|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20070E4671991-02-26026 February 1991 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-73-9 Re Upgrading Design Basis Threat for Radiological Sabotage of Nuclear Reactors.Recommends That NRC Deny Petition to Increase Design Basis Threat for Security ML20207C1331986-12-18018 December 1986 Order Terminating CPPR-81 & CPPR-82,per Util 860711 Motion to Withdraw Applications for OLs ML20215E7301986-12-17017 December 1986 Memorandum & Order Authorizing Withdrawal of OL Application & Dismissing OL Proceeding,Per Applicant 860711 Motion. Served on 861218 ML20215B2071986-12-11011 December 1986 Responds to Questions Posed in ASLBP 861203 Memorandum & Order Re Conversion to gas-fired Facility.Imposition of Conditions on Withdrawal of OL Application Unnecessary. Certificate of Svc & Svc List Encl ML20211L6391986-12-11011 December 1986 Affidavit of Gb Staley Re Preparation of Answers to Board 861203 Questions on Termination of OL Proceeding. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20211L6181986-12-11011 December 1986 Response to Board 861203 Questions Re Util Request to Terminate OL Proceeding ML20214Q4431986-12-0303 December 1986 Memorandum & Order Granting Motion to Expedite Completion of Withdrawal Proceedings & Posing Questions to Parties.Served on 861204 ML20214G7941986-11-24024 November 1986 Motion to Expedite Completion of Withdrawal of Licensee OL Application & Terminate Pending OL & CP Mod Proceedings. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20214T7361986-09-26026 September 1986 Memorandum & Order Dismissing OM Proceeding as Moot & Deferring Action on Applicant Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application Pending NRC Preparation of Environ Assessment.Served on 860929 ML20212M7661986-08-25025 August 1986 Response to Util 860711 Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & for Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings.Board Should Hold Motion in Abeyance Pending NRC Review of Stabilization Plan.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206M8171986-08-15015 August 1986 Response to ASLB 860716 Order Requesting Responses Re Termination of OM Proceeding.Termination of OL Proceeding & Withdrawal of OL Application Requested.Om Proceeding Should Be Considered Moot.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20212B0311986-08-0101 August 1986 Memorandum & Order Withdrawing Retention of Jurisdiction Over Radon Issue Presented in Facility CP Proceeding & Vacating ASLB Partial Initial Decision on Remedial Soils in Consolidated CP Mod & OL Proceeding.Served on 860801 ML20212B0521986-07-31031 July 1986 Order Extending Time Until 860815 for Util & Other Parties to Respond to Questions Posed by 860716 ASLB Order.Time Extended Until 860825 for NRC Response to ASLB Questions & Util Motion.Served on 860801 ML20203F8791986-07-28028 July 1986 Response Supporting Util 860711 Motion for Termination of Appeal Board Jurisdiction Over Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20207H6871986-07-22022 July 1986 Motion for Extension Until 860815 to File Responses to Four Questions Re Util Motion to Dismiss OL & OM Proceedings. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20207E2851986-07-16016 July 1986 Order Presenting Questions in Response to Util 860711 Motion to Dismiss OL Proceeding & to Terminate Order of Mod Proceeding.Served on 860717 ML20202G1621986-07-11011 July 1986 Notice of Change of Address for Washington Ofc of Isham, Lincoln & Beale,Attys for Util.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20202G0121986-07-11011 July 1986 Motion for Authorization to Withdraw OL Application & Dismissal of OL & Order of Mod Proceedings ML20202G1201986-07-11011 July 1986 Motion for Termination of Aslab Jurisdiction to Facilitate Termination of Cps,Withdrawal of OL Application & Dismissal of Consolidated OM-OL Proceeding ML20202G0491986-07-10010 July 1986 Affidavit of JW Cook Re Conversion of Plant Into combined- cycle,gas-fired Power Plant.Plant Never Operable as Nuclear facility.Nuclear-related Equipment Will Be Sold ML20202G0281986-07-0808 July 1986 Affidavit of Ta Mcnish Re True & Correct Extracts of 860408 & 0618 Minutes of Meetings.Resolutions Recited Therein in Full Force & Effect ML20198J3861986-05-27027 May 1986 Notice of ASLB Reconstitution.C Bechoefer,Chairman & J Harbour & Ga Linenberger,Members.Served on 860529 ML20198J4651986-05-27027 May 1986 Notice of ASLB Reconstitution.C Bechhoefer,Chairman & J Harbour & Ga Linenberger,Members.Served