ML20058A483

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Partially Withheld Affirmation Secy That Makes Recommendation
ML20058A483
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/1981
From: Fitzgerald J
NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20058A382 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-92-436, TASK-AIA, TASK-SE SECY-81-284, NUDOCS 8110280705
Download: ML20058A483 (24)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:-- i p= ncy t-a, [9, j ' y( j SECY-81-284 [d I"b/s! May 4, 1981 I-a s., v,- ADJUDICATORY ISSUE (Affirmation) For: The Commission From: James A. Fitzgerald " Assistant General Counsel

Subject:

REQUEST FOR A HEARING (IN THE MATTER OF CONSUMERS POWER CO.) Facility: Palisades Nuclear Power Facility ( ) To recommend '

Purpose:

Discussion: On _ March 9, 1981, the Director of the Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued a confirmatory order to improve the licensee's performance at the Palisades plant. Pursuant to the opportunity i for a hearing offered by the order, the Utility Workers Union of America and the Michigan State Utility Workers Council filed the attached peti-tion requesting a hearing on the overtime condi-tions imposed by the order. I The licensee, by consenting to the order, has waived its right to a hearing. See 10 CFR 2.202(e). Thus there is currently no proceeding on this order. */ The NRC staff has filed a i response opposing a hearing on the basis that

  • )

A separate civil penalty action is being contested by the licensee in a civil penalty proceeding before Administrative Law Judge Ivan Smith. However, Judge Smith has indicated that he would not be available to rule upon this request should he be asked to do so.

Contact:

Marian Moe, OGC, 41493 B110280705 930412 g' ', _,,.." > > c.. f:. ' J en M,;M PDR FOIA CILINSK92-436 PDR j,3 t; ,g , )g7. 1.01, eteg-hs __d g y' t ( g IOS Z A $ $ [ l &l\\bG)6')(b

f..

.[ :, E '/f a m e-- --~, --n...--_--,,,,__,n,

i the petitioners have not alleged an interest within the " zone of interests" protected by the Atomic Energy Act. I herefore, we believe ( Recommendation: q Q,...

d. James A.

Fitzgerald Assistant General Counsel Attachments:

1. Union Request for Hearing
2. NRC Staff Response 3.

Proposed Order Comissioners' comments or consent should be provided directly to the Office of the Secretary by c.o.b. Tuesday, Play 19, 1981. Commission Staff Office comments, if any, should be submitted to the Commissioners flLT May 12, 1981. with an information copy to the Office of the Secretary. If the paper is of such a nature that it reouires additional time for analytical review and comment, the Commissioners and the Secretariat should be apprised of when comments may be expected. This paper is tentatively scheduled for affirmation at an open meeting during the week of tiay 26, 1981. Please refer to the appropriate Weekly Comission Schedule, when published, for a specific date and time. DISTRIBUTI0fl Comissioners Commission Staff Offices ASLBP ASLAP Secretariat

j ,sJa.o@,m J J -J 4 w 51 Y M 4 J 4 ?

' s P

Y r t P ? a f h L t a r p 9 1 h F 1 e .t k i I i s I f, h I i I i 6 4 1 i I j i b 4 l l i J l l -.j s 1 e d

D OCKET l'Ur!.3tR poo,$pinu thc.g ~ MansTox, SACHs, Nuxx, KATES, NADUSHIN & O' HARE, P.C. i -*h ATTORNEY 5 AND COUNSELOR $ mT LAW , '"stvv= s. vss.->= s.,,,,,",',,,'**

  • 000 F A R 6' E a pontene eares DET orf.Mic,atc4w 48r.?6 s e t e o= v ia c.s t at e.4.=

routia.c. sec=. san e 3 a a.co=a.to.macw .. D u.. . ua. wggvt.. te= 43134 96*.3484 SchatD. en p E. FLINT OFFsCE

08. T

-20h&AD..-.. ... n,.,. -, r.... s., a.. u.. s. wtah 4 .~6....za,t. ,6.3 3 W..a. s h a w 4 9.. v. .c...... 1313 3 3 3 3.d 3 03 / 4 3 0 3 ) 1 Sektth howeapw.nt 3399 . ?uktsh L 90.as n= E l J.aht entypO=wa. E. y S.patt 3 00, a FL.Cs.0 8606, LAN.the OMICS . o.t.T a...n.u..., . ~. g w4 t.. .e-..a~. March 31, 1981 ..inin..... e~~ 4.~T ..a...R.L L t h..G U. t w tT.2.. W ws:ew

o. wirr., c.

JE.o.se t.ri.w..ca cr or cown. L so.O.ed t J..a.a un,. s. DOW8La. D MO.ELET D CMa.Lt.Wah. TON I'E * "A'.'."..'.' a 6 w.. s. Se cre t a.n.f U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cenmittee Washington, D.C. 20555 i Re: In the Matter of Consumers Power Company. (Palisades Nuclear Power Facility] Docket No. 50-255 License No. DPR-20 (EA 81-18]

Dear Sir:

Enclosed please find Petition for Hearing, pursuant to said Conr.ission order dated March 9, 1981, in the above, Please notify us of the hearing date. Verv *rulv,ours, / / HEODO).E sACHS ' DOC %rTED m \\ -b APR 7 gggy, Q. TS/mer $e

  • h--

cc: Executive Legal Director, q Ers. m% ch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission f, n.>

c. N -

Frank H. Davis, President . dll\\ Michigan State Utility Workers Council 115 W. Michigan Avenue l Jackson, Michigan 49201 C? Consumers Power Company 212 Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Att: Russell B.

DeWitt, and William R, _ Mills Vice President Director of Union Relations Nuclear Operations n

y v

u. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( NUCLEAR REGUIATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) } Docket No. 50-255 CONSUMERS POWER COPPANY } License No. DPR-20 (Palisades Nuclear Power Facility) ) EA 81-18 PETITION OF U~ILITY FOPJERS U'JION OF A"EPICA. AFL-CIO AND ITS MICHICAN STATE UTILITY WOPREES COU';CIL FOR HEARING ON ORDER CONFIPJ:ING LICENSEE ACTIONS TO UPGRAEE FACILITY PERFOP."J2:CE The Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, and its Michigan State Utility Workers Council (hereaf ter, "the Union") hereby request a hearing on the Order of this Commission dated March 9, 1981, captioned " Order C'nfirming Licensee o Actions to Upgrade Facility Performance," for the following reasons and grounds: I.- On March 9, 1981, the Commission issued an Order Confirming Licensee Actions to Upgrade Facility Performance. Part V, Sec. B thereof, provided that: " Extended overtime on the part of licensed operators shall be avoided by restricting the overtime for licensed operators as b-follows: D .3 (1) No more than 4 overtime hours in any 8 'Docym 24-hour period; E 'APR 71981 > I (2) No more than 24 overtime hours in p h. [n)u{ -}.:.;r-byy 3 j any 7-day period; j ,^. c,/ E t ty cer (3) No rnore than 64 overtime hours in any 28-day period; M

  1. y s

The Director of Region III may relax or terminate any of the preceding conditions in writing for gcod cause." ,= II. Said provisions restricting overtime were evidently proposed by the licensee, not this Commission, and

1 without notice or consultation with the Union, which is the k::: collective bargaining agent for operating, maintenance and construction empicyees of the licenses at the Palisades Facility and elsewhere in Michigan. III. The overtime restriction contained in said e order is more restrictive than this Commission's standards otherwise applicable, as set forth in the interim criteria for shift staffing, issued July 31, 1980, by the Commission, by Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, as follows: " (1) An individual shall not be, permitted to work more than 12 hours straight (not including shift turnover time). (2) An individual shall not be permitted to work more than 24 hours in any 48 hour period. (3) An individual shall not work more than 72 hours in any 7 day period. (4 ) An individual shall not work more than 14 consecutive days without having two consecutive days off. However, recognizing that circumstances may arise requiring deviation from the above restrictions, such deviation may be authorized by the plant manager or higher levels of management in accordance with published procedures and with appro-priate documentation of the cause. " IV. On information and belief, no reason was demonstrated or existed or was pertinent to this Cormdssion's March 9, 1981 Order _to occasion greater restriction on i overtime that is otherwise required by the Commision's l' general standards, or is permitted to the licensee under its collective bargaining. obligations to the L'nion under the hational Labor Relations Act.

'V. Pursuant to 10 CFR 2, 714 (a) (2) and said i ( Me.rch 9, 1981 Order, the Union represents that, as aforesaid, it is the exclusive collective bargaining agent-by law for affected employees; and that the employment opportunities or its members are, or may be adversely affected by said Order. VI.- For the foregoing reasons, the Order should not be sustained insofar as it contains the aforesaid restric-tions on overtine hours. WHEPIFOPI, Petitioners pray that a hearing be held for reconsideration of such Order in the foregoing respects, and that such Order be vacated in the foregoing respects. Respectfully submitted, UTILITY WOPJIRS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, AND ITS MICHIGAN STATE 17TILITY WORKERS COUNCIL, by their Attorneys, EARSTON, SACHS, NUNN, KATES, i KADUSHIN & O ' HAPI, P. C. BY :' O* n eff[V' % THEODOPI SACHS ' (P-19 82 7 ) 1060 Farr.ier Street Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 965-3464 O i I 6 5...

.. ~....... -.. _ _. _ - _. - _. ~ i i } 2 l i i 1 1 i N t 1 r l i i i i I 1 i 9 1 ? d P i t I l,, i I. 4 t I i f-J 1 1 1 [ 4 l 1 0 l 3, ) .L e I. V I i 'l i I i k I J i ' i l I e ? l f I i 4 5 t .t 9 ,1 i l p

4 r Uf11TED STATES OF A'*EP.IC A NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0t?'15510'! EEFC'.E THE C0""155:C', In the Matter of ) ) C0"SU'1ERS FOWER C0'!PPJY ) Docket fio. 50-255 ) (E; El-16) (Palisades fluclear Po,;er Fa:ility) )

  • ~ ~..

S,/

..e-y e7

~ .i \\ / ~ W NRC STAFF'S RESPONSE TO UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA'S REQUEST FOR A HEARIN3 Stephen G. Burns Karen D. Cyr Counsel for f1RC Staff April 23,19El i l

4 U*JTED STATES OF A"ES.I': , a. :: e e..: c lq :, C1'.1' E. 9. ""..i.t t.' ^ *. i. . a - m -,.,......e..e., ~c

n the nat:er cf

) ) Occke: *:c. 50-255 i C0'.50"ERS P0'-lE. C0" A'.y ,) (EA S1-13) -a,1sa:e5..;:.e c rc.er ra:11..., j .c.. :..:: e.e.:..c o ~;.: v, un t.n. .y i. c,.ere y ;4.' 0:. :"::,.:

  • s c:m.. :_:
c. n. : : p :_ : v. i.,~. -

n t Cr. t'a-ch 9,19E1, the Director cf the Office of Inspection and Enferceaen: issued an "Orcer Confirning Licensec :::icns to Upgrade Fa:ili y Ferfor. ante" to :ne Consu e-s Focer Co pany, the licensee of tne e Felisa:es :.uclear :caer Facility. 46 Fed. Pe;.17,6S3 (l'.a*.19,19:1)' (cepy atta:he:). In a petition of l' arch 31, 1951, filed before the i Comnission, the Utility Workers Union of Anerica, AFL-CIO, and its B flithigan State Utility Workers Council (nereinafter "tne Union") requested a hearing on the overtine restriction imposed by the Order. Because_the Unicr. coes not have tne reovisite,"standin;" to demand a hearing as a natter cf rig : tef re tnis Cc--issicn and be:Euse a ciscretionary hearing would neitner ce a v.ise use of agency -rescurtes nor concern the healtn and safe:y candate of the f;0.', the Connission shoulc deny the Union's reques: for a hearin; en the Order. po..n. -:p p ::. c.. --..- e. u .n As the Dire :or's Order e,phasizes, the Office of Inspe: tion and i Enforcemen has cited Consu,ers Power Conpany for a nurber of violatior.s cf regulatory re:vire.ents at tne Palisades facility over the past l l 1 i

1 2-several years. Ine licensee's recent perfornan:e in reactor-operations and raciation protection received a "belou average" rating in the MRC's Syste ali: Appraisal cf Licenses Perfornan:e (SILL). This l troucleso e history vias co ;ounded on Janaary 6,1931, when an ele:trical repairran failed to folic < procedures daring a surveillance j tes: and :nereby isolated the tuo 125-volt battery bani:5 which are ) I re:; ired to be cperable if the prirary coolant syste-is above On :ne basis of :tese various inci$er.:s an.1 ne SALP evaluation, 225 F. ins Dire:::e deterrined that "rajor changes in the licensee's nanagenent controls are necessary to assare tnat the licensee can operate the ~ Palisades facility without undue risk to the health and safety of the I public". 45 Fed. Reg. at 17,688. Before the Diretter issued an order, the licensee anreed to take short-and lon;-ter a:: ions to inorove its pe-forran:e and enhance protecticn cf p;blic healtn and safety in the operation of the Palisades facility. Tne licensee net with NR: Re; ion I:: representa-tives and presented a pr:gran of intended short-ten, actio s to enhance safety and perforran:e while the licensee's refer long-terr s at: ions were developed and inplemented. Because cf the inp;rtance j to puolic health and safety of the licensee's fulfillnent of iis concitnents, the Directer issued the Order confirning the licensee's l a.~ g y e, .=,--e--

co--i "ents. i Tne Union seeks a hearin; to cnallen;e a provision of the Order (V.E.) which restricts, in the interest of providing greater assurance of c;tiru opera:3r perforrance, tne overtine tna: nay be worked by licensed operators. j/ At issue for tne Connission's resolution is unetner te Unior's request should be granted. t L 1/ As cescribe: in :ne text, the Director's Order was a "confirnatory orcer", i.e., tne Order. reflected tne. licensee's prior conseni to be legaliy bound by the restrictions it proposed cn its license. Tne licensee's consent to tre the entry of an ceder constitutes a waiver of nearin;, cf all right to seek Connission and judicial review or to contest tne validity of the order, and the order has the sane force and effect as an order nade after hearing. See 10 C.F.R. 2;202(e). Tne Staff uses confirmatory orders to ensure that licensee connitnents are nade binding, enforceable requirenents of a license. The use of confinnatory orders is encouraged by Comnission policy. public Service Co. of Indiana (ltarble Hill Nuclear Genera:in; Sta:1cc, Ur.its 1 & 2), CL!-5:-lC, 11 *.:: ~35, all (19E:). 1/ Tne provision reads in pertinent part as follows: "E> tended overti e on the part of licensed operators snail be avoided by restricting the overtine for licensed operators as follows: f (1) No nore than 4 overtire hours in any 21-hour perioc; (2) No r. ore tnan 24 overtine hours in ar;. 7-day period; (3) i;o nore than 62 overtine hours in any 23-day period." 45 Fed. Reg. at 17,629. 5 +-

i e II. A HEARING SHOULD NOT BE HELD EITHER AS A MATTER OF RIGHT OR AS A t1ATTER OF DISCRETION A. The Union Does Not Have Standing Such l That A Hearina Is Recuired Ey Law In enforcement cases, as in licensing cases, this Commission applies judicial concepts of standing in determining rights to a hearing under section 189a. of the Atomic Energy Act. Public Service Co. of Indiana (Marble Hill Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 & 2), CLI-80-10, 11 NRC 438 (1980); Wisconsin Electric Power Co.,(Point Beach, Unit 1), CLI-80-38,12 NRC 547 (1980). In the context of an enforcement action i such as this Order, it rast appear (1) that the petitioner has been or may be injured in fact, i.e., adversely affected by the Director's Order, and (2) that the petitioner's affected interest is arguably within the zone of interests protected by the Atomic Energy Act. Id. at 439; see also Portland General Electric Co. (Pebble Springs Springs Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2), CLI-76-27, 4 NRC 610, 613 (1976). In this proceeding, the Union avers that it is the exclusive i collective bargaining agent by law for operating, maintenance and construction employees of the licensee at the Palisades facility and elsewhere in liichigan. Moreover, the Union alleges that the " employ-ment opportunities" of its members are or may be adversely affected by the Order, because the Order places some restrictions, in the i i

n t i -5 interest of safet,*, on over:1 e w:rk. 3/ Fresu aolv, the Union is l a';uing in reference to e-ployner: opportunities ",a sane cf its f nenbers nay not be able to earn as ca:h overtire pay as they night t c her,eise earn if tr.ey could work hours in excess of those pet-itted l by tne Order. v i Even if one concedes that the Order adversely affects the finan:ial interests cf licensed operators at Palisades by restricting their ability to work overtire, this adverse effe : is at best injury to an econ:-it interest. It is well established, however, that en i injury v.hicn is pJrely e:ononic in Character is not an interest within i the " zone of interests" protected by the Atonic Energy Act. Portland General Ele:tric Co., suora, 4 NRC at 514; Houston Lighting & Power Co. l s ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1), ALAB-582,11 NRC l 1 239, 242 (1953); Lon; Island Lightin; Co. (Janesport Hu: lear Power Po. er Sta:icn; Units i L 2), AL E-292, 2 NRC 631, E37-23 (1975). Since j the injury to ine affected e ployees is adnittedly en e:eno,ic injury, l the Union does n:: satisf/ tne " zone cf interests" portion of the i 3/ It should be noted that the Order apolies only to licensed oceraters l at the Palisades fa:ility, not to other personnel nor, for inat j natter, to licensed or unii:ensed employees at other Consumers Power fa:ilities. Inus, any representational standing which the Union seeks to establisn in this proceeding can be based only on the Union's representation of workers who are license: operators at the Palisades facility. l t i 5 f I l l i i i

l t l ) t i i the star.:in test. Tne U. ion is not entitled, therefore, to a he!"ing' I as a natter of ri:F.; on the Director's Order. i ) E. A het'in; 5.osl: N:! Se Ordered j

s * !'a t t e - c # Dis:retitt i

As tne Cc-~1ssicn's cetision in Public Service Co. of Indiana i 1 ret:;rizes, tr.e Co--ission has distretion to hold hearings or pernit l t inter.<entien in cases w".cre such actions are not strictly re:uired as a natter of rignt. f/ ine essence of the Uniar.'s cbjection to the Orde-is a cispute bet.;een itself an: tre licensee regarding cor.sultetion and other i I aspe:ts of labor-nanagerent relations. Because the NRC is not a tribunal l 1 established to resolve what are essentially labor disputes between a licensee and its employees, the Concission should decline to order a i 1 dis:retionary hearing in tnis natter, j i Tr.e tirector issued the Order to Consurers Power Company on the i i basis o# :ne licensee's recent enforcement history and evaluatier.s of l i ine licensee's perforran:e in the Operation of the Palisades fa:ility. l i Tne enforcement history reveals a' number of significant items of non-l con;11ance that resulted fron inadeouate nanagenent cor. trol of licensed a:tivities or fror personnel error. To the NR Staff, this enforce e-1 1 l -4/ 11 NRC at 4:2; see Ato ic Energy Act 6161c., 22 U.S.C. 22Cl( )- I Portland GeneraT Ilectric Co. (Febole Sprin;s Nuclear Power Dient,- Units 1 & 2), CL:-75-2?, 4 NRC 610, 614-15 (197f). ~ i ___...__..__.__._.._______,_)

1 i i l i f l l 1 1 j r.i.s*;cf.c.-.e.:

  • r.s. :. - + %.:. r.:.d a. r i.-' r.. v e-: *. :
3. r.

. * :. '. 4. - e. .c a. s. ' c.p c.'

  • r.2 -

I 3 l , c. ' s r...- :..:..: > 's.- 5 t.:..- =..u..'. .. c. ' i. e ".: :. c...'.',- e r 4 *. :.

  • e 0.* '. i.c.a..' a. t i

fa:ility v.i'*.o;; und : rist. to pu li: heil:7 a.f sa#ety. M 4"fitiOr ..__e...u.. ., er j... t e : r '. i n '..* '.* *.. - #. c.-. '. n

  1. . a r.

e #. #. e.-. '. r.. ws .s es I l-.:..:. -- i gr.%...=....: i,. i..: p :. r, i r .2 r. a c... - :. b

d......c o c.2..:.-

1 a 3 i

--i :e: :: a r.f rer c s;e:ific a::iors 1: assare sa e opere:io,: c :e e

l e e Falisa:es ft:ility w$i's t*.s lon;-ter, actiors v.ere bein; ceveloped a- ' 1 .e.. -eresa a:ti:r.5, i r.:1 p.in; re s :-i::i:" s on ove" tire necr;., e t~. sa tis fi ed tre '.E: Staff's concern tha: :ne.1 :*,;.te r- *enanges...be carrie: L

.. ir

.a *. =. '. s

  1. . 5.:.'".a s. '... s.

a '.. =... a. '..*4. - - 2.-

d. r,- *. e.c.= ' :.. v s '. n c..z.
- r - :; e rs * ": s . if Tre Dire::or a::e: e: tr.ese restrictions, be:ause-i
hey appeare: to be a reasonable apprca:4 to begin to re ety the licensee's inade:uate perfor.an:e a: palisades.

) i l T.e f.R' 5 E#f's concern with Palisades has been, cf course, the i PO*entially adve-se irplications 'of tre licea.see's perfer ar:e for 1

  • te teal *". a*2 s! #e f Cf tr.e PJtli. }n Inis C:rter'! #ct healle an!

i 1 i P i l l 1 1/ Ore.er !!V, a5 Fe. Fe;. at 17,EEE. Tne a cu cf over* ire w:r; et i a t) C:erators alres:. &ODeacef ex:essive to the I;R* $ta#f, an:

  • e l i e".s e: ri;*.* ha.e in:#9ase: overtire eve rOre *o pectice assis..

ar.:s in *he develo? e** And irplerenta* ion Of the licensee's p'.a". I On top of inis arditier.al burden, t he i;R' Staff foresaw tr.a, if attrition oCCJrret as prediC:ed by operators, over* ire ript: a;ain increa se sipr.i ficar.tly. The licensee's res*rictions or. cvertire work satisfied the f;R: Staff's centern tna: over:i e wort n:: CCnt'ibu:e *! less !*.ae. oOtir!r. 00 era:or "erfoPante. i i Y --1

.E-i safety, tne Staff cid n;t exa-ine, however, the effe:: :# :ne licensee's proposed rest'ictitr5 c-tne contractual relationshi; ostweer Censu'ers ?oner Corpany and its e ployees. It is net the function s cf ine N,: lear Reg;1atcry Connission to assess w*etner, in cc,plyin; i witt NE: retJirerents or proposing restrictions on its license, a particular licensee has also ebided by its e:onomic connitments to employees, contractors, ratepayers, and others, j/ protection of psblic health and safety is the parancunt con:ern of this agency. Fower Fenctor Develoo ent Co. v. International Union 0' Electrical, Fazio and !'achine L'orkers, 3E7 U.S. 395 (196l). Given this essential mission, it is not appropriate for -the NR: to provide a forun, even as a natter of discretion, to resolve disputes that are i beyond this nandate to assure adequate protection of public health and safety. Granting the Union's petition in this case would provide. however, just su:n a foru-to exa. ine the licensee's contractual relationship witn its enployees. Tce Union alleges that the licensee l failed to consult with the Union regarding the restriction, that the 6/ Cf. Union Electric Co. (Callaway Plant, Units 1 & ?), LL *.3-527, 9 NR: 125, 102 (1979). In Callaway, despite the licensee's j contention that the GRC's actions constituted an unwarrantej intrusion into labor natters, the Appeal Board found that the i URC's responsibilities to exanine serious questions of public health and safety prevail over any possible adverse inpa:t on labor relations. Tnus, where labor disputes can engencer radiation i hazarcs to the public the NR: is properly concerned. Sucq is not the case here. t i r

.g. i licensee exceece: its p:r:ers uncer its "ccliective bargainin; obliga-tions" to tne Union un:er the.*;stional Labor Relatier.s A:t, and inat the Order affe:ts "e'ployment opportunities" of the Union's renbers. Tr.ese alle;a* ions cerely unders: ore the prir.arily economic nature of the U7 ion's concern and presage the essentially labor-nanagenent type of dispute into which any hearing would devolve. The Nuclear 1 Re;ulatory Comnission should not expend its resources to hear such a cispute. Tne Staff assumes that tnere are tribunals, including state federal labor relations agencies, to h:-ar the Union's grievan:es an: against Consumers Power Conpany. This agency is simply not one of those tribunals. 7/ Tne Conc.ission ec.phasized in its liarble Hill decision that p;blic health and safety is "best served by concentrating inspection and enforcenent resources on actual field inspections and related scientific and engineering work, as opposed to the conduct of legal proceedings. This considera: ion calls for a policy that encourages licensees to consent to, rather than contest, enforcement actions." Public Service Co. of Indiana, sucra,11 NRC at 44). By tne sare token, sound enforcement policy dictates that the Of fice of 1/ Tne Staff would note that if one of. these other agencies were to hear the natter and decide it in the Union's favor, and if, therefore, the licensee were to repuest nodification of the current restrictions, the Staff would evaluate the request on its nerits at that tine and weigh any di,minution in safety tnat could be created thereby agair,st such conpensating factors as nay be shown to exist. -w

l I Inspection and Enforcement be able to confirm by order, in the i interest of the potentially favorable effect on public health and I safety, a licensee's efforts to gain better control of its operations i through its proposed restrictions on its license. The viability of such consent orders is undermined if discretionary hearings are held to hear issues that reach beyond the Commission's interest in public health and safety. l III. C0t4CLUSICfl For the reasons discussed in this filing, the Commission should l t r grant a hearing in this proceeding. The Union has not established a right to a hearing under the Order, and the holding of a discretionary hearing would be wasteful of the Commission's resources and would concern primarily matters beyond the Commission's purview. The Union's petition should be denied, j Respectfully submitted, .b eq",A e-v Stephen G. Burns i Counsel for flRC Staff I I 4 Karen D. Cyr ff Counsel for llRC Staff

Attachment:

As Stated Date in Bethesda,11aryland this 20th day of Anril,1981.

\\.- i - t t f ' t 4 h i i t t i i r 1 t i

1 t

i } i ~ - t t , ? Atte.chment 3 i t 1 - t 1 e 5 4 , i I i L f l t 6 I r 4 ' f . I t i I i ? l [ t r--- 1 e err-g

= 1'7E.SS Tederal Rernter / Vel 45. No 53 / Thursday. March 19 1981 / Notices ^ E.eestise Legal We: tor at the sa re For the % clear R< Nisioi Co.meesom a result of these findtrgs the beensee's - a.dd css if a hesi r is re:ves:rd b) a B I h erW ood. performance en the area of reacict person other than e licensee sna: ceret Oceaneg ss r:A so 2. 0,iu,,e or operations and rad.stica protectio.was pe son sha!! des:: Dr. in acec dar.:e L, cense; ested below everage** as compared to with to CFTs : 714,l'.:) the r.at e of the n= c. e w r.w s.u c. e u.e. other Region 111 bcensees in pers:n's interest s i if e rr.s..er in m.x com nw4. summar zing the b:ensee's replator) I P*rforman:e the S ALP report stated w hah that eteres; s a!!ec:rd by t.:s 't 'tCt;' 'nd)C*Cn* CI *;'=' ':r c.fe:r.r; s?::.::e e e:r.s e. ess :', I O-cer. Arry re;;.es i

w. g mgm, g m,y P

V '-. ect si:y the ar me. u g,,g3 g,.gf, performan:e. but it is too soon to draw If a hearing is rer.ested b) a pers:n Consume s Power Co (Pahsage.s sneaningful conchssons 11replatn who has an eteres afie:ted :) th.s Nw: lear Power Fa:ihty); Croer - perfo*mance does not sh:w Order,the Commis.cn wdi mue an Conbrminj; U:ensee Act.ons To irnpros ement. a ddissons: es:ala te.,, t enforcement a: tion will be take. order designat. g th e tir.e and p!a:e of Up; ace Facihty Performance a.n> sa:h heare; I a hear:.4 is he - Ul the issue to be coni de ed at s.:h The Consumen Power Company (the On IEnva 3 619n an ete::r::a! { heanng sha!) be g )is the holder cf P :usional repairman d d not fo!:ow p ::e:.r s Whether L:ense6,a 3*-OX11-N Operating L:ense No DFis-D (the when conda:ti.-4 a sur eman:e its: show!d be cod.f.e/as sei istih ir ..lirense") w hd. a uthor:res the Th:s caused the tw e 125.s o! be::t-'. se:non U3 of th.s 'Me

  • opershon of the pa!:sades Nu:: ear banis to be isc!ated m notan:n of t*.c i

Dsied at Le:Sesda da-Mand iAs to ca) Pow er Ta:iht) (the f a cihr>~1 a: a Utnismg Concision for Operati:. m of Mart) 19e slead) statt rtactor core pow er les el Techni:al Specificatio": 3 7.1.f had i For de N.:!rar ErfJatory Corv.nsi - not is escess of 2.53 rregaw at:s itere been a loss of offsite power.tnere therrnal(rs ted pew er) Tne bcense w as might not hase been power ava:iab,e far - j

  • I' '

iss.;ed for less than f.!! p:wer leseis on oMranon of safet).reIated eg.a; rent s' l D e:ror.C6:eafl% *:re er: y,. h 24 and Noser-ber 0: 191,and the plant This condinot es:ste: f: onc M "#'

  • September 1.1st: and fer fu;; power nn hs.: wh.!e the plant wa eperann; 0:tober it 19 2. The fatihg a Shori.te m co reetar a: tion were t

in :- s me res-s c.- 7 av c coot rss*-* pressunted hght w ater mo:ersted a.d addressed e en L.meisie A:t.:n [ 1 cooled reactor [P'.'.ry is located at tne Le::er. cate: Janua s 9195*. to :he t i heensee's site in Cose.Towr.sh:y Var bcensee from the NRC Region Ul o! hee. ( IDocaat M W man WW Buren County. M;chigan. gy [ Commonwealth Et son Co.; TI The recent personnel error descr.be.! i Avaitatulity cf Safety Evatsabon Os er the pa st ses eral > ean. this in Section U!. when evaluated witn the l [ Report for t a Sala County Station. fa::ht) has been cated for a number of undesirable les el of rep ste-) Ursits 1 anc 2 violations of regulatory requiremer.ta performance as discussed m Section !! [ 5 Notice is hereb men that the Ofhee The items f r each y ear,from 19 5 indicates that rna3er changn m the throcF 1950 are shown in the beensee's management cent-:Is are h of Nu: lear React $r Fep!atien has attachment to this Order. As pet cf the ne:essar) to assure that the h:ensee .i publ.shed its Safe 1 Eia.'.anen Feiert NRC s 5 sternatic Appraisal et can operate the Fahsades fa:d.t> i p on the prop: sed c;t at.on 0,ce.a Luns&s M m ia (SE a w:theat um%e r;si to the hea!i a.d I Sa!!e Co n-) Str.:s L,n:ts 1 and it meeung w as held with beemee safet) of the !.uth: At the re;ues: of th6 f be located :n Bro:J ed Townst.:; L 6 runsgernent on Nos ember 24.19s to beensee.representatnes cf ReF::n 1:3 Salle Count). Uhn: s hot.ce cf it:e:pt discuss the results of the appraisal fer and the hcer:see's management ene: o.. ' ei of the apphcanon fi

  • fa: 1. ) c;e*a nni the pened September 1.1975 ::

Febr a 318.1981.Tne beenser o bcenses subm:tted :) the September 1.1EM Inspe nons presented a planned prof?am of j ' Commonw eahh E.du on Company was conds:ied duv.; th.s pened cbaclosed a intended a:tions to assa e that the u pubhshed m the Teletal Reg: ster on total of 41 items of riencomphance. Pal:sades facihty will opera'e without yi lune 915 7(4:n 75?6) E.s:alated enfor:4 ment action was undue r:sk to the heslth ar.d safe:) of a The report is be;r g referred to the taieri on two occasions On one the pubhc while maict. leng te.-.. Adsisor) Committs on Rea: tor c:. ssion. Nos ember 9.19 9. an order a: teen are imp emented to 5:pg ade the k Safeguards and is Mnp made available mod.fying the beense w as issued and a fa::ht) pe 'orman:e.The Reg. n D1 at the Commission ; P bb: Dozeent emi penalty of 5453 :00 mas proposed represeMain es er phas: sed tr.a:it is Roo:n.m? H 5: et-NK. Wash nrien for a conunumg no!atson of essentia! that broad sig.:!. cant changu D C 20$55 and at se Ilhnois Vality contamment intep st) and related in the hcensee's contro: of heensed .~ Community ColleF Ru a! Roc 1e 81. procedoral notations. The cm1 pens! > actasues accompary long term 0;'esby. !!hnois 15348 f:: tupects:n a:t:en is bemg contested b3 the operauer of the fa:ihty Rerion 111 I' e"" n;rnemaMn ce6hored tne huun and copyir.g The Epc-:(Ds:::::ent No ad-nued' th8'gh tu haun has Nt.' REC. 0519) ca. s!so be p.rzn. sed at tu t.n=e-lu. F pm:ca,, t'a* thne changu mast be camed c.: notations On the other occasi:n in a time!) fashien withoat soberse!) %a corrent rates fror-ine Nata:nal September 16.1EE a $16 030 cn11 smp.::.r; the safel) of near te m Technicalinfo mt_.on S m s:e. pena:ts was propesed (*h::h w as operenens le a letter to ReFica Ul dett: D parement cf Cor merce. 5:1.5 Fort subeduen:1) paid by tne beensee! fer Te:m.a 3 :31551 and in a te:e; hone j Roy al Re e d. 5prin Seid Vqn a 21El two separate nen:s re:Dur; to ccesen an:. en starch 315EL be:w re-

R Deted at Sedest 3ta >!and LNs 13th ds) pers:nnel errc s *h.h inson ed Mr. R T He:shman of the NRC Re;:

as of g.,e.h is,e1 minalong safet).re:sted enmpment. As !!! off.:e and Mr D F. H:ffrnan of er n-v-, e- - - -,, -- - m-n n., n -,-,e

l.censee's cc ;::a'e sta!!. the beenee i Eeta n.tc n: : alsenheanen Pre. dent for Nuclear Operarie.s preu:e d add nc a: c:-.:tme.:s repre: ents e e speof.ed epp :piste conectne scuor.s to -;a:e t: she S and 1 : ;.:e-. Cre61 can be taken f:: the neew d p.es ent recurren:e. trnp es ements e tre t;.a:4 cf peric med m ns;cese to the NEC s opc a?.:ns at the Fa..sa:es fa::hty. Nosernbe 9.19:s Order, ne 6te: tor of Erg en ill fnay ee:as c-t terminate an) of the preted.t; Ee:a.se tr.e h:ensee has ccm ::ted to 3.Tt.e h:ensee shall rems: u:: a'.! cend.tions in w ite;i : gesd cause. taie a::. s ts ed e tre imme:.4 e pers:..e! who pe-f:= safen.n!ated D ue h:enset sha!! stim:t to the Acucn Le te: c' jar;.a :. 91951 whah w::1 et c$er w: i e n:al areu cf the D.:ect:: cf Region !!! cf the NEC. wen are cent - ed m a c!ar f.ed and reused im;: tan:e of se.ct ade.eren:e to fe= m Se:n:n V.A cf 5:s Ordr, zrd p::ed.Jes and the r.e:ess.. f:: 30 da)s ef th:s Order, a comprehens,e beause tre beensen has cor..mei: pe-!L nan:e of a : ass t.ed d; ties in a pit. cf a:uen that *C eure s;!!a:;ent c9 er s.;;; eme. a! a:t ns a, d.s:;: ned and p: fess.cra! ma. cr. c:ntra!s wih be am;:emen:ed to pres e-t re:. en:e of sahm;and system cenE=ed = Se::.:ns V E a.d C cf da ( Tne h:e..ne sha:: sen') b a l Order. tFere is reas:.ab e asiaan:e sec nd quahted m::n::al tha: a,.1 .;nbr..en's and ode: cre:anenal 3 eners s=:: : to these se: fere. in tha 1.e p.:.sada s fa:.:.3 can ie a drenn, es eis mF l' e fni"da Mon. cf Se:ti:ns U and C ab:s e.Tne ;.'an sla2 l 5 8 8 I). c; era ed safe:) m de ne.:.te r cuts. re.aird ci cu.:s c: systems in:bde a des:.; ten c! the a:Le.s 1: me H w es c:. een:m.;cd c; erat :n es er the e de ::nt :l e:c= has e been fort ter. re q.::es s :- Sa.: cha ;e> :. c:m; e ed as n;;: red Q.:ahned tahn. n;;:nf i p?- e-1 ; s a!! a.d t'.rir gashC:sticas c::;..en:at:n the h:ersee s c: ::s::f.:e tsj snw.:;a.s wnli be du. pated y *.he a ac:.uSea as des:.t+d a-d c:..Ermed t. f '.~ C'n'f 8I M'33i'! I f D' 'E' ;E: n;;iremems and the ;:ar's s:hed.?e Se::.:. V r :* L s C: der A::::: ;'.. I 8"*' e. ir p-a.1..:es -.o he 5 T e hann sha,,ndew de mdeste.es sha : n:: be chanced w:9:. hoe ce:e= ne.i es: nen ccmm.: men:s are re;..re: c: t'e interest specik cc:m> enc;aed e de janea*y p.c: w.iten a;pesal b. de'D.re::: :f E III!' 'd '*C'I' * " 2I'CU - p,g ;3 133 n,p:,3,g,g 3 3g,,, of;.:t:.: heahh and safe. and 'C*~#-]-istenar least de e:emen:s sie:t. red belew. theref: c she.i: be c:r..'-.ed b"v an f hen an seemal.7 n;med to sh

1. A.n independent cats.de cens.hent immeiarch efie: tat :::e-g p e ts:s.

pe r.,ena. ci cLit in:....:a n:.s w.. be heed by the b:enset sha:: esalue,:e e: u L. siew cf the f: rep:r; pas.:a.: te b) Ee; en is c., Q we te be ag eed to manssement cc.7:.a: res.. nsw... ne =e d et a :.6.e,. cc: ent c gan; at:n u .a. .s sta::.n;les e.s S.e:nen 1!:: ?, cf : e A::..: U.e-() A:: ,n Erem; cf n; en U gay n!,ax , j C c= p,,,3 t, g,,,,3,4,,, ,,;r, m r <, c f...,. a s a - e r a.a en:. e c te=w sie an cf t e pete..n*- c *.., =,,,= m =n,,,; n,, r j m. '..o., ' [:. j.,yg, yj j._y,..,. s.8l8,y a-d the c: p: ate c!.3:e T. s cens..::.: cre a.ng pa:te:es be a: t e fa::.,:-) Cce I a.p..ss.en s te f.:a: : e m 1(CE: Far: -',' y,. n CFF Fat: A t is cert.:. cedered e.,fe::ae e e.,:a e!) es: b:ense. c; erat. s s.a.. be as pide.a..u sta.. be der:ted 1: raie s u 3 res..,t... 6..... - e e s e e f. L. :.e ns e.a re:cemenda:.:ns for :hanges e. L'c A Tne h operate un.,ce.see sha: cenunse to af: emer.L:ned areas :.,. er the fr.%w.rr p:vm: s cperat n as f,i:w s DC'""

  • C"' "3 h_,.a: w.:! a s sist de 1,

wh2:h are a c.,ar.f:ed a d nund f:= cf (1) No r c:e than 4 es ert.=e hees in "EU*'M5 an)...s.... pen a. The Lcensee shat s bmit a c:;y cf t*: the pmisiens cf the im-=? ate A:t;en w. 1stter issued Janua 3 S 1FE g ) 3, g3., tg,n.4 eg,.nm.e hors in Lndependent es sh:auen to tne D.n:::: 1.The beenee that: conds:: an suit ,.s 7 das pe.ed. cf Ret en lil (3) g; mere inan 64 es e L: e hecs in

