ML12208A353

Acceptance Review E-mail, License Amendment Request, Revise Physical Protection License Condition Related to Cyber Security Plan

ML12208A353
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	07/26/2012
From:	Kalyanam N Plant Licensing Branch IV
To:	Mason M Entergy Operations
References
TAC ME8998
Download: ML12208A353 (1)

Text

From: Kalyanam, Kaly To: MASON, MICHAEL E (WF3)

Subject:

Acceptance Review Result Re. License Amendment Request - Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Milestones (ME8998)

Date: Thursday, July 26, 2012 11:38:00 AM To: Mike Mason

SUBJECT:

Acceptance Review Result Re. License Amendment Request - Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Milestones Waterford Steam electric Station, Units 3 (TAC No. ME8998)

By letter dated June 28, 2012, Entergy Operations Inc. submitted a [license amendment request] for Waterford Steam electric Station, Units 3. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

N. Kalyanam, Project Manager LPL4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation