ML21117A084

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Q/A Related - Forms (Folder 1)
ML21117A084
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/09/2021
From: Todd Fish
Operations Branch I
To:
Public Service Enterprise Group
Shared Package
ML19353E011 List:
References
EPID L-2021-OLL-0001
Download: ML21117A084 (12)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201

- Facility:

  • Developed by:*
  • Written: Facility l~_- NRcD_.- ll . Operating

.. chief Target .fask DE3~criptiorr (Reference) . *. Examiner's Date* .. . Initials

{ *

  • ExaminaliOI) administration date_ cpnfirmed (C; 1.a; C.2.a'-b);. For NRC~prepared exams, :

-240 *

  • arrangements are made for the facility to submif reference materials (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3) .

. -210. *_* . 2'. .. NRC examiners and facility contactassigned(C.1-.d; C:2.ff.

3... Facility contact briefed ori.sec1irityarid other req*uirements .(C.2.c):. As :applicable, the facility *

-210 *

  • contact submits to the NRC. any ptescreened K/As fo(elimination from the v.iritleri examination

. outline, with a*desc*riplicin of the.facility's prescreening pro:cess (ES-401,".b.1.bf -* . .

-21Q 4. . Reference matericildue for NRG-prepared: ei<arris (c: Le;C.3.~; Attachrnent 3).

. . . .. . . . . . . .\. .

. .;?O ..

. 5: .. Corporate riotifl_cat1on letter sent (c:2.e). *. .r ~> ...

6. * "r-iRC-developed written examinaiion* outline (ES-401-:112 or ES-401 N-1/2 and ES~401 ~3 or .

-195 . *

  • ES-401 N73} se_nlto faciiity coritact(m*ust be on _the exam security agreement) (C.1 .e-:.f; C.2.h; .*

. C.3.d.:..e). _.. . . . . * * * * * * * * * * *

. -150 7.. *.* Operating test outline(s) arid other checklists di.le, including Forms ES-~01-2, ES-201-3; ES-301 ~1. *

. . _ES-301-2; E:S-301 °5, and ES.cD~1; as applicable (C.1 ;~f; C.:fd:--e). . . . . . . . . .* . .

a: Operating test outline(s) reil(iewed by the NRC. and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.d,-e). :* . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . ..

9. *
  • Pro.posed examiriations:(wrftten:- JPMs, and sceharios, .as:applicable) and outlines (Forms *.

- _ - ES0 301~1. Es:so1~2. ESsD-1, ES-401j12 or ES-401N-1/2; and ES-401°3 or ES-401N°3); . . -

,

  • supporting document1;1tion* (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301 ;-4, ES 0 301 ~5, ES-30_1 ~6, ES:-401 ~a, ES-401 N-6, and any Form ES-201-2 arid ES~201-3 updates); and reference materials due ..

-_ . (C.1 ;~t); C:3.d). . . . .

10.: Examii,ations prepared bfthe NRC *are: apprqved by the.NRG supeivisqr. and foiwarded for *

. *. facility Hcensee review (C, 1.i; C,2.h; C,3,f:-:9). _ . . . . . . . .

-60

  • 11. Preliminary Waiver/e~cusal requests due (C.1.m; c.2'.t:; ES-202). :

-so_* . 12. Written_ exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3:f):.

_13.

  • Examination review results discussed.betw¢eii the NRC_ and facility licensee (C.1.i; C.1,k-1;: _* -

C.2.~; C.3;g). - Th_e NRC_ c1nd. ttie facility Jii:ens_ee co_nduct 1;ixam pr1;ipara~ory we1;ik.: . .

  • . -30 *  : 14: Prefimiriary licen$e a"pplicatioris and Waiver/excusal requests,. a(applicable (NRC "Fohn 398) "due

. (C.. 1:rn; C.2.i; E~ 202),* . .. . . .. . . .

  • . V . . .

0 1!:i:

  • Fl rial litens_e applications and Waiver/excusal *requests, as appiicable.(NRC For,ri 398),. d'ue and .

Fori-n ES~20t-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202) .. * . . . .

16. Written examinations and op_erating test!!. approved by the* NRC supervisor (C.2.j7'<; C:3:h). :
  • 1i Request fai:llil}I licens~e management feedback ori ttie. exa*minati~n (C:2.i). :
18. Fina*1. applications reviewed; orie or two (if more than 10) applications audited to. confirm *

.-7 _* qi.Jalification$/eligibility; and examination approva1*and.waiver/excusal letters. sent (C.2.k;

- - Attachment q;_ ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204}. . . . . . . . .

-p Hi. Pioci~ri~g/writteri exam admi_nistrc1tiori guidelines _reviewed with facility licensee (C:3.k) .. *: '\l ..

-7 20. Approved scenarios and job performance meas~res disirib"uted lb NRG examin"ers (C.3.i) ..

.* Target dates are based. on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in ttie corporate notification letter:

  • These dates _are for planning purpqses and_ may be adj1,1sted on a cas1;i-by_-c;ase bc1sis in coord)n!=llion "'.-'ith the f;icility_ licensee~

ES~201; Page 29of 32

ES-201 .. .. Exarnination Outline Quality Checklist

  • F,orm _ES-201.-2.
  • Facility: Hope Creek Date of Exa~ination: 2i15/21 Initials Item Task Description
1. a. Verify that tne outllne(s) flt(s) the appropriate model_ in accordance. Wiih ES-401 or ES:..Wrn.

w

~

b. ksess Whether the outline was systemati~liy_ a~ randomly p~pared in acceirdancit With .

Sectiori D, 1 of Es-401 or ES-401 N. and whether all KIA *categories are appr(ipriately s_anipled, I

t C; Assess.wh~ther th~ outline oveiemph~izes any siter:ns, e~olutions, or:generic topics.

T E

N d, A,ssess whether the justifications for dese!ected _o_r rejected Klfl, statem~nts aie appropriate:.

2. a; Using J=cimi ES~301-5, verify th~t t!ie proposed sceriarip sets cover the. required number pf normal ei(olLitions, lristruinent ani;I component failures, technical specifications, and rriajor transients. .. . . .. .. . .. .. . .. ..

s I

M .b. ~ess whethedhere are eno_ugh scenari9_ sets (and spares) to_ tesi ttie projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L Without compromising exain integrity, and ensure thafeach applicant tjin be testec;I usirig ~t least one new or significantly modified scenario; that no scenarios are duplicated froni the.

A T .applicants' audif.test(s); and that scenarios \Yill not be repeated on subsequent day$. . c;o 0 c. To the extent possible, assess whether. the o_utline(s) conforms with the q1Jalitatiye and * .

R quantitative criteria specified on Forin ES~301-4 arid described In Appendix D. and In

.SElctioil IJ:5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Siinuiatcir:Operating Test/" of ES-301 (incliJdirig overlap). * * * * * * *

a. Verify that the systems waikthtough oJtilne meets the criteria specified on Fooi-i ES~301-2:

(1) The outnrie(s) contairis the r~uiretj -nurnl:>er ofcontrol room: a_nd iii-plant tasks distributed w *

  • among t~e. safetyJunctions a!3 specified on the foi:n,. . *_* . . * . . * * * : **
  • A (2) Task repetition from the last~ NRC examinati!)IJS is within the llmlm specified on the form.

L (3) No tasks are *duplicated from tlie applicant's audit test(s). - ..

  • _* .*

K (4) The riumbet of new or. mod~ ~ks _me$ or ~ s the minimums spec~ on th:e furm.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and* radiologically controlled area

  • H tasks.meets the criteria on the form. . . .

R b bi Verify that ihe acimi~ist~t~e o~tline meets the criteria specified on Foi-in :E5.jQH:

(J *(1)

  • The tasks a:re distributed am*ong .the topics as specif'ied *on th_e form. *
  • G (2) A.tleast one task Is new or significantly modified. . . . * . * . .. .

H .(3). No more than on*e task is repeated from-the last two .NRC licensing examinations.

