ML20067A896
| ML20067A896 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1985 |
| From: | Holloway C NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082420195 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-90-162 NUDOCS 9102080026 | |
| Download: ML20067A896 (13) | |
Text
.
N%
UNITED ST ATES
\\
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON f
M(
f W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 APR I 21985
- q MEMORANDUN FOR:
Files THRU:
William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch, ADM FROM:
C. James Holloway, Jr., Assistant Chief License-Fee Management Branch, ADM
SUBJECT:
IE-HQ AND REGIONAL OFFICE PROFESS 101,4AL STAFF HOUR DATA Part 170 of the Commission's regulations was revised effective June 20, 1984. Sect' a 170.12(b) provides that for each application for which the review enarges are based on full costs and the application has been pending with t.he Comission for six months or longer, the first bill for accumulated costs would be sent to the applicant after the rule became effective.
For construction permit applications, the bill would include the professional staff hours and contractual costs expended from the date the application was filed through June 23, 1984.
For operating license applications under review, the bill would include professional staff hours and contractual services costs from the date the construc-tion permit was issued through June 23, 1984.
The date of June 23, 1984, was used for the end of the reporting period instead of June 20, 1984, the effective date of the rule, because professional staff hours are reported to the Regulatory Information Tracking Systm (RITS) on a weekly basis and can be pulled from the computer only in weekly incre-
- ments, in order to complete the initial billings required by 170.12(b), a detailed analysis,and review was performed of professional staff hour computer data provided by IE-HQ and the Regional Offices relating to 55 cases (Enclosure 1)undergoingreview. The data provided to LFMB was used in the initial fee billings.
Specifically, the activity codes used by the professional staff in IE-HQ and the Regions to charge hours to the specific dockets were reviewed.
In each of the cases, a deter-mination was made as to whether the hours shown in the computer report should be included or excluded from license fee recovery for the period through June 23, 1984.
Those activity codes which were included for license fee recovery are listed in Enclosure 2.
Activity codes which were excluded from fee recovery are shown in Enclosure 3.
The activity codes included for and excluded from license fee recovery will change for those inspections conducted on or after June 24, 1984.
A separate
?$ Uk??b 900921 g(t r
WILLIAN90.162 PDR
.4Hi 2 I l#"
Filer 4 memorandum to files was written for each individual case showing the professional staff hours and contractual services costs expended by IE-HQ and the Regional Offices for the various activity codes..
A review of the activity codes in Enclosure 2 shows that 'only the professional staff hours through June 23,1984, relating to the' routine -
inspection prograin have been included for fee recovery.
When the March 23,1978, fee schedule became effective, the NRC assessed fees for the first time for routine inspections only.
For fee purposes, construc-tion appraisal team (CAT) inspections, integrated design inspections.
(101), emergency pre appraisal team (PAT)paredness (EP) inspections. allegations,. performance.
inspections and systematic appraisal of licensee -
performance (SALP) were not considered routine inspections and thus were
-i outside the scope of fee recovery.
In fact, the Commission indicated on page52461(170.3 Definitions) of the Proposed Notice of Rulemaking.
dated November 22,1982(effectiveJune20,1984) that " Inspections
-l include... non-routine inspections such as reactive inspections,.
investigations, incident / accident responsea performance appraisal inspections, enforcement activities, special emergency preparedness inspections and systematic appraisal of licensee performance." It.was:
the inteut when the March 23,1978, fee schedule was developed that CAT,.
PAT,1D1, and EP inspections, allegations, and SALP were clearly outside the scope of the routine inspection program and'would not be recovered-through inspection fees.
This matter was discussed on September 18, 1984, with the Director and Deputy Director, ADH. and it was. agreed that in determining the costs to be assessed for.those. reactors' undergoing.
operating license review under the fee schedule effective June-20, 1984~,
any costs relating to the types of inspections mentioned above would not-be included in the license fees assessed for the period through June 23',-
1984. The costs.for those kinds of inspections conducted on or after-June 24. 1984, for CP or OL applications under review could be recovered since the revised fee schedule permits recovery of costs for both routine and non-routine inspections.
si,,,a,e J,w w m A C. James Holloway, Jr., Assistant Chief License Fee Management-Branch-Office of AMnistration-
Enclosures:
^*' stated DISTRIBUTION:
APPROVEU*,
ActualManpowerFile(eachcaseinEncl.1).
RMDiggs w/encls.
. oriennt sinons br CJHolloway w/encis..
% o sim..
DWeiss w/encls.
(j 1
w/encls.
William O. Mt W r,' Chief
/ Lice-e Fee &n;; :=t k:n:h
- met >
,,L F j o,,A,DM,',,
3,:
,,,L FM,B,: ADM,,,
ac m e>CJ, way,:Jp,,,W,0M11,1 e,r,,,
on,p I4/~gi/85
....h.,.,/85 4/
RC FORM 318 (10 80l NRCM O240
- OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
LEnclosure 1 Inspection and Enforcement' and RegionalL0ffice Construction Permit-and Operating License Reviews 1
1.
Beaver Valley 2 2 7.-
ilidland 1 2.
Bellefonte 1
- 28. liidland 2
-l 3.
Bellefonte 2 -
- 29. H111 stone 3 4.
Braidwood 1 30.- Nine Mile Point 2 5.- Braidwood 2 31.- Palo' Verde 1-6.
Byron 1-
-22.
.Palo-Verde 2 1
7.
Byron 2 33.
Palo Verde 3-t 8.
Callaway 1 34 = Perry 1 9.
Catawba 1 354 Perry 21
-10.
Catawba 2 36.
River Bend 1-
- 11. Clinch River 37.
River Bend 2
- 12. Clinton 1 38.. Seabrook 1
- 13. Comanche Peak 1
~39.
Seabrook 2 14.
Comanche Peak 2 40.-
Shoreham
- 15. Diablo Canyon 1 41.~ Skagit/Hanford 1 16.. Diablo Canyon 2
- 42. - Skagit/Hanford'2 17.
Fermi 2 43.
SouthLTexas 1
- 18. Grand Gulf 1 14 4.
South Texas.2
- 19. Grand Gulf 2 145.
Susquehanna 2
- 20. Harris l'
- 46. Vogtle 1-
- 21. Harris'2
- 47. -Vogtle 2-
- 22. Hope Creek 1 48.
Waterford 3:
- 23. Limerick 1
- 49. Watts-Bar 1-
- 24. Limerick 2 50L Watts Bar 2
- 25. Harble Hill 1
.51.5 WNP-1:
- 26. Harble Hill 2
- 52. - WNP-2E 153. WNP-3
- 54.. Wolf Creek:1' 155.
Zimmer-r q
l q
- Enclosure 2L t
q INSPECTION-AND ENFORCEMENT AND REGIONAL OFFICE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND OPERATING LICENSE REVIEWS-Activity Codes Included For License Fee Recovery-Throu'gh-6/23/84 -
_ Routine' Inspection Program - The routine inspection program consists.of.'
I scheduled inspection activity.
i Activity Codes' Description of Activity Codes.
ITA -
Off-site' routine-safety inPction effort 1TO All other routine safety inspection offort l
1TV-Preparation for' routine safety inspection 1 W
1TW On-site routine safety inspection effort.
-lTX In-office routine safety' inspection effort ITY Preparation for routine. safety"inspe: tion _ report writing d
ITZ Routine safety inspection _ repo'rt writing.
~2TA~
Off-site routine environment' inspection, o
2TO All other routine environmenta1Li_nspection effort?
2TW On-site routine environmen'al--inspection effort t
2TX In-office routine environmental: inspection effort 3TA Off-site routine safeguardiinspection effort 1/
3TO Routine safeguards inspection effortY 4
On-site routine safeguards inspection.efl forte 3TW 3TX In-office routine safeguards inspection effortE 1/
Included for operating license _ fee recovery since professional-staff effort was expended on or after 3/23/78, the date of the revised rule-pennitting the recovery..of ~ safeguards costs.
.-2..
