Indicator Anetysts - of - ' Locations: Miehest Arww.ast sneen Locations: Nonroutine Pathway Samoted Isame feeen(f) steen(f) Reported
--(Unit of- .Totat er Detection steen(f)
(Range) Distance and Of rection (Range) (Range) tecessansents feessurement) Performed (LLD) LLD LLD 0 Vegetables ' I-131 - ' 'O.02 LLD LLD LLD 0
'(cont'd) Cs-134 '
. 0.C2 LLD LLD LLD 0 Cs-137 0.02 LLD LLD LLD 'O so-140 . LLD
'- LLD LtD .. LLD 0 La-140
- LLD LLD 0 ce-144 - , 0.08-- LLD
-p.
w.
- W- ! Grass Gamme Spec f(pci/g eset) - 90
.. 2.83(72/72) CL 3.46(13/18) 2.71(18/18) 0 se-7 -.
(0.12 - 17.10)' O.7" miles nNE (0.67 - 17.10) (0.26 - 10.30) .
^
K140 - -
^ 5.13(72/72)' CL 6.08(18/18) 5.57(18/18) 0' (1.90 - 9.57) 2.2 miles E (3.27 - 9.57) (3.13 - 9.34) pen-54 ' O.015 g LLD - - -
LLD LLD - 0 0
-. 0.04 ' -LLD -
- LLD LLD Fe-59 ,
LLD LLD -0
' 'Co-58 0.02. LLD -
' 0' 0.02: LLD -
LLD. LLD Co-60
;0.04 - LtD -- -"' LLD - LLD 0 LIn-65 0.02 LLD LLD LLD 0 Mb-95
- ~ 0.03 - ' LLD - -
LLD LLD 0 2r-95 0.01, '- ' LLD LLD- 0 I-131 .. LLD 0.014i LLD - LLD LLD 0 Cs-134 0.015- 0.026(4/72) : . LL - 0.049(1/18)- 0.069(1/18) 0
- Cs-137.
(0.017 -. 0.034) 16 a:4ies s - -
* . LLD
- LLD LLD 0 Sa-140
-. : LLD LLD . LLD- 0
, .La-140-LLD - LLD 0
-Ce-144 0.08 LLD -
,v-n-
-i,.-i,.-c . . - . , _- - c
.-------.,-ia 1_..n =i-4i... .i.
mai s-<a .-
-imm. idig gium r - . .,,.-.u-<
. -wca..- ----.-,--is.-. -
si -..-.a .. .c. -- u. . --, . - m.i.. .--
,u.,%,,-.mio,._-.. . ...--.... , o r -
TA8tE 5-3 (Cont *d) Att Indicator tocation with Control skaber of
' Medius or Type of ~ Lower Limit nichest amust stean tocations: monroutine Pathway sampled Anotysis of Locations:
.mame Mean(f) feeen(f) Reported (Unit'of . Total W Detection Mean(f).
(Range) Distance and Direction (Range) (Range) fecesureusents , Meesurement.) Performed (LLD) I Meet' - ~Casme Spec ?
--(pci/s wet) 3
- LLD mA 0 )
se-7 - LLD CL-106- 1.55(3/3)- mA 0 E - 1.55(3/3) (1.14 - 2.15). 2.0 miles muE (1.14 - 2.15)
- LLD NA 0 Mn-54 ' O.02 LLD 0
- LLD- NA
.$ " Fe-59 ~ 0.04 LLD
- LLD NA 0 O , Co-58: 0.02 LLD
- LLD mA 0 Co-60 0.02 .LLD
- -LLD WA 0 Zn-65_ 0.05 - LLD
- LLO mA ~0 mb-95 0.01 ~ "LLD
- LLD' mA 0 Zr-95 0.02- LLD
-- - LLD - mA 0
-Ru-103 - -LLD
- LLD' mA 0 Ru-1D6 - LLD
- LLD 10 4 - 0
^ I-131 0.06 LLD
- .LLD- h4 0 Cs-134- 0.01 LLD
- LLD- sen 0 Cs-137' O.01 LLDE
' LLD - -LLD NA - 0 se-140. -
- LLD mA 0
'La-140 - LLD.
-- : LLD ' - LLB mA ' O Ce-141
- LLD mA . O Ce-144T 0.05 -LLD J(a)- ~ uignest' quarteely seen ' .
(b) - Values escluded due to insuf ficient sample volume cettected
"(c), ' (T) Treeted weit water sample or (U) Untreated wett noter sample -
(d) . No indicator sample .tocation exists,' no milk producing animets within 10 miles of CPS t e) ;-- no control sample location exists
- - - z:_____._-- _ _. .. _ _ . _
TABLE 9-3 (Cont'd) l Att Indicator Locaticn with Contret uts6er of Medium or Type of tower Limit Analysis locations: Wi@est Amunt Maan Locetions: sonroutine Pathway Sancted of Name Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported (tJnit of Total munber Detection stean(f) (Range) Distance and Direction (Aange) (Range) Measurements Measuremer:t) Performed (LLD) Cottrn 4 Cotum 5 Colum 6 Cotten 7 Column 1 Cotum 2 Cotum 3 TABLE EXPLAI:ATIONS: The unit of Measurement describes att the numerical values for LLD, Mean and Range reported for a particular sample medias. Emanote: . j' Colunn 1: the Cross Beta LLD in AIR PARTID>LATES is 0.010 pci/aE. Albreviations used are: pCi/a} = picoeurie per esbic eeter of sanpted air; I eR/cpaarter = exposure sensured for calendar quarter period; pCi/t = picocurie per titer of sapple; pCi/g = picoeurie per [ gram of sanple. F8 Cotum 2: The Types of Analyses are described as foitows: cansne Spec = measurement of each radielsetope in a sample using Ganina Spectrosemy; Gross Beta = eemsureeent of the radioactivity in a sample by measuremeM of emitted betas - re determination of individust radioisotopes is possible; Tritium = measurement of tritius (n-3) in sappte by liquid scintittation counting method; 7tD = dir xt sessurement of gaene exposure using thersoluminescent dosimeters. Column 3: LLD reported is the highest of those reported for each type of analysis during the year; if att analyses reported positive values, no LLD is reported. Colunn 4: Samples taken at Indicator Locations daring an operational radiological environnentat monitoring program (REMP) reliably measure the quantities of any radioisotopes cycling through the pethways to man from tr.e rastear station. The reported values are the mean or "f" is the fraction of all the samples taken average for the year of att samples of that type which had values greater than the LLD. at att irdicator tocations for the mediue Aich reported values greater than the LLD. Esarpte: 7 resutts greater than LtD out of T5 sanples taken would be reported 7/15. The Range is the values of the tcwest *o hir, hest sanple results greater than LLD reported at att the indicator tocations for that medium. Cotum 5: The Mean, f-fraction and Range along with the name of the tocation, distance front the CPS gaseous ef f tuent stect in miles, and tLe letter (s) name of the conpass sector in the direction of the sample tocation from the CPS gaseous ef fluent stack. The location with the highest annual mean is corpared to both indicator and contro! tocations of the medius sammtes.
il1{l! ; de e c d
~
n e e e r c e x f e er e r f h i t s e ,ru t f d a e h e s t r u s f sg e t i r a ae i r t s t a s r t i t r v n r e e e c e e r n r e o c s u ea t p e i n p m a o S t h o s u c
. i S s o r
o id . t c a s r t a s
) f f i d s o s
'tn e te r
t a l o s b n C r a e ( e t m p e 3 s a ra 8 id e st
$ s E r o :t e t
c M i B / A d nd T n i e a ) t r n 7 o o 7 p i 9 e t 1 R i s o r e n d p e Mi .u t e ev i Erno t ,s a 1 l r e v t
.a e a w R h t
o ,t h n o t e t i a i t c w ii m s sd . _ o n e s P i c m_ er t , u r m_ e s s o e t. s n i i n e d e h c e _.ht i t n
. T ue s t s io is s a et c n m edi ,
r a a t a co r e o sl B l ( p v n ol s a t m o
) i o n s o
d t r a t n it d eoi
't c n a
t r oo c a mt r a 2 e l l ui g C ( t e g f i oh e nt s r t R o s t t nr C c e - e. 0I o o R y w m f T C f W bi A W i A. P : : i 6 7 E E ms m t B t t l u A o o T C C HbM jI !ill
5 APPENDIX C Glossary 4 1 143 wwa-.-w..w--..--
GLOSSARY activation - the process in which stable atoms become radioactive atoms by absorbing neutrons. ALARA - acronym for "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" which . applies to many facets of nuclear power, i.e., radiation exposure for personnel kept low, minimizes number / activity of offluent discharges. alpha particle - a charged particle emitted from the nucleus of an atom having a mass and charge equal in magnitude of a helium nucleus (2 proton and 2 neutrons). atom - the smallest component of an element having all the properties of an element. Comprised of protons, neutrons and electrons such that the number of protons determines the elem9nt. background radiation - source of radiation that mankind has no control of, such as cosmic (from the sun) and terrestrial (naturally occurring radioactive elements) . beta particle - a charged particle equivalent to an electron if negative or a positron if positive, originating near the nucleus of an atom during radioactive decay or fission. control location - a sample collection location considered to be far enough away from Clinton Power Station so as not to be affected by station operations. cosmic radiation - penetrating ionizing radiation originating in outer space. curie (ci) - the unit of radioactivity equal to 2.2 trillion disintegrations per minute, i dead water - water that contains no tritium, dose - a quantity (total or accumulated) of ionizing radiation received. dose equivalent - a quantity used in radiation protection which expresses all radiations on a common scale-for calculating the effective absorbed doso (the unit of dose equivalent is the rem), ecology - a branch of biology dealing with the relations between organisms and their environment. l 144 ,
i i I i i i i electromagnetic radiation - a travelling wave' motion j resulting from changing electric or magnetic fields. l Familiar sources of electromagnetic radiation rango from x-rays (and gamma rays) of short wavelength, through the ultraviolet, visible and infrared regions, to radar and ! radiowaves of relatively long wavelength. All
- electromagnetic radiation travels in a vacuum at the speed of light.
element - one of 103 known chemical substances that cannot be broken down further without changing its chemical , properties. environment - the aggreg'tea of surrounding things, conditions, or influences, t exposure - a measure of the ionization produced in air by x-ray or gamma radiation. Acute exposure is generally accepted to be largo exposure received over a short period of time. chronic exposure is exposure roccived over a long , 4 period of timo, fission - process by which an atomic nucleus splits into two smaller nucloi and releases neutrons and energy. fission products - the nuclei formed as part.of the fissioning of an atomic nuclous. gamma rays - high energy, short wavelength electromagnetic radiation omitted from the-nucleus. half-life - the time required for half of a given amount of a radionuclide to decay. indicator location - a sample collection strategically placed to monitor dose rate or radioactive material that may-be the result of clinton Power Station operations. ionization - the process by which a neutral atom or molecule acquires a positive or negative charge. irradiation - exposure to radiation.. Lower Limits of Detection-(LLD) - the smallest amount of sample activity that will give a net.-count for which thero , is a confidence at a predetermined level that the--activity is present. a microcurie - one millionth of a curie and represents 2.2 million decays per minute. neutron - one of the three basic parts of an atom which has: no charge and is normally found in the nucleus (center) of an atom. 145 ! l L-.,_-_.,._;.__.. _ . . . - .- _ _ _ , _ , _ . _ _ _ _ - . . . , . . a, _~ . - - - _ _ _ . , _ _ . _ . . - . . _ . . . _
1 nucleus - the conter of an atom containing protons and neutrons, that determines the atomic weight and contributes to the not positive charge of an atom, nuclei (plural) nuclides - atoms which all have the same atomic number and mass number. periphyton - water plant life (i.e., algae). radiation - the process by which energy is emitted from a nucleus as particles (alpha, beta, neutron) or waves (gamma). radionuolide - a radioactive species of an atom . characterized by the constitution of its nucleus. The nuclear constitution is specified by the-number of protons, number of neutrons, and energy centent. rem - the unit of dose of any ionizing radiation that produces the same biological effects as a unit of absorbed dose of ordinary X-rays. Acronym-for Roentgen Equivalent Man. roentgen - a measure of ionization produced in air by x-ray or gamma radiation. statistics - the science that deals with the. collection, classification, analysis and interpretation of numerical data by use of mathematical theories of probabilities. terrestrial radiation - source of radiation pertaining to the ground (Earth's crust). wind rose - a graphic representation indicating from'which direction and speed the wind blew. x-rays - high energy, short wavelength' electromagnetic radiation, emitted from the electron shells of an atom. i i 146- _-_________i__.___i___.___.____..__.__.._______.
APPENDIX D CPS Radiological Environmental Monitoring Results During 1990 147
TA9tt 0 1 gtpst BftA AND 100lNE-131 ACTIVITY IN AIR PA%flCULAft1 FOR 1990s (pCI/m312a) Collection Period CL 1 CL*2 CL 3 CL 4 CL 6 01/03/90 01/10/90 0.03110.004 0.03410.004 0.03110.004 0.03610 004 0.031+0.004 01/10 01/17 0.01610.003 0.02010.003 0.02310.003 0.02110.003 0.02010.003 01/17 01/24 0.02410.003 0.02410.003 0.02710.003 0.02610.004 0.02510.003 01/24 01/31 0.01510.002 0.01510.003 0.01410.003 0.01610.003 0.01410.003 01/31 02/0/ 0.01010.003 0.01210.003 0.01210.003 0.01210.003 0.01110.003 02/07 02/14 0.02010.003 0.02010 003 0.02110.003 0.021+0.003 0.02010.003 02/14 02/21 0.02310.003 0.027+0.004 0.02510.004 0.03210.004 0.02810.004 02/21 02/28 0.01710.003 0.02010.003 0.01810.003 0.02110.003 0.020+0.003 02/28 03/07 0.02010.003 0.02010.003 0.02310.003 0.02210.003 0.019+0.003 03/07 03/14 0.013+0.003 0.01610.003 0.01110.003 0.012+0.003 0.01210.003 03/14 03/21 0.01810.004 0.01810.004 0.02010.004 0.01710.004 0.01710.004 03/21 03/28 0.02010.003 0.02310.003 0.02410.003 0.02110.003 0.02210.003 03/28 04/04 0.01310.003 0.01510.003 0.01310.003 0.01310.003 0.01510.003 04/04 04/11 0.01860.004 0.023+0.004 0.02110.004 0.01710.004 0.01210.011' 04/11 04/18 0.01810.003 0.02010.003 0.01610.003 0.01910.003 NDC 04/18 04/25 0.01910.004 0.02310.004 0.02610.004 0.02310.004 0.02210.004 04/25 05/02 0.01510.003 0.01510.003 0.01410.003 0.01510.003 0.01410.003 05/02 05/09 0.02010.004 0.02110.004 0.01810.004 0.01710.004 0.021+0.004 05/09 05/16 0.00910.003 0.00910.003 0.00610.003 0.00710.003 0.00810.004 05/16 05/23 0.00910.002 0.00810.002 0.01010.002 0.01010.002 0.00910.002 05/23 05/30 0.01310.004 0.01210.004 0.01610.004 0.016+0.004 0.01510.004 05/30 06/06 0.010+0.003 0.01010.003 0.01010.003 0.01010.003 0.00910.003 06/06 06/13 0.01410.004 0.01710.004 0.01810.004 0.01310.004 0.01710.004 06/13 06/20 0.01610.003 0.01610 003 0.01610.003 0.02010.003 0.01710.003 06/20 06/27 0.01410.003 0.01410.003 0.01410.003 0.01410.003 0.01510.003 06/27 07/04 0.02410.003 0.02110.003 0.02010.003 0.02310.003 0.02010.003 07/04 07/11 0.01610.003 0.01710.003 0.01210 003 0.01710.003 0.01410.003 07/11 07/18 0.021+0.004 0.02410 004 0.01810.004 0.02310.004 0.02210.004 07/18 07/25 0.01610.003 0.01710.003 0.014*0.003 0.01910.003 0.01310.003 07/25 08/01 0.029+0.005 0.02610.004 0.01910.004 0.027+0.004 0.02010.004 08/01 08/C8 0.02010.004 0.01c0.004 0.015+0.003 0.01810.004 0.01610.003 08/08 08/15 0.02110.003 0.02410 004 0.02410.004 0.02210.003 0.02110.003 08/15 08/22 0.021+0.003 0.02010.003 0.01810.003 0.02010 003 0.02010.003 08/22 08/29 0.02410.004 0.02410.004 0.02410.004 0.02110.004 0.02110.004 08/29 09/05- 0.02910.004 0.02510.004 0.02710.004 0.02910.004 0.03210.004 09/05 09/12 0.027+0.004 0.03110.004 0.025+0.004 0.03210.004 0.03010.004 09/12 09/19 0.01810.003 0.020*0.003 0.01710.003 0.01710.003 0.01910.003 . 09/19 09/26 0.023+0.003
. 0.02010.003 0.020+0.003 0.02210.003 0.02110.003 09/26 10/03 0.03810.005 0.038*0.005 0.03910.004 0.03510.004 0.03610.005 10/03 10/10 <0.023+ 0.01610.003 0.01310.003 0.01110.003 0.01410.003 148
l TABLt D 1 Ront'd) Collection Period CL 7 CL 8 CL 11b CL 15 CL 94 01/03/90 01/10/90 0.02910.004 d 0.03410.004 0.03410.004 ND 0.03610.004 01/10 01/17 0.02010.003 0.02510.004 0.02310.004 ND d 0.02210.003 01/17 01/24 0.02410.003 0.02610.003 0.02710.004 ND d 0.02610.004 01/24 01/31 0.01410.003 d 0.01310.003 0.01410.003 ND 0.01310.003 01/31 02/07 0.00810 003 0.01210.003 0.01310.003 0.01110.003 0.01110.003 02/07 02/14 0.02210.003 0.01910.003 0.02110.003 0.02210.003 0.02210.003 02/14 02/21 0.02210.003 0.022 0.003 0.02010 003 0.03310.007' O pt210.003 02/21 02/28 0.02010.003 0.01710.003 0.01610.003 0.02110.003 0.01910.003 02/28 03/07 0.02410.003 0.02310.003 0.02110.003 0.02010.003 0.022 0.003 03/07 03/14 0.01110.003 0.01610.003 0.01310.003 0.01410.003 0.01010.003 03/14 03/21 0.01710.004 0.02110.004 0.02010.004 0.01910.004 0.01810.004 03/21 03/28 0.02310.003 0.02010.003 0.02210.003 0.01810.003 0.02110.003 03/28 04/04 0.01310.003 0.01610.003 0.01110.00.5 0.01610.003 0.01210.003 04/04 04/11 0.02110.004 0.02010.004 0.02010.0W. 0.02210.004 0.01810.004 04/11 04/18 0.01710.003 0.01710.003 0.01610,003 0.01810.003 0.01910.003 04/18 04/25 0.02010.004 0.02510.004 0.02110.004 0.02110.004 0.02110.004 04/25 05/02 0.01310.003 0.01510.003 0.01510.003 0.01510.003 0.01410.003 05/02 05/09 0.01610.004 0.018f0.004 <0.160' O.01810.004 0.02010.004 05/09 05/16 0.008:0,003 0.009 0,003 0.008 0.003 0.00810.003 0.00810.003 05/16 05/23 0.009:0.002 0.00810.002 0.00910.002 0.00810.002 0.0101 0.'32 05/23 05/30 0.01610.004 0.01510.004 0.01510.004 0.01310.004 0.01410.00/, 05/30 06/06 0.008,0.003 f 0.01010.003 0.00810.003 0.00710.003 0.01110.003 06/06 06/13 0.01710.004 0,01810.004 0.01510.004 0.01310.004 0.01910.004 06/13 0o/20 0.01610.003 0.01610.003 0.01610.003 0.01510.003 0.01110.003 06/20 06/27 0.01310.003 0.01310.003 0.01410.003 0.01410.003 0.01110 003 06/27 07/04 0.02210 003 0.02010.003 0.02210.003 0.02310.003 0.02210.003 07/04 07/11 0.01710.003 0.017,0,003 f 0.02110.003 0.01510.003 0.00910.003 07/11 07/18 0.02210.004 0.02010.004 0.01510.004 0.02110.004 0.022;.0.004 07/*8 07/25 0.01810 003 0.01810.003 0.01410.003 0.01310.003 0.01410.003 07/25 08/01 0.02410.005 0.02510.004 0.03010 004 0.02710.005 0.02413.004 08/01 08/08 0.01510.004 0.01610.003 0.01910.004 0.01710.004 0.02010.004 08/08 08/15 0.02410.003 0.02510.004 0.02210 003 0.021f,0,003 0.02410.003 08/15 08/22 0.02110.003 0.02010.003 0.02310.004 0.01710.004 0.01310.003 08/22 08/29 0.02410.004 0.02510.004 0.02310.004 0.02410.004 0.024;,0,004 08/29 09/05 0.03310.004 0.03110.004 0.03010.004 0.03010.004 0.02710.004 09/05 09/12 0.03110.004 0.03010.004 0.03510.004 0.022 0,003 0 03010.004 09/12 09/19 0.01810.003 0.01810.003 0.02110.003 0.01710.003 0.02010.003 09/19 09/26 0.01710.003 0.02110.003 0.021 0.003 0.01810.003 0.02210.003 09/26 10/03 0.04110.005 0.03610.005 0.04010.005 0.02710.004 0.04010.005 10/03 10/10 0.01510.003 0.01410.003 0.01510.003 0.01410.003 <0.004' 149-
- - . . - -- . - _ _ ~ _ - . - . . . . . . . _ , - . --
-e.. .. - . . . _ , , , - --
p lI TABLE D 1 (Cont 8d) Collection Period CL 1 'CL 2 CL 3 CL*4 CL 6
~k 10/10 10/17 0.02210.004 0.02610.004: 0.02710.004 l0.02810.004 0.02710.004 [
10/17 10/24 0.02210.003 0.02710.004 0.02810.004: 0.02310 003 0.02410.003 ; 10/24 10/31 0.02510.104 0.02610.004 0.02710.003- 0.02210.003- 0.02610.003- i 10/31 11/07 0.02210.004 .0.02010.003 0.02110.003, 0.01810.003; 0.02210.004 ] 11407 11/14 'O.03210.004 10.03210.004 0.03610.0042 -0.03110.004 0.03510.004 11/14 11/21 0.03010.004, -0.03610.004 0.03610.004, 0.03010.004f 0.03310.004-11/21 11/28- 0.02510.003' 0.02310.003 0.02210.003 0.019,0.003 1 0.02410.003 g 11/28 12/05 0.01810.003- 0.0*S10.003 0.02210.004 0.01810.003 0.02110.0031 -{ 12/05 12/12 0.02610.094 0.03210.004 0.02910.004 =0.03010.004: 0.03510.004- , j 12/12 12/19__ 0.02810.004 0.c24,,0.004 0.034:0.004 0.03110.004' O.03110.004 3 12/19 12/26 0.03210.004 0.03610.004- 0.03910.004 -0.C3810.004 :0.03410.004_ 12/26 01/02/91- 0.03310.004 0.03310 004, 0.03610.004 0.03510.004 0.03210.004 {
- L I,
Collection Period CL 7 CL 8' CL 11D- CL 155 CL 94 r 10/10 10/17- 0.02510.004; 0.02510.004 0.02410.004 .0.02410.004 l0.0240.004 1 1 10/17 10/24 <0.065' _ 0.02410.003- 'O.02710.004 0.02410._003 _.0.02610.004 10/24 10/31 0.0291 0.004c 0.02010.003 0.02310.0037 -0.02510.003 0.02710.004 : ' 10/31 11/07 0.02310.004 0.02410.004 : -0.02510.004 ,0.02310.004, 0402010i003l 11/07 11/14 0.03310.004- 0.03210.004 -0.03310.004 -0;03410.004 10.03610.'004, 11/14 11/21 -0.03410.004- 0.03210.004 0.03110.004- 0.0371 0.004 - 0.03210.004 11/21 11/28 -0.02210.003 =0.02010.003 .0.02410.003: :0.02210.003: 0.02410i003: [ 11/28 12/05 0.02110.003 'O.019+C.003 0.02210.004: 0.02010.003; t 0.02010.003 12/05 12/12._ 0.03110.004 -0.03310.004 0.02710.004- 0.03310.003 :0.03210.004 12/12 12/19 0.03010.004'_ 0.0322,0,004 0.03210.004e 0.02910.003- 0.03310.,004) 12/19 12/26 '0.036 10.004' .0.04010.004 0.04010.004- 0.03710 004 -0.03910.004 l- .-12/26 01/02/91 0.03610.004 0.03410.004' O.03510.004 0.03310.0041=0.03610.004I q
-t a- all I 131 activity:Is -<0.07 pcl/m - unless otherwise notediin~ Table A+22 3
b control Location,.att'other locationstere indicators. -;
*~
c No data. E16ctricot power fatture
;r
-d No date. . New _ location. First sample collected 02/07/90 -I
., - i e' : mreliable result, excluded from the mean (see Table A 3 for explanation); '
i l . a si ' lL L
- 150 ,
- (
E , , s , , < l'- + , L. ~ . ..s>. .w <~ ~ ., , .
. - , . - - . . ~
lAE1LEll CAMMA IS0 topic ACTIVITY lli COMPOSITED AIR PARilCUL ATE FILTERS * (pcI/m 312a) ut3 Cotteetion Date 93:Z CL 1 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.05410.010 CL 2 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.06210.012 CL 3 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.06410.017 CL 4 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.06310.011 CL-6 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.05410.013 CL 7 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.05310.010 CL 8 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.05010 012 CL 11 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.05710.010 CL-15 01/03/90 to 03/28/90 0.03910.011 C'. 94 01/03/90 to 04/28/90 0.05510 014 CL 1 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.06410.011 CL-2 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.05910.012 CL 3 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.05810 016 CL 4 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.05910.011 CL 6 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.05210.017 CL 7 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.05910.010 CL 8 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.07010.014-CL 11 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.05910.021 CL 15 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.04410.012 CL 94 03/28/90 to 06/27/90 0.06510.018 CL 1 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.06010.009 CL 2 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.05610.015 CL 3 Do/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.04810.012 1 CL 4 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.06710.017 - CL 6 06/27/90 to 10/03/90- 0.05610.009 CL 7 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.05010.010 CL 8 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.06010.015 CL 11 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.07410.015 CL 15 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.04310.009 CL 94 06/27/90 to 10/03/90 0.05610.015
- r. 1 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 'O.03310.007 CL 2 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 0.04410.007 CL 3 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 0.05210 010 CL 4 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 0.04310,012 CL 6 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 0.04510.008 CL 7 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 0.03710.015 CL 8 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 0.05410.010.
CL 11 10/03/90 to 01/02/95 0.04610.008 CL-15 10/03/90 to 01/02/91- -0.04710.012 CL 94 10/03/90 to 01/02/91 0.04610.012'
- Only gwrma emitters detected are %grted; typical LLC values 'are found'in Table 019, 151
~
TABLE D 3-1990 CPS REMP QUARitRLY TLD RESULTS Jj mR/91 Days (Wet Excosure) ! Location ist Str- 2nd Otr 3rd Otr 4th otr~ CL 1 20.011.1 -17.21 0.9i D17.111.1 17.510,5< CL 2 19.1+0.9
. 17.611.3 18.210.8 17.510.81 CL 3- 19.611.0 18.510 4 16.911.1 18.310.4 CL 4 21.1f,0.8 16.51 0.! 17.410.6 17.410.5 !'
CL 5 19.611.0. 15.610.5 17.410.9 16.610.3-CL 6 16.810.7 16.111.1 13.910.6z 15.710.7- ! CL 7 15.310.5 18.510.9 .16.410.7: .19.3*0.5 -i CL 8 20.510.3 18.511.4 18.210.7- _17.710.9' Ct 11a 19.3 0.7- 16.510.8' 16.5,0.7 f 16.21 0.7/ , CL 15 b ND 11.510.5 '12.110.5' 13.110.7* _l CL 20 -14.610.7 17.0+0.9 L16.510.6 18.1+0.5 l CL 21 20.611.0 17.110.9 17.711.1 -18.510.9 . CL 22 18.610 9 17.010.7 16.111.2 18.'110.7' CL 23 10.610.4 12.910.3 12.710.5- _13.810.6 . g CL 24- 17.610.3 17.010 5- ~17.8+0.5 17.610.6' l CL 25 14.1+0.3 13.010.7 .11.910.3 '14.2+0.6- i CL 26 17.310.7 - 15.311.0 :14.410.8 15.210.8- ' CL 27. 18.010.3- .18.010.8 15.210.4'. 17.4+0.6i _; CL 28 ' 14.810.8 17.610.6 17.411.2 -18.010.6-CL 29 19.610.8 .18.610.8 16.81 0.7- -18.710.4: CL 30 19.610 3< l20.9+1.1 16.9+0.4' '21.410.6 CL 31 17.610 7 16.210.6- 3 15.110.6-- 117.310.7: ? CL 32 18.710.4 :18.210.7' i14.110.6- 18.510.61 -1 CL 338 19.810.4 20.011.0 : 18.210.5 20.910.6-' CL 34 22.110.8 ,21.111.3- l20.210.5-- t 22.110l8 { CL 35 17.911.0_ 16.910.7 16.511.0' 17.41 0.5-' .l ' CL 36 17.110.7 15.610.5' l15.510.5 18.111 0 . CL 37 18.210.7 17.011.3 -i6.310.8-z
-18.411._1- :l CL 38 18.9+0.5 _18.211.0 --i?.810.6 - 20.010.4- -]
CL 39 16.010.7- .15.610.4- 14.510.4 s16.410.6' j CL 40_ :17.110.6 16.710.6 -:15.810.9 18.0f,0.8. Ll CL 41 18.110.9 16.910.6- 16.311.1'- f18.810.5 CL 42- 116.510.8- 15.511.0L 16.8+0.5; 17.810.3 _ - 1 < l CL 43' 18.610.7.' 17.010.8 ~ ' 16.410.8 18.911.2-j 4 CL*44 - 20.911.1 17.611.0 18.810.9.. _18.610.7 , CL 45 - 14.1+0.7- 19.411.1, '17.011.0- 19.710.5: j CL 46 ;14.111.1 -16.711.0' ,17.7 0_.4-~ 1 jj 716.211.4 CL 47 '15.511'.1- 17.910.8 si8.811.2 19.911.0r j CL 48 _12.91 0.41 .24.311.0. .12.710.3 '18.111.0-CL 49 15.111.1- 20.411.6: 17.911.0.: 20.51 0.3;" j
'CL 50 13.910.7- '20.3f,1.4- 16.210.8' L21.310.4. I CL 51 15.110.34 19.7+1.1s 17.610.5; .21.011.0. j CL 52 15.010.4 a :19.211.3: 17.6;,0.5? -19.510.5- , a Cla53 _12.610.6- 16'310.4 .
J15.010.5 ;-18.110.4 W Ct 54 '13.310.5- - 17.410.5 c -16.110.6- , s18.810.5 a
- CL 551 13.810.7 16.010.6 ^ 16.610.7.; 17.510.8 ; q
+
a 1
- c. <
1521 j
l 4 TABLE D 3 (cont'd)
#/91 Days (Net Exposure)
Location ist otr 2nd ote 3rd Qtr 4th ote CL 56 14.410.6 17.610.4 16.510.9 18.810 9 CL 57 14.410.6 16.710.8 16.710.8 18.210.6 CL 58 16.8+0.8 16.510.5 14.910.8 13.1+0.8 , CL 59 18.5+0.8 16.9+1.1 16.2+0.8 18.010.9 l CL 60 13.210.8 18.3 +1. 0 16.110.9 19.211 2 CL 61 14.210.8 18.110.6 16.511.0 18.810.8 CL 62 15.010.6 18.3+0.8 16.010.8- 20.110 6 CL 63 15.1+0.3 20.411.1 17.510 4 21.511 0 CL 64 19.010.8 19.111.2 17.310.6 19.9+0.3 , CL 65 19.511.2 20.711.2 17.511.0 21.811.1 CL-66 12.810,5 14.810.7 13.410.4 16.610.4 CL 67 15.010.7 17.610.8 17.111.0 17.110 3 CL 68 12.410.6 17.11 0 1 13.511.1 19.011.0 CL 69 15.710.8 18.611 1 18.611.2 18.411.0 CL 70 12.210.7 18.211.1 16.2+1.1 17.710.3 CL 71 16.011.0 17.010.4 17.411.2 17.310 4 CL 72 16.8+0.6 15.010.5 14.710.8 16.210.8 CL 73 19.610 8 17.111.0 17.310 5 17.910.6 CL 74 17,011.0 15.910.7 14,610.7 17.510.8 CL 75 14.9+0.9 17.710.8 16.7+1.0 18.510 7 CL 76 14.210 9 16.61 21 16.210.9 17.4+0.7 CL 77 17.8+0.9 15.711.1 15.410.8 16.410.5 CL 78 14.510.5 17.011.1 15.2+0.7 -17.510 5 CL 79 15.310.5 18.0+0.5 16.1 +,,0. 5 18.811.2
-CL 80 15.310 4 17.410 9 16,710.6 18.410.4-CL 81 15.8+0.6 18.8+0.5 17.610.9 19.710.6 CL 82 17.811.0 16.611.0 15.3+1.0 18.710.9 CL E3 16.510.8 17.810.5 17.410.9 19,310.8 CL 84 15.710.5 17.710.6 16.710.6 18.110.7 CL 85 16.410.5 17.111.0 17.210.6 18.310 9 CL 84 16.9,1,1 f 17.611.2 -18.311.1 18.411.5 CL 87 1/.311.0 16.410.7 18.110.8- 18.611 0 CL 109 14.4+0.9
, 15.211.2 14.310.6 16.710.4 CL 110 16.410 7 - 15.310.7 16.511 0 16.610.7 CL 111 19.310.7 10.810.? 16.1+0.9 10.710.3 CL-112 14.810.7 14.91Q.6 16.110.8 16.310.5 CL 113 20.04,0.8 17.411.1 17.010.8 17.3+1.3 Mean i s.d. 16.6f,2.5 17.312.0 16.411 5 18.111.8
-a control Location b N0 s No data. New location. TLD not placed until tLeginning of 2nd Qtr.
153-
si; ll TABLE D 4 ERfQCE WATER GROS $ BETA AND CAMMA* ISOTOPIC' ACTIVITY'
-;(pCl/L12a);
Collectlon Gross Location Date' Beta CL 9- 01/31/90- 2.610.5 CL 10 01/31/90 2.610.4_- j 3 Ct 13- 01/31/90- 2.710.4 CL 9 02/28/90 ? u 3.210;6 -1 CL 10 - 02/28/90 4.110.6 1
.CL 13 .02/28/90. 2.710.2 i CL 9> 03/28/90- - 3.910.5 CL 10'- 03/28/90 2.610.4 CL 13 03/28/90- 2.710.4 CL 9- 04/25/90 2.610.3- i
.CL 10- -04/25/90: - 1.710.3 0 CL 13 04/25/90 2.210.3 CL 9 05/30/90- ' 2.3:0.2 ,
CL 10 05/10/90- 1.610.3-CL 13- '05/30/90 11.710.3-CL 9 ;06/27/90 '2.310.2 CL 10 = 706/27/90; 2.310.3 - 1 CL 13 06/27/90 - 2.410.3'
-CL 9 L07/25/90- _ 1.910.7- -
CL 10' 07/25/90L - 2.410.6-
^
CL 13 07/25/90) - 2.310.4 -j CL*9 08/29/90 12.010.3 1
~CL 10 08/29/90- 'I
'2.210.54 CL 13- ;08/29/90 2.410.6 7 ..!
j CL 9 09/26/90' . 2.010.4,-~ CL 10 - 09/26/90 2.910.6- j CL 13 LO9/26/90- 2.810.67 -j sj CL 9 , CL 10-
.10/31/90' 2.810 6 x j c10/31/90;- - 1.110.5-? *
- j CL 13
-10/31/90 ; , 2.610 3 'I CL 9 - 11/28/90L .2.010.61 i j CL 10-- -11/28/90 '2.310.6 ..i CL*13- '11/28/90 2.910.6. 1 CL 9' 12/26/90 1.610.3-:
4 CL 10 l12/26/90 4.510.4'- C, CL 13 12/26/90; 2.510.4 Jj 1
- Only,gansen emitters detected arc' reported; -typical .LLD Lvelues -are' f ound Iti f abte '0 19 C610'isacmtrollocation.- ;, ;g <
. u' '
.1
.I a
, m ' :' 15 4 - q, .
s
-w a ,
n , g 3 e ...t -3;... .
t a TABLE 0 5 SURF ACE WA1ER CRg,11,51] A. CR0$$ ALPHA. 1 131 AND C4MMA* 180f0PIC ACitV!TY (pct /t 2c) Cottection Gross' Gross Date Alohn .,l!3,ta b L211LI.!20 L .1)l CL 90 12/27/89 to 01/31/90 0.710.4 2.810.3 CL-90 01/31/90 to 02/28/90 0.610.3 3.210.4 CL 90 02/28/90 to 03/28/90 1.2+0.5, 3.010.4 CL 90 03/28/90 to 04/25/90 0.610.4 2.310.3 CL 90 04/25/90 to 05/30/90 0.610.4 2.810.3 CL 90 05/30/90 to 06/27/90 1.110.4 3.0:0.3 L CL 90 06/27/90 to 07/25/90 2.0+f 7 CL 90 07/25/90 to 08/29/90 2.110 5 CL 90 08/29/90 to 09/26/90 1.410.8 4.110.6 i CL 90 09/26/90 to 10/31/90 1.210.5- 3.410.4 CL 90 10/31/90 to 11/28/90 3.210 6 CL 9') 11/28/90 to 12/26/90 3.310.4 0
- Or.ty gerna emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found in Table 0+19.
-a Only gross alpha detected is reported;' typical LLO values are found in Table D 19-b only 1 131 detected is reported; typical LLD values are found in Tabte 0 19.
Ib5
l JABLE D 6 SURFACE. WATER Gross BETA. caost ALPHA. TalfitM AND GAMA* ll0TOPlc AttlVITY - j (pCl/li t o ' a Collection Grosse ,b Gross ~a . .; Location Date Atche it,tt ,,, Tritium
- a CL*91 -12/27/89 to 01/31/90z 2.610.3 CL 92 12/27/89 to 01/31/90 2.510.4 CL 93 .:01/31/90 3.011.8 -
CL 91- 01/31/90 to 02/28/90 ,2.010.6-- CL 92 01/31/90 to 02/26/90 2.810.3+ CL 93 02/28/90- ~3 .711.2 i CL 91 02/28/90 to 03/28/90-- 2.810.4 j CL 92 02/28/90 to 03/28/90 f 4.610.7- } CL 93 '.03/28/90, 3.011.5 4
] i CL*91 =-03/28/90 to 04/2Si90 '2.210.3. -l 1.310.4-. , :
,CL*92- ;03/28/90'to 04/25/90 .3.010.3'- -
d CL 93 -04/25/90 -3.211.1 CL 91 04/25/90 to 05/30/90- 0.910 6 "2.410.3, CL 92 04/25/90 to 05/30/90 _
-:2.910.3{
CL 93 05/30/90 11.911.8 ] CL 91 05/30/90 to 06/27/90 1.310.5 2.410.3. i' h -CL 92 -05/30/90 to 06/27/90 - --3.010.4: CL 93 -06/27/901 - 3.611.1 : 2341105
+
CL 91 06/27/90to07/25/90; - L2.310.5; q CL 92 -06/27/90 to 07/25/90.
.3.110.6c CL 93 07/25/90 2.811.5 :
CL 91 07/25/90 to 08/29/99 .2.610.6-. , CL 92 .07/25/90 to 08/29/90' ' 2.110.5 ;- 1 CL 93 08/29/90- . e2.611.8- .l CL 91 -06/29/90 to 09/26/90 ;1.710.2 - 3.210 2. ,! CL 92 -08/29/90 to.09/26/90 2.810.41 _
-]
CL 93- ;09/26/90 '
-l j
CL 91- -09/26/90 to 10/31/90, .1.410.9- -2.710.6J '
- CL 92 09/26/90 to 10/31/90 - "2.510.5 4 -
;,j CL 93 10/31/90t 3.011.9c ,
'CL791-
- 10/31/90 to 11/28/90i '2.510.6; CL 92 10/31/90!to 11/28/90. 2.110.4> R
-CLt93 L11/28/90- , 2.311.7
'(
CL 91 s11/28/90 to 12/26/90. 2.310.31 , g
~
~
*~~ =)
CL 921 11/28/90 to 12/26/90 3.410.3 ? CL 93 --12/26/90; 3.611.2-'
~
- Only genne emitters detected are reported;-typicalL._LLD values are found in Table _D 19. ~
f a Only gross alphaj gross beta ond_tritius detected are reportedi. typical LLD values.arejfoundlIn : Table 0 19. b Gross alpha-analysis only regJired for CL 91. < a u 2156.: . i j' 'si i j . . .
, J . ' ?
o s
,j i
I
.i
'/
TABLE D-7
}
SUP, FACE JJTER OUARTERLY TRITIUM
- COMPOSITE ;
(pci/1) l 1990 CL-9 CL-10" 'CL-13 CL-90 1st Qtr <LLD. <LLD <LLD <LLD-2nd Qtr <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD' 3rd Qtr <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I 4th Qtr <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD a control location i TABLE D-8 WELL WATER OUARTERLY TRITIUM
- COMPS _ SITE
.(pci/1)
If.1Q CL-7 CL-12 Untreat3d: . C L- 12 : T r e a t,e_4 ' lst"Qtr <LLD <LLD- <LLDL
-2nd Qtr <LLD. <LLD- <LLD -l 3rd Qtr <LLD' ' < LLD - <LLD- . 4 th -:Qtr <LLD -< LLD . .- < LLD - 4 1
- Only: tritium detectedLisireported; typical: LLDLvalues are found.in Table D-19~.
t
!,157I 3. :. ' '.
s
a
.l TABLE D 9 WELL VATER GR0tt BETA. CROS$ ALPHA. 1 131 AND GAMMA
- I80 TOPIC ACT1VITV (pCl/l 2a)
-Collectton .Grossb -. = Crossb l a Date' .Aloha Q,jtig ,,,,,, 1,1118DC !
4ocetIon , , , _ _ CL*7D 01/03/90 -d CL 12u 01/03/90- f CL 12t 01/03/90 CL 70 -01/17/90-CL 12u- 01/17/90 -(i CL 12t 01/17/90-CL 7D 01/31/90 CL 12u. 01/31/90. Ct 12t 01/31/90 $ CL 7D 01/03/90, 01/17/90 and 01/31/90J 2.210.5- 2.010.3 s ,;
' Ct 12u ~ 01/03/90, 01/17/90 and 01/31/90' - 1'.81 0.8:f j CL*12t- -01/03/90, 01/17/90 and 01/31/90 2.810.8'-
CL 7D 02/14/90 CL 12u 02/14/90 'l CL 12t 02/14/90. CL 7D 02/28/90- y CL+12u 02/28/90
'CL 12t. 02/28/90.
CL 70- 02/14/90 and 02/28/90, 0.810.6.- - 1.$10.4' ?
=CL 12u 02/14/90 and 02/28/90 1.811.25 :2.510.8-- -
l
- CL 12t 02/14/90 and 02/28/90: .
.2.310.9'- !
CL 7D 03/14/90 CL 12u 03/14/90 CL 12t .'03/14/90
.CL 7D 03/28/90 CL 12u 03/28/90-CL 12t' '03/26/90 CL 7D 03/14/90 and 03/28/90 L1.210.4-5
!CL 12u 03/14/90 and 03/28/90 1.310.6. ,
CL 12t _03/14/90 and 03/28/90 - 2.110.8> 4 bi 1 Ef
- +
*Onlygasmaemittersdetectedarereported;;typicalL'LDvaluesare.foundinTableDk19.
a The'au a ar.3 "t" found after;CL 12 denote " untreated" and # treated". , b only gross alpha, grces beta,; and i+131 detected are reported;; typicalILLD: values are:fouxitin ? ' ifabte'D 19. , ,
. c Only.1 131 analysis is performed on semi monthly samples.
E i il5'8 - , m, s 9 (j 6 !
? . - , , ,, ... , - -.
.,,I ,.
>;l
TA9ttB$ Jean.Lj,1 W LL WATER CROSS GETA. 0 0$$ ALPHA, 1 131 AWD CAMMA* ISOTOPIC ACT!ytt{ (pCl/t*2a) , Coltectton Crossb Grossb locetion a Dete Althe Beta 1;.1),,1b, c CL 7D 04/11/90 CL 12u 04/11/90 CL 12t 04/11/90 CL-7D 04/25/90 CL 12u 04/25/90 CL 12t 04/25/90 CL 7D 04/11/90 and 04/25/90 0.9+0.5 CL 1?u 04/11/90 ard 04/25/90 2.111.7 CL 12t 04/11/90 and 04/25/90 4.11.8 1 CL 7D 05/09/90 CL 12u 05/09/90 CL 12t 05/09/90 CL 7D 05/23/90 CL 12u 05/23/90 CL 12t 05/23/90 CL 7D 05/09/90 and 05/23/90 1.110.4 CL 12u 05/09/90 ard 05/23/90 2.513.8 CL 12t 05/09/90 :,nd 05/23/90 2.2+0.8 CL 7D 06/06/90 CL 12u 06/06/90 CL 12t 06/06/90 CL 7D 06/20/90 CL 12u 06/20/90 CL 12t 06/20/90 CL 70 06/06/90 and 06/20/90 1.810.4 CL 12u 06/06/90 and 06/20/90 1.210.8 CL 12t 06/06/90 and 06/20/90 1.910.8 CL 7D 07/04/90 CL 12u 07/04/90 CL 12t 07/04/90 CL 7D 07/18/90 CL 12u 07/18/90 CL 12t 07/18/90 CL 7D 07/04/90 and 07/18/90 1.210.6 CL 1?u 07/04/90 and 07/18/90 2.211.2 CL 12t 07/04/90 and 07/18/90 2.011.4
- Only gama emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found in Table 019. i a The aua and "ta found after CL 12 denote a untreated" and " treated",
b only gross al@ a, gross beta, and 1 131' detected are reported; typical LLD values are found i.)
' Table D 19.
c Only 1-131 analysis is performed on semi monthly sanples. l 159
, _ . .. ..~ .~ . ,- .. , ~ _ ... , . -... ~ - . . ~. ..- - . . .
-e - . -
j TABLE D 9 teont8d)- WELL WATER GROSS BETA.; GROSS ALPHA. 1 131 AND CANMA' 1SOTOPlc ACTIVITY - _f (pCI/L12v); j 4 Collection Grossb - i Cross b' > Locatione Date' ' Atchs ' gt,1,gL , Lli.13.lD'C q[ t 0070 .08/01/90< [*
-- CL 12u : 08/01/90--
CL 12t .08/01/90-CL 70' 08/15/90 CL 12u 08/15/90 j CL 12t 08/15/90L ' Cb70 08/29/90- d CL 12u 08/29/90 CL 12t 08/29/90 . . [
- CL 70 '08/01/90, 08/15/90 and 08/?9/901 - 0.810.5; ' 1.110.3 ? .
CL 12u 08/01/90, 08/15/90 and 08/29/90 2.010.8= w? CL 12t 08/01/90,.08/15/90 and 08/29/90L :2.610.6 - -[ CL 70 09/12/90 , i CL 12u- 09/12/90 < CL 12t 09/12/90 CL 7D 09/26/90s
'CL 12u 09/26/90. ,
CL-12t 09/26/90-- ' CL 70 09/12/90 and 09/26/90-- 0.910.5 ; '1.310 4j , CL 12u 09/12/90 and 09/26/902 1.511.2 L < CL 12t 09/12/90 and 09/26/90 3.010.8 1 CL 7D- 10/10/90 CL 12u 10/10/90 CL 12t 10/10/90 '
- CL 70 10/24/90 >
l CL-12u '10/24/90 0 4 l CL 12t . 10/24/90 . .
.-;j
.CL*70- '10/10/90 and;10/24/90' ~
~
Ct "u ' -10/10/90 and 10/24/90= 11 . ~~18 i .2 )
~
CL 12t- -10/10/90 arvf 10/24/90L ;3.611.4 . 1 o q
,i k
-u , :;
y, , b d
- Only gasuna emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found fri Table '0=14. - , ;
eathe"u"and"t"foundafterCL12 denote" untreated"and" treated"? 93 .
. .g ' ,
'b only gross alpha, gross beta, and 1 131 detected are reported;1typlestLLLD ve\ugy stejfound in<
Table D 19. , --W ' c Only'l 1311 analysts is performed on semi monthly ser-Les. N.
._.b e': .
ll, i t' :160L ' v , o . m - j
;[3
~
r 7 [.- ; 4 (' , . . ..a _ . . . . . ., , - . m ., .. 4 . .4 . w.; e '" + .4.
l TAttE D 9 ftont'd) VELL WATER GROSS BETA. CROSS ALPHA. 1 131 AND CA*A* ITOTOPIC ACTIVITY (pcl/l12a) Collection Gross b Crossb Locetione b Dele A t the Bete M .c CL 7D 11/07/90 CL 12u 11/07/90 i CL 12t 11/07/90 CL 7D 11/21/90 CL 12u 11/21/90 CL 12t 11/21/9c CL 70 11/07/90 and 11/21/90 CL 12u 11/07/90 and 11/21/90 1.610.8 CL 12t 11/07/90 and 11/21/90 2.610.6 CL 7D 12/05/90 CL 12u 12/05/90 CL 12t 12/05/90-CL ?D 12/19/90 CL 12u 12/19/90 CL 12t 12/19/90 CL 7D 12/05,90 and 12/19/90 0.810.4 1.410.4 CL 12u 12/05/90 and 12/19/90 1.510.7 CL 12t 12/05/90 and 12/19/90 3.010.8
? Only garmar emitters dstected are reported; t/picet LLC values are found in Table D 19.
a The aau ord dta Vourd af ter (; 12 daw >ts Vtreated' ard " treated". b only gros 4 alva, gross beta, and I 131 detected are reported; typical LLD values are fourd in
-Table D 19.
c Only 1 131 omtysis is perforse:1 r.n semi monthly samles.
~161 ' '
TABLE D 13 DRtWKING WATFR GROSS BETA. Geots ALPHA. TRilitNa AND CAMMA* ISOTOPlc ACTIVITY (pCl/tt2a) i Date Gross b gross b locetion Collected Aloha Dete Tritimb CL 14 01/31/90 0.510 3 2.710.2 CL 14 02/28/90 2.210.2 3 CL 14 03/28/90 2.510.2 CL 14 Conposite CL 14 04/25/90 2.010 1 CL 14 05/30/90 2.110.2 CL-14 06/27/90 2.410.2 CL 14 Ccaposite CL 14 07/25/90 2.610.3 CL*14 08/29/90 2.010.3 CL 14 09/26/90 2.010 2 - CL 14 Ccaposite CL 14 10/31/90 2.110 2 ' CL 14 11/28/90 2.610.3 CL 14 12/26/90 1.510.1 CL-14 Cenposite i a Tritium analysis is performed once a quarter co a composite of monthly sartples.
- Only gama emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found in Table D 19.
b only gross alpha, gross beta, and tritim detected are reported; typical LLD values are focJ ini Table D 19.- 162
TABLE D 11 MILK 1 131 sr 90 AND CA W A* lsoTopIC._ ACTIVITY (pCl/l12a) Date Lxetion iptlected it;?2e 3;,jyya g, ,4,,g CL 116 01/31/90 1.010.5 1240160 CL 116 02/28/90 1.510.6 1230160 CL 116 03/28/90 1.910.6 1280150 CL 116 04/25/90 1.910.6 1140140 CL 116 0'3/09/90 3.310.8 1220170 CL 116 05/23/90' 2.710 8 1140140 CL 116 06/06/90 2.610.7 1210160 CL 116 06/20/90 3.31 80 1280150 CL 116 07/04/90 2.810.5. 1260140 , CL 116 07/18/90 1.710.6 1240150 CL 116 08/01/90 3.210.7 -1220150 , CL 116 08/15/90 1.310 4 1220140 CL 116 08/29/90 2.210 5 1180160 CL-116 09/12/90 3.310.6 1270160 CL 116 09/26/90 1.810.4 .1120160 CL 116 10/10/90 1.810.4 11601 60-CL 116 10/24/90 1.810.4 1170150 CL 116 11/23/90 1. 5f,0. 5 1260140 CL 116 12/26/90 1.210.4 1310150' l I
- Only gama emitters detected are reported; t,pical LLD. values are found .;q Table 019 a Only Sr 90 and 1 131 detected are reportsd; typical LU) values are found in Tabte 019.;
163
1MM.Ad.A CRASS CAMMA'J SOTOPlc ACtt g (pCl/g wet 12a) 1 Date Locat(20 e collected Be 7- ,,K 40 Cs 137 CL 1 01/31/90 5.9010.19 3.4510.24 CL 2 01/31/90 7.8310.27 2.3410.30 CL 8 01/31/90 5.4410.22 5.7410 31 CL 11 01/31/90 7.7010.16 4.2710.19 0.04910.009 CL 116 01/31/90 6.3110.26 2.3810.32 , CL 1 02/28/90 11.1310.15 2.5810.17 0.03410.007 CL 2 02/28/90 11.5010.24 1J010 11 CL 8 02/28/90 3.8110.16 5.9610 27 CL 11 02/28/90 10.3010.32 3.3210.19 CL 116 02/28/90 7.3310.22- 4.3010.24 CL 1 03/28/90 11.9010.38 3.8510.29 -0.03210.009 CL 2 03/28/90 17.1010.44 1.9610.14 CL 8 03/28/90 3.8110.16- 5.9610.27 CL 11 03/28/90 3.0310.16 7.0210.30 CL 116 03/28/90 14.0210.27 2.8310.25 CL 1 04/25/90 1.7510.06 5.7410 22 7 CL 2 04/25/90 1.8110.05- 5.9610.18 ) CL 8 04/25/90 0.8710.03 5.9310.10 CL 11 04/25/90 1.8610 05 6.1110.12 CL 116 04/25/90 2.7010.09 4.9210.17 CL 1 05/09/90 1.0210.06 5.0610.15 ) CL 2 05/09/90 3.0810.10 7.5010.24 CL 8 05/09/90 1.9410.10 9.5710.26 0.01910 008 i CL 11 05/09/90 0.7010.07 4.8010.22 . CL 116 05/09/90 1.1510.06 5.5310.21 CL-1 05/23/90 0.8210.06 4.0210.15 CL 2 05/23/90 1.0210.07 3.2110 16 CL-8 05/23/90 0.6610.06 .4.7710.14 CL 11 .05/23/90 1.1610.08 4.0710.20
.CL 116 05/23/90 0.9910.08 4.7710.18 CL 1 06/06/90 0.6010.09 4.0510 21 CL-2 06/06/93 1.3210.05 4.4010.14 ,
CL 8 06/06/90 -0.7710.04 - 3.2710.14~ CL 11 06/06/90 3.9410.08 6.3610.16 CL 116 06/06/90. 0.8210.06 4.2610.14 CL 1 06/20/90 2.3210.13 5.3910.23 CL-2 06/GrM ~1.3110.14 -6.0010.29 CL 8 06/20/90 ~1.0610.08 5.1310.20 CL 11 06/20/90 2.6110 09 4.3510.15 CL 116 06/20/90 0.6810.05 2.3310.11
.. t
- Only gamo emitters detected tre reporto); typical LLO voltma are fourx! h, Table 019 a CL 11 and CL 116 are conted .tocations.
1 164
1 i l TABtt D 12 (contigl GRASS CAMMA*= ISOTOPIC ACTIVITY
-(pCl/0 wet 2a)
Date Locationa tottected 397 K 40 Cs 137 , 1 I CL 1 07/04/90- -2.2010,10 6.9010.22 CL 2 07/04/90: 1.2110.08 5.7510.16 .j CL 8 07/04/90 2.0510.10 7.0610.31-CL 11 07/04/90 1.8610.10 5.2410.24-CL 116 07/04/90 2.3110.84 6.2110.23 --; CL 1 07/18/90 1.8910.10 5.8610.20 , CL 2 07/18/90 ~1.2110.08_- -5.7510.16- i CL 8 07/18/90 0.6110.04 6.7810.18 -} CL 11 07/18/90 1.4110.11-- .8.2610.36 CL-116 .07/18/90 2.2510.12 6'.3510.22 : CL 1 08/01/90 0.8910.15 5.1110.35 CL 2-- 08/01/90 0.6710.04 =8.7110.20 Cla8 08/01/90 0.3310.06 "$.1010.22 CL 11 08/01/90 0.2610.04 5.40to.12; CL 116 08/01/90 0.1210.03 '$.2810.19 CL 1 08/15/90- 1.3210.11 5.6010.29: CL 2 08/15/90 .1.5510.08 5.1310.25t CL 8 08/15/90 0.5710.03 '7.3710.22 CL 11 ~' 08/15/90 0.2910.04 5.0810.20 CL 116 08/15/90 .1.6710.08 -6.5410.18-CL 1 08/29/90 2.6110.08 -5.2510.18: l CL 2 08/29/90 1.4220.12 5.2910.25 , CL 8 08/29/90.. 10.9110 09 5.9910.23. :h CL 11 08/29/90- 1.04:0.09 -:5.0710.19 - CL*116 08/29/90-- -0.6910.06' 6.7010.25
- CL 1 09/12/90 0.8810.09 4.1110.23' -]
CL 2 .09/12/90 1.3010 07 5.5010.17-- CL 8 09/12/90 'O.9510.05- '6.9910.22; CL 11 09/12/90 1.3310.11 9.3410.31- .l CL 116 09/12/90'- 0.4910.04 -5.4710.24'
.CL 1 09/26/90 0.5410.07 3.6810.20 CL 2 09/26/90 1.3110.06 6.8910.28:
CL 8-- .09/26/90.' -0.9110.05- _-7.8810.26 : CL 11 09/26/90f 1.0310.68 -5.1210.19( CL 116 09/26/90 0.7410.04; -7.8610.24. _ sj i y f' i i l' Only panen$ emitters detteted are reported; typleat LLD values are-found In~ Table D 19. j
's CL 11 end CL 116 are control tocations.- ,
's _
1655 ' O . g V '
. - - , ., ..~ ..... . . - -. . . . . . . .
