ML110770194

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Written Retake - Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML110770194
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/2011
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To: Todd Fish
Operations Branch I
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML103200290 List:
References
TAC U01840
Download: ML110770194 (5)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Examination: 02103/2011 Initials Item Task Description a b* C#

1, w

a, Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401,

~ "L 1f' R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section 0,1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. ~ -Z 1f T

T c, Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 'UF V n-:

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

~ ~ Tr 2,

S I

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients. \ V M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number " I U

L and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using ...vA A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T I from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. /,

/ "\

0 c, To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R

and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

\ \/V

3. a, Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1 ) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' aLdit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. 'tJJA,

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1 ) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified V, (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations L ~

4, c, Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days,

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered V \

G I

in the appropriate exam sections, tUf v l~

E b, Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41f43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ~ ~ "(f N

E

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~ "'1.... if R

A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. ~ 1 rJA L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ~. "'2.. If
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). ~ 2 (f Pri~

Date

~~-.~

~

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor I

Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week of 01/31/2011 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week of 01/31/2011. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE 1 RESPONSIBILITY . - - SIGNATURE (1) DATE DATE NOTE

\

1. '\1I11.,""",'I.l. C.,"A~1) ~ ~t\N\ t\\l~t>tt .G3tc:a,:,o 2'IirJtJ e'~
3. ' 6.

e-~ X/,l.tv\ Av~1\.

,,(......cv,...-.

4.~; { ~(.,,~I( (\..t¥~I;t' 5.~/f ----u:--= 7~~fS&/Asr

~: {({i::t'l:Zlft.$- ~~/

8. L(.lfr: ,sokU, ~ A. (/ -.!
9. 't'1) e 1,1.1"""'/""'1/(/ '*C:1i1 I~A.;

10.~cvrr LA1Af~TL __~C=~=~~SY!~'~5R~~~Q~____________~~~~~__________~=~~~:;~~~~~~~~~

11. :.lv, s...mtLCsnUl c.L~ I is ~t> t't.-94~ ,,;:
12. fC Is('_o f?/(Wo
13. Hc.- OpJ 1,;) MS' I!~Ir.~~.~~~~~~~
14. rllJ'T/l.u.e.101'- III
15. 1;Jj\ J.

NOTES:

ES-201 Examination Secu~ Agreement Form e5-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s} of f8, '; 'l.C:l.tl as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons wno have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-ExgmifHItlQ!J To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered durIng the week(s) of . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY ~ DATE SIGNATURE 12) DATE NOTE EJw.. . ~~!=>>ltU t.~h~Uc.\'etf?,. ~Oa.. ~ Gn.~eJM,~"1'wro~

1. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
2. o.../-n(".
3. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
4. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
5. __ _
6. ____
7. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
8. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
9. __
10. _ __
11. _ _ __
12. _ _ __
13. __"-
14. ._ _ __
15. _ _ __

NOTES:

ES*201, Page 27 of 28

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Hope Creek Generating Station Date of Exam:02f03/2011 Exam Level: RO SRO IXl Initial Item Description

1. Questions and answers are technicall accurate and a plicable to the facilit .
2. a. NRC KJAs are referenced for all questions.
b. Facilit leamin objectives are referenced as available.
3. SRO uestions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401
4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were re eated from the last 2 NRC licensin exams, consult the NRR OL pro ram office.
5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

,L the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or ~ 'V TF the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only 0/15 0/0 0/10

""Rlr.

'1)- .....-

.... nF uestion distribution s) at right.

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly 0/9 0/16 selected KJAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO / SRO Question distribution s) at ri hI.
8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distracters.
9. Question content conforms with specific KJA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are *ustified.
10. Question s chometric quality and format meet the uidelines in ES Appendix B.
11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

iP Printed Name I Signature Date

a. Author 01/14/11 I~
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 'B {
d. NRC Regional Supervisor I- II Note:
  • The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
  1. Inde endent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c'; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist I Facilitt i:l~ - wrHten rd--~ Date of Exam: th*? ht Exam Level: RO(sRQ)

I ( -GR.O*-.::m{t ~t~) Initials Item Description 8 b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading \Sif.. -v- .

iF

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

-Lf- 'Y

~A

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers seat check> 25% of examinations) -~ "V -(y
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail --~ 1-- tJ~
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades ~/A are justified wll\ N~
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evauate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants

~ J,,

lr Printed Name/Signature Date

8. Grader --r\J~'~I5'~'L.l.L,n-,,'I..A~O ~it 0... 7'\ Q..\..[rz.1Ll\.
b. Facility Reviewer(*) L-:::-1~~d~ ~7hlZlZ- J+ ~?LII

-'8 1"I~-J!':.)1\<<- ~ I"1.ntntA

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) -r£)D.i)-F~-14()M

.1\

.I.....

~ "- i' ti u j SF l/.tL-

d. NRC Supervisor (*) -~~-~~~1L-J~ lL~l~
  • (*) The facility reviewer'S signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML110770194&oldid=2551582"