ML12138A007
| ML12138A007 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Kewaunee  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/2012 |
| From: | Feintuch K Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| To: | Sly C Dominion Generation |
| References | |
| TAC ME7110, TAC ME7727, TAC ME8460 | |
| Download: ML12138A007 (13) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDA-ECapture Resource From:
Feintuch, Karl Sent:
Tuesday, May 15, 2012 5:25 PM To:
'Craig D Sly' Cc:
Walker, Harold; Torres, Andrea
Subject:
ME7110 SCVB Draft RAI set Re: adoption of TSTF-51 & TSTF-448, as part of Chi-over-Q action Attachments:
ME7110-RAII 2nd round-SCVB draft RAI set 2.docx; ME7110, ME7727, ME8460 RAI status Tracking 2012-05-15.xlsx In accordance to the RAI process in place to manage items for TAC ME7110, please see attached document that contains additional draft RAI items (RAII) from the Containment and Ventilation Technical Branch (SCVB -
Reviewer Torres).
Also, please find the most recent RAI status tracking spreadsheet, which includes these items and those draft items transmitted earlier today on behalf of the Instrumentation and Controls Technical Branch (EICB -
Reviewer Alvarado).
Response is requested by June 15, 2012, for both Torres and Alvarado items.
We will discuss the draft Alvarado items on Wednesday, May 16, 2012 at 3 PM. Please notify me by May 17, 2012, if we need to have a clarification conference call on the draft Torres items attached, as well.
Karl Feintuch USNRC 301-415-3079
(DRAFT) REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION KEWAUNEE POWER STATION LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST (TAC No. ME7110):
MODIFYING THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (TS) AND THE CURRENT LICENSING BASIS (CLB)
TO INCORPORATE CHANGES TO THE CURRENT RADIOLOGICAL ACCIDENT ANALYSIS (RAA) OF RECORD (KNOWN AS CHI-OVER-Q)
DOCKET NO. 50-305 By letter dated August 30, 2011, Dominion Energy Kewaunee (DEK) submitted a license amendment request (LAR)-244 (ADAMS Accession No. ML11252A521) to revise the Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) Operating License by modifying the Technical Specifications (TS) and the current licensing basis (CLB) to incorporate changes to the current radiological accident analysis (RAA) of record. This proposed amendment would revise the current RAA for the design-basis accidents (DBAs) described in Chapter 14 of the KPS Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR). This amendment would also fulfill a commitment made to the NRC in response to Generic Letter 2003-01, Control Room Habitability.
In the course of their technical review, the Accident Dose Technical Branch (AADB and the Containment and Ventilation Technical Branch (SCVB) have requested further information items to enable completion of their respective Safety Evaluation efforts. These items are provided in draft form for you to review for clarification. We seek to confirm your understanding of the items and the determination of a firm date for response, typically within 30 days of the date of this Request for Additional Information (RAI). The items we seek are attached.
Please contact me by 5/17/2012 to confirm: (1) that the items are clear to you and to the responsive DEK staff without further discussion or (2) that a clarifying conference call is needed. Upon determination that the RAI items are clear and confirmation of when responses to these items are due, these draft RAI items will be considered to be in final form.
ME7110 is a complex project and we (Craig Sly of DEK and myself) have discussed methods for (1) improved movement of RAI information, (2) improved responsiveness to NRC staff requests, and (3) more flexibility for DEK to schedule RAI response activity, over that associated with more rigidly defined RAI milestone events. This and subsequent RAI traffic will be tracked by an individual identifier to provide the associated response by the individualized request by date.
Docketing will take place on groups of RAI item responses based on close completion schedules rather than close issuance schedules, as is now customary. Thus, if DEK can respond with individual information in 5 days, the request by date will be shortened and will be received sooner than the rest of the items, although its docketing event might coincide with the original set of items or with those RAI items originating from another Technical Branch.
We will periodically assess when this new process is of mutual benefit while conforming to the regulation for processing amendment requests and their associated RAIs.
The RAI items requested by SCVB (Reviewer Torres) are assigned the following tracking numbers.
ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-004-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-005-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-006-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-007-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-008-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-009-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-010-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-011-2012-06-15 ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-012-2012-06-15 After reviewing the request for a license amendment to revise the technical specifications to adopt of TSTF-51, TSTF-312 & TSTF-448 for Kewaunee Power Station, the Containment and Ventilation Branch (SCVB) determined that additional information is needed in order to continue the review.
SCVB RAI 4 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-004-2012-06-15)
As presented in Table 3.6-1 of Attachment 4, Basic Data and Assumptions for Locked Rotor Accident (LRA), unfiltered inleakage at 800 cfm is not assumed until the control room is isolated at 60 minutes following the onset of an accident. Provide justification for assuming zero inleakage during the first 60 minutes while the control room is not isolated, discuss the potential radiation dose from inleakage during this time period.
SCVB RAI 5 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-005-2012-06-15)
Table 3.2-5 Basic Data and Assumptions for LOCA, identifies containment spray coverage as being 100%. Please define what you mean by containment spray coverage and identify the surfaces and surface area taken into consideration. Please justify the assumption of 100% spray coverage.
SCVB RAI 6 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-006-2012-06-15)
There appears to be a dichotomy between some statements made in the LAR and the change requiring isolation of the alternate intake which is used to justify not crediting radiation monitor R-23 and removing it from technical specifications. The alternate control room intake could now be opened using the note in TS 3.7.10. The presence of the note challenges the provided justification for the removal of R-23 which partially relies on the permanent closure of the alternate control room intake. Please clarify the treatment of the alternate control room intake considering the following statements contained in the LAR.
Page 29 of Attachment 4 states: As a result of the analyses documented in this License Amendment Request (LAR), the alternate control room intake will be restricted from use. This restriction is required because of the X/Q that would result due to the close proximity of the alternate intake to various release points; one of which is < 10 m from the alternate intake.
Administrative controls will be in place to assure the alternate control room intake is closed and prohibit its use during normal operation, following an accident, or while moving recently irradiated fuel.
, page 73 states: A single Kewaunee Power Station (KPS) Fuel Handling Accident (FHA) scenario models the bounding FHA which does not credit mitigating systems (e.g.,
radiation monitor isolation, bypass and closure signals, or ventilation filtration) and maximizes source term, dispersion and dose. This bounding scenario provides the basis to allow all penetrations to be open under administrative control while moving recently irradiated fuel. The results of this analysis show that control room isolation is required prior to moving recently irradiated fuel assemblies in order to maintain operator dose within 5 rem TEDE.
Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.10, "Control Room Post Accident Recirculation (CRPAR)
System" contains a note that applies to openings in the CRE boundary that could be rapidly restored to the design condition, such as doors, dampers, hatches, floor plugs, and access panels. This Note only applies to openings in the CRE boundary that can be rapidly restored to the design condition, such as doors, dampers, hatches, floor plugs, and access panels.
SCVB RAI 7 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-007-2012-06-15)
Given that Attachment 4 states that control room isolation is required in order to maintain operator dose within 5 rem TEDE (including the alternate control room intake) please confirm that the note will not be used to open the control room. If the control room is allowed to be opened, please provide the methodology that will be used to verify that the time to close the opening does not impact the design basis analyses and the methods which are being used to determine the time of closure and insure that the boundary integrity is restored to its design state (i.e. leakage is not greater than the design value). In addition, please state whether the methods used to perform this assessment includes all current design basis assumptions. If not, please state which assumptions are to be changed and justify not using the design bases to perform this assessment.
SCVB RAI 8 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-008-2012-06-15)
The KPS UFSAR states: The operator can add fresh air to the Control Room under post-accident conditions by first verifying that conditions at the intake plenum will not cause contamination of the Control Room atmosphere, then manually opening the selected outside air damper and the damper at the suction of the post-accident recirculation fans. Excess air is exhausted to the Turbine Room through a backdraft damper. The operator can confirm the incoming fresh/recirculation air mix is not contaminating the Control Room atmosphere by observing a radiation monitor channel in the Control Room. Damper control switches are spring return to the normal position so that when the damper control switches are released the dampers automatically return to the recirculation configuration. (KPS UFSAR Rev 23, page 9.6-
- 12)
Since this is an isolation design, the control room needs to supplement the breathable air after a week to 10 days to keep the air habitable. Is the radiation monitor that being credited in the
UFSAR for fresh air the same monitor that being proposed to be removed from credit in the radiological analyses (R-23)? Since the radiological analyses assume that the control room will remain isolated throughout the accident and that no extra radiation (other than unfiltered inleakage) will enter the control room, how do you intend to monitor for fresh air?
