|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20211B0271999-08-13013 August 1999 SER Accepting Second 10-year Interval Inservice Insp Requests for Relief RR-A16,RR-A17 & RR-B9 for Plant, Unit 1 ML20195K2871999-06-16016 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20199H5931999-01-20020 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Thermo-Lag Re Ampacity Derating Issues for Plant ML20155B6781998-10-28028 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Reduction in Commitment Changes in QA Program Matl Receipt Insp Process ML20236R1441998-07-15015 July 1998 SER Related to Quality Assurance Program Description Changes for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 ML20236K3981998-06-30030 June 1998 SER Accepting in Part & Denying in Part Relief Requests from Some of ASME Section XI Requirements as Endorsed by 10CFR50.55a for Containment Insp for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 ML20236K5131998-06-29029 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Alternate Emergency Operations Facility Location for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 ML20198R4771998-01-13013 January 1998 SER Approving Second 10-year Interval Inservice Inspection Program Plan Requests for Relief for Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 ML20128L3001996-10-0202 October 1996 SER Supporting Dbnp IPE Process of Identifying Most Likely Severe Accidents & Severe Accident Vulnerabilities ML20058M9591993-09-28028 September 1993 SE Accepting Licensee Response to GL 89-19, Request for Action Re Resolution of USI A-47, 'Safety Implication of Control Sys in LWR Nuclear Power Plants.' ML20057A3791993-08-20020 August 1993 SE Concluding That Second 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan for Plant Has Unacceptable Exam Sample as Discussed in Encl Inel TER ML20056G4301993-08-18018 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program Requests for Relief.Licensee Made Changes to Subj Program to Include Exercising & fail-safe Testing of Auxiliary Feedwater Valves AF-6451 & AF-6452,in Response to TER Anomaly 8 ML20056B2721990-08-20020 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief from ASME Code Repair Requirements for ASME Code 3 Piping ML20248D8271989-09-29029 September 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 890228 & 0630 Submittals Presenting Proposed Designs to Comply w/10CFR50.62 ATWS Rule Requirements ML20247E6901989-09-0505 September 1989 Safety Evaluation of Audit of Facility Design for Resolution of IE Bulletin 79-27 Re Loss of non-Class IE Instrumentation & Control Power Sys Bus During Operation.Preventive Maint & Testing Program Should Be Developed for Bus Power Sources ML20247J8731989-05-18018 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 133 to License NPF-3 NUREG-0660, Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 840301 & 870420 Responses to NUREG-0737,Item 1.C.1,except Where Noted in Section 21989-05-0303 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 840301 & 870420 Responses to NUREG-0737,Item 1.C.1,except Where Noted in Section 2 ML20196D9601988-12-0808 December 1988 Safety Evaluation Re Util Response Concerning Auxiliary Feedwater Sys Reliability Study.Util Should Ensure That Sys Mods Do Not Result in Net Reduction in Sys Reliability ML20207K7911988-10-0404 October 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Operation in Cycle 6 W/O Removing Flaws in Cracked HPI Nozzle ML20148D0391988-01-19019 January 1988 SER Accepting Util 831209 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2 Re Reactor Trip reliability-on-line Testing.Unit Designed to Permit on-line Functional Testing of Diverse Trip Features of Reactor Trip Breakers ML20147C2631988-01-12012 January 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1) Re Equipment Classification of Reactor Trip Sys Components ML20149F9621988-01-11011 January 1988 SER Accepting License Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2.1 Re Equipment Classification Programs for safety- Related Components ML20236U6531987-11-27027 November 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Effects of Errors in Util Analysis of Small Break Loca.Use of Incorrect Values in Analysis Results in Incomplete Compliance w/10CFR50,App K.Plant Poses No Risk to Public Health Due to Meeting 10CFR50.46 Requirements ML20236T3871987-11-25025 November 1987 SER Re Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97 Concerning post-accident Monitoring Instrumentation.Design Acceptable ML20211G8641987-02-11011 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 3.2.3, Post-Maint Testing & All Other Safety-Related Components ML20207Q6711987-01-0909 January 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Re Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events ML20212C9231986-08-0404 August 1986 Sser Supporting Util Reanalyses of 74 Masonry Walls ML20212G6021986-08-0404 August 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re Question 29 Concerning Training for Infrequent, Critical & Difficult Tasks ML20212R3421986-06-10010 June 1986 SER Re Progress Made by Licensee in Area of Plant Maint.New Maint Organization Functioning W/No Major Weaknesses.Region III Will Continue to Monitor Maint at Plant to Assure Continued Control & Progress ML20206F3041986-05-27027 May 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Review Re Cold Pressurization of Secondary Side of Steam Generator During Testing on 850906 ML20203N9141986-04-17017 April 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Mods to Safety Actuation Sys Re Shared Power Supply Returns as Result of 801205 Actuation NUREG-0103, Safety Evaluation Supporting Relief from Inservice Insp Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Requiring Quarterly Stroke Testing of RCS Valves & Denying Relief from Code Requirements for Valve RC-11 Testing1986-03-0606 March 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Relief from Inservice Insp Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Requiring Quarterly Stroke Testing of RCS Valves & Denying Relief from Code Requirements for Valve RC-11 Testing ML20137J6891986-01-0808 January 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Identification of Root Causes for Spurious 850609 Steam & Feedwater Line Rupture Control Sys Low Level Actuation,Closure of MSIVs & Actions Taken to Prevent Recurrence.Plant Restart Acceptable ML20137J7031986-01-0808 January 1986 SER Supporting Util Identification of Root Causes for Source Range Nuclear Instrumentation Channels Inoperability During 850609 Steam & Feedwater Line Rupture Control Sys Low Level Actuation & Corrective Actions Taken.Plant Restart Approved ML20136B7841985-12-24024 December 1985 SER Re Util Development of Systematic & Thorough Troubleshooting Plans to Investigate 850609 Incident Leaving Redundant source-range Nuclear Instrumentation Channels Inoperable.Restart & Power Operation Now Acceptable ML20137R1611985-11-12012 November 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 Re Preventive Maint & Trending of Parameters ML20138P0681985-10-30030 October 1985 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee 831107 & 850709 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.1,3.1.2,4.1 & 4.5.1 Re post-maint Testing & Reactor Trip Sys Reliability (vendor-related Mods & Sys Functional Test Description) ML20138P6391985-10-30030 October 1985 SER Re Proposed Mods to Maint Program.Licensee Should Identify Actions to Be Completed Prior to or After Restart. Region Should Actively Monitor Licensee Progress ML20133Q0441985-10-24024 October 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831107 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 3.1.3 Re post-maint Testing (Reactor Trip Sys Components).Eg&G Technical Evaluation Rept Encl ML20062E0871982-07-29029 July 1982 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Request for Relief from ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Section XI Hydrostatic Test (Insp) Requirements ML20214J2801979-12-20020 December 1979 Safety Evaluation Re Preliminary Design for Upgrading Present control-grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip Sys for Loss of Main Feedwater & Turbine Trip to safety-grade ML20125B1331968-12-16016 December 1968 Safety Evaluation Re Piqua Nuclear Power Facility Retirement.T Hamrick to J Schlesinger Encl 1999-08-13
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "".
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
(
, .$g@
f (flg)'A! S UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-@vg
,/ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO THE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM RE0 VESTS FOR RELIEF
, TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY M RIOR SERVICE COMPANY i
b.ND THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY l DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION. U_ NIT NO. 1 l
DOCKET NO. 50-346
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Code of Federal Regulations,10 CFR 50.55a, requires that inservice
. testing (IST) of certain American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) l Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Class 1, 2, and 3 pumps and valves be performed in accordance with Section XI of the Code and applicable addenda, i
- except where relief has been requested and granted or proposed alternatives ,
have been authorized by the Commission pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(f)(6)(1),
(a)(3)(i), or (a)(3)(ii). In order to obtain authorization or relief, the licensee must demonstrate that: (1) conformance is impractical for its facility; (2) the proposed alternative provides an acceptable level of quality and safety; or (3) compliance would result in a hardship or unusual difficulty l without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety. Section j 50.55a(f)(4)(iv) provides that inservice tests of pumps and valves may meet i the requirements set forth in subsequent editions and addenda that are !
incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b), subject to the limitations and modifications listed, and subject to Comission approval. NRC guidance contained in Generic Letter (GL) 89-04, " Guidance on Developing Acceptable Inservice Testing Programs," provided alternatives to the Code requirements t determined to be acceptable to the staff and authorized the use of the alternatives in Positions 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, and 10 provided the licensee follow the guidance delineated in the applicable position. When an alternative is
, proposed which is in accordance with Generic Letter (GL) 89-04 guidance and is l documented in the IST program, no further evaluation is required; however, implementation of the alternative is subject to NRC inspection. I Section 50.55a authorizes the Comission to grant relief from ASME Code requirements or to approve proposed alternatives upon making the necessary findings. The NRC staff's findings with respect to granting or not granting the relief requested or authorizing the proposed alternative as part of the licensee's 15T program are contained in this Safety Evaluation (SE).