~- *beiennine ~h~ther ttieie cjlre enough different outfin~ io t!3$lthe proJect~d ~umber and mbc of. 11ft ./',<"'

. applicants and ensure that riO Items *are dµpllcated on subseqiJenf days. . . . . . ~- () * . . l t'.

a. .Assess ~i!the_r plant-sj:Jecifl~ priorities (incl_ucling probabilistic risk assessment and iilcllvidµal .

plant examin13tion Insights) are covered iri th_e_ appropriate e~ni sections. .

k h..* t ~-.t ~-r

$'.O .

.b. Assess wtiether ttie 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sariiplfng is* appropriaie;

c. .Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except-forplant~speclflc priorities) are at least 2.5..
e. Ch.eek ihe entire exarn for balance ofcover'age.

f.. .Assess ~hettier the exain fits the appropriate job i~vei (RO cir SRO). . l :\ "' ~ -:(f .

a.

b* Faci_lity Reviewer ("") .

.c, NRC Chief Examiner(#)

d. NRC Superviso~
  • Not applicable for NRC.p"repared exaini~atiori outlines.
    1. The independent NRC reviewer initials ite~s In coli.min *c*; the chief-examirie,;s concurrence is required.

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 2/15-22/2021 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinati_ons to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination m

en rG To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning _the NRC licensing examinations administered 0_,._ during the week(s) of 2/15-22/2021 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did

"'O not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically Dl cc noted below and authorized by the NRC.

CD w

_,._ NOTE*

s.w ES-201, Page 31 of 32

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 2/15-22/2021 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have _not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination m

enI I\) To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered 0

...... during the week(s) of 2/15-22/2021 . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did

"'C not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically Ill (C

noted below and authorized by the NRC.

CD w

...... PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE/RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE. DATE NOTE g_

w 1. Paul Breidenbach Exam Author '"3 --1,..2.1

2. Steve Dennis Exam Author 3-'1--- '1
3. Dave Rein Simulator Coordinator z/nJ-w * ['U'/1.,,r
4. 'RvJ ..., C~°'ll\ c"X~W\ Avt-kol" z., I 'J - Z.O J--1 l fz. (
5. Made. BeM,ttq ----"-'ECl=c~\_,;-+-\-y--___;:Oe~r- Ll't-1~~~::7""}-- 2-Jo-cW 3-<-t-;>I
6. J3uw 4 C.i,;lfi" A/ <:..12 P-pe Cf-:l.)-'20 . 'J-'l--2./
7. 2~Ai- L-
a. ~-- ( ~ tvc.CJ
9. j (/V rm
10. l Heu Nto
11. Jo4tt. llf"uiw Nco
12. J.>(e,l.4".'.\ Y,\\~~ ... ) '\KO
13. ~~MALS\lili?""'--__S9'D _______
14. L-/4e1v, .sM
15. Jk~t l(,.,..~ ,..Jl-0

/l*NOT;;~ k;. C. Jttto. h co Vl ., S l.O "\--i U,., rv /JvC-- 5 fL 0 ~

ES-201, Page 31 of 32

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist

  • Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: Hope Creek . Date of Examination: 2/22/21 Ooerating Test Number: 1 1: General Criteria . Initials I
a. b* d'
a. The operating test confonns to the previously approved outline; ch.anges are consistent with-saniplinci requirements (e.Q, 10 CFR.55.45;*operational inii:>ortaricei, safetv function distribution), .-s,;-* Pl~ .IF
b. * . There is no day-to~ay repetition between this and ottier operating tests to be administered durincr this examination*, *
  • * * * * ~ IYitr n::

t:. The operatind test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section O.1.a.), '1') WI&. *rr:::

d, Overlap with the written.examination_and between. different part$ of-the operating test is within acceptable limits. * * '19 ~ *_-"[F.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between -competent and less-than~competent apolicants at the designated license- level.

S!>'  ? -C~

I 2.. Walkthrough Criteria l -- I *- *I:- I:

a*.. Each JPM !nclud_es the _following, as applicable:

..** initial.conditions

.lnlUatlng cues . . *_ * -* -_ _ - - __

. references and tools, including associated procedures

- *_reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific ff designation* if deemed to be time critical by the facility. licensee -

operation ally Important specific perf(im,ance crtierla that include-detailed. expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclatur:e system response and otl)er examiner cues .

,, ftta statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task*

... identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

  • restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable* . *
  • b, . Ensure that any changes from the previously ajlprov~ systems and admfnistrative walkttirough .
  • outlines (Forms ES-301-1 a:nd ES-301 s2) have notcaused the test to deviate from any of the*

acceptance criteria (e~g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the Ia:st two NRC * .

I) -flf~ ff examinations)soecifiE!d on those fonns and.Form ES~201~2, * * * *

3. Simulator Criteria Ttie associated simuiator operating tests (scenariq sets) have been reviewed ill accordance with Forni ES-301-4, and a COPV is attached. . . . . ~- 11118 -ff*

. .. ..- .. _*l-i ~te~anie/Signature. .. Date

_'8. Author Steve Dennis/ . . . . .

  • _* 1/25/21
b. Facility Reviewer (*) -Mark Flemina/ fl/, n...M ~"-v.c * \ * ~ 1/25/21 .

C. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Todd Fish/. £lr-'if- *,,:l_::... JA ~ /. t .z:;.,ij_3-l

d. NRC Supervisor ban. Jackson/ *. *Z?.~ _ _;,f/J C ,c.*_1.n,,, £,;~.- l/7~/2.1.

. ' ' . .//

" The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-deileloped tests. -*

  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/22/21 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 Operating Test No.:1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic iri that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. r' ~

1'~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.  ;(' 113 -(~
3. Each event description consists of the following:
  • the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the the expected operator actions (by shift position) event termination point (if applicable) ,( -;/) tr*
4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. X (f
5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete y

lsr'i evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. I~ (r

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given. /

/ S.f) <f

7. The simulator modeling is not altered.

/

t' r;;/J ~

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. )( ~o 1~
9. Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. r ., (~

s()

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). X so -((?
11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) p l>O ,cf

~- ;1 1f

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible. ,t' ~D -(~
14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position: ff ~:> 1--;'f Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See .Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes - - -
1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2 / 2 / 3 A' 51) ~
2. Abnormal events (2--4) 3 / 2 / 3 t(' ~,:) ri1/
3. Major transients (1-2) 1 / 1 / 1 t _SI) 11r'
4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 2 / 3 £ ~I) lcV
5. Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions ~ 1 per scenario set) 2 / 1 / 1 t (I) (r
6. Preidentified critical tasks ~ 2) 2 I 2 I 3 ,I (I\ l?f'
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/22/21 Operating Test No.:1 A E Scenarios p V p 1 2 3 4 T M E

0 I L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION I

C A A T s A B s A B s A B s A B M N y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 L u 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p M(*)

T p E R I u RX 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 1/C 2-5, 4,5 2,3,5, 13 4 4 2

  1. 1 7,8 6,7 MAJ 6 6 4 3 2 2 1 TS 2,3,4 1,2,3 6 0 2 2 RX 1 2 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 1/C 2,5 3,4,5, 1,3,6 10 4 4 2
  1. 2 7,8 MAJ 6 6 4 3 2 2 1 TS 1,3,4 3 0 2 2 RX 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 1/C 2-5, 4,5 2,3,5, 13 4 4 2
  1. 3 7,8 6,7 MAJ 6 6 4 3 2 2 1 TS 2, 3,4 1,2,3 6 0 2 2 RX 1 2 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 2,5 3,4,5, 1,3,6 10 4 4 2
  1. 4 7,8 MAJ 6 6 4 3 2 2 1 TS 1,3,4 3 0 2 2 Instructions:
1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the appli_cant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified _for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 IFacility: Hope Creek Date of Exam: 2/15/21 Operating Test No.:1 I

A E Scenarios p V p 1 2 3 4 T M E

0 I L N CREW CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION T N I T POSITION POSITION I

C A A T s A B s A B s A B s A B M N y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 L u 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p M(*)

T p E R I u RX 1 2 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 SRO-I 1/C 2-5, 4,5 8 4 4 2

