ML111530494

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of Inspection and Request for Information for NRC PI&R Inspection
ML111530494
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/2011
From: Hopper G
NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB7
To: Madison D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
Download: ML111530494 (10)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVE N.E., SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 June 2, 2011 Mr. Dennis R. Madison Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant 11028 Hatch Parkway North Baxley, GA 31513

SUBJECT:

EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION

Dear Mr. Madison:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Region II staff will conduct a problem identification and resolution (PI&R) inspection at your Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant during the weeks of September 12 - 16 and September 26 - 30, 2011. The inspection team will be led by Eric Stamm, a Project Engineer from the NRCs Region II office. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution, issued on February 26, 2010.

The biennial PI&R inspection and assessment of the licensees Corrective Action Program (CAP) complements and expands upon the resident baseline inspections of routine daily screening of all corrective action program issues, quarterly focused issue reviews, and semiannual trend PI&R reviews.

On June 1, 2011, Mr. Stamm confirmed with Mr. Steve Tipps of your staff, arrangements for the two-week onsite inspection.

The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the inspection. Please have the referenced information available no later than August 12, 2011. Contact Mr. Stamm with any questions concerning the requested information. The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents required for inspection preparation.

SNC 2 If additional documents are needed, they will be requested when identified. Prior to the onsite inspection, Mr. Stamm will conduct a bagman trip to the site August 17 - 19, 2011. During this visit, he will discuss with your staff the following inspection support administrative details:

availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection; method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection; access to licensee computers; working space; arrangements for site access; and other applicable information.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Stamm at (404) 997-4575.

Sincerely,

/RA/

George T. Hopper, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 7 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.: 50-321, 50-366 License Nos.: DPR-57 and NPF-5

Enclosure:

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION cc w/encl: (See page 3)

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0011.

PUBLIC PROTECTION NOTIFICATION The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.

_ML111530494 __ X SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE EJS2 GTH1 NAME EStamm GHopper DATE 06/01/2011 06/02/2011 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO

SNC 3 cc w/encl: Moanica Caston B. D. McKinney, Jr. Vice President and General Counsel Regulatory Response Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Electronic Mail Distribution Steven B. Tipps Jeffrey T. Gasser Hatch Principal Engineer - Licensing Chief Nuclear Officer Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Electronic Mail Distribution Mr. Ken Rosanski M. J. Ajluni Resident Manager Nuclear Licensing Director Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Oglethorpe Power Corporation Electronic Mail Distribution Electronic Mail Distribution T. D. Honeycutt Chris Clark Regulatory Response Supervisor Commissioner Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution Electronic Mail Distribution L. Mike Stinson Lee Foley Vice President Manager of Contracts Generation Fleet Operations Support Oglethorpe Power Corporation Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution Electronic Mail Distribution Senior Resident Inspector R. D. Baker U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licensing Supervisor Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. U.S. NRC Electronic Mail Distribution 11030 Hatch Parkway N Baxley, GA 30334 E. G. Anners Licensing Engineer Arthur H. Domby, Esq.

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Troutman Sanders Electronic Mail Distribution Electronic Mail Distribution Paula Marino James C. Hardeman Vice President Environmental Radiation Program Manager Engineering Environmental Protection Division Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution Electronic Mail Distribution R. E. Varnadore cc w/encl. (continued next page)

Site Support Manager Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Electronic Mail Distribution

SNC 4 cc w/encl. (continued)

Ted V. Jackson Emergency Response and Radiation Program Manager Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution F. Allen Barnes Director Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution Cynthia A. Sanders Radioactive Materials Program Manager Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution James A. Sommerville Program Coordination Branch Chief Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Electronic Mail Distribution Mr. Steven M. Jackson Senior Engineer - Power Supply Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Electronic Mail Distribution Mr. Reece McAlister Executive Secretary Georgia Public Service Commission Electronic Mail Distribution Chairman Appling County Commissioners County Courthouse 69 Tippins Street, Suite 201 Baxley, GA 31513 Amy Whaley Engineer Nuclear Generation Development and Construction Electronic Mail Distribution

SNC 5 Letter to Dennis R. Madison from George T. Hopper dated June 2, 2011

SUBJECT:

EDWIN I HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT - NOTIFICATION OF INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION Distribution w/encl:

C. Evans, RII EICS L. Douglas, RII EICS OE Mail RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMHatch Resource

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION (SEPTEMBER 12-16 AND SEPTEMBER 26-30, 2011)

Note: Unless otherwise noted, the information requested below corresponds to documents generated since November 5, 2009. Please provide the requested documents in electronic format. If the information is not available in electronic format, please contact the inspection team leader to coordinate other available methods to provide the information.

