ML20066K397

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Search for Records Continuing Re Costs for Review of License Application
ML20066K397
Person / Time
Site: Harris 
Issue date: 08/08/1984
From: Greher E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Miller W
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
Shared Package
ML082420195 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-90-162 NUDOCS 9102050293
Download: ML20066K397 (85)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:---- /

  1. e

] f,' g UN1 TIED STATES

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

\\..** / wAssiwoTow, o, c.nosss l rA/s v s MEMORANDUM FOR: William Hiller, Chief Licensee Fee Management Branch i Office of Administration 4AA FROM: ProgramSupportandAn$lysisStaffElliott A. Greher, Pro r D # I "" i Office of Inspection and Enforcement P_Ilf i s i

SUBJECT:

REQUESTED LICENSE FEE INFORya, TION We have reviewed available records on IE staff effort -- sta assigned to IE headquarters or to the Technical Training Center -- de consultants docket number _ license fee-billable efforts for the reactor licens su - Yo o , H Am t.t 1 hlt 1} W during the period _ e e/2n/7g __ to u ( ( ) There isi.no record of IE staff effort. ( ) A total of___There is IE staff effort and it is all devoted to hours of effort is recorded. computer run for the~ details. See enclosed ( ) The appropriate computer run has been mailed to r ()() There is IE staffg ffort and it is devoted in part to IE functions A total of 6 f l. o hours of effort is recorded. computer run for details. See enclosed There is also IE staff effort devoted to regional functions. The appropriate computer run has been mailed to region. T ('K) We are still searching available_ contractor cos wit 11n three weeks. e ( ) There is no record of IE computer costs. ( ) There are IE contractor costs. See enclosed information. <o/>r/av h 'C [].O b w$ F - trs a 2or s~A fMQ Qs W $4 W L Md -M A.v, #W (7 7.

  • A s o m r.. A, 6g.

i t A. Greher, rogram Analyst I Q anun g b r Program Support and Analysis Staff U*

  • W[fu h(so 7 7)

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosures:

pw mg As stated W$44 9 9102050293 900921 cc w/o enclosures: PDR FOIA J. L. Blaha, IE My WILLIAM 90-162 PDR A. J. Burda, IE 2 5LosCLC (w/crycQ

1; f"' $ fi A. ' i [ . q. .w 3 I "= al a af a a. a a = * = a = a uu-+uu ;;*: nna uunn a "~ 0 ; .x 15 In i O .>= o,.e 32 s-o o-W I o.

o. ' o. ' o.

o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o. o o o o o o o o e o c n. up. .,n \\gz w z mz 08 w EO 7 6 L 2H. ,0 } l, . u n.. -J. Ch Lt. e I. omL *: *: a: a: *:

  • 1 L:

Os

  • ' " * * "u XX nn ** uu 2:N O l}

QN MZ - CL 4 E *") W.: HAi<' 4 > > ec aC

    • *=

>= ' > .W.k O. EL > =. > * - O C N 0 >= F O O o 'e

  • = '

UOtM-M >= >- N N N ^M-M. N N M 'W 0 st U i J '- A ec as 0. O., .J - .J. Q. O. O.

0. :

0. Q Q. 0. O. O, A. O. O. L 0. 0 >BBEEREFAES _u _:u ee l n.n. n :..u u n -n u Uu

: Uu

\\ O u.g s ~ ~ u u uu u .u u-u 'o e e e e e e .e e e -e e e ch e e e e cm e e - ck cm e e a V N 'b h h 6 @ 'e M C b b M M M M 32 's E e E. :

; -u U LLLL LL MN aa aa a

f

w..e o o o o o'

e3 o o o o cv o o o oao. os o o,c. oj e o 1 \\ a .J a a s a a L <c <c <c <c <c s s r s r s s s s w t O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 W F. >= F- >= >= >= >= e i R l o o o -o o o e o o o a o 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 .5 A l a a a a a a a a a a a a v .u u u u -- u u u u u a u u I l'

g ..g A. 3 W_ g ^^ 99949999 9 9 99.9".9 9 99-C eenn 2u; nut M

  • ec-

.m

l

,g l l l ,,= o We 'l . 9 ". 9 a. vg ! ;g

  1. o e

~ m Mz M p go 2 4 a 3 s 3 y e ..g z- ~ gM J o... o o o o o e o o o o o o o e o o o o e 'b0 55bi *' "' $ $ d A *' "' l $ l $ d

  • b b *'

r: u, W >- Q - 4 4 **

  • 4 at e-e.

< 4 < < < < e' 4 < < < st L J J J J J W E RIMERENvJ W

==.- e v. N N e e e. e. N N

        • e-w-

N N d b N N N N N N LN N N J N N i O N N iQO M M H H H H H H H H H H H H H M N N H H H H H M M M M M M M M M M N M M M M M M M M M M s5l

: : : ect 0 0 0t EZ~;;;

aa 0* 5lC0020002220220000C.3$$$$ 4 N k 4 5 a a a E E a a E E H >= b- >= >= >= O O O O O O O O O O O A l 5 5 5 5 5 I 5 5 5 5 5 k l l b b b b b b b b b b b e u u u u u u u a u a u I l' m

07,'31/86 MPS' DATA FOR HAtRIS 1 (30/400) P9" JAN 27, 1978 TO JUNE 23, 1994 WK .ORG ENDING. CODE. SOC-SEC ACT REG NON-REG TOTALHRS NO CODE HRS HRS' = _ - W%-END TOTAL 041484 I241 LRA 6.0 .0 6.0 042179 R930 PTG 5.0 .0 5.0 WK-END TOTAt 042179 R 9 'i e._ i s' AT.c

  • i _ 0 '

.0 5.0 042184' I112 LRA 1.0 .0 1.0: f 3 hr ) WK-END TOTA' 042184 I112 LRA 1.0 .0 1.0 R 042184 I241 4 LRA 11.0 .0 11.0 \\() I .WK-END TOTAL 042184 I241. LRA 11.0 .0 11.0 042383 I113l' LRA-5.0 .0 5.0 ME WK-END TOTAL 042383 I113 LRA 5.0 .0 5.0 Jy 042383 I242 .LRA 10.0 / .0 10.0 g# o WK-END TOTAT. 042383 I242 LRA -10.0 .0 10.0 042879 R930 PTG 13.0 2.0 15.0 WK-END TOTAL _042879 R930 PTG 13.0 __ 2. 0 15.0 042884 I241 LRA 3.0 .0 3.0 i 14 v WK-END TOTAL 042884 I241 I LRA 3.0 .0 3.0 043083 1113 LRA 1.0 .0 1.0 'WZ-END TOTAL 043083 I113 LRA 1.0 .0 1.0 050579 R936 PTG 8.0 1.0 9.0 WR-END TOTAL 050579 R930 i PTG 8.0 1.0 9.0 050584 1241 LRA 5.0 .0 5.0 WK-END TOTAL 050584 I241 LRA 5.0 .0 5.0 051279 R93d, .PTG 24.0 2.0 26.0 WK-END TOTAL 051279 R93 A PTG '24.0 2.0 26.0j 051284 124 LRA 2.0 . ts 2.0 ( #,' 5' r eE J s ^ ^%.4; Y ~

i! II EG D AP 7 704 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 8 5 5 8 8 6 6 4 4 4 4 8 8 4 4 2 2 4 4 2 2 S 2 2 1 1 2 2 R 2 2 H L A T O T ) 04 08 49 / 1 G 0 _ E RS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5, (3 - R 2 NH 4 4 4 4 1 O E H SN IU RJ /, R ) AO _o ) NT h' f gh ~ k R8 h (*) ,i O7 F9 1 A GS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 T, ER 2 0 0 8 f. 5 5 8 8 6 6 0 0 4 4 4 c 4 4 2 2 4 4 A7 RH 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 D2 2 2 SN PA MJ E TD A A A G G t 1 1 1 A A 1 1 1 1 V v A A A A A A CO R R R T T C C D D R R D D D D T T R R R R R R AC L L L P P_ P P 1 1 L L 1 1 1 1 A A_ L L L L L L { n C 5 E S O CN O _ S E I 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 i 1 2 2 i 1 2 2 2 2_ 2 2 3 3 2 2 GD 4 1 1 3 3 3 3 t 1 4 4 t 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 4 RO 2 1 1 9 9 9 9 t 1 2 2 t 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 OC 1 I I R R R R I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I G 4 3 3 9 9 0 0 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 N 8 8 8 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 KI 2 4 4 9 9 7 7 6 6 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 2 2 WD 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 N 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6_ 6 6 6 6 7 7 E 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 L L L L L L A A A A A A A A A A A A L L L L L L T T T T T T T T T T T T O O O O O O O O O O O O T T T T T T T T T T T T 4 8/ D D D D D D D D D D D D 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N 3 E E E E E E E E E E E E / 7 K K K K K K K K K K K K 0 W W W W W W W W W W W W ~ ~ ~ tlj

07/39/96 MPS DATA FOR HARRIS 1 (50/40Q) P A *J JAN 27, 1978 TO JUNE 23. 1984 WK ORG SOC-SEC ACT REG NON-REG TOTALHRS ENDING CODE NO CODE HRS HRS I242 Mf.M ^,rd e fs. L*T-END TOTAL 070983 'C E

  • LRA 8.0

.0 3.0 k'4.I'~ygfjj;j ~ 5 'k -j.y 071683 I242 4-C-f-LRA 32.0 e 6.0 38.0 ' T' 7 %' M j.di 40.0 4.0 44.0 ?1 th WM-END TOTAL 071683 1242 _. cf; LRA 72.0 L 10.0 82.0 n :- .o 073083 I2424  ?>M LRA 38.0 6.0 44.0 t.ima y,, - WK-END TOTAL 073083 1242 W;4W:Tey. r LRA 38.0 6.0 Yk%AC5+' 44.0 080683 1242 j LRA 4.0 [ .0 4.0 WZ-END TOTAL 080683 I242 'gf; M LRA 4.0 .0 4.0 I113f fpk h j LRA 080633 2.0 j .0 2.0 b [} WK-END TOTAL 080683 I113 LRA 2.0 .0 2.0 091083 1113! m LRA 1.0 .0 1.0 WK-EMD TOTAL 091083 1113 h LRA 1.0 5 .0 1.0 092483

I242, LRA 15.0

.0 15.0 t WK-END TOTAL 092483 I242 .', LRA 15.0 '\\ .0 15.0 r. 100183 I242 h LRA 40.0 6.0 46.0 } ( g0i y WK-END TOTAL 100183 I242 rf 24 LRA 40.0 6.0 46.0 100833 Itt' W. LRA 5.0

g ]

.0 5.0 a WK-END TOTAL 100833 I113 -j LRA 5.0 .0 5.0 t 3 102983.I242 LRA ' 18.0 .0 18.0 ,68 8 WK-END TOTAL 102983. e.- nt I242 LRA 18.0 .0 18.0 4 110583 I1131 LRA 12.0 ^ .0 12.0 I113 4 -.'. ,n'; j t WZ-END TOTAL 110583 i&M '. LRA 12.0 .0 12.0 I242 'fg {( 35 f,. LRA 110583 20.0 6.0 26.0 ,p, 4 ~.- n T

" 07/31/64-MPS DATA FOR HARRIS 9'C50/4005 PAGEf .JAN 27, 1978 TO JUNE 23,.1984 i-WK ORG' SDC-SEC ACT. REG-NON-REG TOTALHRS. ENDING CDDE' HO CODE. HRS HRS bE-END TOTAL-110583' I242 LRA 20.0 6.0 26.0' A f 111283 'I113 'LRA 2.0 .0 2.0 iM-END TOTAL-111283 1113

  • 5 LRA 2.0

.0 2.0 111283 I242 1 LRA 24.0-8.0 32.0 fE'$3 MX-END . TOTAL: 111283 I242 LRA 24.0 8.0 32.0 111878.R930f. ' r E 1.. 8.0 .0 8.0 y RK-END TOTAL t11878 R93 -7 Pe. t 8.0-p n. [ 111983 124 $ LRA 4.0 y 2.0 6.0 W-EN3 . TOTA. 111983 I24 LRA' 4.0 ~ 2.0 '6.0 111983.I11 - 'LRA 1.0 .0 1.0' t [i s I MK-END TOTAL 111983 I11 LRA 1.0 .0 1.0 1 112683-I24 LRA. 2.0 j .0 2.0 j WK-END TOTAL 112683 I24 ,. LRA 2.0 .0 2.0 l 120383 I24 - LRA' 6.0 .0 6.0. { ', J i WK-END TOTAL 120383 I24

s. ' LRA 6.0 t

.0 6.0 a 123183' I24 11 LRA' 18.0-4.0 22 0 i i sg ) i 'WK-END TOTA! 123183 I24 t-LRA 18.0 4.0 22.0 j b~ ? I e 'f 7 ?$ l i&$ks: nim:Qf em il} 4 ... i .--m-- ~- L- -e " i~ - ~~" ~~ ^ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ^ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' ' ~~ ~

07/31/86 MPS DATA FOR HARRIS 1 (50/400) PA@E JAN 27, 1978 TO JUNE 23, 1984- - L'K ORG SOC-SEC ACT REG NDH-REG .TOTALHRS ENDING CODE NO CODE. HRS HRS GRAND TOTAL 915.0 32.0 997.0 1 9(C0 Xo'{. 0 5, :..,,,, w b-Ofl.o n.i 4.. n, n..o J c u. r e pkug i ~ lf/k = pcews#V Fui O L + i J1-gAu e Iz__ c?an ieu c $Y 2b1 T g3mer corv~ mecww 6*" f /- L a t.- ~ ? .,... _... ~ ~

{ hu b em. % MW ,w ,</mc+ A ' n.- p,9 9 p i <- J. ,13 'h

  1. py'.cE M

jcc 7$+ d. s'h..hM 3 5p. ^*f")p/N g d e*,g-L c)s ?u f 0 \\ #g,, CIRPTER 17 a' /$ / (Vs 17.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE op / 5 e 4, d T'. MS

--.= -1 SHNPP FSAR t ' v fi QM' O" CHAPTER.17 ~ QUALITY ASSURANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 17.1-QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING-DESIGN AND-17.1-1= CONSTRUCTION t-17.2 -QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING-THE OPERATING PHASE' 17.2.0-1 =17.2.1 ORGANIZATION; 17.2.1-1 17.2;1.1 'OA Responsibilities and Authorities 17.2.1-1 17.2.2 LQA PROGRAML 17.2.2-1; '( 17;2.2.1. Quality Assurance Program during-the-Operations Phase-11.2.2-1 17.2'.2.2 Indoctrination-and Training 17s2.2 ' 'l 17.2.2.3' Startup OA Program 17.2.2-7 1 i ..H... P 117.2.2.4' Computer Codes 17.2.2-7 17.2.3- = DESIGN CONTROL- -17.2.3-1 il 7. 2. 4_ ' PROCUREMENT; DOCUMENT CONTROL!

17. 2. 4' 17. 2.'5 '

INSTRUCTIONSE PROCEDURES.-AND DRAWINGS 17.2.5-1. 17.2.61 - DOCUMEE CONTROL - 17.2.6 l' 17.2.7- = CONTROL OF PURCRASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, = 17.2.7-1 ~AND' SERVICES: 1 >17.2.8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROLiOF MATERIALS,. 17.2.8-l PARTS, ANDsCOMPONENTS' 3

17 2.9

. CONTROL =0F SPECIAL PROCESSES- - 17. 2. 9-l '

17.2.10

. INSPECTION- ' 17.2.10-1 f 17.' 2.11 TEST CONTROL i 17.2.ll-1 -17.2.12 .i CONTROL ~OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 17.2.12... y, * .17.2.13 41ANDLING, STORAGE, SHIPPING w: 17.2. 13-I ~17-1 Amendment No. 5 ~... ,,_m,_-.._,

4 SHHPP FSAR 4 "; t' j55I CRAPTER 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE LISI 0F TABLES ^ TABLE TIT LE PAGE 17.2.1-1 INDEX-SHNPP PLANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEX 17.2.1-9 4 W l n 6 9 /l 4 17-111

SHNPP FSAR 4 o z il. QLAPTER 17 QtJALITY ASSURANCE L1!TT OF FIGURES FIGURE T kTLE 17.2.1-1 Carolina Power 6 Light Co. Organization For the Operation 6 Maintenance (A Progran 17.2.1-2 Quality Assurance tupartment Organizational Qiart i 3 17-iv

SIDiPP TSAR f,, 17.1 GUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTIO!4 W The PSAR 04 program will continue to be Laplemented for remaining design and f. construction activities. l' (., ' (~ :., 17.1-1 Amendment No. 4

_.. _ _ _ _.. ~ _ _ -. _ _ _.. _ _ _ - _.. _ SHNTP TSAR l fy}, _17.0 OUALITY ASSURANCE DURING THE OPERATING PRASE Q%' It is the policy of CP&L to engineer, construct, and operate nuclear plants without jeopardy to public health and safety, This policy is implemented in part by the Corporate Qus11ty Assurance Program which provides measures for assuring that the nuclear. Plant engineering provides adequate nut,. lear safety for long-term power production, that engineering design requirements and I objectives are, achieved in construction of new facilities, ard that plant functional capability and nuclear safety is maintained in operation. 4 e t l

gy.tQ. -

l L .7.2.0-1 Amendment No. 4 l.;___,._- _ _..............._. _...,.~.._.

1 1 .h SENPP TSAR h.h s;,c 17.2.1 ORGANIZATION 'the CP&L otganisation responsible for the safe operation of the SMNPP is described in Section 13.1. Figures 17.2.1-1 and 17.2.1-2 dep'ict the OA organisational relationships f or the SH!iPP operations phase. The sise of the QA organisation is based on CP&L's considerable experience in operation of nuclear plants (i.e. Brunswick Plant Units 1 and 2 and H. B. Robinson Plant ( Unit 2). QA/QC staf fing for SRNPP will be adequate to provide coverage of ongoing activities (approximately 15-20 people). Staffing levels vill be based on evaluation of schedules to fulfill the QA/qC conimitments of the PSAR. 17.2.1.1 OA Responsibilities and Authorities Carolina Power & Light Company policy regarding implementation of the OA Program is documented and made mandatory through the Carporate QA Progt an. The Policy Statement is signed by the CP&L Chairman / President. The policy states in parts t "It is the policy of Carolina Power & Light Company to design, construct, and operate nuclear power plants without jeopardy to the public health and safety or to its employees. Quality assurance programs shall be developed, implemented, and updated as necessary to assure that systemo used to produce, use, treat, store, or transport waste produced by the generation of nuclear stehis are designed, constructed, and operated in a safe manner. Deviations (J f rom these programs shall be permitted only upon written authority f rom the 'T corporate management position which originally approved the program or implementing procedures. ) The design and construction of nuclear power shall be accomplished in accordance with the Ibclear Regulatory (bemission (NRC) regulations specified in Title 10.of the United States Code of Federal Regulations. All commitments to the RRC Angulatory Guides and to industry codes and standards shall be j 1 effectively implemented., The operation of nuclear power plants shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the f acility operating 1,. cense issued by the NRC. Any changes in operating procedures or experiments at the f acility, modifications to plant components or systems, revisions to nuclear plant saf ety analysis reports, or proposed changes to' plant technical specifications shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of the f acility operating license. The Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance is responsible for effective implesentation of the approved Corporate 4ality Assurance Program and ASME QA Program, as each applies, at the Company's nuclear construction sites and operating plants. Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) activities-shall be independent f rom scheduling and production commitments. The Hanagers 1 of QA/QC activities shall have suf ficient authority and organisational freedom to identify quality problems; to initiate, recommend, or provide solutions; and to verif y' implementation of solutions. 1he Manager - Ostporate (pality Assurance shall menitor the effectiveness of the Company's nuclear program on l a periodic basis through a system of planned and implemented inspections, surveillances, and audits. 17.2.1-1 Amendment No. 6

(, { j The Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance shall review the overall ef f ectiveness of the Company's quality assurance programs on a regular basis @g j with the Executive Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering 6 C.t..r... tien, A.o has the ultimate Company responsibility for the safe construction ~and operation of nuclear power plants. The Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance shall communicate directly with corporate management up to and including the Chairman / President / Chief Executive Of ficer and, if appropriate, with the Board of Directors to resolve any quality assurance concerns which cannot be resolved satisfactorily at a lower management level. The managers of all functions involving engineering, construction, nuclear fuel, operations, nuclear safety, and quality assurance shall assure that their personnel are adequately trained for their jobs and have the specified experience and education required to perform their assigned responsibilities. Personnel who habitually or villfully disregard or violate nuclear safety and quality assurance policies and procedures shall be subject to disciplinary a c ti on. The Chairman / President is responsible for setting QA policies, goals, and objectives. The Executive Vice President - Power Supply 6 Engineering & Construction, who reports to the Chairman / President, is responsible for establishing the Corporate Quality Assurance Program. He provides for Management, Engineeting, Construction, Procuremint, QA/QC, Operations, Health Physics and Nuclear Safety. The Executive Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering and Construction i has overall responsibility for the Corporate Quality Assurance Program including approval of the program and revisions thereto. He operates through the Senior Vice President - Nuclest Generation, Senior Vice President - Operations Support. Vice President - Corporate Nuclear Saf ety and Research, gg and the Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance. The Senior Vice President - Nuclear Generation is responsible for managing the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the Harris and H. B. Robinson plants. He has assigned the responsibility for managing the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the Harris plant to the Vice President - Harris Nuclear Project. He has assigned the responsibility for licensin'g and engineering support of the Company's nuclear generating iacilities to the Vice President - Nuclear Engineering and 1,1 censing Department. He has assigned the responsibility for procurement and contracting support for all nuclear generating facilities to the Vice 18 President - Noelcar Plant Construction Department. He has assigned the responsibility for coordinating the implementation and maintenance of programs that require high technical knowledge of methods and procedures that should be relatively consistent among the plants and performing staff studies to the Manager - Nuclear Staff Support Section. The General Manager - Barris Plant Operations Section who reports to the Vice President - Harris Nuclear Project, is responsible for all operational phases of plant management, including operation, maintenance, and technical support. He manages and controls the organization through personal contact p with five unit heads and through written reports, meetings, conferences, and ( 17.2.1-2 Amendment No. 12

SMNPP TSAR ,e in plant inspections. He is responsible for adherence to all requirements of the operating license, technica.1 specifications, Corporate Quality Assurance Program, and Corporate Health Physics and Nuclear Safety policies. He is rempor.4 vie N..*....*ovian of incoming and outgoing correspondence with the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and the Of fice of Inspection and Enforcement concerning the Harris Planti the establishment and approval of 1; qualification requirements for all Harris Plant Operations staff positional the personal review of the qualifications of specific personnel for managerial and supervisory positions in the Karris Plant Operations Section; and the review of and concurrence in the plant radiation protection, industrial security, quality assurance, fire protection, training, operations, and saintenance prograss. The Senior Vice President - Operations Support is responsible for the management of the materials and fuels needs of the generating and transe.ission facilities in addition to the training and technical support of those personnel. He has assigned the responsibility for managing fuel to the Manager - Puel Department. He hrs assigned the responsibility for Corporate purchasing to the Manager - Materials Management Department. He has assigned I! the responsibility for supporting nuclear training, including operator training, and providing supplemental technical expertise to the Vice President - Operations Training & Technical Services Department. He has assigned the responsibility for issuing contracts to the Manager - Contract Services Section. The Vice President - Corporate Nuclear Safety and Research is responsible for = the management of the functions of corporate health physics, corporate nuclear (V safety, safety analysis review at the nuclear. plants, and research in support of Company activities. He provides senior management up to and including the Chairman / President and the Board of Directors a continuing assessment of current nuclear safety programs. Additionally, should any nuclear safety or quality assurance issue require immediate attention, the Vice President - Corporate Nuclear Safety and Research has'the authorized organizational freedom to contact anyone with the Company, up to and including the Chairman / President and the Board of Directors, in order to resolve such concerns to his satisfaction. The Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance is assigned overall authority and responsibility for the CP&L Corperate Quality Assurance Program. He reports directly to the Executive Vice President ** Power Supply and Engineering & Construction, is independent from cost and schedule responsibilities (other than Corporate QA departmental budget and schedule) and has no other duties or responsibilities that would prevent his full attention to QA satters.. Reporting to the Executive Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering & Construction at the same level as the Senior Vice Presidents of Nuclear 12 Generation and Operations Support, the Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance has open communication channels both oral and written to these senior management positions. The Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance along with the Senior Vice Presidents of Nuclear Generation and Operations Support 1: recommends the Corporate QA Program, including changes, for approval by the Executive Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering & Construction. The (j$ Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance periodically reviews with the Executive D Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering & Construction the overall effectiveness of the Company's quality assurance program. He has access to 17.2.1-3 Amendment No.12 ~ _ _.. .. l

SENPP PSAR k-corporate management up to and including the Chairman / President to resolve any gl. quality assurance related concerns if the concerns cannot be resolved @',"N satief actorily at a lower management level. He has delegated the authority necessary f or iwp1= .....im. v ac Corporate Quality Assurance Program to the Manager - Quality Assurance / Quality control Estris Plant and to the Manager - QA Services Section. The Manager - Quality Assurance / Quality Control Harris Plant has direct , management responsibility for the QA/QC activities.related to the Engineering. Construction, Start-Up, and Operation of the SHNPP. He has delegated the authority necessary for implementation of the Corporate Quality Assurance i Program to the Director QA/QC Harris Plant, the Principal QA Engineer - J On-site Engineering Quality Assurance Unit, and the" Principal QA/QC Specialist - NDE Unit. The Director - QA/QC Harris Plant is responsible for conducting the onsite QA'QC activities during construction and operation of the Sheaton Harris i Nuclear Power Plant in accordance with the Corporate QA Program and QA/QC' procedure 6. The Corporate QA Program provides assurance that the Director - _QA/QC has appropriate organizational responsibilities and authority to exercise proper control over the onsite QA Program. The Director - QA/QC Harris Plant has delegated the authority necessary for implementation of his portion of the Corporate QA Program to the Superintendent - QA and the Superintendent - QC. The Superintendent - QA and his staff, are responsible fort a) Providing QA services during start-up and operation of the-plant. b) Stopping maintenance and modification work which does not meet requirements. c) Reviewing plant modification and maintenance documents and selected plant procedures and instructions to assure that qua. Jy requirements are adequately prescribed. d) Providing QA coverage of turnover activities. e) Assuring timely resolution of concerns and identified nonconformances. 13 'f) T,nsuring holdpoints have been inserted in work control documents. g) Coordinating / conducting surveillance of ongoing plant activities. h) Providing procedures and instructions necessary for accomplishment of QA activities. Ensuring maintenance of records attesting to accomplishment of QA 1) activities. j) Conducting surveillances of ongoing construction activities. 17.2.1-4 Amendment No. 12 ,_ _ _ _ _. _ _,- ~ - _ . ~ -,

SUNPP FSAR ... e P/ The Superintendent - QA and his staf f receive, on an as-needed basis (i) l 12 6}J.g support from the off-site and on-site Engineering QA units in areas such es ( procedure reviewt (ii) support from the NDE unit in the areas of NDE and review of contractor NDE prce de..;, sr.d '..'.'t) eupport f rom the 12 Superintendent - QC in documentation review for turnovers. The Superintendent - QC and his staff are responsible fort a) Conducting inspections of maintenance and modification activities. b) Stopping maintenance and modification work which does not meet requirements. c) Reviewing procurement documents and performing receipt inspections. d) Providing procedures and instructions necessary for accomplishment of QC activities. e) Ensuring maintenance of records attesting to accomplishment of QC activities. f) Conducting designated inspections of ongoing construction activities. The Superintendent - QC and his staf f receive on an as-needed basis t (i) support from the on-site QA Engineering Unit in areas such as prucurement document review; (ii) support from the NDE Unit in the area of NDE; and (iii) support frem the Superintendent - QA in the area of documentation (L. review. 12 The Principal QA Engineer in charge of the on-site QA Engineering Unit and his staff are responsible fort a) Developing and maintaining the Ibrris QA program to meet regulatory commitments. b) Assisting the' Harris project organizations in the development and implementation of procedures, review of specifications, and modification packages to meet commitmente. c) Providing QA engineering support to the Harris project organizations on QA problem resolution. The Principal QA/QC Specialist - NDE is responsible fort a) Providing NDE technical consultation. b) Performing NDE. c) Maintaining the department's industrial radiography license. d) Providing NDE training / qualification / certification. V..' The NDE Unit also provides QA/QC support in the above areas to CP&L's other Nuclear and Tossil plants. 17.2.1-5 Amendment No. 12

SENPF P2Ak L-C l l The Manager - QA Services Section is responsible for providing the off-site QA services support.in stess of Engineering Quality Assurance, vendor Yfl surveillance, and training. He is also responsible for conducting an t independen corporata audit _ program for all cnt nnetaar.n1.auts. He has delegatea the authority necessary to fulfill his responsibilities to the Principal QA Engineer - Of f-site Engineering QA Unit, the Principal Specialist - Vendor Surveillance Unit, the Principal QA Specialist - Training and Administration Unit and the Principal QA Specialist - Perf ormance Evaluation Unit. The Principal QA Engineer - Of f-site Engineering Quality Assurance Unit is responsible fort a) Reviewing contracts and A-E and NSSS purchase orders for inclusion of applicable QA/QC requirements. b) Maintaining liaison with the A-E and NSSS Supplier to keep up-to-date on project QA/QC activities and status and to assure timely resolution of quality-related. problems. c) When requested, conducting and/or participating in audits of quality-related activities of the A-E and the NSSS Supplier. L d) Reviewing A-E/NSSS Design Specifications and their revisions for QA requiremepts. e) Ensurst.g timely resolu' tion of identified concerns and nonconformances. } The Off-site Engineering Quality Assurance Unit also provides QA/QC support to CP&L's other Nuclear & Fossil Plants. The Principal Specialist - Vendor Surveillance _ Unit is responsible fort a) Qualification of Suppliers' QA programs. When necessary, facility surveys are conducted. For procurement by the A-E, the actual function of conducting auch surveys is performed by the A-E. When surveys are performed by the A-E, the Vendor Surveillance Unit will monitor and may participate in the-survey. b) Conducting tuspections and item acceptance activities (shop ~ inspections) at Supplier facilities for procurement and ensuring timely resolution of identified concerns and nonconformances. c) Evaluating Supplier's corrective action to prevent, recurrence of-nonconformances identified during shop inspections.- d). When requested, conducting or participating in audits of quality-related activities of Suppliers. e) Providing Vendor Surveillance Quality Assurance Procedures (VQA). The Vendor Surveillance Unit also provides QA/QC support in the above areas to 5 CP&L's other Nuclear and Fossil Plants. 17.2.1-6 Amendment No. 12

SHNPP TSAR 'N The Principal QA Specialist - Training and Administration Unit is responeible Q fort a) Maintaining QA/QC procedures for corporate and/or Hald up. i nc.luding document control and coordination of preparation of revisions. b) Haintaining the Corporate QA Program, including document control and coordination of preparetion of revisions. c) Assisting other CQA units in developing, implementing, and maintaining a training program to qualify and upgrade QA/QO personnel. The Training and Procedures Unit also provides QA/QC support in the above areas to other CP&L nuclear and fossil plants. The Principal QA Specialist - Performance Evaluation Unit is responsible for conducting an independent corporate audit program for all CP&L nuclear plants. Personnal in this unit have no responsibility for quality achievemtat nor for quality assurance other than auditing. They are trained to prepare for audits, conduct and report audits, and follow-up, as necessary, to assure timely correction of conditions, practices, and items that could degrade plant quality. The Principal QA Specialist - ierformance Evaluation Unit reports all audit results to the Chairman / President, Executive Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering and Construction, and tc the manegcment of the function audited. [ The qualification requirements of the Manager - Corporate Qaality Assurance ~ are equivalent to those described in Section 4.4.5 of ANSI /ANS-3.1-1978, as w endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.8. These ares a) Most have a bachelur's degree in engineering or the equivalent in practien1 experience. b) Must have developed a high level of competence in the field of quality assurance or related technical areas associated with nuclear stations. c) Hust be innovative and have the ability to plan an effective overall quality assurance program for the Compauy. d) Hust have the ability to effectively coordinate the implementation, monitoring and modification of quality assurance po grams among the several departments of the Company. e) Hust exhibit qualities of leedership pnd communication ability, both oral and vritten. QA/QC personnel routinely participate in plant meetings and review schedules in order to keep abreest of plant activities. Such action ensures that sufficient qualified QA/QC manpower and procedures are made available to provide the necessary QA/QC coverage for the scheduled activities. The appropriate requirements of the docketed QA program description and the b/ regulatory guides are listed in Section 1.8 of the FSAR and are translated into procedures and instructions. These procedures and instructions are, 17.2.1-7 Amendment No. 12

-SHNPP FSAR ... ? N l 7 Ths Principal QA Specialist - Training and Administration Unit is responsible c gY fort a) Kaintaining QA/QC procedures for corporate and/or field use, including documeng control and coordination of preparation of revisions. b) Maintaining the Corporate QA Program, including document control and coordination of preparation of revisions. e c) Assisting other CQA units in developing, iinplementing, and maintaining a training program to qualify and upgrade QA/QC personnel. The Training and Procedures Unit also provides QA/QC support in the above l areas to other CP&L-nuclear and fossil plants.

  • The Principal-QA Specialist - Performance Evaluation Unit is responsible for conducting an independent corporate audit program for all CP&L nuclear plants.

Personnel in this unit have no responsibility for quality achievement nor for quality assurance other than auditing. They are trained to prepare for audits, conduct and report audits, and follow-up, as necessary, to assure timely-correction of conditions, practices, and items that_could degrade plant quality. The Principal QA Specialist - Performance Evaluation Unit reports all-audit-results to the Chairman / President, Executive Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering and Construction, and to the management of the function audited. i _(- The qualification requirements of the Manager - Corporate Quality Assurance .( are equivalent to those described in Section 4.4.5 of ANSI /ANS-3.1-1978, as w endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1 8. These aret j a) Must have a Bachelor's degree in engineering or the equivalent in practical experience.. b) Must have developed a high level of competence in the field of quality _ assurance or related technical areas associated with nuclear stations. R -c) Must be innovative-and have the ability to plan an effective overall quality assurance program for'the Company. j d) Must have the ability to effectively coordinate the implementation, monitoring and modification of quality assurance-programs among the several' _ 1 departments of the Company. e) Must exhibit' qualities of leadership gnd communication ability. both oral and written. QA/QC personnel routinely participate in plant meetings and review schedules in order to keep abreast of plant activities. Such action ensures that sufficient qualified QA/QC manpower and procedures are made available to provide the necessary. QA/QC coverage-for the scheduled activities. Cie,S': ygThe appropriate requirements of the docketed QA program description and the regulatory guides are listed in Section 1.8 of the FSAR and are translated 3 into procedures and instructions. These procedures and instructions are, 17.2.1-7 Amendment No. 12

= &m m.0 i i TABLE 17.2.1-1 i INDEI ^ ) i i ~ SWNPP FLANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEI ( b t N - No Review Required l l 0 - Original Revision Only R - Original and Subsequent Revisions [ l Procedure Approval VOL. No. Rev. Title Responsibility QA Review ALARA Review Authority t I Administrative Instructions'. Admin. Supv. AI-1 Rules of Conduct-Admin. Supv. R Gen. Mgr. " i i-% !o AI-2 Plant Organization Admin. Supv. R Gen. Mgr. 5 U I -- External Interface Instructions Admin. Supv. R Gen. Mgr. % j' AI-3 o 4 ~ 4 AI-4.0 1 Documeet Control-Conduct of Sr. Spec. Doc. R Gen. Mgr. j Operations Cont. AI-4.1 d ~ Filing Index and Instructions Sr. Spec. Doc. R Gen. Mgr. j Cont. i e AI-4.2 Control of Plant Forms - Sr. Spec. Doc. O Cen. Mgr. Cont. [ t AI-4.3 Document Distribution & Control - Sr. Spec. Doc. E Gen. Mgr. ( g e Cont. I 5-I AI-4.4 Micrographics Instructions. Sr. Spec. Doc. O Ge.t. Mgr. E Cont. 2:

  • Procedure to be written
    • To be determined.later i

c I I ~. _.- a

&~ Q Y Q.$ ? 2 1 t TABLE 17.2.1-1 (Cont'd) INDEI SHNPP PLANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEI N - No Review Required 0 - Original Revision Only R - Original and Subsequent Revisions Procedure Approval VOL. No. Rev. Title Responsibility QA Review AT. ARA Review Au*hority . Handling of Confidential / Proprietary / .AI-5 Security Material Admin. Supv. R Gen. Mgr. 4 1 en AI-6.0 Cost Control-Conduct of Operations Admin. Supv. O Gen. Mgr. AI-7.0 Nuclear S.*fety Review Conanittee-Conduct of Operations R Gen. Mgr. g l5 l Al-8.0 , Regulatory Compliance-Conduct of Proj. Spec. Reg. O Cen. Mgr. 4 9: Operations Comp. l Al-9 Plant Safety-Policies and Procedures Admin. Supv. R Gen. Mgr. 4 AI-10 Plant Notices-Admin. Supv. R Gen. Mgr. AI-11.0 Office Services-Canduct of Operations Office Serv. Supv. O Gen. Mgr. l! AI-12.0' Plant Stores-Conduct..of Operations -Admin. Supv. K Gen. Mgr. g= u E. AI-13 Housekeeping Admin. Supv. R Gen. Mgr. l S !. ?,

e

-* Procedure to be. written

    • To-be determined'later 5

l 6 i 7 t-~ ~ m

O.~ ' O[ ' M: Rf; TABLE 17.2.1-1 (Cont'd) INDEI ~ SHNPP PIANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEX N - No review Required ~ 0 - Original Revision Only R - Original and Subsequent Revisions Procedure Approval VOL. No. Rev. Title Responsibility-QA Review AIARA Review Authority AI-14 Planning & Scheduling - Conduct of Director-Planning O Cen. Mgr. . Operations & Scheduling te 2 Procedures Preparation, Sr. Spec. Doc. E., Revision, Review and Approval Control Cont. U PP-1 0 Description of POM 'Sr. Spec. Doc. R Gen. Mgr. $ Cont. ~ 4 PP-2 0 Procedures Format and Preparatio.: Sr. Spec. Doc. R Gen. Mgr. Cont. PP-3 0 Procedure Review'and Approval Sr. Spec. Doc. R Gen. Mgr. Cont. PP-4 Temporary Procedure Revision Review / Sr. Spec. Doc. R Gen. Mgr. [ Approval Cont. .g g PP-5 Disposition of Completed Procedures Sr. Spec. Doc. R Gen. Mgr. ( o-Cont. En i g

  • Procedure to be. written f
    • To be determined later e-L a

i ~ _. _ _ _ i__..__.._ __ _;_..1_

3 .A ^ (- .A.: y-c,-g t. r,;f M i ^ . TABLE 17.2.1-1 (Cont'd) l INDEX 4 ~ l SENFP FLANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEI [ l a N - No Review Required j ! Original Revision Only E - Original and Subsequent l Revisions { j Procedure Approval j VOL. No. Rev. Title Responsibility QA Review ALARA Review Authority l FF-6 Preparation of Hydrostatic /Funenntic. SU Sept. R SU Sept. I l Test Procedures i E I i FF-7 Prepa1tation of Valve and Electrical SU Sept. K SU Sept. ' Lineups

  • e FF-8 Preparation of Flugiting/ Cleaning SU Sept.

R SU Sept. D Procedures g4 { 3 Emergency Plan Sr. Spec. Emer. R Gen. 74Kr. j Frep. I i [ 4 Environmental and j Radtation Control Procedures-i t ? f EVF-1 Environmental-Conduct.of Operations Envir. & Chem. R Mgr. - Sepv. F1. Ops. l !F i jg RCF-1 Radiation. Control-Cooduct of Red. Cost. Sepv. R Mgr. Operations F1. Ope. o-y,- s e i, n" I ? ~ [ 'E 58 Trocedure to be written ..?

    • To be' determined later 3

l i t b 1

.~ ... =. .Q-L {l ' Q I 3 W/ TABLE 17.2.1-1 (Cont'd) j 1 INDEI SNNFP PIANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEI N - No Review Required 0 - Original Revision Only R - Original and Subsequent Revisions Procedure ?_,;;. el VOL. No. Rev. Title Responsibility 04 Review AIARA Review Aetherity CP-1 Chemistry-Conduct of Operations Envir. 5 Chem. R Mgr. - Supv. Pl. Ops. ? Fire Protection Manual 3 i J FPP-1 Fire Brigade-Conduct of Operations Sr. ?pec. - Fire R Cen. Mgr. Prot. 4 6 Security Manual SP-1 Plant Security-Conduct of Operations Sr. Spec. - Security R Gen. Mgr. 7 Engineering Procedures' Eng. Sepv. ~ ENP-1 Engineering-Conduct of' Operations Eng. Supv. R Mgr. - 4 g Tech. Sep. o E. .ENP-2 Development and Maintenance of . SU Supv. O SU Sept. 2 System Descriptions a ENP-3' Development and Maintenance of Q-List' Eng. Sepv. R Mgr. - 0 ' Tech. Sep. s.

  • Procedure to be written
  • O To be determined later'

I h nr w.- TABLE 17.2.1-1 (Cont'd) INDEI l }: SENFP PLANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEI 1 e r 4 l 0 - Original Revision Only N - No Review Required 1 - Original and Subsequent s. I Kevisions Procedure i Approval VOL. No. Rev.- Title Responsibility -QA Review ALANA Review Authority t SU Surv. O SU Sept. j ENP-4 Equipment Code' System i Tech.Sup.{., [ ENP-5 Plant Modification Control Eng. Supv. R Mgr. - !J N 6 j' ENP-6 Preparation of SENPP Specifications Eag. Supv. R Mgr. - U i' Tech. Sep.% i is 4 ENP-7 PSI /ISI Program 1 SU Sepv. R SU Sept. 3 + ENP-8

  • . Plant Performance Program Eng. Supv..

O Mgr. - i. Tech. Sep. 1 ~ i 8 Radweste Operating Procedures Red. Supv. i RO-1 Radweste Operations-Conduct of Rad. Supv. R Metr. - [ Operations Pl. Ops. N vo 9 Imusediate Response Oper. Sepv. O Mgr. [ E. (Emergency) Procedures Pl. Ope. 9p F

n z

a Procedure to be written

    • To be determined later s-

{ t ~ ' - ~'s e m.

.=. M.: - { v 7 3 TABLE 17.2.1-1 (Cont'd) INDEI SHNPP PLANT OPERATING MANUAL INDEI - N - No Review Required 0 - Original Revision Only R - Originst and Subsequent Revisions Procedure. .qproval VOL. No. Rev.- Title Responsibility OA Review ALARA Review authority ' Annunciator Procedures Oper. Supv. O ifgr. - 10! 7 '*1. Ops. g 11 Ceneral Operating Procedures Oper. Supv. ~ Operations-Conduct of Operations Oper. Supv. R Mgr. - N CP-1 Pl. Ops. 4 12 General ~ Maintenance ' Procedures ~ saint. Supv. r CM-1 Maintenance-Conduct of Operations Maint. Sopv. R Mgr. - Pl. Ops. N ~ ae x*

  • Procedure to be written
    • Td be determined later e

m -__.l___j___._.-_.________.____u___ 'N "7

SHNPP FSAR l Y 17.2.2 QA PROGRAM 17.2.2.1 Ouality Assurance Ps o... Ja1 $ J e Operations Ihase a The SHNPP QA Program during the operations Phase is controlled by the policies 4 and requirements of the Corporate 0.tality Assurance Program. (The Corporate Quality Assurance Program applies to all Nuclear Plants). These policies and requirements are implemented through the SHNPP Plant operating Manual and other departmental /section procedures. The program is designed to ensure compliance with the NRC Regulatory Guides and ANSI Standards applicable to the operations phase of the SHNPP project. The commitment to comply or alternatives for CP&L to follow are presented in Section 1.8. The Corporate-QA Program is divided into the following topics: '1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 CP&L Quality Assurance Program 1.2 Scope of Application 1.3 QA Program Implementation 1.4 Supporting Documents & Document Control, 1.5 QA Program control 1.6 CP&L Management Review of Corporate Quality Assurance Audit Activities 1.7 Corporate ALARA Program 1.8 Corporate Energency Plan 2 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES - (" '. 2.1 Scope 2.2 CP&L Organization 2,3 Hanagement Responsibilities 2.4 Quality Assurance Functions 2.5 Supporting Companies 3 DESIGN CONTROL - NEW PLANTS AND NUCLEAR FUEL 3.1 Scope 3.2-New Plant Construction and Nuclear Fuel 4 PR0CUREMElfr CONTROL 4.1 Scope 4.2 Contracts 4.3 Procurement by the Architect-Engineer 4.4 CP&L Purchases 4.5 Pre-Award Meeting 4.6 Purchase Order 4.7 Verification of Vendor Activities 4.8 Nonconformances and Corrective Action 4.9 Final Acceptance 4.10 Plant Procurement Assistance Required .5 MATERIAL & EQUIPMENT CONTROL 5.1 Scope -(', 5.2 Receiving Inspection 5.3-Material in Storage 5.4 Material Released from Storage 5.5 of f the -Shelf items 5.6 Installed Plant' Items Amendment No. 4 17 7.7-1

SENTP TSAR C')'. 14.7 Setpoint Changes 14.8 Temporary Repairs / Modifications o 15 NONCONFORMANCE CORTROL AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 15.1 Scope 15.2 Disposition and control 15.3 Honconf orming Material Status 15.4 Nonconf ormance Documentation & Closeout 16 AUDITS 16.1 Scope 16.2 Internal Audits 16.3 External Audits i 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 17.1 Scope 17.2 Requirements for implementation 17.3 Types of QA Records 17.4 QA Records Accumulation, Maintenance, and Retention 17.5 QA Records 18 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM TOR TIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 18.1 Scope 18.2 General 18.3 New Plant Construction 18.4 Operating Plants (~ 18.5 Material Upgrading s 19 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM TOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMERI SYSTEMS 19.1 Scope 19.2 General 19.3 Management Responsibilities 19.4 Design and Procurement Document Control 19.5 Control of Purchased Material. Equipment and Sntvices 19.6 inspection 19.7 Handling and Storage 19.8 Inspection, Tests, and Operating Status 19.9 Corrective Action 19.10 Instructions, Procedures & Drawings 19.11 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 19.12 Records 19.13 Document control 19.14 Material Upgrading 20 (LATER) 21 IF-300, IRRADIATED TUEL SHIPPING CASR. 21.1 Scope 21.2 Responsibility 21.3 Procurement Control C,. -t 21.4 Operations Control 21.5 Maintenance and Repair 21.6 Quclity Assurance Records 17.2.2-3 Amendment No. 4

1 l V SENFP FSAR ..en Management above and outside the QA organization regularly assesses the scope, l,' adequacy and compliance of the QA Program to 10 CTR 50, Appendix B, through Q (a) review of CP&L and NRC audit reports, (b) review of status of quality assurance at plant status meetings with CP&L and major contractors (c) review of reports of quality problems, (d) participation in meetings concerning quality problems, and (e) review of semiannual preplanned and documented assessments of Corporate Quality Assurance audit activities performed by the CP&L tianager - Corporate Health Physics. The Manager of Health Physics l6 provides a report of the assessment to responsible mana6ement and corrective action is identified and tracked. The CP&L Corporate QA Program requires that the authority and duties of persons and organizations performing QA functions be clearly established and delineated in writing and that these individuals and organizations have sufficient authority and organizational freedom tot a) Identify quality problems. b) Order unsatisf actory work to be stopped and control further processing, delivery, or installation of nonconforming materAal. c) Initiate, recommend, or provide solutions for conditions adverse to quality. d) Verify implementation of solutions. The CP&L Corporate OA Program identifies the persons and organizations with (, the above authority and describes how these actions are carried out. The CP&L Corporate QA Program requires that an individual or organization assigned responsibility for checking, auditing, inspecting or otherwise verifying that an activity has been correctly performed shall be independent of the individual or group directly responsible for performing the specific activity. The Corporate QA Program outlines the methodology for resolution of disputes involving quality arising from a difference of opinion between OA/QC personnel and other groups. Section 17.2.16. " Corrective Action," further outlines thie methodology. When changes are made to the QA program that deletes requirements or positions as presented in the FSAR, the change will be reviewed and approved internally to ensure it meets applicable requirements and then submitted to the NRC for acceptance prior to implementation. If a response from the NRC to submitted changes is not received within 30 days, CP&L will consider the changes approved by the NRC and will proceed on that basis (Note: Format, editorial changes, or increase in requirements and/or positions will be provided with the normal FSAR update requirements). The Corporate QA Program which addresses the QA progran for operations will be implemented at least 90 days prior to fuel loading. (~ j u 17.2.2-5 Amendment No. 6 i

4 SHNPP FSAR 4 Proficiency tests are given to personnel performing independent QA/QC inspection, and acceptance criteria are developed to determine if individuals l5 are properly trained and qualified. Certificates of qualification delineate the functions personnel are qualified to perform. 17.2.2.3-Startup QA Program The description of phase out of design and construction, and takeover of operations (provided in the Shearon Harris Startup Hanual) is described in Chapter 14. The Corporate QA Program applies to preoperational and start-up test activities. Schedules will be developed to assure that implementing procedures are prepared prior to commincement of the activities which they are intended to control. Procedures which prescribe the methods by which preoperational and initial startup testing is accomplished and controlled are contained in the Startup Hanual. These procedures provide f or the orderly transition f rom design and construction to ope ations and, during this transitional period, prescribe the methods for control of management and technical interf aces between the Architect-Engineer, EBASCO, Inc.; the NSSS Vendor Westinghouse; the constructor, Daniel; and CP&L. The conduct of the test program and the administrative controls to be implemented are described in Section 14.2. Preoperational test procedures are reviewed by personnel knowledgeable in QA. The preoperational testing program will be monitored'by QA/QC personnel. 17.2.2.4 Computer Codes The QA Program is applied to the development, content and use of computer codes to ensure (1) the codes are developsd, documented, verified and certified for use per approved procedures; (2) the codes are properly controlled to preclude use of outdated or obsolete codes; (3) that proper instructions concerning the uso of the codes is provided; and (4) adequate QA provisions are invoked for the procurement of computer codes. k. g 17.2.2-7

  • - ~'- " "*
  • l SENPP FSAR

-/" 17.2.3 DES 1GN CONTROL Vg The SENPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes requirements for the' control of design activities associated with modifications of safety-related structures, systems, and components. Design changes, including those originating at the plant, are subject to the same controls which were applicable to the original design. Carolina Power and Light Company may designate an organization to make design changes other than the organization which prepared the original design. In these cases, CP&L will assure that the organization has access to pertinent background information, including an adequate understanding of the requirements and intent of the original design, and that the organization has demonstrated competence in applicable design areas. The program requires that design changes made to the plant are accomplished in a planned and controlled manner in accordance with written, approved procedures. These procedures include provisions, as necessary, to ensure that: a) Design documents (such as specifications and drawings) and procedures and instructions reflect applicable regulatory requirements and design bases and are checked for accuracy and completeness by qualified individuals which 4 are other than those who prepared the document and such reviews are documented. An independent review is conducted to assure that documents are prepared in accordance with procedures. b) Design documents specify quality requirements or reference quality standards as necessary. c) There is adequate review of the suitability of materials, parts, equipment, and processes which are essential to the safety-related functions of structures, systems, and components, d) Materials, parts, and equipment which are standard off-the-shelf items or which have been previously approved for a different application are evaluated for suitability prior to selection. e) Design documents and procedures are revised to reflect design 4 modifications and "as-built" conditions. f) Internal and external design interfaces between organizations participating in design modifications are adequately defined and controlled, including the review, approval, release, and distribution of design documents and revisions. The above controls are applied as necessary to such aspects of design as reactor physics; seismic, stress, thermal, hydraulic, radiation, and accident analyses; compatibility of materials; and accessibility for inservice inspection, maintenance, and repair. 17.2.3-1 Amendment No. 4

i SHNPP FSAR ((, -17.2.4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL g The SENPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes requirements for the control of procurement documents for safety-related componen*,s, materials, and services. The program requires that procurement documents, such as purchase specifications, contain or reference the following a) The design basis technical requirements, including the soplicable regulatory requirements, material and component identification requirements, drawings, specifications, codes and industrial standards, test and inspection requirements,.and special process instructions. b) The applicable requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix B which must be compiled with and described in the supplier's QA program. l c) Identification of the documentation to be prepared, maintained, or r j submitted (as_ applicable) to CP&L for review and approval. These documents I may include, as necescary, inspection and test records, qualification records, ~ or code required documentation. d) Identification of those records to be retained, controlled, and maintained by the supplier, and those delivered to the purchaser prior to use i or installation of the hardware. e) The procuring agency's right of access to cupplier's f acilities -(. and records for. source inspection and audit. l f) Requirements for supplier reporting and dispo'sitioning of nonconformances from procurement requirements. g) Provisions for extending applicable' requirements of-the procurement documents to-lower-tier suppliers, Carolina Power 6 Light Company procurement documents are prepared, reviewed, _ approved, an,d controlled in accordance with QA program requirements and written procedures.to assure that quality requirements are correctly _ stated, inspectable, and controllable, and there-are adequate acceptance /rojection 4 criteria. Procurement document review is done by personnel knowledgeable in .QA, and documentary = evidence of that review and approval is retained and-available-for verification. Carolina Power & Light Company evaluates supplier QA programs (except for off-the shelf items)-prior co award of contracts or purchase ordars, as discussed in Section.17.2.7_.

Carolina Power & Light Company compliance with ANSI' N45.2.13 is discussed in

[ CP&L's position on Regulatory Guide 1.123 in Section 1.8.' \\ L 17.2.4-1 Amendment No. 4 m.-..-,---.- =

I S)INPP TSAR ~'l 17.2.5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINCS (!.if The SHRPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes the requirements for prescribing and accomplishment of activities affecting quality in accordance with instructions, procedures, and/or drawings. The program requires methods to be developed for the preparation, review, approval, and control of instructions, procedures, and drawings. These are reviewed to ensure the appropriate criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B, are included. Instructions, procedures, and drawings are required to imve the following applicable elements included in their contents a) Prerequisites. b) Precautions. c) Qualitative / quantitative acceptance criteria., d) Inapection points, if determined to be required, e) Check list. Confirmation that thcot instructione and procedures meet the, requirements of the program and are being properly implemented is accomplished through e k inspection, surveillance, or audits of activities af fecting quality. (1 17.2.5-1 Amendment No. 4

.y l l 4 $}DTPP TSAR l i 17.2.6 DOCUMENT CONTROL The SHWPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes the requirements for the control of documents relative to activities affecting quality. The documents which are to be controlled include a) Design specifications, calculations, and design analysis. l4 b) Design, manuf acturing, construction, and installation drawings. c) Procurement documents. d) QA Manual and implementing procedures. 4 e) Maintenance, modification, and operating proceduren. i f) PS AR. g) Manufacturing, inspection, and testing instructions. h)- Test procedures. 1)- Design change request. j) Nonconformance reports. ,s 4 'k)- Operatin'g License / Technical Specifications. f The Corporate QA protrum requires that procedures be established to identify those individuals or organizations responsible for reviewing, approving, and 1 issuing documents and revisions thereto. Documents are reviewed for technical 4 adequacy and inclusion,of QA requirements ' prior to implementation. Such l reviews _are performed by individuals other than the person who generated the document. These individuals are knowedgeable of QA program aspects. ~ The program requires that changes to documents be reviewed-and approved -i by the same organization that performed the original review and approval .) or.by other_ designated qualified responsible organizations. Approved changes are included in instructions, procedures, drawings, and other documents prior j to implementation ~of the change. Obsolete or superseded documents are controlled to prevent inadvertent use. Documents will be available at the location where -the activity will be performed prior to commencing the work, except in a radioactive contaminated 4 area where the documents will be readily available. l Haster lists are established-to identify the current revision number of . instructions, procedures, specifications, drawings, and procurement (%}{ij. documents. These lists shall be updated and made available to responsible i personnel to preclude the use of superseded documents. -} 17.2.6-1 Amendment No. 4

kJ SRNPP FSAR t GQ; 17.2.7 CONTROL OF PURCRASED HATERIAL, EQU1PHENT, AND SERVICES v The SHNPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes requirements f or the control of purchased safety-related material, equipment, and services, {ncluding spare or replacement parts. The program requires spare or replacement parts to be subject to QA program controls, codes and standards, and technical requirements equal to or better than those applied to the original parts. The program also requires procurement documents to address (1) vendor records to be submitted for purchaser review; (ii) reporting and disposition of nonconformances and their submittal for purchaser acceptancei (iii) submittal of documentation identifying the purchased item and the specific procurement requirements (e.g. codes and standards) met by the item; and (iv) vendor identification of any procurement requirements that have not been met. Potential contractors and suppliers are evaluated by qualified QA personnel prior to award of a purchase order or contract when needed to assure the contractor's or supplier's capability to comply with procurement document requirements. Receipt ~ inspections at SHNPP are performed by qualified QA/QC inspectors in accordance with written procedures to assure thats a) Haterials, equipment, or components are properly identified and correspond with associated documentation. l b) inspection records or certificates of conformance atte' sting to the acceptance of materials, equipment, and components are completed and are available at SHNPP prior to installation or use. c) Materiale, equipment, and components are inspected and judged acceptable in accordance with predetermined inspection instructions prior to installation or use. d) Items accepted or released are identified as to their inspection status prior to forwarding them to a controlled storage area or releasing them for installation or f urther work. (Bulk items will not require individual accept tags; however, status of unacceptable bulk items will be so i ndicated). - e) Nonconforming items are clearly identified and controlled until proper disposition is made. For Nuclear Fuel Section purchased items, plant personnel shal? perform receipt inspection activities using approved procedures. Inspection results 12 shall be recorded and filed in the appropriate receiving inspection package. Inspection status shall be indicated as required by applicable procedures. Carolina Power & Light Company maintains a program for supplier evaluation, results of supplier evaluation,' surveillance of suppliers, supplier furnished -records, certificates of conformance, effectiveness of supplier quality fh3i control, and the purchase of spare or replacement parts. \\,% 17.2.7-1 Amendment No. 12

l $10iPP PSAR 17.2.8 IDEfft1FICAT10N AND CONTROL OF HATERIALS, PARTS, AND C; COMPONElffS The SENPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate OA Program, establishes rsquirements for the identification and control of safety-related materials, parts, and components, including spare or replacement items. The program requires that materials, parts, and components be identified and controlled to prevent the use of incorrect or defective items. The proEram also requires that identification of items be maintained either on the item in a manner that does not affect the function or quality of the item, or on records traceable to the item. Suppliers of safety-related materials, parts, or components are required by procurement documents to establish a system of identification and control which is consistent with the abovs requirements. Procedures implementing these requirements provide for the followingt a) Verification that items received at the plant are properly identified and can be tracwd to the appropriate documentation, such as drawings, specifications, purchase orders, manufacturing and inspection documents, nonconformance reports, or mill test reports. b) <erification of item identification consistent with the CP&L inventory control system and traceable to documentation which identifies the proper uses or applications of the item. c) Verification of correct identification of material, parts and components prior to fabrication, assembly installation or use, and results documented. Consumables utilized in safety-related structures, systems and components are subject to appropriate QA controls as described in approved plant procedures. 1 17.2.8-1 _ Amendment No. 4

$RKPP TSAR 17.2.9 CoitTROL OF-SPECIAL PROCESSES W5d - The SHNPP QA Program, as controlled by the Cornorate QA Program, establishes requirenents for the control of-special processes, such as welding, heat tretting, and nondestructive testing. Special processes are those that require interim inprocess controle in 'I addition to f'ral-inspection to assure quality. The program : requires the special processes be_ performed by-qualified personnel using proper etjuipment and in accordance with written qualified procedures. These personnel and: procedures are to be qualified in accordance tith applicable codes, standards, and specifications as deectibed in procedures. 4 Qualification ' records _of special process procedures and personne1' performing special processes are filed, maintained, and available for verification.: -. Records of completion _ of special processes will be maintained. Surveillance is performed by-QA of personnel and procedure qualification activities to-assure = such activities are satisfactorily performed, special process j procedures will be reviewed and concurred by QA prior to use. 3 S ~ 4 1 Q - G:- 17.2.9-1 Amendment-No. 4-

1 ) St0&P FSAR [Ch 17,2.10 INSPECfl0N qpt The SHNP,P-QA Program, as contro11od by the Corporate QA Program, establishes requirements for an inspection program to verify conformance of activities af fseting quality. with requirements specified for those activities. Inspections are performed by personnel who are independent of the individuals 4 performing or directly supervising the activity being inspected. The inspection personnel are qualified in' accordance with applicable codes and standards, and their qualifications and certifications are maintained current. If individuals performing inspections are not part of the QA organization, the inspection procedures, personnel qualifications, proficiency 4 tests,_ and independence are reviewed by the QA organization prior to initiation of the activity. ii.e sttions at' SHNPP are performed in accordance with written procedures, instructions, and/or checklists, which provide for the followings a )' identifisction of individuals or groups responsible for performing the inspections. b) Identificar4.c.a of characteristics and activities to be inspected. c) Acceptance ead reje tion criteria. y d) Method of inspection. y e)' Recording the results of the inspection review of the results, and identification of the inspector.- 4 f)- Indirect control by monitoring of processing-methods, equipment, and personnek when direct inspection is not possible. g) Use of necessary drawings / specifications. h)- Specifying special measuring and test equipment. Procedures will be established to assure the correct identification of - mandatory inspection holdpoints where required-beyond which work-may not -proceed until inspected. i Modifications, rep?tre, and-replacements are' inspected in accordance with the original design and inspection requirements or accep*.able alternatives. Inspections are determined based on involvement of technical and QA/QC personnel _ aided by criteria established in approved procedures and !Um 4 commituents. (3ss. A l l 17.2.1 0 -1 Amendment No. 4

---.= i SHNPP FSAR-17.2.11_ TEST CONTROL The SHNPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes the requirements for the preoperation,and operation test programs.- It requires that safety related structures, systems, and components be tested in-accordance with the origins' design and testing requirements or acceptable alternatives. - Procedures are written, reviewed, and approved for conducting the testing program. Modifications, repairs, and replacement of safety-related structures, a systems, and components are in accordance with the original design' and testing requirements or acceptable alternatives.- -Test procedures incorporate or reference the followings a) The requirements-and acceptance limits contained in applicable-design and procurement documents. b)- l Instructions-for_ performing the test. l c) Test prerequisites . provisions'for assuring test prerequisities have been met .[4 r niibrated instrumentation - (r-g . adequate and appropriate equipment . trained,-qualifiedi and licensed or certified personnel , completeness of item to be tested .-suitable and controlled environmental conditions . provisions for data collection and storage d) Hold points ~ e) Acceptance and rejection criteria 1 f) Hethods of documenting or' recording test _ data and results. 4 -Teet results are docum' , evaluated, and their acceptability _ ~ determined by a qualifi,, _ responsible individual or group.; ~ 3 Carolina Iower li Light Company's_ position concerning Regulatory Guides 1.30,_ 1.58, 1.95; and 1.116 (ANSI N45.2.8) are contained in Section 1.8. 1 -1 u 17. 2.11-1 Amendment No. 4

SENPP FSAR 17.2.12 CONTROL OF HEASURING AND TEST EQUIPHENT 'd The SENPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes I the requirements for the control of measuring and test equipment used in activities affecting quality. The program includes the requirement to establish procedures for the calibration technique and frequency, maintenance, and control of all measuring and test equipment. Measuring and test equipment (H&TE) is identified and traceable to the calibration test data. 4 Status Lf calibration for measuring and test equipment is provided through the use of tags, stickers, labels, routing cards, computer programs, or other suitable means. The status indicators indicate the date recalibration is due or the frequency of recalibration. Heasuring and test instruments are calibrated at specified intervals based upon one or more of the followings a) Technical Specifications. { b) Required accuracy. 1 c) Purpose. d) Degree of usage. 4 e) Stability characteristics. f). Other conditions affecting measurement, g) Manufacturer's recommendations. Heasures are required to be taken and documented to determine the validity of prevtous inspections and test results, if the measuring and test equipment is found to be out of calibration. Calibrations, inspections, and tests may be repeated if' required by this determination. QA will be knowledgeable of the above activities by being on distribution for the documented actions attesting to identification and resolution of out of calibration H&TE. Portable measuring and test equipment are calibrated by standards which are at least four times as accuratt as the portable measuring and test equipment, unless limited by the state of the art. In cases where the accuracy is not achievable or limited by thu state of the art, an engineering evaluation or other appropriate justification is performed and documented to justify acceptability of the M&TE in question. The evaluation is reviewed in accordance with approved procedures. Calibration of installed plant devices shall be against H&TE having sufficient accuracy, greater than the device being calibrated, to r.ssure that the system containing the device is within the specified system tolerance. The basis for ? determining the " greater than accuracy", shall be documented. (;m,.p; s.- j i l 1 17.2.12-1 Amendment No. 4 l

SENPP FSAR . 17.2.13 HANDLING, STORAGE, SHIPPING The SsNPP QA Program,-as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes the requirements.for the contro1~ of the handling, storage, and shipping of safety-related components, systems, and structures. This program requires measures to. be taken to ensure special handling, storage, _ cleaning, packaging, shipping, and' preservation requirements are establi.she; and accomplished by-qualified individuals. Procedures are-written to control the cleaning, handling, storage, - packaging, shipping, and preservation of materials, components, and systems 51n accordance with design and specification requirements to preclude damage, loss,- or deterioration by environmental conditions such as temperature or humidity. Provisions 6re established to -control the shelf life-and storage of chemicals, 4 reagents, lubricants, and other consumable materials. - Carolina Power & Light Company's position on Regulatory Guide 1.38 is - contained in Section 1.8. r b6 _ ii 5 4 17.2.13-1 Amendment No. 4

o SENPP FSAR .n. 17.2.14 INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS (M.05 Q" The SNKPP QA' Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes the requirements for the identification and control of the inspection, test, and operating status of safety-related structures, systems, and components. Procedures are written to control the various methods of indicating status;- i.e., tags, markings, labels, stamps, routing cards, calibration data sheets, computer programs, or other suitable means. These procedures include the application and removal of inspection and welding stamps, or other status indicators as appropriate. Measures are established-for indicating the operating status of structures, systems, and components. These measures include the use of checklist *, computer. programs, logs, stickers, tags, labels, record cards. and test records to indicate the acceptable operating status of'installad equipment. Installed equipment which, if operated, could cause damage to other equipment / systems or to personnel is tagged to indiccte its nonoperational status and to prevent inadvertent use. Selected. plant procedures and subsequent revisions are reviewed by the OA group to ensure required inspections, tests, and other critical operations are inserted in the documents. Altering the sequence.of required tests, inspections, and other operations 4 important to safety can only be accomplished by methods outlined in approved 4 f(,. _ procedures. Procedure revisicas reflecting such changes are subject to the { same = controis as the original aview=and approval. e i Ms' 1.2.14-1 Amendment No. 4

( SENPP FSAR ( ,,W ,c/ 17.2.15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS Tiw SRNPP QA Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, establishes requirements for the control of nonconforming materials, parts or components. The Corporate QA Program addresses QA and other organizational responsibilities for che definition and implementation of activities related to nonconformance control. This includes identifying those 'tiividuals or 4 groups witn authority for the disposition of nonconforming items. The Corporate Ql. Program requires QA to document concurrence of the adequacy of corrective action and initiate follohrup action to verify proper implementation of the corrective action. The program requires that material, parts, or components found nonconforming through review, inspection, surveillance, testing, or audits be controlled by administrative procedures. These procedures provide for the followingt a) Identification of nonconforming items by use of nonconformance tage, stickers, or other appropriate status indicators and segregation of those items, if practical, to prevent inadvertent use~ pending proper disposition and reinspection. b) Identification of those individuals or organizations responsible f or disposition of nonconf orming items. ~ c) Preparation of nonconformance reports which identify nonconforming items and describe the nonconformance, the disposition ~ of the nonconformance, and the reinspection or testing performed to determine the acceptability of the item af ter the disposition has been completed, d) Verification of the acceptability of rework / repair of items by reinspection or testing of the item as originally performed or by a method shich is equivalent to the original inspection and testing method, e) Nonconformance reports which are dispositioned "use as is" cr " repair" are retained-as part of the quality records. f) Quarterly analysis of selected reports as determined by OA be performed and forwarded to management to show quality trends. Nonconforming items that - require rework / repairs by the plant maintenance organization are identified to the plant maintenance organization through the use of maintenance work request - forms. Work request form packages include or reference procedures and instructions (including OA hold points) as required by which work has to be accomplished. Referenced procedures and instructions 4 are reviewed and concurred by QA prior to start of work. Upon completion of the work, the maintenance work request form package is reviewed by QA to ensure QA hold point requirements have been satisfied and the necessary documentation, attesting to satisf actory completion of the work, has been C;. generated. Work request form packages, where the resolution of the nonconformance is " accept as is", are also forwarded through QA. Quality Assurance in this case verifies that the documented engineering evaluation, justifying the " accept as is", is part of the package. Responsibility for 17.2. 1 5-1 Amendment No. 4

f e k. SENPP FSAR \\ "?; 17.2.16 CORRECTIVE ACTION The SHNPP QA. Program, as controlled by the Corporate QA Program, requires the identificar. ion and correction of conditions adverse to quality. The progran requires that an evaluation of conditions adverse to quality, such as nonconformances, failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, and def ective ~ material and equipment is conducted to determine need for corrective action. Conditions adverse to quality are identified through inspections, surveillances, audits, tests, checks, and review of documents. The program requires corrective action to be initiated to preclude recurrence of significant conditions adverse to quality. ' Die program requires f ollow-up reviews, audits,' inspections, etc., to be conducted to verify proper implementation of corrective action and to close out the corrective action documentation. Significant conditions adverse to quality, the cause of the conditions, and the corrective action taken are reported to management, both.on site and off site, including QA groups, for review and assessment. Periodic review and assessment of quality trends is made by the General Manager - Harris-Plant Operations Section, Director - SHNPP QA/QC, Manager - 12 QA/QC Harris Plant, and Manager - Co rporate QA., s_ in.the event _the plant staff and the QA/QC organization cannot agree on the corrective action or disposition, the QA/QC-organization will escalate the' matter.through-successive levels of management until a resolution is reached. The ultimate decision making authority is the Executive Vice President - Power Supply and Engineering & Construction. (&$$h ~ 17.2.16-1 Amendment No. 12

SHNPP FSAR p, 17.2.17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS The SHNPP _ QA Program, he 'c'ontrolled by the Corporate OA Program, establishes requirements for the identification, collection, and storege of quality assurance records. The program requires that sufficient records be maintained to_ provide documentary evidence.of the quality of items and the accomplishment of activities af fecting quality. The types of records to be maintained as QA records are based on the guidance given in Appendix A of ANSI N45.2.9-1974, with_ exceptions as noted in CP&L's position on Regulatory Guide 1.88 and Section 6 of the SRNPP Technical Specification'(see Section 16.2). Records are identifiable and retrievable through the use of indexes and filing ' systems, which are required by the program. These records are controlled in accordance with the Plant Operating Manual which requires procedures for their collection, maintenance, and protection. Procedures are required to be developed-to indicate r.esponsibilities and retention yxviods. The SHNPP QA Program. requires inspection and test records to-contain the following, where applicable 'a) A' description of the type of observation. k$ b)_ Evidence of. completing and verifying a.manuf acturing, inspection, or testLoperation. c) Date and results of.the inspection or test. d)- Information related to conditions adverse to quality. ~ -e). Inspection or data _ recorder identification. f) Evidence as to the acceptability of the results. The records are maintained.within structures designad to_ prevent _ destruction,- deterioration, or theft, which are designed, constructed, and maintained as required by L CP6h's position on Regulatory. Guide 1.88, _These - facilities ensure protection against destruction by fire, flooding,, theft and deterioration by the1 environmental conditions of temperature'and humidity.- j ,The SHNPP QA Program requires access control to the records storage j facilities._ l 4} i l 17.2.17-1 Amendment No. 4 ~

SHNPP FSAR 'l 17.2.18 AUDITS The SHNPP QA Program, as couctolled 'oy one Corporate QA Program, establishes requirements for an audit program. This program requires that planned and periodic = audits be performed in accordance with written procedures to verify 4 compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program and that audits include an objective evaluation of the QA program and the effectiveness of _the implementation of the program in meeting _ project ceumitments. Responsibility for the audit of the overall operational phase quality assurance _ program has been ansigned to the Principal QA Specialist - Performance Evaluation Unit. Audits. conducted by personnel of the Performance Evaluation Unit include an examination'of quality-related ectivities such as a) Operation, maintenance, and modification of SENPP. b) Receiving'and plant inspectinn. c) ' Preparation, review, approval, and control of instructions, designs, procedures,-drawings, specifications, and procurement documents. d) indoctrination and training programs. e)- Calibration of measuring and test equipaint. {c,,

l f)

Implementation of operating and test procedures. Organizations performing activities affecting quality that are subject 'to-audit include the followingt. - a): The CP&L Operating Croup' including.the operations, maintenance,. engineering, quality assurance,-support organizations, and Nuclear Fuel. i b). Contr, actors, consultants, and : suppliers of quality-related items or services. The' audit program-includes;the following provisions: -a) An audit planning document-is used which identif'ies the organizations to be audited and the frequency of the audits'.: b)L.._ Audits are conducted in accordance with predetermined schedules,. which are reviewed and updated periodically, i -J -c). > Audits are. scheduled on the basis of the status and safety-1 'importance of the activities being performed, or the requirements of the Technical Specifications. A d) Audits are performed in accordance with audit checklists or written j:d> instructions which identify the activities, processes, items, and documentation to be audited.

)

17.2.18-1 Amendment No. 4

k $ENPP FSAR-(. n --17.2.19.4 Inspection, Test, and operating St atus

d The requirements s tated in Section 17.2.14 will apply.

17.2.19.5 Deficiencies and Nonconformance Items Deficiencies and nonconformances of fire protection system items will be identified, reported, dispositioned, and corrected in accordance with Section 17.2.15. 17.'2.19.6 Corrective Action The requirements of _Section 17.2.16 shall apply. Procedures shall be established for evaluating condtions adverse to fire protection to determine the necessary corrective action. In the case of significant or repetitive conditions adverse to fire protection, the cause of the conditions will be determined and analyzed, and prompt corrective action taken to preclude recurrence. 17.2.19.7 Quality Control Inspections With respect to fire protection systems or f eatures which protect nuclear safety-related systems, structures, or equipment, a documented program of

quality control inspections will be implemented by the Director - QA/QC Unit / Fire Protection Specialist when repairs or modifications to those systems 12 or f eatures are performed, or if the quality of the activity can impair the

/: . ability of the system, equipment, component, or installation to accomplish its s J' intended function. 17.2.19.8 Quality Control Surveillance The General Manager - Rarris Plant Operations Section is responsible f or 12 implementing a documented program of periodic surveillance which verifies compliance with governing procedures f or the f ollowing fire protection activities: a). Housekeeping b) Surveillance tests of the fire protection systems c) Control of ignition sources d) Use of - fire watches

e)

-Control'of combustibles f)- Fire protection training documentation g)- -Preventive maintenance program This program will be conducted by the Fire Protection Specialist in accordance _ #3l; with approved procedures. gr 17.2.19-3 Amendment No. 12

kr. SRNPP FSAR- -17.2.19 FIRE PROTECTION OA PROGRAM The _ General Manager - Harris Plant Operations Section is responsible, unless o$herwise _ designated in this section, for the overall cdminictraV,en of the f }re protection program and provides the on-site point of control and contact for all contingencies. These responsibilities include final approval of all fire protection procedures and assignment of personnel to be members of the Fire Brigade Teams. Fire protection procedures will be reviewed and concurred by QA/QC, The General Manager - Harris Plant Operations Section will direct a documented 12 program of quality assurance for items designated by the Fire Protection Specialist as Fire Protection items. The program will accomplish the following: a) Quality Control inspection of the installation, corrective maintenance, modifications, and receipt of designated fire protection items, b) Verification of compliance with governing procedures of the Fire Protection Program. c) Provision f or adequate quality assurance controls f or designated fire protection items to ensure the maintenance of an effective fire protection p rog ram. - The Fire Protection Specialist is responsible f or: - (ii i an ) - Coordination of all fire protection progr'am activities. b)f Preparation of procedures and instructions which implement the Fire Protection Program. c) Ensuring the development and technical adequacy of the training = materials and training. sources related to the fire protection program, and assigning qualified Fire Protection instructors. .d) Preparation of the listing of those Fire Protection items which are subject to the quality assurance procedures. e) Periodic monitoring of all fire protection activities. f) . Assisting the Plant Supervisor in assuring that all corrective maintenance and modifications of the fire protection systems comply with Te chnical Specifications. g)- Coordination of the arrangements f or of f-site fire company support and training. h)' Scheduling-and implementation of the Fire Drills Program. 1) Establishing the minimum equipment for the Fire Brigade Teams. 17.2.19-1 Amendment No. 12

r -.. _. 9 1 1 .C t -j 10/19/ei i Region II I Jim: 3 Forith'e Region 11 cases.-~1isted.below all professional hours shown as QAT or 3BH: [ j ~ should'be excluded from the=0L' review computation because tChapter 17 ,y of: the' SERTrefers to the licensee's-topical report. .I'm getting copies of the ~

Chapter 17 pages from the updated FSAR retai':ed by the Records Section 1
(Docket Files) ar.d will let you see them when they arrive:

3 x L li-TVA -: Bellefonteil &:2 - Topical Report Number-TVA-TlR-751 i -- Watts Bar Il& 2. - Topical Report' Number-TVA-TR-75-1J 2 Duke Power. Catawba 1 & 2 -' Topical Report Number-DUKE-1 L3. __Hississippi.: Power - Grand Gulf 1 & 2 -Topical Report'. Number-MPL-TOP-1 --I-don'.t find' that there are topicals for-QA on(Itarris 16. 2.br Vogtle 1=& 2 7

but 11:LamgettingChapter#17pagesfto:see;whatLthbFSARsays.

Florida Power & ,e

3 Light:an'd>VEPCO also.have topical reports;but.they do'not-have,any-OL appli-1:

lcationsLunder review'thus'these.two are not atLissue. -I~planito'look at!the 4 revisions /amendmentsito;the topical reports for which fees'have-been collected;- and will.~ determine;if-the feesLassessed cover'the latest amendments filed--or-k approvedi q E ,Ja.. 'Y W } -Reba e l l;

c.

.p.

  • M M 9

O 4 A

  • b N ~~ I C 2

'b D ' d k , $$NM h$$M4 Q E l l.d t>J N. j o f.i. I bi. I. !. I e ~ YN ' j b~' +s, _-. m,. q- - a. gf 7 d % % W.i y ( ,j o .t.. 8.,@. %. + .p;;. gx u x_ c.- w pggp y +;. ypw._,_, g._, _ _.,,_ H,e.:p n p 1 r g, s,j . : 91 j9 ,. _. _p._{'.__. ._._ {._. h2 f 7 7_. __-, _. _,._._ {_ 4 I pe

e.,. dors=

e., w=:% me =:4 - _y 1-----4==w

===4.=- J l I I i r = l I --__I~~_-_ _+ t,. F i t-t,.-t. i t-t 7-5 _. ! t 4 1 i - -7,,,. _- p__ _.,_.4 j t -t-+ I ._p k = _-y _ i [ t e. ._.q p_ - _q.-..._.+ .. --r - s.=_

.. ii.

i t-t- + ,i 4. I aj ( g 6 l l l 1 hl %: ;q j a 1 i a tA.4 n. +.- 4 4, mm m. i_ _m-_. y s... o ! e ye4-% .-)) __.s + --_-...M.i _.j '} y 4 ([' D 7.d. A w. 31_2 { 4g et _._ v i 4 -p i .I .I i \\ ~~ w-m nt-,-m r. s a e i I 0 4 l,s y _., - __yty . _ q-,_..g a_.c 3 _.i p H -p, - 9 ( Q +

  • lh6 i

F-1 g l Q p v -.= .u. _r-- z \\ 4

4. j.

],__ 1$ _-. _..pr.. h;$I Dl~ ~ ' - ~~~~ -~ ~P ~'- {& g j _ -~+~" i -~" n s t-I [ yp--Typ f-X" ~~c.u. O ~ u l+e -s 3- .>p.. - r -ai p J-t ts ^ g c .i s i, s s el 1 s _%n, ,,,.___n L q W. N _.3

  1. n

.u .w ,qa a N 6 k k'(4 A) a v 4 a t b 3 ,4 M. l ~, e) ~. -d l 4 D h i 1 [ 4 e + d e 4 d I q l dj' -zum-- massmoneaums 9 4 l l +T ,. r-J gT l NICE N N M"2 .5 "l8A - m.. .t

,,,,... +. .-e - e e : e 3 e e e a a = =-a = x x.g a.n. ~T n, il.I s.! n .I.!.Q .i .l...I..i.t. L i p q q.x,.7,. . y.-g_g p..q-.._s.py, g;y..;,4_9.. _;.__ g_ _... g y ..4 7 - c_ r._ .e ,7...-. _.. 4-4 .s rh q_, _ _.. p__.r .g, +. - ___._s .-. __,_p___,_ e---. J, .j t I ( s t P-5- .3

1. -

p 4--, _ yv - a g p -r.- _ _9, _. p . _ - - _c, __r.._.. r. w_ j p-- r 7_ _ F. l I. l 1 i i r ~ i i l i 4i =ap i _r - 4 _ +,.; i e HH_- r I .7 '.- i i Hj ~ \\!

  • i&

\\,...- Tw!.!,_k. w .i. l [g -~~{ _ Nf*-5%.k_NM[%[-d-~h f..[;

f. _.

W 441 I r I I y mh- -._ g.,wh ..mm 4 i.! U

  • l.

i i .-3 k m __3'D'N M ~ ~ i $__g .y - r- _b e.e. I I g} ig,g __.g;g.m==....=. m.g -.. -g.gg.;g-gg

gggg

,gggg gg, g y I- . ag n im y-L._ _c.r

  • wA

) s n .m& ~ ^ _ en % h p M__ gY s 4 i M .r I .I ( 9! 1 [ p.l.,,s . r__._.p [ ._.j p.__ ..?f~ ..n 4 s__ 1 y p i musb gh anumusues maisus4r.t u esas mai.sai... t us sr. m a .mLan ei w. imw.*lae6.=ams: unosam.sse-wmess

aswsatpoet

'4 1 9 p.14, __, '$_.p.. c,._ 4-_,r _g. ) g, .t g ,f T+.*.*.*.- n s r t 1 I T N w k A M = .2-_ = p 'l Y c'e e ,b 14 p _. 4,, i i s ooo w-um- - s s eemi bl p t P t u ,- p M a y il ,2 e 7 M eL 4, c m U d I I N ( D s' \\- E N 4 1 E E 5 q G "! 3 d "c u(- m w iI me - c c w wm u e g m al (:s rs

s 3:

11 'til f I t l 3-i .a. -... +. -

- 09/21/84- 'U.S.H.12.C. MAMPOWER ' SYSTEM PAGE 254 REGUI AR MA. ",00RS EXPENDED KR THE SELECTED DOCKET ~ Nj .FROM..wr* ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY *83 REGIDH II .OL REVIEW. 050004LO' HARRIS 1 3 EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME HOURS "FOR FISCAL YEAR '78 CD0 TRAVEL-EMPNME TOTAL ANNAST, MICHAEL V 1.5 EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 3.0 EMPNME TOTAL BROWHLEE, VIRGIL L 9.0 EMPNME TOTAL HERDT, ALAN R 1.0 EMPNME TOTAL SWAN,WALLACE B 9.0 ACT-CODE TO*AL 23.5 1TA SAFETY OFF-SITE INSPECTION EFFORT EMPNME TO L SWAN,WALLACE B .0 ACT-CODE TO t .0 1TW OUT OF OFC SFTY INSP EFFORT (ON-SITE) EMPNME TL 't BRADLEY, ROBERT D 13.5 i EMPNME TGT at .BROWHLEE, VIRGIL L 18.0 EMPNME TC'AL HERDT, ALAN R 3.0 EMPNME TO AL SWAN,WALLACE B. 28.0 ACT-CODE TC AL 62.5 1TX IN OFFICE SAFETY INSPECTIDH EFFORT $ 'EMPNME TL .L 'BRADLEY, ROBERT D 6.0 ACT-CODE 70 *L 6.6 1TO .ALL'OTHER SFTY INSP EFFORT (PREP-DOC-ENF) EMPNME TO'.L BRADLEY, ROBERT D 8.0 EMPNME TC 4L BRDWHLEE, VIRGIL L 20.5 ~~EMPNME TC 4 GERARD, EDWARD H 2.0 EMPNME TC

  • L MCFARLAND, CHARLES R 9.0 EMPNME TC L SWAN,WALLACE B 38.0 t

EMPNME TC 4L VAND00RN, PETER K 6.0 ACT-CODE TC il 83.5 O r u esi. -.*.i_ m ..m.sm_,u.-m._ ---mu ..m. -w- -e.m m-mm m..J..-. m =-a-m.

' P *.GE .U.S.M.R.C. MANPOWER SYSTEM - 09/21/84- - REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPENDED F02 THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP. ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83-REGIDH II - OL REVIEW 05000400 HARRIS 1 . REGULAR EMPLDYEE NAME-HOURS 1UA 0FF-SITE SAFETY; INVESTIGATION ^ EMPNME TOT'.L ANNAST, MICHAEL V 2.9 2.0 ACT-CODE TOT;.L 1UW OUT OF OFC SFTY INVEST. (ON-SITE)- I EMPNME , TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 2.0 2.0 ACT-CDDELTOTAL 1UX-IN OFFICE SAFETY' INVESTIGATION EFFORT EMPNME TOTAL ANMAST, MICHAEL V 18.0 < - EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D: .0 10.0 i ACT-CDDE TOT iL-4 115 SAFETY CP HEARINGS-4

EMPNME T01 BROWNLEE, VIRGIL L 11.0 11.0 ACT-CODE Tai t

2TA OFF-SITE ENVIRONMENT IMSPECTIDM 'EMPNME-TO. L CUMMINGHAM, ANDREW L .8 .0 ACT-CODE TOTI.L 2TW 00T OF OFC ENVIR INSP EFQRT (OM-SITE) CUNMINGHAM, ANDREW L' 5.8 EMPNME TD ' L 5.0 r ACT-CODE T0 6 i 2TO ALL DTHER ENVIR IMSPECTION EFFORT EMPNME TGt c CUMMINGHAM, ANDREW L 8.8 8.8 ACT-CODE TO J. 4 E .W 4 , ~, - ,c a,. ~,.._,, y

'09/21/84 .REGUL AR ' MAN - HOU'25 - EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET -U.S.N.R.C. MAMPOWER SYSTEM PCGE FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY83 REGIG" II - OL REVIEW 05000400' HARRIS 1 EMPLOYEE REGULAR HAME HOURS 2TO ALL.OTHER'ENVIR INSP.ECTION EFFORT YR TOTAL 21:'. 5 ' FGP FISCAL YEAR '79 AST INSPECTOR SUPPORT TO OTHER OFFICES EMPNME TOTAL- ~BROWNLEE, VIRGIL L 45.0 EMPNME TOTAL BROWHLEE, VIRGIL L 8.0 EMPNME TOTAL CANTRELL,1FLOYD 5 15.0 EMPNME

TO' AL' LEWIS, RICHARD C 12.0

'EMPNME TO': AL WESSMAN, RICHARD H 40.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 120.0 B00 TRAINING EMPNME TOTAL ANDREWS. DALE L 12.5 ACT-CODE TOTAL. 12.5 l C00 TRAVEL ' EMPNME TOTAL ANDREWS DALE L 4.5 EMPNME T O A L -ANG, WILLIAM P. 59.1 16.0 EMPNME TO:AL BRADLEY, ROBERT D .EMPNME TC AL BROWNLEE, VIRGIL L 14.0 EMPNME TL AL BRYANT, JACK C 15.0 EMPNME T C ' '. L 'CANTRELL, FLOYD S 6.0 EMPNME TO .L .CUNNINGHAM, ANDREW L 14.0 EMPNME T0

  • L DANCE,.HUGH C 7.0 EMPNME TC +L GERARD, EDWARD H 6.0 EMPNME TL

.L GRANT, WILLIAM B 7.0 EMPNME TC ,L HARRIS, JOHN R 10.0 EMPNME Tr.AL LENAHAN, JOE' '11.0 . ~EMPNME T, .L SWAN.WALLACE B-- 4.0 EMPNME TCIAL THOMAS, McKENZIE 4.0 EMPNME Ta~ AL VAND00RN, PETER K 2.0 ACT-CODE-TC'AL 179.6 l l _ ~.. ---.x- .. ~,,. __..w w.-.-.~.

' Q9/21/84 U.S.N.R.C. MANPDWER' SYSTEM PA$E-REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPEMDED FOR.THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP; ISSUE DATE.THROUGH END FY '83: REGION'II - OL REVIEW 05000400 HARRIS:1-EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME HOURS DOC. ROUTINE' DOCUMENTATION EMPNME TOTAL ALDERSON,-CARL'E' 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL ANG, WILLIAN P 28.0 EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 181.0 EMPNME TOTAL CUNNINGHAM, ANDREW L 52.0 EMPNME TOTAL 'ECONOMOS, NICK 11.0 .EMPNME TOTAL GERARD, EDWARD H 48.0 ,.EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 102.0 ENPNME TOTAL LENAHAN,' JOE: 42.0 EMPNME TOTAL SWAN,WALLACE B 52.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 532.0 J0M-ADMINISTRATIVE' SUPPORT 'EMPNME TOTAL' BRADLEY, ROBERT D 125.0 EMPNME TOTAL CANTRELL, FLOYD S 8.0 s EMPNME TOTAL MURPHY, CHARLES E 16.0 4 -ACT-CODE TOTAL 149.0 PAP ' ROUTINE PREPARATION EMPNME TOTAL -ANG, WILLIAM P 12.0 EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 237.5 .EMPNME TOTAL CUNNINGHAM,-ANDREW L 24.0 EMPNME TOTAL ECONOMOS, NICK' 4.0 2.0 EMPNME TOTAL GRANT, WILLIAM B 106.0 EMPNME TOTAL ~ HARRIS,' JOHN R EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 35.0 EMPNME TOTAL SWAN,WALLACE B 7.0 EMPNME TOTAL 'WILCOX, JOHN D JR 12.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 439.5 pct. ! EMPNME TO. L' BRYANT, JACK C 12.0 ACT-CODE TO it 12.0 l '7:. ~ s e a "~"#' a n'--' ~ ' - ' ' 'Mr+=

09/21/84- ..U.S.N.R.C.-MANPOWE2 SYSTEM PAEE REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE.THROUGH END FY '83 REGION.II - OL REVIEW 05000400 ~ HARRIS 1. EMPLOYEE REGULAR MAME HOURS PPT EMPNME TOTAL 'BRYANT JACK C- .0 EMPNME TOTAL CANTRELL, FLOYD S 24.0 EMPNME TOTAL HERDT, ALAN R 28.0 EMPNME TOTAL KELLOGG,-PAUL J ?2.0 'EMPNME . TOTAL MCFARLAND, CHARLES R 27.0 EMPNME -TOTAL' MCHENRY, THOMAS J 8.0 EMPNME TOTAL MURPHY, CHARLES E 60.5. EMPNME TOTAL RUHLMAN, WILLIAM ARTHUR 13.0 EMPNME TOTAL TROUP, GERALD L. 5.0 EMPNME' TOTAL WESSMAN, RICHARD H 2.0 'ACT-CODE TOTAL 179.5 PP1 ROUTINE INSPECTION -EMPNME TOTAL ANG, WILLIAM P 48.0 EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 352.5 EMPNME TOTAL -BRYANT, JACK C 38.0 EMPHME TOTAL CANTRELL, FLOYD 5 34.0 EMPNME TOTAL CONLON, THDMAS 8.0 EMPNME TOTAL CUNNINGHAM,. ANDREW L 34.0 EMPNME TOTAL DANCE, HUGH C-57.0 EMPNME TOTAL ECONOMOS, NICK 35.0 EMPNME TOTAL GRANT. WILLIAM B 17.0 .EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS,. JOHN R 170.0 EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 36.8 EMPNME JOT L LONG, FRANCIS J 66.0 EMPNME TOT..L MURPHY, CHARLES'E 42.0 l EMPNME TOTAL THOMAS, MCKENZIE 20.0 J EMPNME TOTAL WESSMAN, RICHARD H 29.0 EMPNME TOTAL WILCOX,.J9HN D JR 29.0 ACT-CODE TOT AL 1,015.5 m PR1 REACTIVE ONSITE/0FFISTE INSPECTION 'EMPNME T(vTAL ECONOMOS, NICK 4.0 EMPNME TOTAL 'LENAHAN, JOE 4.8 ACT-CDDE TOTAL' 8.0 S m-e e- -~ n w a-n m

