|
---|
Category:INTERROGATORIES; RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES
MONTHYEARML20069L1991983-04-22022 April 1983 Interrogatories & Document Request.Related Correspondence ML20069L2091983-04-22022 April 1983 Supplemental Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071D2941983-03-0303 March 1983 Supplemental Response to 820621 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2,transmitting Form for Recording Continuous Type Releases.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3931983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry on Licensee Controlled Land to Observe 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Control Rooms & near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20065C2111983-02-22022 February 1983 Motion to Permit Entry Upon Land Controlled by Licensees & to Allow Observance of 830309 Emergency Planning Exercise from Both Units 2 & 3 Control Rooms & from near-site Emergency Operations Facility ML20028C8671983-01-0707 January 1983 Response to Licensee 821203 Ltr Requesting Supplemental Responses to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20064C4481982-12-30030 December 1982 Suppl to Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20070L5471982-12-24024 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Under Commission Question 1 ML20070L5491982-12-22022 December 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Under Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20070F7581982-12-17017 December 1982 Supplementation of Interrogatory Response,Naming Question 1 Witnesses.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069Q5231982-12-0707 December 1982 Supplemental Response to Interrogatories on Commission Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069P7641982-12-0606 December 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20067B1761982-12-0303 December 1982 Response to 820716 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20067B2391982-12-0202 December 1982 Response to Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Related Correspondence ML20028B2981982-11-24024 November 1982 Replies to 820718 Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML20028B4011982-11-22022 November 1982 Supplemental Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20066J2611982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to Interrogatories & Document Requests on Commission Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20066J0411982-11-19019 November 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on ASLB Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028A0491982-11-0303 November 1982 Response to 820526 Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Question 6.Interrogatories Received on 821015 ML20058G5211982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to Final Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5921982-07-23023 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5681982-07-21021 July 1982 Response to 8206221 Interrogatories,Objecting to Interrogatories 1-11 as Irrelevant,Beyond Scope of Permissible Discovery & Beyond Scope of Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20058D5791982-07-20020 July 1982 Response to Second Round of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055B8621982-07-19019 July 1982 Interrogatory on Question 2,Contention 2.2.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C8621982-07-19019 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests on Board Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20055A9981982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20055A9901982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Question 1 ML20055A9961982-07-16016 July 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Documents Re Commission Questions 1 & 2 ML20063E4491982-07-0707 July 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories on Commission Question 6.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5771982-07-0202 July 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories on Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L7991982-07-0101 July 1982 Addl Response to Interrogatories Under Commission Questions 3 & 4 Per ASLB 820625 Order.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054L5201982-07-0101 July 1982 Supplemental Response to Licensee 820503 Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054M1791982-06-30030 June 1982 Reply to Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054L5501982-06-30030 June 1982 Supplementary Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J5871982-06-25025 June 1982 Responses to First Set of Interrogatories Re Questions 1 & 2.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054J9301982-06-25025 June 1982 Final Response to Util Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H8941982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H8901982-06-24024 June 1982 Second Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Questions 1,2 & 5 ML20054J1221982-06-22022 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Requests for Admissions.Details Surrounding TMI-2 Accident Would Require Burdensome & Oppressive Research.Affidavits & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054J1471982-06-21021 June 1982 Interrogatories on Contention 6.2.Related Correspondence ML20054H5411982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5301982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Requests for Documents. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H2601982-06-17017 June 1982 Reply to NRC 820526 Interrogatories ML20054H5661982-06-17017 June 1982 Responses to NRC Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054H2631982-06-16016 June 1982 Reply to Licensee First Set of Interrogatories,Question 6. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F9801982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories & Document Requests Re ASLB Contention 1.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H5811982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to West Branch Conservation Assoc Supplementary Interrogatories.Related Correspondence ML20054H5881982-06-16016 June 1982 Response to Ucs/Ny Pirg Supplementary Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20054H6081982-06-16016 June 1982 First Set of Interrogatories Re Commission Question 6 ML20054F6251982-06-14014 June 1982 Answers & Objections to Interrogatories & Document Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-04-22
