ML19250J500
| ML19250J500 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Skagit |
| Issue date: | 07/22/1981 |
| From: | Mallory M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17275B382 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-110 NUDOCS 8107300092 | |
| Download: ML19250J500 (25) | |
Text
e b
q y
v f
l $ j%
<3 \\
ME N
'l Docket Gos: 50-522/S23 D
h 4,L u 9198% 7-o u.s,-m, - As
\\
row.m r.m APPLILANT:
Puget Sound Power and Lit,ht Co/l.ESCO As
$9 FACILITY:
Slagit/Hanford, Units Nos. I Snd 2
[gf SUBJ ELT:
SubikkY OF SKAGIT/HALFOLD CP APPLIChiluu Sche 00LL EEETING JUNE 18,19o1 On J une 16, 1981, at the request of the applicant, a neeting between representatives of the Skagit/Hanford UPP application ad the stof f was held in bethesda to discuss the environnentel and safety review relative to the site move f rom the Skagit River Site, north of Seattle, Washington to the Hanfora rteservation. A list of attendees enc an agenda are attachea. During the review schecule ciscussion the staf t rei teratet tt'e proposea, expecited schedule.
J. hecca, horthwest Energy Services Coapany (hESCO), provided a brief sunnary of the history of the Skagit LP application to date. rie noted that the Skagit/Hanford proposed site provides ample stancof f distances froa Cable Mountain, FFTf, and the WPPSS projects. The Skagit/Hanford (S/HNP) design changes will be site-related (i.e. cechanical cooling towers, HVAL intake and cischarge ports, supply water system, etc.).
Tne applicant intends to transn.it a Thl-2 licensing requirements amenament the third of August 1981. The applicant inforned the staf f of intent to anend the PSAR and ER relative to the site nove no later than Deceaber 31, 1531. The applicant will trans-cit a letter to !TC t.ddressing the schedule for the site nove anendr.ent.
The staf f expressed concern over the applicont's proposec schecule for issuance of a site-related su;.plemental SER and supplemental FES. The applicant favors issuance of the SSER and FLS witnin tour months of filin. However, the ACkS review s
was not considered in their schedule.
In the alternativa site review section of the Eh, the applicant will provide a thorough discussion of ee selection process and adottional information provided by bcth the applicant and the staf f during the hearings on this project. The statf expressea the need to assure that this inf orit.ation is adequate concerning sites east of the Casade bountains.
The applicant will submit tne same Stagit/hantora En for review by hashington State's Energy f acilities Sittnr, Evaluation Council (EFSEL) and for the LRC.
The statf inforued participants on the current progress to appoint a hearing board chairnan. The progress on the appointaent of a Washington State accinistra-tive law Judge in anticipation of a joint envircnuental hearing was also notea.
Bo+.h appointnents are scheduled before July. The applicant was informeo of tne progress for the joint hcaring protocol.
8107300092 810722 CF ADDCK 05000522 cm c'>
CF sow r >
wn )
1 oc,cu me % emc u c:"
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
'" *3=
_z.
lhe opplicant plans to purchase f ederal land for project develo I,ent.
Currently, the applicant is negotiat.ing the arrence.aents with the Depart;ent. of Encrg. The actual purchese is expccted to occur upon issuance of a CP and a Washington State site certification.
Finally, the applicant intcods to cooperate and cuoreini.te with the We>PSS 4 applicant to the extent possible on site, environsentcl, an 1.aergency preparedness iaatters.
hichael !;allcry, Project !;anager Licensiaj Branch e4 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page
?
b
. 85..
..hkiLE..i.4.
'..AD.;L/D' omet >
suniuut> 1. A; ry..
..Ehde n,g,q
..8Ieggp.,
ll out>
.2 f./ 1..
. 2/..Q31..... 7 /.... / 81..
~
' OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usaa mi-mue rmc ronw a:s oa na> wcu cao
Lt,Aa l i
~
Mr. J. E. !2cca, Manager Nuclear Licensing S Safety Puget Sound Po.ser Light Co.
Puget Pa.ter Building Bellevue, L'ashington 90009 cc:
Mr. F. Theodore Thcasen Perlins, Coie, Stone, Olsen
& Willi w:s 1900 Washington Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Mr. Robert Lowenstein Lowenstein, Newman, Reis
& Axelrad Suite 1214 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washingtore, D. C.
20036 Roger M. Leed, Esq.
Law Offices 1411 4th Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 Mr. Lloyd K. Marbet c/o Forelaws on Boa-d 19142 South Bakers Ferry Road Boring, Oregon 97009 Mr. Nicholas D. Lewis, Chair.c.an Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council 820 East 5th Avenue Olyrpia, Washington 98504 Honorable Richard Sandvik Department of Justice 500 Pacific Building 520 Southwest Yachill Portland, Oregon 97204
JUTiE 18, 1921 SKAGIT hiANFORD APPLICATION MEETIria ATTENDEES PJ3ET PJWER /NESE0 NRC R. Myers R. Purple G. Jacobsen R, Tedesco R. Lownstein F. Leech F. T. Thaasen R. Black J. Mecca M. Mallory T. Grenel C. Thomas J. Leder D. Lasher D Muller n.