109/21/84 . U.S.O.R.C.' MANPOWER SYSTEM-PAGE. REGULAR MAN HSURS EXPENDED FN 'THE SELECTED DOCKET uFROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUCH END FY '83 ' REGION Y - OL: REVIEW '050004: HARRIS 1 fEMPLOYEE-REGULAR HOURS __iMAME t P1V INVESTIGATION EMPNME-TOTAL 'ALDERSCH, CARL E 4.0 'EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D '6.0 EMPNME TOTAL-BROWNLEE, VIRGIL L 14.5 .EMPNME -TOTAL-CANTRELL, FLOYD S 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL' DANCE, HUGH C '20.0' EMPNME. TOTAL HERDT, ALAN R 20.0 EMPNME' TOTAL MCFARLAND, CHARLES R 9.0. 1 EMP24ME TOTAL MURPHY,: CHARLES E- -20.0 ACV-CODE' TOTAL 109.S 1TW OUT OF OFC SFTY INSP EFFORT'(ON-SITE) EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D .4 EMPNME TOTAL GERARD, EDWARD H 20.0 'ENPNME TOTAL SWAN,WALLACE-B-9.0 EMPNME -TOTAL VAND00RN, PETER K 14.0 ACT-CODE TOT AL 43.4 1TX IN OFFICE SAFETY INSPECTION EFFORT EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D' .9 EMPNME TOTAL SWAN,WALLACE B 3.0 8.ACT-CODE TOTAL 3.9 1TO ALL OTHER SFTY INSP EFFORT (PREP-DOC-ENF) I EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 9.2 l EMPNME TOTAL .GERARD' EDWARD.H 22.0 EMPNME TOTAL SWAN.WALLACE B 17.0 EMPNME TOTAL VAND00RN, PETER K 13.0 " ACT-CODE TOTAL St.2-I 100 SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS EMPNME TOTAL ' SWAN,WALLACE B 3.0 1 ~. t .f. ~.2:, -..s u -- i,_ x

U.S.H.R.C. MANPDWER SYSTEM 'PAGE 09/2t/84 REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPENDED FOR.THE-SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE:DATE.THROUGH END FY !bs S REGION I - OL' REVIEW 050004-HARRIS 1 . EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME HOURS 1U0 SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS 3.0 ACT-CODE To t 115 SAFETY.CP HEARINGS EMPNME TO J. ANG, WILLIAM P 6.0 EMPNME TO'.AL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 36.0 EMPNME TOTAL .BROWNLEE, VIRGIL'L 14.5 EMPNME TOTAL BRYANT, JACK C 6.0 EMPNME TOTAL CANTRELL, FLOYD S 122.0 EMPNME TOTAL COMPTON, ROBERT M 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL DANCE, HUGH C-4.0 EMPNME TOTAL COUGE, MICHAEL J 33.0 EMPNME TOTAL GRANAM, MARY JANE 39.0 EMPNME TOTAL HERDT, ALAN R 60.0 EMFNME TOTAL HINCKLEY, DARRELL G 44.0 EMPNME TOTAL JENKINS. GEORGE 8.0 EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 12.0 EMPNME TOTAL MCFARLAND, CHARLES R 20.0 EMPNME TOTAL MCHENRY, THOMAS J 54.0 EMPNME TOTAL MURPHY, CHARLES E 20.0 EMPNME TOTAL TROUP, GERALD L-9.0 EMPNME TOTAL VALLISH, EDWARD J 2.0 EMPNME TOTAL WESSMAN, RICHARD H 70.0 .EMPNME TOTAL WHITENER, HERBERT L 8.0 EMPNME TOTAL WILCOX,' JOHN D JR. 48.0 EMPNME TOTAL WRIGHT, ROBERT 8.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 639.5 2TX IN OFFICE ENVIR INSPECTION EFFORT EMPHME TOTAL CUNNINGHAM, ANDREW L 3.0 ~ ACT-CODE TOTAL 3.0 YR TOTAL 3,511.1 1 7 x . = -

U.S.N.O.C. MANPOWER SYSTEM PAGE' ~ 09/21/84 REGULAR MAN H1URS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET .FROM CP' ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83. REGION I - OL-REVIEW HARRIS 1 050004 EMPLDYEE REGULAR HAME HOURS Frt FISCAL ~ YEAR '80 C00 TRAVEL EMPNME TO .L ASHENDEN, MELVIN C 7.0 EMPNME TO '.i BROWNLEE, VIRGIL 7.0 EMPNME TO it BRYANT,-J C 13.0 'EMPNME 70 cL ECONOMOS, NICK 10.0 LANDSMAN, ROSS B 16.0 i-EMPNME TL c. l EMPNME T D~.. MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN 24.0 EMPNME Toi.; THOMAS,'MCKENZIE 7.0 8.5 EMPNME T01._ ZAJAC,' LEA D 92.5 ACT-CODE TC, R DPP PROGRAM DEV, COORD, 8 ASSESSMENT EMPHME TG '. L KLEINS0RGE, WILLIAM P 16.0 EMPNME T0 Al PERNY, CYNTHIA D 3.0 19.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL ' DOC ROUTIHE DOCUMENTATION EMPNME TOTAL ASHENDEN MELVIN C 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL BLAKE, JEROME J 26.0 EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 74.0 EMPNME TOTAL BROWHLEE, VIRGIL 7.0 _EMPNME TOTAL CROWLEY, BILLY R 1.0 EMPNME TOTAL CUNNINGHAM,-ANDREW L 6.0 EMPNME TOTAL ECONOMOS, MICK 48.0 l EMPNME TOTAL GERARD, EDWARD H f2.0 EMPNME TOTAL GIBBONS, THOMAS D 24.0 EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 4.0 -l EMPNME TOTAL KLEINS0RGE, WILLIAM P 46.0 EMPNME TOTAL LANDSMAN, ROSS B 52.0 EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 61.0 a ~~EMPNME TOTAL MARSH, ROBERT J 4.0 EMPNME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 50.0 EMPNME TOTAL MCFARLANP, C R 34.0 EMPNME TOTAL RAUSCH, JOHN K 10.0 EMPNME TOTAL RUHLMAN, WILLIAM ARTHUR 4.0 THDMAS, McKENZIE 4.0 EMPNME TOTAL C ~

09/21/84 U.S.M.R.C. MAMPOWER' SYSTEM' TPAGEI REGULAR MAN' HOURS EXPENDED F03 THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83 REGION II - OL REVIEW 05000430 HARRIS 1 . EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME. HOURS DOC ROUTINE DOCUMENTATION EMPNME 1 At UALTERS, D KEITH III 32.0 ACT-CODE T*..AL 515.0 JMO-MANAGEMENT SUPERVISION. EMPNME T b. M. COHLON, THOMAS 2.0 EMPNME 'T~!AL RAUSCH, JOHN K 2.0 ACT-CODE T-at -4.0 4 J0M ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT 'EMPNME T ML BRADLEY, ROBERT D 95.5 BCT-CDDE TE'.4L 95.5 i PAA ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT-ACT-CODE T5 J.L MAXWELL, GEORGE F 47.0 EMPNME T AL 47.0 PAP ROUTINE PREPARATI0H 'EMPNME TOTAL BL AKE ' JEROME J 34.0 EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 41.0 EMPNME TOTAL BROWNLEE, VIRGIL 10.5 EMPNME TOTAL BURDETTE, THOMAS E 4.8 EMPNME TOTAL GERARD, EDWARD H 5.0 EMPNME TOTAL GIBBONS, THOMAS D 4.0' EMPNME TOTAL ' HARRIS, JOHN R: 6.0 EMPNME TOTAL. KLEINSORGE, WILLIAM P 22.0 i ""'EMPNME TOTAL' LENAHAN, JOE st.0 EMPNME TOTAL MARSH ROBERT J 12.0 EMPNME TOTAL ' MAXWELL,. GEORGE F 14.0 EMPNME TOTAL MCFARLAND, C R 17.8 EMPNME TOTAL RAUSCH, JOHN K 6.8 EMPNME TOTAL WALTERS, D KEITH III 32.8 + 7 4 -. - ~

i 09/21/8G U.S.M.R.C. MANPOWER SYSTEM PAGE REGULAR MA~J HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END.FY '83. REGION II -'OL REVIEW -05000400 HARRIS.1-l =___ - EMPLOYEE REGULAR N AME '- HOURS PAP ROUTINE PREPARATION TO'il ZAJAC, LEA D .0 -EMPNME

1ACT-CODE TO L 218.5 PP1 ROUTINE INSPECTION

'; EMPtiME TO i ASHENDEN, MELVIN C 30.0 BLAKE, JEROME J-55.0 EMPNME TD- _ 'BRADLEY,~ ROBERT'D - 7 7. 0 - EMPNME TD*.L EMPNME. TO 1 BROWHLEE, VIRGIL-8.5 t i EMPMME TOT *L BRYANT, J C 33.0 L EMPNME TOT at BURDETTE. ' THOMAS E 8.0 EMPNME T0l iL COLEY, J AMES L 'JR 30.0 EMPNME TO' tl CUNNINGHAM, AMDREW L 7.0 EMPNME TO 4L ECONOMOS, NICK 30.0 i ! EMPNME TOTtL GERARD, EDWARD H 15.0 j EMPNME T0i l' GIBBONS,. THOMAS D 36.0 ' EMPNME TO t HARRIS,' JOHN R 4.0 i EMPNME ' T O - F_ HERDT, ALAN R-12.0 ' LMPNME T O' 4 '. KLEIMSORGE, WILLIAM P 57.5 EMPNME TO.. LANDSMAN,'ROSS B 56.0 60.0 i EMPNME TO. r LENAHAN,' JOE 213.0 EMPNME TO '; 3 L MAXWELL,' GEORGE F EMPNME TCi MCFARLAND, C R 30.0 i _EMPNME TOT. MERRIWEATHER, MORMAN 32.0 1 EMPNME T O' M. RAUSCH, JOHN K 4.0 EMPNME TO W. -RUHLMAN, WILLIAM ARTHUR 28.0 THOMAS, McKENZIE 3.5 EMPNME TO 1*. WALTERS, D KEITH III 34.0 EMPNME TO' _ EMPNME TO..L ZAJAC, LEA D 31.5 ACT-CODE TO. it 900.0 i ~ PR1 REACTIVE ONSITE/0FFISTE ' INSPECTION EMPNME TOTAL BRADLEY, ROBERT D 180.6 EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 11.0 j EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAM,' JOE 54.0-EMPNME ~ TOTAL' UPRIGHT,. CHARLES M 15.0 y-i ^ l .-~

.___u_ ~ 09/21/84. U.S.M.R.C. MAMPOWER SYSTEM P'4 E 1 REGULA"2 MAN HOURS TXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE - TH?:DUGH.END FY .8 3.. REGION.II 05000400 EMPLOYEE . REGULAR J -NAME . HOURS 1-1 PR1 REAC'.FE ONSITE/0FFISTE INSPECTIDH-ACT-CODE TOTAL '260.0 t RT1 INCIDENT / ACCIDENT RESPONSE' EMPNME TOTAL MURPHY, CHARLES E 10.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 10.0 4UZ RQST REV & EVAL (PART 21) i EMPNME TO L _MCFARLAND, C.R 5.8 ACT-CODE TO .L S.O YR TO L 2,166.5 F, FISCAL YEAR '81 BR1 REACTIVE PREPARATION EMPNME T b ': < L GIRARD, EDWARD H - 1.0 EMPHME TOTAL -HOWELL,' JERRY C 6.0 EMPHME TG'AL VORSE, JAMES Y 3.0 ACT-CODE TO'AL 10.0 CD1 DOCKET TRAVEL EMPNME-Tc;al BLAKE, JERGME J 9.0 EMPNME Tb")L BROWHLEE,' VIRGIL 2.0 EMPNME Tri tt 'CROWLEY, BILLY R 2.0 EMPHME T f. 4L ECONOMOS.. NICK 6.5 EMPNME 7t1 f.L JGIRARD,-EDWARD H-6.0 EMPNME TL ;. : L HARRIS, JOHN R-5.0 EMPNME T04*L -KLEINS0RGE, WILLIAM ** 2.0 3 ""EMPNME TO 2L LENAHAN, JOE-2.0 EMPNME Tt AL MERRIWEATHER,' NORMAN 8.0 EMPNME T(FAL PEEBLES,~ THOMAS-6.0 ENPNME Tt s e L TILLMAN, AUBREY 7.0 EMPNME-TL AL WRIGHT, R. 2.0 1 ACT-CODE Tt:AL 57.5 7 i i 4 n. .a ow-n .u N -.e -~.- - .-._-.-e wn ~~. - ~.

59/21/94' ' U.S.N.R.C. MANPOWER SYSTEM ! PAGE. ~ REGULAR MAN HOU]S EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET -FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83 - ~ 'REGIDH-II - OL REVIEW 05000409 HARRIS 1 -_~ - = _ - - EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME- -HOURS .s DR1 REACTIVE DOCUMENTATION EMPNME' TOTAL-ECONOMOS, NICK-8.0 EMPNME TOTtL' GIRARD,: EDWARD H 2.0

EMPNME ' TOT.L HARRIS,i JOHN R

~ 12.0 EMrNME TOT L MAXWELL, GEORGE F-2.0 ? FMPNME . TOTAL RAUSCH, JOHN K S.O EMPNME TOTAL TILLMAN, AUBREY 8.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 37.0 3 DOC R30 TINE DOCUMENTATIONL EMPNME TOTAL BL AKE, ' JEROME J 41.0 , EMPNME TOTAL BROWNLEE, VIRGIL 6.0 I EMPNME-TOTAL BUTCHER, ROSS 117.0 EMPNME TOTAL _COLEY, JAMES L JR 12.0 EMPNME TOTAL JCROWLEY, BILLY R 26.0 EMPNME -total CUNNINGHAM, ANDREW L 2.0 i EMPNME TOTnL ECONOMOS,. HICK 12.0 EMPNME TOP L GIRARD, EDWARD H 30.0 EMPNME T01. ! HARRIS, JOHN R 10.0' EMPNME TOT JULIAN, CAUDLE A JR: 6.0 EMPNME T01. KLEINS0RGE, WILLIAM P 45.0 EMPNME TOT LENAHAM, JOE 4.0 EMP:..a (DJ LP/NME T01. MAXWELL,1 GEORGE F 61.0 MERRIWEATHER NORMAN-32.0 EdPNME TD' t PEEBLES, THOMAS 2.0 EMPNME TD *' RAUSCH, JOHN K 4.0 EMPNME 701 a c - WRIGHT, R. 19.0 EMPNME TOTrit ZAJAC, LEA D 18.0 ACT-CODE Toiil 447.C PAA ..DMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT g5 EMPNME T 01.1 MAXWELL, GEORGE F-2.0 I RCT-CODE T0!ai. 2.0 [ r t 9 + b ,-w i.--, ~ .... +.

