ML080840040

Duke Handout from 03/18/08 Meeting

ML080840040
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	03/18/2008
From:	Duke Energy Carolinas
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML080840040 (14)

Text

luke

.fnergy RPSIESPS Digital LAR March 18, 2008 Oconee Nuclear Station

Duke Snergy Objeedvas

• Confirm that the NRC has required information to complete the LAR Acceptance Review

• Provide Technical Information associated with RPS/ESPS V&V Process and ISG 4 Data Communication

• Discuss NRC LAR Review/Plan and Milestones to facilitate resource planning by Duke

• Communicate Duke Unit 1 RPS/ESPS Schedule to facilitate NRC site visits/audits 2

P Duke

_ergy Agenda

. RPS/ESPS Project V&V Process

• . Duke Oversight of AREVA documents

• . LAR Submittal Quality S:. ISG 4 Data Communication Compliance Matrix

• . Status of LAR Acceptance Review

• . NRC LAR Review/Plan-and Milestones

• . Duke Plan To Support Staff Licensing Phase

• . Unit 1 RPS/ESPS Schedule

• . LAR Document Availability

• . Action Items

• . Closing Remarks 3

Require-wnts and Guidance luke

,nergy for V& V

• NRC Regulations for V&V Processes

> 50.55a(h) - IEEE Std 603 Appendix B - Criterion I, 11, 111, Xl, and XVlll S:. Regulatory Guidance provides an acceptable method for meeting the applicable requirements

>RG1 .152 - IEEE Std 7-4.3.2

>RG1 .168- IEEE Std 1012 o:o Applicable requirements and guidance addressed in RPS/ESPS LAR - Enclosure 1, Section 4.2 4

~gn Duke E7 ergy AEVA AEV V ess

• . AREVA V&V organization is outlined in several documents including:

Software Quality Assurance Plan V&V Plan V&V Position Paper AREVA Operating Instructions for V&V

These documents, as a whole, demonstrate that the V&V team is independent from a managerial, financial, and technical standpoint o:. AREVA V&V organization discussed in LAR Enclosure 1 Sections 3.4.3.2.4 & 5 5

kDuke UVEn ergy_ Duke Review ofAREVA V& V

• . Performed detail review of the AREVA V&V documents S:. Initial review determined compliance with IEEE 1012 not clear S:. Requested Position Paper be developed to justify exception from IEEE 1012

• o Several meetings and reviews ensued to gain an understanding of the adequacy of the AREVA V&V process S:o AREVA pointed to the Westinghouse Common Q SPM Topical Report and NRC SE as describing a similar methodology to the AREVA process

• o Following Duke's review and comment resolution Duke concluded that the AREVA V&V documents provided an acceptable method of complying with NRC regulations S:. LAR Sections 3.3.3 and 3.4.3 provide detailed information on the Duke quality review efforts 6

'uke Duke Oversightof ARE VA

, nergy Documents, o;. RPS/ES QMP LQST implemented to address LAR document completeness and accuracy o:. LQST consist of steering team members and core team reviewers from Duke plant engineering, Duke Major Projects engineering, AREVA AE group, and AREVA I&C group.

o:. 35 AREVA documents subject to LQST review from 3/07 to 1/08 o:. 43 comment resolution meetings involving 8 - 12 individuals (average length of meeting - 2.5 hrs)

• . Approved by LQST Steering Team only after LQST core team reviewer comments were resolved satisfactorily 7

Duke SF-CEnergy o:o LAR based on numerous technical documents that support the contents of the LAR which were reviewed and approved by Duke o LAR sections 3.3.3 and 3.4.3 provide information on quality of hardware and software respectively

+ LAR provides information recommended by the regulatory guidance o LAR submitted under oath and affirmation following a rigorous development process 8

Duke Energy IS G 4 ComplianceMatrix o:o Data communication addressed in:

SNumerous Sections of the LAR as noted in compliance matrix- particularly 3.4.6 of Enclosure 1 and 9.2 of Enclosure 2

> Separate cyber security submittal

> TXS Topical Report

> TXS Safety Evaluation

> December 13-14, 2006 meeting.

o:o Handout -,Compliance Matrix 9

Duke NRC discussion Energy o:. Status of LAR Acceptance Review o;, NRC LAR- Review Plans and Milestones 10

Duke Plan To Support Staff Duke wnergy LicensingPhase o:o Overall objective is to resolve concerns in a timely and appropriate manner.

o:o Staff Level

. Several phone calls each week STechnical level meetings monthly or as needed SWritten submittals made as needed to support the LAR review plan o:o Management Level SPhone calls as needed SPeriodic drop-in visits SStatus review meetings as needed o:o Executive Level meetings

> At least one during the licensing review 11

p.uke Unit 1 RPS/ESPS

.n ergy ScheduwediMilestones 3/1 -9/08 Factory Acceptance Test procedure development 10/24 - 12/19/08 Factory Acceptance Test 3/1 - 3/21/09 Site Acceptance Test 4/08- 3/09 Installation Procedures/PMT Procedure Development 3/31/09 Latest NRC SE date for Unit 1 Installation in Fall 2009 4/09 - 12/09 Plant Personnel Training 4*0* 4/09 - 12/09 Plant Procedure Development 10/09 - 12/09 Install Unit 1 RPS/ESPS 12

9kergy LAR DocumentAvailability ID1uke Document Date LAR Encl. 1, Table 1-2 RTM - Post FAT 2/09 Item 2 FAT Procedures 9/08 Item 16a FAT Report 1/09 Item 16b Power Imb. SLs & TS Setpoints Calc. 7/09 Item 34 Duke I&C procedures 10/09 Item 39 SAT Plan 8/08 Item 44 SAT Procedures 2/09 Item 44a SAT Report 5/09 Item 44b 13

Duke Action Items and mnergy Closing Remarks 14