ML20300A589
| ML20300A589 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/2020 |
| From: | Division of Nuclear Materials Safety II |
| To: | Tennessee Valley Authority |
| References | |
| ES-201-1 | |
| Download: ML20300A589 (28) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:
Watts Bar Date of Examination:
08-24 09-03-20 Developed by: Written: Facility NRC // Operating: Facility NRC Target Date*
Task Description (Reference)
Chief Examiners Initials
-240
- 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a-b). For NRC-prepared exams, arrangements are made for the facility to submit reference materials (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).
-210
- 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.f).
-210
- 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c). As applicable, the facility contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for elimination from the written examination outline, with a description of the facilitys prescreening process (ES-401, D.1.b).
-210
- 4.
Reference material due for NRC-prepared exams (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3).
-210
- 5.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.e).
-195
- 6.
NRC-developed written examination outline (ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2 and ES-401-3 or ES-401N-3) sent to facility contact (must be on the exam security agreement) (C.1.e-f; C.2.h; C.3.d-e).
-150
- 7.
Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, and ES-D-1, as applicable (C.1.e-f; C.3.d-e).
-136
- 8.
Operating test outline(s) reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.d-e).
-75
- 9.
Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outlines (Forms ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2, and ES-401-3 or ES-401N-3);
supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-6, ES-401N-6, and any Form ES-201-2 and ES-201-3 updates); and reference materials due (C.1.e-h; C.3.d).
-75
- 10. Examinations prepared by the NRC are approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for facility licensee review (C.1.i; C.2.h; C.3.f-g).
-60
- 11. Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due (C.1.m; C.2.c; ES-202).
-50
- 12. Written exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3.f).
-35
- 13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC and facility licensee (C.1.i; C.1.k-l; C.2.h; C.3.g). The NRC and the facility licensee conduct exam preparatory week.
-30
- 14. Preliminary license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398) due (C.1.m; C.2.i; ES-202).
-14
- 15. Final license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398), due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202).
-7
- 16. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.2.j-k; C.3.h).
-7
- 17. Request facility licensee management feedback on the examination (C.2.l).
-7
- 18. Final applications reviewed; one or two (if more than 10) applications audited to confirm qualifications/eligibility; and examination approval and waiver/excusal letters sent (C.2.k; ; ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204).
-7
- 19. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k).
-7
- 20. Approved scenarios and job performance measures distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i).
- Target dates are based on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
FACILITY: Watts Bar Exam 2020-301 EXAMINATION PROJECT PLAN CHIEF EXAMINER: David Dumbacher Exam Start Date (from annual letter to licensees):
08/24/2020 Written Exam Date (from Corporate Notification Letter):
09/10/2020 Operating Test Start Date (from Corporate Notification Letter):
08/24/2020 Exam End Date (Receipt of Post Exam Comments, i.e. +20 days from exit meeting):
09/17/2020 This schedule assumes that the exit meeting occurs before both the administration of the written exam and the receipt of facility post-exam comments.
Task #
Description Calc Target Notes Completion Date Variance (days)
Revised Target Examination Planning N/A Examination Administration Date Confirmed 12/28/2019 ES-201-1 #1 (-240 days) 12/12/2019
-16 N/A NRC Examiners and Facility Contact Assigned 01/27/2020 ES-201-1 #2 (-210 days) 01/15/2020
-12 1
Contact Facility (210 Day Phone Call) 01/27/2020 ES-201-1 #3 (-210 days) 01/15/2020
-12 Reference Material Due for NRC prepared exams 01/27/2020 ES-201-1 #4 (-210 days) na
- VALUE!
