Information Notice 1986-51, Excessive Pneumatic Leakage in the Automatic Depressurization System

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Excessive Pneumatic Leakage in the Automatic Depressurization System
ML031220687
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/18/1986
From: Jordan E
NRC/IE
To:
References
IN-86-051
Download: ML031220687 (4)


, a

-4 . ".'

SSINS No.: 6835

118 ORIGtINA IN 86-51 UINITED STATES R CE IVED

NUCLEAR RtEGULATORY COMMISSION Eant D. Withers

OFFICE OF INSiPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Vice resident. Nuclear

WASHINIGTON, D.C. 20555 JUN 241986 Route To:

lune 18, 1986 IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-51. EXCESSIVE PNEUMATIC LEAKGE iNHRE-

AUTOMATIC DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM

Addressees

All boiling water reactor (BWR) nuclear power facilities holding an operating

license (OL) or construction permit (CP).

Purpose

This notice is being provided to alert recipients to a potentially significant

problem pertaining to possible pneumatic supply leakage through pathways near

the accumulators serving automatic depressurization system (ADS) safety relief

valves. It is expected that recipients will review this notice for applicabil- ity to their facilities. However, suggestions contained in this notice do not

constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response

is required.

Past Related Documents:

IE Bulletin No. 80-01: "Operability of ADS Valve Pneumatic Supply,"

January 11, 1980

IE Bulletin No. 80-25: "Operating Problems with Target Rock Safety-Relief

Valves at BWRs," December 19, 1980

IE Information Notice 85-35: "Failure of Air Check Valves to Seat,"

April 30, 1985 IE Inspection Report 50-458/84-18: "Integrated Design Inspection of the River

Bend Station," Section 2.4, "Automatic Depressurization System Design,"

August 16, 1984

Description of Circumstances

On March 19, 1986, after noting that the booster compressors were operating

more than was normal, the licensee at Grand Gulf determined.that excessive

instrument air flow was required to maintain the ADS's normal operating pres- sure of 183 psig. The licensee isolated the air supply and observed header

pressure to decrease from 183 to 155 psig in 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. Based on licensee

measurements, the air system was leaking at a rate of 600-1200 standard cubic

Copies to: Withers, Yundt, Lentsch, Orser, Steele, E. Burton, E. Jordan, A. Holm, LIS, C. A. Olmstead, S. Hoag, S. Sautter, TNP:GOV REL F:NRC CHRONO,

TNP:GOV REL F:NRC IE Information Notice 86-51 PGE OAR Action - M. H. Malmros (Due 9/5/86)

., : .  :! lo

IN 86-51 June 18, 1986 feet per hour (SCF/hr). This pressure decrease and the previously observed

excessive air makeup indicated that the ADS receiver and accumulator combined

leakage exceeded the long-term requirements for ADS safety relief valve actuation

specified in the final safety analysis report (FSAR). The FSAR assumes a leak

rate of 1.0 SCF/hr for each valve on the system. Technical Specifications (TS)

require that eight ADS valves be operable, but they do not specify leakage

requirements.

The air supply to the ADS valves was reinstated and the instrument air pressure

remained above the minimum operating pressure of 150 psig. However, if there

had been a failure of the non-safety portions of the instrument air system (the

compressors or the piping upstream of the receiver), the ADS system would have

not remained operable. Therefore, the licensee declared the ADS inoperable and

shut down the reactor for repairs. Investigation of the cause of the high leak

rate showed that the accumulator relief valves in the drywell were defective.

It was determined that 16 of 17 were leaking and required rework and these

valves were repaired. Normal operating pressure was reduced from 183 psig to

165 psig. This increases the margin between the operating pressure and the

relief set point (190 psig). The operating pressure is now below the pressure

(171 psig) at which seat leak tightness is tested yet sufficiently above the

minimum required pressure (110 psig) for meeting FSAR commitments.

Discussion:

Previous generic correspondence has identified problems in pneumatic-systems

that could affect ADS operability. IE Bulletins 80-01 and 80-25 noted problems

with the control air system in maintaining operability of the ADS. In the case

of Bulletin 80-01, the ADS was not operable for all events because of combined

misapplication of the accumulator inlet check valve, lack of accumulator

in

testing, and seismic considerations. For Bulletin 80-25, excessive pressure

the pneumatic. supply system caused an ADS safety relief valve to stay open when

it should have closed. The reactor coolant system was then depressurized while

the reactor was operating at power.

The problem at Grand Gulf described above is analogous to the situation described

in Information Notice 85-35 and the referenced inspection report on the River

Bend plant. In that case, back leakage through the inlet check valve (rather The

than accumulator relief valves) resulted in reduced accumulator pressure.

Grand Gulf ADS accumulators are designed asSection III, Class 3 components, according to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Relief valves are valves

attached to the accumulators for overpressure protection. Such relief This

may not be found at all plants, depending on the accumulator design.

mechanical

event indicates that such leaking relief valves and any other leaking of the

joints provide pathways for air leakage that compromise the operability

ADS during accident conditions.

Only portions of pneumatic systems in nuclear power plants are designed as

emergency

safety systems. In general, the air compressors are not powered from of off-site

buses; therefore, the supply of air is dependent on the availability

power. Further, piping between the air compressors and the safety grade

IN 86-51 June 18, 1986 portions of the system is not designed to withstand major seismic events.

Thus the components that require compressed air to perform their safety func- tion are heavily dependent on the leak-tightness of the seismic resistant

portions of the pneumatic systems, including appurtenances such as relief

valves and check valves. Although the TS do not require monitoring of the ADS

pneumatic supply system makeup rate, lack of monitoring the makeup rate sub- jects the ADS to potentially undetected excessive leakage. This could result

in the ADS being unable to meet its design bass requirements upon loss of the

non-safety-related instrument air system.

No written response to this information notice is required. If there are any

questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator of

the appropriate NRC regional office or this office.

a i Jsordan, DiTrec

Divisio of Emergency Preparedness

and Engineering Response

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Technical Contact:

Vern Hodge, IE

(301) 492-7275 Attachment: List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices

Attachment 1 IN 86-51 June 18, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

IE INFORMATION NOTICES

Information Date of -

Notice No. Subject Issue Issued to

86-50 Inadequate Testing To Detect 6/18/86 All power reactor

FailureaOf Safety-Related facilities holding

Pneumatfc Components Or an OL or CP

Systems

86-49 Age/Environment Induced 6/16/86 All power reactor

Electrical Cable Failues facilities holding

an OL or CP

86-48 Inadequate Testing OfBoron 6/13/86 All BWR facilities

Solution Concentration In The holding an OL or CP

Standby Liquid Control System

86-47 Feedwater Transient With 6/9/86 All BWRs and PWRs

Partial Failure Of The facilities holding

Reactor Scram System an OL or CP

86-46 Improper Cleaning And Decon- 6/12/86 All power reactor

tamination Of Respiratory facilities holding

Protection Equipment an OL or CP and

fuel fabrication

facilities

Potential Falsification Of 6/10/86 All power reactor

86-45 facilities holding

Test Reports On Flanges

Manufactured By Golden Gate an OL or CP and

Forge And Flange, Inc. research and test

facilities

Failure To Follow Procedures 6/10/86 All power reactor

86-44 facilities holding

When Working In High Radiation

Areas an OL or CP and

research and test

reactors

Problems With Silver Zeolite 6/10/86 All power reactor

86-43 facilities holding

Sampling Of Airborne Radio- iodine an OL or CP

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit