ML20023D217
| ML20023D217 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, LaSalle |
| Issue date: | 07/16/1982 |
| From: | Davis A NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20023A480 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-82-366 NUDOCS 8305190399 | |
| Download: ML20023D217 (9) | |
Text
W f
e V
Vtb L A(/ 37)
Mk.. s. (40
%.2c41.
r+ 5 L A L
c I-G&r y 4b.e w
&cJ.
a s
W C'
(A
)
1a lh W N AC psk i
~-
3 wa an r
wap&
9 p h rg
+.
4 1
e hh5 99 830311 PRENDER82-366 PDR 7
[r 131
(
7l/C/s7-L w S.nLG
@fsf ik LLM6 A-Tl 0~ld W)kd M
c -~ - ~b khd taLJ
~
m Cmh kw $
.z.
41 m f
J Md d2, M,
~Q c
lk.
Lil d d
& Ja J
r.
7 +Q 9x
~.
A A n a y o n,e m _=
%m,u
.~aa
. w %
hd h
%h.
1 i
Thal n w -f wd tha m
wh gy M 4 h.
w w
us y ~ s p
y~
s uv~. c@,.
ymM A
- e. gre, a
a.w -
--w
.,g, 4
-s m
,)c Jn
' ta A
C8o yAL.
p
- 2Af, cM a u j
97 c um a i.
x FJ A ;~
a 3.
7e b 77 vaid yw y, M r, f 3 nos A
{^-c skab A suaa
&W d
~ ed f;M.
Y) &
'79
&~-
g 5
s%A 4
% f71
,nd
% %n h
ele L.
pea m
w
~ _+m.
9 a.
WCo W h
j)
L Sn.-L ~ ym. % pd> s L --~LI~,e&-
cs fe 2-4 h g%
Evy Q.
8.
Se
~
At s
b AWS M-9 V-
&d Ac A 1
M n s'u - + e
+ >to-t9 w
m cjo - 7/t3/y0
& ;c rA/ro vA Aa
+7 A A
m si A&r tJL iu]>7}10. ;
- Q; M
+
m
,o ss RJ r
aa e l
lM 4o n.e fs6 5% + y
~G m
u
- a. n a -qa w
4yugq+a.
c cA-n.
yL ss9na,
<l% --y9 ~ + ;
/voZuQaA gh o R.
2 2..
l d a W i c> o p, f Q G Q M aLL g
~,
l 13 24 mMM Dh
& GC q
i ym b
C2Cn 4.
Wm L
19 2b.
h yA w ga. su jy, z voo aA
- c4$
g, ad At#i~
M
/*db d NC 4 d6J
-nu. - p&
. a
~
~
e. a c. Q.
lL.
.co. Ss e.
> a e, m/<a<n a
i r. u~
^
1'fl.
O rneb rr7 u.
9 r
du 4
g+. r+ m.
a er
~~
u aw.
9-u>
s to s u s s i, p n M m, - -4 w
4.
c-g,fo 44cd>f
=^^^n j
j u~t; q% - rA glA %
l L
W A f >M )W y A.
s mw c m~
a C
p&d i
we n
< /o 9, 424
&a
)
/ 9.
dad d E
4 SR
~
L
.sf&
A% A s F-.
W 0
m e
~
m
~w
e Air
(
e e
5 4
e*
.g Y
f 4 L e,-
$ $5
}.,
h..,
{.,.(
,, {,..,, L *, u
] ') ' ; ;
s.., j
?'~l
~ I,'~j
+
-- 1(.
- 4/
- </3 So o 3 c,3 n
Ii 1 ")
6\\
HI F. A - I'/
~
I A4 I
O P
g a.,n-a.
-w
,vw,
,-_e
,,------n, n
---~~
g
(
e e
- l Lw s&
s n keu h m TE A.
e 4 u. n /c 7
+
u.
~, a a a nn. A _ v
+ L.
s Gi/ c + - we &
G&: u'~4/ J%
cM,4 a e.z c>~&%.
_4 a
n ux.
%R w ~ m'b.
cg c u~eg%
m-u4 a n.cuA, c:
w j d J..A l YAM 2 % A 6J I M sL wg
> /.
SM t.
36 s
e M M w u & - LJ.,w-e
~-
a h.
k'
-LJw y m tL wi~' U sw
- c. ~ n-wr stD
+ ws 4
MA
- k y J D a.
st s '
l pA)
,m E.~ A s s h
~
A nsi A L ~
U j-w L.~.s w jm W'
aum l
cM
+
L 05.
[ s[g sMM l-4C M
M.
w eL.
d A
a z3
~.
i l
6 9
q 2
CJ
&4 wAa,
6, M
n,,
1%
~
v&
cM W%
~ % g a y _g rc_ m..
