ML12142A297

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report: January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2011
ML12142A297
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2012
From:
Constellation Energy Nuclear Group
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML12142A297 (69)


Text

Enclosure (2)

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report: January 1, 2011 - December 31, 2011 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC May 14, 2012

CENG a joint venture of ouwtatim 0*Eflww, 41-ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT: JANUARY 1, 2011 -

DECEMBER 31, 2011 MAY 2012 R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 1503 Lake Road Ontario, New York 14519

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF TA BLES ............................................................................................................................... iii

1. EXECU TIV E SUMM A RY ...................................................................................................... 1
2. IN TRODU CTION ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Station Description ......................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Program Description and-Background ............................................................................... 2 2.3 Program Objectives ......................................................................................................... 2
3. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 3 3.1 Sam ple Collection ........................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Data Interpretation ................................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Quality A ssurance Program ............................................................................................... 3 3.4 Land U se Survey ............................................................................................. ............ 4 3.5 Program Exceptions ....................................................................................................... 4 3.6 Corrections to Previous Reports ......................................................................................... 6
4. RESULTS AND D ISCU SSION S .......................................................................................... 7 4.1 A quatic Environm ent ........................................................................................................ 7 4.1 .a Surface and Drinking W ater ........................................................................................ 7 4.1.b Aquatic Organism s ...................................................................................................... 8 4.1 .c Shoreline Sedim ent ................................................................................. 8 4.2 Atm ospheric Environm ent ................................................................................................. 8 4.2.a A ir Iodine ........................................................................................................................ 9 4.2.b Air Particulate Filters ................................................................................................. 9 4.3 Terrestrial Environm ent ................................................................................................... 10 4.3.a V egetation ............................................................................................... I...................... 10 4.3.b M ilk ................................................................................................................................ 10 4.4 D irect Radiation .................................................................................................................... 11 4.5 Groundw ater ........................................................................................................................... 12 4.6 Summ ary and Conclusion ................................ ................................................................. 13
5. REFEREN CES ........................................................................................................................... 14 Appendix A REM P Sample Locations ...................................................................................... 18 Appendix B REM P Analytical Results ...................................................................................... 27 Appendix C Quality A ssurance Program ................................................................................. 51 Appendix D Land U se Survey ................................................................................................... 63 i

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Title Page A-1 Map of New York State and Lake Ontario Showing Location of R. E. Ginna Nuclear P ower P lant ...................................... ......................................................................................... 23 A-2 Onsite Sam ple Locations ...................................................................................................... 24 A-3 , Offsite Sample Locations (TLDs and milk farms within 5 miles) ........................................ 25 A-4 Water Sample, Milk Farms and TLD Locations .................................................................... 26 ii

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 Synopsis of Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ....15 2 Annual Summary of Radioactivity in the Environs of the Ginna Nuclear Power Plant ..... 16 A-1 Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations for the R. E. Ginna Nuclear Plant ............. 20 B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water...29 B-2 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in the Flesh of Edible Fish ............................................ 31 B-3 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Sediment ................................................................... 32 B-4 Concentration of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges) ...................................... 33 B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples ................................. 35 B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples ................................. 38 B-7 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulates . ........................... 40 B-8 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples .................................................. 41 B-9 Concentration of Gamma Emitters (including 1-131) in Milk ............................................ 42 B-10 Typical MDA Ranges for Gamma Spectrometry ................................................................. 43 B-11 Typical LLDs for Gamma Spectrometry .............................................................................. 44 B -12 D irect Radiation ......................................................................................................................... 45 B-13 Groundwater M onitoring W ells ............................................................................................ 49 C-1 Results of Participation in Cross Check Programs .............................................................. 53 C-2 Results of Quality Assurance Program ................................................................................. 55 C-3 Teledyne Brown Engineering's Typical MDAs for Gamma Spectrometry .......................... 62 D -1 Land U se Survey D istances .................................................................................................... 64 iii

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244

1. EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is a comprehensive surveillance program, which is implemented to assess the impact of site operations on the environment and compliance with 10 CFR 50 Appendix I and 40 CFR 190. Samples are collected from the aquatic and terrestrial pathways applicable to the site. The aquatic pathways include Lake Ontario fish, surface waters, and lakeshore sediment. The terrestrial pathways include airborne particulate and radioiodine, milk, food products, and direct radiation.

Results of the monitoring program for the current operational period for R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant are included in this report. This report presents a synopsis of the REMP (Table 1),

summary of the detectable activity analytical results (Table 2), sampling locations (Appendix A),

compilation of the analytical data (Appendix B), results of the Quality Assurance Program (Appendix C), and results of the Land Use Survey (Appendix D). Interpretation of the data and conclusions are presented in the body of this report.

On March 11, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck off the east coast of Japan. The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, operated by Tokyo Electric Power Co., was hit with a series of tsunamis, lost all AC power, and went into a state of emergency. The Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan estimated approximately 17 million curies of iodine- 131 (1-131) equivalent radioactive material was released into the air and 0.127 million curies into the sea between March 11 and April 5, 2011. 1-131 was detected at the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant monitoring locations at both the indicator and control air sampling locations from March 14 through April 18, 2011.

The results of the REMP demonstrate that there was no significant or measurable radiological impact from the operation of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant. The 2011 results for all pathways sampled were consistent with the previous five-year historical results and exhibited no adverse trends. The results of the REMP continue to demonstrate that the operation of the plant did not result in a significant measurable dose to a member of the general population, or adversely impact the environment as a result of radiological effluents. The program continues to demonstrate that the dose to a member of the public, as a result of the operation of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, remains significantly below the federally required dose limits specified in 10 CFR 20 and 40 CFR 190.

I

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244

2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Station Description The R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant (Ginna), owned by Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC (CENG), is an operating nuclear generating facility consisting of one pressurized water reactor. Ginna achieved criticality in September 1969 and commenced commercial operation in July 1970. The location of the plant in relation to local metropolitan areas is depicted in Appendix A, Figure A-i.

2.2 Program Description and Background The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report is published in accordance with Section 5.0 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM, Ref. 1) and the Plant's Technical Specifications (Ref. 2). This report describes the REMP, and its implementation as required by the ODCM. The environmental surveillance data collected during this reporting period were compared with that generated in previous periods whenever possible to evaluate the environmental radiological impact of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant. Results of the monitoring program for the pre-operational and previous operational periods through 2010 have been reported in a series of previously released documents.

The REMP is implemented to measure radioactivity in the aquatic and terrestrial pathways. The aquatic pathways include Lake Ontario fish, Lake Ontario water, and Deer Creek water.

Measurement results of the samples representing these pathways contained only natural background radiation or low concentrations of Cs-137 resulting from past atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Terrestrial pathways monitored included airborne particulate and radioiodine, milk, food products, and direct radiation.

2.3 Program Objectives The objectives of the REMP for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant are:

a. Measure and evaluate the effects of plant operation on the environment.
b. Monitor background radiation levels in the environs of the Ginna site.
c. Demonstrate compliance with the environmental conditions and requirements of applicable state and federal regulations, including the ODCM and 40 CFR 190.
d. Provide information by which the general public can evaluate environmental aspects -

of the operation of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

2

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244

3. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 3.1 Sample Collection and Analysis The locations of the individual sampling stations are listed in Table A-I and shown in Figures A-2 and A-3. All samples were collected and analyzed by CENG personnel or its contractors in accordance with Ginna procedures (Ref. 3).

During 2011, 1300 samples were collected for analysis by gross beta counting and/or gamma spectroscopy. These included 64 surface water samples, 16 fish samples, 5 sediment samples, 621 air particulate samples, 311 air iodine samples, 28 vegetation samples, 38 milk samples, 53 groundwater samples, and 164 dosimeter measurements. Deviations from the REMP sampling schedule are described in section 3.5. This monitoring program satisfied the minimum number of samples required by the ODCM for all pathways.

R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant's Chemistry personnel collected all REMP samples. Analysis was performed at either Ginna's onsite laboratory (groundwater samples), Stanford Dosimetry in Sterling Massachusetts (direct radiation samples), or Constellation Energy's Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory in Baltimore, Maryland (surface and drinking water, aquatic organisms, shoreline sediment, air particulate filters, air iodine, and vegetation samples). A summary of the content of the REMP and the results of the data collected for indicator and control locations are provided in Tables 1 and 2.

3.2 Data Interpretation Many results in environmental monitoring occur at or below the minimum detectable activity (MDA). In this report, all results below the relevant MDA are reported as being "less than" the MDA value. Typical MDA values are listed in Appendix B, Table B-10.

3.3 Ouality Assurance Program Appendix C provides a summary of Constellation Energy Ft. Smallwood Laboratory's quality assurance program for 2011. It consists of Table C-1, which represents a compilation of the results of the Constellation Energy Ft. Smallwood Laboratory's participation in an intercomparison program with Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) located in Arvada, Colorado and Analytics, Inc. located in Atlanta, Georgia. Table C-2 complies the results of the Constellation Energy Ft. Smallwood Laboratory's participation in a split sample program with Teledyne Brown Engineering located in Knoxville, Tennessee.

All the Constellation Energy Laboratory's results contained in Table C-1 generally agree with the intercomparison laboratory's results within the range of +/-2 a of each other with the exception of a beta result for the water sample type on 6/16/11 from Analytics. Investigation into the matter yielded no apparent cause for the discrepancy. All the results contained in Table C-2 agree within the range of +/-2 a of each other with their respective Constellation Energy 3

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Laboratory original, replicate and/or Teledyne Brown Engineering's split laboratory samples, except for the comparisons of four samples involving Cs-137 results. These minor discrepancies, occurring very close to or below the analyses MDA's, are most likely due to counting statistical fluctuations, the non-homogeneous nature of the sample-splitting process and in the case of 1-131, a short decay time (approximately 8.02 day half life). Repeat analysis of these samples for laboratory replicates yielded results within range of +/-2 C.

Table C-3 identifies a list of typical MDA's achieved by Teledyne Brown for Gamma Spectroscopy.

3.4 Land Use Survey In September 2011, a Land Use Survey was conducted to identify the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence, and the nearest garden greater than 50 square meters in each of the nine sectors within a 5-mile radius of the power plant. The Land Use Survey is conducted in accordance with Ginna procedures (Ref. 4). The position of the nearest residence and garden and animals producing milk for human consumption in each sector is provided in Appendix D, Table D-3.

The following land use changes occurred over the past year within a 5-mile radius of the power plant:

" The closest residential dwelling in the SE sector (1601 Lake Road) is no longer occupied.

The new nearest residence is located in the SE sector, approximately 840 meters from the reactor.

" The Monroe County Water Authority (MCWA) continues construction of a new municipal water treatment facility on Lake Road between Salt Road and Basket Road.

While this facility not yet in service, its construction will be tracked and added to the REMP upon completion.

" The construction of two small subdivisions occurred on the south side of Boston Rd.

(eastern end).

" The Summer Lake Subdivision expanded into its final construction phase, adding 14 additional homes.

  • No new agricultural land use was identified.

" No new food producing facilities were identified.

" No new milk producing animals were identified.

3.5 Program Exceptions The reportable items in the Annual Environmental Radiological Operating Report under procedure CHA-RETS-VARIATION are as follows:

1. January 18, 2011: The air sampler at Environmental Monitoring Station #5 was removed from service on January 17, 2011 after it was determined to be out of service. Consistent 4

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 with the normal sampling schedule, the Environmental Technician collected the air sample from the unit later that same day. It was determined that the "new" filter had sampled an insufficient volume of air (6.4 cubic meters), invalidating the air sample for the January 10, 2011 through January 18, 2011 sampling period. The filter from the non-functional air sampler was not retrieved for analysis.

2. April 5, 2011: At Environmental Monitoring Station #8 a small portion of the filter (approximately 3mm x 3mm) rolled back onto itself during the filter change out process, disturbing some of the captured particulates. This sample was analyzed.
3. May 3, 2011: The air sampler at Environmental Monitoring Station #2 remained out of service after being tripped on April 25, 2011. Attempt to reset the unit failed. No sample was collected during the period of April 25, 2011 through May 2, 2011. The unit was ultimately returned to service on May 6, 2011.
4. August 4, 2011: The July 25, 2011 - August 1, 2011 air sample at Environmental Monitoring Station #12 was not obtained due to safety concerns at the substation in which the monitoring station is located. Limbs from two separate trees were in contact with a transformer and the air sampler. The Environmental Technician was not comfortable proceeding under the tree limb to obtain the sample. The Environmental Technician contacted supervision and Personnel at Rochester Gas & Electric (RG&E) to coordinate the tree limb removal. The monitoring station area was cleared of hazards on August 10, 2011, allowing the Environmental Technician to resume sample collection.

Approximately 1,473 cubic meters of air were collected by this air sampler during the sampling period, which meets the minimum sample volume requirements. This sample was ultimately analyzed for the August 1, 2011 - August 8, 2011 sampling period.