The hcensee shall review.evah;str

~ of p: ant operat. cts da.:) by a c pciate era 26-da) pen:i er.d rned.f). as ne:essan. pesen : snanagernent repese.: eta e T* s erpresentatne rna3 be an> Consw nen Tne D.re:te: cf Erp.:en C may relax a; posed safen /related p::cd.: es and g Power Compan) em;;c>ee fTcm w.im er i,=jn t, any er the pee,(ng the po:en tied m tne de e:c; ent at: g the Ene:p 5.;;') De;er.: ent neldef ce36 tion, m w.nt;ng f:: Food cause. s;pe.al cf these pic:ed.tes te e.sce C A corperate nuew team sha:1 that pere;.:m:es pe:a.:.:ns and at leas the t..e cf 5:afik.; neer c its perfo : edeper. dent rer.ews cf safeg. heran: s neassa > t safe en su:. equh6 lent-re!sted esents wh.:h are nper.able as c!the fa::hy are in:h::e:. 1 A comm:t:ee cc ;nsed cf a L. ice..see Esent Repe-:s per Te:ini:al 3 Tne h:e:see sha!!reuew.evaka e rnerbe: cf c: 7: rate.ana;eme b3 Spe::L:anen e 5 and wt :h a e caused and m:d.f). as necenaO. t'e F :i e - edition to the cc ; :a e n;-estntaine b pe ::r.se! e ren c prc:edral is: tra:neg and re::a.nm; cf pts:nne: i erferenced in sie 1 etnc: a Sen::: i.{s:e ;ua: es ne nnew tes= shall be (h:ene.f and v..h:ensei zsched = Rea:ter Operat: an: an: der quahGed g indaidas! sha! renew pict to use all chaired b) the Cha;=en of the Safe-) safe!) fre:ated actmtses m Techn::al 5;e:::.:an:n s.:ne.:.st:e and Aud.t Eenew 5:t-15enes on the ens.ce that the prop am a:y::a: ar,eas is e;;a:e y reuem tes:. shal: be one cember. add enes these a:tmtes. procedces te ass. e t a: heling at :ees: the t::e c!S:aff ( The beensee sha!! renew a.d i t a Ea:A potedare is s;e::B:a '.) En;.eer ciits c: is alent. f := es:t of esa! Late the ade;;a:y cf de cc ent l ide~n:. Sed as be.nr safe >.re:a:ed :: s: tr e Ic:iew..; de; st:..ents: Q.;ah:y p;ae c; erat.:ns s:a!! m:.in;1.:eryed l haung tne potenta: te afie:1 safta-As s aa n:e--N.it:c a: c; era t:ns: crera: cts a..d sense: c; era:::6. te sa:ey re:6:ed e;wpnent. No:: car Senices Dept: ment. a::d pe-fa. n the r.e: essa, p: ant operate, a b Author. sben to perfe m work is Nu: lear A:: nit.es De;ar: ment. fun:t::ts requ: ed frem plant rnanatemen-Tnese merben and dea 5 The h:ensee sha:!esist!:sh i c Spe:ial ne:.fi:.a n:n ci w::i er;:a:emems sha;j te se;e::ed such inat rne.s. es. e:..d.r4 :::en:.ses an: perferred is nade to te S. f: the team sha:1.ase ex;er.ena and chs::;::aa a:U:n. t

.&:e 5.pems:.

empe:ue e c a!. 3 ass. a.:e.7: ant pen:n ci adheren:e ic ade nas::a:..: l d Sistem cond t: ens te pe-!: = w::i c;eran:ns a.d ;: art :)s: ems. cents:!s and safe:3 re:a ed p :es.::es / are cefred E: es:h c:cren:e reuewei the 6 The 1.cence shan ces e::p and i e M.n. nem pers:..ne! siin. es el is team et a:: re:ct mend tc tre Fal.sades i ;:e ent a sistem cf a.:L:s :) def. net.a.d F. ant General Manare s.d ze %ce ma.sge: en::,pesen:a:nes a : ed a i i 1

1 Ep. Federal Ernster / Vol 46 No 53 / Thursday. Ma :h 19 1951 / Notices f t assur.rt confortrance to pro:ed.;res and Operstmg U:ense io NPF-5. issued to Fe the Eclear ReMaior) Comirman cormnaed adr.e ente to chances wnch Cec gia Power Ccrp a ny. Ogie t.5.r:pe R An W. Rest. resdl f :m the reqems identiSed m Power Co poratic9 Municipa! De:t.c CA e' C;emimp Rej rtm kroncA Na 4 ete.s 1.D 1 througn V.D 4 abose Authonr3 of Cecry a and Cry cf Dension af brensc J yg Dahen. Ceo*F a. va:h resised t.he in on r csrun w su.e i h:er:se and Technca: Specifi:stions fer ab;Ars persc" w h

  • k s e s coo rie w.

a s a " ~~~ e s -

'e. by this Order rna. re:;.es a c;catien of the Ed.vm L Hatch Nu: lear

- s . n.1 L.nd. 2 W fa:W beated = hu *..o-o. d:s Orde r wJ. sts is s.a n:e A reci.e s t.j.......a 3 s c,. A "--- N CW *Tu NAMH cr a 6e c.q t s g... t. si s. $ r med te the e,e:re:ary. t. $ amendmentis ene ::a e as olits date cf in.a .e. br,ne Yankee Aomic Power Co : a h.:: car Rep!ator) Corm.m:n m Washegten. D C.0:5n A c:;3 or ee Tnis amendenen: deletes a satisfied luvance of Arrin.5 ment to FaciLty re;;.est sha : a?so be sent to v.e h:ense condit on a[d revises de Operab y Uc me i Fse:utae Le;a! D.re: tor at et same Te:hece!!;pacificcions to add Lir.:n..; The L*.S Nuch er Eer.dato y a:: en if a hen;g is re;.ece: by a Cond. tens for Operan:n and C.? tinion (the)Commissien; ha s j pest.in other then ene 1.:e.see eat 5m e::!an:e Er;..rg ments f:: er isr.ed Amendina-t No siis Fa-H.a i pe s: s'.a:! des:r.tc :n a:::rdance s3 s:e= te monitor :Se output of ee Opera t:rg berts No DFE-35. issued : - mid 10 CFE : :ra:':::he na" re cf the

ome su;;!) for th{ Eea
tor F ote:t:n h!a.ne Yanice Au m:: PeuerCem;ar, psrsen's m;ces: and ee mnner e 5:. rem Tras amer 1.en s:so cct.e::s
  • hich reused Tel nical Spe:;fean:rs which that m'ere3:is affr:tei by As an ident:fied der.:4eh:1 m the for operanon of tT h!.me Yaniee 0;:e A 3 reques for a hec: ; shai!