Roba rt W. Regan J. Norris S. Ramos E. Williams D. l'.unze
NHC MEETING AGENDA JUNE 18,1981 1.
Staff briefing on Skagit history 2.
Document Prcparation (J. Mecca) a)
TMI Schedule b)
ER and PSAR Schedule c)
ER and PSAR document changes 3.
Alternative site review (T. Thomsen) 4.
Lead agency under NEPA (T. Thomsen) 5.
Joint Federal / State ER (T. Grebel) 6.
Discussion Items:
(T. Grebel) a)
Class 9 Accidents b)
Security c)
Emerge'ncy Planning i
[
LICEN5lHG HISTORY e,
d
SKAGrr IIISTORY Date Activity August 6,1974 Environmental Report (ER) and Application for Limited Work Authorization, Construction Permit, and Operating License submitted to Nuclear Regulatory Commission OiRC).
September 27,1974k ER and Application docketed.
December 2,1974 PSAR submitted to NRC.
January 17, 1975 PSAR docketed by NRC.
January 29, 1975 Draf t Environmental Statement issued for comment by the NRC.
March 17,1975 Comment period ended.
April 15,1975 NRC Pre-hearing Conference for Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) - Bellingham.
May 21,1975T Final Environmental Statement issued by the NRC.
j e 16,1975 Draft of Environmental Statement for Wild & Scenic Rivers
(
proposal issued.
July 15,1975 NRC ASLB hearings begin.
August 8,1975 NRC hearings continue.
May 12,1976 NRC Pre-hearing Conference.
June 2-4,1976 NRC hearings.
July 7-11,1976 NRC hearings.
July 1976 Draft Supplemental to Final Environmental Statement issued.
August 17-24, 1976 NRC hearings.
January 1977 Final Environmental Statement issued on Wild & Scenic Rivers Proposal with com ments regarding Skagit Nuclear Power Project.
March 1-9,1977 Joint hearings on "Need-for-Fower" Skagit & Pebble Springs.
April 1977 Final Supplement to Final Environmental Statement issued.
ty 11-13,1977 NRC hearings.
.l
Pege 2 of 4 Dr.te Activity July 19-23,1977 NRC hearings.
September 1-2, 1977 Advisory Committee Reactor Safeguards M eeting, San Francisco, California, on Geology /Scismology.
September 8,1977 ACRS Full Committee Meeting - Washington, D.C. on Geology /-
Seis mology.
Septcmber 23, 1977 Safety evaluation Report issued by NRC.
Septe mber 30, 1977 Subcommittee of ACRS - Seattle - all Safety issues.
October 27, 1977 Subcommittee of ACRS - Portland - Geology /Scismology.
- s' October 28, 1977 Subcommittee of ACRS - Portland.
Novemb<r 4,1977 ACRS Full Committec Meeting - Washington, D.C., 0.35g Safe Shutdown Earthquake Design confirmed.
USGS, NRC, Puget agree. Skagit given clean ACRS letter on Geology /Scismology and all Safety concerns (Letter dated 11/18/77).
December 23, 1977 NRC decision of Pre-LWA work issued allowing limited road work in vicinity of Plant.
auary 24,1S78 p Pre-Hearing Conference on Geology / Seismology; hearing dates A
of March 7-18, 1978 were established. The ASLB also visited the Skagit Site.
March 7-15,1978 LWA Hearing addressing Geology / Seismology.
April 11,1978 Assistant Secretary of Agriculture issued the Department 7b decision regarding impact of plant under Wild & Scenic Rivers A c t.
May 24-26,1978 N RC/USGS, Bechtel an' Puget field trip regarding Geology / Seismology.
June 13,1978 Petition to Intervene filed by the three Indian tribes.
June 16,1978 p*
NRC/USGS requested additional information to clarify questions raised resulting from alternate interpretations of geology.
October 23, 1978 SER Supplement 1 issued by the NRC concluding all significant outstanding items except geology / seismology.
November 24, 1978 ASLB issued a Decision and Order granting intervention to the
~
three Indian tribes (see later decisions for current status).
..ov e mber 27, 1978
. Valentine B. Deale, Esq. replaced Sam Jensch, Esq. as Chairman of the ASLB.
l
Pege 3 of 4 Activity Da te The ASLAB vacated Order granting intervention to the three January 12, 1979 Actual decision issued January 29, 1979.
Indian tribes.
Pre-Henring Conference to acquaint Chairman Deale with outstanding issues, take stock of status of proceeding and January 16-17,1S79 facilitate planning for next steps in proceeding.
Board visited the site, trenches, Ranney Collector site, diffuser January 18, 1979 and barge slip area and Lake Cavanaugh Road cut.
Petition to Pre-licaring Conference to define open issues.
April 24,1979 Intervene by three Indian tribes verbally denied.
The 7a determination, approving mitigating plans proposed by May 2,1979 Puget for the Skagit Project, was issued by the Secretary of I
Agriculture.
The NRC Staff's Request for additional information of June May 25,1979 1978 completed with submittal of additional geologicalinforma-tion.
ASLB issued an Order not to Entertain Non-timely Petition to
/
1,1979 Intervene by the three Indian tribes ir response to their petition
(
of June 13, 1978.
County petitioned for intervention as an interested June 5,1979 Skagit county in the LWA hearings.
Indian tribes submitted an appeal to the June 1,1979 order.
June 14,1979 ASLB issued an Order affo-ding Skagit County the opportunity June 20,1979 to participate in the LWA proceedirgs as an interested party.
NRC hearings including one Saturday session.
~
July 17-31,1979 August 13, 1979 Response and commitments on the short-term TMI lessons,
learned submitted to NRC.
Skagit County election on nonbinding referendum to not extend November 6,1979 g Referendum passed by large majority.
the Rezone Agreement.
Shagit County Commissioners voted unanimously not to extend November 27, 1979 77 the Rezone Agreement.
Received NRC/USGS joint request for additional January 8,1980 geology / seismology information.
The NRC decided to review one issue of the ASLAB Indian euary 16,1980 tribes decision.
I NRC hearing conference. 'NRC and USGS presented evidence Jtnuary 22, 1980 on g~alogy and seismolcgy.
Date Activity Announcement made to move the two Skagit Units to Hanford.
July 3,1980
,!cly 22-23,1950 NRC/Puget meeting with Dr. Harold Denton to discuss the Skagit move to Hanford using Hope Creek as the model to move the docket.
Use of WPPSS data (M et eorology, Demography, Geology, etc.) discussed and concept was agreed upon to be work abic, (Ferguson, Jacobsen, M ecea/Puget; Thomsen/Perkins).
August IS,1980 An Order of Dismissal was signed in the Puget vs. Skagit County case.
Sept ember 16, 1981 NRC Staff visited the Hanford site.
Sept ember 26, 1980 Amendment 5 to the Skagit Application filed with the NRC to move Skagit to the Hanford Reservation.
The NRC issued an Order declaring the Indian petition for October 9,1980 intervention untimely and dismissed as moot and the admini-strative orders of thc Licensing Board and the ASLAB vacated.
March,1981 A speaific site location selected on the Hanford Reservation and egreed to by the Skagit Geologic Consulting Panel.
ch 31, ISSI NRC/Puget/NESCO meeting with Dr. Harold Denton and staff to discuss ER/PS A R Amendment schedule, (Myers/Puget; Jacobsen, Mecca /NESCO).
NOTE:
As of July 1,1979 SG days public meetings and hearings had been held,16,215 pages of transcript taken and about 230 exhibits entered into the record.
4 4
1 4
1 0:
SU M M A RY_
Skagit has been under review for a 3cng time with the ER docketed in o
September 1974 and PSAR in January 1975.
o Final EIS issued May 1975.
Final SER issued September 1977, (clean design).
o Successful ACRS meetings were held and the Ictter was issued dated o
11/18/77.
Impacts in late 1979:
o TM1 Accident Loss of zoning and public support Repiny of geology questions judged to be expensive and time consumming (3 years)
The decision was made early in 1980 to discuss the situation with Dr.
o
(
Denton end certain staff me'mbers and explore the wisdom of moving to the Hanford Reservation.
The Hanford Reservation had been evalucW as an rsiternate site Not e: as well as Pebble Springs during the Hearings sud a:tbeagh judgcd environmentally suitabic, the three year delay to make the change adversely affreted the cost / benefit.
to move has been predicated on the fact that Puget can The decision o
take the docket number and previous review along, (Hge Creek), and much of the environmental data from WPPSS can t>e utilized.
Y t
4 h
e
a c
u,
%1 s
/
s L
J I
- s.
- l
~
~
g
,. a h
I i
,,_.,s j u.r =. i a g
r' 2,';' ',3,,;
t,
,J c,_,. ',r "ose ci o
f wes I
L C
3 b
I 8
l_. __
Y, I
.no
..t.
I
- %,L I
rac...nra 5)
..... i i
-~~
l
\\
/ :..,
/
wes I
L
\\
\\
1 t El F C 8L f 7 7
- ~~~1 L
\\
't
\\
s 1
(
\\
' ' ; - ~ 1_
\\
~ %%%.. ;:. 7,:.
/(4 Star v. arks the site desired by Fuget Power cair or secuv.m-for its proposed nuclear poner project on
' ~ h ~:t
.f.s -
the Hanford Reservation 9
rq 1
'L 3
6 I
I
..-g.
SKAGIT NUCLEAR PROJECT LOCATION HANFORD RESERVAT1011
/* ) E
&c'v7 (
RrACTOR TYPE BWR-6 REACTOR VENDOR GENERAL ELECTRIC REACTOR OUTPUT 1288 l'WE TURBINE GENERATOR WESTINGHOUSE VENDUR COOLING TOWER TYPE MECHANICAL DRAFT cc1.',r.^.Ef Ci a L &PCLj.rictJ PtiEt@'4DATE UNIT #1 - 1991 PROJECT OWNERS PUGET POWER (l40%)
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC (30%)
PACIFIC POWER LIGHT (20%)
WASHINGTON WATER POWER (10%)
~
f
.a*
% (' - T ~ l
\\ \\ %...\\ :x j.
,I
- " x..w'.g s
(
.,,. y l r..,,,- --
.,-.%es..n. p..
k \\,,.. \\.d ; o
%. f.
J
.'g. 4..
n -
s s
Q d N)>g. 'I c T m --- +q n;:] q :
- q.4 M O. ? Em(t. f.W r
a s
l
- {,s b.
b.
y f, S 5
6 J g _ y &. \\ w. O g:s O \\ N y
'3,,,.
1 z:
Vr
'qt F.:M 1 T=
' lv,{. p[yL-6 tp i t m(,.
c\\. '..J W h.
\\.
=
u i
. ; _ A:
N
'.N s g' ifp. t > s.-] d ' d. :,P
- .a.
g u '.;.
1,. ;
W., s r.
e, '-
1), *v.
1 k"'..'LQL:;ih;gL.%
&' %"N; w I > ' :- }'-
M'%
N
~
r N,c$ g~.L,.;.)A. M.
w.. I Q..s 4,
/,,,,,
s.g.
\\\\
5 t4 q
- M.. C. %m r x - + ) y: '". \\. \\,. s T,
i 1.
.,t.
-~ ~gsM*+
l,..*
16-...
f,.e e
q
, s T7 b.--
N,N,. [\\
d,.c~
I' - --H --- --
l
,.s S
.s
'+Q
.. g,.. t h, 4.
i g
J..,...
i gq.-
g
.... -,,.x
- g. w
%,N..*h b b-j s.
s,,..
c a..c s
!' q#(O)'
af s
N%
'./
s p. [' u 3 s.(
A e" M..
=.
=-
L - (n
\\.,.. N '.n.
3.,
- \\
x d;v c ar
/
J s'--'
,x x
. -i <
>b 3
s.
A
,!l * ]
\\
W., p.vjC.N,g'
&~J S%,
b.%V.0 Y'f~c, k,
f.
' y,'l, ; '
- -i ~
3,
~ x&.
E h[*
3.\\
'/
.y
..I m
3'
.ds %%
-gv m
- 7 -
j N
-e s e K.I n
~
'r m f. M ; iC n w* r h 4-4'.'v,;k. g':
\\
pV g.js-% '
q n.
7, A q q.4
-a'..
\\p 4
\\\\tg1 k,,Wh p f
TMM d
- ,NK. ' v L. *, > ; ;;,
s 8
N b.
'~.a Mg Vi
! As Ns.1..
I g.g?
- g., 'w'\\\\\\.m, s_syigw u/..
.p tM pm
. _. m_. :.wecp., ~. z p. j iQ\\5
.p N,j.gh(T~lD k.{.(
'l
- ' f, e
r.
.l l *.
~ ^ :. *.-l
,1 i - r..
1
'{ W K it @ jy ' m. Q, W;m j
!X-.3,..,M._g...):.
y m Q m't g.:p.g.
w@' %. M.,1.agg.g; 2 v.,
s w.f..w# M. g v ^ w..
z
... O
'. j? a' ^
u.r.
N g4 Q
- j 'ic;' '.b',Ep'g W. f,. s L gyby 4.gA
. w
. ~ w'. '. 4 L. e,1 n% ; p. 's t p-
.A A %
... _...3
-N i~3 < g. 4 :-
3 a... s.{ G, <
- j q'?
- bg **
_.,, i
- e.
- 3.,
ytv c!
tj,p6% a"y.,
5' m >,U,;e*)es.
4 k%. - W~. 4 n.
3,.
I c.o s
g s n..
. =
~
. v.s. c
, % n,..
, #1 y,,;,r. A,1, y........q >
.J I
-J '
Ja g e
u y
-~ _.,
'u ;
a
- l
- e. -.
a, f,. ;
e
'1 c.
pc,.
\\.
t
....+.....<w.c.
,,,. _ _. _. +
...p...,,...__...,
. % _ _.\\....
,_ K;: y! \\ !. g b.('.,~
l
,,,,.., 1 :
1
!... '. A. O,,t ~
.^
y( g;.4 N,,,.\\y{C
..N sv
,, f,
-g a g. s.'Q i
4 2 l1g Gt
.y
,s. -
s
- n,
-' 2n y
-M.
n ;,
}
r.,.A">*,
--o AQ
,h th,
.
- 7.y ;p(.-. h ' 'i} b? ~
k TV m.
.,,, p N'7je
.p i
i ' " zu s i.
- 9..-
k~
hf
=
[,,;'
u J.'.Q
~%q 3 qib k
5 n.
jC d
&m- -- p. g.. y--s.-.
W j g y j Y ), ~
n g[ r, 3
.l 3 m
5
- x.. s H} t.. q
')
o i
N.,.
h l
M.
- ,c ? "f p( m n.'_.y >Q__ _
> \\.t }.,1,%- 3;
_y j 3,x:
y
._m _.:
3m
. u.
..).p; m #s.g l:,:
a.
sw,sw-e s
- so.,
m.
y.
t. e.-
m.:. ; 3
/
- x. ix y
yW
. Ne
_ >;,x%
y h.4,
-..Jy i4 j
. p'o #;px a.,
O '3 W
' N. d,*._,.-[**
p'*'
V3i$;-~f.j,(.f;.K o
t.
m q.;.d :.
,Y Q P
uIa)'.y'r
~n---~
.r
,,y -
7 n
.u -
qu
,y y 1.: yy u ;.,.
y m:. -....~-4~3 r
~ m.
3,&.s,. - 4, s
f
.,;. ;
j n 3
- x_
- R.'q
_n.o.,i,}.. /, v. u,,? j" 3,.,. s.,,.A., t 4g// '
ju.
x.u
. z...,
. b ta
- y
&.- v. -[.1 n' 1,
__. p,.
p
., ~,-
c:,
l3\\'
/-
/ <j.
f Mly z
.s e
,w
\\
/
m. ;
1, U I '\\ 6 m{.h
.,,/,< 8 s.
f.,JQ t
"},,
7.'.9.1 y W.,'[s',>:m: -D' N.}. --
$. e 4
4)e+Lb,' '.;
</ [,, r; '. 2 n.-
) + (;.
h*?
]4:-t.-=$ $ '
5,.:' f '"
V'.lW',s[
.1 &,,..-m 4
r v i n
m;.,4 - - <e---, b;a o, :
u t1 w
c 15
&m.L&mf. 7 '[<)4,R, ~a.;,&;,e.#. n a=~4 n &, A n -
- j j,'\\ $
,,-?,* ).,%Q f+, &,b &,( <f$
h--~.u v e e w
- .7-n z
u-. s.
s - s.,
a
. f, s
.v a
p
- n m,n,.
- r..
n
,.r
- l f'u.;- h J D
W#
ay.
p., o n 4 s l ' c3
. bu D
e
- r.,.-
a*,n.
...* a..
-\\oa
, n. <.e. >u n.
r o~s b, P, a.
s
- Jfp. i
'. 3 "P ~
. y, [W f'5 $, c* '%/y.,G-l a
~
7 'f. 8 I h J bI5'5 n -
Q
't r
1 ;
w r
+%: %,y.
, n.,
G,'A, :
y.,
x $.'i sii-Y,Ssd M * )q~= h Z, L' t
.6
, /"
s t
a n
MI S % L W 9., W -w.,,C T,",, 8~.
.,i'f
's'
uu t vot. u i i u i (i;UREG-0718)
DAlf ACl]OE DECEMBER 10, 1979 NRC ISSUES DRAFT 10F NUREG-0660 SUM!'ARIZll:G TMl
' TASK ACTION PLAN (TAP) RECOMMENDATIONS 1%RCH 19,1980 NTCP APPLICAtJTS AtlD NRC JOINTLY MEET TO IDENTIFY 5 CAfEGORIES FO?, EVALUATING TAP ITEMS PARCH 25-28,1980 fflCP APPLICANTS FORMULATE JOINT POLICY TOWARDS NUREG-0660, ASSIGNING NTCP CATEGORY TO EACH 1SSUE AUGUST 1980 NRC ISSUES DRAFT NUREG-0718, ASSIGNING NTCP CATEGORIES TO EACH NUREG-0660 ISSUE AUG-NOV 1980 NRC RECEIVES 12 COMMENT LETTERS FROM 13 COMMENT 0RS (6 NTCP'S, 2 NSSS VENDORS, 2 CITIZENS,1 A/E,1 DEPT. INTERIOR)
+
.nNUARY 5,1981 NRC REVISES DRAFT OF 11UREG-0718, NTCP CATEGORY OF 23 ISSUES REVISED: 20 DOWNGRADED (13 NO PRE-CP CONSIDERATION) AND 3 UPGRADED JANUARY 8,1981 NRC FURTHER REVISES NUREG-0718; DOWNGRADING 2 KEY ISSUES
~
MARCH, 1981 NRC ISSUES FINAL NUREG-0718 MARCH 23, 1981 PROPOSED NTCP RULE ISSUED FOR COMMENT APRIL 8, 1981 NRC/NTCP MEETING TO DISCUSS CRITERIA TO MEET THE RULE APRIL 1981 BOSTON EDISON SUBMITS PSAR AMENDMENT ADDRESSING NUREG-0718 ISSUES
~
MAY 1981 HOUSTON LIGHTING E;! POWER SUBMITS PSAR AMENDMENT ADDRESSING NUREG-0718 ISSUES
SKAGli/HANFDR&-
TMl AMENDMENT
~"
ACilVE MEMBER NICP GROUP FROM INCEPTION.
o MET WITH ALL RELEVANT GROUPS AS OPPORTUNITIES AND INVITATION o
BECAME AVAILABLE.
MONITORED BOSTON AND HOUSTON AMENDMENT PROGRESS AND PROCESS.
o PARTICIPATED IN APRIL 8,1981 NRC/NICP MEETING.
o EVALUATION OF ISSUES STARTED MID APRIL 1981.
o MAY 1,1981 LETTER TO PLANNING AND PROGRAM ANALYSIS SECTION, g
(HUGH THOMPSON FROM ROBERT V. MYERS), COMMITTED SKAGIT/HANFORD TMI AMENDMENT FOR LATE SUMMER 1981.