on 860529 ML20137E0041985-11-21021 November 1985 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding ML20137D9651985-11-21021 November 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133F6421985-10-0909 October 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20134N3771985-08-30030 August 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl DD-84-17, Order Affirming 840724 Director'S Decision DD-84-17 Denying Bp Garde 10CFR2.206 Petition for Action Against Util Re Plant Const.Const Abandoned on 840910.No Further Enforcement Action Required.Served on 8506241985-06-24024 June 1985 Order Affirming 840724 Director'S Decision DD-84-17 Denying Bp Garde 10CFR2.206 Petition for Action Against Util Re Plant Const.Const Abandoned on 840910.No Further Enforcement Action Required.Served on 850624 ML20127N7591985-06-20020 June 1985 Transcript of Commission 850620 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote in Washington,Dc Concerning Denial of 2.206 Petition for Midland plant,SECY-85-60 Concerning Pressurized Thermal Shock Rule & Shoreham Order.Pp 1-4 ML20133D9481985-05-13013 May 1985 Response to Aslab 850423 Order.Aslab Should Cancel OL Application & CPs Because Compliance W/Nrc Basic Requirements Not Met ML20116G5181985-04-29029 April 1985 Response to Memorandum of City & County of Midland,Mi Re ASLB 850405 & 0313 Orders on CP Mod Proceedings.Bechtel Should Not Be Granted Admission to Proceedings ML20115J5551985-04-19019 April 1985 City & County of Midland,State of Mi Response to Aslab 850313 Order to File Memoranda Re Whether Aslab Should Vacate ASLB Decision Re Certain Mods to CP Due to Mootness. Proof of Svc Encl ML20115J4751985-04-19019 April 1985 Memorandum in Response to Aslab 850405 Order Re Dismissal of OL Application.Application Neither Abandoned Nor Delayed in Dilutory Manner.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20115J5501985-04-19019 April 1985 Response Opposing Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order Re Dismissal of OL Applications.Urges Board to Permit OL Applications to Continue in Suspension Until Applicant Affirmatively Resolves Disposition ML20116G5321985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Resolution of Issue to Involuntary Dismissal of License Application,Per Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order.Granted for Aslab on 850422. Served on 850429 ML20115J4351985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion for Leave to Participate as Amicus Curiae,Per Aslab 850313 & 0405 Memoranda & Orders Requesting Response to Questions Re Proceeding ML20115J5461985-04-19019 April 1985 Motion to Participate Amici Curiae in Resolution of Issue of Involuntary Dismissal of License Application as Identified in Aslab 850405 Memorandum & Order ML20115J5421985-04-19019 April 1985 City & County of Midland,State of Mi Motion for Leave to Participate as Amicus Curiae in Aslab Request for Responses to Questions Presented in 850313 & 0405 Memoranda Orders. Proof of Svc Encl ML20112J5281985-04-0101 April 1985 Memorandum in Response to Aslab 850313 Order LBP-85-2. Decision Should Not Be Vacated.Ol Should Be Dismissed.Based on Listed Changes,New OL Review Required ML20112J6301985-04-0101 April 1985 Memorandum Requesting Aslab Not Take Any Action to Vacate LBP-85-2 or Dismiss OL Applications,Per 850313 Order,Based on Current Intent to Hold CPs & Attempt to Sell Plant. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20112H0981985-03-27027 March 1985 Response to Aslab 840313 Order Re Whether ASLB Decision to Review Issues in Soils Hearing Appropriate Use of Public Resources.Concurs W/Decision to Remand OL W/Instructions to Dismiss OL Application for Failure to Pursue Soils Issue ML20106F6531985-02-0808 February 1985 Response Opposing Intervenor B Stamiris 841224 Motion for Evidentiary Hearings Re Litigation Between Applicant & Dow Chemical Co.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20106D6631985-02-0808 February 1985 Response Opposing B Stamiris 841224 Pleading Requesting Evidentiary Hearing on Matter Raised in applicant-Dow Chemical Trial & Referral of Certain Matters to Ofc of Investigations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101S9111985-02-0101 February 1985 Motion for Extension of Time within Which to File Notice of Appeal of ASLB 850123 Partial Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20101S9421985-02-0101 February 1985 Motion for Extension Until 850306 to File Notice of Appeal of ASLB 850123 Partial Initial Decision.Granted by Aslab on 850201 ML20101F3191984-12-24024 December 1984 Request for Evidentiary Hearings on Matter Raised in CPC-Dow Trial & Referral of Certain Matters to Ofc of Investigations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20107K8011984-11-0101 November 1984 Affidavit of Jd Selby Re Plans Concerning Facilities.Const Will Be Resumed Only If Proposed by Appropriate Governmental Agencies & Officials & If Funds from Some Other Source Become Available.Related Correspondence ML20106F5241984-10-24024 October 1984 Motion to Request ASLB to Cancel Const License & Application for OL ML20092J0241984-06-22022 June 1984 Reply to B Stamiris Second Supplemental Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law on QA & Mgt Attitude Issues. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20092J0361984-06-22022 June 1984 Reply to NRC Further Supplemental Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re QA 1991-02-26
[Table view] Category:OTHER LEGAL DOCUMENT
MONTHYEARML20211L6181986-12-11011 December 1986 Response to Board 861203 Questions Re Util Request to Terminate OL Proceeding ML20202G1621986-07-11011 July 1986 Notice of Change of Address for Washington Ofc of Isham, Lincoln & Beale,Attys for Util.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20198J3861986-05-27027 May 1986 Notice of ASLB Reconstitution.C Bechoefer,Chairman & J Harbour & Ga Linenberger,Members.Served on 860529 ML20198J4651986-05-27027 May 1986 Notice of ASLB Reconstitution.C Bechhoefer,Chairman & J Harbour & Ga Linenberger,Members.Served on 860529 ML20137E0041985-11-21021 November 1985 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding ML20137D9651985-11-21021 November 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20133F6421985-10-0909 October 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20134N3771985-08-30030 August 1985 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20115J4751985-04-19019 April 1985 Memorandum in Response to Aslab 850405 Order Re Dismissal of OL Application.Application Neither Abandoned Nor Delayed in Dilutory Manner.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20084K8721984-05-11011 May 1984 Cross-reference to Intervenor B Stamiris Previously Filed Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law ML20084A3071984-04-19019 April 1984 Motion to Request Caseload Forecast Panel to Evaluate CPC New Const Completion Date ML20079M5991984-01-24024 January 1984 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082D8951983-11-21021 November 1983 Designation,As Direct Testimony,Of Encl Portions of Deposition Transcript of Jl Donnell ML20082F7221983-11-17017 November 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20081B0471983-10-21021 October 1983 Notice of Appeal from ASLB Orders Granting Discovery Against Govt Accountability Project.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078M1761983-10-19019 October 1983 Notice of L Clark,L Hallberg,T Devine & Bp Garde 831110,22,1201 & 15,respectively,depositions in Washington, DC & Midland,Mi.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080P0931983-10-0303 October 1983 Notice of Correction to 830930 Motion for Reconsideration ML20080M1091983-09-29029 September 1983 Notice of Jl Donnell 831015 Deposition in Las Vegas,Nv. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20076J9841983-06-28028 June 1983 Discussion of Us Army Corps of Engineers Dynamite Depot in Vicinity of Detroit,Mi & Record Before ASLB ML20072H5021983-06-27027 June 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073R6371983-05-0202 May 1983 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20073R6311983-04-28028 April 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069J9761983-04-19019 April 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20072Q0171983-03-30030 March 1983 Notices of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071B8131983-02-22022 February 1983 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070T1171983-02-0303 February 1983 Response Providing Addl Info Per Agreement at Nov & Dec 1982 Hearings.Info Includes List of Category I Structures Not Included in Seismic Margin Review,List of Underground Pipe & Conduit Hit by Drill & Quality Improvement Plan Raw Data ML20070H3721982-12-15015 December 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027D6561982-11-0202 November 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063P5131982-10-0606 October 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20063J6831982-08-30030 August 1982 Notice of Deposition to M Sinclair of All Persons Identified in Answer to Interrogatory 7,15 Days After Interrogatories Answered.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20063J6591982-08-30030 August 1982 Notice of Deposition to B Stamiris of All Persons Identified in Answer to Interrogatory 1,15 Days After Interrogatories Answered.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20062N0021982-08-10010 August 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding ML20054N0131982-07-13013 July 1982 Memorandum of 820712 Telcon W/Nrc,Util,B Stamiris & Wh Marshall Re Scheduling Matters on Reopened Hearings on Qa/Qc & Mgt Attitude Questions ML20054M1961982-07-0808 July 1982 Memorandum Issuing Four Subpoenas Duces Tecum Directed to Individuals Associated W/Govt Accountability Project.Only Util Second Justification,Re Relevance to Qa/Qc Contentions, Valid Basis for Subpoenas ML20054H2851982-06-18018 June 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054F8041982-06-11011 June 1982 Critique of Ser,Submitted for NRC & ASLB Evaluation & Action.Related Correspondence ML20140G9611982-06-0404 June 1982 Statement Before ACRS Subcommittee on Midland Nuclear Plant Re Alleged QC Problems.Public Confidence in Licensing Process Lost ML20041A0841982-02-12012 February 1982 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20039G0561982-01-0606 January 1982 Notice of Withdrawal from Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20005B1691981-05-24024 May 1981 Notice of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20008G2171981-04-28028 April 1981 Summary of Intervenor Stamiris Outstanding Discovery Requests Per 801204 Document Requests & Interrogatories, Revised 810126.Related Correspondence ML19345H0931981-04-21021 April 1981 Proposed Agenda for 810427-28 Prehearing Conference. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20126H2651981-03-28028 March 1981 Statement on Util Proposed Hearing Agenda.Disagrees That Oral Arguments on Motions Should Be First Agenda Item in Prehearing Conference Established to Determine Issue & Objects to Being Left Out of Conference ML19347D5981981-03-17017 March 1981 Notice of J Kane 810326 Deposition in Bethesda,Md Re Matters Set Forth in ASLB 810128-29 Prehearing Conference Ruling on Issues in 791206 Order Modifying Cp.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML19341C5801981-02-11011 February 1981 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19345F0771981-02-0303 February 1981 Notice of J Gilray,H Thornburg & J Kane Depositions on 810212,13 & 0318,respectively,in Bethesda,Md.K Naidu & G Fiorelli Depositions to Be Taken 810217 in Glen Ellyn,Il. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20002E5361981-01-23023 January 1981 Proposed Agenda for 810129 Prehearing Conference.Schedules Conclusion of Discovery,Further Prehearing Conferences, Motions for Summary Disposition,Filing of Testimony, Evidentiary Hearing & Filing of Proposed Findings of Fact ML20002D2491981-01-14014 January 1981 Notice of Keppler & Naider 810116 Depositions in Glen Ellyn, Il Re 791206 Order Modifying CPs & Contentions in 801024 Prehearing Conference Order App.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20002C0781980-12-31031 December 1980 Notice of J Matra 810108 Deposition in Bethesda,Md Re 791206 Order Modifying CPs & 801024 Contentions in App to Prehearing Conference Order Ruling on Contentions. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20002C0811980-12-29029 December 1980 Notice of F Rinaldi,Jg Keppler,Huang,J Kane,W Otto, R Erickson,J Brammer,Gilray,Shoemaker,H Singh,A Cappuchi & P Chen Depositions on 810106,07,09 & 19-22 Re Issues Set Forth in Order Modifying Cps.W/Certificate of Svc 1986-07-11
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
i je i L
F THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS },
[_
P00R QlfAl.lTY PAGES , ,
BEFORE THE
!f t::9" g OCT 13 E7F' G ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION -
. . . . . . .,y
}s $$3,T 5
.:: S In the Matter of ) g
) , w CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ) Docket Nos 50-329A_
) and 50-330A (Midland Plant, Units 1 and 2) )
ERRATA TO CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND cot:CLUSIONS OF LAW Consumers Power Company submits the following cor ~
rections to its filing of October 8, 1974, in the above-captioned
, proceeding:
PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
- 1. The sentence beginning at the tenth line on page 10, which now reads:
However, not all retail rates of the cooperatives' retail rates are equal to or below the Company's.
should read: .
.However, r.ot all of the cooperatives' retail rates are equial to or below the Company's.
- 2. The citation beginning on the twenty-fourth line of page 49, which now reads:
. . . see also Attorney General's advice letter, August 16, 1971, Detroit Edison Co., (Enrico Fermi Unit 2), Dkt.
No. 50-461A and 50-462A, g Fed. Reg. 15899 (May 6, 1974)].
should read:
.. . see also Attorney General's advice letter, August 16, 1971, Detroit Edison Co., (Enrico Fermi Unit 2), Dkt.
No. 50-461A and 50-462A, 3 Fed. Reg. 17883 _(1971).
1 . .
800611,q yo f g -
D l
P
- 3. Pages 93 and 94 are numbered incorrectly and are in reversed order.
Page 93,should follow g M.
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
- l. .A substitute page 81 is' attached to this Errata.
- 2. The sentence. beginning on line 10 of page 101, which now reads: .
For example, in the areas immediately outside of the I boundaries of the various municipalities which operate their own systems there is some duplication of facilities but, except but the areas surrounding Bay City and Traverse City, the num-ber of retail power purchasers who have a choice of electric suppliers is very small.5J/
should read:
For example, in the areas immediately outside of the boundaries of.the various municipalities which operate their own systems there is some duplication of facilities but, except for the areas surrounding Bay City and Traverse City, the number of retail power purchasers who have a choice of electric suppliers is very small.53/
- 3. The sentence beginning on the second line of page 108 which now reads:
Although in one portion of thic closed market, there is no possibility of the present supplier being replaced in the remaining areas, there is some possibility that retail p5wer purchasers may have a choice of suppliers in the long run..
. should read:
Although in one portion of this_ closed market there i is no possibility of the present supplier being replaceh in' the remaining areas.there is some possibility that retail power purchasers may have a choice of suppliers in the long run. -
t l
l l l l
I i
-m -
L_
. \
9
. 3 ]
- 4. The sentence begi aning on the first line of page l
113 which new reads: ,
the relevant As we demonstrate below, however n J markets are defined in this proceeding, the Company cannot be deemed to possess monopoly power because governmental regulatory authorities prevent the Company, as a matter of l law, from controlling prices or excluding competition in either the retail power or bulk power markets.
should read:
As we demonstrate below, however the relevant markets d i,
are defined in this pr'oceeding,from thecontrolling Company cannot ties prevent the Company, as a matter of law, prices or excluding competition in either the retail power or :
bulk power markets.
- 5. The sentence beginning on the ninth line of page I
Among the laws which deny the Company the of ability the to exclude other systems from its area is Section 202(b)
Federal 35/- interconn tion of twoPower Act authorizes electric suppliers the FPC for bulk power supplyto order the purposes.
should read:
Among the laws which deny the Company the of ability the to exclude other systems from its area is Section 202(b)
Federal connectionPower Act which of two electric authorizes suppliers thesupply for bulk power FPC to order the in purposes.35/
- 6. The sentence beginning on the fourth line of page i 126 which now reads:
527 (1948),
In United States v. Columbia Steel Co. , 334 U.S market place was identified __ a necessary consideration in gauging whether a company with a high market share has acquired monopoly ,
Power. 6/
should read:
U.S. 495, j In United States v. Columbia Steel Co. h r firms , 334 in evaluation of the " strength" of the ot ey consideration in 527 (1948), - h re has acquired the market place was identified as a necessargal i
monopoly power.46/ !
WW e -aw O
-- - - , n . - - - - -
. 4
- 7. The sentence beginning on the third line of page 174 which now reads:
This case '. svolved an effort by largo mine operators and union officials to influence the Secretary of Labor to prescribe minimum wages for companies selling coal to the Tennessee
. Valley Authority on long-term contracts, an action which would have the effect of driving smaller coal opezators out of business.
should read: ,
This case involved an e5 fort by large mine operators and union officials to influence the Secretary of Labor to pre-scribe minimum wages for companies selling coal to the Tennessee Valley Authority on long-term contracts, an action which would have had.the effect of driving smaller coal operators out of business. ,
- 8. .The sentence beginning on the sixth line of page 175 which now reads:
In California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 (197 2) , the protection afforded advocacy with respect to the passage and enforcement of laws before legislature and the executive branch was extended to encompass advocacy in the context of adjudications before both courts and administrative agencies.
should read:
In California Motor Transport Co. v. Truckino Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 (1972) , the protection afforded advocacy with respect to the passage and enforcement of laws before legislatures and the exeGT:ive branch was extended to encompass advocacy in the con-text of adjudications before both courts and administrative agencies.
- 9. The second sentence in footnote 28 on page 223, which now reads:
This is particularly the case, inasmuch the plant was sized in 1967, and no demand for access was receive 3 prior to the in'itiation of this proceeding.
should read: .
This is particularly the case, inasmuch as the plant was sized in 1967, and no demand for access was received prior to the initiation of this proceeding.
O
- a. .e ;
e g
1 I
- 5- -
\
8 f
10.
The sentence beginning on the fou-th line on page 229 which now reads:
' Typically, su~ch arrangements contain agreements'to operate in parallel, to exchange emergency capacity energy rnd to maintain certain reserve capacity levels.g/ !
should read:
l l
Typically, such arrangements contain agreements to l operate in parallel, to exchange ' emergency capacity and energy I and to maintain certain reserve capacity levels. H/
Respectfully submitted,. ,
. . l Keith S. Watsen Attorney for Censumers Power Company WALD, HARKRADER & ROSS 1320 Nineteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 October 11, 1974
a
s L
market should be analyzed with regard to three distinct geographic l "
, areas within and adjacent to the Company's service area. ,
According to the Suoreme Court, the criteria used in "essen-defining the relevant product and geographic markets are tially similar"; i.e.,
both must correspond to " commercial real-1/ Thas, as the Court emphasized, these definitions are ities".
not " formal" or " legalistic"; rather,'the antitrust laws pre-In the following 'sec-scribe "a pragmatic , factual aoproach".
tions, we set ' f o r th the applicable principles of relevar; mar- .
- -ket definition, with regard to the bulk power and retail power
- markets, and then apply those principles to the f acts of the i
l i
'.. instant case.
l A. Bulk Power Market. t to There is only a single bulk power market relevant this proceeding: that market in which the Company's small neighbors look for their bulk power supply requirements. By contrast, we !
understand the Department of Justice to contend that coordination -
power transmitted in the contwxt of coordination arrangements is a separate product which is not part of the bulk power market and that the Company's bulk power requirements should be included
(
I within that market. As shown more , fully below, the Department's
)
position cannot be reconciled with basic principles of antitrust I law or with the " commercial realities" of bulk power supply in ,
336-37 (1962),
3/ Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, t
a i
1 l
l I
Enclosure No. 2 to Brief and Pronosed Findines of Fact of the Unitec State:
- Department of Justice l
1 CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY i ' Midland Units 1 and 2 j AEC Docket Nos. ^^ '?9A and 50-330A j CORRECTIONS IN TRANSCRIPT j Page Line Correction
- 828 16 "vionte-the-law" should be " violate-the-law" 829 5 "aftertimes" should be " of three kinds" 830 7-8 "did he say?" should be "do- we see?"
830 12 "you present" should be "we present" 830 18 " attempt to monopolize" should be " intent to monopolize" 830 25 " violated anti-trust laws" should be " violate the anti-trust laws" 831 1 "to forward" should be "to go forward" 831 12 "per se" should be "per se" 872 2 " Hood" should "Fbote Act"
! 872 3 " particulars" to "Intervenors" 878 1 "their" should be "those"
! 879 12 " underway cable" should be " underwater cable" i 885 4 "D. G. Campbellton" should be "B. G. Campbell" i 885 22 "as well as Duke" shou'lt be "as well as in Duke" 900 4 Delete "and Materials"; should read " National
' Association of Electric Companics" 900 18 "effect and a small system" should be '"ef f ec t on a small system" t 901 9 "but Dr. Leeds had asked" should be "that Dr. Leeds i had asked"
. 905 2 " training organization" should be " lobbying d#
- organization" ,\?yo k\
'd *-
'1- _._.2, ,_
-g- _
Page 2 l Page Line Correction 905 22 " Judge Kline" should be " Judge Clark" 906 21 " inexplicably" should be " inextricably" l 908 15 " industries own power pooling" should be " industries own view of power pooling" 922 5 "Daiber" should be "Daverman"
! 926 6 " Main" should be " Maine" 979 2 "might be elected, or are elected" should be l l
j "might be reluctant, or are reluctant" 1
1076 6 " step-tight" should be " step-type" l 1078 24 " block-tight" should be " block type" l 1078 24 "and separate demand" should be "and no separate i demand" l
l 1145 9 " deal with" should be " dealing with" 1213
^
14 "DJ 142" should be "DJ 42" l
l; 1219 21 "128,000" should be "138,000" j 1221 1 " disputed" should be " distributed" i I
! 1241 20, 23, "DJ No. 142" should be "DJ No. 42" l l 25 l
- 1 j 1242 12, 15 "DJ No. 142" should be "DJ No. 42" i
1329 10 " advanced steam nlant" should be " Advance steam
. plant" -
! 1338 4 "Mr. Powell" should be "Mr. Paul" i
- i 1407 25 " Anderson Electric Institute" sh'ould be " Edison
! Electric Institute" j 1409 2 "665-51" should be "65-51" 1428 17 "it has fallen?" should be "it has fallen out?"
1431 19 " confidences" should be " conferences" 1520 24 Should include "DJ 3" as received into evidence on page 1674. l t
t I
i
,l Page 3 I
3 Page Line Correction i
l 1520-A 11, 12, Should exclude DJ 47 through DJ 49 as these, three 1 13 exhibits were received into evidence on Novstber 28, 1973.
Q 1520-A 17-25 Should exclude DJ 53 through DJ 61 as these i exhibits were received into evidence on November 28, 1973.
i 1520-B 2-4 Should exclude DJ 62 through DJ 64 as these exhibits
! were received into evidence on November 28, 1973.
I 1532 12, 14, "Mr. Sanders" should be "Mr. Saunders"
! 15 i
j 1575 3 "I considered significant" should be "I mentioned considered significant" 1598 22 " planning in training" should be " training in planning"
} 1607 12 " transmitter of data" should be " transmittal of j data" i
1613 11 "those favorable" should be "those unfavorable" m
1639 23 " set off to New York" should be "sent off to Ne9 York" 1670 18 " author of 71" should be " offer of 71" 1674 8 Should exclude DJ 47 through DJ 49 as these three exhibits were received into evidence on November 28,
! 1973.
1674 6 Should include DJ 3 as received into evidence.
1674 8 Should exclude DJ 53 through DJ 64 as these exhibits were received into evidence on i November 28, 1973.
1700 5, 10, " heating" should be " peaking" l 13, 16 1701 10, 13, " heating" should be " peaking" 14 1791 10 "has previously" should be "has not previously" I 1860 1 " location RR" should be " designation RR" la s
. .m . % _ _
.s ,a4 m . .m._- .
.-m .
Page 4 Page Line Correction 1870 1 "It's a damage" should be "Can damage" 1870 19 "a lower loading" should be "a low loading" 2101 7 " Borrow Capacity" should be " Boiler Capacity" 2188 10 " Florida Power Commission" should be " Florida Power Corporation" 2235 12 " Embassy Fool" should be !'M-C Pool" 2316 10 "nyoptic" should " myopic" 2395 18 "7070-megawatt" should be "70-megawatt" 2562 20 " outage for availability" should be " outage or availability" 2567 16, 17 "5 percent" and "15 percent" should be "5 megawatts" and "15 megawatts" 2567 20 "33 1/2" should be "33 1/3" 2572 10, 13 " 004" should be ".0004" l
2573 22 " 004" should be ".0004" 2576 18, 19 Question presently reads, "Could you express one day as a percentage of the number of days in 10 years?" Should read, "Could you express a percent-age of time as the number of days in 10 years?"
. 2576 21, 22 Question presently reads, "Could you express one day as a percentage of days in 20 years?" Should read, "Could you express a percentage of time as
- the number of days in 20 years?"
2581 10 "10" should be "2.5" 2608 21 "DJ 16" should be "DJ 17" i 2623 13 "1,381,000.3 megawatts" should be "1,381,300
- megawatts"
! 2624 3 "I would" should be "It would" i i
i 2652 [Something seems to be missing from transcript] l
\
! 2654 24 "froming" should be " forming" l l
I i
~
[
, Page 5 i
j Page Line Correction 1 2669 25 " Commissions" should be " Conditions"
! 2922 9, 13, "Mr. Hoffman" should be "Mr. Helfman"
- 19, 22, 23
.' 2923 6, 10 "Mr. Hoffman" should be "Mr. Helfman"
. 2997 9 Page number 3126 should be listed under column marked "In Evidence" not listed under " Rejected" (DJ-246-A - D) .
3102 9 " Professor Boris' law" should be " Professor Bork's law" 3573 3 "He said it was" should be "He sent us his" 3814 11 "and the Halsey" should be "in the Halsey" 3914 13 "AEC" should be "AEP" 3914 15 "my saying" should be "by saying" 3939 22 "1973" should be "1974" 4031 12 Delete "of Michigan" 4253 21 " Sandra Streigle" should be " Sandra Strebel" l l
4483 3 "50 to 20 percent" should be "15 to 20 percent" l l
4952 2, 3 " Uncertainty Risk in Profit" should be " Uncertainty '
Risk and Profit" 5222 9, 13 " sixteen-minute" should be "60-minute" 5620 18 "PP-1 rate" should be "TP-1 rate" 5621 6 "PP-1 rate!' should be '"TP-1 rate" 5858 23 ',' exceptions" should be " assumptions" 5861 Should be Applicant's Exhibit 12,008, not Intervenor's Exhibit.
5901 14 "in the densely populated areas" should be "in the less densely populated areas" s
=_ _. -
-- . . , . . ~ -
~ .
- n. . . . - -. --
s Tage 6 l .Page Line i Corrections 1
1 7285 17 "a zoned reasonableness" should be "a zone of rea-I sonableness" t
{ 7661 23 "IEA" should be "REA" 7694 14 Add " Journey" after "Drexel" 7697 4 "that was 500 less" should be "that was $500,000 less."
8241 21 " conclude" should be " concluded" -
l 8410 15 "1956" should be "1966" l
8448 21 "DJ Exhibit No. 288" should be "DJ Exhibit No. 228" 8448 21 Page number 8592 should be listed under the l column marked "In Evidence" not listed under j "For Identification" l 1
8592 Should be DJ Exhibit No. 228, not 288. I
! 8710 18 " peak constants" should be "B constants" 8842 10 "the total savings and resources" should be
, "the total savings in resources" i
l l -
1 i
i i i i l j
-