  1. 5 7,8 MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 TS 2,3,4 3 0 2 2 RX 1 2 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1/C 2,5 3,4, 7 4 4 2 SRO-I 5,7,
  1. 6 8 MAJ 6 6 2 2 2 1 TS 1,3, 3 0 2 2 4

RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 R0#1 1/C 2,3,7 4,5,7 2,5,7 11 4 4 2

,8 ,8 MAJ 6 6 4 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 1/C 2,3,7 4,5,7 2,5,7 11 4 4 2 R0#2 ,8 ,8 MAJ 6 6 4 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (1/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional 1/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
4. For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner mav place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manioulatino plant controls.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: HOPE CREEK Date of Exam: 2/22/21 Operating Test: 1:

APPLICANTS RO-1 ~ RO-2 ~ RO RO SRO-I SRO-I SR0-I-1 IZI SR0-I-2 IZI SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 2,3,6,7 1,4,5,6 1,2,3.4 2,3,6,7 1,4,5,6 1,2,3,4 1,2,4,5 1,2,5,6 All 1,3,4,6 All All

,8, ,7,8 ,7 ,8, ,7,8 ,7 ,6 and Conditions Comply with and All' All All All All All All All All All All All Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control !2,3,6,7 1,4,5,6 1,2,3,4 2,3,6,7 1,4,5,6 1,2,3,4 1,2,4,5 1,3,4,6 1,2,5,6

,8, ,7,8 ,7 ,8, ,7,8 ,7 ,6 Boards (2)

Communicate All All All All All All All All All All All All and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory All All All Ability (3)

Comply with and 2,3,4 1,2,3 1,3,4 Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6

  • Facility: HOPE CREEK Date of Exam: 2/15/21 Operating Test No.1 APPLICANTS RO RO RO RO SRO-1-3 ~ SRO-1-4 ~ SRO-1-5 ~ SRO-1-6 ~

SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1,2,4 1,2,5 1,2,4 1,2,5 All All All 1,3,4,6 All All

,5,6 ,6 ,5,6 ,6 and Conditions Comply with and All All All All All All All All All All Use Procedures (1)

Operate Control 1,2,4 1,2,5 1,3,4,6 1,2,4 1,2,5

,5,6 ,6 ,5,6 ,6 Boards (2)

Communicate All All All All All All All All All All and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory All All All All All Ability (3)

Comply with and 2,3,4 1,2,3 1,3,4 2,3,4 1,3,4 Use TS (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES~03 *. Writteri Examination Grading . Form es-403.:.1 *

  • Quality. Checklist
  • Facility: Hop~ Cree.k Date of Exam: 3/3/21 Ex~m Level: Rb l8l SRO IZl
  • Item Description Initials:

a b c

  • 1. Clean a*nswer sheets copied before grc:1dirig *
2. Propose:Jd .answer key changes and question deletions * .. .

justified and documeilt~d (facility reviewer iriiti~ls nol required .N /f<...

  • N IR_* N~ *

(N/R) if NO. post-examination conm,ents. are subm_itted)

3. *Applicants' scores checked for addition errors

. (reviewers spot check > 25% of exaniirta~ions)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-pnly exam) reviewed in.

detail . . .. . . .

N. / ~ . N jl<.._. bJ Af

  • 5. Aff other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades arejustified * * * * *
  • N//\ fJ \r<,; *~1' Perfomiance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of qu~stions missed by one-half or niore of the appJica_nts Date

.Printed Name/Signature . /';~i1 ~ .*. .2-~ *. ..

a. Grader

. . ; -~~

Paul Bre1denbachr .. ,;,. v . 1 * , *. . .

y* 3/3/21

//;/J.,M~

b. Facilfty Reviewer(')
c. NRC Chief l;xamlner M MarkH,mina Todd Fish .j"'*i,el / 3/4/21
  • d; NRC Supervisor{")

{*) The facility reviewers signature 1s riot applicable for examinations graded by the

.NRC; two independent NRC *reviews ~re r~quired. *

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML21117A084&oldid=3533931"