|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24002A7222023-12-29029 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem Generating Station - 2023 Annual Report - Inspection of the Circulating Water Intake Structure (Cwis) Trash Rack Bars ML23355A2732023-12-21021 December 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) PSEG Response to Questions Associated with Supplement to Salem-Hope Creek Eab Reduction LAR ML23277A0482023-10-0404 October 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - 10/4/2023 Email: Acceptance Review - Hope Creek and Salem 1 and 2 - LAR to Modify Exclusion Area Boundary ML23277A0732023-09-29029 September 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) 9/29/2023 Email from PSEG: Supplement to Proposed Amendment to PSEG Master Decommissioning Trust Amendment ML23129A7892023-05-0909 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise Trip and Standby Auto-Start Logic Associated with Safety Related HVAC Trains ML23122A1672023-05-0202 May 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek and Salem 1 and 2 - Revise TS to Delete TS Section 5.5 - Meteorological Tower Location ML23079A0032023-03-17017 March 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek, Salem 1 and 2 - Evacuation Time Estimate Review ML23065A0452023-02-23023 February 2023 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem & Hope Creek Generating STATIONS-ANNUAL Incidental Take REPORT-STATION & REMP ML22194A0522022-07-13013 July 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek, Salem 1 and 2 - Relocate Staff Qualification Requirements to Licensee Quality Assurance Topical Report ML22038A1552022-02-0404 February 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Salem & Hope Creek Generating STATIONS-ANNUAL Incidental Take REPORT-STATION & REMP ML22021A7012022-01-21021 January 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek -Relief Request HC-I4R-220 Regarding Partial Penetration Nozzle Repairs (L-2022-LLR-0003) ML22006A3212022-01-0606 January 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAI - Hope Creek - Revise TS Limits for Ultimate Heat Sink ML21334A1182021-11-30030 November 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek -Revise SRs for Electric Power Monitor Channels for RPS and Power Range Neutron Monitoring System ML21154A0102021-05-28028 May 2021 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise TS Limits for Ultimate Heat Sink ML20295A4922020-10-21021 October 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek - Final RAI Revise ECCS TS with Respect to HPCI System Inoperability (L-2020-LLA-0131) ML20293A1832020-10-19019 October 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Adopt TSTF-582, Reactor Pressure Vessel Water Inventory Control (RPV WIC) Enhancements ML20289A7062020-10-15015 October 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise Low Pressure Safety Limit to Address GE Part-21 Safety Communication SC05-03 ML20246G5952020-09-0202 September 2020 Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Adopt TSTF-427, Allowance for Non TS Barrier Degradation ML20191A0202020-07-0202 July 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise ECCS TS with Respect to HPCI System Inoperability ML20153A3782020-06-0101 June 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek - Revise TS Actions for Suppression Pool Cooling ML20006E2802020-01-0606 January 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek: LAR Regarding Proposed Adoption of 10 CFR 50.69, Risk- Informed Categorization and Treatment of SSCs for Nuclear Power Plants ML19280A0002019-10-0303 October 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek, Salem 1 and 2 - Final RAI Emergency Plan Staffing Requirements (L-2019-LLA-0145) ML19267A1622019-09-24024 September 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek - Acceptance Review: Alternative for Exam of ASME Section XI, Exam Category B-G-1, Item Number B6.40, Threads in Flange (L-2019-LLR-0090) ML19226A3932019-08-14014 August 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Salem 1 & 2, Hope Creek - Acceptance Review: Delete License Conditions Related to Decommissioning Trust Provisions and License Transfer ML19198A0992019-07-17017 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Salem 1 & 2, Hope Creek - Acceptance Review: Changes to Emergency Plan Staffing ML19186A3842019-07-0505 July 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek, Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-563, Revise Instrumentation Testing Definition ML19123A2172019-05-0303 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Re Acceptance Review - Hope Creek, Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR ML19081A1532019-03-22022 March 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review: Hope Creek - Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-546 (L-2019-LLA-0032) ML19046A2382019-02-15015 February 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Result: Hope Creek-Relief Request to Use ASME Code Case OMN-17 (L-2019-LLR-0010) ML18323A0252018-11-16016 November 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review: Hope Creek - Remote Shutdown System I & C Amendment (L-2018-LLA-0295) ML18288A2512018-10-15015 October 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Result: Hope Creek-Relief Request Associated with Third 10-Year ISI Interval (L-2018-LLR-0124) ML18271A0342018-09-13013 September 2018 Receipt of Stephen Comley, We the People, September 6, 11 and 12 2018 Voicemail and Email ML18263A1442018-09-12012 September 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAI from Apla: Revise Technical Specifications to Increase Inverter AOT Extension (L-2018-LLA-0101) ML18250A3142018-09-0606 September 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Final RAI: Revise Technical Specifications to Increase Inverter AOT Extension (L-2018-LLA-0101) ML18206A7302018-07-27027 July 2018 (50-272, 50-311, 50-354), Transmittal Email 26.717 Updates ML18201A1112018-07-20020 July 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results: Hope Creek, Salem 1 & 2 Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-529 (L-2018-LLA-0185) ML18150A6912018-05-30030 May 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek - Final RAI Revise TS to Adopt TSTF-542 ML18128A3862018-05-0808 May 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results: Hope Creek Revise Inverter AOT TS Actions (L-2018-LLA-0101) ML18122A2392018-05-0202 May 2018 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review Results: Revise Emergency Diesel Generator Technical Specifications Action to Remove Salem Unit 3 Gas Turbine Generator (L-2018-LLA-0079) ML17348A6242017-12-14014 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Final Request for Additional Information for Human Factors Associated with the Hope Creek Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Uprate Request (L-2017-LLS-002) ML17348A9972017-12-14014 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Final Request for Additional Information for Steam Dryer Analysis with the Hope Creek Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Uprate Request (L-2017-LLS-002) ML17349A0812017-12-14014 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Final Request for Additional Information for Reactor Systems Branch (Srxb) - Hope Creek Mur ML17340B2682017-12-0606 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Notification to State of New Jersey of Impending License Amendment Issuance for Hope Creek (MF9501; EPID L-2017-LLA-0183) ML17338A2742017-12-0404 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - State of New Jersey: Notification of Impending Amendment Issuance for Hope Creek - Relocate Pressure-Temperature Limits Curves to the Pressure-Temperature Limits Report ML17338A2752017-12-0404 December 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review - Hope Creek License Amendment Request to Revise the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ML17331A0072017-11-21021 November 2017 E-mail Regarding Final Eicb Request for Additional Information - Hope Creek Power Uprate ML17348A6282017-11-21021 November 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft Request for Additional Information for Steam Dryer Analysis with the Hope Creek Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Uprate Request (L-2017-LLS-002) ML17324A2602017-11-17017 November 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Final Request for Additional Information - Hope Creek Mur Electrical Instrumentation and Controls ML17320A2152017-11-16016 November 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Application Review - Electrical Engineering (Eeob) Request for Additional Information (L-2017-LLS-0002) ML17324A0522017-11-0909 November 2017 NRR E-mail Capture - Draft Request for Additional Information - Hope Creek Mur Chemical, Corrosion, and Steam Generator 2023-09-29
[Table view] |
Text
GlennMeyer - RE: HC Issues Page 1 From: Scott Barber)
To: Marc Ferdas; Mel Gray Date: 5/3/04 4:36PM
Subject:
RE: HC issues Just to add a different angle to the discussion. We have an allegation response in which we questioned adequate oil supply in LO bubblers for various HC pumps. Tom Lake's response indicated that 42 bubblers were checked and there were no significant problems. Sounds like the original issue that was raised in the allegation may have more validity than was mentioned in the PSEG response.
Mel - do you or Marc think we should be highlighting this to them and get them to submit a revised response or is this truly an isolated case?
