Text

Stations, 2004 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML051260140
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/26/2005
From:	Perino C; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	FOIA/PA-2010-0209, LR-N05-0244
	Download: ML051260140 (89)
	v • d • e

PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 APR 2 6 20S LR-N05-0244 o PSEG Nuclear LLC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS DOCKET NOS. 50-272, 50-311 AND 50-354 As required by Section 6.9.1.7 of Appendix A to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-70 and DPR-75 for Salem Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, and Section 6.9.1.6 of Appendix A to Facility Operating License'NPF-57 for Hope Creek Generating'Station, PSEG Nuclear hereby transmits one copy of the 2004 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. Thistreport summarizes the results of the radiological environmental surveillance program for 2004 in the vicinity of the Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations. The result'of this program for 2004 was specifically compared to the result of the pre-operational program.

If you have any questions or comments on this transmittal, please contact Michael Mosier at (856) 339-5434.

Since Iy, Christina L. Perino

-Director - Regulatory Assurance Attachment 95-2168 REV. 7/99

I I

V LR-N05-0244 2

Document Control Desk APR 2 6 2005 C

Mr. S. Collins, Administrator - Region I U. S. Nuclear Reguiatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. D. Collins, Project Manager-Hope Creek, Salem U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08C2 Washington, DC 20555 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector'-' Salem (X24)

USNRC Senior Resident Inspector-Hope Creek (X24)

Mr. K. Tosch, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering P. O. Box 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 Mr. K. Kille Delaware Emergency Management Agency 165 Brick Store Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977

)1

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM For Salem Generating Station, Unit 1: Docket No. 50-272 Salem Generating Station, Unit 2: Docket No. 50-311 Hope Creek Generating Station : Docket No. 5 0-354 2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 Prepared by PSEG SERVICE CORPORATION MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES APRIL 2005

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM & HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2004 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2004 1r

TABLE OFT CONTENTS

.. i'..

PAGE

SUMMARY

1 THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM...........

3 Objectives................................................

4 Data Interpretation..............5........................ 5 Quality Assurance Program.

Results and Discussion....

Atmospheric......

Direct Radiation......

Terrestrial....

Aquatic........

Program Deviations.

Conclusions...............

REFERENCES.

=.

r.

. <X 6

S...

>!. iil.........

17 3 1^

APPENDIX A PROGRAM

SUMMARY

APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX APPENDIX B

C D

E F

SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS.......

39 DATA TABLES....................................

47

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FROM' ANALYTICS &'ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMS........-. '

79 SYNOPSIS OF LAND USE CENSUS.......

87 RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT'ON MAN.91 i

LIST OF TABLES TABLE NUMBER TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE

1.

Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (Program'Overview) 18 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE NUMBER FIGURE DESCRIPTIONS'-

PAGE

1.

Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulate 1983 through 2004 (Quarterly).

21

2.

Ambient Radiation -

Off-site vs Control Station 1983 through 2004 (Quarterly)......................

22

3.

Iodine-131 Activity in Milk 1983 through 2004 (Quarterly).............

23

4.

Gross Beta Activity in Surface Water 1983 through 2004 (Quarterly)

.24

5.

Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1983 through 2004 (Quarterly)

.25

6.

Cesium-137 and Cobalt-60 Activity in Aquatic Sediment 1983 through 2004 (Semi-Annual) 26

7.

Cesium-137 Activity in Soil 1974 through 2004 (Triennial) 27 ii

4

SUMMARY

During normal-.operations 'of a nuclear.-power :generating.station there are'releases6of small amounts'bof.radioactive.-materi'al..to.-':.;:

the environment.

-To monitor:and,dete'rmin'e'-,the:effects:of the'se '

releases a.Radiological -EnvironmentalMonitoring. Program:.(REMP) has been established for the environment around Artificial Island.

where the Salem Generating Stations (SGS)-and Hope

.Creeki.

Generating Station (HCGS) are located.

The results of the REMP are published annually, providing'a summary and interpretation of the data!collected.r*

PSEG's Maplewood Testing Services't:;(MTS). has been.responsible!-for the collection and analysis of environmental samples during the period. of. -January 1,-2004,; -thrbugh 'December 31,

2004,

-andithe results are-discussed.in this--report..

The REMP -for SGS/HCGS 7was conducted-.in accordance,with-:the :SGS and HCGS-Technical: '

Specifications/Offsite Dose ;Cafculation-.-Manual. 4FThe.

9 Lower'Limit of Detection (LLD) values require'd by the Technical Specifications/ODCM were.achieved for. thisjreporting :period.. : The objectives lof the programrwerez.also":-met during-this period.-'-..The data collected assists.in :demonstratin'g that.;SGS' and HCGS were operated in'.compliance with-Techni'cal;-,Specifications/ODCM..v; Mostof the.radioactive-materials.fnote-d.in-this-report.are *.

normally present in the environment-, either naturally, such~as potassium-40, or as a result of non-nuclear generating station activity, such as nuclear bomb'testing. Measurements made in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS" were'compared.to.-background:or'rcontrol measurements and^.the pr'eoperation'al'.1REMP study performed ibefore Salem.Unit-l'-became operational-;..'^"Sampled :of-air. particulates;:_c-.n.

air-iodine,- milk, surface,.-ground' 4 and drinking water,'wvegetables, game,-lfodder crops,'- fish,-,crab's,'Jand sediment were -collected.and analyzed.* '-External,radiation

-'.'dobse:.measurements-were,.also'.made2'in' the vicinity of SGS/HCGS using'<thermoluminescent

.dosimeters-.

From.-the.results.obtained,>Ait:cannbe concluded thatethe ievel and fluctuations,'Of fradioact'ivity<;in envi-ronmental-samplesjwere.,.

asI-expecte~d -for anestuarine' environment.,".No ':unusual

-f n radiological-:characteri-sti'cs-.weres'observed'in. the fenvironsz'of 2.

SGS/HCGS ;during this repbrting ' p-eriod. -Since cthe'se results -were :]

comparable':toI-the resultsobtained, duringthe:.preoperationalWtionalr-f..

phase rof-:theprogrami-..

and.with'hi-'storical

.results 'collected since commercial-- 'operation, weFcan'..conclude -that the,operation of SGS,':..'

and HCGS had no significant impact ^on the -radiological characteristics of the' environs of.these stations.

To demonstrate compliance 'with--:Technical Spe'cifications/ODCM (Sections 3/4.12.1 & 6.8.4.h -71,2,?'3), samples wer'e 'analyzed for one or more of the following:. gamma emitting isotopestritium' (H-3), iodine-131 (I-131),

gross beta and gross alpha.

1

The results of these analyses were used to assess the environmental impact-,of SGS and HCGS operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with Technical Specifications/ODCM7-(Section 3/4. ll)- and applicable Federal and;State regulations, and to verify the adequacy of radioactive-effluent control systems.

The results provided in this report are summarized below:

There were a total of 1219 analyses on 1134 environmental samples during 2004.

Direct radiation dose measurements were made using 196 thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).

In addition to the detection of naturally,- occurring isotopes (i.e. Be-7, K-40, 'Radium and Th-232) trace-levels of Cs-137 were also::detected.'

The concentrations: of these nuclides were well below the-Technical Specification reporting limit.

r t

Dose measurements made with quarterly TLDs at 31 offsite locations around theLSGS/HCGSt site averaged 48 millirems-for the year 2004

-The'average of the dose-measurements at the-control, locations, (background) was 51-millirems for the, year.

This was comparable to the preoperational phase of the program which had an average of 55 millirems. per year for 1973 to.

1976.

During 2004, PSEG Nuclear. completed,.its investigation into. the..

source, and quantity of tritium identified..-in groundwater at, Salem Station.

This investigation was conducted -in-accordance with

-a--

Remedial-Investigation' Work Plan that; was.submitted to the New Jersey Department: of Environmental Protection -

Bureau of Nuclear Engineering. (NJDEP-BNE) !in-June, 2003..

Ongoing,-di-scussions-concerning this work-havet been conducted withlthe. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection -

Bureau of Nuclear Engineering and':the NRC-.

The results of, this.-investigation-were.

submitted to:the NJDEP--in a Remedial-Investigation Report..-.

Subsequently,, a; Remedial Action-Work-Plan was:'submitted to.NJDEP-BNE, and approvedi by them, -in November,' 2004 Pilot::remedial :,

actions-were implemented-during 2004-, with.:a long term pumping-,/-4 remediation -system expected to be in service;-.in early; 2005.~- :--There is -no evidence that tritium - contaminated, water-above regulatory limits has migrated to' the-station-boundary or, the Delaware -River.

2

THE RADIOLOGICAL'ENVIRONMENTAL 'MONITORING PROGRAM 1 -,.em o

"N w

, ;.er.se.

_y is

+the s 4

.i *_v7.

f.vt e

n-.'

i. :,-

'¶4t n

Lower'Alloways Creek Township, 'Salem' County,'NewJersey is the"site of Salem (SGS)and Hope Creek (HCGS)' Generating Stations.

SGS consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors.

Salem Unit One has a net rating'o'f -1199 megawatt electric(MWe) and Salem Unit Two has a net rating of 1160 MWe.

The licensed core power for both units is 3459 _me'gawatt the'rmal (MWt)

HCGSJis 'a -

boilingwater nuclear power reactor,-which has a net rating of 1091 MWe (3339 MWt).

SGS/HCGS are located on a man-made peninsula on the east bank of the Delaware River.- It was'cregtd-by-the ddpositiorof -hydraulic'fi'll from dre'dging -operations'. ';The-:envi'onment surrounding-SGS/HCGS is characterized mainly by the Delaware 'River and Bay, extensive tidal marshlands, a'nd 'low-lying'imead 'w 6nds.W-Theseland types maket'upt approximately 85% 'of theatn'd trea'wthih five minhseof 7 the-site.

Most of the remaining land is useed'for'agriculture [1,2]. More specific'inf'ormation on the'edemog'raph'y=;-

hydrology,>meteorology; and land use of the area may be found'in' the Environmental Reports

[1,2],& EnVironmental tatement's[3,A4]'-iand-th'e Updated Final Safety Analysis Repor'ts; for 'SGS and HCGS'15'[,

61 Since 1968, a radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) has'been'-'conducted at the SGS/HCGS'SitiE'.'

Starting in December, 1972y'moree'xf'ehsive radiologica)l§-monitoring programs were initiat'ed.`

'Th'e o'perational 4 'REMP was 'initiated inDecember,--.197i6,s-

'when Sal'em 'Unit '-1'-ach'ie v..d'critfcal-ityS.--SEGG'5'-MaplewoOd:Testing

^

Services (MTS)'has b'ee'r

,irno'lvzfd'inh,^the' REMP since.-its.'-inception.

MTS is responsible for the collection'of all radiological 73

,,J 19 3

ic du t

d..

,r;......

en'vi'r6nfenhtal !sanples 'ard, ;from 1973 through June;' '198 3, --conducted a quality assurani6'progr'am -in which'.,dudplicates;'.of a-portion of-, those samples analyzed'by -the prima'ry'laborat'ory were.also-,analyzed;..by--

MTS.

r n

'4'k,'

From'-January, ' 1973, -.thr'ough June

aI983, Radiation Management CorporaE'i'ohn '0'(RMC) "'had -'iprima Zrsponsibility for the-. analysis lof -,all samples'-'iider th'e'SGSe/HCGS'REMP:

nd-'nnualLreport ing;.offresults:.>RMC reports for the preoperational and-operational phase of the program are "refeied&'in thi's'report'A7 t9 ]

)On.-July.-.lr; al983. j--.MTS assumed primary' re~s'pon's'ibl--ity!-fo'b f the -anialys is. -of '- all'- s ample's. --.(except ' TLDs) arid 'the' report'ing of-r'e'sults'.^f-, Te1'idyne'-Brown-Engineer.ing.

mil l.

I.l.-,

Enviironmen'tal a

-Services d-a(TBE)

,' assumed-responsibility., for' third-party QA aral'yseg -and -TLDs. 'An' :additiojnjal.

endor',' Controls' -for ': c 3 Environm'e'nt'a"'l 'P'&l 1 luti'o-n-f-nc.' (CEP)., was.. retaine'd to provide -third-party QAiina lyses and'`certainrnon-rotitine 'analyses from.May, :,1-988, unti L:Juflne l

^-1992. 2 Cu'rrientl'y','-iFramatome ANP. DE&S *Environmental Laboratoiry (Firamatdme) lis-1the Sthird :party, QA -vendor.and;.the-4 laborator'yL;which perfoirms sthe 'TLD' ainalyses.-. :6'.MTS :reportsjfor.,the *.

ope'rat'ional' phase -from2'1983 0to2003 Mare referenced in.this report-

[10].

1

I An overview of the 2004 Program is provided in Table 1.

Radioanalytical data from samples collected under this program were compared with results; from.-the preoperational phase.

Differences between these periods were examined stati'sicalty-to determine"the effects of station operations.

This report presents the results from January 1 through December 31,

2004, for the SGS/HCGS REMP.

OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Operational REMP are:.

a To fulfill the requirements of the Radiological Surveillance sections of the Technical Specifications/ODCM for SGS/HCGS.

To determine whether any significant increase occurred in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.

a i

n

-pat-h*way-s,-

To determine if SGS or HCGS-has.caused an increase in the radioactive-inventory of long-lived radionuclides.

To detect any change:in ambient gamma radiation levels.

To verify that SGS and HCGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the.

environment.

This report, as-required, by Section 6.9.1.7 of the Salem Technical..

Specifications/ODCM and Section 6.9.1.6 of. 4the Hope Creek Technical Specifications/ODCM,' summarizes the findings of..the 2004 REMP.

Results of the four-year-preoperational program have been summarized fort comparison with subsequent operational reports, [8].

In order to meet the;objectives, an operational,,REMP.was developed'.

Samples of various media~ were, selected for monitoring due. to the radiological.dose.impact to.human and other organisms.. The selection of samples was based on: (1),

est'ablished critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to man, and, (2)-; experience gained during.,the preoperational phase.

Sampling locations were-,determined based.on-site meteorology, Delaware estuarine hydrology, local demography,. and lanid uses...

Sampling locations were, divided into two classes, indicator and

&&dntrol.

Indicator stationseare those; which,are expected. to...

manifest station effects. Control samplesfare collected at locations which'lare believed' to..be unaffected-,by station operations,-usually at 15 to 30 kilometers" distance... Fluctuations in-'the levels of radionuclides.:and' direct.-radiation:at indicator stations are-eval'uated with respect.:to analogous--fluctuations at control stations.-

Indicatorl'and: control..station;.data are also evaluated relative to preoperational.A data.

Appendix,,A describes and summarizes, in accordance with Section 6.9.1-..7 of the Salem TS and Section 6.9.1.6 of the Hope.Creek TS, the operational program as..

performed in 2004.

4

Appendix"B describes-the cdoding system iwhich identifies sample type and location.

Table B-1 lists the'samplingstations and-the.:types'.

of samples collected atli.a-ach station.

These sampling stations are indicated on Maps ~B-l 'and B-2.

/

DATA INTERPRETATI ON Results-of -analyses are grouped, according to-sample type-and?-

presented in, Appendix C. All results 4above the.Lower.Lirit~ofg Detection' (LLD).are at--a:confidenceA,,-evel of -2,sigma..,,Thist,,,f, represents the range of values.-'into.which-i95%.-of -repeated analyses-..

of -the' samef sample -should: fall:-.`

As-,defined-in Regulatory Guide: 4.8, LLD is th~i smallest concentration 'of --'radioactive Jmaterial in aj sample'-that' will-yield a :net-count4 (above.,system-background) that-,

will be detected with 95% probability, with' only:. 5%-probability.-,of:

falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal".

LLD is normally calculated as 4.66 times the standard deviation of the backgrbunddbiun'tihngrateb, or of.the blank sample count, as appropriate, divided by'counting efficiency, sample size, 2.22 -A(dpm--per -picocurie) --,-.the--r'adi'odhlemical'vyield

.when-applicable,.

the radioactive decay.- constantf'i'and.theh-el-apsed--.timebetween sample.

colle6tion:Land time of.counting-.

-yThe Minimum Detectable '

Concentration -(MDC) isi defined~fas

th'e 'small'est-concentration-iof radioadtive:material that -can.be;detected at -a given.confidence level'. The' MDC 'differs from they-LLD !in:-that the, -MDC

-,takes Iinto-consideration the interference caused by the presence of Tother.

nuclides while the LLD does not.

The grouped data were averaged anhd-'standard deviations calculated jin accordance-with-Appendix-B.of..Reference. -16:-

JThus;;.the!2 sigma h,--

deviations of the averaged-data :represent sample and,;notl!analytical variability. -For -reporting and-,calculation,.of averages, any,:result occurring2 -at;-or-b'low' the-LLD is :considered to be,atcthat' level.

When a'group of.-data-.was'composedrofJ-50%- or-more' -LLD values,;-.

,-,r..,I averages'were not calculated.

7; Grab sampling is a useful -and acceptable procedure for taking environmental samples of a medium in which the concentrationi-.of.,

radionuclides-is expected to vary slowly with time or-where inteimittent' s~ainpling isid~eremd"su establish.fthef t

radiblogfical characteiisticsoftheimediuh;`.-This Imethod, however,';

'is only repr'e~s'eht'ativ:of -the~sampled medium-.for,.'.that-.specific locationw-and'in'stant-'oftimet.

vf As.,'

re'sultryarh radionuclide -. c6n'centrations of-the' samples1 wi'llnormal ly.occur Since :'thesei'variations.wit-tend.'to- '%counterbalancejone;-,another, averages based upon repetitive:' grab samples is considered valid.

-~ >12KA' -QUALITY

>hASSURANCE -- PROGRAM,-'-i MTS -has-a quality assurance--program'.designed-,toivensure ':confidence:- in the-.analyticaltprogram.

Approximately.-20%,-of -the -total "-analytical effort is spent on qualityi control, -iricluding -pirocess-qutalityit

I control, instrument quality control, interlaboratory cross-check, analyses, and-data-review.-

The quality of the results obtained by MTS is ensured by the.-

implementation of the Quality Assurance Program as described in the Maplewood Testing Services Quality Assurance Plan [11] and the Environmental and Chemical Division Procedures Manual.

The internal quality control activity of MTS includes the quality control of instrumentation; equipment and reagents;;. the use of reference, standards'in calibration,-documentation.,of established procedures, and computer programis, and analysis of duplicate samples. The:-.

external quality:<control1 activity is implemented through participation in;both the Analytics and the-Environmental Resource Associates Interlaboratory.Comparison'Programs.- The results of these Interlaboratory Comparison Programs are listed in Tables D-1 through D-4 in Appendix D..

RESULTS.AND'DISCUSSION-.

The analytical results of the 2004, REMP-samples-are divided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct,

-- E terrestrial, and':aquatic.! The analytical'.-results-for the 2004.REMP are summarized'zin Appendix:

A.- The data-for'individual -samples,are presented in Appendix C..The; data collected.,demonstrates that. the-SGS and HCGS REMP;'was' conducted in compliance with the Technical Specifications/ODCM.

The REMP for the SGS/HCGS Site has historically included samples and analyses not specifically required-by theseoStations'- Technical Specifications/ODCM. : MTS continues-;to coltlect-and -analyze some of these samples:.iii;order,-to maintain personnelproficiency in, performing these-non-routine analyses./- These..analyses are.

referenced throughout.the report as -Management Audit-samples.

The summary tables in this report include-these-additional samples and analyses.

ATMOSPHERIC Air particulates were collected-on.Schleicher-Schuell No. 25:glass fiber-filters with,:low-volume airsamplers..

Iodine-was collected from the air

.by-adsorption:on triethylenediamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal 'cartridges connected in series-after the-air.. particulate filters.

Air sample'volumes.were measured-with-calibrated dry-gas meters and were, corrected-to standard temperature and' pressure.

Air Particulates (Tables C-1, C-2)

Air particulate sampie-'~were-.'collected&-weekly, at 6 locations.

Each of the 310 samples collected for the year were analyzed for gross beta:.

Quarterly..rcomposites of, the:y.weekly.. samples from each station were analyzed -for -specific.' gamma emitters.

Total data-recovery for the 6 sampling stations in 2004 was 99.25 percent.

6

Gross beta activity was detected in all of the indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 6 x 10-3 to 39 x 10-3 pCi/M3 and-in all of the control station samples from 6 x 10- to 39x 10-3 pCi/m3.

The averages for the indicator and control station samples were 23 and 24 x 10-3 pCi/r 3, respectively.

The-maximum preoperational level detected was 920 x 10- pCi/'

3, with an average of 74 x 10-3 pCi/M3.

Results from 1984 to current year are plotted on Figure 1 as quarterly averages.

Included;along with this plot, for purposes.of comparison, is an inset depicting a continuation of-this plot from the current year all the way back to 1973.-_

Gamma spectroscopy, performed on each of the 24 quarterly composite samples analyzed, indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides Be-7, K-40 and Radium.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the-LLD..

O Beryllium-7, attributed to cosmic -ray activity-in the atmosphere, was detected in all 20 indicator station composites that were analyzed, at concentrations ranging from 56 x 10-3 to 89 x 10:3 pCi/M3, with an average of 68 x 10-pCi/m3.

It was detected in :the 4 control, station composites ranging-from ;56 x 10- to 86 x; 1 pCi/m 3, with an average of 68 x 10-3 pCi/M3.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 330x10 3 pCi/m3, with an average of 109 x 10-3 pCi/m3.

OPotassium-40 activity was detected in 10 of the indicator station samples, with. concentrations ranging from 9 x 10-to 12 x 10 pCi/m3, with an average of 10 x 10-3 pCi/M3.

K-40 was also detected in 2 control station samples, at concentrations of 10 x 10-3 and 11 x 10-3 pCi/M3.

No preoperational data is available for comparison.:-

O Radium activity was detected in only 1 of the indicator; station samples, with a concentration of 1 x 10_3 pCi/M3.

It was not detected in any-control station samples.

No preoperational data is available for comparison.

Air Iodine (Table C-3)

Iodine in filtered air samples.was collected weekly,.at 6 locations.

Each of the 311 samples collected for the year was analyzed for I-131.

Iodine-131 was not detected in any of the weekly samples analyzed.

LLD sensitivities for all the stations, both indicator and control, ranged from <1.1 x 10 3-3to;<13 x 0,3 pCi/r 3.

The maximum preoperational,level detected was.42 x 10-3 pCi/m3.

-7

DIRECT RADIATION-Ambient radiation levels in the environs' were :measured with energy-compensated CaSd4 (Tl) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) supplied and read by'Framato-me. Packets-containing TLDs for quarterly' exposure were placed i'in'the 'bwner-controlle'd area and around the Site at various distances.

Direct Radiation (Table C-4)

A total of 49 locations werb'monitbred for direct ;radiation 'duiring 2004, including 12 on-site locations, -31' off-site locations within the 10 mile zone, and 6 control locations beyond 10 miles.

Effort was made to locate TLD's at 'schools and population'centers in-the area.

Five readings-'for each,'TLD (ie; 5 elements)-at each location were taken in order to obtain a more statistically valid result.

For these measurementsi'"therad'is considered equivalent to the rem, in accordance with 10CFR20.1004.-

The average do'se rate for' the' 31 quarterly-'off-site'-indicator TLDs was~'s4_'0'millira ds per-'gta-ndrd month, while the on'site average was 4.1 millirads~per standard month.'

The -avera'gedcontrol' rate was 4.3 mili'rads per standard month.

The preoperational average for the quarterly TLDreadings was 4.4 millirads per'standard month.

In Figure 2, the quarterly.average radiation levels of the off-site indicator stati6ns"vv6rsiU the' control stationis, are plotted for the period 1984 thro'iih'2004,'with' aninset graph'depicting the current year back to 1973.

TERRESTRIAL Milk.s'amples were` taken semi-monthly when, cows were' on, pasture and monthly when cows wer'e not grazing'on opbenhpastuire.--

Animals are considered on 'p'Astiire-fr'om April to November"'of 'each year.' Samples were collected'- in'polIyethylene'containers and transported in ice chests with no preservatives added to the milk.

A well water sample was collected monthly.

Separate raw and-treated potable water samples were composited daily at the City of Salem water'treatment 'plant'." All' sarples were colle'ctediin new polyethylene containers.

Locally grown vegetable and fodder crops were collected at the time of harvest.

Such samples were weighed and packed in plastic bags.

Game (muskrat)tf-ha'sbeen collected annually ':(tim6e of year'dependefnt_

on weather conditiohs> '`hich affect pelt 'thifckness)" from local"farms after being trapped, stripped of their pelts and gutted.

The carcasses were packed in plastic bags and kept chilled in ice chests during transport.

8

Soil is sampled every thre'e' years 'atTnine locations>.r.-Ten coref,:

samplesawere collected at, each lo'ca'tion-and,.then-composited into one representative sample-.-

.0c'3 Milk (Table.-C-5)

.da, r-,

Milk samples were collected at 4 loca-ldairy.farms (2 -farms-in zNJ and 2 in Delaware).

Each sample was, analyzed for I-131 and gamma emitters.

J Iodine-131 was 'not detected n-inuanyof the 80 xsamples analyzed.

LLD sensitivities', :for -both wthe-'indicator,and the control station samples ranged from <0.1 to 0.3 JpCi /L..The maximum preoperational level detected was-65 pCi/L which occurred following a.period!,of atmospheric inuclear..weapons tests.

Results-from'61984 -to T2O04 are plotted on Figure 3,, with an

'r-inset 'graph depicting -the-;current year back.>tosl'973.r:a;.

iGamma-spectroscopy'performedon~eachofithe.80isamples-:

indicated the presence of :thed:naturally-ccurring radionuclide K-40. - All 'other-gamma emitters Jsearched-cfor werer-below the LLD.

.O.Potassium-40,wasl 'detected Jinall -80 samples;.-,:Concentrations for the7 60-:indicatorcstation 0samples[-ranged from: 1230 to

-1420 pCi/L, with'.an averageiof1320-;pCi/L.-

The)'20Lcontrol

- station-sample. concentrations;,, ranged.from-1240, to,:1410 pCi/L, with an average of 1320 pCi/L.

The-maximum;-

preoperational level detected was 2000 pCi/L, with an average of 1437 pCi/L.

k Well Wateri,(Ground-Water),(Tables C-6,t'C-7).

l4C'

+

¢ F 1 X

S l

J J;

r-

=

, X s b

Although 'wells

.in the vicinity.-.o fi SGS /HCGS;are!. not':,directly affected by-;plantfoperations,;-water samples.-were collected/'monthly. from,-;one-;

farm'.s:-wdll.-. during.<January.. through' Deember.,,of the,,year.. tEh-Each sample was analyzed~-for'-grossi alpha,-- gross.-beta,,-tritium,zandi gamma emitters.

Gross alpha,act-'ivity4 was'detec ted-sin ;4 of vthe, cwellwateri-.

samples-aitArc6ncentrationsKan7rang.ng'-from 2;.2.tob'

.3.0.:-pCi/L-.'and an average of'27pCiY/L..'ThTwmaximum -preoperational.- level.-.'-

detected wash-'9'.6n.pCi/L-.

W re as a-sno

-preoperaationalaverage determined.'for thi-s analysi.s' Gross'- betd.actlvity -was detectedin all-'2 ^well water-samples.

Concentratib:ns \\for the samples rrangedifrom18 -6:tol-cpCiJL,'

',,with. :an -average.of -ll0 pCi/L x,-The 2004 gross tbetas.results are comparable:-iwith rthe :preoperational.results 'whichi'.ranged.-.from

<2.1. to 38pCi/Lp,,withan'average value of.9 pCi'/L.

SL.

.2 =.t

'3

.ec

,+

-Tritium activity--was not detected'in any of the;.wellwite'r samples.

N W

0 9

The. LLD sensitivities ranged--from- <140.-to- <150 pCi/L. The:.,

maximum preoperational. level detectedc was 380.pCi/L. There was no preoperational average determined for this analysis.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 12 well water samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides K-40 and Radium.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

o Radium was detected in all 12 of the well water samples. at.

concentrations ranging from 43 to 139 pCi/L with an average

-. of 101 pCi/L.

The-maximum preoperational level detected was 2;OpCi/L. 'There was no preoperational average determined for this analysis.

These values are.similar to those found in.:the, past 15 years.

However, -as with the.1989 through 2004 results, they are higher.than those found.in -the-preoperational program.

These results are due to a procedural change for sample preparation. -. The-change results in" ess removal of-radonw'.

(and its.daughter"products) from the-sample,;

It is, reasonable to 'conclude that values currently observed are typical for this region.

O Potassium-40:was detected in, 3 of ~the, samples' at concen-trations ranging-fromnv48-to.78-pCi/L-::and.an average of 64 pCi/L. ',-The maximum preoperational level detected was 30 pCi/L.

There..was no preoperational average. determined for this analysis.

Potable Water (Drinking Water) (Tables C-8, C-9)

Both raw and treated potable-water samples were..collected and....

composited by Salem water treatment plant personnel.

Each sample consisted of daily'-aliquots'composited,'into,,a' monthly sample.

i-The raw;water source-, fore this plant--is-Laurel Lake. andz adjacent wells.

Each of the 24 individual samples was analyzedcLfor.gross.alpha,'.

gross beta, trit'ium,-iodine-131 and.-gamma.emitters:.

Gross alpha activity was detected in 8 raw water samples at concentrations. of-l.O to 1.7 pCi/L and-in 2 -treated water

-samples at, 1.2 and:1.3 pCi/L.

-The averages: for both raw and treated water.samplestwasl1.4-pCi/L.

-The;smaximum pre-operationali?-levelv-detected was 2.7 pCi/L,. - There was no.

preoperational average determined for,this analysis.

Gross.- beta activity was.detectedk.in all 24.samples at.

-concentrations ranging, from-2.3.-to 4.5 pCi/L-,for both the raw and treated water., ?The average concentration - for both raw and treated'was.:3.1-pCi/L

.'The maximum.preoperational level detectedwas 9.0,;:pCi/L,- with -an average of 4.2 pCi/L.

-Tritium activity. was detected in one of the raw samples fat a concentration of 170 pCi/L.

10

'LLD sensitivities~for >thersiremaining raw-~and treated>-samples, ranged from <1'40'tto'. '<150QbpCi/L?-. The maximum;'preoperational.:

level detected was-350 pCi/L,.-with'.an.averageof. 179 pCi/L.

Iodine-'131 measurements. were.performed'

.to`a.sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L, even th'6igh the drinking water':suppliesqareinot' affected by discharges from the-Site since the receiving water body (Delaware River) is brackish and therefore the water is not used for human consumption.

Iodine-131 measurements.-f'or'..:

all 24 samples were below the LLD sensitivities.

These sensitivities'ranged::from,<O.:lto;.<0;4. pCi/L-'.

,,There was-no.

preoperational~data-availabler-for.'comparison.:-',

Gamma spectroscopy performed oneac h-of !the 2,4.monthly-water samples,-indicated :the, pre-sencel:of rthe'. naturally-,occurring:-i-i radionuclides K-40 and Radium. -:All other gamma emitters searched for -were below.th'e LLD-.,

O The radionuclide K-40 was detected'in.,6 of the treated'.'.

potable waters at concentrations ranging from 42 to 78 pCi/L.;

It was.not-*detected.'in cany:of the raw,potable -water samples.

The.'average-for treated.positive results was '54 pCi/L. :-LLD 'snsitivities'ifor';the remaining'>18-potablel'-

water samples were <9 to <45 pCi/L.

There was no preoperational data available for comparison.

O Radium was detected in 3.of' the treated potable waters at concentrations-ranging'from 1'l3!

to.28,.pCi'/L;.

It

-was snoti'

'-detected in any ofithe rawpotab.lewaterisamples.,

'The

..-average.-for the-treated!positiaveeresults was 19 pCi/L': >;LLD sensitivities for.theLremaining':21 samples were'.,<2 to.<3 pCi/L.

The maximum:preope'rat'ional,level detectedcwas, 1.'4.-1

pCi/L.

.There was.,no.preoperational-,average :determined-wfor-,

.this-analysis.

'The-higher -~results. in.the..three-measurableI samples.are. due'~toLsthe-;proc'e'dural. change,-for sample>,

preparation, as discussed in:.the.Well Water section.

Vegetables, !(Table C-10)

,i L.'-,,:?w2 Alth6ughc:vegetables :in.-the-regionr are. not irrigated with water:into

.,.which.liquidjplant effluents have'ibeen'discharged,- a ivariety.:of -food products-'growngin.the-area lfor,-hum'an'consumption-were.-.samipledast' 3

indicator rstatiohs:

(8-samples)tand 5.c'ontrol staitns'(15. samples).

The vegetables:'colllectbd as-,management.audit samples'w were lahnly,zed for,gamma 'emitters-and-included iasparaguscabba' e, sweet.' orny peppers, and tomatoes-.'

n

2>

1 i

.j Gamma spectros'copy'performed "on.ea'h'-'.of the-t233' sampLes -indicated the presence vOf.'the :na~turally.-ocurring Iradionudlide:.K-40i.:-...Al-lother gamma emitters searched-for werke"below the LLD.,

Potassium-40 *was'tdetected. in"all1..23\\

samples.' Concentrations Orfor

-'the 8:-indicator-:station'samples-ranged'.from 1360-to' 2690rpCi/kg-wet and averaged 2160 pCi/kg-wet.

1-11

Concentrations for..the 15 control station samples ranged from 1120 to 2560 pCi/kg-wet, and averaged.-19.70 pCi/kg-wet.

The-.

average concentration-idetected.for all samples,ic. both indicator and control, was 2020 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 4800 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2140 pCi/kg-wet...

Game (Table C-11)

Although not required by the SGS or HCGS Technical.-

Specifications/ODCM, '-samples of muskrats inhabiting the marshlands surrounding the Site, are collected.

Local residents consume this game.- The samples, when available, are. collected once a year as management audit-samples and analyzed for-.gamma emitters.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on the flesh indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below:the LLD.

- Potassium-40 was-detected-in the one sample at a concentration of 2710 pCi/kg-wet..The maximum preoperational level detected was 27000 pCi/kg-wet, with-an average of 4400 pCi/kg-wet.

Fodder Crops (Table C-12)

Although not required;by the SGS or' HCGS Technical-.

Specifications/ODCM,-'t4' samples-of crops. normally used as cattle feed (silage' and soybeans)-.':were collected from one indicator station (2

samples) and one' control-station (2.samples).

-It was determined that."these. products may. be a significant: element in the food-chain pathway..Fodder'crops'~are'collected as managementaudit samples and analyzed for -gamma emitters'.' The two locations 'from which samples were collected this year. are milk sampling 'stations.

Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 4 samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides Be-7 and K-40.

All other :gamma-emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Beryllium-7,. attributed to -cosmic ray activity in. the atmosphere, was detected in. the. indicator -silage sample at a,.concentration of 260 pCi/kg-wet.-'ItDwas detected;:in the control station silage

sample at 80: pCi/kg-wet.

The'average for both the silage-samples

-- was'170 pCi/kg-wet-.--

The maximum preoperational level detected:'

for silage--was. 4700 pCi/kg-wet,,with.lan-average of 2000'pCi/kg-

.wet.

Be-7 was not detected in either of the.- indicator nor.

control station soybean samples.

LLD sensitivities for the

soybean samplesu.were <28 and <34 pCi/kg-wet.1-The maximum-

-.preoperational -level detected for soybean samples was 9300 pCi/kg-dry.

A

'-Potassium-40.was detected in' all 4 of the station samples.

Concentrations'for the'2-indicator station:samples were at 2700 and 15100 pCi/kg-wet.

12

Concentrations,.for the 2:control.-station :sample-swere-at99O and-15300-!pCi/kg-wet The iaverage concentration bdetected-for-,the-;:

silage samples (both4ihdicator and control)j.:was 1850 pCi/kg-wet-Preoperational results averaged 7000-pci/kg-wet-.

Results' for~ the soybean 'samples-i(both` indicator 'and control) -average'd 15200 pCi/kg-wet.; Preoperational -soybean results' averaged. 22000 pCi/kg-dry.

SOIL- (Table C-13)

I Soil is'sampled-every three -years.- iat nine stations,- including..two-control, and analyzed for gamma emitters. Samples are, collected at each station, in areas that havebeen'-relatively undisturbed since the last collection, in order to' dete'rmine anykchanige inithe' radionuclide inventory of the area.

Gamma spectroscopy, performed-on-each-:of.the 9 samples,; indicated.-l-the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclides K-40, Radium and.,Th-232, 4 'in addition-to low-'levels 'of-'the2 fission -product Cs-137.

All other-gamma emitters.-searched'forvwere.below the 3iLLD-.:"

Potassium-'40 was -detected-,:in all7 o'f: the indicator stationy.';

samples at, concentrations; 'ranging Pfrom 4430to-13600 7pCiikg-dry with 'an average:-of,.-10230 pCi/kg-dry.The 2 control station samples had an-average 'of '8160. pCi/.kg-dry. -.Thdimaxi.num.- -.

2 preoperational,-.level detected. was f24000 pCi'/kg-dry-,with-an" '-

,average -of 10000.pCi/-kg-dry.'. -

3-I Y

t Cesium-137 was detected in 5 of the indicator station samples

.ra'nging.from '160, to1345-pCi/kg-dry-,_ with an average :ofc207'QI

'pCi/kg-dry.;,- The -control stationxs'amples hadna average-of-:-134 pCi/;kg'-dry..'The maximum preopeiati'onal :level.detectedwas.'2800 pCi/kg-dry,'>with an average of"1800f pCi-/kg-dry.

-Results frbm--1974 to the,current year' are rplottedi-onF.Figure 7. -

i- '

r z-

,.,i

,x

-,'){1F*>

Radium was. detected n-all 7'indicator-station-.samplles in-;

concentrations of-469 to-'915 pci/kg-dry, -with.an average of.640 pCi/kg-dry.

The control station samples showed an average 'Wof'727 pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 1500 r-pCi-,/kg-dry with-an average 16f 870'zpCi/kg-dry

.x

-Thorium-2324 was detecteid 'in all' of~,the -indicator2.'station samples in -ranges.of-5--07'.to -1080.'pCi/-kg-dr y'-;^.and.had('.n average 6f-?800 pCi`/kg-dry.i:- The 2. control.'stationisaamples wer&79 0"and"1000-pCi/.kg-dry -.with.4an average Lof p895 ZpCi/kg-dry. '.-The

.mhximumr 4,preoperational level detect'ed-was 1400 pCi/kg-dry.:with an average of 740. pCi/kg-dry.

-,-#-.p A

i

-vri iv-t-

AQUATIC c

7,-Z-

?,'i fl-4;t>-A

r.

i

[

Environmental-'Consulting 'Servic s' 'Inc (ECS)'-collected alleaquatic samples (with-,the-'exception of 6S2 'shoreline-. sediment;).-,'?

-A 13

Surface water samples.were collected in new polyethylene containers that were rinsed twice with the sample medium prior to. collection.

Edible fish and crabs..are taken by net and then,;processed..In processing, the flesh is separated from the bone.and shell and, placed in sealedpolyethylene containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests.

Sediment samples collected by ECS were taken with a bottom grab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests.

MTS personnel collect location 6S2 shoreline sediment on the beach behind the observation building.

Surface Water (Tables.C-14, C-15, C-16)

Surface water samples were collected monthly at 4 indicator stations and one control station in:the Delaware estuary.:

One location is at the' outfall area (which--is. the-area where liquid radioactive effluents from the. Salem Station:.are allowed to be; discharged into the Delaware River),

another is downstream from the outfall area, and, another-, is directly west,.of-the outfall.area.-.,at the mouth of the-Appoquinimink River.

Two-:upstream. locations:are in the Delaware River. and -at-the mouth-of the Chesapeake and Delaware.

Canal, the latter being.sampled when the flow. is from the Canal.into the river.

Station 12C1, at the mouth of. the Appoquinimink River, serves as the operational control.

All surface' water samples were analyzed monthly for gross beta, tritium and gamma emitters.

Gross beta activity was detected in 45 of: the, indicator station samples ranging from.5 to', 137 pCi/L,. with., an.average of-43 pCi/L.

-Beta activity was detected -in all 12-of' the control station.'

- samples with concentrations ranging from>,13 to ;88 pCi/L, with an average of 38 pCi/L.'

The maximum preoperational level detected was 110 pCi/L, with an average of 32 pCi/L.

Quarterly results for all locations-are-plotted on Figure 4, for the years 1984. to 2004, with an inset-graph depicting the current year back to;:

1973.

s

Tritium activity was-,not'detected in any.-of the control station samples.

It was detected in 4 of the indicator station samples

-at,concentrations;ranging from,220. to 260 pCi/L with, an-average of. 240 pCi/L., LLD'sensitivities::for the';remairiing.:station samples,: both indicator and-control, ranged from'<140 to'<150 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level^ detected.. was - 600 pCi/L, with an average'-of. 210:pCi/L.

Positive results from, 1984. to :2004 are plotted on Figure 5, with an inset-graph depicting the current year back to 1973.

1 Gamma spectroscopy performed on each of the 48 indicator station and 12 control station surface water samples indicated the presence of-the, naturally-occurring radionuclide K-40.

All other gamma emitters-searched for were below the-LLD.

- 14

Potassiumn-40:was -dete'cted inF 46 -.samples-from the indicator:.-.

stations-a't concentration's ranging from 33..to,164.pCi/L:and',in a'11'12 of the-c6 iB6l station samples rang'ingJ'from 35 to.l100.-3 pCi/L. The average for the indicator-station locations was 73 pCi/L','while the? average for~thecontrol stationelocations.,.was

-70'-pCi/L.

The tmaximum preoperational.-level.:detected-was;,200.

pCi/L', with an average,'of'48 pCi/L.-

d Fish (Table C-17)

Edible 'species of fish were:.coll'ected.semi-annually at..3rlocations and an'alyzed for igamma :emitt'ers' in2."flesh.'.Samplesincluded channel catfish',..bluefish'and striped bass..

U Gamma spectroscopy'performed' onz7 each of the' -4:indicators station samples and 2 control station samples indicated the presence of the naturally-occurring radionuclide

.K-40.'

All:.other-gamma'.

'emitters searched for wer6: belciw the LLD.

'0 Potassium-40 was detecte'd in'alIa 4 -samples' from mthe.-,

indicator stations-6at i.concentrations ;ranging.-fromr 3450to 3910 pCi/kg-wetsfor-'Anea` eragd-f.'f.3710,tpCi/kg7 et-K 40-was detected in both samples from the control location at 3370

':Ifand 3620 'pCi/kg-wet t

eThe'-averagefor-the control.

-samplees

' was 3495"pCi/kg-wet.;-TheTjimaximum 'preoperational; 'levelc.--.

'-detected: was -13000 -pCi/kg-'-wete,,-;with -an -average. of -29001..

pCi/ kg'-wet. ; ^ ;9

!, t r-.

1.4 Blue Crab- (Table C-18)

I

'j,'

Blue 'crab samples were'.collected.-twice-during`,the )beason, ata2;.'.'

locations,'-"l i'dicator ahad'"I control;- -andlthe edible-portions were

analyzed:'for'2 ga'mma -emitters-..:

m c

Gamma spectroscopy performed on1 the2'f esh'o' 'the indicator-.,station samples and the control station samples indicated the presence -of the 'natiirally,-occurring'p-radionuclideZ K-40-. r:All-.other, gamma.emitters

'searched for were' bel 6w t-ie;LLD2t 7.-

'-Potassium-'409-.was dete'cted i hboth indicator.-station-samples,-at

-' concentrations of -2370 3and&2660-.'pCi/.kg-wet.

It was 'detedted An both control st'ation;samp'les'cat2180 "and:!2680 pCi/kg-wet `::rThe average7 for;.both -,the:indicaat'&rand control' s ation 'samples was 2470 pCi/kg-wet.

The maximum -preoperationallevel'";detected.was 12000 pCi/kg-wet, with an average of 2835 pCi/kg-we't..

Sediment-;.- (Table -C-19)

-1

'--'1' 7<;

z

O rit Sedimentir samplesi:-were'collldcted

-semi-annually from. 7'.locations; t including'"6 indi tors'.stations' and A4coritrol'sta'tion ; >('Lo'cation" 6S2 is the :only' shoreline sediment a~nd'-it.'is'directly affected-by, tidal fluctuations) l 5

Each of the 14 samples was analyzed for gamma emitters.

Although trace levels of the man-made nuclide, Cs-13-7, was. detected in-a sediment sample,-'this level was well within the -acceptable levels specified in section 3/4.12.1 of the Technical Specifications/ODCM.

Gamma spectroscopy-was performed on each of the 12 indicator.s'tation samples and 2 control';station samples..,Iniaddition to the.detection of Cs-137, the naturally-occurring radionuclides Radium, K-40,- Be-7 and Th-232 were also detected.

All other gamma emitters searched for were below the LLD.

Cesium-137 was detected in 1 indicator station samples at a concentration of 33.:pCi-/kg-dry.

It was-not detected in-any of;X

,the control statioh:.samples.

The maximum:preoperational level detected was 400 pCi/kg-dry with -an'average of-150 pCi/kg-dry.

Results from 1984 to 2004 are plotted on Figure 6, with an inset graph depicting the current year back to,,1973..

Cobalt-60-was not detected in any of the-sediment samples...,LLD sensitivities for the 14 samples,- indicator and control, ranged from <2.4 to <30 pCi/kg-dry. Results of all the positive values from 1984 to 2004 'are -plotted on Figure 6,

.-with an inset graph depicting the-current-year back.to 1973. --There was no preoperational data available for comparison..-

Beryllium-7 was detected in 3 of the indicator station samples at concentrations.of lll1-to-.166.pCi/kg-dry-iwith-an-average.of 140 pCi/kg-dry. -It-;wasnot detected:in,.either:control location.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 2300 pCi/kg-dry.

There was no preoperational average determined for this nuclide.

Potassium-40 was detected in all 12 indicator-station samples. at concentrations ranging. from 2090 to 19000 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 8310 pCi/kg-dry. -Concentrations-detected. in both of.

-the control. station samples were 'at-14500:,and 16000 pCi/kg-dry.-

The average for the control station samples was. 15250 pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum preoperational level detected was 21000 pCi/kg-dry,

.-with an average2 of-15000 pCi/kg-dry.

.. Radium was. detected in all 12 indicator, station samples at con-centrations ranging from 86 to 842' pCi/kg-dry, 1 with an average of 460 pCi/kg-dry.

Concentrations detected in both of the control

-station samples were, at 584 and-928 pCi-'/kg-dry, !with an average of 760 pCi/kg-dry..The grand average1 for both the indicator and

.control station samples was 500- pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum pre-

.operational-level detected was 1200 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 760 pCi/kg-dry.

Thorium-232 was detected in all 12 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 94 to 1190 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 655 pCi/kg-dry.

Concentrations 4detected. in both-of.

the control station samples were at 1010 and 1270 pCi/kg-dry, with an averagerof 1140-pCi/kg-dry.-.The grand-:.average for~both

-the indicator--and-control station samples--was 720- pCi/kg-dry.

The maximum pre-operational level detected was 1300 pCi/kg-dry, with an average of 840 pCi/kg-dry.

16

PROGRAM DEVIATIONS The following air sampler was unavailable due to power. outage:

STATION -LtOCATION HOURSYUNAVAILABLE 5S1-1.0 mi. E of vent' 137.5 -(l.6%,for year)

This outage--was attributable to a_-lightning' st'ridke nea'r the site causing thetransformer that provides power to"..the Met" tower and our air sampler-to lose one of its pha's'es.

An equipment failure caused the invalidation of the APT/AIO samples collected during one week at control location 14G1. A, separation of the copper strap bracket (which connects the sampling assembly to the cabinet housing the pump) caused the holder to invert 180°,

resulting in the holder assembly facing upwards instead of do'wnward in its normal position.

This caused precipitation to collect':on the filter,,damaging it and then rinsing an unknown portion of the particu'latew'material into the attached iodine cartridge To ensure that this would not happen again, 'the copper brackets on all si'x samplers were replaced with heavy duty'pipe flanges.

't CONCLUSIONS The Radiological Environmental Moinitoring Program for..Salemrand Hope Creek' Generating Stations was conducted du'ring 2004 in`.accordance with the SGS and HCGS Technical Spe'cifications/ODCM.-

Th'e LLD>.Values required by the Technical Specifications/ODCM were achieved4 f-for thi's reporting period.

The object*i'ves.-of the program were '.'also mete during this period.

The data 'collected assists; in demonstratirg that SGS and HCGS were operated in^'compliance with Technica l

6;di Specifications/ODCM.-

rae in

,.inc wh Te'chnlca'

't From the results obtained,, -it !can-b6 concluded that the level's fluctuations 'of radioactivity n^ environmental sampl'es'.-were as expected for an estuarine environment.'

No' unusual radio'logical characteristics were 'observa tinifthe envir'ns.1of SGS/HCGS during this reporting period.

Siin ciethe sresutsI were comparableib to -the results obtained duringithepreoperational phase of jthe

program, which ran from 1973-'t`-o1'976, cv-an'd with.hi'storical results collecited since commercial op'e-ratilon, we' can ':conclude'that the 'operation-of' the Salem and Hope Creek Stations had no significant impact 6on the radiological characteristics of.'the -environs of that area.

4H T

4,

~44j I1 i'

-~j l' f-4 t

i

TABLE 1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (PROGRAM OVERVIEW)

STATION CODE

COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR,,

CONTROL FREQUENCY TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS I.

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, Go beta/weekly

a. Air Particulate 5S1 5Dl1 6El.

I,1Fl 2F6 -.

0.

1 1

.1 I

14G1 1 4G1

'Weekly Weekly Gross beta/weekly Gamma scan/quarterly, Iodine-131/weekly

b.

Air Iodine 5S1 lFl

'5D1 16E1 2F6 - ',

II. DIRECT RADIATION co

a.

Thermoluminescent Dosimeters 5l1 2S2 5S1 6S2 7S1 10si llSl.

4D2 1'1E2 16F2 13F3

'2S4-:

3S1

'5D1 2E1 10DI' 3E1 l4D1l.13El 15S1 16Sl 16E1 5F1

'7F2-11F1 9F1 2F5 15Dl 12E1 1OF2 12F1 14F2 15F3 4S1' lFl 2F2 2F6 4F2 6F1 13F4 3F2 3F3 13F2 3G1 1G3 lOGl 16G1 14G1 3H1 Quarterly

' Gamma dose/ quarterly III. Terrestrial Environment

a.

Milk 13E3 14F4 Monthly 2G3 3G1 (when animals are not on pasture)

Semi-monthly (when animals are on pasture)

Iodine-131/monthly Gamma scan/monthly Iodine-131/semi-monthly Gamma scan/semi-monthly

TABLE 1 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (PROGRAM OVERVIEW)

STATION CODE COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR CONTROL FREQUENCY TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS

b. Well Water 3E1.

Monthly Gross alpha/monthly Gross beta/monthly Tritium/monthly Gamma scan/monthly

c. Potable Water (Raw & Treated) 2F3 Monthly (composited daily)

Gross alpha/monthly Gross beta/monthly Tritium/monthly Gamma scan/monthly Iodine-131/monthly D

d. Vegetables 2F4 6F2 2F10 2F9 14F3 1G4 2G2 9G1 3H5 9G2 3G2 14G2 Annually

,(at harvest)

Gamma scan/on collection

e.

Game (Muskrat)

f. Fodder Crops ilD1 3E1 13E3 14F4 Annually

- Gamma scan/on collection

- Gamma scan/on collection 3G1 2G3 Annually

g. Soil

1. -

'6S2' loD1 1 6E1

-13E3 -

2F9 14F4 5F1 2G3 3G1 Every 3 years -

(2004-2007-2010)

Gamma scan/on collection

.1

.. I -

--

I.11

.1

TABLE 1 (contId)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING (PROGRAM OVERVIEW) -

PROGRAM STATION CODE COLLECTION MEDIUM INDICATOR CONTROL FREQUENCY TYPE/FREQUENCY*

OF ANALYSIS IV. AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

a. Surface Water

b.

Edible Fish IlAl 7E1 1F2 16F1 11A1 7E1 12C1 12CI Monthly Semi-annually Gross beta/monthly.

Gamma scan/monthly Tritium/monthly***

Gamma scan (flesh)/on collection

c. Blue Crabs

-.. si, 1lA1 12C1 0

Semi-annually Gamma scan (flesh)/on collection

d. Sediment llAl 6S2 15A1 16F1 16A1 7E1 12C1 Semi-annually Gamma scan/on collection

Except for TLDs, the quarterly analysis is performed on a composite of individual samples collected during the quarter.

-**Management audit analyses, not required by Technical Specifications or by specific commitments to local officials.*

Tech Specs/ODCM require quarterly analysis but due to the tritium leak at Salem, it was decided to analyze surface waters on a monthly basis for tritium.

FIGURE 1 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR PARTICULATE 1984 THROUGH 2004 1000

GROSS E 1000.

Chernobyl 1

Fn 04-26-86 100 1

100 1976 1982 C.,

X

.1 10 -

Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86 1*

111 1

1. 1.,,,,,,,,,

,,Il 1984

. 1988 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1 998 2000 2002 2004 QUARTERLY AVERAGE

l.

.I

FIGURE 2 AMBIENT RADIATION - OFFSITE vs CONTROL STATION 1984 THROUGH 2004 10.0 8.0 e 6.0 c

0E NJ 4-1.

E 4.0 2.0 0.0 1984 1986 1988 1990 1932 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 QUARTERLY AVERAGE CO)

FIGURE 3 IODINE - 131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 1984 THROUGH 2004 20 10 w

0.

IODINE-1Jt ACTIVMTY IN MILK 1913 THROUH 200 30.00 20.00:

10100 0.00 Aii Ii#-

A_

-10.00 -

1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 Chemobyl 04-26-86 47A Hope Creek Crkitialify 06-28-86 0

J

=

-10 I.

I

... I I

1

,, I l

l l

l 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1

1

.1........-

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 QUARTERLY AVERAGE C& YZ-

FIGURE 4 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1984 THROUGH 2004 100o0 100 bJ i

10 I

1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 lQUARTERLY AVERAGE

FIGURE 5 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1984 THROUGH 2004 10,000 1,000 -

TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 1973 Through 2004 10000 1000 1978 1982 198 1994 2000 Ia 0

I Chernobyl 04-26-86 N'

UL

-l C-,

100 -

Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86 i1 I

4 1984 1988 1 9 9 0 1 990 1986 1992 1994 1996 I

I I I I I I.

i i

III III

[

iI, I I II II 1998 2000 2002 2004 QUARTERLY AVERAGE

I m

FIGURE 6 CESIUM-137 & COBALT460 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1984 THROUGH 2004 10000 1000 -

I

-CS-137i

-C0-60 CESIUM-137 & CO3ALT10 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1"

THROUGH 2004 1000_

looc

, 0 r /, 1 M

m w00;*

- Sg lo 0

0 '

< 0 2 i

". f 09, ', '. g.5 d2j,,' ;'('

04 0 tj t

0

'0 1576 1U2 Is.

1M4 20U (ON Q

s0._

Ch L

100 10.

I Chemobyl 04-26-86 Hope Creek Criticality 06-26-86 I I I.

I.

4.

1.

18.

8 1

1984 1986 1988 1'990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 ISEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE1

FIGURE 7 CESIUM -137 ACTIVITY IN SOIL 1974 THROUGH 2004 10000.0 Salem - 2 Criticality 08-02-80 Hope Creek Criticality 06-28-86 1000.0-

'4 C-,

Salem - I Crticality 12-11-76 t

100.0 Weapons Test Chemobyl 10-15-80 04-26-86 10.0 I

I 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 lYEARLY AVERAGEl

REFERENCES

[1]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Environmental Report, Operating License Stage - Salem Nuclear Generating Station Units 1 and 2".

1971.

[2]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Environmental Report, Operating License Stage -

Hope Creek Generating Station".

1983.

[3]

United States Atomic Energy Commission.

"Final Environmental Statement -

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2".

Docket No. 50-272 and 50-311. 1973.

[4]

United States Atomic Energy Commission.

"Final Environmental Statement -

Hope Creek Generating Station, Docket No. 50-354. 1983.

[5]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Updated Final Safety Analysis Report -

Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2".

1982.

[6]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Updated Final Safety Analysis Report -

Hope Creek Generating Station.

[7]

Radiation Management Corporation.

"Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Annual Reports 1973 through 1982".

[8]

Radiation Management Corporation.

"Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -

Preoperation Summary -

1973 through 1976".

RMC-TR-77-03, 1978.

[9]

Radiation Management Corporation.

"Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -

December 11 to December 31, 1976".

RMC-TR-77-02, 1977.

[10]

Maplewood Testing Services.

"Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -

Annual Reports 1983 through 2003".

[11]

Maplewood Testing Services. "Quality Assurance Plan."

February, 2004

[12]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Salem Nuclear Generating Station Technical Specifications", Appendix A to Operating License No. DPR-70, 1976, Sections 6.8.4.h -

1,2,3 and 6.9.1.7.

[13]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Hope Creek Generating Station Technical Specifications", Appendix A to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, 1986, Sections 6.8.4.h -

1,2,3 and 6.9.1.6.

[14]

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" Salem Generating Station.

28

REFERENCES (cont d)

[15)

Public Service Enterprise Group.

"Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" Hope Creek Generating Station.

[16]

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

"Prescribed Procedures for Measurement of Radioactivity in Drinking Water."

EPA-600/4-80-032, August, 1980.

[17]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. -"Environmental Technical Specifications For Nuclear Power Plants." Regulatory Guide 4.8, December, 1975.

29

APPENDIX A PROGRAM SUMPRY 31

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-2721-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1, 2004 to DECEMBER 31, 2004 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Coritrol Loation Number of SAMPLE Total Number.

Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Rarge)

(Range) ;t Reported Performed (LLD)*

Measurements I. AIRBORNE Air Particulates (1Or3 pCirM 3) zr --

i> -

i 's-f Beta Be7 310 6.0.

24 8.S 0p 8.0 I, I ij, 3

23 (259'/259 )

(6-39) 68'(20 /20 )

(56-89)..

.5S1 1 mi E j i. 1, 5S1 i ml E 1.LK-40,

.RA-NAT i,-1~ ;~r I ~*n'P~.

.tv 24 12 10 (10/20)

If

((9-12) ;i

~~~~~q,. :

j;, i, - i.1 24 0.7 1 (1

(/20)'

.4-X

'4 (

1

}

7.

,z 5S1 1 mi E 5S 1:1'iE.

-,4 L

V k 24; (51 /51:)

(10-39).

170 (414)

(59-86),

12 (3/4)

(9-16)<

2i0,j ( 4

i'(1-1)"

4LLD 24 (51 /51)

(6-39) 68 (4 /4)

(56-86)'

11 (2/4)

(10-11) 4.'

<LLD.

4.3, (24 /24)

(3.3-5.6) 0 0

0 0

0 Air lodine :

(1&

pCi/in-11 DIRECT, 5 I

.,iDirect Radiation

"(mrad/std; month) 1-131 310 -

4, ';

133 -tf I

<LLD Quarterly Badges I.

I a.

4-1(172 /172 )

(2.7-7.3) i ' ;1:

6.2,(4I4)

(4.7-7.3) 196 2S2 0.4 ml NNE 0

Ill TERRESTRIAL.,,.

~'

MiRk.

1-1 31 80

'306 icLD

.4<LLDN r<LLD

,,-K-40

80-,.s~ 50.,,-,,-1320.(60160),,.......

13E3 4.9 miW

.1330 (20/20) 1320 (20 /20 0

(1230-1420)

(1240-'1420)'

'~(1240-1410)-

j' ! ", ".

, I,,,C

, v

,- c-'..

.: aI 1:

I

: --,, i, - - '.. '. , i ') - " -I-

........ wl

.,-

-I 14 -

'.r%, -. ----t..

, 5,-

Jr

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1, 2004 to DECEMBER 31, 2004 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY AnIalysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNr OF MEASUREMENT of Analyses-Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

(Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)*

Measurements III TERRESTRIAL

, Well Water '

(pCIIL)

Alpha Beta I

12 2.6 2.7. (4 112')

(2.2-3) 12 1.0*-

10 (12/12)

(8.6-11) 12 150

<LLD 3E1 4.1 mi NE 3E1 4.1 ml NE 2.7 (4112)

' (2.2-3) 10 (12/12)

(8.6-11)

<LLD H-3 4t-Gamma K-40 12 58 64 (3112)

(48-78)

RA-NAT 12 6.4 101 (12/12)

(43-139)

No Control Location No Control Location No Control Location No Control Location No Control Location I.

3E1 4.1mi NE 3E1 4.1mi NE 64 (3/12)

(48-78) 101 (12/12)

(43-139) 0 0

0 0

0 Potable Water (pCUL)

Alpha 24 1.5 1.4 (10/24)

(1-1.7)

Beta 24 1.0-**

3.1 (24/24 )

(2.3-4.5) 1H-3 24 150

-170 (1 124 )

(170-170)

,, Gamma K-40.

24 1-131 24

.RA-NAT p 24 2F3 8.0 ml NNE 2F3 8.0 ml NNE 2F3 8.0 mi NNE

2..

mi NNE 2F3 8.0 mi'NNE 2F3 8.0 mi NNE 1.4 (10 /24)

(1-1.7) 3.1 (24'/24)

(2.3-4.5) 170 (1/24)

(170-170) 54 (6124)..

(42-78)

<LLD 19 (3 /24 )

(13-28)

No Control Location No Control Location No Control

= Location i No Control Location No Control Location -

No Control Location 0

0 0

0 58 54 (6/24) 11 (42-78) 0.4

.<LLD 6.4, 19 (3 /24 )

(13-28)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1, 2004 to DECEMBER 31, 2004 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number LIrMitof Mean

,,Name

-; Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

(Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)*

Measurements III TERRESTRIAL I Fruit &

Vegetables (pCIUKg-wet)

Gamma K-40 I. i

-.t 23 i

70 2160 (8/8)

(1360-2690) 2F4 6.3 mi NNE 2340.(3 i3 )

(1980-2690) 1970. (15 /15)

(1120-2560) 0 Game.._,L-..

(pCI/Kg-wet)

Fodder Crops--

¢.piCliKg-wet)

Soil (pCi/kg (dry)

Gamma Gamma K-40, Gamma' K-40 Cs-137 I

'4 0 6

.'1 9

9 70 2710 (1 /1) 3E1 4.1 mi. NE (2710) 60

.260 (1 /2)'

14F4,7.6 mi WNW (260-260) 70 8900 (2 /2) 14F4 7.6 mi WNW (2700-15100) 70 10230 (7 /7) 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW (4430-13600) 33 270 (5/7) 2F9 7.5 mi. NNE (160-345) 50

._._640 (7/7) 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW J

8W7774(469 915)

C 50 -t 8004 (i717)

. 16E1i4.1ml; NNW.

(. 71

)

,'. ' r I 2710 (I /1 )

f ~

(2710).,.

-260 (i /2)

(260) 8900 '(2 /2)

(2700-15100) 13600 (1/1)

(13600-13600) 345 (1 /1 )

(345-345) 915 (1/1)

-(915-915) 1080.(il )

(1080-1080)

No Control Location I 80 '(12

/)\\-

(80-80) 5430 (2 /2 )

(990-15300)

-- '5 0

0

-i-I 0

RA-NAT...,..9, ThI 2'~.

I 8160 (2/2) 0 (7260-9060) 134'(2/2) 0 (111-156) 730 (2/2) 0 (640-813)-

.. 1 900, (2 /2)

A

_O_

(79 1~

000)

,-.a,

'IVAQAI

~

-+

- l

- :>~~~

n4T a-.

.i.s...

K Y~~~,z I1 I-Surface Water Beta 60 7.0 43 (45/48) 7E14.5miSE 71(i2/12j 38'i2/12)'

'o' (pcI.)

(5-137)

(31-137)

(13-88)

t~,,: *;,i;

>;nl

$f r' 5 ;

r. 't4-

> i ' <

S ; t;.

t.

g,

Sj1 r;

"I.,

t, t t I. -

,, 1 "".

f,

, ;;

- ;,,_

:

I_.

I,, , t..

11,

I I -

C'1

I-,

, "

.,. " t 1. 1

I

': -; V-,

I -

-

4.,,I

',

. 1 1 1.3 ;- : -

i %, :,t ! I :

--

,

-

j, 5 ..

, :

.., j, :.. - -

-

I

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1, 2004 to DECEMBER 31, 2004 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean,.

Name

, Mean.

- Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT!

of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)

Measurements IV AQUATIC Surface Water (pCi L)

H-3 Gamma K-40 Gamma K40 Gamma K-40 I

260.. (4 /48 )

(220-260) 1hA1 0.2 mi SW 60 150 Blue Crabs (pCi/kg-wet) 60 58 73 (46/48)

(33-164) 4 70 2515 (2/2)

(2370-2660) 6 70 3710 (4/4)

(3450-3910) 7E1 4.5 mi SE 11Al 0.2 mi SW 7E1 4.5 mi SE 240 (2 /12)

<LLD (220-260)',

98 (12/12) 70 (12,/12)

(52-164)

(35-100) 2515 (2/2) 2430 (2 /2)

(2370-2660)

(2180-2680) 3815 (2/2) 3495.(2/2,)

(3720-3910)

(3370-3620) 0 0

0 0

C' Edible Fish (pCI/kg-wet)

Sediment (pCpkg-dry)

I 1

Gamma Be-7 14 297 140 (3/12)

(111-166) 8310 (12/12)

,, (2090-19000),-

<LLD K-40 14 70 Co-60 -'

14

30 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW

4. 5 I, S.

7E1 4.5 mi. SE 145 '(I /2 ),

(145-145) 17700 (2/2)

(16400-19000) 33 (1 /2 )

(33-33)

<LLD, 15250 (2/2)

(14500-16000)

' ' 'LLD

<LLD 0

0 0

0 Cs-i 37 14 33 33 (1/12)

(33-33) '

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY JANUARY 1, 2004 to DECEMBER 31 2004 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Analysis And Lower All Indicator Locations Location with Highest Mean Control Location Number of SAMPLE Total Number Limit of Mean Name Mean Mean Nonroutine (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT' of Analyses Detection (Range)

Distance and Direction (Range)

(Range)

Reported Performed (LLD)*

Measurements IV AQUATIC Sediment (pCitkg-dry)

RA-NAT 14 50 460 (12/12)

(86-842)

Th-232 14 50 655 (12/12)

(94-1190) 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW 760 (2 /2 )

(584-928) 1140 (2/2)

(1010-1270) 760 (2/2)

(584-928) 1140 (2/2)

(1010-1270) 0 0

LLD listed is the lower limit of detection which we endeavored to achieve during this reporting period. In some instances nuclides were detected at concentrations above/below the LLD values shown.

- Mean calculated using values above LLD only. Fraction of measurements above LLD are in parentheses.

- - Typical LLD values.

APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND -

LOCATIONS 39

APPENDIXi B SAMPLE DESIGNATION The PSEG's Maplewood Testing Services identifies samples by a, three.part code.

The first two.letters,.arethe program identification code.

Because'of the pr6ximity'-of the Salem and'--

Hope Creek Stations a'common envirofinmental surveillance progran-is being 'conducted.'

The' identification 'dode, !SA",%`has been appl'ied to Salem and Hope Creek stations.

The'next-three letters are-f or the media sampled.

AIO = Air Iodine IDM Immersion Dose (TLD)

APT = Air Particulate MLK =

Milk ECH-= Hard Shell Blue Crab PWR Potable Water (Raw)'

ESF =:Edible Fish PWT Potable Wat6r (Treated)

ESS-= Sediment..

SOL

,Soil -

FPL' = Green'Le'afy'Vegetables 'SWA =

Surface Water FPV = Vegetables (Various)

VGT -Fodder'Crops (Various)

GAM =,Game (Muskrat).

WWA -',fWell Water..

The last four symbols are a location code based on direction and r

distance from a~standard reference point.

Of.these, the first twos represent each 6f the sixteen-angular sectors j6f 22.5 degrees:",-

centered about the' reactor site..Sector one is divrided evenly by the north axis and-other sectors 'are numbered 'in a'clockwise direction; e.g

-2NNE, 3=NE, 4-ENE, etc.

The-next digit is a letter which represents the radial 'distance from the reference point:

'S = On-site location

,E 4-5 miles off-site:

A = 0-1 miles off-site F'-:5-10 miles'off-site B = 1-2 miles off-site '

G 10-20'.miles-off.-site

- C -23 miles off -site

`'

-,H;=

>20 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site The last number is the station nume'rical 'designa'tion withinea.c' sectori and"zone'; e.g.,

1 3,

'For'example; the designation

-SA:WWA-3E1 'would indicate: a sample 4in the 4 SalemJa rid Hope Creek.--

program (SA),' consisting'f 'wellwater'(WWA),:whi h had been,.,

collected in sector.-number,'.3;;'centered'at 450.,(norith east) £with!

respect.to the react rsite at

-radi'al' di'stance of 4 to"'5,mil'es

off-site, (therefore,-radial sditoance-, E) 2 The f

uriber 1 indid' tes that' this 'is sampli'ng station #1 in that I'particular sector.'

I, 4fl1'

TABLE B-1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1.

Maps B-1 and B-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the Site.

A Portable Global Pzs_

O.

rng System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling locations.

The Datem user was ailS 34.

STATION CODE isl 2S2 2S4 3S1 4S1 5S1 A%

6S2 7S1 10Sl MiS 15S1 16S1 llAl 15A1 16A1 12C1 4D2 5D1 1OD1 14Dl 15D1 Jrli

STATION LOCATION 7--

0.55mi. N of vent 0.4 mi. NNE of vent; Lamp Pole 65 Near HC Switch Yard'-

0.59'mi. NNE of vent 0.58-mi. NE of vent 0.60 mi. ENE of vent 1.0 mi. E of vent; site access road 0.2 mi.. ESE of -vent; observation building 0.12 mi. SE of.vent; station personnel gate 0.14 mi. SSW of vent; inlet cooling water bldg.

0.09 mi. 'SW of vent; service water inlet bldg.

0.57 mi. NW of vent 0.54.mi. NNW of vent' 0.2 mi. SW.of vent; outfall area 0.3 mi. NW of vent; cooling tower blowdown discharge line outfall 0.7lmine NNW of.vent;,south storm drain discharge line

.1 2.5 mi. WSW of vent; -west bank of Delaware River 3.7 mi. ENE of vent; Alloway Creek Neck Road 3.5 mi. E of vent; local farm 3.9 mi. SSW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Spur 3.5 mi. SW of vent 3.4 mi. WNW of vent; Bay View, Delaware 3.8 mi. NW of vent; Rt. 9, Augustine Beach 4.4 mi. NNE of vent; local farm

-4.1 mi. NE of vent; Iccal farm LATITUDINAL DEG. MIN. SEC 39 16 39 -

28 -

07 39 -

28 -

16 39 -

28 -

08 39 -

28 -

02 39 -

27 -

38 39 -

27 -

43 39 -

27 -. 44 39 -

27 -

41 39 -

27 -

43 39 -

28 -

10 39 -

28 -

13 39 -

27 -

59 39 -

27 -

67 39 -

28 -

24 LONGITUDINAL.

DEG. MIN. SEC SAMPLE TYPE 75 -

32 75 -

32 7

75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 31 -

31 -

32 -

32 32 -

13 00

-55

-41 33 08 55

03 10 12 32

-26 25

'9 IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM AIO,APT,IDM IDM,SOL,ESS 1DM IDM IDM IDM IDM ECH, ESF, ESS, SWA ESS ESS ECH,ESF,ESS,SWA IDM AIO,APT,IDM IDM,SOL GAM IDM IDM IDM GAM, IDM, VGT, WWA, FPV 75 -

32 -.58 39 -

39 -

3.9 -

39 -

27 29 28 24 24 29 30 31 30 22 18 24 37 49 02 08 23 07 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 34 32 28 33 34 35 35 30 28 08 11 22 44 26

-.31 02 26 41

TABLE B-1 (cont' d)

STATION CODE

7E1, 11E2 A _.

I

.4.

13E3 16E1 lFi 1 F2 2F2 STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL DEG. MIN. SEC w

2F3 2F4.

2F5 2F6 -

2F8, 2F9 2F1o 3F2 3 F3 3F6

,4.5 mi. -SE cf vent;, 1 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 5.0 mi. SW of vent; Rt. 9-

nas 7a.nz,

i.

z, ;ent; Diehl House Lab 4.9 mi. W of vent; Joseph Vari, Odessa, DE 4.1 mi. NNW of vent; Port Penn 5.8 mi.'N of vent; Fort Elfsborg-7.1 mi. N of Vent; midpoint of Delaware River 8.7 ml'. NNE of vent; Corner of 5th &- Howell, Salem

-8.'0 mi. NNE of vent; Salem Water Company

^6.3 mi.' NNE of vent; local farm 7'.4 m'i."NNE of vent; Salem High School 7.3 mi. NNE of vent; Sduthern Training Center 5.3,mi.~ NNE -OF vent;, local farm 7_.'5` miii; NNE 'odfvent; TilburyFarms,,_45.

S.,

!-Tilbu~ry! Rd,v'Salem,

1Ir

'Tr..

-9V2-Le

.s NNE'ffvefit;

'M esser. Farm,;1027 S6 thvr'dway: (Rt.

49) Pennsville

-5.1 mCii. NE-of vent';'Hancocks-Bridge Municipal-Bld 8.6 -i.NE of'veht; Quinton: Township School 6.5 mi.,NE f vent;-' #324,Salem/Hancocks'Bridge

Road 6.0,mi: ; ENE, of vent; Mays Lane, Harmersville

'6.1`5 M'i-i/"E of vent; Canton 6.4 ml.

ESE of v6nt; SStow Necl& Road 9.1'mi. SE of Vent'; Byslde,'7iNew -Jersey

.5.3.rmi. Sof vent, *D.P.A.L. 48912-30217 1

5.8 mi. SSW~of vent; Rt. 9 6.2 mi. SW of vent; Taylor's Bridge Delaware 9.4 'mi. WSW of vent; Townsend'Elementary School 6.5'mi. 41of vent; Odessa, Delaware 9.3 mi. W of vent; Redding Middle School,

-:'ii etzw

-e..

n.i:; "

D w

-i

,i z nr-; 1.1idziletown, Delaware-39 39 39

.39 39 39 39 39 39

- 25 24 26

- 27 27 30 32 33 34 08 20 52 59 17 47 43-08 38 39 -

39 -

39--

39., -

.39.-

39; -

39 -

3 -,

39 -

_3 LONGITUDINAL DEG. MIN.

SEC 75 -

28 -

64 75 -

35 -

33 75 -

36 -

59 75 -

36 -

44 75 -

37 -

30 75 -

34 -

34 75 -

31 -

05 75 -

32 -

54 75 -

28 -

04 33 -

33 -

31 '-

331 _-

40 21 27 43 54F 55 r 75 -

75 -

75 --

75 -

27 -

18 30 -

33 28 -

31 28 -

48 29 '-!18

.29 -

30 29 -

35 35,,-

35' 30,, 25<

32 -

38 32 -

03 SAMPLE TYPE ESF,ESSSWA

'IDM IDM IDM MLK,FPV,VGT AIO,APT,IDM,SOL AIO,APT,IDM SWA IDM PWR,PWT FPV,FPL IDM AIO,APT,IDM FPV 4F2 5F1 6F1 7F2 9F1-10 F2 llF1 12F1 13F2 13F3 1

4 29 -

28 -

22 -

23 -

24 -

23 58 22 24 56 03 01 44 47 18 75 -,27 -

75 -

24 -

75 -

28 -

75 -

26 -

75 -

24 -

75 -

25 -

75, 75 75 -

34-75 - 75 -

413-75 -75---42 75 -

43 -

36 445 00 39 39 3 9.

39

03 59 09 17

32 09

.37 18 21 32 07 FPV,FPL,SOL FPV IDM

IDM FPV IDM IDM,SOL IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM

'fi' 39--.27 - 14 39'- '26 -

51 IDM IDM

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

STATION CODE 14F2 14F3 15F3 16Fl 16F2 1G3 1G4 2G2 2G3 3G1 3G2 9G1 9G2 lOG1 14G1 14G2 16G1 3H1 3H5 STATION LOCATION 6.6 mi. WNW of vent; Boyds Corner 5.4 mi. WNW of vent; local farm

---,~ i r 3.4 mi. NW of vent 6.9 mi. NNW of vent; C&D Canal 8.1 mi. NNW of vent; Delaware City Public School 19 mi-. N of vent; N. Church St. Wilmington, Del 10.8 mi. N of vent; (Dads Produce) Rt'e. 49, South Broadway, Pennsville 13.5 mi.. NNE of vent; Moore's Market;6324 Pointers Auburn Road (Rt. 540),' Salem, NJ 08079 12 mi. NNE of vent; Asa Caldwallader, Waldac Farms, Corner of Routes 540 & 45, Mannington, NJ 17 mi. NE of vent; Mr. Lee Williams Farm.

11.5 mi. NE of vent;. Commissioner'-s Pike (Main.

St.) Alloway 10.3 mi. S of Vent; Mr. Goldsburrough,. 1784 Woodland Beach-Rd., Smyrna, Delaware 10.5 mi. SE of vent; 2084 Woodland Beach Road (Rt.

3) RD#2, Smyrna Delaware 12 mi. SSW of vent; Smyrna, Delaware 11.8 mi. WNW of vent; Rte. 286; Bethel Church Road; Delaware 12.1 mi. WNW of vent; Locust Grove Farm & Garden Center; 1084 Bethel Church Road; Middletown, DE 19709 15 mi. NNW of vent; Across from Greater Wilmington Airport 32 mi. NE of. vent; National Park, New Jersey 25 mi.

NE of vent; Sorbello Girl's Market LATITUDINAL DEG. MIN. SEC 39 -

30 -

00 LONGITUDINAL DEG. MIN.

SEC SAMPLE TYPE 75 -

38 -

59 IDM 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39.

39 39 39 39 39 29 30 30 33 34 44 37 38 36 35 33 18 18

-.18 31 31

- '40 51

- -41 33 44 7 58 55 18 16 55 19 21 56 39 47 49 13 18 21 38 36 02 75 75 75 75 75

'75 75 75 75 75 75.

75 75 75 75 75 75 7 5 3I-7 4 0 36 34 35

-. 32 30 26 24 16 22 33 33 36 46 44 55 52 36 25 25 31 44 10 53 47 01 50.

51 05 30 57 FPV, FPL MLK,VGT,SOL IDM ESS,SWA IDM IDM FPV FPV MLK,FPV,VGT IDM,MLK,VGT,SOL FPV FPV FPV IDM AIO,APT,IDM -

FPV IDM IDM FPL,FPV 35 -

11 -

12 -

35 06 23 NOTE:

All station locations are referenced to the midpoint of the two Salem Units' location are:

Latitude N 390 -

27' 45.3" and Longitude W 750 -

32' -

09.7".

Vents.

The coordinates of this All Game (GAM), Vegetables(FPV & FPL) and Vegetation (VGT), are management audit samples.

They are not required by the Salem & Hope Creek Stations' Tech.Specs nor listed in the Station's ODCM.

Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer since they rotate the type of crop they grow.

, :; T.',

MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS

~ m.I 13 5

12 8

9 45

46 co(i-

t.

.APPEND:IX C

..' ~

i.

DATA TABLES I

w I 'C r 'A 47

..APPENDIX C-DATA TABLES`-

Appendix C presents the analytical results of the 2004 Radio-logical Environmental Monitoring Program for the period of January 1 to December 31, 2004.

TABLE OF CONTENTS, NO.

TAL D

C:

R I. TI.

ON I

TABLE DESCRIPTION I

...PAGE

A T a I; M

ERI E NVIRON

-ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT AIR PARTICULATES C-1 C-2 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emittersin Quarterly Composites of Air Particulates............................................

2004 Concentr s

o G

s Ba E

ers A ir Partic S,:s 2004 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Air Particulates.

53 54 ATR IODINE

-. 2,. Concentr a t i

.o i

FteA C-3 200)4 Concentrations of Iodine-131 in Filtered Air i

r....

56 DIRECT RADIATION-.

THEIRMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS 2004 Direct Radiation Measurements~-QQua'rterly TLD Results C-4 58 TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT Ml 11K I, v - 1 ,.'.'

f. _11-.

C-5 2004 'Concentrations

'of Iodiiie-131 and Gdmn Emittersin'Milk.;.'

59 Wi:1.1i WATER C-s, 21(14 Concentrations of Gross-Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters,

,1i11 Trditium inn ke'1l-Wate~r"'-..;

61-49

DATA TABLES (cont'd.)

TABLE NO TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT (cont'd)

C-7 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water...

62 POTABLE WATER C-8 2004 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters, and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Waters..................

63 C-9 2004 Concentrations of Iodine 131 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable Water..........................................

64 FOOD PRODUCTS C-i0 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetables..

65 C-il 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Game.

66 FODDER CROPS C-12 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fodder Crops.

67 SOIL C-13 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Soil.....

68 AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

.111kFACE WATER C-14 20(4 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Surface Water....

69 C-15 21)0(4 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water. -

70 C-16 2(1'1) Concentrations of Tritium in Quarterly Composites of Surface W.0tu!r...................

72 Efl1BLE FISH C-17 2(1114 Concentrations of Strontium-89, Strontium-90 and Gamma rF:ii Iters in Edible Fish.

73 50

DATA TABLES (cont'd.)

TABLE NO.

TABLE DESCRIPTION PAGE BLUE CRABS C-18 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs.................

SEDIMENT C-19 2004 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment..............

SPECIAL TABLES 7 4 7 5 LLDs C-20 2004 PSE&G Maplewood Testing Services' LLDs for Gamma Spectroscopy.....................

7 6 51

Table C-1 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS*

IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 104 pCCi/m 3 +I-2 sigma STATION 8-'

Sampling Period ;--

ID Start Stop SA-AP.T-5S1, SA-APT-1 F11' SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-1 6E1 SA-APT-14G1 (C)

SA-APT-5S1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-14G1 (C)-

SA-APT-5S1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-AFT-2F,6, SA-APTf,5D1'.

SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-14G1 (C)

SA-APT-5SI SA-APT-1 F,1,--

SA-APT-2F6:

SA-APT-5D1)

SA-APT-1 6E1 SA-APT-14G1 (C) 12/29/2003 -',,to,'

'12/29120031,, to' 12/29/2003 to 12/29/2003 to 12/29/2003 to 12/29/2003 to 3/30/2004 to 3/30/2004 to 3/30/2004 to 3/30/2004 to

.3/30/2004 ;i to

.3130/2004 " to 6/28/2004 to 6/28/2004 to 6i2812004,, to

f.6128/2004'-;. to 6/28/2004' t6 6/28/2004 to 9/27/2004 to L-Q9/27/2004- !to 9/27/2004 to 9/2712004 to 9/27/2004 to

3/3012004

' 3/3012004' 3/30/2004 3/30/2004 3/30/2004 3/30/2004 6/28/2004 6/2812004 6/28/2004 6/28/2004 p.6/28/2004 9/28/2004 9/27/2004 9/27/2004 9/27/2004

", 9/27/2004 9/27/2004 19/27/2004 12/27/2004 1A 2/27/2004

'12127/2004 12/27/2004 12/27/2004 1 2/27/2004 A'

'~

r.

a Gamma Emitters --->

= Be-7 K-40

-RA-NAT X

59+/-4 j9i3

<0.7 61+/-4

"- 2

<0.2

56+/-4 9+/-3

<0.2

--60+/-4 11+/-2

<0.2 58+/-4 10+/-3

<0.2 56+/-4 10+/-2

<0.3 86+/-4 "

' 16+/-3 1+/-0.3 81+/-5

<5

<0 4 87+/-4

<6

<0.5 88+/-4

<4

<0.4 v' 89+/-4 4

4

<03 2:

86+/-4

<3

<0.2 72+/-4 12+/-3 R

<0.4 70+/-4 9+/-2

<0.2 69+/-4

,8+/-3

<0.3 69+/-4 4102 66+/-4

"`9+/-2

<0.2 70+/-4 11+/-3

<0.4 65+/-4

<3,

<0.2 I r63i4

,.<4.-.

0.4 56+/-4

<0o3 59+/-4

<4

< 0.3 56+/-3

<4

<0.2 61+/-4

<4

<0.3 68+/-23;-

LD, typical LLDs are given in Table C-20 Z

V.,

a,

I q_.

rl J~

,i 1.:

I..

.~

)

I_ ;

r, I

3 t ; i I "

AVERAGE, F

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LL (C) Control Station

-53

TABLE C-2 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 104 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 sigma

<---STATION ID ----- -------

Control MONTH SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-16E1 SA-APT-1F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-5S1 AVERAGE January February March April May 26+/-2 39+/-3 19+/-2 24+/-2 31+/-3 19+/-2 34+/-2 29+/-3 26+/-3 22+/-2 21+/-2 (1) 28+/-2 6+/-2 21+/-2 23+/-2 24+/-2 19+/-2 22+/-2 38+/-4 23+/-2 21+/-2 24+/-2 37+/-3

.16+/-2 19+/-2 28+/-2 17+/-2 34+/-2 33+/-3 27+/-2 17+/-2 18+/-2 13+/-2' 25+/-2 6+/-2 22+/-2 20+/-2 25+/-4 23+/-2 26+/-3 34+/-3 25+/-2 18+/-2 27+/-2 38+/-3 20+/-2 22+/-2 27+/-2 17+2 34+/-2 32+/-3

'27+/-3; 18+/-2 20+/-2 14+/-2 25+/-2 7+/-2 22+/-2 20+/-2f 25+/-2 19+/ 23+/-3, 38+/ 24+3 22+/-2 25+/-2 37+/-3 19+/-2 19+/-2 28+/-2 19+/-2 32+/-2 27+/-3 27+/-3 17+/-2 19+/-2 12+/-2 27+/-2 6+/ 23+/-2 19+/-2 26+/-3 21+/-2 28+/-3 37+/-2 20+/-2 21+/-2 27+/-2 37+/-3

.18+/-2 l 22+/-2 28+/-2 26+/-2 39+/-3 19+/-2

'21+/-2 28+/-3 16+/-2 31+/-2 28+/-3 24+/-2 r :.

19+/-2 18+/-2

.14+/ 24+/-2 8+/-2 ;

23+/-2 19+/-2 ~

27+/-2 22+/-2 '

... 23+/-2.

37+/-3 24+/ 22+/-2 23+/-3 33+/-2 31+/-3 26+/-3 21+/-2 19+/-2 14+/-2 27+/-2 10+/-2 21+/-2 20+/-2 25+/-2

. 24+/-2 26+/-2

38+/-2 25+2 23+/-2 26+/-2 38+/-2 18+/-3 21+/-4 28+/-3 18+/-5 33+/-2 30+/-5 26+/-2 19+/-4 19+/-3 13+/-2 26+/-3 7+/-3 22+/-2 20+/-3 25+/-2 21+/-4 24+/-4 37+/-3 24+/-4 21+/-3 June 13+/-2 25+/-2 21+/-2 34+/-3 13+/-2 23+/-2 17+/-2 30+/-2 14+/-2 26+/-2 19+/-2 32+/-3 14+/-2 26+/-2 18+/-2 34+/-3 il 11+/-2 26+/-2?

16+/-2 29+/-3 15+/-2 21+/-2 18+/-2 33+/-3 13+/-3 24+/-4 18+3 32+/-4

TABLE C-2 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 0 3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 sigma

=

STATION ID Conirol MONTH SA-APT-14G1 SA-AP-1i6E1 SA-APT-1F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1; SA-APT-5S1,,;AVERAGE JuIy-August September S

tb r

06tobber 26+/-2i 18+/-2 18+/-2 24+/-3 26+/-2 26+/-3 37i3" 25+/-2k 24i2 15+/-2_

.'19i-24;

-35i3 18+/-2r';

29+/-2 20+/-2 11+2-27+/-2 18+/-2 15+/-2 23+/-2 13+/-2

.'i.I 20+/-2 23+/-3 32+/-3 24+/-2 22+/-2 15+/-2 17+/-2 33+/-3::

20_2 28+/-2 23+2

.11+2 26+/-2, 16+/-2 19i2

24+/ 15+/-2.

24+/-2, 23+/-2 331i3 27+/-2 23+/-i2 16+/-2, 14+/-2,.

36+3.x

< Ak

.;i s 202i' 26'3' 22+/-2 10+/-2' 26+/-21 18+/-2 17+/-2 22+/-3.

12+/-2 26+2.,:

23+/-2 38i3-,

27+/-2

21+/-2<;

14+/-2 17+/-22:;

36+/-3,;

22+/-2' 24+/-3 22+/-2.'

11+/ 24+/-2 17+/-2 17+/-2 24+/-3 12+/-2 23+/-2 >

26+/-2 31+/-3.-

25+/-2 22+/-2 13+/-2 16+2 30+/-2. 2 20+/-2 27+/-3 20+/-2',-

9+/-2' 24+/-3 22+/-2 20+/ 32+/-2 17+/-2 30+/-3S 1 5+/-2.S.ior 22+/-2 :2.>--,i 22+/-2 22i13--

25+/-2 17+/-2 (2) 22+/-5 12+/-2 25+/-2 26+/-2 32+/-3 25+/-2 25+/-2 18+/-2 15+/-2 31+/-3 22+/-2 30+/-3 22+/-2 11+/-2 29+/-3 24+/-2 22+/-2 35+/-3 18+/-2 26+/-2 17+/-2 17+/-3 23+/-2 13+/-3 24+/-5 24+/-4 34+/-6 26+/-3 23+/-2 15+/-3 16+/-3

.34+/-5 20+/-3 27+/-4 22+/-3 10+/-2 25+/-5 22+/-3

-, 21+/-3 33+/-5 18+/-2 23i2 27i2 26+/-3 22+/-2ij November 20+/-2 24+/-2 22+/-2 21+/-2 21+/-2 23i2 20i2 19_2:'

31+/-3' 37i3 32i3 34+/-3.-

20+/-2' 17+/-2 2012.

18+/-2*

Js Z¢ i

k Decener

. 303 27i3

29+/-3; 263 "7.16+2:;2;'

',16+/

- -14+/-2,,_,v,,* _14+/-_2_

3.3: 23_3 24+/-3 21+/-3 22+/-3,'7Wv

-26+/-2 22+/-2 26+/-2 24+/-3 AVERAGE 24+/-14 22i14 23+/-13_.;'.-23+/-14 28+/-3 17+/-2 _,.

22+/-3 s'.-

27+/-2 24+/-13--"' ' -

28+/-4 9-15+/-2 vl22i+/-2 24+/-4

"'24+/-4

2t,;

.,*r.

"fI'

.4GRAND AVERAGE 23+/-13 (1) Equipment failure; results not included in averages. See programdeviations.

(2) Extended power outage; results not included in averages. See 'program deviations.

II TABLE C-3;:

".,1' 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 1O0 pCI/m3 cSTATION ID Control MONTH SA-AIO-14G1 SA-AIO-16E1 SA-AIO-1F1 SA-AIO-2F6 SA-AIO-5D1 SA-AIO-5S1 January February March

-April

'May June

<1.2

< <3.2

<8.2

,-<3;3

<2.3

<3.5

' <2 4<4.4

<2.7

<3.6

<1.8 (1)

<3.4

<3

'<1.7

<3.2

<2.2

<3.2

<5.8

<11

<2,.1

<2.4

<1.8

'<2.2

<3.9

<3

<3.6

<5.6

<1.8

<1.4

<1.6

<3.8

<2.7

<5.4

<4.3

<1.7

<7.4

<1.8

<7.1

<2.9

<1.6

<7.7

<6.9

<4.1 c<4

<3.2

<2.2

<6.8

<3.6.

<3.7 -

<2.5

<3.2

<3

<3.7

<2.6

<3.1

<3

<1.6

<5.2

-<1.7

<1.3

<3.9

<1.8

<2.3

,*4

<2.1

<5

<2.9 C1.1

<4.1

<2.4

<5.4

-<3.6

<1.6

<4.3

<2.7

'<4.3

<3.4

<3.7

-<4.1

<6

<2.6

<4.8 sc<1.3

<3

<3.3

<2.6

<3.9 C<1.7

<2.3

<2.6

<2.1

, <4.4

<2.2

<3.2

<1.4

<2.2

<1.6

<2.7

<3.3

<3.6

<4.2

<3.2

<1.8

<3.6

<3.5

<2.1

<2.3

<3.2

<3.1

<2.1

<2.4

<6.

<4.2

<3.1

<8.3

<4.5

<3.3

<3.1

<2.5

<2.3

<2.2

<4.1

<3.1

<2.7

<2.6

<3.3

<4.4

<2.1

<5.2

<7.1

<2.6

<3.3

<2.7

<3.1

<3.9

<1.8

<3.3

<2.7

<3.7

<2.5

<1.7

<2.2

<2.1

<1.8

<3.9

<2.3

<4.6

<3.6

<3.8

TABLE C-3 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results In Units of 10-3 pCI/m 3 I MIAUP N

a zI AI IUN IUj r

1

.

i -,

o I '

I "

1" I I

, I-MONTH17

,- Control --

'-"SA4AI0-14G1 SA-AI0-16E1 SA-AI0-1F1' ',SA-AI

_~.

,4 FI i ;,

I

".,-5 7-

io

.1 10-2F6

.: SA AI0-5D31 '-. SA-AI0-5S1."

July I-, !,.

I,

I t '

4

.I I August

<3.4

<3.6

<6.5

!<4.9,-

<5.1

<2

<5.8

'<3.8 Se1 p e

b e' r

'.7 *^Sdottmbeir

-~

t~

5':,

' t I,I I

In

<5.7

<5.2

<4.4

<3.1

<1.8

-<5

<2.5

<5.1

<3.1 is<2.4

<7.2

<3.7

-.4 <4.

s <2.1 ';

<1.4

<3.3

^'<2.4.,;

<3.4""'

<3

<1.8

<4.1

<2.9

-<2.8

<3.8

<2

<3

<4.1 t-i1 ;^<5.3 zw*-

<2.2'

<3.1 2.5

<2.9

<4.7

<1.5,

<2.8

<_4.1

<5.6

<4.4

<4.8

<2.8

<4.1

<."N 2.7'

<3.7-

<3.5

<5.6

<4.1

<3.2

<10.

<4.3

<2.7

<2.3

<3.9

.<1.9

... <2

<2.2

<4.3

<3.6 r.

.4

--j

'79.. >.'Octbber li !2 ;

_ifs.

9._

: iNovember. ~w.

<11'

.~-,"

I

' <2 !

<3.3

<2.3

<3.5 ti.

<4.8

<2.4

<3.7' e

<4.8

<3.2

<8.4

<4.6

<1.6

<3.4

<3.8.

,<916,

.e o'

V.i

<3.5

<4:3

<5.1,

..;<4'.9

<4

<4.4

<1.9

<3.7

<1.7 2.2

,c36

<4.1

<5.2 (2)

<5.7

<4.3

-<4.1

<1.9

<4.1

<2.1

<.A 5.5 F<1 6,;)L-..iL.,-

<3.3

<1.3

.4

',i,:<4.4 L -;: ! <4

<5

<4.3

<1.8

<4.7

^ <5.7

<2 3

<5.4 4<3.1 L

.<4 t

4 1 "

1-:.

i L.

I" 4

.r

40t'.

C- )

'l

.- t.

:Z' ".;

z.I It I

I December T "t<34

<4

<7.8

,;,<1.4, R*.Ee<

,l

<4.1b

<4 9, 2

<7.<1.9 4

14.

I

..i 1,-

1

-131 results are corrected for decay to sample stop date.

(1) Equipment failure: see program deviations. j (2) Extended power outage; see program deviations.

, : a 1,

i II I. I II I

t

j. r

.. jI

-- 'i

"

-",2 ;.,

TABLE C-4 2004 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS Results in mrad/standard month* +1-2 sigma STATION ID SA-IDM-2S2 SA-IDM-5S1 SA-IDM-6S2 SA-IDM-7S1 SA-IDM-1 0S1 SA-IDM-1 1S1 SA-IDM-4D2 SA-IDM-5D1 SA-IDM-10D1 SA-IDM-14D1 SA-IDM-15D1 SA-IDM-2E1 SA-IDM-3E1 SA-IDM-9F1 SA-IDM-1 1 E2 SA-IDM-12E1 SA-IDM-1 3E1 SA-IDM-1 6E1 SA-IDM-1 F1 SA-IDM-2F2 SA-IDM-2F5 SA-IDM-2F6 SA-IDM-3F2 SA-IDM-3F3 SA-IDM-4F2 SA-IDM-5F1 SA-IDM-6F1 SA-IDM-7F2 SA-IDM-10F2 SA-IDM-11F1 SA-IDM-12F1 SA-IDM-13F2 SA-IDM-13F3 SA-IDM-1 3F4 SA-IDM-14F2 SA-IDM-15F3 SA-IDM-16F2 SA-IDM-1G3 (C)

SA-IDM-3G1 (C)

SA-IDM-1 OG1 (C)

SA-IDM-1 6G1 (C)

SA-IDM-3H1 (C)

SA-IDM-1S1 SA-IDM-3S1 SA-IDM-2S4 SA-IDM-4S1 SA-IDM-15S1 SA-IDM-16S1 SA-IDM-14G1 (C)

AVERAGE JAN to MAR.

6.1+/-0.8 3.3+/-0.5 4.7+/-0.5 5.0+/-0.7 3.2+/-0.4 2.9+/-0.5 3.8+/-0.7 3.6+/-0.4 3.8+/-0.6 3.5+/-0.4 4.3+/-0.8 3.5iO.5 2.9+/-0.6 4.1 +/-0.7 4.0+/-0.8 3.9+/-0.6 3.2+/-0.6 3.8+/-0.6 3.7iO.5 3.2+/-0.5 3.9+/-0.4 3.6+/-0.7 3.3iO.6 3.2+/-0.4 3.1i+/-.5 3.5+/-0.9 2.9+/-0.5 2.7+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.6 4.1+/-0.6 3.8+/-0.6 3.9+/-0.5-3.8iO.5 3.8+/-0.4 4.3+/-0.5 4.4+/-0.6 3.6+/-0.4 4.7+/-0.7-4.0+/-0.4 3.8+/-0.4 3.6+/-0.6 3.3+/-0.4 4.2+/-0.5 3.1+/-0.4 3.4iO.7.

3.5+/-0.7 3.3+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.4 4.0+/-0.8 3.7+/-1.2 APR to JUN 6.9+/-i1.1 3.9+/-0.5 5.0+/-0.7 6.2+/-0.7 3.9+/-0.6 3.7+/-0.5 4.4+/-0.7 4.0+/-0.5 4.5+/-0.6 4.2+/-0.6 4.7+/-0.5 4.1+/-0.6 3.4+/-0.4 4.7+/-0.5 4.7+/-0.5 4.9+/-0.7 3.8+/-0.6 4.3+/-0.6 4.4+/-0.5 4.1+/-0.6 4.6+/-0.8 4.2+/-0.5 4.1+/-0.9 3.8+/-0.5.

3.6+/-0.6 4.1+/-0.6 3.7+/-0.6 3.1+/-0.4 4.9+/-0.6 5.0+/-0.7 4.4+/-0.5 4.4+/-0.6 4.5+/-0.7 4.2+/-0.4 5.0+/-0.7 5.1+/-0.6 4.1+/-0.5 5.6+/-0.8 4.5+/-0.6 4.5+/-0.6 4.5+/-0.6 4.1+/-0.5 4.5+/-0.5 3.5+/-0.5 3.8+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.5 3.7+/-0.5 4.6+/-0.8 4.6+/-0.7 4.4+/-1.3 JUL OCT to SEP (1) 3.2+/-0.5 4.9+/-0.4 5.4+/-0.5 3.5+/-0.3 3.4+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.5 3.8+/-0.4 4.3+/-0.5 3.9+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.8 3.9+/-0.4 3.3+/-0.5 4.6+/-0.7 4.4+/-0.4 4.5+/-0.4 3.5+/-0.4 4.1+/-0.6 4.1+/-0.6 3.6+/-0.3 4.2+/-0.5 3.9+/-0.4 3.6+/-0.4 3.6+/-0.5 3.6+/-0.4 3.8+/-0.4 3.1+/-0.5 2.7+/-0.5 4.4+/-0.4 4.4+/-0.7 4.3+/-0.6 "

4.2+/-0.4 4.1+/-0.5 4.0+/-0.4 4.4+/-0.5 4.6+/-0.6 3.7+/-0.4

'5.0+/-0.5 4.1+/-0.4 4.3+/-0.5 3.9+/-0.5 3.5+/-0.4 4.4+/-0.5 3.3+/-0.4 3.4+/-0.4 4.0+/-0.3 3.5+/-0.5 4.4+/-0.5 4.4+/-0.4 4+/-1.4 to DEC 4.7+/-0.3 3.4+/-0.4 4.9+/-0.4 5.4+/-0.4 3.2+/-0.4 2.9+/-0.3 4.4+/-0.5 3.9+/-0.3 4.4+/-0.3 4.0+/-0.4, 4.6+/-0.5 4.2+/-0.5 3.5+/-0.3 4.7+/-0.5 4.6+/-0.6 4.5+/-0.4 3.6+/-0.3 4.3+/-0.4 4.4+/-0.3 4.0+/-0.3 4.3+/-0.3 4.1i0.6 3.8+/-0.4 3.8+/-0.3 3.6+/-0.3:e 3.9+/-0.4 3.3+/-0.3 2.9+/-0.4 4.3+/-0.3 4.6+/-0.4 4.2+/-0.4' V4.3+/-0.3' 4.3+/-0.4 4.2+/-0.3 4.5+/-0.4 5.0+/-0.4 4.0+/-0.4 5.2+/-0.6 4.4+/-0.4 4.4iO.4 4.2+/-0.4 3.5+/-0.4 4.0+/-0.4 3.4+/-0.3 35+/-0.4

'4.0+/-0.3 3.7+/-0.4 4.4+/-0.4 4.6+/-O.4 4.1+/-1.1 QTR ELEMENTS AVG 6.2+/-2.3 3.50.7 4.9+/-0.2 5.5+/-1.0 3.5+/-0.7 3.3+/-0.8 4.2+/-0.6 3.8+/-0.3 4.3+/-0.7 3.9+/-0.6 4.4+/-0.6 3.9+/-0.5 3.3+/-0.5 4.5+/-0.6 4.4+/-0.7 4.5+/-0.8 3.5+/-0.5 4.1+/-0.4 4.2+/-0.7 3.7+/-0.8 4.2+/-0.6 3.9+/-0.6 3.7+/-0.6 3.6+/-0.6 3.5i0.5 3.8+/-0.5 3.3+/-0.7 2.8+/-0.4 4'4iO.7 4.5+/-0.7 4.2+/-0.5 4.2+/-0.4 4.2+/-0.6 4.0+/-0.3 4.5+/-0.6 4.8+/-0.7 3.8+/-0.5 5.1i+/-0.8 4.3+/-0.4 4.3+/-0.6 4.0+/-0.8 3.6+/-0.6 4.3+/-0.S 3.3+/-0.4 3.5+/-0.4 3.9+/-0.5 3.5+/-0.4 4.3+/-0.5 4.4+/-0.6 GRAND AVG 4.1i1.3

The standard month = 30.4 days.

- Quarterly Element TLD results by DESEL.

(C) Control Station 58

TABLE C-5; *,

2004 CONCENTRATIONS OFjIODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS** IN MILK, Results in Units of pCi/L,+/- 2 sigma.

SAMPLING PERIOD t

IVGAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID---- -START'---

-SkTOP--

11311

-40 SA-MLK-2G3 1i4l2004 1/5I2004,'

<0.3

<61,360

+/-70'"

f SA-MLK-13E3

,115/2004 1/612004,

-<0.2, 1420:+/-70 SA-MLK-14F4

-1/5/2004 116/2004,

<0.2; 1280 +/-80 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1/412004 1/5/2004

<0 1 i310+/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 211 2//2004 2 00,

<0o

'I 3b' i

SA-MLK-13E3

-2/212004 2/312004.>

<0.1,

1330'i70 SA-MLK-14F4 2/212004 2/3/2004,

<0.1' 1340'+/-80' SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 2/1/2004 2/212004

<0.2 1270'+/-50 SA-MLK-2G3

,3/8/2004 3/9/2004,

<0.2 1380 +/-80 SA-MLK-13E3 3/7/2004 3/8/2004';,,

<0.1 1 290'+/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 3/7/2004 3/8/2004;

<0.2, 1320 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 3/8/2004 3/9/2004-

<0.3 1260+/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 4/5/2004 4/6/2004,

<0.2

[

1310'+/-70 SA-MLK-13E3 4/4/2004 4/5/2004',..'

<0.2 1310'+80 SA-MLK-14F4 4/5/2004 4/6/2004

<0.3

.1320+/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 4/5/2004 4/6/2004

<0.3 3 1350 +/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 4/18/2004 4/19/2004'.-

<0.3,,:

1300'+/-70 SA-MLK-13E3 4/18/2004 4/19/2004

<0.3 1330 +/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 4/191/2004 4/20/2004.

<0.2 ' ' '

1370 +/-o7;0 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 4/19/2004 4/20/2004

