ML20067A281
| ML20067A281 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 12/13/1984 |
| From: | Gaskin C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082420195 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-90-162 NUDOCS 9102070162 | |
| Download: ML20067A281 (10) | |
Text
i a
12/13/84 9
'^
DOCKET HO.
05000382 MEMORANDUM FOR WILLIAM 0.
MILLER, CHIEF LICENSE FEE MANAGEMENT BRANCH OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION FROMt C.
GASKIN POWER REACTOR SG LICENSING BRANCH.
DIVISIDH OF SAFEGUARDS OFFICE OF HUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS SUBJECT COSTS AND MAHHOURS'FOR LICENSING ACTION THE CONTRACT COSTS INCURRED AND MAHHOURS USED IN-REVIEWING-THE APPLI-CATION DATED 11/15/74 ARE TABULATED BELOW FOR LICENSE =NO.
1.
NAME WATERFORD 3 142 DELARONDE STREET HEW ORLEANS, LA. 70174 2.
A) CASEWORK CONTROL NO. 05000382 (010P,0200,0308,040Q,0500,060Q, A01C.A01G)'
B) MAIL CONTROL NO. 40214 C) TAC HO.
3.- A ) PERIOD ~ COVERED (STAFF HOURS)-11/15/74 - 06/23/84 B) COMPLETION DATE:
C) AMENDMENT NO.
4.
CONTRACT COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS' APPLICATION: $ 0-PERIOD COVERED (CONTRACT COSTS)'
5.
TAC WORK BY OTHER OFFICES:
0 HOURS 6.
HOURS DURING REPORTING PERIOD:
309.0 /
7.
FEE CHARGABLE I $
11742 8.
TOTAL. COST TO PROCESS APPLICATION t $'11742 <
APPROVEDI s)L kt d
G.
MCCORKLE C.
GASKIN BRANCH CHIEF PROJECT MANAGER POWER REACTOR SG LICEHSING BRANCH 9102070162 900921 PDR FOIA WILLIAM 90-162 PDR
RUN'DATE REGULAlvi!Y INFORMATION TRACKING SYSTEM PAGE 12/03/84 DETAIL LISTING OF HOURS REPORTED ON CASEWORK
-72 PERIOD COVEREDI 09/28/78 - 01/18/82 PROJECT MANAGERt JJ DAVIDSON CASEWORK NUMBERt 05000382010P FACILITY NAME: WATERFORD 3 DATE CLOSEDI 01/18/82 NATURE OF ACTIVITY:
WATERFORD REGULAR REVIEWER WEEK ENDING NOURS THE FOLLOUING WERE CALCULATED AT 38 $ PER NOUR CE GASKIN 01/10/81 8.0 CE GASKIN 02/07/81 2.0 CE GASKIN 03/28/81 3.0 CE GASKIN 04/11/81 5.0 CE GASKIN 04/25/81 3.0 CE GASKIH 05/02/81 6.0 CE GASKIN 05/23/81 5.0 TL DIGALOMA 06/06/81 18.0 CE GASKIN 06/06/81 10.0 CE GASKIN 06/20/81 8.0 CE GASKIN 06/27/81 2.0 TL DIGALOMA 07/04/81 9.0 CE GASKIN 07/04/81 2.0 CE GASKIN 07/18/81 1.0 DA KERS 08/08/81 8.0 JJ DAVIDSON 10/10/81 20.0 JJ DAVIDSON 10/17/81 8.0 JJ DAVIDSON 11/14/81 2.0 JJ DAVIDSON 11/21/81 9.0 JJ DAVIDSON 11/28/81 8.0 JJ DAVIDSON 12/05/81 3.0 JJ DAVIDSON 01/02/82 2.0 JJ DAVIDSON 01/09/82 10.0 JJ DAVIDSON 01/16/82 8.0 JJ DAVIDSON 01/23/82 2.0 i
t
- 1 :-
=RU'N DATE REGULATURY?INFORMATION! TRACKING: SYSTEM.
.PAGE.
4
-12/03/84 DETAIL LISTING:OF: HOURS? REPORTED.ON CASEWORK-
- 73 PERIOD.COVEREDI
_02/21/83_
08/05/83_
l PROJECT-MANAGER DA KERS CASEWORKLNUMBERt' 05000382020Q
.v.
FACILITY _NAME WATERFORD-3 DATE CLOSED:;08/05/83i NATURE: OF ACTIVITY '
WATERFORD-REVISION;7/SEClPLN JREGULARI
-REVIEWER WEEK ENDING HOURS THE FOLLOWING WERE--CALCULATED-ATlt-38 4-PERl HOUR <
DA KERS-04/16/83~
2.0' DA KERS 05/14/83 2.0 si CE.GASK1H 07/02/83
- 6. 0'.
CE GASKIN 07/09/83-
- -1.0 CE GASKIH 08/06/831 4.0 15'o t
4 i
)
H q
l
-I A
I f
IP F
F T
F b
E' W
ht'*m
'T t*W*h M
73G'O'f'-*?
- f--U--'
-'S-*-
w'
r.-10 PAGE' i
'..NUNiDATE.
- REGUL AluRY IHFORMATIONST R ACKING SYSTEM.
12/05/84 DETAIL: LISTING 0FLHOURS: REPORTED'ON: CASEWORK
!74-y.
PERIOD,COVEREDt? '03/14/83 - 08/05/83 -
q PROJECT.:MANAGERI D. K E lt S' CASEWORK NUMBER J050003820308 FACILITY HAMEt-WATERFORD 3 DATE CLOSEDt- 08/05/83-
+
a NATURE OF ACTIVITY:
WATERFORD-REVISION 2/CP-REGULAR
. EEK ENDING HOURSL
-l W
REVIEWER THE FOLLOWING WERE CALCULATED AT=.
- 38 4 PER HOUR DA KERS--
03/26/83
,30.0 DA.KERS 05/14/83 2.0 CE GASKIN 07/02/83-6.0 CE=GASKIN 08/06/83
'4.0 1
I
- Q, p '.
.j 4
I
\\
t 4
J 4
~4'
~
(~
1
.g-i
~ -
y ; c'.
i RUN'DATE:
iREGULATURY-:INFORMATION-TRACKINGlSYSTEM
'PAGE:
4
-l
' 12 / 0 3 / 8 4 ----
DETAIL LISTINGr0F-HOU,RS-REPORTED l-ON CASEWORK 69-PERIOD COVEREDt' 12/16/83
--04/05/84.-
t
{
PROJECT MANAGER 11.CE CASKIN CASEWORK HUMBER 050003820400-FACILITY.HAME: WATERFORD 3' DATE CLOSED. 04/05/84-:
NATURE OF ACTIVITY:
WATERFORD-REVISION 2/GTP REGULAR.
REVIEWER WEEK ENDING
. HOURS THE FOLLOWING WERE CALCULATED AT I 38 $'PER HOUR-CE GASKIH 02/18/84 1.0-RB MANTLI 03/10/84 8.0.
CE GASKIN
'03/10/84 1;. 0 s
-CE GASKIH 03/24/84-3.0'
. l. ). o' '
l 4
i-I t -
1.
o
.l 4-
- 1 4
i 1
. ~ ~
.- ' R U N'. D A T E -
REGULAlvRY'INFORMATION. TRACKING; SYSTEM?
i PAGE-y 12/03/84:-
'DETAILFLISTING OF HOURS-REPORTED'-ON~CASEWORKJ 170=
7 1-PERIOD COVERED
' 01/12/84=-'.04/05/84
- v-CE GASKIN CASEWORK NUMBER =-'05000382050Q' PROJECT MANAGERI FACILITY NAMEt WATERFORD.3 DATE1 CLOSED 0'4/05/84 NATURE'0F ACTIVITY:
WATERFORD-REVISION'3/CP REGULAR" REVIEWER WEEK ENDING HOURS =
THE'FOLLOWING WERE CALCULATED-AT 3814 PER HOUR CE GASKIN 02/18/84 1.0 RB HANILI-
-03/10/84
- 8. 0-CE GASKIN 03/10/84 10:
CE-GASKIN _
'03/24/84=
3.0 i 3. * -
.j
-l y
- -j t
-1
-6.
4 1
~
...I.
=
' * ~
.t
! RA)H ' D A T E :
.REGULAluRY;INFORMATION1 TRACKING: SYSTEM
.PAGEL u
12/03/84 DET AIL: LIST 1HG.'0F. HOURS REPORTED' ON C ASEWORK 71i PERIOD _'COVEREDI~ -04/11/841-'05/07/84 PROJECT MANAGER: CE GASKIN~
CASEWORK HUMBE,R: 05000382060Q DATE CLOSED:'05/07/84' FACILITY NAME: WATERFORD-3 NATURE OF ACTIVITY:
WATERFORD-REVISIDH-8/SEC PLN.
REGULAR-
-j REVIEWER.
WEEK 1ENDING.
- HOURS
-THE FOLLOWING WERE CALCULATED:AT-t=.38;$1PER' HOUR J
CE GASKIN-
-05/05/84-~
~2.0'
{
- i v
?
g I !
-f l
~
4 I
l l
s-
=I e
~i...
RUN[DATE REGULATURY INFORMATION TRACKING,SYSTEMi PAGEi
?12/10/84-DETAIL LISTING OFEHOURS-REPORTED!ON~ CASEWORK.
24.
-PERIOD-COVERED
!01/29/80 -:08/t8/80 PROJECT MANAGERt RB MANILI-
. CASEWORK NUMBERIG05000382A01C-
.)
~ FACILITY HAME: )(ATERFORD-3 DATE CLOSED _t:08/18/80 i
NATURE.0F ACTIVITY WATERFORD
_ CONTINGENCY PLAN = REVIEW,
1
.1
- REGULAR
'i REVIEWER WEEK ENDING HOURS l
THE'FOLLOWING HERE-CALCULATED AT 38'4'PER HOUR r.
l RB HANILI
-05/24/80-17.0 l
RB:MANILI 06/28/80 7i0 RB MANILI
.08/02/80 5.0
.21. o -
i i
h ej l
i
[
l.
L
-- d i
I j
e 4
'}
.i i
- )
f l
_g,
- O e.
