ML20054G262

Proposed Changes to Tech Specs Increasing Min Shift Crew Composition Requirements

ML20054G262
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	06/11/1982
From:	GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20054G260	List: ML20054G259 ML20054G262
References
RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.A.1.3, TASK-TM TAC-49071, TAC-49072, NUDOCS 8206210336
Download: ML20054G262 (4)

Text

TABLE 6.2.2-1 MINIML'M SHIFT CPIW COMPOSITION 8 Condition of Unit 1 - Unit 2 in Reactor Power Operation.

(' '

-

• Hot Standby or Hot Shutdown Condition APPLICABLE LICENSE OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS CATEGORY 1, 2, 3 4&5 z 2a SOL **

3 3 l OL**

3 3 Non-Licensed 1 i dn11t Tecnnical Acvisor Condition of Unit 1 - Unit 2 in Cold Shutdown Condition or Ref uel Mode 4

ASPLIC.'.BLE LICEh5E OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS CATEGORY 1, 2, 3 4&5 2 la 50L**

OL** q Z l 3 3 Non-Licensed 1 None Shift Technical Advisor Condition of Unit 1 - No Fuel in Unit 2 APPLICABLE LICENSE OPE?E IONAL CONDITIONS CATEGORY 1, 2, 3 4&5 2 1*

SOL 3 2 uL 2 3 Non-Licensed None 1

Shift Technical Advisor

• Does not include the Licensed Senior Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor Operator Limited to Tuel HandlinS. supervising C0FI ALTERATICNS.

• • Assures each individual is licensed on both units.

(Shift crew composition, including an individual qualified in radiation protection procedures, may be less than the minimum requirements fer a period of tice not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accommodate unexpected absence of on duty shift crew members previdec immediate action is taken to restore the shift crew composjtion to within the

( cinicu= require ents of Table 6.2.2-1.

PLANT HATCH L* NIT 1 6-4 82062i0336 820611 PDR ADOCK 05000321 P pop

s ATTACFf4ENT 2 NRC DOO<ET 50-366 OPERATING LICENSE NPF-5 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 2 REQUEST FOR CHANGE TO TECFNICAL SPECIFICATI0tS The proposed change to Technical Specifications (Appendix A to Operating License NPF-5) would be incorporated as follows:

Remove Page Insert Page 6-4 6-4 l

l

. TABLE 6.2.2-1 MINIML'M SHIFT CPR COMPOSITIONA

(

Condition of Unit 1 - Unit 2 in Reactor Power Operation, Hot Standby or Hot Shutdown Condition APPLICABLE LICENSE OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS CATEGORY 1, 2, 3 4&5 2 2a SOL ** l 3 3 OL** 3 3

Non-Licensed i 1 bh11t Techn1 Cal Advisor Condition of L5it 1 - Unit 2 in Cold Shutdown Condition or Refuel Mode APPLIC.*.BLE LICENSE OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS CATEGORY ,

4&5 1, 2, 2

3 _i, 1*

SQL** ~

OL**

g 2 l 3 3 Non-Licensed None 1

Shift Technical Advisor Condition of Unit 1 - No Fuel in Unit 2 APPLICABLE LICENSE OPEPJ.C ONAL CONDITIONS CATEGORY 1, 2, 3 4&5 2 1*

SOL 3 2 UL 2 3 Ncn-Licensed None 1

Shift Technical Advisor

~

• Does not include the Licensed Senior Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor CORE ALTERATIONS.

Operator Lirited to Fuel Handling, supervising

• • Assures each individual is licensed on both units.

(Shift crew ce=positien, including an individual qualified in radiation protection procedures, may be less than the minic'um requirements for a period of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accor:modate unexpected absence of on duty shift crew me=bers previded innediate action is taken to restore the shift crew conposition to within the

( minicu= requirements of Table 6.2.2-1.

PIANT HATCH L' NIT 2 6-4

ATTACtf4ENT 3 NRC DOCKET 50-321, 50-366 CPERATING LICENSE DPR-57, tPF-5 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1, 2 REQUEST FOR CHANGE TO TECtf4ICAL SFECIFICATIONS Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.22, Georgia Power Company has evaluated the attached proposed amenctnent to Operating Licenses DPR-57 and PPF-5 and has determined that:

a. The proposed amentent does not require evaluation of a new Safety Analysis Report and rewrite of the facility license;

b. The proposed amen &ent does not require evaluation of several complex issues, involve ACRS review, or require an environmental impact statement;

c. The proposed amen &ent does not involve a complex issue or more than one environmental or safety issue;

d. The proposed amen &ent does not involve a single safety or environmental issue.

e. The proposed amen &ent does involve an administrative issue, namely, raising of minimum control room manning requirements.

f. The proposed amenctnent is therefore a Class II amentent for one unit and a Class I amendment for the other unit.

- - - --