<0.2 1350+/-+80 SA-MLK-2G3 5/2/2004 5/3/2004

<0.3 '"1' "I '

','I 330 +/-70 SA-MLK-1 3E3 51212004 5/3/2004-

<0.1>

1300o'+/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 "5/2/2004 5/3/2004

<0.3,

.r

'1350+/-70.

SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

'5/3/2004 5/412004

<0.2

'i330i70 SA-MLK-2G3 5/17/2004 5/18/2004'"

0 1'260 70 SA-MLK-13E3 5/1i6/2004 5/17/2004

' '0.2 4 -1290 i70 SA-MLK-14F4 5/17/2004 5/18/2004

<0.2 1380 i70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 5/17/2004 5/18/2004-

<0A1

'380 i70 SA-MLK-2G3

6/6/2004 6M7/2004

<'0.2

-1230 +/-70 SA-MLK-13E3 6/6/2004 6/7/2004k

<0.2

"' 310 t70e SA-MLK-14F4 6/6/2004 617/2004-

<03 -

'1290 i'70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 0 6/6/2004 617/2004 '

<0 2 1330 '70 SA-MLK-2G3

'620/2004 6/2 1/2004

< c0.'2

'i300 i70 SA-MLK-13E3 6/20/2004 6/21/2004>

<0.2?

z i400o-t SA-MLK-14F4

- 6/2 O/

2 6 0 4 6/21/2004'

<0.2 2 '

"250"i70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

'6/20/2004 6121/2004"'

-03"

1410'+/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 7/5/2004 7/6/2004

<0.2 1320 +/-70 SA-MLK-13E3

"'7/5/2004 7/6/2004

'<0.2-1240 +/-70 SA-MLK-14F4 7/5/2004

'7/6/2004

'<0.2.

1270 +/-70 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 7/5/2004

7/6/20040

<0 1350++/-70 SA-MLK-2G3 7/18/2004 7/1912004

<0.2 1270 i70-SA-MLK-13E3

--; r 1820-71104.g;i~,<0.3

--; j1 ot'ei1280 +/-70 fr,,d/ian.

-l¢: '

SA-MLK-14F4;-

t-m '7/18/2004.

f,7/19/2004,-' t..<0.2 1290 +/-80 i,, n SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 7/18/2004 7/19/2004 i

<0.3 1320 +/-70 p-"

i I

I

'59

TABLE C-5 '

2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS`* IN MILK Results in Units of pCi/L +1-2 sigma<-

SAMPLING PERIOD

, GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID START STOP 1-131 I K SA-MLK-2G3 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2G3 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C)

SA-MLK-2G3 SA-MLK-13E3 SA-MLK-14F4 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 811/2004 8/1/2004 8/1/2004 8/1/2004 8/15/2004 8/i52004 8/15/2004 8/15/2004 9/6/2004 916/2004 9/6/04 9/6/2004 9/20/2004 9/2/2004 9/19/2004 9/20/2004 10/3/2004 10/4/2004 1/0/32004 10/3/2004 10/17/2004 10/18/2004 10/18/2004 10/17/2004 118/2004 11/71/2004 11/7/2004 11/7/2004 11/21/2004 11/21/2004 11/21/2004 11/21/2004 12/13/2004 12/14/2004 12/14/2004 12/13/2004 8/212004 8/2/2004 8/2/2004 8/2/2004 8/16/2004 8/16/2004 8/16/2004 8/16/2004 9/7/2004 9/7/2004 9/7/2004 9/7/2004 9/21/2004 9/21/2004 9/20/2004 9/21/2004 10/4/2004.

10/5/2004 10/4/2004 10/4/2004 10/18/2004 10/19/2004 10/19/2004 10/18/2004 11/8/2004 11/8/2004 11/8/2004 11/8/2004 11/22/2004 11/22/2004 11/22/2004 11/22/2004.

12/14/2004 12/15/2004

.12/15/2004 12/14/2004

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3..

<0.4

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.1

<0.2

<0.2.

<0.3

<0.2.

<0.2

<0.2 e

1310 +/-70 1330 +/-70 1290 +/-70 1310 +70 1270 +/-70 1360 +/-70 1310 +/-70 1300 +/-70 1380 +/-70 1360 +/-70 1240 +/-70 1300 +/-80 1310 +/-70 1390 +/-70 1270 +/-70 1360 +/-70 1270 +/-70 1320 +/-70 1270 +/-70 1380 +/-80 1320 +/-70 1360 +70 1320 +/-70 1240 +/-70

,1360 +/-80 1320 +/-70

'.1310+/-70 1330 +/-70

,1330 +/-70 13:10 +/-70 1 320 +/-70

<0.2

<0.2,.

<0.2

<0.2;

<0.3;

<0.2

.1290 +/-70

-1380 +/-80

-.1350 +/-80 i 1240 +/-110 11270 +/-70 AVERAGE 1310 +/-1330 lodine-131 results are corrected for decay to midpoint of collection period & analyzed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/Lr

- All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20 Monthly sample collected during Jan., Feb., March and Dec., when animals are not on pE (C) Control Station 60

!,... j si tp.,...

.. 5, t..

.. TABLE C~-6 r 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS, AND TRITIUM iN WELL \\NATs ER _

Results in Units of pCiiL +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING__-

_GROSS GROSS --'...

TI U M 0

t:-

ITIUM STATION ID SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E11 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3El SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3El SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 DATE ALPHA-.- -

BETA TRI 1/26/2004 2/23/2004 3/30/2004 4/26/2004 5/24/2004 6/28/2004 7/26/2004 8/31/2004 9/27/2004 10/25/2004 11/30/2004 12/27/2004 2.9+/-2 2.7+/-1.8

<2.6

<1

-1.7

<1.7

<2.4

<2.1

<1.1 2.2+/-1.4

<1.9 3+/-1.3 11+/-1.2 9.9+/-1.3 9.9+/-1.2 9.8+/-0.8 8.6+/-0.8 9.4+/-0.8 9.9+/-0.9 9.9+/-1.2 0+/-0.9 10+/-0.9 10+/-0.9 11+/-0.9

<140

<1 50

<140

<1 50

<140

.<1 50

<1 50

.. ~ I Ii...

AVERAGE 10+/-1 I

J i 61

`

4.

61

- '.I

TABLE C-7 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN WELL WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma

. SAMPLING STATION ID DATE.

SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3El SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3, E SA-WWA-3E1 SA-WWA-3E1 1/26/2004 2/23/2004 3/30/2004 4/26/2004 512412004 6/28/2004 7/26/2004 8/3112004 9/2712004 10/25/2004 11/30/2004 12/27/2004

<----GAMMA EMITTERS ---- >

K-40 RA-NAT

<24 120+/-5

<19 75+/-4

<16 43+/-4 48+/-18 71+/-4

<17 111+/-5 78+/-18 109+/-4 65+/-20 139+/-4

<28 95+/-4

<50 112+/-6

<9 104+/-4

<17 98+/-5

<17 129+/-6 AVERAGE 101+/-53

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20.

62

TABLE C-B '8-2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS 'ALPHA AND 'GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER Results in Units of pCiiL+-7I-2 sigma-'

SAMPLING GROSS GROSS.

TYPE

- PERIOD;.

7r-E`',tALPHA BETA TRITIUM RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED

-,1/1 -31/.2004 - '-

1/1-31/2004 211-2912004 2/1 -29/2004 3/1-31/2004 3/1-31/2004 I I l-,

p

-<1.1

-""I'-3.20.8-

<1.3 1.7+/-0.9 1.3 1 1.4+/-0.9

<1.5 1.5+/-0.8

- <1.4 2.9-+0.8 3.1+/-0.9 2.3+/-0.8 t :

2.8+/-0.8 2.9+/-0.8

<I40

<140 N

I

,<14, -.

<140

.,<140

.-A, , -

l r

- m 1 4

. I - i -,

I J, I 11, -I I I.:! -

z I

- I RAW TREATED 4/1-30/2004 4/1-30/2004 3.2+/-0.5 2.6+/-0.5 RAW TREATED 5/1-31/2004 5/1-31/2004 1.7+/-0.7

'<l ti 3.1+/-0.6 2.9+/-0.6

-<150

- 6

'<140 RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED 6/1-30/2004 6/1-30/2004 7/1 -31/2004 7/1-31/2004 8/1 -31/2004 8/1-31/2004 911-30/2004 9/1-30/2004 9/1-30/2004 10/1-31/2004 10/1 -31/2004 11/1 '30/2004 11/1-3012004 12/1 -31/2004 12/1-31/2004

<0.8

<1>'

<0.9

<1 :1 1.1+0.8

<1.1

,0.5

<0.5 1:7+/-0.7

<0.8 1+/-0.6

<0.8 1.5+/-0.6 1.2+/-0.7 1.2+/-0.8 2.8+/-0.6 2.3+/-0.6 3.3+/-0.6 2.6+/-0.6 2.3+/-0.8 3.4+/-0.8 3.1+/-0.6

-2.7+/-0.5 4.5+/-0.6 3.4+0.6 4.1+0.6 3.6+/-0.6 3.3+/-0.6 3.6+/-0.6 1i 50 -

-<140,

<140

.170+90-,

<140

~<1 50

<1 50

,<150

<150

.<150

-r

<150 AVERAGE RAW TREATED I

^: 3.2+/-1.2 2.9+/-0.9 3.1+/-1.1 I

--l-T

11. 11-; :

,,

-. Z

v -.. :

GRAND AVERAGE I

I I

,-¶ 1,

4 ~-

, I. "

R.,

-- "!-,~,

, ~ 7 4" r.

I I I I~

63 j

TABLE C-9e, 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31 *.AND GAMMA EMITTERS**

IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER.

Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma, TYPE RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED RAW TREATED AVERAGES RAW TREATED SAMPLING PERIOD 1/1-31/2004 1/1-31/2004 2/1-29/2004 211-2912004 3/1-31/2004 3/1-31/2004 4/1-31/2004 4/1-30/2004 511-31/2004 5/1-31/2004 6/1-30/2004 6/1-30/2004 7/1-31/2004 7/1-31/2004 8/1-31/2004 8/1-31i2004 9/1-30/2004 9/1-30/2004 10/1-31/2004 1011-31/2004 11i1-30/2004 11/1-30/2004 12/1-31/2004 12/1-31/2004 1-131

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.1

'o.'1

<0.2

<0.4

<0.2

<0.3

<0.1

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<0.3

<0.2

<----GAMMA EMITTERS !__,

K-.40 RA-NAT

<14

<2

<42

<3

<18

<2 45+/-10 15+/-2

<13

<2 44+/-10

<4

<12

<2

<36

<2

<15

<2 70+/-15

<2

<16

<2

<18

.28+/-2

<15

<2,

<10

<3

<11

<3 42+/-12 13+/-2

<16

<2

<41

<2

<45

<2 78+/-14

<2

<9

<2 46+/-10

<2

<40

<2

<15

<2 GRAND AVERAGE

Iodine-131 analyzed to a sensitivity of 1.0 pCi/L.

- All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20.

64

TABLE C-10 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN VEGETABLES Results in Units of pCi/kg,(Wet) +/,2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE SAMPLE TYPE

s.

K-40 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 5/4/2004 Asparagus

.,1880+110 AVERAGE 1880+/-110 SA-FPL-2F1=0 7/14/2004 Cabbage 1660+/-110 SA-FPL-3H5 (C)

'11412004

'Cabbage' t'

2400+/-130

..if-!,-

SA-FPL-3G2 (C) 7/14/2004 Cabbage 2220+/-140 AVERAGE 2090+/-770 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 7/15/2004 Corn 2540+/-110 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 7/14/2004 Corn 2370+/-120 SA-FPV-2F4 7/15/2004 Corm 2360+/-110 SA-FPV-3G2 (C) 7/14/2004 Corn 2280+/-110 SA-FPV-14F3 7/2212004 Corn 2270+/-100 SA-FPV-9G2 (C) 7/22/2004 Corn 2560+/-120 SA-FPV-2F10 7/14/2004 Corn 2590+/-110 AVERAGE 2420+/-270 SA-FPV-14G2 (C) 7/22/2004 Peppers 1620+/-110 SA-FPV-3G2 (C) 7/14/2004 Peppers 1120+/-80 SA-FPV-2F4 7/15/2004 Peppers 2690+/-130 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 7/15/2004 Peppers 1590+/-100 SA-FPV-2F10 7/14/2004 Peppers 1360+/-90 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 7/14/2004 Peppers 1250+/-90 AVERAGE 1610+/-1130 SA-FPV-2F4 7/15/2004 Tomatoes 1980+/-85 SA-FPV-3H5 (C) 7/1412004 Tomatoes 2360+/-100 SA-FPV-2G2 (C) 7/15/2004 Tomatoes 1580+/-80 SA-FPV-9G1 (C) 7/22/2004 Tomatoes 2060+/-90 SA-FPV-3G2 (C) 7/14/2004 Tomatoes 1740+/-85 SA-FPV-2F10 7/1412004 Tomatoes 2000+/-90 AVERAGE 1950+/-540 GRAND AVERAGE 2020+/-920 r2J

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20 (C) Control Station c'zJ_

65

TABLE C-11 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN GAME Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma

-SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE SAMPLETYPE K-40 SA-GAM-3E1 1/6/2004 Muskrat 2710+/-210

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20 66

TABLE.C-12i, 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN FODDER CROPS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +1-2 sigma SAMPLING ---

'GAMMA' EMITTERS --

STATION ID DATE SAMPLE TYPE

- --Be-7 K-40 K-40 Iw - 1.,-,"Ie, SA-VGT-3G1 (C).

SA-VGT-1 4F4 10/4/2004 1011912004 Silag.

80+/-20 Silage 260+/-60 170+/-250

990+/-80 2700+/-140 AVERAGE SA-VGT-3G1 (C)

SA-VGT-14F4 11/15/2004,.

11/15/2004 Soybeans Soybeans

'_' I -

, j

,:- i, - _-, <34

:28 t;-"ZJ I

1850+/-2420 15300+/-i270 15100+260..

AVERAGE 15200+/-300

_'i ~

_ :Z

~

i "at I ~'

, a -:,

.-, I :

i~. t o

.;1

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20.

(C) Location 3G1 is the Control Station.

67

TABLE C-13 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SOIL Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING' STATION ID -

DATE K-40

,,Cs-137

-. Ra-NAT,..., Th-232.,

I I1 :

1.

SA-SOL-6S2 SA-SOL-2F9 SA-SOL-5F1 SA-SOL-1 ODI SA-SOL-16E1 SA-SOL-13E3 SA-SOL-14F4 SA-SOL-2G3(C)

SA-SOL-3G1 (C) 5/1 1/2004' 5/111/2004 5/11/2004 5/11/2004 5/11/2004 5/112/2004 5/12/2004 5/i 1/2004 5/11/2004 11900+/-390' 6620+/-280 4430+/-230 9690+/-175 13600+/-411 12700+/-376 12700+/-358 7260+/-292 9060+/-329

<33'-

345+/-17 288+/-16 340+/-10 193+/-18 160+/-18

<33 111+/-14k 156+/-15

'475+/-21 '

469+/-19 V

494+/-20 848+/-12 915+/-24 728+/-25 523+/-23 640+/-22 813+/-26

800+/-50 507+/-52 570+/-46 1070+/-30 1080+/-72 847+/-54 715+/-67 790+/-56 1000+/-52 GRAND AVERAGE 9770+/-6390 180+/-240 660+/-350 820+/-410

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20 (C) Control Station 68

TABLE C-14 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma

'------------------------------------------------ STATION ID - ----------

SAMPLING SA-SWA-1A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1 AVERAGE DATE (Control)

January February r March April May June July August 7 -Z 2 -

September,-.,

October M4 ow 32+/-6 79+/-8,.

--- 100i9 '

56+/-7 35+/-6 66+/-7 72+/-8

,8+

-45+/ 44+/-5 68+/-8 40+/-5 55+43 15+/-5 49+/-7t.

88i9 43+/-6 18+/-5 54+/-7 58+/-7 13i4':

, 31 i5 21+/-4 48i7 17+/-4 38+46,.

<7

,33+6, 69+/-8.

36+/-6 18+/-5 41+/-6 49i7'.

', 14i4,.

. 17+/-5 6+/-3 26+/-6 10+/-4

<7 22+/-5 42+6 17+/-5 12+/-5 31+/-6 43+/-6 Ic 7+/-f4, -.,

14+/-4: ,

7+/-3 14+/-5

<5 31+/-6 93+/-9 137+/-11 100+/-9 52+/-7;.

91+/-9 95+/-9

-.46+6 46+/-6

.44+/-5 75+/-8 48+/-5 18+/-26 55+/-60

' 87i71 50+62 27+/-33 57+/-46 63+/-41 j22+/-31

.31+/-31

'24i38 46+/-52 24+/-38

i.

,f;,

I C..

'p November December?,.

AVERAGE. '

.1'1 N

i,,

J

. I

i,

.~t r, I

('11 s:.

i w;

s

AN 25+38.

.,s 4

'...- r'9 ' '.

177+/-27' 71+/-64 G

N iA GRAND AVERAGE ::

i,

C

.,......o

-,, - 059

TABLE C-1 5 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma SAMPLING GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE K-40 SA-SWA-I F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-i lAl SA-SWA-12C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-i F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-I1 Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-i6Fl SA-SWA-I F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-1 1AI SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 1/8/2004 1/8/2004 1/8/2004 1/8/2004 1/8/2004 2/17/2004 2/17/2004 2/17/2004 2/17/2004 2/17/2004 3/14/2004 3/4/2004 31412004 3/4/2004 3/4/2004

3/4/2004

- 44+/-13

- 52+/-13 61+/-17 61+/-18 41+/-17 53+/-12 71+/-22 69+/-18 88+/-20 70+/-15

<34 164+/-20 92+/-18 74+/-20

<44 SA-SWA-I F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-I 1A1 SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16FI SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-i lAl SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 SA-SWA-I F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-IlAl SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-i 1 Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 4/9/2004 4/9/2004 419/2004 4/9/2004 4/9/2004 5/3/2004 5/3/2004 5/3/2004 5/3/2004 5/3/2004 6/9/2004 6/9/2004 6/9/2004 6/9/2004 6/9/2004 7/9/2004 7/9/2004 7/9/2004 7/9/2004 7/9/2004 47+11 124+/-19 82+/-19.

1 00+/-1 7 60+/-17 73+/-14 76+/-16 63+14 66+1 6 55+/-15 130+/-19 143+/-19 76+/-19 96+/-1,7 77+/-16 78+/-17 154+/-26 99+/-20 66+/-18 51+/-15 70

TABLE C-15 :

I 4

I I

o 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN SURFACE-WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +I-2 sigma SAMPLING

- GAMMA EMITTERS STATION ID DATE K-40 1-SA-SWA-l F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-i 1 Al SA-SWA-12C1 (C)

SA-SWA-1 6F1 SA-SWA-i F2 SA-SWA-7El 1-SA-SWA-1 1Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16Fl SA-SWA-1 F2 -

SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-1 lAl SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16Fl SA-SWA-i F2 SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-i 1 Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-i 6F1 SA-SWA-1 F2.

SA-SWA-7E1 SA-SWA-1 1 Al SA-SWA-1 2C1 (C)

SA-SWA-16FI 8/7/2004 8/7/2004 8/7/2004 8/7/2004 8/7/2004 36+/-13 77+/-15 63+/-15 A n e A

i IU 4Y1+/-J 58+/-16 9/8/2004 9/8/2004 9/8/2004 9/8/2004 9/8/2004 10/7/2004 10/7/2004 10/7/2004 10/712004 10/7/2004 11/7/2004 11/7/2004 1ii7/2004 11/7/2004 1/7/2004 V

, 4 -

47+/-14 80+/ 50+/-18 95+/-17 54+/-14

33+/-10

97+/-1 6 71+/-19 56+/-17 54+/-13 54+/-15, 58+/-16 66+/-18 35+/-12 69+/-15 I

1%

A i

i I T 9

I I t II a-Z-r C. j I

. It.

T r -.

I 1 12/6/2004.!

1216/2004-'Y 12/6/2004.: I 12/6/2004 12/6/2004 46+/ ? 4 79+/- 1 6 66+18 58+/-15 96+/-16 C

i 3~

1 71+56 -

I I

.f v'..

i I -

I

.2, I

LI -.-

-,i I -.

AVERAGE

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20 C) Control Station.,

5

~F r

,71

TABLE C-16 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +1-2 sigma

<---------------------------------------------------- STATION ID ------------------------------------------ >

SAMPLING SA-SWA-11A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1F2 SA-SWA-7E1

AVERAGE, PERIOD (Control)

-j January -I February March April May June July August September October November December

<150

<140

<150

<140 220+/-91 260+/-90

<150

1.

1 I

-<150

<150

<140

<150

<140

<150

<150 e <160

<150

<1 50

.<150

<150

<140

<150

<140

<150

<140

<150

<140

<150

<140

<150

<140

<150

<140

<150 240+/-90

<140

<150

<140

<150 220+/-100

<150

TABLE C-.17,' :,

2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS** IN EDIBLE FISH Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +I-2 sigma -

GAMMA EMITTERS SAMPLING STATION ID.....,

PERIOD >M (FLESH)!,

_..k SA-ESF-7E1 SA-ESF-11 A1 SA-ESF-12C1 (C)* -

.AV, I R.G AVERAGE 6/3-9/2004 613-9/2004 6/3-9/2004.

.t_

~p t.I Ij 3720+/-190 3770+/-200 3370+/-190 3620+/-440

,_ -)

C !f V ;

S.;

e_,,,,

:

i ., _',

. f " : -_,.

, 1

SA-ESF-7E1 SA-ESF-11A1 SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 9/13-16/2004 9113-16/2004 9113-16/2004 3910+/-210 3450+/-190.

3620+/-190 AVERAGE 3660+/-470 GRAND AVERAGE 3640+/-410

- All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are given in Table C-20 (C) Control Station 73

TABLE C-18.

2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS* IN CRABS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma -

STATION ID:

SA-ECH-11A1l SA-ECH-12C1 (C)

AVERAGE SA-ECH-1 Al SA-ECH-12C1 (C)

AVERAGE SAMPLING PERIOD 7/2/2004 7/2/2004 9/13-17/2004 9/13-17/2004 GAMMA EMITTER (FLESH)

K-40 2660+/-170 2680+/-180 2670+/-30 2370+/-150 2180+/-160 2280+/-270 GRAND AVERAGE 2470+/-480

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; Typical LLDs are given in Table C-20.

(C) Control Station 74

TABLE C-19 2004 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA"EMITTERS* IN SEDIMENT Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/-2 sigma SAATMIONI IDATPU N SAINID DATE Be-7 K-40 Co Cs-137 RA NAT Th-232 SA-ESS-6S2 5/11/2004 SA-ESS-1 1A1 5/5/2004 SA-ESS-1 5A1 5/5/2004 SA-ESS-1 6A1 5/5/2004 SA-ESS-1 2C1 (C) ' 5/5/2004 SA-ESS-7E1

- 5/5/2004`

SA-ESS-16F1 5/5/2004 145+/-45

<92

<96 111+/-28

<74

<104

<84 AVERAGE

- 1.

2090+/-1311-;

<5.4 3880+/-1836

><13 3900+/-183k

<9 5730+/-123 '

<21 16000+/-440

<5.2 14700+/-209

<13 19000+/-506

<30 9300+/-13900 2440+/-129 -

<2.4 3680+/-188

<13 7730+/-290

<29 7210+/-140

<21 14500+/-4066

<9.9 13000+/-360

<10-16400+/-421

<17

'3.2

<8.1

.. <5

"<6.7

'<11 1336.3

<10 106+/-8.5 107+/-18 297+/-13 386+/-30 365+/-12 425+/-43;-

385+/

589+/-20 584+/-22 1010+57-673+12

^ 957+29 548+/-32 1190+/-196 420+/-390 670+/-790; SA-ESS-6S2 SA-ESS-1 1A1 SA-ESS-1 5A1 SA-ESS-1 6A1 SA-ESS-12C1 (C)

SA-ESS-7E1 SA-ESS-1 6F1 9/8/2004 8/31/2004 8/31/2004 8/31/2004 9/15/2004 8/31/2004 8/3112004

<1 28

<61

<116 166+/-46

<77

<89

<274

<3.6

<5.9

<15

<8.3

<14

<19

<25 86+/-10.

307+/-13 527+22 842+/-11.

928+/-26 737+/-25 589+/-22 94+/-20.

385+/-37 731+/-47 932+/-32 1270+/-96 1030+/-56 1030+/-66 AVERAGE 9

0 0 0

-9300_1 0900 570+/-600 780+/-820 GRAND AVERAGE 9300+/-12000 500+/-510 720+/-780

,,F s i

,3j.

All other gamma emitters searched for were <LLD; typical LLDs are'given in Table C-20 (C) Control Station I

75

TABLE C-20 2004 MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES LLDs FOR-GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY SAMPLE TYPE:

<----------AIR-

<--------WATER---------->

<-ILK IODINE PARTICULATES GAMMA SCAN IODINE GAMMA SCAN IODINE ACTIVITY:

10-3 pCi/M3 103 pCi/rn pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L GEOMETRY:

47 ML 13 FILTERS 3.5. LITER 100 ML 3.5 LITER 100;ML COUNT TIME:

120 MINS 500 MINS 1000 MIN 1000 MINS...

500 MINS 1000 MINS DELAY TO COUNT:

2 DAYS

- 5 DAYS

-7 DAYS 3 DAYS 2 DAYS 2 DAYS NUCLIDES BE-7 8.0 18 18 NA-22 0.5 6.2 6.7 K-40 12 58 50 CR-51 2.2

,j9.8 13 MN-54 0.5

,1.9 1.8 CO-58 0.28 2.0 5.0 FE-59 0.58

5.8 10 CO 0.38 3.1 4.3 ZN-65 0.56 3.1 9.0 ZRNB-95 0.48 3.6 6.3 MO-99 38 174 27 RU-103 0.24 1.6 2.4 R[1-106 2.3 13 26 AG-llOM 0.33 1.8 5.7 Li 0.43 4.9-7 B-125 0-3 TE-129M 9.9 68 116 I-131 13 0.62 3.2 0.4 4 3.4 0.4 TE-132 2.5 12 3.8 BA-133 0.28 1.8 2.2 1 3 4 0.23 1.3 1.9

~^-13b 0.54 4.9 3.4 CS-137 0.34 1.6 3.6 F.ALA-140 1.5 7.1 10.0 CE-141 0.30 2.0 2.6 C:E-144 0.78 6.4 12 RA-NAT 0.72 6.9 7.2 TH-23;'

1.8 10 17 76

TABLE C-20 (Cont'd) 2004 MAPLEWOOD TESTING SERVICES LLDs FOR GAMMAZSPECTROSCOPY SAMPLE TYPE:

FOOD PRODUCTS VEGETATION GAME FISH & SHELLFISH SEDIMENT & SOIL ACTIVITY:

pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pCi/kg WET pci/kg DRY GEOMETRY:

3.5 LITER 3.5 LITER 500 ml 500 ml 500 ml COUNT TIME:

500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS 500 MINS DELAY TO COUNT:

3 DAYS 7 DAYS 5 DAYS 5 DAYS 30 DAYS NUCLIDES BE-7 27 60 40 47 297 NA-22 5

16 10 7.3 20 K-40 70 70 70 70 70 CR-51 20 79 36 31 162 MN-54 2.8 12 4.0 9.0 26 CO-58 4.2 8.5 3.5 5.8 26 FE-59 10 14 14 21 63 CO-60 10 8

6.1 14 30 ZN-65 12 14 6.9 25 26 ZRNB-95 8.2 11 23 11 45 MO-99 69 40 330 305 58000 RU-103 3.4 4.0 4.5 4.4 22 RU-106 49 44 43 36 87 AG-1lOM 16 24 8.3 8.0 25 SB-125 9.0 13 12 17 22 TE-129M 155 227 137 181 616 I-131 3.5 8.2 5.9 10 215 TE-132 7.0 12 11 13 14300 BA-133 33 7.6 3.9 3.6 11 C S-134 2.5 8.2 5.7 7.3 8.5

(";;-13 6 7.5 9.8 5.3 7.8 101 CS-137 6.8 8.9 6.5 7.1 33 BALA-140 10 30 17 20 340 CE-141 3.7 8.0 4.7 4.9 23 CE-144 14

35.

22 20 44 RA-NAT 14 18 10 19 50 TH-232 30 74 31 23 50 77

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FROM ANALYTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL -RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAMS 79

APPENDIX D

SUMMARY

OF RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Appendix D presents a summary of the analytical results for the 2004 Analytics and Environmental Resource Associates (ERA)

Interlaboratory Comparison Program.

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE NO.

TABLE-DESCRIPTION PAGE D-1 Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters in Water 83 D-2 Gamma Emitters in Water and Milk.

84 D-3 Gamma Emitters in Air and Soil.

85 D-4 Tritium Analysis in Water and Iodine Analysis in Air and Water.

86 81

TABLE D-1:.

RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS AND ERA>;INTERLABORATORY :COMPARISON PROGRAM; Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters In Water ;.(pCi/L)

DATE MM-YY

-1 06-2004 08-2004 PSEG.

.SAMPLE CODE ANL-WAT-AB592 ERA-WAT-AB596 MEDIUM-Water.

i Water Water Water

'Al PSEG NALYSIS '

Mean + s.d.-

Alpha

'103+/-5:

Beta

,'-'32 8 +/- 4 Alpha 54+/-0.1 Beta

-. si-'

26+/-0.4 Alpha '

43+/-3 Beta 246+1 Alpha 33+/-2 Beta 'i 219+/-4 ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance ANALYTICS Criteria ERA:

Loxwer'& Upper

'Known Limit

'Limit 96.;-

i 778<

114 286 22 6 346 57 32 82 20 11 29 43 37 49 225 18 3 267 09-2004 ANL-WAT-AB598 12-2004 ANL-WAT-AB603 28 195 22

..':, 159 34 231

- j '.

I I - :

Z:, K i -.,

I I

I

s.d.

{mll standard deviation.!of three individual analytical results 83;1

TABLE D-2 RESULTS FOR ANALYTICS'AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Emitters In Water and Milk (pCi/L)

ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance ANALYTICS Criteria DATE PSEG PSEG ERA Lower & Upper MM-YY SAMPLE CODE MEDIUM ANALYSIS Mean + s.d. -

Known Limit Limit 12-2004 ANL-WAT-G605 Water Cr-51 365+/-6 365 Mn-54 135+/-4 131 Fe-59 125+/-1 117 Co-60 167+/-0 168 Zn-65 195+/-3 189 I-131 96+/-4 92 Cs-134 156+/-3 164 Cs-137 123+/-3 121 Ce-141 150+/-1 149 Co-58 140+/-3 141 08-2004 ERA-WAT-G591 Water Ba-133 30+/-0.8 32 Co-60 25+/-0.3 24 Cs-134 21+/-1.4 22 Cs-137 197+/-1.0 193 Zn-65 143+/-0.9 143 12-2004 ANL-MLK-G607 Milk Cr-51 378+/-6 379 Mn-54 141+/-4 136 Fe-59 128+/-1 121 Co-60 169+/-2 175 Zn-65 199+/-4 196 I-131 68+/-2 67 Cs-134 155+/-3 170 Cs-137 127+/-2 126 Ce-141 152+/-5 155 Co-58 143+/-2 146

/. (i.

t standard deviation of three individual analytical results 2 93 107 93 132 153 73 134 97 1 1 9 1 11 23 15 13 1 7 6 118 301 106 97 139 160 55 134 102 125 116 437 155 141 204 225 110 194 145 179 171 41 33 30 210 168 457 166 145 211 232 79 206 150 185 176 84

TABLE D-53!A"-"

RESULTS OF ANALYTICS AND ERA' INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Gamma Emitters lIn aSoil- '(pCi/Kg-dry) and Air Particulate -Samples (pCi/m3 )

F I...

DATE MM-YY PSEG:

SAMPLE CODE 03-2004 ANL-SOL-G588 06-2004 ANL-APT-G594 MEDIUM APT PSEG ANALYSIS Mean + s.d.

Cr-51 570+/-4 Mn-54 p

"212+/-5 Co-58

'-208+/-9 Fe-59

'.119+/-3 Co-60

.267+/-3 Zn-65 261+/-6 Cs-137 459+/-9 Ce-141 145+/-2 Cs-134 141+/-4 Cr-51 170+/-3

'Mn-54 59+/-2 Co-60 126+/-3

.Fe-59 37+/-2 Zn-65 87+/-3 Cs-134

- 64++/-2 ANALYTICS ERA Known ANALYTICS/ERA Acc eptance Criteria Lowe r

& Upper Limi t

--Limit 576 201 '

198 100 270 252 432 150' 159 149 46 113 29 65 66 102 30 103 462

.-.159 f 156 82 216 20 4 348

.-: 12 O 129 119

.34,.

89

- 23 53

54 84 2 4 8 5

'-690 243 240 118 324 I'300 516 180 189 179 58 137 35 77 78 120 36 121 Cs-137 Co-58 Ce-141 125+/-3 37+/-1

.123+/-2 09-2004 ANL-SOL-G600 Soil Cr-51 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-6 5 Cs-137 Ce-141 Cs-134 297+/-12 256+/-4 129+/-3 13 9+/-5 164+/-1 243+/-17 421+/-1 325+/-2 129+/-4 311 252 132 127 174 248 403 348 134 251 204 108 103 138 200 325 276 110 371 300 156 151 210 296 481 420 158

i(.

.ne standard -deviation of..three;'individual analytical results 851

TABLE D-4 RESULTS OF ANALYTICS AND ERA INTERLABORATORY COMPARIS0N PROGRAM Tritium Analysis In Water (pCi/L)

Iodine-131 Analysis In Water (pCi/L)

And Iodine In Air Samples (pCi/m3 )

DATE MM-YY 03-2004 03-2004 05-2004 PS EG SAMPLE CODE ANL-WAT-H586 ANL-AIO-I590 ERA-WAT-H597 05-2004 ERA-WAT-I602 06-2004 ANL-AIO-I593 06-2004 ANL-WAT-H595 09-2004 ANL-AIO-I599 09-2004 ANL-WAT-H601 12-2004 ANL-WAT-I604 12-2004 ANL-WAT-H606 MEDIUM ANALYSIS Water H-3 AIO I-131 Water H-3 Water I-131 AIO I-131 Water H-3 AIO I-131 Water H-3 AIO I-131 Water H-3 PSEG Mean +/- s. d.

4798+/-8 101+/-3 31271+/-296 25+/-0. 5 92+/-3 11691+/-54 82+/-1 12217+/-288 92+/-1 7 614+/-175 ANALYTICS ERA Known 4700 97 30900 25 83 11900 75 12000 85 8060 ANALYTICS/ERA Acceptance.

Criteria Lower & Upper Limi t Limit 2900 6500 7 9 115 255 4 8 36252 20 30 65 9500 57 9600 67 5660 101 14300 93 14400 103 10460

::.d. -

l,-

standard deviation of three individual analytical results 86

APPENDIX E SYNOPSIS OF LAND USE CENSUS 87

APPENDIX E SYNOPSIS OF 2004 LAND USE CENSUS A land use census was conducted to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the-nearest milk animal the nearest residence, and the nearest garden of,greater than 50m5 (500ft2) producing broad leaf vegetation, in'each of the 16 meteorological sectors.

Tabulated below are the results'0of these surveys:

Milk Animal -

July, 2004 -

km (miles),

' Nearest

.Residence

,July, 2004

'km (miles)

Vegetable Garden July, 2004 km (miles)

Meteorological Sector N

NNE NE EN E E

ESE SE SSE S

SSW SW WSW w

W11W N1W tmWh None None None None -

None None None None None None None None 7.8 (4.9)

None None

-None None None

'6.4 (4.0) 5.8 (3.6) 8.7 (5.4)

None None None None 5.5 (3.-4) 6.9 (4.3) 7.1 (4.4) 6.5 (4.0)

5. 5 (3.4) 5.9 (3.7) 6.8 (4.2)

None None None None None None None None None None None

None, None None None None 89

11 APPENDIX F RADIOLOGICAL -IMPACT ON MAN 91

-APPENDIX F

-.RADIOLOGICAL.

IMPACT ON MN.,

The calculated individual-doses"in this section are based on the controlling doseipathways and age'.groups as described below. The estimated dose represents the maximum. radiation dose that could be received by a member of the general'-p'ublic. The population dose impact is based on the evaluation year site_-specific data (i.e:, food'ir production, milk production, feed for':milk animals,-..and 5egf~od production).

-5 i

The doses were' 5 alculated using metho&

desc'ribed "n Regulatory Guide 1.109 and represent-calculations for th e12-month reporting interval'.

Individual doses from batch and continuous releases were calcul'ated'd using the annual average historic meteorological dispersion factors as described in the respective Offsite-Dose Calculation Manual.

Population doses we're'calculated-using the meteor'l'ogical dispersion' coefficients for the twelve month rep6rti'ng i'terval.

"'i' Liquid.,Pathways Type Total Body Organ Salem Unit 1 Type Total Body Organ Dose (Liver)

Salem Unit.2.

Type,

£ Total..'Body-..

Organ Dose'A.

(Liver)

AgeiGroup

'Adult Adult Dose.

1.49E-02

-.Location

<.Pathway

-.i-Sitea:oBoundary

.'+Sea ood Ingestion

.'SiteBoundary Seafood Ingestion i

z s'

1" mrem mrem Limit 3 mrem 10 mrem Dose..

"r~--~Limi t

239E-~'02, remmrem mrem i

1 ~rem t-:;3 73ELO2-~.~

f LJ.

Hope Creeki.., /

Type D6se Total Body 4..02E-02,mrem Organ Dose

6. 6.09E-02:-`iirem (Bone)

Limit

, 3 mrem 10 mrem

_,;ier Dose

, < fr8!

oS-s Limit Population.

5.69E-03.

person-rem N/A (Total)

-f'

, j Population 1.26E-.03, mrem N/A (Average)

_.j 93

,Air; Pathways Type Total Body Skin Organ Age Gioup' All All' Infant '

L

-Locatfon Site Boundary Site Boundary 4.9 mi. W.'

_Pathway Direct Exposure

! Direct Exposure; -

Milk,-Ground Plane, Inhalation Salem Units 1&2 Type Total Body Skin Organ Dose (Thyroid)

Hope Creek Type Total Body Skin Organ Dose (Thyroid)

Site Population (Total)

Population (Average)

Dose '

1. 66E-04

4. 55E,-04

1. 50E-03 Dose 4.54E.04

9. 62E-04

7. 95E-03 Dose 3.54EL01.,

7. 67E-05 mrem mrem mrem Limitf 500 mrem 3000 mrem 15 mrem mrem mrem mrem I

i.

Limit 500 mrem 3000 mrem 15 mrem Limit N/N person-rem mrem N/A Direct Radiation Direct radiation may be estimated by thermoluminescent dosimetric'-

(TLD) measuremeinits. One method for comparing, TLD measurements is byi comparison withp're-operational data. It should'befnoted that the TLDs measure direct'radiation from'both t16e Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations at Artificial Island, and natural background radiation.--

TLD data for the twelve-month reporting period is given below::-

TLD 1l-1 5S-1 Location 0.4 mile NNE 1.0 mile E I:~ ;-

- Measurement 4.27 mrad/std. month 3.47 mrad/std. month These values are' interpreted to represent natural background', 'since the values are'within the statis'ti ai variation associated with 'the pre-operational program results which are 3.7 mrad/standard month for TLD lS-1 and 4.2 mrad/standard month for TLD 5S-'1.'

94

Total Dose 40CFR190 limits the total1idose to members of the.,public due to radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources to:

<25 mrem total body or any-organ and;

<75 mrem thyroid for a calendar year.

For Artificial Island, the major sources of dose are from liquid and gaseous effluents from the Hope Creek and Salem plants.

The following doses to a "hypothetical maximum exposed individual" have been calculated for the twelve-month.reporting period. They are the sum of gaseous and liquid pathway.

"--doses for the Salem 1 and 2 and Hope Creek plants:

2.56E-02 mrem Total Body 1.95E-02 mrem Organ (GI-LLI) 3.43E-01 mrem Thyroid Dose to members of the public due tot-activities inside the'site Boundary Dose to members of the public is limited to 100 mrem total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) in 'a year -in 'accordance with 10CFR20.1301.

The definition of members of the public changed on September 11, 2001.

The various food vendors that-have previously comprised the maximally exposed group are no longer..allowed on site.

For this reporting period, the definition of--the members of the public are the members of the New Jersey National Guard to augment the security force at the site.

Their typical patrol spans the site, and-the following locations 16S1; CA8. an~di.A15. (Hope Creek Barge Slip, Dredge Spoils and Baseball Field) are-averageId-to estimate their dose.

In accordance with the requirements'6'of 'ODCM 6.9.1.8 (SGS) and 6.9.1.7.

(HCGS), the dose to members of:'the publi c inside the site boundary has been calculated based on the following assumptions:

a. The National Guard works a40 -hour week, -,therefore all doses are multiplied by 0.25 to assess-their dose.

For the 12-month reporting period,' January 1, :2004 to December 31, 2004 the calculated doses are':

2.69E-01 mrem TEDE ;Total-Body 2.33E-02 -.mrem'TEDE' Organ (Lung) 1.67E-02 mrem TEDE Thyroid 95

LR-N05-0244, Stations, 2004 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

LR-N05-0244, Stations, 2004 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search