ML102371248

301 Final Administrative Documents

ML102371248
Person / Time
Site:	Watts Bar
Issue date:	08/25/2010
From:	NRC/RGN-II
To:	Tennessee Valley Authority
References
50-390/08-301
Download: ML102371248 (75)

Text

ES-201, Rev. 9E Examination Preparation Checklist Fonn ES-201-1 Facility: Watts Bar 2008-301 Date of Examination: 5/12/2008 Facility Examinations Developed by:

Written I Operating Test T le Chief Task Description (Reference) Examiners Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C. 1 .a; C.2.a and b) 1 1/2007

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l.d; C.2.e) 1/08/2008

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 1/08/2008

-120 4. Coorate_notification letter sent (C.2.d)

[-901 [5. Reference material due (C. I .e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)] 3/31/2008

(-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES 301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-l/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 3/17/2008 applicable (C.l.e and f; C.3.d)

(-70) (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 3/22/2008 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}

{ -45) 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, 3/31/2008 ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g and h;C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.1; C.2.g; ES-202) 4/12I2O08

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-20 1-4 prepared (C. 1.1; C.2.i; ES-202) 4/28/2008

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review 4i28i2008J (C.2.h; C.3.f)

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.l.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g) 4/28/2008

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor 5/5/2008 -

(C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 5/5/2008 (C.2.i;_Attachment 4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k)

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job pefformance measures, and questions distributed to 5/5/2008 NRC examiners (C.3.i)

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] (Does not apply) to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:

Item .

Initials Task Description

1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.

Q

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S and major transients.

M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

C c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations JJY r

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

A e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

L Wi

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RD or SRO).

a Author DJ(

b. Facility Reviewer (*) bci.w. Ld 1,,). 7Q$Ir7z&:24LkL

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) (AAf L.4JCA

d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines M71rN tJo.t( a- Fewts ES-201, Page 26 of 28

MRYØ22Ø7 1i4 P.3/Ø3 IJw Opi Oa SMeV I$-2O1 Examination OutIin Quality CheckIst Form ES2O12 Foility: DfxmhsUeri:

Irti&e Item Task Qesoription

1. a. Verify t,at the outline(s) JTt(si the pproprlate model, In accoidance with S.4O1.

w -. - -.

R b. Assess whether fhe outlinO was sy ernebcaily arid randomly prepared in cordance with I Section Dl of ES4OI and whether lI K/A categories are apøtcpriately arnpled -

T 7

, Aess whether the cutIre ove ihasies any systems, evolutions, or generic topICs.

N d. Aess wheter the justificajfons lot deseleoted or rejected Kllk statements are appropriate.

Z. a Using Form 5-301-5, verify that the proposed soenaric sets cover the required number fnrmI evoludons. bstrumant and comDonent fai1urs technicel specifications, S end major transients. cit

.1 *1.. -. -

M b. Assess whether there era enough scenero 5et.s (and Spare5) to test the projected numbør u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected creW composition end rotation schedule L 1 and ensure that each $pplicant can be tested using without compromising exam iritegrtty A at least one new or sinlflcsntly modified soenarlo. that no scenarios are duplicated (rem the spplicants audit tests, arid that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent 4 T --

0 0. To the axtent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) witi itie qualitative R and quantitauve criteria scifled On Form ES-W14 and described in Appendix D.

3. a. Verify th1 the systems walk.through outline meets the criteria specified on orm ES-301-2; (1) the OutllrtQ(5) Contain(s) III, required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed ornen the seety functions as specified on the form I (2) task rep.titiori from the It two NRC ax tlnions i$ within the Ilmlt specified on the foim T () no tasks are duplicated from the applints mudit test(s)

(4) the number or mew or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the fcrn CS) the number of elternate path, lcwpower. emergency. arid RCA task5 meet the crIterIa onjhe form.

b. Verify that the administradve outline meets the criteria specified Oil Form -3O1-l (1) the tasks are distributed srrion the topics as spepifiad on the form (2) at least one tssk iS flew or sIgnIficantly modifled (3) n more then ori task is repeated frrn the lest (We NClicenalrrg oxarliiflationa z

c. Determine if there are enough different Outlines to test the projected number arid mix of applicents end enswe that no items era duplicated on subsequent days.

4. a. assess whether plant-specific prioritIes (iriciuding PRA and lP insights) er covered in the apprepriats etam sections.

G b. ssess whethør the 10 CFR 55.41/4-3 and .45 sarnpHng is appropriate, N c. Ensure that K/A importance rat1gs (except fpr plant-specific pricritie) are St leat 2.5.

R d Check ftr dupliafion nd overlap among exan, sections. . 14 I

A a. Check the entire eem for balanc, of coverage.

L -- -.

L. Assess whether th aam fits the appropniata job level (RO or SO). ,

. Author I,. acililyReviewer()

r:. NRC Chief Examiner (#1 t?J

/ 2jD

.Ø/h.L Note: # independent NRC reviewer initial itern in Column c chief examiner concurrencn roulred.

NofalIcabFe for NRC-prepared examination outlines ,. -

(A4 itit j.IG4J4 Lq ES-201 Page 26 of 28 5Jt1 TDTflL P.3

Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, Tennessee 37381-2000 June 11,2008 10 CFR 55.40 Mr. Gerard W. Laska U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8931

Dear Mr. Laska:

In the Matter of the ) Docket No. 50-390 Tennessee Valley Authority )

WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT (WBN) UNIT 1 REACTOR AND SENIOR REACTOR -

OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATIONS 05000390/2008301 -

TVAs letter dated June 6, 2008, submitted documentation related to the operator initial examinations to satisfy the requirements of Examination Standard (ES) 501, Initial Post-Examination Activities, of NUREG 1021, Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors. Also in the June 6, 2008, letter, TVA indicated that the original Examination Security Agreement would be provided by June 30, 2008. Consistent with this, please find enclosed the completed original Examination Security Agreement. With the transmittal of this document, all required documentation associated with the examinations has been provided to NRC.

TVAs principal contact regarding the license examination is Don LeGrand, WBN Operations Training. Should you require additional information regarding this matter, please contact Mr. LeGrand at (423) 365-3858 or contact me at (423) 365-1824.

Sincerely, C c M. K. Brandon Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs Enclosure cc: Page 2

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 June 11,2008 Enclosures cc (w/o Enclosures):

NRC Resident Inspector Watts Bar Nuclear Plant 1260 Nuclear Plant Road Spring City, Tennessee 37381 ATTN: Patrick D. Milano, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation MS O-8H4 Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II ATTN: Mr. Malcolm Widmann Chief, Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., Suite 23T85 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

ENCLOSURE Examination Security Agreement

Cr,( ic 1 u

2 -;h - Wofs L(

w/FA Examination Security Aqreement Form ES-201-3 ialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of sfi.fo as of the date owingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered ate until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC r or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect he physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and s of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or port to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNAT RE(2) DATE NOTE iTharrd( &mIe.j Pte4 Wlor

2. J (l/ (

cr.JS o5

4. D;i- oe9/9 ,),,.r,jr SJ.r IA ) ltc A. JC) i;j)._&

5. c)o

6. (L

7. (2

8. R.H- Sifrl

9. k I4sfImttvi 6ini kifr M N- / -ze e xAi,

10. e&c*u ./RKe Zf2.OfOci (1L4

11. S1tie -p 1 v1u1qk4 ch-cf- 1 C.s. ..Z1 9

I 12 F 14?

&L 3/ /9 - i1 13: 1 3/I/Op h_

14. cIAL , ?rx 4 D______

15. l{A1y C. 1&Ek NOTES:

I of3 ES-201, Page 27 of 28

1 N R.c Excur (AJO4M-s ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of j, as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not ben authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered

_-- during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY 1) DATE SIGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE

1. 77 5) x1 5E EL 1A

2. tok l RO&N N SEE A-rritH-E

3. 5.\ /\77; .>

4.

IDk)IWwN

%k)c l.j)P JN

\ \..

JO L 4! J J f.//Q

6. gfiJ.s AJ WAJ f: /AI$f dI,Y /:G9 Lj.j L)t I (-+-

t:6J J gZL_- c 1

10. 8,U S.47 W7o

11. e5.Et _qf 12.i(.lwil ,IAA) /

,,%/ /2

15. Lj\ca-r O jA) Sf CL .

8 )/VJLi /.L4 f 9J NOTES:

rc ES-201, Page 26 of 27

( ac i.r ;c !c (

-1 ES-2fi Eriraoni5ecutiIyAgmilnnt - Form ES-201-3

-J cc

1. Ex.Tninalinn I 0

I rt ve-1je tiat I heve acq4red çeci;Ized k 1o1etg. aboU the NR-D Iioenng ex nina1cn shedud fo. tee ireek(s) of I a Vt the cbte j

1 of m j g1rI.1re- I agree thi-. Iwill it knwly v 11gB iy in1riio 1 boig tesA eai ni.aUons ti any persors dm have not been autrnrizsd by the NRC chif exaniner. I urid tand iat I ii rot c tEuc, evajate o iiIde perforim io feethad Lo irs ap> icits cheduted to 1 administered thesceiirig xn orkomthsdstgI or1ettn ofair adninIstra1r, e1pta pecrsalynDtedbetowafldaulhorlzcd bye NRC (e.9 a ctj swnulatw xth oçrao r oorIrpikatjr Is a.paUe if the hdkiuI :does rxr tect tie trai.itc content cx provic &ecl x indired feec1bak]. Fijrlherrnore, I nawar ot IJ-e p1ysbasecti ly risures d reJramer *(adorxntec in tls Iaciti licnss procedises) and iwdsIa rd that violatkn ot cxrncJiUor .,f Ibis a earn1 ma roiIt m cicalion o Ihe axanira1bnando- ar torcernent acUon isk c the facIt Icon see. I will in edicty rert to fa ty meagersent Dr tl-e NRC chief arreirer ar iridicaons- sLgestkn1s thel exnkat1on security may hav ee.cornpicsnil

2. rst-Em,nati To the b* of ny kncledçe. I dk rot dJge Lo ari iina.thonef pers any nfriia5n crrueranq th NR-) h isni exarninattons 1mitilsteied duri 11E eI(s) of . F m lw te 1 I enred ni4) tills urlty grearrr4 u itil tt comp:t1on ol eaaElInation adrninistrahon, I cii not instruc, .alue, oi proverfornanca ec14 t lhce appIfcectwio ws admif terd thil hcerlng elamiratiDcis, except as specitkslly noted beIct ard ail)h#ized bylhNRC.

IcUNT(D NAME J03 TIT! I RESRINSmILIV( 31 (1) EMTE S ON E 1

(

T E NOTE ii

1. L oiv,-i

< r1i O*rf-rjJ .-.fJ!*

/

Ar

2. Ori - N #Trc i- S 3.*:(ut 1 .. %vJ?\

I

4. .c*-4. %ab..4 tc5

\k1 ).c-h4J4 cc idf.

tL*J.J ) D 1

10. 47 IL-BL,. ,%,

11 S - iJIki Q-l:

- ji* &kQ 12.IeJ1 -

if 1- 1 iI#7 , F

-( iqJ4W ---

15. J-- i- ¶a 4 -. L £LJ NO1ES:

ES-N1. Pag-26c27

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g.. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. r

2. 4LJ EP,

3. Pr bipe W+/-MP sit flR6Mii T2r.

4. 5J iiz/i

5. 5c- i j j (

10 L.

11 .jI kv /-- 1 /-

EEUZEEEEEEEE V----- -- -

NOTES:

3t63 c +lc1\rdOQ.S ha ( ES-2O. Page 27 of 28

Crc oo CtT N.C ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1i/o & as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNAT RE (2) DATE NOTE i7)rrt( 1-kns1e & * (/3/o t

2.iej 7 Lf-frs i4_t

3. -G- c-i

_-7 4

cr/i,/o 4 If

4. )l- bc-e 5 q,(-fç /, tL& ,4 A 9 ,/,,/ :,Jj. _c, I !./;j I (L1.-

5. Uo L4 n/I 44

/l r ic.

ip.

1 J

6. (U( 1 .

7.

8. Qf - .- !h1?

f 1 r)

9. fr 6tvi lntr 4th 1ITh- /-28-- XLl,

10. L.A&Q e&L-Q/EP ./RKG ( zf2ofcc / -

1t

11. l?fLr CF4cfv C 9 sl Zh

-o t-z__---__ /j/fjJ

14. Vcé AL ,4x3

15. !-(A.VY C.

NOTES:

6 r

I 0

- F3 ES-201, Page 27 of 28

(r f\)RC cxi (4J2c1tS ?a4-ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of I(j as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY NftIRE1) DATE SIGNATURE(2) DATE NOTE

1. 5P N>% 5E 4TT?LHE l?. ROcti .QH ATIoN51(4 4(%1 SEE hr77tf f

3. MFw f)P S\ 7r / ( c

4. \-t

- 3 2<(---- 7s76

,\

1 c:.

6. r,.,j Os

7. 4- r)/75

8. z AJ v

10. ,iA&i-,r (Aif\)

,31v  % i 4

5JA4 ii. )(e3iy S,. VJtN Cf sfc 12.J(,\. l, R £J(& 10 1 /A)4 ,9/L(

14. 464

15. t/ \J5JXJ VL Cf ) )/VLd i>:>.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

( aco )C --

( I djg r I

-1 ES-201 EinaorSecuygjsrmrnt rormEs-201-3

-J cE

i. Rr-Ex..arnintin I 0

I-3 aci: e-iqe SatI have qjired tçeci;Izd k e.aboU eNR iicenng ex nina1on sshedud b. I.e ireek(s of I ft

. a of the cbte t mj ture- I agr tha will rt kncjy iv ilge y ii-.1erro 1 about these ei nkiaUoiis t any persars 1,im have not he4n auLorized by the NRC cimf exarlinet, I und Lnd that I sm  : tiu, eva%jae o Ide pecfOr,T 1o feth,dc to IVTh app iCitS hedued to t adinnistered thess3 Ieiin 3xnore torn this dc tiiiI orietn of ci rrnth adninIstrr, ecpt8 ep1gcI y nDtad beftw aild aUIhDrI2Ud by fle NRC (oJ., actnJ i sirnulatoT xU1 Operato )r Domkat,r e a.piatIe if the i?iu3 :does rxr stect t e triii content a provkie kect a indirect fee 1ekj. Fur*r,ixe, I airawar Oi tJe pt1ysahecJ &y rrsiras d (ecIJr e *(adotrnentec in t taotitj Iicenss procediuies) and rxdegsa rd thaiioiatkn oftii- condiUoms. this a eam1 maj reiit. caica1ien o fhe xanirabnsaxid- ar toJcennt action me a IhB fciry tcen .ee. I wi in diacty relzrt to fa ty age1ent or Ire NRC eNuf rnirer arty tndicons-c sLesttcms tt exnnatIon security niar1v e1IcOrfl[)fl)fli1

2. Pst-Ei!

To the b o1y knowedçe, did rot dJge to ar iinamlha rs any nfalilakn rnj th NR-) ir examirttnns edmnrated duri t weel(s) of F rn lw date 1E1 I enre<i irit 1[IS Elty 9reairerl U tI Itn comp:elton o1 eaaEiInation adrninistrahon, I dcl not insruc, .aJuaie, o piovk prfornana eIia t thcze aptcctwIo ia admif tertd th IIcerlng eiamirations, except as sectficaIty noltil below arci itwized by Ih l4RC.

FIUNTID NAME 303 TITE RESFONSIUTY (1) TEEt

/

1. .

5) Okr,fR,.i- .E,i.if

- 5 ti c3?RATrori 5 Xjjf,

3. S.

r)ww Li)P

4. 4

& .44t

• c; c s /dd1_

tL4.J D 1

)

Jfr 1

4 1O8 4 .:T i I _yAc EI 11 S - ii JIc (ciSlO 6 12.jh-- R I

LJi _J-(

1& si- -

g1c-9?5/cc?

ES-20l. Page-26 c 27

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination acknowledge that have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of /i/O as of the date of my signature. l agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the RC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or corn nunicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1 in, \). -_

2. w$.J ,)77Ue,c

3. 14 r_L__.5iii ne 4.

5.

L

7. -

t3 &r Si ;;) 8.

11 12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

• c tic \rcdoas hcw n.st 6 e i ES-201. Page 2? of 28 A ,+ t,., . .. 4,..-. I. s LI \.)I. .. . ..J -. . (

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-3d-i Facility: WATTS BAR Date of Examination: May 2008 Examination Operating Test Number 1 Administrative Topic Describe activity to be performed (see_Note)

Hand calculation of Boric Acid & Primary Water Conduct of Operations N integrator settings for a manual makeup to the VCT.

Conduct of Operations N Perform Shift Daily Surveillance Log Model Equipment Control N Hand calculation of RCS water inventory balance 1-SI-68-32.

Calculate radiation dose to perform job in an area with Radiation Control M two possible access routes and determine if dose exceeds administrative limits.

NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.

Type Codes & Criteria (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (< 3 for ROs;< 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (>1)

(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)

NUREG-i021, Revision 9

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: WATTS BAR Date of Examination: May 2008 Examination Level (circle one): RO Operating Test Number 1 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed Code*

(see Note)

Hand calculation of Boric Acid & Primary Water Conduct of Operations N integrator settings for a manual makeup to the VCT.

Conduct of Operations N Review and Evaluate Shift Daily Surveillance Log Model Equipment Control N Hand calculation of RCS water inventory balance, 1-SI-68-32.

Calculate radiation dose to perform job in an area with Radiation Control M two possible access routes and determine if dose exceeds administrative limits.

Emergency Plan M Classify the event per the REP and determination of PAR, per EPIP 4.

NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.

Type Codes & Criteria (C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank (< 3 for ROs; < 4 for SROs & RO retakes)

(N)ew or (M)odified from bank (> 1)

(P)revious 2 exams (< 1; randomly selected)

NUREG-1021, Revision 9

ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301 -2 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: May 2008 Exam Level: RO Operating Test No.: 1 B.1 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function

a. Synchronize Main Turbine to grid. 4S MLS

b. Manual makeup to VCT with failure of Primary Water to 1 automatically stop. MAS

c. Transfer Containment Spray Suction to Containment Sump 5 Per ES-i .3. DS

d. Raise Cold Leg Accumulator Level. DENS 3

e. Establish RCS Feed and Bleed per FR-H.1.

MALS

f. Calibrate Power Range Nuclear Instrumentation MS 7

g. Restore charging and letdown with failure of letdown 2 temperature controller and letdown temperature divert valve. NAS

h. Place Upper Containment Purge in service. NS 8 In-Plant Systemse (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-l); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)

a. Local SIG level control from Motor Driven AFW Pump. DRE 4S 6

b. iA-A Diesel Generator idle start for warmup. DA

c. Local emergency Control of 1 93 Charging Flow Control DRE i Valve

@ All RO and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

• Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-l / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 I 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrom bank <9/ <8 I <4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 I 1 / 1 (EN)gineered safety feature - / - / 1 (control room system)

(L)ow-Power I Shutdown 1 / > 1 / > 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) > 21 2 / 1 (P)revious 2 exams < 3/ < 3 / < 2 (randomly selected)

(R)CA >11>1 1>1 (S)imulator

ES-301 Control Room/I n-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301 -2 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: May 2008 Exam Level: SRO-I Operating Test No.: 1 B.1 Control Room Systemse (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function

a. (Not required for SRO-I.)

b. Manual makeup to VCT with failure of Primary Water to 1 automatically stop. MAS

c. Transfer Containment Spray Suction to Containment Sump 5 Per ES-i .3. DS

d. Raise Cold Leg Accumulator Level. DENS 3

e. Establish RCS Feed and Bleed per FR-Hi. MALS

f. Calibrate Power Range Nuclear Instrumentation MS 7

g. Restore charging and letdown with failure of letdown 2 temperature controller and letdown temperature divert NAS valve..

h. Place Upper Containment Purge in service. NS 8 In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)

a. Local S/G level control from Motor Driven AFW Pump. DRE 4S 6

b. iA-A Diesel Generator idle start for warmup. DA

c. Local emergency Control of 1 93 Charging Flow Control DRE 1 Valve

@ All RO and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

• Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 I 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrom bank <9/ <8 / <4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant > 1 I > 1 / > 1 (EN)gineered safety feature - / - I > 1 (control room system)

(L)ow-Power I Shutdown > 1 / > 1 / > 1 (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) > 2/ > 2 / > 1 (P)revious 2 exams 3/ 3 / 2 (randomly selected)

(R)CA 1/1 I?1 (S)imulator

ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: May 2008 Exam Level: SRO-U Operating Test No.: 1 B.1 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-I); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)

System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety Function

a. (Not required for SRO-U.)

b. (Not required for SRO-U.)

c. (Not required for SRO-U.)

d. Raise Cold Leg Accumulator Level. DENS 3

e. Establish RCS Feed and Bleed per FR-H.1 MALS

f. (Not required for SRO-U.)

g. Restore charging and letdown with failure of letdown 2 temperature controller and letdown temperature divert valve. NAS

h. (Not required for SRO-U.)

