ML18058A953
| ML18058A953 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 02/27/2018 |
| From: | Booma Venkataraman Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Venkataraman B | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18058A526 | List: |
| References | |
| CAC MF3301, CAC MF3302, EPID L-2013-LLF-0001 | |
| Download: ML18058A953 (2) | |
Text
A 20180122SE SectionNo.
20180122SE PageNo.
20171109DraftSE PageNo.
Draft Paragraph No.
20171128DRAFTSEComment ProposedRevisedStatement 20180122SEStatement Comment 18 3.1.1.2 33 34 bulletlist Onesectionshouldbeaddedtothislist:section3.3.6.Ref 12providedatableofsectionsthatneedtobechanged fromComplieswithClarificationtoeitherCompliesor ComplieswithuseofEEEE.Ref14providedanupdateto thattable-Table5b.01.ThethirditemisSection3.3.6with acompliancestatementofComplieswithUseofEEEE-FunctionallyEquivalent.
Othersectionsclassifiedlikethisaregivenanexplanationin thedraftSER,confirmingthattheEEEEdemonstratesthe basisforbeingacceptable.
NFPA805,Section3.3.6requiresthatmetalroofdeck constructionshallbedesignedandinstalledsotheroofing systemwillnotsustainaselfpropagatingfireonthe undersideofthedeckwhenthedeckisheatedbyafire insidethebuilding.RoofcoveringsshallbeClassAas determinedbytestsdescribedinNFPA256,Standard MethodsofFireTestsofRoofCoverings InFPERAI05b(Reference23),theNRCstaffrequestedthe licenseetoreviewall"CompliancewithClarification" compliancestatementsandensurethatthestrategyis suitableforthecondition.InitsresponsetoFPERAI05b (Reference12),thelicenseestatedthatthecompliance statementforNFPA805,Section3.3.6willberevisedto "Complies"and/or"ComplieswithUseofEEEE."InFPERAI 05.02(a)(Reference26),theNRCstaffrequestedthatthe licenseeidentifyiftheNFPA805,Chapter3,compliance statementiseither"Complies"or"ComplieswithUseof EEEE"andprovidethecompliancebases.Initsresponseto FPERAI05.02(a)(Reference14),thelicenseestatedthatit "ComplieswithUseofEEEE"withtheNFPA805,Section 3.3.6requirementandrevisedthecompliancebasis.The NRCstaffconcludesthatthelicensee'sresponsetoFPERAI 05bandFPERAI05.02(a)areacceptablebecausethe licenseerevisedthecompliancestatementandbasistomeet theNFPA805requirement,whichisalsoinaccordancewith theguidancecontainedinRG1.205andNEI0402forthe useofEEEEs.
N/A NFPA805Section3.3.6needstobeaddedtoSERSection 3.1.1.2"ComplianceStrategyComplieswithClarification" onthebottomofSERpage33.
Additionally,aparagraphneedstobeaddedonSERpage35 regardingNFPA805Section3.3.6(SimilartoNFPA805 Section3.5.10onSERpage37).InFPERAI05b,itwasstated thatthecompliancestatementforNFPA805Section3.3.6 willberevisedtoCompliesand/orComplieswithUseof EEEE.InresponsetoFPERAI05.02(a),itwasstatedthat ComplieswithUseofEEEEisusedforNFPA805Section 3.3.6.
19 3.1.1.2 35 36 1
AfollowupRAIwasissuedregardingNFPA805Section 3.3.5.3(FPERAI04.01L15371ML15356A136),withthe responsestatingthatapprovalwillberequestedasan AttachmentLItem.TheAttachmentLItemwassubmittedas ApprovalRequest6.(L16058ML16055A160).
ThisshouldbeupdatedtoreflecttheApprovalRequest, whichisidentifiedinSESection3.1.4.6 SeeSEpage194forsamecomment.
Add:InFPERAI04.01(Reference25),theNRCstaffstatedIn theengineeringevaluation,thelicenseeconcludedthatthe lowpopulationof cablesthatdonotmeetInstituteofElectricalandElectronics Engineers(IEEE)
Standard383,1974Edition,orequivalent,wereconsidered inthefiremodeling evaluationanddeterminedtobeadequateforthehazard.In accordancewith FAQ060008,thistypeofEEEEcannotbeselfapprovedby thelicensee.InitsresponsetoFPERAI04.01(Reference14),
thelicenseestatedthatthecompliancestrategyforNFPA 805Section3.3.5.3,forthelowpopulationofcableswith potentiallynonqualifiedelectricalcableinsulationmaterial installedinelectricalracewaysatBVPS1andBVPS2willbe revisedto"SubmitforNRCApproval" N/A:Thelicenseefurtherstatedthatthecables installedwerecomparedtoIEEE383,whichisarecognized flamepropagationtestacceptedinFAQ060022(Reference 74).Thelicenseefurtherstatedthattheengineeringanalysis determinedthatthemajorityoftheelectriccablesused withinthepowerblockareequivalenttotherequirements ofNFPA805,Section3.3.5.3,andthelowpopulationof electriccableswithpotentiallynonqualifiedelectriccable insulationmaterialsinstalledinelectricalracewaysis acceptable.TheNRCstaffconcludesthatthelicensee's responsetotheRAIisacceptablebecausethelicensee demonstratedthatitusedengineeringevaluationsto compareitscableinstallationsagainstthecriteriaofNFPA 805andtheguidanceofFAQ060022anddeterminedthat theinsulationmaterialsareacceptable.
Omittingthe"proposedrevisedstatement"doesnotalign withtheNRCstaffpositionduringtheRAIresponses.The NRCstaffdidnotaccepttheEEEE"AdequatefortheHazard" conclusion,hencethefollowupFPERAI04.01andtheneed toissuetheAttachmentLrequestforSection3.3.5.3.