/4-RUN;DATE:
REGULATuRY!:!NFORMATIONtTRACKING SYSTEMF PAGE
~
.12/10/84 D E T A I L-':.. L I S T I N G. 0 F ! H O U R S L REPORTEDiOH CASEWORKi 125
^
o PERIOD / COVERED :.10/01/79. -::06/05/811
, i-PROJECT MANAGERI.RB MANJLI
' CASEWORK NUMBERt;'05000382A01G'~
FACILITY.HAMEt WATERFORD13 DATE'lCLOSEDt106/05/81-NATURE OF ACTIVITY -
WATERFORD-GUARD TRAINING PLAN REVIEH; REGUL~AR:
REVIEWER.
WEEK-ENDING-
- HOURSa 1HE! FOL' LOWING' WERE;CALCUL ATED-AT 't- ~ 38 t b PER. HOUR ~
RB=MANILI 03/28/81
'28.0.'
RB'MANILI 05/09/81
.5;0:
' 33.:
\\-
9 9
1 7
}
8 s
5 6
1 h
'(
.e -
~
4 i
1 h.
i '
L S
,\\,.
.Q.
,a-s,-
e
-~s-.
+
+
w,
i
-)
+
i
SUMMARY
NMSS NArr45' opp J Regular Professional Total Hours S_taff-Hour Cost _
Costs Power Reactor SG p /, yjg Licensing Branch 3a7 4 "3r
/
tiersus.1/4 srsn 14 3r I'
- yy kemis,$nuet 1
uraniu rue Licensing gy,f
,f-
.,g yg f 1
V/el (AClet} ; $h kot>%Ie G,f 3(_
ygj 8mg
- I
.u m a n y sp u,&e. M j as G*
paad m ALs ygg,
t, y,,,3,
i 1
I i
i t
J.
6 i
. =.. -
/"%
UNITED STAT [8 t
NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION g<
WASHINGTON, o.C. Posse
%, ses e*
a Docket No. 50-382 anH 2'41985 e
j MEMORANDUM FOR:
Files THRU:
- i...iam 0. Miller, Chief, Ocense Fee Management Branch. ADM.
FROM:
C. James Holloway, Jr.,- Assistant = Chief, License fee KL.ogement Branch.- ADM
SUBJECT:
, WATERFORD 3 OPERATING LICENSE REVIEW COSTS 10 CFR 170 of the-Conmission's regulations for license fees was revised effective June 20,1984.
Section 170.12(b) of the revised rule:provides -
that ap>11 cations for. operating. license (OL) review which have been pend-i ing wit 1 the Commission for six months or longer, the first bill' for 3
accumulated review costs would-be -sent' to the applicant at the time the_ rule
~
becomes effective and at six-month intervals thereafter until:the review is completed, whichever is earlier.
The first bills for OL review will include applicable professional staff. review time expended through June 23,1984, _ and 4
contractual support services expended to May 31, 1984. -Subsequent bills cover-ing six-month reviews will be issued approximately1ninety days after, the end of each six-month period which closes in Decenter and June of each year.
In accordance with Section 170.12(b), we have-reviewed the cost incurced by.
the various program offices directly involved in processing the Waterford 3-operating license.
Attached is a suninary of the review costs as'well as L
the supporting documentation from the program offices.- The attachment shows j
that a total of $4,100,044-was expended through' June 23.1984' for the OL review. The cost of the OL review through' June 23,1984_ exceeds 1the maximum fee of. $3,077,400'as stated in 10 CFR 170.21.
In accordance with
. Footnote 2 of the revised _10 CFR 170.21 and since the licensee received.
an operating license (5%1 power) on December 18,1984, only $3,077,400 may be assessed for the OL review through issuance of the-100%' power =
license.
.l
'Q.jJamesgoloway,Jr.,
'?
G, L
?6 sistant Chief M cense Fee Management Branch Office of Administration
Enclosure:
Sunmary of costs and supporting documentation
OPERATING 1.lCENSE REYlEW COSTS THROUGH JUNE. 23.1984 r
i I'
FACILITY:: Waterford 3 t
_ POCKET NO.': F0-382 Costs Per.
Professional Program Office Professional
- Sta ff-hours
-Staff-hour
- Contractual Total 1 Review
_$taff-hour
' Expended Costs Cos_ts Costs k,943.-
- 1. NRR
$39 40,140.2
$1,565,468
$1,377,548' 2
2.
IE-HQ 36 580.0 20,880 22,436 43,.
3.
REGIONS 36-28,827.7 1,037,797~
1.037,t 4
4.
ACRS-50 921.7 46,085 46,;
5.
HMS$-
38 785.0-29',830 29.
Total Cost:3/ $4,100I 4
i
) '
1 4
--]/
The cost of the OL-review through June 23,.1984 exceeds the= maximum fee of:
1
$3,077,400 as stated in 10 CFR 170.21.. In accordance with Footnote-2.
of 170.21 and since the-licensee received a 5% power license on December 18,;1984, only.$3,077,400 nay. be assessed for.the OL review through issuance of the-100% power -license.
M&cto t s' ret /
i
~..