In-Plant Systemsa (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-l); (3 or 2 for SRO-U)

a. (Not required for SRO-U.)

6

b. lA-A Diesel Generator idle start for warmup. DA

c. Local emergency Control of 1 93 Charging Flow Control DRE 1 Valve

@ All RO and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

• Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO-I / SRO-U (A)ltern ate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrombank <91<8 /4 (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 / 1 I 1 (EN)gineered safety feature - I - I 1 (control room system)

(L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 / > 1 / > I (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2/ 2 I 1 (P)revious 2 exams < 3I < 3 I < 2 (randomly selected)

(R)CA ?1/?1 I1 (S)imulator

MflYØ2ØØ7 1Ø:4 P. 02/03 ES.301 .

Operating Test Quality Checklist lorm ES..301 3 r .7 -. . ..lrr FaciJity: .

DaExarninadon .. Opl.IfleStNUnib I. an,raiciw1 .

a b a, Tha Oparatin tflEt conforma with the ptei4cueiy approved ouUire ctenges ar tnsIstnt with

- sa,nplinrequramenta (eu., 10 CFFS4 , Operational im.portance, afti TunCion dtrlbulionj. .

zA fr,

b. There Ia n day4o-day repetition between this and other operedn tesis to to dminishirod dur this uzámnatio. --,-...,.

c r...Tht Operatlnn tt shall not thpIleate items from the pØiertts ed ost(s), (ano Seion Piei .. iW

d. Ovartap with Ihe written exemirialion anti between different parts of the opetin test it: within

. p8ata, -

ii appars that the op rotir test will differentiate between competent end Ieosthancornpetent

.. applicants at the deatedflcanpplavel: .. - -.,

2 W

7 oJkThrouh Criteria

. Eech JPM includes the following, as appIicaIo

• initial conditions

• Iflkiatiri eusa

• tefarzicos and tools, including aecocioted Frooedure reasonable and v&idalad time (mii (avecuge time allowed for completion) and spiidltc deelqnsiion If deemed to be hlrne-cnticaF by the facility ticensee operationally lmporlard psci1lc performance crIteria that inclUde; detailed e*psctad actions with exact CriLeria and nomenclature 44

. syetan reeporree and other examiner cues tatemenl describing important obeeivailoris to be made by the appiic*nt criteria rsucsesaitJI completion at the task ideiitMdon of ridl eleps and their aseocialed performance standards ions on th.seguanco of p, if applicable ,. ...

b. Ensure that any chingea front the plevietI8, approved systems and adntinistMtlvb w&k-through oulilnás (Poms ES-301-T and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of (he cap tanco ctiterta (e.g., item distribution, berTk use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) speitled

- on those forms end Fom, ES-01-2,

. 3. $innjtatcr Criteria Ths associated airnulator operating tests (scenario sale) have boan raviewed in accordance with Form ES- 1-4andepyie alctted. .. . .-.

. Printed Narrte / Signature Date

a. Author (p

b. Facility Re%Iewer(9 bti L1 Li -

C NRC Chief Ex*hiner (#) ji. LkL -. 5/1/ZW ti. NRC5upereor IJM i.. is,

/

NOTE; not The facility signature is epptiáabie fo NRCdeveIopmd tasla.

independent NR reviewer initial [tame in Column c: ONe? Qx Inarconcuflence rguIred, oio(1 (Q 3c I f;s MLhcJ ot\

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: Date of Examination: Operating Test Number:

Initials

1. General Criteria a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with fj sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). W.1

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1 .a.)

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. Nl rv

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions

• initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include: kI4 detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author ThcuUt (iSiMII ku4j

b. Facility Reviewer(*) t/ J). LG r d #/i/

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c*: chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 to .,!

QUALtTATtVE ATTF6BUTES TI Ie nOonS Ore ft,St-C n i SOmu eq ,rn OO Sitnr On t I to Ot Ur ds 110 1

2 inn rosost I osth nI \0111S 3 ,,rOn 2 molfo n0nS jot Onn1i,n tjb, tOn he

• n ,,ht(nr iojOs 101 00 0 C rnnniS On o0d wjIh rfl, I.IniS --

6. Son r:cr On:: flnO coOr::nZjso0lo no:: 1 n sin 010:: loam to of an j osnnOnn rn3 i on .0:150 :0:0 mona:

7, If t:me ::o0:essio:: lee :quns are used, the snonano summao eieSrIy so nd:eatee, Ut 00105 Oasis u1f:c:ent tsl:o to cornj out expeofod :Sct:v:ti0 0 thut u: due binu 000Str:25ls Coos are mvcm 6 jS 9  : see Oroc sins been asdat:f 5

ij PursriarI to 0 CIR on 40J:. apn

_____________ n: .no-0sn-nn:

I ni 1 fl I F I 11 I

2 .o:

13ta clot UPpj3 i CO 101 11 LAF I ia:n:rr-aifnnns5-5 5

_______L 0 I I s,0 C , W?> I

• inmmm:2-On 2-S lrS0,iI,- 2: 1 1 -

0 n:lrr1 :0:000 t,isrl.,rr e:t:Omi --.2 - 02 6 002 oorslrmn1i 10001 :sO-i20t.u onIonS  :(m2: -___________ I.  :

7 ir100: 10050 2.i 0 2 -

ES301 , Page 2 sit 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: May 2008 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios for Ui, Ii, Ri P V 1 2 3 T M P E 0

L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N T

A C POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION L M A T S A B S A S A B B S A B U N Y 0 R T 0 R T R T 0 R T 0 M T P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P R U E

RO RX 0 110 SRO-l NOR 2 111 I/C 7 442 SRO-U Ui MAJ 3 221 TS 3 022 RO RX 1 110 NOR 1 1 11 SRO-I Ii I/C 6 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 3 221 TS 3 022 ROR1 RX 1 1 10 NOR 1 1 11 SRO-l I/C 4 442 SRO-U MAJ 3 221 TS 0 022 RO RX 110 NOR 111 SRO-l I/C 442 SRO-U MAJ 221 TS 0 22 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: May 2008 Operating Test No.: 1 A E Scenarios for 13, 12, R2, U2 P V 1 2 3 T M P E 0 I L N CREW CREW CREW CREW T N T

A I C POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION L M A T S A B S A B S A B S A B U N Y R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 A T 0 M T P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P RI U E

RO RX 1 110 SRO-I 13 NOR 1 1 11 I/C 7 442 SRO-U MAJ 3 221 TS 3 022 RO RX 1 1 10 NOR 1 1 11 SRO-I 12 I/C 6 442 SRO-U MAJ 3 221 TS 3 022 ROR2 AX 1 110 NOR 1 1 11 SRO-I I/C 4 442 SRO-U MAJ 3 2 2 1 TS 0 022 RO AX 1

.2_ 1 0 NOR 11 SRO-I I/C 3 442 SRO-U MAJ 2 221 U2 TS 3 022 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-i event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-i basis.

3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: May 08 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO I RO 2 RO El RO LI SRO-I [1 SRO-I LI SRO-I I SROl 2 SRO-U El SRO-U LI SRO-U LI SRO-U LI Competencies SNIRI.P.. CNARIO 1234123412341234 Interpret/Diagnose 3,6 2,3 3,6 2,3 2A, 1-7 4, 1-7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 1,3, 2,3, 1,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1-7 1,2, 1-7 6 6 6 6 4,5, 4,5, Use Procedures (1) 7 7 Operate Control 1,3, 2,3, 1,3, 2,3, 1,2, N/A 1,2, N/A 6,7 5,6 6,7 5,6 4,5 4,5 Boards(2)

Communicate 1,3, 2,3, 1,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1-7 1,2, 1-7 6 6,7 6 6,7 4,5, 4,5, and Interact 7 7 Demonstrate N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,2, N/A 1-6 Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,3, N/A 1,3, 5

Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: May 08 Operating Test No.: 1 APPLICANTS RO El RO El RO El RO El SRO-13 SRO-l El SRO-I El SRO-I El SRO-U El SRO-U I SRO-U 2 SRO-U El Competencies SCENAPJO 1234123412341234 Interpret/Diagnose 2-7 2,3 2-7 1,4, 1-7 Events and Conditions Comply With and 17 2,3, 1-7 1,4, 1-7 5,7 5,6, Use Procedures (1) 7 Operate Control N/A 2,3, N/A 1,4, N/A Boards (2)

Communicate 17 2-7 1-7 1,4, 1-7 and Interact Demonstrate 1-7 N/A 1-7 N/A 1-6 Supervisory Ability (3)

Comply With and 3,4, N/A 3,4, N/A 1,3, 5 5 5 Use Tech. Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 NRC Exam Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: May 2008

[ RO Tier RD K/A Category Points SRD-Only Points Group K K K K K K A A A AG Total A2 G* Total 1 2 34 5 6 1 2 34

• 2 1 5 3 4 3 18

1. 1 Emergency 1 3 2 N/A 1 1 N/A 1

& Abnormal 2 9 Plant Evolutions Tier Totals 3 2 342 1 342 22 28 1

2 2 - I - 1 1 1 1 - 1 2 10 ysems TierIotal& 5 2 4 4 3 2 4 5 2 3 4 38

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 3 2 2 10 Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the RD and SRD-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRD-only outline, the Tier Totals in each K/A category shall not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RD exam must total 75 points and the SRD-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evol utions that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.1 .b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RD and SRD ratings for the RD and SRD-oniy portions, respectively.

6. Select SRD topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.

7,* The generic (G) K/As in Tiers I and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1 .b of ES-401 for the applicable K/As.

8. Dn the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRD-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply).

Use duplicate pages for RD and SRD-only exams.

9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers,

(#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRD selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43. descriptions, IRs, and point totals Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 -

2 Form_ES-401-2 -

NRC Exam ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emerv and Abnormal Plant Evolutions Tier 1/Group 1 (RO)

E/APE # I Name / Safety Function KI K2 K3 Al A2 G K/A Topic(s) lR 000007 (BW/E02&E10; CE/E02 Reactor 01 Reason for actions contained in EOP for reactor trip 4.0 1 Trip Stabilization Recovery /

000009 Small Break LOCA / 3 03 Interrelation between SIGs and small break LOCA 3.0 1 000015/17 RCP Malfunctions /4 03 Basis for reduced power with one RCP out of service 3.0 1 000022 Loss of Reactor Coolant Makeup / 2.4.31 Alarms, indications, and response procedures 4.2 2 1 000025 Loss of RHR System / 4 02 RHR low press piping isolation 3.3 1 000026 Loss of Component Cooling Water 02 3.2 Monitor loads on CCW system from control room 1

/8 000027 Pressurizer Pressure Control 02 Normal values for RCS pressure 3.8 1 System Malfunction / 3 000038 Steam Gen. Tube Rupture / 3 2.2.40 Apply Tech Specs 3.4 1 000040 (BW/E05; CE/E05; W/E12) Steam 02 1 Adhere to procs and operate within limits of license Line Rupture Excessive Heat Transfer / 4 000055 Station Blackout / 6 01 Operate/monitor incore thermocouples 3.7 1 000057 Loss of Vital AC Elec. Inst. Bus / 6 01 Reasons for EOP actions 4.1 1 000058 Loss of DC Power / 6 01 Op imps of battery chrgr and instrumentation 2.8 1 000062 Loss of Nuclear Service Water / 4 02 Determine/interpret cause of SWS leak 2.9 1 000065 Loss of Instrument Air) 8 04 Reason for crossover to backup air supplies 3.0 1 W/E04 LOCA Outside Containment / 3 03 Manipulation of controls for desired results 3.8 1 W/El 1 Loss of Emergency Coolant 03 3.7 1 Monitor for desired results Recirc./4 BWIEO4; W/E05 Inadequate Heat Transfer 02 1 Adhere to procs and operate within limits of license

- Loss of Secondary Heat Sink / 4 000077 Generator Voltage and Electric 2.1.20 4.6 1 Interpret and execute procedure steps Grid Disturbances / 6 K/A Category Point Totals:

2

[ Group Point Total: }18 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 3 Form_ES-401-2 NRC Exam ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Emero29y and Abnormal Plant Evolutios - Tier 1/Group 2 (RO)

E/APE # / Name / Safety Function Ki K2 K3 Al A2 G K/A Topic(s) IR #

000001 Continuous Rod Withdrawal / 1 01 Rod bank step counters 2.9 1 000028 Pressurizer Level Malfunction /2 PZR reference leak abnormalities 8 1 000032 Loss of Source Range NI / 7 01 Power supplies, mci proper switch positions 2.7 1 000059 Accidental Liquid RadWaste Rel. / 9 01 Reasons for termination of a release 3.5 1 000067 Plant Fire On-site / 8 07 Operate/mon fire alarm reset panel 2.9 1 000069 (W/E14) Loss of CTMT Integrity / 5 01 Determine conditions and select procedures 3.3 1 000076 High Reactor Coolant Activity /

2.2.38 Conditions and limitations in facility license 3.6 1 W/EO1 & E02 Rediagnosis & SI Termination / 3 02 Procedures associated with SI Termination 3.3 1

. WLE13 StearaGeneratorOvrerpressureJ_4 -

Component interlocks, failure modes etc. - 3.0 1 K/A Category Point Totals:

[11312)1 1 1 Group Point Total: 9 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

E4O1 4 Form_ES-401-2 NRC Exam ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Pnstems- Tr2/Gyp lJO System # / Name K1 K2 K3 K4 KS K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G K/A Topic(s) 003 Reactor Coolant Pump 04 Effect on RPS of RCP malf 39 004 Chemical and Volume Control 14 L/D tank bypass valve 2.8 1 005 Residual Heat Removal 09 Dilution/boration consider 3.2 1 006 Emergency Core Cooling 02 Eff. of core flood tanks malf 3.4 1

007 Pressurizer Relief/Quench Tank 02 Maintain PRT tank pressure 2.7 1 008 Component Cooling Water 02 High/low surge tank level 3.2 1 01 Monitor during PORV test 3.0 1 010 Pressurizer Pressure Control 08 Cause/eff with PZR level 3.2 1 012 Reactor Protection 2.4.31 Alarms, response procs 4.2 1

013 Engineered Safety Features 02 4.3 Actuation Reset ESFAS channels 1 022 Containment Cooling 01 Monitor auto operation 4.1 1 025 Ice Condenser 05 Abnormal glycol tank level 2.5 1 026 Containment Spray 03 Containment sump level 3.5 1 08 Steam removal eff on react 3.6 1 039 Main and Reheat Steam 03 Rad mon inds for SGTR 3.4 1 059 Main Feedwater 05 Control MFP speed 2.5 1 061 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 02 AFW malf effect on S/G 4.2 1

01 Power supp to system 062 AC Electrical Distribution loads 063 DC Electrical Distribution 02 Causeleff with AC system 2.7 1 02 Power supp to fuel oil pps 2.8 1 064 Emergency Diesel Generator 05 Incomplete start relay 2.8 1 073 Process Radiation Monitoring 01 PRM malf eff on release 36 1 2.4.35 Local AO tasks and effects 3.8 1 076 Service Water CCW hx isolation valves 2.9 1 02 Rx/turb bldg water temps 2.6 1 078 Instrument Air 01 Sensor air 2.8 1 103 Containment 05 Emergency entry 2.9 1 09 Cont. vacuum system 3.1 1

=

KlACategoryPointTotals:

F =J== 4J2 2 2 GroupPointTotal: =

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 5 Form_ES-401-2 NRC Exam ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2

Playstems- 1er2IGroupO) =

System # / Name Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G K/A Topic(s) 014 Rod Position Indication 02 Power loss to RPIS 3.1 1 028 Hydrogen Recombiner andPurge (,ontrol 02 34 Predict effect on cont pressure 033 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling 2.2.36 Effect of maint on LCO status 3.1 1 045 Main Turbine Generator 17 Effect on reactor of raising load 2.5 1 055 Condenser Air Removal 2.4.3 Identify post-accident instrument 3.7 1 056 Condensate 03 Cause/eff with MFW 2.6 1 068LiquidRadwaste Radmoneffonon Liq Rod Sys 2.5 1 075 Circulating Water 02 Interface with radwaste discharge 2.9 1 079 Station Air 01 Cross-tie with lAS 2.7 1 086 Fire Protection 01 FPS malt eff on SID capability eqp 2.7 1 KIA Category PointTotals:

E[ E] T 1 2 Group Point Total:

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) Form ES-401-3 NRC EXAM Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: May 2008 RO Category KJA # Topic RO SRO-Only IR # IR #

2.1.5 Ability to use procedures related to staffing/overtime. 2.9 1 2.1.28 Purpose of major system components/controls 4.1 1 1 -

Conduct 2.1.36 Procedures/limitations for core alterations 3.0 1 of Operations Subtotal 3 Knowledge of surveillance procedures 3.7 1

[ntréntrolroomlndications -

4.2 --

1 2.

Equipment Control Subtotal 2 2.3.7 Ability to comply with radiation work permits 3.5 1 2.3.14 Knowledge of radiation or contamination hazards 3.4 1 3.

Radiation Control Subtotal 2 2.4.13 Knowledgeofcrewrolesduring EOPusage 4.0 1 2.4.37 Knowledge of lines of authority during E-plan. 3.0 1 4

Emergency 2.4.42 Knowledge of emergency response facilities 2.6 1 Procedures /

Plan Subtotal 3 Tier 3 Point Total 10

ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 NRC EXAM Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: May 2008 SRO Tier RO K/A Category Points SRO-Only Points Group K K K K K 1

K A A A A G Total A2 G*

1 2 3 4 Total 5 6 1 j2 3 4 *

1. 1 6

Emergency N/A N/A

& Abnormal 2 2 2 4 Plant Evolutions Tier Totals 5 5 10 3 2 5 2.

Plant 2 1 2 3 Systems Tir TntI 4 4 8

3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 2 3 4 ii 2 3 4 7

2 1 2 2 Note: 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each K/A category shall not be less than two).

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.

The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.

3. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evolutions that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.1 .b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.

4. Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.

5. Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected. Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.

6. Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.

7* The generic (G) K/As in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1 .b of ES-401 for the applicable K/As.

