ML15167A321
| ML15167A321 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 10/29/2014 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML15167A321 (31) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:
Date of Examination:
A1I&/5PTiLi Developed by: Written
- FacilityE NRC II II Operating
- Facility NRCE Target Chief Date*
Task Description (Reference)
Examiners Initials
-180 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C.2.a and b)
-120 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C2e)
-120 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
YV
-120 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) fl4.
[-90]
[5.
Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]
{-75}
6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-i/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
{-70}
{7.
Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
{-45}
8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.i.I; C,2.g; ES-202)
-14 10.
Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)
-14 11.
Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 1
cfl3 (C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14 12.
Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (Cli; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
-7 13.
Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7 14.
Final applications reviewed; I or2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-7 15.
Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed ryØ with facility licensee (C.3.k)
-7 16.
Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Page 25 of 28
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: I.Q.
Date of Examination: g/ ta 1 Initials Item Task Description a
b c#
1.
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
N/A N/A w
R b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared In accordance with N/A N/A iY/
I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
T T
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
N/A t&t4I
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
N/A N/A 2.
a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, Instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S
and major transients.
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u
and mix of applicants In accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation L
schedule without compromising exam Integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested A
using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
k-c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described In Appendix D.
3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W
distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations Is within the limits specified on the form T
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the mkiums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
A?
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form
/
v47 (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last Iwo NRC licensing examinations
c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered
.1/
in the appropriate exam sections.
E b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.4 1/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate, c.
Ensure that K/A Importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
R d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
..L:;;
L e.
Check the enlire exam for balance of coverage.
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
t
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer ()
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence requlred Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
1)
Date of Examination:
E
Initials Item Task Description
a b*
1 a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
N/
,)4,3 w
R b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I
Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
h
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems. evolutions, or generic topics.
(/j.
jv1 d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. j t4 2.
a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S
and major transients.
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number u
and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A
at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T
from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R
and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks
\\
W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form
/
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 5545 sampling is appropriate.
47 iv r3 N
c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
i/4 ffi8 d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
t4)y
- ftM, A
e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
fh ikff
- vt4, f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
fr7
- a. Author n1ct /*7bL
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
V.iic 4
//7LJ
- d. NRC Supervisor AAALóLtL,t.W4,LLbA.MI Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:
H B Robinson Date of Examination: 8/18/14 Examination Level; RO X SRO Operating Test Number; ILC-14 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note)
Code*
Complete an Estimated Critical Position GP-003 Conduct of Operations N, R 0.1 Al-i (Common for RO and SRO candidates)
P, R Calculate the Boron Addition Required Prior to Conduct of Operations Initiating a Natural Circulation Cooldown to CSD A1-2 M, R Determine Proper Equipment Boundaries Equipment Control A2 N R Release of Items From the RCA Radiation Control (Common for RO and SRO candidates)
A3 Emergency Procedures/Plan A4 NOTE; All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)
(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
2014 NRC RO Admin JPM Summary 2014 NRC JPM Admin RO Al-I
- Complete an Estimated Critical Position GP-003 0.1 G 2.1.37 Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or limitations associated with reactivity management. (CFR: 41.1 / 43.6 I 45.6) RO 4.3 SRO 4.6 The candidate will be given GP-003 Attachment 10.1 Estimated Critical Condition Form to backup Reactor Engineerings Powertrax calculation for criticality. The candidates calculation will need to be between 719-1954 PCM.
- Calculate the Boron Addition Required Prior to Initiating a Natural Circulation Cooldown to CSD G 2.1.25 Ability to interpret reference materials, such as graphs, curves, tables, etc.
(CFR: 41.10 /43.5 /45.12) RO 3.9 SRO 4.2 The candidate will be expected to calculate the boron addition needed for the plant to be placed in the cold shutdown condition while in natural circulation. This boration includes calculating the change in boric acid storage tank level.
- Determine Proper Equipment Boundaries G2.2.13 Knowledge of tagging and clearance procedures. (CFR: 41.10 /45.13) RO 4.1 SRO4.3 The candidate will need to determine the pump boundaries and power supply necessary to isolate the leakage from relief valve CVC-2080 using plant drawings and the EDPs (Electrical Distribution Procedures).
2014 NRC JPM Admin RO-SRO A3 Release of Items From the RCA G2.3.15 Knowledge of radiation monitoring systems, such as fixed radiation monitors and alarms, portable survey instruments, personnel monitoring equipment, etc. (CFR:
41.12 /43.4/45.9) RO 2.9, SRO 3.1 (Common for RO and SRO candidates)
The candidate need to determine the requirements to release equipment used during the performance of an OST from the RCA. These items will include a DIP Gauge, the paper work for the OST, a clipboard, a pen, and PPE. The candidate can SAM out the paper work for the OST, clipboard, pen, and PPE, however, when they do so, the SAM will alarm and the candidate is supposed to call for a Health Physics technician. The D/P gauge cannot be released by the candidate and they will have to get a Health Physics technician to release this item.
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301.-1 Facility:
H B Robinson Date of Examination: 8/18/14 Examination Level:
Operating Test Number:
ILC-14 Administrative Topic 1 Type Describe activity to be peormed (see Note)
[
Code*
Complete an Estimated Critical Position GP-003 Conduct of Operations 0.1 N, R (Common for RO and SRO candidates)
M, R Complete Equipment Inoperable Record lAW Conduct of Operations OMM-007 M, R Review a Completed Surveillance Procedure Equipment Control (OST-702-2, Secondary Side In-service Valve Test for Main Feedwater)
N, R Release of Items From the RCA Radiation Control (Common for RO and SRO candidates)
N, R Classify an Emergency Event Emergency Procedures/Plan NOTE:
All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)
(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
2014 NRC SRO Admin JPM Summary 2014 NRC JPM Admin SRO Al-I Complete an Estimated Critical Position GP-003 0.1 G 2.1.37 Knowledge of procedures, guidelines, or limitations associated with reactivity management. (CFR: 41.1 / 43.6 /45.6) RO 4.3 SRO 4.6 The candidate will be given GP-003 Attachment 10.1 Estimated Critical Condition Form to backup Reactor Engineerings Powertrax calculation for criticality. The candidates calculation will need to be between 719-1954 PCM.
2014 NRC JPM Admin SRO AI-2 Complete Equipment Inoperable Record G2. 1.18 Ability to make accurate, clear, and concise logs, records, status boards, and reports. (CFR: 41.1 /45.12/45.13) RO 3.9, SRO4.0 The candidate will be given OMM-007 to complete for SW Pump B OOS for emergent work due to failed inboard motor bearing. The candidate will complete OMM-007 0.1, EIR-ITSITRM/ODCM/RG 1.97. The candidate will identify the ITS requirements associated with SW Pump B being inoperable.
2014 NRC JPM Admin SRO A2 Review a Completed Surveillance Procedure (OST 702-2, Secondary Side In-service Valve Test for Main Feedwater)
G2.2.12 Knowledge of surveillance procedures. (CFR: 41.10 /45.13) RO 3.7, SRO 4.1 The candidate will be given a completed OST-702-2 that has been reviewed and signed off as satisfactory by the STA. The candidate will need to identify that FW-V2-6B, Feedwater Header Section Valve has exceeded its limiting value and is inoperable.
Also, FCV-488, SG B Feedwater Regulating Valve has exceeded its limiting value and is inoperable.
2014 NRC JPM Admin RO-SRO A3 Release of Items From the RCA G2.3.15 Knowledge of radiation monitoring systems, such as fixed radiation monitors and alarms, portable survey instruments, personnel monitoring equipment, etc. (CFR:
41.12 / 43.4/45.9) RO 2.9, SRO 3.1 (Common for RO and SRO candidates)
The candidate need to determine the requirements to release equipment used during the performance of an OST from the RCA. These items will include a DIP Gauge, the paper work for the OST, a clipboard, a pen, and PPE. The candidate can SAM out the paper work for the OST, clipboard, pen, and PPE, however, when they do so, the SAM will alarm and the candidate is supposed to call for a Health Physics technician. The D/P gauge can not be released by the candidate and they will have to get a Health Physics technician to release this item.
