ML100910335

ENG-002, Revision 003, Sensitivity Analysis for Enrico Fermi 1 Derived Concentration Guidelines Level for Soil.

ML100910335
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	01/28/2010
From:	Dionne B Bartlett
To:	NRC/FSME
References
ENG-002, Rev 003
Download: ML100910335 (73)

Text

I* BARTLETT ENGINEERING CALCULATION Calculation Number: ENG-002 Revision Number: 003 Calculation

Title:

Sensitivity Analysis for Enrico Fermi 1 Derived Concentration Guidelines Level for Soil

?2,on--

Preparer: Date /-, ý2-2o)o Date -Z a-lg/O Date /-Dqt-  ; otO Date: .,.'- ,,(O Director of quality Assurance Bartlett.

60 Industrial Park Road Plymouth, MA 02360

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3

1. PURPOSE The purpose of this calculation is to identify which stochastic parameters used in the RESRAD computer code have the greatest influence on the calculated dose, i.e., peak of mean dose. The results of this calculation will support the development of the Derived Concentration Guideline Levels (DCGLs) that are being developed for Detroit Edison's (DTE) Enrico Fermi I (EF-1) Fast Breeder Reactor located in Newport, Michigan. This calculation is part of the scope of work defined in the DTE Contract No. 4400001090.

Revision 2 reversed the min and max values for Evapotranspiration Coefficient Ce in Table 5 Irrigation Rate. The correct values are now listed as Min Value 0.75 and Max Value 0.5. Some parameter values in Attachment I were revised. The parameter values that were changed did not impact the parameters that were used in the sensitivity runs. No additional RESRAD 6.4 runs were required.

Revision 3 corrected the Rankings listed in Table 11 - Sensitive Parameters Based on RESRAD Sensitivity Analysis. The sensitive parameters are now ranked by the absolute value of the PRCC value. Also, a typographic error was corrected in the title for a sensitive parameter in Table 11, for H-3 the "Kd of H in the contaminated zone" was changed to "Kd of H in Unsaturated Zone." Minor typographical errors were also corrected.

2. APPLICABILITY This calculation addresses only the sensitivity analysis for input parameters for the resident farmer scenario that will be used to develop the DCGLs for soils at the DTE EF 1 site.

3. REFERENCES 3.1. ANL/EAIS-8, Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling the Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil; U.S. Department of Energy - Argonne National Laboratory, April 1993.

3.2. NUREG/CR-5512, Volume 3, Residual Radioactive Contamination from Decommissioning: Parameter Analysis, Draft Report for Comment, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, October 1999.

3.3. ANL/EAD-4, User's Manual for RESRAD Version 6, U.S. Department of Energy - Argone National Laboratory, July, 2001.

3.4. NUREG/CR-6697, Development of Probabilistic RESRAD 6.0 and RESRAD-BUILD 3.0 Computer Codes, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, December 2000.

3.5. Detroit Edison Co., Enrico Fermi 2 Final Safety Analysis Report, Hydrology, section 2.4.1.2 Rev 9, April 1999.

3.6. Golder Associates, Report on Groundwater Characterization: Enrico Fermi I License Termination, October 2007.

1 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF- t DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 3.7. Health Physics, Regional and Site-specific Absolute Humidity Data for Use in Tritium Dose Calculations, Vol 39, August 1980, p. 319.

3.8. Conestoga Rover & Associates E-mail date July 1, 2008

Subject:

Soil Results-CRA BNI 08-C-006 Rev 000.

3.9. M. Erickson - DTE LTP Manager, E-mail June 18, 2008, 11:08

Subject:

Protected Area Area.

3.10. DTE site meteorological data (10 m) X/Q and D/Q Joint Frequency Distribution Tables 2003 - 2007.

3.11. www.rssWeather. Com/climate/Michigan/Detroit from 1971 -2000.

3.12. NUREG-1727, NMSS Decommissioning Standard Review Plan, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission September 2000.

3.13. Bartlett Engineering Procedure ENG-AP-02, Verification of Software Operability, June 2008.

3.14. NUREG/CR-6692, Probabilistic Modules for the RESRAD 6.0 and RESRAD-BUILD 3.0 Computer Codes, LePoire, D., et al., U.S. Department of Energy- Argonne National Laboratory, November 2000.

3.15. NUREG/CR-6676, Probabilistic Dose Analysis Using Parameter Distributions Developed for RESRAD and RESRAD-Build Codes, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 2000.

3.16. FRG- 11, Limiting Values of Radionuclide Intake and Air Concentration and Dose Conversion Factors for Inhalation, Submersion and Ingestion, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 1968.

4. METHOD OF CALCULATION The operability of the RESRAD Version 6.4 code was verified on each computer used for code executions in accordance with Bartlett Engineering procedure ENG-AP- 02, Verification of Software Operability [ref. 3.13]. The RESRAD User's manual [ref. 3.3] provided guidance for code operation and execution. The RESRAD code has undergone extensive review, benchmarking, verification, and validation. Details on reviews, benchmarking, verification, and validation for the RESRAD code are summarized in Sections 5.1-5.4 of RESRAD User's manual [ref. 3.3].

The RESidual RADioactivity (RESRAD) model and computer code was developed by Scientists and Engineers at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) as a multifunctional tool to assist in developing radiological criteria for unrestricted release and assessing the dose or risk associated with residual radioactive material. The RESRAD computer code is a pathway analysis model designed to evaluate the potential radiological dose associated with residual radioactive material for 2 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev.33 a defined receptor scenario: in this case resident farmer. Eight environmental pathway models are considered in this software application: 1) direct radiation exposure, 2) inhalation of airborne dust,

3) ingestion of plants, 4) ingestion of meat, 5) ingestion of milk, 6) ingestion of groundwater, and 7) ingestion of aquatic foods, and 8) inadvertant ingestion of soil contaminates.

The code requires input for numerous parameters in order to calculate the dose via various exposure pathways to a hypothetical resident farmer living on the radioactive material in the soil. The probabilistic modules in RESRAD permit the user to perform a sensitivity analysis to identify parameters that have the greatest impact on dose. In addition, the probabilistic modules allow the evaluation of dose as a function of parameter distributions. Monte Carlo simulations are executed using the Latin Hypercube Sampling techniques to generate vectors for the input parameters.

The approach taken in this calculation for parameter selection is illustrated in Figure 1 and is summarized as follows:

First SubTask: The initial parameter selection process is based on guidance provided in NUREG/CR-6676 (ref 3.15), NUREG/CR-6697 (ref. 3.4), and NUREG/CR-6692 (ref. 3.14). The set of initial input parameters are listed in the first column of Attachment I under the following categories:

• Soil Concentration

• Distribution Coefficients

• Calculation Time

• Contaminated Zone

• Cover and Contaminated Zone Hydrological Data

• Saturated Zone Hydrological Data

• Unsaturated Zone Hydrological Data

• Occupancy

• Ingestion, Dietary

• Ingestion, Non-dietary

• Storage Times

• Special Radionuclides (C-14)

• Inhalation Dose Conversion Factors

• Ingestion Dose Conversion Factors

• Transfer Factors for Plants, Meat, Milk, Fish and Other Seafood Second Sub Task: Parameters were classified into three types: 1) behavioral (B), 2) metabolic (M),

or 3) physical (P). The classification of initial parameters shown in column 2 of Attachment I are consistent with those shown in NUREG/CR-6697 Attachment A (ref. 3.4). Behavioral parameters depend on the behavior of the receptor and the scenario definition. Metabolic parameters are independent of the defined scenario, and represent the metabolic characteristics of the receptor.

Physical parameters are those parameters that would not change if the receptor changed. Physical parameters are measurements of physical properties such as: the radioactive source, its size, its 3 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 location, as well as meteorological, geologic and hydrologic characteristics of the potentially contaminated site Third Sub Task: Next, the parameters were assigned priority rankings: Priority 1 parameters are high priority; Priority 2 parameters are medium priority; and Priority 3 parameters are low priority.

The priority rankings of initial parameters shown in column 3 of Attachment I are consistent with NUREG/CR-6697 Attachment B (ref. 3.4). Those rankings were adopted in this calculation. The priority for the parameters was based on:

• the relevance of the parameter in dose calculations,

" the variability of the dose because of changes in the parameter value,

• the parameter type, and 0 the availability of parameter-specific data.

Fourth Sub Task: Input parameters are treated as either deterministic or stochastic based on whether a single value is assigned or a probability distribution is assigned. The treatment type used is shown in column 4 of Attachment 1.

After completing these subtasks, the next task was to assign deterministic values or distributions to each of the parameters. The decision making process shown in Figure 1 entitled Parameter Selection Process was used to assign values/distributions and is summarized as follows:

Behavioral and metabolic parameters are assigned values representative of the average member of the critical group, as appropriate. Behavioral and metabolic parameters were treated as deterministic and were assigned values selected from NUREG/CR-5512, volume 3 (ref. 3.2),

NUREG/CR-6697 (ref. 3.4), ANL/EAD-4 User's Manual for RESRAD Version 6 (ref. 3.3) or EPA FRG-1 I (ref. 3.16). Physical parameters for which site-specific data were available were assigned these site specific values or distributions from NUREG/CR-6697 (ref. 3.4). Physical parameters for which no site-specific measurements are available are identified and assigned conservative values as follows: 1) Priority 1 and 2 physical parameters were treated as stochastic and assigned probability distributions from NUREG/CR-6697 (ref. 3.4); 2) Priority 3 physical parameters were treated as deterministic and were assigned values from NUREG/CR-5512, Volume 3 (ref. 3.3),

ANL/EAIS-8 (ref. 3.1), or the RESRAD default library.

The values/distributions that were selected are shown in column 5 of Attachment 1. After completing the initial parameter selection process described above, RESRAD input files were generated for each radionuclide of concern. Input correlations were applied based on guidance in NUREG/CR-6676 (ref. 3.15). The following correlations were used for each code execution:

• Total porosity and bulk density = - 0.99 (contaminated zone, unsaturated and saturated zones);

• Total porosity and effective porosity = 0.96 (unsaturated and saturated zones); and

• Well Pumping rate and irrigation = 0.96.

4 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 The sensitivity analyses were run using 2000 observations and I repetition. The Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) technique was used to sample the probability distributions for each of the stochastic input parameters. The correlated or uncorrelated grouping option and a random seed of 1000 were used to preserve the prescribed correlations.

The RESRAD Ver. 6.4 output reports for the Uncertainty Analysis were reviewed to determine which stochastic parameters were sensitive based on an absolute value of the PRCC exceeding the sensitivity Threshold. Next, the RESRAD Ver. 6.4 Interactive Report was used to identify the 2 5 th or 7 5 th percentile values for the sensitive parameters. The 2 5 th and 7 5 th percentile values were obtained by using the Interactive Report feature in RESRAD and the following instructions:

1. Open the RESRAD file for the desired nuclide that was generated during the sensitivity runs.

2. Select the "View Interactive Output" (blue bar graph) button on the RESRAD icon menu,.

3. Click the "Results" tab in the interactive output window.

4. Click down arrow on "Primary Object" box. Select "Peak Nuclide Dose" from the pull down menu.

5. The desired nuclide will appear in the "Nuclide" box.

6. Click on the "Graphics" tab. A graph of a distribution will appear.

7. Click the down arrow on "Primary Object" box. Select "Input Vector" from the pull down menu. Click the down arrow on "Input Parameter" box. Select the desired parameter by scrolling through the choices in the pull down menu. The distribution will appear.

8. Right click on the cumulative probability graph and select "Edit Chart Data."

9. Scroll down in the column labeled C2 and select 0.25 for 25th percentile values and 0.75 for 75th percentile values.

10. Select the corresponding parameter value in Column C1.

5 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF- 1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Figure 1 - Parameter Selection Process Input parameter lnputparmeter valuevau Assign site-specific value, median value or distribution 4

Assign site-specific value or Assign site-specific value or GE) distributio or 75 Quantile distribution or 25 Quantile Gnu aaee Input parameter Input parameter value value 6 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3

5. ASSUMPTIONS AND INPUT 5.1. Assumptions 5.L.1. Soil: Soil is defined as unconsolidated earth material including rubble and debris that may be present. Sandy loam was assumed to be the types of soil in the vadose and saturated zone.

5.1.2. Radionuclides of Concern. Twenty-five radionuclides were assumed for the Fermi 1 site: Ag-108m, Am241, C-14, Co-60, Cm-242, Cm-243, Cs-134, Cs-137, Eu-152, Eu-154, Eu-155, Fe-55, H-3, Mn-54, Na-22, Nb-94, Ni-59, Ni-63, Pu-238, Pu239, Pu-240, Pu-241, Sb-125, Sr-90, and Tc-99. This list of nuclides of concern was provided by the client for this contract i.e., DTE.

5.1.3. Resident Farmer Scenario:The dose model used to perform the sensitivity analyses is based upon the Resident Farmer Scenario defined in NUREG/CR-5512 Volume 3 (Ref. 3.2). The average member of the critical group is the resident farmer that lives on the plant site, grows all or a portion of his / her diet onsite, and drinks water from a groundwater source onsite. The potential pathways used to estimate human radiation exposure resulting from residual radioactivity in the soil for this scenario includes the following:

• Direct exposure to external radiation from soil containing residual radioactivity;

" Internal dose from inhalation of airborne radionuclides;

" Internal dose from ingestion of:

- Plant foods grown in the soil material containing residual radioactivity;

- Meat and milk from livestock fed with fodder grown in soil containing residual radioactivity and water containing residual radioactivity;

- Drinking water containing residual radioactivity from a well;

- Aquatic food from a pond containing residual radioactivity; and

- Soil containing residual radioactivity.

4. Conceptual Model: EF-1 Protected Area GeoHydrology: The conceptual hydrological model for this resident farmer scenario has three geological stratas: 1) a contaminated zone, 2) an unsaturated zone, and 3) a saturated zone. The residual radioactive material was assumed to be contained in the contaminated zone assumed equivalent in size to the EF-1 Protected Area (see Figure 2). The contaminated zone was assumed to include only top soil (0 to 15 cm deep): It was assumed that no soil cover exist over the contaminated zone.

The soil between the topsoil and the groundwater table, namely the unsaturated zone is initially uncontaminated. On July 1, 2007, grain size distributions were determined for seven soil samples obtained near the Protected Area fence at the EF-I site (Attachment 2). The results indicated that the soil collected in the range 20 to 50 cm, i.e., 8" to 20" is 7 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 classified using the USDA method as sandy loam. The third zone is the saturated zone.

It is assumed that the ground water is initially uncontaminated. The depth of the groundwater table is variable at EF- 1,but the average depth to groundwater as measured in 2005 and 2006 as 6.5 feet (see section 6.1.20).

5.2. Inputs Attachment 1 summarizes the parameter name, type, prioritiy, treatment, values/distribution and the reference source that provides the bases for each input parameter. Some parameter values required calculations. These calculations are documented below in section 6.1 Calculations.

6. CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS 6.1. Calculations 6.1.1. Area of the Contaminated Zone Figure 2, Area of the Contaminated Zone (DTE Drawing) was generated with AutoCAD. The area of the contaminated zone was calculated by the AutoCAD software. The value for the area was documented in an e-mail from Martin C. Erickson, RE: NOL divided.dwg dated June 18, 2008, as 7,855.06 square meters. The area of the contaminated zone is assumed equivalent to the area of the ERI Protected Area (outlined with a bold line in Figure 2).

Figure 2 - EF-1 Area of Contaminated Zone 8 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 6.1.2. Length of Parallel The Length of Parallel is defined in Ref 3.1 as is the maximum horizontal distance measured in the contaminated zone, from its up gradient edge to the down gradient edge, along the direction of the groundwater flow in the underlying aquifer. It was assumed that the area of the contaminated zone could be approximated by a circle with an area of 7,855 m 2. The diameter of the circle is equivalent to the length of parallel and is calculated as follows:

Area of a Circle A = r1 r 2 Where A is the Area in m2 and r is the radius in meters.

r=

r =50 m D = 2 x r =2*50 D = 100 m Therefore, the length of parallel is 100 m.

6.1.3. Contaminated Zone Erosion Rate The slope of the contaminated zone was determined from Figure 9 in the Ref 3.6 entitled Groundwater Elevation Map February 7, 2006 Detroit Edison Fermi 1 (reproduced here as Figure 3). The line extending perpendicular from the contour line between MW- EFT-10S and MW-EF-8S is a run of 313 feet with a decreasing change in elevation from 588.5 feet to 582.5 feet. The slope at the DTE Contaminated Area is 6ft per 313ft, which corresponds to a 1.9% slope. Figure 2 shows the monitoring wells, MW- EFT-OS and MW-EF-8S, that were used for their ground elevation data.

9 of 28

6 z Logend 0

- ~ FENCE C ....____.. PROTECTED AREABOUNDARY U

MAONITORW ELL 0

- - -- -TERMINATION BOUNDARY PIEZOtdETRIC 57710, GROUND WATER ELEVATION PO1U411WE1RIC R ~6.9 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CU COTO4tUR 00 4-i 0

Notes 1.Drowing In adopted from twefolowing Doi htEion Company droulogr:

0 - E721-56 (Porkneer rood and geera building laomut)

CU GE721-43-1 (Scaled ~r~nsiions of bodlm/goo buildings. reactor aid FARB) 6P721-1074-1 (Sodium tunnel) 2~ -fiC721-1640-l1 (F~ARB Interior) 0 - E721-57-4 (Ewk odu gllr CU -

E721-57-6 (Wl ocumVa;-y P721-1117-1 (Health phymicea I butting and drain.)

-6P721-11l181-l dlacharge mie)

(Radioactive viwait

.Th 0 - P72t-1B36-20 (Fbeison products detector buildIng)

Q I

m~.

-3 C > I ~A WQW2J" GROUNDWATER IELEYA11ONl MAP W)z I in...~I"' tA~IFEBRUARY 7 2000 I ~ ~ DETROIT EDISON act I eco f a ~FERMI 11 OErROIT, Ml IFE APVROMAlt EhLL 01IT m. ...S~h R:

I UIF"bWRMI WII

- I-Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Data from NUREG/CR-6697, Attachment C, Section 3.8, 2nd paragraph of the Discussion Section on pages 3-25 & 3-26, was used to select the appropriate Erosion Rate that corresponds to the DTE EF-1 Site slope of 1.9%.

The data in Table I below was generated using NUREG/CR-6697's row-crop Erosion Rate of 6.0 x10-4 for a 2 % slope. As recommended in this section of NUJREG/CR-6697, the remaining Erosion Rates were calculated for 5, 10 and 15 percent slopes using the rate increase factors on p. 3-25.

Table 1 displays the results of the erosion rate calculations.

Table 1 - Erosion Rate Percent Erosion Rate Slope (m/y) 2 6.OE-4 5 1.8E-3 10 4.2E-3 15 9.OE-3 Plotting the above Erosion Rate/Slope data (Figure 4) and then selecting a value which corresponds to the DTE EF-1 site slope of - 1.9 %, yields an Erosion Rate -6 x 10-4 m/y.

11 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Figure 4 - Erosion Rate vs. Slope Erosion Rate for Row Crops 1.OOE+O0 1.OOE-01 E

I,"-

1.OOE-02 0

(0 0

w_

1.OOE-03 1.OOE-04

% Slope 12 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-l DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 6.1.4 Field Capacity: Contaminated Zone, Unsaturated zone and Saturated zone ANL/EAIS-8, Data Collection Handbook to Support Modeling the Impacts of Radioactive Material in Soil, (ref. 3.1) defines the relationship of field capacity (residual water content) to effective porosity. The field capacity is the ratio of the volume of water retained in the soil sample, after all drainage has ceased, to the total volume of the soil sample. Equation 4.4 of ref. 3.1 relates Total and Effective Porosities to Field Capacity as follows:

Effective Porosity = Total Porosity - Field Capacity Rearranging this equation:

Field Capacity = Total Porosity - Effective Porosity The total porosity of 0.410 and the effective porosity value of 0.346 were used for each of the three zones. These values are the mean values of the NUREG/CR-6697 distributions for sandy loam.

Therefore the field capacity is approximately:

Field Capacity = 0.410 - 0.346 = 0.064 6.1.5 Runoff Coefficients Table 10.1 of ref. 3.1 provides the equation below to calculate the Runoff Coefficient, Cr, for an agricultural environment. Table 10.1, Runoff Coefficient Values, also lists values for c1, c2 and c3 for various environments:

C, = 1- c 2 - C3 c, = 0.3 for Flat land with an average slope between 0.3 and 0.9 m/mi.

C2 = 0.4 for open sandy loam as identified at the EF-1 Protected Area (Ref. 3.8).

C3 = 0.1 for cultivated lands which also fits the scenario for the EF-I site.

Cr = 1 -0.3 -0.4- 0.1 =0.2 6.1.6. Watershed Area for Nearby Streams and Ponds The Detroit Edison EF 2 Final Safety Analysis Report (ref. 3.5) states in section 2.4.1.2.2 that "The Fermi site is in the Swan Creek drainage basin. The watershed is an area of 109 square miles, elongated in shape from northwest to southeast. The basin is about 25 miles long with a maximum topographic relief of about 130 ft". Converting the area of 109 square miles to square meters.

8 2 Area = 109lmi 2 x 2.59 km /mi x 10 m /km2 = 2.82 x 10 m 2 2 6 2 13 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 6.1.7. Fraction of Time Spent Indoors NUREG/CR-5512 (ref. 3.2) Table 6.87 provides default values for the residential parameters the exposure period indoors is given as 240 days. Multiplying by 365.25 days/year gives a fraction of time spent indoors of 0.6571.

6.1.8. Fraction of Time Spent Outdoor NUREG/CR-5512 (Ref. 3.2) Table 6.87 provides default values for the residential parameters the Exposure period outdoors is given as 40.2 days and the Exposure period gardening is 2.92 which yields a sum of 42.92 days outdoor. Multiplying by 365.25 days/year gives a fraction of time spent of 0.1175.

6.1.9. Inhalation Rate:

NUREG/CR-6697 (ref 3.4) in Appendix C section 5.1 states "the ICRP's best estimate, which is based on 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> of light activity and 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of rest as 23 m 3/d for adult males. This results an annual inhalation rate of approximately 8400 m 3/y.

6.1.10 Soil Ingestion Rate NUREG/CR-5512 (Ref. 3.2) Table 6.87 provides default values for the residential parameters the soil ingestion rate is given as 0.05 g/d. Multipling by 365.25 days/year gives a soil ingestion rate of 18.26g/yr.

6.1.11 Drinking Water Intake NUREG/CR-5512 (ref. 3.2) Table 6.87 provides default values for the residential parameters the drinking water ingestion rate is given as 1.31 liters/d. Multipling by 365.25 days/year gives a drinking water ingestion rate of 478.5 liters/yr.

6.1.12 Miscellaneous Consumption Rates NUREG/CR-5512 (ref. 3.2) Table 6.87 provides default values for the residential parameters for other ingestion rates used by this resident farmer scenario. These parameters and the ingestion rates listed in Table 2 below.

Table 2 Miscellaneous Consumption Rates Parameter Value (NUREG//CR-5512 Vol. 3, Table 6.87)

Fruit, veg & grain consumption 112 kg/yr Leafy vegetable consumption 21.4 kg/yr Milk consumption 233 L/yr Meat & poultry consumption 65.1 kg/d Fish consumption 20.6 kg/yr 14 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 6.1.13 C-14 Evasion Flux Rate for Soil The RESRAD Users Manual ref. 3.3 provides on p L-16 the value for the C-14 evasion loss rate constant of 22 I/per yr. RESRAD requires that this parameter be expressed in units of 1/sec.

Converting 22 1/yr to inverse seconds by dividing by 31,557,600 sec/y gives approximately, 7 x 10-7 1/sec.

6.1.14 C-12 Evasion Flux Rate for Soil The RESRAD Users Manual ref. 3.3 provides on p L-16 the value for the C-12 evasion rate factor of 0.0032 1/y. RERAD requires that this parameter be expressed in units of 1/sec. Converting 0.0032 per year to inverse seconds by dividing by 31,557,600 sec/y gives 1.01 x 10-° 1/sec.

6.1.15 Humidity in Air The reference, "Regional and Site-Specific Absolute Humidity Data for Use in Tritium Dose Calculations", Health Physics, Vol.39, pp. 318-320, 1980 (ref. 3.7) provides a table of absolute humidity for selected locations in the U.S. These values were calculated from data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1977, Climatological Data, Annual Summary, volume 28, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. The value of 4.6 g/m 3 (Detroit, Michigan) was chosen from Table I of this technical paper for the RESRAD humidity parameter.

6.1.16 Average Annual Wind Speed The wind speed and direction, joint frequency distributions from Ref 3.10 obtained from Detroit Edison were used to calculate the average annual wind speed. The mid-range value and the associated frequency for each of the wind speed ranges over the five year period from 2003 to 2007 are shown in Table 3. An average wind speed was calculated by summing the product of the mid-range value for each range and the fraction of time the wind was recorded to be within the range. A value of 2.91 m/s was assigned to this parameter.

15 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 3 - DTE EF-1 Average Wind Speed Avg 2003 Wind Measured at 10 Annual ws

m. (m/s)

Avg. Wind Speed (m/s) 0.168 0.726 1.565 2.459 3.353 4.47 5.812 7.376 9.388 2.748 2003 Avg WS Frequency 0.65 12.8 22.87 23.83 18.84 13.85 4.91 1.83 0.42 100 2004 Wind Measured at 10 m.

Avg. Wind Speed (m/s) 0.168 0.726 1.565 2.459 3.353 4.47 5.812 7.376 9.388 3.038 2004 Avg WS Frequency 1.42 8.7 18.5 22.1 20.91 19.11 6.74 2.17 0.35 100 2005 Wind Measured at 10 m.

Avg. Wind Speed (m/s) 0.168 0.726 1.565 2.459 3.353 4.47 5.812 7.376 9.388 2.939 2005 Avg WS Frequency 0 6.83 21.92 26.26 22.09 15.44 5.45 1.79 0.22 100 2006 Wind Measured at 10 m.

Avg. Wind Speed (m/s) 0.168 0.726 1.565 2.459 3.353 4.47 5.812 7.376 9.388 2.928 2006 Avg WS Frequency 0 8.07 21.54 24.68 21.68 16.7 5.77 1.46 0.09 99.99 2007 Wind Measured at 10 m.

Avg. Wind Speed (m/s) 0.168 0.726 1.565 2.459 3.353 4.47 5.812 7.376 9.388 2.908 2007 Avg WS Frequency 0.39 10.28 20.49 23.9 20.67 16.56 5.44 1.94 0.34 100 2.91 5 yr Avg WS 16 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 6.1.17 Precipitation Table 4 provides monthly mean precipitation totals for Detroit, Michigan. These rain guage measurements were taken over the period 1971 to 2000 (ref. 3.11). This information was based on precipitation data from the the website called rssWeather.com.

Table 4 - Precipitation Rate Detroit,MI Monthly Mean Precipitation Totals (inches of water)

Period:1971-2000 Month Precipitation (inches)

Jan 1.91 Feb 1.88 Mar 2.52 April 3.05 May 3.05 Jun 3.55 Jul 3.16 Aug 3.1 Sept 3.27 Oct 2.23 Nov 2.66 Dec 2.51 Year Total 32.89 Converting to meters/year: 32.89 inches/year divided by 39.37inches/meter = 0.84 meters/year. The precipitation rate was assigned a value of 0.84 meters/year 6.1.18 Irrigation Rate (Evapotranspiration and Runoff Coefficients)

NUREG/CR-6697 Attachment C, Section 4.3 discusses the Irrigation Rate in terms of the Evapotranspiration Coefficient. Equation 4.3-1 expresses the Evapotranspiration Coefficient as:

Ce= ETr (1 -Cr)(Pr) + IRr Where: ETr = the Evapotransporation Rate (m/y)

Pr = the Precipitation Rate (m/y)

IRr = the Irrigation Rate (m/y) and Cr = the Runoff Coefficient.

17 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Rearranging this equation, the Irrigation Rate can be expressed as:

IRr = ETr - (1-Cr)(Pr)

Ce The input values for the variables in the equation above follow:

1. ANL/EIS-8 (Ref 3.1) Figure 12.1 provides a map of the United States with the regional Average Annaul Potential Evapotranspiration Rate in inches per year. The midpoint of the average anuual evapotranspiration rate for the region around Newport, Michigan is 30 inches/year. Converting to m/yr by multipling by2.54 cm/in and dividing by 100 cm/m yields 0.762 m/yr for the ETr, evapotranspiration rate.

2. The Precipitation Rate, Pr, has been assigned a site-specific value of 0.84 m/yr as discussed in item 6.1.17 above.

3. Table 10.1 of Ref. 3.1 provides the equation below to calculate the Runoff Coefficient, Cr, for an agricultural environment. Table 10.1, Runoff Coefficient Values, also lists values for C1 , C2 and C3 for various environments:

C = 1- c - C3 c, = 0.3 for Flat land with an average slope between 0.3 and 0.9 m/mi.

C2 = 0.4 for open sandy loam as identified at the EF-1 Protected Area (Ref. 3.8).

c3 = 0.1 for cultivated lands which also fits the scenario for the EF- 1 site.