I 1
RESULTS OF EVALUATIONS SHOW THAT ABOU1 33 ISSUES FALL INTO OLD CATEGORIES 3, 4 AND 5 AS' DEFINED BY NUEGY@
25 NESCO LEAD ITEMS 3 PUGET LEAD ITEMS
~
10 BECHTEL LEAD ITEMS 1 CONSULTANT LEAD ITEM
- o MAJOR ll' PUTS TO THE 39 ISSUES INVOLVE THE FOLLOWING
04(AMsgnp) 3 HL8P/BEC0/GE/WPPSS (16 ISSUES) l
-860G/GE (13 ISSUES) 1 SKAGIT/HANFORD UNIQUE (10 ISSUES) f BASED ON THE ABOVE EVALUATION AND MONITORit'G, A SKAGIT/HANFORD i o TMl AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL IS BEING PLANNED FOR AUGUST 1,1981cp f
~
Wh
SKAGIT/HA!; FORD ER/PSAR AMENDMENTS IN FEBRUARY 1981 INITI ATED A SCOPING EFFORT A'.a DURING MA o
APRIL 1981 RELEASED CONTRACTORS TO PURSUE THEIR PROGRAM DRAFT TEXT IS CURRENTLY BEING PREPARED AND WILL CONTINU o
THROUGH AUGUST 1981.
BETWEEN SEPTEMBER AND NOVEMBER ALL ER/PSAR TEXT WILL BE o
FINALIZED.
WHERE APPROPRIATE, ER SECTIONS WILL BE SUPPLEMENTED OR o
APPENDICES ADDED TO SATISFY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON SITI CRITERIA.
A MATRIX IDENTIFYll1G THE ABOVE ITEMS WILL BE GENERATED.
MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS AND CONSULTANTS TO fHE ER/PSAR AMEND o
INCLUDE:
PUGET, NESCO, WPPSS, BATTELLE, NUS, BECHTEL, GE (GESSAR PDA), AND OTHERS AS APPROPRIATE.
SUBMIT ER/PSAR CHAPTERS AS S00N AS AVAILABLE: FINAL SUBMI o
NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 1981.
~
~
e
(_
,l
c SCHEJULE FILE ERIPSARIEFSEC 12/81 SUPPLEMENTAL EIS AND SER 04/82
~
START HEARINGS 06/82 FILE FINDINGS 09/82
'~' BOARD DECISIONS 12/82 CP AND SITE CERTIFICATION 01/83 O
.+,i k
/* dedtv Ennennt,dq yUNE15,1981 HEET 1 0F 2 SKAGIT/ITANtuRU PSAR AMENDEENI
' o jiECIIGN '
TITLE CFIANGE
]0
- lNTRODUCTION AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION MINOR CHANGE TO REFLECT NEW SITE.
OF,, P u AN T 2.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS GEOGR APHY AND DEMOGR APHYh/osn',dtdh o W{'55)
BASED ON WPPSS DATA AND UPDATED T0 2.1 n
w REFLECT 1980 CENSUS DATA.
2.2 NEARBY INDUSTRIAL, TRANSPORTATION BASED ON WPPSS DATA AND INCLUDES AND MILITARY FACILITIES SITE SPECIFIC VICINITY INFORMATION.
2.3 METEOROLOGY BASED ON WPPSS DATA WITH SITE / PLANT SPECIFIC INFORMATION.
2. 11 llYDR0 LOGIC ENGINEERING BASED ON WPPSS DATA WITH SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION.
2.5 GEOLOGY, SEISMOLOGY AND GEOTECHNICAL BASED UPON PUGET/WPPSS GENERIC PROGRA'4/
ENGINEERING REVIEW WITH SITE SPECIFIC GE0 TECHNIC /.L INFORMATION.
2.G VOLCANIC llAZARDS BASED ON PUGET/WPPSS GENERIC PROGRAM /
REVIEW.
3.0 DESIGN W ""i UPDATED TO REFLECT SITE RELOCATION.
1.0 REACTOR NO CHANGE.
1 5.0 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM AND NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
CONNECTED SYSTEMS G.0 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
7.0 INSTRUMLNTATION AND CONTROLS NO CHANGE.
$HkT2'0E2 r
SKAGJT/HAi,,4D PSAR AMEtGMERT SECT 10N TLTLE CHANGE 8.0 ELECTRIC PcWER 8.1
-ftttMDBUCW N MODIFIED TO REFLECT SITE RELOCATION.
s 8.2 OCFSITE POWER "YSTEM MODIFIED TO REFLECT SITE RELOCATION.
8.3
.E POWER SYSTEMS NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
9.0 1ARY SYSTEMS MINOR CHANGES TO WATER SYSTEMS TO REFLECT
//
NEW SITE.
10.0 /.EIMANDPOWERCONVERSION MINOR CHANGE TO WATER SYSTEMS TO REFLECT i
NEW SITE.
j 11.0 RADIDACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
12.0 RADIATION PROTECTION NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
13.0 CONpVCT OF OPERATIONS REVISED BY TMI AMENDMENT.
14.0 INITIAL IEST PROGRAM NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
i3.0 ACCIDENT ANALYSES REVISED TO REFLECT SITE SPECIFIC X/OS.
16.0 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS NO CHANGE.
