ML092190888

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Draft Meeting" is not in the list (Request, Draft Request, Supplement, Acceptance Review, Meeting, Withholding Request, Withholding Request Acceptance, RAI, Draft RAI, Draft Response to RAI, ...) of allowed values for the "Project stage" property.

Meeting Slides, Current Status of the Topical Report Draft Prioritization Scheme
ML092190888
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute, Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group, PROJ0704, PROJ0669, PROJ0700, PROJ0710, PROJ0694
Issue date: 08/25/2009
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Mensah T
References
TAC MD4832
Download: ML092190888 (2)


Text

I-L Current Status of the Topical Report Draft Prioritization Scheme July 30, 2009 Division of Policy & Rulemaking (DPR)

Special Projects Branch (PSPB)

Stacey Rosenberg, Branch Chief Tanya Mensah, Senior Project Manager Key Points o

Purpose:

o Discuss the implementation of the draft topical report (TR) prioritization scheme.

o Outcome:

o Vendors and Owners Groups should begin utilizing the draft (TR) prioritization scheme.

o Process:

" July 30, 2009 Public Meeting

" LIC-500 & Updating the TR public website.

1

Draft Prioritization Scheme YT Recommendation io TR Lessons Learned Task Force (LLTF)

Recommendation 2 o

DPR to develop a prioritization/valuation scheme for TRs, including consideration of internal and external stakeholder views. Draft prioritization scheme developed with implementation plan and presented to LT by 5/30/09.

oi TR LLTF Recommendation 3 o DPR to reassess TR metrics for timeliness and resource expenditures, based on the new prioritization/valuation scheme. Provide results of metrics assessment to LT for the first and second quarters following prioritization scheme implementation, but no later than 1/30/10.

Pilot Results io Each vendor and Owners Group selected one TR, already accepted for NRC review, to support a pilot of the draft prioritization scheme.

oi Based upon the pilot, NRR confirmed that the draft prioritization scheme assigns the highest priority to a TR supporting the resolution of safety concerns.

io Future areas for follow-up:

o TRs requested by the Associate Director (or above)

Making the prioritization results public. (concerns about proprietary reports) o Ensuring that reviews of low priority TRs are completed.

2