ML19116A121

301 Retake Exam Administrative Items ADAMS-2D - Normal Release

ML19116A121
Person / Time
Site:	Robinson
Issue date:	04/26/2019
From:	NRC/RGN-II/DRS/OLB
To:	Duke Energy Progress
References
50-261/18-301 50-261/OL-18
Download: ML19116A121 (18)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: 1B. 6J Date of ExaminationpnI zl.tI Developed by: Written: Facility NRC II Operating Facility NRC

. . Chief Target Task Description (Reference) Examiners Date Initials

1. Examination administration date confirmed (Cia; C.2.ab). For NRC-prepared exams,

-240 arrangements are made for the facility to submit reference materials (C.i .e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).

-210 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.i.d; C.2.f). Liv

3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c). As applicable, the facility

-210 contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for elimination from the written examination outline,_with_a_description_of the_facilitys_prescreening_process_(ES-401,_D.1 .b).

-210 4. Reference material due for NRC-prepared exams (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).

-210 5. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.e).

6. NRC-developed written examination outline (ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-i/2 and ES-401-3 or

-195 ES-401N-3) sent to facility contact (must be on the exam security agreement) (C.1.ef; C.2.h; C.3.de). C

7. Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301 -1,

-150 ES-301-2,_ES-301-5, and ES-D-1, as_applicable_(C.i.ef;_C.3.de).

8. Operating test outline(s) reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h;

-136 C.3.de).

9. Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outlines (Forms

) -75 ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2, and ES-401-3 or ES-401N-3);

supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2 and ES-201-3 updates); and reference materials due fC.1.eh; C.3.d).

10. Examinations prepared by the NRC are approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for facility licensee review (C.1.i; C.2.h; C.3.fg).

-60 11. Preliminarywaiverlexcusalrequestsdue(C.1.m; C.2.c; ES-202).

-50 12. Written exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3.f).

13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC and facility licensee (Cli; C.l.kl; C.2.h;_C.3.g). The NRC and the facility licensee conduct exam preparatory week.

14. Preliminary license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398) due

-30 (C.1.m; C.2.i; ES-202).

15. Final license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398), due and

-14 Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202).

-7 16. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.2.jk; C.3.h).

-7 17. Request facility licensee management feedback on the examination (C.2J).

18. Final applications reviewed; one or two (if more than 10) applications audited to confirm

-7 qualifications/eligibility; and examination approval and waiver/excusal letters sent (C.2.k; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204).

-7 19. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k).

-7 20. Approved scenarios and job performance measures distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i).

) Target dates are based on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.

These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

ES-201, Page 29 Of 32

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-20f-2 (Rev_180409)

Facility: Robinson Date of Examination: 41201 8

___ lllltl&S Item Task Description 1 a Verify that the outline(s) fit(S) the appropriate model per ES-401 or ES-401N . N/A N/A b Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with N/A N/A w Section 0.1 of ES-Aol or ES4O1 N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled C Assess wheiher the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. N!A N/A T

I U Assess whether the lustifications for deselected or re)ected K/A statements are NIA N/A E appropriate N

2. a Using Form ES-Wi -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets covet the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and .

major transients. -

S b Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number M and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromlsmg exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be U tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are L duplicated from the applicants audit lest(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on A subsequent days.

T c To the extent possicle, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and 0 quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-3014, described in Appendix D and described R in Section 0.5 Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test of ES-301 (including overlap).

3, a. Verify that systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2 7 (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the requked number of control room and In-plant tasks, w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form A

(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on L the form, K NIA (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s) N/A T

H (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form R

0 (5) the number of alternate path, tow-power, emergency and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form U

6 b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301*1:

H (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form N/A N/A (2) at least one task Is new or sIgnificantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of N/A N/A tJ),)

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in

- the appropriate exam section.

6 b. Assess whether the IOCFR 55 41143 and 5545 sampng is appropriate E Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. 1 c

N E d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. L.. .

R

a. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage A

C f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). -

Prf.J1ame / Signature T Date

a. Author - Christopher McComber I,< -

b. Facility Reviewer () Joe Rackley/ -

c. NRCChlefExaminer(#) jj3 / L//))

d. NRCSupeMsor /J --_ ti/uft applicable tot NRC-prepared examination outlines.

N The indeDendent NRC reviewer initials Items in column c: the chief examiners concurrence is required, NUREG-1 021, Revision 11

C, . .

