Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Administration
- Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting
|
MONTHYEARML0830403912008-11-10010 November 2008
October 21, 2008, Public Meeting: NRC Presentation Slides, NRC Topical Report (TR) Program Monthly Meeting
Project stage: Meeting
ML0830800482008-11-10010 November 2008
October 21, 2008 Public Meeting: NEI Handout 2, Presentation Slides
Project stage: Meeting
ML0830400492008-11-10010 November 2008
Summary of the October 21, 2008, Category 2 Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Industry Representatives Regarding the NRCs Topical Report (TR) Process (Tac No. MD4832)
Project stage: Meeting
ML0830800472008-11-10010 November 2008
October 21, 2008, Public Meeting: NEI Handout 1, LIC-500 Comments
Project stage: Meeting
ML0834301072008-12-29029 December 2008
Summary of the November 20, 2008, Category 2 Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Industry Representatives Regarding the NRCs Pical Report (TR) Process
Project stage: Meeting
ML0833903672008-12-29029 December 2008
November 20, 2008 Topical Report Monthly Public Meeting: Industry Handout
Project stage: Meeting
ML0902200952009-02-0404 February 2009
Draft Flowchart for Topical Report Reviews That Include Pilot LARs
Project stage: Request
ML0902200842009-02-0404 February 2009
Technical Champion Flow Diagram (Draft)
Project stage: Request
ML0902200972009-02-0404 February 2009
Summary of Category 2 Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Industry Representatives Regarding the NRCs Topical Report (TR) Process
Project stage: Meeting
ML0902200692009-02-0404 February 2009
NEI Handout: January 8, 2009 Monthly Topical Report Public Meeting
Project stage: Request
ML0906502422009-03-12012 March 2009
2/19/09 Public Meeting Handout: Draft Topical Report Prioritization Scheme
ML0906502952009-03-12012 March 2009
Summary of the February 19, 2009, Category 2 Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Industry Representatives Regarding the NRCs Topical Report Process
Project stage: Meeting
ML0906502752009-03-12012 March 2009
NEI Meeting Handout: 2/19/09 Public Topical Report Monthly Meeting
Project stage: Meeting
ML0906502852009-03-12012 March 2009
2/19/09 Public Meeting Handout: Technical Champion Flow Diagram
Project stage: Meeting
ML0912003602009-05-19019 May 2009
Summary of Category 2 Public Meeting Between NRC and Industry Representatives Regarding NRCs Topical Report Process
Project stage: Meeting
ML0921908882009-08-25025 August 2009
Meeting Slides, Current Status of the Topical Report Draft Prioritization Scheme
ML0922301812009-08-25025 August 2009
Meeting Summary, Category 2 Public Meeting Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Industry Representatives Regarding the NRCs Topical Report Process
Project stage: Meeting
ML0921908862009-08-25025 August 2009
Meeting Slides, Nrc/Nei Public Meeting TR Process
Project stage: Meeting
ML0921908872009-08-25025 August 2009
NRC Handout: Appendix C - Draft Topical Report Prioritization Scheme
Project stage: Draft Other
ML0934903872009-12-17017 December 2009
Summary of Category 2 Public Meeting Between NRC and Industry Representatives Regarding the NRCs Topical Report Process
Project stage: Meeting
2009-02-04
[Table View] |
Text
Technically challenging, complex TRs that involve multiple organizations AND/OR
- 1) Are unique, first-of-a-kind reviews.
- 2) Involve low risk, but is a compliance issue,
- 3) Involve technical or policy issues.
- 4) The technical experts/divisions have differing views on the staffs actions going forward.
Does the TR warrant a technical champion?
No After providing the resolution to the PSPB Branch Chief, the PM Documents Resolution in Draft/Final SE PM & TR reviewers discuss the issue(s) with appropriate SL(s) or senior technical leads -
involve the Owners Group representatives when appropriate.
YES Senior lead able to facilitate discussion to resolve the issue?
Issue(s) elevated to appropriate senior manager(s)
NO Further discussion with industry to discuss next steps (issue TR, withdraw TR, or other options)
Is senior management resolution consistent with industry proposal?
YES YES NO