Activity Codes Description of Activity Codes APD Routine documentation API Routine on-site /of f-site 11nspection APP-Routine inspection preparation DOC Routine documentation PAP Routine preparation PP1 Routine _ inspection
Other Activities Included For Fee-Recovery-BC
-Emergency 4Preparednessil_icensing review:
JH
-Quality Assurance ReviewsU i
J90 Review comment and' assistance to licensing _
q I
LEP L i cens ing-emergency-- prepa rednes s.
' LOA Licensing other activities; 3
1 LRA Licensing reactor _ activities l
.Part 50-security,p1_ans OLA Operator Licensing Activities
- 1
- i PFE Power facility initial exam-l 1
PSA Performing secur_ity-activities; PSR Licensing action.- power reactori_ plant specific -
QAT Quality Assurance resiews E
-110 Safety CP activities-E -Included for operating license ; fee recovery if review was of. Chapter 17-'
of-the FSAR;and not a topical' report review.
)
__.___.__1_mm__
m
- .a.._g.;i2_~.
y.
.....*2.
.#2_.
=. -_-,,
..~..
.m,2
+
a 9a m-y
..~.
a
-1 c
-t 3-a i
I Activity Codes Description of Activity Codes <
131 Power facility. initial exams' 135 Training Program Review relating t'o initial ~ operator ekams:
140 Safety review of partial = power application' j
Operator Licensing
- Initial hot and cold: operator: exams-r t
.]
k 1
l
- 1
- (
[
1
- ,E.,-v.osm-f
.e 4
w y-.5,-.r-
+,
. hee g
y v m --p
-ee y g g.,
g 9
4
INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMEllT AND REG 10liAL OFFICE C0liSTRUCTION PER!11T AND OPERATlHO LICEllSE. REVIEWS Activity Cooes Excluded From License Fee Recovery Through 6/23/84-
. Activity Codes Description of Activity Codes t
AlK1 Program development and other' support-i AEP InspectlGn program management and administration i
AFE-Allegation follow-up effort AFI Freedom of information ALR ACRS operating license' review (reported separately)'
ANT Non-technical training.
A0A Other administrative APA-tionitor= case review 4
a APL ACRS Monitor-Case Progress-(reported separately)
ARD Reactive documentation-ARI Reactive.on-si te/of f-si te. ins pection -
ARP-Reactive inspection preparation ASl Inspector support to other offices.
AST Inspector support to.other offices -
1 AT Travel - inspection related ATV Travel
. l BA1 Normal enforcement-activities' 4
BA2 Escalated; enforcement activities o
BB Systematic-assessmentlicenseeperformance(SALP) l BD1 Emergency; response support activities 802 Response'to events / incidents r+
d
- -WW M
e w
4e-41--
- ly
.. 1 Activity Codes Description of Activity Codes ;
BE Technical support.for investigations BF Laboratory technician activities-BG Contract monitorship BH QualityAssuranceReviewsE BJ
'AllegationLfollow-up.
B00
. Training-i BR)
Reactive preparation -
-l BTA Off-site inspection training _ effort BTW.
On-site inspection-training effort BZX In-office regional training _
i C00 Travel
'C01 Docket Travel e
COT Code unknown 000 Professional meetings-DPP Program development,; coordination and assessment _-
DR1 Reactive = documentation:-
e EPG Emergency response supporti-EPl Emergency preparedness; inspection EVA Event analysis EVC Event correspondence O
Excluded from fee recon y sina reviews covered by -a-topical report.
i I
_4 a
-.!3.-
n Activity Codes
' Description ~of Activity Codes HLE Escalated enforcement H00 Absence JAC Assist NRR - caseload forecasting -
JA0 Commission:Information Requests JHO Management; supervision JHK Principal. correspondence.
JNO Manageme'nt assistance-i JNP
- Management - informationisystemsL I
.4 JNR Planning / forecasting-
~
J0L Budget y
I J0M Administra tive: support -
L
'J00 Indirect.and overhead JQO Clerical support' 7
J-80 Overhead review, commenti assistancetto operations ~-
LKB-F01A - document search LKM FOIA - other related activities HMS
-NtiSS related activity-OllD Office management direction.
PAA-Administrative. support 4
PB1 Providing publicLinformation?
d
-PCl-Providing Congressional information' PDA-Program development and appraisal o
PEl Enforcement
- t l-a:,,
.1.,
-i
- i Activity Codes Description of Activity Codes-Pls Performing-information systems support activities-P1V Investigation-PPit Performing personnel management activities-PPS Performing special studies-PPT
- Providing.& preparing.;for testimony-PRI Reactive on-site /off-site. inspection =
PRM Petitions'.for rulemaking PRS
. Administrative _ support to other-NRC offices PTG Suppor* to-lE HQ & other regional offices PTP Program third party <:
'QAT Quality assurance topical report-RAH Regional assessment HQ R1ll -
-Respond to inquiries-RTl Incident / accident response RPE
~ Regional office professional effortL SLP Systematicassessmentoflicensee-performance.(SALP)
SRO-Support:to regional-offices-SR1 Site public relations SSS Support of special studies STA Supportifor technical = assistance STF Support for' problem facility ICA Inspection construction appraisal 1D1 Integrated _ design inspection; J
E j
Activity Codes
- Description of Activity Codes 1DV
~
Independent designiverification IMO Technical: report review - standards
~
liff IllPO follow-up 10R-Inspection - other 100 Safety - review of operating experiences-
- 1 PA Inspection performance appraisal 10A Off-site safety investigation effort-1U0 Safety investigations o
IUW On-site safety investigation effort IUX In-office safety investigation effort i
TVO Safety _ inquiry activities lWO Safety enforcement-lY0 Safety. specification' technical studies 2V0-Envi ronmen ta l l i nqui ry a c ti v i ties -
1 3UX In-office safeguards investigation effort i
30W
- On-sito safeguards-. investigation _ effort; 402 Part.21. request, review,- and evaluation :
4WO Part 21 - enforcement action 7VO Agreement state &_non licen~see inquiryJactivitiesi 100
- Safety activities not case related 115-Safety CP hearing 125 OL safety hearings 134 Certification exams 1
'i
-_6 -
Activity-Codes Description of Activity Codes 1321 Power facility replacement: exam
{
t 1322 Power facility.requalification exam 200 Environmental activities-not case related:
215 Environmental CP hearings.
3TA
- Off-site. routine safeguards inspection' effort.2/
3TO Routinesafeguards;inspectioniffortE/l 3TW On-site'routinesafeguardsinspectionefforkS[
[
3TX In-office = routine safeguards inspection effortEI ~
No name Professional staff hours-had-either no name_
Ho act. code or no activity code listed.in the computer Unidentified time printout -so it was excluded from licensee fees; lEl Excluded from fee. recovery since professional-staff _eff' rt was expended o
i before 3/23/78.
l i
+
iu I,
I l
J
-r L
.1...-
... ~1
~.
INVOICC OR SERVICES AND MATERIALS UNITFD i XTEs fJU:. LEAR REGULATORY COf.1!.ilSslON OFFICE OF CONTROLLER WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 i3 Pacific Gas & Electric Company To:
ATTH: Mr. Malcolm H. Turbush Oste:
August 20, 1981 Vice President - General Counsel P.O. Box 7442 F. O. B.:
77 Beale Street - 31st Floor San Francisco, CA 94106 Terms:
r,'et 30 Days c'Uncn Ast onoER Acctss rERuiT No.
LictusE No.
DPR-76 oVANTITY V
DESCRIPTION OF SERVirES ANO MA1ERIALS AMoVNT pR E ORDEREo SHirPED Operating License Fee - Diablo Canyon, Unit 1 51,024,500 110TE : The Commission amended 10 CFR 170 of its regulations tffective March 23, 1978, The unit listed above is subject to the revised regulations as shown in Section 170,21(a)A;1, in accordance with footnote 3 of 10 CFR 170,21, the Commission will determine the. expenditures for professional manpower and appropriate contractual services expended for the review after the review has been compl e ted,
if the review cost is less than that shown on this invoice, a refund will be made by the Commission, If the cost of the review' exceeds the amount of this invoice, no additional charges will be made since the regul.ations provide that in no event will the fee exceed that shown in the schedule of facility fees l
AM UNT DUE
$1,024,501 MAKE CHECK P AY AOLE TO U. S. NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMIS$10N AND Mall TO ADOVE ADDRESS g
l