2014 NRC JPM Admin SRO A4 Classify an Emergency Event.
G2.4.41 Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications. (CFR:
41.10/43.5/45.11) RO 2.9, SRO 4.6 The candidate will be given the necessary plant conditions to classify that an emergency event has occurred. This classification is required to be determined within 15 minutes of the onset of the event. The turbine will overspeed causing extensive turbine damage and multiple components ejecting from the turbine enclosure. These projectiles will puncture the CST. This will result in a declaration of HAl.4, Turbine failure generated missilles result in any visible damage to or poentration of any Table H-i area or HA2.1 Fire, explosion, or steam line break (non-hostile) in any table H-i area AND EITHER Affected system parameter indications show degraded performance OR Plant personnel report visible damage to permanent structures or equipment within the specified area. The table has the CST listed. Once the classification is communicated to the examiner, the candidate will be expected to fill out the Emergency Notification Form for communication to the state and counties within 15 minutes. Both portions of this JPM are time critical with a 15 minute completion criteria on each section.
ES-301 Control Roomlln-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301 -2 Facility:
Robinson Date of Examination; 8/18/14 Exam Level; RO SRO-l SRO-U Operating Test No.;
Control Room Systems (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l, a-g); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including I ESF)
System I JPM Title Type Code*
Safety Function
- a. Restore Control Power to SI Valves and Isolate Accumulators EN, A, D, S 3
lAW_EPP-008.
ADS 4P b.
Fill Reactor Coolant Stand Pipe NS 5
- c. Terminate an Inadvertent CV Spray Actuation
- d. Perform an Emergency Boration lAW EOP-ES-O.1, using the A, L, D, S 1
- e. Remove N-44 from service lAW OWP-OI I D, 5 7
AMS 4S
- f. Respond to a Reactor trip and Turbine trip
- g. Restore Normal Power after Loss of Startup Transformer D, 5 6
DS 8
- h. Respond to a Loss of a Circulating Water Pump In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)
- i. Trip the Reactor Locally as Outside Auxiliary Operator D, E I.
- j. Local Control of S!G Level and Pressure during a Site Black D, E 45 Out
- k. Locally align containment isolation valves following a Safety R, D, E 5
Injection All RD and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
- Type Codes Criteria for RD / SRO-l I SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 I 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrombank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 I 1 /
1 (EN)gineered safety feature
- I I 1 (control room system)
(L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 /
1 I 1
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2 /
2 /
1 (P)revious 2 exams 3 /
3 I 2 (randomly selected)
(R)CA (S)imulator
JPM A: Restore Control Power to SI Valves and Isolate Accumulators lAW EPP-008.
K/A 009 EA1.13: Ability to operate and monitor the following as they apply to a small break LOCA: ESFAS (009 Small Break LOCA) The plant has been tripped due to a small break LOCA. The crew is in EPP-8 and they are at the point to restore control power to SI Valves and isolate or depressurize SI Accumulators. The candidate will be given a marked up copy of EPP-8 to this point. The candidate will then restore power to multiple SI Valves. After that they will verify SI Accumulator Discharge valves are shut. One valve will not be shut and they will then have to depressurize the accumulator to prevent it from discharging. Once the Accumulator is depressurized, the JPM will be complete. (Bank JPM CR-069) (RO, SRO-l, SRO-U)
JPM B:
Fill Reactor Coolant Stand Pipe K/A 003 A4.05: Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: RCP seal leakage detection instrumentation.
(003 Reactor Coolant Pump System (RCPS)) The plant will be at 100% power. The candidate will assume the watch. APP-001-C5, RCP STANDPIPE HI/LO LVL is in alarm. The candidate will use OP-lOl Section 8.2 to refill the standpipe until APP-001-C5 is extinguished.
RC-519B will not close which will force them to OP-103 to relieve the Hydraulic lock. Once RC-519B goes closed, the JPM will be complete. (Bank JPM CR-ill) (RO, SRO-I)
JPM C: Terminate an Inadvertent CV Spray Actuation(New)
K/A 026 A4.0l: Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: CSS Controls.
(026 Containment Spray System(CSS)) The plant will have just tripped. The candidate will take the watch while in EOP-E-0, REACTOR TRIP OR SAFETY INJECTION, at step 9, Check CV Spray NOT Required.
