ML051260437
| ML051260437 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/2005 |
| From: | Thullen G Nuclear Management Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML050800491 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-331/05-301 50-331/05-301 | |
| Download: ML051260437 (14) | |
Text
VARIOUS SIGNATURE CHECKLIST OUTLINE FORMS FOR THE DUANE ARNOLD INITIAL EXAMINATION JANIFEB 2005
CI Duane Arnold Enerav CenteC Operated by Nuclear Management Company. LLC November 4.2004 NG-04-0699 NUREG 1021 U S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region Ill Attention: Hironori Peterson 2443 Warrenville Road Suite 210 Lisle, IL 60532-4352 Duane Arnold Energy Center Docket 50-331 License No. DPR-49 Examination Material for Duane Arnold Enerqv Center Initial License Examination Week of Januarv 31,2005 In accordance with the guidelines of NUREG 1021, Operating License Examination Standard for Power Reactors, Revision 9.we are sending you the integrated examination outlines for the initial license examinations to be administered at our facility the week of January 31, 2005.
NUREG 1021 physical security requirements state that the enclosed examination materials shall be withheld from public disclosure until after the examination is complete.
You may direct any questions or comments regarding this material to George Thullen at 319-851-7945 or Kelly Gassman at 319-851-7427.
T h m t a i n s no new commitments.
7 .
Mark A. Pkrfer Site Vice President, Duane Arnold Energy Center Nuclear Management Company, LLC Enclosures (20)
CC: Chief Operator License Branch, Region 111 w/o NRC Resident Inspector w/o 3277 DAEC Road Palo. Iowa 52324-9785 Telephone: 31 9.851.761 I
Enclosure 1 ES-201-2 Examination Outline Quality Checklist
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: fi Q e L Date of Examination: 1/3 11 Item Task Description h Initials w I#
- 1. a. Verity that the outline(s) fit@) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
W R
I T
T E
- N
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5. verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the requred number of normal evoI~1ions.mtrument and component failures. technical specif;cat~ons.
S I
M U
L A at least one new or significantly modified scenano. that no scenarios are dupllcaled T
0 I
R c
- ~~
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Fwm ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control rcom and in-plant tasks I
W I
T distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test($
(4) the number of new a modified tasks me& w exceeds the mirimums specified on the foim 4
(5) the number of alternate path. low-power. emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
- b. Verity that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations 4.
G E
N E
R A
L
- 3. Author
- 1. Facility Reviewer (')
- , NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- 1. NRC Supervisor qote: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
Le ~ & t j&L&-
ES-201, Page 25 of 27
Enclosure 10 ES 3014 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: & c- 0s Date of Exam:\/ 311Scenario Numbers: 1 z I I 3 Operating Te!
I1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES
- 1. The initial conditions are realistic. in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does no1 cue the operators into expected events.
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is lo be initialed the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
. the symptomslcues that will be visible to the crew
. the expected operator actions (by shifl position) the event lerminalion point (if applicable)
- 4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g.. pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
- 5. The events are valid wilh regard lo physics and thermodynamics.
- 6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examinalion team lo obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected aclivilies without undue time constraints.
Cues are given.
- 8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
- 9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d). any open Simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated l o ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
IO. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new of significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
- 11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated. as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12 Each applcant wtl be signrficanlly involve0 m Ihe minimbm nbmber of transients and events specofied an Form ES-301-5 (sbbm I the lorm vnth the simulator scenanos)
Target Quantitatlve Attributes (Per Scenario: See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes
- 1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 6/71?
- 2. Malfunctions afler EOP entry (1-2) I ,"t? I
- 3. Abnormal events ( 2 4 ) 21 z / 2,
- 4. Major transients (1-2) I / 112,
- 5. EOPs enteredlrequiringsubstantive actions (1-2) z / 1 1 2 ,
- 6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 01 I / 7
- 7. Critical tasks (2-3) 2 / L /2 ES-301, Page 25 of 27
Enclosure 12 ES 301-5 Transient and Event Checklist
CS-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 racili P
P I.
I SpareiESG 2 c Crew Position i
A N
ATC T
E- 1 RO NOR E-2 E-4 E-4 E-6 4
TS Rx I ~
E-3 I/C E-5
__ E-I, MAJ E-9 TS
~
E- 1 SRO - E-3
\U E-3 E-2 E-4 E-5 3
E-6
- E-I MAJ E-9 TS E-2 E-6 E-4 E-5
Instructions:
I. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and the balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (IK) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer t Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a pf Appendix D. *Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a Ifro-l basis
- 3. whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those thi require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirement.
Author:
NRC Reviewer
S-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5
'acility: Date of Exam: I/s I / b 5 Operating Test No.: 305-I Scenarios ESG 1 ESG 2 Crew Position Crew Position SRO I ATC I BOP g$
E- 1 E-4 SRO ATC BOP E-2 E-2 E-4 E-5
-r" I
E-5 E-6 E-7 vlAJ E-8 TS E-2 E-6 SRO ATC BOP KX NO E-3 K
I/C E-5 E-6 E-4 E-5
Instructions:
I. Circle the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers controls (ATC) and the balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
- 2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a pf Appendix D. Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a Ifro-l hasis
- 3. whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirement.
Author:
N R C Reviewer
Enclosure 13 ES 301-6 Competencies Checklist
1 ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility OAF. c Date of Examination: L / 3 L o5 Operating Test NO:Z---O I A r r POP APPLl ANTS Competencies ROISRO-VSRO-U ROISRO-IISRO-U ROISRO-VSRO-U ROISRO-l/SRO-U Scenario Scenario Scenario Scenario 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 InterpreVDiagnose E-2, E-4, E-3, E-5, E-2, E-5, E-4, E-5, E-2, E-4, E-3, E-4, E-2, E-3, E-2, E-4, E-3, E-4, Events and E-8 E-1, E-9, E-I, E-9 E-6, E-I, E-5, E-6, E-5, E-6, E-4, E-5, E-5, E-6, E-5, E-6, Conditions E-8 E-I, E-8 E-I, E-8, E-6, E-I, E-1, E-8 E-1, E-8, E-9 E-8, E-9 E-9 Comply with and E-1, E-2, E-2, E-3, E-2, E-5, E-3, E-4, E-I, 72, Use Procedures (1) E-4, E-8 E-5, E-1, E-I, E-8, E-5, E-6, E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, E-9, E-9 E-I, E-8 E-5 E-6, E-I, E-8, E-1, E-8, E-9 Operate Control E- I , E-2, E-2, E-3, E-2, E-5, E-3, E-4, Boards (2) E-4. E-8 E-5, E-7, E-I, E-8, E-5, E-6, E-9 E-9 E-7, E-8 Communicate and E-1, E-2, E-2, E-3, E-1, E-5, E-3, E-4, E-1, E-2, E-1, E-2, Interact E-4, E-8 E-5, E-1, E-1, E-8, E-5, E-6, E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, E-9 E-9 E-7, E-8 E-5 E-6, E-5 E-6, E-7, E-8, E-I, E-8, E-9 E-9 E-9 Demonstrate E-1, E-2, E-1, E-2, E-I, E-2, E-I, E-2, supervisory Ability E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, (3) E-5, E-6, E-5, E-6, E-5 E-6, E-5 E-6, E-I, E-8 E-I, E-8, E-I, E-8, E-I, E-8, E-9 E-9 Comply With and E-2 E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, E-3, E-4, Use Tech. Specs. E-6 E-5 E-5 E-6 (3)
Notes:
(I) Includes Technical Specification compliance for RO.
(2) Optional for an SRO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs Instructions:
Circle the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Author:
NRC Reviewer