Please note that in accordance to Safety Review Plan 6.4,Section III.3.IV which refers to duel inlets for the emergency zone, the NRC staff would not allow full credit for operator action to take in only un-contaminated air.
SCVB RAI 9 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-009-2012-06-15)
TS 3.3.6-APPLICABILITY-In the Bases of TSTF-51 it is stated that The Manual Initiation, Automatic Logic and Actuation Relays, Containment Isolation - Phase A, and Containment Radiation Functions are required OPERABLE in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, and during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies [(i.e., fuel that has occupied part of a critical reactor core within the previous [x] days)] within containment. Under these conditions, the potential exists for an accident that could release significant fission product radioactivity into containment.
However, in your mark-up, dated July 25, 2011 (ML11222A123) the words an accident that could release significant is not included. In order to be in compliance with TSTF-51 please update your mark-up to include these words, or provide acceptable justification explaining why it is not necessary.
SCVB RAI 10 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-010-2012-06-15)
The NRC staff understands that credit for the control room ventilation intake radiation monitor R-23, which provides control room isolation, is being removed. And that, only the current fuel handling accident (FHA) and locked rotor accident (LRA) events use and credit the R-23 system for control room isolation. The proposed new FHA requires that the control room be isolated prior to moving recently irradiated fuel therefore R-23 is no longer required for that accident. A proposed operator action will be required one hour following a LRA to isolate the control room.
You stated that one hour is sufficient time for the operator to identify the accident, take necessary emergency steps in response to the accident, and direct action to isolate the control room and start the control room post accident recirculation system (CRPARS). Please provide a discussion demonstrating continued compliance with 10 CFR 20.1701.
SCVB RAI 11 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-011-2012-06-15)
In order for a licensee to correctly implement TSTF-51-A, Rev 2, it needs to include Insert O Reviewers Note into the Applicability Section of TS Bases 3.9-4 Containment Penetrations.
The proposed Bases for Kewaunee TS 3.9-4, omit the inclusion of such a note. The note requires that the licensee make a commitment consistent with draft NUMARC 93- 01, Revision 3, Section 11.2.6 Safety Assessment for Removal of Equipment from Service During Shutdown Condition, subheading Containment-Primary (PWR)/Secondary (BWR). The staff notes that in Page 26 of Attachement 2 to Kewaunees LAR dated August 30, 2011 (ADAMS No.
ML11252A651), the licensee has made an equivalent commitment to NUMARC 91-06 in regard to the assessment of fuel handling/core alterations, ventilation system and radiation monitor availability, with respect to the filtration and monitoring of releases from the fuel. If the note is not to be included, please justify the omission of Insert O in TS Bases 3.9-4. (Note: The NRC staff considers it acceptable to provide a Reviewers Note in the applicable TS bases committing to NUMARC 91-06)
SCVB RAI 12 (ME7110-RAII-SCVB-Torres-012-2012-06-15)
Included in Kewaunees LAR dated August 30, 2011(ADAMS No. ML11252A521) is a new TS Section 5.5 Programs and Manual. Subheading 5.5.9 Ventilation Filter testing Program (VFTP), to the associated TS states Demonstrate for each of the safety related systems listed below that an inplace test of the HEPA filters shows a penetration and system bypass < 1.0%
when tested in accordance with Regulatory Position C.5.c of the Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, and ANSI N510-1975 at the system flowrate specified below + 10%. The proposed penetration bypass is inconsistent with the bypass stated in Regulatory Position C.5.c in Reg Guide 1.52 Rev 2, which states The in-place DOP test for HEPA filters should conform to Section 10 of ANSI N510-1975 (Ref. 2). HEPA filter sections should be tested in place (1) initially, (2) at least once per 18 months thereafter, and (3) following painting, fire, or chemical release in any ventilation zone communicating with the system to confirm a penetration of less than 0.05% at rated flow.