5. September 8, 2011: The gas meter associated with the air sampler at Environmental Monitoring #11 failed its calibration check after being removed from the field on June 13, 2011. The calibration indicated the volume noted on the unit meter recorded a value approximately 3.9 percent more than the unit actually sampled. The air samples taken with this pump began in June 2010 and continued through June 2011. Initial calibration of the unit indicated the gas meter was under reporting the volume of sampled air by approximately 0.4 percent. The acceptable calibration range for gas meters is +/- 2 percent. Ginna staff reviewed the air volumes sampled by this pump from June 2010 through June 2011 and determined that the lowest sample volume occurred during the July 5, 2010 through July 12, 2010 sampling period - 303.4 cubic meters, which does not challenge the minimum air sampling volume requirement of 100 cubic meters.
6. December 13, 2011: The weekly composite surface water sample volumes collected at Ontario Water District for the sampling periods of November 28, 2011 through December 5, 2011 and December 5, 2011 through December 11, 2011 were less than normal. It is suspected that the compositors could not obtain fully representative samples during these periods. Ontario Water District personnel took the plant offline during these sampling periods to perform facility modifications. The plant was returned to service on December 12, 2011.

5

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 3.6 Corrections to Previous Reports No modifications are required to previously submitted Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports at this time.

6

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS All environmental samples collected during the year were analyzed in accordance with Constellation Energy analytical procedures (Ref. 5). The analytical results for this reporting period are presented in Appendix B and the detectable activity results are also summarized in Table 2. For discussion purposes, the analytical results are divided into four categories: Aquatic Environment, the Atmospheric Environment, the Terrestrial Environment, Direct Radiation, and Groundwater.

4.1 Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment surrounding the plant was monitored by analyzing samples of surface and drinking water, aquatic organisms, and shoreline sediment. These samples were obtained from various sampling locations near the plant.

4.1.a Surface and Drinking Water Monthly composite samples are collected from Lake Ontario at upstream control locations (Russell Station or Monroe County Water Authority - Shoremont) and downstream indicator locations (Ontario Water District Plant - OWD) and analyzed for gross beta activity (Table B-I).

A grab sample of Deer Creek is.collected and analyzed monthly for gross beta activity (Table B-1).

In 2011, the gross beta averages for the upstream Lake Ontario monitoring locations (controls) and downstream Lake Ontario monitoring locations (indicators) were 2.12 pCi/Liter and 2.08 pCi/Liter, respectively. Gross beta analysis of the monthly composite samples showed no statistically significant difference in activity between the indicator and control locations.

The average gross beta concentration seen in the Deer Creek samples was 4.32 PCi/Liter.

Historically, Deer Creek gross beta values are typically higher than other surface water samples due to Radon progeny in the soils from which the creek recharges and over which the creek flows.

Gamma isotopic analysis including 1-131 is performed on each monthly composite sample.

These are listed in Table B-I and are separated by source of sample. During 2011, no sample results indicated detection of 1-131 activity.

Tritium analysis was performed on all water samples on a monthly basis. Composites are made from the weekly samples and a portion filtered to remove interferences for analysis by beta scintillation. During 2011, no surface water or drinking water sample results indicated tritium activity.

7

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.1.b Aquatic Organisms Indicator fish are caught in the vicinity of the Discharge Canal and analyzed for radioactivity from liquid effluent releases from the plant. The fish are filleted to represent that portion which would normally be eaten. Additional fish are caught more than 15 miles away to be used as control samples and are prepared in the same manner.

At a minimum, four different species of fish are analyzed during each half-year from the indicator and background locations. Fish are caught by R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant environmental staff and are analyzed by gamma spectroscopy after being held for periods of less than one week to keep the LLD value for the shorter half-life isotopes realistic. Detection limits could also be affected by small mass samples, (< 2000 grams), in some species. Gamma isotopic concentrations (pCi/kilogram wet) are listed in Table B-2.

During 2011, none of the indicator samples indicated activity other than naturally occurring radionuclides. There was no significant difference in the radiological activity in the indicator and control sampling locations.

4.1.c Shoreline Sediment Samples of shoreline sediment are taken upstream (Town of Greece near Slater Creek) and downstream (Near the Ontario Water District) of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

Results of the gamma isotopic analysis for sediment are included in Table B-3, along with benthic sediment from Lake Ontario. During 2011, all sediment samples indicated that gamma emitters were below detection limits. There was no difference in the radiological activity observed in the indicator and control sampling locations.

4.2 Atmospheric Environment Radioactive particles in air are collected by drawing approximately one standard cubic foot per minute (SCFM) through a two inch diameter particulate filter. The volume of air sampled is measured by a dry gas meter and corrected for the pressure drop across the filter. The filters are changed weekly and allowed to decay for three days prior to counting to eliminate most of the natural radioactivity such as the short half-life decay products of radon. The decay period is used to give a more sensitive measurement of long-lived man-made radioactivity.

A ring of six sampling stations is located on the plant site from 150 to 420 meters from the reactor centerline near the point of the maximum annual average ground level concentration, one additional sampling location is located on-site at 690 meters, and two others offsite at approximately 7 miles. In addition, there are three sampling stations located approximately 7 to 16 miles from the site that serve as control stations. See Figure A-2 and Figure A-4.

8

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.2.a Air Iodine Radioiodine cartridges are placed at six locations. These cartridges are changed and analyzed each week.

During the 2011 air sampling program, airborne radioiodine was detected in 26 of the 311 weekly samples collected at the six sampling stations. 1-131 was detected at both the indicator and control stations during five weekly sampling periods: March 14, 2011 - March 21, 2011; March 21, 2011 - March 28, 2011; March 28, 2011 - April 4, 2011; April 4, 2011 - April 11, 2011; and April 11 - April 18, 2011. Detectable 1-131 concentrations at indicator stations averaged 0.054 pCi/mi3 , ranging from 0.012 to 0.128 pCi/m 3. Detectable 1-131 concentrations at control location averaged 0.065 pCi/m 3 , ranging from 0.012 to 0.135 pCi/m 3 . Comparisons between indicator and control sample location showed no statistically significant difference in activity. Analytical data is summarized in Table B-4.

The measurable concentrations of 1-131 are attributed to the 'trans-continental transport and fallout of airborne releases from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station event that followed the magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck off the east coast of Japan on March 11, 2011.

These 1-131 detections are not attributed to operations at Ginna.

4.2.b Air Particulate Filters The major airborne species released from the plant are noble gases and tritium. Most of this activity is released in a gaseous form; however, some radioiodine is released as airborne particulate and some of the particulate activity is due to short lived noble gas decay products.

Tables B-5 provides a list of gross beta analysis values for the on-site sample stations. Table B-6 is a list of gross beta analysis values for the off-site sampler stations.

Based on weekly comparisons, there was no statistical difference between the Control and Indicator radioactive particulate concentrations. The average for the control samples (i.e.,

monitoring locations 8, 10, and 12) was 0.024 pCi/m 3 and the averages for the indicator samples (i.e., monitoring locations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 13) was 0.023 pCi/m 3 for the period of January to December 2011. Maximum weekly concentrations for all control stations and all indicator stations were 0.047 and 0.050 pCi/m 3 , respectively.

The particulate filters from each sampling location were saved and a 13 week composite was made. A gamma isotopic analysis was performed for each sampling location and corrected for decay.

Positive results for Cs- 134 and Cs- 137 were identified in samples taken during the second quarter of 2011. Detectable Cs-134 was identified at one control location at a concentration of 3 0.0006 pCi/m 3 . Detectable Cs-134 concentrations at indicator locations averaged 0.0007 pCi/m ,

ranging from 0.0003 to 0.0013 pCi/m 3. Detectable Cs-137 concentrations at control locations averaged 0.0011 pCi/m 3 , ranging from 0.0008 to 0.0013 pCi/m 3. Detectable Cs-137 concentrations at indicator locations averaged 0.0009 pCi/m 3, ranging from 0.0006 to 0.0012 9

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 pCi/m 3 . Comparisons between indicator and control sample location showed no statistically significant difference in activity. Analytical data is summarized in Table B-7.

The measurable concentrations of Cs-134 and Cs-137 are attributed to the trans-continental transport and fallout of airborne releases from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station event that followed the magnitude 9.0 earthquake struck off the east coast of Japan on March 11, 2011. Although the 1-131 was detected in both late first quarter 2011 samples and early second quarter 2011 samples, Cs-134 and Cs-137 was identified only in air particulates during the second quarter 2011. A closer review of the 1-131 data (Table B-4) indicates that the highest concentrations were detected in samples occurring in the second quarter 2011. It is theorized that any Cs-134 and Cs-137 from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station event was below detectable levels in first quarter 2011 samples. The Cs-134 and Cs-137 detections observed during the second quarter 2011 are not attributed to operations at Ginna.

4.3 Terrestrial Environment Crops are grown on the plant property in a location with a highest off-site meteorological deposition parameter, and samples of the produce are collected at harvest time for analysis.

Control samples are purchased from farms greater than ten miles from the plant.

4.3.a Vegetation There was no indication in the vegetation samples contained activity greater than naturally occurring background levels. There was no difference in the radiological activity observed in the indicator and control sampling locations. Gamma isotopic data is provided in Table B-8.

4.3.b Milk There was one indicator dairy herd located within five miles from the plant in 2011. Milk samples are collected monthly during November through May from the indicator farm and biweekly during June through October. A control farm sample is taken for each monthly sample and once during each biweekly period. The milk is analyzed for Iodine-131 and also analyzed by gamma spectroscopy for major fission products.

During 2011, no samples indicated 1-131 activity above detection levels. There was no difference in the radiological activity observed in the indicator and control sampling locations.

Table B-9 provides a listing of all samples collected during 2011 with analytical results.

10

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.4 Direct Radiation Dosimeters are placed as part of the environmental monitoring program. Thirty-nine dosimeter badges are currently placed in four rings around the plant. These rings range from less than 1,000 feet to 15 miles and have been dispersed to give indications in each of the nine land based sectors around the plant should an excessive release occur from the plant. Badges are changed and read after approximately 3 months exposure. Each direct radiation sampling location is described in Table A-I and identified in Figure A-2.

Direct radiation readings at locations #7 and #13 are influenced by their close proximity to the site's Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) and will normally read slightly higher than other locations. These dosimeters received an average quarterly dose of 13.0 mRem/qtr after the ISFSI had received fuel (i.e., the second half of 2010). Environmental Station 13, the closest sampling location to the ISFSI, received an average dose of 13.4 mRem/quarter during 2011. All onsite indicators averaged 12.8 mRem/qtr.

For the year of 2011, the average, minimum, and maximum exposure readings was as follows:

Monitoring Group Average Min. Max (mreLn/qtr) (mrem/qtr) (mrem/qtr)

Onsite Indicators 12.8 10.0 16.1 Site Boundary Indicators 12.7 10.3 16.1 Offsite Indicators 11.8 10.1 14.3 Control Locations 11.1 9.4 13.0 40 CFR 190 requires that the annual dose equivalent not exceed 25 millirem to the whole body of any member of the public. The average quarterly exposure observed at the control monitoring stations was used to determine the background level (equivalent to 44.4 millirem annually),

while the highest total annual dosimeter reading at an individual site boundary environmental monitoring location (56.8 millirem observed at Environmental Monitoring Station 64). The difference in these values determines the maximum possible direct radiation dose exposure to an offsite member of the public. Accordingly, the hypothetical maximum direct radiation dose exposure to the public for 2011 was determined to be 12.4 millirem.

Table B-12 provides quarterly dosimeter readings at each location.

On May 1, 2012, an apparent trend associated was identified with the reported average annual direct radiation dose to the general public. It was noted that the average annual direct dose to an offsite member of the public has increased 2 - 3 mRem over the past 2 to 3 years. Condition report CR-2012-001275 was entered into the site's corrective action process to further evaluate this observation. At the time this report was published, Ginna staff had not completed their evaluation of this trend. It is anticipated it will be completed by mid-July 2011.

11

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 4.5 Groundwater At a minimum, environmental groundwater monitoring wells are sampled quarterly. There are currently a total of 8 functional onsite groundwater monitoring wells: Ginna sampled from 10 groundwater monitoring wells during 2011:

" GW01: Warehouse Access Road (Control)

  • GW03: Screenhouse West, South Well
  • GW04: Screenhouse West, North Well
  • GW05: Screenhouse East, South (15.5')

" GW06: Screenhouse East, Middle (20.0')

  • GW07: Screenhouse East, North (24.0')
  • GW08: All Volatiles Treatment Building

" GW09: Technical Support Center, North

" GW10: Technical Support Center, South

  • GW1 1: Contaminated Storage Building, SE (24.0')

Groundwater samples are analyzed for tritium to a detection limit of 500 pCi/L. Groundwater samples are analyzed for tritium to a detection limit of 500 pCi/L, and for gamma emitting radionuclides to the environmental LLDs. Results of the groundwater monitoring well sampling are presented in Table B-13.

Positive tritium results were identified in GW03, GW04, GW09 and GW 11 on February 9, 2011.

Condition Report CR-2011-001113 was initiated in the Ginna Corrective Action Program and an Apparent Cause Evaluation was performed. The subsequent information wa's gathered regarding these positive results:

  • GW03, GW09 and GW1 1 were re-sampled on 2/18/2011. The results indicated positive tritium concentrations at these sampling locations.

" GW03 was declared out of service due to the depth to water being 3 feet higher than adjacent groundwater monitoring well, GW04. The discrepancy in water height is indicative of a degraded well material condition.