1. Copies of the corporate and site level procedures and sub-tier procedures associated with the corrective action program. This should include procedures related to:

a) Corrective action process b) Cause evaluation c) Operating experience program d) Employee concerns program e) Self-assessment program f) Maintenance rule program and implementing procedures g) Operability determination process h) Degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20) i) System health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs j) Preventive maintenance deferral and Condition Report (CR) extension process If any of the procedures requested above were revised after November 5, 2009, please provide (or have available) copies of all revisions during the onsite inspection.

2. List of top ten risk significant systems, top ten risk significant components for each one of the top ten risk significant systems, and top ten risk significant operator manual actions.
3. List of all CRs initiated including the following information for each CR:

a) CR number b) Brief, but complete problem description c) Priority or level d) Affected system e) Affected component f) Responsible plant department g) CR completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).

CR # Problem Priority System Component Org Status CR001 A RHR Pump 2 RHR 2-RHR- ENG Open failed flow criteria PMP-A per SR 5.0.5.4 Enclosure

2

4. List of outstanding corrective actions including the following information for each action:

a) Corrective action number b) Corrective action type (e.g., corrective action to prevent recurrence, enhancement, maintenance rule evaluation, etc) c) Brief, but complete corrective action description d) Associated CR number e) Corrective action initiation date f) Number of Extensions g) Corrective action due date h) Completion status If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).

Corrective Type Description CR Initiation Extensions Due Status Action # Date Date AR0034 CAPR Revise CR0058 01/05/08 2 06/15/08 Closed Procedure NGK-003-4585

5. List of control room deficiencies with a brief description and corresponding CR and/or work order (WO) number.
6. List of operator workarounds and operator burdens with a brief description and corresponding CR number.
7. List of all currently extended or overdue CRs, sorted by initiation date, with the following information:

a) CR number b) Priority or Significance c) CR title and short description

8. List of all CRs that have been voided or cancelled. Please provide the following information for each CR:

a) CR number b) Brief, but complete problem description c) Reason voided or cancelled

9. List of all structures, systems, and components (SSCs) which were classified as (a)(1) in accordance with the Maintenance Rule since November 5, 2009. Please include the following information for each system in (a)(1):

a) Date of classification in (a)(1) b) Reason for being placed in (a)(1)

Enclosure

3 c) Planned actions and their status

10. List of Maintenance Preventable Functional Failures (MPFF) of risk significant systems.

Please include actions completed and current status.

11. List of corrective maintenance work orders. Please include the following information for each work order:

a) WO number b) Brief, but complete work description c) Affected system and components d) Date of initiation e) Date of completion (if completed)

If possible, provide this list in a format compatible with spreadsheet software (example shown below).

Work Description System Component Initiation Due Status Order # Date Date WO01345 Replace breaker SI 2A-SI-PMP, 01/05/08 03/15/09 Closed 2A-BKR-08-BB4 BKR-08-BB4 for 2A SI Pump.

12. Corrective action closeout packages, including CRs with description of corrective actions, for all NRC findings and Licensee identified violations (LIVs). Please include a cross reference linking NRC findings and LIVs to appropriate CR numbers.
13. Corrective action closeout packages, including CRs with description of corrective actions, for all licensee event reports (LERs) issued. Please include a cross reference linking LER numbers to appropriate CR numbers.
14. List of all NRC generic communications (e.g., Information Notices, Generic Letters, etc.)

and industry operating experience (OE) documents (e.g., Part 21 reports, vendor information letters, information from other sites, etc.) evaluated by the site for applicability to the station, regardless of the determination of applicability. Please include the reference number (e.g., CR #) for the documents that evaluated the aforementioned generic communications and OE information.

15. Copies of all quality assurance audits and/or assessments issued, including the last two audits/assessments of the corrective action program.
16. Copies of all department self-assessments for those programs related to the Corrective Action Program (e.g. Operating Experience, Maintenance Rule, etc.).
17. Copy of the most recent integrated plant trend report, departmental trend report(s), and corrective action trend report, including any human performance and equipment reliability trends.

Enclosure

4

18. Copy of the latest Corrective Action Program statistics (if exists) such as the number of CRs initiated by department, human performance errors by department, and others as available.
19. Copies of any minutes of meetings by the offsite safety review boards/groups. In addition, please provide a list of routine meetings involving the CAP to be held while team is onsite.
20. List of CRs related to equipment aging issues in the top ten risk significant systems since November 5, 2006, (e.g., system erosion and/or corrosion problems; electronic component aging or obsolescence of circuit boards, power supplies, relays, etc.;

environmental qualification). Please provide the following information for each CR:

a) CR number b) Priority or Significance c) CR problem description

21. If performed, please provide any recent self-assessment of the site safety culture.
22. Copies of CAP documents related to cross-cutting issues (human performance, problem identification and resolution, and safety conscious work environment) identified via trending, self-assessments, safety review committee or other oversight methods.
23. List of all root cause evaluations with a brief description. Please include a cross reference linking the evluations to appropriate CR numbers.
24. Copy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment importance measures report, if available.
25. Copies of System Health Reports, system design basis documents, and system description information for the top ten risk significant systems.

Enclosure