-)
TABLE D 12 (cont 8d) + i i> galt CA*A* 1sotople ActivlTY i- (pCf/g weti2a) Date-e K 40 cs 137 $ Location Coltected Be 7
.1 CL 1 10/24/90 .1.7410 11- 3.3110.20' .F CL 2 s10/24/90- 1.6610.05- '4.3410.13 CL 8 10/24/90 ' 2.3710.12' 7.5410.30 .
' CL 11 -10/24/90- : 2.6510.12i 6.9810.24 CL 116 10/24/90= .1.3410.08; -4.7110.21 '
CL 1 11/28/90 3.1110.10 .3.2710.17 f CL 2 - 11/28/90 3.2510.10- 3.3310.17 CL*8- 11/28/90 2.4410.06 4.3310.14~ CL 11 11/28/90 5.9010.16- '6.2810.23-:
-.CL 116 _11/28/90 2.5110.11. .4.4810.19 4
i i i e
.1 4
- p
-t I
, ,1 4
.; [
4 f ' r_ Only game emitters Ntected are reported; typical LLD' values.are-fomd in able D 19.J ;
-a CL',11 and CL*116'are controblocations, ,
l] 1 3 49 r' 4 * f g*g 9* g' g' w gy. 9y gy y., g } ,_g _
' TABLE D 13 GREEK LEAFY VEGETABLE 090$$ BETA AND GAMMA
- ISOTOPIC ACTIVffY (pCl/g wet 2a)
Date Gross Location" Lottected Beta Be 7 K 40 CL 114 Lettuce 06/27/90 2.211.1 2.5110.10' CL 114 Ca h ge 06/27/90 4.111.8 2.4810.07 CD 114 Swiss "hard 06/27/90 2.811.2 0.1010.06 5.80:0,19 CL 117 Lettx ; 06/27/90 3.712.1 3.5110.15 CL 117 Ca b ge 06/27/90 5.412.7 3.2710.13 CL.117 Swiss Chard 06/27/90 5.712.7 0.08310.016 5.1810.15 CL 114 Lettuce 07/25/90 3.4410.18 2.5910.26 CL 114 Ca b oo 07/25/90 2.1310.09 2.0510 08 CL 114 Swiss Chard 07/25/90 0.1110.02 4.0910.13
- 4.1610.21 CL 115 Lettuce 07/25/90 3.9010.19 4.2610.21 CL 115 Swiss Chard 07/25/90 5.0710.24 0.1210.054 4.6010.18 CL 117 Lettuce 07/25/90 2.5210.10 0.07810.044 1.9010.17 CL 117 Ca h ge 07/25/90 4.9110.29 1.9410.10 CL 117 Swiss Chard 07/25/90 3.5310.15 0.08310.018 4.3430.17 CL-114 Ca h ge 08/29/90 2.2710.12 0.1210.05 2.5210.14 CL 114 Swiss Chard 08/29/90 3.54f,0.16 0.1910.04 3.5410.13 CL 115 Lettuce 08/29/90 1.8910.07 0.2110.10 1.8910.23 CL 115 Ca h ge 08/29/90 2.2910.06 2.2210.07 CL-115 Swiss chard 08/29/90 3.7010.13 0.2210 08 4.2810.24 CL 117 Ca h ge 08/29/90 1.9510.08 -1.5510 10 CL 117 Swiss Chard 08/29/90 2.7910.12 0.1510.03 2.4810.08 CL 114 Cabbage 09/26/90 2.7210.10 0.1110 02 2.3210.10 CL 114 Swiss Chard 09/26/90 3.5010.13 3.3510.16 CL 115 Lettuce 09/26/90 3.6210.20 3.4410.39 CL 115 Ca h oe 09/26/90 2.8810.13 2.3310.07 CL 115 Swiss Chard 09/26/90 4.7310.18 0.1410.03 3.8810.10 CL 117 Co h ge 09/26/90 2.5510.09 1.8310.22 CL 117 Swiss Chard 09/26/90 3.6310.16 0.1310.05 2.6410.14
- Only gama emitters detected are remeted; typical LLO values are fourd in table 019.
a CL 114 Is a control location. 167
TABLE D-14 MEAT GAMMA
- ISOTOPIC ACTIVITY (pCi/g wet 2a) ,
Date Location Collected K-40 CL-106 Bovine Thyroid 01/10/90 1.1410.71 CL-106 Hamburger 01/10/90 1.3710.10 CL-106 Bovine Liver 01/10/90 2.1510.70
- only gamma emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found in Table D-19.
'l I
168 ii
q 7ABLE D-15 FISH GAMMA
- ISOTOPIC ACTIVITY =
(pCi/g weti2a) Date -j Locationa Collected K-40 CL-19 Blue Gill 04/09/90 2~.3910.10 CL-19-Crappie 04/09/90 3.0810.14 CL-19 Carp
. 04/09/90 '2.8010.15' CL-19 Largemouth Bass 04/09/90_ 2.8010.07_- _j CL-105 Blue Gill =04/10/90 2.2510.12 :-]
CL-105 Crappie :04/10/90- 2.'7710.13- ! CL-105 Carp _ 04/10/90_ :2.6910.12 ! CL-105-Largemouth Bass 04/10/90- 2.9810.11: , CL-19 Blue Gill 10/22/90 2.2410.18-CL-19 Crappie- 10/22/90 :2.7110.17; CL-19: Carp 10/22/90 2~6010.19
- l:i -
CL Largemouth . Bass - 10/22/90 2.6710.13 ' CL-105. Blue Gill 10/23/90 .2.3910.10 CL-105 Crappie- 10/23/90 2.8410.16 ' CL-105 Carp . . 10/23/90 2.5510 13- . CL-105 Largemouth Bass 10/23/90 2.91iO.12 -q i
- only gamma-emitters-detected are reported;-.typicalL-LLD- N values are foundLin Table D-19.
a CL-105 is a-control-location.-
.j-s.
3 -
.o 1
'T.
[ ; 1 >169; Cil i
^ , .
m N
TABtt D 16 AQUATIC YtCETAfl0N CAMMA* ISOToplc ACTIVITY (pCl/g wett2a) Date Locations .Cottected Be 7 K 40 Co 60 Co 137 CL 7B 04/09/90 0.49+0.16 1.60(0.21 CL*7C 04/09/90 0.3810.14 1.6210.33 0.04410.018 CL 9 04/09/90 2.8810.49 CL 10 04/09/90 5.1811.05 CL ti 04/09/90 1.3410.21 4.2710.55 CL 105 04/10/90 1.7011.38 0.1110.046 CL 78 06/18/90 1.5410.44 4.5810.76 CL 7C 06/18/90 1.3210.43 1.6510.43 0.0721v.017 CL 9 06/18/90 1.0310.13 2.1610.32 CL 10 06/18/90 2.6710.7C CL-19 06/18/90 2.5510.38 4.6510.66 0.08710.041 CL 78 08/20/90 0.6510.32 1.9210.71 0.1210.05 CL + 7C 08/20/90 3.4111.57 CL 9 08/20/90 1.0010.31 CL 10 08/20/90 1,841 0.66 CL 19 08/20/90 2.6610.66 0.2010.04 CL 78 10/22/90 0.3810.09 1.2110.20 CL 7C 10/22/90 0.5710.15 1.5810.25 CL-9 10/22/90 0.3810.09 1.14+0.21 CL 10 10/22/90 1.8510.25 CL 19 10/22/90 0.68*0.15 1.5210.28'- 0.'J3010.016 CL-105 10/23/90 0.59+0.22 4.7010.30
, 0.07310.020
- Only ganno emitters detected are reported; typteal LLD values are found in Table 019.
a CL 105 is e control location. 170 l
TABLE D 17 SHORELINE SE0thEI!T CROS$ ALPH4; CROSS BETA, Sr 90 AND CAWMA* Isot0Pic AcilVITY (pC1/g drys 2a) Date Gross b Gross b ff. 22b g.so 8 k2SE120 Collected 1)fhe Beta _ g,.7 CL 78 04/09/90 7.312.0 3.7810.11 CL 7C 04/09/90 10.712.6 6.6110.20 CL 10 04/09/90 4.012.8 9.512.0 7.8410.11 CL 19 04/09/90 10.812.1 8.5310.31 CL 88 04/09/90 10.112.2 6.5210.19 CL 89 04/09/90 10.112.6 6.7210.20 CL 93 04/09/90 B.812.3 0.6410.073 3.6510.20 CL 105 04/10/90 9.612.4 6.5210 23 ; Date Location
- Cottected Cs 137 Ac 228 ph114 Pb 212 Pb 214 CL 78 04/09/90 0.1410.019 0.1210.007 0.1210.009 0.1110.015 CL 7C 04/09/90 0.2010.022 0.2410.013 0.1310.011 CL 10 04/09/90 0.00610.003 0.2410.019 0.1710.007 0.2410.007 0,201 0.008 CL 19 04/09/90 0.4110.030 0.2810.020 0.4910.020 0.3410.024 CL 88 04/09/90 0.1810.029 0.1410 013 0.1810.098 0.1710.014 CL 89 04/09/90 0.3010.014 0.2210 021 CL 93 04/09/90 0.2810.034 0.4210.026 0.3810.022 0.4210.029 CL-105 04/10/90 0.1410.020 0.2010.011 0.1310.011 Date a
[ocetion Collected Re 226 TI 208 CL 78 04/09/90 0.4510.12 0.1210.013 CL 7C 04/09/90 0.1810.016 CL 10 04/09/90 0.3510.008 0.2210.015 CL 19 04/09/90 0.7(1.12 0.3510.027 CL 88 04/09/90 0.3010.12 0.1610.024 CL 89 04/09/90 0.5410.10 0.2310.017 CL-93 04/09/90 1.5810.17 0.2710.030 CL 105 04/10/90 0.2710.070 0.1310 015
- Only gamo emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are fomd in Toble 019.
a CL 105 is a controt location, b only cetected values are reported; typicat LLD values are found in table 0 19. 171
}
}
TABLE D 17 (cont'd) SHORELINE SEDIMENT GROTS ALPHA. CROSS BETA.