3 Send Corporate Notification Letter 01/27/2020 ES-201-1 #5 (-210 days) 01/27/2020 0
4 Reference Material Due for site prepared exams 06/10/2020 ES-201-1 #9 (-75 days) 06/09/2020
-1 Written Examination Development 5
NRC-Developed Written Examination Outlines sent to facility (exam security established) 02/11/2020 ES-201-1 #6 (-195 days) 01/09/2020
-33 8
Develop Draft Written Examination 06/10/2020 ES-201-1 #9 (-75 days) 06/09/2020
-1 Exam prepared by NRC Approved by supv and forwarded to Facility Licensee for review 06/10/2020 ES-201-1 #10 (-75 days) 06/09/2020
-1 Written and operating test review completed 07/05/2020 ES-201-1 #12 (-50 days) 06/30/2020
-5 Prep week and review exam results 07/20/2020 ES-201-1 #13 (-35 days) 07/20/2020 0
10 Written & Op Examination Approved by NRC Supervisor 08/17/2020 ES-201-1 #16 (-7 days) 08/19/2020 2
Request facility feedback on exam 08/17/2020 ES-201-1 #17 (-7 days) 08/25/2020 8
Review guidelines for proctoring written exam with facility 08/17/2020 ES-201-1 #19 (-7 days) 07/22/2020
-26 Operating Test Development 14, 21 Develop Operating Test Outlines 03/27/2020 ES-201-1 #7 (-150 days) 03/23/2020
-4 16, 23 Outlines Reviewed / Feedback Provided to Facility 04/10/2020 ES-201-1 #8 (-136 days) 03/27/2020
-14 17, 24 Develop Draft Operating Test 06/10/2020 ES-201-1 #9 (-75 days) 06/09/2020
-1 Exam prepared by NRC Approved by supv and forwarded to Facility Licensee for review 06/10/2020 ES-201-1 #10 (-75 days) 06/09/2020
-1 Written and operating test review completed 07/05/2020 ES-201-1 #12 (-50 days) 06/30/2020
-5 Prep week and review exam results 07/20/2020 ES-201-1 #13 (-35 days) 07/20/2020 0
19, 26 Operating & Written Test Approved by NRC Supervisor 08/17/2020 ES-201-1 #16 (-7 days) 08/17/2020 0
Request facility feedback on exam 08/17/2020 ES-201-1 #17 (-7 days)
Distribute approved scenarios and JPMs to examiners 08/17/2020 ES-201-1 #20 (-7 days) 07/24/2020 Examination Preparation Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due 06/25/2020 ES-201-1 #11(-60 days) 06/23/2020
-2 Prep week and review exam results 07/20/2020 ES-201-1 #13(-35 days) 07/20/2020 28 Preliminary License Applications Due and waiver/excusal request (w/398s) 07/25/2020 ES-201-1 #14 (-30 days) 07/24/2020
-1 N/A Final License Applications Due and waiver/excusals (398s & 201-4, list of applicants) 08/10/2020 ES-201-1 #15 (-14 days) 07/24/2020
-17 35-36 Final Applications Approved (Audit to confirm qualifications) Elgibility letters sent out 08/17/2020 ES-201-1 #18 (-7 days) 08/19/2020 2
Examination Administration 38 Administer Written Examination 09/10/2020 09/03/2020
-7 39 Administer Operating Test 08/24/2020 08/24/2020 0
40 Conduct Exit Meeeting 08/28/2020 08/28/2020 Post-Examination Activities 41 Receive Facility Post-Examination Comments 09/17/2020 09/10/2020 09/10/2020
-7 48 Issue Exam Report 11/01/2020 ES-501-1 (+ 45 days of po 10/26/2020
-6 N/A Complete licensing / denial actions 12/16/2020 ES-501-1 (+ 90 days of po 10/27/2020
-50 Contact NRR for concurrence if written and operating exams will be administered more than 30 days apart.
Examination TAC Number Closed 10/20/2020 1 of 1
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: 8/24/2020 Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c*"*
1 a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
w b.
Assess whetl1er the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I rJ/
R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
"IA I
T C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
1J IA,J/A T
E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
>i/A "'I
N
- 2.
a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of Jf q, normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
I M
b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule jf qr L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
C.
f quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in ly Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3.
a Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1)
The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
}, q, L
(3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
(4)
The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0
b Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
Jt qr G
(2)
At least one task is new or significantly modified.
H (3)
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
C.
Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of Jlj q, applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4.
- a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual If Cp-plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G Ji hr E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
llf rr E
C.
R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
- t vJr A
/1 0',--
L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
i:71 !Jr Print N?---
I Date; a
Author Tim Gabosch
})r!i_
- b.
Facility Reviewer (*)
Jeremy Thompson &*
C.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d NRC Supervisor
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
>i/A rJ/
DD David Dumbacher 03/25/2020 DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD Gerald J McCoy 3/26/2020
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilit Watts Bar Date of Examination: 8/24/2020 0 eratin Test Number: 301
- a.
- b.
C.
- d.
- e.
- 1. General Criteria The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sam lin re uirements (e.., 10 CFR 55.45, o erational im ortance, safe! function distribution).
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a
licants at the desi nated license level.
- 2. Walkthrou h Criteria a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
- b.
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a licable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations s ecified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4, and a co is attached.
a.
Author
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d.
NRC Supervisor Tim Gabosch Jerem Thom
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- The inde endent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is re uired.
