ML020910529

Nuclear Ship Savannah Annual Report for Cy 2001

ML020910529
Person / Time
Site:	NS Savannah
Issue date:	03/25/2002
From:	Seelinger J US Dept of Transportation, Maritime Admin
To:	Alexander Adams NRC/FSME
References
Download: ML020910529 (24)

Text

0 U.S. Department 400 Seventh Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20590 of Transportation Maritime Administration March 25, 2002 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Alexander Adams, Mail Stop 012-G13 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

License NS-1, Docket No. 50-238 Nuclear Ship SAVANNAH Annual Report for CY 2001

Dear Mr. Adams:

Please find enclosed the Maritime Administration's (MARAD) annual report of activities for the Nuclear Ship (N/S) SAVANNAH (NSS) for calendar year 2001. The report consists of two documents, the minutes of the NSS Review and Audit Committee meeting held at the James River Reserve Fleet on February 13, 2002, and the NSS Annual (radiological) Survey prepared by General Health Physics, Inc. Please note that the latter includes a report of the condition of the primary and secondary systems, based on visual inspection during the annual radiological survey.

As you are aware, MARAD was cited for two violations of the NSS Technical Specifications in early 2001. As was noted in our annual report for calendar year 2000, the first violation (Primary and Secondary Systems Inspection) was permanently corrected by mid-year 2001. The correction was accomplished by promulgating inspection procedures to document the condition of the primary and secondary systems during routine radiological monitoring inspections.

The second violation (Emergency Response Team, Health Physicist on-call within two hours) is not yet corrected. Again, our 2001 annual report anticipated that MARAD would provide an emergency radiological response team from local, U.S. Navy resources. This seemed logical given the concentration of naval nuclear facilities and vessels within the greater Hampton Roads area.

However, our attempts in this regard were unsuccessful. MARAD subsequently contacted the City of Newport News (Virginia) Emergency Coordinator, to determine if the City could provide response services. A meeting and site inspection was scheduled for September 12, 2001. The meeting was cancelled in the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11. The resultant delay in rescheduling the meeting meant that no corrective action on the second violation was completed during calendar year 2001. Our efforts are continuing in calendar year 2002, and will be the subject of separate correspondence. Again, as noted last year, MARAD anticipates that our permanent corrective action will be to amend the technical specification, once an interim response capability is put in place.

Of particular interest in recent months are developments in the possible near-term decommissioning and disposal of the NSS reactor and nuclear systems. Motivated by the impending closure of the Barnwell, South Carolina waste disposal facility, MARAD was investigating decommissioning frDI

N/S SAVANNAH Annual Report, CY 2001 alternatives for FY 2004 funding prior to September 11. In recent weeks these efforts have accelerated, with the possibility of FY 2002 supplemental funding for total decommissioning and disposal. While this particular effort remains very preliminary at present, it serves to indicate that MARAD is moving ahead with plans to substantively deal with the NSS reactor, something which NRC has expressed interest in over the years. I look forward to working with you and your staff as we chart this final course for the N/S SAVANNAH, and bring to a close her successful career.

incerely, ep H. Seeli-n.ger, Deputy Director, Offic of Ship Operations Enclosures E. Koehler/ek/03/25/02 1EK.610.1-02.037L cc: MAR-600, 610, 610.1, 611 (rfrb, wc, ek), 612, 613 MRG-7100, 7600 (mfb, rr), 7700 General Health Physics (J. Davis)

U.S. Army Humphreys Engineer Center (D. Breeden)

O U.S. Department of Transportation Maritime Administration Nuclear Ship SA VANNAH Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Review and Audit Committee Covering Calendar Year 2001 James River Reserve Fleet Fort Eustis, Virginia February 13, 2002 License NS-1 Docket No. 50-238

'N -

N/S SAVANNAH Review & Audit Committee CY 2001 Annual Meeting February 13, 2002 Minutes of the Calendar Year 2001 meeting of the Nuclear Ship (N/S) SAVANNAH Review and Audit Committee (as required by N/S SAVANNAH Facility License No. NS-1) held at the James River Reserve Fleet, Wednesday, February 13, 2002. These minutes are arranged in the order shown on the meeting agenda (attached for reference).

Members Present:

"* Joseph Seelinger, Committee Chair, MAR-610

"* Michael Bagley, JRRF Fleet Superintendent

"* John Davis, General Health Physics, Inc.

Robert Rohr, JRRF Fleet O&M Officer Erhard Koehler, MAR-611

"* denotes members required for quorum, Mr. Davis representing the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Humphries Engineering Center.

Guest:

Jeffrey McMahon, MARAD South Atlantic Region Ship Operations & Maintenance Officer Agenda Topics I. Welcome Mr. Seelinger convened the meeting at 11:15. A quorum was present.

Section 3.6 of the NSS Technical Specifications (TS) requires the Review and Audit Committee to meet at least annually to review and discuss events of the preceding period. The committee last met on January 17, 2001 (to discuss CY 2000), at the James River Reserve Fleet (JRRF). The minutes of that meeting were briefly reviewed without comment.

II. Discussion A. Significant Events of CY 2001: Mr. Seelinger opened the discussion of CY 2001 significant events. The terrorist attacks of September 11 and their aftermath heavily skewed the discussion from what otherwise would have been the dominant item of the year - the two violations of the Technical Specification received in February. In the post 9-11 environment, security measures were of great importance, in

N/S SAVANNAH Review & Audit Committee CY 2001 Annual Meeting February 13, 2002 particular the continuing NRC Advisories regarding physical security of nuclear facilities. Mr. Seelinger commended the JRRF staff, particularly Ms. Cynthia K. Stockwell, for their hard work responding to the advisory comments and requests.

There has been continuing, although diminished contractor interest in decommissioning of the remaining nuclear systems.

One contractor present at the ship tour last January was invited to join a MAR-610 briefing to the new Maritime Administrator - that briefing was originally planned for December 2001, but was delayed to February 6, 2002. Although not in the reporting period, it was deemed of interest to the committee to review the substance of the briefing. Various options and general points regarding decommissioning and terrorist threat mitigation were reviewed with the Administrator. Subsequent to the briefing, the Department of Transportation sought modal input for a FY 2002 supplemental appropriation for security related investments. As of this date, MARAD requested a measure of funding for SAVANNAH threat reduction.

It is understood that the Army Corps of Engineers has advanced its plans to decommission the STURGIS, and has reportedly sought funding for that purpose.

On February 15, 2001 MARAD received a notice of violation from the NRC for two apparent violations of the Technical Specification (TS). One violation has been corrected, and will be discussed further in the minutes. The other violation was an administrative violation of section 3.1 - failure to have on call within two hours a radiological health physician, and failure to have available an emergency radiological response team. MARAD was advised that interim corrective action to comply with the TS was required before final corrective action - a planned revision to the TS that would remove these requirements - could be approved by NRC. MARAD sought to obtain these services on an inter-agency basis from multiple U.S. Navy sources within the greater Hampton Roads area, on the theory that the concentration of nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable vessels in the area would require similar support. This proved impossible, however, as it was discovered that Navy policy precludes Naval, or Navy contractors from providing radiological support outside of naval nuclear facilities. Because STURGIS has no such response requirements, the Army Corps of Engineers could not provide the services.

MARAD sought assistance from the city of Newport News, and had

N/S SAVANNAH Review & Audit Committee CY 2001 Annual Meeting February 13, 2002 scheduled a ship tour and facility inspection for September 12, 2001. The terrorist attacks of September 11 deferred any action on this matter beyond the end of the calendar year, such that corrective action on this violation remains outstanding, but in progress. The facility inspection for Newport News officials took place immediately prior to the committee meeting this date.

Mr. McMahon briefly noted that the plate anchor system developed for the JRRF following Hurricane Floyd is scheduled for installation on the SAVANNAH/STURGIS nest in the summer of 2002.

B. JRRF Activities: Mike Bagley noted the following for the record:

a. Underwater hull surveys indicate significant fouling of the hull, both hard and soft; however, the coating system is intact. The most recent survey was conducted in January 2001.

(no change from CY 2000)

b. Cathodic protection system service visits have been discontinued, and a hanging anode system installed. The installed hull cathodic protection systems on STURGIS and SAVANNAH essentially performed too well after STURGIS returned from drydocking; therefore, the systems were shut down. The hanging system provides effective protection to hulls that are well-coated and maintained, such as SAVANNAH and STURGIS. The hanging system is monitored periodically, and hull potential readings are logged and evaluated monthly. Mr. Seelinger recommended periodic tests of the installed system in light of the experience at Patriots Point.'

c. No changes in tank soundings have been found. (no change from CY 2000)

d. Radiation inspections, including the containment area, have been satisfactory, and seals have been changed as required.

(no change from CY 2000)

e. The remote radio alarm system is tested monthly, and has been functioning satisfactorily. (no change from CY 2000)

f. The CY 2002 Reimbursable Agreement to fund the radiation health physics contract with the U.S. Army is in process.

1. At PPDA the installed hull cathodic protection system was assumed to be functional, and was not serviced or tested. The system had in fact ceased to function, and failed to protect the hull from deterioration. The installed systems will be tested at least quarterly on SAVANNAH/STURGIS.

N/S SAVANNAH Review & Audit Committee CY 2001 Annual Meeting February 13, 2002

g. FY 02 funds have been allotted to the South Atlantic Region, and purchase orders are being processed routinely.

h. New Item - CY 2001: The City of Newport News, VA is acquiring a fireboat, and has requested copies of fire safety plans for vessels at JRRF, including SAVANNAH.

III. Review of Technical Specification Requirements In accordance with paragraph 3.6.3 of the TS, the Committee is specifically required to review the following items:

1. Proposed changes to Technical Specifications For the CY 2001 reporting period, no changes to the Technical Specifications were implemented. Changes had been planned as part of the final corrective action to the violation of TS 3.1 (see below); however, the 9-11 events deferred the corrective action plan to the point that TS changes were not completed.

The chairman committed to complete a thorough review and rewrite of the TS this year, and submit same to the committee for review.

2. Proposed changes or modifications to the vessel's controlled radiation area entry alarm system or containment system No changes were implemented during CY 2001.

3. Substantive changes to radiation surveys or security surveillance procedures

a. Radiation Surveys No changes to the radiation survey protocols were made during CY 01; however, in response to the cited violation of TS section 3.7.6, physical evaluations of the primary and secondary systems were added to the radiological surveys.

b. Security Surveillance Procedures No routine changes were implemented during CY 01; however, physical security was increased within the entire JRRF facility following the 9-11 attacks. The additional security is primarily accomplished through additional river patrols in the anchorages, and through heightened security at the landside accesses to Fort Eustis proper.

Mr. Seelinger noted that several physical security measures are under consideration at this time which, although they do not bear on the reporting period, are worth noting for

N/S SAVANNAH Review & Audit Committee CY 2001 Annual Meeting February 13, 2002 discussion. One item is to relocate the ship to a more secure facility/location, yet to be determined. Physical enhancements to minimize the physical risk of damage to the ship and/or potential radiological release to the environment include foaming the innerbottom tanks beneath the reactor compartment, removal of selected equipment from the periphery of the reactor compartment, and partial or full decommissioning of the reactor and nuclear systems.

4. Reported violations of Technical Specifications The NRC cited violations of TS sections 3.1 and 3.7.6 on February 15, 2001. MARAD responded by letter dated March 15, 2001. The violations and responses are discussed elsewhere in these minutes. In summary, one violation (of TS 3.7.6) has been corrected, and the other (of TS 3.1) remains in progress.

5. License Event Reports No LER's were noted during the reporting period.

6. Annual reports to the NRC The CY 2000 annual report was submitted to the NRC on March 15, 2000. Mr. Seelinger will submit the CY 2001 full annual report, which includes the radiological survey and the minutes of this meeting to the NRC, as soon as the radiation survey report is available.

IV. Other Topics A. Review meeting with NN/VA re. Radiological Emergency Response B. Security Issues C. Funding - FY 02 Supplemental / FY 04 D. Decommissioning E. Other A. Review of meeting with Newport News/Virginia re. Emergency Radiological Response Team. In response to the violation of TS 3.1 (radiological response), MARAD contacted the city of Newport News to determine if the city could provide emergency radiological response. As noted previously, the initial facility inspection was scheduled for September 12. The inspection was later rescheduled for the date of the Review & Audit Committee meeting. The Newport News delegation was headed by the City's Director of Emergency Response, Mr. Jack Williamson. An attendance list is attached. Mr. Koehler briefed the delegation

N/S SAVANNAH Review & Audit Committee CY 2001 Annual Meeting February 13, 2002 on the nature of MARAD's requirement, the status of the NSS reactor and systems, and MARAD's plan for final corrective action (TS amendment). After a short open discussion, the delegation toured the vessel. Follow-up discussions and meetings will be scheduled as required.