> 9309030110 93081Ei DR ADOCK 050003 6
In rulemaking to 10 CFR 50.55a effective September 8, 1992, (57 FR 34666), the 1989 edition of ASME Section XI was incorporated in 10 CFR 50.55a(b). The 1989 edition provides that the rules for IST of pumps and valves shall meet the requirements set forth in ASME Operations and Maintenance Standards Part 6 (OM-6), " Inservice Testing of Pumps in Light-Water Reactor Power Plants," and Part 10 (OM-10), " Inservice Testing of Valves in Light-Water Reactor Power Plants." Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(f)(4)(iv), portions of editions or addenda may be used provided that all related requirements of the respective editions or addenda are met, and subject to Commission approval. Because the f
alternatives meet later editions of the Code, with NRC approval, relief is not l required for those inservice tests that are conducted in accordance with OM-6 and OM-10, or portions thereof, provided all related requirements are met.
Whether all related requirements are met is subject to NRC inspection.
2.0 BACKGROUND
Toledo Edison (the licensee), in their letter dated April 8,1993, responded to an anomaly identified in NRC's Safety Evaluation (SE) of December 2,1991, related to a relief request for the Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Inservice Testing (IST) Program for pumps and valves, second 10-year interval.
The submittal provided the licensee's response to one of the anomalies found in the Technical Evaluation Report (TER) attached to the SE. The anomaly identified in TER Appendix B, as Anomaly No. 8 concerned TER Section 3.2.1.1 regarding the licensce's request for relief from measuring stroke times for auxiliary feedwater valves AF-6451 and AF-6452. The licensee proposed to exercise and fail-safe test these valves quarterly, but not record stroke times. The SE granted interim relief to allow the licensee to develop a method to monitor the valves for degradation.
In the SE, the NRC staff requested that the licensee resolve the anomalies associated with the relief requests and implement program / procedures changes a: needed. The other anomalies identified in the TER were addressed in TE's letter dated July 8,1992, and evaluated in the NRC SE dated April 23, 1993.
2.1 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO ANOMALY NO. 8
- The licensee states:
AF-6451 and AF-6452 are Target Rock solenoid operated valves with position indication from linear variable differential position transmitters. The valve actuator is a closed cylinder containing the upper valve stem, a solenoid positioner, and stem position instru-mentation. The valve position cannot be directly observed. Valve stroke time is dependent on system flow rates. An indirect indication of stroke time can be obtained by measuring the time from a valve-open signal until a predetermined voltage from the linear variable differential position transmitter indicates the valve is fully open.
Stroke time will be determined quarterly by indirectly measuring the stroke time under no flow conditions using this method.
I l
j -
1 l
2.2 EVALUATION
! The licensee revised the IST Program to incluce quarterly stroke time measurement and fail-safe testin; for valves AF-6451 and AF-6452. The stroke times will be obtained indirectly using output voltage from the linear variable differential position t ansmitter at no flow. Position indication and fail-safe position will be verified using system flow each quarter. The
- ASME Bof 7er and Pressure Vesse? Code,Section XI, Paragraph IW-3412 (b),
l requires valve disk movement be determined by exercising the valve while observing an appropriate indicator which signals the required change of disk position, or by observing indirect evidence. Paragraph IW-3413 (a) states that the full-stroke time is the time interval from initiation of the actuating signal to the end of the actuating cycle. The licensee's proposed t alternative meets the intent of the Code.
2.3 CONCLUSIQH l
l The NRC staff requested the licensee to resolve the anomalies associated with the relief requests contained in the NRC SE and attached TER dated December 8, l 1991, and implement program and procedures changes as needed. The licensee's response was completed by letter dated April 8,1993, which addressed TER Anomaly 8. To address the anomaly, the licensee made changes to the IST Program to include exercising, stroke timing, and fail-safe testing of auxiliary feedwater valves AF-6451 and AF-6452. The NRC staff has evaluated the changes and finds that they meet the intent of the ASME Code,Section XI requirements, and are acceptable.
Principal Contributor: F. T. Grubelich Date: August 18, 1993