Initials a
b*
It David E Dumbacher 08-06-20
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: August 2020 Operating Test No.: 301 A
P P
L I
C A
N T
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E Scenarios 1
2 3
x T
O T
A L
M I
N I
M U
M(*)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P R
I U
RO SRO-I1 SRO-U RX 3
2 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
4 2
1 1 1 I/C 1,2,5,6 1,3,4,7 2,7 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 2,3 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I2 SRO-U RX 3
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 4
1 1
1 1 I/C 1,5 6
1,2,3,6,7 8
4 4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 1,2,4 3
0 2 2 RO SRO-I3 SRO-U RX 2
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
1 1
1 1 I/C 2,6 1,3,4,6,7 1,3,6 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 3,4 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 0 NOR 1
1 1 I/C 4
4 2 MAJ 2
2 1 TS 0
2 2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: August 2020 Operating Test No.: 301 A
P P
L I
C A
N T
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E Scenarios 1
2 3
x T
O T
A L
M I
N I
M U
M(*)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P R
I U
RO SRO-I4 SRO-U RX 3
2 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
4 2
1 1 1 I/C 1,2,5,6 1,3,4,7 2,7 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 2,3 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I5 SRO-U RX 3
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 4
1 1
1 1 I/C 1,5 6
1,2,3,6,7 8
4 4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 1,2,4 3
0 2 2 RO SRO-I6 SRO-U RX 2
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
1 1
1 1 I/C 2,6 1,3,4,6,7 1,3,6 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 3,4 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 0 NOR 1
1 1 I/C 4
4 2 MAJ 2
2 1 TS 0
2 2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: August 2020 Operating Test No.: 301 A
P P
L I
C A
N T
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E Scenarios 1
2 3
x T
O T
A L
M I
N I
M U
M(*)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P R
I U
RO SRO-I7 SRO-U RX 3
2 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
4 2
1 1 1 I/C 1,2,5,6 1,3,4,7 2,7 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 2,3 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I8 SRO-U RX 3
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 4
1 1
1 1 I/C 1,5 6
1,2,3,6,7 8
4 4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 1,2,4 3
0 2 2 RO SRO-I9 SRO-U RX 2
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
1 1
1 1 I/C 2,6 1,3,4,6,7 1,3,6 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 3,4 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1
1 0 NOR 1
1 1 I/C 4
4 2 MAJ 2
2 1 TS 0
2 2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Watts Bar Date of Exam: August 2020 Operating Test No.: 301 A
P P
L I
C A
N T
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E Scenarios 1
2 3
4 T
O T
A L
M I
N I
M U
M(*)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P S
R O
A T
C B
O P
S R
O A
T C
B O
P R
I U
RO SRO-I10 SRO-U RX 3
2 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
4 2
1 1 1 I/C 1,2,5,6 1,3,4,7 2,7 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 2,3 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I11 SRO-U RX 3
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 4
1 1
1 1 I/C 1,5 6
1,2,3,6,7 8
4 4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 1,2,4 3
0 2 2 RO SRO-I12 SRO-U RX 2
4 2
1 1 0 NOR 3
1 1
1 1 I/C 2,6 1,3,4,6,7 1,3,6 10 4
4 2 MAJ 4
5 5
3 2
2 1 TS 3,4 2
0 2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U1 RX 1
1 1
1 0 NOR 1
1 1 I/C 1,2,3,5,6 5
4 4 2 MAJ 4
1 2
2 1 TS 2,3 2
0 2 2 Instructions:
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
- 2.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.
- 3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
- 4.
For licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)
Facility: Watts Bar Date of Examination: August 2020 Operating Test No.: 301 APPLICANTS RO SRO-I 1,4,7,10 X SRO-U RO SRO-I 2,5,8,11 X SRO-U RO SRO-I 3,6,9,12 X SRO-U RO SRO-I SRO-U X
Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SRO 1
ATC 2
BOP 3
ATC 1
BOP 2
SRO 3
BOP 1
SRO 2
ATC 3
1 2
3 4
Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 1,2, 5,6 1,3,4, 5,7 2,5,7 1,5 5,6 1,2,3
,5,6, 7
2,4, 6
1,2, 3,4, 5,6, 7
1,3 5,6 1,2,3
,4,5, 6
Comply with and Use Procedures (1)
ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Operate Control Boards (2) 1,2,3, 4,7 2,4,5, 7
1,3, 4,5 5,6 2,3, 4,6 1,3, 4,5, 6
Communicate and Interact ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3) 1,2, 3,4, 5,6 1,2,3
,4,5, 6,7 1,2, 3,4, 5,6, 7
1,2,3
,4,5, 6
Comply with and Use TS (3) 2,3 1,2,4 3,4 2,3 Notes:
(1)
Includes TS compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
ES-403, Page 6 of 6 ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:
Date of Exam:
Exam Level: RO SRO Item Description Initials a
b c
1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2.
Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted) 3.
Applicants scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in detail 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date a.
Grader b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
c.
NRC Chief Examiner (*) _________________________________
d.
NRC Supervisor (*)
(*)
The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
mgd N/A mgd mgd N/A mgd Michael G. Donithan 9/9/2020 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A David E. Dumbacher Gerald J. McCoy X
9/3/2020 Watts Bar David E.
Dumbacher Digitally signed by David E. Dumbacher Date: 2020.09.11 15:11:36 -04'00' Digitally signed by Michael G. Donithan Date: 2020.09.11 15:24:38 -04'00'