spenf.:ations for 19 AC ms er:c, Atomic Pem e 5:a on (the fa::: ;.! j not s:e> the ammed.a e eile:tnenen cf anociated with tnebw Prenure lo sted in bn:oli: : canty.hfaine The l th's O':r inje: tion 5 ste= amedmet is ene (se as of 6e date of 3 j If a he. p is re; vested by a perser The a;;h:atio: for the amendment who bs an micest a!!e:13: ty t'..s j Orde the C:mm. nan m.. issue an go.gg .,e g, y,.ida ds ud The amendrnere :ensists of adt.nons to 6e Te:hni al SW :anonsac re:mrements of tr. Atcr:i: Enerp; the Am orc'er des:;nat.rt t. e 1: e an:;.%:e cf ev., ovide F eater aso.ran:e tna pr t c,.1954, as amende (the Act). g. .n3 su:5 heang !!a Fen.g:s he.y .n;.sn:) e dem heat remosat Cec =umis CCmmissict hn@crae appreptsa eay regdahons Tr.e capabihn wn!! be IIamtained e a:: '( the tsue tc, be cons;:ced at sa:n J heem:s.kalbt /- M ritner. er: ne t..s.s cf the estte s hndings as n;a.nd by tne A:t a.d the modu of cpMahc" n, ,,g,, } set forth m 5. : tens 1.: and Lj :f th.s Ccemission's n leisn rer..anons e tc Order this Order shoWd be sustamed CTe, Cr.arter L w Exh are set fort.h m the com;hes with the nandar:s and 4 requirements of thd Atomic Ene py A:t j in the es en: that a need ict Nrther b:ense stoen:'.tnen Prior pubhc notice cf1934 as a:nends (the Act). and tne infortement a:.cn be: .es s;; cent of this amendmen: as not requind either in the co;.cse of a hen.ng er an3 sace the amendment does not involve a Cceminion's rules and regulanens T.5 i 1 other time. ar;tepnate a:a:n m3;l be sign:f.: ant hazards'considera tien Com::assen has tryde appropr.a:e fed:.gs n requatec b) the A:s a.d de f i

t. ken b) the Dire:ter The Cornrnission t as deter = bed that Commission's rule, and ref !abots s:: 1-I F.flec:ne da'e h!ar:h 5192: Beinest.

de inuance of thisemendment will not CTR Chapter L wh ch are set fortn m the kta9.md 1 sm;a:1 and that p p{ ant envirorse.:al s result in any sign:f. b:ense amendrnen. Prior pub:c nc:.:e } For t* e % ::ta Rep. late > Cc- ..p . ; ant to 10 CrE cf th:s amend. men'tw as tct re;u. red %ctor $teEc le 515 d) 4) en er.urcqmen:ali. pa:: s.nce this amendrJn: does not mso:s e. D:.Os ce c'1. sy:r.fr : : siatement or netatae dedatat:en a.d si;.ifcans harard6: s; terat:. t E,4me-e-: envi.on ::ental:m;.h appraisaj neri T'ne Co:.missio4has dete =.ned dat raisansAv." a.cc,a

  • *
  • b' PE * ** d 3" P."'C h8" "'O d' A"8 0' 'I N ' *" A*"' "< ' Af 6

essaan:e of this aw.nm ent. resa!i e any signt'kan: enuronmen:4. ~~ For fu-ther detaib w & respect to is it;act ud that pdsuant to to CFR ~, .,~7 E. 1.'; at.;on. see (1) the arpleston f : 515(dh4) an ensut.r.enta u.;a:t m = amendment dated 0:tober 15.19e as state:nent o riefa$e de::arat:: and { o" 7.~T E S. supp emented Noscimber 11.1960. (:)um ac alimp : appra:nyd M. Amendment No :3 lo License No. N77-not be p erand in ;onnecucn w. a e:* 5 and (3) the Com:-3nion's re:a:ed invance af dis a:-{ndmt 7; 7 ,9 Safes Esalcation 41: of:hese stems a r Fe-Mee de:aa won rno7ct to tha w au n,.!ible for pubhc inspe:sion at th, sch:n. see [1] the afphcat,on ser -~ ~' Commiss:en's Pubt : Docurr ett Koom amed mt dated Cetober 3. 25M t 1 s %, se r e m:.... til? H Street. NL Washeron. D C AmendmentSo 500 License No DFK-ow=: coot nu-e-= and at de Applmg Coun y Pubhc 3E and (3) the Cot- ::ssiot. s letters L:brst). Pa Ser dated June 11.19S: an: h!arcn 51521 3"I3 A **E} *,5:re

t. Ba sley. Cects:a
  • U'**

',,M * * ) A!! of these :e~.s a t asailable fer IDo: set two bre-M61 be ob.med up:n ri ;uest accress: to pub!g insperno ahhe Cem..ss.: a F.bhe Dxament R&am.1?17 H 5: ee Georgia Powe Co.. et al.: Iss.iance et the U.S Sucitar EeN ato y N% % nheron. C. and at the Ameno nent Ic Facil.ty Operate; Commssion %ashyton D C. 20555 beense Attentien Director. mision of his:asse: Publ:: L rary Associaton U s L S Ncr -u Ec;.!r:r. Wens.n; g p $;.,, n.,, , ;;,39,,,,4 g;;, ofiiets 1:: and m rr.s be ot:.me - Cum *:n ori Comn..n.:n: n Ds:e et Twt.neses k r> tand this 6+ e.s upon n:ves! a:drete:f to ee *c.i int.ed Amend 1 ni No 03 to Fa:ah 3 of M.-ch asiin Nuclear Ergviator) vornm:ssic: I

U!JITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS10!i BEFORE THE CO'NISSIO!! r In the Matter c# ) l ) i CO.'!SU"ERS P0k;ER CD'G A*a ) Docket No.'50-255 (Palisades Nuclear Power Facility) ) (EA Si-lE) I CECIFICATE OF SER'!!g i I hereby certify that copies of NRC STAFF'S RESPONSE TO UTILITY HORKERS U"10 OF A" ERICA'S REQUEST FOR A HEARIN3 in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, or as indicated by an asterisk, through deposit in the Nuclear Regula-tory Commission's internal mail system, this 20th day of Aoril,1931. Atomic Safety & Licensino Soard Panel

  • Judd Bacon. Esc.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissicn Consumers Power Company Washington, D.C. 20555 -212 W. Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Panel' U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Theodore Sachs Esq. 1 Marston, Sachs Nunn, Kates. Samuel J. Chilk* Kadushin & 0' Hare, P.C. Secretary of the to ission 1000 Farmer Street U.S. Nuclear Reguleury Commission Detroit, Michigan 48226 Washington, D.C. 20555 Docketing & Service Section* Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Corrission Washington, D.C. 20555 f 1 a Stephen G. Burns Counsel for NRC Staff -}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20058A483&oldid=4476972"