Reorganization of Witnesses Necessary to Prove Contentions 3.7 & 4.7 on Emergency Evacuation & Notification.Svc List EnclML20054J311 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Indian Point |
---|
Issue date: |
06/21/1982 |
---|
From: |
PARENTS CONCERNED ABOUT INDIAN POINT |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
ISSUANCES-SP, NUDOCS 8206280473 |
Download: ML20054J311 (9) |
|
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] Category:OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENT
MONTHYEARML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098E6531984-09-25025 September 1984 Comments on Staff 840905 Briefing Re Pra.Ucs Requests Decision on Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20094P5421984-08-13013 August 1984 Comments on Dissenting Views of Chairman Gleason Re Safety of Plant Mods.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20091P6521984-06-0909 June 1984 Suppl to Joint 840406 Petition for Immediate Suspension of Operation ML20087P8641984-04-0101 April 1984 Addl Attachment to 840204 Comments on ASLB Recommendations to Commission.Testimony on Encl Attachment G Reveals Emergency Planning Transportation Woefully Lacking & Grossly Inadequate ML20080D5401984-02-0606 February 1984 Comments on ASLB 831024 Recommendations to Commission Re Emergency Planning,Plant Risk & Comparative Risk.Continued Operation Recommended.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080B7871984-02-0606 February 1984 Comments on ASLB Recommendations Re Facilities.Commission Urged to Focus on Fact That Serious Release Would Be Catastrophe of Far Greater Dimensions than Event at Any Other Sites.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080C5581984-02-0606 February 1984 Addition to Parents Concerned About Indian Point 840202 Comments on ASLB Recommendations ML20086L3351984-02-0404 February 1984 Comments on ASLB Recommendations to Commission.Aslb Improperly Placed Burden of Persuasion on Plant Opponents, Failed to Conduct Thorough Investigation & Failed to Conform Conclusions W/Findings of Fact ML20086L0591984-02-0202 February 1984 Comments on ASLB Recommendations for Evacuating School Children ML20080B4071984-02-0202 February 1984 Comments Responding to ASLB 831024 Recommendations to Commission Re Safety Issues.Commissioners Invited to Attend Next Emergency Response Drill ML20080C5421984-02-0202 February 1984 Comments on Recommendations of ASLB Re Continued Operation of Facility While Problems Util Should Correct Remain Unresolved or Inconclusive.Aslb Urged to Admit go-home Plan Leaves Major Problems W/Protection of School Children ML20080H1761984-01-30030 January 1984 Response to ASLB 831024 Recommendation to Commission ML20072D6981983-06-20020 June 1983 Response to Pj Amico to ASLB & Analysis of PRA Testimony.Areas in Which Addl Testimony Recommended Do Not Present Issues Materially Affecting Record & Are Too Costly.W/Certificate of Svc ML20024A0831983-06-10010 June 1983 Response to ASLB Consultant,Pj Amico,830502 Ltr Re Issues on Accident Probability Requiring Addl Testimony.New York City Audubon Soc/Friends of the Earth Comments Endorsed. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071Q9081983-06-0808 June 1983 Recommendations for Emergency Planning Process.Plans Should Originate at Local Govt Level & Should Be Supported & Enforced at State & Federal Govt Levels ML20071Q9191983-06-0808 June 1983 Statement on Role of Federal,State & Local Govts & Utils in Planning,Testing & Executing Emergency Response Procedures ML20072A0711983-06-0808 June 1983 Statement Before House of Representatives Subcommittee on Energy Conservation & Power Re Emergency Planning.Public Must Be Involved in Planning & Testing Process ML20071H3631983-05-23023 May 1983 Submission Addressing Commission 830505 Order on Possible Facility Closing.Requests Oral Presentation on 830526 Re Economic Inpact of Facility Shutdown.Economic Impact Is Not Compelling Reason for Continued Operation ML20071H2031983-05-23023 May 1983 Submission Re Commission 830505 Order CLI-83-11.Emergency Planning Must Be Well Developed & Detailed W/Special Emphasis on Health & Safety of Children ML20071H1981983-05-23023 May 1983 Comments on Commission Order CLI-83-11 Establishing Procedures for Decision on Enforcement Action.Emergency Planning Deficiencies Fundamental.Adequate Interim Compensating Measures Impossible.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071H4861983-05-21021 May 1983 Submission Re Commission 830505 Order on Intention to Shut Down Facility on 830609 If Emergency Preparedness Problems Not Resolved.Adequate Protective Action in Case of Radiological Emergency Cannot Be Guaranteed by 830609 ML20071H1541983-05-20020 May 1983 Views Re Radiological Emergency Planning in Response to Commission 830505 Order.Fema & NRC Should Rule That Plants No Longer Have Significant Deficiencies Based on Improvement & Interim Compensating Actions ML20071H1601983-05-20020 May 1983 Opinion on NRC 830505 Order Re FEMA Rept on Licensee Emergency Planning & Preparedness & Possible Suspension of Plant Operations.Immediate Shutdown Urged ML20071H0181983-05-20020 May 1983 Response to Commission 830505 Order Establishing Procedures for Decision on Enforcement Action.Emergency Planning Deficiencies Not Significant.Nrc Enforcement Action Unwarranted & Improper.W/Certificate of Svc ML20071H1761983-05-16016 May 1983 Citizens Advisory Committee Progress Repts Re Nuclear Evacuation & General Disaster Preparedness Plan ML20069K6221983-04-21021 April 1983 Notice of 830425 Deposition in New City,Ny Re 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20069K6131983-04-21021 April 1983 Notice of K Toscani,K Felt & L Culpepper 830422 Depositions in Croton-on-Hudson,NY Re 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise.Related Correspondence ML20073M8971983-04-15015 April 1983 Notice of 830421 Deposition of FEMA Witnesses P Mcintire,J Keller & R Koweiski by Licensees in New York,Ny.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20073H4621983-04-12012 April 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072J9821983-03-22022 March 1983 Notice of DA Schlissel 830413 Deposition in New York,Ny Re Testimony Under Commission Question 6.Related Correspondence ML20072J9921983-03-22022 March 1983 Notice of Deposition of V Taylor & All Other Witnesses Testifying on Behalf of Ucs/Pirg of Ny & Greater Ny Counsil on Energy on Commission Question 6,in New York,Ny.Related Correspondence ML20072K0001983-03-22022 March 1983 Notice of Deposition of Witnesses Testifying on Behalf of NRC on Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20072J9711983-03-22022 March 1983 Notice of B Commoner & R Schrader 830324 Deposition in New York,Ny Re Testimony Under Commission Question 6.Related Correspondence ML20072J9621983-03-22022 March 1983 Notice of 830330 Deposition of R Rosen & Other Witnesses Testifying on Behalf of Greater Ny Counsil on Energy on Commission Question 6,in New York,Ny.Related Correspondence ML20072K0111983-03-22022 March 1983 Notice of Deposition of All Persons Testifying for Parents Concerned About Indian Point on Commission Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20072G4191983-03-21021 March 1983 Cross-examination Plan for Wk Commencing 830322.County Will cross-examine D Davidoff Representing Ny State & Parsons, Brinckerhoff,Quade & Douglas Representing Licensees. Affidavit of Svc Encl ML20069F5951983-03-18018 March 1983 Proposed Order of Testimony.Affidavit of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20069C8221983-03-14014 March 1983 Forwards Intervenor Refined Witness List for Commission Questions 3 & 4 for Presentation on 830315-18 & 22.List Does Not Include Witnesses Subj to Stipulation by Licensees & NRC ML20071F0231983-03-11011 March 1983 Intervenors Joint List of Witnesses to Be Presented on 830315-18 & 22 Re Commission Questions 3 & 4 ML20071E4451983-03-0808 March 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding ML20071D2781983-03-0303 March 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072B6791983-03-0101 March 1983 Notice of F Rowsome,R Blond & Other Unidentified Witnesses Deposition Re Testimony on Commission Question 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072B6561983-03-0101 March 1983 Notice of Sholly & Other Unidentified Witnesses Deposition Re Testimony on Commission Question 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072B7791983-02-28028 February 1983 Memorandum Re Scheduling of Testimony on Commission Questions 3 & 4 ML20071C4171983-02-25025 February 1983 Notice of Meshnick 830226 Desposition in New York,Ny Re Testimony on Commission Questions 3 & 4.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071C4101983-02-25025 February 1983 Notice of D Gurin,J Friedman & R Mccarthy 830228 Deposition in New York,Ny Re Testimony on Commission Questions 3 & 4. Related Correspondence 1998-08-26
[Table view] |
Text
' -
c
- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COI@iISSION beforeth,eATOMICSAFETYANDLICENSIhGBOARb
'62 di 25 R2 Z0 In the Matter of : (- W
- ,1 . i!.
