ML020510075
| ML020510075 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/2002 |
| From: | Nunn D Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML020510075 (22) | |
Text
ISOUTHERN LiEDISON CALIFORNIA Dwight E. Nunn Vice President AnEDISON INTERNATIONAL" Company February 13, 2002 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20852-2738
SUBJECT:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Docket Nos. 50-361, 50-362 Application for technical specification change regarding missed surveillance using the consolidated line item improvement process Gentlemen:
Edison (SCE) is In accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90, Southern California (TS) for the San submitting a request for an amendment to the technical specifications Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3.
in The proposed amendment would modify TS requirements for missed surveillances SR 3.0.3.
Attachment 1 provides a description of the proposed change, the requested provides the confirmation of applicability, and plant-specific verifications. Attachment 2 provides existing TS pages marked up to show the proposed change. Attachment 3 revised (clean) TS pages. Attachment 4 provides a summary of the regulatory TS Bases commitments made in this submittal. Attachment 5 provides the existing pages marked up to show the proposed change (for information only).
of SCE requests approval of the proposed License Amendment within one year submittal, with the amendment being implemented within 60 days.
is being In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, a copy of this application, with attachments, provided to the designated California Official.
P 0. Box 128 San Clemente, CA 92674-0128 949-368-1480 Fax 949-368-1490
February 13, 2002 Document Control Desk If you should have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Jack Rainsberry at 949-368-7420.
Sincerely, L ww_-
i
Enclosures:
Notarized affidavits Attachments:
- 1. Description and Assessment
- 2. Proposed Technical Specification Changes (Mark-Up)
- 3. Proposed Technical Specification Pages
- 4. Regulatory Commitments
- 5. Proposed Technical Specification Bases Changes cc: E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV 2 and 3 C. C. Osterholtz, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 L. Raghavan, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units S. Y. Hsu, Department of Health Services, Radiologic Health Branch
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Application of SOUTHERN, CALIFORNIA )
EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. for a Class 103 ) Docket No. 50-361 License to Acquire, Possess, and Use )
a Utilization Facility as Part of ) Amendment Application No. 214 Unit No. 2 of the San Onofre Nuclear )
Generating Station )
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. pursuant to 10CFR50.90, hereby submit Amendment Application No. 214. This amendment application consists of Proposed Change No. PCN-535 to Facility Operating License NPF-10. PCN-535 is a request to revise Surveillance Requirement 3.0.3 of the Technical Specifications for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2.
State of California County of San Diego Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me this day of '*J_,
2002.
3v:_
Vice MARIANE SANCHEZ zz. *.-*1* Ntary m Public ission -#ICalifomia I9:CaI 2
- d ,T z NOtMc Son Dieo County
- ~ CMMm. E;h Oct 14,2002no Notary Public
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Application of SOUTHERN, CALIFORNIA ))
EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. for a Class 103 Docket No. 50-362 License to Acquire, Possess, and Use )
a Utilization Facility as Part of ) Amendment Application No. 199 Unit No. 3 of the San Onofre Nuclear )
Generating Station )
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL. pursuant to 10CFR50.90, hereby submit Amendment Application No. 199. This amendment application consists of Proposed Change No. PCN-535 to Facility Operating License NPF-1 5. PCN-535 is a request to revise Surveillance Requirement 3.0.3 of the Technical Specifications for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 3.
State of California County of San Diego Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me this /ý"*ay of , 2002.
By:_ ,*l.(*,-*_.
0 Vice MARIANE SANCHEZ Commission # 1196482 Notcry PuNic - Califomia
,Son Diego wMCornm. EqxpSCounty-Oct 14,20 Notary Public
ATTACHMENT I DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT
1.0 DESCRIPTION
The proposed amendment would modify technical specifications (TS) requirements for missed surveillances in SR 3.0.3.
The changes are consistent with Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved Industry/Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) STS change TSTF-358 Revision 5, as modified by Federal Register Notice 66FR32400, of June 14, 2001, and in response to public comments. The availability of the TS improvement was published in the Federal Register on Friday, September 28, 2001 as part of the consolidated line item improvement process (CLIIP).
2.0 ASSESSMENT 2.1 Applicability of PublishedSafety Evaluation Southern California Edison (SCE) has reviewed the safety evaluation dated June 8, 2001 (published June 14, 2001) as part of the CLIIP. This review included a review of the NRC staff's evaluation, as well as the supporting information provided to support TSTF-358. SCE has concluded that the justifications presented in the TSTF proposal and the safety evaluation prepared by the NRC staff are applicable to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 (SONGS 2 and 3) and justify this amendment for the incorporation of the changes to the SONGS 2 and 3 TS.
2.2 Optional Changesand Variations SCE is not proposing any variations or deviations from the TS changes described in the fully modified TSTF-358 Revision 5 or the NRC staff's model safety evaluation dated June 8, 2001 (published June 14, 2001).
3.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS
3.1 No SignificantHazards ConsiderationDetermination Southern California Edison (SCE) has reviewed the proposed no significant hazards consideration determination (NSHCD) published in the Federal Register as part of the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process. SCE has concluded that the proposed NSHCD presented in the Federal Register notice is applicable to San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 and is hereby incorporated by reference to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 50.91(a).
3.2 Verification and Commitments As discussed in the notice of availability published in the Federal Register on September 28, 2001 for this TS improvement, plant-specific verifications were performed as follows:
the delay period SCE has established TS Bases for SR 3.0.3 which state that use of not intended to be established by Surveillance Requirement 3.0.3 is a flexibility which is only for the but used as an operational convenience to extend surveillance intervals, performance of missed surveillances.
that provide details The modification will also include changes to the Bases for SR 3.0.3 provide guidance for on how to implement the new requirements. The Bases changes based on specified surveillance frequencies that are not based on time intervals but are In addition, the unit conditions, operating situations, or requirements of regulations.
surveillance test at the Bases changes state that SCE is expected to perform a missed such as the first reasonable opportunity, taking into account appropriate considerations, of unit conditions, impact on plant risk and accident analysis assumptions, consideration surveillance.
planning, availability of personnel, and the time required to perform the through the program in The Bases also state that the risk impact should be managed NRC place to implement 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and its implementation guidance, Activities Regulatory Guide 1.182, "Assessing and Managing Risks Before Maintenance treated as an at Nuclear Power Plants," and that the missed surveillance should be addition, the Bases emergent condition, as discussed in Regulatory Guide 1.182. In be commensurate with state that the degree of depth and rigor of the evaluation should the importance of the component and that missed surveillances for important that the results of components should be analyzed quantitatively. The Bases also state the Bases state the risk evaluation determine the safest course of action. In addition, Action Program.
that all missed surveillances will be placed in the licensee's Corrective of the STS.
5.5 Finally, SCE has a Bases Control Program consistent with Section 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION safety evaluation SCE has reviewed the environmental evaluation included in the model has concluded SCE dated June 8, 2001 (published June 14, 2001) as part of the CLIIP. SONGS 2 and 3 to that the staff s findings presented in that evaluation are applicable and the evaluation is hereby incorporated by reference for this application.
ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES (MARK-UP)
SR Applicability3.0 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY SR 3.0.1 SRs shall be met during the MODES or other specified unless conditions in the Applicability for individual LCOs, otherwise stated in the SR. Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the to Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the LCO. Failure perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the LCO except as provided in SR 3.0.3.
Surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment or variables outside specified limits.
SR 3.0.2 The specified Frequency for each SR is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met.
For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply.
If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . . ." basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance.
Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications.
SR 3.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the from requirement to declare the LCO not met may be delayed, of the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit the specified Frequency, whichever is great6re-". This delay period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance. A riský:evaluation shall be 'Perforned,,f~or~a~ny uii~ef1la~nce delayed qreater-:t'hain 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />s-and the-risk impact 'shall Ibe managed'..
If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered. The Completion Times of the Required Actions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period.
(continued) 3.0-4 Amendment No. +2 SAN ONOFRE UNIT--2
SR Applicability 3.0 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY SR 3.0.1 SRs shall be met during the MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for individual LCOs, unless otherwise stated in the SR. Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the LCO. Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the LCO except as provided in SR 3.0.3.
Surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment or variables outside specified limits.
SR 3.0.2 The specified Frequency for each SR is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met.
For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply.
If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . . ." basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance.
Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications.
SR 3.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the LCO not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of the specified Frequency, whichever is gra*tdilsi. This delay period is permitted to allow performýance of the Surveillance. Aked t han4 iyabeefk If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered. The Completion Times of the Required Actions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period.
