ML062700281

E-Mail from Cobey to Tifft, 12/2 NRC-PSEG Meeting - Potential Commitments

ML062700281
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	12/06/2004
From:	Cobey E NRC Region 1
To:	Barber B, Doug Tifft, Joel Wiebe, Ted Wingfield NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2005-0194
Download: ML062700281 (3)

Text

deorgEt rhalon*,,%- Re: 12/2 NRC-PSEG IMeeting: Potential "Commitments" Pagel 1 ,

From: Eugene Cobey To: Douglas Tifft; Joel Wiebe; Scott Barber; Theodore Wingfield Date: 12/6/04 4:55PM

Subject:

Re: 12/2 NRC-PSEG Meeting: Potential "Commitments" Ted, Please get a DRP Action Item. Request a due date of January 14, 2005.

Thanks Eugene W. Cobey, Chief Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects (610) 337-5171

>>> Theodore Wingfield 12/06/04 01:31 PM >>>

After meeting with Gene, the following Items require follow-up (Bolded/Underlined/Green):

>>> Theodore Wingfield 12/03/04 11:22AM >>>

DISCLAIMER - I reviewed my notes from the meeting and pulled anything that I thought may, might, or could be construed as a "commitment."

NO ACTION REQ'D: Sam Collins - "1st of several meetings" NO ACTION REQ'D: Sam Collins - "we will look at technical findings through the prism of SCWE" NOA O RBakke

'tris my intent was to place in the public forum, on a quarterly basis, our operational decision-making and our technical decisions" NO ACTION REQ'D.hris Bakken "we will shut down both Salem units ... Unit 1 will start their shutdown at 8am and Unit 2 will begin their shutdown at 8pm" (in response to the approach of the oil spill)

NO ACTION REQ'D: Gene Cobey - NRC "oversight during the next 36 hrs for the Salem shutdowns

... continuous coverage [during the oil spill Impact period]"

NO ACTION REQ'D./ike Brother - "Synergy survey in 3rd week in January" Salem Resident Inspector F/U: 'like Brothers (re: Dan Orr's question about anonomous notifications)

"we will take action to communicaTe how that is done" NO ACTION REQ'D.2ke Brothers- (re: Gene Cobey's question about a need to change the goals for the CM/EM backlog reduction given the Hope Creek outage expansion) "we expect an impact ... not changing the goal ... expect continued leveling off" NO ACTION REQ'D'1Jke Brother(re: Randy Blough's question about a need to modify reported metric numbers based on repeat failures of things that were approved by the Corrective Action Closure Board (CACB)) "no ... do not see a lot of value in adjusting the historical data ... the items will be addressed as "repeat maintenance" ... prior CACB approval is definitely an area that is and will continue to be looked at

... notifications are/will be written to document/trend/correct that" Salem Resident Inspector F/U:.ke Brothel (re: George Malone's question of more detailed data quantifying Engineering evaluation response timeliness ... i.e. things done last-minute are probably of lower quality) "yes we have that data and can share it with you ifyou like" Salem/HC Resident Inspector F/Utike Brotheis (re: Gene Cobey's question of whether alignment o-

[George Ma!gr 7-Re: 12/2 NRC-PSEG Meeting: potential "Commitments" Page 21 correlation exists between Maintenance Rule "A-I" systems and the safety system unavailability in the SCWE Metrics that were RED) "there is some correlation but it is not 1 to 1 ... we should look at that" NO ACTION REQ'D:j*e Brotherf-(re: J. Persensky's question related to the first SCWE Metric/PI about "initial SCWE training" and what do they expect it to do) "we expect that PI to trend to zero ... it will become part of continuing training ... we will need to develop a replacement metric" NO ACTION REQ'D)i~ke Brothers - (re: J. Persensky's question related to availability of these metrics to the entire PSEG staff) "all of the m'esrics are on the [PSEG Internal] web" HC Resident Inspector F/UL.ike Gallaghej'- (re: Gene Cobey's question about inclusion of non-Tech.

Spec. items in the scope of the 'operability reviews") "yes they are part of the scope" Also, follow-up on why not reviewing backlogs for degraded equipment Issues with some engineering evaluation conducted to allow continued operation or deferred work.

NO ACTION REQ'D ike Gallaghe* (re: Gene Cobey's question about the timeline for the operability reviews) "for Hope Creek all requireditems will be reviewed prior to start up ... Salem items will be reviewed in accordance with an appropriate timeline" NO ACTION REQ'Dfhris Bakke'(re: Sam Collins' and Randy Blough's comments about inclusion of the operability review results in future discussions) "yes, both at the next meeting, about Hope Creek, and the next SCWE meeting in 2005" SalemIHC Resident Inspector F/UTMike Brother~s (re: Gene Cobey's question about any insights gained in looking at differences in human performance error rates among different work groups) "it is not homogeneous ... I will follow-up with on that" NO ACTION REQ'Dtjike Brotherst(re: J. Persensky's question about the existence of and PSEG's intent to use other survey tools) "there are other tools available to us ... ECP surveys, satisfaction index being developed, targeted surveys ... we do intend to use them, however, we do not want to inundate the workers with too many surveys [dilute the worth]"

Currently a B3/NRR Action Item: Gene Cobey - (re.'ave Lochbaum's request for a Salem/Hope Creek website) "that is something that has been in development aJlWdis in the review process" SalemiHC Resident Inspectors provide BS/DBS hours: Sam Collins - (reT.,Norm Cohenj iuestions about Inspector In-plant and back-shift/off-shift hours) "we can get you those numbers ...

significant amount of Inspection hours at these plants" [NORM - "Send me an email."]

Completed already by Diane Scrench: Sam Collins - (re rieda Berryhill'ssresident of Wilmington)

Inquiry about something she saw in an email about FelIral Registrar Vol. 69 No. 215, Monday, November 8, 2004) "I'm not sure what you are referencing but we will find out and get back to you" Scott Barber - Follow-up with PSEG regarding the differences between the Pis presented at the 12/2/04 public meeting (also placed on the docket) and those submitted to the SCWE inspection team while on-site.

SalemiHC Resident Inspectors follow-up with ohn Carlin~n QA-Group performance metrics.

CC: Daniel Orr; George Malone; Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray

_te*.p\GWJO)oo1 .TMP Page 1 ,1 Mail Envelope Properties (41B9F15A.CFA :24 :35262)

Subject:

Fwd: Salem and Hope Creek Coordination Team Meeting 04-04 Agenda (1:00 p.m. 12/10)

Creation Date: 12/10/04 1:56PM From: Daniel Orr Created By: JDO@nrc.gov Recipients kpl-po.KPDO MSF2 (Marc Ferdas)

MXG3 (Mel Gray) nrc.gov kpl-po.KPDO GJM2 (George Malone)

Post Office Route kpl-po.KPDO kpl-po.KPDO nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 557 12/10/04 01:56PM Mail Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard