|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20069L2091983-04-22022 April 1983 Supplemental Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069L1991983-04-22022 April 1983 Interrogatories & Document Request.Related Correspondence ML20071D2941983-03-0303 March 1983 Supplemental Response to 820621 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2,transmitting Form for Recording Continuous Type Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3931983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry on Licensee Controlled Land to Observe 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Control Rooms & near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20065C2111983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry Upon Land Controlled by Licensees & to Allow Observance of 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Both Units 2 & 3 Control Rooms & from near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20028C8671983-01-0707 January 1983 Response to Licensee 821203 Ltr Requesting Supplemental Responses to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C4481982-12-30030 December 1982 Suppl to Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20070L5471982-12-24024 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Under Commission Question 1 ML20070L5491982-12-22022 December 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Under Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20070F7581982-12-17017 December 1982 Supplementation of Interrogatory Response,Naming Question 1 Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069Q5231982-12-0707 December 1982 Supplemental Response to Interrogatories on Commission Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069P7641982-12-0606 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20067B1761982-12-0303 December 1982 Response to 820716 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20067B2391982-12-0202 December 1982 Response to Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Related Correspondence ML20028B2981982-11-24024 November 1982 Replies to 820718 Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20028B4011982-11-22022 November 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066J2611982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to Interrogatories & Document Requests on Commission Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066J0411982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A0491982-11-0303 November 1982 Response to 820526 Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Question 6.Interrogatories Received on 821015 ML20058D5921982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058G5211982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to Final Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5681982-07-21021 July 1982 Response to 8206221 Interrogatories,Objecting to Interrogatories 1-11 as Irrelevant,Beyond Scope of Permissible Discovery & Beyond Scope of Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5791982-07-20020 July 1982 Response to Second Round of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055B8621982-07-19019 July 1982 Interrogatory on Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C8621982-07-19019 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on Board Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20055A9981982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055A9961982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20055A9901982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Question 1 ML20063E4491982-07-0707 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories on Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5771982-07-0202 July 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories on Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L7991982-07-0101 July 1982 Addl Response to Interrogatories Under Commission Questions 3 & 4 Per ASLB 820625 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5201982-07-0101 July 1982 Supplemental Response to Licensee 820503 Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054M1791982-06-30030 June 1982 Reply to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5501982-06-30030 June 1982 Supplementary Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J9301982-06-25025 June 1982 Final Response to Util Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J5871982-06-25025 June 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H8901982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20054H8941982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1221982-06-22022 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Requests for Admissions.Details Surrounding TMI-2 Accident Would Require Burdensome & Oppressive Research.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1471982-06-21021 June 1982 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2.Related Correspondence ML20054H5661982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5411982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5301982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H2601982-06-17017 June 1982 Reply to NRC 820526 Interrogatories ML20054F9801982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re ASLB Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H6081982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 6 ML20054H2631982-06-16016 June 1982 Reply to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories,Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H5811982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to West Branch Conservation Assoc Supplementary Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20054H5881982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Supplementary Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054F6251982-06-14014 June 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-04-22
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
--
REIATED COmpogy r
. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -:ggiE?
^
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '5?:7 l
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD g7 Eg -3 P2 s o -
Before Administrative Judges:
Louis 3. Carter, Chairman -
1.
@L _
g~q Frederick 3. Shon ... l'_r l Dr. Oscar H. Paris l
i' In the Matter of ) ,
) l CONSOLIDATED 2DISON COMPANY OF ) l NEW YORK, INC. (Indian Point, )
. Unit No. 2) s } Docket Nos. 50-247-SP
) 50-286-SP POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ) .
I 19, April 29, 1982 ,
NEW YORK, (Indian Point, )
Unit No.-3)
) N -
N' -
) o. mqY
, scc' + }
[? , n, G " J ;( --
INTERROGATORY TO THE LICENSEES FROM c- *
'e WEST BRANCH CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION - s. ,
[ -
m?y Attached are interrogatories covering Questionso ltN(6; 7 3 and 4 of the Commission's Order, addressed to the two licensees. Kindly reply either singly or as one but we are unable to divide the questions. !
"Rockland Co.unty RERP' in the text stands for l
Radiological Emergency Response Plan. " General emer-gency'is as described in Appendix 1 of NUREG-0654, !
t
~ ~~
Rev. 1, pages 1-16 through 1-19.
l submitted for We t gn servation Association by Q. S. Fleisher, Secretary 3 443 Buena Vista Road ~
$)ScD f New City, N.Y. 10956 :
914/634-2327 7 8205060316 820429 ;
PDR ADOCK 05000247 :
G PDR *
- I
50-247-SP, 50-286-SP WBCA INTERROGATORY
} WBCA-3.2-1 What provisions have been made in the Rockland County RERP to make it safe for operating per-sonnel to remain in the generating station at Lovett? and at Bowline? during a " general emer-gency"? Please answer for a 2 mile evacuation, a 5 mile evacuation and a 10 mile evacuation.
WBCA-3.2-2 Up to what level of radiation exposure will the employees be allowed in order to maintain opera-tion? Who will make the decisioniin the RERP?
Have you the informed consent of the employees who are expected to remain at Indian Point?
If so, please supply a consent form sample or the text of any letters of agreement.
What percent of the employees needed on the site during an emergency have signed agreements? Are there enough such employees on all shifts to con-tinue operation of the plants at Indian Point?
WBCA-3.2-3 What onsite provisions are there to decontaminate i emergency personnel at Lovett and Bowline?
Have they dosimeters or film badges?
L WBCA-3.2-4 '
l l Have the above described emergency personnel re-l ceived Radiological Emergency Response training?
If so, to what level of training? On what date or dates? For O&R'statio,ns? For Indian Point?
l
WBCA-3.2-5 o
Please reply to 3.2-2 above as applied to emergency personnel expected to remain in Indian Point #2 and #3 !
generating stations during a " general emergency."
WBCA-3.2-6 Ref er to NUREG-0654,Rev.1, page 35 Evaluation Criteria
- 2. Are employees of the licensees informed and have they given consent to the extent that a full comple-ment of shift workers is available at all times?
If not, how will such volunteers who have consented reach the plant to assist in an emergency? Within what time frame can a full complement be assembled?
Can each licensee meet the requirements of Table B-1 on pages 37 and 38 of NUREG-0654,Rev.l?
If not, in what numbers are each short?
WBCA-3.3-1 Please provide methodology used to arrive at Tables A-4, A-5, A-6 and A-7 on pages A-67, A-68, A-69 and A-70 in Rockland County'RERP. Copies of working pa?ers to show what populations are assumed and for what situ-ations. List " operational strategies" referred to in footnote (1) below each of the tables.
WBCA-3.3-2 Kindly provide total population estimated to be in Rockland County within the 10 mile EPZ.
l In Rockland County RERP Appendix G please designate l which sectors' zones were used to define the boun-dary of Rockland County.
l i
i l'.-_.-__ - - . . -.-.
o UBCA-3.9-1 What studies were made of road evacuation routes and characteristics as shown in EUREG-0654,Rev.1, pages 4-15 and 16, Tables 1 and 2 for Rockland?
What studies were made for the above under different weather conditions such as 1, rain; 2, snow; 3, ice and 4, f og'on Rockland's evacuation routes ?
Show if studies did or not include width of roads, shoulder conditions, room for disabled vehicles to pull over, crest down center of road.
Which roads were actually traveled?
Why are the road names in the brochure not correct where road names change? Were all directions in the brochure checked for correct names? For correct turns?
Please explain why there are errors on the brochure map for southern Rockland within the EPZ.
How was the capacity determined for each road?
Were any field counting stndies made during commu-ting hours? 7-8:30 AM? 5-7 PM? If so,.please list where, under what conditions and on what dates.
How was capacity integrated with population and road characteristics :within the EPZ?
WBCA-4.3-1 Please list the most difficult to solve patterns and the roads involved. Those that were the least amen-able to their burden, from 1, the worst, through 10 and relate if they vary in difficulty on a 1-10 scale.
i l
- I At what locations is there potential for serious congestion? Is it due to road configuration? Due to the amount of vehicles using the road? Or both? -
Please explain.
WBCA-4.4-1 Please supply a copy of each emergency assistance l
card sent to the "Four County Nuclear Safety Com-
. mittee from the brochures by residents of Rockland County.
WBCA-4.4-2 Did you determine how many uheelchair users there 10 mile are in Rockland'saEPZ? If so, what number did you determine and how did you arrive at it?
WBCA-4.4-3 The Rocklar.d County RERP page Trl 24 lists Helen Hayes Hospital. The new building is now open, the lower line of occupants applies. Only 14 are ambu-latory. The vehicles shown are insufficient to move f the patients. Please provide a corrected figure f and explain from where the transportation might be j i expected. '
l WBCA-4.4-4 i The Rockland County REPP page Tr1 20 lists Camp :
Jowonio. It has 350 students at a session. 70 are f 1
in wheelchairs, 35 in crutches or braces, 245 are ambulatory but slow. Its bus capacity totals 18 l
wheelchairs. .How will the wheelchairs be moved c in the event of a general emergency?
x
( .
WBCA-4.4-5 What transportation plans are there for citizens who are permanently disabled and who live at home?
WBCA-4.4-6 What is the length of time used to determine the ability to move a uheelchair patient into a van?
WBCA-4.4-7 Much of the PLm expects to provide several trips to and from one location to evacuate the disabled, or even the school population. How will buses be i
able to return to the assigned pick-up place on l roads clogged with evacuees?
How have you determined the use of police and sheriffs to cover all these tasks? What numbers?
WBCA-4.4-8
, Before the National Guard can be of assistance it I
will have to be mobilized and moved. These guards-men may be otherwise occupied. In a " general emer-gency" how could they be mobilized in sufficient time to assist the police and sheriffs? What calcu-lations were made to determine when they could be on the scene and in what numbers? Please supply data.
WBCA-4.4-9 Please provide text of questionnaire used by door-I to-door survey teams in Rockland County preparatory
- any opinion study. How many homes or apartments j were visited where interviews were completed?
4 Please provide totals or tallies of results of replies to the questions asked.
WBCA - 4.4-10 How many buses did Red and Tan Lines offer for an evacuation of the ten mile EPZ in Rockland?
How many school buses would be needed for a worst case emergency of a plume passing through Rockland County 10 mile EPZ?
What is the total number of buses that would be needed from outside the 10 mile EPZ in a worst case emergency?
How many drivers of school buses do you count on being available if a general emergency is declared during a week-day during working hours, 8 AM - 6 PM7 Absent letters of ag?eement with drivers how do you expect to rely on their willingness to cooperate?
What survey did you make of drivers' attitudes?
If any, please supply dates, numbers of drivers interviewed and responses.
WBCA-4.4-11 How many accidents or illnesses have you figured would occur on the roads during a " general emer-1 gency" that would require ambulance service.
)
Per hour? Per sector? Would ambulances be avail-able if the mode was to be moving the sick and l 1
those " dependent on others for their mobility"?
l
- 7-m? "
~
~
. WBCA-4.7-1 ,
4 Why wasn't the brochure printed in Spanish to be provided to the more than 6,000 Spanish speaking residents within the Rockland County 10 mile EPZ?
How much would it cost for 2,000 copies? What is the total printing bill for the present brochure for four counties?
What mailing list was used for the brochure's dis-tribution? Have you any estimate of how many resi-dents within the 10 mile EPZ were missed?
WBCA-4.7-2 Describe the structure of the "Four County Nuclear Safety Committee". How often has it met in 1980, 1981 and 1982? Who are its officers? How were they elected? How many people from each of the four counties are on.the Committee? Is there a' Board of Directors? If so, how many are on it and how are they elected? Who may speak for it? By what grant of authority? Is it incorporated? If so, where?
Respectfully submitted, b
Zipporah S. Fleisher copies to parties list Secretary
~ .
=
UNITED STA-"ES OF AMERICA g . .
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COME1ISSION C C: n.- r .
i ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD "'
1 Administrative 3udges:
- gp W -3 pg q9 Louis 3. Carter, Chairman Dr. Oscar H. Paris E - A yr Frederick 3. Shon "N.: . dy ,j;
. .. n In the Matter of CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK Docket Nos. 50-247-SP (Indian Point, Unit 2) 50-236-SP POWER' AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (Indian Point, Unit 3) ___ .
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have placed in the U. S. mails, l first class, a copy to all parties listed below, of the Interrogatory to the Licensees and of WBCA Reply to PASNY's Notice of Appeal to Granting Intervention...of April 19,1982 on this 30th of April, 1982.
Docketing and Service Branch Brent L. Brandenburg, Esq.
Office of the Secretary . Assistant General Counsel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Consolidated Edison Company of New York,Inc.
Washington, DC 20555 vmg Pla Y 10003 Janice E. Moore, Esq.
Henry 3. McGurren, Esq. Paul F. Colarulli, Esq.
NRC Staff Counsel 3 seph J. Levin, Jr., Esq.
Office of the Executive Legal Director Pamela 5. horowitz, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Charles Morgan, Jr., Esq.
Washington, DC 20555 M rgan Associates., Chartered 1899 L Street, N.W.
Louis 3. Carter, Esq., Chairman Washington, DC 20036 Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Charles M. Pratt, Esq.
7300 City Line Avenue mas R. Frey, Esq.
Philadelphia, Pa. 19151
' **# ^" # *Y ** **** I **
10 Columbus Circle Dr. Oscar M Paris New York, NY 10019 Administrative Judge .
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Ellyn R. Weis, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission William S. Jordan, III, Esq. -
Washington, DC 20555 Harmon & Weiss 1725 I Street, N.W., Suite 506 Mr. Frederick 3. Shon Washington, DC 20006 Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Joan Holt, Proj.ect Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Indian Point Project Washington, DC 20555 New York Fublic Interest Research Group .
5 Beekman Street >
New York, NY 10038 t .
. Greater New York Council on Encrgy -
- '**' c/o Dcan R. Corren, Direc ce John Gilroy, Westchest:;r Coordinator Ncw York University g Indian Point Project 26 Stuyvesant Street l New York Public Interest Research Group New York, NY 10003
( 240 Central Avenue White Plains, NY 10606 Atomic Safety and Licensing Boarc Panel l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq. Washington, DC 20535 New York University Law School " " ASL Appeal Board Panel 423 Vanderbilt Hall Pat Posner, Spokesperson 40 Washington Square South Parents Concerned About Indian Point New York, NY 10012 P. O. Box 125 Charles 3. Malkish, Esq.
Litigation Division Charles A. Scheiner, Co-Chairperson Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Westchester People's Action Coalition, Inc.
One World Trade Center p,o,gax 433 New York, NY 10043 White Plains, NY 10602 Alfed B. DelBello Alan Latman, Esq.
Westchester County Executive 44 Sunset Drive Westchester County Croton-on-Hucson, NY 10520 148 Martine Avenue White Plains, NY 10601 Lorna Salzman Mid-Atlantic Representative Ezra I. Bjalik, Esq.
, Friends of the Earth, Inc.
Steve Leipsiz, Esq. . 208 West 13th Street Environmental Protection Bureau New York, NY 10011
~
New York State Attorney General Two World Trade Center New York, NY 10047 Judith Kessler Rockland Citizens for Safe Energy Renee Schwartz, Esq. P. O. Box 74 Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg New City, NY 10956 Attorneys for Metropolitan Transportation Auth. Mayor Gg V. Be'v 200 Park Avenue Village of Buchanan New York, NY 101066 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511 Stanley B. Klimberg General Counsel Fion. Richard Brod' sky New York State Energy Office County Legislature Agency Building #2 County Office Building Empire State Plaza White Plains, N.Y. 10601 Albany, NY 12223 .
andrew S. Roffe, Esq.
Honorable Ruth Messinger N. Y. State Assembly A any, N.Y. 12248 f Member of the Council of the-City of New York .
8 ty H !
Ms. Amanda Potterfield, Esq.
New York, NY 10007 _.
hi ia St tion Marc L. Parris, Esq. , Eric Thorsen,Esq, New York, New York 10014 County Attornev County of Rockiand David H. Pikus ,Esq. , Richard Czaja, Esg 11 New Hemps.ead Road 330 Madison Avenue New City, NY 10956 New York, N.Y. 10017 Geoffrey Cobb Ryan by Zipporah S. Fleisher i
Conservation Committee Chairman, Director Secretary New '(ork City Auducon Society 71 West 23rd Street, Suite 1323 New York, NY 10010