8. On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G*

on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply). Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams,

9. For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals

(#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 2 Form ES-401-2 NRC EXAM ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 EmerQcL Abnormal Plant Evolutions - Tier 1/Group 1 (SRO)

E/APE # / Name / Safety Function K1 K2 K3 Al A2 G K/A Topic(s) IR #

000007 (BW/E02&E10; CEJEO2)

Reactor Trip Stabilization Interpret reactor trip first-out indication 1 00k02217ss of Reactor Coolant 2.1.7 Evaluate plant perf and make operational judgements 4.7 1 000025 Loss of RHR System / 4 I Interpret running RHR pump amperage a i 000027 ressurlzerPres.sur73 2.4.6 EOP mitigation strategies 47 1 000058 Loss of DC Power / 6 I Determine loss of DC power has occurred/backups I/S 4.1 1 W/E11 Loss of Emergency Coolant 2.2.22 Knowledge of LCOs and safety limits 1 GroupPoint-TotaL Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 3 Form_ES-401-2 NRC EXAM I ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Emerv and Abnormal Iant Evolutions Tier 1/Group 2 (SRO)

Form ES-401-2 E/APE # / Name! Safety Function Ki K2 K3 Al A2 G K/A Topic(s) 000059 Accidental Liquid RadWaste Rel. 19 Misleading Rad Mon inds for accidental release 3.6 1 000068 (8W/A06) Control Room Evac. /8 2.4.8 Use of abnormal procs in conj with EOPs 4.5 1 W/El 3 Steam Generator Over-pressure / 4 1 Interpret conditions and select appr procedures 3.4 1 CE/All: W/E08 RCS Overcooling - PTS /4 2.4.18 Specific bases for EOPs 4.0 1 K/A Category Point Totals: -- -- -- 2 2

] Group Point Total: 4 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 4 Form_ES-401-2 NRC EXAM ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2

=

= Pnstems- Tr2/Gyp ljOj_

System # I Name Al A3 A4 G K/A Topic(s) IR 003 Reactor Coolant Pump 5 Effect of VCT press 2.8 1 012 Reactor Protection 2.2.44 Verify system status 4.4 1 061 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 9 Total loss of feedwater **TBD 1 064 Emergency Diesel Generator 2.2.37 Determine operability 4.6 1 076 Service Water I Loss SWS 3.7 1 K/A Category Point Totals: 2 Group Point Total:

]

(TBD): Please note: Internal discussion with exam team members determined that the Importance Rating of K/A 061A2.09 is greater than 2.5. This discussion included the following points:

iSafetysignWancoftotallosso-EWon-Watts BarNuclearPIant Operating Procedures.

2. Recent industry operating experience related to total loss of feedwater.

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 5 Form ES-401-2 NRC EXAM ES-401 PWR Examination Outline PntSystems-1er 2/GroupjSRO) Form ES-401-2 System # / Name Kl K2 K3 K4 KS K6 Al A2 A3 A4 0 K/A Topic(s) lR 011 Pressurizer Level Control 2.1.32 Limits and precautions 4.0 1 075 Circulating Water 3 Safety features 2.7 1 086 Fire Protection 2.4.9 Mitigation for low power 4.2 1 KlACategoryPointTotals:

I__I_z}___]_z.

2 GroupPointTotal:

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant NRC Exam May 2008

ES-401 Generic Knowledge and Abilities Outline (Tier 3) Form ES-401-3 NRC EXAM Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: May 2008 SRO Category K/A # Topic RO SRO-Only IR IR #

2.1.23 Perform system and integrated procedures all modes 4.4 1 2.1.34 Knowledge of primary/secondary plant chemistry limits 3.5 1 1 Conduct of Operations Subtotal 2

2.2.40 AbilltytoappiyTechSpecsforasystem 2.

Equipment Control Subtotal 1

2.3.6 Ability to approve release permits 3.8 1 2.3.15 Knowledge of radiation monitoring equipment 3.1 1 3

Radiation Control Subtotal 2

2 4 23 Basis for prioritizing emergency procedures implementation 44 1 2.4.29 Knowledge of the emergency plan 4.4 4 1 Emergency Procedures /

Plan Subtotal 2

Tier3PointTotal

ES-401 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant - Record of Rejected K/As (Updated Version) Form ES-401-4 RO Examination Tier / Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection 1/1 015/017 AK1 .03 Watts Bar does not operate at a reduced power level with one RCP out of service. A new K/A (015/O17AK1 .04) was provided by the Chief Examiner.

1/1 000022 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly selected Category G, with a randomly selected K/A of 2.4.31.

1/1 000058 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating> 2.5. Randomly selected Category K1 with a randomly selected K/A of K1.01.

1/1 000062 Category Kl Category K1 contains no K/As. Randomly selected another category (K2). This category also contains no K/As. Continued random selection_of categories_and_obtained_Category A2,_with_a_K/A of A2.02.

1/1 000065 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly selected Category K3 with a randomly selected K/A of K3.04.

1/2 000076AA1 .04 Failed fuel monitor not part of current design basis at Watts Bar. Since there were no other K/As in Category Al with importance rating > 2.5, selected another Category, obtaining Category Generic. Note: this Category re-selection was not entirely random, but was implemented in order to improve sampling balance in Category Generic, for Tier 1 Group 2. After selecting G Category, performed a random sample, and obtained G2.2.38.

2/1 005K5.04 Low importance rating (2.1). Randomly resampled and obtained 005K5.09.

2/1 039 Category K6 Category K6 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category K5.

2/1 078 Category K5 Category K5 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category Ki.

2/1 103 Category K6 Category K6 has no K/As with importance rating> 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category A2.

2/1 026A1 .05 Chemical additive tank for Cont. Spray not part of Watts Bar design. Randomly resampled remaining K/As in Category Al and obtained Al.03.

2/2 033 Category K6 Category K6 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category A4.

2/2 033 Category A4 Category A4 has no K/As with importance rating 2.5. Randomly resam pled and obtained Category G.

2/2 045K5.08 Low importance rating (1.8). Resampled and obtained K5.10. Resampled repeatedly (due to numerous low importance ratings) until obtaining K5.l7.

2/2 055 Category K4. Category K4 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category G.

2/2 056 Category K3 Category K3 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category Al.

2/2 056 Category Al Category Al has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category Ki.

2/2 068 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category K6.

E 0

C ci) a)

(U C 0 2 0 (U U) x

. Ui (U

0 ci) 0 V C 0 U) ci)

(U -c 0

0 2 c a)

(U a)

IC)

• 0 -D a) .0 C) 0 o::  ? 0 U)

C 0 V U) cS C: C (NJ a)

CU (U (N (U -D 0

. 0 (N (N C c.i V V V -D -D 0 0 a) ci) a) a) a) U) a) C C C C C a) C (U .E (ci I)

(U (U (U (U (U (U a)

- (U a) D (U

.0 .0 -D -D -Q 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 -o 0 V C V C C C C C 0 C 0 (U (N (U (U (U (U (U (U

-D -D V V V 0 -D D N C a) U) U) i)

. Q C C a) a C/)

U)

E 2 2 2 C (U (U (U (U (U x C, U) a)

ci) a)

a) 0 a) 0 LU (U a)

C C (U 0 >

0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 U) -D -D -o V V C V C C C C C C (U (U (U (U (U 8 (U a)

(s 0

. . ( 2 IC) IC) (C) IC) IC) cC)

(C) IC) IC) (0 (N Ll)

(U E 0 0 L1 0 C C U- U- U- LL Ii- U-a) a) a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (U (U (U C C C C C C

.C .0 (N IC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V -D -D V L 2 a) a) a) a) ci) a) 0 0 0 I C C C C C C C 00 a) a)

(U 0

a)

(U z

0 z

0 z

0 z

0 z

0 I z 0 0 LL C

a)

E

. a)

(N. (CS 0 c0 0.

- (N 0.

?.  ?. a)

C/)

0 C

0 C

0 C (j C) C) C/)

a) C

. 0)

. (U (U (U 00 0 >

IC) 0) 0) 0) a)

I_- F t- F C C C C (N (N (N (N C C C (N

0 D

0 CD (

w (N (N (N -a) - (N (N (N (N (N I- C)) C)) C)) - - (N D 7.

ES-401 Record of Rejected KIAs Form ES401-4 RO Examination Tier I Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection 1/1 000022 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating> 2.5. Randomly selected Category G, with a randomly selected K/A of 2.4.31.

1/1 000058 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating> 2.5. Randomly selected Category Ki with a randomly selected K/A of Ki .01.

1/1 000062 Category Ki Category K1 ontains no K/As. Randomly selected another category (K2). This category also contains no K/As. Continued random selection of categories and obtained Category A2, with a K/A of A2.02.

1/1 000065 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly selected Category K3 with a randomly selected K/A of K3.04.

1/2 000076AA1 .04 Failed fuel monitor not part of current design basis at Watts Bar. Since there were no other K/As in Category Al with importance rating > 2.5, selected another Category, obtaining Category Generic. Note: this Category re-selection was not entirely random, but was implemented in order to improve sampling balance in Category Generic, for Tier 1, Group 2. After selecting G Category, performed a random sample, and obtained G2.2.38.

2/1 005K5.04 Low importance rating (2.1). Randomly resampled and obtained 005K5.09.

2/1 039 Category K6 Category K6 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category K5.

2/1 078 Category K5 Category K5 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category Ki.

2/1 103 Category K6 Category K6 has no K/As with importance rating 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category A2.

2/1 026Al .05 Chemical additive tank for Cont. Spray not part of Watts Bar design. Randomly resampled remaining K/As in Category Al and obtained Al .Q3.

2/2 033 Category K6 Category K6 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category A4.

2/2 033 Category A4 Category A4 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category G.

2/2 045K5.08 Low importane rating (1.8). Resampled and obtained K5.10. Resampled repeatedly (due to numerous low importance ratings) until obtaining K5.17.

2/2 055 Category K4. Category K4 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category G.

2/2 056 Category K3 Category K3 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category Al.

2/2 056 Category Al Category Al has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category Kl.

2/2 068 Category K2 Category K2 has no K/As with importance rating > 2.5. Randomly resampled and obtained Category K6.

2/2 075Kl .05 Low importance rating (2.0). Resampled and obtained Ki .02.

2/2 079 Category K2 Category K2 has only one K/A and it has a low importance rating (2.3). Resampled and obtained Category Al.

E a)

C/)

a)

C.)

-J 0

c%J L

P Cl)

Ca C.)

