ML16176A110

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy - Nuclear Test Reactor Annual Report No. 56; for the Year 2015
ML16176A110
Person / Time
Site: Vallecitos Nuclear Center
Issue date: 06/24/2016
From: Leik M
GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16176A107 List:
References
TML 16-004
Download: ML16176A110 (10)


Text

  • HITACHI Nuclear Energy Vallecitos Nuclear Center 6705 Vallecitos Rd Sunol . CA 94586 USA NUCLEAR TEST REACTOR ANNUAL REPORT NO. 56 FOR THE VEAR 2015 LICENSE R-33 DOCKET 50-73 June 24, 2016 Revision 1

NTR Annual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016 GE Hitachi Nuclear Test Reactor Annual Report No. 56 This report summarizes the operations, changes, tests, experiments, and major maintenance at the GE Hitachi (GEH) Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR), which were authorized pursuant to License R-33, Docket 50-73, and 10CFR50, Section 50.59, for the period of January 1. 2015 throug h December 31. 2015.

I. General Specific information about the operation of the NTR during the reporting period is presented as follows:

~ IN 2015 there were 256 reactor startups with the reactor operating at or above critical for 826.05 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. Total power generation equaled 810.82 EFPH; equivalent to 3.38 MW days. The majority of this time was spent in the performance of approved experiments. either neutron radiography or small sample irradiations.

~ The highest radiation exposure to any worker at NTR was 0.706 Rem.

~ There were two unplanned shutdowns of the reactor in 2015.

~ There were no occurrences that required notification of the NRC during 2015.

II. Organization The details of changes in the status of personnel, which occurred during the reporting period, are described as follows:

~ Mr. Daniel Thomas continued as Manager NTR performing licensed SRO activities and radiography NOT Level Ill activities.

~ Mr. Thomas McConnell continued performing licensed SRO activities. He also worked as a radiographer, NOT Levell I.

~ Mr. Tim Peterson continued performing licensed SRO activities. He also continues performing his radiography NOT Level ill activities.

~ Mr. Max Paronable continued performing licensed RO activities. He also continues his radiography NOT Levell activities.

Page 1 of 9

NTR Ann ual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016

~ Mr. Jorge Gorcia continued performing licensed RO Trainee activities. He qualified as NOT Levell and continued the associated radiography activities.

~ Mr. Martin Whitman continued performing licensed RO Trainee activities. He qualified as NOT Levell and continued the associated radiography activities.

~ Mr. Stephen Nee! continued licensed RO Trainee activities. He qualified as NOT Levell and continued the associated radiography activities.

~ Ms. Carmen qualified as an NOT Level II and continued performing radiography activities.

~ Mr. James Graham. under contract. qualified as NOT Levell and continued performing radiography activities.

~ Ms. Moralynn Segors. under contract. returned to work for NTR to support the operation as a radiographer assistant.

~ IV1r. Mork Leik was hired to perform at the Vallecitos Nuclear Center (VNC) Manager for EHS and RC in 2015 with overall responsibilities for the Vallecitos site, including NTR.

~ IV1r. Earl Saito moved on to another position within GE Hitachi EHS and is no longer directly associated with the daily management of the VNC EHS and RC.

~ IV1r. Thomas Caine continued performing as the VNC Site Manager and the NTR License Level Ill Manager.

Page 2 of9

NTR Annual Report No. 56 June 24 , 2016 III. Facility Changes, Tests, Experiments, and Procedure Changes Approved by the Facility Manager In accordance with written procedures, facility manager approval is required for changes to the facility, procedures, tests, and experiments. Specific information about the reporting period is presented as follows:

A. Facility Changes Pursuant to 10CFR50.59(a). the following facility change was implemented in 2015 requiring Facility Manager, Regulatory Compliance and VTSC approval. The change and associated activities were comprehensively reviewed using a 50.59 analysis.

CA-307. Change of Material used in the Primary Makeup System

>- This change allowed for the replacement of an elbow and pipe connection in the Primary Makeup System that was leaking. The original material was aluminum . The significant change introduced by this repair was when the material of choice for the repair became stainless steel.

CA-213R3, ETA for the Neutron Radiography of Exp losives

>- This change recorded a review to an Experiment Type Approval (ETA). The ETA was updated to the current license and regulatory compliance environment to ensure its continued relevancy for the neutron radiography of objects containing explosive materials at the GE Hitachi Nuclear Test Reactor (NTR).

B. Tests Pursuant to 10CFR50.59(a). no special tests were performed during 2015 .

C. Experiments Pursuant to 10CFR50.59(a). there were no new experiments in 2015 requiring Facility Manager, Regulatory Compliance and VTSC approval. The two routine experiment types described as neutron radiography and Schafer slide sample irradiations were properly authorized utilizing experiment authorization forms throughout 2015.