1/.0 CU ALITY ASSUR ANCE R!vlSEDTOREFLECTINCORFORATIONOFTHE N SCO ORGANIZAT10N.
'tl,* ; f..
- N!
A
IUNE 15 1981
/
5HEET1,0F2 SKAGIT/HANF01tu ENVIRONBENTAL REPORT SEG10N IllE CHANGE
!.0 PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY AND UPDATED TO REFLECT NEW SYSTEM RESOURCES l
Ass 0CIATEDTRANSMISSIONSqi[t,-fer 2.0 THE StTE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACES 2.1 GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY BASED ON WPPSS DATA AND UPDATED TO REFLECT 1980 CENSUS DATA.
2.2 ECOLOGY BASED ON WPPSS DATA WITH SITE SPECIFIC INFORMATION.
2.3 METEOROLOGY BASED ON WPPSS DATA.
2.4 HYDROLOGY BASED ON WPPSS DATA.
2.5 GEOLOGY BASED ON WPPSS DATA.
2.6 0ULTURAL RESOURCES Dm N" '
BASED ON WPPSS DATA WITH SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION.
2.7 NOISE BASED ON WPPSS DATA.
2.8 BACKGROUND
RADIOACTIVITY BASED ON WPPSS DATA.
(STATE REQUIREMENT) 3.0 THE STATION 3.1 EXTERNAL APPEARANCE NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
3.2 NSSS AND TG NO CHANGE.
3.3 STATION WATER USE UPDATED TO REFLECT SITE-SPECIFIC INFORMATION.
~
3.4 HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM REFLECTS NEW COOLING TOWER DESIGN AND INCORPORATES WPPSS INTAKE AND DISCHARGE FACILITY DESIGN.
Julli 15 L81 O
SHEET 2,0F 2 SKAGIT/HANF0nu ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT SECILO!!
TITLE CHANGE 3.5 RADwASTE SYSTEMS AND SOURCE TERMS Il0 SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
3.6 CHEMICAL AND B10 CIDE WASTES NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGE.
3.7 SANITARY AND OTHER WASTE SYSTEMS REVISED TV REFLECT SITE-SPECIFIC DESIGN.
3.8 RAD 10ACTlvE MATERIALS INVENTORY NO CHANGE.
3.9 IRANSMISSION FACILITIES REVISED TO REFLECT SITE-SPECIFIC DESIGN, 3.10 ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARIZES PSAR CHAPTER 2 DESIGN CRITERIA.
(STATE REQUIREMENT) 3.11 SECURITY SUMMARIZES PSAR CHAPTER 13.6.
(STATE REQUIREMENT) 3.12 EMERGENCY PLANS SUMMARIZES PSAR CHAPTER 13.3.
(STATE REQUIREMENT) 4]O SITE PREPARATION AND CONSTRUCTION REV! SED TO REFLECT NEW SITE LOCATION.
5: 0 PLANT OPERATION REVISED TO REFLECT NEW SITE LOCATION.
G0 ENVIRONMENT AL MONITORING PROGRAMS BASED ON WPPSS MONITORING PROGRAMS.
7.0 ACCIDENT REVISED TO REFLECT NEW SITE LOCATION.
8.0 SOC 10 ECONOMICS REVISED TO REFLECT NEW SITE LOCATION AND SCHEDULE.
9.0 ALTERNATIVES REVISED TO REFLECT MOVE TO ALTERNATE SKAGIT SITE AND UPDATED ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCE INFORMATION.
10.0 DESIGN ALTERNATIVES BASED ON WPPSS DESIGN AlfERNATIVES.
CR6f.1E!L3_IIE_SIM1011 CROSS REFER. TO SECILOl' C_0RTENTS EFSEC RED.
3.1 EXTERNAL APPEARANCE WAC 463-42-210 WAC 463-42-580 3.2 REACTOR AND STEAM-ELECTRIC WAC 463-42-210 SYSfEM 3.2.1 NUCL E AR STE AM SUPPLY SYSTEM WAC 463-42-210 3.2.2 TURBINE SYSTEH WAC 463-42-210 3.3 STATION WATER USE WAC 46 210 WAC 46 390 DVERALL PLANT WAC 463-42-210 (3.3.1 WAC 463-42-390 3.3.2 HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM WAC 463-42-210 WAC 463-42-390 3.3.3 PROCESS WATER IREATMENT WAC 463-42-210 SYSTEMS WAC 463-42-390 3.3.4 CHEMIC AL AND RADWASTE WAC 463-42-210 WAC 463-42-280 bYSTEMS WAC 463-42-390 3.4 HEAT DISSIPATION SYSTEM WAC 463-42-210 l
3.4.1 COOLING TOWERS WAC 463-42-210 3.4.2 CIRCUL ATING MATER SYSTEM WAC 463-42-210
r.
~'
EPSEC INTPitP ACft M ATitiX (W A C-4 5 3-4 2) w AC seCTron mt secTion NOTrs 11 0.
Centent - Grephic meterlet. It is the intec? that
$11 All graphic meterial in the En rneet this meteriel submitted pursuent to these guide!'nes shnu requ'rement.
tw descriptive end shell include 1:!ustretive greph!cs in edetico to narration. This requirement shell partleularly apply to sub,'ect mntter that deels with syste'ns, precesses, end spet'el reistionship. The meteriel so submitted shall be prepered in a profess'enel r"enner end in suc5 form and seste e.s to te understood by those who n'ay rey!ew it.
