ML18093B006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision 31 to Updated Safety Analysis Report, Post-Fire Safe Shutdown (Pfssd) Analysis, XX-E-013, Rev 4, Sequence CN002
ML18093B006
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/2018
From:
Wolf Creek
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18093A810 List: ... further results
References
WO 18-0011 XX-E-013, Rev 4, Seq CN002
Download: ML18093B006 (11)
v • d • e


Text

FORM APF-OSD-001-01 REV 10 -, Page 1 CALCULATION CHANGE NOTICE CCN NO_ XX-E-013 -~-<...'J.PCJ2.-

GN0~ /0;.: -Base Cale No. Rev No. Sequence No. CALCULATION TITLE -Enter this item in CALCULATION TITLE field in EIS: Post-Fire Safe Shutdown (PFSSD) Analysis COMPUTER CODE: N/A VERSION: N/A Administrative?

I DYES IZI NO I ASSOCIATED CHANGE #: l DCP 14209 I ON/A -only if Administrative REGULATORY D REVIEWS: Attached IZI Attached to: DCP 14209 Evaluation#

USAR STATEMENT:

D Requires a change to the USAR: IZI Does not require a change to the USAR ANY DOCUMENTS D YES If yes, Condition Report# I IMPACTED?

IZI NO Status: IZI COMMITTED D FINAL D VOID D SUPERSEDED DigsigOrg

2. 8, o. 7 /0/zl/l.£'

ORIG 8FiaF1 i;;:gx i(/,//~l}t

-41. {,(/;t_k111s_

e ,,g ,, ;rn i.s-ORIG PlintedName Date PlintedName Date ~., ~-i¥-4/J#~ Signature Signature ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED:

ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED:

DigsigVer 2.8, 0.7 I ?/?:?.;/J'5 VERF Howa~F -~-VERF Date Printed Name Date Signature Signature ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED:

ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED:

DigsigApp 2.8, D. 7 S-eff S\..\..-teo 10/~1!/ ~Q,., APP -deff £Ytlir 69,'2'.:,:,l,lQ=l:i APP Printed Name Date Printed Name Date -4',, I/ _"}.. -/.--//1 ,,/ .J1 -)\~ Signature Sionature

/ / ,r ~\\\\\\llllllllll/f////l

~,,~ " r,..N R 11~ o* *t 11

  • d ~~~-_.: .... J::o+% 191 a y s1gne .-*,cE.Ns~
  • -f ~P.7}t\ by Brian R Fox *295 = § Date: \ 1\. ..-ti 2013.09.25

\%~-~t'!~r:-.~---&~f 1a*27*31 -os*oo* "IONAL& . . 'IJ/111, ~\\\\~ 711 llll/lJIIU11\\\\\\\X RPE Certification (For ASME Section Ill Stress Reports/Design Reports, l'efer to AP OSD-001 for qualification requirements)

FORM APF-OSD-001-02, REV. 10 Page 2 CALCULATION CHANGE NOTICE -~r -G/6{):L.. CCN NO. XX-E-013 Base Cale No. Rev No. Sequence No. CALCULATION SUBJECT (Statement Of Problem) -Enter this in SUBJECT field in EIS: DCP 14209 removes the HMCP breakers from MCC cubicles NG03DBF6 and NG04DBF6, which were added as PFSSD components in CCN XX-E-013-003-CN004 per DCP 13800. These breaker cubicles provide power and control functions for Train A and B Emergency Diesel Generator Room supply fan motors DCGM01A and DCGM01 B, respectively.

Due to breaker coordination issues, DCP 14209 will modify the power supply to supply 480 VAC power to the diesel generator room supply fan motors DCGMD1A and DCGM01 B directly from new Load Center breakers NG0308 and NG0408, respectively.

Breakers NG0308 and NG0408 will supply power to the fan control functions within NG03DBF6 and NG04DBF6, respectively.