Cr = 1 -0.3 -0.4- 0.1 = 0.2

4. NUREG/CR-6697, Attachment C, Section 4.3-Evapotranspiration Coefficient, Ce, defines this parameter as the ratio of the total volume of water (a combination of evaporation from soil surfaces and transpiration from vegetation) transferred to the atmosphere to the total volume of water available within the root zone of the soil. The NUREG/CR recommends the use of a uniform distribution with minimum and maximum values of 0.5 and 0.75, respectively and with 0.625 as median Making the appropriate substitution of minimum and maximum values of Ce into the rearranged equation above results in the following range for the Irrigation Rate, IRr, shown in Table 5 below.

18 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 5 - Irrigation Rate Variable min value max value Evapotranspiration Rate (m/y) ETr 0.762 0.762 Precipitation Rate (m/y) Pr 0.84 0.84 Runoff Coefficient Cr 0.2 0.2 Evapotranspiration Coefficient Ce 0.75 0.5 Irrigation Rate (m/y) IRr 0.344 0.852 The calculated minimum and maximum IRr values are 0.344 and 0.852 m/y, respectively.

A uniform distribution was assigned for this parameter and s previously mentioned a positive input correlation to the Well Pumping Rate was assigned based on the guidance in NUREG/CR-6697 (ref. 3.4) and NUREG/CR-6676 (ref. 3.15).

6.1.19 Well Pumping Rate NUREG/CR-6697 (ref. 3.4), Attachment C, Section 3.10 states that "A site-specific input distribution for well pumping rate can be determined as the sum of individual water needs."

A uniform distribution was assigned for this parameter with a positive correlation to the Irrigation Rate. The household use component is calculated from the domestic use in Table 7:

Table 7 - Resident Farmer Water Use Water Use Component (Family of four) Median Minimum Maximum Household* (m 3/y) 374 374 374 Livestock (m3/y) 76.7 76.7 76.7 Contaminatedfractionfor Irrigation 1 1 1 f, = I (assumes irrigationof the entire area))

Irrigationrate Ir (m/y) 0.598 0.344 0.852 Irrigation water (m 3/y) fp x 1,x 2000 1196 688 1704 Drinking Water (m3/y)** 1.91 1.91 1.91 Total for Family of Four (m3/y) 1649 1141 2157 19 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-l DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3

• EPA recommends (ref 3.18) a Household Water Use for a family of four persons of 272 gallons per day (272 gal/day

• 3.79E-3 gal/mr3

• 365.25day/y = 376 m 3/y). EPA also recommends for Drinking Water the use of 478 L/y per individual (478 L/y-Ind

• 4 Ind

• lm 3/1000L = 1.91 m 3/y). The Household Water Use is equivalent to 376 m 3/y minus the Drinking Water component of 1.91 m 3/y which equals 374 m 3/y.

The well pumping intake rates which use a uniform distribution will be assigned the following values for the statistical parameters: median = 1649 m 3/y, minimum = 1141 m 3/y and maximum = 2157 m 3/y.

6.1.20. Unsaturated Zone 1, Thickness The Golder Associates Report on Groundwater Characterization for Enrico Fermi I License Termination (ref. 3.6) provided Groundwater Elevation measurements from 11/17/03 to 12/11/06. The groundwater elevation data from 9/22/05 to 12/11/06 were used to establish average depth to groundwater since this period had full data sets for the shallow monitoring wells. The groundwater elevations recorded in Table I and the associated average elevation are listed in Table 7.

Table 7 - Groundwater Elevations in Shallow Monitoring Wells at EF-1 EF Shallow 9/22/05 2/7/06 6/6/06 12/11/06 Average MW EFT-IS 576.93 576.73 577.64 578.5 577.45 EFT-2S 578.46 575.57 578.34 576.75 577.28 EFT-4S 579.31 582.76 581.07 580.6 580.94 EFT-5S 580.19 581.69 571.44a 580.79 578.53 EFT-6S 577.85 579.23 578.88 578.16 578.53 EFT-7S 579.4 578.11 578.02 578.74 578.57 EFT-8S 575.12 575.96 575.36 575.48 EFT-8S/D 575.83 574.25 573.92 573.25 574.31 EFT-9S 579.07 578.26 578.82 578.02 578.54 EFT-10S 570.49 575.29 574.78 574.06 573.66 Avg GW El. 577.3 aThis value has been corrected subsequent to these calculations; however, there is no impact on the DCGL values (refer to NRC-09-0080, Information Regarding the Fermi I License Termination Plan, sent 12/15/09).

The Golder Associates Report also had in Appendix B Borehole and Monitoring Well Construction Logs for the shallow monitoring wells above. Table 8 lists the ground elevations that were measured when these wells were constructed.

20 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 8 - Ground Elevation for Shallow Monitoring Wells at EF-1 EF Shallow MW Ground Elev (feet)

EFT-IS 582.20 EFT-2S 583.40 EFT-4S 584.60 EFT-5S 584.20 EFT-6S/D 583.00 EFT-7S 582.30 EFT-8S 583.00 EFT-9S 583.10 EFT-10S 588.50 Avg. Ground Elevation 583.8 Average ground surface elevation = 583.8 feet Average groundwater elevation = - 577.3 feet Average Depth to groundwater = 6.5 feet Thickness of contaminated zone = - 0.5 feet Unsat. Zone 1 Thickness 6.0 feet Converting 6.0 feet to meters by multiplying by 0.3048 equal 1.8 m for the Unsat. Zone Thickness.

6.2 Results The probabilistic module of the RESRAD code was used to perform the analyses to identify stochastic parameters having the greatest influence on the resultant dose and the associated DCGLs.

The code was run individually for the nuclides listed in Section 5 at a concentration of 1 pCi per gram. The basic radiation dose limit was set to 25 mrem/yr.

The RESRAD Probabilistic Output Report provides regression and correlation coefficients for the average doses at the user defined evaluation times (Attachment 3). Table 9 identifies for each radionuclide the sensitive parameters in order of rank and the PRCC values. The Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient (PRCC) has been used to identify sensitive parameters. NUREG/CR-6676 (ref. 3-15), provides a sensitivity threshold of 0.25. The guidance further recommends the use of the PRCC if strong correlations exist between input parameters exists. The threshold for sensitivity used in this calculation was a PRCC value with an absolute value greater than 0.25.

21 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 9 Sensitivity Analysis Results Based on the Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient Radionuclide Sensitive Parameter Units PRCC (file name)

H-3 Depth of roots m -0.93 (MCSUMMARH3.REP) Saturated Zone Hydraulic m/y 0.48 Conductivity Kd of H in unsaturated zone cm 3/g -0.28 C-14 Depth of roots m -0.97 (MCSUMMARCI4.REP) Thickness of evasion layer of C- m 0.82 14 Kd of C in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.44 Na-22 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.89 (MCSUMMARNA22.REP) Kd of Na in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.59 Mn-54 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.96 (MCSUMMARMN54.REP) Kd of Mn in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.50 Fe-55 Meat transfer factor for Fe pCi/kg per pCi/d 0.88 (MCSUMMARFE55.REP) Kd of Fe in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.35 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.90 Ni-59 Milk transfer factor for Ni pCi/1 per pCi/d 0.89 (MCSUMMARN159.REP) Plant transfer factor for Ni pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.85 Depth of roots m -0.77 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.58 Ni-63 Milk transfer factor for Ni pCi/l per pCi/d 0.89 (MCSUMMARNI63.REP) Plant transfer factor for Ni pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.85 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.58 Depth of roots m -0.77 Co-60 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.95 (MCSUMMARCO60.REP) Kd of Co in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.48 Sr-90 Plant transfer factor for Sr pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.94 (MCSUMMARsoilSA.Sr Depth of roots m -0.85 Kd of Sr-90 in contaminated zone cm 3 /g 0.45 Milk Transfer Factor for Sr m 0.27 Nb-94 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.93 (MCSUMMARNB94.REP) Kd of Nb in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.52 Tc-99 Kd of Tc in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.92 22 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 9 Sensitivity Analysis Results Based on the Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient Radionuclide Sensitive Parameter Units PRCC (file name)

(MCSUMMARTC99.REP) Plant transfer factor for Tc pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.90 Depth of roots m -0.81 Evapotranspiration Coefficient Unit-less 0.26 Ag-108m External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.98 (MCSUMMARAGO08M.RE Kd of Ag in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.47 P)

Sb-125 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.93 (MCSUMMARSBI25.REP) Kd of Sb in contaminated zone cm3 /g 0.52 Cs-134 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.95 (MCSUMMARCSI34.REP) Plant transfer factor for Cs pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.50 Depth of roots m -0.39 Kd of Cs in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.27 Cs-137 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.92 (MCSUMMARCSI37.REP) Plant transfer factor for Cs pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.59 Depth of roots m -0.47 Milk transfer factor for Cs pCi/l per pCi/d 0.30 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.28 Meat transfer factor for Cs pCi/kg per pCi/d 0.26 Eu-152 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.95 (MCSUMMAREUI52.REP) Kd of Eu in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.44 Eu-154 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.95 (MCSUMMAREUI54.REP) Kd of Eu in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.44 Eu-155 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.95 (MCSUMMAREU155.REP) Kd of Eu in contaminated zone cm 3/g 0.44 Pu-238 Plant transfer factor for Pu pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.90 (MCSUMMARPU238.REP) Depth of roots m -0.83 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.76 Pu-239 Plant transfer factor for Pu pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.89 (MCSUMMARPU239.REP) Depth of roots m -0.83 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.76 Pu-240 Plant transfer factor for Pu pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.89 (MCSUMMARPU240.REP) Depth of roots m -0.83 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.76 Pu-241 Plant transfer factor for Am pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.64 (MCSUMMARPU241.REP) Depth of roots m -0.67 23 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 9 Sensitivity Analysis Results Based on the Partial Rank Correlation Coefficient Radionuclide Sensitive Parameter Units PRCC (file name)

Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.52 Kd of Am in contaminated zone pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.47 Plant transfer factor for Pu pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.39 Kd of Pu in contaminated zone 3 cm /g 0.35 Am-241 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.26 (MCSUMMARAM241RevI Depth of roots m -0.79 Depth of Soil Mixing Layer m -0.68 Plant Transfer Factor for Am Unit-less 0.88 Cm-242 Plant transfer factor for Cm pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.88 (MCSUMMARCM242.REP Depth of roots m -0.85 Depth of soil in mixing layer m -0.74 Plant transfer factor for Pu Unit-less 0.30 Cm-243 External gamma shielding factor Unit-less 0.89 (MCSUMMARCM243.REP Plant transfer factor for Cm pCi/g plant per pCi/g soil 0.75 Depth of roots m -0.66 Depth of soil in mixing layer m -0.37 The PRCC values which are greater than zero (positive value) or less than zero (negative value) identifies whether a sensitive parameter is positively or negatively correlated to dose, respectively.

The, 2 5 th percentile values were identified for sensitive parameters that had a negative PRCC value.

The 75th th percentile t values were identified for sensitive parameters that had a positive PRCC value.

The 25 and 7 5 th percentile values that are recommended for use in the DCGL calculations are listed in Table 10. These 25th and 7 5 th percentile values are proposed as reasonably conservative input for the DCGL calculation for the EF 1 site.

24 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 10 - 25th and 75th Percentile Values for Sensitive Parameters Percentile Value Parameter a Affected Nuclides 2 5 th 7 5 th Depth of roots H-3,C-14, Ni-59, Ni-63, Sr-90, Tc-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, Pu-241, Am-241, Cm-242, Cm-243 1.225 Fe-55, Ni-59, Ni-63, Cs-137, Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, Am-241 Pu-Depth of soil in mixing layer 241, Cm-242, Cm-243 0.149928 Evapotranspiration Coefficient Tc-99 0.687414 Na-22, Mn-54, Co-60, Nb-94, Ag-External gamma shielding 108m, Sb-125, Cs-134, Cs-137, Eu-152, Eu- 154, Eu-155, Cm-243, factor AAm-241 0.3982*

Hydraulic Conductivity for H-3 Saturated Zone 370.578 Thickness of Evasion Layer C-14 0.426683 Distribution Coefficients Kd of Ag in contaminated zone Ag-108 888.945 Kd of Am in contaminated zone Pu-241 12081.1 Kd of C in contaminated zone C-14 95.7876 Kd of Co in contaminated zone Co-60 1289.53 Kd of Cs in contaminated zone Cs- 134 2131.38 Kd of Eu in contaminated zone Eu-152, Eu-154, Eu-155 7211 Kd of Fe in contaminated zone Fe-55 1252.41 Kd of H in unsaturated zone H-3 0.0429964 Kd of Mn in contaminated zone Mn-54 733.382 Kd of Na in contaminated zone Na-22 1342.29 Kd of Nb in contaminated zone Nb-94 3301.51 Kd of Pu in contaminated zone Pu-241 3400.37 Kd of Sb in contaminated zone Sb-125 3322.31 Kd of Sr in contaminated zone Sr-90 130.78 Kd of Tc in contaminated zone Tc-99 4.27099 Transfer Factors Meat transfer factor for Cs Cs- 137 0.0651616 Meat transfer factor for Fe Fe-55 0.0391293 Milk transfer factor for Cs Cs- 137 0.0139265 Milk transfer factor for Ni Ni-59, Ni-63 0.0320793 Milk transfer factor for Sr Sr-90 0.00281171 Plant transfer factor for Am Am-241, Pu-241 _0.00182659 25 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Plant transfer factor for Cm Cm-242, Cm-243 0.00182659 Plant transfer factor for Cs Cs-134, Cs-137 0.078229 Plant transfer factor for Ni Ni-59, Ni-63 0.091145 Pu-238, Pu-239, Pu-240, Plant transfer factor for Pu Pu-241, Cm-242 0.00182691 Plant transfer factor for Sr Sr-90 0.589716 Plant transfer factor for Tc Tc-99 9.15863

• The 7 5 th percentile value for the External Gamma Shielding Factor was rounded to the fourth significant digit due to slight variations in the value at the fifth significant digit.

Note: The 2 5 ih and 7 5 th percentile values are the same for a given number of observations with the exception of the External Gamma Shielding Factor (see footnote above). Therefore, because 2000 observations were used in the sensitivity analysis for each radionuclide, the 25th and 7 5 th percentile values will be the same for each radionuclide.

7 CONCLUSION Parameters used in the Resident Farmer scenario were identified as sensitive if the absolute value of the PRCC was greater than or equal to 0.25. These sensitive parameter that were idetified are listed for each nuclide in order of PRCC rank in Table 11. The 25t' and 7 5 th percentile values for these senstive values are listed in Table 10 above. These input values are recommended for use as inputs in the RESRAD runs to calculate DCGLs for soil at EF1.

26 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 11 Sensitive Parameters Based on RESRAD Sensitivity Analysis Nuclide Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 4 Rank 5 parameter parameter parameter parameter parameter H-3 Depth of roots Saturated Zone Kd of H in Hydraulic unsaturated Conductivity zone C-14 Depth of roots Thickness of Kd of C in evasion layer of contaminated C-14 zone Na-22 External Kd of Na in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Mn-54 External Kd of Mn in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Fe-55 Depth of Soil Meat transfer Kd of Fe in Mixing Layer factor for Fe contaminated zone Ni-59 Milk transfer Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of Soil factor for Ni factor for Ni Mixing Layer Co-60 External Kd of Co in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Ni-63 Milk transfer Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of Soil factor for Ni factor for Ni Mixing Layer Sr-90 Plant transfer Depth of roots Kd of Sr in Milk Transfer factor for Sr contaminated Factor for Sr zone Nb-94 External Kd of Nb in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Tc-99 Kd of Tc in Plant transfer Depth of roots Evapotranspiration contaminated factor for Tc Coefficient zone Ag-108m External Kd of Ag in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Sb-125 External Kd of Sb in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Cs-134 External Plant transfer Depth of roots Kd of Cs in gamma factor for Cs contaminated zone shielding factor 27 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Table 11 Sensitive Parameters Based on RESRAD Sensitivity Analysis Nuclide Rank 1 Rank 2 Rank 3 Rank 4 Rank 5 parameter parameter parameter parameter parameter Cs-137 External Plant transfer Depth of roots Milk transfer Dept of soil gamma factor for Cs factor for Cs mixing layer shielding factor Rank 6 Meat transfer factor for Cs Eu-152 External Kd of Eu in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Eu-154 External Kd of Eu in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Eu-155 External Kd of Eu in gamma contaminated shielding factor zone Pu-238 Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of Soil factor for Pu Mixing Layer Pu-239 Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of Soil factor for Pu Mixing Layer Pu-240 Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of Soil factor for Pu Mixing Layer Pu-241 Depth of roots Plant transfer Depth of Soil Kd of Am in Plant transfer factor for Am Mixing Layer contaminated zone factor for Pu Rank 6 Kd of Pu in contaminated zone Am-241 Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of soil in External gamma factor for Am mixing layer shielding factor Cm-242 Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of soil in Plant transfer factor for Cm mixing layer factor for Pu Cm-243 External Plant transfer Depth of roots Depth of Soil gamma factor for Cm Mixing Layer shielding factor 28 of 28

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-l DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 RESRAD 6.4- Input Parameters to Sensitivity Analysis for Soil Scenario: Resident Farmer

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Typea Priority b Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2Median or I I ý II Mean Soil Concentrations Basic radiation dose limit (mrrem/y) 3 D 25 10 CFR 20.1402 NR NR NR NR Initial principal radionuclide concentration in soil (pCi/g)II j 2 D I Unit Value NR NR II NR NR 3

Distribution Coefficients for Contaminated, Unsaturated, and Saturated Zones (cm /g)

Ac-227 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.72 3.22 0.001 0.999 825 3 30 Ag-108m* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 5.38 2.1 0.001 0.999 216 3 30 Arn-241* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 7.28 3.15 0.001 0.999 1445 Arn-243 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 7.28 3.15 0.001 0.999 1445 3 30 C-14* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 2.4 3.22 0.001 0.999 11 3 30 Cm-242" P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 8.82 1.82 0.001 0.999 6761 Cm-243* P 1 S Truncated lognorrnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 8.82 1.82 0.001 0.999 6761 Co-60' P 1 S Truncated lognorrnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 5.46 2.53 0.001 0.999 235 3 30 Cs-134* P 1 S Truncated lognorrnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 6.1 2.33 0.001 0.999 446 Cs-137* P 1 S Truncated lognormnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.1 2.33 0.001 0.999 446 3 30 Eu-152* P 1 S Truncated lognorrnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 6.72 3.22 0.001 0.999 825 3 30 Eu-154" P 1 S Truncated lognormnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 6.72 3.22 0.001 0.999 825 Eu-155* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.72 3.22 0.001 0.999 825 Fe-55* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 5.34 2.67 0.001 0.999 209 Gd-152 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.72 3.22 0.001 0.999 825 H-3* P 1 S Truncated lognorrnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 -2.81 0.5 0.001 0.999 0.06 Mn-54* P 1 S Truncated lognormnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C,p. 3-30 5.06 2.29 0.001 0.999 158 Na-22* P 1 S Truncated lognorrnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 5.04 3.22 0.001 0.999 154 Nb-94* P 1 S Truncated lognorrnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 5.94 3.22 0.001 0.999 380 Ni-59* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.05 1.46 0.001 0.999 424 3 30 Ni-63* P 1 S Truncated lognomial-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - 6.05 1.46 0.001 0.999 424 Np-237 P 1 S Truncated Iognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 2.84 2.25 0.001 0.999 17 3 30 Pa-231 P I S Truncated lognormnal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - 5.94 3.22 0.001 0.999 380 Page 1 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Pb-210 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 7.78 2.76 0.001 0.999 2392 Po-210 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3 - 3 0 5.20 1.68 0.001 0.999 181 Pu-238* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.86 1.89 0.001 0.999 953 Pu-239* P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.86 1.89 0.001 0.999 953 Pu-240* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.86 1.89 0.001 0.999 953 Pu-241* P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 6.86 1.89 0.001 0.999 953 Ra-226 P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3 - 3 0 8.17 1.7 0.001 0.999 3533 Ra-228 P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 3-30 8.17 1.7 0.001 0.999 3533 Sb-125* P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3 - 3 0 5.94 3.22 0.001 0.999 380 Sr-90* P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 3.45 2.12 0.001 0.999 32 Tc-99' P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-30 -0.67 3.16 0.001 0.999 0.51 Te-125m P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Ant. C, p. 3 - 3 0 3.64 3.22 0.001 0.999 38.1 Th-228 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 3-31 8.68 3.62 0.001 0.999 5884 Th-229 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 3-31 8.68 3.62 0.001 0.999 5884 Th-230 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-31 8.68 3.62 0.001 0.999 5884 Th-232 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 3-31 8.68 3.62 0.001 0.999 5884 U-233 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 3 - 3 1 4.84 3.13 0.001 0.999 126 U-234 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3 - 3 1 4.84 3.13 0.001 0.999 126 U-235 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 3-31 4.84 3.13 0.001 0.999 126 U-236 P I S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 3 - 3 1 4.84 3.13 0.001 0.999 126 Initial concentration of radionuclides P 3 D 0 Ground water uncontaminated NR NR NR NR present in groundwater (pCi/I) I Calculation Times Time since placement of material (y) P 3 D 0 I NRINRI NR NR 0, 1,3, 10, 30, 100, 300, RESRAD Defaults 1000 Time for calculations (y) P 3 D NR NR NR NR Page 2 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmente Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 24 Median or Mean Contaminated Zone Site-specific Value - EF- I Protected Area, Area of contaminated zone (mi2 ) P 2 D 7,855.06 M. Erickson , E-mail June 18, 2008. See NR NR NR NR calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

T'hickness of contaminated zone (m) P 2 D 0.1524 Site-specific Value. Assumed topsoil NR NR NR NR contamination only, i.e. top 6 inches.

Site-specific Value - Diameter of circle with an area = EF-I Protected Area. M.

Length parallel to aquifer flow (m) P 2 D 100 withson ea= I 18, See M. NR NR NR NR Erickson, E-mail June 18, 2008. See calc.

ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Cover and Contaminated Zone Hydrological Data Cover depth (m) P 2 D 0 Site-specific Value - no cover assumed NR NR NR NR Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Density of contaminated zone Bounded Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.1-1 for site soil 5635 0.2385 0.827 2.3 (g/cm 3) type - sandy loam p. 3-3. See CRA e-mail -

July 1, 2008.

Site-specific Value - Calculated value Contaminated zone erosion rate based on site-specific slope of dx/dz and (m/y) P 2 D 6.OOE-04 interpolated value in Figure 3.8-11 from NR NR NR NR NUREG/CR-6697 pp. 3-25 to 3-28. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6. 1.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.2-I for site soil Contaminated zone total porosity P 2 5 Bounded Normal - Table3-1 CRA for soil 0ype 0.0899 0.41 0.1322 0.6878 type - sandy loam p. 3-6. See CRA e-mail -

July 1, 2008.

Site-specific Value - Calculated value using Contaminated zone field capacity P 3 D 0.064 Equation 4.4 for the Field Capacity. See NR NR NR NR calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Contaminated zone hydraulic P 2 5 Bounded Log Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.4-1 for site soil 5.022 1.33 2.49 9,250 conductivity (mzy) type - sandy loam p. 3-13. See CRA e-mail

-July 1,2008.

Page 3 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Typea Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Contaminated zone b parameter P 2 S Bounded Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.5-1 for site soil 0632 0.282 0.786 4.50 type - sandy loam p. 3-16. See CRA e-mail

-July 1, 2008.

(g/m 3 ) Site-specific Value, Health Physics, Vol. 39 Humidity in air (/3)P 3 D ________ 4.6

_________________ p.39 e calc.

. 319. See a ENG-002 N-0 eto . 6.1.1 Section NR

__ NR NR NR Evapotranspiration coefficient P 2 S Uniform Site-specific Value - NUREG/CR-6697 Alt. 0.5 0.75 NR NR 0.625 C, p. 4-9 (Median = midpoint).

Site-specific Value - DTE site Average annual wind speed (m/s) P 2 D 2.91 meteorological data (10 m) Tables: 2003 - NR NR NR NR 2007). See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Site-specific value; www.rssWeather.

Precipitation (m/y) P 2 D 0.84 Con/climate/Michigan/Detroit from 1971 - NR NR NR NR 2000. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Site-specific Value - NUREG/CR-6697, Alt Irrigation (m/y) B 3 S Uniform C methodology. See calc. ENG-002 Section 0.344 0.852 NR NR 0.598 6.1.

Irrigation mode B 3 D Overhead Site-specific Value - overhead irrigation is NR NR NR NR standard practice in Midwest.

Site-specific Value - Calculated value using Runoff coefficient P 2 D 0.2 Equation 10.1 for Runoff Coefficient. See NR NR NR NR calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Watershed area for nearby stream or Site-specific Value- drainage area, EF2 oond (M 2) P 3 D 2.82E8 FSAR. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1. NR NR NR NR Accuracy for water/soil computations 3 D 1.0E-03 RESRAD Defalt I- NR NR NR NR Saturated Zone Hydrological Data Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Density of saturated zone (g/cm 3) P I 5 Bounded Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.1-1 for site soil 1.5635 0.2385 0.827 2.3 type - sandy loam p. 3-3. See CRA e-mail -

July 1, 2008.

Page 4 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Typea Priorityb Treatmentc Value[Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Site-specific Value - Used distribution from NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.2-I for site soil Saturated zone total porosity P I S Bounded Normal typeG- sandy loable 3-1 CRA for soil 0.41 0.0899 0.1322 0.6878 type - sandy loam p. 3-6. See CRA e-mail -

July 1, 2008.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.3-I for site soil Saturated zone effective porosity P I S Bounded Normal typeG- sandy loable 3-1 CRfor t soil 0.346 0.0915 0.0629 0.628 type - sandy loam p. 3-9. See CRA e-mail -

July 1,2008.

Site-specific Value - calculated using Saturated zone field capacity P 3 D 0.064 Equation 4.4 from Field Capacity. See calc. NR NR NR NR ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Saturated zone hydraulic P I 5 Bounded Log Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.4-1 for site soil 5.022 1.33 2.49 9,250 conductivity (m/y) type - sandy loam p. 3-13. See CRA e-mail

-July 1,2008.

Site-specific Value - Golder Associates Saturated zone hydraulic gradient P 2 D 0.002 Report on Groundwater Charecterization p. NR NR NR NR 17.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Saturated zone b parameter P 2 5 Bounded Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.5-1 for site soil 0632 0.282 0.786 4.50 type - sandy loam p. 3-16. See CRA e-mail

-July 1,2008.

Water table drop rate (m/y) P 3 15 .OOE-03 RESRAD Default ANL/EAIS-8, Table 1.3 NR NR NR NR

p. 11.

Well pump intake depth (m below P 2 S Triangular Site-specific Value - Used distribution 6 30 10 10 water table) from NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C. 6_30_10__ 0 Model: Nondispersion (ND) or P 3 D ND ND model recommended 2 for contaminant NR NR NR Mass-Balance (MB) _ 3 D ND areas > 1,000 m NR NR I NR N Site-specific Value - Min, Max, and Median value based on NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C section 3.10 method using site Well pumping rate (m 3/y) P 2 S Uniform irrigation method and area. 1141 2157 1649 Page 5 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev.3 I Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatment' Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd

] 2 3 4 Median or

_ _ _ Mean Unsaturated Zone Hydrological Data Site-specific Value - Golder Associates Number of unsaturated zone strata P 3 D Report on Groundwater Charecterization NR NR NR NR (Table I and Appendix B)

Site-specific Value - Golder Associates Unsat. zone 1, thickness (m) P I D 1.8 Report on Groundwater Charecterization NR NR NR NR (Table I and Appendix B) See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Unsat. zone 1, soil density (g/cm 3) P 2 5 Bounded Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.1-1 for site soil 1.5635 0.2385 0.827 2.3 type - sandy loam p. 3-3. See CRA e-mail -

July I,.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Unsat. zone 1, total porosity P 2 5 Bounded Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.2-1 for site soil 0.41 0.0899 0.1322 0.6878 type - sandy loam p. 3-6. See CRA e-mail -

July 1, 2008.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Unsat. zone 1, effective porosity P 2 D Bounded Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.3-1 for site soil 0.346 0.0915 0.0629 0.628 type - sandy loam p. 3-9. See CRA e-mail -

July 1, 2008.

Site-specific Value - calculated using Unsat. zone 1, field capacity 3D 0.064 Equation 4.4 for Field Capacity from ANL/EAIS-8. See calc. ENG-002 Section NR NR NR NR

_6.1.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Unsat. zone 1, hydraulic P 2 5 Bounded Log Normal NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.4-1 for site soil 5022 1.33 2.49 9,250 conductivity (mny) type - sandy loam p. 3-13. See CRA e-mail

-July 1, 2008.

Site-specific Value - Used distribution from Unsat. zone 1,soil-specific b P 2 S Bounded Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697 Table 3.5-1 for site soil 0.632 0.282 0.786 4.50 parameter type - sandy loam p. 3-16. See CRA e-mail

-July 1, 2008.

Occupancy Page 6 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Inhalation rate (m3/y) B 3 D 8,400 NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 5-1. See calc. NR NR NR NR ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Used distribution median from 3

Mass loading for inhalation (g/m ) P 2 S Continuous linear NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 4-16, Fig 4.6- 2.33E-05 I.I Exposure duration B 3 D 30 RESRAD default, ANL/EAD-4, p. 2-22. NR NR NR NR Indoor dust filtration factor P 2 S Uniform Used distribution values from NUREG/CR- 0.15 0.95 0.58 6697, Att. C, p. 7-1 & 7-3.

