ML070120543
| ML070120543 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 09/18/2006 |
| From: | Mccarthy J, Newson C, Randall D Yankee Atomic Electric Co |
| To: | NRC/FSME |
| References | |
| 9527-0001, CY-06-128 | |
| Download: ML070120543 (134) | |
Text
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
- 1. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION...........................................................3 2. CLASSIFICATI ON BASIS....................................................................3 3. DATA QUALITY OB JECTIVES (DQO)..............................................5 4. SURVEY DESIGN.................................................................................8 5. SURVEY IMP LEMENTATION..........................................................11 6. SURVEY RESULTS............................................................................12 7. QUALITY CONTROL.........................................................................16 8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS.................................................17 9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS.......................................................17 10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN.............18 11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA)..........................................18 12. ANOMALIES.......................................................................................18 13. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................19 14. ATTACHMENTS.................................................................................19 14.1 Attachment 1 - Figures (6 pages including cover) 14.2 Attachment 2 - Sample and Sta tistical Data (108 pages including covers)
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 3 1. SURVEY UNIT DESCRIPTION Survey Unit 9527-0001 (East Mountain Side) is designated as Final Status Survey (FSS) Class 2 and consists of approximately 8,600 m 2 (2.13 acres) of wooded and wetland area located approximately 0.1 miles from the reference coordinate system benchmark used at Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) (see Attachment 1, Figure 1). The survey unit is bounded by a fence on the north (called north as oriented with the north to south flow of the Connecticut River) side, a partial fence to the east, a partial stone wall to the south, and an unpaved road along the west. The survey unit comprises wooded terrain with some steep rock ledge and rock outcroppi ngs within the interior. The soil of this survey unit meets the requirements for unrestricted release as a Class 2 survey unit under the criteria and requirements of the HNP License Termination Plan (LTP). The reference coordinates associated with this survey uni t are E013 through E022 by S056 through S064 (refer to License Termination Plan Section 5.4.4). The reference coordinates provide the maximum dimensions of a rectangle containing this survey unit. Some areas contained in this rectangle may not be part of this survey unit. The boundary of the survey unit was defined using a Global Positioning System (GPS).
- 2. CLASSIFICATION BASIS The survey unit was classified in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-10, "Survey Unit Classification." The historical information, scoping analyses and characterization results provided sufficient data to designate Survey Unit 9527-0001 as Class 2 in September 2005.
The "Classification Basis Summary" conducted for this survey unit consisted of: a) A review of the 10CFR50.75 (g) (1) database, b) A review of the "Initial Characterization Report" and the "Historic Site Assessment (HSA) Supplement,"
c) Historic and current survey records review, d) Visual inspections and a "walkdown."
A review of the 10CFR50.75 (g) (1) database report identifies six (6) documents associated with or relating to this survey unit.
a) Event PIR 80-37: Contamination was documented to be present in an area outside the restricted area. Small areas of low-level contamination were found on the facility grounds through routine survey in a normally non-radioactive area. The ar eas were cleaned up in 1980.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 4 b) Radiological Assessment Branch (RAB) memo NE-83-RA-1374 (September 1983): Results of a contamination survey outside the southeast RCA boundary has identified plant related activity in an adjacent survey unit to 9527. According to the memo, the source could have been the events described by PIR 80-37.
c) Adverse Condition Report ACR 97-0994: Soil sample analysis identified plant related radioactivity on hillside east of plant (in another survey unit of 9527).
d) Scoping Survey Report 1998: Results of scoping samples performed for decommissioning characterization data. Cesium-137 was the predominate radionuclide found in this survey unit during the scoping survey. No other plant-related radionuclides were identified in this survey unit.
e) Event CR 05-0244: Tank farm material with low-level fixed contamination was found on the East Mountain Side in another survey unit of 9527. A single piece of tent material was found in Survey Unit 9527-0005 along the fence and about one hundred eight (180) feet from the nearest boundary of 9527-0001.
f) Memo ISC 05-045: Periodic surveillance following final status survey. Surveillance is required periodically by the LTP to ensure the radiological condition does not significantly change from the FSS results. The memo documents no negative change in the radiological status. A review of the "Initial and Supplemental C haracterization Reports" as well as the previous "Classification Basis Summaries" provided no additional information pertinent to classification. Characterization was performed by Site Closure personnel in April 2005 to determine existing conditions and obtain radiological data for Final Status Survey (FSS). The reported concentrations of Cs-137 found in the soil were statistically consistent with those concentrations in wooded areas determined from off-site locations as documented by Health Physics Technical Support Document (TSD) BCY-HP-0063, "
Background Cs-137 Concentration in Soil." The average concentration was 0.487 pCi/g as expected; however, one (1) sample reported Cs-137 at a concentration of 1.01 pCi/g. Cobalt-60 was reported at a maximum concentration of 0.0302 pCi/g. The basic statistical quantities (i.e., mean, standard deviation, median) for Cs-137 and Co-60 are provided in Table 1.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 5 Table 1 - Basic Statistical Quantities for Cs-137 and Co-60 from the Characterization Survey Parameter Cs-137 (pCi/g)
Co-60 (pCi/g) Minimum Value: 9.66E-02 -4.93E-03 Maximum Value: 1.01E+00 3.02E-02 Mean: 4.87E-01 1.07E-02 Median: 4.35E-01 9.21E-03 Standard Deviation: 2.62E-01 1.29E-02 The FSS Engineer performed a visual inspection and walkdown during September 2005 to assess the physical condition of the survey unit, evaluate access points and travel paths and identify potentially hazardous conditions.
The final designation was Class 2 based on historical information (HSA Supplement and LTP Table 2.10 and 2.11B) and characterization survey data which resulted in the expectation that no FSS sample would be reported in a concentration that would exceed the LTP criteria.
- 3. DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES (DQO) FSS design and planning is based on the Data Quality Objective (DQO) process as described by the LTP, Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparation of Final Status Survey Plan," and the "Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual" (MARSSIM). A summary of the main features of the DQO process are provided herein. The DQO process incorporated hypothesi s testing and probabilistic sampling distributions to control decision errors during data analysis. Hypot hesis testing is a process based on the scientific method that compares a baseline condition to an alternate condition. The baseline condition is technically known as the null hypothesis. Hypothesis testing rests on the premise that the null hypothesis is true and that sufficient evidence must be provided for rejection. In designing the survey plan, the underlying assumption, or null hypothesis was that residual activity in the survey unit exceeded the release criteria. Rejection of the null hypothesis would satisfy the release criteria objective of the FSS. Probabilistic sampling is a preferred method to select a sample so that each item in the population being studied has a known likelihood of being included in the sample. Probabilistic sampling might include simple random sampling where every sample has the same chance of being included, or systematic random sampling where samples are arranged in some order and a random starting point is selected. The primary objective of the Final Status Survey Plan (FSSP) was to demonstrate that the level of residual radioactivity in 9527-0001 did not exceed the release criteria specified in the LTP and that the potential dose from residual radioactivity is As Low As R easonably Achievable (ALARA).
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 6 A fundamental precursor to survey design is to establish a relationship between the release criteria and some measurable quantity. This is done through the development of Derived Concentration Guideline Values (DCGLs). The DCGLs represent average levels of radioactivity above background levels and are presented in terms of surface or mass activity concentrations. Chapter 6 of the LTP describes in detail the modeling used to develop the DCGLs for soil (called Base Case Soil DCGL), existing groundwater radioactivity and additional future groundwater radioactivity from building basements and footings. The DCGLs presented in Chapter 6 of the LTP were developed for exposures from three (3) components, that is, residual radioactivity in soil, existing groundwater radioactivity, and future groundwater radioactivity from the burial of concrete foundations or footings from site buildings containing residual radioactivity. Equation 1 shows the mathematical relationship between the three (3) com ponents and the total dose.
Equation 1:
H Total=H Soil + H Existing GW
+ HFuture GW The total dose under the LTP criteria is 25 mrem/yr TEDE from all three components. The allowable total dose under the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (CTDEP) radiological remediation standard for Connecticut Yankee (CY) is 19 mrem/yr TEDE. To satisfy both the LTP and CY CTDEP criteria, the dose from soil must be reduced when using the existing and future groundwater dose values discussed above. This survey unit is affected by existing groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024 and the Final Status Survey Final Report Phase III). The dose contribution from existing groundwater is bounded at 2 mrem/yr TEDE based on field data. This survey unit is not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no concrete foundations or footings containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third dose component, is therefore 0 mrem/yr TEDE.
Equation 2:
19 mrem/yr Total=17 mrem/yr Soil+2 mrem/yrExisting GW+0 mrem/yr Future GW The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is 17 mrem/yr TEDE as shown by Equation 2 above. The concentration of residual radioac tivity resulting in 17 mrem/yr TEDE is designated as th e Operational DCGL, and has been established for the radionuclides of concern as provided in Table 2. Note, the EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 7 survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 to conservatively account for the contribution to the total dose from existing and future groundwater which had not been established at the time of planning the FSS.
Table 2 - Radionuclide Specific Base Case Soil DCGL, Operational DCGLs and Required Minimum Detectable Concentrations Radionuclide (1) Base Case Soil DCGL (pCi/g) (2) Operational DCGL (pCi/g) (3) Required MDC (pCi/g) (4) H-3 4.12E+02 2.80E+02 1.65E+01 C-14 5.66E+00 3.85E+00 2.26E-01 Mn-54 1.74E+01 1.18E+01 6.96E-01 Fe-55 2.74E+04 1.86E+04 1.10E+03 Co-60 3.81E+00 2.59E+00 1.52E-01 Ag-108m 7.14E+00 4.86E+00 2.86E-01 Ni-63 7.23E+02 4.92E+02 2.89E+01 Sr-90 1.55E+00 1.05E+00 6.20E-02 Nb-94 7.12E+00 4.84E+00 2.85E-01 Tc-99 1.26E+01 8.57E+00 5.04E-01 Cs-134 4.67E+00 3.18E+00 1.87E-01 Cs-137 7.91E+00 5.38E+00 3.16E-01 Eu-152 1.01E+01 6.87E+00 4.04E-01 Eu-154 9.29E+00 6.32E+00 3.72E-01 Eu-155 3.92E+02 2.67E+02 1.57E+01 Pu-238 2.96E+01 2.01E+01 1.18E+00 Pu-239/240 2.67E+01 1.82E+01 1.07E+00 Pu-241 8.70E+02 5.92E+02 3.48E+01 Am-241 (5) 2.58E+01 1.75E+01 1.03E+00 Cm-243/244 2.90E+01 1.97E+01 1.16E+00 (1) Bold indicates those radionuclides considered to be Hard to Detect (HTD) (2) The Base Case Soil DCGLs for soil are specified by the LTP in Chapter 6 and are equivalent to 25 mrem/yr TEDE (3) The Operational DCGL is equivalent to 17 mrem/yr TEDE (4) The required MDC is equivalent to 1 mrem/yr TEDE (5) Americium-241 can be analyzed by gamma and alpha spectroscopy and is considered to be Easy to Detect (ETD). The preferred result is the alpha spectroscopy's when both analyses are performed. Another important facet of the DQO process is to identify the radionuclides of concern and determine the concentration variability. Characterization was performed in April 2005 as discussed in Section 2. Cesium-137 was found to be the predominate radionuclide of concern. Cobalt-60 was included in the EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 8 survey design based on the 1997 scoping survey results. The basic statistical quantities (i.e., mean, standard deviation, median) for Cs-137 and Co-60 are provided in Table 1. Instrument DQOs included a verification of the ability of the survey instrument to detect the radiation(s) of interest relative to the DCGL. Survey instrument response checks were to be performed before issue and after the instrument had been used. Control and accountability of survey instruments was to be maintained to assure the quality and prevent the loss of data. Laboratory DQOs and analysis results were to be reported as actual calculated results. Results reported as less than Minimum Detectable Concentration (<MDC) would not be accepted for FSS. Sample report summaries were to include unique sample identification, analytical method, radionuclide, result, and uncertainty of two standard deviations, laboratory data qualifiers, units, and the required and observed MDC.
- 4. SURVEY DESIGN The level of effort associated with planning a survey is based on the complexity of the survey and nature of the hazards. To assist the FSS Engineers when preparing survey plans for FSS, guidance is provided in Procedure RPM 5.1-11, "Preparation of Final Status Survey Plans". By design, the FSSP meets the ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP. The FSSP uses an integrated sample design that combines scanning surveys and sampling which can be either random or biased. Characterization was performed by Site Closure personnel in April 2005 to determine existing conditions and obtain radiological data for Final Status Survey (FSS). The DQO process determined that Cs-137 and Co-60 would be the radionuclides of concern (refer to Section 3). The sum of fractions or unity rule would be used with the individual Operational DCGLs because multiple radionuclides (Cs-137 and Co-60) were considered in the survey design. Other radionuclides identified during FSS would be evaluated to ensure adequate survey design and compliance with the unity rule. Surrogate DCGLs were not required for this survey unit based on process knowledge from FSS of nearby adjacent areas and via screening under LTP Section 5.4.7.2, "Gross Activity DCGLs". Radionuclide screening or de-selection is a process where an individual radionuclide or aggregate may be considered insignificant and eliminated from the FSS. The criteria for de-
selection are concentrations less than 5% for individual radionuclides and less than 10% for aggregates. The Elevated Measurement Comparison (EMC) did not apply to this survey unit since the survey unit is a Class 2 and discrete, elevated areas of contamination were not expected.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 9 The Sign Test was selected as the non-parametric statistical test. The use of the Sign Test did not require the selection or use of a background reference area, which simplified survey design and implementation. This approach was conservative since it included background Cs-137 as part of the sample set. The number of soil samples for FSS was determined in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-12, "Determination of the Number of Samples for Final Status Survey." The Lower Bound of the Gray Region (LBGR) was set in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-11 to 0.79 to maintain the relative shift
(/) in the range of 1 and 3. A Prospective Power Curve was generated using COMPASS, a software package developed under the sponsorship of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) for implementation of the MARSSIM in support of the decommissioning license termination rule (10 CFR 20, Subpart E). The result of the COMPASS computer run showed adequate power for the survey design. Survey design specified fifteen (15) surface soil samples for non-parametric statistical testing. The grid pattern and locations of the soil samples were determined using Visual Sample Plan (VSP) in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-14 , "Identifying, and Marking Surface Sample Locations for Final Status Survey." Visual Sample Plan was created by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the United States Department of Energy. A systematic triangular grid pattern with a random starting point was selected for sample design, which is appropriate for a Class 2 area. Sample locations were identified using AutoCAD-Lt, a commercially available plotting software package with coordinates consistent with the Connecticut State Plane System. These coordinates were integrated with a GPS to locate sample locations in the field. Sample Measurement Locations for the design are listed with the GPS coordinates in Table 3. Table 3 -Sample Measurement Locations with Associated GPS Coordinates Designation Northing Easting 9527-0001-001F 237268.05 668668.64 9527-0001-002F 237268.05 668755.82 9527-0001-003F 237268.05 668843.00 9527-0001-004F 237192.55 668450.69 9527-0001-005F 237192.55 668537.87 9527-0001-006F 237192.55 668625.05 9527-0001-007F 237192.55 668712.23 9527-0001-008F 237192.55 668799.41 9527-0001-009F 237117.05 668494.28 9527-0001-010F 237117.05 668581.46 9527-0001-011F 237117.05 668668.64 9527-0001-012F 237117.05 668755.82 9527-0001-013F 237041.55 668625.05 9527-0001-014F 237041.55 668712.23 9527-0001-015F 236966.06 668668.64 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 10 There were to be three (3) judgmental samples total for soil sampling. The soil sample locations would be determined based on professional judgment and observation during characterization and walkdowns to determine areas having the potential for residual radioactivity (e.g., runoff and collection, area disturbance). The number of judgmental samples represented about 20% of the number of samples that would be used for non-parametric statistical testing.
Although Procedure RPM 5.1-11 only specified that 5% of the samples be selected for HTD analysis, at least three (3) soil samples or 20% of the number of samples that would be used for non-parametric statistical testing were randomly selected for HTD radionuclide analysis using the Microsoft Excel "RANDBETWEEN" function. Each sample would be sent off-site for a full suite analysis of the HTD radionuclides specified in the LTP, Table 2-12, "Radionuclides Potentially Present at Haddam Neck Plant." The implementation of survey specific quality control measures as referenced by Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey," included the collection of two (2) soil samples for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory. These locations were selected randomly using the Microsoft Excel "RANDBETWEEN" function. The number of quality control soil samples was determined to be 10% of fifteen (15) samples, rounded up to the next whole number. The LTP specifies that scanning will be performed in a combination of systematic and judgmental measurements for a Class 2 land area and cover 10% to 100% of the area. The fraction of scanning coverage was determined during the DQO process with the total amount and location(s) based on the likelihood of finding elevated activity during FSS. Approximately 25% of the survey unit was to be scanned based on the characterization survey and sampling results. For this Class 2 survey unit, the "Investigation Level" for area scanning and soil sample measurement results are those levels specified in LTP, Table 5-8, "Investigation Levels." Note, the survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 to conservatively account for the contribution to the total dose from existing and future groundwater which had not been established at the time of planning the FSS.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 11 Table 4 - Synopsis of the Survey Design (1) Feature Design Criteria Basis Survey Unit Land Area 8,600 m 2 Based on AutoCAD-Lt and Visual Sample Plan calculationsNumber of Measurements 15 Type 1 and Type 2 errors were 0.05, sigma was 0.10, the LBGR was adjusted to 0.79 to maintain Relative Shift in the range of 1 and 3, Relative Shift was 2 Grid Spacing 20.7 Based on triangular grid Interval Spacing 17.9 Based on triangular grid Design DCGL 2.53 pCi/g Cs-137 1.52 pCi/g Co-60 To achieve 8 mrem/yr TEDE Operational DCGL 5.38 pCi/g Cs-137 2.59 pCi/g Co-60 To achieve 17 mrem/yr TEDE (2) to demonstrate compliance with Equation 2 of this Release Record Scan Survey unit Coverage Approximately 25%
of the area The LTP requires >10% area coverage for Class 2 Survey Units Soil Investigation Level 2.53 pCi/g Cs-137 1.52 pCi/g Co-60 The Operational DCGL meets the LTP criteria for a Class 2 survey unit Scan Investigation Level Detectable over background The LTP specifies investigation at the MDC SCAN for a Class 2 survey unit when the MDC SCAN is greater than the Operational DCGL (1) The survey design used a much smaller value for investigation than the Operational DCGL provided by Table 2 as the total dose from existing and future groundwater had not been established at the time of planning the FSS (2) The allowable dose for soil in this survey unit is 17 mrem/yr TEDE as the bounding dose from existing and future groundwater has been established based on field data (reference CY memo ISC 06-024 and the Final Status Survey Final Report Phase III)
- 5. SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION The FSS field activities were conducted under Work Plan and Inspection Record (WP&IR) 2005-0054. The WP&IR package included a detailed FSSP, job safety analysis, job planning checklist and related procedures for reference. Daily briefings were conducted to discuss the expectations for job performance and the safety aspects of the survey. The "Daily Survey Journal" was used to document field activities and other information pertaining to the FSS.
Survey activities occurred September 13, 2005 through September 22, 2005. The scan areas were marked out and scanned for elevated readings (see Attachment 2 for Scan Area Results). Scanning was performed with an Eberline E-600 using a SPA-3 sodium iodide detector. The E-600 was operated EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 12 in the rate-meter mode and used with audio response. The probe was positioned as close to the ground as possible and was moved at a scan speed of about 0.5 meters per second. Using GPS coordinates, sample measurement locations were identified and marked with a surveyor's flag for identification. At each sample measurement location, a one (1) meter radius around the sample flag was scanned for elevated
radiation levels. Fifteen (15) surface soil samples were collected and packaged in accordance with Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) Procedure RPM 5.1-3, "Collection of Sample Media for Final Status Survey" and FSS design. Samples were controlled, transported, stored, and transferred to the off-site laboratory using Chain-of-Custody (COC) protocol in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-5, "Chain of Custody for Final Status Survey Samples."
Three (3) soil samples (9527-0001-004F, 9527-0001-006F and 9527-0001-007F) were randomly selected for HTD radionuclide analysis by the off-site
laboratory. Three (3) biased soil samples (9527-0001-016F through 9527-0001-018F) were collected and analyzed by the off-site laboratory for gamma spectroscopy. The implementation of survey specific quality control measures included the collection of two (2) samples (9527-0001-010F and 9527-0001-013F) for "split sample" analysis by the off-site laboratory.
- 6. SURVEY RESULTS The eighteen (18) soil sample measurement locations identified in the FSS plan and Addendum were scanned about a one (1) meter radius for elevated radiation levels. Table 5 provides an overview of the scan area survey. Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2.
Table 5- Scan Area Results for Sample Measurement Locations Sample Measurement Location Highest Logged Reading (kcpm) Action Level (1) (kcpm) Above Action Level (2) 1 8.87 8.91 No 2 7.67 8.63 No 3 8.94 10.5 No 4 7.93 9.43 No 5 10.4 12.9 No 6 9.12 12.2 No 7 8.42 9.57 No 8 8.20 9.92 No 9 10.7 12.4 No EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 13 Table 5- Scan Area Results for Sample Measurement Locations Sample Measurement Location Highest Logged Reading (kcpm) Action Level (1) (kcpm) Above Action Level (2) 10 10.1 11.7 No 11 9.97 10.9 No 12 11.1 12.2 No 13 12.7 13.9 No 14 11.3 13.5 No 15 13.6 14.7 No 16 9.27 10.0 No 17 9.10 9.27 No 18 9.90 11.2 No (1) The action level is based on a measurement above ambient background (2) Samples are collected from the location within the boundaries of the scan yielding a response above the action level Twenty-two areas were scanned for elevated radiation levels. Several elevated areas were identified. Table 6 provides an overview of the scan area survey. Scan area results are provided in Attachment 2. Table 6- Scan Area Results Scan Area Highest Logged Reading (kcpm) Action Level (1) (kcpm) Elevated Reading Identification (2) Investigation Sample 1 8.42 10.2 None - no elevated areas identified None 2 8.46 9.61 None - no elevated areas identified None 3 10.9 10.2 9527-01-SC-01-25-0 None (3) 4 11.3 12.6 None - no elevated areas identified None 5 12.1 12.0 9527-01-SC-01-42-0 None (3) 6 10.5 11.5 None - no elevated areas identified None 7 9.84 10.5 None - no elevated areas identified None 8 9.75 10.2 None - no elevated areas identified None 9 10.1 11.3 None - no elevated areas identified None 10 9.81 10.7 None - no elevated areas identified None 11 9.52 10.9 None - no elevated areas identified None EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 14 Table 6- Scan Area Results Scan Area Highest Logged Reading (kcpm) Action Level (1) (kcpm) Elevated Reading Identification (2) Investigation Sample 12 10.7 12.5 None - no elevated areas identified None 13 11.1 12.6 None - no elevated areas identified None 14 10.5 10.9 None - no elevated areas identified None 15 10.7 11.3 None - no elevated areas identified None 16 8.44 9.30 None - no elevated areas identified None 17 7.50 8.23 None - no elevated areas identified None 18 9.56 9.87 None - no elevated areas identified None 19 8.48 8.90 None - no elevated areas identified None 20 9.31 10.2 None - no elevated areas identified None 21 11.3 11.7 None - no elevated areas identified None 22 11.7 13.0 None - no elevated areas identified None (1) The action level is based on a measurement above ambient background (2) Samples are collected from the location within the boundaries of the scan yielding a response above the action level (3) Refer to Section 8 for additional details The off-site laboratory employed for the radiological analyses of samples was General Engineering Laboratories (GEL) - Charleston, South Carolina. The laboratory analyzed the fifteen (15) samples taken for non-parametric statistical testing and the associated duplicates using gamma spectroscopy. Gamma spectroscopy analysis was performed to the required MDC. Gamma spectroscopy results iden tified radionuclides other than Cs-137 and Co-60 meeting the accepted criteria for detection (i.e., a result greater than two standard deviations uncertainty). All could be de-selected or excluded using the 5% and 10% rule described in Section 4. Cesium-137 was identified in all fifteen (15) samples. Cobalt-60 was only identified in one (1) of the fifteen (15) samples. The average gamma spectroscopy results for Cs-137 were lower than the concentrations of Cs-137 found in soil at off-site locations within the vicinity of the HNP as presented in the Health Physics TSD BCY-HP-0063.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 15 None of the samples exceeded 28% of the Operational DCGL. Sample analysis did not require further investigation. A summary of the sample results is provided in Table 7.
Table 7- Summary of Soil Sample Results Sample Number Cs-137 pCi/g Co-60 pCi/g Fraction of the Operational DCGL (1) 9527-0001-001F 5.19E-01 1.26E-02 0.101 9527-0001-002F 2.43E-01 2.43E-02 0.055 9527-0001-003F 8.83E-01 -4.47E-03 0.162 9527-0001-004F 4.40E-01 1.00E-02 0.086 9527-0001-005F 3.12E-01 4.45E-03 0.060 9527-0001-006F 5.55E-01 2.08E-02 0.111 9527-0001-007F 5.63E-01 -9.59E-03 0.101 9527-0001-008F 4.16E-01 1.91E-02 0.085 9527-0001-009F 8.07E-01 6.04E-03 0.152 9527-0001-010F 3.31E-01 2.50E-02 0.071 9527-0001-011F 5.02E-01 -1.63E-04 0.093 9527-0001-012F 1.48E+00 -5.98E-03 0.273 9527-0001-013F 4.05E-01 -1.63E-02 0.069 9527-0001-014F 4.50E-01 1.61E-02 0.090 9527-0001-015F 2.69E-01 1.19E-02 0.055 (1) The Operational DCGLs from Table 2 are 5.38 pCi/g for Cs-137 and 2.59 pCi/g for Co-60 and are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve 17 mrem/yr TEDE The off-site laboratory also processed three (3) samples for HTD analysis as required by the sample plan. The requested analyses included alpha spectroscopy, gas proportional counting, a nd liquid scintillation depending on the radionuclide and the measurement method. All analyses met the required MDC. Two (2) of the HTD radionuclides met the accepted crit eria for detection (i.e., a result greater than two standard deviations uncertainty) in more than one sample. A result greater than two standa rd deviations uncertainty was reported once for Sr-90. Table 8 lists the results for the HTD radionuclides that could not be de-selected based on e ither the 5% and 10% rules.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 16 Table 8-Hard-to-Detect Sample Results Sample Sr-90 pCi/g C-14 pCi/g Tc-99 pCi/g Fraction of the Operational DCGL (1) 9527-0001-004F 2.05E-02 1.15E-01 2.37E-01 0.077 9527-0001-006F -1.88E-02 1.03E-01 2.00E-01 0.032 9527-0001-007F -1.03E-03 1.36E-01 1.07E-01 0.047 (1) The Operational DCGLs from Table 2 are 1.05 pCi/g for Sr-90, 3.85 pCi/g for C-14 and 8.57 pCi/g for Tc-99 used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve 17 mrem/yr TEDE Three (3) biased samples were collected at locations selected by FSS Supervision based on professional judgment and observation. Gamma spectroscopy analysis was performed by the off-site laboratory to the required MDC. A summary of the all sample results is provided in Table 9. Table 9 - Biased Sample Results Sample Number Cs-137 pCi/g Co-60 pCi/g Fraction of the Operational DCGL (1) 9527-0001-016F 5.95E-01 1.24E-02 0.115 9527-0001-017F 4.19E-01 -3.49E-03 0.077 9527-0001-018F 5.71E-01 -1.69E-03 0.105 (1) The Operational DCGLs from Table 2 are 5.38 pCi/g for Cs-137 and 2.59 pCi/g for Co-60 and are used in conjunction with the unity rule to achieve 17 mrem/yr TEDE
- 7. QUALITY CONTROL The off-site laboratory processed the split samples and performed gamma spectroscopy analysis. Thirteen percent (13%) of the samples were selected for analysis, which exceeds the 5% minimum required by the LTP. The data were evaluated using USNRC acceptance criteria specified in Inspection Procedure 84750 as detailed in HNP Procedure RPM 5.1-24, "Split Sample Assessment for Final Status Survey." There was acceptable agreement between the field split results for sample 9527-0001-013F. There was unacceptable agreement between field split results for Cs-137 in sample 9527-0001-010F which was identified under Condition Report (CR) 05-0781. Evaluation of the data using the reported results for NORM resulted in acceptable agreement. The source of the disagreement for Cs-137 is likely a disproportionate amount of organic material in the field splits. Sample location 9527-0001-010 is within an area that receives considerable runoff from the mountainside. The area also contains a dense root system and organic material.
The MARSSIM Section 7.5.1.2 recognizes that vegetative cover and foreign material (e.g., plant roots) are generally not considered part of the sample and are typically removed in the field. Pict ure 1 clearly shows a dense root system within the layer of material available for sampling which would be difficult to remove in the field using available equipment and techniques.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 17 Picture 1 - View of sample media from 9527-0001-010 showing the root system and layer depth.
The sample analysis vendor, Genera l Engineering Laboratories (GEL) - Charleston, South Carolina, maintained quality control and quality assurance plans as part of normal operation. Refer to Attachment 2 for data and data quality analysis results.
- 8. INVESTIGATIONS AND RESULTS Additional scanning was performed in two (2) small locations in March 2006 to obtain additional data relevant to the DQOs. The scanning was performed in two (2) strips in scan area 19 and scan area 21. No elevated readings were identified.
- 9. REMEDIATION AND RESULTS Historically, no radiological remedial action as described by MARSSIM Section 5.4 was performed in this survey unit prior to or as a result of the FSS. Health Physics TSD BCY-HP-0078, "ALARA Evaluation of Soil Remediation in Support of Final Status Survey," determined that remediation beyond that required to meet the release criteria to be unnecessary and that the remaining residual radioactivity in soil was ALARA.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 18 10. CHANGES FROM THE FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN The survey was designed to 8 mrem/yr TEDE which was conservative and necessary at the time of FSS planning. It is no longer required as the total dose from existing and future groundwater has been established. The dose for soil used to demonstrate compliance with the LTP criteria is 17 mrem/yr TEDE as
discussed in Section 2 of this Release Record. Three (3) HTD radionuclides were reported in concentrations exceeding either the 5% and 10% rule for de-selection (i.e., in one of the three samples). Therefore, the individual Operational DCGLs for Sr-90, C-14 and Tc-99 were included into sample design in conjunction with the unity rule to ensure adequate survey design in accordance with the DQOs. The result of the COMPASS computer run showed adequate power and maintained the original fifteen (15) surface soil samples for non-parametric statistical testing.
- 11. DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT (DQA) The DQO sample design and data were reviewed in accordance with Procedure RPM 5.1-23, "Data Quality Assessment," for completeness and consistency. The sampling design had adequate power as indicated by the Retrospective Power Curve. The Sign Test was performed on the data and compared to the original assumptions of the DQOs. The Sign Test shows that the survey unit passes FSS. Documentation was complete and legible. Surveys and sample collection were consistent with the DQOs and were sufficient to ensure that the survey unit was properly designated as Class 2. The preliminary data review consisted of calculating basic statistical quantities (e.g., mean, median, standard deviation). The range of the data, about 3.7 standard deviations, was not unusually large. The difference between the mean and median was 30% of the standard deviation which indicates positive skewness in the data. The data was represented graphically through posting plots, a frequency pl ot, and a quantile plot. The frequency plot shows significant positive skewness as confirmed by the calculated skew of 1.0 and is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff. All data, assessments, and graphical representations are provided in Attachment
- 2. 12. ANOMALIES The anomalies associate with the disagreement between the field splits has been discussed in Section 7. The source of the disagreemen t for Cs-137, especially at sample location 9527-0001-010, was likely a disproportionate amount of organic material between the field splits.
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDE SURVEY UNIT 9527-0001 RELEASE RECORD Revision 1 19 13. CONCLUSION Survey Unit 9527-0001 has met the final DQOs of the FSS. The ALARA criteria for soils as specified in Chapter 4 of the LTP were achieved. Elevated Measurement Comparison and reme diation was not required. The sample data passed the Sign Test. The null hypothesis was rejected. Graphical representation of data indicates significant positive skewness as that is probably due to the differences in terrain and the collection of runoff. The
Retrospective Power Curve generated using COMPASS shows adequate power was achieved. The survey unit wa s properly designated as Class 2. The dose contribution from soil is less than 2 mrem/yr TEDE based on the average concentration of the samples used for non-parametric statistical sampling. This survey unit is affected by existing groundwater (reference CY memo ISC 06-024 and the Final Status Survey Final Report Phase III). The dose contribution from existing groundwater is bounded at 2 mrem/yr TEDE based on field data. This survey unit is not considered impacted by future groundwater radioactive contamination, as there are no concrete foundations or footings containing residual radioactive material within the groundwater saturated zone in the area (reference CY memo ISC 06-024). The dose contribution from future groundwater, the third dose component, is therefore 0 mrem/yr TEDE.
- 14. ATTACHMENTS 14.1 Attachment 1 - Figures 14.2 Attachment 2 - Sample and Statistical Data EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 1Figures(5 pages)
Feet03570 Feet03570 Feet03570 Feet03570 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2Sample and Statistical Data EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2aSample Data(80 Pages)
General Narrative 1..................................................................
Chain of Custody and Supporting Documentation 4...........
Radiological Analysis 9..........................................................
Sample Data Summary 25......................................................