The candidate will verify that CV spray is not required but that it has actuated. The candidate will go through the actions to terminate CV Spray. Once CV Spray is terminated, the JPM will be complete. (RO, SRO-I)
JPM D: Perform an Emergency Boration lAW EOP-ES-0.1 K/A 024 AA1.02/AA1.04: Ability to operate and/or monitor the following as they apply to Emergency Boration: Boric Acid Pump/Manual boration valve.
(024 Emergency Boration) The plant has tripped and the crew is in EOP-ES-0.1, REACTOR TRIP RESPONSE. The candidate will recognize that two control rods are stuck out and will need to emergency borate the RCS to cold shutdown. The candidate will attempt to borate via the BAST but this will not work.
The candidate will then transition to borating from the RWST. Once the candidate has an emergency boration flow path from the RWST aligned, the JPM will be complete. (Bank JMP CR-054 ) (RO, SRO-I)
JPM E: Remove N-44 from service lAW OWP-Ol 1 K/A 015 A4.03: Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: Trip Bypasses (015 Nuclear Instrumentation System(NIS)) The plant is at 100% power. The candidate will be directed to remove NI-44 from service lAW OWP-01 1. The candidate will get OWP-0l 1 and remove NI-44 from service.
Once the NI is removed from service, the JPM will be complete. (Bank JPM CR-009) (RO, SRO-I, SRO-U)
JPM F: Respond to a Reactor Trip and Turbine Trip K/A 007 EA1.07: Ability to operate and monitor the following as they apply to a reactor trip: MT/G trip; verification that the MT/G has been tripped.
(007 Reactor Trip) The candidate will assume the watch at 100% power. The reactor will fail to automatically trip and the candidate will be required to depress either reactor trip pushbutton. The turbine will fail to trip. The candidate will be required to respond to the reactor trip lAW EOP-E-0, REACTOR TRIP OR SAFETY INJECTION. The candidate will verify the reactor is tripped then respond to the turbine not being tripped. The candidate will attempt to run the turbine back, however, this will not work. The candidate will then shut the MSIVs. The candidate will finish the Immediate Actions of EOP-E-0. Once these Immediate Actions are complete, the JPM is complete. (Bank JPM CR-085 modified) (RO, SRO-I, SRO-U)
JPM G: Restore normal power after loss of startup transformer K/A 062 A4.01: Ability to manually operate and/or monitor in the control room: All breakers(including available switchyard)
(062 AC Electrical Distribution System) The plant will be shutdown due to a reactor trip and Safety Injection from a loss of the startup transformer. The candidate is directed by the CRS to perform OP-603 Section 6.4.1 (with the exception of E-1, E-2, and 480V bus 4 and 4KV bus 5). The candidate will make multiple switch manipulations in order to restore power. Once power is restored, the JPM is complete. (Bank JPM CR-28) (RO, SRO-I)
JPM H: Respond to a Loss of a Circulating Water Pump K/A 075 A2.02: Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following malfunctions or operations on the circulating water system; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those malfunctions or operations: Loss of Circulating Water Pumps (075 Circulating Water System) The plant is at 50% power. The Candidate will be given the shift and told to respond as necessary. Circulating Water Pump A will trip. The candidate will recognize the pump has tripped and take Immediate Actions of AOP-012, PARTIAL LOSS OF CONDENSER VACUUM OR CIRCULATING WATER PUMP TRIP. The candidate will then start Circulating Water Pump C. Once Circulating Water Pump A discharge valve has closed, the JPM is complete. (Bank JPM CR-055) (RO)
JPM I: Trip the Reactor Locally as Outside Auxiliary Operator(OAO).
K/A 029 EA1.12: Ability to operate and monitor the following as they apply to a ATWS: M/G Set power supply and rector trip breakers.
(029 ATWS) The plant is at 100% power with an ATWS in progress. As the OAO, the CRS has dispatched the candidate to 480V Busses 2B and 3 to trip the following breakers: ROD DRIVE MOTOR GENERATOR SET A and ROD DRIVE MOTOR GENERATOR SET B. The candidate will go to the 4Kv room and find 480V bus 2B and breaker 52/lOB. The candidate will then open the breaker by depressing the trip pushbutton in the center of the cubicle door. The candidate will find 480V bus 3 and breaker 52/14A in the 4Kv room. The candidate will then open the breaker by depressing the trip pushbutton in the center of the cubicle door. Once the breakers are open, the JPM will be complete. (RO, SRO-I, SRO-U)
JPM J: Local Control of SIG Level and Pressure during a Site Black Out.
K/A 061 A1.01/A1.02: Ability to predict and/or monitor changes in parameters (to prevent exceeding design limits) associated with operating the AFW controls including: SIG Level and SIG Pressure.
(061 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater(AFW) System) The plant has experienced a loss of orisite and offsite power. EPP-1 has been implemented. S/G levels are currently 55%. The candidate will be directed by the CRS to perform Attachment 1 of EPP-1 which is Local Control of S/G Level and Pressure. The candidate will first go to the Pipe Jungle and open one of the V!-8A/B/ or C Steam Supply to the SDAFW Pump. Next, the candidate will go to the Secondary Control Panel area and manually throttle V2-14N6/C to control SIG level between 60-68%. Next, the candidate will go to the Pipe Jungle and perform several valve manipulations to align Nitrogen to the SIG PORVs. Once the candidate has notified the Control Room that SIG level is under control locally and the SJG PORVs have Nitrogen supplied for motive air, the JPM will be complete.
(RO, SRO-I, SRO-U)
JPM K: Locally align containment isolation valves following a Safety Injection.
K/A E02 EA1.1: Ability to operate and / or monitor the following as they apply to the (SI Termination);
Components, and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features.
(E02 SI Termination) A plant trip and Safety Injection have occurred. EPP-7 is currently being implemented and the CRS has directed the candidate to perform Attachment 2 of EPP-7, Realignment of Components following SI Termination for Inside AO. The candidate will have to go to several different locations inside the Auxiliary Building(RCA) and reset multiple valves in order to realign components necessary to terminate Safety Injection. Once the Control Room is notified that the attachment is complete, the JPM will be complete. (RO, SRO-I, SRO-U)
ES-301 Operating Test Quality_Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:
H B Robinson Date of Examination:
8/18/2014 Operating Test Number: ILC-14 Initials
- 1. General Criteria a
b*
c#
a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
Un-.,
c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)
J.
d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
system response and other examiner cues
statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
criteria for successful completion of the task
identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outtnes (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
=
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 42 Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
a.
Author b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d.
NRC Supervisor NOTE:
The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: H.B. Robinson Dateof Exam: 8/18/2014 Scenario Numbers: 3 /2/5 Operating Test No.: ILC-14 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES InWals a
b*
cf 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instwmentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
(Y 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Ps Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D5.d)
Actual Attributes 1.
Total malfunctions (58) 10/10/11 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 2/3/4 3.
Abnormal events (24) 4/3/3 4.
Major transients (12) 2/2/1 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 3/3/2 6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (02) 0/1/2 7.
Critical tasks (23) 5/6/4
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: H.B. Robinson Date of Exam: 8/18/2014 Scenario Numbers: 4 /
/
Operating Test No.: ILC-14 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Irnbals a
b*
c#
1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instwmentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-3d.
11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-3d -6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.cI)
Actual Attributes 1.
Total malfunctions (58) 11/
/
2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 2/
/
3.
Abnormal events (24) 4/
/
4.
Major transients (12) 2/
/
y 3
5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2/
/
6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (02) 2/
/
7.
Critical tasks (23) 4/
/
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:
H B Robinson Date of Exam:
8/18/14 Operating Test No.: ILC-14 A
E Scenarios P
V 2
5 T
M P
E o
I L
N CREW CREW CREW CREW T
N I
T POSFflON POSmON POSmON A
C S
A B
S A
B S
A B
S A
B L
u A
T R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 M(*)
N y
0 C
P 0
c P
0 C
P 0
C P
T R
IU E
RX 5
6 2
110 NOR 1
1 111 I/C 1,2, 3,10 3,4, 10 4
4 2
Ii 6, 8 MAJ 9,10 7,8 7
5 2
2 1
TS 2,3, 4
022 4, 5 RX 5
1 2
110 NOR 6
1 111 I/C 1,3, 3,4, 1,8, 11 4
4 2
12 8
6, 9,
10, 11 MAJ 9,10 7,8 7
5 2
2 1
TS 2,5, 2
022 RX 1
6 2
110 NOR 5
1 111 13 I/C 2,
4,6, 1,3, 9
4 4
2 4,6 11 4
MAJ 9,
7,8 7
5 2
2 1
10 TS 3,4 2
022 RX 110 NOR 111 I/C 442 MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:
H B Robinson Date of Exam:
8/18/14 Operating Test No.: ILC-14 A
E Scenarios P
V 2
5 T
M P
E I
L N
CREW CREW CREW CREW T
N I
T POSmON POSfl1ON POSmON POSmON A
C S
A B
S A
B S
A B
S A
B L
u A
T R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
M(*)
N y
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
T P
E RX 5
1 110 NOR 0
111 I/C 1,2, 6
4 4
2 Ui 6, 8 MAJ 9,10 2
2 2
1 TS 2,3, 4
022 4, 5 RX 1
1 110 NOR 0
ill U2 I/C 3,4, 3
4 4
2 6,
MAJ 7,8 2
2 2
1 TS 2,5, 2
022 RX 110 NOR ill I/C 442 MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022 Instructions:
1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a i-for-i basis.
3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-3d Transient and Event Checkllst Form ES-301-5 Facility:
H B Robinson Date of Exam:
8/18/14 Operating Test No.: )LC-14 A
E Scenarios P
V 3
2 5
T M
P E
o I
L N
CREW CREW CREW CREW T
N I
T POSmON POSmON POSmON POSmON A
C S
A B
S A
B S
A B
S A
B L
u A
T R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 M(*)
N Y
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
T RU E
RX 5
1 110 NOR 1
1 111 Ri 1,3, 3,10 5
4 4
2 8
MAJ 9,107,8 4
2 21 TS 0
022 RX 1
1 110 NOR 5
1 111 I/C 2,
4, 6
442 R2 4,6 6,
11 MAJ 9,
7,8 4
2 2
1 10 TS 0
022 RX 110 NOR 111 I/C 442 MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022 RX 110 NOR 111 IC 442 MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022 ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility:
H B Robinson Date of Exam:
8/18/14 Operating Test No.: ILC-14 A
E Scenarios
P V
4(Spare)
T M
P E
CREW CREW CREW CREW N
POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION I
I T
A M
C S
A B
S A
B S
A B
S A
B L
u A
T R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 M*
r 0
C P
0 C
P c
P 0
C P
N Y
RU T
P E
RX 5
5 110 NOR 5
111 I/C 2,3, 3,6, 2
4 4
2 6,7 7
MAJ 8,9 8,9 8,9 2
2 1
TS 1,6 0
2 2
RX 110 NOR 111 I/C 442 MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022 RX 110 NOR 111 I/C 442 MAJ 2
2 1
TS 022
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: RB. Robinson Date of Examination: 8/18/2014 Operating Test No.: ILC-14 APPLICANTS LI LI LI LI RO1 LI R02 C]
[El LI LI LI LI LI SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Corn petencies 3
2 3
2
!,4,5, 1,4,6,7, Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 1, 3, 5, 8, 1, 3, 7, 8,
) 9, 10 3, 11 9,10 10
,4,5, 1,4,6,7, Comply With and 1,3,5,8, 1,3,7,8,
, 9, 10 3, 11 Use Procedures (1) 9,10 10
, 4, 5, 1, 4, 6, 7, Operate Control Boards (2) 1,3,5,8, 1,3,7,8,
, 9, 10 3,11 9,10 10
!,4,5, 1,4,6,7, Communicate and 1,3,5,8, 1,3,7,8, i, 9, 10 3, 11 Interact 9,10 10 Demonstrate N/A N/A N/A N/A Supervisory Ability (3)
Comply With and N/A N/A N/A N/A Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicantsIicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: H.B. Robinson Date of Examination: 8/18/2014 Operating Test No.: ILC-14 APPLICANTS SRO-l1 El SRO-12 El SRO-13 El El El El El El El El El El SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies 3
2 5
3 2
5 3
25 3
2 5
Interpret/Diagnose 1,2,3, 1
3 3 4 6 1,3, 1,3, 1,6, 2,4, 1,4, 1,3, Events and Conditions 4 5, 6,
5, 8, 4, 6
5 6 6, 7, 4, 6 8,9,10 10,7,8 7
9,10 7,8 9, 10, 9 108,11 7
11 Comply With and 1, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3 1, 6, 2, 4, 1, 4, 1, 3, Use Procedures (1) 4, 5 6, 8
