ML19209A529

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 79-079/03L-0:on 790909,reactor Water Level Surveillance Test Grace Period Had Been Exceeded.Caused by Personnel Error.Test Was Performed Satisfactorily.Personnel Counseled on Timely Completion of Tests
ML19209A529
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/1979
From:
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19209A505 List:
References
LER-79-079-03L-01, LER-79-79-3L-1, NUDOCS 7910040286
Download: ML19209A529 (1)


Text

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7CMM 364 g

. LICENSEE EVENT REPOFlT {

(PLEASE PRINT 09 TYPE ALL RECUtRED INPORf.tATION)

  • CONTROL BLOCK: l l l l l l lh l [s. g 3

M J Auct~sEE l E lCoat I l H l l l@l 0 l O l 0 lucEsst

.4 is O l 0~u-.E.

l 0 l 010 l 0 l 0 l2t,0 l@l >> uc ~st4 lTTPE 1 l,a1. I Is,I cI Tl@l l 5

"!'?"' 60Lt_]@l0 15 occKET s

65 to I *iuM4Em 0101312 6dI 1 63l@t 0 EVENTI 9oATE i O 19 I 719 l@l0 14 7. is 12 L' REPO.tToATE 8J 17 19 l@

a #

EVENT CESC tiPTION AND PPC8 ABLEl JNSECUENCES h l

yl While in shutdown, it was discovered that ne Reactor kater Level (ADS) Serveillance l l

Test' (HNP-1-3251) grace feriod had been c.xceeded. The Lest was completed ten (10) j

, l hours later than the grace period allows. When the surveillance test was performed. l i 3 g the level switches were found to be operating satisfactory.  ;

, hk b b i.

I a 1 .3 CE CoOE Su C E CCVPoNCNT Coc.E SLS co'E $ E s II IB l@ [Aj@ {C J Q l ZlI3 Zl Z l Z l Z l Z l@ [Z J@ [Z 13 19 20 JQ 8 9 10 11 12 e4EV151oN sEcutNTI AL OCCURRENCE P 2 Po*ti ^

R EPoRT No. CooE T4PE .40.

LER

@ ,agg/Ro g EVENTYEAR I7 I9 I l-J l 01 71 91 24 26 M

27 i oi3I 25 29 LI 30 l-1 31 W32

,,,,. 2 8 22 23 "s'u"p'e8 E7 uf0uIOETu"n'sa TNr" 'EcEo"5 ofa72d7 **S?:7 u souns

  • s5 s' M I U Po E "aS e.

l0 l0 l0 @j 0] [ Nlg l N [g l Z l Z l Z l Z l@

[HJglJ4Z 33 lg lJsZ lg l3aiZ]@ 31 40 41 42 l3Zl@

4 44 47 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS o l rae cause was_ personnel error. The lim!t of the grace peri.od was overlooked. Th t. J surveillance test was perf ormed satisf actorily. Personnel was counseled on the I

l I

,7 )

importance of cocipleting surveillance tests within their grace periods.

I i3 I I

e4 l 80 8 9

% power oTHER$7ATUs isCo ERY oascovtHY oEscRIP Tion sTA s l I5 b @ l0l0l0l@j ' '

NA l l B l@l Maint. Supr. Observation

' c'Tivity A co'0 TENT LocATies or aELE AsE @

mEtt..sto or aELEAst 15S 1Iz_] @ 10lZl@lt1 AuovNT NA os ActiviTv 44 l

4s

@l NA 8J PERsoNN EL. E X PosuR E s Nu'AS E R TYPE oisCRIPTioN

  • l NA 87 101010 l@l El@l
  • * ,Easo~~ A'iN,vLs Nuvet a oEscRiefioN@ NA - l

_L 10 lo lo l@l 83 lO'!O 110

_ 9 11 12 W,5 " s^c"^,'rio' " c" @

E NA l s LE j@l 8 9 to

' " * ' ' '* ""C"' "'*

@. 7 910 04 0 A & lllIllll1f[lj:;

o isdsuE l @SEscai,rio, NA 4l e3 s se es

_ _  !