Shielding factor, external gamma P 2 S Bounded Lognormal-n Used distribution values from NUREG/CR- -1.3 0.59 0.044 1

_6697, Att. C, p. 7-35.

Fraction of time spent indoors B 3 D 0.6571 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol.3, Table 6.87, NR NR NR NR

p. 6-126. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, Table 6.87 Fraction of time spent outdoors (on B 3 D 0.118 (outdoors + gardening) p. 6-126. See calc. NR NR NR NR site) ENG-002 Section 6.1.

RESRAD Default - Circular contaminated Shape factor flag, external gamma P 3 D Circular zone assumed for EF-I Protected area, NR NR NR NR ANL/EAIS-8, Table 1.3 p. 12.

Ingestion, Dietary NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, (other Fruits, vegetables, granB 2 D 112 vegetables + fruit + grain), Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR consumption (kg/y) 127. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Leafy vegetables consumption B 3 D 21.4 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR (kg/y) 127. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Milk consumption (L/y) B 2 D 233 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR 127. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 (beef + poultry),

Meat and poultry consumptionB 3 D 65.1 Table 6.87 p. 6-127. See calc. ENG-002 NR NR NR NR (kg/y) Section 6. 1.

Fish consumption (kg/y) B 3 D 20.6 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Fish ____________g) I 1npi 20.6 1127. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Page 7 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parameters_

1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Other seafood consumption (kg/y) B 3 D 0.9 RESRAD Default -- ANL/EAD-4, Table D- NR NR NR NR 2, p. D-10.

Soil ingestion rate (g/y) B 2 D 18.26 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR 126. See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

Drinking water intake (/y) B 2 D 478.5 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3,Section Table 6.87 126. See calc. ENG-002 6.1. p. 6- NR NR NR R

NR N

NR N

RESRAD Default - all water assumed Contamination fraction of drinking 3 D 1 contaminated ANL/EAIS-8 Table 1.3 p. 12 NR NR NR NR (Ref 1).

Contamination fraction of livestock P 3 D I RESRAD Default - all water assumed NR NR NR NR contaminated ANL/EAIS-8 Table 1.3 p. 12.

Contamination fraction of irrigation P 3 D I RESRAD Default - all water assumed NR NR NR NR contaminated ANL/EAIS-8 Table 1.3 p. 12.

Contamination fraction of aquatic P 3 D I NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, p. 6-5&6. NR NR NR NR food___________________

Contamination fraction of plant food P 3 D I NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3, p. 6-5&6. NR NR NR NR Contamination fraction of meat P 3 D I RESRAD Default 2.3, p. 2-22

-- ANL/EAD-4, Table NR NR NR NR Contamination fraction of milk P 3 D I RESRAD Default -- ANUEAD-4, Table NR NR NR NR 2.3, p. 2-22.

Ingestion, Non-Dietary Livestock fodder intake for meat M 3 D 27.1 NUREG/CR5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87, beef (kg/day) cattle + poultry + layer hen Livestock fodder intake for milk M 3 D 63.2 NUREG/CR5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87, forage (kg/day) +grain+hay p.6-131.

Livestock water intake for meat M 3 0 NUREG/CR5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87, beef (L/day) 50 cattle + poultry + layer hen p. 6-131.

Livestock water intake for milk M 3 0 NUREG/CR5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 p. 6-(L/day) 60 131.

Page 8 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Livestock soil intake (kg/day) M 3 D 0.5 RESRAD Default, ANL/AED-4 p. D-15 NR NR NR NR (Ref. 3).

Mass loading for foliar P 3 03 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87, NR NR NR NR deposition (g/m**3) 4.00E-04 _gardening p. 6-126.

3 42 Depth of soil mixing layer (m) P 2 S Triangular NUREG/CR-6697, Ant. C p. - . 0 0.6 0.15 Depth of roots (m) P 1 S Uniform Min. from NUREG/CR-6697, A Used 0.3 4.0 distribution values from tt. C p. 6-I.

RESRAD Default - all water assumed to be Drinking water fraction from ground p 3 D I supplied from groundwater, ANL/EAIS-8 NR NR NR NR water Table 1.3 p. 12.

Livestock water fraction from P 3 D 1 RESRAD Default - all water assumed to be NR NR NR NR ground water supplied from groundwater, ANL/EAIS-8 Table 1.3 p. 12.

Irrigation fraction from ground P 3 D RESRAD Default - all water assumed to be NR NR NR NR water supplied from groundwater, ANL/EAIS-8 Table 1.3 p. 12.

6 13 Wet weight crop yield for Non- P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C p. - . 0.56 0.48 0.001 0.999 Leafy (kg/m**2) I Wet weight crop yield for Leafy P 3 D 2.88921 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR (kg/m**2) p. 6-130.

Wet weight crop yield for P 3 D 1.8868 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR Fodder (kg/m**2) p. 6-130.

Growing Season for Non-Leafy P 3 D 0.246 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR (years) p. 6-128.

Growing Season for Leafy P 3 D 0.123 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR (years) p. 6-128. 1 1_

Growing Season for Fodder P 3 0 0.082 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR (years) p. 6-128 Translocation Factor for Fodder P 3 D I NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR 129.

Page 9 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-1 DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Weathering Removal Constant P 2 S Triangular NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C p. 6-15. 5.1 84 18 for Vegetation (lI/yr)

Wet Foliar Interception Fraction P 3 D 0.35 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR for Non-Leafy p. 6-128.

Wet Foliar Interception Fraction P 2 S Triangular NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C p. 6 - 17 . 0.06 0.95 0.67 for Leafy Wet Foliar Interception Fraction P 3 D 0.35 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR for Fodder 128.

Dry Foliar Interception Fraction P 3 D 0.35 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR for Non-Leafy 128.

Dry Foliar Interception Fraction P 3 D 0.35 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 p. 6-128. NR NR NR NR for Leafy Dry Foliar Interception Fraction P 3 D 0.35 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 p. 6-128. NR NR NR NR for Fodder Storage times of contaminated foodstuffs (days)

Fruits, non-leafy vegetables, and B 3 D 14 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR grain p. 6-127.

Leafy vegetables B 3 D I NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR

p. 6-127.

Milk B 3 D I NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 p. 6- NR NR NR NR 127.

Meat and poultry B 3 D 20 NUREG/CR-5512, Vol. 3 Table 6.87 NR NR NR NR (holdup period for beef) p. 6-127.

Fish B 3 D 7 RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, Table NR NR NR NR D.6, p. D-21.

Crustacea and Mollusk B 3 D 7 RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, Table NR NR NR NR D.6, p. D-21.

Well water B 3 D 1 RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, Table NR NH NH NR SD.6, p. D-21.

Page 10 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Typea Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/lDistribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Surface water B 3 D 1 RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, Table NR NR NR NR D.6, p. D-2 1.

Livestock fodder B 3 D 45 RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, Table NR NR NR NR D.6, p. D-21.

Special Radionuclides (C-14)

C- 12 concentration in water RESRAD Default, ANLIEAD-4, p. L-22 2.00E-05 NR NR NR NR (g/cm 3 ) P 3 D C-12 concentration cnaiaesolgg)Pin 3 D 3.00E-02 RESRAD RERDDfut Default, AN/EAD-4, N/A-,p p. L-19

-9 NR NR NR NR contaminated soil (g/g)

C-14 evasion layer thickness in soil P 2 S Triangular NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C p. 8-27. 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.3 (m)

C-14 evasion flux rate from soil RESRAD Default, ANLIEAD-4, p. L-16.

(lI/s) See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

C-I12 evasion flux rate from soil P 3 D 1.1E-1O RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, p. L-16. NR NR NR NR (lIs) See calc. ENG-002 Section 6.1.

64 Fraction of grain in beef cattle B 3 D 0.8 NUREG/CR-6697, Table 3.2 p. NR NR NR NR feed Fraction of grain in milk cow B 3 D 0.2 NUREG/CR-6697, Table 3.2 p. 64. NR NR NR NR feed I _

Fraction of vegetation carbon P 3 D 2.OOE-02 RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, p. L-20. NR NR NR NR from soil Fraction of vegetation carbon P 3 D 9.80E-01 RESRAD Default, ANL/EAD-4, p. L-20. NR NR NR NR from air I _

Inhalation Dose Conversion Factors (mrem/pCi)

Ac-227 M 3 0 6.72E+00 FGRI 1 (RESRAD Dose Conversion NR NR NR NR Ac-227_ _ Library)

Ag-108m* M 3 D 2.83E-04 FGRll NR NR NR NR Am-241 M 3 D 4.44E-01 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Am-243 M 3 D 4.40E-01 FGRI1 NR NR NR NR C-14* M 3 D 2.09E-06 FGRIt NR NR NR NR Cm-242* M 3 D 1.73E-02 FGRI t NR NR NR NR Page 11 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/D)istribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Cm-243* M 3 D 3.07E-01 FGRII NR NR NR NR Co-60* M 3 D 2.19E-04 FGRII NR NR NR NR Cs-134* M 3 D 4.63E-05 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Cs-137* M 3 D 3.19E-05 FGRII NR NR NR NR Eu-152* M 3 D 2.21E-04 FGRlI NR NR NR NR Eu-154* M 3 D 2.86E-04 FGRIl NR NR NR NR Eu-155* M 3 D 4.14E-05 FGRII NR NR NR NR Fe-55* M 3 D 2.69E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Gd-152 M 3 D 2.43E-01 FGRIl NR NR NR NR H-3* M 3 D 6.40E-08 FGR1I NR NR NR NR Mn-54* M 3 D 6.70E-06 FGRI l NR NR NR NR Na-22* M 3 D 7.66E-06 FGRI1 NR NR NR NR Nb-94* M 3 D 4.14E-04 FGRll NR NR NR NR Ni-59* M 3 D 2.70E-06 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Ni-63* M 3 D 6.29E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Np-237 M 3 D 5.40E-01 FGRII NR NR NR NR Pa-231 M 3 D 1.28E+00 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Pb-210 M 3 D 1.38E-02 FGRlI NR NR NR NR Po-210 M 3 D 9.40E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR Pu-238* M 3 D 3.92E-01 FGRII NR NR NR NR Pu-239* M 3 D 4.29E-01 FGRI1 NR NR NR NR Pu-240* M 3 D 4.29E-01 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Pu-241 M 3 D 8.25E-03 FGRI1 NR NR NR NR Ra-226 M 3 D 8.60E-03 FGRIl NR NR NR NR Ra-228 M 3 D 4.77E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR Sb-125* M 3 D 1.22E-05 FGRII NR NR NR NR Sr-90* M 3 D 1.31 E-03 FGR1I NR NR NR NR Tc-99" M 3 D 8.33E-06 FGRI1 NH NH NH NH Page 12 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Te-125m M 3 D 7.29E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Th-228 M 3 D 3.42E-01 FGRII NR NR NR NR Th-229 M 3 D 2.16E+00 FGRII NR NR NR NR Th-230 M 3 D 3.26E-01 FGRI1 NR NR NR NR Th-232 M 3 D 1.64E+00 FGRII NR NR NR NR U-233 M 3 D 1.35E-01 FGRI I NR NR NR NR U-234 M 3 D 1.32E-01 FGRII NR NR NR NR U-235 M 3 D 1.23E-01 FGRII NR NR NR NR U-236 M 3 D 1.25e-01 Ingestion Dose Conversion Factors (mrem/pCi)

Ac-227 M 3 D 1.48E-02 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Ag-108m* M 3 D 7.62E-06 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Arn-241* M 3 D 3.64E-03 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Am-243 M 3 D 3.63E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR C-14* M 3 D 2.09E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Cm-242* M 3 D 2.51E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR Cm-243* M 3 D 2.69E-05 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Co-60* M 3 D 7.33E-05 FGRII NR NR NR NR Cs-134* M 3 D 5.OOE-05 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Cs-137* M 3 D 6.48E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Eu-152* M 3 D 9.55E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Eu-154* M 3 D 1.53E-06 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Eu-155* M 3 D 6.07E-07 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Fe-55* M 3 D 1.61 E-04 FGRlI NR NR NR NR Gd-152 M 3 D 6.40E-08 FGRI I NR NR NR NR H-3* M 3 D 2.51E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR Mn-54* M 3 D 2.77E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Na-22* M 3 D 1.15E-05 FGRII NR NR NR NR Page 13 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Nb-94* M 3 D 7.14E-06 FGR1I NR NR NR NR Ni-59* M 3 D 2.1OE-07 FGRII NR NR NR NR Ni-63* M 3 D 5.77E-07 FGR11 NR NR NR NR Np-237 M 3 D 4.44E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR Pa-231 M 3 D 1.06E-02 FGR1I NR NR NR NR Pb-210 M 3 D 5.37E-03 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Po-210 M 3 D 1.90E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NHR Pu-238* M 3 D 3.20E-03 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Pu-239* M 3 D 3.54E-03 FGRI1 NR NR NR NR Pu-240* M 3 D 3.54E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR Pu-241* M 3 D 6.85E-05 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Ra-226 M 3 D 1.33E-03 FGRII NR NR NR NR Ra-228 M 3 D 1.44E-03 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Sb-125* M 3 D 2.81E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Sr-90* M 3 D 1.53E-04 FGRII NR NR NR NR Tc-99* M 3 D 1.46E-06 FGRII NR NR NR NR Te-125m M 3 D 3.67E-06 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Th-228 M 3 D 4.03E-03 FGR11 NR NR NR NR Th-229 M 3 D 5.48E-04 FGRII NR NR NR NR Th-230 M 3 D 5.48E-04 FGRI I NR NR NR NR Th-232 M 3 D 2.73E-03 FGRI I NR NR NR NR U-233 M 3 D 2.89E-04 FGRI I NR NR NR NR U-234 M 3 ID 2.83E-04 FGRI I NR NR NR NR U-235 M 3 D 2.67E-04 FGRI I NR NR NR NR U-236 M 3 D 2.69E-04 FGRII NR NR NR NR Plant Transfer Factors ((pCi/g plant)/(pCi/g soil))

Ac-227 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n INUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 1.1 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Ag-108m* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -5.52 0.9 0.001 0.999 4.OE-03 Page 14 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Prioritb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Arn-241* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Arn-243 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 C-14' P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-5. -0.36 0.9 0.001 0.999 7.OE-01 6 5 Cm-242* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Cm-243* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Co-60* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-5. -2.53 0.9 0.001 0.999 8.OE-02 6 5 Cs-134* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . -3.22 1.0 0.001 0.999 4.OE-02 6 5 Cs-137* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -3.22 1.0 0.001 0.999 4.OE-02 6 5 Eu-152* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . -6.21 1.1 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 6 5 Eu-154* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -6.21 1.1 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 Eu-155* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-5. -6.21 1.1 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 6 5 Fe-55* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 6 5 Gd-152 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. - . -6.21 1.1 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 6 5 H-3* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . 1.57 1.1 0.001 0.999 4.8E+00 6 5 Mn-54* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . -1.20 0.9 0.001 0.999 3.OE-01 Na-22* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-5. -3.00 1.0 0.001 0.999 5.OE-02 6 5 Nb-94* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -4.61 1.1 0.001 0.999 1.OE-02 Ni-59* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-5. -3.0 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.0E-02 Ni-63" P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-5. -3.0 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-02 Np-237 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -3.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.OE-02 6 5 Pa-231 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -4.61 1.1 0.001 0.999 1.OE-02 Pb-210 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -5.52 0.9 0.001 0.999 4.OE-03 Po-210 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.90 0.9 0.001 0.999 L.OE-03 Pu-238' P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 6 5 Pu-239* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Pu-240* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Pu-241

• P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Ra-226 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-5. -3.22 0.9 0.001 0.999 4.OE-02 Page 15 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment I Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Ra-228 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Aut. C, p. 6-5. -3.22 0.9 0.001 0.999 4.OE-02 Sb-125' P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -4.61 1.0 0.001 0.999 1.0E-02 Sr-90* P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6 - 5 . -1.20 1.0 0.001 0.999 3.OE-01 Tc-99" P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. 1.61 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE+00 Te-125m P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -2.30 1.0 0.001 0.999 1.OE-01 Th-228 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Th-229 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Th-230 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Th-232 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Aut. C, p. 6-5. -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 U-233 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 U-234 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.0E-03 U-235 P 1 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 U-236 P 1 S Truncated legnormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-5. -6.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 Meat Transfer Factors ((pCi/L)/(pCi/d))

Ac-227 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -10.82 1.0 0.001 0.999 2.OE-05 Ag-108m* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -6.21 0.7 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 Arn-241

• P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -9.90 0.2 0.001 0.999 5.OE-05 Am-243 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -9.90 0.2 0.001 0.999 5.OE-05 C-14* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -3.47 1.0 0.001 0.999 3.1E-02 Cm-242" P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -10.82 1.0 0.001 0.999 2.OE-05 Cm-243' P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -10.82 1.0 0.001 0.999 2.OE-05 Co-60* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-8. -3.51 1.0 0.001 0.999 3.OE-02 Cs-1 34* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -3.00 0.4 0.001 0.999 5.OE-02 Cs-137* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6 - 8 . -3.00 0.4 0.001 0.999 5.OE-02 Eu-152* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6 - 8 . -6.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 Eu-154* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -6.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 6 8 Eu-155* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . -6.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 Fe-55* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -3.51 0.4 0.001 0.999 3.OE-02 Page 16 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean 6 8 Gd-152 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -6.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 H-3* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-8. -4.42 1.0 0.001 0.999 1.2E-02 Mn-54* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6 - 8 . -6.91 0.7 0.001 0.999 L.OE-03 Na-22* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -2.53 0.2 0.001 0.999 8.OE-02 Nb-94* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -13.82 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-06 Ni-59* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -5.30 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-03 Ni-63* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-8. -5.30 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-03 6 8 Np-237 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C p. - . -6.91 0.7 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 6 8 Pa-231 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -12.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 5.OE-06 Pb-210 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6 - 8 . -7.13 0.7 0.001 0.999 8.OE-04 Po-2 10 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-8. -5.30 0.7 0.001 0.999 5.OE-03 6 8 Pu-238* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -9.21 0.2 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 6 8 Pu-239* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -9.21 0.2 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 Pu-240* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6 - 8 . -9.21 0.2 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 6 8 Pu-241* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -9.21 0.2 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 6 8 Ra-226 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -6.91 0.7 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 6 8 Ra-228 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -6.91 0.7 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Sb-125* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6 - 8 . -6.91 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 Sr-90* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6 - 8 . -4.61 0.4 0.001 0.999 1.OE-02 Tc-99* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-8. -9.21 0.7 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 6 8 Te-125m P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -4.96 0.9 0.001 0.999 Th-228 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -9.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 Th-229 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-8. -9.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 Th-230 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-8. -9.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 Th-232 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-8. -9.21 1.0 0.001 0.999 1.OE-04 6 8 U-233 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -7.13 0.7 0.001 0.999 8.OE-04 6 8 U-234 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . -7.13 0.7 0.001 0.999 8.OE-04 U-235 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6 - 8 . -7.13 0.7 0.001 0.999 8.OE-04 Page 17 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parameters" 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean U-236 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-8. -7.13 0.7 0.001 0.999 8.OE-04 Milk Transfer Factors ((pCi/L)/(pCi/d))

Ac-227 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -13.12 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.OE-06 Ag-108m* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6 - 1 1 . -5.12 0.7 0.001 0.999 6.OE-03 Arn-241

• P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -13.12 0.7 0.001 0.999 2.OE-06 Am-243 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -13.12 0.7 0.001 0.999 2.OE-06 C-14" P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-11. -4.4 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.2E-02 Cm-242" P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Atl. C, p. 6-11. -13.12 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.OE-06 Cm-243" P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-11. -13.12 0.9 0.001 0.999 2.OE-06 Co-60" P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-11. -6.21 0.7 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 Cs-134' P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-11. -4.61 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-02 Cs-137* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-11. -4.61 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-02 Eu-152* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-11. -9.72 0.9 0.001 0.999 6.OE-05 Eu-154* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6 - 1 1 . -9.72 0.9 0.001 0.999 6.OE-05 Eu-155* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6 - 1 1 . -9.72 0.9 0.001 0.999 6.OE-05 Fe-55* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-11. -8.11 0.7 0.001 0.999 3.OE-04 Gd-152 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6 - 1 1 . -9.72 0.9 0.001 0.999 6.OE-05 H-3* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6-11. -4.6 0.9 0.001 0.999 1.OE-02 Mn-54* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6 - 1 1 . -8.11 0.7 0.001 0.999 3.OE-04 Na-22* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -3.22 0.5 0.001 0.999 4.OE-02 Nb-94* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -13.12 0.7 0.001 0.999 2.OE-06 Ni-59* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6 - 1 1 . -3.91 0.7 0.001 0.999 2.OE-02 Ni-63" P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -3.91 0.7 0.001 0.999 2.OE-02 Np-237 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-11. -11.51 0.7 0.001 0.999 1.0E-05 Pa-231 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-11. -12.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-06 Pb-2 10 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-11. -8.11 0.9 0.001 0.999 3.OE-04 Po-2 10 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -7.82 0.7 0.001 0.999 4.OE-04 Pu-238* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -13.82 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-06 Page 18 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean 6 11 Pu-239* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -13.82 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-06 6 11 Pu-240* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. - . -13.82 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-06 6 11 Pu-241* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. - . -13.82 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-06 6 11 Ra-226 P 2 S Truncated legnormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -6.91 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 6 11 Ra-228 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . -6.91 0.5 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 6 11 Sb-125* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . -9.72 0.9 0.001 0.999 6.OE-05 Sr-90* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6-11. -6.21 0.5 0.001 0.999 2.OE-03 6 11 Tc-99* P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . -6.91 0.7 0.001 0.999 1.OE-03 6 1 Te-125m P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C p. -1 . -7.60 0.6 0.001 0.999 5.OE-04 6 11 Th-228 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C p. - . -12.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-06 6 11 Th-229 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C p. - . -12.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-06 Th-230 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C p. 6-11. -12.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-06 6 11 Th-232 P 2 S Truncated lognermal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C p. - . -12.21 0.9 0.001 0.999 5.OE-06 U-233 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C p. 6-11. -7.82 0.6 0.001 0.999 4.OE-04 6 11 U-234 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C p. - . -7.82 0.6 0.001 0.999 4.OE-04 U-235 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C p. 6-11. -7.82 0.6 0.001 0.999 4.OE-04 U-236 P 2 S Truncated lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C p. 6-11. -7.82 0.6 0.001 0.999 4.OE-04 Bioaccumulation Factors for Fish ((pCi/kg)/(pCi/L))

6 21 Ac-227 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 2.7 1.1 1.5E+01 6 21 Ag-108m* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 1.6 1.1 5.OE+00 Am-241* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 6 21 Arn-243 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 C-14' P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 10.8 1.1 4.9E+04 Cmn-242" P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 Crn-243" P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Aut. C, p. 6-21. 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 6 21 Co-60* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 5.7 1.1 3.OE+02 6 21 Cs-134* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 7.6 0.7 2.OE+03 6 21 Cs-137* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 7.6 0.7 2.OE+03 Page 19 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Typea Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Eu-152* 6 21 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. - . 3.9 1.1 4.9E+01 Eu-154* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6 - 2 1 . 3.9 1.1 4.9E+01 Eu-155* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 3.9 1.1 4.9E+01 Fe-55* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. 6 - 2 1 . 5.3 1.1 2.OE+02 Gd-152 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6 - 2 1 . 3.2 1.1 2.5E+01 H-3* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6 - 2 1 . 0 0.1 1.OE+00 Mn-54* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-21. 6 1.1 4.OE+02 Na-22* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. 6 - 2 1 . 3 1.1 2.OE+01 Nb-94* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-21. 5.7 1.1 3.OE+02 Ni-59" P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 4.6 1.1 9.9E+01 Ni-63" P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 4.6 1.1 9.9E+01 Np-237 6 21 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 Pa-231 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-2 1. 2.3 1.1 1.OE+01 Pb-2 10 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 5.7 1.1 3.0E+02 Po-210 6 2 1 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 4.6 1.1 9.9E+-0l Pu-238* 6 2 1 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. - . 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 6 2 1 Pu-239" P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. - . 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 Pu-240* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-21. 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 Pu-241* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Aut. C, p. 6-21. 3.4 1.1 3.OE+01 Ra-226 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. 6-21. 3.9 1.1 4.9E+01 Ra-228 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 3.9 1.1 4.9E+01 Sb-125* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 4.6 1.1 9.9E+01 6 2 1 Sr-90* P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 4.1 1.1 6.OE+01 Tc-99" 6 2 1 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C 'p. - . 3 1.1 2.0E+01 Te-125rn 6 21 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . 6.0 1.1 4.OE+02 6 2 1 Th-228 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Art. C, p. - . 4.6 1.1 9.9E+01 Th-229 6 2 1 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, All. C, p. - . 4.6 1.1 9.9E+01 Th-230 6 21 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 4.6 1.1 9.9E+01 Page 20 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Type' Prioritb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean 6 21 rh-232 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . 4.6 1.1 9.9E+01 6 21 U-233 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. - . 2.3 1.1 1.OE+01 U-234 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Att. C, p. 6-21. 2.3 1.1 1.OE+01 6 21 U-235 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . 2.3 1.1 1.OE+01 6 21 U-236 P 2 S Lognormal-n NUREG/CR-6697, Alt. C, p. - . 2.3 1.1 1.OE+01 Bioaccumulation Factors for Crustacea/Mollusks ((pCi/kg)/(pCi/L))

Ac-227 P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Ag-108m* P 3 D 7.70E+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Arn-241* P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Arn-243 P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR C-14* P 3 D 9.1OE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Cm-242* P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Cm-243* P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Co-60* P 3 D 2.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Cs-134* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Cs-137* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Eu-152* P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Eu-154* P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Eu-155* P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Fe-55* P 3 D 3.20E+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Gd-152 P 3 D 1.OOE+03 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR H-3* P 3 D 1.OOE+00 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Mn-54* P 3 D 9.OOE+04 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Na-22* P 3 D 2.00E+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Nb-94* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Ni-59* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Ni-63* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Np-237 P 3 ID 4.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Page 21 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 1 Input Parameter Values for Sensitivity Analysis Resident Farmer Scenario - Soil Parameter Typea Priorityb Treatmentc Value/Distribution Value/Distribution Reference Source Distribution's Statistical Parametersd 1 2 3 4 Median or Mean Pa-231 P 3 D 1.10E+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Pb-210 P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Po-210 P 3 D 2.OOE+04 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Pu-238* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Pu-239* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Pu-240* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Pu-241 P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Ra-226 P 3 D 2.50E+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Ra-228 P 3 D 2.50E+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Sb-125* P 3 D 1.OOE+01 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Sr-90* P 3 D 1.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Tc-99* P 3 D 5.OOE+00 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Te-125m P 3 D 5.OOE+O0 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Th-228 P 3 D 5.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Th-229 P 3 D 5.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Th-230 P 3 D 5.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Th-232 P 3 0 5.OOE+02 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR U-233 P 3 D 6.OOE+01 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR U-234 P 3 D 6.OOE+01 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR U-235 P 3 D 6.OOE+01 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR U-236 P 3 D 6.OOE+01 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Graphics Parameters Number of points I32 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Spacing log RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Time integration parameters Maximum number of points for dose 17 RESRAD Default NR NR NR NR Page 22 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for EF- I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Footnotes a P = physical, B = behavioral, M = metabolic; (see NUREG/CR-6697, Attachment B, Table 4.)

b I = high-priority parameter, 2 = medium-priority parameter, 3 = low-priority parameter (see NUREG/CR-6697, Attachment B, Table 4. 1)

CD = deterministic, S = stochastic d Distributions Statistical Parameters:

Lognormal-n: 1= mean, 2 = standard deviation Bounded lognormal-n: 1= mean, 2 = standard deviation, 3 = minimum, 4 = maximum Truncated lognormal-n: I= mean, 2 = standard deviation, 3 = lower quantile, 4 = upper quantile Bounded normal: 1 = mean, 2 = standard deviation, 3 = minimum, 4 = maximum Triangular: I = minimum, 2 = maximum, 3 = most likely Uniform: I = minimum, 2 = maximum

• Designates principal radionuclide-of-concern; undesignated radionuclides are included as daughter products.

Additional Sensitivity Analysis Data:

Sampling technique = Latin Hypercube Number of observations =2000 Number of repetitions = 1 Input Rank Correlation Coefficients:

Total porosity and bulk density = - 0.99 (contaminated zone, unsaturated and saturated zones)

Total porosity and effective porosity = 0.96 (unsaturated and saturated zones)

Well Pumping rate and irrigation = 0.96, see NUREG/CR-6676, p. 7-2.

Page 23 of 23

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 2 Conestoga Rovers and Associates Grain Size Analysis of Enrico Fermi-i Soil Samples July 1, 2008

R~ev Y From: Reid, James Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 2:05 PM To: 'Joseph Bisson'; 'Martin C Erickson'; 'Chris Messler' Cc: Pinter, Chuck

Subject:

(49643) Soil Results - CRA BNI-08-C-006 Rev 000 Gentlemen, Attached please find the full set of results for all seven soil samples. Any questions, please let me know.

(Please note I had incorrectly labeled SB-7 as SB-4 in my prior email. See below for the correct list of soil types.)

James SB-1 Loam SB-2 Sandy Loam S8-3 Sandy Loam SB-4 Sandy Loam SB-5 Sandy Loam SB-6 Loamy Sand SB-7 Loamy Sand James A. Reid, P.Eng., PE.