Quality Control Data 70...........................................................
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS 9 Radiochemistry Case NarrativeConnecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co. (YANK)SDG MSR#05-2329Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSSAnalytical Method:DOE EML HASL-300, Am-05-RC ModifiedPrep Method:Ash Soil PrepDry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:Dry Soil PrepAnalytical Batch Number:471786Prep Batch Number:467615Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:467614Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F1200957639 Method Blank (MB)1200957640 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1200957641 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200957642 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP ReferenceProcedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 14.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590018 (9527-0001-004F).QC InformationAll of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.
10 Preparation InformationAll preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisNone of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.Miscellaneous Information:NCR DocumentationNonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Alphaspec Pu, Solid-ALL FSSAnalytical Method:DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-RC ModifiedPrep Method:Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:Dry Soil PrepAnalytical Batch Number:471787Prep Batch Number:467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:467614Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F146590020 9527-0001-007F1200957643 Method Blank (MB)1200957644 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1200957645 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200957646 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP ReferenceProcedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-011 REV# 14.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank Information 11 The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QCThe following sample was used for QC: 146590018 (9527-0001-004F).QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisNone of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.Miscellaneous Information:NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Manual Integration No manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Liquid Scint Pu241, Solid-ALL FSSAnalytical Method:DOE EML HASL-300, Pu-11-RC ModifiedPrep Method:Ash Soil PrepDry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:Dry Soil Prep Analytical Batch Number:471788Prep Batch Number:467615Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:467614Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F146590020 9527-0001-007F1200957647 Method Blank (MB) 1200957648 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200957649 146590018(9527-0001-004F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200957650 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP ReferenceProcedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-035 REV# 7.Calibration Information:
12 Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590018 (9527-0001-004F).QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisNone of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.Miscellaneous Information:NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.Manual IntegrationNo manual integrations were performed on data in this batch.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.
Method/Analysis InformationProduct:GFPC, Sr90, solid - 0.025 pCi/gAnalytical Method:EPA 905.0 ModifiedPrep Method:Ash Soil PrepDry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:Dry Soil PrepAnalytical Batch Number:472639Prep Batch Number:467615Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:467614Sample IDClient ID 13 146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200959675 Method Blank (MB)1200959676 146590019(9527-0001-006F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200959677 146590019(9527-0001-006F) Matrix Spike (MS)1200959678 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-004 REV# 9.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank InformationThe blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590019 (9527-0001-006F).QC InformationAll of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisNone of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.Chemical Recoveries All chemical recoveries meet the required acceptance limits for this sample set.Miscellaneous Information:NCR DocumentationNonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.
14 Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Liquid Scint Tc99, Solid-ALL FSSAnalytical Method:DOE EML HASL-300, Tc RC ModifiedAnalytical Batch Number:468332Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F146590020 9527-0001-007F1200949447 Method Blank (MB) 1200949448 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200949449 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Matrix Spike (MS) 1200949450 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-005 REV# 12.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank InformationThe blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Z12-4-01).QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisNone of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.
15 Miscellaneous Information:NCR DocumentationNonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Liquid Scint Fe55, Solid-ALL FSSAnalytical Method:DOE RESL Fe-1, ModifiedPrep Method:Ash Soil Prep Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:Dry Soil PrepAnalytical Batch Number:473150Prep Batch Number:467615 Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:467614Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200960974 Method Blank (MB)1200960975 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200960976 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Matrix Spike (MS)1200960977 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP ReferenceProcedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-040 REV# 3.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Z12-4-01).QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
16 Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisSamples were reprepped due to the quench number being outside the calibration range.Miscellaneous Information:NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. The following NCR was generated for this SDG:NCR 260476 was generated due to Container scanning event for custody missed. 1. The analyst did not scan thesamples 146590018, 146590019, 146590020, 146692033, and 146692034 into the batch prior to analysis, howeverthe samples did remain in their custody at all times. The error has been corrected and the analyst has been instructedon the proper scanning procedures. 1. Reporting results.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Liquid Scint Ni63, Solid-ALL FSSAnalytical Method:DOE RESL Ni-1, ModifiedPrep Method:Ash Soil PrepDry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Method:Dry Soil PrepAnalytical Batch Number:470704Prep Batch Number:467615Dry Soil Prep GL-RAD-A-021 Batch Number:467614Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F1200954979 Method Blank (MB)1200954980 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200954981 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Matrix Spike (MS)1200954982 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-022 REV# 7.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).
17 Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank InformationThe blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Z12-4-01).QC InformationAll of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisNone of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.Miscellaneous Information:NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:LSC, Tritium Dist, Solid - 1 to 2 pCi/gAnalytical Method:EPA 906.0 ModifiedAnalytical Batch Number:467508Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F 146590020 9527-0001-007F1200947551 Method Blank (MB)1200947552 145495003(9802-0000-003RA-SBIV) Sample Duplicate (DUP) 1200947553 145495003(9802-0000-003RA-SBIV) Matrix Spike (MS)1200947554 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-002 REV# 10.Calibration Information:
18 Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank Information The blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 145495003 (9802-0000-003RA-SBIV).QC InformationAll of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisSamples 1200947553 (9802-0000-003RA-SBIV) and 1200947554 (LCS) were recounted due to low/high recovery.Miscellaneous Information:NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Liquid Scint C14, Solid All,FSSAnalytical Method:EPA EERF C-01 ModifiedAnalytical Batch Number:470741Sample IDClient ID146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F146590020 9527-0001-007F1200955096 Method Blank (MB)1200955097 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200955098 146692033(9804-0000-Z12-4-01) Matrix Spike (MS)1200955099 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) 19 SOP ReferenceProcedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-003 REV# 8.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards InformationStandard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank InformationThe blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146692033 (9804-0000-Z12-4-01).QC Information All of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisNone of the samples in this sample set required reprep or reanalysis.Miscellaneous Information:NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.
Qualifier informationManual qualifiers were not required.Method/Analysis InformationProduct:Gamma,Solid-FSS GAM & ALL FSSAnalytical Method:EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3Prep Method:Dry Soil PrepAnalytical Batch Number:467961 Prep Batch Number:467614 20 Sample IDClient ID146590001 9527-0001-001F146590002 9527-0001-002F146590003 9527-0001-003F 146590004 9527-0001-005F146590005 9527-0001-008F146590006 9527-0001-009F 146590007 9527-0001-010F146590008 9527-0001-010FS146590009 9527-0001-011F146590010 9527-0001-012F146590011 9527-0001-013F 146590012 9527-0001-013FS146590013 9527-0001-014F146590014 9527-0001-015F 146590015 9527-0001-016F146590016 9527-0001-017F146590017 9527-0001-018F 146590018 9527-0001-004F146590019 9527-0001-006F146590020 9527-0001-007F 1200948602 Method Blank (MB)1200948603 146590001(9527-0001-001F) Sample Duplicate (DUP)1200948604 Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)SOP Reference Procedure for preparation, analysis and reporting of analytical data are controlled by General EngineeringLaboratories, LLC as Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The data discussed in this narrative has been analyzed inaccordance with GL-RAD-A-013 REV# 10.Calibration Information:Calibration Information All initial and continuing calibration requirements have been met.Standards Information Standard solution(s) for these analyses are NIST traceable and used before the expiration date(s).Sample GeometryAll counting sources were prepared in the same geometry as the calibration standards.Quality Control (QC) Information:Blank InformationThe blank volume is representative of the sample volume in this batch.Designated QC The following sample was used for QC: 146590001 (9527-0001-001F).QC InformationAll of the QC samples met the required acceptance limits.
Technical Information:
21 Holding TimeAll sample procedures for this sample set were performed within the required holding time.Preparation Information All preparation criteria have been met for these analyses.Sample Re-prep/Re-analysisSample 146590001 (9527-0001-001F) was recounted due to high relative percent difference/relative error ratio.Miscellaneous Information:NCR Documentation Nonconformance reports are generated to document any procedural anomalies that may deviate from referencedSOP or contractual documents. An NCR was not generated for this SDG.
Qualifier informationQualifierReasonAnalyteSampleUIData rejected due to interference.Europium-155146590008UIData rejected due to low abundance.Actinium-228146590002Cesium-1341200948603146590001146590003146590004146590007146590008146590009146590014146590016Lead-2141200948602Silver-108m1200948602Certification StatementWhere the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of therequirements of the NELAC standard unless otherwise noted in the analytical case narrative.Review Validation:GEL requires all analytical data to be verified by a qualified data validator. In addition, all data designated for CLPor CLP-like packaging will receive a third level validation upon completion of the data package.
The following data validator verified the information presented in this case narrative: Reviewer:_________________________________________________________
22 Page 1 262902 NCR Report No.:
1 Revision No.:
Jodi Cummings Originator's Name:
28-OCT-05 Melanie Aycock
Data Validator/Group Leader:
28-OCT-05 Instrument Type:
Client Code:
Quality Criteria:
GAMMA SPECTROMETER Specifications YANK Type: Process Division: Radiochemistry Mo.Day Yr.
27-OCT-05 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR
Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Quality Review:
Director: NRG Disposition:
- 1. Reporting results.
Specification and Requirements Nonconformance
Description:
- 1. The relative percent difference for Bi-214 and Ra-226 does not meet
the client requirements. Bi-214 and Ra-226 are naturally occurring
isotopes.Application Issues:
Failed RPD for DUP Batch ID: 467961 Test / Method:
EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 Solid Matrix Type:
See Below Sample Numbers:
Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG):
146590(MSR#05-2329) 23 Page 1 260476 NCR Report No.:
Revision No.:
Melanie Aycock Originator's Name:
20-OCT-05 Theresa Parrotte
Data Validator/Group Leader:
20-OCT-05 Instrument Type:
Client Code:
Quality Criteria:
LSC Specifications YANK Type: Process Division: Radiochemistry Mo.Day Yr.
20-OCT-05 General Engineering Laboratories Form GEL-NCR
Rev. 06/05 COMPANY - WIDE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Quality Review:
Director: NRG Disposition:
- 1. Reporting results.
Specification and Requirements Nonconformance
Description:
- 1. The analyst did not scan the samples 146590018, 146590019, 146590020, 146692033, and 146692034 into the batch prior to analysis, however the samples did remain in their custody at all times. The error
has been corrected and the analyst has been instructed on the proper
scanning procedures.
Application Issues:
Container scanning event for custody missed Batch ID: 473150 Test / Method:
DOE RESL Fe-1, Modified Solid Matrix Type:
See Below Sample Numbers:
Potentially affected work order(s)(SDG):
146590(MSR#05-2329),146692(MSR#05-2332) 24 SAMPLE DATA
SUMMARY
25 GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Certificate of Analysis Report YANK001 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co.
Client SDG: MSR#05-2329 GEL Work Order: 146590 Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
- Indicates the analyte is a surrogate compound.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with General Engineering Laboratories, LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Cheryl Jones.
___________________________________________________________
Reviewed by T he Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
- Indicates that a quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria.
< Result is less than amount reported.
> Result is greater than amount reported.
B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
D Sample has been diluted and reanalyzed after initially exceeding inst. calibration range E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
P The response between the confirmation and the primary columns is >40% Different.
R Sample results are rejected.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
X Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.
Y QC Samples were not spiked with this compound.
Z Paint Filter qualifier: Particulates passed through the filter. No free liquids were observed.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
for ND The analyte concentration is not detected above the reporting limit.