6, 5, 8, 4, 6, i8d 5, 6, 6, 7, 4, 6, 8,9,101 9,10 7,8
9,108,11 7
Operate Control N/A 1, 3, 3, 4, 6, 1,
N/A 6,
2, 4, 1,,
N/A Boards (2)
SRO 10, 7, 8 7
3RD Communicateand 1,2,3, 1
3 3 4 6 1,3, 1,3, 2,4, 1,4, 1,3, Interact 4,5,6, 1078
5,8, 4,6, 910 5,6, 6,7, 4,6, 8,9,10
9,10 7,8
9,108,11 7
Demonstrate i, 2, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, Supervisory Ability (3) 4, 5,6, N/A N/A N/A 4, 6, N/A N/A N/A 4, 6, 8,9,10 7,8 7
Comply With and 2,
N/A N/A N/A 2, 5 N/A N/A N/A 3, 4 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicantsIicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: H.B. Robinson Date of Examination: 8/18/2014 Operating Test No.: ILC-14 APPLICANTS SRO-U 1 El SRO-U 2 El El El El El El El El El El El SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies Interpret/Diagnose
1,3,
Events and Conditions 5 6 4, 6, 8:9:
7,8 10 1,2, Comply With and 1, 3, Use Procedures (1) 5 6 4, 6, 8,9, 7,8 10 Operate Control N/A N/A Boards (2) 12 Communicate and 1, 3, Interact 5 6 4, 6, 8:9:
7,8 Demonstrate
1,3,
Supervisory Ability (3) 5 6 4, 6, 8:9:
7,8 10 Comply With and 2, 5 Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicantsIicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Robinson 2014-301 Exam ES-401-2 (Final Written Sample Plan) is a combination of ES-401-4 and the Draft Sample Plan
ES-401 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES-401-4 Tier /
Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KJA TI / G2 024AA2.03 Could not write discriminating question to match KA. Randomly replaced original KA with 024AA2.02.
T2 / Gi 007K5.02 Could not write discriminating question to match KA. Randomly replaced original KA with 007A2.05.
T2 / Gi 012A2.03 Could not write discriminating question to match KA. Randomly replaced original KA with 012A2.06.
T2 / GI 073K4.02 Could not write discriminating question to match KA. Randomly replaced original KA with 073K4.O1.
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility:
Date of Exam: pt-qL Exam Level: RDSRQ Initial Item Description a
b*
c#
1.
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
/4 413 2.
a.
NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
q /
b.
Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
i
3.
SRD questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 1,4 4.
The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RD or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR DL program office).
5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed: or 19 VA i2, the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started: or
.the examinations were developed independently: or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication: or other (explain) 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest IA V
newormodified); entertheactualRO/SRO-only
(<. lf(L)
..7(t/4) question distribution(s) at right.
s t.
i
7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RD Memory C/A exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level:
the SRD exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly
- 3j(.3
/9 T
selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels: enter
/
/
the actual RD / SRD question distribution(s) at right.
¶S 7
-z, s i (ia 2
8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers
)/I Ae::
or aid in the elimination of distractors.
I 9.
Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned:
deviations are justified.
10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
11.
The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items:
,i
/4 the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
Printed Name! Signa,Jr,,
Date
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
v. wr3 /7) ).k(
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor MALtA&tWtML4iA/
Note:
- The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c: chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-401, Page 29 of 33
Robinson 2014-301 Exam ES-401-9 was not performed because it was an internally written exam.