Therefore, MCC cubicles NG03DBF6 and NG04DBF6 will remain as PFSSD components.

FORM APF-OSD-001-02, REV IO Page 3 CALCULATION DATABASE INPUT CAW2._ CCN NO. XX-E-013 --CNOOli Base Cale No. Rev No. Sequence No. l!J/;!,#._

Link systems to the calculation/CCN in EIS. Systems NG Affected:

Develop relationships between interdependent calculations in EIS. Additional Calculations Providing None Input to this calculation:

Additional Calculations None Impacted by this calculation:

Develop relationships between the calculation/CCN and controlled reference documents in EIS. Additional Controlled None Documents Inputs to this calculation:

Additional Controlled None Documents Impacted by this calculation:

The reference documents listed below are those that cannot be linked to the calculation/CCN and shall be entered in the INDUSTRY REFERENCE field in EIS, e.g., ASME Codes, ANSI Standards, letters, etc. Additional Other DCP 14209, Rev. 0 Reference Documents:

Link components to the calculation/CCN in EIS. Additional Components:

None REFER TO DESKTOP GUIDE FOR PROCESSING CALCULATIONS IN EIS FORM APF-OSD-001-02, REV JO CCN Page No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 DVR SCRN AD Page 4 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES aYf C.Na::>L CCN NO. XX-E-013 ---9%3---6NQ9§ ---8-a-se-Ca_l_c_N-.o-.

--Rev No. -S-eq-u-en_c_e_N_o_. -II0/¥6 Cale. CCN Cale. CCN Page Page Page Page Affected No. Affected No. DVR/SCRN/

/DVR/SCRN Other /Other N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A App. 3, pgs 62, 86, 87, 88 and 90 DVR Design Verification Repokt (if applicable)

Regulatory Screening (if applicable)

Applkability Determination Cale. CCN Cale_ Page Page Page Affected No. Affected /DVR/SCRN

/DVR/SCRN

/Other /Other FORM APF-OSD-001-02 REV 10 CALCULATION SHEET Changes to XX-E-013 are described in the following pages. The Calculation Main Body is not affected by this change. Appendix 1 is not affected by this change. Appendix 2 is not affected by this change. Changes to Appendix 3 are shown on the following pages. Appendix 4 is not affected by this change. Attachment 1 is not affected by this change. '~ r ~is not affected by this change. fi"'~ W16 t!J~~ G ,o, ,Afotaol'l1+1ei::it

~s not affected by this change. Page 5 ,;v,L,J Ot/Cl::'.}.t.

,,,1 ~oo. ___ x_x_-E_-_0_1_3

___ -~---*-e_~_e_s_~s Base Cale. No. Rev. No. Sequence N<;i FORM APF-OSD-001-02, REV. 10 CALCULATION SHEET CCN NO. XX-E-013 Base caJ.c. No. Revise Appendix 3 as follows (Changes shown in boldface).

Also refer to CCN XX-E-013-003-CN004.

a:J'f -...fJ.e -Rev. No. Page 6 a,',;Zl.2...

,-eN&&5' Sequence No .1.r.z.~s

  • -: 1:1{~:-te:m o~e~r~,1:

':i ;,,/,.~~;~-, ;~irJi>.;nsi~It1nt'* . , '""~*~* ,-;,--~.-~ .' *./*** *:**: ~-*r ~xi[) .* .,, : ; ftt .. , .. 'SIG, .*Desct1p11on, A . </ 1* T ....

  • Other .. Drawmgs Power Source \t, . "'~. : ... ,./.{ l~: .. * ' ; * -* *, {~, *:.:L oca 10n ._.;: , . ~**. . . . . . GM DCGM01A 1 GM IDCGM01B GM IGMHIS0001A GM IGMHIS0011A GM IGMHS0011 B NG ING0308 NG ING0408 NG ING03DBF6 NG ING04DBF6 4 !Train B Diesel Generator I 5201 I D-2 Ventilation Supply Fan Train A Diesel Generator I 3601 I C-27 Ventilation Supply Fan HIS 4 !Train B Diesel Generator I 3601 I C-27 Ventilation Supply Fan HIS 4 IT rain B Diesel Generator I 5201 Room Supply Fan HS D-2 !Train A Diesel Generator I 3301 I C-9 Room Ventilation Supply Fan (DCGM01A) 4 !Train B Diesel Generator!

3302 I C-10 Room Ventilation Supply Fan (DCGM01B) Train A Diesel Generator I 5203 I 0-1 Ventilation Supply Fan 4 IT rain B Diesel Generator I 5201 I D-2 VenUlation Supply Fan S IR,M.HI X RL020 S IR, M, HI X RL020 S IR, M, H X S IR, M, H S I R,M,H X S I R,M,H X S I R,M,H X S IR, M, H X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X M-12GM01 I E-13GM01A M-12GM01 I E-13GM01 M-12GM01 I E-13GM01A M-12GM01 I E-13GM01A M-12GM01 j E-11NG01 E-13NG01A M-12GM01 I E-11NG02 E-13NG01A E-13GM01 E-11NG20 E-13GM01A NG0308 .NGJ3!)8f:o NG0408 NGQ4DBF6 NG0308 NG03DBF6 NG0408 NG04DBF6 NG0408 NG04DBF6 NG03 NG03 NG0308 NG0408 . ~.Notes* R E* V 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 FORM APF OSF-001-01, REV. 04 PAGE 1 OF 5 DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT OOJ,f-CMXQ_ DOCUMENT NO. XX-E-013-~ $A'~>> DOCUMENT TITLE: Post-Fire Safe Shutdown (PFSSD) Analysis ORIGINATOR: Brian R. Fox .DESIGN VERIFIED.: 0 PRELIMINARY !ZJ FINAL D REVISION SAFETY CLASSIFICATION.: 0 SAFETY-RELATED !ZJ SPECIAL SCOPE 0 NON-SAFETY RELATED .VERJFICA TION METHOD.: !ZJ DESIGN REVIEW 0 AL TERNA TE CALCULATION D TESTING !Zl INDIVlDUAL VERIFICATION SIGNATURE: DATE: 9/24/13 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED-- ES9280465 OR ES9280479 D TEAM VERIFICATION Scope Verified: SIGNATURE: .DATE: TEAM LEADER SIGNATURE: DATE: QUALIFICATION REQUIREU ES9280465 OR ES9280479

  • Team leader signature certifies that adequate interfaces and overlaps have occurred.

OVERVIEW (PURPOSE AND SCOPE): The purpose of this CCN is to incorporate the changes to the PFSSD Analysis due to relocating the Train A and B Emergency Diesel Generator Room supply fan power supplies from MCC cubicles NG03DBF6 and NG04BF6 to Load Center Breakers NG0308 and NG0408, respectively. CRUCIAL AREAS: 1. Ensure the Database Input sheet is complete and accurate.

2. Ensure all changes shown in Appendix 3 are complete and accurate.
3. Determine whether any changes, in addition to Appendix 3, should be made. AL TERNA TE OR INDEPENDENT ITEMS USED FOR VERIFICATION:
1. CCN XX-E-013-003-CN004 FORM APF 05F-00l-Ol, REV. 04 PAGE 2 OF 5 DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT OM-cM:;O:i...

DOCUMENTNO. XX-E-013-003*EN065-,.,y~~ REV. NIA COMMENTS: ORIGINATOR'S RESPONSE:

1. p2: A superseded CCN should not be the sole 1. Replaced CCN XX-E-013-002-CN014 with CCN reference in line 2 of the Statement of Problem. XX-E-013-003-CN004.

Suggest that the ending of the first sentence be revised to read as follows: " ... PFSSD components in CCN XX-E-013-002-CN014 (subsequently superseded by CCN XX-E-013-003-CN004) per DCP 13800". 2. p3: DCP 14209 should be added to the "Additional

2. DCP 14209 added. Other Reference Documents" section. 3. p4: It is not clear why the affected pages of Appendix 3 3. Changed the affected pages to 62, 86, 87, 88 and are shown as being 61, 85, 86 and 89. It seems that 90. the actual affected pages would be 62, 86, 87, 88, 90. 4. p5: It is generally an error trap to repeat detailed 4. Deleted the 1 51* paragraph.

information in different areas. Suggest that the first paragraph be deleted as it is an exact duplication of what has already been stated in the Calculation Subject. 5. p6: Suggest that the first line above the table be 5. Changed to reference only the current CCN. revised to not only reference the superseded CCN, but also reference the current superseding CCN. 6. Final thought: CN005 to XX-E-013 Rev. 3 appears to 6. It is not the intent to revise portions of CN004 with revise portions of CN004 to XX-E-013 Rev. 3. The CN005. CN005 uses the current information in calculation procedure does not allow CCNs to be the parent calculation plus outstanding CCNs, revised, only superseded. Explain how or why this is which are required to be considered when acceptable. preparing a new CCN. Both CCNs need to be worked together when revising the parent calculation following implementation in MC20. CONCLUSIONS: The changes accomplished by CCN XX-E-013-003-CN005 are complete and accurate. FORM APF OSF-001-01 REV 04 ' PAGE 3 OF 5 DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT 00'1-C/V.x>.Z. DOCUMENT NO. XX-E-013-093 E?Ht65 ~p/1.y/S-REV. NIA TABLE A (This table is required for change packages, or when required by a Supervisor.) If the answer to the question is yes, then provide a descriptive answer that explains why you came to this conclusion. If the question is not annlicable, then provide a descriptive explanation detailing why it is not applicable.

1. Were the design inputs correctly selected and incorporated into the design? 2. Are assumptions, necessary to perform the design activity, documented, adequately described and reasonable?
3. Are the appropriate quality and quality assurance requirements specified?
4. Are the applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements, including issue and addenda, properly identified and are their requirements for design met? 5. Has applicable plant and industry construction and operating experience been considered?
6. Have the hardware interface design requirements been satisfied?
7. Is the output reasonable compared to input? 8. Are the specified parts, equipment and processes suitable for the required application?
9. Are the specified materials compatible with each other and the design environmental conditions to which the material will be exposed?

FORM APF OSF-001-01, REV. 04 DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT REV. N/A TABLE A (This table is required for change packages, or when required by a Supervisor.) lfthe answer to the question is yes, then provide a descriptive answer that explains why you came to this conclusion. If the question is not a licable, then rovide a descri tive ex lanation detailin wh it is not a licable. 10. Have adequate maintenance features and requirements been specified?

11. Are accessibility and other design provisions adequate for performance of needed maintenance and repair? 12. Has adequate accessibility been provided to perform the in-service inspection expected to be required during the plant life? 13. Has the design properly considered radiation exposure to the public and plant personnel?
14. Have adequate pre-operational artd subsequent periodic test requirements been appropriately specified?
15. Does each document contain the required signatures and date? 16. If a computer program was used in the analysis, has the program been verified?
17. If a component has been added, has a Safety Classification Analysis been completed?
18. Were the commitments provided in the USAR and the Design Criteria documents correctly incorporated into the design documents?

FORM APF OSF-001-01, REY. 04 PAGE50F5 DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT "t'-CAt.:::;.;;,.Z.. DOCUMENT NO. XX-E-013-~~.,P~ REV. N/A TABLE A (This table is required for change packages, or when required by a Supervisor.) If the answer to the question is yes, then provide a descriptive answer that explains why you came to this conclusion. If the question is not a licable, then rovide a descri tive ex lanation detailin wh it is not a licable. 19. Have the appropriate design documents been identified and/or updated? 20. Has warehouse stock been considered for modification or retirement?}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18093B006&oldid=1504893"