- ,G & 5 E Consolidated Edison Company of BAE-New York (Indian Point Unit 2) : Docket Number 50-247SP Power Authority of the State of New York (Indian Point Unit 3) : Docket Number 50-286SP June 21, 1982 PARENTS CONCERNED ABOUT INDIAN POINT REORGANIZATION OF WITNESSES
.TO PROVE CONTENTIONS 3.7 & 4.7 Witnesses necessary to prove contentions for which Parents is the lead intervenor are listed.herein and grouped according to themajor points addressed in their testimonies.
This is not meant to and does not limit the testimony of any witness to the specific point under which he or she is listed.
Numbers in parenthesis refer to'the witness numbers as listed in "Index of Witnesses Presenting Testimony on Behalf of the Intervenors: UCS, NYPIRG, RCSE, WBCA, Parents, WESPAC, F03/
Audubon and on behalf of the Attorney General of the State of New York.
Because we anticipate that many of our witnesses will not be available during the summer months due to vacations and other previous committments, we are unable to eliminate witnesses because we do not know who will be able to testify on any given date.
! B206280473 820621 0}
l PDR ADOCK 05000247 Q PDR
~ ~
3.7 THE PROBLEMS OF EVACUATING CH'ILDREN FROM THREATENED AREAS HAVE NOT BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED IN THE PRESENT EMERGENCY PLANS .
I. Some parents do not have transportation at their dis-posal at all times. Parents who have to evacuate by public transportation will have special problems.
Agata Craig (11) Loretta Brunda i
Jamie Greene (12) Evan Litty(56)ge (55)
II. The reception centers designated to receive our children have not been adequately prepared to meet even basic needs and certainly not energency needs.
Robert Johnson (18) Anthony Napoli (89)
John Moore (51) John Indusi (124)
Vince Rubeo (86)
III. Public officials are not convinced that the evacuation of school children by bus will work.
Richard Wishnie (33) Richard Herbeck (34)
IV. Families and people who care for children with special needs cannot successfully evacuate.
(a) emotionally disturbed children Ronnie Wilkin Schwartz (54)
(b) handicapped Evan Litty (parents 56)*
(c) children with medical conditions Evan Litty (56)*
Susan Scheffel (123) ,
(d) children home alone Gerald T. Kapusinsky (80)
Nancy Sheer (112)
V. People who are directly responsible for carrying out emergency plans and ensuring the safety of children have not been adequately prepared and have expressed doubts about their willingness to, participate.
(a) Day care center operations and babysitters have indicated their concerns about caring for the children of others in a radiolo6 1 cal emergency.
Phyllis Hilbraun (99) Kathy Feit (167)
Sally Zeigler (100) Linda Puglisi (161)
Lillian Moore (130)
(b) Bus drivers have no training, equipment or contracts, and are not familiar with the evacuation routes.
Fern Narod Sheik (105) Sonny Hall (39)
. Tom Turner (107)
( -
-3,-
(c) The police do not hav.e adequate equipment, training '
. or personnel;' therefore, lack of confidence that they can communicate effectively and ensure public safety.
Ronald Goldfarb (34) Reginald Iambruschi (37)
(d) Ambulance corps personnel have expressed reservations about their ability to meet the medical needs of the public in a radiological emergency.
Earle Ellefson (85) Edward Connelly (150)
Albert Johnson (108)
(c) Fire fighters are concerned about massive congestion and communication problems.
Stanley Brooker (151)
VI. Special facilities will have extensive problems in attempting evacuation of children.
. (a) Schools have many problems in evacuating children which are not addressed by the plan.
(b) Teachers, whose lives are dedicated to the welfare of children, have pointed out the following inade-quacies in the plan:
(1) Teachers have reliable knowledge about the needs of their students, but have not been consulted by tne planners and their input has not been incorporated into the plan.
Paula Myers (158)
(c) School administrators are uncertain that the plan can be implemented.
David Siegel (81) Toby Gersony (90)
Leon Bock (95) cleland conklin (98)
Richard Dunne (82) Colleen (109)
Murray(110)
John Iurato (87) Lynn Doughty (d) No contractual or economic provisions have been made with bus companies or drivers.
Dick Alexander (83)
(e) Teachers cannot be depended upon to stay with the children.
John Rodin (84) Vincent Rubeo (86)
(f) Children participating in off premises programs during school hours are not covered by the evacuation plan.
Ray Bowles (85) h....
_4_
, (g) Teacher training does not include a response to a
~
radiological emer6ency.
John Livin6ston (114) Ruth Isaacs (117)
(h) Teachers do no't have medical supplies for a radio-logical emergency.
. Barbara 'ochman G (115)
(i) Teachers have indicated that children will not respond
. to their instructi'ons to evacuate because parents have given other instructions.
Barbara Hirschman (116)
(j) Some teachers have medical problems which may prevent them fro'm fulfilling the role assigned to them.
Breda Curran (118)
(k) Lack of confidence in the plan will interfere with teacher cooperation.
John Indusi (124)
(1) Children reflect the anxiety of parents who lack confidence in the evacuation plan, and teachers cannot reassure them.
Maggie North (119)
(m) Teachers and students in school districts which border the 10-mile EPZ will have special problems.
Eleanor Kahn (120)
(n) The evacuation plans regarding adolescent children are unrealistic and inadequate.
Mary Lou Gohring (125) David Churchill (127)
(o) The evacuation plans regarding very small children are unrealistic and inadequate.
Phyllis Mendelson (155) Charlyn Appolonio (162)
Abby Perl (156) Margaret Davis (163)
Judith Glass (159)
(p) Health personnel are not equipped with sufficist medical supplies necessary to maintain treatment far children with chronic medical problems.
Elizabeth Sekelsky (88) Clare Rosen (121)
(q) The evacuation plan does not cover all schools and in some cases has given inappropriate instructions to other schools.
, s -
s- - . - , , - - - -,,e-, ,-,- - + , - -
-5~ _
- Eleonarc Bronzo (91) Arlene Tift (92)
Lynn Kauderer. (93)
- 2) The plan does not provide for evacuation of children in
~
camps and parks.
Ronnie Witkin Schwartz (5h)* Judy Kesselman (71)
Linda Co (75)
- 3) Public after school recreation programs have not been provided for in the evacuation plan.
Kathe Saunders (73) Helen Barnham (79)
Willian Rodriguez (102)
Syd Ginsberg (78)
Stephen Elkins (69) h) Private recreation programs with large student enroll-ments are not - provided for in the evacuation plan.
Vincent Savastano (9h)
Shareane Baff (111)
- 5) Private recreation prograns that offer individual or small group instruction are not provided for in the evacuation plan.
Joan Fine (7h) Monya Brown (77)
Phyllis Rodriguez (76)
- 6) Churches have received no instructions for evacuating
- children attending services or classes David Wayne (97) Robert Hare (96)
Michael Robinson (101)
VII A panel of parents will testify on the following problems posed by the p1hn.and its evacuation of children:
a) children home alone Nancy Sheer (112) Kathy Pierpont (lh2)
Elise Lentz (13 6) Ervine Kimmerling (lh5) b) lack of confidence in plan and ability of officials to implement it Mary Bulleit (131) Helga Ancona (135)
Jane Courtney (13h) c) disregard of school evacuation by parents Betsy Doepken (122) Susan M. Teasdale (133) d) anxiety ofchildren Daniela Misch (129) e) children with babysitters .
Madeleine and Marc Holzer (lhl)
I -
I f) parents with children in different schools Eileen L'cGovern (lkh) Karen Ford (lh0) g) children who live outside the evacuation zone but go to school ,
within the EPZ l Ellen Burgher (138)
VIII .In order for any evacuation plan to work it must be thoroughly explained to all participants and rehearsed, but such preparations will be damaging 3 to the emotional lives and he'althy developnent of children.