(continued)
SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 3 3.0-4 Amendment No. 4
ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES
SR Applicability 3.0 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY SR 3.0.1 SRs shall be met during the MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for individual LCOs, unless otherwise stated in the SR. Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the LCO. Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the LCO except as provided in SR 3.0.3.
Surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment or variables outside specified limits.
SR 3.0.2 The specified Frequency for each SR is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met.
For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply.
If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . . ." basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance.
Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications.
SR 3.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the LCO not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of I
the specified Frequency, whichever is greater. This delay period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance. A risk evaluation shall be performed for any Surveillance delayed greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and the risk impact shall be managed.
I If the'Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered. The Completion Times of the Required Actions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period.
(continued)
SAN ONOFRE UNIT--2 3.0-4 Amendment No.
SR Applicability 3.0 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT (SR) APPLICABILITY SR 3.0.1 SRs shall be met during the MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for individual LCOs, unless otherwise stated in the SR. Failure to meet a Surveillance, whether such failure is experienced during the performance of the Surveillance or between performances of the Surveillance, shall be failure to meet the LCO. Failure to perform a Surveillance within the specified Frequency shall be failure to meet the LCO except as provided in SR 3.0.3.
Surveillances do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment or variables outside specified limits.
SR 3.0.2 The specified Frequency for each SR is met if the Surveillance is performed within 1.25 times the interval specified in the Frequency, as measured from the previous performance or as measured from the time a specified condition of the Frequency is met.
For Frequencies specified as "once," the above interval extension does not apply.
If a Completion Time requires periodic performance on a "once per . . ." basis, the above Frequency extension applies to each performance after the initial performance.
Exceptions to this Specification are stated in the individual Specifications.
SR 3.0.3 If it is discovered that a Surveillance was not performed within its specified Frequency, then compliance with the requirement to declare the LCO not met may be delayed, from the time of discovery, up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of the specified Frequency, whichever is greater. This delay period is permitted to allow performance of the Surveillance. A risk evaluation shall be performed for any Surveillance delayed greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and the risk impact shall be managed.
If the Surveillance is not performed within the delay period, the LCO must immediately be declared not met, and the applicable Condition(s) must be entered. The Completion Times of the Required Actions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period.
(continued)
SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 3 3.0-4 Amendment No.
ATTACHMENT 4 LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS
The following table identifies those actions committed to by SCE in this document. Any other statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments. Please direct questions regarding these commitments to Mr. Jack Rainsberry at 949-368-7420.
Regulatory commitments Due date/event SCE will establish the Technical Implemented within 60 days of Specification Bases for SR 3.0.3 as amendment adopted with the applicable license amendment.
ATTACHMENT 5 PROPOSED CHANGES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION BASES PAGES
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.3 been completed within the specified Frequency. A delay (continued) period of up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of the specified frequency, whichever is greateret-e-i, applies from the point in time that it is discovered that the Surveillance has not been performed in accordance with SR 3.0.2, and not at the time that the specified Frequency was not met.
This delay period provides an adequate time to complete Surveillances that have been missed. This delay period permits the completion of a Surveillance before complying with Required Actions or other remedial measures that might preclude completion of the Surveillance.
The basis for this delay period includes consideration of unit conditions, adequate planning, availability of personnel, the time required to perform the Surveillance, the safety significance of the delay in completing the required Surveillance, and the recognition that the most probable result of any particular Surveillance being performed is the verification of conformance with the requirements.
When a Surve:J . - with a rre-uency ba.sed no-t an tiI ITillan.
intervals, but upon speeified unit conditions or op~erational situations, is diseevered not to have beenl prrmd when specified, SR 3.0.3 allows the full delay period of 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />sy to perform the Surveilkanee.
SR 3.0.3 also provides a time limit for eompletiono Surveillances that become applicable as a consequence of MODE change imo 4 by Required Actions-.
w~i~
- &;surye1la-n'c e witahe e&bednt.nime inteI e~1 as'.,butit'upon speclfified unit conditi ons-,- ope r~atinq si t~uati~ois j!, r'requiremeiits, ofrequiations~e.q4--priortd enteing MODE- i afte'r each 'fuel -1oa-diiiq, or.Jn acc~ordance wi th...*I0R50>p*enddi......-" a s .Jmod*I*
1ed "Iy :approved' eetions,,etc.) is dis-covered to no't have been prone ubfto-ýthe sp~eci fi ed Freque _ncy to Iperforiii t'hh SU rVeilla'6, l .i:ce.
Hloweve.r, since there is,not at*i -mei nterval I .i i f spe thd.I..I "sed'ýrSirv, i11 ance should,be-perfo 6*4 mi
- d at the fi'-st reasonabl e opport~un~ity.
SR 3.0.3 provi.-pdes. a time -limit for, and allowances for the performance of, Surveillances that become applicable as a consequenceof MODEf changes imposed by'Required Actions.
(continued)
SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 2 B 3.0-13 Amendment No. 7-
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.3 Failure to comply with specified Frequencies for SRs is (continued) expected to be an infrequent occurrence. Use of the delay period established by SR 3.0.3 is a flexibility which is not intended to be used as an operational convenience to extend Surveillance intervals. Whileup 0tb24 h: s__our!s6ri ejiit o'al~se~ife Frequency is . rovided'&1t'-perform-the-miý Survei1l1 i teitht expected h ince-sis lance wilI 1;ýb6 erf'med at the firsýoppor uni Th dei'teri~nat fthe first 'r na innclude -considerationn of theanm n. 1....
- coýnj jq pration 'cages reur rsut'g. -n h 'rveillance) ,and impa tl-.on ny-and .Ysi s if' personnel, aifh r 1red,` perfom ice.-,"This riskJpc'so_ efaae
'ogrIam in plc oipeet `OCR5065(a) (4)'
lentation guidance,..'NRC Requlatory.yGuide 1.182,,
IManaginq Ri sk Bef r'e Ma-1ntenc;Atiie
,'er.Plants.' Th 'Rq tt-,ý e-adrs
~of. temporary and: aqqveqte,xri s k',i mpa'cts, of r~isk manaqement :-ac ,tjon threhildsi"4d is on'O pto and.-includinq -" t' hutdown. ýThe ahnce' should be trea'adne reh liscussed in the-Rgeg ul,zft6r,ý-$J Ode >ý.Yhe "risk or impbr I~ii~~s t$p~otsou dbe used~ rtdq f s~~Me cou tui~ n~
1.1 an s 13ed2f trve_- hance bhe' If a Surveillance is not completed within the allowed delay period, then the equipment is considered inoperable or the variable is considered outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period. If a Surveillance is failed within the delay period, then the equipment is inoperable, or the variable is outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon the failure of the Surveillance.
(continued)
SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 2 B 3.0-14 Amendment No.+2
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.3 Completion of the Surveillance within the delay period (continued) allowed by this Specification, or within the Completion Time of the ACTIONS, restores compliance with SR 3.0.1.
SR 3.0.4 SR 3.0.4 establishes the requirement that all applicable SRs must be met before entry into a MODE or other specified Condition in the Applicability.
This Specification ensures that system and component OPERABILITY requirements and variable limits are met before entry into MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for which these systems and components ensure safe operation of the unit. This Specification applies to changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability associated with unit shutdown as well as startup.
The provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS.
The precise requirements for performance of SRs are specified such that exceptions to SR 3.0.4 are not necessary. The specific time frames and conditions necessary for meeting the SRs are specified in the Frequency, in the Surveillance, or both. This allows performance of Surveillances when the prerequisite condition(s) specified in a Surveillance procedure require entry into the MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability of the associated LCO prior to the performance or completion of a Surveillance. A Surveillance that could not be performed until after entering the LCO Applicability, would have its Frequency specified such that it is not "due" until the specific conditions needed are met. Alternately, the Surveillance may be stated in the form of a Note as not required (to be met or performed) until a particular event, condition, or time has been reached. Further discussion of the specific formats of SRs' annotation is found in Section 1.4, Frequency.
B 3.0-15 Amendment No. 42 SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 2
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.3 been completed within the specified Frequency. A delay (continued) period of up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or up to the limit of the specified frequency, whichever is greater]-es-s, applies from the point in time that it is discovered that the Surveillance has not been performed in accordance with SR 3.0.2, and not at the time that the specified Frequency was not met.
This delay period provides an adequate time to complete Surveillances that have been missed. This delay period permits the completion of a Surveillance before complying with Required Actions or other remedial measures that might preclude completion of the Surveillance.
The basis for this delay period includes consideration of unit conditions, adequate planning, availability of personnel, the time required to perform the Surveillance, the safety significance of the delay in completing the required Surveillance, and the recognition that the most probable result of any particular Surveillance being performed is the verification of conformance with the requirements.