>>> "Schoppy, Joseph G CDR" <joseph.schoppy~navy.mil> 04/29/04 10:18AM >>>
Thanks for the update. Relative to the H2 issue: yeah, when all was said and done they determined that hydrogen remained below the detonation limit in that pipe. However, all the conditions were present for the phenomenon to occur except for a continuous leakage path or a mechanism to allow hydrogen to accumulate over time. Engineering's subsequent investigation revealed that they did in fact have a leakage path back through the 52B valve to the HPCI drain pot following HPCI depressurization. Based on soundings though, the hydrogen pocket at the high point is not large enough to be of concern. I'm back to repeating my comments from an earlier e-mail: if they had the detonation event (which they were very-close.to-havingall the necessaryvingredientsfor) then we would send an SIT or AIT and try to fit toa yellow or red finding. But because they were fortuitous (through no action or evaluation of their own) and te to the point of a detonation trigger, then thewholeisueinot more than minor?" Double or ibthingll There's somethingravely wrong with our assessment process. As always the inspector is left hanging out tring to work within our p gt the licensee to "do the right thing" but God forbid something happens (like a Davis Besse near miss) and everyone wants to know "where was theNRC?" Who'sassessmeent process is it anyway? Bottom line: I'm fine with making it a PI&R sample (a wkoraround Just to get the issue in the report) and not making it a corrective action violation.
I Mel - my comments concerning our assessment process were not aimed at you. I feel better for having stated my opinion and am moving on in search of other windmills to battle.
Don Q.
-- Original Message-From: Mel Gray [mailto:MXG3@nrc.gov1 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:09 To: Schoppy, Joseph G CDR
Subject:
Re: HC issues Sorry, I've been swamped with emegent equipment issues here. Your issues not forgotten or discarded.
Quickly., on H2 issue, got some internal NRC pushback that more than minor threshold based on if left uncorrected, could be more significant..." This is time based and looks like, after all said and done with much prodding, would not have h2 potential conflaguration. I proposed to my mgt that we this be PIR sample in this IR since it has much insight into that area. Also some corrective actions still in progress (beleive they fixed HPCI leka a week ago). So its fair game to keep tracking.
Second, C booster pump. PS?ops saw the light and cut a notification on operator performance in monitoring protected equipment, not just oil leak rrends. There is performance deificiency. I was reviewing more than minor threshold yesterday morning by going to MR a4 violation examples in the OEM/.
Section 8.1.11 (draft still?) for gauidance when it all hit the fan around here. AM pulling PS MR a4
I Glenn.Meyer - RE: HG issues Page 2 I procedures also. Have it on my board as an issue to be pushed through 0612 to see where it falls.
Mel
>>> "Schoppy, Joseph G CDR" <joseph.schoppy@navy.mil> 04/29/04 07:47AM >>>
Mel, What did you decide about the hydrogen buildup in the SCM piping (1R12 in report ending 3/31/04)? I believe that their engineering folks are expecting at least a corrective action violation.
What do you think about the C spray water pump oil bubbler issue? It's definitely a case of weak PI&R (poor Identification of empty bubbler, poor SRO follow-up (ust an N2 for trending, and slow resolution of oil leakage issue) but is it more than minor? This one seems like it could either way (and to think that our process is purely objective). Glenn likes to use the following measure to break ties for these type of issues: what message are we trying to send, what has their performance been in this area, do they get it?
We've certainly have been beating on operators for lack of attention-to-detail and poor questioning attitude in the performance of their rounds (especially for protected equipment). Here's a case where they got a lot a bit closer to adversely impacting operability - do they want to be good or just lucky? Do they get it yet - look at the SRO's response for a hint (NRC inspector calls you from the field to inform you that a protected pumphiis a bone dryToil bubbler and the extent of your aactions are to have a NEO add oil and initiate a N2 for trending).
Do you think that they'll ever get back to full power?
Please send response to my NRC e-mail.
Joe CC: Daniel Holody; Fred Bower; Glenn Meyer; Joseph Schoppy; Lawrence Doerflein; Raymond Lorson; Schoppy, Joseph G CDR