Page 3 of9

NTR Ann ual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016 D. Procedure Changes Pursuant to 10CFR50.59, three procedural changes were initiated during 2015 to incorporate editorial or typographical corrections, technical data. and changes to requirements, or to provide for the addition or clarification of information and reliability of performance.

Changes were made with Facility Manager and Regulatory Compliance review when required. A summary of the changes is presented in the table below.

Revision Procedure Summary of Changes 1016 SOP 10-4, Explosives Incorporates the necessary changes to add a flagging Handling requirement when explosive setups exceed 70 grams TNT equivalent for Technical Specification compliance assurance.

1017 SOP 3-5 , Manual Poison In conjunction with the change in the manual poison Sheet sheet (MPS) configuration, changed Table 1 to record the new nomenclature for the 118 MPS .

1018 SOP 10-4, Explosive Clarified posting requirements for explosives.

Handling Corrected acronyms ofiHCP and SDS. Updated location and quantity allowances to include both Tech Spec and the Site Plan for Explosives information.

1019 SOP 7-5 , Radiation Makes applicable the VNC VSS exposure control Exposure Control procedures to NTR. Updates the dose estimating process for NTR.

1020 SOP 5-2, Stack Gas Updates the technical specification release rate limits and action level tables. Updates the record keeping and reporting process.

1021 SOP 10-4, Explosive Consolidates the allowed explosives locations rule for Handling HD 1.1 , 1.2, and 1.3 materials to correspond to the rules in the revised Site Plan for Explosives and ETA 213R3 ,

Radiography of explosives. The change simplifies the handling rules and will enhance compliance.

1022 SOP 6-7 Startup Adds a precaution during the reactor startup during the Summary time period soon after attaining 100% power when temperature and reactivity are quickly changing which will require frequent control rod adjustments to maintain power below the trip point.

Page 4 of9

NTR Annual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016 IV. Major Preventative or Corrective Maintenance During this reporting period, all routine preventive maintenance and surveillance checks were completed as scheduled . The following lists the noteworthy corrective maintenance activities performed in 2015.

Manual Poison Sheet Modification

~ Made modifications to one of the% manual poison sheets (MPS) to cut the amount of cadmium poison on the sheet in half to 1/8 of an original full sheet. This 1/8 MPS was then used to replace the other% MPS in the core to boost the available reactivity to a sustainable value for normal reactor operations supporting the radiography experiment. This MPS adjustment was routine and necessary due to fuel burnout.

Linear Reactor Power (PICO) Detector

~ On 6/23/14, replaced the coaxial cables supplying the detector for one power instrument ion chamber detector to eliminate noise that was causing fluctuations in the readings at low power levels.

Primary Makeup Piping

~ On 7/6/15, implemented repairs to the deionized water supply piping for the primary makeup system. A pipe weld at a valve flange had a slow dripping leak. Since the weld connected aluminum components, it was decided to change the materials to stainless steel to avoid the complications of attempting an aluminum weld repair in a radiation controlled environment. A 50-59 impact evaluation was conducted for this change in material and documented with CA 307.

Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation (Victoreen)

~ On 11/2/15, performed corrective maintenance on one of the five on Radiation Area Monitors involving the replacement of the PC boards in the detector. This is a continuing effort to maintain the system. Having only this one failure in 2015 supports the current premise that the system remains viable and relevant.

Log N Reactor Power Instrument

~ On 11/16/15, replaced the pre-amp board for the Log N instrument after erratic readings were noted before a routine startup.

Page 5 of9

NTR Annual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016 V. Unscheduled Shutdowns During the reporting period, there were two unscheduled reactor shutdowns after reaching criticality.

Scram Report 15-01 Description of the Event At 13:22 on Thursday the 5th of February 2015 , an unplanned shutdown occurred while operating at power. Two of three Pico-ammeter nuclear instruments locked in at their trip point of 120% to initiate a Pi co-ammeter high level nuclear scram of the reactor. The Reactor Operator observed all normal indications of a reactor scram and proceeded to shutdown and secured the reactor. All safety rods automatically scrammed to full-in positions. All control rods and the source rods automatically drove in to their full-in positions. The Manager, NTR was notified ofthe scram.

Sequence of Events After completing a four hour reactor run and while awaiting the results of the final experiment, rods were bumped in to place the reactor power on a slight down slope as is common practice. It was later decided that experiment rework was required to complete the work plan for the day.

Power had drifted down to approximately 60% so the reactor operator pulled control rods to raise reactor power back to 100% which was a pre-condition for the experiment.

Almost immediately following the control rod pull, the control room phone rings, the reactor operator answers the phone and begins a conversation.

From the chart recording trace, it can be seen that approximately 60 seconds after first pulling control rods, the reactor scrams on high power.

Primary causes for the Event The act of taking the phone call by the operator creating a distraction at just the wrong time and for long enough to allow the high power trips to lock in.

Immediate Corrective Actions The operator was interviewed and reminded that his primary responsibility when operating the reactor is to monitor and maintain control of the reactor and reactor experiments such as NRay.

The operator agreed that he must block out all distraction during periods when known reactivity changes have occurred in the reactor.

Page 6 of9

NTR Annual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016 Scram Report 15-02 Description of the Event An unplanned shutdown occurred at 12:03 PM on I 1/2/20I5. A preemptive manual scram was inserted by the operator after receiving a CIC trip on Pica channel #3 caused by a high power condition during a power transient (startup). This avoided a CIC High Power Protective System Scram. The reactor was subsequently secured.

Sequence of Events A normal rector startup was being conducted on I 1/2/15. During the startup, a lightning strike monitor alarm was activated and noted by the reactor operator in the control room. Having heard the alarm, the Manager, NTR got involved and started an investigation ofthe lightning strike monitor alarm. The reactor startup was temporarily suspended with the reactor sub-critical.

Confirmation of the weather condition was being sought by checking the Doppler radar site on the internet using the control room computer. The Manager, NTR concluded that there was no immediate indication that lightning was upon the site . The reactor operator was made aware of this assessment. The Manager, NTR then authorized the reactor operator to finish the reactor startup and moved the monitoring of the Doppler radar site to his office where he would not be a distraction to the operator.

After achieving I 00% indicated power, the reactor operator felt compelled to additionally check the Doppler site to verify the nearby weather status. While performing this action, he was distracted from his primary responsibilities long enough for one of the three CIC channels to reach the trip point at I20%. He then inserted a manual scram.

Primary causes for the Event The operator did not fulfill his primary responsibility, to maintain control of the reactor.

Immediate Corrective Actions This was the second time this year that this operator was involved in an unplanned shutdown with very similar causes . The license for this operator was suspended by the Manager, NTR until such time that deficiencies can be identified, addressed, and corrected.

Page 7 of9

NTR Annual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016 VI. Radiation Levels and Sample Results at On-Site and Off-Site Monitoring Stations The data below are from sample and dosimeter results accumulated during the 2015 reporting period. Except for the NTR stack data, these data are for the entire VNC site and include the effects of operations other than the NTR.

A. NTR Stack Total airborne releases (stack emissions) for 2015 are as follows:

Alpha Particulate: 1.62E-08 Ci (predominantly radon-thorium daughter products)

Beta-Gamma Particulate: 3.86E-07 Ci lodine-131: 6.56E-06 Ci Noble Gases: 2.83E+2 Ci Noble gas activities recorded from the NTR stack integrate both background readings and the actual releases. Background readings may account for as much as 50% of the indicated release.

B. Air Monitors (Vearly average of all meteorological stations.)

Four environmental air-monitoring stations are positioned approximately 90 degrees apart aroun d the operating facilities of the site. Each station is equipped with a membrane filter, which is changed weekly and analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta-gamma .

Alpha Concentration:

Weekly Maximum, 7.93 E-15!-lCi/cc Weekly Average, 1.36 E-15 1-lCi/cc Beta Concentration:

Weekly Maximum, 6.58 E-14 !lei Icc Weekly Average, 1.49 E-14 !-lCi/cc C. Gamma Radiation The yearly dose results for the year 2015 as determined from evaluation of site perimeter environmental monitoring dosimeters showed no departure from normal stable backgrounds.

D. Vegetation No alpha, beta or gamma activity attributable to activities at the NTR facility was found on or in vegetation in the vicinity of the site.

Page 8 of9

NTR Annual Report No. 56 June 24, 2016 E. Water There was no release of radioactivity in water or to groundwater greater than the limits specified in 10CFRZO. Appendix B. Table 2. and Column 2.

F. Off-Site The result s of samples collected from off-site locations indicate norm al background for the reg ional area.

VII. Radiation Exposure In 2015, the highest annua l exposu re to any full t ime radiation worker whil e working at NTR was 0. 706 Rem and the lowest exposure for this category of worker was 0.501 Rem . The overage radiation exposure for the nine workers involved was 0.521 Rem per person.

The 2015 col lective rad ration exposure far all workers while performin g work at NTR w as 4.688 Person -Rem.

VIII. Conclusion GE Hitac hi concludes that th e overa ll operat ing experi ence of th e NTR reflects another year of safe and efficient operations. Th ere were no reportable events.

GE- Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC Vallecitos Operations Daniel M. Thomas, Manager Nuclear Test Reactor Page 9 of9