ML20067A578
Text
-
.~
/ ef
'o, UNntD sTAf t s I
/,
c.
NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION 1
wAsmwotow. p. c. eom t
X
%*...../
- w. 311$v MEMORANDUM FOR:
William O. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration FROM:
R. $. Brown, Jr., Assistant to tht:
Director and Chief, program Support Branch, NM55
$UBJECT:
LICENSE FEE MEMOS As requested in P. Norry's July 2,1984 memorandum, enclosed are license fee memos for the cases indicated in tht enclosure.
NM55 is sorry for the delay in processing theset however, the delay was beyond our control. We have been working with RM since April to make the necessary changes to the R115 computer prograr which generates license fee memos and these changes have recently been completed by RM.
We are forwarding the fee memos and backup materials (c9nputer listing of hours and copies of. contract correspondence).
As l-stated in my Jul you on procedures for administration of the revised fee rule, y 23 memorandun to NM55 expects LFMS to retain backup materials to be released to licensees upon request.
Please note that the monthly letter status reports.should npt be released without a prescreening by HMSS because they of ten contain information considered to be sensitive about competitors.
As specified in the referenced memorandum, also nott that unreconcHed monthly letter status reports received from DOE.and private contractors are the source of contract costs.
NMS$ recently discovered through conversations with your staff toat licensing casework for f resh fuel storage is subject to fees, regardless of the fact that all correspondence is marked " FEE EXEMPT" by LFME.
We are currently processing all the remaining OL reviews listed in P. Norry's memorandum; they were delayed because they involve fresh fuel storage licenses.
We will forward these as soon as possible.
As we discussed with your staf f, many multi-unit reactor sites have joint physical security plans.
NM55 is not able to track the time for each unit discretely.
Therefore, we suggest that LFMB divide fee costs equally for safeguards reviews of these reactors. Joint physical security-plan reviews are indicated in the enclosed fee nemos.
/
4 4 1
.. k. Brod, Jr., Assistant to the Dtet.ctor_and 0 Prospem 5{lport@41ef,-
ranch, NM55 g=
e
Enclosures:
-f' M
1 1.
1.1 sting of license fee memos E
2.
License fee memos and backup.
w 9102070306 900921 N
- }$
PDR-FDIA WILLIAM 90-162 PDR g
-