ML020780296

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Various Checklists for the Point Beach Initial Examination - Jan/Feb 2002
ML020780296
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/13/2002
From: Short P
Nuclear Management Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML020780296 (8)
v • d • e


Text

VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE POINT BEACH INITIAL EXAMINATION - JAN/FEB 2002

POINT BEACH j EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED)

(.' *'*rre-Examination:

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about theft-*r - .c.- examination scheduled to be administered durin I agree to not knowingly divulge any infomiation about this examination to any unauthorized'persons. An unauthorized person is any individual who has not been approved by an Operations Training Coordinator to receive specialized knowledge of the examination. [

understand that I am not to participate in any instruction or tutoring involving those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

Post-Examination:

I did not, to the best of my knowledge, divulge any information concerning the examination, administered during j", oq- a,,0, to any unauthorized persons. I did not participate in instructing those licensees who were administered tLis examination from the date that I entered into the security agreement until the completion of their examination administration.

Name Pre-Examination Date Post-Examination Date Certification Certification S`2 j _ .A I2)l z/o

(-/ V l (

U PBF-6805

  • Pct

~~i6e~Je~+ Page I of 2ci,4i~i~1, Revision 2 (1 I1/24i9g) ~ISh ell.

File: A8. 16.13

FEB-11-2002 13:28 SEABROOK TRAINING GROUP 603 773 7630 P.02/02 r~ i -*i. ,,.,,- '. . . . . . .. POINT BEACH EXAMINATION SEC LR-ITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED) c°dre- Nxaminauton-: A-17-0 I acknowledge that I have Ocquired..peciali)e,dje].wledge abouthe "r.ckc.-",* examEna1Liofl

,, I agree to not knowingly divulge any information scheduled to be administered durinn.-.g not about this examination to any unauthorized' jersons. An unauthorized person is any individual who has of the examination. 1 been approved by an Operations Training Coordinator to receive specialized knowledge scheduled to be understand that I am not to participate in any instruction or rutoring involving those individuals understand that I further administered this examination until completion of their examination administration.

of the examination and/or an violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

Post-Examination:

the examination. administered I did not, to the best of my knowledge, divulge any infarnation concerning during jag- I 2a/"a,z to any unauthorized persons. I did not participate in instructing those hccnseCs agreement until the who were administered Nis examination from the date that I entered into the security completion of their examination administration.

  • '.. n IV * - o Name Pre-Examinafon Vate WM*

Cernlkati nP Cerlification

/44V 01~ al~~e 0.AO -. p .

il't

/v U,

I 01 LA Page I of 2 PBF.6805 Rev gion 2 ( I124,")

Fil,; A .16.1 3

POINT BEACH EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED)

Pre-Examination:

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the ) 0C2 Ali? CC r t- F examination scheduled to be administered during T,4, I Fe 6. ,2oo :2 . I agree to not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any unauthorized persons. An unauthorized person is any individual who has not been approved by an Operations Training Coordinator to receive specialized knowledge of the examination. I understand that I am not to participate in any instruction or tutoring involving those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

Post-Examination:

I did not, to the best of my knowledge, divulge any information concerning the examination, administered during 1/&16 a - a/a/0.)_ , to any unauthorized persons. I did not participate in instructing those licensees who were administered this examination from the date that I entered into the security agreement until the completion of their examination administration.

Name Pre-Examiination Date 1Post-Examination Date j Certification ________J Certification 1&"ULC6-~&~ ____"U.__2-2 c.

ze Z_ 144 V LeE _ _ __ __ _ 0Z2--c~_

f;IWO

~~ I- __ -111__ _

/Z 6A /-L7 Page 1 of 2 PBF-6805 Revision 2 (11/24/99)

File: A8.16.13

POINT BEACH EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED)

Pre-Examination:

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the i9c,>C vto£

  • _T4-r examination scheduled to be administered during 4A M a,6, . I agree to not knowingly divulge any information about this examination to any unauthorized persons. An unauthorized person is any individual who has not been approved by an Operations Training Coordinator to receive specialized knowledge of the examination. I understand that I am not to participate in any instruction or tutoring involving those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination until completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.

Post-Examination:

I did not, to the best of my knowledge, divulge any information concerning the examination, administered during ijh&.od - A jc /o a , to any unauthorized persons. I did not participate in instructing those licensees who were administered this examination from the date that I entered into the security agreement until the completion of their examination administration.

Name Pre-Examination Date Post-Examination [Date

_______________j Certification jCertification I_____

CA&C(- EV6ElZEV'/W6 /[&'K "12 Z, 0 91a 4, 71 Page 1 of 2 PBF-6805 Revision 2 (11/24/99)

File: A8.16.13

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: PBNP Date of Examination: 1/28/02-2/2/02 Operating Test Number: 2002301 Initials

1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b* c#
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with ,4*

sampling requirements (e.g., 10CFR55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). 9"_"-

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered .,1 during this examination. T-1 "
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s) )see Section D. 1.a). T'L_
d. Overlap with the written examination and between operating test categories is within acceptable limits. / -j
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent ,.

applicants at the designated license level.

E2. WALK-THROUGH (CATEGORY A & B)CRITERIA [ I I-

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable their criteria f -//i

b. The prescribed questions in Category A are predominantly open reference and meet in Attachment 1 of ES-301. /V N ,F/

A'//*

c. Repetition from operating tests used during the previous licensing examination is within acceptable limits_(30%_for the walk-through)_and do not compromise test integrity.______
d. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified. 1 ___I _ _t_ ...
3. SIMULATOR (CATEGORY C) CRITERIA
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Name / Signature Date

a. Author 1 -7 I/'/;2A.,5.4 /00
b. Facility Reviewer(*) "/ L.3pa- j
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 1..,*, H A rZ,,42,5] /

t*/. , . .r- I 24

d. NRC Supervisor ,, -I L'*

NOTE:

  • The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c;" chief examiner concurrence required.

NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-301 Simulat~r ,Scenario Quality Checklist . .Form ES-301-4 Facility: PBNP Date of Exam: 2/28/02 - 2/2/02 Scenario Numbers: 1/ 2 Operating Test No: 2002301 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
  • ' the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event
  • the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) ffJ the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a e-L credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. - I
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objective.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have T%_

sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

"8. The simulator modeling is not altered.

9. The scenarios have been validated. Any open simulator performance deficiencies have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.4 of ES-301. U
11. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each position.

Actual TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (PER SCENARIO; SEE SECTION D.4.D) Attributes

1. Total malfunctions (5-8) 6/6
  • ___
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/2
3. Abnormal transients (2-4) 3/3 ___A__
4. Major transients (1-2) 1/2 __
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/1
  • ___
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0/1
7. Critical tasks (2-3) 3/2 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: o* AŽ - L1 I i LA Date of Exam: o0z/02/cZ Exam Level: RO/SRO Initials Item Description a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading RMM N/A I
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and N/A N/A documented I___
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors RMM N/A (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
4. Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/- 2%) reviewed in RMM N/A detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades N/A N/A are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training RMM N/A deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name / Signature Date
a. Grader R. Michael MorrisTS,44 f -,-, 02/06/02
b. Facility Reviewer(*) WA___ _ _ _ _iA
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) ________ A/__

_____"___'_, _____/__ 2

d. NRC Supervisor (*) _ "

I-A/-- " 1~-7* -t

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

5 of 5 NUREG-1021, Revision 8, Supplement 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML020780296&oldid=2709460"