B. Security Issues. Mr. Seelinger reviewed some of the actions that have been suggested to either improve the physical security of the ship, or to reduce the threat of radiological release in the event of a terrorist attack on the ship. The principal security improvement considered is to relocate the ship to a better-protected location. However, few sites are known where the risk of physical attack can be significantly reduced. The physical enhancements to reduce or mitigate radiological release are considered a more practical means to improve security. The enhancements include foaming the ship's innerbottom tanks beneath the reactor compartment, selectively removing irradiated components, piping and equipment from spaces in proximity to the ship's hull, and a combination of these two. Partial and/or total decommissioning are considered separately.

C. Funding FY 02 Supplemental / FY 04. Discussion restricted due to departmental budget sensitivity. MARAD submitted a funding request for NS SAVANNAH in the FY 02 DOT Supplemental Appropriations Request. MARAD plans to request funding for decommissioning in its FY 04 Budget Request.

D. Decommissioning. Mr. Seelinger briefly discussed recent activities MARAD has taken in pursuing decommissioning since last year's meeting. Because the subject remains somewhat sensitive from a budgetary perspective, the committee minutes cannot reflect the full extent of the discussion; however, the minutes can reflect that MARAD is considering options for partial and total decommissioning, that these options have been presented to senior agency management, and that MARAD intends to seek funding for these activities beginning in FY 04.

E. Other. It was noted for the record that staff responded to one Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request during the reporting period, and numerous routine historical inquiries.

The meeting was adjourned at 1215.

AGENDA N.S. SAVANNAH Review and Audit Committee Meeting James River Reserve Fleet Fort Eustis, Virginia February 13, 2002 13:00 Convene meeting.

1. Welcome by Committee Chairman II. Discussion A. Significant Events of CY 2001 B. JRRF Activities III. Review of Technical Specification Requirements

1. Proposed changes to the TS

2. Proposed changes or modifications to the vessel's controlled radiation area entry alarm system or containment system

3. Substantive changes to radiation surveys or security surveillance procedures

4. Reported violations of TS

5. License Event Reports

6. Annual Reports to the NRC IV. Other Topics A. Review meeting with NN/VA re. Radiological Emergency Response B. Security Issues C. Funding - FY 02 Supplemental / FY 04 D. Decommissioning E. Other

SAVANNAH ANNUAL MEETING February 13, 2002 NAME (Print) 1COMPANYIORGANIZATION 1PHONE # FAX # EMAIL Ii 8 -- F_, &IC L___A__(_S__4_ .7-K C, '7d -Y,2~

Kle C

~&~ ~~~~~~~5,~ f 3-73/7_

____ 77__

_ _ __ _ _ S- G 7f4T.

4~iat-7j39 -).( (. Y -fQ

) _/f~IO 0I~ Y 2 ,~~

&6~ /-P 92,-7,C Y";~L 2it orK&____C_:_ _0

~ §~ ~ e<D~A~~ ~(g~s ~/-5 3 _ ______12_

12,6?~j 12-1

GENERAL HEALTH PHYSICS, INC.

72 1 7 LOCKPORT PL #203 LORTON VA 22079 703 550-7525, 1-800 247-6572 FAx: 703 550-7525 March 4, 2002 Mr Joseph Seelinger Division of Ship Maintenance & Repair Office of Ship Operations(MAR 611, Rm 2119)

US Maritime Administration Washington DC 20590

Dear Mr Seelinger:

Attached id General Health Physics, Inc. report on the radiological status of the N.S. Savannah. If you have any questions please call.

Sincerely yours, John B. Davis MS, CeP President

NSS Savanah Annual Survey Location uREM/hr Alpha dpm/100cm 2 Beta dpm/100 cm 2 NAVIGATION BRIDGE Pilot House at helm 3.0 mda mda Bridge Wing port side 3.0 mda mda Fire Stat. #1 near chart rm 4.5 mda mda Fan rm port side gen. rm 3.5 mda mda E.O.G. rm 3.0 mda mda BOAT DECK Chief Eng. State rm port side 3.0 mda mda Cpt. State rm starboard side 2.5 mda 40 Fire Stat. #2 port side 4.0 mda mda Officer's lounge aft 4.0 mda mda Hallway floor port side 3.5 mda mda Forward state rm starboard side 3.5 mda mda Hallway floor forward center 3.0 mda mda PROMENADE DECK Top of reactor hatch 4.0 mda mda Starboard side of reactor hatch 4.0 mda mda Top of Hatch #4 3.0 17 mda Between Hatch #3 &#4 3.5 mda mda Bow center of deck 3.0 mda 56 Center of Main Lounge 3.0 mda mda Center of Veranda 3.0 mda mda Fire Stat. #7 starboard side 4.0 mda mda Between Veranda & Swimming Pool 2.5 mda mda Library 3.0 mda mda ills101011 oilE JluHUlrII aiirEePIM E UT IN IIsPamjUIIUehJII4Nhi

,*IaIOil N IE 11UIIE i Iii IIEIIE II NIi01 i11i 1 111 11

Location uREMI/hr Alpha dpm/100cm 2 Beta dpm/100 cm 2 Hallway in front of Main Lounge 3.5 mda mda Veranda port side forward 2.5 mda mda Bar at Veranda 3.0 mda mda REACTOR SPACE Hot pipe forward entry hatch 34 x x 1 meter forward of lab tank 16 x x At lab tank 28 x x Pipe elbow port side forward 42 x x "Hot" pipe near entry hatch x mda mda Containment vessel middle of catwalk 18 mda mda Lab tank surface 10.0 mda 40 Open valve next to lab tank 11.0 x x Containment vessel middle of catwalk 8.0 x x Piping at the port side forward catw 8.5 x x Middle of catwalk port side 20 mda mda Piping at the port side middle of ca 21 mda mda Valve handle port side aft 12 x x Damp area on floor middle of catwalk 10 mda mda Containment vessel starboard side af 63 x x Inside entry hatch pipe x mda mda FAN ROOM At floor rm center 3.5 x x Electric motor 4.5 mda mda Control box 3.5 mda mda CABIN B1 B2 On drums of PC's in Cabin B-1 5.0 mda 45 Average reading of Cabin B-3 4.5 x x On floor of Cabin B-1 x mda mda Drum lid in Cabin B-1 x mda mda

Location uREM/hr Alpha dpm/1 00cm 2 Beta dpm/1 00 cm 2 STB STABILIZER RM At entrance door 3.5 x x Average background 5.0 x x Catwalk Lower level x mda mda Catwalk Upper level x mda mda PORT STABILIZER RM At access hatch 4.5 x x At catwalk upper level 13 x x At internally contaminated strainer 26 x x Diaphragm valve 48 x x Pipe to left of diaphragm valve 65 x x Internally contaminated valves x mda mda Control valve lower deck x mda mda Volume Chambers x mda mda Elbow diaphragm valve x mda 45 STB CHARGING PUMP RM Outside hatch 2.5 x x Inside hatch 10.0 mda mda Center of floor x mda mda Pipe back of pump motor 82 mda mda Pipe in back of pump x mda mda Top of pump x 15 mda Backside of pump x mda mda Center of floor 22 mda mda Outside of hatch x mda mda Air duct at pump x mda mda Pump motor x mda mda PORT CHARGING PUMP RM Outside door 1m from deck 9.5 x x Between pumps 30 x x ll,,,llualull,,ll~111111101R lUamil~ l ar~* m lmllul l il lill ol 0 11oila11n11 mlm im ulillill 1 E 11111111 i111111 l B

Location uREM/hr Alpha dpm/100cm 2 Beta dpm/100 cm 2

-ill i I. = I .mm R. S l mIi miii m-Hill il ilm il- ml mm I l Sii Sil II S- -n -n i l iii mii61 111 sm ii -im. m Deck at hatch x mda mda Acccess hatch x mda mda Deck by pumps x mda mda Floor between pumps x mda mda Pump in front of rm x mda mda x

COLD CHEM LAB Background in Cold Chem Lab 10 x x Ventilation system/lead blanket 110 x x Drain (C deck) 289 x x Fume hood (D deck) 20 x x Top of storage tank 34 x x Air sampler (D deck) 39 x x Floor under air sampler (D deck) 13 x x Ledge of fume hood 68 x x Floor in front of ventilation system 12 x x Ventilation system 14 x x Ledge of fume hood (D deck) x mda mda Drain (C deck) x mda 48 Floor under air sampler (D deck) x mda mda Floor front of vent system (C deck) x mda mda Air Sampler (D deck) x mda mda Floor under fume hood x mda mda Shelving (C deck) x mda mda Top of storage tank x mda mda Valve near floor (D deck) x mda mda HOT CHEM LAB Background in hot chem lab 4.5 x x Waste collection tank 18 x x Sink 3.5 x x Doorway to hot chem lab 4.5 x x Under sink 4.5 x x atray r Page 4ot

