ML051520267

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

6/2/05, Palo Verde, RAI, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors
ML051520267
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/2005
From: Fields M
NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4
To: Overbeck G
Arizona Public Service Co
Fields M, NRR/DLPM, 415-3062
References
GL-04-002, TAC MC4702, TAC MC4703, TAC MC4704
Download: ML051520267 (4)


Text

June 2, 2005 Mr. Gregg R. Overbeck Senior Vice President, Nuclear Arizona Public Service Company P. O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-0234

SUBJECT:

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI) RELATED TO GENERIC LETTER 2004-02, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS (TAC NOS. MC4702, MC4703, AND MC4704)

Dear Mr. Overbeck:

By letter dated March 4, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company (the licensee) provided the 90-day response to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02 for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The GL requested the licensee perform an evaluation of the emergency core cooling system and containment spray system recirculation functions in light of the information provided in the GL and, if appropriate, take additional actions to ensure system function. Additionally, addressees were requested to submit to the NRC the information specified in the GL.

The NRC staff has completed its preliminary review of your response and has determined it needs additional information requested in the enclosure to complete our review.

This RAI requests additional information about your overall plans and schedules and not any information on detailed plans or extensive analyses. In light of this, please provide the additional information requested in the enclosure within 45 days of receipt of this letter.

If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-3062.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mel B. Fields, Senior Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate IV Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, and STN 50-530

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page

June 2, 2005 Mr. Gregg R. Overbeck Senior Vice President, Nuclear Arizona Public Service Company P. O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-0234

SUBJECT:

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI) RELATED TO GENERIC LETTER 2004-02, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS (TAC NOS. MC4702, MC4703, AND MC4704)

Dear Mr. Overbeck:

By letter dated March 4, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company (the licensee) provided the 90-day response to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02 for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The GL requested the licensee perform an evaluation of the emergency core cooling system and containment spray system recirculation functions in light of the information provided in the GL and, if appropriate, take additional actions to ensure system function. Additionally, addressees were requested to submit to the NRC the information specified in the GL.

The NRC staff has completed its preliminary review of your response and has determined it needs additional information requested in the enclosure to complete our review.

This RAI requests additional information about your overall plans and schedules and not any information on detailed plans or extensive analyses. In light of this, please provide the additional information requested in the enclosure within 45 days of receipt of this letter.

If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-3062.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mel B. Fields, Senior Project Manager, Section 2 Project Directorate IV Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, and STN 50-530

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC PDIV-2 R/F RidsOgcRp RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsNrrDlpmLpdiv2 (DTerao)

RidsNrrPMMFields RidsNrrLADBaxley RidsRgnIVMailCenter DCullison/DSolorio RidsNrrDlpmDpr RidsNrrDssaDpr MWebb Accession No.: ML051520267

  • RAI input from SPLB without any major change OFFICE PDIV-1/PM PDIII-2/PM PDIV-1/LA DSSA/SPLB/SP PDIV-2/PM PDIV-1/SC PDIII-2/SC NAME MWebb/JHopkins DBaxley DCullison/DSolorio*

MFields DTerao/GSuh DATE 6/2/2005 6/2/05 5/23/05 6-2-05 6-2-05 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Palo Verde Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 cc:

Mr. Steve Olea Arizona Corporation Commission 1200 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007 Douglas Kent Porter Senior Counsel Southern California Edison Company Law Department, Generation Resources P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770 Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 40 Buckeye, AZ 85326 Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harris Tower & Pavillion 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 Chairman Maricopa County Board of Supervisors 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85003 Mr. Aubrey V. Godwin, Director Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency 4814 South 40 Street Phoenix, AZ 85040 Mr. Craig K. Seaman, Director Regulatory Affairs Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Mail Station 7636 P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034 Mr. Hector R. Puente Vice President, Power Generation El Paso Electric Company 310 E. Palm Lane, Suite 310 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Mr. John Taylor Public Service Company of New Mexico 2401 Aztec NE, MS Z110 Albuquerque, NM 87107-4224 Mr. Thomas D. Champ Southern California Edison Company 5000 Pacific Coast Hwy Bldg D1B San Clemente, CA 92672 Mr. Robert Henry Salt River Project 6504 East Thomas Road Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Mr. Jeffrey T. Weikert Assistant General Counsel El Paso Electric Company Mail Location 167 123 W. Mills El Paso, TX 79901 Mr. John Schumann Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Southern California Public Power Authority P.O. Box 51111, Room 1255-C Los Angeles, CA 90051-0100 Brian Almon Public Utility Commission William B. Travis Building P. O. Box 13326 1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, TX 78701-3326 Karen O'Regan Environmental Program Manager City of Phoenix Office of Environmental Programs 200 West Washington Street Phoenix AZ 85003

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 2004-02, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 DOCKET NOS. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, AND STN 50-530 By letter dated March 4, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company (the licensee) provided the 90-day response to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02 for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The GL requested that addressees perform an evaluation of the emergency core cooling system and containment spray system recirculation functions in light of the information provided in the GL and, if appropriate, take additional actions to ensure system function. Additionally, addressees were requested to submit to the NRC the information specified in the GL. The staff has completed its preliminary review of your response and has determined it needs the following additional information to complete our review:

In your 90-day response to GL 2004-02, you indicated that you intend to use future test results, industry guidance, and NRC guidance to account for chemical precipitants in your evaluation and their availability will impact the schedule for performing an evaluation. The cooperative NRC-Electric Power Research Institute tests in progress at the University of New Mexico are designed to determine if chemical effects occur, but are not designed to measure head loss associated with any chemical effects. The staff notes that some chemical effects have been observed in the initial three tests.

In your 90-day response to GL 2004-02, you also indicated that you intend to use industry owners group guidance and component manufacturer data to evaluate long-term performance degradation of downstream susceptible components caused by debris-laden fluid and their availability will impact the schedule for performing an evaluation.

For both of these issues, you stated the evaluation may occur after the September 1, 2005, response due date, depending on the schedule for testing and the availability of industry guidance. This is contrary to the information request in GL 2004-02, which requests that chemical and downstream effects be addressed in the September 1, 2005, response. This delay is also contrary to the staffs position that there are sufficient bases to address sump vulnerability to chemical effects and that the September response will be incomplete if the evaluation is incomplete, the design is not complete, or there is no schedule for upgrades. In this light, please discuss your plans and schedule for evaluating chemical effects and the long-term downstream effects. In addition, please discuss any plans for performing testing to support your evaluation of these effects.

ENCLOSURE