  • GW04 was not re-sampled due to ground surrounding well location being submerged in standing water due to inadequate ground gradient. It was determined the standing water compromised the integrity of the groundwater sample. Sampling of this well continued after the surrounding ground gradient was corrected to improve drainage in the area surrounding the groundwater well. Subsequent samples taken at these locations did not have tritium at detectable levels.
  • GW09 was declared out of service due to a significant amount of clay and silt during sampling. These conditions are indicative of well screen damage.
  • The Apparent Cause Evaluation determined that the likely cause of the positive February 2011 tritium results was related to a significant snow melt that occurred the week prior to groundwater well sampling. It was suspected that snow contained tritium was recaptured from Auxiliary Building Plant Ventilation, accumulated in areas surrounding the groundwater monitoring wells, melted during warm weather occurred, and entered the 12

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 groundwater. Subsequent samples taken at these locations did not have tritium at detectable levels. No adverse trends have been identified.

The average and maximum tritium concentration found in the groundwater monitoring wells during February 2011 were 841 PCi/L and 1820 PCi/L, respectively. These concentrations are consistent with concentrations seen in precipitation samples taken around Ginna and are well below the Environmental Protection Agency drinking water standard of 20,000 PCi/L. No continued or upward trend in tritium concentrations was identified in any groundwater monitoring wells. All other samples taken during 2011 did not indicate positive results for tritium (i.e., all other samples were below MDA).

4.6 Summary and Conclusion Operation of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant produced radioactivity and ambient radiation levels significantly below the limits of the ODCM and 40 CFR 190. The analytical results from the Radiological Environmental Monitoring program indicate the operation of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant had no measurable radiological impact on the environment or significant build-up of plant-related radionuclides in the environment. The results also indicate operation of the plant did not result in a measurable radiation dose to the general population above natural background levels.

Additionally, the 2011 results are consistent with data for the past five years and exhibited no detectable increases or adverse trends.

13

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244

5. REFERENCES
1. R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revisions 26 (Effective Date: 12/10/20 10) and 27 (Effective Date: 05/03/2011).
2. R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, Technical Specification 5.6.2; Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
3. Procedure CNG-EV- 1.01-1000, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP).
4. Procedure CH-ENV-LAND-USE, Land Use Census; completed September 2011.
5. Constellation Energy Ft. Smallwood Environmental Laboratory Procedures Manual, General Services Department.

14

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table 1 Synopsis of Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sample Type Sampling Number of Number Analysis Analysis Number Frequency1 Locations Collected Frequency1 Analyzed Aquatic Environment Surface Water, MC 5 64 Gamma MC/MG 64 Drinking Water Gross Beta MC/MG 64 Bottom Sediment A 1 1 Gamma A 1 2

Fish A 4 16 Gamma SA 16 Shoreline Sediment SA 2 4 Gamma SA .4 Groundwater a. 10 53 Tritium Q 53 Atmospheric Environment 3

Air Iodine W 6 311 1-131 W 311 4

Air Particulates W 12 621 Gross Beta W 621 Gamma QC 48 Direct Radiation Ambient Radiation a 41 164 TLD Q 164 Terrestrial Environment 5

Milk M/BW 2 38 Gamma M/BW 38 Vegetation 6 A 8 28 Gamma A 28 1 W=Weekly, BW=BiWeekly (15 days), M=Monthly (31 days), Q=Quarterly (92 days), SA=Semiannual, A=Annual, C=Composite 2 Twice during fishing season including at least four species 3 The collection device contains activated charcoal 4 Beta counting is performed >= 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following filter change. Gamma spectroscopy performed on quarterly composite of weekly samples 5 Bi-Weekly during growing season.

6 Annual at time of harvest. Samples include broad leaf vegetation 15

January 1 -December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table 2 Annual Summary of Radioactivity in the Environs of the Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Medium or Type and Total Lower Limit of Indicator Location with Highest Annual Control Locations Pathway Sampled Number of Detection (LLD) Locations Mean Highest Annual Mean (F) / Range 1 Mean (F)/Range (Unit of Analyses (F)/Range 1 Mean Measurement) Performed Name/Distance 2 &

Direction Aquatic Environment Surface Water, Gamma (36) 2.3 -- (51/51) - (51/51) -- (13/13)

(pCi/L) (Cs-1 37) (-)

Surface Water, Gross Beta (36) 0.5 2.64 (51/51) Deer Creek - E 4.32 (12/12) 2.12 (13/13)

(pCi/L) (1.41-7.64) DC (3.40 - 7.64) (1.82-2.61) 0.29 km ESE Sediment "Gamma (5) 17 (Cs-1 37) - (3/3) -- (3/3) - (2/2)

(pCi/kg)

Fish Gamma (16) 15 (Cs-137) - (8/8) - (8/8)

(-)

- (8/8)

(pCi/kg) (--)

Groundwater Tritium 500 841 (48/48) GW03 - 1090 (2/2) -- (5/5)

(PCilL) Screenhouse West, South Well Direct Radiation Ambient Radiation Dosimeters (164) 12.4 (128/128) Env. Station 64 14.2 (1/32) 11.1 (9/9)

(mR/91 days) (10.0-16.1) 1.19 km W (13.5-14.9) (9.4-13.0) 16

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table 2 Annual Summary of Radioactivity in the Environs of the Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Medium or Type and Total Lower Limit of Indicator Location with Highest Annual Control Locations Pathway Sampled Number of Detection (LLD) Locations Mean Highest Annual Mean (F) / Range1 Mean (F)/Range (Unit of Analyses (F)/Rangel Mean Measurement) Performed Name/Distance 2 &

Direction Atmospheric Environment Air Iodine 1-131 (311) 0.15 5.4 (22/259) Williamson - 11 7.3 (3/52) 6.5 (4/52)

(10-2 pCi/m 3) (1.2- 12.8) 11.5 km ESE (4.7 - 11.0) (1.2-13.5)

Air Particulates Gross Beta (621) 0.5 2.34 (466/466) Main Parking Lot 2.44 (52/52) 2.35 (155/155)

(10-2 pCi/m 3) (0.6 - 5.0) - 06 (1.1 -4.6) (0.6-4.7) 0.23 km SW Air Particulates Gamma (48) 0.6 (8/36) Webster- 09 1.0(1/4) 1.0 (2/8)

(10-3 pCi/mr3 ) (0.3-1.0) 11.4 km SW (1.0-1.0) (0.6-1.3)

Air Particulates Gamma (48) 0.9 (9/36) West Fence Line 1.2 (1/4) 1.1 (3/8)

(10" pCiVm 3 ) (0.6-1.2) -07 (1.2-1.2) (0.8-1.3) 0.2 km WSW Terrestrial Environment Milk Gamma (38) 5 (Cs-1 37) -(19/19) - (19/19) -(19/19)

(pCi/L) (-) (-)

Vegetation Gamma (28) 27 (Cs-1 37) -(19/19) -(19/19) --(9/9)

(pCi/L)

Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction (F) of detectable measurements at specified location is indicated in parentheses 2From the center point of the containment building.

-- No detectable activity at specified location.

17.

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIX A REMP Sample Locations Summary of Appendix A Content Appendix A contains information concerning the environmental samples which were collected during this operating period.

Sample locations and specific information about individual locations for the Ginna is provided in Table A-1.

Figure A-I shows the location of the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant in relation to New York State and Lake Ontario. Figures A-2, A-3, and A-4 show the locations of the power plant sampling sites in relation to the plant site at different degrees of detail.

18

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS - SAMPLING LOCATIONS Table Title Page A-1 Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations for the Ginna Nuclear Power Plant .......... 20 Figure Title Page A-1 Map of New York State and Lake Ontario Showing Location of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plan t ................................................................................................................................... 23 A-2 Onsite Sample Locations ................................................................................................. 24 A-3 Offsite Sample Locations (TLDs and milk farms within 5 miles) ................................. 25 A-4 Water Sample, Milk Farms and TLD Locations ............................................................. 26 19

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE A-1 Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant Station Description Distance Direction Meters Miles Sector 2 Manor House Yard 360 0.22 E 3 East Field 440 0.27 ESE 4 East of Training Center Parking Lot 320 0.20 SE 5 Creek Bridge 180 0.11 SSE 6 Onsite-SW side of plant parking lot 300 0.19 SW 7 Onsite-utility pole along West plant fence 240 0.15 WSW 8 Seabreeze 19840 12.33 WSW 9 Webster 11150 6.93 SW 10 Walworth 12730 7.91 S 11 Williamson 11540 7.17 ESE 12 Sodus Point 25170 15.64 E 13 Substation 13 690 0.43 SSW

. . . . .. .. . . i.ti.

.j.tR l,... _....... ..

2 Onsite-Manor House Yard 360 0.22 E 3 Onsite-In field approximately 200 ft SE of station #2 440 0.27 ESE 4 Onsite- East of Training Center Parking Lot 320 0.20 SE 5 Onsite-Between creek and plant entry road 180 0.11 SSE 6 Onsite-SW side of plant parking lot 300 0.19 SW 7 Onsite-utility pole along West plant fence 240 0.15 WSW 8 Topper Drive-Irondequoit, Seabreeze Substation #51 19840 12.33 WSW 9 Phillips Road-Webster, intersection with Highway #104, 11150 6.93 SW Substation #74 10 Atlantic Avenue-Walworth, Substation #230 12730 7.91 S 11 W. Main Street-Williamson, Substation #207 11540 7.17 ESE 12 12 Seaman Avenue-Sodus Point-Off Lake Road by 25170 15.64 E Sewer district, Substation #209 13 Onsite - South of Meteorological Tower 260 0.16 WNW 14 NW comer of field along lake shore 860 0.53 WNW 15 Field access road, west of orchard, approximately 3000' 920 0.57 W West of plant 16 SW Comer of orchard, approximately 3000' West of 1030 0.64 WSW plant, approximately 200' North of Lake Road 17 Utility pole in orchard, approximately 75" North of Lake 510 0.32 SSW Road 510 0.32_SS 18 Substation 13A fence, North Side 730 0.45 SSW 19 On NW comer of house 100' East of plant access road 460 0.29 S 20 Approximately 150' West of Ontario Center Road and 650 0.40 SSE I approximately 170' South of Lake Road 20

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE A-i Locations of Environmental Sampling Stations

. for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Plant Station Description Distance Distance Meters Meters Sector 21 North side of Lake Road, approximately 200' East of 660 0.41 SE Ontario Center Road 22 North side of Lake Road, SE, property comer 920 0.57 SE 23 East property line, midway between Lake Road and 780 0.49 ESE Lake shore 24 Lake shore near NE comer of property 730 0.45 E 25 Substation #73, Klein Road, adjacent to 897 Klein Road 14000 8.70 WSW 26 Service Center, Plank Road, West of 250 14600 9.07 SW 27 Atlantic Avenue at Knollwood Drive utility pole, North 14120 8.77 SSW side of road 28 Substation #193, Marion, behind Stanton Ag. Service, 17450 10.84 SE North Main Street 29 Substation #208, Town Line Road (CR-118), 1000' 14050 8.73 ESE North of Route 104 30 District Office, Sodus, on pole, West side of bldg 20760 12.90 ESE 31 Lake Road, pole 20' North of road, 500' East of Salt 7330 4.56 W Road 32 Woodard Road at County Line Road, pole @ Northwest 6070 3.77 WSW comer.

County Line Road at RR tracks, pole approximately 100' 7950 4.94 SW East along tracks 34 Pole at Route 104, Lincoln Road, SW Comer. 6520 4.05 SSW 35 Transmission Right of Way, North of Clevenger Road 7490 4.65 SSW on pole.

36 Substation #205, Route 104, East of Ontario Center 5480 3.41 5 36_____ Road, North side of fence.

37 Rail Road Avenue, pole at 2048 5770 3.59 SSE 38 Fisher Road at RR Tracks, pole East of road 6910 4.29 SE 39 Seeley Road, Pole South side 100' West of intersection 6930 4.31 ESE with Stony Lonesome Road 40 Lake Road at Stoney Lonesome Road, pole at SE comer 6440 4.00 E 63 Westside of warehouse access road 740 0.46 SW 64 Westside of direct road, adjacent to orchard 1190 0.74 W I Lake Ontario Discharge Plume 2200 1.4 ENE 21

January 1 - December 31,2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Russell Station 25600 1 15.9 W Indicator and background samples of lettuce, apples, tomatoes, and cabbage are collected from gardens grown on company property and purchased from farms >10 miles from the plant.

Station Description Distance Direction Meters Miles Sector Shoremont/MCWA 27160 16.9 W Ontario Water District 2200 1.4 ENE Circ Water Intake 420 0.3 N Circ Water Discharge 130 0.1 NNE Deer Creek 260 0.2 ESE Lake Ontario Discharge Plume 2200 1.4 ENE Russell Station 25600 15.9 W Bethnic 1070 0.7 N Sur SSuCn Milk

______Eaton Farm, Williamson (Indicator) I8270 I5.1 I ESE

_____Schultz Farm, S. Sodus (Control) 21000 13.0 SE 22

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-1 Map of New York State and Lake Ontario Showing Location of R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant 23

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-2 Onsite Sample Locations 24

January 1 -December 31,2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-3 Offsite Sample Locations (TLDs and milk farms within 5 miles) 25

January 1 -December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Figure A-4 Water Sample, Milk Farms and TLD Locations 26 U

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIX B REMP Analytical Results Summary of Avpendix B Content Appendix B is a presentation of the analytical results for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant radiological environmental monitoring programs.

27

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS - ANALYTICAL RESULTS Table Title Page B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water...29 B-2 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in the Flesh of Edible Fish .......................................... 31 B-3 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Sediment ................................................................... 32 B-4 Concentration of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges) .................................... 33 B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples ............................. 35 B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples ................................ 38 B-7 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulates ....................................................... 40 B-8 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples ................................................ 41 B-9 Concentration of Gamma Emitters (including 1-131) in Milk ............................................... 42 B-10 Typical MDA Ranges for GammaSpectrometry ............................................................ 43 B-11 Typical LLDs for Gamma Spectrometry .......................................................................... 44 B -12 Direct Radiation ........................................................................................................................ 45 B-13 Groundwater M onitoring Wells .......................................................................................... 49 28

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water (Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2a)

Sample Code Sample Date Gamma Emitters Gross Beta CIRC-IN Circulating Water Inlet - N 1/17/2011 1.85 +/- 0.54 2/15/2011 1.88 +/- 0.55 3/15/2011 1.90 +/- 0.52 4/12/2011 2.86 +/- 0.59 5/10/2011

  • 2.26 +/- 0.54 6/7/2011 2.42 +/- 0.56 7/6/2011 1.99 +/- 0.53 8/2/2011
  • 2.33 +/- 0.56 8/30/2011 1,41 +/- 0.54 9/27/2011 1.59 +/- 0.55 10/26/2011 2.18 +/- 0.55 11/22/2011 1.86 +/- 0.54 12/20/2011 2.35 +/- 0.55 CIRC-OUT Circulating Water Outlet - N 1/17/2011 2.27 +/- 0.56 2/15/2011 2.31 +/- 0.57 3/15/2011 2,23 +/- 0.55 4/12/2011 2.67 +/- 0.58 5/10/2011 2.29 +/- 0.55 6/7/2011 2.11 +/- 0.55 7/6/2011 1.91 +/- 0.54 8/2/2011 2.49 +/- 0.56 8/30/2011 1.64 +/- 0.55 9/27/2011 1.49 +/- 0.51 10/26/2011 1.77 +/- 0.52 11/22/2011 2.01 +/- 0.54 12/20/2011 2.22 +/- 0.54 DC Deer Creek - ESE 1/3/2011 3.43 +/- 0.67 2/21/2011 3.80 +/- 0.75 3/7/2011 3.40 +/- 0.67 4/4/2011 3.98 +/- 0.74 5/2/2011 3.46 +/- 0.65 6/21/2011 3.42 +/- 0.70 7/18/2011
  • 7.64 +/- 1.09 8/15/2011 3.52 +/- 0.70 9/12/2011 4.39 +/- 0.82 10/10/2011 5.77 +/- 0.85 1117/2011 4.58 +/- 0.78 12/5/2011 4.42 +/- 0.76 29

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-1 Concentration of Tritium, Gamma Emitters and Gross Beta in Surface and Drinking Water (Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2a)

Sample Code Sample Date Gamma Emitters Gross Beta MCWA Monroe County Water/Shoremont, Greece - W1 1/17/2011

  • 1.94 +/- 0.55 2/15/2011
  • 1.91 +/- 0.54 3/14/2011
  • 2.38 +/- 0.55 4/11/2011
  • 2.24 +/- 0.55 5/9/2011
  • 2.08 +/- 0.53 6/6/2011
  • 2.68 +/- 0.57 7/5/2011
  • 2.05 +/- 0.53 8/1/2011
  • 1.82 +/- 0.53 8/29/2011
  • 2.03 +/- 0.06 9/26/2011
  • 2.33 +/- 0.58 10/24/2011 1.82 +/- 0.54 11/21/2011
  • 2.26 +/- 0.55 12/19/2011
  • 1.98 +/- 0.52 OWD Ontario Water District - NE 1/17/2011
  • 2.21 +/- 0.56 2/14/2011 2.24 +/- 0.57 3/14/2011 2.61 +/- 0.56 4/11/2011 2.52 +/- 0.56 5/9/2011 2.09 +/- 0.54 6/6/2011
  • 1.91 +/- 0.55 7/5/2011 1.71 +/- 0.53 8/1/2011 1.95 +/- 0.53 8/29/2011 1.44 +/- 0.53 9/26/2011 1.88 +/- 0.55 10/26/2011 2.06 +/- 0.54 11/21/2011 1.85 +/- 0.53 12/19/2011 2.21 +/- 0.54 Control Location
  • All Non-Natural Gamma Emitters. Tritium less than MDA.

30

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-2 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in the Flesh of Edible Fish (Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2ar)

Sample Code Sample Date Sample Type Gamma Emitters EAST East Sector 5/20/2011 Carp *h 11/1/2011 Brown Trout *t 11/2/2011 Chinook Salmon GREECE'

  • Control 7/25/2011 Smallmouth Bass HAMLIN 1 Control 5/13/2011 Bowfin 5/13/2011 Largemouth Bass 5/13/2011 Perch 5/13/2011 Pike 9/26/2011 Brown Trout 9/26/2011 Chinook Salmon 9/26/2011 Salmon NORTH
  • North Sector 5/13/2011 Freshwater Drum 6/17/2011 Smallmouth Bass 6/22/2011 Lake Trout 7/20/2011 Smallmouth Bass 11/23/2011 Lake Trout 1Control Location
  • All Non-Natural Gamma Emitters <MDA 31

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-3 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Sediment (Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2a)

Sample Code Sample Date Gamma Emitters Shoreline EAST East Sector 4/25/2011 7/18/2011 GREECE1 Control 4/25/2011

  • 7/18/2011
  • Benthic NORTH 7/20/2011

'Control Location

  • All Non-Natural Gamma Emitters <MDA 32

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-4 Concentration of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges)

(Results in units of 10.2 pCi/M3 +/- 2c)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-04 STATION-07 STATION- STATION-09 STATION-11 Manor Training West Fence 08' Webster Williamson House Yard Center Line Seabreeze Parking Lot

"* *t 1/3/2011 1/10/2011 *t

  • t
  • k 1/10/2011 1/17/2011 *
  • t *t 1/17/2011 1/24/2011 *t
  • /

1/24/2011 1/31/2011 *t

  • t
  • t
  • t 1/31/2011 2/7/2011 *t 2/7/2011 2/14/2011 *t *t 2/14/2011 2/21/2011 *t
  • t *t 2/21/2011 2/28/2011 *t
  • t 2/28/2011 3/7/2011 3/7/2011 3/14/2011 3/14/2011 3/21/2011 1.2 +/- 0.3 1.4 +/- 0.7 1.7 +/- 1.2 3/21/2011 3/28/2011 5.4 +/- 0.6 6.3 +/- 0.9 5.8 +/- 1.8 7.1 +/- 0.7 6.5 +/- 0.8 6.1 +/- 2.5 3/28/2011 4/4/2011 11.2 +/- 1.0 12.3 +/- 2.5 11.8 +/- 0.8 13.5 +/- 2.6 12.8 +/- 2.2 11.0 +/-2.1 4/4/2011 4/11/2011 3.9 +/- 0.5 3.8 +/- 0.6 4.0 +/- 0.6 4.3 +/- 1.2 3.9 +/- 0.5 4.7 +/- 0.9 4/11/2011 4/18/2011 1.4 +/- 0.4 1.3 +/- 0.4 1.8 +/- 1.6 1.2 +/- 0.4 1.3 +/- 0.8
  • t 4/18/2011 4/25/2011 2 *t *t 4/25/2011 5/2/2011 *t *t
  • t
  • t 5/2/2011 5/9/2011 */
  • t *t
  • t *t 5/9/2011 5/16/2011 *t 5/16/2011 5/23/2011
  • t 5/23/2011 5/30/2011 *t
  • t
  • t 5/30/2011 6/6/2011 *t
  • *t 6/6/2011 6/13/2011 */

6/13/2011 6/20/2011 *t

"* *t 6/20/2011 6/27/2011 *t

  • t
  • t 6/27/2011 7/4/2011 *t
  • / *t 7/4/2011 7/11/2011
  • k 7/11/2011 7/18/2011
  • t 7/18/2011 7/25/2011 *t 7/25/2011 8/1/2011 *k
  • t 8/1/2011 8/8/2011 *t 8/8/2011 8/15/2011 8/15/2011 8/22/2011 1 *k 8/22/2011 8/29/2011 2

1Control Location Samnple not collected. Sampler out of service.

  • <MDA (1-13 1),

33 Lcatio Conrol

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-4 Concentration of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air (Charcoal Cartridges)

(Results in units of 10-2 pCi/M3 +/- 2a)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-04 STATION-07 STATION- STATION-09 STATION-1 1 Manor Training West Fence 081 Webster Williamson House Yard Center Line Seabreeze Parking Lot

  • /

8/29/2011 9/5/2011 *

  • /

9/5/2011 9/12/2011 *r 9/12/2011 9/19/2011

  • t *t 9/19/2011 9/26/2011 9/26/2011 10/3/2011 *
  • k "*

10/3/2011 10/10/2011 *

  • t wi 10/10/2011 10/17/2011 * *
  • 10/17/2011 10/24/2011 *
  • 10/24/2011 10/3112011 * * *
  • k 10/31/2011 11/7/2011 * * *
  • 11/7/2011 11/14/2011 * *
  • /

11/14/2011 11/21/2011 *k 11/21/2011 11/28/2011 *

  • 11/28/2011 12/5/2011 *
  • 12/5/2011 12/12/2011
  • 12/12/2011 12/19/2011 * *
  • 12/19/2011 12/26/2011
  • 12/26/2011 1/2/2012 * *

' Control Location 2 Sample not collected. Sampler out of service.

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples (Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2cr Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-03 STATION-04 STATION-05 STATION-06 STATION-07 STATION-13 Manor House East Field Training Creek Bridge Main Parking West Fence Substation 13 Yard Center Parking Lot Line Lot 1/3/2011 1/10/2011 3.0 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.1 2.9 +/- 0.1 3.5+/-0.2 3.1 +/-0.1 3.0 +/- 0.1 3.1 +/-0.1 2

1/10/2011 1/17/2011 1.5 +/-0.1 1.5+/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/-0.1 1/17/2011 1/24/2011 2.2 +/-0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- O.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/-0.1 1/24/2011 1/31/2011 3.0 +/- 0.1 3.1 +/-0.1 3.0 +/- 0.1 3.2 +/- 0.1 3.1 +/-0.2 3.1 +/-0.2 2.9 +/- 0.1 1/31/2011 2/7/2011 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.5+/-0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/-0.1 2.9 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2/7/2011 2/14/2011 2.6 +/-0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/-0.1 2.8 +/-0.1 2.9 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2/14/2011 2/21/2011 2.1 +/-0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/-0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2/21/2011 2/28/2011 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/-0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2/28/2011 3/7/2011 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- O.1 2.4 +/- O.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 3/7/2011 3/14/2011 1.6 +/-0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/-0.1 1.8 +/- O.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 3/14/2011 3/21/2011 2.4 +/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/-0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 3/21/2011 3/28/2011 3.2+/-0.2 3.3+/-0.2 3.5+/-0.2 3.8 +/- 0.2 4.3+/-0.5 3.6 +/-0.2 3.3 +/- 0.2 3/28/2011 4/4/2011 4.1 +/-0.2 4.4+/-0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 4.9+/-0.2 4.6 +/- 0.2 4.3 +/-0.2 4.7+/-0.2 4/4/2011 4/11/2011 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 4/11/2011 4/18/2011 2.3 +/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.7+/-0.1 2.6+/-0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 4/18/2011 4/25/2011 2.0 S1+/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 4/25/2011 5/2/2011 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- O.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- O.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 5/2/2011 5/9/2011 1.8 +/- 0.2 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- O.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 5/9/2011 5/16/2011 1.0 +/-0.1 0.9 +/- 0.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 1.0 +/-0.1 1.1 +/-0.1 1.6 +/- O.1 1.1 +/-0.1 5/16/2011 5/23/2011 0.6 +/- 0.2 1.0 +/-0.1 0.9+/-0.1 1.0 +/-0.1 1.1 +/-0.1 1.0+1-0.1 0.9+/-0.1 5/23/2011 5/30/2011 0.7 +/-0.1 1.1 +/-0.1 1.2 +/- O.1 1.2 +/-O.1 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- O.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 35

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples (Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2a Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-03 STATION-04 STATION-05 STATION-06 STATION-07 STATION-13 Manor House East Field Training Creek Bridge Main Parking West Fence Substation 13 Yard Center Parking Lot Line Lot 5/30/2011 6/6/2011 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.2+/-0.2 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.2+/-0.2 2.2 +/- 0.1 6/6/2011 6/13/2011 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 6/13/2011 6/20/2011 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 6/20/2011 6/27/2011 1.1 +/- 0.1 1.0 +/-0.1 1.1 +/-0.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/-0.1 1.1 +/-0.1 1.0 +/- 0.2 6/27/2011 7/4/2011 1.4+/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.2 7/4/2011 7/11/2011 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/-0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0+/-0.2 7/11/2011 7/18/2011 2.5+/-0.2 2.4 +/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 7/18/2011 7/25/2011 2.9 +/- 0.2 2.8 +/- 0.1 2.9+/-0.2 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.9 +/- 0.2 7125/2011 8/1/2011 2.3+/-0.1 2.2 +/-0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.6+/-0.2 8/1/2011 8/8/2011 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.4+/-0.2 8/8/2011 8/15/2011 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/-0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/-0.2 2.1 +/-0.1 2.3 +/- 0.2 8/15/2011 8/22/2011 3.1 +/-0.2 2.9+/-0.2 3.1 +/-0.2 2.8 +/-0.1 3.2+/-0.2 2.9 +/- 0.1 3.3+/-0.2 8/22/2011 8/29/2011 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/-0.1 1.9 +/-0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.2 8/29/2011 9/5/2011 2.5+/-0.4 3.8+/-0.2 3.7+/-0.2 3.7 +/-0.1 3.9+/-0.2 3.6 +/- 0.1 3.8 +/- 0.2 915/2011 9/12/2011 1.6+/-0.1 1.6 +/-0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6+/-0.1 1.7 +/- 0.2 9/12/2011 9/19/2011 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9+/-0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/-0.2 9/19/2011 9/26/2011 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.8+/-0.2 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.7+/-0.2 9/26/2011 10/3/2011 1.5 +/-0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/-0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.2 10/3/2011 10/10/2011 3.6+/-0.2 3.5 +/- 0.1 3.2+/-0.2 3.5 +/- 0.1 3.8 +/- 0.2 3.8 +/- 0.2 3.9+/-0.2 10/10/2011 10/17/2011 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.7 +/- 0.2 3.3+/-0.2 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.8+/-0.2 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.9+/-0.3 10/17/2011 10/24/2011 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.2 10/24/2011 10/31/2011 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8+1-0.1 1.9+/-0.1 1.9+/-0.1 2.0 +/-0.1 1.7+/-0.1 1.9 +/- 0.2 36

January 1 -December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-5 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Onsite Samples (Results in units of 10.2 pCi/M3 +/- 2a Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION-02 STATION-03 STATION-04 STATION-05 STATION-06 STATION-07 STATION-13 Manor House East Field Training Creek Bridge Main Parking West Fence Substation 13 Yard Center Parking Lot Line Lot 10/31/2011 11/7/2011 2.6+/-0.2 2.5+/-0.1 2.8+/-0.1 2.6+/-0.1 2.8+/-0.2 2.7+/-0.1 2.8+/-0.2 11/7/2011 11/14/2011 3.4 +/- 0.2 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0.2 3.5 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0.3 11/14/2011 11/21/2011 2.9+/-0.2 2.8+/-0.1 2.9+/-0.2 2.8+/-0.1 2.7+/-0.1 2.7+/-0.1 2.9+/-0.2 11/21/2011 11/28/2011 2.4+/-0.1 2.4+/-0.1 2.5+/-0.1 2.3+/-0.1 2.6+/-0.2 2.4+/-0.1 2.4+/-0.2 11/28/2011 12/5/2011 2.2+/-0.1 2.2+/-0.1 2.1 +/-0.1 2.2+/-0.1 2.3+/-0.1 2.0+/-0.1 2.2+/-0.2 12/5/2011 12/12/2011 2.7 +/-0.2 2.6 +/-0.1 2.8 +/-0.1 2.7 +/-0.1 2.8 +/-0.2 2.6 +/-0.1 2.8+/-0.2 12/12/2011 12/19/2011 4.0 +/- 0.2 4.1 +/- 0.2 4.0 +/- 0.2 4.0 +/- 0.2 4.4 +/- 0.2 3.9 +/- 0.2 4.0 +/- 0.3 12/19/2011 12/26/2011 2.4 +/-0.1 2.5 +/-0.1 2.6 +/-0.1 2.5 +/-0.1 2.7 +/-0.1 2.4 +/-0.1 2.6+/-0.2 12/26/2011 1/2/2012 2.1 +/-0.1 2.1 +/-0.1 2.3+/-0.1 2.2+/-0.1 2.4+/-0.1 2.1 +/-0.1 2.5+/-0.2 1Sample not collected. Sampler out of service.

2 Insufficient sample collected for analysis.

  • < MDA (Beta) 37

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples (Results in units of 10-2 pCi/M3 +/- 2a Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION-081 09 101 11 121 Seabreeze Webster Walworth Williamson Sodus Point 1/3/2011 1/10/2011 3.0 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.1 3.1 +/-0.2 2.9 +/- 0.2 3.4 +/- 0.2 1/10/2011 1/17/2011 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/-0.1 1.7 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.1 1/17/2011 1/24/2011 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.3+/-0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.1 1/24/2011 1/31/2011 2.9 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/-0.1 3.1 +/-0.2 3.1 +/-0.2 3.3 +/- 0.2 1/31/2011 2/7/2011 2.1 +/-0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/-0.2 2.9 +/- 0.2 2/7/2011 2/14/2011 2.7 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.8 +/- 0.1 2/14/2011 2/21/2011 2.3 +/-0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.5 +/-0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 2/21/2011 2/28/2011 2.4 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/-0.2 2.3 +/-0.2 2.5 +/- 0.1 2/28/2011 3/7/2011 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.1 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.1 3/7/2011 3/14/2011 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/-0.1 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 3/14/2011 3/21/2011 2.8 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.5+/-0.2 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/-0.2 3/21/2011 3/28/2011 3.5 +/- 0.2 3.3 +/- 0.1 3.3 +/-0.3 3.2 +/- 0.2 3.5 +/-0.2 3/28/2011 4/4/2011 4.7+/-0.2 5.0+/-0.2 4.4 +/- 0.3 4.3 +/-0.2 4.5 +/- 0.2 4/4/2011 4/11/2011 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/-0.2 2.6 +/- 0.2 4/11/2011 4/18/2011 4.6 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.9 +/- 0.2 2.7 +/- 0.2 4/18/2011 4/25/2011 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.2 1.9 +/- 0.1 4/25/2011 5/2/2011 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/-0.1 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.3 +/- 0.2 1.2 +/- 0.1 5/2/2011 5/9/2011 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.2 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/-0.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 1.1 +/- 0.1 5/9/2011 5/16/2011 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.2 1.1 +/-0.1 5/16/2011 5/23/2011 1.0 +/- 0.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 1.2 +/- 0.2 0.9 +/- 0.1 0.6 +/- 0.3 5/23/2011 5/30/2011 1.1 +/-0.1 0.8 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.2 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.3 +/- 0.1 5/30/2011 6/6/2011 2.5+/-0.2 2.1 +/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.3 2.2 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.2 6/6/2011 6/13/2011 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/-0.1 2.6+/-0.2 2.2 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0.1 6/13/2011 6/20/2011 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 6/20/2011 6/27/2011 1.1 +/-0.1 1.0+/-0.1 1.2 +/-0.2 1.2+/-0.1 1.1 +1-0.1 6/27/2011 7/4/2011 2.0 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.2 1.9 +/- 0.1 *1.7+/-0.1 7/4/2011 7/11/2011 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.1 +/-0.1 2.3 +/- 0.3 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0.1 7/11/2011 7/18/2011 2.8 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.8 +/-0.2 2.6 +/-0.2 2.4 +/- 0.1 7/18/2011 7/25/2011 3.0+/-0.2 2.8 +/- 0.1 3.0 +/- 0.3 2.8 +/-0.2 2.9 +/- 0.1 2

7/25/2011 8/1/2011 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/-0.1 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.4+/-0.2 8/1/2011 8/8/2011 2.6 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.6+/-0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0.1,2) 8/8/2011 8/15/2011 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.2 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 8/15/2011 8/22/2011 3.4 +/- 0.2 3.2 +/- 0.2 3.4 +/- 0.3 3.3 +/- 0.2 2.9 +/- 0.2 8/22/2011 8/29/2011 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/-0.2 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1Control Location 2 Extended Sample Period to weekending 8/8/11 due to safety concern at substation.

38

January I - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-6 Concentration of Beta Emitters in Air Particulates - Offsite Samples (Results in units of 10-2 pCi/m3 +/- 2ca Uncertainty)

Start Date Stop Date STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION- STATION-081 09 10, 11 121 Seabreeze Webster Walworth Williamson Sodus Point 8/29/2011 9/5/2011 3.7+/-0.2 3.9 +/- 0.2 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0.2 3.6 +/-0.2 9/5/2011 9/12/2011 1.5 +/-0.1 1.7+/-0.1 1.8+/-0.2 1.7 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/-0.1 9/12/2011 9/19/2011 1.9 +/-0.1 1.8+/-0.1 1.3+/-0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/-0.1 9/19/2011 9/26/2011 2.7 +/-0.1 2.6+/-0.1 1.8+/-0.1 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.7 +/- 0.1 9/26/2011 10/3/2011 1.6 +/-0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1. 1.2+/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 10/3/2011 10/10/2011 3.3 +/-0.2 3.3 +/- 0.2 2.9 +/-O.1 3.5 +/- 0.2 3.2 +/- 0.2 10/10/2011 10/17/2011 3.4+/-0.2 3.4 +/- 0.2 2.0 +/- 0.1 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.5 +/- 0.2 10/17/2011 10/24/2011 1.8+/-0.1 1.8+/-0.1 1.4+/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 10/24/2011 10/31/2011 1.9+/-0.1 1.9+/-0.1 1.5+/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 10i31/2011 11/7/2011 2.6+/-0.1 2.7+/-0.1 2.2+/-0.1 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.6 +i-0.1 11/7/2011 11/14/2011 3.4+/-0.2 3.4.+/- 0.2 2.8 +/- 0.2 3.9 +/- 0.2 3.7 +/- 0.2 11/14/2011 11/21/2011 2.7+/-0.1 2.8+/-0.1 2.3+/-0.1 2.7 +/-0.2 2.9 +/- 0.1 11/21/2011 11/28/2011 2.4+/-0.2 2.4+/-0.1 1.8+/-0.1 2.6 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.2 11/28/2011 12/5/2011 2.2+/-0.1 2.2+/-0.1 1.7+/-0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.1 +/-0.1 12/5/2011 12/12/2011 2.7 +/-0.1 2.4+/-0.1 2.2+/-0.1 2.9 +/-0.2 2.9 +/- 0.1 12/12/2011 12/19/2011 3.6 +/-0.2 3.8 +/-0.2 3.1 +/-0.2 3.9 +/-0.2 4.3 +/- 0.2 12/19/2011 12/26/2011 2.3 +/-0.1 2.3+/-0.1 2.0+/-0.1 2.5 +/- 0.1 2.7 +/- 0.1 12/26/2011 1/2/2012 1.9+/-0.1 1.9+/-0.1 1.8+/-0,1 2.1 +/-0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1

'Control Location 2 Extended Sample Period to weekending 8/8/11 due to safety concern at substation.

39

January 1 -December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-7 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulates (Results in units of 10-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2a) 2 Sample Description 3/28/2011 6/27/2011 10/3/2011 01/02/2012 Location Cs134 Cs 137 Cs134 C s 137 Cs134 Cs137 Cs 134 Cs 137 STATION-02 Manor House 0.7+0.3 0. 9+0.4 Yard STATION-03 East Field 0.5+0.2 0.7+0.3 STATION-04 Training Center

  • 0.3+0.2 1.1+0.3
  • Parking Lot STATION-05 Creek Bridge *
  • 0.6+0.3 0.6+0.3
  • STATION-06 Main Parking Lot *
  • 0.8+0.2 0.7+0.3
  • STATION-07 West Fence Line *
  • 0.5+0.2 1.2+0.3 *
  • STATION-08 1 Seabreeze *
  • 1.3+0.3 1.1+0.4 * *
  • STATION-09 Webster *
  • 1.0+0.3 0.8+0.4
  • STATION-101 Walworth 1.3+0.5 STATION-I 1 Williamson * * *t * * *l STATION-12 1 * * * *
  • Sodus Point 0.6+0.3 0.8+0.3 STATION-13 Substation 13 *
  • 0.7+0.2 1.0+0.3 * *

'Control Location 2 Cs134 and Cs137 were uniquely detected in the sample period that is a composite of 13 weeks from 03/28/2011 to 6/27/11. These positive detections are attributed to Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station event that occurred in March 2011.

  • All Non-Natural Gamma Emitters <MDA 40

January 1 - December.31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-8 Concentration of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples (Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2a)

Sample Code Sample Date Sample Type Gamma Emifters CONTROL' Local Sites in Control Sectors 7/9/2011 Raspberries 7/28/2011 Cucumbers 7/28/2011 Squash 9/15/2011 Grapes EAST East Sector 7/13/2011 Greens 7/25/2011 Squash 9/14/2011 Cabbage 9/14/2011 Tomato ESE East South East Sector 7/18/2011 Raspberries 7/28/2011 Greens 7/28/2011 Squash 8/1/2011 Blackberries 9/9/2011 Grapes 9/14/2011 Cabbage 9/14/2011 Tomato HAMLIN 1 Control 7/28/2011 Greens 9/15/2011 Cabbage LYNDONVILLE 1 Control 9/15/2011 Apples 9/15/2011 Blackberries 9/15/2011 Tomato SE

  • South East Garden 9/14/2011 Apples SSE
  • South South East Garden 7/2512011 Squash 7/28/2011 Greens 7/28/2011 Turnips 9/12/2011 Apples 9/14/2011 Tomato 11/1/2011 Cabbage SW South West Sector 7/8/2011 Raspberries

'Control Location

  • All Non-Natural Gamma Emitters <MDA 41

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-9 Concentration of Gamma Emitters (including 1-131) in Milk (Results in units of pCi/Liter +/- 2a Sample Code Sample Date Gamma Emitters EATON ESE Indicator 1/25/2011 2/22/2011 3/22/2011 4/19/2011 5/17/2011 6/1/2011 6/14/2011 6/28/2011 7/12/2011 7/26/2011 8/9/2011 8/23/2011 9/7/2011 9/20/2011 10/4/2011 10/18/2011 11/1/2011 11/29/2011 12/28/2011 SCHULTZ1 South Sodus Control 1/25/2011 *k 2/22/2011

  • t 3/22/2011 4/19/2011
  • t 5/17/2011 6/1/2011 6/14/2011 6/28/2011 7/12/2011 7/26/2011 8/9/2011 8/23/2011 9/7/2011 9/20/2011 10/4/2011 10/18/2011 11/1/2011 11/29/2011

<MDA 12/28/2011 r Control Location Gamma Emitters

---'Control Location

  • All Non-Natural
  • All Non-Natural Gamma Emitters <MDA 42

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-10 Typical MDA Ranges for Gamma Spectrometry Surface Selected Air Water, Ground- Milk Oysters Shoreline Vegetation Particulates Drinking Fish water (pci/kg) Sediment Soil (pCi/kg)i Nuclides (10-2 pCi/m 3) Water (pCi/L)

(pCi/L)

Na-22 0-0 2.9-6.9 18.8-46.8 3.8-9.7 5-9.1 5.7-36.3 12.1 -49.6 26.7-79 .9-40 K-40 0-0 31.1 -68.3 170.9-340 40.8-82.2 41.6-74.4 87.1 -325 i30 - 438.2 346-770 13-323 Cr-51 0-0.1 21.7-44.2 133-351 25.5-52.7 27.6-49.6 38.2-219 97.2-377 200-594 15-363 Mn-54 0-0 2.6-5.9 16.3-32.1 3.5-7.5 3.7-6.9 5.6-29.2 11.3-38.5 23-66.2 .4-32.8 Co-58 0-0 2.6-6 20-38.1 3.3-7.6 3.7-6.8 5.1 -28.6 11.8-41.5 24.3-70.6 0-70.3 Fe-59 0-0 5.7-13.4 55-110 7-16.5 9.2-16.8 15.8-63.4 28.1 -116 56.3-170 21-363 Co-60 0-0 2.7 -6.7 19.7 - 39.6 3.5 - 8.3 4.5 - 8.4 5.8 -34.2 12.2 - 44.2 24.6 - 72.2 0.6 - 37.5 Zn-65 0-0 5.8-13.5 43-94.1 9-18.6 9.7-17.9 14-71.5 36.4-120 62.7-191 1.2-82.5 Nb-95 0-0 2.8-6.3 19.6-50.4 3.6-8.3 3.9-7 5.8-30 14.3-56.4 28.6-90.3 8.9-69 Zr-95 0-0 4.6-10.5 29.2-66.9 5.8-13.7 6.4-12 8.6-49.1 21.1 -75.5 42.7-128 16-131 Ru-106 0-0 22-51 114-264 27.9-64.9 29-58.3 35-232 87.1 -299 182-530 0-277 Ag-11Om 0-0 2.5-5.5 13.6-30.4 3.2-7 3.3-6.5 4.4-26.8 9.4-35.1 24.6-72.9 0-30.9 1-1311 0-1.1 0-6 0-470.3 3.2-9.4 .1-1.4 0-80.2 0-326 63.4-248 9.0-57 Cs-134 0-0 2.5-5.6 13.9-26.6 3.2-7.6 3.1 -6.4 11.1 -34.1 22.5-42.5 40.2-70.3 .6-31.4 Cs-137 0-0 2.5-5.9 13.9-30.7 3.5-7.9 3.4-7.1 12.9-36.1 21.4-43.5 35.9-68.6 .6-32.4 Ba-140 0-0.1 5.2-10.7 33-198 5.4-11.6 5.3-9.9 6.1-67.3 13.5-216 70.9-238 14-120 La-140 0-0.1 5.0-10.7 33-198 5.4-11.6 5.3-9.9 6.1 -67.3 13.4-216 70.9-238 14-120 Ce-144 0-0 13.4-28.5 50.4-115 17.9-37.4 17.5-32.9 19.1-108 41.8-139 84.5-244 0-132

' This MDA range for 1-131 on a silver zeolite cartridge is typically 4.16 x I 0A-3 to 3.40 x 10A^-2 43

January 1 -December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-11 Typical LLDs for Gamma Spectrometry Air Selected Pariculates 3 Surface Water, Fish pCi/kg Groundwater Oysters pCi/kg Precipitation Soil pCi/kg Vegetation Nuclides 10 pCi/m3 pCi/L (wet) pCi/L (wet) pCi/L (dry) pCi/kg (dry)

Na-22 2.9 2.9 22 2.9 22 2.9 24 35 Cr-51 12 17 88 17 88 17 110 162 Mn-54 2.1 2.4 17 2.4 17 2.4 18 27 Co-58 2 2.4 16 2.4 16 2.4 17 25 Fe-59 4.6 5.2 37 5.2 37 5.2 38 60 Co-60 2.7 2.8 22 2.8 22 2.8 21 33 Zn-65 2.8 5.6 23 5.6 23 5.6 54 66 Nb-95 1.9 2.2 15 2.2 15 2.2 18 25 Zr-95 3.3 3.8 27 3.8 27 3.8 29 44 Ru-106 17 20 135 20 135 20 146 223 Ag-11Orn 1.8 2.1 14 2.1 14 2.1 16 25 Te-129m 20 26 149 26 149 26 180 265 1-131 1.5 2 11 2 11 2 14 20 Cs-134 1.9 2.2 15 2.2 15 2.2 20 24 Cs-137 1.8 2.3 15 2.3 15 2.3 17 27 Ba-140 6.1 7.3 48 7.3 48 7.3 54 80 La-140 3.4 4.1 26 4.1 26 4.1 25 41 Ce-144 5.5 12 43 12 43 12 75 101

  • The LLD for 1-131 measured on a silver zeolite cartridge is 2.0 X10-3 pCi/m 3 44

January 1 -December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 Table B-12 Direct Radiation (Results in Units of mR/90 days +/- 2a)

Station~ ~ Location .

Quintarter Th d~,Ffh 2 Onsite-Manor House Yard 12.1 + 0.7 13.2 +/- 0.9 15.2 +/- 0.8 13.9 +/- 0.7 3 Onsite-In field approximately 200 ft SE of 12.5 + 0.9 14.0 +/- 0.9 14.5 +/- 0.9 13.5 +/- 2.0 station #2 4 Onsite-Training Center yard driveway circle 11.7 +/-10.8 12.7 +/- 0.8 12.9 +/- 1.2 13.1 +/- 0.8 5 Onsite-Between creek and plant entry road 12.8 +/- 0.6 14.4 +/- 1.2 14.8 +/- 0.6 14.1 +/- 0.8 6 Onsite-SW side of plant parking lot 10.0 + 0.7 10.4 +/- 1.0 11.1 +/- 0.7 10.6 +/- 0.6 7 Onsite-utility pole along West plant fence 12.1 +/-10.5 12.9 +/- 1.1 14.0 +/- 0.7 13.7 +/- 1.1 8 1 Topper Drive-lrondequoit, Seabreeze 11.1 0.5 10.6 +/- 1.1 12.0 +/- 0.7 11.3 +/- 0.8 Substation #51 Phillips Road-Webster, intersection with 10.7 0.7 11.0 +/- 0.8 12.3 +/- 0.8 11.7 +/- 0.9 Highway #104, Substation #74 101 Atlantic Avenue-Walworth, Substation #230 9.6 +/- 0.7 10.7 +/- 1.1 10.8 +/- 0.6 10.3 +/- 0.8 11 W. Main Street-Williamson, Substation #207 11.2 + 0.6 10.6 +/- 0.8 11.5 +/- 0.9 10.8 +/- 0.8 12' 12 Seaman Avenue-Sodus Point-Off Lake 11.5 +/- 0.7 12.3 +/- 0.9 13.0 +/- 0.8 11.1 +/- 1.1 Road by Sewer district, Substation #209 13 Onsite- South of Meteorological Tower 12.4 + 0.9 13.2 +/- 0.9 13.2 +/- 0.9 16.1 +/- 0.8 14 NW comer of field along lake shore 11.1 +/- 0.6 14.2 +/- 2.1 12.8 +/- 0.6 12.6 +/- 0.8 15 Field access road, west of orchard, 12.5 +/- 0.7 13.2 +/- 1.2 13.1 +/- 0.7 13.8 +/- 0.7 approximately 3000' West of plant 45

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-12 (Continued)

Direct Radiation (Results in Units of mR/90 days +/- 2o)

Qjjarer Qarte QWjALX-QQruarter.

SW Corner of orchard, approximately 3000' 16 West of plant, approximately 200' North of 11.9 +/- 0.6 12.7 +/- 0.9 14.2 +/- 0.8 12.8 +/- 0.7 Lake Road 17 Utility pole in orchard, approximately 75" North 11.5 +/- 0.6 12.9 +/- 1.1 12.6 +/- 0.6 12.4 +/- 0.7 of Lake Road 18 Approximately 30' North of NE corner of 10.6 +/- 0.6 10.4 +/- 0.7 10.7 +/- 0.6 11.2 +/- 0.8 Substation 13A fence 19 On NW comer of house 100' East of plant 10.3 +/- 0.5 10.7 +/- 0.7 11.3 +/- 0.7 11.9 +/- 0.9 access road Approximately 150' West of Ontario Center 20 Road and approximately 170' South of Lake 12.0 +/- 0.6 12.2 +/- 0.8 13.1 +/- 1.6 12.5 +/- 0.8 Road 21 North side of Lake Road, approximately 200' 11.3 +/- 0.5 12.4 +/- 1.1 13.6 +/- 0.6 12.5 +/- 0.7 East of Ontario Center Road 22 North side of Lake Road, SE, property owner 10.9 +/- 0.6 10.3 +/- 0.8 12.1 +/- 0.7 11.1 +/- 0.9 23 East property line, midway between Lake 11.8 +/- 0.6 12.5 +/- 1.1 14.5 +/- 1.2 13.2 +/- 1.2 Road and Lake shore 24 Lake shore near NE corner of property 12.8 +/- 0.6 12.0 +/- 1.1 14.0 +/- 0.9 14.4 +/- 0.7 25 Substation #73, Klem Road, adjacent to 897' 10.3 +/- 0.5 11.5 +/- 0.8 11.8 +/- 0.9 11.4 +/- 0.7 Klein Road 26 Service Center, Plank Road, West of 250 10.5 +/- 0.7 11.5 +/- 0.7 12.0 +/- 0.9 12.2 +/- 0.8 Atlantic Avenue at Knollwood Drive utility pole, 271 10.6 +/- 0.5 11.2 +/- 0.9 13.0 +/- 1.1 12.1 +/- 1.0 North side of road 46

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-12 (Continued)

Direct Radiation (Results in Units of mR/90 days + 2a)

~1auu ~~~~}moctin tFirst Seohnd T6 ~ Thir~d Fourth Quartr Quarter~ ure 28' Substation #193, Marion, behind Stanton Ag. 9.6 +/- 0.6 11.5 +/- 0.7 13.0 + 1.1 11.1 +/- 0.6 Service, North Main Street 29 1 Substation #208, Town Line Road (CR-118), 10.0 +/- 0.5 10.6 +/- 0.7 11.7 +/- 0.6 11.4 +/- 0.7 1000' North of Route 104 30 1 District Office, Sodus, on pole, West side of 9.4 +/- 0.5 9.9 +/- 0.8 10.8 +/- 0.6 9.9 +/- 0.9 bldg 31 Lake Road, pole 20' North of road, 500' East of 11.7 +/- 0.5 13.0 +/- 0.8 13.7 +/- 0.7 12.3 +/- 0.9 Salt Road 32 Woodard Road at County Line Road, pole @ 11.4 +/- 0.5 11.4 +/- 1.1 12.7 +/- 1.0 11.2 +/- 0.6 BW corner 33 County Line Road at RR tracks, pole 10.6 +/- 0.5 10.2 +/- 0.9 12.1 +/- 1.0 10.5 +/- 0.7 approximately 100' East along tracks 34 Lincoln Road, pole midway between Ridge 12.6 +/- 0.6 14.3 +/- 0.9 14.0 +/- 0.7 13.8 +/- 0.8 Road and Route 104 35 Transmission Right of Way, North of 11.5 +/- 0.5 13.5 +/- 1.0 13.5 + 0.8 12.3 +/- 1.0 Clevenger Road on pole 36 Substation #205, Route 104, East of Ontario 10.7 + 0.8 11.6 + 0.8 12.1 +/- 0.8 11.7 + 0.7 Center Road, North side of fence 37 Rail Road Avenue, pole at 2048 10.1 +/- 0.5 10.6 +/- 0.8 12.4 + 1.7 10.5 +/- 0.9 38 Fisher Road at RR Tracks, pole East of road 11.5 +/- 0.5 12.8 +/- 1.0 13.0 + 0.9 12.5 +/- 0.8 39 Seeley Road, Pole South side 100'West of 11.2 +/- 0.6 12.8 +/- 0.9 13.2 + 0.7 12.7 +/- 0.9 intersection with Stony Lonesome Road 40 Lake Road at Stoney Lonesome Road, pole at 10.5 +/- 0.6 10.7 +/- 0.7 11.4 +/- 1.0 10.7 +/- 0.6 SE corner 47

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-12 (Continued)

Direct Radiation (Results in Units of mR/90 days -2a) 63 Westside of warehouse access road 12.1 +/- 0.8 12.5 +/- 0.9 13.4 +/- 1.1 12.5 + 0.7 64 Westside of direct road, adjacent to orchard 14.1 +/- 0.8 14.9 +/- 1.0 14.4 +/- 0.7 13.5 +/- 0.8 1 - Control Location 48

January 1 -December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-13 Groundwater Monitoring Wells Location Sample Date Tritium GW01: Warehouse Access Road (Control) 02/09/11 *.