In addition, subheading 5.5.9.b states Demonstrate for each of the safety related systems listed below that an inplace test of the charcoal adsorber shows a penetration and system bypass <
1.0% when tested in accordance with Regulatory Position C.5.d of the Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, and ANSI N510-1975 at the system flowrate specified below + 10%. Regulatory Position C.5.d of the Reg. Guide 1.52, Rev 2 states The activated carbon adsorber section should be leak tested with a gaseous halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant in accordance with Section 12 of ANSI N510-1975 (Ref. 2) to ensure that bypass leakage through the adsorber section is less than 0.05%.
Please justify the proposed penetration and leakage bypass of < 1.0% taking into consideration that it differs from Regulatory Position C.5.c and C.5.d which states a penetration and leakage bypass of < 0.05%.
TAC Doc type Source Tech Branch Source Reviewer and Ser#
Request by date Status ML#
Description ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-001 12/29/2011 draft MLnnnnnnnnn Assigned TAC No. This may be different than ME7110 if future sub-projects need other TAC No.
RAII RAII = Request for information item RAIR = Request for information response Suppl = docketed supplement EICB EICB = Instrumentation and Control Branch (Alvarado)
AHPB = Health Physics and Human Performance Branch (Lapinsky)
AADB = Accident Dose Branch (Blumberg, Brown)
ITSB = Technical Specifications Branch (no SE expected) (Hamm)
SCVB = Containment and Ventilation Branch (Torres)
SRXB = Reactor Systems Branch (no SE expected) (Sun, Guzzetta)
Alva-001 Alva-nnn = Items from Reviewer Alvarado (EICB)
Lapin-nnn = Items from Reviewer Lapinsky (AHPB)
Sun-nnn = Items from Reviewer Sun (SRXB)
Blum-nnn = Items from Reviewer Blumberg (AADB)
Brown-nnn = Items from Reviewer Brown (AADB)
Torres-nnn = Items from Reviewer Torres (SCVB) 12/29/2011 Request by date (updated as mutually understood by PM, Reviewer and Licensee; maintained by PM and Licensee) draft draft = as issued prior to clarification pending = pending verification that no clarification is requested firm = as mutually understood and to be respond to by licensee resp = has dated response; is planned to or is already docketed
ML#
If blank, then = not yet docketed in ADAMS If RAIR, then = docketed ML#
If RAII, then = issued RAI If Suppl, then = docketed supplement letter containing no RAIR information ME7727 Assigned TAC No.
RAII Same as ME7110 EVIB For ME7727: Vessel and Internals Integrity Branch = EVIB Cher-001 Cher-nnn = Items from Reviewer Cheruvenki (EVIB) 4/27/2012 Same definition(s) as ME7110 draft Same definition(s) as ME7110 ML#
Same definition(s) as ME7110 ME8460 SRXB SRXB = Reactor Systems Branch (Parks for ME8460)
Parks-001 Parks-nnn = Items from Reviewer Parks (SRXB)
ME7110 ME7727 ME8460 RAI status Tracking 2012-05-15.xlsx 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12 13 14 A
B C
D E
F G
H I
Row TAC Doc type Source TB Source TB Reviewer Request by date Status RAI Response ML#
MLnnnnnnnnn Description 1
ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-001 1/27/2012 resp ML12031A138 dated 01/25/2012 2
ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-002 1/27/2012 resp ML12031A138 dated 01/25/2012 3
ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-003 1/27/2012 resp ML12031A138 dated 01/25/2012 4
ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-004 1/27/2012 resp ML12031A138 dated 01/25/2012 5
ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-005 1/27/2012 resp ML12031A138 dated 01/25/2012 6
ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-006 1/27/2012 resp ML12031A138 dated 01/25/2012 7
ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-007 1/27/2012 resp ML12031A138 dated 01/25/2012 8
ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-001 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 9
ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-002 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 10 ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-003 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 11 ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-004 3/2/2012, slipped from 2/13/2012 resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 12 ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-005 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 13 ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-006 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012
ME7110 ME7727 ME8460 RAI status Tracking 2012-05-15.xlsx 1
A B
C D
E F
G H
I Row TAC Doc type Source TB Source TB Reviewer Request by date Status RAI Response ML#
MLnnnnnnnnn Description 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 14 ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-007 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 15 ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-008 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 16 ME7110 RAII AHPB Lapin-009 3/2/2012 (slipped from 2/13/2012) resp ML12068A142 dated 02/27/2012 17 ME7110 RAII SRXB Sun-001 3/5/2012 (slipped from 2/28/2012) resp ML12080A223 dated 03/12/2012 18 ME7110 RAII SRXB Sun-002 3/5/2012 (slipped from 2/28/2012) resp ML12080A223 dated 03/12/2012 19 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-001 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 20 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-002 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 21 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-003 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 22 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-004 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 23 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-005 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 24 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-006 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 25 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-007 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 26 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-008 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 27 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-009 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 28 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-010 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 29 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-011 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 30 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-012 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 31 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-013 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 32 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-014 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 33 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-015 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 34 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-016 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 35 ME7110 RAII AADB Blum-017 4/5/2012 firm response received Response contained in Dominion Letter Serial No.12-234 dated 4/30/2012 36 ME7110 RAII AADB Brown-001 5/13/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 37 ME7110 RAII AADB Brown-002 5/13/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM
ME7110 ME7727 ME8460 RAI status Tracking 2012-05-15.xlsx 1
A B
C D
E F
G H
I Row TAC Doc type Source TB Source TB Reviewer Request by date Status RAI Response ML#
MLnnnnnnnnn Description 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 38 ME7110 RAII AADB Brown-003 5/13/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 39 ME7110 RAII AADB Brown-004 5/13/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 40 ME7110 RAII AADB Brown-005 5/13/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 41 ME7110 RAII AADB Brown-006 5/13/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 42 ME7110 RAII AADB Brown-007 5/13/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 43 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-001 5/12/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 44 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-002 5/12/2012 deleted no action See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 45 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-003 5/12/2012 pending needs clarification to confirm firm See content in email Friday, April 13, 2012 12:57 AM 46 ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-008 6/15/2012 pending 47 ME7110 RAII EICB Alva-009 6/15/2012 pending 48 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-004 6/15/2012 pending 49 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-005 6/15/2012 pending 50 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-006 6/15/2012 pending 51 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-007 6/15/2012 pending 52 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-008 6/15/2012 pending 53 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-009 6/15/2012 pending 54 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-010 6/15/2012 pending 55 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-011 6/15/2012 pending 56 ME7110 RAII SCVB Torres-012 6/15/2012 pending 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
Row TAC Doc type Source TB Source TB Reviewer Request by date Status RAI Response ML#
MLnnnnnnnnn Description 1
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-001 4/27/2012 replaced Withdrawn 2
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-002 4/27/2012 replaced Withdrawn 3
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-003 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 4
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-004 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 5
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-005 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 6
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-006 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 7
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-007 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 8
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-008 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 9
ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-009 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 10 ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-010 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 11 ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-011 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 12 ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-012 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 13 ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-013 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 14 ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-014 5/25/2012 pending ML12107A149 = email dated 4/17/2012, 9:19 AM; resent on 4/30/2012 15 ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-015 5/25/2012 pending sent 4/30/2012 16 ME7727 RAII EVIB Cher-016 5/25/2012 pending sent 4/30/2012
Row TAC Doc type Source TB Source TB Reviewer Request by date Status RAI Response ML#
MLnnnnnnnnn Description 1
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-001 5/30/2012 deleted See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 2
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-002 5/30/2012 firm See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 3
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-003 5/30/2012 firm See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 4
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-004 5/30/2012 deleted See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 5
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-005 5/30/2012 firm See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 6
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-006 5/30/2012 firm See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 7
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-007 5/30/2012 firm See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 8
ME8460 RAII SRXB Parks-008 5/30/2012 firm See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 9
ME8460 RAII DORL Paige-009 5/30/2012 firm See email to Sly and Gadzala dated Thu 4/26/2012 9:04 AM 16 17 18