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARJPN-99-029, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirement for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20212E4181999-09-15015 September 1999 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting OL for Unit 2 Be Modified or Suspended to Prevent Restart Until Reasonable Assurance That Licensee in Substantial Compliance with Terms of OL & Has Proper Consideration for Public Health & Safety JPN-99-022, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds1999-06-22022 June 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Requirements for Industry Codes & Stds ML20202J6321999-01-20020 January 1999 Transcript of 990120 Meeting in Peekskill,Ny Re Decommissioning.Pp 1-132.With Related Documentation ML20198E9721998-12-21021 December 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities. Orders That Wh Clark Prohibited for 1 Yr from Engaging in NRC-Licensed Activities JPN-98-052, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects1998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50,52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments.Util Endorses & Supports Position Presented by NEI & Commends Commission for Initiative to Address Disconnects ML20198L2731998-12-21021 December 1998 Comment Supporting NEI Re Proposed Rules 10CFR50, 52 & 72 Re Changes,Tests & Experiments JPN-98-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint at Nuclear Power Plants.Encourages NRC Staff to Withdraw Proposed Change & to Work with Nuclear Power Industry & Other Stakeholders to Accomplish Goal ML20155F4561998-08-26026 August 1998 Demand for Info Re False Info Allegedly Provided by Wh Clark to Two NRC Licensees.Nrc Considering Whether Individual Should Be Prohibited from Working in NRC-licensed Activities for Period of 5 Yrs ML20238F5271998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 IA-98-261, Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-461998-05-20020 May 1998 Partially Deleted Transcript of 980520 Enforcement Conference in King of Prussia,Pa Re J Stipek.Pp 1-46 ML20238F5241998-05-0606 May 1998 Transcript of 980506 Enforcement Conference Held in King of Prussia,Pa Re Con Edison,Indian Point.Pp 1-75 JPN-97-037, Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated1997-12-0101 December 1997 Comment on Final Direct Rule Changes to Paragraph (H) of 10CFR50.55a Codes & Standards. Effective Date of New Rule Should Be Delayed Until Listed Concerns Can Be Resolved & Appropriate Changes Incorporated ML20148M6471997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Porposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20133N0511997-01-0505 January 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Draft Policy Statement on Resturcturing & Economic Deregulation of Electric Util Industry ML20149M4621996-12-0909 December 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Draft Policy Statement on Restructuring & Economic Deregulation of Electric Utility Industry ML20077G3481994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Nuclear Power License Renewal ML20070P0561994-04-19019 April 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NRC Draft Policy Statement on Use of Decommissioning Trust Funds Before Decommissioning Plan Approval ML20029C5771994-03-11011 March 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Draft Rule on Decommissioning.Informs That 15 Mrem/Yr Unreasonably Low Fraction of Icrp,Ncrp & Regulatory Public Dose Limit of 100 Mrem/Yr ML20059C3031993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Definition of Commercial Grade Item ML20045H8751993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Supports Rule ML20045F2451993-06-28028 June 1993 Comment on Proposal Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning NRC-licensed Facilities.Opposes Proposed Criteria ML20044F5681993-05-20020 May 1993 Comment on Draft Commercial Grade Dedication Insp Procedure 38703,entitled Commercial Grade Procurement Insp. Endorses NUMARC Comments Dtd 930517 JPN-02-034, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl1992-07-0606 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl JPN-91-021, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants1991-05-13013 May 1991 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR71,170 & 171, Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery. Endorses NUMARC Comments. Approx 300% Increase in NRC Fees for FY91 Will Have Major Impact Upon Operating & Maint Budgets of Plants JPN-91-005, Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended1991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Re SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept. Util Concurs W/Numarc Comments.Analysis of Info from NUREG-1395 Insufficient to Complete Evaluation.Root Cause Analysis of Seven Themes Listed in SECY-90-347 Recommended ML20066G4411991-01-23023 January 1991 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Substantive Typo in 901015 Filing on Behalf of Licensee Noted ML20058G6341990-10-30030 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program JPN-90-068, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS1990-10-22022 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS ML20065H7541990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 on Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Commission Assessment of Four Alternatives Should Be Expanded to Include Not Only Safety Considerations But Other Atomic Energy Act Objectives JPN-90-067, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC1990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal.Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC JPN-90-052, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR1990-07-0909 July 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR JPN-90-050, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary1990-07-0202 July 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Operators Licenses Mod for fitness-for-duty.Proposed Rule Will Place More Stringent Restrictions on Licensed Operators & Unnecessary ML20012C6491990-03-0909 March 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events. Any Utilization of NRC Proposed Application of Reg Guide 1.99, Rev 2,would Be Inappropriate W/O re-evaluation by NRC ML20005F6521989-12-13013 December 1989 Comment on Proposed Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Concurs w/industry-wide Position Presented by NUMARC & Offers Addl Comments ML20246P6061989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Significant & Independent Industry Efforts Already Underway to Address Issue ML20245K1941989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V9011989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Supports NUMARC Position.Proposed Rule Will Hinder Important Initiatives to Improve Maint JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20205L8521988-10-21021 October 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Cleaning or Disposing of Nuclear Waste.Incineration of Radwaste Oil Should Not Be Allowed JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site1988-04-18018 April 1988 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed1988-01-25025 January 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex1987-12-31031 December 1987 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection1987-10-15015 October 1987 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl1987-09-28028 September 1987 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl ML20235Y9911987-07-20020 July 1987 Notice of Issuance of Director'S Decision Under 10CFR2.206 Re Emergency Planning for School Children in Vicinity of Indian Point.* Request to Suspend OLs Denied ML20151C5061987-02-18018 February 1987 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants Where State &/Or Local Govts Decline to Cooperate in Offsite Emergency Planning ML20093H6421984-10-15015 October 1984 Comments on Staff Presentation at Commission 841002 Meeting. Commission Should Conclude Proceedings Due to Inescapable Conclusion That Facility Safe to Operate & Poses No Undue Risk to Public.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098D2721984-09-26026 September 1984 Comments on Commission 840905 Meeting Re Facilities,Per Sj Chilk 840911 Memo.Licensee Agrees W/Staff That Further Mitigative Features or Plant Shutdown Unnecessary Due to Low Risk.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-09-20
[Table view] |
Text
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF ) Docket Nos. 50-247 SP NEW YORK, INC. (Indian Point, ) 50-286 SP Unit No. 2) )
)
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF ) July '16, 1982 NEW YORK (Indian Point, Unit No. 3))
NRC STAFF FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS FROM WBCA CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S QUESTIONS 2 AND 5 INTRODUCTION The NRC Staff hereby requests that West Branch Conservation Association (WBCA) pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 95 2.740b and 2.741, answer separately and fully, in writing under oath or affirmation, the following interrogatories and produce or make available for inspection and copying all documentary material identified in responses to the interrogatories below.
INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS
- 1. Information sought in these Interrogatories shall include infomation within the knowledge, possession, control or access of any agents, employees and independent contractors of WBCA.
- 2. Answer each Interrogatory separately (by part) in writing under oath or affirmation of the individuals who contributed thereto.
~
Do$k'o*$0fy 5
PDR
_2 Documents produced shall indicate in response to which specific request the documents are being produced, i.e., 1(a). For all references requested in these interrogatories, identify them by author, title, date of publication and publisher if the reference is published; and if it is not published, identify the document by the author, title, the date it was written, the qualification of the author relevant to this proceeding, and where a copy of the document may be obtained.
- 3. In your answer, repeat each Interrogatory set forth herein and then set forth an answer thereto separately and fully. As to any Interrogatory, section or subsection of said Interrogatory that you refuse to answer for any reason, separately state the grounds for any such refusal. Where a complete answer to a particular Interrogatory, section or subsection of said Interrogatory is not possible, such Interrogatory, section or subsection of said Interrogatory should be answered to the extent possible and a statement made indicating the reason for the partial answer.
- 4. Identify any documents used as the basis for the answer to the Interrogatory.
- 5. If any Interrogatory or part thereof is objected to, state separately (by part) the objection and basis therefor.
- 6. If privilege is claimed as to any document, identify what is being withheld, the date of the document, the sender (s), the receipient(s) of all copies, the privilege claimed, the basis for the assertion of privilege, and the present location of the document.
- 7. If any document requested is unavailable, explain the circumstances of such unavailability.
1
- 8. In accordance with 10 C.F.R. 5 2.740(e) these Interrogatories and requests for documents require prompt supplemental answers should WBCA obtain or identify supplemental infomation or documents which call into question the correctness of earlier answers. l
- 9. In the event any word, term, or phrase is unclear to WBCA it is requested that oral clarification be requested of the undersigned Staff counsel. Any word, term, or phrase is to have its generally accepted meaning.
- 10. " Documents" mean all writings and records of every type in the possession, control or custody of WBCA its directors, officers, attorneys, employees or agents, including, but not limited to, memoranda, correspondence, reports, surveys, evaluations, charts, books, minutes, notes, agenda, diaries, logs, transcripts, microfilm, accounting statements, telephone and telegraphic comunications, speeches, and all other records, written, electrical, mechanical or otherwise.
" Documents" shall also mean copies of documents, even though the l originals thereof are not in the possession, custody or control of WBCA.
INTERR0GATORIES j Interrogatory 1 Identify all documentary or other material that you intend to use during this proceeding to support Contentions 2.2 and 5.1 and that you may offer as exhibits on this contention or refer to during your cross-examination of witnesses presented by Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Power Authority of the State of New York, or the NRC l Staff.
l
. a- a iM.:.w:--
Interrogatory 2 a) Upon what person or persons do you rely to substantiate in ,
D whole or in part your case on Contentions 2.2 and 5.1? -
b) Provide the address and education and professional 3 qualifications of any persons named in your response to 22 above.
c) Identify which of the above persons or any other persons you may call as witnesses on the contentions referenced in 2a above.
Interrogatory 3 (Refer to Contention 2.2)
Please provide the basis for your contention that brackish Hudson River cooling water in the cooling system has caused serious corrosion problems and that the cooling system should be changed to combat those problems. Identify all documents referenced or relied upon in response to this interrogatory.
Interrogatory 4 (Refer to Contention 2.2)
Please define the term " steam system" as used in your statement in WBCA 2 (filing of January 11,1982).
Interrogatory 5 (Refer to Contention 2.2)
Please provide the basis for your conclusions in WBCA 2 (filing of January 11,1982) that " cement lined pipes are bound to corrode again at the welding joints because of the unique use of brackish water."
Interrogatory 6 (Refer to Contention 2.2)
Identify the dates and report numbers, if any, which discuss the history of fines by the NRC and New York State Public Service Consnission on the Licensees of the Indian Point plants.
Interrogatory 7 (Refer to Contention 2.2)
Please provide the basis for your contention that a resolution of the radiation embrittlement problem in the Units' reactor pressure vessels must be found and implemented.
l
Interrogatory 8 (Refer to Contention 2.2)
Please provide the basis for your conclusions in WBCA 2 (filing of January 11,1982) that "the embrittlement of the vessels of both IP stations has proven to be beyond design specs" and that "the parts cannot last for the design life of the plant."
Interrogatory 9 (Refer to Contention 2.2)
Please provide the basis for your contention that a resolution of the steam generator tube deterioration problem is necessary as a condi-tion of operation for both Indian Point units.
Interrogatory 10 (Refer to Contention 2.2.)
Please provide the basis for your contention that a complete review of quality assurance and quality control in construction and operation is necessary as a condition of operation for both Indian Point units.
a) Please give a brief description of each incident relied upon in formulating this contention.
b) Identify all reports relating to these incidents if any by date and report number.
Interrogatory 11 (Refer to Contention 5.1)
Please provide the basis for your statement in WBCA letter of December 2,1981 which states "the risks surrounding Indian Point are greater than that af many other operating stations due to the design and condition of the stations." Identify all documents referenced or relied upon in response to this interrogatory.
DOCUMENT REQUESTS
- 1. Provide for inspection and copying by the NRC Staff all documents identified in WBCA's answer to Interrogatories I through 11 above.
- 2. Provide for inspection and copying by the NRC Staff all documents within the possession or control of WBCA which relate to the use of brackish Hudson River water in the cooling system at the Indian Point Plants.
- 3. Provide for inspection and copying by the NRC Staff all documents within the possession or control of WBCA which relate to the history of fines by the NRC and New York State Public Service Comission on the Licensees of the Indian Point plants.
3
- 4. Provide for inspection and copying by the NRC Staff all documents within the possession or control of WBCA which relate to the reactor embrittlement problem.
- 5. Provide for inspection and copying by the NRC Staff all documents within the possession or control of WBCA which relate to the steam generator tube deterioration problem.
- 6. Provide for inspection and copying by the NRC Staff all documents within the possession or control of WBCA which relate to quality assurance and quality control in construction and operation.
- 7. Provide for inspection and copying by the NRC Staff all documents within the possession or control of WBCA which relate to the risk of Indian Point Units 2 and 3 are greater than other operating stations due to the design and condition of Indian Point Units 2 and 3.
. Respectfully submitted, O N\_ll E. [W Janice E. Morre Counsel for NRC Staff Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 16th day of July, 1982.
1 l
I l
l l' UNITED STATES OF AMERICA m NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD , .
)
In the Matter of )
) Docket Nos. 50-247-SP a CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY 50-286-SP 0F NEW YORK (Indian Point, Unit 2 )
)
) July 16, 1982 POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE )OF NEWYORK(IndianPoint, Unit 3)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of NRC STAFF FIRST SET OF INTERR0GATORIES ES - T DOCUMENTS FROM PARENTS CONCERNING COMMISSION QUESTION 1,NRC AND REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTS FROM UCS/NYPIRG CONCERNING COMMISSI STAFF FIRST SET OF INTERR0GATORIES AND REQUEST FOR COMMISSION'S QUESTIONS 2 ANC 5, in the day above copti through deposit in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's internal mail system, this 1 of July, 1982.
\
Paul F. Colarulli, Esq.
Louis J. Carter, Esq., Chairman Joseph J. Levin, Jr. , Esq.
Administrative Judge Pamela S. Horowitz, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Charles Morgan, Jr. , Esq.
7300 City Line Avenue Morgan Associates, Chartered Philadelphia, PA 19151-2291. 1899 L Street, N.W.
Dr. Oscar H. Paris Charles M. Pratt, Esq.
Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Thomas R. Frey, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Power Authority of the State Washington, D.C. 20555 of New York 10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 Mr. Frederick J. Shon Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Ellyn R. Weiss, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission William S. Jordan, III, Esq.
Washington, D.C. 20555 Hannon & Weiss 1725 I Street, N.W., Suite 506 Washington, D.C. 20006 Brent L. Brandenburg, Esq. ,
Assistant General Counsel Consolidated Edison Co. of Jonathan D. Feinberg New York, Inc. New York State Public Service 4 rv n P Cortraission 0003 Three Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Mayor George V. Begany Village of Buchanan DESIGNATED ORIGIrg 236 Tate Avenue ~
- Buchanan, N.Y. 10511 Certitgeg gy m:\Q _.
l
John Gilroy, Westchester Coordinator Stanley B. Klimberg Indian Point Project General Counsel New York Public Interest New York State Energy Office Research Group 2 Rockefeller State Plaza 240 Central Avenue Albany, N.Y. 12223 White Plains, N.Y. 10606 Marc L. Parris, Esq.
Jeffrey M. Blum, Esq. Eric Thorsen, Esq.
New York University Law School County Attorney, County of Rockland
, 423 Vanderbilt Hall 11 New Hempstead Road '{
l 40 Washington Square South New City, N.Y. 10956 New York, N.Y. 10012 t ion o' nd a o nt Coordinator The Port Authority of New York City Audubon Society New York and New Jersey 71 West 23rd Street, Suite 1828 -
One World Trade Center New York, N.Y. 10010 New York, N.Y. 10048 Greater New York Council on Ezra I. Bialik, Esq. Energy Steve Leipsiz, Esq. c/o Dean R. Corren, Director Environmental Protection Bureau New York University New York State Attorney 26 Stuyvesant Street General's Office New York, N.Y. 10003 '
Two World Trade Center New York, N.Y. 10047 Honorable Richard L. Brodsky Member of the County Legislature Alfred B. Del Bello Wes Westchester County Executive gu t ce ding White Plains, N.Y.
10601 s e r ounty 148 Martine Avenue Pat Posner, Spokesperson White Plains, New Yo u.. 10601 Parents Concerned About Andrew S. Roffe, Esq. Indian Point New York State Assembly P.O. Box 125 Albany, N.Y. 12248 Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520 Ruthanne G. Miller, Esq. . , Charles A. Scheiner, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Co-Chairperson Panel . . Westchester People's Action U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Coalition, Inc.
Washington, D.C. 20555
- P.O. Box.488 White Plains, N.Y. 10602 Honorable Ruth Messinger Richard M. Hartzman, Esq.
Member of the Council of the Lorna Salzman City of New York Friends of the Earth, Inc.
District #4 208 West 13th Street City Hall New York, N.Y. 10011 1 New York, N.Y. 10007
{
Donald Davidoff Director Radiological Emergency Alan Latman, Esq. Preparedness Group 44 Sunset Drive Empire State Plaza Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. 10520 Tower Building, Rm. 1750 Albany, New York 12237 Zipporah 5. Fleisher -
West Branch Conservation Renee Schwartz, Esq. -
Association Paul Chessin, Esq.
443 Buena Vista Road Laurens R. Schwartz, Esq.
New City, N.Y.. 10956 Margaret Oppel, Esq.
Botein, Hays, Sklar & Hertzberg Judith Kessler, Coordinator 200 Park Avenue Pockland Citizens for Safe Energy New York, NY 10166 300 New Hempstead Road New City, N.Y. 10956 Amanda Potterfield, Esq.
Joan Holt, Project Director ~
David H. Pikus, Esq. New York Public Interest Research Richard F. Czaja, Esq. ,
Group, Inc. -
330 Madison Avenue 9 Murray Street New York, N.Y. 10017 New York, New York 10007 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comr '-don Washington, D.C. 20555
- David B. Duboff Vestchester Peoples' Action Coalition Ato Safety and Licensing Appeal 25 G e ain , NY 10601 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Craig Kaplan, Esq.
Washington, D.C. 20555
- National Emergency Civil Committee Docketing and Service Section 175 Fifth Avenue, Suite 712 , , -
Office of the Secretary New York, NY 10010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555 *
- I DlZ A /WX0 /V1D7thO Janice E. Moore Counsel for NRC Staff n