IM.
Centent - Sources of '..ormatic.n.
The appl! cent All References In the ER rneet the requirement s%11 d sclose scurces of ;d Infermellen and date end shell for dlselosure of source Informat!cn. Pre-identif y e t
,....t fen st udies beertrg on the site and oppilca.n studies are described in the ER.
Ot he-sou tes of informet!on.
120.
Content - Construction emd Study Schedules. The 4.1 and other Sect!en 4.1 will discuss construction schedules.
erMiennt s%ll fur 9ish a brlef description of all present appropria te Schedules for environmental studles which are er projected construction schedules and schedules for Sections necessary to complete the application will be enWormentel studies whleh ere necessary to complete d!scuued In th= eppropriate Ell sections.
the epptlention. The stud!cs descr'ptiens shnuld outlire their scope end Indieete projected comp!etf.n dates, t
tM.
Content - Potentiel for future activltles et site.
1.1 Modify ER Section 1.2 to include future T he erplicent shell describe the potentlel for any future ect!vities.
edditiens, empens!ons, er further activltles which rnight be onde*teken by the applicent on or contiguous to the a-
- d site.
150.
Content - Analysis of etternettves. 'rhe opptleent 9.0, 10.0 s%11 provide en enslysts of af ternettves for si;*, route, end other mejor elements of the proposal.
+*.O
.r..a ~
.g r
l PPSP.C fytTEftP ACE M ATitfK
(% AC-463-42)
NOTQ ER SPCTIOr4_
W AC SECTION 9
3.v. 4.?
The Content - Energy transmissten systems.
' pn! constwetion schedule of att proposed enoctated*ppliennt eell deteri5e the routtreg, conceptu
' 243.
f eell'tles to t* constreeted.
3.9,10.9 Centent - Criterin, stenderds, and feetors The eppUcent
,' 250.
, utilized to develop t ensmission route.shnll indicate the f'.deral, state, and Industry criterle trensmission route selection end used in the energ'
, censtructlen f ac* ors considered in develop!ng the, proposed desir, and shall Indicate bo ere s9ttsfled.
3.9, 4.2. S..
Co, tent \\tuttlpurpose use of transmission f
The oppilemnt shall Ind!cese consideration of 250.
! rnultipu*lvse utilitellen of r!ghts of way end
. routes.
l d to uttllte,
('eser!De the measures to t>e emp oye restore, or rehabilltete disturbed trees.
2.1.2 Content - Safety where publie eeeess ellowed.
e The Pppucant shai!! deserlbe the means proposed toinsure safe utlliretion of thosa erees under np Add Section 2.9 Tiedfonctivity tr En metris,
' 170.
centrol to which pubMe access will be gianted.
3.3.4, 3.5, 3.9, For feellities whleh 4.4, 5.2, 7.1. 7.2 Content - Radlett..n levels.
prepme to release nny red!oactive meterials, the 2E0.
eppilesnt eMll set forth information relettrg to Such Information shall Include red!c*ettwity.
j tuckg-ound radiation levels of enpropriate receptorThe appliennt shall also t
medim pertleent to the alte.
rieserite the preposed radioactive waste treatment f-process, the entle!peted release of radlonveUdes, their espected distribution end retention In the enstonment, and pathways whleh may become sources
e A
N I i f
4 g
L..__
EPSEC tNTEHFACH M ATHfX (W AC-4 6 3-4 21 W AC SPCTION Ett 8FCTION NUTF1 of tediation upusure, and projected resulting radiation duses to human populations. Other sources of radistim which may be associated with the project shall be desertbed in ett opptlestions.
290.
Contert - Protection from risturel bezerds. The Add Section 3.10 on environmental herard opplicant shsU descr3e the meen.s employed for design arlterle.
protectien of the fee..ity from carthquakes, flood, tsunami, storms, evalanche or lendslides, and other m ejor rsatural disruptive occurrences.
Y 3CO, Conte t - Security concerns. The epplicent shall Add Seetion 3.11 on security concerns.
/\\ describe the means employed for protection of the feeility from sabotage, vendat!sm and other security thr e a ts.
310 Content - f.mergency ptens. The epplicent shall Add Section 3.11 on emergency plans.
describe emergency piens to essure the public safety and s
environmental protection on and off the site in the event of a natural disester er other mejor !neicent and further, will identify the speelfle rapons!bilities which a
will be assumed by the eppiteent.
s 320.
C-Went - Earth removal. The opptleent shnu 4.1, 4.5 dacribe ell procedures to be utilized to m!ntm!ze crusion end other adverse consequences during the removal of vntetetton, eteevation of borrow pits, foundatims end trenches, disposal of surplus materlels, er.] curtstruction of earth fil!s. Tt'e locatlon of such eetivities shall be described and the quantitles of m eteria! shall t>e indf ested.
330.
Content - Surface-water runoff. The applicant 4.1, 4.5 staU describe how surfece-water runof; and erosion a e e