Location uREM/hr Alpha dpm/100cm 2 Beta dpm/100 cm 2 Sink drain 12 mda mda Inside waste collection tank 13 mda 56 Fume hood inside 4.0 mda mda Floor inside door 4.5 mda mda Intake for hood 3.5 mda mda CARGO HOLD 2B Floor starboard side forward 3.0 mda mda Floor starboard side center 3.5 mda mda Floor starboard side aft 3.0 mda mda Floor aft center 4.0 mda mda Floor port side aft 3.5. mda mda Floor port side center 4.0 mda mda Floor port side forward 3.5 mda mda Floor forward center 3.0 mda mda CARGO HOLD 2C 2.5 mda mda Floor port side center 3.0 mda mda Floor port side forward 4.0 mda mda Floor forward center 4.0 mda mda Floor starboard side forward 3.0 mda mda Floor starboard side center 3.0 mda mda Floor starboard side aft 3.0 mda mda Floor aft center 3.5 mda mda Floor port side aft 3.5 mda mda Floor 1c cargo hold 3.5 mda mda CARGO HOLD 2D Starboard aft 4.0 mda mda Starboard amidships left 3.5 mda mda Starboard amidships right 3.5 mda mda Starboard bow 4.0 mda mda Centerline bow 3.0 8.5 mda IIIEIIEEIEEIEII IIIIiEMII IIl ll02, Saturday, March lII II lllll ll 2002 II aIgIeIIII Pageb UllIIII I 5of 1 ll I llllllI llI l

Location uREM/hr Alpha dpm/100cm 2 Beta dpm/100 cm 2 Port side bow 2.5 mda mda Port side amidships 3.5 mda mda Port side aft 3.0 mda mda Centerline aft 3.0 mda mda Average 3.5 x x Maximum 3.0 x x 2 TANK TOP Floor forward & starboard of sailboat 3.5 mda mda Floor sailboat center port side 3.0 mda mda Floor sailboat aft starboard 3.5 mda mda Floor sailboat center starboard 4.0 mda mda CARGO HOLD 3B At stairwell entering hold 4.5 mda mda Floor center forward 4.0 mda mda Floor starboard side forward 3.0 mda mda Floor starboard side center 2.5 mda mdda Floor starboard side aft 3.5 mda mda Floor center aft 3.0 mda mda Floor port side aft 4.5 mda mda Floor at display center 2.5 mda mda Floor port side forward 3.5 mda mda Average 3.5 x x Maximum 4.0 x x CARGO HOLD 3C Floor starboard side 3.0 mda mda Floor starboard center 3.0 mda mda At door starboard aft 3.5 mda mda Center aft vent 3.5 mda mda Floor port side aft 2.5 mda mda Floor port side center 3.0 mda mda Satuday Mach 0, 202 age 6of

Location uREM/hr Alpha dpm/100cm 2 Beta dpm/100 cm 2 i

-.. m im

.-.. il i I - IS. -

li. . i i-i==.i i i mIl.S S.

I. ml.... mm .. .. i m

. mi ....... ...... Iron mmi m

i. I. .

Floor starboard forward 3.0 mda mda Vent center forward 4.0 mda mda Average 3.0 x x Maximum 3.5 x x CARGO HOLD 3D Floor port side forward 3.5 mda mda Floor port aft 3.0 mda mda Floor center aft 3.5 mda mda Floor starboard aft 3.0 mda 45 Floor starboard forward 3.5 mda mda Floor forward center 3.0 mda mda CARGO HOLD 4B Men's restrm 3.5 mda mda Floor port side center 3.0 mda mda Floor by door to 3B port side 4.5 mda mda Floor by handrail port side 3.0 mda mda Floor by handrail starboard side for 3.5 mda mda Floor by handrail starboard side cen 4.0 mda mda Floor by handrail starboard side aft 3.0 mda mda CARGO HOLD 4C Port side aft 3.5 x X Centerline aft 19 x x Starboard side aft 4.0 x x Max. reading along stern bulkhead 14 x x Floor at aft center (@ Max. Reading) 5.0 mda mda Starboard forward floor 30 mda mda CARGO HOLD 4D Floor at stern bulkhead 3.5 mda mda Floor starboard side 3.0 mda mda 1101 1N101 1NI .*aiui1.,

10 1i0110i11. alrciNNIm m m u~ ~ ~ amnmn ~ Hin m m HmH~ ,i

Location uREM/hr Alpha dpm/lOOcm 2 Beta dpm/100 cm 2 Under barrier rope 3.5 mda mda Floor starboard side forward 4.5 mda 45 Floor port side forward 3.0 mda mda Floor port side center 3.0 mda mda Floor port side aft 3.5 mda mda 4 TANK TOP At ladder entering hold forward 3.0 mda mda Cylindrical equipment on floor forwa 3.0 mda mda Cylindrical equipment-center of hold 3.0 x x Average background 4.0 x x At wall port side aft 3.0 x x Platform center aft 3.5 x x Platform starboard side aft 3.5 x x At wall starboard side aft 3.5 x x Cylindrical equipment on floor forwa 4.0 mda mda Floor starboard side forward 2.5 mda mda Floor starboard side center 3.0 mda mda FLoor starboard side aft 3.5 mda mda Floor starboard side aft 3.0 mda mda Wall center aft 3.5 mda mda Floor port side aft 3.5 mda mda Floor port side center 3.0 mda mda Floor port side forward 3.0 mda mda x= No measurement required MDA for alpha = 8.5 dpm/100 cm2 MDA for beta = 45 dpm/100cm2 111lM l INIl11Ellll MI I IIEf IT l Elall Iy llll MP lMlll I311 Il l T WIgel ll1l I I IE I E I IEIIEIIE l IIEIIUIIIl I IE l l II Il IIIEIIEIIII

Water Sediment Activity Time Period Water (pCi/l) Sediment ('pCi/gm) 2nd Qtr Fwd 14.3 14.6 2nd Qtr Aft 11.9 12.8 4th Qtr Fwd 15.8 13.9 4th Qtr Aft 16.4 12.6 Saturday,March 02, 2002 Page I of I

Visual Inspection of Accessible Primary and Secondary Systems A visual inspection of accessible primary and secondary systems was conducted. There was no abnormal corrosion or moisture present on system components or hull. The photographs of the systems did not come out. Apparently the flash was not operating properly.

TId Location2 Badge Number Location 1st Half (mR) 2nd Half (mR) Total (mR) 0 are Control 0 33 33 1 are Pilot House 34 37 71 2 are Navigation Dk Chart Rm 28 31 59 3 are Navigation Deck Cabin N 27 33 60 4 are Navigation Dk Sea Cabin 28 31 59 5 are Navigation DKr Officer Lo 28 31 59 6 are Promenade Dk Main Lou 29 32 61 7 are Promenade Dk Fire Sta. 27 30 57 8 are Promenade Dk Purser St 29 30 59 9 are Stb Ventilation Rm At Po 27 30 57 10 are "A"Deck Fire Sta. 15 28 26 54 11 are "A"Deck Fire Sta 14 29 28 57 12 are "B" Deck Fire Sta. 20 25 0 25 13 are "B: Deck Fire Sta. 20A 26 24 50 14 are "B"Ent. To Reactor Corn 27 28 55 15 are Fan Room Door 28 29 57 16 are Cabin C-9 0 35 35 17 are "C"Deck Fire Sta. 31 40 40 80 18 are "C"Deck Fire Sta. 34 27 26 53 19 are Cold Chemistry Room Do 24 32 56 20 are Between D&C Dk Fr 96 P 28 36 64 21 are Stb Stabilizer Room Door 25 30 55 22 are "D"Deck Fr 118 Stb 41 49 90 23 are "D"Deck Fr 118 Port 27 28 55 24 are Port Stabilizer Room Doo 27 34 61 25 are "B" Deck Hold 4 Aft Port 26 33 59 "C" Deck Hold 4 Aft Stb 29 36 65 26 are 27 are "C" Deck Fire Sta 28 30 27 57 Salurday, March 02, 2002 Page I of 2

Badge Number Location 1st Half (mR) 2nd Half (MR) Total (mR) 1st Half (ml?) 2nHaf(l) Ttl(n?

28 are Sturgis Stb Side 51 31 82 29 are Turbine Viewing Sta Stb 26 0 26 30 are Turbine Viewing Sta Port 26 30 56 31 are Control Rm Fwd 25 28 53 32 are Stb Charging Pump Roo 25 26 51 33 are Port Charging Pump Roo 27 32 59 Saturday.Mlarch 02, 2002 Page 2 of 2