When a Surveillanee with a Frequeney basred not an time intervals, but upon specified unit conditions or operational situations, is discovered not to have been performed when specifled, SR 3.0.3 all..
- th full delay period of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to perform Ithe Surveillanee.
SR 3.0.3 also provides a time limit for completion of Surveillances that beeome applicable as a eansequenee of MODE changa impsedby Requtired Actions-.
W~hen , -'e newtarqec based :not-bn -t.1me'
.nt1rvals,,but upon spIecified 'unit conditions, oper atjIng sTi.t ations.o ýýr*equirements ~of regulations (eg.Aor~t
~ftrMODE~batei'~ch fue loading, or in_'ccr~c
ýAiih `O1C FR8O',:_;'Append ixJ,: ~s modified by~app roved ZexMP~tions, :'efc.-) Assdisco ered to not *have bee efo'rmed whe'ýpeci fied;`-,.SR -3O.Q 3. il 1oWs f or thef full adly,-peri od of upht6 "the' speci fi d,Frequiency 'to 'perform the'1Su'-ve'ill'ance.,
Howqever, since' there is,'not a time interval .sp'-eci fie6d, the missed Surveillance should be performed. at-hlIft irs, reasonable- opportunity'.
SR 3.0.3 p'rovidies a time limit for, 'and allowance's for the performance of, Surveillances that become applicable as a consequence of MODE'changes imposed-by Required Actions.
(continued)
B 3.0-13 Amendment No. -16 SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 3
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.3 Failure to comply with specified Frequencies for SRs is (continued) expected to be an infrequent occurrence. Use of the delay period established by SR 3.0.3 is a flexibility which is not intended to be used as an operational convenience to extend Survei~llace intervyals. *WOO -tot.limi of -the ~spec~ifie~d ~Frequencyzjis ,i-o Ide'dJ~ fim e mni se~
nuof2A2'the deterrni n~im 1'.
deryi 11gJsaexpited' h" ances. e1 perfrrn'the'S"firsi nd sa
- .nce) ti n~ n~p~ u deeiidto' ii, ton i1an eh&~~hicr dq the -uicvnii #-T f~ -mpa o-ta ~n,. aq d_.m and -1,6 i dpe~rat~ on'. o 1e e k 1.(f determi na.tion ofrik management,; ac,'oa Jehls andris mlsso -hoh 11 r'm ~?~Yn, nbeiysese avlýai , ~th ormpoe 6rfthe~
If a Surveillance is not completed within the allowed delay period, then the equipment is considered inoperable or the variable is considered outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon expiration of the delay period. If a Surveillance is failed within the delay period, then the equipment is inoperable, or the variable is outside the specified limits and the Completion Times of the Required Actions for the applicable LCO Conditions begin immediately upon the failure of the Surveillance.
(continued)
SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 3 R 3.0-14 Amendment No. 4
SR Applicability B 3.0 BASES (continued)
SR 3.0.3 Completion of the Surveillance within the delay period (continued) allowed by this Specification, or within the Completion Time of the ACTIONS, restores compliance with SR 3.0.1.
SR 3.0.4 SR 3.0.4 establishes the requirement that all applicable SRs must be met before entry into a MODE or other specified Condition in the Applicability.
This Specification ensures that system and component OPERABILITY requirements and variable limits are met before entry into MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability for which these systems and components ensure safe operation of the unit. This Specification applies to changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability associated with unit shutdown as well as startup.
The provisions of SR 3.0.4 shall not prevent changes in MODES or other specified conditions in the Applicability that are required to comply with ACTIONS.
The precise requirements for performance of SRs are specified such that exceptions to SR 3.0.4 are not necessary. The specific time frames and conditions necessary for meeting the SRs are specified in the Frequency, in the Surveillance, or both. This allows performance of Surveillances when the prerequisite condition(s) specified in a Surveillance procedure require entry into the MODE or other specified condition in the Applicability of the associated LCO prior to the performance or completion of a Surveillance. A Surveillance that could not be performed until after entering the LCO Applicability, would have its Frequency specified such that it is not "due" until the specific conditions needed are met. Alternately, the Surveillance may be stated in the form of a Note as not required (to be met or performed) until a particular event, condition, or time has been reached. Further discussion of the specific formats of SRs' annotation is found in Section 1.4, Frequency.
SAN ONOFRE--UNIT 3 B 3.0-15 Amendment No. 46