'PZE .U.S.N.R.C. MANPOWER SYSTEM - 0 /21/84 ' REGULAR MA% HOURS' EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE' DATE THROUGH END FY.'83 REGION II - OL1 REVIEW '~ 05000400 HARRIS 1' .EMPLLYFE REGULAR ' HAM 7 HOURS' l F PAP ROUTINE PREPARATION BLAKE, JERDME'J' 19.0 i EMPNME TOTAL EMPNME TOTAL BROWHLEE, VIRGIL '6.0 EMPNME TOTAL CROWLEY, BILLY.R -3.0 4.0 l EMPNME TOTAL ECONOMO% NICK 9.0 GIRARD, EDWARD H' EMPNME TOT 3L 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JDHN R KLEINSORGE, WILLIAM P 6.0 EMPNME TOTAL 1.0 LENAHAN,-JOE - EMPNME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 50.0 EMPNME TOTAL MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN-8.0 EMPNME TOTAL RAUSCH, JOHN K. 2.0 EMPNME TO ~ AL 13.0 EMPNME TO'AL = WRIGHT, R 137.0 -ACT-CODE TOTAL PP1 ROUTINE INSPECTION. BLAKE, JEROME J 35.0 EMPNME TOTAL 19.0 BROWNLEE, VIRGIL EMPNME TOTAL 4.0 BUTCHER, ROSS EMPNME TOTAL 14.0 CRDWLEY, BILLY R EMPNME TOTAL 18.5 ECONOMOS, MICK EMPNME TOTAL GIRARD, EDWARD H 18.0 EMPNME TDTAL 7.0 ') HARRIS, JOHN R EMPNME TOTAL JULIAN, CAUDLE A JR 5.0 _EMPNME TO~AL KLEINSORGE, WILLIAM P 26.5 EMPNME TD'AL 8.0 LENAHAN, JOE EMPNME Tr7AL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 750.0 EMPNME TO AL MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN 32.0 ' EMPNME Tt -.tL 32.0 PEEBLES, THOMAS EMPNME lt AL EMPNME Tt kL WRIGHT, R 12.0 981.0 ACT-CODE TL ?L PR1-REACTIVE ONSITE/DFFISTE INSPECTION EMPNME TUTAL ' ECONOMOS, NICK 1.0 GIBBONS, THOMAS D 2.5 EMPNME T?iAL EMPNME TfrAL GIRARD, EDWARD.H 3.0 ~_ e _m. ....m

I " 09/21/04 U.S.F..Q.C. MAMPOWER SYSTEM ?ASE -REGULAR MAM MOURS EXPENDED FDR THE SELECTE3 CCCRET FROM CP I35UE DATE TH:tDUGH END FY '83 REGIOM II - OL REVIEW 05900400 HARRIS 1 EMPLOYEE REGULAR MAME HOURS PR1 . REACTIVE DMSITE/DFFISTE IMSPECTIDM ~ EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JDMM R 22.9 EMFNME TOTAL-MAXMELL, GEORGE F 15.8 ,43.5 ACT-CODE' TOTAL F1V INVESTIGATIDM EMPNME TOTAL-ALDERSON, CARL E 3.8 EMPHME ' TOTAL HARRIS, JDMM R 7.8 EMPNME. TOTAL HOWELL, JERRY C T.S -EMPNME TOTAt RLEIM50RGE, WILLIAM P 2.8 EMPNME TOTAL. MAXMELL, GEDRGE F. 3.8 .EMPNME TCTAL' TILLMAN, AUBREY 9.8 EMPMME- -TDTAL VDRSE, JAMES Y S.8 EMPNME TCTAL WILLIAMSDM, EVERETT 1.8 39.8 'ACT-CDDE TOTAL SR1 SI)E PUBLIC RELATIDMS l EMPNME TtTAL MAXMELL, GEDRGE F 9.8 ?.R ACT-CODE TOTAL 1,763.s YR TOTAL FOR FISCAL YEAR '82 BR1 REACTIVE PREPARATIOM EMPNME TOTAL COLEY, JAMES L JR 2.8 EMPNME TOTAL HARDIN, AUSTIM K 2.8 EMPNME TOTAL HUMT, MILTOM D 4.9-EMPNME TOTAL MAXMELL, GEORGE F 2.8 18.3 ACT-CDDE TOTAL CST DOCKET TRAVEL EMPNFL. " rAL COLEY, JAMES L JR 16.S 8.9 'EMPNME T,'AL' DEBBAGE. ARTHUR G. EMPNME .T ?At .GIRARD, EDWARD M 4.8 C J .. _ _. _ -....... =.. _ _ _ _. _. _ _

07/21/84 U.S.M.R.C. MANPOWER SYSTEM PAGE REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM OP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83 REGION I - CL REVIEW 05000440 HARRIS 1 -= PEGULAR EMPLOYEE NAME HOURS C01 DOCKET TRAVEL EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 11.0 EMPNME TOTAL HUNT, MILTON D S.0 EMPNME TOTAL JULIAN, CAUDLE A JR 3.5 EMPNME TOTAL KLEINSORGE, WILLIAM P 7.0 EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 6.0 EM*NME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 20.0 EMPNME TOTAL MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN 23.0 EMPNME TOTAL MILLER, WILLIAM H JR 4.0 EMPNME TOTAL RUFF, ALBERT B 8.0 EMPNME TOTAL URYC, BRUNO, JR 20.0 EMPNME TOTAL VORSE, JAMES Y 46.0 EMPNME TOTAL WRIGHT, R 8.0 EMPNME TOTAL YORK, JOHN W 3.0 193.0 ACT-CODE T01AL l DR1 REACTIVE DOCUMENTATION i EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 3.0 l EMPNME TOTAL HOWEtt, JERRY C 2.0 EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 26.0 EMPNME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 3.0 EMPNME TOTAL URYC, BRUND, JR 29.0 EMPNME TOTAL VORSE, JAMES Y 67.0 137.0 .ACT-CODE TOTAL DOC ROUTINE DOCUMENTATI0H EMPNME TO.AL BELI3LC, GEORGE A 3.0 EMPNME TOTAL BUTCHER, ROSS 48.0 EMPNME TOTAL COLEY, JAMES L JR 80.0 EMPNME TOTAL CRGWLEY, BILLY R 1.0 EMPNME TOTAL DEBBAGE, ARTHUR G. 47.0 ~~ EMPNME TOTAL GIRARD, EDWARD H 23.0 EMPNME TOTAL MARDIN, AUSTIN K 29.0 EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 37.4 EMPNME TOTAL EEHL, CHARLES W. 7.0 EMPNME TOTAL HUNT, MILTON D 32.0

.o PAGE U.S.C.R.C. MAMPOWER SYSTEM 09/21/34 REGULC2 MAN HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH EMD FY '83 REGIch ~I - OL REVIEM 050004.2 HARRIS 1 EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME HOURS DOC ROUTINE DOCUMENTATION EMPHME TOTAL JULIAN, CAUDLE A JR 39.0 EMPNME T 0 i A t_ KLEINSURGE, WILLIAM P 67.0 EMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 65.8 EMPNME TOTAL MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN 8C.0 EMPNME TOTAL MILLER WILLIAM M JR 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL FUFF. ALBERT B 20.0 EM?NME TOTAL SKINNER, PIERCE 22.8 4 EMPNME TOTAL WRIGHT, R 37.0 EMPNME TOTAL YORK, JOHM W 15.9 697.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 1 PAP ROUTIME PREPARATION EMPNME TOTAL COLEY, JAMES L JR 26.0 EMPNME TOTAL DEBBAGE, ARTHUR G. 16.0 EMPNME TOTAL GIRARD, EDWARD H 10.5 EMPdME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 35.8 EMPNME TOTAL HEHL, CHARLES W. 1.0 EMP Kf4E TOTAL HUNT, MILTON D 7.0 EMPNME TOTAL KLEIN50RGE, WILLIAM P 29.0 EMPNME TOTAL LEMAHAN, JOE 5.8 EMPNME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 22.0 13fPNME TOTAL MERRIWEATHER,v40RMAN 50.5 UTPNME TOTAL MILLER WILLIAM H JR 3.0 EMPNME TOTAL RUFF, ALBERT B 33.0 EMPNME TOTAL WRIGHT, R 17.0 255.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL PET ENFORCEMENT EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 4.0 EMPNME TOTAL VORSE, JAMES Y 5.0 9.0 ACT-CCDE TOTAL i )

E G A P -{' l I T

  • (

E AS 50000.a05000000000 000000000000000 K LR C UU 82762254816120153 864021050163124 O GO 832 5 44327822416 21 21$1 1 1 8 D EH 8 4, 1 R D3 1 E8 TC' EY MLF EE TSD S K YEE SHTH R G . ERU WOO OFR P H M3T AE MCE P NT NR N .EA RM AJ A C. XPD JA M M RG I FRH ARGD FR R.E E E ~J HK . AL O N J K OD U E R W L ENM O E RS EN E C. R S SS YE LUDNR DEI G,AB I GLUANR GI ABC OM HRI S LW R I T R HMI R R STATNEND,EDRLT W C OSTOTNEORHTE W UI LA S. O EEWSHLOU OEELR E EERHSHOEETRI PN CHP M MADUORTAEJGHIE N P GMATUOJGHNEP N C O A.EAJALCG,,TWBRH S ,J, AJ ,TYB,RH A N J ,,,HICM,RONLE L A O N , ACL O .AM ,E E,ESGNNSALW,AR ,,NLE ,J A ,J I MO GDNS,,NSALWR,T E,SYAOIIHEIY,ET L R YARII ANHEIE H, NH, 2F EBADRLTIIAWRLFGK T IEBBDRAWRMFNGK A LBRRRHNLENXRLFIR S LLBBRRNXRRFIIR L OEIAAEUULEAEIURO I EOEIAAEAEEUKRO U CDGHHHHJKLMMMRWY F BCDGHHLMMPRSWY G N F E O D C I / T E C T E I P S S N N O I E E V N I I T T C U A O E R R W E I1 V 1 1 ES P R RI P P R LR OAH I i;4( wlLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLL, I) s _L 4AAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ~ l'. TTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT 2 T N4 G O O D D O O O'OGOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O0 TTTTTTTTT~ TTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTTT I0 4 G0 E E 8 E5 D D / R0 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEO EEEEEEEEEEEEEED 1 MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMC MMMMMMMMMMMMMMC 2 NNNNRHNNHNNNNNNN-NNNNNNNNNNNNNN- / PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPT PPPPPPPPPPPPPPT 9 MPMMMMMMMMMMMMMMC MMMMMMMMMMMMMMC 0 EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEA EEEEEEEEEEEEEEA ~ ~ !l

09/21/84. U.S.N.R.C. MANPtN#E2 SYSTEM PAGE CEGULA2 MAN HDURS EXPECDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END F f '83 REGION .I - OL REVIEW 050004' HARRIS 1 EMPLOYEE REGULAR l NAME. HOURS l P1V INVESTIGATION EMPNME Tt -t COLEY, JAMES L JR 13.8 'l EMPNME T O * *.L HARRIS, JOHN R 49.8 EM?NME T(;al HOWELL, JERRY C 4.8 EMPNME TD.AL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 112.8 i EMPNME' TC ' 4L RUFF, ALBERT B 15.8 -EMPNME T0-4L SWAN, WALLACE 3 8.8 EMPNME-TC AL URYC, BRUND, JR 43.9 EMPNME TO'.L VORSE, JAMES Y 147.5 i j-ACT-CODE T37.L 388.5-I 1 1 SR1 SITE PUBLIC RELATIONS EMPNME TC.JL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 42.8 ACT-CODE TC'AL 42.8 l ' YR TO' tt 3.378.5 FOR FISCAL YEAR '83 NOT RELATED TO AN ACTIVITY CODE 1 LLL{ h,.d*g/ } EMPNME TOTAL JOHNSON, ARTHUk H

12. *J

^ EMPNME TOTAL NORRIS. TIMOTHY L 72.8 ACT-CDDE TOTAL 84.8 i a BR1 REACTIVE PREPARATION 1 EMPNME TOTAL AMG, WILLIAM P 8.8 ^ EMPNME TOTAL ELDROD, STEPHEN 5.8 EMPNME TOTAL FREDRICKSON, PAUL E 4.8 EMPNME TOTAL GIBBONS, THOMAS D 7.8 EMPNME TOTAL GIRARD, EDWARD H 2,9 EMPNME TOTAL JACKSON, LOUIE H 4.8 ~EMPNME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 24.8 EMPNME TOTAL PREVETTE, RICHARD L 24.9 ACT-CODE TOTAL 78.s

m. m

89/21/84
U.S.M.12.C. MAMPOWER SYSTEM PAGE~

CEGULA2 MA3 HOURS EXPENDE3' FOR THE SELECTED DOCRET + l-

FROM CP ISSUE DATE..THROUGH EMD FY '83 REGION II - OL REVIEW 2

t 05080400 . HARRIS 1. EMPLOYEE REGULAR MAME HOURS 4 s a CS1 DOCKET TRAVEL' L !.EMPMME TO' i AMG WILLIAM P 22.8 ): EMPNME TO. il CLLEY. JAMES L JR 4.8 l EMPNME. TO 'L ECONOMOS. MICK 7.8

.. EMPNME TOTrL

- ELDROD. STEP.' TEM 13.8 ) i.EMPNME TOT *L-FREBRICKSON, PAUL E 15.8 1. TO'At GIBSONS THOMAS D 4.8 l EMPNME EMPNME 701 tl GIRARD. EDWARD H 6.8 j 'EMPNME TO.tl HARRIS, JOHN R. 17.8 3'.EMPMME TO:'LL HEATHERLY, THEODORE-6.8 ' EMPNME TOi L JACKSOM. LOUIE N 15.8

EMPNME TO' ' L '

JOHMSGM, ARTHUtt M 3.8 i EMPNME T O' ? c. KLEIMSORGE. WILLIAM P 5.8 '. EMPNME TOT *L. LEMAHAM. JOE 15.8 j !EMPNME-TO %L LIU. WAM-CHEMG~ 9.8 EMPMME. TOLL MAXWELL GEORGE F 8.8 I EMPNME T0!rt MCFARLAND. CHARLES R - 8.8 EMPNME' Tal c.L MERRIWEATHER. MORMAN 18.5 i EMPNME TOT: L MILLER. WILLIAM M JR 3.5 i 'EMPNME To i. 'PREVETTE RICHARD L 3.3 EMPMME-TO:si RUFF. ALBERT B. 12.8 j EMPMME TO * -_ TOBIN WILLIAM J 8.8 . EMPMME T0!-L WRIGHT, ROBERT W 4.8 i EMPNME T 0 ! 4 *_ YORK. J0MM W 15.9 ' ACT-CODE Toi+L 217.5 I - DR1 REACTIVE DOCUMENTATION 4 1 EMPNME TOTAL AMG. WILLIAM P 63.8 j EMPMME TOTAL 'GIBSDMS. THOMAS D 22.S i EMPNME TOTAL GIRARD EDWARD M 11.9 { EMPNME TOTAL-JACKSON LOUIE N 28.8 + EMPMME- ' TOTAL LEMAHAM. JOE 11.9 }~EMPMME~ TOTAL MAJerELL. GEORGE F 6.0 - -EMPMME TOTAL URYC BRUNO 1.8 i ACT-CODE TOTAL; 139.8 4~ 4 i 4 i 4 !j-

09/21/84 U.S.H.R.C. MANPDWER SYSTEM PAGE REGULAR NAN HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83 REGION II - OL REVIEW 05000400 HARRIS 1 EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME HOURS DOC ROUTINE DOCUMENTATI0M EMPNME TO'AL ECONOMOS, NICK 20.0 EMPNME TOTAL ELDROD, STEPHEN 4.0 EMPNME TO'AL FREDRICKSON, PAUL E 109.0 EMPNME TC:AL GIBBONS, THOMAS D 29.0 EMPNME TO '

  • L HARDIN, AUSTIN K 140.0 EMPNME TO

.L HARRIS, JOHN R 67.0 EMPNME TO

  • L HEATHERLY, THEODORE 8.0 EMPNME TC.-L HEHL, CHARLES W 7.0 EMPNME TO

.L JACKSON, LOUIE H 22.0 EMPNME TO 4L KLEINSORGE, WILLIAM P S4.0 EMPNME TL AL LENAHAN, JOE 24.0 EMPNME TLI '.L LIU, WAN-CHENG E7.0 EMPNME TOT LL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 65.0 FMPHME TC'AL MCFARLAND, CHARLES R I4.0 EMPNME TO AL MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN 30.0 EMPNME TC AL MILLER, WILLIAM H JR 8.0 EMPNME TO AL PREVETTE, RICHARD L 42.0 EMPNME TE ~ IL RUFF, ALBERT B 4.0 EMPNME TC it WRIGHT, ROBERT W 27.0 EMPNME T 0 * *.L YORK, JOHN W 44.0 787.0 ACT-CODE TC'e.L LEP LICENSING - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 'EMPNME T O'.T L WRIGHT, ROBERT W 24.0 24.0 ACT-CODE TO~ L PAP ROUTINE PREPARATION EMPWME Tf AL ECONOMOS, NICK 4.0 EMPNME TL %L FREDRICKSON, PAUL E S.0 " ENPNME TU.AL GIBBONS, THOMAS D 11.0 EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 13.0 EMPNME TOTAL HEATHERLY, THEODORE 4.0 EMPNME TOTAL JACKSON, LOUIE H 18.0 EMPNME TOTAL KLEINS0RGE, WILLIAM P 30.0 OMPNME TOTAL LENAHAN, JOE 7.0 7

PAGE U.S.G.R.C. MANPOWE2 SYSTEM 99/21/84 REGULA2 MA3 HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83 TEGION II - DL REVIEW-05000400 HARRIS 1 EMPLOYEE REGULAR MAME HCURS. PAP ROUTINE PREPARATION EMPNME TOTAL LIU. WAM-CHEMG 1*.8 EMPNME TOTAL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 36.8 EMPNME " TOTAL MCFARLAND, CHARLES R 22.8 EMPNME TOTAL MERRIWEATHER. HORMAN 34.8 EMPNME ' TOTAL MILLER, WILLIAM M JR 4.8 EMPNME TOTAL PREVETTE, RICHARD L 18.8 -EMPNME TOTAL . RUFF, ALBERT B 24.8 l.EMPNME TOTAL WRIGHT, ROBERT W 2.8 EMPNME' TOTAL YORK, JOHN W 16.8 259.8 ACT-CODE TOTAL PE1 ENFORCEMENT ~EMPNME. TO'UL MAXWELL, GEORGE F 12.8 EMPNME T0 *.L PREVETTE, RICHARD L 6.8 l I 18.8 -ACT-CODE TO' lL PP1 ROUTIME IMSPECTIDM. EMPNME' TOT 4L BELISLE, GEORGE A-6.8 i EMPNME-TO AL .COLEY, JAMES L JR 1.8 l l EMPNME TDiAL CROWLEY, BILLY R 2.8 EMPNME TOTAL ECONOMOS, MICK 33.8 EMPNME Toi4L ELDROD, STEPHEN 5.8 l EMPNME TCT1L FREDRICKSON, PAUL E 39.8 EMPHME TO?tt GIBBOMS. THOMAS D 5.8 l .EMPNME 70',4L HARDIN, AUSTIN K 52.8 l EMPNME TOTJL- . HARRIS,' JOHN R 85.8 .EMPNME TOi!L HEATHERLY, THEDDORE 38.8 EMPNME TC f.1L HEHL, CHARLES W 2.8 EMPNME TG74L JACKSON, LOUIE H 47.0 ~~EMPNME Toist KLEIHSORGE, WILLIAM P 117.8 EMPNME TOT *L LEMAHAN, JOE 43.8 EMPMME TO 4L LIU, WAM-CHENG $8.8 EMPMME T0~4L MAXWELL, GEORGE F 75E.8 EMPNME: TO TAL. MCFARLAND, CHARLES R 38.8 EMPNME. T02 *L MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN 23.8 7 I m e w ww._.._w ..-_-mi_,.%, _ _ _ _ m _____,y

109/21/84' .U.S.C.Q.C. MAMPOWE2 SYSTEM PAGE REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPENIED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET FROM CP ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83 REGION II: - OL REVIEW, 05000400 HARRIS 1 EMPLOYEE REGULAR NAME HOURS PP1 ROUTINE INSPECTION EMPNME TOTAL MILLER, WILLIAM H JR 13.8 EMPNME TOTAL PREVETTE, RICHARD L 557.8 EMPNME TOTAL RUFF, ALBERT B 48.8 EMPNME. TO'AL. TAYLOR, PETER A 19.8 EMPNME T0JAL TOBIN, WILLIAM J 16.8 EMPNME T0iAL WRIGHT, ROBERT W 28.8 EMPNME TOTAL YORK, JOHN W 96.8 ACT-CODE' TOTAL 2,897.8 PR1 REACTIVE ONSITE/0FFISTE INSPECTIDM EMPNME TOTAL .ANG, WILLIAM P 134.8 EMPNME TOTAL' ELDROD, STEPHEN 17.8 EMPNME TOTAL FREDRICKSON, PAUL E 28.8

EMPNME.

TOTAL GIBBONS, THOMAS D 57.8 EMPNME 10TAL HARDIN, AUSTIN K 4.8 EMPNME TOTAL HARRIS, JOHN R 27.8 EMPNME T0iAL JACKSON, LOUIE H 35.8 EMPNME T0fAL LENAHAN, JOE 16.8 EMPNME TP Al MAXWELL, GEORGE F 64.8 EMPNME. TC.AL-MERRIWEATHER, NORMAN 58.8 EMPNME TO at MILLER WILLIAM H JR 6.8 EMPNME TC?st .PREVETTE, R' CHARD L 58.8 __EMPNME TC AL RUFF, ALBERT B 7.8 EMPNME TC tl URYC, BRUNO 2.8 EMPNME TC. f.L WRIGHT, ROEERT W 6.8 ACT-CODE. TC e AL 511.8 P1V INVESTIGATION EMPNME TC '. AL GIRARD, EDWARD H 17.8 ~~EMPNME TC'AL HARRIS, JOHN R 4.8 EMPMME TC?4L MAXWELL, GEORGE F 46.8 EMPNME' TV AL PREVETTE, RICHARD L 68.8 EMPNME TGTAL RUFF, ALBERT B 17.8 EMPNME TGIAL TODD, GREGORY A 36.8 ACT-CODE TCIAL 188.8 7 I. .-.__.i. ~..-

h.: f 1 i l t >= W w 4M wp m en n. o. n. e 'i .e e e se e M N N 6h t n e0 a ww e' n g W tt W a a M WW l e0 i M* j u i Wh g,a [g. 1 - WW >@D CW5 ME Wh 58' 'E kO-a '-- g W ] .E O W t De 4 ed 4 M l O O $;) A Cl. e i Cf W 3 W .1 D. e < 1 -(3 M M b e z .]

  • m O

me wu i e N .J 4 W. OM i 4 3 m WW D A' W O-

k. Q u

.J. w - ( R W 6 *W i a gg' - U e k. et nt h5 r M o , 5 gl W -.. 3 D C E ta. 1 E St Mgk op e M l W i . Lt.:. e.J 4 .H W bu o M W .J

-l o

E D -- A EU W i 4 N M 5-M*- $=, De WW 4 N' gM p. m- _, g ..a g. Qw I M .J.J .J.J.J.J.J.J Mo w w w w w et O' HH H >= W s= >= W DO 000000 O sn Ma WH i d' -Co. W W-O-so Wm O O, E. i N Wo-WO WWWO - th E Y,- EEEY-w s w r-u EU UWD ts. W sf et >= Q ... - ~., _ -. ., - -,., -, - ~ ...*w.,r,-.~.,<, 8',

h - 09/21/84 U.S.N.R.C. MANPOWER SYSTEM jgV PAGE 6 REGULAR 9%N HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCMET FOR BLANK.ACT-CODES FROM CP. ISSUE DATE THROUGH END FY '83 REGION II - OL REVIEW: 05000400 HARRIS 1 i -NAME HOURS FOR FISCAL YEAR '83 1321 POWER FACIL. REPLACEMENT EXAM 'EMPNME . TOTAL MORRIS. TIMOTHY L 16. O i PA-NUM TOTAL 16.0} \\.. 4y . 134 . CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS \\ 's \\.@ i }* I - EMPNME TOTAL JOHNSON, ARTHUR H 12.0 . EMPNME TOTAL-NORRIS,-TIMOTHY L 56.0 f A PA-NUM TOTAL 68.0 I hy e YR TOTAL 84.0 ' DOCKETNO TOTAL 84.0 s d .. _ -.. ~.. a.,-...._.m..~. _. _ _. _, _ .m....-

__J,

. =...

i..'-

j t JM PAGE 5I 09/20/V . 'U_S.N.R.C: MANPOWER SYSTEM REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKETS FOR FISCAL YEAR '84 THRU 06/23/84 i RLJION II.- OL REVIEW ~ 05000400 HARRIS 1 t

?

-- = _ =-- ----- =_= ---------- _ REVIEWER-NAME OF ' REGULAR INITIALS . REVIEWER HOURS .------------------------_=___ = 1 i APD ROUTINE DOCUMENTATION i t + REV-INIT TOTAL AER ABRtFF 10.0 i REV-INIT TOTAL .AKH AKHARDIN 85_O i i' REV-INIT TOTAL DKWl DKWALTERS '32.0 t REV-INIT' TOTAL' .. ENG E ENGIRARD I.O + REV-INIT TOTAL GFM-GFMAXWELL 57.0-i REV-INIT' TOTAL JHO JRMARRIS 32.0 REV-INIT TOTAL LHJ UtJACKSON '20.0 l REV-INIT TOTAL MNH: 10 HUNT 24.0 i QEV-INIT TOTAL: NGM: N MERRIWEATHER 20.0 i' REV-INIT TOTAL PET PEFREDRICKSON 4.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PEK WPKLEINSORGE 82.0 t i REV-INIT TOTAL RHR ~ RWWRIGHT 44.0 REV-IMIT TOTAL .RKP-RLPREVETTE 60.0 REV-INIT TOTAL WBS: WBSWAN 10.0 ACT--CODE TOTAL 481.0 [ API ROUTINE.OM-SITE /OFF-SITE INSPECTION REV-INIT TOTAL AER ABPUFF 10.0 I i-REV-INIT TOTAL AKH. AKHARDIN 41.0 l REV-INIT TOTAL CQH ~ CMh0SEY 8.0 t REV-INIT TOTAL- .DKW DKWALTERS 32.0 i REV-INIT TOTAL GFM GFMAXWELL 692.0 REV-INIT TOTAL-JHO ; JRHARRIS 28.0 4 l REV-INIT TOTAL LHJ LHJACKSON. 34.0 REV-INIT TOTAL MNH 90 HUNT 23.0 ( l. QEV-INIT TOTAL NGM N MERRIWEATHER 32.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PEK WPKLEINSORGE 133.0 REV-IMIT TOTAL PGT PATAYLOR I6.0 i GEV-INIT TOTAL RHR RWWRIGHT 33.5 1 REV-INIT TOTAL RKP - -RLPREVETTE 690.0-i i REV-INIT TOTAL TRC .TRCOLLINS 5.0 i ll OCT-COOT TOTAL .I.777.5 L i APP ROUTINE INSPECTION PREPARATION [ i REV-INIT TOTAL ,AER ABRUFF 18.O h i REV-INIT TOTAL AKH AKHARDIN 2.0 REV-INIT TOTAL - GFH GAHALLSTROM 24.0 r REV-INIT TOTAL GFM GFMAXWELL 38.0 l [ t i } } 5 ,-s

09/20/U U.S.N.R.C. MAMPOWER SYSTEM PAGE 52 REGULAR MAN HOURS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKETS FOR FISCAL-YEAR ~84 THRU C6/23/84 REE10N II'- OL REVIEW 05070400 HARRIS I _ = = - - - - - _-----.-_==.___. REVIEWER MAME OF REGULAR + INITIALS REVIEWER HOURS ~~ ~ APP ROUTINE INSPECTION MEPARATION - REV-INIT TOTAL GN GRWISEMAN 64.0 REV-INIT TOTAL JHO JRHARRIS 4.0 REV-INIT TOTAL. LHJ LHJACKSOM 16.0 i REV-INIT TOTAL MNH M) HUNT 8.0 REV-INIT TOTAL NGt M MERRIWEATHER 8.0 1-REV-INIT TOTAL FET WPKLEINSORGE 59.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PEM. PCMCPHAIL I.0 ' REV-INIT TOTAL . RHR RWWRIGHT 12.0 REV-INIT TOTAL RKP RLPREVETTE. 36.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 290.0 1 ARD REACTIVE DOCtNENTATION 1 REV-INIT TOTAL AKH AKHARDIN 4.0 REV-INIT TOTAL BAU B URYC 2.0 REV-INIT TOTAL CIL WCLIU 4.0 REV-INIT TOTAL DGN DEMORMAN 40.0 REV-INIT TOTAL DTM DOMYERS 1.0 REV-IMIT TOTAL JWL JBLANKFORD 20.0 REV-INIT TOTAL NA WPANG 32.0 REV-INIT TOTAL WBS WBSWAN 24.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 127.0 j .ARI 8tEACTIVE ON-SITE /OFF-SITE INSPECTION REV-INIT TOTAL AER ABRUFF 9.0 REV-INIT TOTAL CIL WCLIU-4.0 i REV-IMIT TOTAL DGN DEMORMAN 28.0 REV-INIT TOTAL GFM' GFPMXWELL 112.0 j REV-INIT TOTAL JHO JRHARRIS 25.0 REV-INIT-TOTAL LHJ LHJACKSON 3.0 3 REV-INIT TOTAL NGM N MERRIWEATHER 3.0 I REV-INIT TOTAL PAA WPANG 51.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PEK WPKLEINSORGE 31.0 REV-INIT TOTAL RHR RWWRIGHT 19.0 REV-INIT TOTAL RKP^ RLPREVETTE 93.0 REV-INIT TOTAL TDG l ACT-CODE TOTAL TDGIBBONS 4.0 392.0 i i 4 d

'09/20/84 U.S.N.R,C. MANPOWER SYSTEM PAGE 53 REGULAR MAN hot;RS EXPENDED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKETS FOR FISCAL YEAR '84 THRU 06/23/84 REiION II'- OL REVIEW 05000400 HARRIS.1

=__-

REVIEWER MAME OF . REGULAR . INITIALS REVIEWER HOURS .ARP ~ REACTIVE INSPECTION PREPARATION - REV-INIT TOTAL GFM GFMAXWELL 10.O I PEV-INIT TOTAL PAA WPANG 8.0 1 REV-INIT TOTAL RKP RLPREVETTE 8.0 QCT-CODE IOTAL 26.0 AS1 REV-INIT TOTAL GFM GFMAXWELL 4.0 .REV-INI* TOTAL ~ RKP' RLPREVETTE 4.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 8.0 AT INSPECTION-RELATED TRAVEL REV-INIT TOTAL AER 'ABRUFF 5.0 REV-INIT TOTAL BWJ BWJONES 16.0 REV-INIT TOTAL DGN' DEMORMAN 12.O REV-INIT TOTAL DMW DMWALTERS 8.0 REV-INIT TOTAL GFM '3FMAXWE LL 36.0 REV-INIT TOTAL JSt0 JRHARRIS 8.0 REV-INIT TOTAL LHJ LHJACKSON-6.0 REV-INIT TOTAL MNH POMUNT 9.0 REV-INIT TOTAL NGM N MERRIWEATHER' 8.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PAA WPANG 9.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PEK WPKLEINSORGE 25.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PEM PCMCPHAIL 4.0 REV-INIT TOTAL RHR RWWRIGHT 6.5 REV-INIT TOTAL R t.P RLPREVETTE. 38.0 REV-INIT TOTAL WBS WBSWAN 8.0 QCT-CODE TOTAL 198.5 BAI. NORMAL ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES REV-INIT TOTAL GFM GFM4XWELL 6.0 REV-INIT TOTAL NGM N MERRIWEATHER 1.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL 7.0 BA2 ESCALATED ENFORCEMEW1 ACTIVITIES REV-INIT TOTAL DGM DEMO

  • MAN 10.0 REV-IMIT TOTAL GFM GFMAXWELL 12.0

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ~ _ _ =

U.S.95 R.C. SeusPOWER SYSTEM PAGE 54 09/20/88' REGULAR penst HOURS EXPEM)ED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 84 THRU 06/23/84 REC ON II'- OL REVIEW ~ ' 05f. ")400 HARRIS 1 - _ - - - - = _ _ - - - _ - ' REVIEWER WAME OF REGULAR INITIALS REVIEWER HiMNf3 ---............-..== - - ------- BA2 ESCALATED ENFORCENENT ACTIVITIES REV-INIT TOTAL-RKP. RLPREVETTE.. 8.0 20.0 t.CT-CODE TOTAL BB SALP REV-INI" TOTAL AKM AKHARDIN 6.0 . REV-IMI" TOTAL DNP D PRICE I.O REV-INIT TOTAL 'GFM GF84LXWELL 33.0 REV-INI! TOTAL HAM WMMILLER 6.0 CEV-INIT TOTAL JHO JWHARRIS 33.0 REV-IMIT TOTAL MNH DOHUIET 43.0 REV-IN77 TOTAL PAA WPAteG 16.0 WEV-IMIT TOTAL PEK WPELEIWSORGE 21.0 - REV-INIT 10TAL RHR RWWRIGHT 23.5 REV-INIT TOTAL RKP RLPREVETTE 4L.0 [I REV-INIT TOTAL TLM TCpthCARTHUR s.0 228.5 l ACT-COD *. TOTAL 802 RESPONSE TO EVENTS / INCIDENTS FEV-IMIT TOTAL EJW E WORettsut I4.0 REV-IMIT TOTAL PEM PCMCPHAIL 14.0 23.0 F.CT-CODE TOTAL BE TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR INVESTIGATIONS CEV-19 TIT TOTAL BAU-B URYC 4.0 REV-INIT TOTAL EHG EMGIRARD' 1.5 r ffEV-INIT TOTAL GET GATODO 4.0 REV-INIT* TOTAL JHO. JRMARRIS 5.0 t!!EV-INIT" TOTAL JWL JBLAspKFORD 12.0 REV-INIT TOTAL MIIM 9eMussi 2.0 REV-INIT TOTAL PEK WPMLEINSORGE 4.0 ACT-CODE TOTAL-32.5 SF LABORATORY TECHNICIAst ACTIVITIES REV-INIT TOTAL EN E WORusenet 64.0 64.8 ACT-CODE. TOTAL e em... - -. - _._,.,.._m,__m..__

l 09/20/** U.S.M.R.C. SeM8 POWER SYSTEM PeGE 55 REGULAR MMt MOURS EXPEWED FOR TME SELECTED DOCKETS FOR FISCAL YEAR *34 THRU 06/23/84 RECIOM II - OL REVIEW. 05000400 HARRIS I. =- REVIEWER leeME OF REGULAR INITIALS 'PEVIEWER HOURS ) -- _. = _ _ _ _ _ _ BM OUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEWS REV-I4 'T TOTAL' GKB GABELISLE 2.0 REV-IP T TOTAL-RHR RWWRIGHT 5.0 ACT-CwE TOTAL. 7.0 1 BJ ALLEGATION FOLLOW-UP REV-IPIT TOTAL GTM-GFMULNWELL 2.O REV-It.IT TOTAL JHO JRHARRIS 16.0 REV-I4tf TOTAL PEK WPRLEINSORGE .O' ' REV-I IIT TOTAL ' RKP. RLPREVETTE 2.0 1 ACT-C30E TOTAL 20.0 NRR NRR TAC-RELATED ACTIVITY 1 REV-I4tT TOTAL JMU JFMUseRO 2.0 a. REV-IP T TOTAL' LGL LLLAWYER 7.O / s REV-IiT TOTAL LTN TL9eORRIS 12.0 f3r { \\ l 3 REV-IMIT TOTAL TBR T ROGERS 3.0 ,i 4 l' ACT-CODE TOTAL-24.0 fr j DOCKET 40 TOTAL 3.741.0 I k i.. t i i. i l i i l

1 f J+l f PftGE 5 ~ 09/20/84 U.S.N.R.C. MMIPOWER SYSTEM PEGUt.AR Matt HOURS.EXPEIWED FOR THE SELECTED DOCKET i FOR BLANK ACTIVITY CODES FOR FISCAL YEAR *84 TMRU 06/23/84 i REGION II~- OL REVIEW 05000400 HARRIS 1 t. - - - - - - = _ - .=- REVIEWER seAME OF REGULAR . INITIALS REVIEWER HOURS } _ = - - - = - _ - - - - 131 POWER FACILITY INITIAL EXAMS - QEV-INIT TOTAL LTN TLle0RRIS 12.0. ~ REV-INIT TOTAL TBR T ROGERS 3.06 $( j PA-MUM TOTAL 15.0{ s ) O 4 134 CERTIFICATION EXAMIseATIONS - b) \\ i t 1 REV-INIT,"OTAL JMU- - JFMUNRO 2.0 .I k 4 l REV-INIT'iOTAL LGL LLLNWYER T.0 l j Jg PA-MUM 90TAL 9.0 j. DOCKETf80 TOTAL 24.0 i i I' f i 4 e k i '6 -..m _ea+

__m_,

,m..-s-- e,.r, -,.m m____ .,m-_ m.

f RIBil110N: 5br LFDR LF2 Actual Manpower File 1.. ' " C a FMB Reg Docket File Docket No. 50-354 DEC 2 81984 DWeiss,LFMB LFMB Reactor File LSolander. NRR MKaltman, HRR Public Service Electric and Gas Cogany ATTN Mr. R. L. Nitti, General Manager Nuclear Assistance and Regulation 80 Park Plaza T22A Newark, New Jersey 07101 Gentlemen: As you are aware,10 CFR 170 of the Commission's requlations for license and inspection fees was revised effective June 20, ' 984. Section 170.12 b of. the revised rule provides that for applications for permits licenses (, ) facility reference design approvals, and special projects which have been on file with the Coernission for reylew for six months or longer, the first bill for accumulated review costs would be sent to the applicant at the time the rule becomes effective and thereafter at six-sonth intervals or when the review is cogleted, whichever is earlier. The first bill for the operating Itcense (OL) review will include applicable professional staff re-view time expended through June 23,1984, and contractual sup> ort services expended to May 31,1984. Subsequent bills covering six-monti reviews will be issued approximately ninety days after the end of each six month period which closes in December and June of each year. Consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR 170.12(b) we have cogleted the cost analysts for the Ho)e Creek 1 OL application review for the period specified above. The cost tirough that period is $1,268.587. The Office of Resource Management has been notified to bill your Company.for this When making payment, please make reference to the invoice mmber amount. on your bill. Enclosed is a copy of the revision to Part 170 as sent to all applicants and licensees on May 24, 1984. Sincerely. 'D4tulsin.d g l W m. O,. 1huer j %'6/O-ydr69[(/ -) William O. Miller, Chief / License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration 6

Enclosure:

Revision lto Part 170 w/N..otice 'DM L M . ~ ~.M.....:.ADM LF ..........,f.. /sg................... ................sie < ~~ .... ~ .. ~... -. ~ ~ J.4... 1 1in. gan....g/}/84 ......... ~... om > 12 84 .~.12 /84 12/ .... ~.... ~. ~.. .~.. ~.. . - -. - ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ wne roav m oo sci uncu eteo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY . _ _, _ _ _. _. _. _ _. _. - _}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20066K397&oldid=4431809"