CONESTOGA.ROVERS & ASSOCIATES 14496 Sheldon Rd, Ste 200, Plymouth, MI 48170 direct 734-357-5506 fax 734-453-5201 cell: 313-806-5366 www.CRAwar.d.com This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.

For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email

.1 oj I

-O~.j k~

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCH)ES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1. 1 34 2 3 4 6 810 14 'a 20 30 40 50 60 100140200 100i- - - rI 1 -1 95---

85 80 70 85 30 ri It~ti I l* \ I!!1 l

-55 LLJ5 w

35 0Hl-JIlt IIIi- .LLllI I~l 25 - -

15 - -

100 1010.0.1.0 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS COBBLES GRAVEL SAND' SILT OR CLAY I coarse I fine coarse medium I fine Specimen Identification Classification LL PL P1 Cc Cu 0 SB-1 0 Loam (USDA Method)

Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 0@ SB-I 0 12.5 0.097 0.06 2.6 42.4 35.8 19.1 PECSOL -I GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION g Project Name. Fermi #-

,iE Project Number. 049643 ENGINEERING INC. Client: Bartlett Nuclear Inc.

V

-. *M WMKAMWJOICO,.A.... Location: Newport,MI I

Test by: Checked by:

--c2 brb iRe4 9 IW ECSOL PARTICLE-SIZE SENGINEERING INC. ANALYSIS OF SOILS E M FAM&Y MIMPEROFTHf OFCOMPAMUS (ASTM D 422-63)

CLIENT: Bartlett Nuclear Inc. LAB NO: 131 PROJECT I SITE: Fermi # 1 PROJECT NO: 49643 BORING NO: SAMPLE NO: SB-1 DEPTH: 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION: Loam (USDA Method)

APPARATUS:

Balance No: Sieve No: Hydrometer No:

Oven No: 1000m] Cylinder No.: Hydrometer Jar No:

SIEVE SIZE WEIGHT  %  % TOTAL Coarse portion RETAINED (g) RETAINED PASSING TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 730.6 9 G 3' 0.0% 100.0%

Weight after washing: 29.6 g R 1" 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

Loss by wash: 701.0 g A 314" 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

S V 1I2" 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

I E 318" 8.1 1.1% 98.9%

E Fine portion L #4 11.6 1.6% 97.3%

V WEIGHT OF SAMPLE USED ON PASSING #10: #8 8.2 1.1% 96.20/6 N #10 1.7 0.2% 95.9%

G TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 50.0 g S #16 0.7 1.3% 94.6%

Weight after washing: 21.8 g A #40 1.7 3.3% 91.3%

Loss by wash: 28.2 . N #50 1.6 3.1% 88.3%

% PASSING #10 95.9% D #100 10.3 19.8% 68.5%

ADJUSTED DRY WEIGHT 52.11 9 #200 7.1 13.6% 54.9%

pan 0.4 54.9% 0.0%

"C TTmin R 5R R-8R L LIT K D P%

H 24 0.5 34 0.0594 27.9 y 24 1 32 0.042 26 D 24 2 30 0.0306 24.1 R 24 5 29 0.0178 23.1 o 24 16 28 0.011 22.2 M 24 30 26.5 0.0081 20.1 E

E 246'5____ _____ ____

24 60 25 0.0057 19.3 T"

E 23 120 25 0.0041 18.9 R 23 240 21 0.003 15.1 23 480 20 0.0021 14.2 23 1447 18 0.0012 12.3 WATER CONTENT (R- 6R) a CAN No: PT 11 Ms DISPERSING AGENT:

Soil wet + Tare 883.0 Dra = K LJTr L is fundion of (R + rnenLxus) R' Soil dry + Tare 748.1 Dr = o measured o estimated CONCENTRATION:.

Weight water 134.9 a=

Tare 16.6 Weight dry soil 731.5 REMARKS W% 118.4% 1 +

PERFORMED BY: Dan Kribs DATE: 6/26/2008 CHECKED BY: gal DATE:.

8M, 02-3 ReveA U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMSTER 10 5 2 4 0O60 100 140 O0 10FF1-fn~ri-1EIHH-~flm--l-6]1FFI4-ffh}3-3 2 .5 1 31 11231 3 46 a 14 16 20 30 40 70 BE GAL-l SAND SILT OR z 25 60-i--I111I~ l~ 1 / ll z

tu 0

w M.

I ~GRAIN SIZE INMIILLIMTR ct arselfil coarse! me 111umfin CLAY 10 01 .0.0 .0 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I ILE coarse I fie o =o ars I medlum 1 - ne I Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu

_ SB-2 0 Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

'Specimen Identification D100 D60 030 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 0 SB-2 0 37.5 0.213 0.046 14.6 61.7 15.1 18.5 0.

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project Name: Fermi # 1 imiOPE C SOL Project Number: 049643

.ENGINEERING INC. Client Bartlett Nuclear Inc.

. , , .,o*,; . * , Location: Newport,MI Test by: LI- " Checked by:

NSPECSOL PARTICLE-SIZE ENGINEERING INC. ANALYSIS OF SOILS ufIMSIROFTHt[

• FAWS OfII CO Isf.tI S

(ASTM D 422-63)

CLIENT; Bartlett Nuclear Inc. LAB NO: 131 PROJECT I SITE: Fermi # 1 PROJECT NO: 49643 BORING NO: SAMPLE NO: SB-2 DEPTH: 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION: Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

APPARATUS:

Balance No: Sieve No: Hydrometer No: I52H Oven No: 1000ml Cylinder No.: Hydrometer Jar No:5773 SIEVE SIZE WEIGHT  %  % TOTAL Coarse portion RETAINED (q) RETAINED PASSING TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 3751.6 9 G 3" 0.0 0.0% 100.00%

Weight after washing: 624.4 9 R 1" 248.5 6.6% 93.4%

Loss by wash: 3127.2 9 A 3/4" 122.2 3.3% 90.1%

S V 1/2" 99.4 2.6% 87.5%

1 E 318" 20.6 0.5% 86.9%

E Fine portion L #4 56.9 1.5% 85.4%

V WEIGHT OF SAMPLE USED ON PASSING #10: #8 62.2 1.7% 83.7%

1 N #10 14.6 0.4% 83.4%

G TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 100.0 g S #16 1.2 1.0% 82.4%

Weight after washing: 59.7 A #40 5.1 4.3% 78.1%

Loss by wash: 40.3 N #50 5.5 4.6% 73.5%

% PASSING #10 83.4% D #100 32.8 27.3% 46.2%

ADJUSTED DRY WEIGHT 119.97 #200 15.0 12.5% 33.7%

pan 0.1 33.7% 0.0%

C T rain R 5R R-8R L LIT K o P%

23 0.5 42 0.0556 30.9 H 23 1 40 0.04 29.3 D 2 38 0.0288 27.6 R 5 35 0.0186 25.1 O 23 16 34 0.0108 24.3 M 31 31 0.0077 21.8 E 60 28 0.0057 19.3 T ........ _ _ _ _ _

E 23 120 26 0.0041 17.4 R 240 23.5 0.003 15.3 480 21.5 0.0021 13.6 23 1425 20 0.0012 12.4 WATER CONTENT p%= (R - 8R) a X100 CAN No: PT11 Ms DISPERSING AGENT:

Soil wet + Tare 4339.1 Omm = K Lf'r i. sfuncIlon of(R +r menscus) R' Soil dry + Tare 4012.7 Dr= _o measured c3 estimated CONCENTRATION: It/

Weight water 326.4 a=

Tare 260.8 Weight dry soil 3751.9 JREMARKS W% 8.7%

PERFORMED BY: Dan Kribs DATE: 6/26/2008 CHECKED BY: DATE:

-,Del UIt IVEOPNNGINt IVENUBRSHiRMEE ISU-.

A") 0.)

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUIMBERS HYDROMETER 6 4 3 1.5 1 3/4 1/2318 3 4 6 a10 1416 20 30 40 5s 60 10a 140 200 100 - -.-

70 -

45 ---

40 ---

z 355-z UJ Ew 30-25 II~tIo's I I coarse medi.1i1.ne um I I Ir 100 1010. .1 0 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu

] SB-3 0 Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

Specimen Identification D100 060 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay T 6e SB-3 0 50 0.261 0.046 15.9 50.7 14.1 19.3

- - GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project Name: Fermi # 1 L4rJSPECSOL Project Number 049643 z ENGINEERING INC. Client: Bartlett Nuclear Inc.

OLo.uu, Of & YOFC.Vr*.

,W Location: NewportMI Testby:

Checke by:i

S"bSECSOL PARTICLE-SIZE ENGINEERING INC. ANALYSIS OF SOILS S

MEMBE FAT OFCO*UANIES THE uCNA (ASTM D 422-63)

CLIENT: Bartlett Nuclear Inc. LAB NO: 131 PROJECT / SITE: Fermi # 1 PROJECT NO: 49643 BORING NO: SAMPLE NO: SB-3 DEPTH:

SOIL DESCRIPTION: Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

APPARATUS:

Balance No: Sieve No: Hydrometer No: 152H Oven No: 1000rmo Cylinder No.: Hydrometer Jar No:5773 SIEVE SIZE WEIGHT  %  % TOTAL Coarse portion RETAINED (9) RETAINED PASSING TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 3751.6 9 G 1 1/2" 79.7 2.1% 100.0%

Weight after washing: 1019.0 g R 1. 50.3 1.3% 98.7%

Loss by wash: 2732.6 g A 3/4" 162.6 4.3% 94.3%

S V 1/2" 197.7 5.3% 89.1%

! E 318" 135.6 3.6% 85.4%

E Fine portion L #4 193.5 5.2% 80.3%

V WEIGHT OF SAMPLE USED ON PASSING #10: #8 165.9 4.4% 75.9%

I N #10 33.7 0.9% 75.0%

G TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 100.0 g S #16 2.7 2.0% 72.9%

Weight after washing: 59.6 9 A #40 9.2 6.9% 66.0%

Loss by wash: 40.4 9 N #50 7.6 5.7% 60.3%

% PASSING #10 75.0% D #100 28.2 21.1% 39.2%

ADJUSTED DRY WEIGHT 133.40 #200 10.7 8.0% 31.2%

pan 1.2 31.2% 0.0%

"C T min R 5R R-5R L LIT K D P%

24 0.5 44.5 0.0544 31.4 24 1 414 0.0397 28.7 D 24 2 40 " 0.0231, 27.9 R 24 5 37.5. .. .. ....I0.0154 25.9 0 24 16 35 0.0108 23.9 M 24 31 32.5 0.0078 22 E 24 60 30 0.0056 20 23 120 28 0.0041] 18.1 R 240 23.5 0.003 14.5 480 23 0.00211 14.1 23 1436 20 0.0012 13.4 WATER CONTENT - (R- 6R) a CAN No: Big 1 1 - Ms DISPERSING AGENT:

Soil wet + Tare 6021.2 Dmm= K &LT Lisfunction of tR + meniscus) R' Soil dry + Tare 5585.9 Dr = on measured o estimated CONCENTRATION: g/L Weight water 435.3 a Tare 435.4 Weight dry sail 5150.5 REMARKS W% 8.5%

PERFORMED BY: Dan Kribs ._DATE: 6/26/2008 CHECKED BY: DATE:

& L~~'

U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U,S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER

~ 3 6 4 32 1.5 1 314 U23/8 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 506Is 1001140200 100 --.--

95 - - 1 - :' Itlt ItýI I Illll ll l 950 85-75 - -

70--

I-I LI 9L 25 30--

t1*111

}

• lltl GRA INIZE IMILM tNi TERS1 1II 20 I--~li-lllJ 1 1:l IIIfl, 45 40 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 1

I COBBLES I coarse I GRAVEL fine Icoarse I medium SAND I fine SILT OR CLAY Specimen Identification Classification LL PL I P, Cc Cu

• 1 SB-4 0 Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay e6 SB-4 0 75 1.871 0.051 I 32.1 26.4 26.7 14.8 H E OGRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project Name: Fermi # 1 uJS'PELC L Project Number: 049643

" ENGINEERING INC. Client Bartlett Nuclear Inc.

.... Location: Newport,MI Test by: 7)q Chec-ked ;r: _ _ __-_ _ _ _ _ _ _

o( /t~

ChIL> 03 i PECSOL PARTICLE-SIZE ENGINEERING INC. ANALYSIS OF SOILS Of Th CRAfAAfI OFCOMMFME; AdfMQtR (ASTM D 422-63)

CLIENT: Bartlett Nuclear Inc. LAB NO: 131 PROJECT I SITE: Fermi # 1 PROJECT NO: 49643 BORING NO: SAMPLE NO: S3-4 DEPTH: 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION: Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

APPARATUS:

8alance No: Sieve No: Hydrometer No: 152H Oven No: 1000mi Cylinder No.: Hydrometer Jar No:5774 SIEVE SIZE WEIGHT  %  % TOTAL Coarse portion RETAINED (g) RETAINEO PASSING TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 4335.9 g G 3" 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

Weight after washing: 1719.8 9 R 1" 226.5 5.2% 94.8%

Loss by wash: 2616.1 g A 3/4" 148.3 3.4% 91.4%

V 112" 359.4 8.3% 83.1%

S3/8" 235.9 5.4% 77.6%

E Fine portion L #4 421.7 9.7% 67.9%

V WEIGHT OF SAMPLE USED ON PASSING #10: #8 280.1 6.5% 61.4%

N #10 47.9 1.1% 60.3%

G TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 100.0 g S #16 4.4 2.7% 57.7%

Weight after washing: 31.2 p A #40 8.6 5.2% 52.5%

Loss by wash: 68.8 p N #50 3.2 1.9% 50.6%

% PASSING #10 60.3% D #100 9.7 5.9% 44.7%

ADJUSTED DRY WEIGHT 165.74 _ #200 5.3 3.2% 41.5%

pan 0.0 41.5% 0.0%

"C T min R aR R - IR L LIT K D P%

H 23 0.5 58 0.0500 29.2 y 23 1 57 0.0358 28.6 O 23 3 51.5 0.0209 28.0 R 23 5 47 0.0163 27.4 O 23 16 42.5 0.0097 25.6 M 23 37 39.5 0.0071 23.2 E 23 60 36 0.0052 21.1 T

E 23 125 32.5 0.0037 18.5 R 23 257 25 0.0027 16.4 23 584 21.5 0.0018 14.3 WATER CONTENT p%= (R - 6R) a x 100 CAN No: B-1 Ms DISPERSING AGENT:

Soil wet + Tare 6575.6 Dmm = K ý'Jff L is function of (R + meniscus) R' Soil dry + Tare 5882.2 Dr = o measured 0 estimated CONCENTRATION: g/L Weight water 693.4 a=

Tare 376.6 1 1 Weight dry soil 5505.6 REMARKS W% 12.6%1 PERFORMED BY: Dan Kribs .1 DATE: 6/26/2008 CHECKED BY: DATE:

15N 6 -1,102 ALI U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S.SIEVE NUMEERS 1 HYDROMETER 6 ~1 15 31I4'3/8 4 8 14 20 40 60140~

U-85: --

a.