However,theAttachmentLrequestisdescribedinSection 3.1.1.5and3.1.4.6,butthesesectionsnowdonotalign withwhatSection3.1.1.2states.NotethattheotherNFPA 805Chapter3sectionsdescribedin3.1.1.2thatinitially performedaEEEEforthefirstroundRAIresponseand subsequentlychangedtoanAttachmentLRequestfor ApprovalinthesecondroundRAIresponse,andareall accuratelydescribed.
28 3.1.1.4 50 52 3rdSub Bullet FireCompartments2PT1,2SG1Sarenotlisted,butwere identifiedintheFPERAI02TableforNFPA805Section 3.11.3.
InLARAttachmentA,thelicenseestatedthatinfire compartments2PT1,2SB1,2SB2,2SB3,2SB4,2SB5,2 SB6,2SB7,2SB8,2SB9,2SG1S,2WH1,and3CR1 Both2PT1and2SG1Swereadded,but2SB3was removed.2SB3shouldnothavebeenremoved.
48 3.2.1.4 108 111 4
The"RHR"abbreviationisambiguousinthiscontext:
recommendthisbeclarifiedtodistinguishbetweentheRHR ValveandtheRHRSystem.TheRHRSystemisnotcredited forHotStandby,whiletheRHRValveisanalternativetothe atmosphericdumpvalves.
...Thelicenseestatedthatdecayheatisremovedbyuseofa naturalcirculationcooldownandsteamreleasebythemain steamsafetyvalvesandmanualoperationofatmospheric dumpvalvesorRHRvalveandthatAFWiscreditedtosupply coolingwatertotheSGs...
Thelicenseestatedthatdecayheatisremovedby useofanaturalcirculationcooldownandsteamreleaseby themainsteamsafetyvalvesand manualoperationofatmosphericdumpvalvesorRHRand thatAFWiscreditedtosupplycoolingwatertotheSGs.
Topreventconfusioninfutureinspections,FENOC recommendsthat"valve"beaddedafter"RHR"asfollows:
"atmosphericdumpvalvesorRHR[valve]andthatAFW".
Thiswouldmakeitconsistentwith"DecayHeatRemoval"on page111oftheSE.
A 20180122SE SectionNo.
20180122SE PageNo.
20171109DraftSE PageNo.
Draft Paragraph No.
20171128DRAFTSEComment ProposedRevisedStatement 20180122SEStatement Comment 100 3.5.1.3 188 194 2
AfollowupRAIwasissuedregardingNFPA805Section 3.3.5.3(FPERAI04.01L15371ML15356A136),withthe responsestatingthatapprovalwillberequestedasan AttachmentLItem.TheAttachmentLItemwassubmittedas ApprovalRequest6.(L16058ML16055A160).
ThisshouldbeupdatedtoreflecttheApprovalRequest, whichisidentifiedinSESection3.1.4.6 SeeSEpages35/36forsamecomment.
Replacewith:InFPERAI04.01(Reference25),theNRCstaff statedIntheengineeringevaluation,thelicenseeconcluded thatthelowpopulationofcablesthatdonotmeetInstitute ofElectricalandElectronicsEngineers(IEEE)Standard383, 1974Edition,orequivalent,wereconsideredinthefire modelingevaluationanddeterminedtobeadequateforthe hazard.InaccordancewithFAQ060008,thistypeofEEEE cannotbeselfapprovedbythelicensee.Initsresponseto FPERAI04.01(Reference14),thelicenseestatedthatthe compliancestrategyforNFPA805Section3.3.5.3,forthe lowpopulationofcableswithpotentiallynonqualified electricalcableinsulationmaterialinstalledinelectrical racewaysatBVPS1andBVPS2willberevisedto"Submit forNRCApproval."
InFPERAI04aandFPERAI04c(Reference23),theNRCstaff requestedthatthelicenseeprovideanapprovalrequestin accordancewith10CFR50.48(c)(2)(vii)thatdescribesthePB approachtocompliancewithNFPA805,Section3.3.5.3,for whichNRCapprovalisrequestedorrevisethecompliance basis.InitsresponsetoFPERAI04aandFPERAI04c (Reference12),thelicenseestatedthatLARAttachmentK, assupplemented,LicensingAction27isnotrequired,andan engineeringevaluationwasperformedthatanalyzedthelow populationofcableswithpotentialnonqualifiedelectric cableinsulationmaterialinstalledinelectricalracewaysand determinedtheconfigurationtobeacceptable,and removedthecompliancestatement"SubmitforNRC Approval."
Omittingthe"proposedrevisedstatement"doesnotalign withtheNRCstaffpositionduringtheRAIresponses.The NRCstaffdidnotaccepttheEEEE"AdequatefortheHazard" conclusion,hencethefollowupFPERAI04.01andtheneed toissuetheAttachmentLrequestforSection3.3.5.3.
However,theAttachmentLrequestisdescribedinSection 3.1.1.5and3.1.4.6,butthesesectionsnowdonotalign withwhatSection3.1.1.2states.NotethattheotherNFPA 805Chapter3sectionsdescribedin3.1.1.2thatinitially performedaEEEEforthefirstroundRAIresponseand subsequentlychangedtoanAttachmentLRequestfor ApprovalinthesecondroundRAIresponse,areall accuratelydescribed.
New 4
224 N/A N/A N/A ThelastsentencebeforeSection5beginsshouldbe" whicharetobecompletedbytheendofthesecondUnit2 refuelingoutageafterissuanceofthesafetyevaluation."
ThesentenceinthissectionoftheSEcurrentlysays"Unit 1(2)."
TheemailfromBoomaVenkataraman(NRC)toPhilLashley (FENOC)senton121117hadthecorrectproposed transitionlicensecondition.