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that) hav acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of j/2_3 /tO/g as of the date of my signature. I agree that twill not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who nave not been authorized by the NRCs chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRCs chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered CD r%3 during the week(s) of -lIZ) / i . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did 0 not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

-U CLD CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITY 1SjjJATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

()

0

-4,

1. C14(a.. £c:#N 4VrtQg.. -;_--- k-L----

C.)

2. 5o6 ACC6M4 3.AJcte/ (L17p

£x,.,, fLAs 52t Pt!

opr71c itQ V/7)-7 J.

I iS y/zfYg

4. P-v +n.lLc*_ 5LL o.Wfcs 24 i____

5.546D JcHI9LFAf nct 2. J 6.fp.,Te-( .J#.ir J

7. MW ç,Vlicti iM f.n& Al2_ 3%/j.

8. N5 1L_TDT- 2TZ_ 3i- -Z&

9. /4im it4-C1bf OjC,y ,I, - I ?-i &._ L.j t

10. 4 5 c/ C) 3.-/f_/.

11.Y.w .SQC) 3 I,

12. ]crri trix1u,d cP l/t)xr/z L/tj-o,e C 3; /

13.flri 5,,5t ¶ . 7 . ,

-,. I

14. i%&smi ,#-/-_Z J q tT I cs.eé. Z?.-__ y NOTES:

ES-201, Page 31 of 32

a 0 0 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of q/Z! / 2-o i as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRCs chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRCs chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowIedge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered P during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did CD not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations,

- except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

-U Co CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE c) iHi(y ;%(r_ 02s qI)3k fr 0

-i

-h

() 2. j- 5L /L.qtv Lc. t,.J, O? (1( I 4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 31 of 32

ES-3o1 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301 -3 (Rev I 8O4O9 FacUlty: HB Robinson Date of 4/2018 Operating Test Number: Ni 8-1RT Examination:

Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the pteviousty approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g. 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safely function distribution).

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s) (see

, Section D.1.a).

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is N/A N/A within acceptable limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA - -

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions

• initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and N/A N/A specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

• system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the appUcant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative N/A N/A r),

walkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and ES-301 -2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item dIstribution, bank use, repetitIon from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA -

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name / nature Date

a. Author Christopher McComb r/ j/q /,g

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Joe Rackley/

c. NRC Chief Examiner f#) frj &--1 c,(11 (i d, NRC Supervisor (f /

The facility licensee signature Is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items In column c; the chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 11

ES-307 - Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 fRev_180409)

Facility lw Robinson Date of Exam: 4/2018 Scenario Numbers: 12 3 Operating Test No.: NiS-1RT QUALITATIVE AURIBUTES Initials a b* d#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment anWor instrumentation may be out ot service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

3 Each event description consists of the following:

• the point in the scenario when It Is to be initiated

• the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to Initiate the event h

• the sl,rnptorns/cues that will be visible to the crew .

t i1i,

• the expected operator actions (by whIff position)

• the event termination point fit applicable) 4.The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics, ..

d:

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives L_.

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient lime to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given.

7 The simulator modeling is not altered. .z

8. The scenarios have been validated Pwsuant to 10 CFR 55 46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is ..

maintained white running the planned scenarios.

9. Scenarios are new or significantly moditied in accordance with Section D.5 of ES3O1 - -_______

10. All individual operator competencles can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES.301 .6 (submIt the form along with the simulator scenarios).

ii. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the apphcable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES.303-1 and ES-303.3.) C.....

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on L..

Form ES-301-5_(submit_the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible C..

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position C..

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section O.S.d) Actual Attributes -

t M&IunctionsafterEOPentry(1-2) 1 1 1 C

2. Abnormal events (24) - . -

.i 2 7 1 C..-

3. Major transients (1-2) 4

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1 -2) 2 1 1

5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (> Iper scenario set) 1 0 . 1 - .

fr

6. Preldentified critical tasks (> 2) - - - 2 3 2 C..-

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer Initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 11

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 (Rev_I 80409)

Facility: HB Robinson Date of Exam: 4/2018 Operating Test No.: N18-IRT A E Scenarios P V N18-IRT-1 N18-IRT-2 T M P E 0 I L N T N CREW CREW CREW CREW I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION A I C L M A T u N Y T P S A B S A B S A B S A B R I U E R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P RX 1 1 1 1 0 2

NOR 1 1 1 1 1,3, 23, 5, 7 8 4 4 2 SROI-1 I/C 5,6 6 MA] 3 2 2 1 1,3 TS 2 0 2 2 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 4 4 2 I/C MAJ 2 2 1 IS 0 2 2 RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 4 4 2 I/C MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 RX = 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 4 4 2 I/C MA] 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must service in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and Ubalance of plant (SOP) positions; Instant SRO5 (SRO-l) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO-l additionally serves in the SOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-l applicants in either the ATC or SOP position to best evaluate the SRO-l in manipulating plant controls.

NUREG 1021 Revision 11

ES-301 Corn petencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6 (Rev_i 80409)

Facility: HB Date of Examination: 4/207 8 Operating Test No.: Ni 8-1 RI Robinson APPLICANTS SRO(U/I) RO/AIC BOP Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO_____

1 2 3 Interpret/Diagnose Events and 1-7 1-7 1-5 Conditions Comply With and Use 1-7 1-7 1-5 Procedures (1)

Operate Control 1,2, 1-3, 1-5 Boards (2) 3-7 5-7 Communicate and 1-7 1-7 1-5 Interact Demonstrate Supervisory Ability 1-7 1-7 1-5 (3)

Comply with and Use 1 3 1 3 23 TS(3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RD.

(2) Optional for an S P0-U.

(3) Only applicable to SRDs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

NUREG-1021, Revision 11

wfa, DUKE Charles E. Sherman ENERGY H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2 Director Nuc Org Effectiveness Duke Energy 3587 West Entrance Road Harts ville, SC 29550 0:843951 1609 F: 843 957 7379 Chuck.Shennan@duke-energy.coin Serial: RNP-RN18-0007 JAN10 2018 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-23 REQUEST FOR INITIAL OPERATOR LICENSE RE-EXAMINATION Ladies and Gentlemen:

In response to a telephone conversation between Mr. Daniel Bacon, NRC Region II, and Mr. Joe Rackley, Duke Energy Progress, LLC on January 8, 2018, Duke Energy Progress, LLC requests the NRCs support for administering an initial operato r license operating re-examination during the week of April 23, 2018.

This document contains no new Regulatory Commitments.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Terry Giese, Manager Nuclear Operations Training at (843) 951-3889.

Sincerely, Charles E. Sherman Director Nuc Org Effectiveness C ES/cac c: Document Control Desk NRC Resident Inspector Mr. Dennis Galvin, NRC Project Manager, NRR

f DUKE Charles E Sherman ENERG H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2 Director Nuc Org Effectiveness Duke Energy 3587 West Entrance Road Harts vile, SC 29550 0:843 957 7609 F: 843 951 1379 Chuck.Sherman @duke-eizergy.com 10 CFR 55.40 Serial: RNP-RA/1 8-0019 FEB 2 7 2018 Mr. Daniel Bacon U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-23 LICENSED OPERATOR RE-TAKE INITIAL EXAMINATION OUTLINE

Dear Mr. Bacon:

In accordance with the guidelines in Revision 11 of NUREG-1 021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Duke Energy Progress, LLC is providing the enclosed outline for the examination scheduled to begin the week of April 23, 2018.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.40(b)(3), Mr. Joseph Rackley, as the designated authorized representative of the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2, has approved this outline for examination of the applicant.

As required by Revision 11 of NUREG-1 021, Section ES-201, Initial Operator Licensing Examination Process, please ensure that these outlines are withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Joseph Rackley at (843) 951-1625.

Director Nuc Org

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial: RNP-RA/18-0019 Page 2 of 2 CES/cac Enclosure C: Document Control Desk (w/o Enclosure)

NRC Resident Inspector, HBRSEP (w/o Enclosure)

Regional Administrator, NRC, Region II (w/o Enclosure)

Mr. Dennis Galvin, NRC (w/o Enclosure)

Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie, NRC, Region II (w/o Enclosure)

. -. . *1.l ., - -Wifilt 10 LD UN D ER 1-U6FR-2 ..a90-Ernest J. Kapopoulos, Jr.