26 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 0916 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/28/05 MJH1 U UUI U U
U U U U U 0.0612 0.105 0.132 0.036 0.0242 0.0186 0.0194 0.0497 0.0554 0.0569 0.0305 0.035 0.0192 0.0174 0.168 0.036 0.0157 0.016 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590001 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 1.12 0.750 0.946 0.00 0.519 0.0126 0.0476 1.05 1.16 0.0246 0.0102 11.0 0.946 0.323
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
13.6%0.131 0.218 0.280 0.0757 0.0509 0.0394 0.0421 0.104 0.119 0.118 0.0634 0.0733 0.0408 0.0366 0.369 0.0757 0.0331 0.034 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 2 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 2 LCMDA 27 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590001 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
28 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1912 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/21/05 MJH1 UUI U U U U U U
U U U U 0.199 0.0455 0.285 0.057 0.0392 0.0368 0.0375 0.0842 0.0928 0.072 0.0457 0.0615 0.0364 0.0316 0.319 0.057 0.0285 0.0341 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590002 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.00 0.00512 0.568 0.840 0.243 0.0243 0.575 0.838 0.00959 0.010 6.63 0.840 0.238
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
22%0.414 0.0937 0.602 0.121 0.0833 0.0777 0.0813 0.176 0.203 0.149 0.095 0.129 0.0774 0.0668 0.701 0.121 0.060 0.072 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 29 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590002 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
30 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1913 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/21/05 MJH1 U UUI U U U
U U U U 0.0626 0.118 0.167 0.0405 0.024 0.0207 0.022 0.0513 0.0625 0.0663 0.0353 0.0396 0.0232 0.0194 0.225 0.0405 0.0186 0.0219 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590003 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.648 0.0315 0.392 1.08 0.00 0.883 0.0147 0.641 1.26 0.000602 0.0301 7.42 1.08 0.154
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
21.9%0.136 0.246 0.355 0.0856 0.0511 0.0441 0.0481 0.108 0.136 0.138 0.0734 0.0834 0.0494 0.0411 0.491 0.0856 0.0392 0.0464 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 31 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590003 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
32 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1913 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/21/05 MJH1 U UUI U U U
U U U U 0.0493 0.0611 0.130 0.0328 0.0229 0.0173 0.016 0.0452 0.0501 0.0504 0.0265 0.0305 0.0192 0.0164 0.141 0.0328 0.0155 0.0158 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590004 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 1.09 0.730 0.834 0.00 0.312 0.00445 0.0659 1.17 1.11 0.00267 11.5 0.834 0.378
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
12.4%0.106 0.126 0.274 0.0687 0.0478 0.0364 0.0346 0.094 0.107 0.104 0.0549 0.0636 0.0403 0.0343 0.308 0.0687 0.0323 0.0333 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 33 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590004 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
34 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1740 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U U U U U
U U U U 0.0687 0.089 0.179 0.0381 0.026 0.0214 0.024 0.0521 0.0699 0.0598 0.0311 0.0356 0.0252 0.0201 0.204 0.0381 0.0186 0.0212 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590005 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.740 0.00329 0.444 0.909 0.0248 0.416 0.0191 0.0462 0.652 0.976 0.0294 0.0186 12.1 0.909 0.235
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
12.2%0.149 0.184 0.379 0.0809 0.0553 0.0455 0.0525 0.110 0.152 0.124 0.0646 0.0751 0.0534 0.0426 0.453 0.0809 0.0392 0.0449 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 35 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590005 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
36 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1741 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U U U U U
U U U U 0.0904 0.0437 0.238 0.0512 0.0364 0.0294 0.0262 0.0761 0.0874 0.0666 0.0411 0.0548 0.0295 0.0264 0.296 0.0512 0.0253 0.0307 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590006 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.980 0.0379 0.992 1.14 0.0671 0.807 0.00604 0.150 0.00525 1.25 1.07 0.0189 10.8 1.14 0.370
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
10.1%0.197 0.0897 0.507 0.109 0.0774 0.0627 0.0585 0.159 0.191 0.137 0.0855 0.115 0.0633 0.0563 0.653 0.109 0.0534 0.0649 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 37 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590006 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
38 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1741 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U UUI U U U
U U U U 0.0515 0.103 0.122 0.0334 0.0228 0.0174 0.018 0.0465 0.0519 0.0588 0.0346 0.0327 0.0195 0.0158 0.140 0.0334 0.0149 0.0174 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590007 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 1.32 0.126 0.813 0.924 0.00 0.331 0.025 0.0234 0.0335 1.19 1.12 0.0159 0.0318 11.6 0.924 0.396
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
8.93%0.111 0.212 0.260 0.0702 0.0478 0.0367 0.0389 0.097 0.112 0.121 0.0713 0.0683 0.041 0.0333 0.309 0.0702 0.0313 0.0366 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 39 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590007 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
40 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1742 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U UUI U U U UUI U U U 0.0563 0.061 0.137 0.0324 0.022 0.0185 0.0182 0.0462 0.0555 0.0481 0.0272 0.031 0.0188 0.0168 0.131 0.0324 0.0157 0.0178 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590008 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 1.08 0.0553 0.620 0.851 0.00 0.697 0.000998 0.031 0.0307 0.00 1.13 1.10 0.00703 0.0183 10.7 0.851 0.00316 0.303
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
11.1%0.120 0.126 0.289 0.0679 0.0462 0.0388 0.0391 0.0961 0.119 0.0995 0.0562 0.0648 0.0396 0.0352 0.290 0.0679 0.0329 0.0372 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 41 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590008 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
42 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1957 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U UUI U U U
U U U U 0.0766 0.084 0.145 0.0366 0.030 0.0208 0.0233 0.0591 0.0588 0.0663 0.031 0.0417 0.0235 0.0199 0.170 0.0366 0.0211 0.0215 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590009 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.699 0.0707 0.600 0.725 0.00 0.502 0.0223 0.063 0.772 0.809 9.85 0.725 0.00303 0.212
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
16.8%0.168 0.175 0.319 0.079 0.0642 0.0449 0.0523 0.125 0.133 0.137 0.065 0.0879 0.051 0.0428 0.398 0.079 0.0447 0.0461 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 43 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590009 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
44 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1957 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U U U U
U U U U 0.0904 0.133 0.165 0.0462 0.0279 0.0271 0.0276 0.0726 0.0806 0.0761 0.039 0.0429 0.0254 0.0236 0.200 0.0462 0.0253 0.0236 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590010 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.942 0.379 1.03 0.879 0.00759 1.48 0.0669 0.0523 0.0596 0.874 1.24 0.0125 11.5 0.879 0.00773 0.308
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
17.2%0.197 0.278 0.360 0.0989 0.0605 0.0581 0.0616 0.153 0.178 0.158 0.0814 0.0911 0.0551 0.0507 0.462 0.0989 0.0534 0.0507 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 45 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590010 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
46 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1957 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U U U U U
U U U U 0.073 0.0893 0.149 0.0422 0.0276 0.0226 0.0172 0.055 0.0643 0.061 0.0339 0.0378 0.0201 0.0201 0.184 0.0422 0.0183 0.0223 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590011 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.829 0.092 0.658 0.834 0.0583 0.405 0.00557 0.932 1.06 0.0365 0.0117 12.0 0.834 0.277
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
12.7%0.158 0.184 0.321 0.0893 0.0586 0.0482 0.0389 0.116 0.141 0.126 0.0705 0.0796 0.0434 0.0428 0.414 0.0893 0.0387 0.0472 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LCMDA 47 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590011 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
48 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 1958 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U U U U U
U U U U 0.0661 0.0242 0.172 0.0347 0.0288 0.0239 0.0231 0.0498 0.0626 0.0423 0.0286 0.0365 0.0251 0.0184 0.196 0.0347 0.0179 0.0184 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590012 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.945 0.000425 0.664 0.819 0.0556 0.405 0.0031 0.974 0.955 0.020 11.7 0.819 0.002 0.350
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
11.7%0.144 0.050 0.367 0.0742 0.061 0.0507 0.0509 0.105 0.138 0.0876 0.0597 0.0768 0.0535 0.0393 0.439 0.0742 0.0379 0.0395 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 49 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590012 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
50 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 2044 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U U U U U
U U U U 0.0664 0.0798 0.150 0.0362 0.0241 0.0195 0.0235 0.0531 0.0674 0.0587 0.0336 0.036 0.0218 0.0194 0.209 0.0362 0.0179 0.0194 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590013 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.827 0.772 0.666 0.0176 0.450 0.0161 0.0294 0.00452 0.0211 0.715 0.726 0.00786 0.0165 9.64 0.666 0.236
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
7.62%0.144 0.165 0.321 0.077 0.0515 0.0418 0.0515 0.111 0.147 0.121 0.0697 0.0758 0.0466 0.0412 0.462 0.077 0.0378 0.0413 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 51 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590013 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
52 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 2044 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U UUI U U U
U U U U 0.0865 0.0392 0.187 0.0489 0.0332 0.0237 0.0251 0.0576 0.073 0.0589 0.0409 0.0432 0.0263 0.0224 0.175 0.0489 0.0243 0.0261 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590014 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.956 0.0738 0.984 0.852 0.00 0.269 0.0119 0.0237 0.0819 1.09 1.10 0.00992 0.0103 11.1 0.852 0.0386 0.357