$r 90 AND CAMMA* ISOTOPlc ACTIVITY (pC1/g drys 2e Date Grossb Cross b locettona cetteeted AltAo . Bete it,:,9Qb g,.y g.43 CL 7B 10/22/90 8.112.0 '5.5610.42 CL 7C 10/22/90 5.311 7 7.0810.17 CL 10 10/22/90 5.411.7 ~ 5.8410 '.8 CL 19 10/22/90 4.212.8 8.211.9 6.4510 34 j CL 88 10/2?/90 7.911.9 5.85+0.31 CL 89 10/22/90 11.911 4 0.2710.055 10.0910.23 CL 93 10/22/90 5.513.2 10.412.3 0.0341 0.008 1.5610.12 3.8110.31 ,
CL 105 10/23/90- 7.611.9 7.3610.24 l Date Location a Cottected Cs 137 Ac 228 gj -2j,4 Pb 212 Pb-214 CL 78 10/22/90 0.1310.030 0.1510.043 CL 7C 10/22/90 0.1610.025 0.1410.013 0.1810.010 0.1610.014 CL 10 10/22/90 0.1410.029 0.1210.014 0.1410.010 0.1310 014 CL 19 10/22/90 0.2010.064 0.2010.025 0.1710.024 0.2010.032 CL 88 10/22/90 0.1110.033 0.1410.037~ 0.1410.040 CL-89 10/22/90 0.0371 0.007 0.35+0.024 0.3010.015 0.4210.013- 0.3110.015 CL-93 10/22/90 0.2710.042 0.4010.038 0.24+0.027 0.4110.035 CL-105 10/23/90 0.26+0.042 0.2010.023 0.2610.017 0.23+0.022' ! Date Locations cegg,eg,q p, 226 ft 208 CL 78 10/22/90 0.5510.26 0.1210.047-CL 7C 10/22/90 0.3210.12 0.1810.021 CL 10 10/22/90 0.2910.12 0.16+0.020 CL-19 10/22/90 0.4510.30 0.1810.032 CL 88 10/22/90 0.12+0.058 CL 89 10/22/90 0.7410.093 0.3810.020 CL 93 10/22/90 1.4010.27 0.2610.033 CL 105 10/23/90 0.64+0.18 0.2610.036 i
- Only gama emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values 9re found in Table 019.
a CL 105 is a control location. i b only detected values are reported; typical LLD values are found in Table D-19. 172
t I neura BOTTOM SEDIMENT CROSS ALPHA. CROSS BETA. St-90 AND CAWMA* ts0TOPlc ACTIVITY (pC1/0 drytta) Date Cross b Gross b locatione Cottected A t rA s _ Bete II-29b g ,.7 g.40 CL 7C 04/09/90 12.314.0 20.712 9 0.03010.011 13.9710.81 CL 10 04/09/90 13.913.3 24.012.4 0.03110.007 14.0010.36 CL 13A 04/09/90 7.812.4 5.7710.32 CL 19 04/09/90 6.413.1 13.212.5 0.01410.010 11.22 0.44 CL 89 04/09/90 8.413.6 16.212.7 9.0110 30 CL 105 04/10/90 14.213.4 25.112.4 0.02010.006 13.4010.37 Date Qcation s Cottected Cs 137 Ac 228 gj ,2,li Pb 212 _ Pb 214 CL 7C 04/09/90 0.23:0,036 1.05+0.14 0.7810.077 1.1110.056 0.9310081 CL 10 04/09/90 0.4510.019 1.21+0.070 0.8310.045 1.4210.041 0.8310.040 CL 13A 04/09/90 0.2110.059 0.1210.032 0.1710.027 0.14+0.037 CL 19 04/09/90 0.05810.018 0.4310.071 0.19+0.043 0.3110.050 0.3110.053 CL 89 04/09/90 0.3810.045 0.5310.026 0.3010.022 CL 105 04/10/90 0.3610.018 1.0510.061 0.6210.044 1.4210.036 0.7010.030 Date Locationa Collected Rn 226 Tt 208 CL 7C 04/09/90 1.73+0.060 0.9010.12 CL 10 04/09/90 2.0010.44 1.0210.065 CL 13A 04/09/90 0.3710.35 0.1910.042 CL 19 04/09/90 0.2510.61 0.2610.084 CL 89 04/09/90 0.9610.16 0.3310.030 CL 105 04/10/90 1.9610.24 0.9810.048
- Only gaarna emitters detected are reported; typical LLD values are found in Table 019.
.a CL 105 is a control tocation.
b only detected values are reported; typlcal LLD values are found in Table 019. 173
TABtt D-1B fcont'd) BOTTOM SEDIMENT CROSS ALPHA. CROS! BETA, s Sr-90 AND CAMMA* 1Sofopic ACTlvlTY (pCl/g dryt2a) I Date Gross b Gross b Locottona collected Alohn Beta b 3 ,.7 g.co Jft-2Q CL 7C 10/22/90 12.713.5 21.512.2 0.4910.12 15.4810.24 CL 10 10/22/90 8.013.2 23.612.6 0.02110.008 13.2010.61 i CL 13A 10/22/90 6.7+1.8 7.8610.28 CL 17C 10/22/90 5.812.8 17.912.3 0.01410.008 11.34+0.51 CL 19 10/22/90 14.515.6 33.813.9 10.7010.33 CL*89 10/22/90 9.611.4 6.2810.25 CL 105 10/23/90 10.413.5 22.212.3 15.1210 ,62 f Date i Loestiona colteeted es 137 Ae 228 91 214 Pb 212 Pb 214 CL 7C 10/22/90 0.3210.014 1.3610.052 1.0410.033 1.6710.028 1.3310.040 CL 10 10/22/90 0.4210.033 1.0810.096 0.93*0.059 1.5110.057 0.9010.052 CL 13A 10/22/90 0.22+0.028 0.3010.014 0.1810.015 . CL 17* 10/22/90 0.07010.026 0.6510.13 0.3610.058 0.5710.053 0.45+0.071 i CL 19 10/22/90 0.22+0.020 0.2110.010 0.1910.014 CL 89 10/22/90 0.2110.018 0.1610.022 CL 105 10/23/90 0.3910.032 1.42+0.14 0.7110.075 1.4310.071 0.90+0.072 Date locationa CoHettisl Ra 226 ft 208 CL 7C 10/22/90 3.2410.33 1.3910.54 CL 10 10/22/90 2.0610.33 1.0710.075 CL-13A 10/22/90 0.4410.082 0.2010 019 CL 17c 10/22/90 0.7010.68 0.5110.096 CL 19 10/22/90 0.35+0.075 0.2110 017 CL 89 10/22/90 0.4110.024 0.2210.022 CL 105 10/23/90 2.3110.87 1.11+0.12 i
- Only game emitters detected are reported; typical LLD vetues are found in Table 019.
a CL 105 is a control location. b Only detected values are reported; typical LLD values are found in Table D 19. c New sampling tccation; first collection 10/22/90. 174 q 1
TAPLE D 19 DETECTION REQUIREMEhTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSita,b LOWER LIMlf 0F DETECTION (LLD) Airborne Water Particulate fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCl/l) or Gas (pCl/m 3) (pCl/kg, wet) (pCl/l) (pCl/kg, wet) (pCl/kg. dry) Gross Beta 4 0.01 -- - - *** H3 2,000c _ Mn 54 15 - 130 - -- -- Fe 59 30 -- 260 - - - Co 58,60 15 - 130 - " - Zn 65 30 " 260 -- - Zr 95 30 - - - - - Nb 95 15 -. -- -- - - 1 131 1d 0.07 - 1 60 "- a Cs 134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs 137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba 140 60 "- "- 60 ~ - La 140 15 ~ - 15 "- -- Tab'.e Notations a This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that a.e identified, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyted and reported. b Required detection capabilities for .TLDs used for envirorpental measurements shall be in accordance with the recornmendations of Regulatory Guide 4.13, Revision 1, July 1977. c if no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 3,000 pcl/l any be used. d If no drinking water pathway exists, a vr.lue of 15 pcl/l may be used. 175
APPENDIX E CPS Radiological Environmental Monitoring Quality Contro1' Check Results 1990 176
LABLE E 1 U. S. EPA CROSSCHECK PROGRAM 8 Correntration in pCl/lb TIML Result EPA Resultd Lab sample Date Code Type Collected Analysis 32 s.d.C 21 s.d., Nel Control Limits STW 589 Water J6n 1990 Sr 89 22.7:5.0 25.025.0 16.3 33.7 Sr 90 17.3 t 1.28 20.011.5 17.4 22.6 STW-591 Water Jan 1990 Gr. Alpha 10.313.0 12.0t5.0 3.3 20.7 Gr. Beta 12.3*1.2 12.015.0 3.3 20.7 STW 592 Water Jan 1990 co 60 14.7:2.3 15.015.0 6.3 23.7 Zn-65 135.026.9 139.0214.0 114.8 163.2 Ru 106 133.3213.4 139.0114.0 114.8 163.2 Cs 134 17.3tt.2 18.015.0 9.3 26.7 Cs 137 19.311.2 18.015.0 9.3 26.7 Ba 133 78.020.0 74.017.0 61.9 86.1 StW 593 Water Feu '990 H3 4827tB3 49764498 4113 5839 STW 594 Water Mar 1990 Ra 226 5.0:0.2 4.9s0.7 4.1 5.7 Ra 228 13.520.7 12.721.9 9.4 16.0 STW 595 Water Mar 1990 U 4.0 0.0 4.016.0 0.0 14.4 STW 596 Air Mar 1990 Gr. Alm a 7.3 1.2 5.015.0 0.0 13.7 Fitter Gr. Seta 34.0t0.0 31.0 5.0 22.3 39.7 Sr 90 10.0 0.0 10.021.5 7.4-12.6 L. '37 9.3 1.2 10.0 5.0 1.3 18.7 STW 597 Water Apr 1990 598 (Blind) Sample A Gr. Alpha 81.023.5 90.0223.0 50.1 129.9 Ra 226 4.910.4 5.040.8 3.6 6.4 Ra 228 10.6 0.3 10.2 1.5 7.6 12.8 U 18.723.0 20.016.0 9.6 30.4 Sample B Gr. Beta 51.0110.1 52.015.0 43.3 60.7 Sr-89 9.311.2 10.025.0 1.3 18.7 Sr 90 10.3t3.1 10.0 1.5 8.3-11.7 Cs 134 16.010.0 15.025.0 6.3 23.7 Cs 137 19.042.0 15.045.0 6.3 23.7 177
TABLE E 1 (cont'd) Concentration in pCl/lb T!ML Result EPA Resultd Lab Sanple Date Code Type Collected Analysis 12 s.d.C al s.d., Ns1 Control Limits STM 599 Mllk Apr 1990 Sr 89 21.7 3.1 23.015.0 14.3 31.7 Sr 90 21.0 7.0 23.015.0 14.3 31.7 I 131 98.721.2 99.0110.0 81.7 116.3 Cs 137 76.016.0 24.015.0 15.3 32.7 K 1300.0269.2f 1550.0278.0 1414.7 1685.3 STW 600 Water May 1990 Sr 89 6.0 2.0 7.015.0 0.0 15.7 Sr 90 6.7t1.2 7.025.0 0.0 15.7 STW 601 Water May 1990 Gr. Alpna 11.02.00 22.026.0 11.6 32.4 Gr. Beta 12.3:1.2 15.015.0 6.3 23.7 STW 602 Water June 1990 Co 60 25.322.3 24.015.0 15.3 32.7 2n 65 155.0:10.6 148.0 15.0 130.6 165.4 Ru 106 202.7217.2 210.0221.0 173.6 246.4 Cs 134 23.7t1.2 24.015.0 18.2 29.8 Cs 137 27.7 3.1 25.0:5.0 16.3 33.7 Ba 133 100.7t8.1 99.0:10.0 81.7 116.3 STW 603 Water Jun 1990 H3 29274306 2933:358 2312 3554 STW 604 Water Jul 1990 Ra 226 11.St0.9 12.111.8 '9.0 15.2 Ra 228 4.1 1.4 5.111.3 2.8 7.4 STW 605 Water Jul 1990 U 20.3tt.7 20.8 3.0 15.6 26.0 STW 606 Water Aug 1990 1 131 43.0t1.7 39.016.0 28.6 49.4 STV 607 Water Aug 1990 Pu 239 10.1:1.7 9.1:0.9 7.5 10.7 STW 608 Air Aug 1990 Gr. At @ a 14.0:0.0 10.025.0 1.3 18.7-Gr. Bets 65.3t1.2 62.015.0 53.3 70.7 Sr 90 19.026.9 20.0t5.0 11.3 28.7 Cs 137 19.022.0 20.015.0 11.3 28.7 STW 609 Water Sep 1990 Sr 89 9.012.0 10.0 5.0 1,3-18.7 S r 90 . 9.025.0 9.0:5.0 0.3 17.7 STM 610 Water Sep 1990 Gr. Alpha 8.3tl.2 10.C 5.0 1.3 18.7 Gr. Beta 10.3 1.2 10.025.0 1.3 18.7 178
l TA8tt E 1 (cont 8d) Concentration in pCl/tb TIML Result EPA Resultd Lab Sample Date Code Type Collected Analysis 12 s.d.C si s.d., Nai Control Limits STM 611 Milk Sep 1990 Sr 89 11.713.1 16.015.0 7.3 24.7 Sr 90 15.010.0 20.015.0 11.3 28.7 1 131 63.026.0 58.026.0 47.6 68.4 Cs 137 20.022.0 20.015.0 11.3 28.7 K 40 1673.3470.2 1700.0185.0 1552.5 1847.5 STW 612 Water Oct 1990 co 60 20.313.1 20.0:5.0 11.3 28.7 2n-65 115.3212.2 115.0212.0 94.2 135.8 Ru 106 152.028.0 151.0t15.0 125.04177.0 Cs 134 11.020.0 12.025.0 3.3 20.7 Cs 137 14.0t2.0 12.025.0 3.3-20.7 Ba 133 116.729.9 110.0211.0 90.0 129.1 STW 613 Water Oct 1990 H3 7167 330 7203t720 5954 8452 STW 614 Water Oct 1990 615 Sanple A Gr. Alpha 68.727.2 62.0116.0 34.2 89.8 Ra 226 12.9:0,3 13.6:2.0 10.1 17.1 Ra 228 4.210.6 5.0 1.3 2.7 7.3 U 10.4:0.6 10.223.0 5.0 15.4 Sample 8 Gr. Beta 55.0 8.7 53.025.0 44.3 61.7 Sr 89 15.722.9 20.015.0 11.3 28.7 Sr 90 12.012.0 15.015.0 6.3 23.7 Cs 134 9.0 1.7 -7.015.0 0.0 15.7 Cs 137 7.721.2 5.015.0 0.0 13.7 STW 616 Water Nov 1990 Ra 226 6.821.0 7.441.1 5.5 9.3 h STW 617 Water Nov 1990 U 35.0to.4 35.5:3.6 29.3-41.7 a Results obtained by Teledyne Isotopes Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the environmental sample crosscheck program cperated by the Interconparison and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Envirornental Protection Agency (EPA), Las Vegas, Nevada, b Att results are in the pCl/t, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in - mg/L; air filter samptes, which are in pcl/ fitter; and food, which is in mg/kg. c Unless otherwise Indicated, the TIML results are given as the mean 12 standard deviations for three determinations. d USEPA results are presented as the known values end expected laboratory precision (1 s.d., 1 determination) and control limits as defined by EPA. 179
TABLE E i (cont 8d) Concentration in pCl/lb TIML Result EPA Resultd Lab Sanple Date Code Type Collected Analysis 22 s.d.C al s.d., Ns1 Control Limits e Sanple was reanalyzed in triplicate. Results of reanalyses 18.8tl.5 pCl/L. No further action taken. f Sample was reanalyzed in triplicate. Results of reanalyses 1421.7s95.3 mg/L. The cause of the low results is unknown. g Sample was reanalyzed in triplicate. Results of reanalyses 13.411.0 pcl/L. No further action taken. h Sanple was analyzed but the resulta not submitted to EPA because deadline was missed (6ll data on file). O o 180
YtBLE E 2 IW. HOUSE SplKfD SAMDLES Concentration in DCi/l Lab Sanple Date TIML Result Known Expected Code Type Collected Analysis n=3 Activity Precision ti s.d. ra3 QC MI 26 Milk Jan 1990 Cs 134 19.311.0 20.818.0 8.7 Cs 137 25.2t1.2 22.818.0 3.7 QC MI 27 Milk Feb 1990 Sr 90 18.0 1.6 18.815.0 5.2 QC MI 28 Milk Mar 1990 1 131 63.8:2.2 62.6 6.0 6.3 QC MI 61 Water Apr 1990 Sr 89 17.925.5 23.128.7 8.7 Sr 90 19.412.5 23.515.2 5.2 QC MI 29 Milk Apr 1990 1 131 90.7 9.2 82.5t8.5 8.2 Cs 134 18.3t1.0 19.725.0 5.0 Cs 137 20.3t1.0 18.215.0 5.0 QC W 62 Water Apr ii90 co 60 8.7 0,4 9.4t5.0 5.0 Cs 134 20.0t0.2 19.7 5.0 5.0 Cs 137 28.7t1.4 22.725.0 5.0 QC W 63 Water Apr 1990 1 131 63.548.0 66.026.7 6.6 QC W 64 Water Apr 1990 H3 19411130 1826.01350.0 724 QC W 65 Water June 1990 Ra 226 6.4:0.2 6.941.0 1.0 QC W 66 Water June 1990 U 6.210.2 6.026.0 6.0 QC W 68 Water June 1990 Gr. Alpha 9.810.3 10.616.0 8.7 Gr. Beta 11.4t0.6 11.317.0 8.7 QC MI 30 Milk July 1990 Sr 89 12.810 4 18.4+10.0 8.7 Sr 90 18.211.4 18.716.0 5.2 Cs 134 46.011.3 49.015.0 5.0 Cs 137 27.611.3 25.315.0 5.0 QC MI 31 Milk Aug 1990 1 131 68.8 1.6 61.4212.3 10.4 QC W-69 Water Sep 1990 $r 89 17.711.6 19.2210.0 8.7 Sr 90 13.9:1.6 17.4210.0 5.2 QC MI 32 Milk Oct 1990 1 131 34.8 6.5 32.4t6.5 8.7 Cs 134 25.811.2 27.3210.0 B.7 Cs 137 25.3s2.0 22.4210.0 8.7 QC W-70 Water Oct 1990 H3 2355:59 2276t455 605 181
TABLE E 2 (Cont 8d) IN HOUSE $ PIKED SAMPLES Concentration in DCl/t Lab Sanple Date TIML Result Known Expected Code Type Collected Analysts n=3 Activity Precision ti s.d. n=3 QC W 71 Water Oct 1990 1 131 55.940.9 51.8110.4 10.4 QC W 73 Water Oct 1990 Co-60 18.312.7 16.815.0 8.7 Cs 134 28.312.3 27.045.0 8.7 Cs 137 22.741.3 22.4t5.0 8.7 QC W 74 Water Dec 1990 Gr. Alpha 21.421.0 26.146.5 11.3 Gr. Beta 25.9:1.0 22.315.6 9.7 182
1ABLE E 3 IN HOUSE BLANK SAWPLES
. Concentration in DCl/t Acceptance Lab senple Date Results Criteria C_qde Tvoe Collected Analysts (4.66 s.d.) (4.66 s.d.)
SPW 8039 Water Jan 1990 to 226 <0.2 <1 SPS 8040 Milk Jan 1990 Sr 89 <0.8 <5 Sr 90 <1.0 <1 SPS 8208 Milk Jan 1990 Sr 89 <0.8 <5 Sr 90 1.6t0.5a <3 Cs 136 <3.6 <10 Cs 137 <4.7 <10 SPS ST12 Milk Feb 1990 Sr 89 <0.3 <5 Sr 90 1.2 0.3 8 <1 SPW 8312A Water Feb 1990 Sr 89 <0.6 <5 Sr 90 <0.7 <1 SPS 8314 Milk Mar 1990 1 131 <0.3 <1 SPS 8510 Milk May 1990 1 131 <0.2 <1 Cs 134 <4.6 <10 Cs 137 <4.8 <10 SPW 8511A Water May 1990 H3 <200 <300 Sos 8600 Milk July 1990 Sr 89 <0.8 <S Sr-90 1.740.6a <j 1 131 <0.3 <1 Cs 134 <5.0 <10 Cs 137 <7.0 <10 SPM 8877 Milk Aug 1990 1 131 <0.2 <1 SPW 8925 Water Aug 1990 H3 <200 <300 SPW 8926 Water Aug 1990 Gr. Alpha <0.3 <1' Gr. Beta <0.7 <4 SPW 8927 Water Aug 1990 U 234 <0.01 <1 U 235 <0.02 <1 U 238 <0.01- <1 183
TABLE E-3 (cont'd) IN HOUSE PLANK SAMPtts Concentration in t<i/l Acceptance Lab Sanple Date Results Criteria
$.9de Type cetteeted Analyste (4.66 s.d.) f4.66 s.d.)
SPW 8928 Water Aug 1990 Mn 54 <4.0 <5 Co 58 <4.1 <5 Co 60 <2.4 <5 Cs 134 <3.3 <5 Cs 137 <3.7 <5 SPW 8929 Water Aug 1990 Sr 89 <1.4 c5 Sr 90 <0.6 <1 SPW 69 Water Sep 1990 $r 89 <1.8 <5 Sr 90 <0.8 <1 SPW 106 Water Oct 1990 H3 <180 <300 SPM 107 Milk Oct 1990 1 131 <0.4 <1 Cs 134 <3.3 <5 Cs 1'7 <4.3 <5 SFW 370 Water Oct 1990 G 44 <1.7 <5 Co 58 <2.6 <5 Co 60 <1.6 <5 Cs 134 <1.7 <5 , ts 137 <1.8 <5 SPW 372 Water Dec 1990 Gr. Alpha <0.3 <1 Gr. Beta <0.8 <4
- Low level (1 5 pCl/L) of Sr 90 concentration in milk la not unusual.
184
TABLE E 4 CROSS CHEtt PROGRAM RESULTS. THERMottMlWEstENT DOS! METER * (TLDs) ne Teledyne L e.b TLD Result Known Code Type Measurenent 22 s.d.a Valueb Teledyne TestinaC 90 id Tetedyne Lab 20.6s1.4 19.6 CaSo4tDy Cards 90 2' Tetedyne Lab 100.8:4.3 100.0 Caso4tDy Cards a Lab result given is the mean 12 standard deviations of three determinations, b Value determined by sponsor of the intercarperison using continuously operated pressurized ion chanter. c Cards were sutaltted in September 1990 and cards were sutnitted in November 1990 to teledyne 1sotopes, Inc., Westwood, NJ for irradiation. d Cards were irradiated by Teledyne isotopes, Inc., Westwoud, NJ on June 19, 1990, e Cards were irradiated by Dosimetry Associates, Inc., Northyllte, MI on October 30, 1990. 9 185
TABLE E 5 ACCEPTAWCE CRITERIA FOR SPIKED SAMPLES LABORATORY PRECISIONt ONE STANDARD DEVIAtl0N VALUES FOR VARIOUS ANALYSESa One Standard Deviation Analysis levet for Sinate Determination Canma Emitters 5 to 100 pcl/ titer or kg 5 pct / liter
>100 pcl/ liter or kg 5% of known value Strontlun 89b 5 to 50 pct / titer or kg 5 pct / liter
>50 pci/ titer or kg 10% of known value Strontiun 90b 2 to 30 pct / liter or kg 3.0 pct / Liter
>30 pcl/ titer of kg 10% of known value Potassium >0.1 g/ liter or kg 5% of known value Gross Alpha <20 pct / liter 5 pct / liter
>20 pct / liter 25% of known value Gross Beta <100 pct / liter 5 pct / liter
>100 pct / titer 5% of known value Tritium <4,000 pcl/ titer 1 s.d. e (pcl/ liter) =
169.05 x (known) 0933
>4,000 pct / liter 10% of known value t
Radium 226 <0.1 pct / titer 15% of known value Radium 228 Plutontun 0.1 pcl/ liter, gram 10% of known value or sanple lodine 131, <55 pcl/ titer 6 pcl/ titer lodine 129b >$$ pcl/ liter 10% of known value Uranium 238, <35 pcl/ titer 6 pcl/ liter-Nickel 63D, >35 pcl/ liter 15% of known value Technetium.99b , Iron 55D 50 to 100 pcl/ liter 10 pcl/ titer 10% of known value a From EPA publication, "Envirorsnental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program", Fiscal Year 1981 1982, EPA 600/4 81 004. b TIML limit. 186
1 \ 4
- FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL OR WRITE The Radiation Protection Department -
Clinton Power Station gg g> R.R. 3, P. O. Box 228 ,.
--l((ll$l$ .
- Clinton,.lllinois 61727 -
g _.
-(217) 935-8881-dfy , . ,
. _- - _ _ - _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ - - - _ - - - .. _}}