( DUKE H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2 ENERGY. Site Vice President Duke Energy 3587 West Entrance Road Hadsville, SC 29550 0:8439577707 F: 843 957 7379 Ernie.ICapopou!osdiike-energy.co,n 10 CFR 55.35(b) 10 CFR 2.390(a)(6)

Serial: RNP-RAI1 8-0025 MAR 2 2 2078 Ms. Catherine Haney Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1257 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-23 PRELIMINARY REAPPLICATION AND MEDICAL EXAMINATION CERTIFICATION FOR OPERATOR LICENSE RETAKE EXAMINATION Ms. Haney:

In accordance with 10 CFR 55.35(b), Duke Energy Progress, LLC is submitting a preliminary reapplication for an operator license for the individual in Attachment Ito this letter. The applicant previously applied by letter RNP-RA/17-0026, dated September 11,2017 and failed the NRC Senior Reactor Operator operating test administered the weeks of September 25, 2017 and October2, 2017, byletterdated December 13, 2017.

A preliminary Personal Qualification Statement Licensee (i.e., NRC Form 398) and Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee (i.e., NRC Form 396) form for one Senior Reactor Operator applicant for H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant (HBRSEP), Unit No.

2 are provided in Attachment II and Attachment Ill. The Remedial Training Form for the applicant will be included in the final application.

Duke Energy Progress, LLC requests that the information in the attachments be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(a)(6) since the disclosure of this information would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

HAR 2 9 2018 Attachments to this letter contain PER NALLeENTtFlABtEtp4rORMAT-teN - T14NOL-D--UN DER I 0-C-FR 2.300 i Upon removal of Attachments, this letter is decontrolled.

RERA&ENAB4NFGRMONThHeBNBEWt6-eFR-2S9O-  %

Regional Administrator, Region II United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial: RNP-RN1 8-0025 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Kevin Ellis, Manager Nuclear Regulatory Affairs at (843) 951-1329.

Sincerely, Ernest J. Kapopoulos, Jr.

Site Vice President EJKIcac Attachments Attachment I: List of Scheduled Applicant Attachment II: Personal Qualification Statement Licensee (NRC Form 398)

Attachment Ill: Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee (NRC Form 396)

C: Document Control Desk (w/o Attachments)

NRC Resident Inspector (wlo Attachments)

Mr. Dennis Calvin, NRC Project Manager, NRR (w/o Attachments)

Mr. G. J. McCoy, NRC, Region II Attachments to this letter contain ERSONALL11DENTWIAE4NFORMATION -W1ThH6B-NDfR 1 00Ffl 2.330 Upon removal of Attachments, this letter is decontrolled.

PW fItJ

DUKE Charles E. Sherman H. B. Robinson Steam ENERGY Director Electric Plant Unit 2 Nuc Org Effectiveness Duke Energy 3587 West Entrance Road Hartsville, SC 29550 0:843957 7609 F: 843 957 1319 Chuck.Sherman @duke-eizergy.coin 10 CFR 55.40 Serial: RNP-RA/1 8-0022 MAR 2 6 2018 Mr. Daniel Bacon U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1 257 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-23 LICENSED OPERATOR RE-TAKE INITIAL EXAMINATION

Dear Mr. Bacon:

In accordance with the guidelines in Revision 11 of NUREG-1 021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, Duke Energy Progress, LLC is providing the enclosed operating test for the examination scheduled to begin the week of April 23, 2018.

As required by Attachment 1 of Revision 11 of NUREG-1 021, Section ES-201, Examination Security and Integrity Considerations, please ensure that these examination materials are withheld from public disclosure until after the examinations are complete.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Joseph Rackley at (843) 951-1625.

Sincerely, Charles E. Sherman )

Director Nuc Org Effectiveness CES/cac

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial: RN P-RAIl 8-0022 Page 2 of 2 Enclosure c: Document Control Desk (wlo Enclosure)

NRC Resident Inspector, HBRSEP (w/o Enclosure)

NRC Regional Administrator, Region II (wlo Enclosure)

Mr. Dennis Galvin, NRC (w/o Enclosure)

Mr. Gerald J. McCoy, NRC, Region II (wlo Enclosure)

BERSGNALLY I DENTW E-tfPORM*rIeN--w1THHeID-uNDfR--to-Crn-s9o-Ernest]. Kapopoulos, Jr.

DUKE H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit 2 ENERGY Site Vice President Duke Energy 3581 West Entrance Road Hartsville, SC 29550 0:843 957 1707 F: 843 951 7379 Ernie.Kapoponlos@duke-energy. coin Serial: RNP-RN1 8-0026 10 CFR 2.390(a)(6)

APR 052078 Catherine Haney Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1 257 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-23 REAPPLICATION AND MEDICAL EXAMINATION CERTIFICA TION FOR OPERATOR LICENSE RETAKE EXAMINATION Ms. Haney:

In response to letter dated March 22, 2018, Duke Energy Progre ss, LLC is submitting an application for an operator license for the individual listed in Attach ment Ito this letter. The applicant previously applied by letter RNP-RN1 7-0026, dated Septem ber 11, 2017 and failed the NRC Senior Reactor Operator operating test administered the weeks of September 25, 2017 and October 2, 2017, by letter dated December 13, 2017.

_As discussed during-a meeting between Mr. Christopher McCom ber, Duke Energy Progress, LLC, and Mr. Daniel Bacon, NRC Region II, arrangemnts were made to administer the license examination at HBRSEP, Unit No. 2, the week of April 23, 2018.

A Personal Qualification Statement Licensee (i.e., NRC Form 398) and Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee (i.e., NRC Form 396) form for one Senior Reactor Operator applicant for H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant (HBRSEP), Unit No. 2 are provided in Attachment II and Attachment Ill. Attachment IV includes the Remed ial Training Form for the applicant.

Duke Energy Progress, LLC requests that the information in the attachments be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(a)(6) since the disclosure of this information would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

APR 12 2018 Attachments to this letter contain

• ERSONAIY IDLNT1FB-INQRMAFION--WIHHOtDUt1DER-W OFR2OOG Upon removal of Attachpients, this letter is decontrolled.

gs4Y (C ved

-ER8ONALL-Y IOENTIA NffORMteN*rrHHoIzD-UNaEn 10 CFR-2390-Regional Administrator, Region II United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial: RNP-RN18-0026 Page 2 of 2 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Kevin Ellis, Manager Nuclear Regulatory Affairs at (843) 951-1329.

Sincerely, Ernest J. Kapopoulos, Jr.

Site Vice President EJK/cac Attachments Attachment I: List of Scheduled Applicant Attachment II: Personal Qualification Statement Licensee (NRC Form 398)

Attachment Ill: Certification of Medical Examination by Facility Licensee (NRC Form 396)

Attachment IV: Remedial Training Form c: Document Control Desk (w/o Attachments)

NRC Resident Inspector (w/o Attachments)

Mr. Dennis Galvin, NRC Project Manager, NRR (w/o Attachments)

Mr. Gerald J. McCoy. NRC. Region II Attachments to this letter contain PfRSON*LtY DENT 1A1Z1NFOflMJ4ON WIIKH 9UNDR epw2.go-Upon removal of Attaphments, this letter is decontrolled.

foVc

ERSON-DENWIABtE-WWQRMATION WIThHOLD-UNER48-CPf 2.398-4 DUKE Ernest J.Kapopoulos,Jr.

ENERG Electric Plant Unit 2 Site Vice President Duke Energy 3581 West Entrance Road Hartsville, SC 29550 0:843957 1701 F: 843 951 1379 ii, nw aupuynha,,,3vnh,Rc-efler2e.co,JJ 10 CFR 2.390(a)(6)

Serial: RNP-RN1 8-0034 MAY 032018 Mr. Gerald J. McCoy, Branch Chief U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-1 257 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-261/RENEWED LICENSE NO. DPR-23 POST RETAKE INITIAL LICENSE EXAMINATION DOCUMENTATION

Dear Mr. McCoy:

The post examination materials for the H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2, retake initial license examination, completed on April 25, 2018, in accordance with NUREG-1021, ES-501 C.1.b, is enclosed, having completed all signature signoffs. Furthermore, the facility and the applicant do not have any post-examination comments to submit regarding the examination.

Duke Energy Progress, LLC requests that the information in the enclosures be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(a)(6) since the disclosure of this information would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

This document contains no new Regulatory Commitments.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Terry Giese, Manager Nuclear Operations Training at (843) 951-3889.

tJ.Kapos,Jr.

Site Vice President EJ Klcac Enclosure C: Document Control Desk (w/o Enclosures)

NRC Resident Inspector (w/o Enclosures)

Mr. Dennis Galvin, NRC Project Manager, NRR (w/o Enclosures)

Enclosure to this letter contains Upon removal of Enclosure, this letter is decontrolled.

Ckr fCioJeJ