.0 a)

C C Ca 0

.0 C.)

0 a) 0 .0 a) ,

C a) Ca C) C r Ca .0 - .

C) a) (N (N (N CN (N

.0 C 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Cl) 0 a) a) a) a)

C S C C C c C C Ca Ca Ca (0 Cl) a) Ca Ca (0 Ca Ca (U

.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0

-Q LC 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 4-C C C C C C Ca (N Co Ca (U Ca Ca Ca

.0 A *0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 a)

C a) a) a) Cl) Cl) Cl) 0 S

C E S 0

S CU CU CC) x Ca U)

Ca (0

a) a) Iii a) Cl)

C.)

C Ca 0 0 .0 SEE S S S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) .0 .0 0 *0 0 S C C C C C C 0 CD Ca Ca (U Ca Ca a)

Ca C) C C.i C 0 *: - -

I C) C.)) Ct) C C)) C))

U) C))

C.)) CC) CC) C)) C)) C))

Ca 0 Q C u_ u LI LL IL U C) C) C) () C) C) C)

(U a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0

.0 .0 0 0 Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) a) Cl) 0 .) . .

C

.E c C C C C a)

Ca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) z z z z z z LL C

a) 2 a) a.

D 0 0 C/)

0 C a) Cl)

Ca (U E 0)

C) C-) >

0) 0) G)

F- F a a c c (N (N (N a a C 0 D

0 0 (

Lii (N a) (N (N c C/) C) (N D

MAY292007 13:44 P. 02/02 i5i Written Examination Quality Checklist_ Form S-4Q1-6

c111tv (A)c.:t(-s Bor Date of Exam a13 (a Exam Level RO SRS Initial

, Item Description a b

,1. Questions and answers are technically accurate end spable to the facility.

2. a NRC KIM are referenced or all questions.

b. Facility learning objecthes are referenced as available.

3 SRO guestione are eppropiiate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES.401 - ii

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 3RD questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRROL.proram gsJ

. Question duplication from the license screeflingfaudit exam was controlled asj?dicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was stailed; or the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain)

Bank use meets tmits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest j_

new or modified); enter the actual RO 1 SRO-only I

i QI / 1t question distribution(s) at right.

. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RD Memory CIA exam we written at the compretiension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels: enter

• _the_actual_RD l SRO question_distrIbution(s) at right.

/ (, 4j i j 4.

ii. Reerences/hendouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors, S. Question content conforms with specific K/A statements in the previously approved examination outline nd is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified 4Q41. ri

10. Question Oeycfiometric gujand form at meet the guidelines in S Appendix .

1 1. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple chic items; .-,

the_total_is_correct and_erees with the value on the_cover sheet.

Printed Name I Signawre Date

a. Author 4&1kM 1 £) MLI(kLJL L

4 b, Facility Reviewer (*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 5/7

d. NRC Regional Supervisor 1% ote:

• The tclllty reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC4eveloped examina,ioris.

1. Independent NRC reviewer Initial items in Column c: chief examiner concencereuired, ES-401, Page 29 of 33 TOTAL P.02

FIAJnc..

ES-401, Rev. 9 Watts Bar 2008-301 SRO Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401 -9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S Instructions

[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).

3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

• The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

• The stein or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

• The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

• The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.

• One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

• The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KJA but, as written, is not operational in content).

• The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

• The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

• The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 007 EA2.05 Appears to match K/A. Does Watts Bar 76 H 3 typically use the term via? If not try using in E

accordance with or using 1-SI-99-1OB.

Are these the only first outs or annunciators that will be of significance in this event? Appears to be SRO only.

NEW Changed to using instead of VIA. Question SAT 5/20/2008.

022AG2.1 .7 Appears to match K/A. In the second 77 H 2 reactor E part of the question ..on the PER by ...

engineering fits grammatically, but Management Review Committee does not. Maybe a the in front of management would work.

NEW Added the to Management Review committee. SAT 5/20/2008.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q SRO U/El Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 025AA2.01 Appears to match the K/A. Not SRO 78 H 2 x x only. Stem Focus is giving the applicant a cue. And x u the mitigating strategy in accordance with GO-lO.

The other actions are in accordance with AOPI 14.0.

The applicant need only know is what is happening to motor amps. This question can then be answered with only systems knowledge, making it an RO question. Need to reword stem.

NEW Removed several items from stem, appears to be SRO only knowledge. Changed distractors B and D. Changed all implements to enter. SAT 5/20/2008.

U 027AG2.4.6 Appears to match K/A. Question is not 79 H 2 SRO only. Knowledge of EOP immediate operator actions is RO knowledge, along with the entry conditions for FRP-S.1. Would AOP actions apply?

Secure the RCP in that loop?

NEW Completely changed question, replaced it with a bank question, and them modified it. SAT 5/20/2 008.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 058AA2.01 Question does not appear to match K/A.

80 H 2 u A loss of DC has not occurred. Also may not be SRO only, although this information is listed in the TIS basis, it is typically system knowledge. (How long are the batteries supposed to last. With this K/A, we should be going into the loss of DC AOl, or something similar.

NEW Replaced Question with a new question. Need to add correct breaker ID.

Otherwise SAT 5/20/2008.

Made changes as requested. SAT 5/21/2008 WIE1 1 G2.2.22 Question does not appear to match 81 H 2 u K/A. Appears to be SRO only. There is not a loss of X emergency coolant Recirc. in the question, only a possible loss of swapover capability.

NEW Replaced question with another new question.

SAT 5/20/2008.

059AA2.03 Question does not appear to match the 82 F 2 x u K/A. The question really asks what is required if a X normal release is interrupted. Need to attempt to cover the failure modes, symptoms and the cause of misleading indicators. This question is not SRO only also. This is the process for restarting a release.

NEW Gerry to select New K/A.059AA2.02 Wrote new question SAT 5/22/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 068AG2.4.8 Question appears to match K/A.

83 H 2 E Appears to be SRO Only. It appears that the correct answer (D) Does not allow any actions from the EOP (as answer is written). Are we sure that entry into the EOP5 are NOT allowed. The terminology in distractor C states that the AOP and EOP will be entered and that the EOP takes precedence, but in D it appears that no actions of the EOP are allowed. I just want to make sure this is correct. Also is there an EOP that would be used in conjunction with the AOl?

BANK Rewrite question using AOI-27 Keep same K/A. Completely rewrote question SAT 5/21/2008 W/E13 EA2.1. Question appears to match K/A.

84 H 2 s Question appears to be SRO only.

Distractor analysis is incorrect on a and b. The transition to H.3 is directed on H.2.

Otherwise SAT NEW SAT 5/20/2008.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S W/E08 G2.4.18 Question borderline on matching 85 H 3 K/A. Appears to be SRO only. It does contain the u

basis for one step, but it also tests transitions.

Teaching in stem, both the step listed is considered teaching, and the flow path in stem El to Z.1 to P.1.

This needs to be addressed.

NEW Tabled (C and D distractors need work to be more plausible. 5/20/2008.

Replaced distractors C and D SAT 5/22/2008 003A2.05 Question matches K/A in a backwards 86 H 2 U logic method. Not SRO only. Why would you leave the other pumps off if all of their criteria were sat. A and C distractors not credible.

NEW Still needs work. 5/20/2008. Made changes as requested.

SAT 5/21/2008 012G2.2.44 Question appears to match K/A. Is not 87 H 2 U SRO only, this question can be answered using systems knowledge. 1) What is the power supply to the MFRV5. 2) What happens when the RT breakers loose power? (UV coils drop out and breaker opens). This question may be complicated, but can still be answered using only systems knowledge.

NEW Rewrote question appears to be SAT 5/20/2008.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 061 A2.09 Question appears to match K/A. Appears 88 H 2 s to be SRO only SAT.

NEW 064G2.2.37 Question appears to match K/A.

89 H 2 u Appears to be SRO only. It appears by reading your distractor analysis that A is the correct answer, however the analysis states that D is the correct answer. Need to ensure that this reference will not answer any questions on the other SRO questions, or the RO questions. This reference can not allow the applicants to rule out other distractors on any of these questions. This question is Unsat until the correct answer is determined.

NEW A was correct, but with further investigation the term available is not applicable for TS. Need to rework question to work availability into answer.

5/20/2008.

Work in progress appears to be a good start.

Question SAT 5/22/2008 076A2.01 Kind of meets K/A. Although the PSA risk 90 H 2 X u assessment is high level, and would not be considered until after the mitigating actions are completed. It appears in the distractor analysis that the question may not be technically correct, analysis for B states: plausible since crosstie is done for various other situations, but not this one. Yet, this is the correct answer listed in D. this question will be listed as Unsat until the technical issues are addressed. May want to move the PSA risk

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S statement to the second part of the answer.

NEW Got second opinion for FJE .Changed as requested, also changed B DIG to A D/G. Some distractor analysis otherwise SAT.

U 011G2.1.32 Question appears to match K/A.

91 H 2 Appears to be SRO only. Distractors B and C are not credible. Why would any one pick Condition C (Completion time of condition B not met) if condition B was not the statement of concern? The distractor analysis does not match the actual distractors. I believe that D is the correct answer. I also dont believe that there is a procedure for preventing a lockout on low pressurizer level and heater shutoff. I believe that there are actions that would help prevent level from getting that low and maintain the heaters energized. This question needs a lot of work. And with two non plausible distractors is Unsat.

NEW upon further review, the K/A is not being met. Continue to work.

5/20/2008.

Made changes to all distractors using reasons.

SAT 5/21/2008 075A2.03 Question appears to match K/A. Is not 92 F 2 SAC only. Understanding how the water box delta T responds to the dumps being closed and procedure entry requirements are RO knowledge. Unsat NEW Made changes to add notifications to make

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/El Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S SRO only. SAT 5/20/2008.

086G2.4.9 Good attempt at matching a tough K/A.

H 2 Appears to be SRO only. Do you have procedure direction to cross connect SEP cooling and RHR systems to keep the core cooled? If so, under what conditions would this lineup be allowed? If not, distractors B and D are not credible.