-g-a w.
- -,%, # % g f&n A u.
aA y -% w e-4 n,
+~y 9,
+
. zi n.
.a oc V.
13 y4 LQl kJ.
w a
i r % qm %- ~ a nur nyJu Q f 4in J yy.
- s. s9A J
A.
j-n f-G u<a s
. o eg a pa w g g.-
4.
&M L
J-9 pl.tv
.,~t A
%~
~u+
d-Q,Ap~
A p-~o m a
~Ja L 2 s4 ap z A a O
n a.
, a M
A + &~
& < 7 W
d>
&( afM eM
-sm M 't
(8 f,
Q~
M k3%6%
JJ J g.
ci' m q
sx >Hj L M.
cscs 64 4 M,
c/ 'W M sf.,
~
~.+ 9 v.
y -., v2, -c ~
Ha Q 4
N.
-d) c.
u
. m,..
0 M
y 7 y.
J cM
%2 y
a 7j 7
~ ~ +1 an
-u+
id twh.
M.
0 LM b A mL..
s~t% u at
~ m a a a mn M.s A
%, et c e A 4g%
rg M % %.
M.h A x, U 2- - (J wJA Mf&,
k -u 4%L ~4 y, 20 d %
g 12-19 oK M -4A z 4 G~WA,@
ggd 6E
- 6 g m%
oX s m s ->>
,,c a
,u. w
-9.n R
I 4
- (
pa. t I T2-Att. h.J o E-WM 3J s.
u mi-ms aJ d
ra m
gW Q
we a
sw oc m. e+
g a. m..
.u f
=. c, am.
cM-J w m..
to.
k nn tu3 na tr a e - n 4 g.
i l
l l
i l
l e
G
.,._.._,_,_.,,.,_m-.
742
._ -4: M b T I W eVIek d by _
dl/3 Q
gW & Lp er>M r
^=
l Date _
pg)p)py
&w
- >" ^O YW' -
DI S~RIBlTTION L
Probicm; Yes Date to HIS
~ No gRA'sOffice
~
Director, DPRP Docket File C. Paperiello J. Miller INSPECTION EVLUATION F. Maura K. Naidu SECTION I Inspector Inspector's Division 1.
Fact 11ty
&Sa$, $mb l Dates of Inspection _/ud,// - 8M / /9J'2 i
Report No.
Sc./-3 73./82-s~/ : So -37'//s z-/8 Type (X) Routine Reactive _ W Special_
X Inspt:ctors
@b h,4,Es f.,,.f
/
N M. / Oct o / l
(
2.
Scope of Inspection l
SscNl.4
'd$r WA:wurY ON CA g 'fbtuif lcn N }/y'
, (*'
f a
- $,.c&>
.}b lk'N W
/f -> J"E S'
.26. fad &pg d * /daa 4.
3.
Evaluation of Licensee Performance (Include such things as 1) najor concerns not represented by the items of noncompliance; 2) positive observations not reflected in the report, or 3) perspective on the significance of the findings.)
f (f)gh,'.. y,f G,b EY"l '""G"1 0'* '"
Gjp uyv.n jwx tbu Mub D**f t a
g c
_4 O 7"
../ 7
,, 2.
b U-
)[. pt i iGrfWM-e "t W # 7, Atta ment - RP 1206 l
Igg y}
r s
4.
Overall Inspector Assessment Since the last inspection of this type, I believe the licensee's regulatory performance in this area has:
Improved Regressed Stayed the Same Indeterminate X
Additional Inspector Comm y s rd/A Inspector (s) tidw gy /y/p,t C
(Signature 7 (Date)
$$hE Mj"
- ~m4Y
/! ?n d hp<s~s- :,
l'
/,3 g, x z. L L L + w U N ~ 9 4 k ffy & [fTo Y w hk "'f h%
, EE A 6 nad'pl w yyj f
5.
Supervisor's Comments Supervisor D
//
(Signatu )
(Date)
Attachment - RP 1206 8/16/82
. e,*
e*.
r,
o INSPECTION EVALUATION
'(
SECTION II 6.
With respect to Identified Concerns, you believe they are:
Yes No 9
Beingdealtwitheffectivehbylicensec a.
o b.
Being dealt with effectively by NRC
/
6 7.
If either enswer tog is "No," provide your recommendations and rationale.
S *.i h 3 -
Inspector (s) h 12fhE2
@ gnath 2s' V (Da t'e)'
I.
8.
Supervisor's Comments i
l Supervisor (Signature)
(Date) i l
Attachment - RP 1206 8/16/82 w