Dr. Arthur Zelman (10)
II The plan makes untenable assumptions about the responses of parents outside !
j the 10-mile EPZ about emergency workers, and abcut children. j Dr. Julie Palmer (153) Dr. Kai T. Erikson (lh8)
Dr. David Elkind (10h) Dr. T. Berry Brazelton (128) j l
I Psychologican and social damage will result if families are separated during an evacuation. r Dr. Albert J. Solnit (15h) Dr. Jerore Kagan (103)
Sheilah Rechtshaffer (132) Sherry Horowite (lh6) d 1
\
-7 .
4.7 The present emergency planning brochures and present means of alerting and informing the population of an emergency do not give adequate attention to problems associated with persons who are deaf, blind, too young to understand the instructions, or who _
do not sp eak English. ,
I. Incomplete notification of the public by brochure and _
siren in case of nuclear emergency will result in failure
. of emergency plan.
a) Not all members of the general public have received the correct brochure or heard the sirens during testing..
Feralyn Woods (5) Fabel Cronk (6) Lynn Gunzenhauser (8) .
Pat Chazen (13) Gertrude -nd Henry Gillette (14)
Joan livingston (114) Mary bulleit (131) -=
b.) No special provisions have been made for notification of gitizens who are disabled by virtue of being, i
- 1) Deaf E Clifford and Nancy Rowley (58) -
Oscar Cohen (58a) J Barbara Blattstein (59)
- 2) Elderly Seymour Greenbaum (62) c.) People who' spend a considerable amount of time -
vithin the 10 mile EPZ but live elsewhere would not know what to do in the event of emergency. .
Raymond Bowles (85)
Iois Jessup (126) -
d.) Tne brochure is ambiguous as to how non-public schools should evacuato.
Jane Capon (164)
- 11. Not all people who have received the emorgency planning brochure understand what they are expected to do -
in the event the plan is implemented. ,
a.) the general population is uncertain of the procedure they are expected to follow. _
Richard Altschuler (3) A=y Kriveloff (4) =
Myra Spiegelran (137) _
b.) The emotionally and develop =entally disabled are incapable of effectively undersknMnv the brochure 3 Charles.Avalt (49) Richard Iand $50)
Pat Bethge (52)~ 'Betsy Bergman (53) "
l l c.) Parents are unable to explain the plan th their l children in a meaningful manner.
Barbara Hickernell (7) Karen Henes (9) Micheal Holland (29)
Daniela Hisch (129) d.) The elderly are unsure of the steps they must take under the plan.
Seymour Greenbaum (62) Susan Simon (65)
Sari Eklund (143) e.) The physically disabled do not understand how they are to follow the brochure 8s directives.
Gladys Burger I63) .
Hattie Coffee (64)
,f.) Public inforcation is not prepared in any language other than English. The non Ihglish speaking.
population vill'be confused by and ill prepared for a radiological emergency.
Michael Holland (29) 111. The content of the brochure is incomplete and misleading. ' '
Kathleen Toscani (139)
Theodora Dyer (147)
O pe i.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'Lbuts d. Carter, Esq.. Chairman RMTtf UOfd0. Usq.
- SiRVICE LIST Steve LS1ps12. Esq.
, A:)ministrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Eavironmental Protect 11n Burea
,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission HonIrable GilbIrto Cerana-Valentin hw mk State Attcrney Member cf th: Council cf th2 n 8*
Washingtin, D. C. 20555 City cf New York Two or Tr ent*.r 4 New York, H.Y.
'Dr. Oscar N. Paris
. District f11 f> 10047 City Hall w Y rk, New York 10007 &C $N ' Alfred B. Del Bello A . a a censing Board j'd .S Westchester County Esecutive U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cornission Washington. D. C. 20555 Honorable Arthur J. Katzman S C "" U Hember of the Council of the "
- Mr. Frederick J. Shon City of New York m l N J;..n qL - - '"(601 Administrative Judge District e22 City Hall *T
,C) og t Atomic Safety and Licensing Board New. York, New York 10007 cv M Andrew S. Roffe. Esq )
U New York State Assec51 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C. 20555 Jonathan L. Levine. Esq.
g> g4. .- c - ;; Albany. N.Y. 12248 Rockland Citizens for g a h t"- @tRenee Schwartz Esq.
Brent L. Brandenburg. Esq. Safe Energy . 8 j g[ Botein. Hafs. Sklar & Herzberg Assistant General Counsel P.O. Box 74 oM s Attorneys for Metropolitan Consolidat'ed Edison Co. New City NY 10956 54 M :w
- Transportation Authority of Hew York. Inc.
4 Irving Place Marc L. Parris Esq. M%$h o 4 200 Park Avenue hew York. N.Y. 10166 New York, N.Y. 10003 County Attorney County of Rockland .$
a s.$ eqagMg Stanley B. Klimberg 11 New Hempstead Road General Counsel Paul F. Colarulli. Esq. New City. NY 10956 g g y to New York State Energy Office Joseph J. Levin, Jr. Esq. % O 23 h 2 Rockefeller State Plaza Pamela 5. Horowitz. Esq. Geoffrey Cobb Ryan Albany, New York 12223 Charles Morgan, Jr. Esq. Conservation Comittee Morgan Associated. Chartered Chairman, Director 1899 L Street. N.W. New York City Audabon Society Washington, D. C. 20035 71 West 23rd Street, Suite 1828 ,
hew York, NY 10010 Charles 11. Pratt. Esq. Honorable Ruth flessinger Thorus R. Frey. Esq. Greater New York Council 11 ember of the Counct) of the Power Authority of the on Energy City of New York State of New York c/o Dean R. Corren, Director District #4 10 Columbus Circle fiew York University City Hall New York. N.Y. 1001g 26 Stuyvesant Street New York, New York 10007 New York, NY 10003 Ellyn R. Weis. Esq. Honorable fliriam Friedlander William S. Jordan. III. Esq.
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Member of the Council of the Harmon & Weiss Board Pene) City of New York 1725 I street. N.W. , Suite 506 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission District #2 Washington, D. C. 20006 Washington. D. C. 20555- ' City Hall New York, New York 10007 Joan Holt. Project Director ' Atomic Safety and Licensin9 1ndian. Point Project Appeal Board Panel Honorable Carol Greitzer New York Public Interest Member of the Council of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Research Group Washington, D. C. 20555 City of New York fr-Gee +=en-Street YgM/g* .
District f3 New York, N.Y. 10007 Honorable Richard L. Brodsky City Hall Member of the County Legislature New York, New York 10007 Charles A. Scheiner, Co-Chairperson Westchester County Westchester People's Action County Office Buildin9 Honorable Stanley E. Michels Coalition. Inc. White Plains. NY 10601 Member of the Council of the P. O. Box 488 City of New York White Plains, N.Y. 10602 District 96 City Hall
- n -- - - - - - New York. New York 10007 44 Sunset Drive Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520 Honorable Susan Alter John Gilroy. Westchester Coordinator Member of the Cosncil of the Indian Point Project City of New York Lorna Salzman . New York Public interest Mid-Atlantic Representative Research Group District e32 Friinds of the Earth, Inc. City Hall 240 Central Avenue New York, New York 10007
,208 West 13th Street White Plains, New York 10606 New York, N.Y. 10011 Honorable Edward C. Wallace 2tpporah 5. Fleisher Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq. Member of the Council of the W;st Branch Conservation New York University Law School City of New York Association 423 Vancerbuilt Hall Councilmember-at-Large, Manhattan 40 Washington Square South City Hall 443 Buena Vista Road New York, N.Y. 10012 New City N.Y. 10956 New York. New York 10007
- 0ocketing and Service Section Charles J.'Malkish, Esq. Honorable Mary Pinkett Litigation Division Member of the Council of the Of fice of the Secretary The Port Authority of City of New York U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission New York and New Jersey Washington, D. C. 20555 District #28 One World Trade Center City Hall New York. N.Y. 10048 . New York, New York 10007 Mayor George V. Begany Village of Buchanan 236 Tate Avenue Honorable Mary T. Codd Buchar.an, N.Y. 10511 David H. Pikus, Esq. Member of the Council of the City of New York Richard F. C2aja. Esq. Coune.11mecter-at-Large, Staten Island Judith kessler, Coordinator 330 nadison Avenue -
City Hall Rockland Citizens for Safe Energy *:ra Y M . NY
- 0M 7 300 New Hempstead Road New York, hew York 10007 N W City, N.Y. 10956 ' .