U) 75C w

0.7.00.UJ 100 10 A*

I 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS

.COBBLES GRaVe SAND SILT OR CLAY I coarse J _fine coarse I mectiumn f Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc CU ISB-5 0 Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

Specimen Identification 0100 060 D30 D10 %Gravel, .Sand' %St 0 SB-5 0 75 0.825 0.019 _ 34.6 24.5 25.6 15.3 LCL I GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION il454PECSOL

' U h Project Project Name:

Number:Fermi #

049643 ENGINEERING INC. Client Bartlett Nuclear Inc.

............. Location: NewportMI T :c y Test by: Checked by: xAlq-

I I I N.SPECSOL PARTICLE-SIZE ENGINEERING INC. ANALYSIS OF SOILS MIUMEI0F 4*1ft FALWYOtCOPAW1S (ASTM D 422-631 CLIENT: Bartlett Nuclear Inc. LAB NO: 131 PROJECT I SITE: Fermi # 1 PROJECT NO: 49643 BORING NO: _ _ _ _ SAMPLE NO: SB-5 DEPTH: 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION: Sandy Loam (USDA Method)

APPARATUS:

Balance No: Sieve No: Hydrometer No: 152H Oven No: 1000ml Cylinder No.: Hydrometer Jar No:5774 SIEVE SIZE WEIGHT  %  % TOTAL Coarse portion RETAINED (g) RETAINED PASSING TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 5505.1 g G 3" 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

Weight after washing: 2018.9 g R 1" 47.3 0.9% 99.1%

Loss by wash: 3486.2 g A 3/4' 312.5 5.7% 93.5%

s V 1/2" 1047.7 19.0% 74.4%

I E 3/8" 326.0 5.9% 68.5%

E Fine portion L #4 172.7 3.1% 65.4%

VI WEIGHT OF SAMPLE USED ON PASSING #10: #8 *63.5 1.2% 64.2%

N #10 49.2 0.9% 63.3%

G TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 100.0 g S #16 2.8 1.8% 61.6%

Weight after washing: 35.6 g A #40 7.0 4.4% 57.1%

Loss by wash: 64.4 g N 0 #50 4.3 2.7% 54.4%

% PASSING #10 63.3% #100 13.5 8.5% 45.8%

ADJUSTED DRY WEIGHT 157.91 9 #200 7.8 4.9% 40.9%

pan 0.2 40.9%1 0.0%

"C T min R OR R-6R L LIT K D I _P%

23 0.5 58 0.0478 33.2 y 23 1 57 0.03421 32.5 D 2 55 0.0247 31.3 R 5 51.5 0.0163 29.1 a 23 16 47 0.0098 26.3 M 37 42.5 0.0065 23.4 E 23 60 39.5 0.0052 T 21.6 E 23 120 36 0.0038 19.4 R 250 32-5 0.0027 17.2 582 28.5 0.0018 14.7 WATER CONTENT p%- (R-,R)a xl100 CAN No: B-1 Ms DISPERSING AGENT:

Sail wet + Tare 6575.61 Dmm = K UL/TLisfunction of (R + meniscus) R' Sail dry + Tare 5882.2 Dr = o measured o estimated CONCENTRATION: gaL Weight water 693.4 a=

Tare 376.6 Weight dry soil 5505.6 REMARKS W%

_ 12.6%

PERFORMED BY: Dan Kribs DATE: 6126/2008 CHECKED BY: DATE:

. / &ýg16'

R 0e3 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS 1 -HYDROMETER 6 4 .L 2 1.5 1 314 112 W8 3 4 6 810 1416 20 30 40 so60 100140200 100 ' I I I II 1I '

85 2750 70 65 so 55  ::

ý 451:  :

3501:::0 301  ;* *.

a.,25 - -ii 40' ll 201 - _- ___

151! ,I, oL I.. .

100 10 10.1 0.01 0.00' GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS I coarse I fine coam I medium I - fine Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu 0 SB-6 0 Loamy Sand (USDA Method) 11.13 908.7 Specimen Identification D100 D60 D30 D10 %Gravel %Sand -Sift -Clay SB-6 0 75 10.689 0.261 0.006 56.1 25.0 12.2 6.7 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project Name: Fermi # 1 i" PEN EEIN Project Number: 049643 fENGINEERING INC. Client Bartlett Nuclear Inc.

____________,_m_____________________ Location: Newport,MI Test by: P Checked by: .4L

0 1 4 RIi 61 ikPECSOL PARTICLE-SIZE ENGINEERING INC. ANALYSIS OF SOILS AIM IMNO ThO MEC"A ýII OFCOMPAWES (ASTM D 422-63)

CLIENT: Bartlett Nuclear Inc. LAB NO: 131 PROJECT I SITE: Fermi # 1 PROJECT NO: 49643 BORING NO: SAMPLE NO: SB-6 DEPTH: 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION: Loamy Sand (USDA Method)

APPARATUS:

Balance No: Sieve No: Hydrometer No: 152H Oven No: lO00mi Cylinder No.: Hydrometer Jar No:5773 SIEVE SIZE WEIGHT  %  % TOTAL Coarse portion RETAINED (g) RETAINED PASSING TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 3476.7 9 G ,3 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

Weight after washing: 2061.9 9 R 1" 32.4 0.9% 99.1%

Loss by wash: 1414.8 g A 3/4" 144.0 4.1% 94.9%

S V 1V2" 952.4 27.4% 67.5%

I E 3/8" 481.3 13.8% 53.7%

E Fine portion L #4 338.6 9.7% 43.9%

V WEIGHT OF SAMPLE USED ON PASSING #10: #8 99.2 2.9% 41.1%

N #10 14.0 0.4% 40.7%

G TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 100.0 9 S #16 2.9 1.2% 39.5%

Weight after washing: 53.7 _ A #40 9.7 3.9% 35.6%

Loss by wash: 46.3 9 IN #50 8.4 3.4% 32.1%

% PASSING #10 40.7% #100 26.0 10.6% 21.6%

ADJUSTED DRY WEIGHT 245.74 g #200 6.5 2.6% 18.9%

..... __ _pan 0.2 18.9% 0.0%

"C TTmin R 6R R-61R L LIT K D P%

23 0.5 47 0.0537 16.9 H 23 1 44 0.0391 15.7 o 23 2 42 0.0279 15.3 R 23 5 41 0.0179 14.5 o 23 16 36 0.0105 12.5 M 23 30 33 0.0078 11.2 23 60 30 0.0056 10.0 T ..... _

E 23 120 27.5 0.0041 9.0 R 23 240 25 0.0029 8.0 22 566 21.5 0.002 6.7 WATER CONTENT p%= (R - 6R) a X100 CAN No: WTF1 Ms DISPERSING AGENT:

Soil wet + Tare 4119.5 Drm = K q/L L is tuncIon of (R + meniscus) R' Soil dry + Tare 3830.3 Dr = ]o measured o estimated CONCENTRATION: g/L Weight water 28912 a =

Tare 352.6 Weight dry soil 3477.7 REMARKS W% 8.3%

PERFORMED BY: Dan Kribs DATE: 6126_2008 CHECKED BY:,,-___ __--_-__ DATE: __.,_

12 T l/9

0 LAJ G - 1 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES U.S. SIEVE NUM8ERS I HYDROMETER 1

a 4 3 2 1.5 314 1/23/8 3 4 6 810 j1416 20 30 40 50Sr 00t4n200 95 - - IlC0III Tll~ * -ll!

90-75 -

70 -

65 I I'd, 55

50. is f1-,&lU UI Il l U-1 45 0

40-w 11 25 20 10-5--

10 01010.01 0.C00 l I GRAIN SIZE INMILLIMETERS OOBLES GRAVEL SAND SILT OR CLAY Icoarse I coarse meditim - inefI Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu SB-7 0 Loamy SAND (USDA Method) 112.48 5.14 Specimen Identification D100 D60 030 D1O %Gravel %Sand %S 0 SB-7 0 25 4.106 0.875 0.015 36.8 48.1 9.8 5.2 0

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Project Name: Fermii # 1 NP CProject Number 049643 ENGINEERING INC. Client Bartlett Nuclear Inc.

0 ,, MOMI.0 AMO* O"CO""S Location: NewportMI Test by:

• Viý - Checked by: ._

0 1 I i

-ievA3o IS PECSOL PARTICLE-SIZE ENGINEERING INC. ANALYSIS OF SOILS MEW3Co1 TOhe VtAFAWtY OFCOMPANSI IASTM 0 422-l3~

CLIENT: Bartlett Nuclear Inc. LAB NO: 131 PROJECT I SITE: Fermi #1 PROJECT NO: 49643 BORING NO: SAMPLE NO: SB-7 DEPTH: 0 SOIL DESCRIPTION: Loamy SAND (USDA Method)

APPARATUS:

Balance No: Sieve No: Hydrometer No:

Oven No: 1000ml Cylinder No.: Hydrometer Jar No: 5775 SfEVE SIZE WEIGHT  %  % TOTAL Coarse portion RETAINED (g) RETAINED PASSING TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 1110.1 9 G 3" 0.0% 100.0%

Weight after washing: 659.6 g R 1" 0.0 0.0% 100.0%

Loss by wash: 450.5 g A 314" 41.4 3.7% 96.3%

S V 1/2" 96.9 8.7% 87.5%

I E 3/8" 78.0 7.0% 80.5%

E Fine portion L #4 192.6 17.3% 63.2%

V WEIGHT OF SAMPLE USED ON PASSING #10: #8 168.2 15.2% 48.0%

N #10 82.5 7.4% 40.60/6 G TOTAL DRY WEIGHT: 100.0 9 S #16 18.1 7.3% 33.2%

Weight after washing: 63.1 Q A #40 27.2 11.0% 22.2%

Loss by wash: 36.9 N #50 4.5 1.8% 20.4%

% PASSING #10 40.6% #100 9.6 3.9% 16.5%

ADJUSTED DRY WEIGHT 246.42 . #200 3.5 1.4% 15.1%

pan 0.2 15.1% 0.0%

mC Tmin R 5R R-6R L LIT K D P%

24 0.5 42 0.0556 15 H 24 1 40 0.04 14.2 D 24 2 37 _0.029 .. 13 R 24 5 32 0,0191 11 O 24 16 26.5 0.0111 8.8 M 24 30 23 0.0083 7.4 E

E 24 60 20 0.006 6.1 E 23 120 16.5 0.0044 4.6 R 240 14 0.0031 3.6 480 13.5 0.0022 3.4 23 1447 11 0.0013 2.4 WATER CONTENT p/ (R -6R) a x 100 CAN No: BP3 Ms DISPERSING AGENT:

Soil wet + Tare 1425.8 Drm = K 4L/T I is function of (R.÷meniscis) R' Soil dry + Tare 1343.9 Dr = ai measured 0 estimated CONCENTRATION:________glL Weight water 81.91 a =

Tare 233.3 Weight dry soil 1110.6 REMARKS W% 7.4%

PERFORMED BY: Dan Kribs DATE: 6126/2008 CHECKED BY: 4 DATE:

/g~.! /~

Soil Samnpling for CRA CRA Project # 049643 BartenttServices Inc. 0 Location: Enrico Fermi Unit I On 6/23/08 soil sampling was performed at seven (7) locations at Fermi I adjacent to the Protected Area in locations as shown on the attached map. The samples were dug until a consistent soil texture was achieved. In arems where grass was presen the average sod thic3mess was approximately 5-10 centimeters thick. The layer of soils below the sod was a sandy loam type material with some areas containing more sand than others. The next layer was a thick clay soil with small rocks present (shown in the attached photo). This layer extended down to past 51 centimeters. A considerable amount of moisture was present in some samples (s*e photo) most probably. due to the amount of moisture received lately and the high water table. The following is a des~riptiotn of the soil sampling sites:

1. Sod depth of -10 cm. followed by dark colored sandy loam a depth of 15 cm. The next 24 cm. consisted of thick light brown clay with small rocks.

2. Sod depth of 5-7.5 cm. followed by dark sandy loam to a depth of 15 cm.

The next layer consisted of light brown sand to a depth of 24 cm. The next layer was a thick light brown clay with small rocks extending to a depth of 61cm.

3. Sod depth of 5-7.5 cm. foliowed by dark sandy loam to a depth of 20 cn.

The next layer was uniform to a depth of 51 cm. consisting of light brown thick clay with small rocks.

4. 2.5-12.5 depth of tar/asphalt with a layer of stone to a depth of 28 cm.

From 28 cm. to a depth of 38 cm. wet, thick lay with small rocks.

5. Stone and light brown clay mixture to a depth of 30 eca. then turning into a thick light brown clay with small rocks to a depth of 56 cm.

6. Sod depth of 5-7.5 cm. followed by a layer of dark loam to a depth of 15 cm. The next layer was composed of gravel to a depth of 35.5 cm. The next layer was a mixture ofdark sand and gravel extending past 61 cm.

7. Alayer of loose gravel covered the sample point to a depth of 10 cm.

From there on the consistency was a dark sand/loam mixture with gravel extending past 66 ens

4 mI

'-I

DYE Enaergr Enrico Ferml Unit 1 Chain .of Custody Record NO. O"-Oo I 6400 North Dixie Hwy.

Newport. M 48166 C~pY, PrOjeCt Name: CR4 P z.-cT 4-q &q&!- Analys Requested EFI Contact MIt-I' Ir-C t..Po 77 Name &Phone .73,ýcontabe 3 z Analytical Lab Media Sample Si e NametY.Stat ,- Coda Code Requested Date &T"F'eTesting 6/, ý4* I? /2o Code /. , .

Sample Designation Date TDetee I 44 ~ P4A S o,L _C2iA ~jgdt-i V

-- 7 5SP. ~ J~ 0 1Q150 G~mb Ltd 14c, 1aA a C~Lab.~,ad NOTES:

1) Sampled By.

~ Datilzafflm S 2) Received By, Date/am IlYGS LINO

3) Rallnquiahed By.~( Datafflme 4) dY.

IReel Date/Time waed?

5) Rerinqulahed By. Date/Time 6) Received By Date/eflme IIY63 liN.

1) Relinquished By: Date/rime 8) Received By: Date/fime

Bartlett Engineering Calculation Calculation No. ENG-002 Sensitivity Analysis for DTE EF-I DCGLs for Soil Rev. 3 Attachment 3 RESRAD 6.4- Uncertainty/Sensitivity Analysis Reports for Soil

EF-1 Resident Farmer Scenario No RESRAD runs were performed for Rev 3. No reports are attached.