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
12%0.186 0.0804 0.401 0.103 0.0704 0.0507 0.0553 0.121 0.160 0.121 0.0846 0.0907 0.0563 0.0478 0.401 0.103 0.0509 0.0553 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 53 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590014 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
54 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 2044 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U U U U U
U U U U 0.0586 0.108 0.130 0.0343 0.024 0.019 0.0186 0.0484 0.0513 0.0588 0.0286 0.0334 0.0188 0.0176 0.172 0.0343 0.0177 0.0179 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590015 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 1.05 0.0423 0.742 0.869 0.0364 0.595 0.0124 0.0145 0.0314 0.0821 1.22 1.12 0.00844 0.00756 12.5 0.869 0.0237 0.326
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
12.6%0.125 0.222 0.276 0.0721 0.0503 0.0399 0.0402 0.101 0.111 0.122 0.0593 0.0698 0.0398 0.0369 0.373 0.0721 0.037 0.0377 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 55 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590015 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
56 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 2045 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/23/05 MJH1 U UUI U U U
U U U U 0.0591 0.0561 0.105 0.0303 0.0209 0.0178 0.015 0.0418 0.0505 0.0474 0.0255 0.0306 0.0172 0.0147 0.149 0.0303 0.0148 0.0156 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590016 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 1.04 0.935 0.782 0.00 0.419 0.0618 1.08 1.00 11.4 0.782 0.370
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
10.2%0.125 0.116 0.223 0.0635 0.0438 0.0374 0.0325 0.0872 0.108 0.0978 0.0526 0.0636 0.0363 0.0309 0.322 0.0635 0.0309 0.0329 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 57 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590016 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
58 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Gamma Spec Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime 467961 2038 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/24/05 MJH1 U U U U U
U U U U 0.0751 0.0902 0.184 0.044 0.0282 0.0202 0.0233 0.0564 0.0749 0.0614 0.0348 0.0423 0.0257 0.0203 0.215 0.044 0.0216 0.0237 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590017 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.973 0.0116 0.766 0.853 0.0307 0.571 0.0045 0.101 0.929 0.955 0.00589 10.2 0.853 0.0187 0.320
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
12%0.164 0.187 0.395 0.0937 0.0606 0.0438 0.0521 0.119 0.165 0.128 0.0726 0.0891 0.0552 0.0435 0.484 0.0937 0.0457 0.0506 The following Prep Methods were performed Dry Soil Prep09/29/05 467614 1619 AXP2 Method DescriptionAnalyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3 1 LC MDA 59 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590017 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
60 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Alpha Spec Analysis R ad Gamma Spec Analysis R ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting R ad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Liquid Scint C14, Solid All,FSS 471786 471787 471788 467961 472639 467508 1042 1042 0037 2039 2227 0243 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
Tritium 10/15/05 10/15/05 10/21/05 10/24/05 10/18/05 10/10/05 HOB1 HOB1 HOB1 MJH1 EXW1 BXF1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0.133 0.043 0.116 0.151 0.0778 6.47 0.095 0.0339 0.208 0.0451 0.031 0.0269 0.0274 0.0617 0.0897 0.0536 0.0325 0.0434 0.0276 0.0229 0.267 0.0451 0.0226 0.0268 0.0108 0.703 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590018 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.0139 0.0641 0.0419 0.0418 0.763 0.00782 0.600 0.594 0.0432 0.440 0.010 0.053 0.0238 0.625 0.605 10.7 0.594 0.00608 0.275 0.0205 0.586
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch 13.2%0.331 0.158 0.296 0.364 0.217 13.5 0.208 0.0704 0.450 0.0974 0.0672 0.0581 0.0616 0.131 0.198 0.112 0.0683 0.0922 0.0601 0.0497 0.604 0.0974 0.0482 0.0576 0.0225 1.47 Mt
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 2 3 4 5 6 LC MDA 61 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime Liquid Scint C14, Solid All,FSS
470741 473150 470704 468332 0801 1218 0340 1541 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/12/05 10/20/05 10/14/05 10/08/05 SLN1 BXF1 BXF1 BXF1 U U
U U 0.0632 33.3 4.68 0.122 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590018 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
0.115 27.6 0.667 0.237 362 Injun Hollow Road Surrogate/Tracer recovery Recovery%Test Acceptable Limits Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch A P
C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL 84 104 95 45 73 0.129 69.0 9.67 0.250 The following Prep Methods were performed A sh Soil Prep D ry Soil Prep 09/30/05 09/29/05 467615 467614 0554 1619 PD AXP2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
1 0 1 1
EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3
EPA 905.0 Modified
EPA 906.0 Modified
7 8 10 11 LCMDA 62 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590018 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery 91 89 Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
63 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Alpha Spec Analysis R ad Gamma Spec Analysis R ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting R ad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Liquid Scint C14, Solid All,FSS 471786 471787 471788 467961 472639 467508 1042 1042 0054 2039 2227 0316 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
Tritium 10/15/05 10/15/05 10/21/05 10/24/05 10/18/05 10/10/05 HOB1 HOB1 HOB1 MJH1 EXW1 BXF1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0.0635 0.071 0.139 0.135 0.0613 6.12 0.0502 0.0553 0.124 0.0348 0.019 0.0154 0.0184 0.0429 0.0458 0.0493 0.026 0.031 0.016 0.0157 0.156 0.0348 0.015 0.0159 0.0116 0.700 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590019 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.0513 0.805 0.0609 0.507 0.545 0.0144 0.555 0.0208 0.0152 0.026 0.702 0.699 8.96 0.545 0.230 0.913
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch 12.8%0.194 0.217 0.346 0.322 0.174 12.7 0.108 0.115 0.264 0.0729 0.0404 0.0326 0.0397 0.0898 0.0994 0.102 0.054 0.0649 0.0341 0.0332 0.341 0.0729 0.0315 0.0337 0.0241 1.46 Mt
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 2 3 4 5 6 LC MDA 64 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime Liquid Scint C14, Solid All,FSS
470741 473150 470704 468332 1101 1235 0412 1613 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/12/05 10/20/05 10/14/05 10/08/05 SLN1 BXF1 BXF1 BXF1 U U
U U 0.0615 32.3 5.24 0.114 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590019 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
0.103 12.9 0.200 362 Injun Hollow Road Surrogate/Tracer recovery Recovery%Test Acceptable Limits Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch A P
C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL 84 101 104 48 83 0.125 66.9 10.8 0.234 The following Prep Methods were performed A sh Soil Prep D ry Soil Prep 09/30/05 09/29/05 467615 467614 0554 1619 PD AXP2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
1 0 1 1
EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3
EPA 905.0 Modified
EPA 906.0 Modified
7 8 10 11 LCMDA 65 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590019 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery 86 91 Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
66 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Alpha Spec Analysis R ad Gamma Spec Analysis R ad Gas Flow Proportional Counting R ad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL FSS Liquid Scint C14, Solid All,FSS 471786 471787 471788 467961 472639 467508 1042 1042 0111 2044 2228 0348 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
Tritium 10/15/05 10/15/05 10/21/05 10/24/05 10/18/05 10/10/05 HOB1 HOB1 HOB1 MJH1 EXW1 BXF1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0.00 0.047 0.0666 0.109 0.0464 6.76 0.049 0.085 0.107 0.0285 0.0156 0.0152 0.0135 0.0401 0.0426 0.0498 0.0241 0.0275 0.0168 0.0135 0.129 0.0285 0.0119 0.0139 0.0106 0.707 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590020 TS YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
Client 0.061 0.0554 0.0619 0.378 0.030 0.309 0.465 0.0076 0.563 0.0461 0.436 0.581 0.0144 0.00156 5.13 0.465 0.165 0.333
362 Injun Hollow Road Sample ID:
Receive Date:
Client Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Collector:
Moisture:
Batch 18%0.0707 0.173 0.204 0.273 0.148 14.1 0.106 0.177 0.229 0.0603 0.0335 0.0324 0.0299 0.0842 0.0928 0.103 0.0503 0.0579 0.0356 0.0287 0.286 0.0603 0.0254 0.0297 0.0221 1.48 Mt
TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 2 3 4 5 6 LC MDA 67 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC R ad Liquid Scintillation Analysis Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime Liquid Scint C14, Solid All,FSS
470741 473150 470704 468332 1235 1252 0444 1645 pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g
10/12/05 10/20/05 10/14/05 10/08/05 SLN1 BXF1 BXF1 BXF1 U U
U 0.063 28.0 4.68 0.119 DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590020 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
0.136 6.73 0.107 362 Injun Hollow Road Surrogate/Tracer recovery Recovery%Test Acceptable Limits Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch A P
C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery Alphaspec Am241, Cm, Solid ALL 83 103 89 44 91 0.128 57.9 9.66 0.243 The following Prep Methods were performed A sh Soil Prep D ry Soil Prep 09/30/05 09/29/05 467615 467614 0554 1619 PD AXP2 Method Description Analyst Date Time Prep Batch Mt The following Analytical Methods were performed Method Description TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.:
1 2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
1 0 1 1
EML HASL 300, 4.5.2.3
EPA 905.0 Modified
EPA 906.0 Modified
7 8 10 11 LCMDA 68 Certificate of Analysis GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC Parameter Result Units QualifierAnalystDateTime DF Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Address : Soils PO# 002332 Project: 146590020 YANK01204 Project: YANK001 Client ID:
362 Injun Hollow Road Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows :
Sample ID:
Client Sample ID:
Batch B Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
BD Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
E Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
H Analytical holding time exceeded.
J Indicates an estimated value.
U Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
UI Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