NEW Licensee does have a procedure that allows the cross connect between the SFP and RHR.

SAT 5/20/2008.

94 E 2 X E G2.1 .23 Question appears to match K/A. Appears to be SRO only. Distractor B is not plausible as written the Spent fuel pool is full of irradiated assemblies.

So why would anyone pick this one?

NEW To be fixed on 5/21/2008 Made changes to question SAT 5/21/2008 95 E 2 S G2.1 .34 Question appears to match K/A. Appears to be SRO only.

NEW SAT 5/20/2008.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 96 F 2 X U G2.2.40 Question appears to match K/A. Is not SRO only. This is a less than 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> technical specification and is required knowledge of ROs.

Need to change to a topic that is greater than one hour. This question has been on several RO exams.

Replaced with a NEW question. SAT 5/20/2008.

97 F 2 S G2.3.6 Question appears to match K/A. Appears to be SRQ only. SAT NEW SAT 5/20/2008.

98 F 2 E G2.3.15 Question appears to match K/A. Appears to be SRO only. Remove the Since from distractors B and C. Use RM-90-102 output will be blocked during the source check: the SRO will Does this monitor start a particular train if so which one? This should also be listed (i.e. B train ABGTS will be inoperable.)

NEW Ask Phil to get a second opinion. (ABGTS autostarts)

Question Okay SAT 5/22/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD I

(F/H) (1 -5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/El Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 99 H 2 U G2.4.23 Question appears to match K/A. It is NOT SRO only. Entry conditions for ECA 0.0 are RO knowledge, Immediate actions are RO knowledge, and the notes prior to the immediate action steps are RO knowledge (they apply).

BANK Rewrite using SGTR and FR P.1 entry or not. SAT 5/20/2008. question rewritten question SAT 5/21/2008.

100 H 2 G2.4.29 Question appears to match the K/A.

X E Appears to be SRO only. Distractor D is not plausible. If you declare any event you must report within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. Therefore no one will choose D.

NEW Changed times to be 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and 15 minutes. SAT 5/20/2008.

4 Sats 15 Unsats 6 Enhancement

1 F1g4 ES-401, Rev. 9 Watts Bar 2008-301 RO Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S Instructions

[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]

Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.

2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1 5 (easy difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).

3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

• The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

• The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

• The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.

• The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.

• One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).

4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

• The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).

• The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

• The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).

• The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.

5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).

6. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

7. At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/El Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 007 EK3.01 Question appears to match K/A.

H 2 S NEW 009EK2.03 Question appears to match K/A.

2 H 2 S NEW 015/01 7AK1 .03 Question appears to match K/A.

3 H 2 u Distractors B and D are not plausible. 10% power may be the power required to allow entry to inside the polar crane wall, but there is nothing that states entry is required. Also, distractors C and D are subsets of A and B. A and B also lower power to less than 10%. This question needs some work, NEW Gerry to Select new K/A. (5/21) 01 5AK1 .0 (5,2,4) 022G2.4.31 Question appears to match K/A.

4 H 2 S SAT. Consider adding assume no operator action NEW SAT 5/21/2008 025AK3.02 Question kind of matches K/A.

5 H 2 u Distractors C and D do not appear to be plausible.

How does stopping one or two CCPs ensure that a relief path is provided? The whole upper portion of the stem could be covered up and the question started with Section 3.4... and that would make it a memory level question. NEW Completely changed the question SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 026AA1 .02 Question kind of matches the K/A. Very 6 H 1 u little discriminatory value. The first portion of the stem could be removed it is just window dressing. It could also be asked which one of the following is the setpoint for isolating the sample heat exchanger?

The question is only monitoring one load. Try giving the alarm and state what would have happened or something like that. Distractors a and d are not really credible.

NEW Replaced Question SAT 5/21/2008 027AA2.02 Question appears to match K/A.

7 F 2 X u Distractor analysis appears to be incorrect. One set of analysis states that the Reactor trip for an SI will maintain subcooling and one states that the trip will occur from the RPS. It seems like this question was modified from one at 5% reactor power. You have it listed as NEW. I believe the trip will ensure that DNB does not occur, but if pressure continues to fall subcooling will be lost with the reactor critical or not.

Are we sure that the reason for the trip is to maintain subcooling?

MODIFIED?

After discussion, changed subcooling to DNB, question appears to be SAT 5/21/2008 038G2.2.40 Question appears to match the K/A.

8 H 2 Appears to be SAT.

X NEW SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 040 (W/E12) EA2.2 Question appears to match K/A.

9 H 2 u The reference material that you included with the question refers to E-2 not ECA-2.1. However I checked ECA-2.1 and the actions appeared to be the same, except in ECA-2.1 it had the steps performed on 1 SG at a time. Does this need to be included in the question? Why would someone think the amber light indicates that a valve is closed?

Does an amber light ever indicate that a valve is closed at this plant? This would make the two distractors not plausible NEW Changed Question SAT 5/21/2008.

055 EA1 .01 Question does not meet the K/A. This 10 H 1 X u question is asking why they are monitored. It does not determine the ability of the operator to monitor them during a station blackout. This question needs to be re-written or replaced.

NEW Replaced Question SAT 5/21/2008.

057AK3.01 Question does not match K/A. The K/A 11 H 2 X u states: Knowledge of the reasons for the following responses... Reasons need to be included in the responses.

NEW Added reasons for actions SAT 5/21/2008.

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 058AK1 .01 Question appears to match K/A.

12 H 2

? Do you typically test on Unit II components? Does Unit II have any vital loads? If not why are we testing on battery IV? If this battery has some purpose and effect unit one operation it may be okay. We need to discuss this.

NEW (Second opinion by FJE)

Changed Diesel to 2B-B. This changed the answer to A. SAT 5/21/2008 062AA2.02 Question appears to match K/A. For 13 H 2 s easier reading may want to move 1 A from the distractor up into the stem. Otherwise. SAT BANK SAT 5/21/2008 065AK3.03 Question appears to match K/A. This 14 F 2 question could have been asked at a higher cognitive level. SAT s

NEW SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/El Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S W/EO4EK3.3 Question does not match K/A. The K/A 15 H 2 u asks for reasons. No reasons are listed in the distractors. Need to develop a question covering reasons for actions. For example, why are the valves in ECA 1-2 checked in the order that they are checked in? (Largest leak probabilities, can be checked from the control room etc.)

BANK Changed stem and distractor C. SAT 5/21/2008 W/E1 1 EA1 .3 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 16 F 2 S NEW SAT 5/21/2008 W/EO5EA2.2 Kind of matches K/A. Distractors A 17 F 2 X and C are essentially the same thing (thermal shock and damage to some S/G component). Distractor D (the correct answer) assumes a failure of HHSI. If this is assumed why can an applicant not assume improper operation of the primary PORV5, which would make B correct. The reference that you provided with the question does not support the correct answer. Unsat.

BANK Changed distractors, and order SAT 5/21/2008.

077G2.1 .20 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 18 F 2 S NEW SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues Focus T/F Dist. Link I

Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back-junits ward 0=

KJA SRO Only U/El S

Explanation 19 H 2 X X U OO1AK2.01 Question does not meet the K/A. The question meets the first part, but is nothing more than rods insert/withdraw and how fast they will move. Need to attempt to match the K/A with something about the step counters for example will indicate the same as DRPI Or IRPI, or with x steps of DRPI etcetera. Distractors b and d not credible. This is manual speed of the shutdown banks. If you are going to use the speed of manual it should at least be what is capable of the control banks.

BANK (Second opinion by FJE)

Changed stem and choices SAT 5/21/2008 20 H 2 028AK1 .01 Question appears to match K/A. SAT S Need a copy of original question to determine if it is modified as listed.

MODIFIED SAT 5/21/2008 21 H 2 X E 032AK2.01 Question appears to match K/A.

Distractor C is not credible. Why would the Rector trip if the channel is in bypass and not trip in normal.

This does not make sense. Distractor analysis for A, B, and C are not correct. Question is listed as an enhancement, but need to determine another distractor C prior to allowing on exam.

BANK Changed the stem and distractors. SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1 -5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 22 F 2 S Question appears to match K/A. SAT NEW SAT 5/21/2008 23 H 2  ? 067AA1 .07 Question loosely matches K/A. If convinced that the question meets the K/A. then question is SAT. The K/A asks for resetting the fire alarm Panel. This question asks for when the fire alarm (similar to an evacuation alarm and controlled from the control room) can be reset. I believe that resetting the local panel in accordance with SQl-13.01 section 6.2 is what the K/A is asking for. Will discuss.

NEW Will rewrite Question 5/21/2008.

Question rewritten SAT 5/22/2008 24 H 2 S 069(W/E14)EA2.1 Question appears to match K/A.

SAT BANK SAT 5/21/2008 076G2.2.38 Question meets K/A. Suggest changing 25 F 2 E stem to read RCS specific activity allowed without exceeding the TS limit.

BANK SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back-Dist. Link units ward Q=

K/A I SRO Only U/E/

S Explanation Focus W/EO2EK3.2 Question appears to match K/A. Low 26 F 1 X U discriminatory value. Distractor B and D do not appear to be plausible. B would be more plausible if it stated to confirm a secondary heat sink was required. Why would you secure RCP5 if you were in SI termination? These need some work.

BANK Changed distractors as requested. SAT 5/21/2008 W/E13EK2.1 Question appears to match K/A. Not 27 F 2 X U sure if distractors A and B are plausible. I will get a second opinion. I dont think a reference is required.

Will discuss.

BANK Replaced Question SAT 5/21/2008 003K3.04 Question appears to match K/A. Stem should state will cause a reactor trip signal. B 28 F 2 E

- distractor does not seem plausible.

BANK Rewrote question SAT 5/21/2008 004K4.14 Question kind of matches K/A. This 29 F 1 S question is similar in topic to #4. Not very discriminating. Will discuss.

BANK Revise to take out alarm aspect. 5/21/2008.

Revised will look at later.

005K5.09 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 30 H 2 S NEW (Need to ensure this is a requirement as stated in stem)

SAT 5/21/2008

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- 0= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 006K6.02 Question appears to match K/A. Distractor 31 H 1 X U A is not plausible. Three of the CLAs are enough to flood up to the lower core plate (they do not actually cover the core) So A should state: remains capable, since the contents of two operable CLAs is all that is required to provide an adequate inventory of borated water to meet the... Distractors C and/or D as written are not plausible in that should an applicant remember the TS values, and both of these are outside the value, and both cant be correct, then neither would be correct and therefore would not choose either.

NEW Replaced Question with a new question.

SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK (F/H)

LOD (1-5)

Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial r

Job- Minutia

1. 1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 007A1 .02 Question appears to match K/A.

32 H 1 X U Distractors A, C and D are not plausible. There is not a PRT on any Westinghouse plant that has a vent that automatically opens to lower pressure (that is one reason they have a rupture disk). Normal level in most Westinghouse PRTs is about 75% to allow for quenching the exhaust from a relief that has listed so why would anyone believe that A is plausible.

Also B is the only distractor that has an alarm that will annunciate (just happens to be at the correct setpoint, so as written all the applicant need remember is the setpoint.

NEW Rewrote Question. SAT 5/21/2008 008A2.02 Question appears to match K/A. Distractor 33 H 2 E A is not plausible. Replace distractor.

BANK Replaced distractor as requested. SAT 5/21/2008 010A3.01 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT 34 H 2 SNEW SAT 5/21/2008 01 OK1 .08 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT 35 H 2 SNEW (need to say just pressurizer control system in stem or the second half of the distractors are not applicable).

Added Pressurizer Pressure/Level Control.

SAT 5/21/2008

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 012G2.4.31 Question does not meet the K/A. The 36 H 2 X U K/A is for the reactor protection system, and the correct answer on this question is an ESF function.

NEW Replaced Question. SAT 5/21/2008 01 3A4.02 Question appears to match K/A. Can the 37 H 2 X E Hi-Hi containment pressure main steam isolation signal ever be blocked? If not distractors A and B are not plausible.

NEW Rewrote Question. SAT 5/21/2008 022A3.O1 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT 38 F 2 SNEW SAT 5/21/2008 025A2.05 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 39 H 2 SNEW SAT 5/21/2008 026A1 .03 Question appears to match K/A.

40 F 2 S* *Question is very similar to #16. May have to replace one of them (otherwise SAT)

NEW SAT 5/21/2008 039K5.08 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 41 H 2 S Modified (need to see original question to verify that it is modified.

SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. IPaial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SPO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 039A2.03 Question appears to match K/A.

42 H 2 X U Not sure that the second part of distractors Band D are plausible.

NEW Removed second parts of B and D SAT 5/21/2008 059K4.05 Question appears to match K/A. Distractor 43 H 2 X U D is not plausible; it is the only one with the FRV initially going open. Distractor Bs reason is not plausible. Also in two of the distractors FW is used and the other two feedwater is used. Need to be consistent.

BANK

, Rewrote distractors. SAT 5/21/2008 061 K3.02 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 44 H 2 SBANK SAT 5/21/2008 062K2.01 Question appears to match K/A. The 45 F 2 S drawing that were provided were for the 1 A Hotwell pump (instead of 1 B), and 1 A#3 Heater Drain Pump (instead of 1 B#3 heater drain pump). Otherwise SAT.

NEW SAT 5/21/2008 063K1 .02 Question appears to match the K/A.

46 H 2 E Distractor D is not plausible, why would anyone think that the breaker could not be tripped mechanically?

BANK Changed distractor D. SAT 5/21/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S 064K2.02 Question appears to match K/A. (again we 47 F S are testing U2 power supplies, do these supply anything on U2? Are they still covered by TS, and will they have an impact on Ui?)

NEW SAT 5/21/2008 064K4.05 Question appears to match K/A. Distractor 48 H 2 S analysis for C does not appear to be correct.

Otherwise SAT BANK Verify that D is not Correct. SAT 5/21/2008 073K3.0l Question appears to match K/A. Would 49 F 2 E this monitor ever get a high alarm if flow through it were lost? If not (unless background got to the setpoint). D could be a correct answer. Need to investigate.

BANK Changed distractor D. SAT 5/21/2008 073G2.4.35 Question appears to match K/A.

50 F 2 SSAT NEW Changed stem. SAT 5/21/2008 076K4.03 Question appears to match K/A. Remove 51 F 2 E the part of the stem that states you are the CRC.

Which one of the following describes the required positions for the listed ERCW valves PAW E0 Appendix A Equipment Verification? (Does FCV 144 have a position A? if so the throttled distractors should be opened to position A also. What does position B do?

BANK

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD I (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SAC U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S SAT 5/21/2008 076A1 .02 Question appears to match K/A.

52 H 2 SSAT NEW Changed to 1 B CCP. SAT 5/21/2008 078K1 .01 Question appears to match K/A.

53 H 2 SSAT NEW SAT 5/21/2008 103A2.05 Question does not meet K/A as written.

54 F 2 X U The question addresses the impacts of the malfunction. But does not address use procedures to correct, control or mitigate the consequences, during and emergency entry. What action will allow operation to continue? Etc. this is what needs to be covered. This question as written is also at the fundamental level it requires memory of T/S.

NEW Replaced question SAT 5/21/2008.

1 03A4.09 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 55 H 2 SNEW SAT 5/21/2008 014A2.02 Question appears to match K/A. Teaching 56 H 2 X U in stem, by informing the applicant that one CERPI display is dark. Allow the applicant to diagnose.

Remove the last bullet. Change the stem to read:

Which one of the following describes the impact on RPI, and what is required for...?

NEW

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LCD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S Changed question as requested. SAT 5/21/2008 028A1 .02 Question appears to match K/A. Is the 57 F 2 E second value in the question the design limit of H2 for a design basis LOCA, if so, why would anyone ever have to sample for H2, Just put the recombiner in service. I believe this to be the value that would be acceptable to place the recombiner in service.

Explain. The SQl you included states 5% is the limit for placing a recombiner in service.

NEW Changed Stem SAT 5/21/2008 033G2.2.36 Question appears to match K/A.

58 H 1.5 S Distractor analysis for A in incorrect. Very little discriminatory value. Otherwise SAT NEW Verify Power supplies, made changes to make question easier to read. SAT 5/21/2008 045K5.17 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 59 H 2 SBANK 055G2.4.3 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 60 F 2 SNEW Changed all distractors to shorten them (moved items into stem)

SAT 5/22/2008 056K1 .03 Question appears to match K/A. Can the 61 F 2 E unit be at 100% power on only 1 MFP? If both MFP5 are required for 100% power, then remove the second bullet. As written distractor A is not plausible.

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD rr (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cuesi TIF Cred. Partial Job- IMinutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus j Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S NEW Made changes to stem SAT 5/22/2008 068K6.10 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 62 H 2 SNEW SAT 5/22/2008 075K1 .02 Question appears to match K/A.

63 F 2 U Distractors A and B do not appear to be plausible.

Need to find either two other distractors or another way of using C and D. C, along with something wrong, and C along with something right. Etc.

BANK Added directly to stem. SAT 5/22/2008 079A4.01 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 64 H 2 SBANK SAT 5/22/2008 086K3.01 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 65 H 2 S Modified Need to see original question. Reference is okay as long as it does not answer any other questions or cause distractors to be eliminated on either the RO or SRO exam.

MODIFIED SAT 5/22/2008

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues TIF Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= j SRO U/El Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S G2.1 .5 Question appears to match K/A. Why do you 66 H 2 E statethattwoSROarerequiredinthestem?

Operator should know the shift staffing requirements for licensed individuals. Remove the in addition to the two licensed SROs from the stem and add it to the choices. Need to see the original question that was modified. This is also very similar to Admin JPM.

MODIFIED Changed distractors, SAT 5/22/2008 G2.1 .28 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 67 F 2 SBANK SAT 5/22/2008 G2.1 .36 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 68 F 2 S Need to see the original question that was modified.

MODIFIED SAT 5/22/2008 G2.2.12 Question appears to match K/A. Need to 69 F 2 E make sure the SR statement will not aid answering any of the SRO questions. Need to add every to the SR statement and every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> thereafter.

BANK Made changes as requested. SAT 5/22/2008

2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD r I (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cuesi T/F Focus Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back-Dist. Link units ward Q= I SRO K/A j Only U/E/

S Explanation G2.2.24 Question appears to match K/A. Distractor 70 H 2 X U C and D are not credible. I do not know of a Westinghouse plant where the AFW FCV fail closed.

Need to replace these distractors.

NEW This was performed on a JPM.

Change Question. New Question required 5/22/2008 G2.3.7 Question appears to match K/A. Change 71 F 2 E distractor A to read 1 OOmr. Also D distractor analysis is missing total expected dose is greater than.. .This should be added to distractor D. area where total expected dose is greater than 5 mrem.

NEW Ensure correct RCI is reference and that D is actually incorrect. 5/22/2008 G2.3.14 Question appears to match K/A. Distractors 72 F 2 X U A and C not plausible. It appears that the pressurization unit is already running, so let the action for A and C be Start the MCR emergency Pressurization Fans NEW Upon further discussion agreed to leave question as is.

SAT 5/2212008 G2.4.13 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 73 F 2 SBANK SAT 5/22/2008

1. 2. 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6. 7.

Q# LOK LOD r

(F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred. Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/ Explanation Focus Dist. Link units ward K/A Only S

• G2.4.37 Question appears to match KJA. SAT 74 F 2 SBANK SAT 5/22)2008 G2.4.42 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 75 F 2 SNEW SAT 5/22/2008 38 Sats 21 Unsats l2Enhancement 3?

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: \j4c Date of Exam: C  ? Exam Level: RO1 SRO Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 4//4. j 4

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

3. Applicant& scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as_applicable,_+/-4%_on_the_SRO-only)_reviewed_in_detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

• are justified

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity CM(

of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) /k&

d. NRC Supervisor (*) io/i/cf

(*) The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6