Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Results
Other: ML19207A484, ML19211C710, ML19260C348, ML19261E167, ML19305C254, ML19317G953, ML19323D911, ML19340C943, ML19347D771, ML19347E513, ML19347F291, ML19350E381, ML20003E288
|
MONTHYEARML19317G9531977-08-17017 August 1977
Confirms Telcon Between NRC & Util Re 770609 Contract Personnel Screening Program.Total Modified Program Will Include Character Evaluation,Psychological Checks Evaluating Emotional Stability & Continued Observation by Foreman
Project stage: Other
ML19261E1671979-06-25025 June 1979
Forwards Modified Physical Security Plan:Updated 1979-80 Engineering & Const Schedule.Plan Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML19249A3171979-07-25025 July 1979
Forwards Replacement Pages to Security Plan Evaluation Rept Which Supports Issuance of Amend 27 to License DPR-54.Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Approval
ML19207A4841979-08-16016 August 1979
Forwards Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan. Plan Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML19260C3481979-12-14014 December 1979
Forwards Constr Installation & Testing Schedule Re Physical Protection Sys.Schedule Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML19211C7101980-01-0404 January 1980
Forwards Two Pages to Be Inserted Into Revision 7 of Physical Security Plan.Pages Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML19305C2541980-03-19019 March 1980
Forwards Updated 1979-1980 Engineering & Const Schedule Re Physical Protection Sys Per Stello 781005 Request.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML19323D9111980-05-0505 May 1980
Ack Receipt of Revised Const,Installation & Testing Schedule for Physical Protection Sys.Revised Completion Dates Are Acceptable.Advises Tht Encl to Util Will Be Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML19340C9431980-12-12012 December 1980
Forwards Updated 1979-1980 Engineering & Const Schedule for Plant Security Mods,Dtd 801024.Schedule Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML20003E4171981-03-0606 March 1981
Forwards Proposed Changes to Facility Security Plan.Changes Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Request
ML19347D7711981-03-20020 March 1981
Submits Info Re Physical Security Plan.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML20003E2881981-03-23023 March 1981
Responds to 800421 Request for Confirmation of Receipt of Five Copies of Entirely Reprinted Physical Security Plan, Including Amend 7.Confirms Receipt of Documents
Project stage: Other
ML19347E5131981-04-24024 April 1981
Forwards Rept Re Temporary Revision to Physical Security Plan.Rept Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)
Project stage: Other
ML19347F2911981-05-0505 May 1981
Requests Clarification Re Application of 10CFR73.71(c) & Reg Guide 5.62, Reporting of Physical Security Events, to Facility.Handling Loss of Security Effectiveness Is Unclear
Project stage: Other
ML19350E3811981-06-11011 June 1981
Informs That 810424 Changes to Security Plan Are Acceptable
Project stage: Other
ML19350E6551981-06-16016 June 1981
Submits Info Re Clarification of Physical Security Rules & Regulations,Per 810505 Request.Requirements in 10CFR73.71(c) Applicable to Util
Project stage: Approval
1980-03-19
[Table View] |
Text
^
RSMUD v SACRAMENTO MUNIC: PAL UTILITY DisTRIOT O 611 S street. Bem 15330. Sacramento, Cahforma 95313, (916) 452 3211 March 6,1981 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Robert W. Reid, Chief Operating Recctors, Branch 4 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Mr. Reid:
Docket No. 50-312 Rancho Seco Nuclear Generation Station Unit No.1 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54p and 50.90 tne District is hereby submitting five copies of proposed changes to tne District's Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Security Plan. Some of these changes would decrease the effective-ness of the security plan.
However, with these changes the plan still meets or exceeds the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55 The attached proposed changes and discussion of them should provide suf-ficient information for a thorough review by your staff.
Since the District considers some of t1ese changes to be a decrease in the effectiveness of the security plan, we da require your approval before they will be implemented at Rancho Seco Unit No.1.
We request your review to be made on a timely basis to allow the District to implement these changes as soon as possible.
The enclosures contain infomation of the types specified in 10 CFR 2.790(d) and should be withheld from public disclosure.
Under this cover, we will be providing payment for this submittal, as re-quired per 10 CFR 170. This amendment has been determined to be Class III since the issues do not involve a hazards consideration. A payment of
$4,000 is enclosed.
Sincerely, John J. Mattimoe Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer Enclosures cc:w/Encis.
\\
Mr. R. H. Engelken, Director h
Region V, Office of Inspection and Enforcement
/.p U. S. Nuclear Regelatory Commission
@\\Ce9
\\$
Suite 202, Walnut Cr eek Plaza 1990 North California Boulevard Md dg'pf Walnut Creek, CA 94596 f
8104oao+o'/
- p AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING MORE THAN 600,000 IN THE HE ART OF CALIFORNI A