d The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample h Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
C arrier/Tracer Recovery C arrier/Tracer Recovery 91 90 Mt TPU Uncertainty Vol. Recv.: LCMDA The above sample is reported on a dry weight basis.
69 QUALITY CONTROL DATA 70 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec 471786 471787 Batch Batch Americium-241 Curium-242
Curium-243/244 Americium-241 Curium-242 Curium-243/244 Americium-241 Curium-242 Curium-243/244 Americium-241 Curium-242 Curium-243/244 Plutonium-238 Parmname Mr. Pete Hollenbeck Contact: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Client : Haddam Neck Plant East Hampton, Connecticut October 28, 2005 Report Date:
Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time H OB 1 H OB 1 10/15/05 10/15/05 10/15/05 10/15/05 10:42 10:42 10:42 10:42 QC 0.0189 0.0191-0.0933 8.08 0.0052 10.1 0.0167-0.00623 0.075 8.56-0.0112 9.81 0.0496 NOM Sample-0.0834 0.0139 0.0641-0.0834 0.0139 0.0641 0.0419 Range (0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
Qual U U U U U U U U U QC1200957640 146590018 QC1200957642 QC1200957639 QC1200957641 146590018 QC1200957644 146590018 RPD%REC%91 94 95 88 8.88 10.8 9.05 11.1 DUP LCS MB MS DUP 146590 Workorder:
362 Injun Hollow Road U U U U U U U+/-0.0893+/-0.0552+/-0.133+/-0.0893+/-0.0552+/-0.133+/-0.131
+/-0.076+/-0.0893+/-0.761+/-0.0394+/-0.849+/-0.0832
+/-0.0523+/-0.142+/-0.866+/-0.0579+/-0.930 Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: TPU:
TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:+/-0.090+/-0.0553+/-0.133+/-0.090+/-0.0553+/-0.133+/-0.131+/-0.076+/-0.0902+/-1.32+/-0.0394+/-1.59+/-0.0832
+/-0.0524+/-0.143+/-1.37+/-0.0579+/-1.53 N/A 32 N/A 17Page1 of9 71 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Alpha Spec Rad Gamma Spec 471787 471788 467961 Batch Batch Batch Plutonium-239/240 Plutonium-238 Plutonium-239/240 Plutonium-238 Plutonium-239/240 Plutonium-238 Plutonium-239/240 Plutonium-241 Plutonium-241 Plutonium-241
Plutonium-241 Actinium-228 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time H OB 1 M JH 1 10/15/05 10/15/05 10/21/05 10/21/05 10/21/05 10/21/05 10/25/05 10:42 10:42 01:45 02:19 01:28 02:02 07:02 QC 0.0317 0.0393 8.95-0.0405 0.00545-0.175 6.95-2.06 108-4.72 102 0.964 NOM Sample 0.0418 0.0419 0.0418-2.5-2.5 1.12 Range (0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
Qual U U U U U U U QC1200957646 QC1200957643 QC1200957645 146590018 QC1200957648 146590018 QC1200957650
QC1200957647 QC1200957649 146590018 QC1200948603 146590001 RPD%REC%109 83 90 83 8.20 8.36 120 123 LCS MB MS DUP LCS MB MS DUP 146590 Workorder:
U U U U U+/-0.154+/-0.0947+/-0.154+/-0.0947+/-7.59+/-7.59+/-0.193+/-0.113+/-0.0728+/-0.118+/-0.825+/-0.0659
+/-0.0413+/-0.0785+/-0.702+/-8.17
+/-11.8
+/-7.05
+/-11.0+/-0.191 Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU:+/-0.154+/-0.0949+/-0.154+/-0.0949+/-7.60+/-7.60+/-0.113+/-0.0729+/-0.118+/-1.32+/-0.066+/-0.0413+/-0.0808+/-1.04+/-8.17+/-16.2
+/-7.07+/-15.0+/-0.187 28 N/A 15Page2 of9 72 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Gamma Spec 467961 Batch Americium-241 Bismuth-212
Bismuth-214 Cesium-134 Cesium-137 Cobalt-60 Europium-152
Europium-154 Europium-155 Lead-212 Lead-214 Manganese-54 Niobium-94
Potassium-40 Radium-226 Silver-108m Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time QC-0.0394 0.786 0.838 0.00 0.546 0.00654 0.0189 0.0224 0.0354 0.964 1.05-0.0188 0.0106 10.7 0.838-0.00636 NOM Sample-0.053 0.750 0.946 0.00 0.519 0.0126-0.0189-0.00297 0.0476 1.05 1.16 0.0246 0.0102 11.0 0.946-0.0139 Range (0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 20%)
(0% - 20%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 20%)
(0% - 100%)
(0% - 100%)
Qual U UUI U U
U U U U U RPD%REC%146590 Workorder:
U UUI U U U U U U U+/-0.166+/-0.345+/-0.108+/-0.0391
+/-0.0524+/-0.0229
+/-0.0591+/-0.0691+/-0.0952
+/-0.0788+/-0.109+/-0.0268
+/-0.0208+/-0.888
+/-0.108+/-0.0195+/-0.0597+/-0.285
+/-0.126+/-0.034+/-0.0725+/-0.0175+/-0.0427+/-0.0854
+/-0.0522+/-0.100
+/-0.132+/-0.0199
+/-0.0166+/-0.915+/-0.126+/-0.0157 Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:+/-0.189+/-0.163+/-0.338+/-0.106+/-0.0383+/-0.0514+/-0.0224+/-0.0579
+/-0.0678+/-0.0933+/-0.0772+/-0.107+/-0.0262
+/-0.0204+/-0.870
+/-0.106+/-0.0585+/-0.279
+/-0.124+/-0.0333+/-0.0711+/-0.0171+/-0.0418+/-0.0837
+/-0.0511+/-0.0982+/-0.129+/-0.0195
+/-0.0162+/-0.897+/-0.124 N/A 5 12 55 5 63 N/A N/A 29 8 10 N/A 4 2 12 N/APage3 of9 73 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Gamma Spec 467961 Batch Thallium-208 Actinium-228 Americium-241 Bismuth-212 Bismuth-214 Cesium-134
Cesium-137 Cobalt-60 Europium-152
Europium-154 Europium-155 Lead-212 Lead-214 Manganese-54
Niobium-94 Potassium-40 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time10/21/0518:05 QC 0.277-0.0977 24.7-0.813 0.0847-0.0724 10.2 14.9-0.0803-0.165-0.0932 0.250 0.0478 0.107-0.0767-0.989 NOM Sample 0.323 Range (0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
Qual U U U U U U U U U U U U QC1200948604 RPD%REC%101 109 105 24.4 9.39 14.2 LCS 146590 Workorder:
+/-0.0531+/-0.0473+/-0.779+/-1.12+/-1.51+/-0.334+/-0.223+/-0.651
+/-0.878+/-0.410+/-0.465+/-0.446+/-0.219
+/-0.304+/-0.198+/-0.196 Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU:+/-0.0192+/-0.052+/-0.0154+/-0.0464+/-0.763+/-1.10+/-1.48+/-0.328
+/-0.218+/-0.638
+/-0.861+/-0.402+/-0.456
+/-0.437+/-0.215+/-0.298
+/-0.194+/-0.192 15Page4 of9 74 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Gamma Spec 467961 Batch Radium-226 Silver-108m Thallium-208 Actinium-228 Americium-241
Bismuth-212 Bismuth-214 Cesium-134
Cesium-137 Cobalt-60 Europium-152
Europium-154 Europium-155 Lead-212 Lead-214 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time10/25/0507:01 QC 0.0847 0.0266 0.000906 0.0201 0.0105 0.00349 0.031 0.00892 0.000391-0.00275 0.0114 0.0161 0.00413 0.0138 0.00 NOM Sample Range (75%-125%)
Qual U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UUI QC1200948602 RPD%REC%MB 146590 Workorder:
+/-1.49+/-0.334
+/-0.157+/-0.192+/-0.102+/-0.0736+/-0.0959
+/-0.0279+/-0.0123+/-0.0128+/-0.013+/-0.0342
+/-0.0328+/-0.0343+/-0.030+/-0.059 Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: TPU:
TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU:+/-1.46+/-0.328+/-0.154
+/-0.188+/-0.100+/-0.0722+/-0.094+/-0.0273+/-0.012+/-0.0126+/-0.0127+/-0.0335+/-0.0322
+/-0.0336+/-0.0294+/-0.0578Page5 of9 75 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Gamma Spec Rad Gas Flow Rad Liquid Scintillation 467961 472639 467508 Batch Batch Batch Manganese-54 Niobium-94 Potassium-40 Radium-226 Silver-108m
Thallium-208 Strontium-90 Strontium-90 Strontium-90
Strontium-90 Tritium Tritium Tritium Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time E XW 1 BXF1 10/18/05 10/19/05 10/18/05 10/19/05 10/10/05 10/13/05 10/10/05 23:07 10:56 22:28 10:56 04:53 02:10 04:21 QC 0.00689 0.00302 0.0254 0.031 0.00 0.022-0.00423 1.26 0.000421 2.22 5.48 2.43 0.341 NOM Sample-0.0188-0.0188 3.73 Range (0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
Qual U U U U UUI U U U U U QC1200959676 146590019 QC1200959678
QC1200959675
QC1200959677 146590019 QC1200947552 145495003 QC1200947554 QC1200947551 RPD%REC%97 82 80 1.30 2.70 3.03 DUP LCS MB MS DUP LCS MB 146590 Workorder:
U U U+/-0.013+/-0.013+/-6.27+/-0.0123+/-0.0117+/-0.130+/-0.0279
+/-0.0249+/-0.0129+/-0.00989
+/-0.0792+/-0.00651
+/-0.214+/-5.58+/-0.368 Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:+/-0.013+/-0.013+/-6.27+/-0.0121+/-0.0114+/-0.127+/-0.0273
+/-0.0244+/-0.0126+/-0.00989
+/-0.0875+/-0.00651
+/-0.224+/-5.58+/-0.370 N/A 0Page6 of9 76 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Liquid Scintillation 467508 468332 470704 470741 Batch Batch Batch Batch Tritium Technetium-99 Technetium-99 Technetium-99
Technetium-99 Nickel-63 Nickel-63 Nickel-63 Nickel-63 Carbon-14 Carbon-14 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time BXF1 BXF1 SLN1 10/13/05 10/08/05 10/08/05 10/08/05 10/08/05 10/14/05 10/14/05 10/14/05 10/14/05 10/12/05 10/12/05 01:38 21:04 22:09 20:32 21:36 06:54 07:58 06:21 07:26 18:55 20:44 QC 50.9 0.116 12.6 0.126 11.5-5.8 451-4.7 515 0.00819 6.93 NOM Sample 3.73 0.0779 0.0779-5.55
-5.55 0.0819 Range (75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
Qual U U U U U QC1200947553 145495003 QC1200949448 146692033 QC1200949450
QC1200949447
QC1200949449 146692033 QC1200954980 146692033 QC1200954982 QC1200954979 QC1200954981 146692033 QC1200955097 146692033 QC1200955099 RPD%REC%76 96 89 92 90 100 67.2 13.1 12.9 490 575 6.94 MS DUP LCS MB MS DUP LCS MB MS DUP LCS 146590 Workorder:
U U U U U U+/-6.27+/-0.163+/-0.163+/-6.92
+/-6.92+/-0.0775+/-0.435+/-9.06+/-0.153+/-0.382
+/-0.159
+/-0.327+/-6.42
+/-15.5+/-5.32+/-20.2+/-0.0747+/-0.388 Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert:
Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU: TPU:+/-6.27+/-0.163+/-0.163+/-6.93
+/-6.93+/-0.0776+/-0.435+/-9.10+/-0.153+/-0.478
+/-0.159+/-0.418+/-6.42+/-21.1+/-5.32+/-26.9+/-0.0747+/-0.403 0 N/A 0Page7 of9 77 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com Rad Liquid Scintillation 470741 473150 Batch Batch Carbon-14 Carbon-14 Iron-55 Iron-55 Iron-55 Iron-55 Parmname Units pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g Anlst Date Time BXF1 10/12/05 10/12/05 10/20/05 10/20/05 10/20/05 10/20/05 17:18 20:27 14:00 14:34 13:43 14:17 QC 0.0653 6.72-2.57 609 20.1 733 NOM Sample 0.0819 4.18 4.18 Range (75%-125%)
(0% - 100%)
(75%-125%)
(75%-125%)
Qual U U U QC1200955096 QC1200955098 146692033 QC1200960975 146692033 QC1200960977
QC1200960974 QC1200960976 146692033 Notes: The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
RPD%REC%97 95 98 6.95 641 750 MB MS DUP LCS MB MS 146590 Workorder:
B BD E H J U UI X d h Target analyte was detected in the sample as well as the associated blank.
Results below the MDC or low tracer recovery.
Concentration of the target analyte exceeds the instrument calibration range.
Analytical holding time exceeded.
Indicates an estimated value.
Target analyte was analyzed for but not detected above the MDL or LOD.
Uncertain identification for gamma spectroscopy.
Lab-specific qualifier-please see case narrative, data summary package or contact your project manager for details.
The 2:1 depletion requirement was not met for this sample Sample preparation or preservation holding time exceeded.
U U U+/-0.0775+/-51.5+/-51.5+/-0.0756+/-0.381+/-44.0+/-63.9
+/-39.2+/-70.1 Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: Uncert: TPU:
TPU: TPU: TPU:
TPU:
TPU:+/-0.0776+/-51.5+/-51.5+/-0.0756+/-0.395+/-44.0+/-76.0+/-39.3+/-85.9 N/APage8 of9 78 QC Summary GENERAL ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, LLC 2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - (843) 556-8171 - www.gel.com ParmnamePage9 of9 Units Anlst Date Time QC NOM Sample Range Qual RPD%REC%146590 Workorder:
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more.
- Indicates analyte is a surrogate compound.
^ The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptence criteria when the sample is greater than five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of +/- the RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
79 EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2bSample and Scan Area Data(9 Pages)
Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/N9527-01-SL-00-01-07660890988709/20/200510:08 AM110710109527-01-SL-00-02-07400862876709/19/2005 8:35 AM110510019527-01-SL-00-03-091801054789409/19/2005 8:21 AM110510019527-01-SL-00-04-08140942879309/19/2005 2:09 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-05-01140012924104009/19/2005 2:05 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-06-0107001217691209/19/2005 8:49 AM110510019527-01-SL-00-07-08270956884209/19/2005 9:03 AM110510019527-01-SL-00-08-08600992382009/20/200510:01 AM110710109527-01-SL-00-09-01090012390107009/19/2005 1:59 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-10-01030011748101009/19/2005 2:59 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-11-095501094599709/19/200510:45 AM110510019527-01-SL-00-12-01070012176111009/19/200510:37 AM110510019527-01-SL-00-13-01230013883127009/19/20053:04 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-14-01190013457113009/19/2005 2:53 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-15-01310014733136009/19/2005 2:48 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-16-08670999992709/19/2005 1:56 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-17-07990926691009/19/2005 1:52 PM110510019527-01-SL-00-18-098001121399009/19/2005 1:48 PM11051001Survey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveALAL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 1 SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 8Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/N9527-01-SC-01-01-07340856373209/14/200510:08 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-02-089001024684209/14/200510:10 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-03-07870913669409/14/200510:12 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-04-07380860674409/14/200510:15 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-05-07420864978209/14/200510:19 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-06-07990926669809/14/200510:22 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-07-07830909379009/14/200510:24 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-08-07540877964609/14/200510:27 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-09-08200949276309/14/200510:31 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-10-06420756471409/14/200510:33 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-11-08590991374509/14/200510:35 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-12-08310961184609/14/200510:38 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-13-07420864958309/14/200510:41 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-14-07080828168209/14/200510:44 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-15-093101068778009/14/200510:45 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-16-08630995667309/14/200510:48 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-17-091101047269709/14/200510:51 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-18-07920919060709/14/200510:53 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-19-07950922266109/14/200510:54 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-20-06940812972509/14/200510:56 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-21-08590991385309/14/20051:30 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-22-08130941766409/14/20051:33 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-23-06990818362309/14/20051:34 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-24-08240953566009/14/20051:36 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-25-088901023610900+9/14/20051:46 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-26-0109001239076209/14/20051:50 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-27-0105001196268109/14/20051:54 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-28-0105001196274309/14/20051:56 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-29-01030011748101009/14/20052:21 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-30-0113001281796809/14/20052:23 PM11071010Survey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveALAL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 1 SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 8Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/NSurvey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveAL9527-01-SC-01-31-01020011641106009/14/20052:25 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-32-01110012604113009/14/20052:27 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-33-01030011748100009/14/20052:53 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-34-0114001292498109/14/20052:56 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-35-0945010837104009/14/20052:59 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-36-0106001206991309/14/20053:01 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-37-087401007499709/14/20053:06 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-38-097501115989709/14/20053:09 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-39-0107001217697709/14/20053:11 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-40-0102001164185509/14/20053:13 PM110710109527-01-SC-01-41-0109001239088809/14/20052:50 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-42-0106001206912100+9/14/20052:53 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-43-0121001367089609/14/20052:55 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-44-01040011855103009/14/20052:58 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-45-01130012817117009/14/20053:01 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-46-01120012710115009/14/20053:03 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-47-01140012924117009/14/20053:05 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-48-01150013030111009/14/20053:07 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-49-01050011962109009/14/20053:10 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-50-01210013670113009/14/20053:12 PM110510019527-01-SC-01-51-01020011641103009/20/20058:23 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-52-0975011159104009/20/20058:29 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-53-01170013244102009/20/20058:33 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-54-0111001260499109/20/20058:37 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-55-01010011534105009/20/20058:39 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-56-0109001239095709/20/20058:40 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-57-099801140696709/20/20058:42 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-58-01050011962103009/20/20058:45 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-59-0102001164198909/20/20058:46 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-60-0108001228392509/20/20058:48 AM11071010AL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 1 SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 8Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/NSurvey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveAL9527-01-SC-01-61-091001046195209/20/20058:54 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-62-0104001185590109/20/20058:55 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-63-0102001164193309/20/20058:57 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-64-089601031192609/20/20058:58 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-65-0101001153489709/20/20059:00 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-66-091401050498409/20/20059:01 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-67-093601074191909/20/20059:02 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-68-090201037593309/20/20059:04 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-69-087001003180509/20/20059:06 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-70-091601052681509/20/20059:07 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-71-088701021483509/20/200510:21 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-72-08620994587909/20/200510:23 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-73-093801076290209/20/200510:25 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-74-090201037588709/20/200510:27 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-75-092801065589309/20/200510:28 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-76-08640996788509/20/200510:29 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-77-090901045187409/20/200510:30 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-78-08570989187709/20/200510:31 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-79-088501019397509/20/200510:33 AM110710109527-01-SC-01-80-098101122496209/20/200510:34 AM11071010AL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 2 SECTIONS 9 THROUGH 16Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/N9527-01-SC-02-01-07880914778609/20/200510:40 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-02-095901098897709/20/200510:42 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-03-08330963384309/20/200510:43 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-04-08470978384309/20/200510:44 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-05-093001067691109/20/200510:45 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-06-089301027990409/20/200510:47 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-07-0987011288101009/20/200510:49 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-08-095201091294409/20/200510:50 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-09-0100001142797809/20/200510:51 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-10-0941010794101009/20/200510:53 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-11-091101047280509/20/200510:56 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-12-093501073098109/20/200510:57 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-13-08560988082709/20/200510:59 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-14-086901002094509/20/200511:00 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-15-090601041886009/20/200511:01 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-16-08340964389609/20/200511:03 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-17-095201091277209/20/200511:05 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-18-088101015094109/20/200511:07 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-19-096701107391209/20/200511:08 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-20-0101001153489009/20/200511:09 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-21-095101090295209/20/200511:12 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-22-0101001153495209/20/200511:14 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-23-08350965485509/20/200511:15 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-24-08620994588809/20/200511:17 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-25-08210950389409/20/200511:18 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-26-08320962270109/20/200511:20 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-27-07200841183409/20/200511:22 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-28-08010928756609/20/200511:23 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-29-06760793372609/20/200511:24 AM110710109527-01-SC-02-30-07790905053909/20/200511:26 AM11071010Survey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveALAL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 2 SECTIONS 9 THROUGH 16Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/NSurvey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveAL9527-01-SC-02-31-01080012283103009/20/20051:19 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-32-097301113890609/20/20051:21 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-33-0949010880102009/20/20051:22 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-34-0102001164192309/20/20051:23 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-35-087901012899509/20/20051:26 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-36-0105001196296209/20/20051:27 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-37-01100012497107009/20/20051:29 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-38-090601041898709/20/20051:31 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-39-0104001185598809/20/20051:32 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-40-01020011641104009/20/20051:33 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-41-01110012604111009/20/20051:36 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-42-0109001239097609/20/20051:38 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-43-01070012176108009/20/20051:39 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-44-0102001164199409/20/20051:40 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-45-0106001206994609/20/20051:42 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-46-0104001185598209/20/20051:43 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-47-01020011641102009/20/20051:45 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-48-0106001206997909/20/20051:46 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-49-0107001217694209/20/20051:48 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-50-01090012390103009/20/20051:49 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-51-01000011427101009/20/20051:54 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-52-098001121396909/20/20051:55 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-53-0108001228391009/20/20051:56 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-54-0104001185595509/20/20051:58 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-55-0101001153484809/20/20052:00 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-56-090801044091809/20/20052:02 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-57-0994011363102009/20/20052:03 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-58-097201112797709/20/20052:05 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-59-0953010923105009/20/20052:06 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-60-088401018299309/20/20052:07 PM11051001AL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 2 SECTIONS 9 THROUGH 16Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/NSurvey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveAL9527-01-SC-02-61-0110001249783009/20/20052:09 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-62-093801076295909/20/20052:11 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-63-0111001260499009/20/20052:12 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-64-01100012497106009/20/20052:13 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-65-0987011288107009/20/20052:15 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-66-0994011363106009/20/20052:16 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-67-01040011855101009/20/20052:17 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-68-099401136391909/20/20052:18 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-69-092901066694809/20/20052:20 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-70-0107001217688609/20/20052:21 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-71-08670999972509/20/20052:36 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-72-08020929884409/20/20052:39 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-73-08620994567109/20/20052:39 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-74-07090829279409/20/20052:43 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-75-096201102063409/20/20052:44 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-76-0102001164152209/20/20052:46 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-77-0111001260450909/20/20052:47 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-78-087501008560109/20/20052:49 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-79-094901088051309/20/20052:50 PM110510019527-01-SC-02-80-097601117082309/20/20052:51 PM11051001AL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 3 SECTIONS 17 THROUGH 22Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/N9527-01-SC-03-01-07350857469109/21/20058:31 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-02-06490764065909/21/20058:32 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-03-06180730253009/21/20058:34 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-04-06320745570309/21/20058:36 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-05-07310853038209/21/20058:37 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-06-05210624059709/21/20058:41 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-07-06720789042909/21/20058:43 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-08-07240845463009/21/20058:43 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-09-06380752058209/21/20058:45 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-10-07030822775009/21/20058:46 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-11-07340856374409/21/20058:48 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-12-091101047283809/21/20058:50 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-13-08500981693409/21/20058:51 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-14-08550987095609/21/20058:54 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-15-099301135282209/21/20058:55 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-16-089001024694809/21/20058:57 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-17-089601031193709/21/20058:59 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-18-07810907180009/21/20059:00 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-19-08040932065009/21/20059:01 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-20-08190948280709/21/20059:03 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-21-07300851974709/21/20059:07 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-22-07210842278509/21/20059:08 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-23-07640888770409/21/20059:10 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-24-07650889884809/21/20059:12 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-25-08280957979409/21/20059:13 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-26-07360858470909/21/20059:14 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-27-07480871478909/21/20059:15 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-28-07130833553209/21/20059:16 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-29-06450759675309/21/20059:18 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-30-07520875852609/21/20059:19 AM11071010Survey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveALAL - Action Level 9527-0001 SCAN AREA 3 SECTIONS 17 THROUGH 22Log DateLog TimeE600 S/NProbe S/NSurvey Release Record Scan Area ResultsSurvey Unit 9527-0001Background(cpm)Action Level(cpm)Results(cpm)Sample NameAboveAL9527-01-SC-03-31-089901034362109/21/200510:26 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-32-08640996779009/21/200510:30 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-33-095101090253909/21/200510:32 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-34-088501019366709/21/200510:34 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-35-07580882344709/21/200510:36 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-36-088601020393109/21/200510:39 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-37-086901002082209/21/200510:40 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-38-08260955774309/21/200510:42 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-39-07930920175809/21/200510:43 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-40-08480979487309/21/200510:45 AM110710109527-01-SC-03-41-097301113897409/21/20051:16 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-42-090201037595309/21/20051:18 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-43-0934010719102009/21/20051:20 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-44-096601106380109/21/20051:22 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-45-07480871479309/21/20051:24 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-46-0111001260494709/21/20051:25 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-47-08200949291609/21/20051:28 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-48-098601127788709/21/20051:29 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-49-01050011962103009/21/20051:31 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-50-01030011748113009/21/20051:33 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-51-0966011063108009/21/20051:37 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-52-01100012497106009/21/20051:39 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-53-01040011855109009/21/20051:40 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-54-01150013030117009/21/20051:43 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-55-01070012176107009/21/20051:44 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-56-0114001292483609/21/20051:46 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-57-01000011427104009/21/20051:48 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-58-01130012817102009/21/20051:49 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-59-01150013030117009/21/20051:51 PM110510019527-01-SC-03-60-0997011395105009/21/20051:53 PM11051001AL - Action Level EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2cSplit Sample Assessment Forms(2 Page)
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2dPreliminary Data Forms(2 Pages)
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2eGraphical Representation of Data(2 Pages)
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2fSign Test Calculation(1 Page)
EAST MOUNTAIN SIDESURVEY UNIT 9527-0001RELEASE RECORDAttachment 2gCOMPASS DQA Surface Soil Report withRetrospective Power Curve(4 Pages)