03/03/11 06/22/11 08/30/11 12/08/11 GW03: Screenhouse West, South Well 02/09/11 3.53E-07 02/18/11 1.82E-06 GW04: Screenhouse West, North Well 01/21/11 02/09/11 3.49E-07 06/29/11 07/21/11 08/30/11 09/29/11 10/27/11 11/29/11 12/14/11 GW05: Screenhouse East, South (15.5') 02/09/11

  • 06/22/11
  • 08/30/11
  • 12/08/11
  • GW06: Screenhouse East, Middle (20.0') 02/09/11
  • 06/22/11
  • 07/21/11
  • 08/30/11
  • 12/08/11
  • GW07: Screenhouse East, North (24.0') 02/09/11 03/03/11 03/18/11 04/01/11 05/06/11 06/22/11 08/30/11 12/08/11 GW08: All Volatiles Treatment Building 01/21/11 02/09/11 06/29/11 09/29/11 10/27/11

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE B-13 Groundwater Monitoring Wells Location Sample Date Tritium GWIO: Technical Support Center, South 02/09/11

  • 03/03/11
  • 06/22/11
  • 08/30/11
  • 12/08/11 GW11: Contaminated Service Building, SE (24.0') 02/09/11 4.36E-07 02/18/11 9.66E-07 03/03/11
  • 06/22/11
  • 08/30/11
  • 12/08/11 *

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIX C Quality Assurance Program Summary of Appendix C Content:

Appendix C is a summary of Constellation Energy Laboratory's quality assurance program. It consists of Table C-I which is a compilation of the results of the Constellation Energy Laboratory's participation in an intercomparison program with Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) located in Arvada, Colorado and Analytics, Inc. located in Atlanta, Georgia. It also includes Table C-2 which is a compilation of the results of the Constellation Energy Laboratory's participation in a split sample program with Teledyne Brown Engineering located in Knoxville, Tennessee and Table C-3 which is a list of typical MDA's achieved by Teledyne Brown for Gamma Spectroscopy.

All the Constellation Energy Laboratory's results contained in Table C-I generally agree with the intercomparison laboratory's results within the range of +/-2 a of each other with the exception of a beta result for the water sample type on 6/16/11 from Analytics. Investigation into the matter yielded no apparent cause for the discrepancy. A new calibration source was used to calibrate the instrument prior to analyzing this study. Results for a study run prior to and after this calibration were in agreement within +/-2 a. Repeat analysis yielded results consistent with the initial reported value. Further analysis on an another instrument did not identify any factor that would explain the erroneous result. All other intercomparisons for beta filters and water prior to and after this sample were in full agreement. With this one exception all the sets of intercomparison results in the table are in full agreement when they were further evaluated using the NRC Resolution Test Criteria.' The uncertainties for the Constellation Energy Laboratory's results and 2 Analytics' results are +/-2a, while the ERA laboratory's uncertainty is based on USEPA guidelines.

All the results contained in Table C-2 agree within the range of +/-2 a of each other with their respective Constellation Energy Laboratory original, replicate and/or Teledyne Brown Engineering's split laboratory samples, except for the comparisons of four samples involving Cs-137 results: a soil at SFS2 collected 3/22/11, a soil at SFS2 collected 9/19/11, a soil at SFS3 collected 9/19/11 and a cabbage at 1B9 collected 07/25/11. In addition, two samples involving 1-131 results in vegetation: SFb2 collected 03/22/11 and SFb3 collected 03/22/11, had results that fell outside the range of +/-2 a. In all cases low levels of Cs-137 or 1-131 were observed in one or more of the results of the comparison set and not observed in all three. These minor discrepancies, occurring very close to or below the analyses MDA's, are most likely due to counting statistical fluctuations, the non-homogeneous nature of the sample-splitting process and in the case of 1-131 a short decay time. Weekly air samples were collected on 4/11/11 at A4 and A5 and found to contain low levels of l-131 consistent with other sites in the program and around the country attributable to Fukishima releases. The low levels and short decay time of 1-131 observed in these air samples precludes them from splitting to an outside laboratory. Repeat analysis of these samples for laboratory replicates yielded results within range of +2 a. Other samples whose nature generally precludes sample splitting are marked "**" in the Split Analysis column.

1 NRC Inspection Manual, Inspection Procedure 84750, March 15, 1994 2 National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Studies Criteria Document, December 1998 51

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE OF CONTENTS - ANALYTICAL RESULTS Table Title Page C-1 Results of Participation in Cross Check Programs ...................................................................... 53 C-2 Results of Quality Assurance Program ........................................................................................ 55 C-3 Teledyne Brown Engineering's Typical MDAs for Gamma Spectrometry ............................... 62 52

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C-1 Results of Participation in Cross Check Programs Sample Type and Reported Cross Check Lab Sample Date SamlUnits Ua eT dIsotope Observed R lts Laboratory's Results 03/17/11 Air Iodine - pCi 1-131 115.0 +/- 6.0 96.9 +/- 1.6 03/17/11 .Milk - pCi/L Fe-59 164.0 +/-27.0 175.0 +/- 2.9 Co-58 106.0 +/- 17.0 113.0 +/- 1.9 Co-60 157.0 +/- 14.0 172.0 +/- 2.9 Zn-65 264.0 +/- 39.0 261.0 +/- 4.4 Cs-1 34 104.0 +/- 11.0 130.0 +/- 2.2 Cs-1 37 214.0 +/- 20.0 205.0 +/- 3.4 Cr-51 263.0 +/- 104.0 298.0 +/- 5.0 Mn-54 254.0 +/- 22.0 266.0 +/- 4.5 1-131 98.0 +/- 31.0 96.9 +/- 1.6 03/17/11 Water- pCi/L Gross Beta 199.0 +/-3.0 205.0 +/- 3.4 04/04/11 Water- pCi/L Ba-1 33 69.7 +/- 5.0 75.3 Cs-1 37 73.3 +/-6.0 77.0 Co-60 87.0 +/- 5.0 88.0 Zn-65 108.0 +/- 14.0 98.9 Cs-1 34 63.5 +/- 4.0 72.9 06/16/11 Air particulates on filter- pCi Cr-51 162.0 +/- 30.0 142.0 +/- 2.4 Ce-141 68.0 +/- 5.0 55.2 +/-0.9 Cs-1 37 116.0 +1-9.0 95.3 +/- 1.6 Cs-134 116.0 +/- 6.0 131.0 +/- 2.2 Zn-65 213.0 +/- 19.0 180.0 +/- 3.0 Co-60 157.0 +/- 8.0 134.0 +/- 2.2 Co-58 122.0 +/- 8.0 105.0 +/- 1.8 Fe-59 99.0 +/- 10.0 85.2 +1/ 1.4 Mn-54 104.0b+1- 8.0 95.2 +/- 1.6 06/16/11 Water - pCi/L H-3 34.3 37.2 06/16/11 Water - pCi/L Co-58 184.0 +/- 17.0 "177.0+/- 3.0 Zn-65 344.0 +/- 30.0 305.0 +/- 5.1 Co-60 243.0 +/- 10.0 228.0 +/- 3.8 Cs-1 34 205.0 +/- 7.0 222.0 +/- 3.7 Cs-137 179.0 +/- 12.0 161.0 +/- 2.7 Fe-59 162.0 +/- 28.0 144.0 +/- 2.4 Mn-54 168.0 +/- 14.0 161.0 +/-2.7 Ce-141 77.0 +/- 28.0 93.5 +/- 1.6 1

06/16/11 Water -pCi/L Gross Beta( ) 171.0 +/- 3.0 123.0 +/- 2.1 53

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type and Reported Cross Check Lab Sample Date SampleUnits U Datent Isotope Observed Laboratory's Results Results 07/05/11 Water - pCi/L 1-131 23.0 +/- 5.6 26.0 07/05/11 Water -pCi/L Gross Beta 44.1 +/-2.3 63.4 09/15/11 Filter -pCi Gross Beta 59.8 +/- 1.6 54.6 +/- 0.9 09/19/11 Particulate Filter Cs-1 37 533.0 +/- 11.8 486.0 pCi Co-60 596.0 +/- 15.0 524.0 Zn-65 601.0 +/- 34.0 464.0 Cs-1 34 416.0 +/- 11.0 429.0 10/07/11 Water - pCi/L 1-131 28.0 +/- 11.0 27.5 12/08/11 Charcoal - pCi 1-131 85.0 +/- 7.0 89.5 +/- 1.5 12/08/11 Particulates filter Cr-51 354.0 +/- 43.0 339.0 +/- 5.7 pCi Cs-1 37 131.0 +/- 9.0 126.0 +/- 2.1 Cs-1 34 90.0 +/- 5.0 103.0 +/- 1.7 Zn-65 193.0 +/- 17.0 174.0 +/- 2.9 Co-58 134.0 +/- 9.0 132.0 +/- 2.2 Fe-59 124.0 +/- 11.0 110.0 +/- 1.8 Mn-54 149.0 +/- 10.0 144.0 +/- 2.4 Co-60 169.0 +/- 8.0 162.0 +/- 2.7 12/08/11 Water - pCi/L H-3 25.1 25.2 12/08/11 Milk - pCi/L Cs-1 34 148.0 +/- 7.0 171.0 +/- 2.9 1-131 97.0 +/- 20.0 90.2 +/- 1.5 Zn-65 288.0 +/- 26.0 291.0 +/- 4.9 Co-60 255.0 +/- 11.0 270.0 +/- 4.5 Cr-51 523.0 +/- 80.0 566.0 +/- 9.5 Fe-59 175.0 +/- 16.0 183.0 +/- 3.1 Mn-54 232.0 +/- 15.0 241.0 +/- 4.0 Cs-1 37 203.0 +/- 13.0 210.0 +/- 3.5 Co-58 194.0 +/- 14.0 221.0 +/- 3.7 12/08/Il Water -oCi/L 292.0 +/- 3.0 281.0 +/- 4.7 12/08/11 Water -DCi/L Gross Beta Gross Beta 1See discussion at the beginning of the Appendix 54

January 1 -- December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C-2 Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type Sample Type of Original Replicate Split and Location Date Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Iodine - Al 01/17/11 1-131 # **

Air Iodine - A2 01/17/11 1-131 # **

Air Filter - Al 01/24/11 Gross Beta 3.2 +/- 0.2 3.4 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A2 01/24/11 Gross Beta 2.9+/-0.3 2.9 +/-0.3 **

Air Filter - A3 01/24/11 Gross Beta 2.7 +/-0.4 2.9 +/- 0.4 **

Air Filter - A4 01/24/11 Gross Beta 2.6 +/-0.3 2.8 +/-0.3 **

Air Filter - A5 01/24/11 Gross Beta 2.9 +/-0.2 3.1 +/-0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA1 01/24/11 Gross Beta 3.6 +/- 0.2 3.5 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA2 01/24/11 Gross Beta 3.2 +/-0.2 3.2 +/-0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA3 01/24/11 Gross Beta 2.9 +/- 0.3 2.8 +/- 0.3 **

Air Filter - SFA4 01/24/11 Gross Beta 2.6 +/- 0.3 2.4 +/- 0.3 **

Air Filter - Al 02/07/11 Gross Beta 2.1 +/-0.1 2.1 +/-0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 02/07/11 Gross Beta 1.6 +/- 0.3 1.6 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A3 02/07/11 Gross Beta 1.6 +/- 0.3 1.8 +/- 0.3 **

Air Filter - A4 02/07/11 Gross Beta 1.3+/-0.2 1.5+/-0.2 **

Air Filter - A5 02/07/11 Gross Beta 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA1 02/07/11 Gross Beta 2.3+/-0.1 2.2 +/-' 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 02/07/11 Gross Beta 1.8+/-0.1 1.8+/-0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA3 02/07/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/- 0.2 1.9+/-0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA4 02/07/11 Gross Beta 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.5+/-0.2 **

Air Iodine - A4 02/14/11 1-131 # **

Air Iodine - A5 02/14/11 1-131 # **

Air Iodine - CA 03/14/11 1-131 # **

Air Iodine - LB 03/14/11 1-131 # **

55

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type Sample Type of Original Replicate Split and Location Date Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Oysters - IA3 03/15/11 Gamma Oysters - IA6 03/15/11 Gamma Misc ground coverage - SFB2 03/22/11 1-131 (1) 71.5 +/-41.7 Misc ground coverage - SFB3 03/22/11 1-131(1) 180.1 +/- 33.0 173.6 +/- 32.8 Soil - SFS2 03/22/11 Cs-137 59.0 +/- 29.1 78.6 +/- 57.6 Soil - SFS3 03/22/11 Cs-1 37 37.2 +/- 26.9 62.3 +/- 30.2 81.4 +/- 57.2 Shoreline Sediment - WBI 03/30/11 Gamma

  1. f Bay Water - WA2 03/31/11 Gamma Air Iodine - A4 04/11/11 1-131 (1) 0.47 +/- 0.25 0.31 +/-0.1 Air Iodine - A5 04/11/11 1-131 (1) 0.34 +/- 0.27 0.38 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - Al 04/11/11 Gross Beta 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - A2 04/11/11 Gross Beta 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - A3 04/11/11 Gross Beta 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.8 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - A4 04/11/11 Gross Beta 2.5 +/- 0.3 2.7 +/- 0.3 Air Filter - AS 04/11/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/-0.2 2.1 +/-0.2 Air Filter - SFA1 04/11/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/- 0.2 2.3 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - SFA2 04/11/11 Gross Beta 2.0+/-0.2 2.1 +/-0.2 Air Filter - SFA3 04/11/11 Gross Beta 2.3+/-0.3 2.3 +/- 0.3 Air Filter - SFA4 04/11/11 Gross Beta 1.9 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 Air Iodine - A3 05/16/11 1-131 Air Iodine - A4 05/16/11 1-131 Air Filter - Al 05/16/11 Gross Beta 1.0 +/- 0.1 1.0 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - A2 05/16/11 Gross Beta 0.8 +/- 0.2 0.8 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - A3 05/16/11 Gross Beta 0.9 +/- 0.2 0.8+/-0.2 Air Filter - A4 05/16/11 Gross Beta 1.2 +1- 0.2 1.1 +/-0.2 Air Filter - A5 05/16/11 Gross Beta 1.1 +/-0.1 1.2 +/-0.1 Air Filter - SFA1 05/16/11 Gross Beta 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.1 +/-0.1 Air Filter - SFA2 05/16/11 Gross Beta 1.0 +/- 0.1 0.9 +/- 0.1 56

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type Sample Type of Original Replicate Split and Location Date Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Filter - SFA3 05/16/11 Gross Beta 1.0+/-0.3 0.8 +/- 0.3 **

Air Filter- SFA4 05/16/11 Gross Beta 0.9 +/-0.1 0.9 +/-0.1 **

Air Filter - Al 05/30/11 Gamma #

Air Filter - A2 05/30/11 Gamma # #

Air Filter - A3 05/30/11 Gamma # #

Air Filter - A4 05/30/11 Gamma # #

Air Filter - A5 05/30/11 Gamma # # #

Air Filter - SFA1 05/30/11 Gamma # # 0 Air Filter - SFA2 05/30/11 Gamma # # #

Air Filter- SFA3 05/30/11 Gamma # # #

Air Filter - SFA4 05/30/11 Gamma # # #

Air Filter - Al 06/06/11 Gross Beta 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A2 06/06/11 Gross Beta 1.9 +/- 0.3 2.0 +/- 0.3 **

Air Filter - A3 06/06/11 Gross Beta 2.1 +/-0.3 2.1 +/-0.3 **

Air Filter - A4 06/06/11 Gross Beta 2.4 +/- 0.3 2.3 +/- 0.3 **

Air Filter - A5 06/06/11 Gross Beta 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA1 06/06/11 Gross Beta 2.7 +/- 0.2 3.0 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA2 06/06/11 Gross Beta 2.5 +/-0.6 2.7 +/-0.6 **

Air Filter - SFA3 06/06/11 Gross Beta 3.8 +/- 0.5 4.2 +/- 0.5 **

Air Filter - SFA4 06/06/11 Gross Beta 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.4 +/- 0.2 **

Soil - SFS3 06/13/11 Cs-137 69.2 +/- 30.5 78.2 +/- 29.0 160.0 +/- 86.5 Soil - SFS5 06/13/11 Cs-137 212.7 +/- 44.6 240.3 +/- 39.3 333.0 +/- 84.2 06/20/11 1-131 # U **

Air Iodine - A2 06/20/11 1-131 # U **

Air Iodine - A3 Oysters - IA3 06/22/11 Gamma # # #

Oysters - IA6 06/22/11 Gamma # # #

Gamma # # #

Eggplant- 1B2 06/27/11 Cabbage- 1B3 06/27/11 Gamma U U U 57

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type. Sample Type of Original Replicate Split and Location Date Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Eggplant- IB5 06/27/11 Gamma Cabbage- IB6 06/27/11 Gamma Squash - IB7 06/27/11 Gamma Eggplant- 1B9 06/27/11 Gamma Air Filter - Al 07/04/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - A2 07/04/11 Gross Beta 1.9 +/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - A3 07/04/11 Gross Beta 1.6 +/- 0.2 1.7 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - A4 07/04/11 Gross Beta 1.3 +/- 0.2 1.5 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - A5 07/04/11 Gross Beta 2.2 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA1 07/04/11 Gross Beta 2.4 +/- 0.1 2.4 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA2 07/04/11 Gross Beta 2.0+/-0.1 1.8+/-0.1 Air Filter - SFA3 07/04/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.2 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA4 07/04/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 DR05 07/06/11 TLD 16.6 +/- 0.8 17.4 +/- 1.8 DR06 07/06/11 TLD 14.3 +/- 1.2 15.2 +/- 1.3 DR07 07/06/11 TLD 14.4 +/- 1.6 15.4 +/- 1.3 DR08 07/06/11 TLD 20.8 +/- 1.6 20.9 +/- 2.8 DR09 07/06/11 TLD 15.2 +/- 1.1 16.9 +/- 0.9 DR10 07/06/11 TLD 14.9 +/- 2.3 15.5 +/- 1.1 DR1 1 07/06/11 TLD 14.9 +/- 2.3 16.3 +/- 0.7 DR29 07/06/11 TLD 21.2 +/- 3.4 20.7 +/- 1.2 DR31 07/06/11 TLD 22.7 +/- 3.9 23.3 +/-4.6 SFDR14 07/06/11 TLD 23.2 +/- 4.3 25.1 +/-6.3 SFDR15 07/06/11 TLD 26.1 +/-5.3 30.6 +/- 5.6 Shoreline Sediment - WB1 07/06/11 Gamma Cabbage - IB3 07/25/11 Gamma Cabbage - IB9 07/25/11 Cs-1 37(1) 12.2 +/- 7.7 58

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type Sample Type of Original Replicate Split and Location Date Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Bay Water - WA2 08/01/11 Gamma Spot - IA4 08/25/11 Gamma Air Iodine - A2 08/29/11 1-131 #

Air Iodine - A5 08/29/11 1-131 Air Filter - A2 08/29/11 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - A3 08/29/11 Gross Beta 2.6 44- 0.4 2.6 +/- 0.4 Air Filter - A4 08/29/11 Gross Beta 1.4 +/- 0.3 1.7 +/- 0.3 Air Filter - A5 08/29/11 Gross Beta 1.8 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA1 08/29/11 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA2 08/29/11 Gross Beta 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.4 +/- 0.2 Air Filter - SFA3 08/29il 1 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA4 08/29/11 Gross Beta 1.0 +/- 0.1 1.1 +/-0.1 **

Peppers- 1B6 08/30/11 Gamma Mint- 1B7 08/30/11 Gamma Bay Water - WA2 08/31/11 Gamma a Misc ground coverage - SFB2 09/19/11 Gamma Misc ground U

coverage - SFB3 09/19/11 Gamma Soil - SFS2 09/19/11 Cs-1 37 60.5 +/- 25.6 **

91.9 +/-43.2 Soil - SFS3 09/19/11 Cs-137 47.6 +/- 23.5 DR05 09/27/11 TLD 13.5 +/-1.2 13.6 +/- 1.2 DR06 09/27/11 TLD 11.7 +/- 0.9 12.5 +/- 0.8 DR07 09/27/11 TLD 12.2 +/- 1.6 12.5 +/- 0.8 DR08 09/27/11 TLD 16.8 +/- 1.6 17.3 +/- 1.2 DR09 09/27/11 TLD 13.0 +/- 1.6 13.5 +/- 1.1 DRII 09/27/11 TLD 13.1 +/- 1.6 13.0 +/- 0.6 59

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type Sample Type of Original Replicate Split and Location Date Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis DR29 09/27/11 TLD 16.4 +/- 1.3 17.6 +/- 1.8 DR31 09/27/11 TLD 18.5 +/- 2.3 18.5 +/- 1.9 SFDR14 09/27/11 TLD 19.1 +/-2.9 21.0 +/- 3.3 SFDR15 09/27/11 TLD 24.9 +/- 3.0 25.8 +/- 5.9 U

Air Iodine - Al 10/03/11 1-131 **

Air Iodine - A2 10/03/11 1-131 **

Air Filter - Al 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.2 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A3 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.2 +/- 0.2 1.3 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A4 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.4 +/- 0.2 1.6 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A5 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.3 +/-0.1 1.3+/-0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA1 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA3 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 10/03/11 Gross Beta 1.3 +/- 0.1 1.5 +/- 0.1 **

Air Iodine - A4 10/10/11 1-131 **

Air Iodine - A5 10/10/11 1-131 **

Air Filter - Al 10/10/11 Gross Beta 3.0 +/-0.2 3.0 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A2 10/10/11 Gross Beta 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A3 10/10/11 Gross Beta 2.3 +/- 0.2 2.5 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A4 10/10/11 Gross Beta 2.5 +/-0.2 2.7 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - A5 10/10/11 Gross Beta 2.6 +/-0.2 2.7 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA1 10/10/11 Gross Beta 4.0 +/- 0.2 4.1 +/-0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA2 10/10/11 Gross Beta 2.4 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/- 0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA3 10/10/11 Gross Beta 2.7 +/- 0.2 2.6+/-0.2 **

Air Filter - SFA4 10/10/11 Gross Beta 2.5 +/- 0.2 2.6 +/-0.2 **

Oysters - IA3 10/13/11 Gamma Air Filter - Al 11/07/11 Gross Beta 1.9 +/-0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

60

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C Continued Results of Quality Assurance Program Sample Type Sample Type of Original Replicate Split and Location Date Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis Air Filter - A2 11/07/11 Gross Beta 1.9 +/-0.1 1.8 +/-0.1 **

Air Filter - A3 11/07/11 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A4 11/07/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A5 11/07/11 Gross Beta 2.0 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA1 11/07/11 Gross Beta 1.8 +/- 0.1 2.0 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 11/07/11 Gross Beta 1.7+/-0.1 1.7+/-0.1 **

Air Filter- SFA3 11/07/11 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 Air Filter - SFA4 11/07/11 Gross Beta 1.9 +/- 0.1 1.9 +/- 0.1 **

Air Iodine - Al 11/14/11 1-131 # **

11/14/11 1-131 # **

Air Iodine - A5 Air Iodine - Al 12/05/11 1-131 # **

Air Iodine - A3 12/05/11 1-131 # **

Air Filter - Al 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A2 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.5 +/-0.1 1.6 +/-0.1 **

Air Filter - A3 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.5+/-0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A4 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - A5 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.7 +/- 0.1 1.8 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA1 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA2 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.5 +/- 0.1 1.6 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter- SFA3 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.4 +/- 0.1 1.4 +/- 0.1 **

Air Filter - SFA4 12/05/11 Gross Beta 1.6 +/- 0.1 1.7 +/- 0.1 **

'See discussion at the beginning of the Appendix 2 Results reported for Air samples 1-131 and Beta are in 10-2 pCi/m3. All Vegetation and Soil, Oysters and Fish are in pCi/Kg. All water and milk are in pCi/L, TLD are in mR/90 Day

    • The nature of these samples precluded splitting them with an independent laboratory.
  1. All Non natural Gamma Emitters are <MDA 61

C-January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE C-3 Teledyne Brown Engineering's Typical MDAs for Gamma Spectrometry Selected Bay Water Fish Shellfish Sediment Vegetation Particulates Nuclides pCi/I pCi/kg pCi/kg pCi/kg pCi/kg 10-3 pCi/m 3 H-3 175 -- -- -- -- --

Na-22 1 8 3 12 6 5 Cr-51 12 105 4 104 50 63 Mn-54 1 9 3 12 -5 4 Co-58 1 9 4 9 4 5 Fe-59 3 28 9 24 10 12 Co-60 1 9 4 12 5 6 Zn-65 2 20 8 25 10 9 Nb-95 1 12 7 14 6 9 Zr-95 2 18 8 20 9 9 Ru-106 9 75 30 90 41 40 Ag- Inm 1 10 10 10 5 4 Te-129m 16 131 60 162 79 95 1-131 4 65 30 35 22 74 Cs-134 1 8 4 10 5 4 Cs-137 1 9 4 10 5 4 BaLa-140 3 32 15 25 14 36 Ce-144 7 40 16 54 26 18 62

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 APPENDIX D Land Use Survey Summary of Appendix D Content:

Appendix D contains the results of a Land Use Survey conducted around R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant during this operating period. A discussion of the results is included in Section 3.4 of this report.

63

January 1 - December 31, 2011 Docket Nos. 50-244 TABLE D-1 Land Use Survey Distances Sector Distance to Nearest Distance to Nearest Distance to Milk Residence Garden Producing Animals E 1170 m 580 m N/A Onsite Supplemental Garden ESE 1660 m 390 m N/A Onsite Garden SE 840 m N/A 8,270 m SSE 610 m 620 m N/A Onsite Supplemental Garden S 1500 m N/A N/A SSW 620 m N/A N/A SW 740 m N/A N/A WSW 1470 m N/A N/A W 2420 m N/A N/A The house located at 1601 Lake Road has been abandoned (SE sector). The new closest closest residence in this sector is situated in the SE sector is now 1652 Lake Road, Ontario New York at a distance of 840 meters from the reactor.

The nearest milk producing animals within a 5-mile radius of the power plant are located in the SE sector at Eaton Farm located at 6747 Salmon Creek Road, Williamson, NY (8,270 meters).

64